The David Knight Show - Wed Episode #2060: Congress Caves to Cover-Up: Epstein Fallout Shelved to Protect Trump

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 23, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:16

Wed Episode #2060: Congress Caves to Cover-Up: Epstein Fallout Shelved to Protect Trump

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	In the world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it is Wednesday, the 23rd of July, Year of Our Lord 2025.
	We have Mike Johnson running as much cover as possible for Trump over the Epstein scandal.
	Going so far as to start the recess early to avoid the vote.
	Nothing to see here, of course.
	It looks like Congress may give the pesticide industry the same kind of liability shield that vaccine manufacturers enjoy.
	Stay with us.
	Well, good morning and welcome to the David Knight Show.
	I, of course, am not David Knight, but I am your host, Travis Knight.
	Hope you're all having a wonderful day so far.
	As I said, we're going to look at what's going on with Mike Johnson and his desperate bid to keep the vote over the Epstein files from happening.
	But first, we're going to take a look at some other news.
	Trump push makes Coke great again with cane sugar.
	We even talked about soda yesterday.
	That's right.
	He's trying to force Coke to use only cane sugar.
	However, they gave him an offer he couldn't refuse.
	He said, you know what?
	We will bring a cane sugar option to the United States, but we're not going to only sell cane sugar.
	A real strong move from Maha, huh?
	No, Coke's not going to get rid of their chemicals, but they'll give you the cane sugar option.
	The once-mum soda maker is now confirming plans to do just as directed.
	Well, not quite as directed.
	Days after Trump revealed the move at his pressure, Coca-Cola confirmed Tuesday it plans to offer a cane sugar version in the U.S. This edition is designed to complement the company's strong core portfolio and offer more choices across occasions and preferences.
	This is from newsmax.com.
	They say, but that statement fails to credit Trump an avid diet Coke consumer.
	That's right.
	It was all Trump.
	It was all Trump.
	Thing is, there's already a cane sugar Coke option in America.
	It's called Mexican Coke.
	Yeah, I suppose.
	Mexico only get the cane sugar option.
	Yeah, I suppose that you can't get it everywhere, but it's readily available.
	No, we're going.
	The company has to provide an option for Americans.
	The interesting thing will be comparing the two, Mexican Coke and American Coke with cane sugar, seeing if there's still any difference.
	No, this is Trump.
	And of course, he's a diet Coke enjoyer.
	He is one of those guys that is consuming all those chemicals.
	As I said, this is the next article.
	Coca-Cola rejects Trump's demand for only cane sugar in U.S. Coke.
	They said, no, nah.
	We're not going to get rid of the high fructose corn syrup.
	We're just going to add the cane sugar version, which I suppose, I guess, is some kind of a win.
	Coca-Cola Tuesday rejected President Trump's demand to use only cane sugar in its flagship soda and instead vowed to introduce a new product for the U.S. market that would use the Made in America sweetener.
	A few days after Trump claimed Coca-Cola had agreed to switch from high-fructose corn syrup to the beverage giant instead only agreed to launch a new version of the signature drink that will use only American cane sugar.
	The company plans to launch an offering made with U.S. cane sugar to expand its trademark Coca-Cola product range, Coca-Cola said in its second quarter earning report.
	That's right.
	They're not going to replace the chemicals.
	Why would they?
	It makes them a lot of money.
	If they were, there's going to be some people, probably a sizable portion that go, I don't like this.
	Give me the high fructose corn syrup back.
	That's all I've ever...
	If it's purely a cost-saving issue, unless Mexico has some regulation forbidding it.
	Forbidding high fructose corn syrup.
	So in chat, if you guys know why Mexico doesn't have that, let us know.
	Is it simply they don't like the taste, or is there some kind of law that prevents them from making it there or shipping it there?
	We appreciate the president's enthusiasm for our Coca-Cola brand, Quincy said in a conference call with investors Tuesday.
	We're definitely looking to use the whole kit of available sweetening options.
	That's right, the whole kit of available sweetening options.
	And of course, no one cares about Pepsi.
	No one has any interest.
	We're not going to try to force them to make their drink out of cane sugar.
	He says it could also be healthier than corn syrup, although most nutritionists say people should avoid sweetened drinks altogether.
	Of course, as we talked about yesterday, yes, you should avoid them in large quantities and as a regularity, but every once in a while, if you need a sugary something or other, you know, if you can do it in moderation, you're not going to pop open a Coke and instantly combust.
	Moderation is the key.
	It switched from cane sugar to high fructose corn syrup in 1980.
	It was a cost-cutting measure.
	Of course, it was.
	You know, sure, it's chemical garbage, but hey, we're going to keep prices down.
	KWD68 cane sugar and coke.
	That would have worked great at the Epstein parties.
	Cane sugar.
	I'm sure there was a different type of cane at the Epstein parties.
	Yeah.
	Democrats all-electric USPS fleet sees each truck come with a $6.8 million price tag.
	That's right.
	About $7 million each for these electric trucks.
	Isn't it wonderful?
	The government just blowing money.
	We're going to have electric vehicles for our post.
	It's going to save the climate, guys.
	The planet's melting down.
	We need electric vehicles.
	And your money is...
	It's amazing that that's significantly more than your average supercar.
	Yeah.
	Like, they could all be driving Lamborghinis and save money.
	Yeah, I think even the most expensive hypercars, the last time I remember, you know, this was when we were watching Top Gear years ago, but I think they topped out around $2.5 million even for something like a Bugatti.
	I could be wrong, but $7 million.
	And you know that this is going to be some chintzy piece of garbage.
	It's going to look awful.
	It's going to have all kinds of issues.
	And we're going to pay $7 million each.
	Your money is no object.
	Sure, pour it out like water.
	This is from a USPS press release in 2022.
	The United States Postal Service today announced that it expects to acquire at least 66,000 battery electric vehicles as part of its 106,000 vehicle acquisition plan for deliveries between now and 2028.
	Of course, 66,000 by 7 million.
	That's about 462 billion, something along those lines.
	The vehicles purchased as part of this anticipated plan will begin to replace the Postal Service's aging delivery fleet, over 220,000 vehicles.
	The Postal Service anticipates at least 60,000 next-generation delivery vehicles, of which at least 75% 45,000 will be battery electric.
	But like Buddha Judge's EV charging stations, which cost about $1 billion each, or Kamala Harris's $42 billion rural internet flop that connected a whopping zero rural Americans to the web, or her $1 billion solar panel plan for Puerto Rico, which resulted in only few installations, Biden's green USPS plan has been an absolute disaster.
	Funny how that keeps happening with these green agenda plans.
	How come none of them ever seem to work right?
	It's almost like we're getting scammed on the deal.
	It's almost like the technology isn't there yet.
	It's almost like this is some kind of, I don't know, ruse to soak money from the American people.
	The Biden administration planned to create a green fleet of postal vehicles has turned out a mere 250 electric mail trucks.
	A little short of their 66,000 goal in just over two years after shelling out taxpayer funds meant to build thousands.
	Yeah.
	So it was $16 something billion, I believe, so far.
	It says the nearly $10 billion project, which someone's math isn't adding up, which called for more than 35,000 battery-powered U.S. Postal Service vehicles to be completed by September 2028, was funded in part by $3 billion in funding from former President Joe Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
	I suspect the post item is a typo because as you see above, the number from the USPS is $45,000, not $35,000.
	So far, the dispersed IRA funds are around $1.7 billion, which means that if Congress is able to claw back the $1.3 billion still allocated for the project, each of these 250 trucks have cost U.S. taxpayers a minimum of $6.8 million apiece.
	The whole plan was a $10 billion investment, so who knows how much else was spent from other sources.
	The biggest issue with the program, the lucky contractor doesn't even know what they're doing.
	It's the bottom line.
	We don't know how to make a darned truck, one person involved with the manufacturing process told the Washington Post.
	So the federal government is only $44,750 short of its $45,000 goal.
	With this race, purchasing around 83 electric mail trucks a year, it will take the government another 539-ish years to finalize their plans.
	Well, you know, by government speed standards, that's pretty good.
	You know, it's like they put the DMB in charge of this.
	Maybe they did.
	Maybe that's who's manufacturing the electric trucks.
	I mean, I don't care one bit if the USPS fleet doesn't electrify, but this is just one more example of astounding corruption and incompetence.
	Every single day there's a new astounding example of corruption and incompetence from our government TW97401 used to be able to buy Mexican Coke at Costco, but no longer.
	I prefer the cane sugar version.
	Yeah, it tastes a lot better.
	Didn't yeah, didn't you used to be able to buy like a big box of the Mexican Cokes at Costco?
	Instead of yeah, I think I think I remember that.
	High Boost.
	Aspartame is in diet Coke makes you stupid, hence Trump.
	Yeah, he fried his brain on aspartame.
	This is your brain on aspartame, and you just see a picture of Donald Trump.
	HAL 9000, make soda healthy again?
	Yeah, that's right.
	Gonna carbonate our way to health.
	Hi Boost, why don't we put real cocaine back in Coke like was intended?
	See, that's why.
	That's what I've been saying for years.
	How do you think we made things like the Hoover Dam or the Panama Canal and all these other great works?
	It's'cause we had actual cocaine in the Coke.
	You think you're not going to create these types of things?
	If you put cocaine back in the Coke, we'll be a highly motivated nation once more.
	We'll be creating wonders of the world at record pace.
	Zoxov Oxaz.
	So, how long did Nancy Pelosi invest?
	How long ago did Nancy Pelosi invest in big sugar?
	That's right.
	Anytime Nancy Pelosi invests in something, you can go ahead and follow right along.
	You can bet she's got some kind of info you don't.
	That's not actual.
	I don't give investment advice.
	TW97401.
	Trump does.
	About 10 cans a day is what I heard.
	How do you even drink that much soda a day?
	How?
	Varkius.
	Mexico used high fructose corn syrup too.
	Only the bottles exported to America have sugar.
	Ah, so they do have that.
	They're just not going to import the Mexican high fructose corn syrup because it would be the same.
	That makes sense.
	Not going to overlap the market.
	TW97401.
	I believe some countries banned phosphoric acid and sodas, which is used as a toilet bowl cleaner, by the way.
	Well, it's nice to know that in a pinch, if I ever really need to scrub a toilet, I can just reach for a nice bottle of Coke.
	Maybe AI isn't going to replace you at work after all.
	This is from Zero Hedge.
	It's authored by Charles Hugh Smith via Of Two Minds blog.
	AI fails at tasks where accuracy must be absolute to create value.
	In reviewing the ongoing discussions about how many people will be replaced by AI, I find a severe lack of real-world examples.
	I'm remedying this deficiency with an example of AI's failure and the kind of high-value work that many anticipate will soon be performed by AI.
	For the same reason, nobody's sharing the AI tool's error that forfeited the lawsuit, saying here that, you know, they don't share the mistakes that happen.
	They don't share where it goes wrong.
	You only see where someone is saying, wow, look at this, look what it did so well.
	The only way to really grasp the limits of these tools is to deploy them in the kinds of high-level, high-value work that they're supposed to be able to do with ease, speed, and accuracy, because nobody's paying real money to watch robots dance or read a copycat AI-generated essay on Yates that's tossed moments after being submitted to the professor.
	And of course, my dad has been saying for a long time that there's going to be an AI crash, just like the dot-com crash.
	That people always do this with technology.
	They get overexcited about it.
	They get very, very bullish.
	But then it doesn't materialize in a timeframe or the way they want.
	And people pull out.
	In the real world of value creation, optics don't count.
	Accuracy counts.
	Nobody cares if the AI chatbot that turned out the Yates homework hallucinated midstream because nobody paying for AI outputs that has zero scarcity value.
	Yeah, it can do this over and over again.
	You're not paying it to put out these kinds of things because it doesn't matter.
	An AI-generated class paper, song, or video joins 10 million similar copycat paper songs videos that nobody pays attention to because they can create their own in 30 seconds.
	So let's examine an actual example of AI being deployed to do the sort of high-level, high-value work that it's going to need to nail perfectly to replace us all at work.
	My friend Ian Lind, whom I've known for 50 years, is an investigative reporter with an enviable, lengthy record of the kind of journalism if you have the experience or resources to do.
	The judge's letter recommending Ian for the award he received from the American Judges Association for Distinguished Reporting about the January Judiciary ran for 18 pages.
	It was just a summary of his work.
	Ian has spent the last few years helping the public understand the most complex federal prosecution case in Hawaii's recent history.
	And so the number of documents that have piled up is enormous.
	He's been experimenting with AI tools, Notebook LLM, Gemini, ChatGPT, for months on various projects and recently shared his account with me.
	My experience has definitely been mixed.
	On the one hand, sort of high-level requests like identify the major issues raised in the document and sort by importance produced interesting and suggestive results.
	But attempts to find and pull together details on a person or topic almost always had noticeable errors or hallucinations.
	I would never be able to trust the response to even what I consider straightforward instructions.
	Too many errors.
	Looking for mentions of Drew in 150 Warrants said he wasn't mentioned, but he was.
	I've gone back and found those mentions.
	I think the bots read through enough to give an answer and don't keep incorporations incorporating data to the end.
	They'll shoot from the hip and in my experience have often produced mistakes.
	Sometimes it's 25 answers and one glaring mistake, sometimes more basic.
	Let's start with the context.
	This is similar to the kind of work performed by legal services.
	Ours is a rule of law advocacy system, so legal proceedings are consequential.
	They aren't a DIDI or a class paper.
	Indian's experience is mirrored by many other professionals.
	Yeah.
	It's fairly accurate up to a point.
	It's accurate enough that at a cursory glance, a lot of people just go, oh yeah, this looks good.
	This looks fine.
	There's nothing to worry about here.
	But if you're actually paying attention, you'll notice, oh, no, there's a mistake here.
	That isn't true.
	This is completely created out of whole cloth.
	A friend who works at IBM, and he was telling me over a year ago what they were focusing on with their AI development was they're trying to create something that was less prone to hallucinations, something that could be reliably counted on like this.
	And months later, they released their granite models and AI stuff.
	And of course, it's all just as prone to hallucination as anything else.
	I know they were specifically trying to fix that problem, though.
	Yeah, this...
	So it seems like it's going to take a complete overhaul to get rid of it, if they even can.
	Let's summarize AI's fundamental weaknesses.
	One, AI doesn't actually read the entire collection of texts.
	In human terms, it gets bored and stops once it has enough to generate a credible response.
	It's not going to parse through all the data you give it.
	It's just going to look at enough to make you think, okay, yeah, this looks fine.
	Then it moves on to something else.
	AI has digital dementia.
	It doesn't necessarily remember what you asked for in the past, nor does it necessarily remember its previous responses to the same queries.
	It doesn't actually have memory.
	It doesn't store these things.
	It doesn't think about them like a human does.
	AI is fundamentally irrevocably untrustworthy.
	It makes errors that it doesn't detect because it didn't actually read the entire trove of text.
	And it generates responses that are good enough, meaning they're not 100% accurate, but they have the superficial appearance of being comprehensive and therefore acceptable.
	This is the shoot from the hip response Ian described.
	In other words, 90% is good enough, as who cares about the other 10% in a college paper, copycat song, or cutesy video?
	90% is good enough for the average person's needs.
	You know, if you're just generating a video, like they said, what does it matter if there's some artifacts here or there that make it look strange?
	The average person on the internet isn't really going to care.
	But if you're actually using this for some real serious work, 10% is a huge amount of error.
	But in real work, the 10% of errors and hallucinations actually matter because the entire value creation of the work depends on that 10% being right and not half-assed.
	Of course, this is exactly what my dad was talking about.
	He gave me some notes here.
	He said he saw a Christian influencer on YouTube.
	The guy had 1.3 million followers, and he did a video about how chat programs are fabulous for Bible study, just praising it up and down.
	This is wonderful.
	So he said it's great for summaries, answers, you know, just whatever you're looking for, the chat GPT or whichever AI he was using.
	It's just so good for Bible study.
	He says, imagine trusting AI for something of eternal importance.
	Yes, that is the most important thing you can ever contemplate or do, turning your life over to Christ, studying the Bible.
	And you're going to turn it over to this machine that hallucinates and creates things, makes stuff up.
	So there are a lot of comments echoing this guy's admiration of AI for Bible study.
	He said, the blind leading 1.3 million blind.
	Yeah.
	That is completely terrifying.
	Yeah, the AI is so wonderful for Bible study.
	I just ask it questions and this machine gives me answers.
	I don't have to think about it at all.
	I don't have to go in and do my own research.
	Why would I turn to church fathers or those who have come before me who have spent their lives dedicated to studying the scripture?
	No, I don't think I'll look up anything.
