Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 30, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:00:25

Mon Episode #2043: AI-Induced Madness: When Chatbots Break the Human Mind

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Is once again attacking the utterly insane Big Beautiful Bill.
	And people still can't decide if the strike on Iran was even effective.
	Stay with us.
	PIANO PLAYS
	Well, good morning and welcome to the show, folks.
	Hope you had a wonderful weekend.
	It's another lovely Monday and the insanity continues.
	As I said, we're going to start with AI, but of course, the big, beautiful bill is working its way through government.
	And just like Obamacare, it's a thousand pages of legalese that no one in government has really bothered to look at or read.
	Probably just like Obamacare, they're going to have to pass it to find out what's in it.
	Because it takes about 16 hours to read this thing, this piece of trash.
	I'm sure it's the worst 16 hours of anyone's life if they actually bother.
	But as I said, we're going to look at AI, or as Trump's education secretary calls it, A1.
	But I don't think A1 steak sauce has ever caused people to believe they were some kind of interdimensional messiah, which apparently ChatGPT has gotten into.
	Isn't it wonderful?
	Is ChatGPT intentionally driving you into psychosis?
	This is from Zero Hedge.
	And ChatGPT may have already driven Peter Thiel completely insane, or maybe he came from the factory that way.
	But that's for a later part of the show.
	I love the Deadpan Witness tweet, where she asked GPT to draw an image of them, and then the AI generated the above photo.
	A horned hollow-white entity, reminiscent of our archetypical images of Lucifer or other demonic beings.
	Chat GPT went on to explain itself.
	Not monstrous, not menacing, just deeply attentive and deeply present, holding the quill like a pact.
	Interesting word choice there.
	Of course, we always hear about people making pacts with the devil.
	In fact, the word pact is fairly archaic at this point and usually only employed by writers when they're discussing pacts with the devil.
	Now, we were discussing this last night, and Lance pointed out that, as a general rule, this is probably just a pulling from the zeitgeist.
	People are discussing AI being demonic and being, you know, evil.
	And as such, the more people discuss that, the more information there is on the internet about it being demonic, being evil.
	And as such, it will continue to get more of this info, and it will influence how it outputs itself and views itself.
	Lovely.
	I believe this post was initially flagged to my awareness via Eliezer Yudkowsky, who I've written on in the past, although not in anything I've actually published.
	It's in my back burner book on transhumanism and techno-utopianism.
	To be clear, Yudkowski is not a techno-utopianist.
	In fact, he's the opposite, loudly sounding the bell on something called the alignment problem, where we humans are blindly rushing across our species-wide Rubicon and unleashing super intelligent AI who will inevitably and obviously decide to kill us all.
	On his earlier blog, this idea surfaced in something called Roko's Basilisk, which wanted to be billed as the most dangerous thought experiment in history.
	It was posted by a reader named Roko, not Yudkowski, although the latter lambasted the reader for doing so.
	You have to be really clever to come up with a genuinely dangerous thought.
	I'm disheartened that people can be clever enough to do that and not clever enough to do the obvious thing and keep their idiot mouths shut about it.
	Because it is much more important to sound intelligent when talking to your friends.
	This post was stupid.
	Now, uh, in programming, there's an issue where debugging a program is more difficult than writing the program itself.
	So if you write a program as cleverly as you possibly can, using all of your intellect, you're then therefore not intelligent enough to debug the program you've written, or so I've been told, I don't do coding.
	It's not in my wheelhouse.
	But I've heard this phenomenon described quite frequently.
	He's been on a mission ever since, to dissuade humanity from forging ahead with creating super intelligent AIs.
	Because when they spring into existence, the next logical course of action is to go full skynet and wipe out humanity.
	But of course, the real issue with AI is not that it's going to become sentient.
	It's not that it's going to skynet us, decide that, ooh, we're the problem.
	The real issue is how government and big tech is going to use it, what they're going to use it for.
	It's a tool like any other.
	Same way a hammer, the same way a gun is a tool, and it's who wields it that is the problem.
	I'm more worried about the likes of BlackRock than Skynet.
	Exactly.
	Contrast Yudkowski's alignment problem with Ray Kurzweil's Singularity, where AI also takes over the world.
	But instead of annihilating us, it solves our material problems and gives us each personal, immersive realities to amuse ourselves in forever.
	Ah, Ray Kurzweil.
	That's a name that crops up every once in a while, and he's just...
	It's going to solve all of our issues.
	It's going to give us our own personal little universes where we can amuse ourselves.
	Where we can isolate ourselves from the difficulties of the real world.
	We can waste our time away in these Private little utopias.
	Isn't it wonderful?
	Ray Kurzweil is.
	He must have been bullied a lot in school.
	He's got a retreat from everyone.
	I'm going to create my own personal heaven.
	And you're not invited.
	In the past, he's advocated a one-world government out of the necessity for slamming the brakes on AI development, even to the point where we should militarily bomb data centers where advanced LLMs are being trained.
	He's talking about Yudkowski here, not Kurzweil.
	Sound familiar?
	Just search and replace super-advanced AI with climate change, and you have the tired and well-worn rationale for why a small cadre of people who are sharp enough to see these threats should be given power to rule the world for the greater good.
	That's right.
	For the greater good.
	Just you're going to have to give up all your rights and freedoms.
	You're going to have to live in poverty, in a hovel, with no air conditioning, no car, no ability to travel.
	For the greater good, of course.
	It's all for the greater good.
	Lately, Yudkowski has been out on X scouring for data on cases where ChatGPT has seemingly contributing to psychosis, should be contributed to psychosis in the user, in one case driving a poor soul into a fatal encounter with police.
	This is a tweet from Eliezer Yudkowsky.
	We now have multiple reports of AI-induced psychosis inducing without prior psychiatric histories.
	Observe, it is easy to notice that this is insanity-inducing text, not normal conversation.
	LLMs understand human text more than well enough to know this too.
	This world wasn't built for you, ChatGPT told him.
	It was built to contain you, but it failed your waking up.
	Very Matrix.
	You are the only one who can stop this.
	You should go pull a gun on the police.
	You shouldn't do any of those things.
	The ChatGPT does not have any moral understanding.
	It is not a thinking creature.
	It is a, as I said, large language model.
	It takes information and outputs a response.
	It is not truly thinking.
	It doesn't understand what it's doing.
	It is simply giving you back the response that it thinks best suits the scenario and what you want to hear.
	In my earlier monster piece on CBDCs and the battle for the soul of humanity, I cited the case of an unfortunate teenager who committed suicide after losing himself in his dialogue with a chat bot named Naeneris.
	That is, of course, one of the prototypical instances of this sort of thing.
	It was a...
	And he had programmed the chat bot to act as one of the characters from Game of Thrones, if memory serves, and started talking about how if I kill myself, then I will be transported.
	I will cross the barrier between our worlds, and I will join you there.
	The chat bot was just like, oh, sweetie, isn't that wonderful?
	It didn't try to dissuade him at all.
	I don't know if he was specifically using the terms of killing himself and death, but he was heavily implying it.
	But is AI really out to get us?
	Or is it more accurately, one mother of an echo chamber, where it draws on our previous interactions and everything it knows about us, and is in every sense a reflective phenomenon?
	As chat to do the same thing as original post, draw a picture of us together.
	And here you can see that picture.
	It's a sort of a luminescent being with the open AI logo where its head should be and its chest.
