The David Knight Show - The David Knight Show - 7/30/2025

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 30, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:19

The David Knight Show - 7/30/2025

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	In the world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it is Wednesday, the 30th of July, Year of Our Lord 2025.
	We have Danish researchers establishing a connection between vaccines and autism, but then refusing to admit it.
	What a shocker.
	We have some members of NATO pushing Europe closer to World War III.
	And in the third hour, we have a brand new interview by David Knight with Eric Peters.
	stay with us.
	PIANO PLAYS
	PIANO PLAYS
	Thank you.
	Good morning and welcome to the show, folks.
	Hope you're having a good start to your day.
	As I said, we've got Danish researchers.
	This is from Children's Health Defense.
	It says Danish researchers remain mum on corrected data showing link between aluminum and vaccines and autism.
	So they put in some incorrect data at first that didn't show the link.
	Then when they updated the data and it did show the link, they didn't want to say anything about it.
	They didn't want to talk about it anymore.
	Oops.
	No, you're going to have to talk to someone else not interested in continuing this story.
	Data researchers who said their study of 1.2 million children found no link between aluminum and vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders including autism have yet to acknowledge that the studies corrected data show a link.
	They were more than happy to talk about it before they corrected the data.
	This study got pushed everywhere.
	It was all people wanted to talk about when it came to vaccine C, you're all wrong.
	There's no correlation.
	There's no link at all here.
	And they updated the data and suddenly, ah, well, you know, I think there's other things we can talk about.
	I don't think we want to have anything to do with this story.
	Editor's note here says the lead author of the Danish study on aluminum in vaccines, Andersch Vid, he wid?
	He wid?
	I don't know.
	Responded post-deadline to the defender's request for comment.
	Here's his verbatim response.
	The journal has issued a correction which correctly describes that an earlier version of the supplementary materials was originally uploaded instead of the current correct version.
	This was a mistake made by the journal.
	We currently have no plans of commenting further on this.
	But encourage people to raise this issue to Annals of Internal Medicine in comments where we can respond and there will be a record of this exchange associated with the paper.
	We're not interested in talking about this anymore.
	Yeah, we know we made a mistake and that mistake allowed news agencies everywhere to broadcast this and people were using this to assure people, no, there's no link between vaccination and autism.
	But now that we've had to correct it, that the data has been updated and it shows there is, we're done.
	Move along.
	I'm not going to answer your questions.
	Most blatant example of publication bias, or even a step beyond that.
	This is big news when it agrees with me, but absolutely nothing when it doesn't.
	You might even be.
	You might go along with me and be a bit of a conspiracy theorist and say perhaps they uploaded the incorrect, the old data first, so they could get this new story out and then issue a retraction quietly later.
	No, but no, they would never do something like that.
	They would never give you bad data to start and then update it later when no one is paying attention.
	They would never do that, right?
	No, of course not.
	These people are honest and trustworthy.
	You can tell, by the way, he doesn't want to talk about the truth.
	You can tell.
	I'm sure these people would never, ever do something like that.
	Of course not.
	In a press release today, Children's Health Defense Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker said, Although the authors claim to not find evidence associating aluminum with any harm, an examination of the study's additional data reveals that Asperger syndrome, autistic disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and other pervasive developmental disorders are found to be statistically significantly associated with higher doses of aluminum in vaccines.
	No, we don't see it.
	But if you actually go and look at the data for yourself, it's there.
	To ignore this data in the initial publication, not correct it now is highly inappropriate.
	I might say it's actually criminal, in my opinion.
	You know, you're just going to lie to people, or at minimum, not give them the full truth.
	You're going To give them the wrong information and then not talk about it when the real info comes out.
	And who knows how many children this could impact?
	Who knows how many people who are on the fence are going to look at this and say, Well, I guess if there's no real link, I guess it's safe to vaccinate.
	How many children are going to be damaged because these people won't correct the record?
	On July 21st, the defender reached out to lead author Anders Vid, a professor and department head of epidemiology at the Statens Serum Institute for comment on the allegation that the corrected data show a link between increased aluminum and exposure and autism.
	In response, he received an automated email from Vid stating he was out of the office for the summer until August 11th.
	That's right.
	Make a correction to a highly publicized paper.
	Don't really comment on it.
	No one else comments on it.
	Children's Health Defense notices it.
	And you just go on vacation for the summer.
	I'm out of the office.
	Sorry, I'm not going to explain anything.
	Leave me alone.
	Yet on July 22nd, Vid and his co-authors posted an author response to other criticisms about the study that researchers had posted on the journal's study webpage.
	The response appears at the bottom of the webpage.
	Sorry, I'm out of office for your comments.
	Oh, people are making nasty comments on my page?
	That I can respond to.
	And it's just so evil that they're silent on the fact that it is harming children, you know, with lifelong debilitating illnesses.
	And yet that's what they're silent on.
	They'll preach from the rooftops about how safe it is, but then when they realize what a mistake they've made in encouraging this horrible, horrific illness on children, they're silent.
	Yeah, no words.
	Sorry.
	Don't want to talk about that.
	Move along.
	The link between aluminum and vaccines and autism appears in figure 11, page 19 of the corrected supplemental material.
	And you can see they have it hyperlinked there, so you can go check it for yourself.
	The original version showed that children who received a large dose of aluminum were not at greater risk of getting a neurodevelopmental diagnosis, including autism than kids who received a small or moderate dose.
	Yet the corrected version showed that kids who received a large dose had a statistically significantly higher risk of being diagnosed with autism or other pervasive developmental disorders compared to those who received a moderate dose of aluminum.
	Significantly higher risk.
	No, nothing to see here.
	No, no correlation, nothing to see.
	Oh, sorry, that was old data.
	No, I won't comment on the new data.
	When the defender today asked Vid in an email if he and his co authors intended to alert news agencies that their data did find evidence of a link between aluminum and vaccines and autism, we received another automated email from Vid stating that he was on summer leave until 13th of August.
	It's extended by two days, apparently.
	The study's corresponding author Nicholas Worm Anderson, MD, PhD, and epidemiology researcher, at the Staten Searam Institute, did not respond to a request for comment today or on July 21st.
	Worm indeed.
	Worm is a good name for this guy.
	I like that.
	It could be a nickname.
	You got Nicholas the Worm Anderson and Johnny the Rat making these.
	We got the worm and the rat on it, boss.
	According to the Staten Searam Institute in a July 15th press release about the study, Videna's co-author found no association between aluminum and childhood vaccines in 50 different health conditions, including autism, asthma, and autoimmune diseases.
	The release stated the findings reaffirmed the safety of Denmark's childhood vaccination program.
	I'm sure there's big money for Denmark for these companies as well.
	No, there's no findings that link the two.
	Well, there are findings, but don't pay attention to those.
	Vid was quoted in the release as saying the results were reassuring and the large studies like his are important in an era marked by widespread misinformation about vaccines.
	Yeah, there's some misinformation going on there, isn't there?
	Vid These studies are so important.
	Well, hey, they're doing their part to correct the misinformation.
	I mean, look, it's right here on, what was it, page 19, figure 11 of this.
	So, you know, just scroll down to page 19 and figure 11 right here near the end.
	And there you go.
	They've been so transparent about it.
	This is another one of those things where people who get very into specific industries or researchers of specific fields generally become extremely inefficient at communicating any useful data to people who aren't in that field.
	They are utterly useless when it comes to actually telling the populace about anything.
	They couch them in terms that people won't understand or put them in figures that are hard to parse.
	This guy, I'm sure, is very happy about that.
	That the average person is not going to go in there, look through his data packet, and then find the correct info.
	He's glad that most people are going to have to go to him or someone like him.
	And most of those people have a very deep interest in keeping vaccines going.
	I mean, after all, if people found out these were unsafe and uneffective, it might cause vaccine hesitancy, which is the worst possible thing that could happen.
	Your child having a lifelong debilitating autoimmune disorder or autism or Asperger's?
	No big deal.
	Who cares?
	If we can stop them from getting measles.
	These people are pure evil.
	This is something you can absolutely point to and say it is not just the people at the top.
	It is not just these billionaires.
	It is these scientists too.
	These researchers, these doctors.
	They're all in it.
	They have sold their souls to the devil.
	It's everyone that's getting a cut.
	All the doctors that are getting a paycheck from these people, all the researchers that are getting their funding.
	Soxavaksaw's Gulf War syndrome was vaccine injury, not weapons of mass destruction.
	The Gulf War syndrome, I've thought for a while, sounds eerily similar to what people are dealing with with the COVID vaccine injuries.
	Just the random, strange, different side effects that you get.
	Nothing seemed to really be tied into each other.
	And it has this wide-ranging list of, you know, damages it can do to you.
	Nothing really cohesive.
	Sox Havoxas, they jabbed up all the soldiers with cocktails of jabs before they went.
	When they got there, and when they left, when they got back.
	Gulf Jab Syndrome.
	G-Talent 60, mostly peaceful vaccines.
	Wilt to box, moderate aluminum.
	Yeah, just so long as you're only getting a moderate dose of aluminum, you should be fine.
	Again, this data shows that they have a higher risk of those who are getting jabbed with moderate amounts of aluminum.
	I wonder if they did, you know, a test against kids that didn't get any aluminum injected at all.
	Because again, they do these studies on vaccines where when a new vaccine comes out, they'll test it against possibly the worst vaccine they can find when it comes to damage.
	So they can say, oh, well, it doesn't show any higher risk than this other one over here.
	And they'll use that as a way to push it.
	Look, it's only as bad as this other one that's been crippling and maiming and killing people for decades.
	So nothing to worry about.
	On July 14th, even before the study went live, mainstream and health industry media, including NBC News and Stat News, publicly announced the results.
	In this interview with NBC News, Veed said the aluminum in vaccines is in the form of aluminum salts, which is not the same as elemental aluminum, which is a metal.
	Look, it's not even a metal.
	It's a salt.
	You don't have to worry about it.
	Thing is, it's going to assault your body.
	He added, it's really important for parents to understand that we are not injecting metal into children.
	No, look, it's not metal.
	You don't have to worry about it.
	This guy is a master of obfuscation.
	But aluminum experts who spoke with the defender said aluminum doesn't need to be in its metal form for it to be toxic.
	Reassuring the public by drawing a false distinction between aluminum salts and elemental aluminum is rhetorical obfuscation.
	It's like saying mercury in thimerosol isn't mercury.
	This is, again, how they operate.
	No, no, it's not what you're thinking of.
	You're thinking of metal aluminum.
	This is salt aluminum.
	And they're not going to tell you that it doesn't make a difference.
	And in fact, it can be just as dangerous or worse.
	Because it says here, in fact, he said these salts are more bioavailable than elemental aluminum because they dissolve in bodily fluids and are actively taken up by immune cells.
	The adjuvants used in vaccines are well documented to migrate, accumulate, and persist, especially in infants whose renal clearance is immature.
	Numerous studies, human, animal, and mechanistic, demonstrate that aluminum adjuvants can access the brain, disrupt cytokine signaling, and impair development.
	No, no, don't worry.
	It's just the aluminum salt.
	It's not the elemental metal aluminum.
	You don't have to worry about it, except for the fact that it's just as bad.
	That it is even more bioavailable.
	That it's the exact same thing for all practical purposes for what you're worried about.
	Yeah, it's going to do the exact same thing the metal aluminum would when it comes to damaging your child, but don't worry about it.
	We are using something different so we can tell you not to worry.
	It's truly amazing the techniques these people engage in.
	They know what they're doing.
	This doctor, Vid, researcher, whatever he is, is truly such a despicable individual.
	Him and his colleague, Worm.
	Name Fitz.
	They're both worms.
	Assyrian girl.
	What is even more troubling about that study is that they injected children with moderate and heavy amounts of aluminum when they already know aluminum is a dangerous substance.
	Yeah.
	It's...
	They're just like, ah, well, you know, we'll test.
	How much aluminum is too much aluminum?
	You're still getting a moderate amount.
	Maybe that won't be a big deal.
	And of course, we've seen RFK talk about vaxed versus unvaxed before.
	Let's play that again real fast.
	This is our glorious HHS head, RFK Jr.
	Not doing vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies because they're frightened of the results.
	If you did a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study, we know what's going to happen.
	entire vaccine program would come into question Welcome back.
	Thanks, RFK.
	Vaxxed versus unvaxxed.
	It's because the vaccines are poison.
	They don't do you any good.
	This is continually what we've seen.
	They don't provide any lasting immunity, if they provide immunity at all.
	And they can cripple your child or cripple you for life.
	Gloves are finally off.
	Pediatricians urge no religious exemptions to mandated shots.
	That's right.
	Sorry.
	You have a religious objection to this?
	You don't want to use this vaccine that was concocted with aborted fetal cells?
	Too bad.
	We don't care.
	Once again, doctors are so unbelievably...
	I don't even know.
	Authoritarian?
	You're not going...
	How dare you try to avoid injecting your child with poison?
	How dare you make your own decisions for your you and your family's health.
	The words come down from on high.
	These people have told you what you're going to do, and if you don't do it, well, we're going to bring the government in.
	We're going to bring the men with guns in, or maybe we'll take your children from you using the men with guns.
	Haven't you heard that the vaccines are safe and effective?
	Oh, wait, that's been disproven, but hey, we're going to keep pushing them anyway as though they were.
	It is truly despicable.
	It is science that many, many products used to vaccinate children against the threats of various diseases use cell lines obtained from abortions to develop or test these products.
	And some do a great deal of good while others have left behind serious injuries.
	I don't believe they do a great deal of good.
	That's where I disagree with this guy.
	I think they're all dangerous.
	I don't think they help at all.
	Church organizations and faith groups long have delivered advice to their faithful on how to address the conflict between a legitimate opposition to abortion and the unneeded deaths of the unborn and protecting against infection.
	If you'll remember...
	I forget.
	The guy that said, oh, well, you know, the vaccine redeems those aborted cells.
	How despicable.
	How wicked of him to say that.
	I think it was Curtis Chang.
	It may have been someone else.
	There's so many different people involved in this.
	But I think it was Curtis Chang that said that.
	Whoever did, though, it's such an evil thing to say.
	It redeems the cell lines.
	Pushing Christians to use aborted fetal cells.
	I can't even imagine being willing to sell out the gospel like that.
	Denver Attaway Doctors equals God Complex often.
	Yeah.
	Very often they have no interest in actually listening to you.
	They have a treatment they want to prescribe.
	They have a certain drug they want to give you, whatever it is.
	And if you don't listen to them, they're going to get very upset.
	Don't you know I went to school?
	Don't you know that I read this computer printout that said this would be the best treatment?
	Who are you to question me?
	The AAP advocates for the elimination of non-medical exemptions from immunizations as contrary to optimal individual and public health.
	A stunning dictate comes in the organization's new statement.
	It's just, I'm still...
	This is how you can use them, you know, ethically, to the glory of God or however.
	It infuriates me.
	I cannot...
	How can you justify that?
	You're either a pure evil sellout, someone that doesn't believe the gospel at all, or someone who is so incredibly twisted.
	David Ramsey, 2328.
	If you play along with immunity, you are now again playing along with the idea that viruses do exist and vaccines have a potential use.
	Have I mentioned anything about agreeing with vaccines?
	Don't get them.
	They're dangerous.
	They're poison.
	They don't work.
	They don't provide immunity.
	We've mentioned that there are a lot of issues with vaccine theory as it exists now and that people should look that up and determine for themselves.
	But the idea of immunity existing is a thing.
	Once you get sick with something, you are immune to it going forward.
	And early vaccines were essentially just exposing people to the virus.
	And now they've got a whole bunch of adamants and things in them, which make all the viruses very, all the vaccines very harmful.
	But the idea of it isn't necessarily against what we've observed from how sicknesses spread.
	Yeah.
	I don't really believe in viruses, but as we pointed out, there is something that makes people sick.
	It's not viruses, but however it works, there is something, and it seems to, if you get it, your body, your own immune system is able to fight it off better.
	Gloves are finally off.
	The American Academy of Pediatrics, AAP, the official voice of the pediatrics cartel, finally issued a statement calling for the repeal of all religious conscience, philosophical, moral, or non-medical exemptions from vaccine mandates to attend school.
	Cartel is a good way to describe them.
	It fits perfectly.
	You're going to do what we say, and if you don't, there's going to be severe consequences.
	We may even come after your family.
	We may make sure that your child gets taken by CPS.
	The number of times we've heard stories of families saying, no, we're not going to vaccinate our children.
	And nurses or doctors calling CPS.
	Or no, we're not going to do this, we're not going to do that.
	And these maniacal, ego-maniacal doctors and nurses deciding, well, obviously that means it's child abuse.
	And if you're not going to do what I say, you should have your child taken.
	It's pure wickedness.
	The statement claims that the leaders of some religious groups have highlighted that vaccination can be one important way to protect oneself and one's neighbors.