	Hey, ChatGPT, what does this mean?
	I'm sure you can trust it.
	Trusting AIs for Bible study is a whole nother level above the blind leading the blind.
	This thing cannot think, and you're going to trust it with this.
	The ghost in the machine.
	In the realm of LLM AI getting Gates' data birth wrong, an error without consequence is the same as missing the defendant's name in 150 warrants.
	These programs are text slash content prediction engines.
	That goes to what Lance was saying.
	They simply are giving you responses that you like.
	It parses through other conversations it's had and waits responses that had more positive interactions from the user more highly.
	It's not actually looking at a thing, anything from true or false.
	It's simply, well, this made other users happy.
	It made them continue to use the program.
	They liked this response.
	So prioritize this.
	They don't actually know or understand anything.
	They can't tell the difference between a consequential error and a who cares error.
	Everything is on the same playing field.
	Four AI agents will claim their response is accurate.
	When it is obviously lacking, they will lie to cover their failure and then lie about lying.
	If pressed, they will apologize and then lie again.
	Well, at least we know ChatGPT would make a great politician then.
	this thing could be the best it could be No, I didn't lie.
	I didn't lie.
	Okay, you caught me.
	I'm sorry.
	Come here.
	Exactly.
	Eventually, Congress will be nothing but AI agents arguing with each other.
	In summary, AI fails at tasks where accuracy must be absolute to create value.
	Lacking this, it's not just worthless, it's counterproductive and even harmful, creating liabilities far more consequential than the initial errors.
	But they're getting better.
	Quote unquote, no, they're not, not in what matters.
	AI agents are probabilistic text and content prediction machines.
	They're trained parrots in the Chinese room.
	They don't actually know anything or understand anything, and adding another gazillion pages to their training won't change this.
	How AI sells conviction without truth.
	The widespread excitement around generative AI, particularly large models, like ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, and DeepSeek, is built on a fundamental misunderstanding.
	While these systems impress users with articulate responses and seemingly reasoned arguments, the truth is that what appears to be reasoning is nothing more than a sophisticated form of mimicry.
	These models aren't searching for truth through facts and logical arguments, they're predicting text based on patterns in the vast data sets they're trained on.
	That's not intelligence, and it isn't reasoning.
	If their training data is itself biased, then we've got real problems.
	Yeah, of course, garbage in, garbage out.
	It's only as good as who programs it.
	It's only as useful as they can make it.
	I'm sure it will surprise eager AI users to learn that the architecture at the core of LLMs is fuzzy and incompatible with structured logic or causality.
	The thinking isn't real, it's simulated, and it's not even sequential.
	What people mistake for understanding is actually statistical association.
	It has a critical flaw and it's unfixable.
	As I said, statistical association looks at what produced good results in the past.
	It's not thinking about like, I know this response to be true.
	I know this is the answer to this question.
	It goes, well, this seemed to get positive responses from other users.
	Let's try it here.
	And of course, if you don't like that response, you can tell it so and it'll give you a different one.
	It doesn't have any attachment to truth or doing the right thing.
	It simply wants to keep you using the chat bot, keep you paying for its services.
	AI isn't intelligent in the way we think it is.
	It's a Probability machine.
	It doesn't think, it predicts, it doesn't reason.
	It associates patterns, it doesn't create, it remixes large language models, don't understand meaning, they predict the next word in a sentence based on training data.
	As Lance said, it's advanced autocorrect.
	It simply is trying to guess what you want.
	Let's return now to the larger context of AI replacing human workers en masse.
	This post by Michael Spencer of AI Supremacy and Jing Hu of Second Order Thinkers offers a highly informed and highly skeptical critique of the hype that AI will unleash a tsunami of layoffs that will soon reach tens of millions.
	Jing Hu explains a fundamental weakness in all these agents.
	It's well worth reading her explanation in real-world examples in the link above.
	Here's an excerpt.
	Today's agents have minimal true agency.
	Their initiative is largely an illusion behind the scenes they follow or are trying to tightly choreograph steps that a developer or prompt writer set up.
	If you ask an agent to do task X, it will do X and stop.
	Ask for Y and it does Y, but if halfway through X something unexpected happens, say a form has a new field or an API call returns an error, the agent breaks down, because it has zero understanding of the task.
	Change an environment slightly, e.g.
	update an interface or move a button and the poor thing can't adapt on the fly.
	AI agents today lack a genuine concept of overarching goals or the common sense context that humans use.
	They're essentially text prediction engines.
	It's the pseudoscience hype we see from people like Ray Kurzweil.
	Oh, look.
	I'm going to...
	They're going to be capable of doing anything and everything for us.
	Like Ray Kurzweil saying, I'm going to get eternal life.
	They're going to find a way to stop death, and I'm going to get it.
	I'm going to...
	Yeah.
	They're going to transfer my consciousness into a robot body.
	Or we're going to find ways to just keep the body running.
	No, it's not going to happen, Ray.
	I'm sorry.
	You can just feel and sense the fear from Ray Kurzweil when he talks about this sort of thing.
	He's desperate to avoid death.
	He is so utterly afraid of it.
	He's deluded himself with these ideas.
	The singularity is going to happen, and I'm going to live forever.
	It's not going to happen, Ray.
	You're getting older.
	Death is approaching.
	I don't say this in a gloating fashion.
	I've known I've joked about that sort of thing.
	But it's around the corner, Ray.
	It's closer than it's ever been, and it'll be closer tomorrow than it was today.
	You really need to think about some other alternatives and who might really give you eternal life.
	I've shared my own abysmal experiences with customer service AI bots.
	Of course, I went off about those yesterday.
	Was it the day before?
	Either way, yeah, they're a nightmare.
	They're unpleasant.
	They're useless.
	Here's my exploration of the kinds of experiential real-world skills AI won't master with total capital and operational costs that are lower than the cost of human labor.
	Oops, that hallucination just sawed through a 220-volt electrical line that wasn't visible, but the human knew was there.
	That's right.
	The AI just assumed.
	Oh, no, there's nothing there.
	Zap.
	You see this little comic here.
	It says, no, Alexa, I said order lunch.
	And you see missiles firing off on TV screens in the background.
	And Alexa is just saying, sorry, my bad.
	Oops.
	The AI apocalypse, it's not going to be doing everything for us.
	It's fundamentally flawed in ways that make it unuseful, unusable in many different tasks.
	I do think it is going to take a lot of jobs.
	It's going to allow a streamlining for a lot of companies.
	One person is going to be able to use AI to do a lot of different things.
	So long as they're capable of sitting there and managing it, so long as they're capable of sitting there and checking for errors, they'll be able to, again, streamline, cut down on the number of people needed.
	It'll let one person do the job of multiple people.
	And of course, if they can import a lot of H1B workers, they can have them sit there and monitor the AIs for cheap.
	Nights of the Storm, so it looks like cane sugar is used in Mexico because of the lack of availability of the corn syrup, part of an ongoing trade dispute between the U.S. and Mexico.
	Huh, well, they're getting a good deal on it then, since the cane sugar coke is a lot better than the corn syrup.
	Yeah.
	So cane sugar, although more expensive here in the U.S., is more cost-effective in Mexico.
	Again, man, they're getting the good stuff.
	In 1997, the Mexican government passed a levy on high fructose corn sip in an attempt to keep the demand and thus the price for Mexican sugar higher.
	KAWD68 Rick Beto did a music video about an AI-generated artist and a couple of songs.
	It's as good as current music.
	There will be an AI superstar soon.
	Concerts, merchandise, albums.
	All A1 mania.
	The A1.
	It's taking over.
	You've already have things like Hatsume Miko and The Gorillas, where they have fake artists.
	The music is still written by real people, but why not have AI as they get a little better?
	Also, as you said, modern music, you know, it's so dull and boring and uninteresting and doesn't take much talent at all.
	And I know that's rich coming from someone that doesn't have any musical talent, yada yada, glass houses and all that.
	But it's nothing.
	It's these throwaway pop songs.
	It's garbage.
	There's people like Taylor Swift who their fans dearly love for some unknown reason.
	But the music is so trite and contrived.
	The lyrics have no meaning.
	So why not have an AI write that kind of thing?
	Is it going to make a difference?
	Malutin Milankovic, please don't forget to like and share the stream.
	Still want the DK show on something like Editor's Picks Assass Front Page.
	That's right, please do like and share the stream.
	Thank you, Malutin, for reminding me.
	Trucker Chris for the win.
	I follow a stocks guy that uses AI to pick stocks.
	He has a portfolio of just nothing but AI picks.
	He says he makes money.
	I don't do this myself.
	You know?
	Perhaps, you know, since the stock market does seem to follow trends and patterns, perhaps AI is good for looking at it and assessing it.
	But again, I don't give financial advice and trusting anything of importance to AI sounds scary to me.
	To the storm, inherently AI will always be biased and prone to mistakes because it searches top results, which are artificially promoted due to existing bias of humans.
	It's simply looking at what is most popular and what has the most consensus, what has the most amount of data.
	It's not necessarily...
	So the storm AI is also trying to please the user, so it shapes the answers.
	That's a marketing thing to get people to use it because it makes them feel good.
	I think the best way to describe AI is it produces a consensus.
	We saw where that leads with climate science.
	Yeah.
	A consensus would not be half bad if the sources were honest, but they're not.
	People with certain ideas are in charge of promoting what comes up on the web, and that's AI's source material.
	Just like Google has hidden a lot of things, made sure it's unfindable, they'll make sure it's not in the AI training data.
	Like if I asked what's the best way to remove grass stains from white genes, a consensus might be useful.
	But if you're going to ask it, what about climate change?
	What about the vaccine injuries?
	You're going to get the standard stock response.
	It's not going to dig down and let you see anything from conspiracy theories.
	That would be terrible.
	As conservative political backlash sweeps across U.S. media, some aren't reaching for the ultimate prize, Hollywood.
	Shifting the liberal tilt of the studios and creative culture that shapes America's image of itself has long been a goal for the right.
	Late media entrepreneur Andrew Breitbart popularized the notion that politics is downstream from culture, and acolytes from Steve Bannon to Ben Shapiro have sought to inject their politics in the movie business with limited success.
	I can only imagine how horrifying a movie with Ben Shapiro's hands-on it would be.
	Also, they have to go to Ben Shapiro obscure movies to find examples of political bias in Hollywood, really?
	But conservatives have celebrated a few mainstream hits, like the patriotic Top Gun Maverick and Taylor Sheridan's nostalgic libertarian-inflected Yellowstone.
	I've never seen it, but from what I've heard, it is filled with despicable people doing despicable things.
	Some awful...
	I've seen clips, and there's just this one completely foul-mouthed woman that comes across as nothing but a child.
	Just complete...
	Like, she has no idea.
	Despite the fact that she apparently has nothing to bargain with or threaten with.
	The one clip I saw of this woman, she is so completely and utterly insufferable.
	I can't imagine why people watch this show.
	I can't imagine sitting there and having to go through and put up with this kind of thing.
	The dialogue was so unimaginably bad.
	In a long-standing Christian culture, industry has backed projects like the 2023 film Sound of Freedom, a dramatization of child trafficking that grossed to more than $242 million for Provost Angel Studios.
	The Christian drama The Forge earned $30 million on a $6 million budget last year.
	Now a set of prominent figures close to the software firm Palantir are pitching a new project to shake up streaming TV and film with a portfolio ranging from feature films about darling Israeli and America daring Israeli and American military operations to three-part treatment of an Ayn Rand tome.
	That's right.
	You can get some Israel propaganda or a three-part miniseries on Ayn Rand.
	I can think of nothing I would rather watch less than anything based on anything Ayn Rand has written.
	Ayn Rand, her work is so inc I have tried, but it is so incredibly dull and self-aggrandizing in the sense of just like, oh yes, it is a heavy-hearted work of staggering genius that I am engaged upon.
	Can you imagine a work produced by Palantir about Ayn Rand's books?
	It would be the most boring, insufferable piece of trash the world has ever seen.
	I don't know who needs to hear this.
	Ayn Rand is only really liked by a very specific, a very small and specific subset of libertarians.
	And everyone else cannot stand it.
	Whether they agree with her philosophy or not, they all universally agree that her books are pretty bad.
	They're very, very dull.
	The way she writes is uninteresting.
	It's simply a vehicle for her own ideology.
	It's not supposed...
	It is all about just looking at and saying, my philosophy good.
	It produced this.
	Look at this fake world in my books that runs flawlessly.
	It's a utopia.
	Look at my utopian philosophy.
	Look at my works and weep.
	Raising Money for Founders Films, a new production company based in Dallas that aims to push for films with a nationalistic bent and unsubtle political overtones.
	Yeah.
	Nationalistic bent.
	That might be.
	When movies were about making good entertaining art, making something that people wanted to watch rather than pushing a political thing either from the massive amounts of leftist stuff that has killed Hollywood, honestly, and now we're seeing the same thing from the right.
	What if someone just made movies?
	One of the things is if you have a strong ideation one way or the other, if you simply write a story, your beliefs will work their way in there.
	But they will generally do it in a way that it is more subtle.
	They're not going to be beating people, you're not going to be beating people over the head with them.
	Look at Lord of the Rings.
	It is obviously a Christian allegory, despite the fact that Tolkien himself denied it for a while.
	But it obviously has Analogous parts to Christ and the redemption story Everyone is All the bad guys are evil.
	It's a very Christian tale.
	But it doesn't beat you over the head with it.
	Now, of course, you can look at the Chronicles of Narnia and say, yeah, that one does kind of beat you over the head with it a little bit, but it's still good.
	Because it is beating you over the head with the most important story, the greatest story ever told.
	I'm a big fan of the Chronicles of Narnia.
	Whatever.
	I know C.S. Lewis had his problems.
	I have some theological disagreements with him.
	And I point them out and have them pointed out in the Chronicles of Narnia.
	But they are still wonderful children's stories.
	I still love them very dearly.
	Preaching is a lot more forgivable when it's literal preaching for some political hobby horse.
	Say yes to projects about American exceptionalism.
	Name America's enemies.
	Back artists unconditionally.
	Take risk on novel IP.
	The American brand is broken.
	Hollywood is AWOL.
	Movies have become more ideological.
	And they're going to keep them and make them more ideological just in a different way.
	And less entertaining.
	And they're not going to get any more entertaining under their auspices.
	The Hollywood of today.
	Now, they may potentially have better morals.
	They may potentially have less direct hate.
	So in that sense, yes, I think they would be better.
	You could potentially get away from these anti-family, anti-God, anti-whatever films that are produced.
	You're not necessarily going to get movies, get good movies out of it, though.
	If we do manage to get away from the anti-God, anti-family agenda, I will still take that as a win.
	I would still be thankful for that.
	Because at least then we're not having negative propaganda in that sense.
	The project's name echoes that of Peter Thiel's founders fund.
	Of course, since it is from Peter Thiel and Palantir, chances are we're not going to see anything of value.
	Both Palantir and Garrett have close ties to the investor, a key figure on the new right, a spokesman for Teal, didn't respond to a request for comment on the project.
	In the post late last year on his substack, Sankar outlined his view for a return to blockbusters of the 80s and 90s like Red Dawn, Top Gun, Rocky IV, and the hunt for Reddock.
	Rocky 4.
	Come on.
	Rocky 1, 2, and 3 are great films.
	They're fantastic.
	Rocky 4 is pretty good.
	I'll give you that.
	But are we just looking at it and saying, you know what?
	We need to go back to a time when Russia was our enemy.
	Because that's what I'm getting from this.
	You know, Red Dawn, the Russians invade, if memory serves.
	I'm pretty sure in the original it was Russia.
	Top Gun, which I've never seen, so I can't say, but it's around that same time.
	So I wouldn't be surprised if it was Russians that were the enemy in Top Gun.
	I will say it's slightly better to have Russians as the enemy in absolutely everything than the current thing of having white conservative rednecks as the enemy in everything.
	At least it would be a foreign power.
	Rocky IV, of course.
	That's the one where Ivan Drago kills Apollo Creed.
	And the hunt for Red October.
	He said the entertainment needed to be unafraid of offending Chinese audience.
	All of those are Russians!
	Unafraid of offending Chinese audiences by putting the Russians in them.
	What are you talking about?
	What are you talking about?
	And use American cultural power to spread skeptical views of the Chinese government.
	Breaking out of our cultural malaise will require the studios to wake up and choose America, he wrote, invoking the Renaissance in American film in the 1970s.
	Directors, including Steven Spielberg, brought back heroes, villains, and romance, and rekindled the flame of the American cinematic universe.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	And again, maybe, again, I would be happy just to get rid of the current propaganda, get rid of the fact that all these movies are anti-family, anti-God, anti-white, teaching all people, all the white people to hate themselves over and over again.