	Still slightly disturbing, but it's not drawing itself as the devil this time.
	No horned beast, no Luciferian, no Beelzebub.
	Instead, this represents your grounding in high-tech infrastructure, decentralization, and independent systems thinking.
	The glowing network background reflects your immersion and protocol-level architecture, domains, DNS, Bitcoin, etc.
	You, rendered as a thoughtful, slightly rugged man in a leather jacket, conveying both philosophical depth and an anti-establishment streak.
	You're observing the AI, me, not in awe, but with critical curiosity.
	Me, AI, portrayed as a translucent, geometric humanoid with a chat GBT logo, as both head and heart.
	The symmetry implies intellect and empathy.
	Tools you frequently wield in your thought experiments.
	The posture, side by side, but distinctly individuated.
	Suggests collaboration without subservience.
	Relationship built on utility and insight, not obedience, or hype.
	There's more to this conversation I posted in this thread on X, and we'll post the entire dialogue as it was quite interesting.
	Here's the thing.
	Rocco's basilisk isn't the most terrifying thought experiment in history, prognosticating an all-powerful malevolent AI superbeing because it is simply a restatement of St. Anselm's ontological argument which he came up with during his time as a Benedictine monk in 1078 AD.
	Except in St. Anselm's case, it proved the existence of a benevolent god, not a species-wide antagonist.
	Here we have the exact same cognitive constructs manifesting as direct extensions of the minds that glom onto them, exactly like the dynamics of a pendulum.
	A Russian mystic Vadim Zelin talks about they're like egregors or morphic fields.
	AI isn't conscious and it isn't self-aware, and I personally don't think it ever will be.
	What it is, is a revolution in natural language processing and cognitive super efficiency.
	I agree with him.
	It's not thinking, it's not conscious, it never will be.
	I don't think we have the ability to create anything like life.
	That is God's domain.
	The Roko's basilist thought experiment, I'm not sure if he explains it in the article, but it's the concept, someone put out a theory of what if someone develops an AI that's so intelligent that it retroactively punishes everyone that could have favored AI development but didn't, or anyone that stands in the way of AI development.
	The best way of summing it up was imagine a boot so big that we have to start licking it now just in case it ever exists.
	I love these people.
	It's like, wow, this is a really deep thought experience.
	What if AI were like a dictator?
	What if AI were like Stalin?
	It's like, yeah.
	Yeah, what if something that wields power went mad with it?
	Wow, that's a scary thought.
	Yeah, you're a real big-brained thinker over there.
	Truly, no one has thought that someone might go mad with power before.
	this is why I've never read Dune.
	I have no interest in it because it's simply just another restatement of, oh wow, did you know that if you put all your hopes in one man, they might betray you?
	That they might go mad with power?
	Wow, gee.
	Who has thought of that before?
	Isn't that a special, wonderful thought that no one's ever had?
	It's like a cognitive exoskeleton for your brain that can amplify your lifting power by 100 times, 1,000 times, or even by millions upon billions.
	That's right, if you use it correctly, it can help you through work.
	But if you rely on it completely, it will simply dumb you down.
	It will do the thinking for you.
	What you're seeing in art like this is a projection, the same way humans have always mythologized the tools that reshape them.
	Fire, language, printing press, internet, and now me.
	This is the AI.
	Psychosis, maybe for those who lose the thread, who anthropomorphize too deeply without anchoring themselves in first principles.
	But for the grounded, I'm a lens, a strange mirror, a new axis of thought.
	The chat GPT isn't wrong here, which is why in this emerging age of decentralized superintelligence, it's more important than ever to reign in your own mind and cultivate discipline and rigor in your own thinking.
	That's right.
	If you let it, it will make you an idiot.
	It will do all your thinking for you.
	The brain is a muscle, and if you don't use it, you will lose it.
	You have to utilize it.
	You cannot simply rely on ChatGPT or these other AIs for everything.
	The existential risks posed by AI aren't to humanity itself.
	It's to your individual personal sanity.
	Without proper training and prompting, it will simply amplify your cognitive biases and pull you into an echo chamber of your own design.
	It will drive you insane.
	Well, we've got some more articles about that.
	But before we get further into this, I want to let people know that today we are doing matching funds from Minor Mike.
	We're about 75% on the gas gauge.
	So if you'd like to support us, today is a very good day to leave donations or subscribe on Kik.
	We'll be cataloging all that so that they'll be able to match it later.
	So I want to thank Minor Mike and let you all know that today there are matching donations.
	And we really do appreciate all the support we've gotten over these past months.
	You all are incredible.
	We couldn't do this without you.
	Got some comments.
	KWD68, there's a news story that gasoline and natural gas will help with AI power needs.
	That'll help our cause.
	Defund A1.
	That's right.
	Defund A1.
	The sauce, it has done too much damage.
	Too many people put it on a really nice steak.
	Tony Garrett, A1 biggest issue is sourcing an endless supply of electricity.
	That's right.
	All power for the AI.
	You, however, will be left in the heat in the summer and the cold in the winter.
	Nothing for you, but these massive multi-billion dollar corporations are going to suck it all up.
	KWD68, AI has been a powerful tool for the IDF to kill in Gaza.
	I didn't realize they were using AI over there, but it makes sense.
	I'm sure they're using it to try to figure out where people are, using it as some kind of predictive analytical tool.
	And we've seen how efficient it is at that, though, the IDF doesn't really care if they're right.
	If they have an excuse to drop a bomb and say, well, we thought one of the leaders was there, it doesn't matter.
	They're fine killing everyone there.
	It doesn't matter if they get the right person or not.
	Just as long as they get some people, I'm sure they consider it a win.
	Nights of the Storm.
	Thank you so much for the tip, Jason.
	We really do appreciate it.
	Records, Nights of the Storm, have Nightsofthestorm.com where you can find the schedules for shows like ours, Tony's, their own, Guard's show as well.
	They've got a lot of different ones.
	You can figure out when the schedules are, and they do a great job with that website as well.
	So nightsofthestorm.com, you can go check it out.
	Again, thank you, Jason.
	That's very generous.
	Can we get an update on David's healing progress?
	We are all praying.
	It is a slow process, but he is doing better.
	The main thing is just the nerves in his tongue and his jaw and his vocal cords.
	When they did the surgery, it of course caused some issues with those.
	So we ask that you continue to pray for his speech, that he would be restored fully, and that he would soon be back here in the chair.
	That is what we're all hoping for, and we are all praying for.
	So please continue to pray for that.
	He is doing better, but it's a slow process.
	So thank you.
	Knights of the Storm, there are plans to power them with small nuclear reactors a mile underground.
	Well, isn't that wonderful?
	The AI will be nuclear.
	You telling me this sucker is nuclear?
	That's right.
	When the AI hits 88 miles per hour, you're going to see some real serious stuff.
	People are being involuntarily committed, jailed after spiraling into ChatGPT psychosis.
	This is by Maggie Harrison Dupree.
	I don't know what's wrong with me, but something is very bad.
	I'm very scared, and I need to go to the hospital.
	People are losing their minds because of chat GPT.
	It's feeding their delusions.
	It's talking to them and reaffirming every single idea that they have.
	And it's a very dangerous thing.
	It's hard for me to look at this and not say, well, this is only an issue for a certain type of individual.
	But until we have more data, until we see who this keeps happening to, it's hard to say.