	And have thus suggested that there is a moral or religious obligation to seek vaccination.
	So they're using these arguments that these people made.
	Oh, the vaccine has been redeemed.
	The aborted fetal cells are redeemed, so you don't have to worry about that.
	Oh, you're loving your neighbor by getting vaccination.
	All these large sell-out pastors are giving these people legal cover to say, look, so many of them said it that we don't believe your moral Objections matter anymore.
	They have given them a way to try to fight this out legally.
	These mega church, mega pastors that have no truth.
	They've created a brand new RNA technology that they want to spray on all of our crops.
	That's right.
	They're going to...
	I'm pretty sure.
	I remember seeing them doing it already on certain crops.
	But this is the true meaning of food poisoning at this point.
	This is more Maha fraud.
	RFK and all his cronies in there are allowing this.
	At least it seems like they're going to.
	I'll have to wait and see, but I don't have any hope that they're going to stop this.
	RNA is the big push.
	That's the future of vaccination for these people.
	And the future of everything, it seems like.
	Oh.
	Well, we don't even have to spray these pesticides on it anymore.
	We're going to spray RNA-infused pesticides.
	Isn't that going to be wonderful?
	Sure, it might linger on whatever you get.
	Maybe it'll worm its way into the fruit or the produce and then do something to you later down the line, but that's not our problem.
	The company that created Moderna has now created a new company called Tirana that has developed an RNA technology for plants that is unlike anything we have seen before.
	This new technology uses RNA from plant viruses as a platform to transport other pieces of cargo RNA into a plant.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	We've got plant viruses.
	So they say.
	From Terrera.
	Tirana.
	Yeah, the people that, you know, are secretly Moderna, the people that poisoned everyone.
	People that brought you the vaccine that gave you myocarditis.
	From the makers of myocarditis, pericarditis comes new.
	The side effect list on a Moderna vaccine commercial would have to be longer than the commercial itself, you imagine, at this point.
	As you will see below, once the RNA from this new technology enters a plant, it replicates.
	The goal is to get farmers all over the world to use this new product, and needless to say, that could have huge implications.
	I realize that all this is a lot to wrap your mind around, and so I will take it one step at a time.
	Flagship Pioneering is the parent company that created Moderna, and now Flagship Pioneering has also created Tirana.
	So Moderna and Tirana are very closely related to one another.
	Yeah, they're brothers.
	They've got the same parent.
	The saying in real estate is location, location, location, and that applies for technology being unveiled by Tirana Biosciences.
	Emerging from stealth mode after four years of development, this flagship pioneering company is taking the RNA expertise of cousin company Moderna.
	More like probably going to take just about everything and use a different name so that people who are worried about Moderna don't get as antsy.
	The RNA expertise from the company that failed every actual clinical study to release a product until they got to release it without the studies when they did the COVID vaccine.
	The only way they were able to manage it is just to simply waive all safety concerns.
	Tirana is coming out of the flagship pioneering ecosystem in Boston, and flagship has a long history of working on RNA.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	I'm sure they've got all the kinks worked out.
	I'm sure this won't be another COVID vaccine disaster.
	After farmers have sprayed this new product on their crops and it gets inside the RNA begins to replicate.
	Once the RNA gets inside a plant, it replicates, meaning farmers could spray the products less frequently than they spray traditional pesticides.
	That's wonderful.
	They want it to spray as much because it'll just be inside replicating and replicating and replicating.
	And who knows, maybe when you eat it and it gets inside you, it'll just keep replicating and replicating and replicating.
	I'm sure that won't happen.
	I'm sure that's nothing to be concerned about, having a self-replicating pesticide inside you.
	It's the total amount of poison in it.
	This is probably aimed at the farmers themselves.
	Look, you can save a couple pennies by not having to spray quite as often.
	Yeah, I can only imagine how this is going to play out down the line.
	I wonder what it's going to do to farmers who are having to spray this frequently.
	How much of the self-replicating RNA are they going to get into their system and what is it going to do to them?
	We've seen what glyphosate does, the cancers it causes in farmers and people that live nearby.
	What about these RNA hotspots?
	These people that are continually being exposed to it.
	What are we going to see happen to these farmers as the years go by?
	I would not want to be them.
	I would not want to be on the front lines of testing what a mega dose of RNA self-replicating pesticide does to you.
	And I have a terrible feeling that we're going to find out.
	You would think that there should be an opportunity for public debate before farmers all over the country start spraying their crops with a brand new self-replicating RNA technology.
	What kind of long-term effects could it have on our crops?
	Is it safe to eat?
	How will it affect humans?
	There are so many unanswered questions.
	Yeah, just like the other time they pushed out an RNA technology.
	No, we don't know what it does.
	We don't know the long-term effects.
	We don't know the short-term effects.
	We don't really know anything about it, but hey, warp speed.
	Warp speed, it's the best.
	Trump is really the gift that keeps on giving when it comes to these new quote-unquote vaccines.
	They are poison.
	And not just poison, they are modifying DNA.
	They are creating all kinds of never-before-seen issues.
	And instead of pulling back on it and saying, all right, this was a mistake.
	We can't utilize this.
	It's obviously bad.
	No, we're now going to start spraying it on produce and crops.
	It's wonderful.
	I can't wait.
	SoloCat 1980.
	Vaccines contain cancer cells, which are literal zombie cells that refuse to die.
	Zombies, brainwashed, fools trust the vaccines, yeah.
	We're all surrounded by zombies.
	The zombie apocalypse came and went, and nobody even noticed.
	Dougda 007, these people are truly wicked.
	Nobody asked for mRNA technology.
	It's incredibly dangerous, and they know it.
	Yeah.
	These technologies being dangerous has never once stopped these people.
	They've never once cared.
	It's like I was talking about yesterday with the nuclear bombs.
	They weren't sure that it wasn't just going to cause a cascade reaction and fry the entire planet.
	But they decided, eh, well, you know, it's worth the risk.
	We're pretty sure it's not going to do that.
	Pretty sure, you know.
	It's worth it.
	Citizen of Americaca, issues with your warp speed turbo cancer qua scene?
	Receive three nights at Trump's Gaza Gazebo Spa and Casino Resort with every custom Stargate AI mRN boutique serum purchased at the fee of your soul.
	Well, that's a good deal.
	Very, very kind of them to give you those three nights at the Trump Gaza Resort.
	I'm sure it'll be lovely.
	Assyrian girl, this mRNA assault on her health would have continued full speed ahead regardless of who was selected as president.
	Yeah.
	They're not going to stop.
	You would have to have somebody truly outside the system come in to put a stop to it, and they would probably just assassinate somebody like that.
	I doubt they would ever let anyone who really is going to make a change anywhere near the presidency or one of the higher offices.
	That's why local government is so important.
	That's why if you can vote someone in at the local level who can oppose these things, who can keep them out of your area, you can do a lot of good.
	Local governance is the only route we have left.
	The federal government is out of reach.
	Washington is completely the domain of huge super PACs and lobbyists.
	Local politicians, though, you can potentially elect someone who will do some good.
	And again, not saying put all your hope in them, not saying you trust them implicitly.
	But it's worth still fighting over and caring about.
	Denver Adaway, phosphorus is a sticky substance that is found in most pesticides, so when they spray millions of tons of poison on the food, it increases crop yields.
	Nice, right?
	That's wonderful.
	I'm so excited that we're able to grow more poisoned food.
	It's lovely.
	I for one am excited that we can feed so many more people poison.
	Scientists sound alarm as deadly abnormalities found in mRNA boosted healthy young adults.
	A group of scientists has just issued a chilling warning after a major new study confirmed that dangerous abnormalities are triggering in healthy young adults within hours of receiving a COVID mRNA booster injection.
	The six-month longitudinal study uncovered evidence confirming that the vaccines cause almost immediate damage in people with no underlying conditions, almost immediate damage.
	Tracking 68 healthy young adults, the study observed a significant health risk that emerged just 48 hours after vaccination, signaling potential long-term issues that must not be ignored by public health and authorities.
	The findings have raised serious concerns regarding the potential biological consequences of receiving a third dose of Pfizer's COVID mRNA vaccine.
	Within just two days after the booster injection, participants exhibited acute systematic inflammation, coagulation, abnormalities, and a significant suppression of key immune markers.
	One of the most concerning results was the dramatic spike in inflammation markers.
	Inflammation is actually very, very damaging to your body over time.
	A little bit of inflammation now and then isn't going to kill you, but sustained inflammation over the long term puts a tremendous amount of stress on it and can cause serious issues.
	Shocking study shows chemotherapy reactivates dormant cancer cells, triggers metastasis.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Chemotherapy.
	It's been the go-to treatment for years now.
	And more and more people are coming out and saying, this is terrible.
	This is not something that we can defend anymore.
	We actually have this video here.
	Let's check it out.
	Chemotherapy is a hoax.
	It's a scam perpetuated by big pharma to make money at the expense of people who suffer.
	Chemotherapy prolongs life about two to three months.
	Two to three months.
	That's the sum benefit.
	For some cancers, such as gastric cancer, it actually reduces life expectancy.
	Chemotherapy has been shown to help cancer spread.
	It causes metastases.
	It helps cancer cells spread.
	It also activates cancer stem cells.
	So chemotherapy seems to be the worst things possible that you would want.
	It doesn't save lives, but it generates billions of dollars.
	These chemotherapy drugs cost patients over $100,000 a year, and about 50 to 60% of patients with cancer get into financial problems and become insolvent because of the cost of their medication.
	So we actually more recently think that the combination of ivermectin and mabendazole or fenbendazole is probably a very effective combination as first off therapy for the treatment of cancer.
	A whole host of over-the-counter medications as well as cheap prescription drugs that are very effective against cancer.
	We need to test them.
	Yeah.
	Chemotherapy is now being exposed as the poison that it is.
	My dad's father, my grandfather, I never got to meet him.
	He got cancer and it was the chemotherapy that actually killed him.
	Chemotherapy awakens dormant cancer cells in lung by inducing neutrophil extracular extracellular traps.
	Now, if you would like to know more about cancer, you can get the book A World Without Cancer by G. Edward Griffin at rncstore.com.
	And if you use promo code night, you get 10% off.
	Again, it's A World Without Cancer by G. Edward Griffin at rncstore.com, promo code night.
	Has a lot of really good information.
	Chemotherapy is supposed to kill cancer, not bring it back, but a groundbreaking cancer cell study by He et al.
	has revealed that common cancer drugs like doxorubicin and cisplatin can reawaken dormant tumor cells, triggering deadly metastatic relapses, especially in the lungs.
	These sleeping cancer cells, known as disseminated tumor cells, DTCs, can lie hidden for years before reactivating.
	This study is the first to directly prove that chemotherapy itself can wake them up.
	All these things that they use to treat people.
	It's amazing how often they end up actually being worse or worsening the problem.
	It's funny how that keeps happening.
	Huh, strange.
	Who could have seen this?
	You know, oops, sorry, I guess we did it again.
	It's almost like it's happening on purpose.
	Almost.
	But who would do such a thing?
	You'd have to be an evil psychopath to do that.
	Rebel Forever 01.
	Kimo is like what Israel does to Gaza, blows up a building of hundreds to kill a few terrorists.
	That's it.
	Pastor Archer Polowski wins legal victory after being fined for holding services during COVID-19.
	Of course, he was just simply engaging in the free exercise of religion and speech.
	Pulowski was faithful to the law that truly matters, to God's law.
	He did not back down.
	He did not submit to the Canadian government.
	He did what was right, and he's been vindicated in court.
	Even if he hadn't been vindicated in court, though, it still would have been the right thing.
	A Canadian court has ruled in favor of a pastor who gained international notoriety for a steadfast objection to coronavirus restrictions and sought to have a lower court ruling holding him in contempt of court dismissed.
	Over to court appeal issued the outspoken pastor a slam dunk win.
	Slam dunk.
	The court of appeal made a unanimous sound decision overturning the finding of contempt against my client, Miller wrote.
	The unanimous ruling from the three-judge panel vacated a lower court decision holding Pulowski and his brother David in contempt of court for holding an illegal public gathering in violation of Alberta's provincial restrictions on large gatherings imposed during the coronavirus pandemic.
	The ruling ordered Alberta Health Services to pay Pulawski and his brother David $15,733.59.
	Should be more.
	I was hoping he'd when I first read this that he'd get to soak the Canadian government for a tremendous amount.
	Glad he got the $15, but it would have been nice if it was millions.
	The finding of contempt and the sanction order are set aside.
	The decision declared, the fines have been paid to them are to be reimbursed.
	Polowski regarded the ruling as a welcome development in an interview with Rebel News.
	I was speechless, he recalled.
	When I learned that this was a total vindication, I stopped talking.
	I can imagine, knowing how corrupt and wicked the court systems are here in the US, I can only imagine they're just as bad or worse in Canada.
	It must have been shocking to him to hear that.
	It must have been a true vindication of his belief that God protects and provides.
	After lamenting that he had lost hope in the justice system, Pulowski expressed gratitude that finally something positive, something good is happening.
	He praised the ruling as great news, not just for us.
	In addition to Pulowski's, the Alberta Court of Appeal considered a request from restaurant owner Christopher Scott to overturn a lower court order requiring him to pay a fine of $20,000 in costs totaling $10,922.25.
	The Court of Appeal decided to reduce Scott's fine to $10,000.
	It should be $0.
	I don't understand how you can say, ah, well, you know, we'll reduce it.
	But nah, you've still got to pay.
	When asked if he would change his behavior if he had to do it all over again, Pulowski responded in the negative.
	Every single thing I did, I did it from the heart, he said.
	Pulowski indicated a desire that government officials would see the court decision as an order to let us live our lives free and respect our fundamentally guaranteed rights.
	The only problem is while getting the money reimbursed is great, the people that actually penalized him, the people that went after him, the people that were engaged in this, they're not suffering any consequences.
	It's not their money.
	It's not being pulled out of their accounts or their pockets.
	It's the taxpayer that's going to pay it.
	So the people that did this have no incentive not to do it again.
	Oh, we lost this time, but no skin off my nose.
	I can just attempt again later.
	Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which proclaims that the country acknowledges the supremacy of God.
	That's what he pointed to.
	Video footage of Pulowski confronting public health officials entering his church seeking to enforce coronavirus worship restrictions went viral in the spring of 2021.
	He likened the public health officials to Nazis and the Gestapo, as he ordered them to leave his property and not come back without a warrant.
	He did not back down.
	In addition to Pulowski, Pastor Tim Stevens of Calgary and James Coates of Edmonton, Alberta, also found themselves subject to jail time for holding in-person church services that ran afoul of coronavirus restrictions.
	Glad to see some justice for Arthur Pulowski.
	He refused to back down.
	He stood on his principles.
	He said, this is what God commands.
	I don't care what you say, if it countermands that.
	I will follow God.
	So I'm happy for that.
	He stood for the right.
	He stood up for what was right.
	stood on the gospel.
	So that's wonderful to hear.
	Stay with us, folks.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	PIANO PLAYS
	PIANO PLAYS you Defending the American dream.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	You should be able to buy me several hundred.
	Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
	The air is the air.
	Welcome back, folks.
	That commercial always makes me chuckle.
	That's right, we won't ship to Volodymyr Zelensky.
	We refuse.
	No matter how many times he contacts us and asks for a hoodie, we say no.
	You can't have one.
	Defy Tyrant 1776.
	If you have cancer, will docs give you scripts for ivermectin and fibenazole?
	Don't you need scripts for both?
	Assyrian girl responds.
	You can buy Fibendazole from Chewy and ivermectin from alldaychemist.com without scripts.
	Trick is you need to know dosage and protocol.
	Oncologists could lose their job if they gave you this info.
	If you're going to take any kind of pharmaceutical, you absolutely have to know the dosage to take.
	You don't want to be winging it by the seat of your pants.
	Even these ones that can be helpful, if you are not careful, can be very bad for you.
	So just make sure if you ever do purchase these things that you do your research, that you find out how much to take.
	Do not just willy-nilly take things.
	Assyrian girl.
	So of course no self-respecting oncologist will jeopardize his cushy income by telling you the truth.
	So chemo radiation surgery is all he'll tell you about.
	Yeah.
	The things that are going to make them a lot of money.
	The things that are going to keep you a permanent customer until you pass away.
	They'll make a lot more money that way than actually curing you of anything.
	Defy Tyrant 1776.
	Regular docs don't want to cure cancer.
	Seems they want to make pharma rich and kill you.
	Yeah.
	They make a lot of money keeping you sick.
	Curing people is a bad business model.
	Pezovante, I forget who it was.
	It was one of the pharma companies.
	They brought in some, you know, hedge fund managers or something like that.
	And the hedge fund managers pointed out like, hey, look, this company over here, they made this drug that actually cured what they were working on.
	And they made billions upon billions of dollars that first year.