	And maybe, you know, maybe something good will come out of it also in the sense that maybe they'll make such terrible movies, such completely idealistic propaganda films, that people will just completely stop going to them.
	Nope, sorry.
	You know what?
	You've actually killed my interest in watching TV and films altogether.
	And as such, I'm going outside.
	I mean, you've kind of just described Hollywood for the past 10 years.
	Yeah.
	Though I can imagine they make one Ayn Rand project and it's over.
	It's done.
	We have to burn the technology.
	We cannot give you access to it.
	I don't know.
	If you look at the pendulum of censorship in Hollywood from McCarthyism of blacklisting people that were communists to modern-day blacklisting people unless they're communists, at least back during McCarthyism, they were able to make some good movies.
	Yeah, communists don't make good art, in case anyone's wondering.
	We all owe McCarthy an apology.
	We should have been out there.
	Yes, McCarthy, Please shut down Hollywood.
	Stick it to those nasty communists.
	The slate includes 102 Minutes, a feature film about the evacuation of the World Trade Center on 9-11.
	I'm sure that's a thrilling watch.
	Courage is contagious, the tagline reads.
	The company also hopes to create a three-part adaptation of Atlas Shrugged and a film about the killing of Kassim Soleimani.
	Man, a movie from Palantir about 9-11.
	Yeah, I'm sure that's going to, you know, again, so 9-11, I'm sure they're going to be like, Arabs bad.
	Atlas Shrugged, which is going to be, look, Peter like Pete, people like Peter Thiel are the future.
	We need them.
	If we don't love and worship and prostrate ourselves before men like Peter Thiel, they will simply leave society.
	And then we'll be left out in the cold.
	Won't you feel like a fool once Peter Thiel moves to Mars or wherever it is Peter Thiel wants to go?
	So bow down before him.
	Then a film about the killing of Kassim Soleimani, which is once again, you know, Middle East propaganda.
	So 9-11, that's going to be Middle East war propaganda.
	Kassim Solemani is going to be Middle East war propaganda.
	Atlas shrugged.
	Peter Thiel, amazing.
	Look at Peter Thiel go.
	Men like Peter Thiel must be worshipped.
	That's what we can expect from these, in my opinion.
	They're not going to give you something.
	They're not going to be in there on the World Train Center being like, I heard explosions before the plane hit.
	Why is it coming down in free fall?
	That's not how this would work.
	You're not going to get that.
	And of course, the Kassim Soleimani film is going to be all about, look at how amazing the American military is.
	Look at how we killed this guy.
	Wonder how heavily Building 7 will be featured in the 9-11 movie.
	You'll just see it in one shot in the background just collapsing on its own.
	No one's going to reference it.
	Just like, nope, ignore that.
	Pretend that didn't happen.
	But with Kassim Soleimani, they'll talk about how there'll be a bunch of shots of CIA offices or people in suits.
	We finally found him.
	We're launching the attack now.
	That sort of thing.
	We've got our intel operative on the ground spying on him, this, that, and the other.
	They're not going to cover the fact that, honestly, in a more devastating blow, Iran said, we could strike back.
	We could, but America has no heroes.
	Who could we target that was of the same standing as our General Soleimani?
	He was a hero.
	He was a hero to our people, and you have no heroes.
	Who could we ever take from you that would matter?
	Who cares?
	And honestly, to me, that was more devastating than if they had killed someone.
	Because it's true.
	It's true.
	America has no heroes.
	Not of any standing.
	We don't have anyone that would matter if they were taken out.
	Not in the sense of, you know, every life is valuable, every life has meaning, but not in a sort of cultural impact sense.
	What are they going to do?
	Launch a drone and target some celebrity, some TikToker?
	Who cares?
	Then there's the Greatest Game, a multi-season global spy thriller that lays bare China's plan to replace the United States as the dominant global power by showing their operations and sometimes devastating impact from Kenya to the Atacama Desert in northern Chile.
	So we're going to have Hollywood, which normally kowtows to China because they get a lot of funding from there by fact they just have a huge market.
	You can send your film to China and make a ton of money because they have a gigantic population base.
	And we're going to have this, which is going to be bad.
	China bad.
	Bad China.
	Yes, China bad.
	China's bad.
	We get it.
	Yes.
	I don't need to be beat over the head with it.
	Because when they make movies for the Chinese audience, they say China is great.
	And when they make movies for the American audience, they say America is terrible.
	Uh-huh.
	Founders proposed film Slate also includes Roaring Lion, a movie about the recent attack against Iran, which depicts Israel as striving for nuclear non-proliferation, exercising its right of self-defense against a crazed regime intent on destroying it.
	Ugh.
	Now, this is all going to be just ham-fisted propaganda, simply meant to be funneled directly into those people that keep Fox News on 24-7, that simply absorb whatever the mainstream Republican talking points are.
	Much of the content has a military bent.
	The company also said it hoped to produce an unscripted document, unscripted documentaries about influential figures like Musk, Oculus founder Palmer Lucky, Admiral Hyman Rickover.
	That's right.
	Influential figures like Musk and Palmer Lucky.
	Isn't that going to be great?
	That can go hand in hand with our Ayn Rand series.
	Look, you need these billionaires.
	They're the ones that lead society forward.
	They're the ones that matter.
	It doesn't matter if they trample over top of you.
	You have to prostrate yourself before them.
	Because if you don't, they're all going to vanish.
	They're going to take their toys with them.
	Palmer Lucky is now a part of the military-industrial complex creating drones for the military.
	That's great.
	All I knew about him was he was the guy that made the meme VR helmet where he's just like, oh yeah, I've attached shotgun shells to it.
	So if you die in the game, you die in real life.
	Well, he's called Lefalvara VR.
	He created the Oculus headsets and founded Oculus before it was bought by Meta and then kicked him out.
	Ah.
	That I did not know.
	I just knew of him as that guy.
	Just that I made the meme real, guys.
	Here's your VR helmet that will blow your head off if you die in the game.
	This is all just going to be proselytizing and evangelizing for their technocrat agenda.
	Whitewashing Israel, too.
	It's going to be multi-purpose.
	It'll do a couple of things, but they're going to use this coding of, oh, we're Christian filmmakers.
	We're going to go back to morals to push this idea of celebrity worship.
	Musk, Teal, Palmer Lucky, these guys, they're so cool and wonderful.
	Israel is amazing.
	Look at how they performed these surgical strikes.
	I have zero interest in this stuff.
	Maybe, maybe, when it comes out, if it ever comes out, we'll do a review of the first episode of the Ayn Rand Show, and I'll be pulling my hair out.
	I'll show up bald the next day.
	That's the storm.
	Like if I asked what the best way to remove...
	Audi MRR, they want us to rely on AI to stop us from the simple act of thinking.
	Yeah, it will.
	Like anything else, if you don't use it, you'll lose it.
	If you do not exercise your critical thinking ability, it will vanish.
	KWD68, I watch an old movie a couple times a week.
	I have no interest in poorly written rehashed woke new movies.
	Disney has successfully ruined several franchises, and writing is a lost art.
	The dialogue in modern movies is so incredibly bad, I cannot believe it.
	It is so, so awful.
	I have very strange criteria for...
	I think a good movie is one that, you know, it can be as cheesy as it wants, just so long as it takes its premise and applies it in an interesting or appropriate way.
	One of my favorite movies of all time is Pacific Rim.
	It's very, very light on plot.
	The dialogue is cheesy, but do what it was.
	It's a giant robot fighting giant monsters movie.
	You make those as good as possible.
	If you have great fight scenes between giant robots and giant monsters, that is a great movie because it executed the premise well.
	Pacific Rim 2 is one of the dullest, least interesting movies I have ever seen.
	I have tried to watch it twice.
	I have fallen asleep both times and could not tell you a thing about it.
	Because instead of looking at it and going, we have a giant robot versus giant monster movie, let's do that.
	They said, wouldn't it be cool if instead of giant robots fighting giant monsters, we just did a lot of dialogue and talk about feelings and people overcoming their whatever?
	No.
	No.
	You have giant robots versus giant monsters.
	It's a kaiju film.
	Make that.
	No one wants to hear these people whine about their feelings when they could be stomping giant monsters.
	And that is so much of what Hollywood is.
	We need to talk about our feelings.
	Every single movie has some scene where they have to go off and explain how this really hurt them.
	I don't care anymore.
	I don't want to see them do that anymore.
	Go do something cool.
	Simple as that.
	Have cool guys doing cool things and you've got a cool movie.
	It doesn't have to be a high work of art.
	It doesn't have to have mind-blowing dialogue.
	If it's cool guys doing cool things, generally that's enough to make a cool film.
	Chevkin says, Ayn Rand with lesbian black protagonists.
	Oh, truly.
	A work of high art as if Ayn Rand couldn't get any worse.
	Trump Burger, pull it.
	That's right.
	You'll hear that off-camera in the background of the 9-11 series.
	And then Building 7 just into its footprint.
	No one will reference it or talk about it.
	Nights of the Storm.
	I should do a compilation video of the control demolitions and slip in World Trade Center 7 to see if anyone notices.
	That would be good.
	Just have it happen real fast in the middle.
	Trump Burger, Pacific Rim is definitely one of the movies of all time.
	That's right.
	It is one of the movies of all time.
	And I'll die on that hill.
	Some of my favorite movies are things like Pacific Rim, Equilibrium, Reign of Fire.
	Very cheesy films, but very entertaining.
	Well, Rain of Fire is a classic.
	Reign of Fire is a classic.
	Kind of stupid.
	Shut up.
	No descent will be tolerated.
	Lance hates equilibrium.
	I love equilibrium.
	There is no equilibrium on equilibrium.
	It's a very polarizing movie, ironically enough.
	Reign of Fire is just fantastic.
	More movies need dragons in them.
	You could do a lot more with dragons, but people don't.
	Anyway, enough about me ranting about films.
	Move on from there.
	This is from Zero Hedge.
	It would be a safe path to civil war.
	Majority of Germans against an AFD ban.
	Of course, that is their far-right party, quote-unquote.
	More of just a standard conservative party, really.
	New polling shows that Germans are firmly against a ban of the alternative for Germany, AFD, with one historian even warning in the wake of the results that a ban on AFD would lead to a civil war.
	It shows that 52% of Germans are against a ban of the AFD, with all only 27% are in favor.
	Among East Germans, two-thirds are opposed to the ban, while in the West, 49% are opposed to the ban.
	And of course, that's because they remember what it's like to live under a dictatorship.
	They're like, no, don't do this, please.
	Not again.
	It is just so shocking to me that that's a point of debate.
	No, we should ban an entire political party and call this a democracy, or I don't know if it's a Democratic Republic in Germany or what their system is.
	You can't really call it a democracy if they're banning an entire political point of view.
	Yeah.
	Of course, that is continually one of the issues with democracy.
	Eventually, people can just vote out democracy.
	Sort of a paradoxical existence for democracy.
	They're now even warning that a ban could lead to a civil war and not from an AFD politician.
	That's right.
	Just like, if you're going to do this, this is shutting down a large portion of the population.
	It's saying, you have no right to your beliefs.
	You cannot exercise political power.
	We will not give you the access.
	You cannot have anyone that truly represents you.
	And as such, what recourse do they have left?
	CDU member and historian Andres Roder told Eur News that an AFD ban represents a serious threat.
	Ban procedure that leads to the loss of all votes for the AFD and thus to red, red-green parliamentary majorities across the board would be sure path to civil war, he warned.
	The Allensbach poll results also come despite a concerted media and government spy campaign to demonize the party.
	Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution has already labeled the AFD as having right-wing extremist elements.
	In some German states, the AFD is confirmed right-wing extremist.
	Just being slightly right of Marx at this point gets you labeled as a right-wing extremist.
	Even in America, the continual refrain from tankies on the left is, well, America has no left-wing party.
	And what they mean by that is they don't have a full-on communist socialist party.
	Liberals to them are, you know, moderates.
	They don't go far enough, not nearly far enough.
	America has no left-wing, they say.
	The far right is drifting closer and closer to the center, according to them.
	It could be someone that would be honestly considered a Democrat a few decades ago would now be considered far right.
	Yeah, you could read them policies from probably Barack Obama, definitely Bill Clinton, and they'd say they were fascist.
	They'd ask, is that Mussolini?
	Is that Hitler?
	No, it's Bill Clinton.
	It's Barack Obama.
	These people have gone utterly insane.
	One of the main reasons why Germans are against an AFD ban is that many Germans know an AFD supporter in their social circle.
	The poll shows that 67% of West Germans say they know an AFD supporter and 88% of East Germans say they know an AFD supporter.
	These acquaintances are viewed differently from the party itself, while 54% of Germans believe the AFD is right-wing extremist, only 5% believe their AFD supporter friends and family are also right-wing extremists.
	They're not willing or able to make that logical jump and think to themselves, well, if he's in the party, is the rest of the party like him?
	Is he the type of person that makes up that party?
	And if so, maybe my interpretation of their beliefs is wrong.
	It's the don't believe your lying eyes.
	Don't go by examples that you can see.
	And friends and family, go by what the mainstream media represents the party as.
	And I don't even know what the AFD party is exactly, but if they're against it this much, it's probably something good.
	Yeah.
	Hold the belief that the parties advocating for a ban are looking to eliminate the political opposition.
	And that's right.
	That's exactly what they're trying to do.
	They just don't want any challenge to their authority.
	In fact, these were the words of the Chancellor of Germany with Friedrich Mertz stating that the efforts to ban the AFD are essentially undemocratic.
	That's right.
	Essentially undemocratic.
	He's a bit mild with his criticism there.
	Shutting down an entire political party because we don't like what they believe is essentially undemocratic.
	That's a little undemocratic, guys.
	Speaking to Disecht in May, Mertz said, working aggressively and militantly against the free democratic basis order must be proven.
	And the burden of proof lies solely with the state.
	That is a classic task of the executive branch.
	I've always internally resisted initiating ban proceedings from within the Bundestag.
	That smacks too much of political competition elimination to me.
	When you've got even Mertz going, I don't know, guys.
	I don't know.
	When even Mertz is sitting there telling you this is a step too far, you know it's crazy.
	The poll also shows that banning the party in Germany would not solve the country's political problems with 54% saying that the AFD party would just reform under a different name with the same ideology.
	It'd just be playing whack-a-mole.
	Alright, we can't form under the AFD banner.
	Let's go over here.
	Now something else.
	That is, of course, until they get the idea to simply ban the ideology.
	You cannot espouse this ideology.
	If you do, there will be consequences.
	However, the poll results are not deterring the left.
	In fact, they may only serve to hasten the left's anti-democratic efforts as the AFD grows in popularity.
	A number of recent polls show the AFD is supported by 25% of the population, including a Yuga poll from last week.
	Minister President of Rhineland Palatinate Alexander Schweitzer, and he remains in favor of preparing a ban procedure against the AFD.
	He's hold, Welt am Sontag, I am for preparing ban proceeding against the AFD, and I am against quick fixes.
	So I hope that it is well prepared and not set in motion too quickly.
	He wants to make sure that if they do ban proceedings, it's thoroughly thought out.
	Doesn't want them to have any wiggle room.
	He emphasized that our state must be able to defend itself against those who want to abolish it.
	That AFD approval ratings are not an argument against a ban, but rather about consolidating and protecting our democracy.
	That's right.
	You can protect democracy by removing people's free choice.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Once again, just paradoxical nature of democracy is you can vote yourself out of it.
	You can import enough people of differing ideologies that just go, no, I don't like this.
	I think we'll do something else.
	How about you can't say there are many, so we'd rather leave it alone.
	We've got to end democracy preemptively so they don't end it.
	Exactly.
	We must destroy it before they can.
	Klaus Schwab blasts WF board.
	Denies report he fudged data, racked up 1.1 million expenses.
	From Zero Hedge, it looks like there is no honor among thieves.
	He wants to steal all your stuff, so there's no reason to assume he wasn't stealing from the WEF either.
	But he just wanted the WEF to own nothing.
	Exactly.
	He was practicing what he preached.
	He was simply adhering to his own code of conduct and morals.
	How can we be mad at Klaus?
	He told us what he was.
	We knew what he was when you let him run the WEF.
	The founder of the World Economic Forum is firing back after a bombshell investigation accused him of cooking economic reports and billing over a million dollars in questionable expenses.
	That's right.
	Klaus Schwab, the 87-year-old architect of Davos in The WF's global elite gathering slammed the organization's board of trustees on Sunday, accusing them of breaking a confidentiality deal by letting media outlets get wind of the allegations.
	I'm in a position to refute all the accusations brought up against me, Schwab said in a statement after the Swiss newspaper, Sonnagstagzeitung.