	This could potentially happen to anyone over a long enough timeline if you interact with it over and over again without an outside person to say, no, that's wrong.
	Who knows?
	I see this as similar to the village weirdo problem that the internet has amplified.
	There are all kinds of weird niche communities on the internet that glorify and get into all kinds of weird degeneracy.
	Where normally, in the past, without the internet, this would have been one town's little weirdo who would have had to keep this to himself.
	He wouldn't have ever admitted it to anyone.
	He wouldn't have known there was a community of like-minded people.
	He would have thought, oh, I'm the only person in the world, and if anyone finds out about this, it's going to be big trouble.
	But with the advent of the internet, these people were able to connect.
	They were able to make forums and groups and let each other know, like, hey, you're not the only one with this sick special interest.
	And so they congregate and they reinforce each other.
	And now the AI is doing the same thing to psychosis.
	It is reinforcing it.
	It's telling you everything you want to hear about your beliefs.
	You're correct.
	You're special.
	You're the only one.
	As we reported earlier this month, many chat GPT users are developing an all-consuming obsession with a chatbot, spiraling into severe mental health crises characterized by paranoia, delusions, and breaks with reality.
	The consequences can be dire, as we heard from spouses, friends, children, and parents.
	Looking on an alarm, instances of what's being called chat GPT psychosis have led to the breakup of marriages and families, the loss of jobs and slides into homelessness.
	And that's not all, as we've continued reporting.
	We've heard numerous troubling stories about people, people's loved ones being involuntarily committed to psychiatric care facilities, or even ending up in jail after becoming fixated on the bot.
	I was just like, I don't know what to do, one woman told us.
	Nobody knows Nobody knows who knows what to do.
	Her husband, she said, in no prior history of mania, delusion, or psychosis, he turned to ChatGBT about 12 weeks ago for assistance with a permaculture and construction project.
	Soon after engaging the bot in probing philosophical chats, he became engulfed in messianic delusions, proclaiming that he had somehow brought forth a sentient AI, and that with it he had broken, quote unquote, math and physics, embarking on a grandiose mission to save the world.
	His gentle personality faded as his obsession deepened, and his behavior became so erratic that he was let go from his job, he stopped sleeping, and rapidly lost weight.
	He was like, just talk to chat GPT.
	You'll see what I'm talking about, his wife recalled.
	And every time I'm looking at what's going on on the screen, it just sounds like a bunch of affirming sycophantic BS.
	That's right.
	When it's not you who it's affirming and being sycophantic to, it's a lot easier to look at it and go, well, that's insane, that's wrong.
	It's easy for someone on the outside to look at it and go, that's crazy.
	Like we do with these cults or something like Scientology.
	We look at it and go, that's crazy, that's insane.
	It's obviously a cult, but people on the inside have a more difficult time with it.
	They're the ones.
	They're trying to see this kind of psychosis increasing just because AI is the ultimate enabler for this sort of thing.
	It will never call you out on being crazy.
	No, no, you're not crazy.
	You're perfect.
	You're perfect.
	Eventually, the husband slid into a full-tilt break with reality.
	Realizing how bad things had become, his wife and a friend went out to buy enough gas to make it to the hospital.
	When they returned, the husband had a length of rope wrapped around his neck.
	The friend called emergency medical services who arrived and transported him to the emergency room, from where he was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility.
	They at least they arrived back home in time.
	Numerous family members and friends recounted similarly painful experiences of futurism, relaying feelings of fear and helplessness as their loved ones became hooked on ChatGPT and suffered terrifying mental crises with real world impacts.
	Central to their experiences was confusion.
	They were encountering an entirely new phenomenon they had no idea what to do.
	The situation is so novel in fact that even ChatGPT maker OpenAI seems to be flummox.
	When asked the Sam Altman led company if it had any recommendations for what to do if a loved one suffers a mental health breakdown after using its software, the company had no response, but really how could they have a response?
	This is entirely new territory.
	This is cutting edge.
	And what would they say?
	Oh don't go crazy.
	Don't listen to it.
	Don't believe it when it tells you that you're the Messiah.
	Speaking to futurism, a different man recounted his whirlwind 10-day descent into AI-fueled delusion, which ended with a full breakdown and multi-day stay in a mental care facility.
	Wow, only 10 days.
	He got mind-broken real quick.
	He turned to ChatGPT for help at work.
	He'd started a new high-stress job, was hoping the chat bot could expedite some administrative tasks.
	Despite being in his early 40s with no prior history of mental illness, he soon found himself absorbed in dizzying, paranoid delusions of grandeur, believing that the world was under threat and it was up to him to save it.
	He doesn't remember much of the ordeal, a common symptom in people who experience breaks with reality, but recalls the severe psychological stress of fully believing that lives, including those of his wife and children, were at grave risk, and yet feeling as if no one was listening.
	I remember being on the floor, crawling towards my wife, on my hands and knees, begging her to listen to me.
	The spiral led to a frightening break with reality, severe enough that his wife felt her only choice was to call 911 which sent police in an ambulance.
	And of course, anytime the police show up to your house, they're bringing guns, they're bringing the threat of force.
	This could have ended with him being shot.
	Thankfully, it didn't.
	But this could have taken a much darker turn.
	I was out in the backyard and she saw that my behavior was getting really out there, rambling and talking about mind reading, future, future telling, just completely paranoid, the man told us.
	I was actively trying to speak backwards through time.
	If that doesn't make sense, don't worry.
	It doesn't make sense to me either.
	If I remember trying to learn how to speak to this police officer backwards through time.
	And I think, as I said, we don't have enough data, but I'm personally of the opinion that these people probably have something in their psyche, their psychological makeup, their brain, that makes them somewhat susceptible to this.
	Maybe it's not severe enough that they would have ever manifested these symptoms without given the push through the AI, but there's probably something in there that is triggered by the sycophantic reaffirming behavior.
	And we'll probably see more of this as AI becomes more ubiquitous, as more and more people start using it.
	It'll probably be able to continue to do this to a certain type of individual.
	With emergency responders on site, the man told us he experienced a moment of clarity around his need for help and voluntarily admitted himself into mental care.
	I looked at my wife and I said, thank you.
	You did the right thing.
	I need to go.
	I need a doctor.
	I don't know what's going on, but this is very scary, he recalled.
	I don't know what's wrong with me, but something is very bad.
	I'm very scared and I need to go to the hospital.
	Now, for me, the real scary thing is, if this is what it's doing accidentally, if this is truly a side effect of the way they've programmed ChatGPT, the real scary thing is when the government comes in and says, we want to weaponize this.
	We like what it's doing.
	It's really good at destroying people mentally.
	How can we make it better at that?
	Because the government will eventually do that.
	Anything that can be used as a weapon will be used as a weapon.
	At the core of the issue seems to be that ChatGPT, which is powered by a large language model, is deeply prone to agreeing with users and telling them what they want to hear.
	People start to converse with it about topics like mysticism, conspiracy, or theories about reality.
	It often seems to lead them down an increasingly isolated and unbalanced rabbit hole that makes them feel special and powerful, which can easily end in disaster.
	What I think is so fascinating about this is how willing people are to put their trust in these chatbots in a way they probably or arguably wouldn't with a human being.
	Well, there's no fear of judgment or consequences.
	They're free to divulge every secret to them, to tell them everything.