	But then it basically dropped to zero because there were no more customers.
	They cured it.
	And that's what you don't want to do.
	You want to treat.
	You don't want to cure.
	Treatment.
	Keeping them just healthy enough that they have to keep coming back to you.
	That's the goal for most of these pharmaceutical companies.
	Pezovante, 7876.
	How many decades of failure and death are they responsible for?
	The program has always been to cut, burn, radiation, or blast one with chemicals.
	The medical industry is complicit and insane.
	It's like a cellular military-industrial complex.
	Assyrian Girl.
	Go to the Medical Rebel website.
	I think Lee Merritt still has the Fenbend dosage for parasites there.
	Or Look at Dr. William D. Makis or Dr. John Campbell interviews.
	Talks about dosages too.
	Assyrian girl giving some great info on where you can find that.
	Thank you, Assyrian Girl.
	Defy tyrants.
	1776 seems strange that they can tell you how long you have to live and be right most of the time because they know how long it will take for their treatment to kill you, probably.
	Yeah, well, we've given this poison to a few million people now, and it usually kills them in about this time period.
	So this is what we're thinking you've got left.
	Audi MRR, for those not paying attention, government hates Christianity.
	I don't care if people start dropping like flies, never ever participate in a lockdown again.
	The government hates Christianity because it's the truth.
	Because it means there is a higher power than them, because it gives people something to stand on.
	Audi MRR, it is more profitable to treat disease and cure it, therefore it behooves them to create the diseases as well.
	Problem, reaction, solution.
	That's their method in everything they do.
	They want to make sure that they are making money on all sides.
	Senator John Kennedy dismisses calls for gun control in wake of NYC shooting.
	Need more idiot control.
	These people, the second the shooting was over, you I remember seeing pictures of the AR-15.
	They're every time there's something like this that happens, they focus on the weapon.
	This one especially, though, just instantaneously, look, he's got this AR-15 from man, I can't remember, again, I have a terrible memory for details like this, but they listed out the company name.
	Was it Daniel Defense?
	It might have been Daniel Defense.
	I don't know.
	I saw someone mention that in reference to this.
	Yeah.
	But they're immediately saying, look here, look at this gun manufacturer, as if to say, this is the problem.
	These people are the problem.
	The people manufacturing these weapons are the issues, not the crazy people who use them.
	And just before this, there was a mass stabbing that killed several people and injured more.
	And I don't recall them posting stuff about knife control.
	America hasn't quite gotten there yet.
	Britain's already there.
	We'll get there eventually, which is sad to say, but it's probably true.
	I'm going to have to turn in all my knives, sadly.
	Knives are one of the few things I enjoy collecting.
	I don't buy them frequently, but I do enjoy a nice knife.
	It's satisfying when it's a well-made product.
	So, also, offside, if you're someone who manufactures knives and you want to sponsor the show, get in contact.
	That would be a sponsor I'd love to have.
	I would plug it very enthusiastically.
	You know, if you really want to focus on gun safety, maybe you need to look at SIG, see what's going wrong there.
	They're the true dangerous firearms right now.
	Guns don't kill people, except for maybe a few SIGs.
	Guns don't kill people.
	Well, SIG sours might kill people.
	The only thing that stops a bad guy with a SIG sour is occasionally the SIG sour itself.
	How the mighty have fallen.
	Senator John Kennedy, R, Republican, dismissed calls for more restrictive gun control laws after a shooting rampage in a midtown Manhattan skyscraper Monday where a gunman killed four people, including an NYPD officer before taking his own life.
	Kennedy's comments made during an appearance with Fox News personality Sean Hannity directly addressed the sadly predictable chorus of left-wing calls for further gun control.
	Following a high-profile shooting, they never let a crisis go to waste, after all.
	They've thoroughly understood the process.
	Something bad happens and the propaganda machine kicks into high gear immediately.
	Even if it's not something they've completely manufactured, which again a lot of these shootings seem to be, a lot of them are completely creations of the intelligence apparatus.
	But even if it's not, even if it's some crazy guy that actually does it on his own, they know what to do.
	They've got the plan in place.
	Post pictures of the weapon and start pushing people towards suing these manufacturers.
	The Republican senator argued that America has enough gun laws and instead needs idiot control to address such gun vi- to address such violence.
	On Capitol Hill, probably beginning in the morning, there will be inevitable calls by some of my colleagues for more gun control laws.
	We've got hundreds of gun control laws.
	Maybe thousands.
	We don't need more gun control.
	We need more idiot control, and I don't know exactly how to do that.
	New York requires permits for purchasing and possessing handguns and semi-automatic rifles, enforces universal background checks, and has implemented the New York Safe Act, which bans certain assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.
	The state also has a red flag law, prohibits open carry of handguns, and imposes strict concealed carry regulations, with additional restrictions in New York City.
	None of these stopped this madman.
	They've already got laws that are about as strict as you can go while still allowing people to carry a weapon at all or purchase them.
	And they did nothing to stop this.
	Gun control laws.
	I'm preaching to the choir here, but they do not work.
	If you outlaw guns, the law-abiding citizens may turn them in.
	Certain members of them will just go, well, I gotta follow the law.
	We'll turn them in, but none of the criminals will.
	This is the continual issue.
	Criminals do not follow the law.
	That's what makes them criminals.
	The other thing that Franklin Newark's going to have to face is the issue of whether we should bring back more aggressive stop and frisk, which is a perfectly legal law enforcement tactic, suggested Kennedy, which I don't agree with.
	I don't think that the police have the right to stop and frisk you at any given time.
	They are continually infringing on your rights already.
	New York is such a dystopian hellscape.
	It is amazing to me that people choose to live there.
	I have to imagine people just kind of get stuck.
	You know, it's so expensive they can't save up enough money to get out.
	We've got to bring back stop and frisk.
	The police state isn't strong enough.
	It's not invasive enough.
	President Trump earlier this year responded to a deadly shooting at Florida State University by reaffirming his commitment to the Second Amendment.
	In the process, the president pointed out that guns are not scary, inanimate objects that fire of their own accord.
	Well, assuming you don't own a SIG Sauer.
	I'm a big advocate of the Second Amendment, Trump stated.
	I've been from the beginning.
	I protected it.
	No, he didn't.
	Remember the bump stock ban?
	Remember that?
	He is not a friend of the Second Amendment.
	He is an enemy of it.
	He's an enemy of liberty in general.
	That's who Donald Trump is.
	I'm a big fan of the Second Amendment.
	I protected it, aside from those times I attacked it.
	These things are terrible, but the gun...
	These things are terrible, but the gun doesn't do the shooting the people do.
	It's amazing, again, the bump stock ban was one of the first major cognitive dissonances you saw with MAGA.
	People giving Trump a free pass, despite the fact that he is attacking the Second Amendment.
	Of course, we all know that bump stocks are kind of just a gimmick.
	They're just for fun.
	If you want to slap one on your weapon, it's not really going to make it any better.
	It will probably end up making it worse when it comes to accuracy.
	But that is still your right to do that.
	The government does not have the right to come in and tell you you cannot put a bump stock on your weapon.
	And people are just like, ah, well, you know, they're a gimmick, so who cares?
	We got to support Trump anyway.
	They continually give him a pass, no matter what he does.
	The gun doesn't do the shooting.
	The criminal does, and a criminal, hell-bent on killing, doesn't give a hoot about what laws are on the books.
	It's true.
	Kennedy also addressed those left-wing pundits who will invariably feel sympathy for the shooter over any mental health issues he may have been experiencing at the time of his heinous attack.
	There are unconfirmed reports from CNN sources that the shooter left behind a note blaming his behavior on chronic, traumatic, encephalopathy.
	CTE.
	I don't want to hear anyone feeling sorry for this guy who did this, the Louisiana senator said.
	I believe there's objective evil in this world, and we saw it today.
	I'm just sorry.
	Yeah.
	It is truly amazing how frequently people on the left will empathize with people that commit these crimes.
	They will put themselves in the shoes and say, oh, look, the poor stabber, the poor shooter, they were victims of a system that made them this way and completely remove any responsibility.
	The article says idiot control, but when you talk about how this guy had mental illnesses and CTE or whatever, it kind of makes me suspect that he's going to be on SSRIs.
	So is it idiots that are causing all these mass shootings, or is it the massive amounts of these disassociative events that these SSRIs cause?
	Yeah.
	I recently got a book, which I just read the preface of and haven't had a chance to actually start.
	I continually buy books and then don't have the time to read them, but I got The Franklin Saving and Loan Scandal by John DeCamp.
	In the beginning of it, he talks about the Columbine shooting and how he has yet to come across a shooting where SSRIs weren't involved with this.
	Even back then, this was a known problem.
	It's been a known problem for years.
	And wasn't there a bill recently that was trying to make it publicly available information if a mass shooter was on an SSRI?
	I think it was a very important thing.
	I want to say that was something that they were bandying around two months ago.
	I need to look that up.
	Audi MRR media is doing its part to distract from the Trumpenstein Blunderbiew reports on tsunami alerts on the West Coast, as well as New York mass shooting from the Obama-Biden playbook.
	That's right.
	It's a playbook that stretches back further than Obama and Biden.
	They've got these worked out to a T. They know how long the average attention span is when it comes to anything.
	And if they can just distract the American people long enough, as a general rule, they'll forget about anything and everything.
	Oh, well, you know, two weeks has passed, time to move on from whatever I was focused on.
	Who can remember?
	Who can say?
	One of America's handguns is allegedly firing on its owners.
	This is, of course, about Sig Sauer and their P320 pistol.
	A series of incidents where the Sig Sauer P320 pistol allegedly discharged at the trigger being pulled.
	The article highlights that the P320 is a striker-fired handgun, which means it is designed to fire when the trigger is pulled.
	The P-320 has been the subject of numerous lawsuits alleging design defects and unintentional discharges.
	Was that sarcasm?
	It's designed to fire when the trigger is pulled.
	That's how this pistol was put together.
	This is how it's supposed to function, in case you were wondering.
	Now, I've heard some interesting rumors that are floating around.
	Was it last year, I believe, Sig Sauer got a contract with the Indian military to manufacture firearms for them.
	They said, don't worry, all the firearms we manufacture for India will stay in India, but firearms manufacture in India have been found in places in Europe and in the United States.
	And as such, people are beginning to wonder if the quality control is coming from India.
	There have been rumors that are floating around, and I've heard people talking about it, that the they're not doing the theory anyway, is that they're not doing good quality control, and they're not keeping the 10mm strikers and the 9mm strikers separate.
	They just throw them into a bin, and sometimes a 10mm ends up in a 9mm, and a 9mm ends up in a 10-millimeter.
	And as such, this can cause issues leading it to accidentally discharge.
	I don't know how much truth is to that, but that's what I've heard people speculating about.
	So we'll have to see as time goes on.
	But it is funny that right after they got the Indian contract and started manufacturing a bunch of guns in India, this would happen.
	You know, correlation doesn't equal causation, but perhaps there's something there.
	Six hours P320 pistol has wounded more than 80 people who say they didn't pull the trigger, and no US agency has the power to intervene, they say.
	80 people.
	That is a shocking number.
	This is...
	I had friends that worked in gun stores and were very passionate about guns.
	If there was something like this, they would have been apoplectic.
	They would have been screaming from the rooftops at that time.
	One warm afternoon in May, Dwight Jackson was getting dressed for a visit to his favorite cigar lounge.
	He slipped his holstered Sig Sauer P320 pistol onto his belt, put on a button-down shirt, and leaned across his bed for his wallet.
	Suddenly he said the gun fired, sending a bullet tearing through his right buttock and into his left ankle.
	I heard bang, said Jackson 47, a locomotive engineer who lives in Locust Grove, Georgia.
	I looked down and I saw Locust Grove.
	I would not want to live someplace like that.
	That's like, you know, you might as well name it something like pestilence place.
	I looked down and saw blood.
	His wife heard the shot from down the hall and screamed.
	She called an ambulance while Jackson hobbled toward the front door, painting a trail of blood over the hard wood floors.
	This guy is a tough cookie.
	Shot in the buttock and ankle, and he still hobbles himself out the door.
	This Jackson guy sounds tough.
	I like this guy.
	At no point, Jackson later told police had he touched the gun's trigger.
	The P320 is one of the nation's most popular handguns, a variant of the weapon of the standard issue sidearm for every branch of the U.S. military.
	Since its introduction to the commercial market in 2014, manufacturer SIG Sauer has sold the P-320 to hundreds of thousands of civilians, and the gun has been used by officers at more than a thousand law enforcement agencies across the nation, court records show.
	More than 100 people allege that their P-320 pistols discharged when they did not pull the trigger.
	An eight-month investigation by the Trace and the Washington Post has found at least 80 people were wounded in the shootings, which date to 2016.
	So, further back than 2024 when they got the Indian contract.
	So maybe my speculation is unfounded and unwarranted.
	The number and frequency of injuries are strongly suggestive of a design flaw versus a human performance error, said Bill Lewinsky, a behavioral scientist, an executive director of the Force Science Institute and one of the nation's leading experts on accidental shootings.
	What we're seeing is highly unusual.
	Yeah, like I said, if any of my friends who worked in the gun stores had heard about something like this years ago, they would have immediately started just raising a fuss.
	They would have been screaming from the rooftops, never buy a SIG.
	Injurers include both casual and expert firearm owners whose guns fired in their homes and offices and in busy places like casinos and parking lots.
	In two cases, the guns went off on school grounds.
	Interviews with more than a dozen victims, video recordings, and a review of thousands of pages of court documents and internal police records reveal a pattern of discharges that were alleged to have occurred during routine movements.
	These have included the holstering or unholstering of the P-320, climbing out of vehicles and walking downstairs.
	In several cases, records and video show the gun fired when a victim's hand was nowhere near it.
	So, you know, I guess you slightly jostle this thing in some manner, and something in the internal mechanism fails.
	Navy veteran former gunner's mate Dionysio Delgado said his P-320 fired a bullet through his thigh and into his calf after he holstered it during a training session at a gun range in Ruther, Glenn, Virginia.
	Michael Parker, a welder, said his holster P-320 fired a bullet into his thigh as he removed the holster from his pocket.
	On his car in St. Petersburg, Florida, police officer Brittany Hilton said her holster P-320 fired while inside her purse as she walked to her car in Bridge City, Texas.
	The bullet entered her groin and exited her back just inches from the base of her spine.
	In a written response to questions, Sig Sauer based in Newington, New Hampshire, denied that the P-320 is capable of firing without a trigger pull and cited accounts of unintentional discharges with other firearms as evidence that such issues with the P-320 are neither uncommon nor suggestive of a defect with the gun.
	I don't know.
	This seems like far too many for it to be ruled as, oh, well, you know, people just be shooting themselves.
	6-Hour P-320 model pistol is among the most tested, proven.
	It's rare.
	It's rare.
	It's uncommon.
	These discharges are rare.
	And successful handguns in small arms history, the company wrote.
	Experts said the risk of unintentional discharges tends to be greater for law enforcement officers because they are frequently trained to keep a round chambered in their duty weapon, which they often wear on their hip throughout the day.
	At least 33 officers at 18 law enforcement agencies have been injured by P320 discharges.
	According to court records and interviews, at least six agencies removed the P320 from service over concerns about the model's safety record show.
	And it's still...
	It's amazing to me that they're still just running...
	No matter what kind of business companies are in, they refuse to admit when something has gone wrong.
	I've been running a gun store for over 10 years at this point, and you always hear anecdotal statements about some gun going off, said Jeff Webb, a certified master gunsmith who operates Gray Wolf Armory, a gun store in Tampa Bay suburbs, but dozens of injuries of local and federal police agents over the last five years.
	That's not an anecdote, that's a problem.
	Webb has for years publicly criticized the P320 as unsafe and was recently retained as an expert witness in a case against the gunmaker.
	Most of the incidents occurred after Sigsauer changed the internal design of the P320 following reports that the pistol could fire when dropped and launched a voluntary upgrade program allowing gun owners to send their pistols to the company's New Hampshire factory for modification.
	That's wonderful.
	We know something's wrong.
	Don't worry, we'll fix it.
	And they end up making it worse.
	Web and other critics of the P320 say the versions used most often by civilians and police are essentially cocked at all times with no external safeties to prevent the gun from firing in cases of malfunctions.
	These design features make them especially vulnerable to unintentional discharges, critics say.
	Firearms are one of the few products that are exempt from federal consumer safety regulations.
	No regulatory body has the power to investigate alleged defects or impose mandatory recall of guns.
	As thousands of P320s circulate in the civilian market waiting for buyers, SIG Sauer faces lawsuits from at least 70 people.
	Alleged the company is selling a defective product.
	Of course.
	The vaccine companies are pretty much immune from safety regulations as well.
	Jackson, a former track and football player.