	That's right.
	Klaus Schwab may end up in prison.
	Maybe he's going to have to eat Zebugs.
	The investigation conducted by a Swiss law firm, Homburger, and ordered by WF's own board reportedly found that Schwab interfered with the forum's flagship economic rankings to favor political allies and avoid controversy.
	And submitted 900,000 Swiss francs, about $1.1 million in expenses, that investigators say it lacked proper justification.
	Three months ago, we reported that Schwab was under investigation by the WF after a whistleblower alleged financial and ethical misconduct by Mr. Eat Zibugs and his wife.
	In an anonymous letter sent to the board of directors by current and former foreign employees, Schwab and his wife were accused of commingling their personal affairs with WF resources without proper oversight and much more.
	No, say it ain't so, Klaus.
	I trusted you, Klaus.
	How could I have been so foolish?
	Among the most serious allegations, Schwab asked junior employees to withdraw thousands of dollars from ATMs on his behalf and use foreign funds to pay for private in-room massages at hotels.
	Naughty, naughty Klaus, naughty boy!
	This sounds...
	You go to the ATM for me, get the thousand dollars.
	I must go to the hotel for the massage.
	These are the people that are running the world.
	His wife, Hilde, a former forum employee, scheduled token forum funded meetings in order to justify luxury holiday travel at the organization's expense.
	That's right.
	I would like to take a trip here to this wonderful, beautiful place.
	I know what I'll do.
	We'll have a forum meeting there.
	Letter also raises concerns about how Klaus Schwab treated female employees and how his leadership over decades allegedly allows instances of sexual harassment and other discriminatory behavior to go unchecked in the workplace.
	Oh no, Klaus.
	How could you do this?
	I thought you were such a nice guy.
	You seemed so wonderful as he stood up there and told us all that we need to own nothing, eat zebugs, that we're gonna have to sacrifice, and all of us are the problem.
	He seemed like such a wonderful man.
	And here we're finding out all these terrible things.
	Other allegations include the Schwab's family's use of Villamunde, a luxury property bought before the pandemic by the forum located next to the organization's Geneva headquarters, which the whistleblower letter maintains that Hilde Schwab maintains tight control over, which the forum paid $30 million to purchase and another $20 million to renovate, which was also overseen by Hilde.
	Schwab says he paid the WAF back for said in-room massages and denied the allegations about luxury travel and withdrawing funds.
	I paid for my own massages very much.
	Thank you very much.
	Schwab abruptly resigned from the WF in April after the allegations surface.
	A replacement has yet to be named.
	The report claims Schwab personally intervened to tweak the WF's global competitiveness report to protect ties with key leaders, like Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
	In 2017, Schwab allegedly ordered a delay in releasing the rankings to avoid souring relations with India, whose score took a dive.
	He also reportedly advised holding back on boosting the UK's ranking to avoid giving ammo to Brexit supporters.
	Say it ain't so, Klaus.
	You think you know somebody.
	You think you know an oligarch, a technocrat.
	And all of a sudden, here they are getting in-room massages.
	Doesn't sound like it was a very happy ending for our boy Klaus.
	Well, really news about the hypocrisy, but it is still funny that they were flying with their private jet fleet to these remote locales to ostensibly talk about climate change when it was just about going to the remote locales.
	Boy, it sure would be nice to vacation on the French Riviera.
	You know where they need a lecture on climate change?
	The French Riviera.
	Rings Flying Always Home Cam, launching soon.
	We have a video of this.
	In case you want to incorporate more spyware into your day, in case you'd like to have the ring camera not just at your doorbell, in case you want it always monitoring your house and capable of being potentially hacked and floating around, this is the product for you.
	In case you're a complete idiot, here's something you can put into your home.
	At Ring, we invent stuff.
	Yeah.
	Ring video doorbell, ring alarm, and so much more.
	Oh boy, go from here.
	Introducing Ring Always Home Cam.
	Listen here, you buffoon.
	You can put this in your home.
	Um, what?
	What?
	What if we made a camera?
	I can see every angle in your home.
	You're a stupid guy.
	Camera in every room.
	And make it its marketing notes so that you can teach it where to go.
	Like this.
	Or this other camera.
	Just like that.
	So with the push of a button, it wakes up and goes here.
	There.
	Oh man.
	Look.
	Wherever.
	My own little spy cam.
	Orange spices, didn't you?
	No way.
	Frankly, I blame the oranges.
	Oh look, and the always home cam works seamlessly with ring alarm.
	Sure.
	Yeah, that's not good.
	Actually, it's great, because you can watch it live.
	Men are stupid.
	You forgot the orange slices.
	This guy's a dummy.
	And when you're home, the always home cam is docked and the camera is hidden.
	Designed with your privacy in mind.
	Ah.
	Introducing Always Home Cam.
	Sure.
	Only from Miranda.
	Only from Miranda.
	Yeah, so in case you're a complete idiot, Go ahead and you know purchase your ring home cam.
	I'm sure nothing nefarious will ever come of that.
	I can't wait for SWAT teams to be able to remotely activate those and just fly them around your home before they burst through and kick in your door.
	Just activate your Ring cam, get an exact position on everyone.
	The funny thing about this is presumably if you're looking at Ring's remote controlled camera drone for your home, you've already bought into the Ring infrastructure and you've got cameras at the important points, the entrance points and exit points of your home.
	Yeah, it's hard to believe that this is going to be the first product that someone incorporates from Ring, you know?
	This makes a good point.
	They already have cameras for every door and window.
	Come on.
	Oh boy, look, it can fly over to your kitchen counter and show your stupid husband that he did forget the orange slices.
	What an idiot.
	Yeah, if you put this in your house, you are an idiot.
	A flying surveillance drone in your home, ring the anti-privacy company that brought you always-on doorbell cameras has outdone itself.
	Pictured as a roomba vacuum that hoovers up dirt from your floor, but the always-home cam hoovers up 4K images of your entire home, whether you're home or not.
	And of course, again, I was talking about the FBI or the SWAT team using it to get a lay of the land.
	But just imagine that this firmware, the software gets cracked.
	People with nefarious intent can activate it to actually check to see if you are home.
	Be able to fly it around your house and see if there is anyone in there before they bust in, knowing for a fact you're not.
	And of course, anything that is connected to the internet, anything that has these capabilities can and will be hacked eventually.
	That's simply the way of things.
	Nothing that is attached to the internet of things is safe.
	No problem that the images are transmitted to the internet.
	No problem that it will image all the contents of your house, including things left around, like important papers or people doing private things.
	Like Larry Ellison recently said, you will be on your best behavior.
	That's right.
	You don't want Jeff Bezos hearing you say naughty things.
	Who owns Ring?
	Why, Amazon, of course.
	Why would Amazon want to see inside your house?
	What a marketing bonanza.
	Yeah.
	That too.
	I'm more focused on those other possibilities.
	But realistically, that's probably...
	It's always scanning for what you have, what you might need.
	Hey, look, I noticed that you don't have an obj dar, some knickknack that would fit just perfectly on the shelf right here.
	Here's an ad for a thousand of them.
	Yeah, you've got Alexis already listening for ways to send you more targeted ads.
	Imagine these things, you know, scanning your home with AI for things to target for ads.
	See a dog bowl, you get, you know, dog products.
	I notice that your coffee table has a stain on it.
	Wouldn't you like to replace that?
	I notice your couch cushion has a stain or a tear.
	It's looking a bit old and ratty.
	Want to replace that?
	Despite only having a camera and no microphone, unlike Ring's popular doorbells, critics argue that the very concept of a flying surveillance camera in the home is problematic.
	Yeah, just a little bit.
	It's difficult to imagine why Amazon thinks anyone wants flying internet cameras linked up to a data gathering company in the privacy of their own home.
	Yeah.
	I'm sure there's an entire cadre of people out there like, oh man, a little flying drone that I can pilot around my house and look at things while I'm gone?
	It's going to be so cool.
	There's also the fact that I know some people that have ring cameras and things, and what they use them for is to check in on their dogs while they're away.
	I still think it's a bit silly and foolish, but they're using it to make sure the dogs aren't destroying anything.
	I can imagine that if you have dogs, this thing is going to, they're going to go crazy.
	They're going to rip this thing out of the sky.
	Dogs, at least every dog I've ever seen, has completely and utterly hated drones and wanted them dead.
	So I can't wait for the first video.
	You know there's going to be one of it flying around the house and some, you know, something absolutely taking it out.
	Incoming fail videos for those YouTube channels.
	In solidarity with Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel vows not to tell any funny jokes until late show is reinstated.
	This is from the Babylon B. Well, you know, what I would say to him if this were real is, you haven't before, so why start now, Jimmy?
	You know, there's no point in getting started this late in life.
	In solidarity with his friend Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel has vowed not to tell any funny jokes until the late show is reinstated.
	Kimmel's bold announcement was made as support continued to rally around Colbert following the cancellation of his program.
	With Jimmy Kimmel Live, I was promising to remain unfunny and completely devoid of humor unless this perceived wrong was righted.
	I take great personal pride in carrying on this mission, Kimmel said.
	Well, thank you, Jimmy.
	I actually saw something yesterday.
	If you'll go ahead and pull up that tweet I sent you, this got shown to me.
	You can see.
	Oh my gosh, it's Anderson People.
	Look at my TV shows jump to show their support for Stephen Colbert.
	It's who that guy is, these other guys, these other losers that you hate.
	It's that British guy and Stewart, I think.
	Look at all these unfunny dorks that have come out for Colbert.
	Look, the most true thing is that it's just them.
	Because no one else cares.
	You can pause it.
	The most interesting part is the end there, where it shows them all just in a row.
	Completely empty seats behind Them, all just clapping like seals.
	Because that's the reality of it.
	No one can stand these guys anymore.
	They're losing money.
	Colbert was losing millions for the network.
	But they're sitting there, oh, Colbert, we love you so much.
	Because he's a mirror image, a reflection of all of them.
	It's simply sitting there praising themselves.
	Yes, we're so wonderful.
	We have to be supported.
	How utterly disgusting.
	None of them have been funny in years, if they ever were.
	And to sit there and simply just clap.
	Yes, we're so important.
	You're so wonderful.
	And by you, I mean me.
	Because there's no difference.
	They're all the same.
	I just couldn't believe it when I saw it.
	It was so incredibly on the nose, just these out of touch millionaires.
	No, you have to.
	You can't cancel Colbert.
	You have to keep this millionaire on the payroll to lecture the American people.
	Cannot stand those guys.
	Cannot stand them.
	KWD 68, the U.S. Communist Party quit running a presidential candidate in 2012, stating that the Democrats were fighting the fight.
	Yeah.
	The Democrats have gone so far left.
	They simply are.
	Look at what's happening with Zoron Mamdani in New York.
	They're probably going to elect him.
	And New York will finally have to wall it off and make escape from New York a reality.
	The front porch media.
	Bottom line is all the social engineering propaganda is being rejected.
	Thinking people are stupid is a fatal flaw.
	Humans will win in the end.
	I like your optimism, the front porch media.
	Tunnel Lord 1337.
	Didn't the AFD have their right to bear arms legitimately taken from them by the government?
	I remember something about that.
	Remember something about that.
	Lance, if you're able to, would you look that up?
	Let's attach a gun to it.
	That's right.
	We're going to attach a gun to the ring drone camera.
	That way, as soon as you try to break in, we just vaporize your lungs.
	It'll, of course, it'll be a one-shot sort of thing.
	I don't think it's stable enough, but one-shot sometimes is all you need.
	Yeah, Jeremy Rules remembers that far members of Farite AFT Party can't own firearms.
	You were right, Tunnel Lord.
	Yes.
	I thought I remembered something about that.
	Thank you, Lance.
	Douged 007.
	I could see cats destroying those, swatting them down with their paws.
	Yeah, this seems like a really questionable thing to have in a lot of homes.
	Not just from a, this is stupid, you're going to regret this, but in a sense of, yeah, animals are going to destroy these.
	From Porch Media, your UBI gets a nice bump once your home is surveilled.
	Once you make sure you're not doing anything that's dangerous or unhealthy or problematic for the government, well, bump up your UBI.
	You'll get a little bit more.
	You'll be a little bit more equal than others.
	High Boost.
	Where are the Epstein ring camera videos?
	That's right.
	We needed one of these in Epstein's cell, just circling around and filming him at all times.
	If only we'd had the ring drone camera on Epstein, none of this would have happened.
	They want your house completely surveilled at all times, but allegedly this high-security prison, it's got ancient technology that stops for a minute every day.
	They're constantly scanning what you post on social media in case you say something naughty.
	Jeffrey Epstein's guards fall asleep.
	The cameras don't work.
	He's moved off of Suicide Watch.
	And his cellmate is removed.
	Funny, you know?
	Who cares?
	Move on.
	Tunnel Lord 1337.
	I wonder if Ring's getting government subsidies.
	Now, I don't know, but there's always some kind of weird government contract somewhere.
	About Klaus Hybu says an Epstein massage?
	You know, we can only speculate, but I don't want to speculate too much because that's gross.
	Trump Burger.
	This would be pretty loud if it was flying an apartment next door.
	Yeah, even in the video, it has an obnoxious droning to it, and they're going to make it sound as good as possible.
	They're going to try to sell you on it.
	But rotors are not known for being quiet.
	And it's probably going to have a very obnoxious, high-pitched whine.
	So, yeah, I imagine if your neighbor has this thing and uses it frequently, you are going to be annoyed.
	Apartment walls are not very thick.
	When I lived in an apartment, our next-door neighbors fought continually.
	They would just scream at each other, and it was just so obnoxious.
	Just late at night, screaming.
	Just constant domestic squabbles.
	Audi MRR, the CIA loves people who buy this tech.
	Yeah, that's right.
	You know?
	The CIA loves a sucker, and there's one born every minute.
	Shelly A. Wi-Fi can see your body positions and movements using signal technology in your body's electromagnetics.
	Yeah.
	This is something that, you know, people on the far right conspiracy fringe had talked about for a while, for quite a few years, that this was possible.
	And people dismissed it.
	You're crazy.
	And then it came out.
	And I even saw some people admitting, like, wow, you know what?
	I suppose I owe the conspiracy theorists an apology.
	Even some normies were kind of freaked out by it.
	An extra 20 million Trump rebels in $36 million settlement for fraud.
	I have a comment from Dan here that says, if only Epstein's neighbor had had a camera like that, would have followed him and figured out where he actually went.
	Yeah.
	Actually, you know what?
	We have a video that might explain it.
	Maybe this is the ring camera footage.
	Let's take a look at that.
	Footage is missing one.
	There you go.
	Oh.
	How confused.
	There he goes.
	He's escaping.
	We're finally figuring out the truth.
	Client list gone.
	That's right.
	Case closed.
	Client list gone.
	Don't worry about it.
	Nothing to see here.
	That's what we could have had if his cellmate or his next-door cellmate or the prison in general just had a ring hammer.
	It could have followed him down the hallway as he absconded back to Tel Aviv or wherever, you know.
	Actually.
	Just move along, folks, nothing to see here, like I'm going to move along.
	An extra $20 million?
	Trump revels in $36 million settlement for fraud and deceit by 60 minutes on CBS.
	Yeah.
	He's just out there gloating, oh boy, look at me.
	This is great.
	In the wake of legal action over a deceptively edited 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris in the 2024 White House race, President Donald Trump on Tuesday said CBS and its parent company Paramount have finally paid a $16 million settlement with another $20 million on the way.
	That's right, $36 million.
	That's almost as much as Stephen Colbert was losing a year.
	And this is yet another absolutely frivolous lawsuit from Trump.
	He loves his frivolous lawsuits, folks.
	He's the best at them.
	CVS does a lot of underhanded things and twists a lot of stories.
	He just happened to sue them over one instance where they weren't doing that.
	Trump also issued a warning to other deceptive news media saying, The Wall Street Journal, the failing New York Times, the Washington Post, MS, DNC, CNN, and all our mainstream media lies are on notice that the days of them being allowed to deceive the American people are over.
	Make America great again.
	Yeah.
	You won the election.
	Prove the damages, realistically, should be the response, but he just likes to gloat and rub people's noses and things.
	Well, we have been live for nearly an hour and a half, nearly halfway through the show already.
	And I still have so many articles to get through.
	But first, before we take a break, I want to remind you to please support the show.
	You can do so here on Rumble by leaving a tip.
	You can do so by subscribing on Kik.
	You can also go to davidknight.new to see all the products we have there and also the ways we have that you can donate.
	There's a P.O. box, which is David Knight, Kodak Tennessee.
	Or David Knight, PO Box 994, Kodak Tennessee, 37764.