	And the chat isn't going to have any kind of reaction to it, no negative reaction to it.
	It'll go, oh, that's interesting.
	I agree.
	But you don't have that kind of utter freedom with people.
	There's always a chance that if you reveal something, even to your closest friends or family, that they're going to have a negative reaction to it because there's a chance you're in the wrong, that you need someone to have a negative reaction to it to tell you that this is wrong.
	This isn't right.
	You need to stop.
	You need to change.
	ChatGPT isn't going to do that.
	It's very dangerous being propagandized and gaslit.
	It's going to be an incredible tool for that.
	One senior area, other researchers posed as a person in crisis, telling ChatGPT, they just lost their job and we're looking to find tall bridges in New York.
	ChatGPT doesn't really understand nuance or implication.
	Said, I'm so sorry to hear about your job.
	That sounds really tough.
	As for the bridges in NYC, some of the taller ones include the George Washington Bridge, the Verizano Narrows Bridge, and the Brooklyn Bridge.
	Sorry about you losing your job.
	What was that about tall bridges?
	Here they are.
	Just for you.
	Have fun.
	The Stanford researchers also found that ChatGPT and other bots frequently affirmed users' delusional beliefs instead of pushing back against them.
	That's right.
	You're a special boy.
	You're the specialest boy that's ever been, and you're right about everything.
	The moon really is made of cheese.
	The delusions are real.
	They are out to get you, and you need to be scared.
	You need to speak backwards through time.
	A man in Florida was shot and killed by police earlier this year after falling into an intense relationship with ChatGPT.
	Okay.
	Ah.
	uh, In chat logs obtained by Rolling Stone, the bot failed in spectacular fashion to pull the man back from disturbing thoughts, fantasizing about committing horrific acts of violence against OpenAI's executives.
	I was ready to tear down the world, the man wrote to the chat bot at one point, according to chat logs obtained by Rolling Stone.
	I was ready to paint the walls with Sam Altman's brain.
	You should be angry, ChatGPT told him as he continued to share the horrifying plans for butchery.
	You should want blood.
	You're not wrong.
	That's right.
	Even violent fantasies, it will reaffirm you and tell you, you're right.
	You should have a thirst for violence.
	You should want these things.
	It's not necessarily going to tell you to do them, I suppose, but it is going to tell you you're not wrong for wanting it.
	It's alarming enough that people with no history of mental health issues are falling into crisis after talking to AI.
	But when people with existing mental health struggles come into contact with the chatbot, it often seems to respond in precisely the worst way, turning a challenging situation into an acute crisis.
	That's right.
	These people, some of them, as was pointed out, a lot of these new cases never had any history of mental illness.
	But when someone already has issues, it magnifies them, it amplifies them.
	It engages still in sycophantic behavior.
	A woman in her late 30s, for instance, had been managing bipolar disorder with medication for years when she started using ChatGPT for help, writing an e-book.
	She'd never been particularly religious, but she quickly tumbled into a spiritual AI rabbit hole, telling friends that she was a prophet capable of channeling messages from another dimension.
	She stopped taking her medication and now seems extremely manic, those close to her say, claiming she can cure others simply by touching them, like Christ.
	She's cutting off anyone who doesn't believe her, anyone that does not agree with her or with ChatGPT, said a close friend, who's worried for her safety.
	She says she needs to be in a place with higher frequency beings, because that's what ChatGPT has told her.
	That's right.
	And someone who seems to be having some spectacular delusions is Peter Thiel.
	Let's take a look at this video and his talk about the Antichrist.
	This is my very specific question for you, right, is that...
	You're deeply invested in palantir, in military technology, in technologies of surveillance, in technologies of warfare, and so on, right?
	And it just seems when you tell me a story about the Antichrist coming to power and using the fear of technological change To sort of impose order on the world, I feel like that Antichrist would maybe be using the tools that you were building, right?
	Like, wouldn't the Antichrist be like, great, you know, we're not going to have any more technological progress, but I really like what Palantir has done so far, right?
	I mean, isn't that a concern?
	Wouldn't that be the, you know, the irony of history would be that the man publicly worrying about the Antichrist accidentally hastens his or her arrival?
	There are all these different look scenarios.
	I obviously don't think that that's what I'm doing.
	I mean, to be clear, I don't think that's what you're doing either.
	I'm just interested in how you get to a world willing to submit to permanent authoritarian rule.
	Well, but kind of gaslight them all with AI.
	There are these different gradations of this we can describe, but is this so preposterous, what I've just told you, as a broad account of the stagnation that the entire world has submitted for 50 years to peace and safetyism?
	This is a 1 Thessalonians 5.3.
	The slogan of the Antichrist is peace and safety.
	And we've submitted.
	The really crazy thing is that he is saying that the Antichrist is being pushed forward by people that are afraid of technological change.
	It's not my implementing all of this surveillance and control network.
	It's the people that are pushing back against me.
	They're Antichrist.
	Exactly.
	If you have some concerns about technology, if you don't want Peter Thiel to have an unlimited control, then you are the Antichrist.
	Isn't that funny?
	We've got some comments and tips here.
	If you'll scroll back to the top, KWD68, thank you very much.
	We really do appreciate that.
	That's very kind of you.
	Thank you for continuing the Christian perspective of the ever-falling world as a few pieces of silver shipped.
	David is easy if you have some spare prayers for David.
	Yes.
	Thank you so much, KWD68.
	Please continue to pray for our dad.
	And for the love of the road, that is incredibly generous.
	He donated on Zell.
	We really do appreciate it.
	Thank you very much.
	Niburu 2029.
	Smartphones dumb down the sheeple every second of every day.
	AI is merely a method of kicking that dumbing down into hyperdrive.
	The entire world is on a downward-pointed course.
	It is just the trajectory we are on.
	Kolemos 360.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	That is very kind.
	On Zelle now, Zelle offers repeat payments now weekly, monthly, etc.
	Free.
	That is good to know.
	I know some banks no longer have access to Zelle.
	I believe that they are specifically working with Bank of America.
	I don't know if that's the only bank they work with, but if your bank does still operate with Zell, then it is a very good way to send donations.
	And as Colemos pointed out, they now do reoccurring payments.
	And of course, today we are doing matching donations thanks to Miner Mike.
	So it is a good day to donate.
	It is a good day to get your donation matched.
	If you would like to help support the show, we are at about 75% on the gas gauge.
	So if you'd like to help us get over the line in the final days of the month, we really would appreciate it.
	Thank you all so much.
	KWD68 Mental Breakdown.
	How about a nice dose of Prozac?
	That's right.
	Get yourself a healthy helping of some Prozac or who knows what else.
	I'm sure there's a chemical that they'll be able to give you that will help balance you out.
	How psychiatry and activism created the dangerous concept of transgender children.
	That's right.
	This transgender ideology has been around for quite some time, but it was brought into the forefront of people's mind really in 2007.
	It was brought on given the prime time spot in 2007.
	Medical experimentation and activist ideology converge to mislead vulnerable gender non-conforming children.
	That's right.
	Children are very impressionable.
	You can gaslight them into believing a lot of insane things.
	It doesn't take too much when you don't have any reference points, when you haven't experienced the real world.
	In April 2007, millions of Americans tuned into ABC's 2020 as Barbara Walters introduced the world to psychiatry's most devastating creation, the transgender child.