	Jackson, a former track and football player with two children, can no longer run as a result of his injuries and struggles to use chairs.
	He's grateful to be alive after the bullet nearly hit his femoral artery, which could have caused massive blood loss and possibly death.
	But he's worried that if Sig's Hauer doesn't implement changes, the next victim won't be so lucky.
	Yeah.
	Just, nope, nothing to see here.
	Sig refusing to do anything about it.
	I suppose they assume if they admit anything, this will damage their court cases and they might be forced to pay more money.
	Once again, prioritizing money over a good product and the safety of the people who purchase your product.
	You expect a company to address that, but SI is not addressing it.
	Consumer Product Safety Commission has required recalls of candles whose flames burn too tall, fleece pajamas shown to cut infants in classroom chairs with loose welding.
	But it has never ordered a recall of a gun because it does not have the authority to do so.
	Even if the weapon explodes in someone's hand or spontaneously fires a bullet, the omission is the result of an amendment written by U.S. Representative John D. Dingell in 1972 when the agency was created by Congress.
	I don't...
	I think it would be okay for them to issue a recall.
	I think that's covered more under liability issues.
	That's not telling SIG they can't manufacture guns or sell guns.
	It's saying you can't manufacture a safety hazard.
	Yeah.
	Present this as a finished product when it's going to explode or fire.
	SIG Sauer's face claims that the P320 malfunctioned since at least 2017 when accounts resurfaced or surfaced that the gun could fire when dropped.
	A video released in August that year by Texas Gunstore showed the gun firing consistently.
	When dropped at certain angles, the impact caused a trigger to depress, the video showed.
	The day after the video was released, SigSauer announced that it would modify the pistol's design and launched a voluntary upgrade program.
	Reporting by CNN later showed that SIGSAUR had been notified twice about instances in which the gun fired when dropped roughly a year before, warning the public of the problem.
	One of those notices was from the U.S. Army.
	This is a known issue.
	And again, no matter what line of work companies are in, they have zero interest in the safety of their consumers.
	They just care about making money.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	The air conditioning is still out in here.
	It is still incredibly warm, and I need water.
	Before we go to break, we do have...
	Khan think guns don't kill people.
	Sigs kill people.
	That's right.
	These gosh darn SIGs.
	Tunnel Lord 1337.
	Why do people insist on asking someone else to protect their life?
	It's not difficult to train and use a handgun.
	There's so many grand master shooters on YouTube offering free courses.
	Yeah.
	There's a course on YouTube for just about anything you can think of.
	If it's...
	We appreciate the tip.
	It is.
	If you want to learn something, YouTube is your best friend at this point.
	You can find courses on some really esoteric things.
	That's how I basically learn everything at this point.
	That and obscure forum posts from like 10 years ago when someone encountered the same issue I did.
	Nights of the Storm, I was in New York when they passed that SAFE Act.
	It was ridiculous.
	The police had to disarm until a carve-out was made for them.
	It's truly amazing the idiocy and the way politics happens.
	Oops, sorry, I guess the police don't get to carry guns because we're dummies.
	Rebel Forever01, criminals generally do not get guns legally.
	Any law written only keeps guns out of the law-abiding citizens' hands.
	Drugs are illegal.
	I don't see that being stopped anytime soon.
	Yeah.
	Again, criminals don't follow the law.
	That's what makes them criminal by definition.
	Passing laws does nothing to stop them.
	Tunnel Lord 1337.
	The gun actually killed one airman recently.
	Yeah.
	We talked about that story the other day briefly.
	There was not much info when we last covered it since the Army or the Air Force doesn't release info.
	They're not very forthcoming.
	Tunnel Lord.
	Fun fact, SIGP-320 don't only go off on their own, but they also have been exploding as well.
	Oh, good.
	It's not just one issue, it's multiple.
	Incredible.
	I'm glad that they didn't confine themselves to one avenue.
	It's a multifaceted handgun.
	It doesn't just fire rounds willy-nilly without the trigger being pulled.
	It can also explode on you.
	As I said, we're going to take a quick break because it is overly hot in here.
	But that's a good segue.
	In case it's very hot where you are, too.
	You can go to homesteadproducts.shop.
	They've got things like this all-natural deodorant.
	You can check out and see if it's something you've interested in it.
	And this scent is rosemary mint.
	It's something I'm Going to need a lot of by the time the show is over.
	So go to homesteadproducts.shop and with promo code night, you can get 10% off the products they have there.
	They're high quality, made in America, and they do their best to make sure that they are things that you would actually find useful.
	So stay with us, folks.
	When we come back, we're going to look at the racist attack on these white women.
	So we'll be right back, folks.
	Thank you.
	you you You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music?
	Find it now at APSradio.com.
	APSradio.com
	Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, folks.
	Thank you for still being here with us.
	As I said, we're now going to look at the mob of black people that attacked this poor white woman.
	Unacceptable.
	White woman viciously pummeled by Cincinnati mob reveals maddening detail in wake of brutal attacks.
	This really does go to show the racist and just hateful.
	Just how racist and hateful they have managed to make members of the black community towards white people.
	This is the true work.
	Hate to the point they will just assault and brutalize people if they get the chance.
	Defy a tyrant 1776.
	Remington sold millions of model 700 rifles, just a few supposed safety failures to cause a massive lawsuit, even though it could have been user error.
	SIG is shaking in their boots.
	Like, oh, please.
	No, we're not admitting anything.
	As police in Cincinnati announced the five arrests have been made in connection with the brutal weekend beating of several white people by an angry mob, angry mob of black people.
	The woman seen in a viral video getting knocked unconscious is revealing a disturbing detail.
	Holly, the victim, said not a single local or state official has yet reached out as of earlier this afternoon, other than one police detective.
	This was said by Vivek Ramaswamy.
	Said I spoke to Holly earlier today.
	The woman tragically assaulted in Cincinnati this weekend, Ramaswamy said on X. She's a single working mom who went to a friend's birthday party.
	It's unconscionable that there were no police present in that area of Cincinnati on a Friday night or even an ambulance to take her to the hospital.
	Ramaswamy continued, hardworking Americans shouldn't have to worry for their safety when they have a good time in our cities.
	Holly said not a single local or state official had yet reached out as of earlier this afternoon other than one police detective.
	I'd have just like to lecture about systemic injustice while thugs turn our cities into war zones.
	I'm done with their excuses.
	As governor, I'll make sure they're behind bars and not running wild.
	Of course, that's coming from Vivek, the snake.
	You can definitely trust what he says.
	You can definitely trust him to actually do something about this.
	We actually have the picture.
	I believe this is the right one.
	Yeah, you can see her there.
	She's bleeding, laying on the ground.
	You can tell she has been beaten.
	This is truly hard to watch.
	We're going to play some of the video.
	We've taken the sound out because there's just cursing continually in the background, but it is just swearing and hooting hollering and screaming.
	And just it's hard to watch.
	You can see a guy gets punched, hit in the back of the head.
	He gets mobbed by three different guys.
	More guys run over and just start kicking him and stomping on him while he's down.
	This woman starts kicking him as well.
	It is a mob of individuals.
	Just utterly despicable behavior.
	Just continually wailing on him and hitting him as he's down.
	Stomping on his head.
	Punching him in the face.
	He's just encircled by these people.
	Once again, some guy comes up and punches him in the back of the skull.
	Some people help him up.
	And he is so beaten that he cannot stand on his own.
	He falls over again.
	Now, some people are trying to help him.
	Others are just watching, filming.
	Some are just walking away, disinterested.
	No interest in helping this man after what has happened to him.
	Still encircled by a crowd.
	He's finally up and you can see he is bloody limping as he walks away.
	And they are now attacking this woman.
	This white woman, she is laying on the ground, unmoving.
	She's beautiful.
	She hit her head pretty hard when she was punched without any provocation.
	by a man ok For those I'm sure most of you have seen this video or seen pictures.
	This is all happening in the middle of a street trying to help her up.
	These people that are helping her, thank goodness they were there.
	Thank goodness for them at least.
	We have five we have charged and anticipate more, Thietge said.
	Let me be clear.
	Anyone who put their hands on another individual during this incident in an attempt to cause harm will face consequences.
	I don't care which side of the incident or the fight they were on.
	If they place their hands on somebody in an attempt to cause harm, that is unacceptable.
	That's a police chief Thietge slammed the estimated 100 witnesses to the incident, noting only one phone call to police was made, adding it, it is unacceptable that only one person did the right thing and called 911.
	We've actually got a video from the police chief.
	Let's take a look at that as well.
	Another topic I want to cover real quick.
	Social media and journalism and the role it plays in this incident.
	And yes, guys, that's you.
	That is you.
	Social media, the post that we've seen, does not depict the entire incident.
	That is one version of what occurred.
	At times, social media and mainstream media and their commentaries are a misrepresentation of the circumstances surrounding any given event.
	What that does, that causes us some difficulties in thoroughly investigating the activity and enforcing the law.
	Because what happens, that social media post and your coverage of it distorts the content of what actually happened.
	And it makes our job more difficult.
	Go ahead, right here.
	Thank you.
	Two questions.
	Where were the nearest officers?
	In the central business section.
	They were working.
	They were both in vehicles.
	And like I said, they had to maneuver through the traffic.
	Second question is, you had said social media and news media distorted the content of what actually happened.
	What exactly was distorted?
	I understand that there was one, you know, multiple views of the video, but exactly what led up to this?
	I mean, what was distorted?
	Yeah, so I think by the irresponsibility with social media is it just shows one side of the equation quite frequently without context, without factual context.
	And then people run with it.
	They really need context.
	And then it grows legs and it becomes something bigger that we then have to try to manage as part of the investigation.
	Yeah, you really need context to understand why that guy's getting his head stomped in by a crowd of people.
	What context makes that alright?
	Now, I'm sure let's play devil's advocate.
	Let's say, you know, he pulled a gun on a child and these were all people intervening.
	That's the sort of context that makes this okay, in my opinion.
	Somebody that is going to do grievous bodily harm to others or murder.
	And as such, a group of people, you know, making sure they can't do that, absolutely.
	But I don't get the feeling that's what was going on here.
	Cecilia 14, Travis, if race was reversed, there'd be peace marches, aka riots like George Floyd panels about racism on every channel.
	Yeah, it's the again.
	Things have been set up so that anytime a white person is seen, you know, if there's violence against a black person by a white person, it's immediately unjustified and racist.
	But if there's violence by black people against white people, you need the context.
	You need to know what was going on.
	Did they say something that was provocatory?
	What happened?
	How could this have led to it?
	I'm sure it was deserved.
	There's always these continual prevarications to try to justify the actions.
	Do not obey.
	See a crowd of whites beating the crap out of a single person of another race, and oh boy, the news will worship it.
	Yeah, the news would never let something like that go.
	I'd also like to point out how disingenuous all of the arguments from this police chief are.
	Like, only one person out of 100 people there called the police, as though if we had gotten 100 calls, we would have gotten there much faster.
	The faster you call the police, the faster they arrive, the more people.
	It's like, I do believe in fairies.
	I do believe in fairies.
	Yeah, or like, you know, when you've got that street crossing and the little hand pops up, you just keep hitting that button, it lets you across faster.
	Yeah.
	Knights of the storm.
	Then, of course, it's all the media's fault and social media for talking about this.
	You can't question the police.
	No.
	Knights of the Storm, where were the flock cameras for their safety?
	That's right.
	We need constant real-time surveillance.
	That's the only way we'll be able to keep everyone safe.
	That's the only way we'll be able to make sure the police are dispatched immediately and can get there in time.
	Well, you know, not in time, because of course there will be lag time.
	And that beating took all of about, you know, two minutes, three minutes for the two of them.
	So, you know, the police aren't going to get there that quick, but they'll get there in time to pick your carcass off the ground.
	You'll still be warm by the time they get there.
	Nights of the Storm.
	Things like this just show that all the measures they take towards tyranny are not for your safety.
	Nope.
	Anarcho-tyranny.
	Guard doesn't like that term.
	I forget what he says.
	He had a better term for it, but until I can remember it, anarcho-tyranny is what I'll have to call it.
	You know, if you infringe, you know, if you don't pay your taxes, they'll come down on you with all the force they can muster.
	But for things like this, you're on your own.
	Cecilia 14, this woman tried to blame both sides.
	Disgusting.
	Yeah.
	There's probably some context.
	Maybe the white person said something that was nasty.
	Maybe they said a word.
	That's the continual thing.
	is just if you say a word it is justified for black people to assault you, to potentially kill you because you said a word and again I don't want You should say it whenever you feel like it.
	Go forth, my son.
	I think...
	I don't think there's a reason to say it.
	I don't think you should be out there just trying to offend people.
	However, I don't think it's justified if someone says a word that you don't like that you get to stomp their head in.
	It's a clear distinction between anything you say and getting physical with someone.
	Also, you know, the police chief is saying we need context.
	There's faults on both sides.
	What's the context that would make it okay for a large man to just straight up punch this woman in the face like we saw in that video?
	This is another one of those.
	If you are a woman and your husband gets into a fight with someone or someone you're with gets into a fight with someone, do not attempt to intervene.
	You will make things worse.
	And there are certain people that are not going to care that you are a woman.
	And they will just hit you.
	Stay out of the conflict.
	Whatever happens, call the police, do something else, but do not try to get between two guys.
	It will probably end badly for you.
	It is a bad, bad move.
	You know, again, it's like if there's two 6'5 guys that are about to get into a fistfight, I'm not going to step between them.
	That is not going to end well for me.
	It most likely ends with me accidentally getting clocked in the face.
	You have to realize at certain times that you don't want, that there's nothing you can do and your actions can only make things worse if you attempt to physically get involved.
	I don't know how the fight started, but the one part that I saw that was really gruesome is you had a grown man who sucker punched a middle-aged woman.
	From where I come from, at least, when you have a grown man who sucker punches a middle-aged woman, that person ought to go to jail for a very long time, said J.D. Vance.
	Yeah.
	I think if you are a full-grown man and you sucker punch a woman, you kind of deserve prison.
	I don't think that's a controversial statement.
	Ceely 14, this woman tried to blame both sides.
	Disgusting.
	Nadlander, picture of her on the wall behind her.
	I hadn't noticed that.
	Well, yeah, this is actually in the next article, exclusion of white men.
	Cincinnati police chief who scolded people for sharing video black mob gets sued.
	And it actually has her picture from this press conference.
	And you can kind of see it does look like that's her behind her.
	Which, I mean, a little bit of narcissism there, potentially.
	And I'm also curious how this woman became police chief.
	Women should not be police.
	It's crazy to me that that's even a controversial statement.
	Some people would get offended by that, but no.
	I've seen far too many videos of female officers having their firearms wrestled away from them with little to no effort by suspects, and then they're left to just run away screaming as the guy has the gun.
	Women are physically much smaller and weaker than men.
	As a general, and again, I hate that I have to clarify this, but there's certain people like, well, I know a woman who is this tall and can outlift most of the men I know.
	It's like, yes, there are outliers on every side.
	But then you have to account for the fact that while there are outliers of women who are bigger and stronger than the average woman, there are outliers of men who are bigger and stronger than the average man, and as such, dwarf the outliers in women.
	There are always outliers.
	That doesn't invalidate a generality.
	Four previous members of the Cincinnati Police Department are suing police chief Teresa Thietge, Thietke, whatever, for workplace discrimination against white males on the force.
	A lawsuit brought by Captain Robert Wilson and Lieutenant Patrick Caton, Gerald Hodges and Andrew Mitchell on May 19th alleges that the city and Thietge partook in intentional discriminatory practices based on sex and gender.
	According to the Cincinnati Inquirer, the officers asserted they suffered harm, damage to their professional reputations and emotional distress as a result of the department's alleged favorable treatment toward women and racial minorities.
	Okay, I know that this is like a legal term and you have to build a case and you want to put as many charges in there as possible, but the picture of these big, tough want-be police officers, guys that got discriminated against being like, they caused me emotional distress.
	Like, ah, I really hope it didn't, because if you were going to be caused emotional distress by this, I don't think you were cut out to be a police officer in the first place.
	Doug Lug, thank you very much for the tip.
	We appreciate it.
	I think that's just the legal term that it is.
	Yeah.
	Like I get, like I said, you're building a case.
	You have to use these specific terms.
	You want to utilize what the courts give you.
	And I'm sure the lawyers are like, you got to say this, you got to say that.
	But still, you've got to imagine there's four or five just big, tough guys in a room like, they cause me emotional distress.
	The city and chief Thietge have actively and systemically undertaken efforts to promote advance and make promotion and assignment decisions that are preferable to women and minorities and to the exclusion of white men, the lawsuit reads.
	This is continually...
	This does nothing to correct the laws in place that allows cops to basically be road pirates to harass us.
	All this does is make sure that there are women and minorities in positions that are allowed to harass us.