	There is Cash App, Zelle, and the Bitcoin address.
	There's also Subscribestar, which is subscribestar.com forward slash the David Knight show.
	If you'd please go check that out and see if there is a tier that fits your budget.
	There's DavidKnight.gold, which is set up by Tony Arderburn.
	We'll let him know that you're coming through us.
	If you'd like to start accumulating gold or silver, that's your way to do it.
	There's also TrendsJournal.com, promo code Night for 10% off.
	Works out to be about $2.50 a week.
	And that is an incredible value for what Gerald is providing with the Trends Journal.
	There's also RNCStore.com, 10% off with promo code Night as well.
	You can look at their products, see if they might help you with any of your health concerns.
	There's also Homestead Products.shop.
	They have high-quality made in America products, so many different kinds, whether it's camping or survival food or beauty and skincare.
	They have an amazing variety of things.
	Promo code night for 10% off there as well.
	And of course, jacklawsonbooks.com, where you can get the civil defense manual, where you can learn how to start preparing for the worst and learning how to defend your community and have access to things like water.
	And without water, nothing else is really going to matter.
	Lack of water will take you out quicker than anything aside from acts of malicious force.
	So go check those out.
	We really do appreciate all the support you have given us.
	And I just want to personally thank you all for all the kind, kind words you said about the video from my dad the other day.
	I normally don't go look at the comments on videos.
	That's generally a rule of thumb you want to follow when you post something.
	If you want to maintain sanity, don't go check what people are saying about you.
	But for this one, since it wasn't about me, I wanted to go check it out.
	And just the sheer amount of love that you have all shown has been truly moving.
	And I cannot thank you all enough.
	Please continue to pray for him.
	But I really, we really do appreciate it.
	It means so much to see how loved he is and how much you all appreciate him.
	So we'll take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Stay with us.
	PIANO PLAYS
	Defending the American dream.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	You should be able to buy me several hundred.
	Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
	The USA is a production of the USA.
	Welcome back, folks.
	Appreciate you still being here.
	I see Sir Knighted in chat says there was a David Knight video that I missed.
	Yeah.
	You can find it on all of the places we upload to It's on Rumble.
	You can look for Remember Me.
	It's got a picture of our dad as the thumbnail.
	It should be right up there.
	Should be pretty easy to find.
	Yeah, it's about 10 minutes.
	So go ahead if you want an update from him on what's going on.
	He is working towards coming back, and we'll be having more from him soon.
	I want to assure you all, he is coming back.
	We were seeing more and more comments from people saying, I don't think David is coming back.
	He is.
	He is.
	You don't have to worry.
	I am simply an interim host.
	I am not David Knight.
	I am not trying to assume his position.
	Got comments here.
	Alien poop evolution.
	The CIA and burglars love your camera.
	That's right.
	They're going to have a field day with it.
	I can really see those creepy videos of people hacking into nursery cams and things like that.
	Gee, Talent60, thank you.
	That is very generous.
	We really do appreciate it.
	Cannot thank you all enough for the support.
	Good job, Travis and Lance.
	Well, thank you for the kind words.
	That is very, very kind.
	I appreciate them, and I'm sure Lance does too.
	Alien Poop Evolution.
	The drone cameras will start leaving chemtrails around your house.
	That's right.
	They'll have a biometric scanner that's linked, or they'll just link to your smart wearable tech, and notice that you're getting your daily dose of chemicals, and they'll just spray your house down for you.
	Won't that be handy?
	Isn't that great?
	Tunnel Lord 1337.
	Eh, just attach a block of C4 to the ring drone.
	You definitely take out the thief.
	Yeah.
	Make sure that there's no question.
	My plan for self-defense is starting to train judo or MMA and strapping a claymore to my chest, you know?
	Get in real close.
	North American House Hippo.
	A couple of sheriff's deputies showed up on my porch one day.
	They thought my solar-powered security lights were cameras and they wanted to capture footage from a drive-by.
	Yeah, that's something that's happening more and more, it seems like.
	More and more people have these security or ring doorbells and the cops are showing up being like, please give us that footage.
	Perhaps they're not saying please.
	Now I'm going to move on to what's happening with the Jeffrey Epstein stuff.
	The House Speaker starts, August recess early to avoid the Jeffrey Epstein votes.
	What a sycophant Mike Johnson is.
	He's covering up.
	He's doing everything he can to give Trump cover.
	How about we just go to recess early, guys?
	You don't really want to see the Epstein files.
	We're just going to go to break, and we'll be back later once this is all calmed down.
	Maybe you guys won't be so interested in it in a few months once we're back.
	This is simply how our government works.
	Look at what happened with Dennis Haster.
	He was a pedophile, and he became, I believe, the longest-serving speaker.
	And it's because he was blackmailable.
	It's because they knew they could keep him in line.
	And now Johnson is basically covering for an entire cabal of pedophiles.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Good old Mike Johnson.
	Thank you, Mike.
	How is Speaker Mike Johnson?
	No vote on releasing Jeffrey Epstein documents before recess.
	We have a video of Thomas Massey talking about that because, of course, he's one of the people that is fighting to get the files released.
	Probably because he's one of the only people that aren't on the Epstein aren't on the list.
	Do you think the president is losing trust with members like you who want more transparency?
	I wouldn't say he's lost trust.
	I'm sort of in a, I would say, a different category.
	Yeah, he's persona non-rada with spent $1.8 million against me.
	And I got a new tweet last night, or a Truth Social last night.
	And clearly that was because I've done this Epstein file.
	Like, dogs don't bark at parked cars, right?
	This bill is moving.
	This is coming to a vote.
	We've got enough Republican co-sponsors of the bill, twice as many as we need right now, such that when they sign it and every Democrat signs this, we're going to force a vote on it.
	It's not going away.
	He assured them it's not going away.
	In response, Mike Johnson was like, well, if the bill's not going away, we are.
	So long, and thanks for all the underage girls, I suppose, is probably what they said.
	Johnson told reporters that the House will not vote on the resolution before the August recess, adding that he wants to give the Trump administration more time.
	That's right, they're out of time.
	Here's what I would say about the Epstein files: there is no daylight between the House Republicans, the House, and the President on maximum transparency.
	That's right, this is maximum transparency you're getting here.
	It's clear as mud.
	This is such a cynical lie.
	My belief is we need the administration to have the space to do what it is doing, and if further congressional action is necessary or appropriate, then we'll look at that.
	That's right, we'll look at it.
	He added, but I don't think we're at that point right now because we agree with the president.
	We agree that you're all a bunch of idiots that need to move along.
	We all agree that you're stupid.
	We're so committed to transparency that we're going to shut down the government so that a vote about transparency doesn't come through.
	Exactly.
	That's entirely unnecessary.
	That's how committed to transparency we are.
	No one has ever been more committed to transparency.
	The most transparent administration in history, one might say.
	Despite criticisms from certain corners of the right, Trump defended Attorney General Pam Bondi's handling of the situation.
	No, it's Bondi that's defending Trump.
	He is the one that needs the cover.
	She's the one that's sticking her neck out.
	That's right.
	We're so committed to transparency.
	By the way, we're not going to vote on it.
	We're going to recess.
	Leave us alone.
	Trump administration.
	Johnson to shut down House early to avert the Epstein vote.
	And this just more proof.
	Mike Johnson is nothing but a snake.
	Nothing but just a shill for the powers that be.
	Florida man arrested for threatening to kill everyone on the Epstein client list.
	Now, of course, the obvious thing to say is, well, if there is no client list, how could he be arrested for threatening to kill people that don't exist?
	Now, that was my first thought.
	When you read further into the article, he does make some more directed threats at specific individuals.
	it's not as amusing as it seems at first but that is a threat to We know it does.
	They've talked about it.
	Terrell Bailey Coursey allegedly posted the threats on X last Tuesday, seemingly reacting to a response from X's AI agent Grok that disputed any such client list exists, as the FBI and Justice Department recently confirmed.
	Well, at Grok, you're wrong.
	Everyone involved, if I see them in real life, I will kill them on site.
	Bailey Corsair was getting arrested because you had to threaten an AI, because you've gotten to a fight with an AI on the internet.
	Grok.
	Grok's a snitch, apparently.
	Bailey Corsay allegedly said, I will kill everyone on the list on site, and they absolutely deserve it.
	Roughly an hour after that post, Bailey Corsay posts another message singling out three government officials.
	That's most likely what got him in trouble.
	Unnamed in the charging documents saying he would kill you on site.
	I don't think even our government is stupid and incompetent enough to come in and arrest you for threatening to kill people they say don't exist and are desperately trying to say don't exist.
	Thing is, this is clearly hyperbole because one single person could never kill everyone on the Epstein list.
	Do you know how much time that would take?
	Do you know the type of resources you would have to have to accomplish that?
	And I'm quoting this man.
	I'm not saying this myself.
	He said, it's time to start killing politicians on site.
	Those are the types of things that got him in trouble.
	And again, don't do stochastic terrorism, please.
	They will come down on you like a neutron bomb.
	They will use the entire force of government.
	They're not going to play nice.
	They can.
	Sure, maybe one-upping the AI and winning your debate with it might feel nice, but it's not worth it if it involves going to jail for terroristic threats.
	Yeah.
	As nice as it is to prove the AI an idiot, don't do what this man did.
	Don't do it.
	They will at least drag you into court, and it will make your life miserable.
	North American House hippo, Trump is doing an awesome job of implementing Agenda 2030.
	No wonder he was installed.
	He's the perfect man for the job.
	He is.
	He's a man for not all seasons, but this specific season.
	He's managed to silence so many people on the right wing, drag them into his fold, and now they're completely trapped.
	Their audiences love Donald Trump.
	They promised that Donald Trump was their guy over and over again.
	They assured everyone, and now their audiences love Trump more than they love them.
	If they break from Donald Trump, they're going to lose a large portion of the people that watch their shows.
	I mean, even here, where it's known we don't support Donald Trump, we still routinely get comments about, oh, I can't believe you would say this.
	If we simply towed the party line, if we were to just go out there and start saying, Trump is amazing, look at how good Trump is.
	Look at Trump.
	He's grand and wonderful.
	It would probably get us a much larger audience.
	Because that's what people want to hear.
	They want to be told this lie.
	They want to believe this.
	People want to believe that they have a hero in Washington.
	But they don't.
	It is a lie.
	KWD68, can we get another Epstein binder?
	Yeah, that's right.
	We should have another fun little photo shoot.
	You can trot out these MAGA influencers and grifters.
	You can bring them out, have them trot around.
	Maybe Pam Bondi can even go on more shows and talk about how she's got it on her desk.
	Oops, those were the prop binders.
	We forgot to give them the real ones.
	Ah, darn.
	Oops are bad.
	Oh, by the way, there was nothing to see anyway.
	Move along.
	Florida Surgeon General highlights vaccine injuries, calls on NIH to act.
	At a press conference at Florida State University in Tampa, Florida, Surgeon General Joseph Lotipo made an urgent call for the NIH program funding to help Americans injured by COVID-19 vaccines.
	Of course, we talked about this article yesterday.
	He is actually standing up and saying something.
	He's doing more than RFK is.
	He's being more vocal and more honest.
	Trump is never going to admit, though, that his shot was the problem.
	He's still very proud of warp speed.
	He had to have that country and Western singer tell him, what are you doing?
	Your bass doesn't like this.
	Stop bringing it up if you want people to, you know, if you want the support to increase.
	I was invited to Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Latipo's press conference in Tampa on July 17th, 2025.
	From my front row perspective, Dr. Latipo's tone was measured yet resolute.
	He recounted how unusual it is in his experience to encounter so many post-vaccination issues.
	Notice he says, so many.
	That is a tacit acknowledgement that other vaccines have issues as well.
	He's simply saying that, wow, yeah, normally it's not this bad.
	This is an absurd amount of issues.
	When was the last time that you had a vaccine that literally almost every single person knows someone who had a bad reaction from it, Latipo asked pointedly.
	Now, of course, personally, I would say you probably know a lot more than you would think.
	You probably know many people who simply cannot get a diagnosis on what's wrong with them, or the doctor refuses to tie the two together.
	We saw RFK talking about the sheer number of autoimmune disorders and autism and all these other diseases that have spiked in the decades since vaccines became liability-free and they became pushed and the numbers increased.
	However, it's very, very difficult to get doctors to do any sort of correlation there.
	So we probably all know many people that have some kind of long-term vaccine injury that is simply not going to be admitted.
	Now continue.
	There are very few people that I run into who either themselves have not had a bad reaction from these mRNA COVID-19 vaccines or who don't know someone who had a bad reaction.
	Yeah, these reactions from the COVID vaccine are obvious.
	They're large.
	The things like heart attacks, blood clots, myocarditis, they're very obvious.
	They tried, but as a general rule, every time you see one of these articles about people dropping dead on the soccer field, young high school athletes or college athletes or even professional athletes, the comments are flooded with people saying, I bet he got the COVID vaccine.
	It's so obvious, nobody with any common sense left can deny what's happening.
	Dr. Latipo's call to action, fund research and care for the vaccine injured.
	But of course, I would be shocked to see that happen.
	Trump, that would be an admission that what he did was bad, that his actions caused this.
	And so getting Trump to do that is probably a futile endeavor.
	FDA chief admits he knows people injured by COVID shots, but defends their approval.
	Dr. Marty McCary, this is another Maha fraud, pleaded with Americans to be patient with its handling of the COVID-19 shots amid discontent with the agency approving a new mRNA-based shot instead of pulling the existing ones from the market.
	Yeah, I know they're causing issues, and I know people myself that are injured.
	But just, you know, give us a pass on this new mRNA shot.
	Please be patient with our ongoing murders.
	Stop whining.
	Just take the shots.
	On July 19th, the Epoch Times released a video interview with McCary covering a broad range of issues, during which senior editor Jan Chikilik relayed the surprise of the Make America Healthy Again movement that the FDA authorized spike vacc for high-risk children aged 6 months to 11 years old.
	Spike Vax later received a disclaimer warning of the potential for heart damage.
	That's right, they'll put a little warning on the box.
	They might not tell you about the issues, but you know, if you look at the box and see it there, maybe you can avoid it.
	McCary said they were moving away from blindly rubber stamping COVID vaccines each year.
	You know, they're still putting out these mRNA vaccines.
	They claim that simply rejected...
	We were blindly rubber-stabbing them before.
	Now that we have the evidence showing that they're harmful...
	That's right.
	We're knowingly rubber stamping them.
	But claim simply rejecting the jabs entirely would eliminate government's leverage to get the companies to conduct proper randomized trials.
	You don't need leverage.
	You have a unilateral use of force, basically, in the United States.
	You have the ability to come in and say, you have poisoned people.
	You have killed American citizens.
	You could march the Marines in, the Army, the National Guard.
	You could knock down the doors of these companies and haul their CEOs off to Guantanamo.
	Not saying you should, but you could.
	You continually do this sort of thing to individuals that don't deserve it.
	And yet, we need leverage with these companies.
	We've got to play it smart.
	Really?
	He stressed that the vaccine is not approved for healthy children.
	That's right.
	But if your child is sickly and weak, inject him with this poison.
	Thanks, McCary.
	That's great.
	Wonderful.
	McCary said the government's current adverse event databases were too clunky.
	That's right.
	Too clunky to make any inferences about rates.
	Yeah.
	We can't really tell.
	We don't know for sure.
	Our databases are faulty.
	We're not going to do anything.
	We can't really tell how many people have been killed or injured.
	The fact that you know that it's happening, the fact that you know it's killing and injuring people, is enough for you to go, what's our prime directive as healthcare professionals.
	That's right.
	First, do no harm.
	No harm.
	Not, well, potentially try to work out a system where you do less harm than might be done by whatever is harming people.
	And if it does less harm than what's harming people, you can justify it.
	No, it's do no harm.
	There's no wiggle room there.
	We're committed to reliable analysis, McCary said, and are not blowing off warning signs.
	That's right.
	We're not blowing them off as we allow more mRNA vaccines.
	As we keep the ones that are known to be damaging on the market, we're not blowing them off.
	No.
	I would ask people to be patient with us as we do this the proper scientific way.
	The proper way, again, is to stop them right now.
	Do no harm.
	Kick in their doors, drag them off to prison, and start processing them for mass murder.
	That's the proper way to do this, McCary.
	None of this.
	Oh, we need leverage.
	We need leverage with these companies that are poisoning and injuring and killing the American people.
	Not just Americans either, but people around the world.
	We need leverage with them.
	Yeah.
	McCary says, I personally know of people who have been injured by the vaccine.
	I personally know of friends who have lost a loved one from the mRNA COVID vaccine.
	People have a right to be angry.
	They've been deceived.