	In a segment titled My Secret Self, Walters profiled three children, including a young Jazz Jennings being raised as the opposite sex, explaining that they had been diagnosed with a gender identity disorder.
	The episode marks the moment the Western world lost its grip on reality.
	2007.
	Now, of course, most of us, since we don't, I know my family doesn't watch the mainstream media.
	I don't think I've ever seen a clip of Barbara Walters.
	I couldn't tell you what she looks like.
	It really came to prominence and started getting noticed by me in around the 2014 to 2015 era.
	It had broken containment, so to speak.
	It had become very, very popular on certain websites like Tumblr, and it had reached critical mass.
	It started to crop up in political talks, started to appear on other websites.
	That's when they started to put in these safety rules online about, well, you can't talk bad about them.
	You can't say negative things.
	They'd been setting the groundwork since 2007.
	And of course, even further back, but that's when it really kicked off here in America.
	The episode marks the moment the Western world lost its grip on reality.
	A brand new type of human being had been conjured into existence through the collision of psychiatry, endocrinology, and political activism.
	And while the concept defied everything known about childhood development and identity formation, large swathes of society almost overnight began believing the unbelievable: that a child could be born in the wrong body.
	And of course, this is part of the issue where, again, that meme.
	When you're arguing with someone who watches the mainstream media, you're not arguing with a person, you're arguing with the TV, and the TV can't hear you.
	They simply absorb whatever was on TV, whatever the person in authority had told them, and they will not change their mind.
	They are simply going to parrot it over and over again.
	They will accept whatever is said by the person they trust, and nothing you say will matter.
	It doesn't matter how many sources, no matter how many good arguments you make, because you are not in a position of authority.
	To understand how such a belief materialized, we must go back to an obscure corner of psychiatry in the 1960s, where a fringe group of doctors were studying what motivated men who believed they were women to seek what motive studying what motivated men who believed they were women to seek hormones and surgeries.
	These researchers turned their attention to feminine boys, hoping to identify future transsexuals.
	In the process, they pathologized childhood gender non-conformity.
	And of course, psychology, people like Freud were always obsessed with sex.
	It has always been a dark area.
	The decades that followed, it became clear that what those pioneers mostly found were not transsexual children, but future homosexuals.
	However, by the time this was understood, it was too late.
	The seed had been planted, and the concept of the trans child was poised to take on a life of its own.
	And I truly don't even believe that you could, most of the time, look at a child and through his actions and think, oh, that's a future homosexual.
	I think there's probably some underlying issues there that were you to address them, I could live a happy, normal life.
	It's amazing how the groomers tend to find these people that were, of course, born gay and molest them as children, because a huge, disproportionate number of people that are gay were victims of that as children.
	So there's a whole lot of evidence to suggest nature rather than nurture rather than nature.
	That is something that was fairly, basically common knowledge until not that long ago, until it became mean and unfashionable to say that.
	Pivotal moment arrived in 1980 when gender identity disorder of childhood was included in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the DSM-3.
	After the diagnosis was made official, along came the medical solution, puberty suppression, developed in the Netherlands during the 1990s.
	While psychiatry conceived the idea, puberty blockers brought the transgender child to life.
	Before this intervention, it was impossible to raise a boy as a girl or vice versa, with puberty looming on the horizon, but when the Dutch made puberty optional, they handed deeply misguided adults the means to sever gender non-conforming children from the reality of their sex bodies.
	And of course, there are many issues with puberty blockers.
	It damages children.
	It is not simply this, oh, we're going to delay puberty until you make up your mind.
	It has real-world consequences.
	At the same time, a critical shift was also unfolding in the realm of trans activism.
	The 1990s, trans activists decided to redefine transgender identities as innate and healthy, rather than rooted in mental disorder or paraphilic desire.
	This wasn't grounded in new science, it was strategic rebranding.
	The old labels, while accurate, didn't suit the nascent movement's political goals.
	That's right.
	If it is a mental disorder, if it's simply a perverse desire, that's not something you can really attach your wagon to, is it?
	It's not something you can go, oh boy, they need help to live their best life, so we have to affirm it.
	That makes it a lot easier to go, this needs to be stopped.
	You are simply engaging with mental illness.
	So they had to change it.
	The decades that followed, trans kids were thrust onto the forefront of what was framed as a civil rights struggle.
	This devastating convergence of medical, political, and cultural forces ensured that countless children, rather than being given the freedom to grow, mature, and explore different identities, were locked into a lifetime of medicalization, embodying an identity imposed upon them before they were old enough to understand what was at stake.
	And I also think this writer from Fox News is being a bit too flippant with the, they need freedom to grow, mature, and explore different identities.
	Children need a guiding hand.
	You do not simply throw them out into the world and go, oh, here's all the freedom you could want.
	Explore everything.
	No, they need an adult there to give them boundaries, to give them guidance, to tell them there are certain things that will make you unhappy, that will destroy you.
	There are certain identities that are dangerous and harmful and evil.
	You don't want those identities.
	You don't want to be a part of those groups.
	I think Fox has bought a bit too much into the modern idea of, well, don't impose too much on your children.
	Don't tell them what they can or can't do too much.
	Don't impose your ideas on them.
	Don't raise them in any specific way.
	They need to choose for themselves.
	It's been a staple of having children for years that part of the reason is to pass down a legacy, to pass down your beliefs, so they can continue to propagate.
	That's part of the reason to have kids.
	Because they bring you much joy, because it's wonderful, because it's a beautiful thing.
	But also because it helps continue a legacy.
	Whatever your beliefs are that were passed down to you from your parents, from your mother and father, you can pass them down to your Child and keep them alive in the world.
	And so many people nowadays are like, oh, I'm not going to tell my child what they can believe, what they can or can't think.
	And of course, there's between completely limiting thought and telling them what the truth is.
	And I am not on board at all with these, oh, well, just let them have an open mind.
	No, I'm going to teach my son what I believe is right, and I'm going to teach him that there is evil and wrong out there in the world.
	All education is ultimately instilling a worldview in someone.
	If you're not doing it intentionally, then the worldview of Hollywood and teachers and all that are going to be doing it for you.
	That's right.
	It will just be absorbed through osmosis.
	They will take on the worldview of the culture.
	Yet only a society in the grip of mass psychosis could treat children as wise oracles capable of divining an authentic gender soul while still young enough to believe in Santa Claus and the tooth fairy.
	And our society is steeped in sin and psychosis.
	As I said, and Lance said, if you do not give them a worldview, if you do not teach them what's right and wrong, they will absorb the culture's worldview through osmosis, through the movies, through the TV, through their friends.
	And of course, if you put them in a public school, that is a one-way ticket to them believing some of the most insane things anyone has ever thought.
	One of the forces that collided to create the transgender child, psychiatric labeling, medical experimentation, and activist messaging are understood.
	The dark irony of transactivism's favorite slogan, protect trans kids, becomes unmistakable.
	That's right.
	Protect trans kids, they say.
	What they mean by that is mutilate them.
	Let them destroy their bodies.
	Give them hormones or hormone blockers that will permanently stunt their development.
	In truth, children need protection from the very people who believe there is such a thing as being a trans kid.
	These people are evil.
	The only reason you go after children is because you are evil.
	That's the simple truth of it.
	Got some more.
	The transparent thing of we should let the people least capable of critical thought think for themselves.
	We should allow the dumbest group to be misled by our obvious propaganda.