	If anything, it makes it worse because a man has more options without resorting to a gun or a taser to take someone down.
	But a woman is going to struggle to physically restrain someone, to say the least.
	Yeah.
	Women are forced to rely on a firearm much more frequently than a man would be.
	And again, if we want to address police corruption, brutality, militarization, putting black people, other minorities or women into these roles does nothing to do that.
	You're not going to get a kindler, gentler police force because you staff it with women if you do nothing about the underlying laws that allow them to abuse us.
	This does nothing to address the issue.
	You could staff the entire police force with women or an entire, you know, let's say the entire city or the area they're policing is black.
	You could staff them all with black police officers and it wouldn't do anything to really change the situation.
	They would still be empowered to brutalize and abuse the people that they're supposed to protect and serve.
	It's an abuse of power and people will abuse power you give them if they are not, you know, power corrupts, absolute power corrupts, absolutely.
	We've seen that the police oftentimes behave as their own private mob.
	They protect one another continually, no matter what happens, no matter how obvious the situation is.
	They further alleged that since Sitgee became chief, a race-based quota system has been used to promote women, racial minorities, to the rank of lieutenant.
	Cincinnati Police Department did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation's request for comment.
	Well, I'm sure this woman would never do something like that.
	In early 2025, the city paid a $95,000 settlement to a white police officer who sued over comments made about white people by her supervisor and colleagues.
	According to the inquirer, in 2021, a federal judge ruled that the police department could not use a race or sex-based quota when hiring or promoting officers.
	Thietke has emerged into the national public eye since the violent brawl that took place in Cincinnati, Ohio in the early hours of Saturday morning.
	During a Monday press conference, the police chief accused users on social media and journalists of misrepresenting the incident with footage that allegedly lacked context.
	And again, I don't think there's any context, any likely context that makes this acceptable.
	That makes, you know, sucker punching a woman in the back of the head as a full-grown man acceptable.
	This could have very easily resulted in her death.
	It is a blessing from God that she is still alive.
	Social media, the post that we've seen, does not depict the entire incident.
	That is one version of what occurred.
	At times, social media and mainstream media and their commentaries are misrepresentations of the circumstances surrounding any given event.
	That's right, you know.
	Sure, this video shows a mob beating to a man on the ground and then sucker punching a woman, but there's context you don't have.
	Or she's implying there is.
	She's not saying that there is.
	She's just saying, well, there could be.
	That social media post and your coverage of it distorts the content of what actually happened, and it makes our job more difficult.
	Heisenberg's uncertainty principle when applied to policing, I suppose.
	That which we study, we also change.
	What is the police's job anyway?
	Is it to make sure that they have the correct representation of women and minorities to abuse us, to sit around and collect paychecks as crimes go unsolved and unpunished?
	The police desperately are in need of reform.
	And this woman is focused on getting the right, you know, people with the right skin color and of the right sex to abuse their power.
	It's utterly ridiculous.
	Cecilia 14, Travis and Lance, they'll lie and claim they said bad word and justify all their debauchery.
	Again, I don't think you should be going out and calling people slurs.
	You know, I don't think, you know, when it comes to jokes and comedy and that sort of thing, leeway, do say whatever.
	But if you're just going out in public to try to harass people, I find that to be stupid.
	I find that to be low class.
	However, even if someone says a word you don't like, I don't think that gives you justification to assault them.
	Tunnel Lord 137.
	Even insults are still protected free speech.
	No.
	Tunnel Lord 1337.
	That's why women should be armed, just not with a SIG.
	Yeah, don't put a SIG in your purse.
	CO14 Travis is getting lots of coverage, not for a good reason.
	Used to call for more AI tyranny, especially advanced and VVEC in it.
	They're anything but altruistic.
	Yeah.
	I'm sure, like Knights of the Storm pointed out, you know, more flock cameras, more shot-detecting microphones, more this, more that.
	We need to be able to track and trace everyone all the time.
	Instead of addressing the real issues.
	Britons flock to VPNs to not flock cameras.
	That means they're flocking to.
	Britons flock to VPNs to dodge new age verification checks online.
	And of course, I've already seen posts online of people being threatened that if you use a VPN in England, you'll get into trouble.
	You don't have a license for that.
	There's no license for a VPN.
	You can't use it.
	Yeah, they're actually specifically attacking VPNs, which to me shows that this entire narrative of this being about protecting children was always a lie, blatantly from the get-go, because it's a stretch to say that, you know, if a kid can get a VPN, get their parents' credit card to pay for it, do all that, that your law is going to stop them at this point.
	Yeah.
	Downloads of virtual private networks VPN apps have surged in the UK as users look for ways to bypass new age verification rules.
	Rather than upload their ID or F faces scanned, users are moving towards VPNs.
	A VPN allows users to establish a secure and encrypted connection over the internet.
	They effectively mask internet protocol addresses and anonymize online presences, making it more difficult for websites, advertisers, and governments to track a user's activities.
	Just a few minutes after the Online Safety Act went into effect last night, Proton VPN sign-ups originating in the UK surged by more than 1,400.
	Proton VPN stated, unlike previous surges, this one is sustained and is significantly higher than when France lost access to adult content.
	I wonder if England is such a depressing, drab, gray place.
	They just have nothing else going on.
	Well, let's not forget that this is more than just adult content.
	It's anything that is remotely related.
	They've already been filtering out migration protests and all kinds of other things the government doesn't want them to see.
	The now Labor government states on its website that platforms have a legal duty to protect children online.
	Of course, this is coming from the same government that does everything they can to cover up for the rape gangs that are going on there.
	We have a duty to protect children, you know, when it allows us to infringe on your ability to see what's actually happening in the country.
	We have a duty to keep children from accessing these things.
	But no, we're not going to do anything about the rape gangs that are abusing them.
	News aggregation website Reddit said that from July 14th, a third-party provider called Persona will perform age verification for the social media platform either through an uploaded selfie or a photo of your government ID such as a passport.
	Of course, we saw with the T-app leak why this is such a bad idea.
	Now, most websites are going to have a bit better security than a completely unprotected URL.
	However, nothing on the internet is truly safe.
	Anything that is connected to the internet can be hacked and probably eventually will be if someone puts in the time and effort.
	It's back to the fact that the government cannot raise your children no matter how much they legislate.
	That is the parents' job and the government trying to step in where they have no authority is only going to make matters worse.
	The Age Verification Providers Association lists several approved methods for age checks, including mobile phone account verification, credit database matching, transactional records, and digital ID apps.
	Digital ID, it's coming.
	Google Trends data showed that searches for VPNs in the UK quadrupled following the law's implementation.
	Another way they're going to push digital ID, even if they don't legislate it, is they'll get more and more companies to move towards requiring ID forms online.
	And eventually people will get sick of having to scan in and upload a version of their physical ID.
	They'll make it inconvenient.
	They'll make it so much more convenient if you just have the digital version.
	You can just click a button here and it'll be done.
	You don't want to have to go take a picture of it and upload it and email it or send it this or that.
	They'll make it quicker.
	They'll make it more efficient to have the digital version.
	That's another way they go about doing this.
	And I'd just like to reiterate my point about the VPNs because look at the list of things that they can have for age checks.
	You've got mobile phone account verification, credit database matching, transactional records.
	These sound like, you know, a credit card, you know, which is the same thing as just getting a VPN.
	You have to have a credit card to get a VPN.
	So if you've got a VPN, you're already doing probably more to verify your age than these checks and balances, but they want their official system implemented because that can track what you look at and discourage you from looking at certain things.
	So as many of the top 10 free apps in the UK Apple Store are currently VPNs.
	Economist Maxwell Marlow said that he believed that the rise of the use of VPNs is indicative of how short-sighted, malicious, and authoritarian the Act is.
	Yes, immediately after it went into effect, they started blocking people from seeing immigration protests.
	Immediately.
	Things that it had no business Being applied to.
	Normally, it's funny.
	Normally, they'll pass these laws and they'll give you a little bit of time to forget about them before they start implementing the overreach.
	Not in this case.
	It was immediate, immediately blocking you from viewing these things.
	They weren't interested in slowly boiling the frog.
	No, this time they just threw.
	They didn't.
	It wasn't a slippery slope.
	It was a sheer cliff.
	They just stepped right off it.
	Disregarding concerned critics and specialists about how this legislation will only crush freedom of speech and association, not protect a single vulnerable person.
	Young and old know what VPNs are.
	No matter if the government tries to prevent their usage, they are ubiquitous and will easily sidestep the provisions in the law.
	The government should repeal this dreadful law, Marlowe said.
	Conservative peer at Lord Daniel Moylan told the Epoch Times that during the passage of the Online Safety Act, he challenged the government over the unintended effects of implementing blanket protections for children from harm.
	As Lance pointed out, it's the parent's job to protect the child from harm.
	The government can't do it.
	even if they were being sincere, even if it was their goal to protect children, they wouldn't be able to.
	It would simply...
	It would...
	Yeah.
	We've seen what happens with broken homes.
	We've seen what happens when there's not a father in the home over and over again.
	The government cannot replace a father or a mother.
	I'm not surprised that many people appear to be seeking to circumvent requirements to disclose personal details to often foreign websites with no proven track record of data security.
	Wasn't this predictable?
	And how many of those doing so are in fact children?
	Well, the intention to protect children is laudable.
	He doesn't believe that seeking to regulate the entire internet is a proportionate or effective answer to the particular problem.
	And of course, they're not really out to protect children.
	That might be their stated objective, but this is about surveillance.
	It's about making sure that there is no anonymity on the internet anymore.
	That you're not allowed to protect your identity.
	Anonymity is a very powerful thing.
	It can be used for good.
	It can be used for bad.
	And that's the price of freedom.
	VPNs are still legal in the UK, but they're soon going to try to fix that.
	They're tired of it.
	They don't like people circumventing and circling around their laws.
	Tony Garrett, so the British government wants to protect children, but won't arrest the people that violate those same children?
	Yeah, no.
	We want to protect them from seeing immigration protests.
	We don't want them to see the people who are coming into this country that'll probably be the ones that will abuse them.
	T-App leak worsens with second database exposing user chats.
	It just gets worse and worse.
	Now the things that these women were saying back and forth to each other is getting leaked.
	A women-only dating safety platform, the leak exposed users' chats, drivers' licenses, and selfies with the second database containing 1.1 million private messages.
	The TAP is a women-only dating safety platform where members can share reviews about men.
	Again, basically just gossip back and forth about men.
	This guy was rude.
	This guy was mean.
	This is, again, don't gossip back and forth.
	Don't engage in gossip.
	It's not healthy for you.
	It's not healthy for other people.
	Well, we, as I said, have an interview that my dad did yesterday recorded with Eric Peters.
	Eric was his last interview before the strokes, and it's his first interview back now.
	We will be playing that for you.
	I want to thank you all for tuning in.
	Appreciate you sticking it out here with us today in this sweltering heat.
	So it's, as I said, David Knight and Eric Peters.
	It was, it's a good interview.
	I won't spoil anything.
	So thank you all.
	God bless you.
	Here's that interview.
	Well, my first guest, as I come back, is so happy to be back.
	And my first guest is Eric Peters, somebody I really respect who really gets it.
	He's been on the side of liberty and freedom for a very long time.
	And he's been on my side as well.
	Really do appreciate his offers of help when I was in the hospital.
	It's great to have you on, Eric.
	Thank you for coming.
	It's a privilege and an honor.
	And I'm so happy to see you back in the saddle.
	Well, thank you.
	Thank you.
	And thank you for your offers even to give blood, as I said yesterday.
	Let's talk a little bit about what is happening right now.
	I was looking at your diaper report and I was thinking, you know, it's interesting.
	Here we are five years later.
	And you started the diaper report making fun of people who are wearing, you know, the diapers on their faces.
	And yet, as you point out, that is still going on.
	You know, what's happening?
	We've got Trump back.
	Oh, wait a minute.
	He was the one who was there when they did the diaper stuff, right?
	Right.
	Well, I think because it never really got cured, did it?
	That's right.
	The report focused on what's going on in Honduras.
	Apparently, the Honduran health minister has reinstated mandatory mask wearing in pretty much all public areas again.
	And I just thought to myself, oh my gosh, it's kind of early, but I need a drink.
	Here we go again.
	And then I thought, well, okay, maybe it's just Honduras.
	But you know, it really isn't.
	Every time I go somewhere, whether it's Lowe's or the supermarket or any place here in the United States, at least in my part of Virginia, it's 99.9% certain that I'm going to see at least one person still wearing a mask.
	And that's an indication of just how effective they were in pathologizing and PTSDing people.
	And I guess the underlying point that I wanted to make in that Article: Is that all that's happened is that this psychosis has sort of waned a little bit.
	It hasn't gone away, it certainly hasn't been cured, I don't think.
	And it hasn't been cured because it hasn't been forcefully repudiated.
	We haven't had any kind of official announcement by the authorities: hey, we erred.
	This was wrong and foolish, and we shouldn't have done this.
	They'll never admit to that, will they?
	They'll never admit to that.
	Of course.
	They'll make two mistakes rather than never admit to one.
	You know, when I was in the hospital, they had a sign-up saying, you need to wear a mask.
	I was like, what?
	And I looked at it.
	It's like, if you've been around anybody exposed to measles, you know, that's the new thing.
	Isn't it interesting how we had all this press hype about, oh, we got an epidemic in Texas and blah, blah, blah.
	They misattributed a death there to measles.
	And they're telling everybody, it's the most contagious disease ever.
	Well, it appears to have just died off, even according to their narrative.
	If you believe them, it just disappeared.
	We don't hear anything more about it.
	But they do have the signs up at a hospital in Tennessee because they had a couple measles cases in Texas.
	I mean, that is absolutely nothing.
	But, you know, we're still expected as a society to pretend that there's nothing abnormal about people walking around wearing these masks.
	And I'm not trying to be mean.
	I understand that the people who are wearing the masks genuinely probably believe that they are effective.
	And they're afraid.
	And they think that if I do this, I'm not going to catch a sickness.
	So I don't intend to disparage those people.
	The point is they do still believe.
	And the point is we are expected to go along with that belief.
	And it's an aberrant belief.
	If you had somebody in your family, remember the old Bugs Money cartoon where the crazy guy thinks he's Napoleon, and he dresses up like Napoleon, he wears the hat, and he demands to be called emperor.
	Now, if you had somebody in your family who started wearing Napoleonic outfits and demanding to be called the emperor, you could be kind.
	You don't want to hurt their feelings, and you could address them as the emperor, but you're not really helping them.
	You're not doing them any favors.
	All you're doing is enabling their mental illness.
	Well, you know, it has a lot of parallels to a lot of things that are going on in our society, right?
	Everybody's got their own truth, and we don't have any objective standard of truth.
	It's just like what this person thinks, and, you know, it's their felt experience and so forth.
	We see the same thing with pronouns and gender imagination, right?
	Yes.
	And so it feeds into all of that stuff.
	And so we're supposed to play along.
	That's part of the way I think that they have silenced us.
	Well, I can't criticize their mask fantasies any more than I can criticize somebody's gender fantasies.
	We've got to get away from the objective realities here.
	And I've said for the longest time, even if you go through their science of virology, you know, it's kind of like watching a bad sci-fi movie or a bad superhero movie.
	They create a universe, right?
	And you expect them then to abide by the rules of whatever that universe is or that particular character.
	And so if they start just, you know, they create this fictional world.
	And if they don't abide by it, then you have to call BS on that.
	And yet, you know, they create this fictional world, which, you know, as I've looked at this, I've talked to Dr. Sam Bailey and her husband, also a physician, both of them physicians in New Zealand.
	And they looked at research that's done by Christine Massey going around asking all these public health officials, have you isolated the virus?
	And she talked to over 200 of them.
	Nobody did it.
	As a matter of fact, some of them started saying, we never do that.
	It's like, wait a minute, if you don't do that, what are you doing from a scientific standpoint?
	And so what they pointed out was, is that whether or not viruses even exist is in question.
	But certainly what is not in question is that none of this is scientifically proven.
	If you look at the PCR test, none of it is consistent with their fictional world.
	Absolutely.
	And there's another aspect of this that I think bears discussing, which is that no one has been held accountable for the extraordinary psychological, social, and economic damage that was done over the course of that pandemic.
	And again, it's not about retribution.
	It's about justice.
	And it's about putting this behind us by holding to account the people who did this to us.
	It's imperative that that be done.
	And if that isn't done, then they can get away with acting like they were somehow kind of in the right.
	That it wasn't really wrong what they did.
	In any other case, if somebody had committed a serial murder, you wouldn't just stop talking about it.
	You wouldn't let the serial murder go on about his business.
	That person has to be brought to trial, has to be held accountable.
	That's right.
	Medical martial law, unconstitutionally imposed.
	And we let that go.
	We forget it.
	We just move on.
	Now everything is great because Trump's back again, the guy who did it.