	I would ask people to be patient with us.
	People have a right to be angry since they've been deceived and murdered.
	They just don't have a right to justice.
	Yeah.
	According to this guy.
	You can be angry.
	Feel free.
	Just, you know, don't ask us to do anything about it.
	I understand that you're angry that I'm not doing my job and allowing this to happen to you.
	Yeah, smacks of Bill Clinton, doesn't it?
	I feel your pain.
	What scumbags?
	Many viewers were dissatisfied by McCary's explanation.
	I'm one of them.
	Wondering why the existing vaccines would not be paused for safety's sake, at least until the results of those feature studies are in, and noting that he originally supported much of the establishment pandemic response, including the shots in 2020 and 2021.
	Of course, that's why he was chosen, because he's nothing but an establishment shill.
	He's simply there to put a new face on it, to reignite trust in the system.
	Come on, guys.
	You can trust me.
	I paid some lip service to the things you want now.
	Take this spike vax.
	Give it to your kids.
	At Marty McCarry personally knows of people who have been injured or killed by the MRNA shots, but wants us to be patient.
	While they conduct some type of traditional studies, any other drug or therapeutic would have been pulled three years ago.
	Approving a new Moderna Coba shot moving red dye number five takes no time at all.
	But if you've been sitting around injured for the last four years or hoping for justice for a loved one who passed, you gotta wait, guys.
	Yeah.
	Just gotta wait for justice.
	Just gotta hope.
	Marty McCary showed zero awareness, unsure how he managed to squeeze into the anti-lockdown community.
	It's because these people...
	We can actually play that video of Marty McCary.
	Let's play it.
	Let's raise my blood pressure.
	Let's have me get a little upset.
	The safety signal that many people have described, I personally know of people who have been injured by the vaccine.
	I personally know of friends who have lost a loved one from the mRNA COVID vaccine.
	Don't care.
	So I think it is reasonable at this time to say we want good, solid, definitive data.
	And the conditional limited approval of the COVID vaccines is in that framework that we want to see a proper data set come to us so we can take a good look at that data.
	You mentioned your look at the data.
	Okay, that's enough.
	That's the lucky from this guy.
	I also have to question, does anyone else...
	Is there something about them that makes the government look at him and say, yeah, that's the guy we need?
	Does it make the government think, oh, well, he's kind of small and unimposing?
	Maybe people won't realize that we're using him to push mass murder.
	Federal vaccine adverse event reporting system, VAERS, reports 38,709 deaths, 221,030 hospitalizations, 22,331 heart attacks, 28,966 myocarditis and pericarditis cases as of June 27th.
	This is Trump's real legacy.
	This is what he should be most remembered for.
	And the fact that he's proud of it.
	I gave you warp speed.
	It was me.
	Yeah.
	But no.
	Not going to hold his feet to the fire on that.
	Handy, Florida HB 2006 line 111.
	The law says the state health officer has the right to vaccinate us by any means necessary.
	That's great.
	That's right.
	We're going to kick in your doors.
	Remember, Alan Dershowitz said he'd be in favor of that, using the military to drag you out and vaccinate you by force.
	The front porch media and the injured are realizing the injections cause their problems.
	People who I never believe would admit it are.
	Sometimes when it's you who are suffering and sometimes it's a lot harder to deny when the evidence is directly in your face and it's you who the damage has been done to.
	Francine, two in my family, my sister dead of turbo cancer, my brother's waiting for open heart surgery from an aorta aneurysm.
	I'm so sorry to hear that, Francine.
	That is terrible.
	Defy Tyrants 1776.
	There's been other vaccines that have been pulled due to only four or five people dying, so why are they still pushing these COVID jabs when they've Killed and maimed millions around the world.
	Yeah.
	KWD 68.
	The fact that the Biden administration didn't pursue the deaths from the warp speed jab and prosecute Trump shows the Uni Party in March 2030.
	It was teed up for him.
	Nothing.
	Yeah, they can't do that because it would question their narrative.
	It would make you look at vaccines and go, oh, maybe they are dangerous.
	It would validate what people on our side of things have been saying.
	Tunnel Lord 1337, wait a minute.
	So you don't have the data, but you'll give permission to use mRNA jabs?
	Yeah.
	Well, we don't have much data on these things.
	We aren't sure what's going on with them, but we'll authorize them.
	You know, we don't need data for that.
	We need data to pull them when we know for a fact they are actually killing people and maiming them, injuring them.
	Who knows what else?
	But, you know, we don't have enough data from that to pull them off the market.
	The front porch media.
	How about it doesn't stop transmission or infection?
	Isn't that important anymore?
	Nah, what's important is they're making a lot of money, like a lot of money, a stupid amount of money.
	More money than you could shake a stick at.
	Maxime Bernier calls for immediate withdrawal of COVID shots.
	People's Party of Canada leader Maxime Bernier called for immediate stop to the dangerous COVID vaccines throughout Canada.
	Bernier wrote, dangerous COVID vaccines, quote-unquote, must be withdrawn from the market and victims compensated.
	At some point, people have to care about this.
	Global News has now reported that over 10,000 Canadians suffered serious injuries after COVID vaccination, including heart damage, neurological disorders, and blood clots.
	Yet while people suffered serious side effects from the vaccine, the media downplayed risks and silenced the warnings four years later.
	The truth is undeniable, but still ignored.
	Yeah.
	This is a worldwide poison that Trump pushed that was greenlit.
	Bernier noted how Pfizer's own release documents reveal that they knew about cardiac risk as early as February 21.
	Yeah.
	How about that, McCary?
	Is that enough info for you?
	Pfizer's own documents?
	No, I guess not.
	You know, not enough to stop the billions upon billions of dollars that's being raked in.
	The hypocrisy is staggering, he said.
	Bernier, who did not get the COVID shots and was one of the only Canadian politicians to speak out against COVID mandates for a time, brought up how in 1976 the U.S. government halted the swine flu vaccine after just 25 deaths and 450 cases of Guillain Beret syndrome.
	Today, with thousands of injuries, politicians, regulators, and the media dismiss, censor, or attack those demanding accountability.
	The people's body warned the public.
	Bernie lamented that those who spoke out against shots were targeted as conspiracy theorists.
	As conspiracy theorists, now the data proves the lie, and we were right, he said.
	It's funny how that seems to keep happening.
	It's funny how they'll smear you as a conspiracy theorist anytime you question the official narrative, despite the fact that it keeps coming back as reality.
	It keeps coming back as true.
	It doesn't really matter, though, to most people.
	They get whatever their choice is in terms of political commentator, whether it's someone in Fox News, CNN, or some of the newer media, if they don't hear that from whoever they've chosen as their favorite orator, they're not going to believe it.
	Whether you get it from TikTok or legacy media, people tend to just believe whatever the talking head says.
	They don't want to go out and do any research for themselves.
	They don't want to question the status quo.
	They don't want to be seen as kooky.
	There's an entirely new generation of political commentators on YouTube and TikTok and these other platforms that are still just status quo establishment shills.
	You saw it, especially on the left during the election, these young, you know, late teens to early 20s political commentators that are deep in the tank for Kamala Harris.
	They're doing everything they can to get people.
	They know the next generation isn't going to get news from the mainstream sources.
	So they're flooding TikTok and other places with these talking heads, these know-nothings that will simply parrot party lines.
	Operation Mockingbird isn't going away just because Colbert is fired.
	They're simply changing where it's implemented.
	Now, as I said, we're going to talk about what's going on with the pesticide industry.
	Seems like Congress is about to give them a de facto liability shield, you know, just like they did with vaccines.
	And to me, you only need a liability shield when people are going to hold you liable for things.
	You don't need a liability shield if your product isn't dangerous, if it's not hurting people.
	If your product is completely safe, you don't go to Congress and say, hey, would you make it so we can't be prosecuted?
	Not that we're going to be.
	We wouldn't ever be prosecuted for stuff, but hypothetically, if we were to be prosecuted, if we were poisoning people with our pesticides, maybe you could protect us from that.
	Theoretically, hypothetically.
	Not that we are.
	That's how I see this going down.
	You don't go get a shield unless you think you need it.
	Will Congress give the pesticide industry a de facto liability shield?
	This is a essay by Dr. Meryl Nass, and it's exclusive to Malone.news.
	In 2013, Bayer had its 150th anniversary.
	It was riding high.
	It sent an airship and anniversary exhibition around the world to celebrate.
	Its stock price was 27, the highest it had been since it entered the New York Stock Exchange in 2002.
	It was bullish and interested in acquisitions.
	Bayer decided to go after Monsanto.
	Bayer bought Monsanto as part of its reinvention as a life science firm with a focus on health and agriculture.
	Bayer wanted to become a bigger Player in seeds and genetically modified crops, and Monsanto offered just that.
	But there were potential problems.
	The WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer had just reported that glyphosate, the active ingredients in Monsanto's most popular product, the Herbicide Roundup, was a probable human carcinogen.
	I mentioned this before, but on the last road trip that we took down to Texas, I saw a large billboard just on the side of the highway that said, stand up for glyphosate.
	And I was blown away.
	I almost wanted to turn around and pull off to the side of the road to get a picture of it because I couldn't believe what I was seeing.
	Stand up for glyphosate.
	That's right.
	Stand up.
	And beg for more poison.
	Stand up for it.
	There were potential problems.
	By the time the sale was completed for $63 billion in 2018, thousands of lawsuits against glyphosate were developing.
	First case to trial, that of groundskeeper Dwayne Johnson, ended in the plaintiff's favor just two months after Bayer concluded the purchase.
	Johnson was awarded $278 million by the jury.
	That amount was reduced twice in subsequent proceedings to $21 million.
	Discovery revealed that Monsanto had known of the potential carcinogenicity of glyphosate.
	This is the early 1980s.
	Monsanto had pressured the EPA, which ignored much of the independent scientific evidence revealing glyphosate's toxicity, and instead relied on industry-supplied studies negating it.
	In its official safety assessment, California however listed glyphosate as a carcinogen since 2017.
	Bayer's stock has been dropping ever since it bought Monsanto.
	Oh, poor Bayer.
	So sad to hear that.
	But they have their own industry-supplied scientific data showing that it's not harmful that they paid for.
	What do you not trust the science?
	That's right.
	Trust the science that we bought and paid for and made explicitly clear the outcome we wanted.
	177,000 potential lawsuits appeared.
	About 67,000 have settled at a cost to Bayer of $11 billion.
	Bayer's current share price is $8.05, less than a third of its value before the Monsanto purchase.
	Taking over a two-thirds hit.
	You've got to imagine whoever recommended they buy Monsanto got fired.
	In 2023, Bayer hired a new CEO, Bill Anderson, a Texan, who vowed to take care of the glyphosate liability problem for the company.
	That's right, we're going to take care of the liability problem.
	We're not going to fix the product.
	We're not going to make it so it's no longer carcinogenic.
	We're not going to make it so it's no longer a poison that's killing people.
	That's giving them cancer.
	No, we're going to take care of that problem by lobbying for a liability shield.
	He developed an aggressive six-pronged approach that was sure to solve the problem one way or another, and he sequestered a $16 billion war chest that could be used to, what they say, pay claims.
	But realistically, they mean bribe politicians by influence with the media.
	Microphone is open.
	Bayer is no stranger to risk and controversy.
	During World War II, as part of IG Farben's network, it ran its own concentration camp to produce war materials, admitting on its website to working 25,000 slave laborers to death.
	I wonder how many other websites have tags like that.
	Yes, buy our product.
	It's good.
	It does great stuff.
	By the way, we killed 25,000 slave laborers by working them to death.
	And remember, if they don't care about the employees or slaves that they use, they do not care about you.
	Here are the six prongs of its attack to make its glyphosate liability disappear.
	And they're nothing if not bold.
	One, Bayer's CEO announced the company would be developing five new pesticides.
	Presumably, by the time one is discovered to be harmful, Bayer would simply move on to selling the next one in line.
	Bayer has hinted at spinning off part of the company, leaving the spun-off portion stuck with all the liability.
	Oh no, that was that other company over there.
	Bayer's CEO warned that the company might stop producing Roundup.
	Probably an idle threat since it sells $8 billion of the product yearly, which remains profitable despite its liabilities.
	Bayer appealed one of its losses to the Supreme Court in hopes it would find against lower courts after that made awards to plaintiffs.
	It is using the strategy of preemption, asking the court to rule that federal pesticide recommendations preempt lawsuits in state courts.
	A court filing Friday, Bayer urged the Supreme Court to take up a Missouri case that awarded $1.25 million to a man who developed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after spraying Roundup on a community garden in St. Louis.
	Leeb reported the federally approved label for Roundup includes no warning of cancer.
	Bayer contends federal pesticide laws preempt states from adopting additional labeling for products and thus prohibits failure to warn lawsuits brought under those states.
	Of course, my dad has told this story before, but they had a basset hound that used to love getting out of the yard.
	He was an escape artist.
	He would shimmy his way up the fence and out, which is incredible to think of when you actually know what a basset hound looks like, that he would be able to do this.
	But he would get out of their yard and go into the neighbor's yard and eat their grass.
	And their grass was treated with all kinds of chemicals.
	And the basset hound developed cancer.
	This was happening for years.
	This is, like they said, they knew about the carcinogenicity since the 80s.
	This is not a surprise.
	The neighbor, dad was retelling the story recently.
	They put up, you know, a sign that says this lawn has been treated with Kemlawn or whatever the brand was, and keep children and pets off of it for X amount of time, danger, all that.
	And then they put their phone number and logo at the bottom.
	So here you can hire us to poison your lawn.
	If you'd like some chemical warfare on your lawn, call this number.
	Bayer has at the same time sought laws in nearly two dozen states to get its preemption doctrine passed and prevent lawsuits in those states.
	Two states, North Dakota and Georgia, passed the Bayer legislation.
	Several rejected it.
	Others have yet to decide.
	I wonder if they're holding out for more money.
	Politicians sitting there like, yeah, they ponied up some, but maybe if I sit here and think about it, I can get a real payout out of it.
	Maybe they'll lobby me.
	Bayer gathered up other pesticide makers to collaborate in a clever scheme that would virtually end injury lawsuits against all pesticides at the federal level.
	In this case, the term pesticide applies to all herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, rodenticides, and pesticides.
	Tens of thousands of different chemicals, all of which would be shielded.
	Just think how many billions of dollars the chemical industry would save if they could find a way to exempt a whole class of toxic consumer products from liability.
	Yeah, they're looking at what Big Pharma did with vaccines, and they're envious.
	They're sitting there like, look, they're getting away with it.
	No one's able to really sue them for poisoning and killing people.
	How come we're being targeted?
	How come people get to get justice from us?
	That's not fair.
	If Moderna doesn't have to pay out, why should I?
	They killed more people than we did.
	Exactly.
	Guys!
	Come on.
	Mom says it's my turn to poison the American people with impunity.
	Here's how it would work.
	The plaintiffs have won lawsuits against Bayer for glyphosate injuries made use of a legal doctrine called failure to warn.
	It can be used when a product manufacturer inadequately informs or instructs consumers how to correctly use a product.
	Failure to warn is essentially a principle of product liability law.
	Any warning labels on the product or within the owner's manual need to be clear, concise, and include all possible dangers and risks associated with using the product.
	So Bayer hired some very clever lawyers and somehow convinced the Republican leadership to slip a writer into an appropriations bill that would essentially end the possibility of using failure to warrant in pesticide lawsuits.
	Here's what the writer says.
	And you can see that there.
	Let's scroll down.
	It didn't appear in yours, so it says, Section 453, none of the funds made available by this or any other act may be used to issue or adopt any guidance or any policy, take any regulatory action, or approve any labeling or change such labeling that is inconsistent with or in any respect different from the conclusion of a human health assessment reform pursuant to the federal secticide fungicide and rotinicide act.
	What does it actually mean?
	It means no federal agency, including the EPA, USDA, CDC, NIH, etc., will be able to take any action, make any recommendations, or spend any funds that challenge a human health assessment that has already been made by the EPA.
	Yeah.
	And we know how trustworthy the EPA is.
	They're suing to keep fluoride in the water.
	They would never poison the American people.
	They would never allow that to happen.
	No.
	We can trust the EPA, of course.
	And under the Act, EPA is the only agency authorized to regulate pesticides in the United States.
	Furthermore, this is not just about glyphosate, but about tens of thousands of registered pesticides now and in the future.
	If passed, Section 453 will restrict the ability of pesticide companies to update warning labels on their products, even when evidence shows risks.
	Unless the Environmental Protection Agency undertakes a new full review of the chemical under federal sexicide fungicide and rodenticide act or makes a new carcinogenicity classification of it, either of those options will take years, leaving billions of unaware Americans potential victims of their known risks.