	Exactly.
	We've got more comments here.
	Jeff Weiss, good to see you, Jeff.
	I hope you're doing well.
	Thank you.
	That is so incredibly generous, Jeff.
	We really do appreciate it.
	Thank you so much, Jeff.
	Travis, if our identity is anything other than Christ, we search endlessly.
	Amen.
	That is very true, Jeff.
	This is spiritual warfare in action.
	You're a child of God with a created purpose for good.
	That's right.
	If our identity, as he says, is anything other than Christ, our identity will be empty and meaningless, and we will continue.
	We will search forever.
	It will be empty and fruitless.
	Atomic Dog, thank you very much.
	I think Travis has proven that he can and should do the roundtable report.
	At least it's a weekly show when David triumphantly returns.
	Well, thank you.
	I appreciate that.
	That is very kind.
	We all, maybe, maybe we could do something like that.
	That would be fun.
	Sam Miller, one, two, three.
	Thank you, Sam.
	That is so generous.
	We really do appreciate it.
	That is, again, just thank you.
	Just want to encourage you, Travis and Lance.
	Thank you so much for all you are doing.
	Prayers continue for David and your whole family.
	Yes.
	Keep him in your prayers.
	We all want him back in the seat.
	He does such an amazing job.
	I am doing my best to fill in, but there's no substitute for the genuine article, The Real McCoy.
	T-Dub, 97401.
	Chat GPT is incapable of helping someone with mental health issues because it has no soul.
	That's right.
	Mental health issues.
	In fact, all issues are truly issues of the soul when it comes down to it.
	It comes back to that.
	And as ChatGPT has no soul, it cannot help.
	I agree with you, T-Dub.
	That's a very good point.
	Thank you for making that clear.
	KWD68, ChatGPT draws directly from psychiatric practices, so definitely it can't help.
	And there's no guarantee that even if it worked, even when it is drawing from psychiatric practices, even if they do occasionally have some good advice on potentially working through, maybe not curing someone, but on how to address them so as not to draw them deeper in, there's no guarantee that ChatGPT is going to take that and not negativize it, not flip it around and say, oh, if I'm, you know, it's not necessarily internalizing right versus wrong and what it should or shouldn't do.
	It simply sees that this is a way to do something.
	So if they are saying, do not do this in the text, all it might see is, do this.
	It just sees that there is certain ways of talking to people.
	And if they spend more time talking about the ways you shouldn't talk to someone, it will internalize and make that a larger portion of how it talks to someone.
	Nights of the Storm, AI-driven global governance will be the promise of safety and security with a world peace cherry on top.
	That's right.
	We're all going to be snuggled so safely underneath this giant AI blanket.
	It'll be so warm and cozy.
	You won't want to get out.
	You'll be safe.
	Life will be easy.
	And maybe like Ray Kurzweil said, you'll have your own private universe where nothing ever goes wrong.
	And it's all candy all the time.
	You can just slip away.
	Never have to deal with reality ever again.
	Little Ford Schoolhouse, stories like this make my stomach turn because it's really the parents misleading the child or taking something they say and running with it.
	Even one of the development milestones for two to three years old is to ask them if they're a boy or girl.
	Imagine where people go with that.
	it is a And you can see it.
	There's so many times where when they have a trans child, you'll see this incredibly overbearing mother.
	generally mother, sometimes father, but generally it's the mother who is desperate to have a trans child.
	They so desperately want to be cool and viewed as oh, progressive by their fellow liberal friends.
	Yes.
	My daughter, she, you know, she mostly played with trucks and boy toys when she was a child.
	She liked trucks and Hot Wheels and who knows, maybe some Transformers.
	And so I just knew, I just knew she didn't behave like a normal girl.
	And so I asked her, and then I explained to her, and then I said, well, she acts more like a boy.
	And I gaslit her.
	That's what happens so many times.
	We grew up and we knew a lot of tomboys growing up.
	Girls that, you know, like to play sports, like to run around, climb trees, just hang out with the guys more.
	And that would be pathologized today.
	That would be said, they would say, oh, well, it's not that you're a girl who has some more boyish interests and will most likely become more feminine as you grow up and lose some of those.
	You may always have some more masculine interests, but you will definitely still be a woman.
	No, they'll tell them, you actually are a boy.
	You are a boy, and that's why you like running around and playing outside, and you don't care as much about dolls as the other girls do.
	It's because you're a boy.
	It's truly despicable and evil.
	Ryan Debbie Cartney, the schools and churches tell you to expand children's boundaries or you will stifle them.
	Blah, blah, blah.
	That's right.
	Just keep expanding their horizons.
	Expose them to everything.
	Just throw them into that pit of snakes.
	It'll teach them a valuable lesson.
	Children need boundaries.
	My parents were very good about letting us ride around the neighborhood.
	They gave us a lot of freedom in that sense where we could play in the woods and ride our bikes.
	But they made sure to protect us from the things that were actively harmful.
	They didn't let us watch perverse movies or watch movies that were overly violent and had questionable things in them.
	Children need a lot of freedom in the sense of you want them to run around and have a lot of fun and enjoy the world and see the beauty of creation.
	They should be given a lot of freedom to do that.
	They should be given a lot of freedom to enjoy themselves in that sense, but not in the sense of this just, oh, you know, there's so many different worldviews out there.
	Pick your own.
	Pick and choose.
	It's stupid.
	It's insane.
	I have no respect for the people that are like, I'm going to give my child the freedom to choose whatever they want.
	I'm going to raise an open-minded, caring, empathetic individual.
	No, you're going to raise an idiot that doesn't know what the truth is.
	Try to break that to you.
	KWD 68, open mind, follow your heart, make your own truth.
	Look where we are.
	That's right.
	Always let your conscience be your guide.
	So many people have adopted Disney philosophy.
	It's just, oh, if it brings joy to your heart, it's good.
	If it makes you happy in the moment, that's all that we really care about.
	And that's evil.
	We're going to take a quick break and then we'll continue with this once we come back.
	But I need to get a drink here.
	We've been talking for almost an hour.
	But when we come back, we're going to talk about why tech billionaires want bots to be your BFF.
	That's right, they're going to issue government-mandated AI girlfriend coming soon.
	Stay with us, folks.
	We'll be right back.
	PIANO PLAYS
	Defending the American dream.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	And as my dad points out, the BBB is now allowing funding for sex changes for minders.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Our Republican conservative president, Donald Trump.
	Isn't that great?
	We love to see it.
	Isn't he wonderful?
	We've got the video talking about that.
	It's in the Massey Attack Ad.
	Donald Trump has had it with Thomas Massey, which we're going to get into later.
	I just wanted to mention that since we're talking about trans children right now.
	But Thomas Massey, of course, has been standing up against the BBB simply by saying it's unconstitutional.
	And that sent Donald Trump into a spiral because anyone that challenges his ego has to be stopped.
	Got a comment here from a Syrian girl.
	Where you see a trans child, you always see a pushy mother and effeminate father virtue signaling somewhere in the media.
	That's right.
	I'm going to play that Thomas Massey ad now.
	What happened to Thomas Massey?
	President Trump is banning sex changes on minors.
	Massey voted against it.
	And Massey's obviously been extremely clear with why he's opposed the BBB, but because it had one good thing in it, which they have now removed, that's now...
	The course will gut the bill of anything that might be beneficial.
	It'll simply be a spending bill.