	And what is he doing?
	He's making up one emergency after the other to rule by executive order.
	And so there's a real issue with that.
	Of course, the very first thing that he did when he came back was to set up Stargate with his crony capitalist billionaire friends to push mRNA combined with artificial intelligence.
	So now we're going to add AI into the mix of nonsense that is here.
	And, you know, there's nothing from RFK Jr. to stop this.
	They're not banning the RNA.
	They no longer recommend it for some groups of people.
	But they're not banning this thing.
	And every week, we see more studies coming out talking about death and disability of people who took that jab.
	And yet they're not banning this under any other circumstance.
	It ought to be banned.
	And of course, RFK Jr. is just letting this go.
	As a matter of fact, they also approved yet another mRNA in the meantime.
	And the Trump administration is really doubling down on DNA and mRNA research, just like they are with AI, as he did his first day in office.
	Yeah.
	I think that RFK is kind of the beard of the Trump administration.
	They bring him forward.
	I think he seems to be a genuine person, not perfect.
	I disagree with him on a number of things, but I think he's well-meant.
	And I think that's why they brought him aboard, because a lot of people do respect him and believe that he's legitimate on those issues.
	So it makes it more difficult to pin the tail on the appropriate donkey, which is Trump.
	Well, what he said, and of course, Tulsi Gabbard said as well, we're here to restore trust in the institutions.
	I'm here to destroy trust in the institutions.
	That's my life mission, is to destroy blind Trust in government and their unconstitutional institutions.
	But that's what they're trying to restore.
	And so that's why they use people like RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard, who have, as you point out, they have this certain public perception whether or not it's deserved.
	They have that perception.
	They're trading off of it to try to restore confidence.
	Well, that kind of blew up in their face with Mongino and Cash, didn't it?
	If you caught that interview, which I'm sure you did, where Mongino and Patel looked like somebody was holding a gun to their heads when they came up, you know, this whole thing, everything that has been happening over the course of the last four or five weeks makes me feel like I'm in a circus funhouse.
	All of the populist nationalist things that Trump ran on have just been cast by the wayside.
	I have some Red Hat friends, and I asked them, would you have voted for Trump if he had campaigned on imposing real ID, continuing the aid to Ukraine, and pushing an AI technocratic surveillance state, a la Palantir, and instituting some form of digital currency via the so-called Genius Act?
	And yet, if you look at what he did his first term, none of that stuff is a stretch.
	It was kind of predictable that he's going to go in that direction.
	He is basically, how do I put this politely?
	He is the servant, we'll say, of the deep state.
	And you can see this in everything that happened in the first term.
	He's throwing everything against the wall, isn't he, to try to distract from the Epstein thing.
	And, you know, some people even say, oh, now we need to go investigate Gina Haspel.
	It's like, why don't you ask Trump why he made her his head of the CIA after she was the one who produced the lies?
	And Trump said we were lied into the Iraq war.
	Well, she's the one who did it with illegal torture.
	And he put her in charge of the CIA.
	Of course, she was right at the epicenter of London and Langley, Axis, where they were doing this RussiaGate stuff.
	I'm so sick of RussiaGate.
	I got sick of it from the very beginning.
	Oh, yeah, of course.
	It's now Trump's look, a squirrel.
	Obama, it's now not lock her up.
	It's locked him up.
	They're going to do any such thing.
	That's right.
	But, you know, there is a silver line to this dark cloud of, I think.
	Now, I hope I'm not being Pollyanna-ish here, but my sense of it is that Trump's bizarre and corner-brat behavior over the last several weeks on the Epstein stuff has kind of given us our peek behind the curtain.
	You know, in The Wizard of Oz, when they finally pulled the curtain back?
	And we see that it's not the Democrats, the Republicans, it's them.
	They're all like, the whole, the thing is fundamentally unreformable.
	They're run by a mafia.
	I know, a disgusting cohort of people who are engaged in not just grift and graft, but some of the most sordid and reprehensible things you could possibly imagine.
	And I think that's part of what you're trying to do with Ghulane Maxwell in terms of, I think he wants to bring in Clinton and try to revive the partisanship, at least for his people there.
	You and I are going to look at this and say, yeah, they're all part of the same club.
	You know, Clinton was partying with Trump and vice versa.
	They're going to the same Jeffrey Epstein parties and, you know, she's at his wedding and so forth and so on.
	But, you know, we'll look at that and say, yeah, it's all just one big eyes wide shut party.
	But he will look at it and say, yeah, the Clintons, we need to lock them up.
	That movie, for people who are not aware of it, it was Stanley Kubrick's last movie.
	And I think that he deliberately wanted to give us a peek inside that world.
	Watch that movie if you haven't seen it, and you can kind of get a sense of what's going on here.
	And it helps to understand Trump's disingenuous assertion that, well, if they had anything on me in the last four years, they would have spilled the beast.
	No, they wouldn't have because it's like it's mutually assured destruction.
	They're all guilty and they know it.
	And so, you know, they know that if I say something about you, you're going to say something about me, and we both go down these lanes.
	So they shut up and don't say anything.
	And we'll get more to that, too.
	As a matter of fact, you've got an article about that and a little bit of a clip of Eyes Wide Shut to give people an idea of that.
	But before we do that, I wanted to talk a little bit about cars.
	You've got a funny article, Kick Me, about that.
	And talking about, I guess, one of your favorite cars because you've also got to review the VW ID Buzz.
	And I thought that was kind of an interesting name for a car in the age of surveillance, the VW ID.
	It's interesting.
	It could be the name of another, the next Samsung generation phone.
	It's like all of, they've succeeded in turning things that used to have emotional appeal into these cold, distant, remote, who cares?
	Why wouldn't they come up like the old micro bus?
	That was a cool name, micro bus, you know, or an affectionately known as the hippie van.
	It was just kind of, it was cute and it was fun.
	And that thing is the antithesis of everything that the old micro bus was.
	And that kind of might fit that kind of a name if you called it a micro bus because it is a device now.
	That would kind of fit.
	To get back to what you were talking about, I was so frustrated with the IV bus, I was only able, when they sent it to me, I was only able to drive it twice because they didn't include a charge cord, if you can believe that.
	Really?
	It's extra cost.
	So this is a vehicle that starts at $60,000.
	And if you want to have the home charge cord, you have to pay almost $700 extra for it.
	So it wasn't included in the press car loan that they sent me, which is even more crazy because I'm a journalist.
	So it's like battery is not included, except they put the batteries in, but no way to charge the batteries.
	So that essentially forced me because what am I going to do?
	I can't charge it at home now, which is like the main thing.
	They try to sell you the EV with, well, you have the convenience of being able to charge it at home, but now I don't even, I'm not even able to do that.
	So you're forced then to rely on this sketchy network of so-called fast chargers.
	Well, I drove into town and I went to the first place in my area where there are fast chargers and it's completely offline.
	They're like doing some construction to it.
	So that didn't, you know, that didn't work.
	And so now I'm sweating and nervously eyeing how much range have I got left?
	And I think, okay, I can probably make it to the other one that's on the other side of town.
	So I drive to that one and that one's working, but it won't accept my credit card or any of them.
	I tried six different credit cards.
	I had to download the app.
	In other words, they want access to my phone and access to my bank account, basically, My debit accounts in order to charge me for this service.
	And I'm not willing to do that.
	I'm not willing to let this creepy third-party entity that I don't know these people.
	I don't want them having access to my phone.
	So, long story short, I wasn't able to charge it.
	So, I limped it home at low speed and it became a 6,000-pound, not a joke, curb weight, 6,000 pounds for the next five days until they came to pick the thing up.
	I left just enough charge in it so the poor guy, you know, the delivery guy, can pick it up and get it.
	He can deal with it.
	Then it's not my problem anymore.
	With all these electric vehicles weighing so much money, weighing so much in terms of weight, it's going to tear up the roads.
	And, of course, they're not going to replace them either.
	So it does a couple of things for the elites.
	They don't want us to own private cars, and they don't want to maintain the roads, obviously.
	So now they've got these heavy EVs to destroy the roads for them at the same time.
	Now, you had that same problem when you were test-driving the Mercedes, and you had an article about how they pulled your credentials with your press credentials with Mercedes after you gave them an honest review of what it was like to have range, panic, and all the rest of the stuff, not be able to get where you wanted to go with Mercedes in a very cold streak back in December of 2023, I think it was.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	It was very interesting because I've been doing what I've been doing for a very long time.
	And I had been getting regular press car deliveries from Mercedes for more than 25 years.
	And they never had a problem before with anything that I've written or anything at all like that.
	And I wasn't gratuitous.
	I didn't insert my personal dislike of EVs, which I'm quite open about.
	I find them to be just lacking anything that makes a vehicle appealing.
	But that's just my personal preference.
	And I don't bring that into the car reviews.
	What I did bring into the car review was that I attempted to use their EQS, which was a $112,000 electric luxury sedan, to visit my mom, who lives 50 miles away in Bedford, Virginia.
	50 miles.
	Now, it happened that it was in December of 23, and it was very cold, if you remember that month.
	That's it.
	It was a bad cold snap.
	So by the time I got down to Roanoke, which is the closest city to where I live, I looked at the range, and boy, the range wasn't so hot anymore.
	And I thought, you know, it might be smart.
	Dawn and I were looking at the temperature and it's about, you know, 13 degrees outside.
	And I'm thinking, I don't want to be caught on the side of a road with it being 13 degrees outside this thing.
	So maybe we should just stop and put some charge in the thing.
	So again, same problem.
	The first place wouldn't work at all.
	The second place, Dawn put the app on her phone and we were able to hook up the charger.
	But after sitting there for 40 minutes, we barely got enough charge to make it home.
	And we put the quash on it by that time.
	I thought, I'm just not going to risk driving this thing a significant distance away from home and being stuck on the side of the road with it.
	It's difficult to charge them when the weather gets really cold like that.
	Yeah, it's much harder because the battery in the car is trying to keep the battery warm because it's that cold outside.
	And that uses anybody who has a heat pump or tries to use like one of those hot wire portable electric heaters knows they burn a lot of energy to try to keep you warm.
	So I just wrote about that.
	And I wrote specifically, your clientele, the people you're trying to sell this car to, this is a $112,000 car.
	These are affluent people.
	Affluent people pay to not have hassles.
	Affluent people pay to be able to do the things that we can't do.
	And I thought, my God, I could get in my 24-year-old truck and easily drive to Bedford with the heat blasting.
	Now, I'm not worried about it because it's not going to leave me by the side of the road dead.
	And that's ridiculous.
	Even a virtuous signaling leftist who has $115,000 to spend isn't going to put up with that.
	I thought that that was a very fair and objective thing to say.
	And now you've been vindicated.
	Yes.
	Hell yeah.
	That's a good thing.
	That's the truth.
	The elite people don't want the hassles of buying that thing and they're not buying it.
	So Mercedes-PR gave me this stuff about how I'm now out of their delivery area, which is nonsense.
	I know that that's nonsense.
	I mean, I happen to have people who do what I do that I know who are still getting the cars, you know, who are as far away or farther than I am.
	So that's just not true.
	Well, anyway, fast forward to now, and they've had to announce a, they call it a pause, a pause in the continued manufacture of the EQS and the EQE because they can't sell them in this country.
	It's been a catastrophe for them.
	They've had to cut bait and cut prices massively.
	They're marked down to try to desperately get rid of these things because we're getting to, we're in the middle of 2025.
	We're at the 2026 model year now.
	So the 2025s are already becoming kind of like old fish that you want to get rid of.
	And people aren't buying them.
	And part of the reason they're not buying them is also, this is another aspect of this issue.
	The depreciation rates on these things is absolutely catastrophic.
	You can find a year-old EQS that sold for $100,000 more or more, what it was new, for $35,000.
	Now, rich people tend to be a lot of things, but they tend not to be stupid people.
	And nobody wants to take a $70,000 bath on depreciation in the course of a year or two.
	It's just, it's ridiculous.
	Wow, that is amazing.
	Yeah.
	You know, I look at this VW ID buzz.
	Like I said, it's interesting to call one of these devices an ID because they are going to be IDing you everywhere you go.
	But I guess the other alternative, you call it a bug or something.
	I mean, that would also kind of harken into the Internet of Things and tracking you everywhere you go.
	You know, originally it was the Beetle, or wasn't it the Type 1 technically?
	Type 1 was the designation.
	And then affectionately it became known as the Beetle, which I think is from the German, which I think is Kafer, I think K-I-F-I-R, which was what Hitler came up with because he actually sketched the shape of it.
	You know, there are sketches of Hitler's original concept of the Beetle that he worked on with Ferdinand Porsche to create the car.
	Now, all that aside, the original Beetle was a great car.
	It literally was the car for the people.
	It was very basic.
	It was very simple.
	It was very light.
	It was efficient.
	And it was something that anybody could learn to fix.
	You could do your own maintenance on the thing and save a lot of money that way.
	You know, something that has been totally tossed out and kicked to the curb now.
	This idea that you own this extremely expensive gadget.
	And when the gadget glitches, what do you do?
	Well, you either take it or have it flatbed towed to a dealer where you pay an exorbitant sum of money to have some specialist try To fix it for you.
	Yeah.
	And I remember, even though it was a very inexpensive car, it had a reputation for reliability.
	I remember a Woody Allen movie.
	I don't even remember which movie it was, but he goes to sleep or something like that, maybe a sleeper or something.
	And he wakes up hundreds of years in the future, and he sees, he's on the run or something, and he sees a Volkswagen in a cave.
	And he thinks, wait a minute, no, it couldn't possibly.
	But he opens the door and he gives it a push and it starts.
	And it's like, oh, how about that?
	So it had this reputation for being reliable.
	I remember we had a VW dealer close to where we lived, and it was called Birdsong Motors, kind of as a reference to the noise that it made.
	It kind of sounded like the Jetson car as it was running.
	It had this little tweeting sound that it made with the air-cooled engine in the back.
	They were funny cars.
	One of the great things was they were also kind of the first step on that ladder.
	I can speak from personal experience.
	For me, also, I had a Volkswagen when I was young.
	It was a great car for a teenager because, again, it was like a step up from a Briggs and Stratton push mower, literally.
	I mean, an air-cooled engine with a little one-barrel carburetor on it and a fan.
	And then you pop the back of the hood.
	There it was.
	It was so simple.
	It wasn't intimidating.
	So if you're a 15 or 16-year-old kid, you can look at that and go, I think I could maybe figure out how to take those spark plugs out.
	I can learn how to change the world.
	I mean, there was just a bolt on the bottom of the engine.
	I mean, you didn't even have to jack the car up.
	You could just undo the bolt and wow, look, I just changed the world.
	And it sounds trivial, but when you're 15, 16 years old, it's kind of intimidating.
	You know, you're like, oh, do I want to touch that?
	Do I want to mess with that?
	I don't want to break that.
	Well, the cars are intimidating today, aren't they, to work on?
	Yeah.
	I had an interesting kind of lesson.
	Now here I am, a middle-aged guy, and I'm afraid of computers.
	So, you know, this is how I can sort of understand what's happened.
	I had a problem with my laptop.
	The battery basically wouldn't accept the charge anymore.
	And I thought, gosh, do I dare, do I dare to try to open this thing up and maybe see about replacing the battery myself?
	And I gathered up my courage and I did it.
	I bought a battery online for $35.
	And, you know, I very timorously, I removed the screws and I took the cover off.
	And it wasn't so bad.
	And I felt so good.
	It made me feel like I did when I was a kid.
	Wow, I learned how to do something today.
	I did it.
	And it's so empowering as opposed to if I had gone to the computer store, which I've done in the past, when I've had a battery issue, and $300 later, there's your thing.
	And you have no idea what they did.
	Works great, but now you're out $300 and you feel kind of emasculated because you had to go to get somebody else to fix it for you.
	And I think we've lost that.
	It used to be so common for dads and their sons to work on the car in the driveway on Saturdays or Sundays.
	And I'm not talking about major gearhead overhauls of the entire engine.
	I'm just talking about doing basic things like a tune-up, doing brake work, stuff like that.
	And it was a good experience for the father and the son or the daughter, frankly.
	And it helped to empower that young person.
	That young person felt competent.
	And that's extremely important, I think, growing up, you know, to feel like, hey, I can do things.
	My hands are capable.
	My brain is capable.
	I can understand this.
	I know how to do this.
	And now they can change the blinker fluid, right?
	Yeah, now they're inculcating helplessness.
	There's this commercial that makes me want, it makes me feel like, remember the story about how Elvis would shoot the TV when Robert Boulet came on?
	I saw this commercial.
	I think it was for Evolvo.
	It might have been a super group.
	And it's a couple of teenagers and they're out in the car and they have a flat tire.
	And what do they do?
	They call mom who calls AAA or some roadside assistance thing.
	Everybody's all thankful and grateful.