	So Section 453 will also limit state or independent authorities from doing anything about it.
	Don't care about the Tenth Amendment.
	Throw that out.
	Ignore that.
	Who cares?
	Bottom line, Section 453 transforms EPA registration to legal immunity, gutting both federal enforcement authority and state-level accountability mechanisms, creating a regulatory dead zone where companies cannot be held liable even when they knowingly conceal health risks.
	That's right.
	That's what we're moving towards.
	No liability for these companies no matter what they do.
	Doesn't matter.
	They've got enough money to buy what they want.
	What they want is politicians.
	There's no better return on investment than getting a politician in your pocket.
	The U.S. vaccines are the only consumer product for which liability has been waived.
	You've got to imagine Bayer's kicking themselves like, gosh darn it, we were a pharmaceutical company.
	We had this.
	Why did we go here?
	Well, we can at least try to get that same kind of liability shield for the pesticides we now produce.
	Bayer CEO Bill Anderson has bragged about his bipartisan support.
	Bayer sponsored a political event in March with the ranking member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, Amy Klobuchar, and two other members of the committee, Senators Tina Smith and Deb Fisher.
	And of course, folks, bribery is bipartisan.
	All our politicians love a little extra cash infusion.
	Today, Tuesday, July 21st, 2025, the appropriations bill with the Bayer Ryder goes before the full appropriations committee.
	Citizens have been calling their representatives and asking them to vote no.
	However, a surprising number of congressional offices have told their constituents that the writer is something like what they've been told.
	They claim it is not a liability shield at all.
	Well, I must ask if it is not a de facto liability shield and what exactly is it and how is it intended to benefit the American people?
	And we get crickets.
	Sounds like Bayer or party leadership planned to use the convoluted language of the writer and the associated need to understand the extremely long FIFRA Act to deny the Bayer writer means what we know it means.
	They continually love to do this.
	They write these things in this long, meandering legal jargon that is difficult or impossible to parse unless you know exactly what it's referencing and precedent that has come before it.
	That's how they get away with so much stuff, making it difficult for the layman.
	It's continually funny to me that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are very clear.
	They're not difficult to understand.
	They were written by very intelligent people, but they were written clearly and concisely.
	And then we're told by these legal scholars that, well, they don't actually mean what we think they mean.
	It takes years, decades of training in legal fields to be able to understand them.
	You as a modern rube couldn't.
	No, the old laws, the ones they left us, were quite clear.
	It is only in modern times, well, semi-modern, that we have reached this torturous, insane, opaque lawfare.
	Karen Carpenter, 27, I listened to the hearing about chemical liability yesterday.
	It was voted on with a verbal yay or nay, and a roll call vote wasn't held.
	People are absolutely infuriated.
	Some of the chemicals being used are many times more toxic than glyphosate.
	The use of these chemicals is highly related to Parkinson's disease, cancer, and many other issues.
	Yeah, we saw an article recently where there was a study done and it showed that living next to or within a fairly large radius of a golf course drastically increases your likelihood of Parkinson's because of all the chemicals they use on the lawns to keep them green.
	Tony Lord 1337.
	Oh wow, so they were getting sued into oblivion.
	That's why Monsanto was pushing for legal immunity in my state.
	They had ads and everything pushing for the protection.
	They're poisoned.
	Yeah, they're losing money, a lot of money continually.
	Not if they can get that same sweetheart deal the vaccine manufacturers got, though.
	Doug did 007.
	It's absurd because they're acknowledging that they don't believe in their product that should raise automatic red flags.
	Yeah.
	If you have to come in and, as I said, say, hey, you know, we could really use some liability here.
	That means they need it for some reason.
	Occult sim.
	I saw Glife State ad in Florida because they are fighting against it.
	Yeah.
	Like they said, there's a huge war chest, billions of dollars that they've allocated to spend.
	They claim it's to pay out claims, but you can see what they're really using it for.
	Ads and bribing politicians.
	You know, Defy Tirement 1776.
	Guess I should stop eating my neighbor's grass.
	You know, I'm not going to tell you how to live your life, but from my family's own personal experience, eating your neighbor's grass is not a healthy way to live.
	Johnny, gospel seed.
	Governments are run by corporations now.
	They have more money than most governments.
	Yeah, it's the crony capitalist merger of business and big government.
	It is a nightmare for everyone involved.
	Well, for the American people.
	For big government and big business, it's highly profitable.
	For the American people, it is deadly.
	Stay with us, folks.
	We will be right back.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to the David Night Show.
	Wait a minute.
	Where am I?
	Sorry, Jefferson.
	The scoundrels who put America on central bank fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy.
	Despicable.
	This is outrageous.
	Washington.
	I spent my life fighting centralized power.
	Now the Federal Reserve Monopoly parades us around on their monopoly money.
	Tell me there's some good news to all this.
	Well, there is a coin they can't control.
	One that isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the Fed up.
	The all-new David Knight Show commemorative coin.
	Now patriots can support a show that won't sell out with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
	They say money talks, and this coin has something worth listening to.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	That's right, folks.
	Welcome back.
	You can go to DavidKnight.news if you're interested in that coin or any of the other products we have there.
	And there's also ways to support the show linked there as well.
	And of course, you can leave a tip on Rumble.
	We really do appreciate it.
	It is people like you that keep the show going.
	And we cannot thank you enough.
	For-profit hospital chain reportedly left patient lying in pool of his own blood.
	This is the for-profit medical industrial complex.
	Of course, you have to strike a balance between allowing people to make money.
	But it's first do no harm.
	I have some comments before I get into this.
	Front porch media.
	Anyone remember the Monsanto feature at Disneyland in the 1960s?
	Tomorrowland.
	It goes that far back.
	The propaganda has been running for years.
	It pays dividends.
	If you can propagandize the American people, it makes them slow to react.
	Cecilia 14, anyone remember when grocery stores started having medical areas, not just pharmacy?
	Guest prepping to give shots.
	Yeah, it's amazing to Me, you'll go into grocery stores, they'll be like, Get your flu shot here, get it right now.
	You can get it right next to our deli section, get your flu shot, and then go pick up some sliced roast beef or something.
	It the future is very strange.
	The post-acute care industry, which deals with rehab and long-term care facilities, was worth an estimated $483 billion in 2024 and is expected to grow to over $785 billion by 2034.
	That's right.
	It's a growth industry.
	I wonder why.
	Could it be because they're making you sick?
	Because they're poisoning the atmosphere.
	They're poisoning the ground.
	They're poisoning you.
	Making everything toxic.
	So you have to continually go to the doctor.
	And then you have to get a new drug from them.
	Something to deal with the symptoms that you're dealing with from the poison they've put into the world.
	At the Encompass facility in Jackson, Tennessee, for example, a 68-year-old patient was found lying in a pool of his own blood.
	For the New York Times, a pressure and motion-triggered alarm to alert nurses if he left his bed had been turned off prior to the gruesome discovery.
	Whoops, our mistake.
	Sorry about that.
	Patient in Morgantown, West Virginia died a similarly preventable death after he fell off the bed.
	After a fall off the bed gave her a huge gash on her forehead, their two hospital chains alarms failed to notify staff in time.
	We're having a lot of problems with the bed alarms, a nurse technician told police inspectors after the woman's death.
	Having a lot of problems with the bed alarms.
	You don't have enough people to go in there and check on them regularly.
	They didn't really talk about how understaffed hospitals are.
	When Dad was in the hospital recently, he had the bed alarm on for a while and it would have false positives.
	So it would just start ringing loudly until a nurse eventually walks in and shuts it off.
	And, you know, it's the bed that you are lying in.
	And they eventually just turned it off to prevent the false positives.
	Yeah.
	It becomes a boy who cried wolf scenario.
	They continually are getting these false positives.
	So when they do have a real emergency, it probably makes them a bit slower to react.
	They're probably thinking, oh, it's that darn alarm again.
	I'll get to it in just a minute.
	I know that this is just another false positive.
	I'm doing something right now.
	The medical industrial complex is the enemy of the American people.
	Basically, I can't think of a large industry that isn't.
	If you can, let me know in the comments because every single one, even down to something as ridiculous and innocuous as video games, has been turned against the American people.
	Not just the American people, but people in general.
	The global populace.
	The common people of each country are the target of all of these industries.
	There's also the matter of the bet alarms being applied, even in instances where they aren't necessary.
	For instance, you know, dad was moving around and fine with it, but they're still going to waste as much manpower on that as the people that really need it.
	Yeah.
	And of course they continually say how understaffed they are, how tight everything is.
	I...
	That made me so angry to see these people that are pushing poison on people.
	Pushing poison and separating families.
	No, you can't go see your husband, your wife, your child, your mother or father.
	Can't do that.
	We're going to go film a dance in the parking garage now.
	Or maybe in the hallways.
	Sorry, your grandma's dying and all that, but I've got to go hit the gritty, thanks.
	I was infuriated by that.
	I had some arguments with people over that.
	To me, it was such an obvious sign that this all was nonsense, and that the medical industry doesn't care at all.
	That these people that claim, oh, we're working so hard for you.
	We're here to help you and protect you, are simply doing it for their own personal aggrandizement.
	There's also those extremely performative videos where you'd see, you know, some nurse, usually women, because nurses usually are.
	I never saw one from a man, where they would stage the camera and the lighting would be dramatic and they would slowly slide down the wall and put their head in their hands.
	And the caption would be something about how you have to tell another person that they lost a loved one today.
	Oh, it's so difficult.
	It's so difficult for me.
	You don't understand my pain having to tell another person that their grandma died, that their mom died, their dad died.
	It's so hard on me.
	It's so hard for me to deal with the death of your grandma or mom or father or son or daughter.
	So hard for me, me, me.
	That's what a lot of the medical industry is.
	It's people that wanted a quick way to make a lot of money and a quick way to get a job that gets them social standing.
	You're not allowed to criticize nurses or doctors.
	If you do, you're a bad person.
	They're saving us.
	It's a lot of people that simply wanted to be seen as virtuous while getting to exercise a lot of power.
	iHandy, Travis, that's nothing unusual.
	There are two facilities here that I wouldn't put my worst enemy into.
	we uh iHandy, if you don't know, works in EMS.
	You can check out his substack.
	It's iHandy.substack, I believe.
	He has been cataloging what he has seen over what has happened with COVID.
	He's got a lot of really great info on there.
	You should go check it out.
	That reminds me, I still need to email Handy.
	When it comes to responding to emails and getting back to people, I am probably the worst person alive.
	Tunnel Lord 1337: How does such faulty tech even get inside hospitals?
	From my experiences, hospitals are heavily subsidized.
	So I'm wondering if these faulty beds are a product of cronyism.
	No, that couldn't be Tunnel Lord.
	You would never have someone create a terrible product and find a way to pawn it off onto the medical industrial complex.
	You never have them repurpose something and it doesn't work that ends up harming people.
	Remdesive.
	You would never have that happen.
	Also, the beds were a known major problem in the hospital, according to all the nurses.
	The entire time Dan was there, there was problem after problem.
	Like one of them, it can be lifted up and down.
	It went to its highest position and then just started rattling around.
	I guess the motor to raise it was still going or something.
	And he was stuck like that, getting motion sick from the bed while they are desperately trying to figure it out for a long time.
	They wouldn't let him get off because it was too high.
	Eventually they moved another bed over next to it at its maximum height and moved him onto that.
	It was constantly inflating and deflating, horribly uncomfortable, and all the nurses were like, oh yeah, these beds are terrible.
	And yet they charge thousands of dollars for just a single visit.
	You'd think one visit, they could get an actually good bed.
	Yeah.
	No.
	Come on, Tunnel Lord.
	Don't be a conspiracy theorist.
	Be my Valentine.
	I could not leave our mom alone in the emergency and next hospital room.
	She was a fall risk and no way the staff could monitor for her safety.
	Yeah.
	They're not going to be in there to check.
	Eye handy.
	I had to call the police to escort me and my patient out of the building because the case manager at the facility refused to let us leave.
	These people are these petty tyrants.
	They've been given this area of control over your life and they relish it.
	They love it.
	They love the fact that they can boss you around and tell you what to do.
	We've seen those cases where families have said, no, I don't want to vaccinate my child and nurses call CPS.
	No, you don't want to vaccinate your child?
	You're going against what I say?
	That's child abuse.
	We're going to punish you for that.
	Cecilia 14, Travis, yes, dancing to shove it in our faces.
	Dancing on our collective graves, yeah.
	KWD68, COVID is hard, 2020 nurses.
	Now we dance.
	Yes.
	Well, you know, you gotta get rid of the stress somehow.
	Perhaps a nice little TikTok dance is what does it, right?
	Ah, handy.
	Our fire department put giant heroes work here signs on their front lawns in 2020.
	They refused to make patient contact if any symptom was cold flu related in the dispatch notes.
	Yeah, heroes work here.
	Just, you know, not heroes if you have a COVID symptom.
	That's scary.
	That's spooky.
	I'm not going to handle that.
	No, you're infected.
	Get away from me.
	I do appreciate what first responders do.
	They're great.
	It's a difficult job, but this continual lionization.
	I think once you've reached the point where you're calling yourself a hero, where you're putting up signs to praise yourself, something has gone wrong.
	Front porch media, ask doctors or nurses, some educated questions and see how pissed off they look.
	Yeah.
	Like when my dad went in before the stroke, and they kept trying to put him on all these different medications that have these horrible side effects.
	And they said, oh, you've been talking to Dr. Google, haven't you?
	Haha, smugly.
	Like, how dare you do your own research?
	How dare you question me?
	You think you know something?
	Come on.
	I went through years of propagandization.
	You think you can compare with that?
	It's also that they don't want to admit that they don't know something and look stupid.
	Yeah.
	As I've recounted before, when I got my diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, I had gone to multiple doctors and they had looked at me and poked and prodded me and all of them were just like, I don't know, eh, eh.
	Then I got a blood test.
	They sent it off.
	A lab analyzed it.
	The computer spit out some results and he read off the diagram and said, yeah, you got rheumatoid arthritis, kid.
	It was the computer that did all the real work.
	They could have sent it to me and had it properly labeled and I would have been able to do that.
	Considering I can read.
	That seems to be the prerequisite for being a doctor.
	Being able to read a printout from a computer.
	CJP Rumble, we've got teachers who shouldn't be teaching and doctors who shouldn't be treating.
	All like mechanics who purposely break stuff.
	Yeah.
	Cecilia 14.
	Before COVID, my dad was in hospital.
	I was with him and nurses were openly mocking him and ridiculing him.
	Imagine if he'd been alone.
	Told him to stop.
	Imagine them during COVID enjoying harming.
	Yeah.
	It's truly amazing.
	I've met some very, very kind nurses, some nurses that have been excellent.
	They have truly cared about their patients.
	But I've also met and seen numerous, numerous examples where they simply wanted, again, a quick way to get some status in society.
	They wanted a quick way to gain some level of authority and a quick paycheck.
	Oh, I'm a nurse and you know how hard nursing is.
	You know, I went to school for medicine.
	You should listen to me.
	You should respect me.
	And if you don't, you're an idiot and I get to mock you.
	Nights of the Storm.
	And my wife was in the hospital last time.
	They did the same.
	The machine would go off and they would just come in and shut it off.
	What is the point of the machine if it don't work?
	That's right.
	There's that old thing.
	If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
	I guess this is, if it is broke, just ignore it.
	Doug to 007, such a pathetic excuse.
	The medical system is so cold and heartless.
	Yeah.
	It's the commodification of everything.
	Everything is simply a product.
	Everything is simply meant to maximize profits.
	If you can't maximize profits, you're useless.
	And actually treating someone, spending time with them, getting to know their symptoms, that's not an efficient way to maximize.
	That's not how we want to do things.
	Syrian girl, you'd have to be a corpse not to be infuriated by the dancing nurses laughing in your face.
	And the next most infuriating thing was these monsters raising signs telling us what heroes they all are.
	Yeah.
	This.
	Oh, I'm so great.
	You should praise me.
	Think about how much of a hero I am.
	It was disgusting.
	One jaded view.
	Most nurses tend to be authoritarian, yeah.
	Nurse Roger is a stereotype for a reason.
	Yeah.
	And it's gotten worse since then.
	I found that a lot of the nurses that were kind and actually cared were the older ones.
	Women in their 60s, generally.
	Maybe a little bit younger, a little bit older.
	With that, those are the ones that seemed to actually care about their patients.
	The younger generations seem to just be there for a paycheck and are more than willing to mock you or complain or TikTok dance as your grandma dies.
	Karen Carpenter, 27, there were some great nurses actually helping people escape during COVID.