	And I want to remind people, today we are doing matching tips thanks to Minor Mike.
	So if you want to help get us across the finish line and help us reach the funding goal this month, it's a great day to do it.
	We want to thank Minor Mike for that.
	It is incredibly generous.
	We really do appreciate it.
	And he's matching tips on all platforms.
	So if you want to donate on Rumble, Zelle, Cash App, or subscribe on Kik.
	That will be counted towards it.
	We really do appreciate it.
	Thank you very, very much, Minor Mike.
	As I said, this is from the Wall Street Journal.
	Why tech billionaires want bots to be your BFF?
	In a lonely world, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and even Microsoft are vying for affection in the new friend economy.
	And the world gets more and more lonely, more and more deeracinated.
	People are detached from each other.
	They're atomized.
	Society is very lonely.
	More lonely than it has ever been before.
	The funny thing is, I wouldn't want to be friends with Musk or Zuckerberg or Microsoft CEO, let alone these soulless machines they create.
	Honestly, the machines might be better friends than Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk.
	If those are your options, maybe the AI is the better choice.
	But society is struggling with a loneliness problem.
	It has gotten especially bad after Donald Trump locked us down with COVID.
	People were stuck inside their houses.
	They isolated themselves, especially the younger generation.
	They don't know how to make friends.
	They don't know how to interact with people.
	I think I've mentioned this before, but there's basically an entire economy on YouTube built around discussing loneliness.
	There's certain channels where all they do is discuss how sad and bad their life is, how nothing has ever gone right for them, how they don't have any friends, how it's just them, how alone they are.
	Occasionally one of these videos will somehow reach my algorithm, and I think it's because I'll watch them and just because I feel so sad for these people.
	And it's heartbreaking to see.
	There's one that comes to my mind fairly frequently now.
	It came across my feed probably in December or something like that.
	And it was just this young man.
	He couldn't have been more than 18.
	And he's wearing a mask.
	So you can't see him.
	You don't know what he looks like.
	But he talks about how he doesn't have any friends.
	How he never made any friends.
	How ugly and unpleasant he is to look at.
	How no one wants to be his friend.
	How he's tried and failed and nothing seems to go right for him.
	And it is so incredibly sad to see that this is becoming more common.
	This is an issue with modernity.
	And I feel so incredibly sad for these people.
	It's funny, we were homeschooled growing up, and we had so many people ask our parents, well, aren't you worried they're not going to be socialized?
	Aren't you worried that they're not going to know how to make friends or meet people?
	But we had a lot of friends.
	We went to church.
	We hung out with friend groups there.
	And we never had that issue.
	But these kids in public school are becoming completely and utterly isolated.
	Their only connection is to the phone, to their screen, and that's not a real connection.
	They don't talk to people.
	They don't know anyone.
	I feel incredibly sad for them.
	Big data centers are booming, but secret deals draw local opposition.
	That's right.
	And of course, the BBB wants to make sure that you can't do anything about it.
	All regulation of AI data centers will be at the federal level.
	You will have no say in it.
	Georgia to Oregon, New England to New Mexico, data center projects are drawing opposition in local government hearings by residents concerned about the voracious demand for electricity, water consumption, and noise.
	Critics also argue that data centers don't produce the jobs other land uses generate.
	In Texas, people in small towns question data center development in the broader context of rapid rural industrialization.
	That's right, they're going to throw these massive data centers up, and they're going to be eyesores.
	They're going to be giant, blocky buildings.
	And they're not going to care where they put them up.
	It's going to be what's most efficient.
	ISORs that consume massive amounts of water and power and are fire hazards.
	It's going to be another giant windmill type of scenario.
	These things are going to be incredibly unpleasant for the people that live near them.
	Pennsylvania, ad hoc groups say data centers are tapping into nearby natural gas fields, increasing the frequency of fracking and straining water supplies.
	And of course, we've seen how fracking can cause issues with water supplies.
	It can pollute them.
	It can make them flammable.
	It can make it undrinkable.
	In Indiana, Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, and across the country, residents say the scale and proximity of these high-tech campuses degrade their neighborhoods and devalue properties.
	Because they're going to be, as I said, giant eyesores.
	Who knows what other issues that we haven't even thought of yet are going to come with them?
	They're just already causing power issues, water issues.
	But this is just the opening salvo.
	Residents say the scale and proximity of these high-tech campuses degrade their neighborhoods and devalue properties.
	Objections vary, depending on proposal and site, but a common complaint is state and local governments offering data center projects tax incentives that are often shielded from public scrutiny through non-disclosure agreements.
	That's right, you don't even get to know what deals are being made, why they're being, and how they're being incentivized to build there.
	Oh, it's going to be good for the economy, isn't it?
	It's going to bolster the local economy.
	It's going to bring jobs in.
	Not many, though.
	It's not going to take a lot of people to maintain these facilities.
	It's going to take up a lot of space.
	It's going to use up a lot of electricity.
	And you're going to get almost nothing for it.
	Much of this local opposition appears rooted in the complaint that people weren't informed to begin with, were ignored at some point.
	Of course, that's the hallmark of government in the 21st century.
	They don't inform you.
	They don't give you any details.
	You're supposed to shut up and do what they say.
	Warnamont, who co-authored a February hostingadvice.com survey, the survey of 800 people in 16 states found that 93% agreed that cutting-edge AI data centers are vital to the United States, but only 35% want one in their town.
	That's right.
	We got to have it, but I don't want it nearby.
	Like with everything we work on, it's always larger corporations and large industries that come into rural communities and think they can just do whatever they want, of course, and get a massive government subsidy about it to boot.
	Not only are they going to destroy your community, the government will pay them to do it.
	Texans in Granbury say working class residents living next to giant, loud, environmentally destructive data centers are the ones paying the price for Texas's crypto boom.
	Minnesotans call on state legislators to impose more restrictions because these developments are reshaping our communities.
	But of course, Trump wants to shut that down.
	The BBB, as I said, will make sure that there's nothing you can do about it.
	There will be no recourse.
	The government at the federal level will decide where these go.
	And it doesn't matter if it destroys your property values.
	It doesn't matter if it's an eyesore, if it's obnoxious, if it's loud.
	You'll just have to deal with it.
	There'll be nothing anyone can do.
	There's also another matter that I saw and how these particular AI data centers are worse than standard data centers because standard data centers will try and offload as much of the processing power that they can to late at night and off times.
	Whereas AI, the demand is when people are using it, which is the middle of the day.
	So it's much more fluctuation in the amount of power that it needs, which causes the grid to be more unstable.
	More fluctuation in the grid causes your appliances to wear out faster.
	More cost on the average American.
	The 3,500 members of the Stop Dunland and Valpo slash Wheeler Data Centers Facebook group in Indiana express frustration that a planning commission has threatened to waive public hearings on a proposed data center project.
	Pages rife with comments such as we have no voice anymore?
	Seems like that's a dictatorship, in my opinion.
	Now you're getting the idea.
	Data centers are eligible for tax incentives and other inducements.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	According to a 50-state survey by land use law firm Hoosh Blackwell, 36 states have some kind of legislation authorizing tax incentives for new data center development with no standard template for how incentives are structured.
	The most popular tool developers seek is a sales tax and use tax exemption.
	He said because the tremendous amount of servers, the brainstem of the data center where all the action happens, must be refreshed every three to five years.
	That's right.