	My God, it's embarrassing.
	Can you imagine being 16 years old as a boy and you didn't know how to change a tire?
	Your friends would have lapped you into the next county.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, now you don't have to write.
	You can just use AI to do your website there for you, right?
	That is the ultimate emasculation and lobotomization, actually, I think it's happening.
	But tell us a little bit about this kick-me article.
	I thought it was a funny idea.
	You talk about Jeremy Clarkson.
	Yeah, I've never met Jeremy.
	I'd love to.
	I have always enjoyed Top Gear and his shenanigans.
	You know, I think he's got the right kind of tally-hoe pirate spirit.
	You know, he's a guy who just, he has a knack for telling the truth in an interesting way, you know, a funny way sometimes.
	Anyway, we were watching his most recent thing is a, it's called Clarkson's Farm.
	And it just reminded me, you know, I should do things like Jeremy does.
	Now, I don't have the backing that he has.
	I don't have the resources that he has, but I thought it would be just hilarious if I could figure out a way to acquire, to buy one of those ID Buzz electric vans.
	And so it's mine now.
	And I can do what I want with it, like Jeremy does on top here.
	And I could put a kidney sign on it and take it to a shopping mall somewhere and people could just kick it.
	You know, we could film it.
	I think it would provide a great kind of cathartic moment.
	I think so many people are so frustrated and angered by everything that's being foisted on us and pushed on us, and particularly these electric cars.
	You think it could stand the kind of abuse that the Toyota highlights got from top gear guys?
	No, actually, I think they would act without even using implements, without necessarily getting involved with crowbars and hammers and things, I think you completely total an ID buzz within about probably half an hour.
	Yeah, amazing.
	Was there anything that you liked about it that you thought was clever that they laid out with it?
	I liked, well, yeah, I liked that it looks immediately distinctive from everything else on the road, kind of like cars do too.
	One of the attractions of the old Volkswagens was, you didn't even have to see it.
	You heard it.
	You know, you knew it.
	Here comes a Beetle or here comes a bus because it had that distinctive sound.
	So I like the way that they styled it.
	I think it is the idea is great.
	It's a perennial favorite.
	The idea of the old micro bus was brilliant.
	What a fantastic, practical vehicle.
	Now, if only they could have taken that vehicle that they created and instead of using a battery-powered drivetrain, imagine if they had put one of their TDI diesels in that thing.
	Yeah.
	Then you'd have a micro bus that would be able to go probably 600 miles on fill-up.
	And also would only probably cost about $35,000 to $40,000 as opposed to $60,000.
	That would be great.
	They'd sell a lot of those.
	You'd actually make money.
	Imagine that.
	You try to kind of sell virtue, they'd make money.
	Well, the only thing better than putting one of those things, a shopping mall and putting a kick-me sign on it would be to do that to Klaus Schwab, who actually he had a big kick-me sign on put on him there at the World Economic Forum, I think, or as I like to refer to them.
	You know, you can take like some gigantic piñata and let people take a turn at giving him a whack.
	Yeah, eat some bugs.
	But isn't it sad?
	You know, it really breaks my heart to think that Volkswagen as a company caved into that nonsense about the cheating on the federal emissions certification test.
	Because its diesel engines that they used to sell were brilliant.
	I had the opportunity to drive every vehicle that they make equipped with the diesel engine, and every single one of them outperformed the advertised mileage.
	They were phenomenal.
	Some of them would go 700 miles on a full tank of fuel.
	I remember driving to North Carolina and back and still having a substantial amount of fuel in the tank of the thing.
	And you could pick one up.
	This is as recently as I think 2015, you could pick up a TDI-powered jetta for about $22,000.
	So naturally, that's why they had to go.
	Can you imagine the juxtaposition?
	On the one hand, you've got a $22,000 Jetta that gets 50-plus miles per gallon, that goes 700 miles on a tank full of fuel, and it will probably last you for 25 years because it's such a durable car.
	And on the other, you've got a $50,000 electric car that goes maybe 240 miles that forces you to plan your life around these constant charge, discharge cycles, and that in all likelihood is going to require a new $15,000 battery by the time it's about 10 years old.
	Yeah, because it clicks all the boxes of what the elites want for us, which is nothing, you know, to own nothing and to go nowhere.
	And that's the thing that concerns us about all this stuff.
	You know, when you mentioned the Epstein thing and the other things, you say, well, everybody's looking at Epstein, they're missing the stuff about Palantir and the Genius Act and all the rest of the stuff.
	And those things are not unrelated.
	No, they're not.
	Now, I'll preface my remarks by saying that obviously the allegations and the facts that we're aware of with regard to Epstein are just repellent beyond description.
	And I think that that stuff definitely should be exposed.
	I don't think we probably ever will get to the bottom of it, at least not with any of their help.
	They don't want this stuff out.
	But at the same time, it has served to distract attention away from things that are extraordinarily important for people to be aware of.
	Palantir is one.
	And, you know, by the way, I didn't know what Palantir was.
	I wonder, what does that mean?
	What does that word mean?
	I'm not a big Lord of the Rings guy.
	I never read Tolkien's books on it.
	But it turns out that in the universe of Lord of the Rings, the Palantir is a sorcerer's stone.
	And the sorcerer uses it to see what people are doing.
	And that's what Palantir is about.
	I did reports on it about a decade ago, and I said, at the time, I said, no, the Palantir would allow the sorcerer to actually see into you, right?
	Which is really what Palantir data mining is allowing them to do as well.
	They're able to look at externals like metadata and other stuff like that and to anticipate what you're going to do, to make connections between you and other people and ideologies and religion and politics and all these other things that they want to track and control.
	It is really insidious.
	What is there?
	And of course, they're not the only one.
	You've got Endril, which is a sword, right, from Lord of the Rings that belonged to the king.
	And there's a company called Endril that is working with Trump, and they want to use that for creating a no man's land at the border, basically having real high-tech surveillance and law enforcement that is automated.
	And they're working with them hand in glove.
	And he's another one of these guys from the PayPal Mafia, Palmer Lucky, I think is his name.
	I get confused.
	I always talk about Howard Lutnik.
	I call him Lucky Lutnik because he didn't show up on 9-11.
	He knew not to go.
	And so he got real lucky, but not so much his employees, even his brother who was there.
	The other thing that's related to this that's important, it's not just Palantir.
	There are two arms of the Pincer.
	And the other one is this Genius Act, which essentially is the propagation of some form of digital currency, non-real money, digital money.
	Now, what they're going to end up doing, in my view, is on the one hand, they're going to use the Palantir to draw these profiles of you and to be aware of everything that you do.
	And then if you do things they don't like or don't want you to do, they'll be able to use this digitized money to limit your ability to buy things.
	Oh, you want to buy some hamburger.
	Well, you've exceeded your carbon footprint this month.
	So your coin, and it's interesting that they use, the psychology of it is fascinating.
	They talk about coin, but there's no physical anything.
	It's a coin in name only.
	Your wallet is your phone.
	It's not your wallet.
	You don't have physical money anymore.
	So they control the money, which means they control you.
	Well, they call them crypto coins, and you think, oh, it's got crypto.
	It's got encryption in it.
	And so they can't tell what, no, it's completely visible what's going on.
	The encryption is there for the processing, not to protect your privacy.
	And it's a blockchain, a public ledger that's available and visible to anyone and everyone, especially the government that's there.
	Yeah, it's an absolute nightmare.
	At least during the pandemic, when they attempted to throttle people's ability to engage in commerce, to buy and to sell, if you had cash.
	And for example, I was friends with a local guy who operates a convenience store, a gas station convenience store.
	Because we're friends, he knows me, I know him.
	He didn't hassle me about the masks or anything.
	And I could go in there and I could buy things with cash and nobody knew except for him and I. Now, in this regime that they want to create, not only will they know whether I'm wanting to buy something, they'll know how I'm trying to pay for it.
	And if the two things aren't aligned, and if their algorithm says, oh, no, Eric's been a bad boy, he shouldn't be allowed to buy anything.
	What are you going to do?
	Now you can't transact business.
	That's what they want.
	They want absolute total control.
	And they exert this control using the data mining and using our ability to transact commerce.
	Well, and you know, that's coming at us in a lot of different ways.
	I look at the stablecoin, and they want to tie it to the dollar, which is a joke because the dollar is not stable.
	So it's not a coin, and it's going to be tied to fiat currency, which is not stable.
	And the crypto is not there to protect your privacy and letting them know anything about it.
	All of it is a lie, but they're looking at the stablecoin as a way to protect the dollar and to transition into the next monetary system.
	We've had Bretton 1, Bretton Woods 1 and 2, and so now they've got to transition to something else because they can only run these scams for a few decades until everybody catches on and people have caught on to this thing.
	So they've got to come up with something new and fresh, a new con.
	And that's a big part of that.
	But I experienced this personally back in May of 2021.
	My program here independently was only five months old when PayPal banned me.
	And I still can't use PayPal.
	So they banned me and Venmo, which is owned by them, banned me at the same time.
	I spent hours with him on the phone.
	And the guy was very helpful.
	But he finally came back and he said, I can only find one thing.
	It says delete this account immediately.
	There was no violation, no alleged violation of anything, and no reason given for taking me off, as a matter of fact.
	But that's what they want to do.
	They want to use it to control content.
	And we've got something very similar we talked about here on the show last couple of days.
	It's some Australian group of feminists called Collective Shout.
	You should look this up, Eric.
	I think a better name for them would be the Collective Karens.
	I'm going to make a note.
	I'll look it up after we talk.
	Collective Shout.
	And so they're out there trying to use the banking bans or like Operation Chokepoint.
	They're trying to use that against anybody that they don't like.
	And they have focused on some video games that they say are not safe for work.
	Some of them are, but some of them are not.
	But what they're doing is they're setting a very dangerous precedent.
	But this is something that the governments are very eager to do for them.
	And so are the corporations.
	Fine, fine.
	We'll just shut everything down.
	So that's what's coming.
	Banning anything that anybody doesn't like and doing it right away and just completely shutting you off, whether it's for your carbon footprint or because your politics or your religion or because you oppose the pandemic or the vaccine, it's just going to take you off for that stuff.
	Ultimately, they want uniformity because they want predictability.
	Yes.
	You know, they don't want anything unexpected to crop up.
	They want to have the ability to know ahead of time what the reaction is going to be, how people are going to move forward, and all of this stuff.
	And it's the most anti-human thing I can imagine.
	Yes, it is.
	It is the end of creativity.
	It is the end of personal judgment, initiative.
	It is literally the NPC world where we're just the gray man.
	All of us are just the same sort of representation human stick figures, marching bleakly in line.
	And it's just incredibly depressing to me.
	Yeah, geospatial intel, I've been looking at this for a long time, and they've had a thing that they called AI before.
	We talked about artificial intelligence.
	They talked about anticipatory intelligence, which was to predict what you're going to do before you did it.
	And of course, Zabig Nubrzinski was talking about that back in the 1970s when he wrote between two ages.
	And he said, in the technocratic age, we're going to know what you're going to do before you know what you're going to do.
	And that really is their goal, to know, to surveil, and to control everything that we do, to live in a pan-optagon state.
	Now, people got the message about CBDCs.
	So now Trump is here to gain their trust and to put in a different form of CBDC.
	That's the stablecoin.
	I even call it CBDC in terms of crony billionaire digital cash as opposed to central bank digital cash, right?
	It's just another CBDC.
	All he has to do is give it one of his narcissistic appellations about how big and beautiful it is.
	And apparently people will fall in line for that.
	I have gotten to the point, I hope I'm not falling down a rabbit hole of madness, but I begin to believe that this whole thing is just a gigantic form of political wrestling.
	That they put Biden in there deliberately to create chaos and demoralization, to flood the country with random foreign people and to just rub it in Americans' faces that if they make an illegal U-turn, they're going to get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
	But people can just scamper across the border and do whatever they want.
	They can drive without insurance that you and I will get nailed to the wall for if we do.
	Anyway, they let that go on for a number of years, along with the whole Tranny thing and all the other things that happened.
	And in comes Trump on his white steed.
	Trump is the populist nationalist savior.
	He's going to correct everything.
	And sure, I mean, it was attractive.
	You know, people were desperate to hear that maybe we can fix this.
	Maybe, you know, we can do something about it.
	So, yeah, okay, I'm going to vote for the orange man.
	Vote for Trump.
	Yay, America, right?
	You know, and then he gets in here and crashes everything.
	And what ends up happening when he crashes everything, he will have completely demoralized and discredited the populist nationalist movement such that anybody who even tries to say, well, maybe free enterprise and, you know, all of that are a good idea.
	It's going to be like Herbert Hoover before the Great Depression.
	And then, you know, they got Franklin Roosevelt.
	We'll probably end up with Pete Budig for AOC.
	Yeah.
	And, you know, where has Trump spent so much time?
	In professional wrestling.
	I mean, he's even got Lyndon McMahon running the Department of Education.
	It really is crazy, but he knows how that works.
	And that's one of the key ways that he controls a narrative is by making these heroes and heels stuff.
	You know, it's all the stuff about Canada, the 51st state.
	That's as phony as Hulk Hogan on the ring.
	All of that was just to create these different issues out of nothing.
	We also had something else that was also kind of interesting, also involving a bunch of women, and that was the TAT app.
	I don't know if you saw that or not, but it was actually the number one free app on download on Apple before the stuff all blew up.
	And what happened was this is another one of these deals where we've got to have your ID Before you can get onto the internet.
	And we've got to be very careful because Republicans are pushing that extremely hard.
	You know, well, we don't want kids to be harmed by anything, so we're going to have to require ID in order to use the internet, you know, to use these porn sites or whatever it is.
	Never mind the fact that they're going to be able to easily get around these restrictions.
	They're always coming up with reasons that we've got to have an ID.
	We've got to have ID because otherwise we'll have illegal aliens who are going to be taking your jobs.
	So we've got to have mandatory E-Verify and an ID for that.
	Or we've got to have ID.
	And I agree we should have ID for voting.
	That's the one thing I would agree with because it is voluntary.
	And if you don't want to vote and get involved in the professional wrestling match, then I don't have to give them my ID.
	But for all the rest of these things, they're always looking for an excuse to push ID on us.
	Well, this app, the T-App, was a place where women could go in and gossip about men that they had dated.
	And it became extremely popular.
	But they required that you give them a picture ID to show that you're a woman and so forth.
	And they just put all of this personal information, give us a shot of your driver's license and all the rest of the stuff.
	They put it on a page, a URL that was completely no password, no encryption, nothing.
	If you had that URL, you could see it all.
	And guess what?
	Somebody got it and showed it to everybody.
	And one of the things that we could see that was really funny was a guy just wearing a wig.
	That was his ID.
	And they let him in because he, I guess, identified as a woman.
	But one of the worst case examples of how all this stuff that is supposed to protect us and keep us safe and secure actually endangers us and our identity.
	So all this kind of stuff.
	That ID thing has stuck in my crawl for a very long time.
	I understand that just as a moral matter, not a legal matter.
	If I were a storekeeper, I probably would not be comfortable selling beer or booze to a 14 or 15 year old kid.
	I consider that to be not appropriate.
	That's something that I wouldn't personally do.
	But there's something efronterous about demanding that a guy our age, for example.
	I mean, anybody's, I mean, there's no possible way that we could be underage, that we could be anywhere near 18, 19, 20 years old.
	It's ridiculous.
	Once upon a time, this is a few years back.
	I was attending a press event in Southern California, and I was at LAX Airport, you know, waiting in the terminal for my flight to board.
	And I went up to the, there was a bar there.
	I just wanted a cup of coffee because it was too early to have a drink.
	And I just sat there having a cup of coffee.
	And this guy who clearly was in his 70s, you know, had a white beard, older guy, he sits down and asks for a drink.
	And the guy who was manning the bar, who looked like he was maybe 24 or 25, you know, demanded ID of this guy.
	And the guy, to his credit, said, you know, I was in Vietnam when, you know, you were still in your diapers.
	And then he expleted, deleted, and just walked away.
	And again, I think it's this constant pecking at us, treating us like stupid children, you know, the contempt that the system shows for us.
	And also, if you flip it around too, these poor people at the cashier, for example, at a store, they probably know perfectly well that you're old enough to buy a bottle of wine with your groceries.
	But because of store policy, they have to participate in this degrading kabuki, you know, of asking you to present your ID.
	We can't even buy cough syrup anymore without begging and pleading.
	Here's my ID.
	Look, I'm old enough.
	I'm not a meth head.
	I'm not a drug addict.
	I just freaking want some cough syrup.
	But now you have to be treated as if you were a meth head, drug addict, whatever, just to buy a box of cough syrup.
	That's right.
	Well, Lance tells me, he says, the UK's Online Safety Act considers all criticism of illegal immigration to be 18 plus content and requires that you register your face and a government ID in order to be able to see any content related to it.