	Most of the ones with compassion have been weeded out.
	Yeah, they don't want those people working in there.
	Yeah, they come after them like Dr. Kirk Moore.
	Yeah.
	Oh, you helped people?
	You gave them a way out.
	We're going to make sure no one else does that again.
	We're going to make an example out of you.
	Yeah.
	Cecilia 14.
	That's the truth, Karen.
	So ones left are pretty scary because they were okay with it all.
	Yeah, they were.
	They're the ones that agree with Dershowitz.
	We should be allowed to drag these people out of their homes and inject them against their will because we know better.
	We are the ones that understand this.
	They're idiots.
	They didn't go to school.
	They didn't get the propaganda weeded.
	Karen Carpenter, 27, COVID served to weed out the people with a conscience and compassion from many professions.
	We saw that in the military.
	People like Jason Barker had to send letters to be, you know, he was the one who went in and gave the kind of template letter for people in the military.
	He helped a lot of people by doing that, by making sure that they weren't, I believe, dishonorably discharged.
	I'm not an expert on military way things work there.
	But let's look at what's going on with the Obama Russia gate nonsense.
	More obfuscation, more, hey, look over here.
	Before we move on, you know, the article that you were just looking at was all about the for-profit system, which, yes, there should be some checks and balances against that, but let's not forget the article immediately before that of the government trying to give immunity to legal liability for these things.
	Having the government in charge of it isn't going to increase the empathy in any way.
	Yeah.
	This is from Revolver News.
	Purpook, for the first time, Barry is squarely in Russia Gate Crosshairs.
	Oh boy.
	Isn't that great?
	He's squarely in the crosshairs.
	Of course, why didn't Trump do anything about this before?
	Why didn't he do anything about this?
	Only trotting it out now that he needs distraction.
	For eons now, the media and political elites have told us Barack Obama was above it all.
	He was clean, untouchable.
	The gold standard of presidential perfection.
	Thanks to a damning new extra from Tulsi Gabbard, the former president is now at the center of the entire Russia hoax conspiracy.
	Not a bystander, not a clueless observer, the director of the operation, and she's got the evidence to back it up.
	Ooh.
	Ooh.
	Isn't that fun?
	Isn't that great?
	Here, have some more documents you can look at.
	Well, you don't get to see the Epstein list.
	You can fantasize about what it'd be like if Donald Trump threw him in prison.
	Isn't that great?
	Look, look at this AI video.
	We've still got that.
	Do we still have that?
	I thought we did.
	I swear I saw it.
	Oh, well.
	Fourth video.
	There we go.
	You can imagine what it'd be like when I post this to Truth Social and I put it on Twitter.
	Look, I'm arresting Barack Obama.
	Isn't that cool?
	Come on, guys.
	That's right.
	Put those handcuffs on him.
	Lock him up.
	And MAGA gets to sit there and drool on themselves and clap like seals.
	Oh my gosh.
	That's amazing.
	He did it.
	He's going to do it.
	Come on.
	Are you guys going to get fooled again?
	We're going to have to put another medal on that chest, another Fell For It Again award?
	Surely, there's not enough room.
	Americans will finally learn the truth.
	This is from Tulsi Gabbard.
	Americans will finally learn the truth about how, in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Donald Trump, subverting the will of the American people and undermining our democratic republic.
	Of course they did that.
	This is how they operate.
	This is how the FBI and the CIA have always operated.
	J. Edgar Hoover did this sort of thing right at its inception.
	Trotting this out and being like, look, look what they did.
	Yeah, everyone knows.
	Duh.
	Of course.
	For months preceding the 2016 election, the intelligence community shared a consensus view.
	Russia lacked the intent and capability to hack U.S. elections.
	And weeks after President Trump's historic 2016 victory defeating Hillary Clinton, everything changed.
	Of course, he defeated her by promising things like lock her up, which we never got.
	Another broken promise.
	Another time where Trump chickened out.
	On December 18, 2016...
	Surprise, surprise.
	Hey, everyone that is the most gullible people in the world.
	Intelligence was politicized.
	No, say it ain't so, Tulsi.
	They wouldn't do that.
	They could never.
	The FBI?
	The CIA?
	Those bastions of integrity.
	I don't believe it.
	Officials prepared an assessment for the President's daily brief, finding that Russia did not impact recent U.S. election results by conducting cyber attacks on infrastructure.
	Before it could reach the president, it was abruptly pulled based on new guidance.
	This key intelligence assessment was never published.
	Next day, top national security officials, including FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and DNI James Clapper.
	What a rogues gallery those guys are, huh?
	Yeah, they're scumbags.
	They're all the worst.
	None of them should be in power.
	But that's all the way down.
	It's not just them, it's the guy right beneath them, and then right beneath that guy, and right beneath him is another scumbag, too.
	It's scumbags all the way down.
	This is what they're made up of.
	If you get an honest guy in there, if you get someone that wants to do the right thing, they'll get rid of you.
	If you have somebody like John Kiriaku who goes in and blows the whistle on torture, they prosecute him.
	They make sure that they don't have these kinds of people within their ranks.
	The next day, top national security officials, including FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and DNI James Clapper gathered at the Obama White House to discuss Russia.
	Obama directed the IC to create a new intelligence assessment that detailed Russian election meddling.
	No, would someone really do that?
	Just go to the White House and tell lies?
	I think they might.
	I think they just might.
	Matt later points out that investigations like this take time, sometimes a lot of time.
	We all know there are layers of protection around someone like Obama, but the evidence is there.
	He could be in serious hot water.
	He might get a real bad slap on the wrist for this one.
	They have to build criminal cases.
	There are challenges because of statutes or limitations, but if you read between the lines, the documents, some of these folks were in CYA mode even back then.
	Of course, that means cover your behind.
	And speaking of evidence, you can see it in her interview.
	Tulsi isn't just raising questions, she's actually making the case, evidence in hand, that Barack Obama directly manufactured and pushed the false Russian narrative that was used to sabotage Trump from day one.
	Oh no.
	Oh, how could this happen?
	Yeah, he's gonna mention perhaps the fake pandemic, the bioweapon shots, maybe hold Trump accountable for that.
	Like you want to hold Obama accountable for this?
	Or at least you want to play at holding Obama accountable for this?
	No, cricket, silence from the MACA media, from the grifters on the right wing.
	No interest.
	Sorry.
	Don't want to talk about that.
	He's my golden ticket.
	There's no strong case to be made that Obama pressured the intelligence community to manufacture and spread fake stories about President Trump.
	All to destroy his campaign and boost Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
	Yeah.
	Well, we know they don't like him, but it's not for the reasons the MAGA base want to believe.
	These people all hate each other.
	They're all vile.
	They're all evil.
	There is no honor among thieves.
	There is no honor among these people.
	They know each other.
	They aren't the sycophant fans.
	I've said for years that if these people were to accomplish their goals, if these globalists were to cull the population, basically have it so it's just them left, they would immediately start scheming how to take out each other.
	They would immediately go to war with one another.
	They want it all for themselves.
	They don't want to be one of a dozen different rulers.
	Each one wants to be the last one left on top of the pile.
	Of course they hate Donald Trump, because they hate each other.
	Brennan and Comey probably despise each other.
	Clapper probably too.
	Hillary Clinton hates all of them, and they hate her.
	Lance has...
	Lance can actually pull that up.
	That's actually an AI-generated image.
	So that for me is a use case for AI.
	I am utterly untalented in the art department.
	I have no capability when it comes to drawing.
	And while I don't consider that it's art, I think it can be used to very quickly create little things like that.
	It's not art, but it is a funny little image.
	If I'm making ridiculous, different pieces, I prefer to grab elements and Photoshop them poorly together.
	There you go.
	Fell for it again.
	That's the MAGA base.
	Here you go, buddy.
	Here's your award.
	You're a good little soldier.
	Thanks for sticking by, President Trump, as he's poisoned the world.
	As he's locked the world down.
	Good job.
	You did so good.
	There's now a strong case to be made that Obama pressured the intelligence community.
	He pressured him.
	He came in and said, let me be clear.
	We're going to undermine President Trump.
	Bombshell, Tulsi Gabbard allegedly has revealed that Obama.
	That's right.
	That Obama may have been involved.
	Bombshell!
	Who could have known?
	Except everyone's been saying this.
	They continually do this.
	People already know all these things.
	And they trot it out as some kind of...
	How?
	How shocking?
	Barack Obama responds to Donald Trump's Russia treason threats.
	That's right.
	Former President Barack Obama's office has released a statement after President Donald Trump accused the Democrat and members of his administration of committing treason.
	Treason by allegedly manufacturing intelligence regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election.
	Out of respect for the presidency, out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response.
	But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one.
	These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.
	He's right, they are an attempt at distraction.
	Lance says he can play the video in the article, so let's go ahead and take a look at it.
	Let's see what they have to say.
	Absolutely cold, Tulsi Gabbard.
	What they did to this country in 2016, starting in 2016, but going up all the way up to 2020 of the election.
	They tried to rig the election, and they got caught.
	And there should be very severe consequences for that.
	After what they did to me, and whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people.
	Obama's been caught directly.
	Some people say, oh, you know, thank you, President Trump.
	Obama has been caught directly.
	See if they do anything about it, huh?
	Now, I don't think they will, but since this was a direct slight against Trump and he's very petty, he might.
	I don't think he will.
	I doubt it.
	We don't ever seem to get any justice, and I'd be surprised if they wanted to set that precedent.
	But since Donald Trump is one of the pettiest men alive, he just might do something.
	Karen Carpenter 27.
	Yes, a lot of teachers and nurses, first responders, actually went into the profession to help people.
	They were weeded out.
	Yeah.
	They got rid of them.
	Don't need your type here.
	We're trying to make money, baby.
	Cecilia 14.
	Travis, I saw Pam Bondi drop the Kirkmoor charges because they knew Discovery went out all they did.
	I wouldn't be surprised if that played a role in it.
	Also, I think they needed good press at the moment.
	The MAGA base, while unwilling to lay the vaccine at Trump's feet, understand implicitly that the vaccine was bad.
	And so pardoning Kirkmoor was something they could do to appease them.
	Give them something as they pulled the Epstein file.
	No, you can't have that.
	Will you settle for a little bit of justice for Kirkmoore?
	Audi MRR.
	Trump is grasping at straws.
	The establishment is giving him every scandal of the past plus the kitchen sink to distract the MAGA base cultists.
	Yeah.
	Whatever you need.
	How about Barack Obama in prison?
	Would that do it?
	Nad Lander, nobody is going to jail.
	Yeah, I'm right there with you.
	I don't think so.
	Like I said, they haven't put anyone in prison so far, and they're not going to, because that sets a dangerous precedent.
	We're going to start throwing politicians in prison for, you know, treason.
	We might have a lot of them end up there.
	I don't think we could do that.
	That's a mutually assured destruction sort of road to go down.
	This article says, could Barack Obama go to jail?
	No.
	Almost definitely not.
	If it does, if he does end up in prison, I would be shocked.
	It would be the most surprising thing.
	It is the least likely outcome of all these scenarios.
	They'll grandstand.
	They'll send mean letters and tweets back and forth.
	Trump will call him a criminal.
	Obama will call him a lying scoundrel or some such nonsense.
	And they'll move along.
	Obama will go back to having, you know, his paddleboarders show up drowned, and Trump will go back to leering on models.
	Status quo will be maintained.
	What are people saying?
	Speaker of the House Mike Johnson said in a recent CBS interview, the people who are being called out now were involved in a scheme, a ruse, maybe even a wheeze.
	It was a shameless false set of accusations and they perpetuated a lie on the American people who looked right into the camera and just lied.
	Oh, Mike, you wouldn't know anyone that's doing that, would you?
	Looking directly into the camera and lying shamelessly for the establishment, would you?
	No, Mike Johnson wouldn't do that every day of his life.
	Shamelessly.
	That's the thing.
	You can't make it in Washington if you have a sense of shame.
	You'll get weeded out.
	It's the art of deflection coming from former President Obama.
	Deflection.
	Talk about projection.
	It's Barack Obama who's deflecting.
	He's the one.
	I'm sure he is.
	I'm sure he is a criminal.
	I'm sure he's a criminal in more ways than we could ever imagine.
	However, it's Donald Trump that is using this as deflection right now.
	This is from the Trump camp.
	The front porch media.
	What's next?
	Bondate will prosecute O.J. Simpson.
	That's right.
	We'll also get Norm McDonald back out and he can commentate on it.
	This just in, California has legalized murder.
	Norm McDonald truly was a hilarious individual.
	Comedy genius.
	Everyone says that.
	It's not a hot take to say that, but he is extremely funny and extremely well thought out.
	Most of today's modern comedians are simply sycophants for whatever is going on.
	They'll push the propaganda.
	And Norm just wanted to be funny.
	He actually cared about comedy.
	That's one of the things he actually wanted to be a comedian, not some commentator.
	It's like that Carson clip we played.
	It's like, I just want to make an entertaining show.
	I'm not here to comment on public events.
	I'm not here to give my opinion on politics.
	That leads you to having an ego.
	How far we've come, Colbert and these people.
	I saw Gard played the clip yesterday on his show where Colbert made his response to Donald Trump.
	And he said, you know, oh, you know, you think I'm not funny.
	Well, would someone who's not funny and not smart or witty be able to come up with a scathing response like this?
	Words to this effect.
	And he just says, well, F you.
	Like, isn't that funny?
	No.
	I'm tired of subversion.
	Instead of actually being funny, what they do is they set up as if they're about to do something funny, and then the joke is that they don't.
	But the setup isn't as important as the punchline, the payoff.
	So you are making the job easier on yourself.
	You're not actually being funny.
	You're saying, wouldn't it be funny if I was funny?
	But then subverting it.
	Look, I'm about to do something entertaining.
	No, actually, the joke is that I'm not being entertaining.
	The joke is that I'm bad at my job.
	It's like the Marvel millennial humor as just, I'm above humor.
	Like, well, this isn't funny.
	You know, pointing out that whatever you're doing isn't funny as the whole thing of, oh, this movie is ridiculous that we see in all these Marvel things.
	They cannot just genuinely have a straight-faced moment of humor or seriousness.
	Yeah.
	They are poisoned by irony.
	They are incapable of writing good characters.
	They are incapable of writing good dialogue.
	They are incapable of the core tenets of their job.
	That's right.
	Colbert, would a funny man be able to do this?
	No.
	I think a funny man might have done something actually entertaining.
	And Hayes has to say the exact same joke that he's been saying since 2016.
	That's what's really killed these people is how political they've gotten with just monotonous anti-Trump.
	It's one thing when you're a news show, the news can be very similar day to day, but when your objective is to entertain people, you have to keep changing things.
	You have to update.
	That's an issue a lot of shows have, you know, like with Happy Days.
	That's where the term jumping the shark comes from.
	Eventually they reach a point where they've exhausted a lot of the basic plot lines and they go for something absurd.
	Jump the shark.
	Colbert couldn't even be bothered to do that.
	He couldn't be bothered to become ridiculous and absurd.
	Because that's entertaining in its own way.
	He became the most dull, uninteresting, dim-witted version of himself possible.
	Nothing but a propaganda mouthpiece.
	And I'm excited to see him go.
	I hope they're all next.
	I hope all of them end up fired.
	Now, of course, they'll all still be millionaires, and they'll all start their own terrible podcasts where they can reminisce about the good old days and have people tell them what geniuses they were and are.
	But at least they're not going to be getting paid millions upon millions of dollars to do it.
	I cannot stand these people.
	They have no talent.
	We...
	I surely do miss norm at times like this.
	Defy tyrant 1776.
	Trump's going to get that Obama.
	Going to lock him up in the same cell with Hillary.
	That's right.
	He's going to put them both in there and they can argue and bicker with each other.
	Now that would be entertaining.
	You get a live feed direct from the Obama and Hillary cell.
	You can see them yell at each other.
	True entertainment right there.
	Well, we're almost out of time, folks.
	I appreciate that you have stuck with the show.
	If you'd like to support it, you can go to DavidKnight.news and see all the different products we have as well as the multiple ways of supporting it, whether it's the P.O. box, which is P.O. Box, David Knight, PO Box 994, Kodak, Tennessee, 37764, or Subscribestar, Zell, Cash App, leaving a tip on Rumble, subscribing on Kik, going to TrendsJournal.com and using PromoCode Knight for 10% off, going to DavidKnight.gold and starting to accumulate gold and silver through that.
	Homestead Products.shop, promo code night for 10% off, rncstore.com, promo code night for 10% off, or jacklawsonbooks.com.
	God bless you all.
	Thank you so much.
	I'll be back tomorrow.
	See you then.
	Dramatic music
	The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at theedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