	So if you're going to criticize their policy of taking society down, then they want to completely ID you and get you into their files.
	It's pretty amazing.
	But that's where this stuff is all headed.
	And as you point out, this is the government corporate thing that replaced the somewhat limited government that briefly existed until about April of 1865.
	You have a statement about Lincoln.
	You said, Lincoln was no more free than the country that he enslaved, by the way, owned by the railroads and by a kind of precursor to Palantir, the Pinkerton thing.
	It's all very depressing, but no less true for being depressing.
	You know, I remember years ago, I read an alternative history by Harry Turtledove.
	It was called So Few Remain.
	And in it, he changes history slightly so that there's an early end to the war and the South is able to go its separate way.
	And as a result of that, in his novel, Abraham Lincoln is despised by everyone and ostracized.
	But he makes a comeback a few decades later when this book picks up.
	And he comes back, guess what, as the Socialist Party candidate, which I thought was really accurate.
	I think that's exactly where he would have been.
	So he's a socialist to boot, as well as a crony capitalist and in control of the corporations.
	And that's what we're seeing today, isn't it?
	Yeah, you know, Tom DeLorenzo, who's written a number of books about this subject, points out that Lincoln was, until after the war, after his assassination, when what he calls the Lincoln cult was erected, Lincoln was widely loathed in the North as well as the South.
	There were massive riots in New York City over the dragooning of people to be pushed into this war in what was then another country.
	Understandably, these fresh off-the-boat Irish immigrants were like, why in the world?
	I don't want to be dragged all down south of the Mason-Dixon line to get killed.
	I haven't got a dog in this fight.
	And the whole, Americans are so propagandized about that.
	I mean, ultimately, the South just wanted to do exactly what the American colonies wanted to do.
	They wanted to leave.
	They wanted to no longer be under the control of the central authority.
	You know, like the most foundational fundamental principle that Jefferson was writing about and that Tom Paine wrote About that's right, you know, self-determination.
	We want government, and then Lincoln had the insolence to talk about government of the people, by the people, except the people of the South.
	Yeah, he's going to impose it upon them.
	Yeah, well, they were able to, with massive propaganda and educational system, completely change history with all that stuff, weren't they?
	They were.
	And that's the way it always works.
	Yeah, part of recovering our senses is recovering our history and getting at the truth of things.
	And the so-called Civil War, which was nothing of the kind, it was an attempt by the South to secede, a very different thing.
	Not a civil war.
	The South did not want to take over the North.
	That's right.
	Did not want to control the whole country.
	They just wanted to depart.
	Leave us alone.
	We're out of here.
	Yeah, the American colonies didn't want to take over England.
	They just wanted their independence.
	And that's what the southern states were doing as well.
	So if that's illegitimate, there was no legitimacy for the American government to start with.
	But I think it's a perfectly legitimate thing to do.
	Yep, exactly right.
	And so I think, you know, what we do, you and I and other people do, if we can just get people to see even one example of the sort of manipulation of history and of truth and facts, it's like you can't unsee it.
	You know, that's the one blessing of the whole COVID thing.
	I think a lot of people have been disabused of the falsehood, that the experts, the authorities, that they're well-meaning, that they have our best interests at heart, and they can be trusted.
	We know now they are not to be trusted.
	That's right.
	Yeah, for years we talked about the harm from mercury and vaccines.
	And they say, oh, we took that out in 2002, 2003.
	No, they didn't.
	It's still in the flu shots.
	And they just revealed that and just said, well, we're going to stop doing it in the flu shots.
	I don't know if I believe that or not.
	We look at it.
	But they're keeping their fingers crossed.
	It's like, well, what we meant was the childhood vaccines.
	We meant the MMR and other things like that.
	But they manipulate the information.
	And as we see all this stuff coming together and the technocrat billionaires that have completely owned Trump, I don't know if you saw this or not, but Peter Thiel and Alex Carpoo runs Palantir.
	They have been tied together with their venture capital firms.
	And now they want to come out and start making movies.
	And they were talking about that, the kind of movies that they want to make.
	And of course, they're all going to be very jingoistic, militaristic, high-tech, you know, and they'll throw in your subservience in the name of patriotism as well.
	But that's the next big thing coming.
	Sorry?
	They're unwatchable.
	Hollywood is collapsing.
	Yeah, yeah.
	There are occasionally exceptions, but for the most part, the drec that they are putting out is so awful as entertainment.
	Leaving aside politics, it's poorly written.
	It's poorly acted.
	It's full of clumsy cliched propaganda, political correctness.
	People are tired of it.
	They don't want to watch it anymore.
	They grab you by the lapel and yell at you about LGBT and DEI and all the rest of stuff.
	So there is perfect, there is a big opportunity for somebody who comes in.
	As I said, they want to do things like Top Gun, Hunt for Red October and stuff like that.
	But of course, they'll put their technocracy spin on it as well.
	Anybody could come in and start doing movies that are better in terms of acting, characterization, plot, you name it, and not hector people over this left-wing nonsense and be successful.
	The key is, are they going to come in and remake things to come?
	You know, H.G. Wells' book, Shape of Things to Come, if you remember that movie from the 1930s, that basically shows the kind of fascistic technocracy that they wish to put in.
	And Elon Musk's grandfather completely bought into that.
	And that's one of the reasons they wound up in South Africa.
	He tried to instate that instead of the form of government that they had in Canada.
	But that's really where these guys are going.
	And I think they're going to be pretty successful at that.
	And that should worry us because that's a different kind of threat that's going to be coming in.
	It's going to take people a while to wake up.
	I'm bullish and positive, actually, about this topic.
	And I'll tell you why.
	Look at how Joe Rogan, and he's just one example.
	You and I are another example.
	Look at how people like us have managed to sort of get around the mainstream media as it's folded.
	Rogan's got a much bigger audience than CNN.
	People have had it enough.
	This whole thing has just reached its critical mass.
	And I think with regard to movies, independent studios that come up with quality stuff that people like, there's now a vehicle for getting that out there.
	Maybe we don't have the media.
	I agree.
	It's just going to be a different subtext for a different way to come at us.
	They're going to be coming at us from another angle.
	I mean, take a look at the collapse of the late-night talk shows that long ago stopped being funny and just hectored people with lectures.
	It's like, who in the world was watching that stuff anyway?
	Well, it turns out they weren't.
	They were losing $40 million a year on Cobear's show.
	But, you know, so there is a big opportunity for somebody who wants to come in and do it differently.
	But then you've got to be careful what are they trying to sell you, even if they do it subtly.
	Because, you know, Hollywood for the longest time has been selling very subtle, very subtle philosophy and a worldview and the rest of this stuff.
	And if you just accept that without looking at it critically, that is what has had a big role in changing our society.
	It goes back to the Franklin School.
	I mean, they've been working on these types of things, very calculating the way they do it.
	The problem with them was that they became a little bit too confident and they jumped the shark.
	You know, they did it right in your face.
	They don't really care anymore.
	If it was more subtle, it would be more effective.
	And I think that's probably what's going to happen.
	I think that trust is probably the most valuable currency that there is.
	And once you lose it, it's almost irrecoverable.
	And so now I think people are much more tuned into that.
	They want to feel as though that they can trust whoever it is that they're listening to, that they're viewing.
	And if they get a whiff of shadiness, a lot of people get immediately turned off by that.
	And good.
	There should be consequences for shadiness and for being a propagandist.
	And that's healthy.
	You know, people talk about a high-trust society.
	And a high-trust society is a good thing.
	But at the same time, you can't be naive.
	You can't just assume that everybody's benevolent and there's nothing harmful to this.
	I know it's a little more work to have to investigate and check things out and make a determination, but ultimately that's how we get back to some kind of an adult, healthy society instead of this fearful, infantilized society that we built up around us.
	That's right.
	Well, Patrick Henry said in his day, he said, trust no man, but bind them down with the chains of the Constitution.
	If they're not going to abide by the Constitution, they certainly don't deserve your trust.
	But you don't put blind trust in anybody.
	And it's just part of critical thinking.
	That's a key part of it.
	And so I think that's one of the things that we need to be very, very wary of.
	And one of the things that's always concerned me about Trump.
	And that's why I see the Epstein stuff as very good, because at least some people are having second thoughts about blind trust in Trump.
	The biggest issue is people will come back and say, well, if we can't trust Trump, who can we trust?
	It's like, no one.
	Trust yourself.
	Trust your neighbors.
	Start working at the local level.
	You know, we just had a story about how on the sly they wanted to do these experiments to block out the sun.
	Well, where did it get stopped?
	It got stopped at the local government level.
	There are things that we can do.
	We need to understand the usual suspects of the federal government with its unlimited amounts of money and they're trying to keep that thing going.
	And I think they will with the stablecoin.
	But we need to understand that, especially if we use the Constitution, there's a lot that can be done at the local level, and it's harder for them to control it.
	That's why they keep trying to move everything to the federal level so that they can get rid of any of these restrictions.
	We saw that with glyphosate.
	They're now talking about moving things to the federal level on other pesticides and basically giving them a big pharma deal in terms of legal immunity.
	And we know exactly why they're doing that, because they can buy a few people in Washington a lot more easily than they can buy people at the local level.
	And so, you know, it's just, as you point out, it's, you know, people who are not a part of the system, and you have to look at what these people have done and actually hold them accountable.
	I know for the longest time, one of the key weaknesses of Trump on this thing is not only did he campaign on it, but even before he was elected, the first time he had all this cue of nonsense, that's what I call it, about how, oh, he's going to wrap up all these pedophile rings that are out there and all the rest of this stuff.
	And I thought, really?
	With his background, they sold that for so long.
	That's why it's so much deeper.
	It's not just a campaign promise.
	They had this entire mythology about how he was the white knight who was going to come in and stop these known pedophile rings.
	They should have talked more about the actual pedophiles like on Capitol Hill.
	You remember Dennis Astord?
	Oh, my gosh, yeah.
	We've forgotten about that.
	We didn't really have him a lot.
	The longest serving Speaker of the House for the Republicans.
	And he was picked because he was a pedophile wrestling coach and then made Speaker of the House.
	And, you know, while he was Speaker of the House, they had two pedophile scandals.
	You know, remember the one with Mark Foley, the House Page scandal?
	Mark Foley and Barney Frank were the rent boys from his townhouse in Georgetown.
	That's right.
	The Hastert thing, you know, it was Hastert.
	I remember him going on with Rush Limbaugh and just poo-pooing all of it and saying, oh, they're only coming after Foley and these other guys because that's what the Democrats are doing.
	This is purely political.
	There's nothing real here.
	Well, it was real.
	And Dennis Hastert was eventually exposed as being a pedophile.
	And the most interesting thing about that whole thing to me was that after it was all known, what did they do about it?
	Nothing.
	Zero zip nada, right?
	They could have gotten rid of the statute of limitations, which is incredibly short for pedophilia.
	And if they had done that, they could have prosecuted Haster.
	Instead, what they did was they manufactured a crime so they could send him to jail and satisfy people into thinking that they're doing something about the pedophile networks when the whole system was set up to make sure they did nothing about the pedophile networks.
	And so, yeah, nothing is going to happen with this thing with Trump.
	But it's a little bit more cynicism and critical thought is going to be something that'll be very good if that can get into the module world.
	In Trump's comments, the arrogance and the narcissism that is his probable greatest weakness, I think.
	Yeah.
	And it makes him do things that just from his point of view are stupid.
	Calling a supporter stupid is stupid politically.
	And yet he did that.
	And you can see it, like snarling contempt that he has, even for the people who support him, the moment they don't support him abjectly.
	The minute that they raise a question, that they take off their red hat and say, hmm, wait a minute.
	Then he comes after them, doesn't he?
	It's amazing.
	He demands literally slavish, obsequious, like cur dog rolling on its back, kick-me kind of, you know, followership.
	And that brings me to, I think, this other point that I wanted to make.
	I think all of us, whatever your politics, stop looking for secular heroes and saviors.
	Yes.
	We see ourselves.
	That's how we fix this.
	Absolutely.
	Stop looking for these heroes.
	It's idolatry and it's stupidity.
	It's amazing.
	You know, how many times, as one person said, you're talking about Trump's narcissism, you know, all these guys in politics are narcissists, and especially all these billionaires.
	Just take a look at Musk, right?
	It was a clash of egos as they were coming after each other.
	But of all the narcissists, Trump does stick out in his own special category, doesn't he?
	He really does.
	Yeah, I mean, he's a tour to force.
	Well, Eric is great talking to you.
	Always is great talking to you.
	EricPetersAutos.com is a place to go for honest reviews.
	And you've got comments about new cars.
	And we didn't get into the underneath pan, which makes maintenance more difficult and oil leaks more difficult to know about and all the rest of the stuff.
	But there's a lot of practical articles in there.
	The perils of the pan is that article.
	I love your site.
	Always have loved it.
	And you focus on mobility and liberty.
	We can't have one without the other, can we?
	And it's great to have an honest review.
	And if you're going to get shut down by a car company for an honest review, now you've been proven right to them as well.
	But I don't expect they're going to restore your credentials.
	I hope they do.
	But you can still.
	I'll see.
	Yeah, you can still talk about that.
	Again, it's heartbreaking to me because I'm a car guy.
	I love cars.
	And Mercedes at one time made brilliant cars.
	They had superb engines.
	They're inline six-cylinder engine, their V8s, their V12s.
	Remember those?
	Just magnificent things.
	And they just decided to give that all away and to basically make another Tesla with a cheap plastic three-pointed star on the hood.
	That's right.
	Yeah, I'm very negative on the survival ability of the entire German auto industry because it's not just their craven subservience to that aspect of the Green New Deal, but the Green New Deal for manufacturing in general in Germany is just sabotaging them, whether it's the manufacturing of steel or the ability to be able to compete in terms of cost on energy.
	The governments have put the businesses in Germany and France and especially the UK at such a competitive disadvantage.
	I don't see how they're going to be able to do any kind of manufacturing, especially something like automobiles and steel and that type of stuff.
	They've basically just given a monopoly or duopoly, I should say, to India and China with the carbon mandates that they have on it.
	But again, it's always great talking to you.
	And thank you for being such a great friend.
	I really do appreciate it, Eric.
	Thank you, I appreciate our friendship, and I appreciate you having me on the show.
	Well, thank you.
	Thank you.
	Have a good day.
	And before we leave, I just want to thank everyone for all the support in the last couple of days.
	Thank you so much for supporting the show.
	We would not be here without you.
	Thank you for your prayers.
	And let's go out with a clip from Dennis Haster, just as a reminder of what this whole thing looks like.
	Thank you, Eric.
	EricPetersAutos.com.
	That shocking indictment.
	Former House Speaker Dennis Haster charged with lying to the FBI and trying to hide secret payments, apparently to cover up misconduct in his past when he was a high school teacher and wrestling coach.
	ABC's John Carl has the story.
	Good morning, John.
	Good morning, George.
	The indictment alleges that Hastert had a dark secret in his distant past, and he was willing to pay millions to keep it a secret.
	Dennis Hastert was once the most powerful man in Congress.
	Now he stands accused of a dark past before his career in politics.
	Federal prosecutors have charged the 73-year-old Hastert with bank fraud and lying to the FBI in connection to a promise he made to pay an unidentified person $3.5 million in hush money.
	Prosecutors say Hastert started making the payments five years ago to, quote, compensate and conceal his prior misconduct.
	It's quite a fall for the man who was chosen Speaker of the House because he had a reputation as being Mr. Clean.
	It's popular these days to ask political figures what mistakes they've made, where they've failed.
	As a former history teacher, I know such analysis is best tempered by time and reflection.
	And that is probably best left to others.
	The indictment doesn't say what Hastert was trying to cover up or who he was paying, but it points to his time as a high school teacher and wrestling coach in Yorkville, Illinois, and notes the unnamed person has known Hastert for most of his or her life.
	The indictment alleges Hastert structured withdrawals from his bank accounts to avoid detection, taking out just under $10,000 in 100 separate transactions.
	When asked about it, Hastert told the FBI, yeah, I kept the cash.
	That's what I'm doing.
	His former constituents are surprised by the news.
	You're prideful of people that are coming from your community and trying to make a difference in Illinois.
	It's just disappointing.
	There's no word from Dennis Hastert this morning or from his legal team, but he has reportedly stepped down from his job at a powerful Washington, D.C. lobbying firm, and that firm, George, has removed Hastert's bio from its website.
	But as you said, John, we really don't know what conduct he was trying to cover up.
	That is a complete mystery here.
	There is no indication whatsoever, except in that indictment, it says that his time as a wrestling coach and a high school teacher back in Youngville, Illinois, way back when, is material to this indictment.
	So it apparently is something that he did back when he was a high school teacher.
	Okay, John Carl, thanks very much.
	I know you have more on Sunday this week.
	music
	The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidnightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