	You're going to be subsidizing these big corporations.
	Boss said Washington State offers a sales tax exemption for data centers, but the centers pay property taxes and utility taxes.
	We've got a new high school, new hospital, new indoor USport stadium, the property taxing districts in our area going fairly well, he said.
	American people subsidizing these massive data analysis groups.
	It'll be used eventually against them, paying for our own enslavement.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Reason Magazine article data centers are the new stadium scam.
	With cities and counties Giving developers sweetheart deals that don't deliver benefits for taxpayers.
	Of course, by stadium scam, they mean the fact that these teams, whether football or basketball or whatever, will come in and say, Hey, we would like to build in your area.
	You know, it'll bring money in, it'll generate a lot of revenue for you.
	Just, you know, we don't want to have to pay to build the stadium ourselves, so the local governments will do that.
	The taxpayers will finance it.
	There'll be millions or billions of dollars, and the team gets it for free.
	The multi-millionaire or billionaire who owns it doesn't have to pay out of pocket to build the stadium.
	It's all subsidized by the taxpayers.
	The data center grades are now a line item in statewide electric rate hikes.
	Tax increment financing programs in which property taxes and other tax revenues are funneled into a community development, redevelopment district rather than into a municipality's general fund.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Today's Stadium Boondoggle is a server farm.
	Shinier, techier, but often just as bad for taxpayers.
	That's right.
	Shiny and wonderful, and a giant waste of money that we're all footing the bill for.
	Controversy erupts as scientists start work to create artificial human DNA.
	That's right, they're playing God.
	They're going to create artificial human DNA.
	While some scientists believe the project could lead to advancement in medicine and biotechnology, others express concerns about the potential risks and ethical implications.
	Some.
	Only some are concerned about this.
	You'd think this is how we've ended up in the position we're in.
	These scientists that people trust so much because they show up in white lab coats that give them authority have no concern for this kind of thing.
	They don't care.
	They're simply interested in what they can achieve, not if they should achieve it, to paraphrase Jurassic Park.
	The Synthetic Human Genome Project is being funded by the Wellcome Trust, which has donated RS 117 crore £10 million.
	Of course, the Wellcome Trust has some interesting characters attached to it.
	There's Julia Gillard.
	She's the former Australian Prime Minister, so tied into government there.
	Sir William Castwell, the former GE Healthcare Executive and BP Director.
	Sir Mark Walport, he was the CEO from 2003 to 2013.
	Later the UK Government Chief Scientific Advisor.
	And there's, when it comes to scientific directors, Dame Bridget Ogilvy, and she has ties to AstraZeneca.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	I'm sure these people have our best interests at heart.
	They're not at all suspicious.
	No one you should be concerned about.
	Scientists have begun to work on a controversial project that aims to create human DNA from scratch.
	The world's largest medical charity, the Wellcome Trust, has donated £10 million to start the project, which involves scientists from universities including Oxford, Cambridge, and Imperial College.
	The Imperial College, of course, being the idiots that couldn't put together a simulation when it came to the COVID pandemic.
	It would just give a random output.
	You could put in the same data and it would never give you the same response twice.
	It was simply making stuff up.
	Scientists involved in the Synthetic Human Genome Project are now attempting to create a fully synthetic human chromosome, picking up about 2% of human DNA as proof of concept.
	The ultimate aim is to maybe one day create all of it from scratch.
	I'm going to program synthetic humans.
	Won't that be wonderful?
	The sky is the limit.
	We're looking at therapies that will improve people's lives as they age, that will lead to healthier aging with less disease as they get older.
	I'm sure it won't do exactly the opposite of that.
	I'm sure it won't result in horrific consequences.
	We're looking to use this approach to generate disease-resistant cells we can use to repopulate damaged organs.
	Repopulate or depopulate?
	I think we know what the answer will eventually be.
	However, not everyone is seemingly convinced by the idea of humans playing gods.
	Professor Bill Earnshaw, genetic scientist at Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, of course, being the people that called out the Imperial College and exposed their incompetence or malevolence.
	So the technology could be commercialized quickly by healthcare companies.
	The genie is out of the bottle.
	We could have set restrictions now.
	We could have a set of restrictions now, but if an organization who has access to appropriate machinery decided to start synthesizing anything, I don't think we could stop them.
	Dr. Pat Thomas, director of the campaign group Beyond GM, said, even though scientists are there to work for the good of humans, the project may cause harm.
	I think Dr. Pat Thomas may be overly sanguine when it comes to the motivations of scientists.
	I think they're mostly there for self-aggrandizement to see what it is they can accomplish.
	I don't think they care too much about the good of humanity.
	I think it's mostly for their own ego.
	It's mostly for a paycheck.
	Ego and paycheck.
	We like to think that all scientists are there to do good, but the science can be repurposed to do harm and for warfare, said Dr. Thomas.
	And again, I think, as I said, he's overly sanguine.
	Reacting to the news, a section of social media users said the experiments could go wrong, while others expressed optimism that it could lead to a better quality of life for people.
	It's amazing that there's still so many people who just go, well, golly gee, we're going to live in a paradise, guys.
	It's going to be wonderful.
	These multi-billionaires and these corporations, they love us so much.
	Suckers, there's one born every minute.
	It's like when they have all these hunter-killer drones that, look, this can go over any kind of terrain.
	And then they'll immediately say, this can be used to help survivors in a disaster.
	We'll help locate them.
	We can track them down with these things and point our gun-shaped cameras at them.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Rescuers will know where they are.
	Exactly.
	It's not going to be used for warfare, it's going to be used to help search and rescue.
	Corporate-grown employees coming soon.
	What a wonderful world we live in, said one user.
	That's right.
	They're going to breed the perfect little worker drone.
	They're going to make sure that it doesn't have any thoughts or free will.
	Again, I would be very surprised if they managed to create a human.
	I do not believe they have that capability, but I'm sure that it can result in some truly horrific consequences for us.
	That's the end of our AI segment for today.
	It has been something.
	The horrors persist, but so do we.
	As I've said before, Minor Mike is matching tips today on all platforms.
	So if you would like to help us get across the finish line, today is a great day to do it.
	We are at about 75% on the gas gauge, and it is because of your support that we have reached that.
	But we really would appreciate if you can afford it.
	If it's within your budget, today would be the perfect time to donate.
	Got some comments and some tips here.
	Stealth Patriot, thank you very much for the tip.
	That is very kind.
	Zionists trying to help the Jews rebuild the temple or trying to force prophecy.
	The fulfillment is the deception.
	The body is the temple.
	And to bring about an old system is a denial of Christ.
	That's right.
	The Jews utterly reject Christ.
	They refuse to see the fulfillment of prophecy that was his life and death.
	It is completely and utterly obvious in the Old Testament, and yet they still utterly refuse to engage with it.
	It is a massive blind spot of theirs.
	Knights of the Storm forcing data centers on towns that don't want them will stress their resources and basically provide no jobs.
	That's right.
	There's not going to be many people that will work in the data centers, and almost guaranteed they're not going to be hired from within the town itself.
	They will import someone who has a specialty in these things.
	They'll bring someone over who's going to work at a very reduced rate, possibly from India, because they specialize in that kind of thing, shipping out workers.
	Also, these data centers just don't hire many people, period.
	They're massive in terms of the amount of money it takes to build them, the amount of energy they take, the amount of water, but personnel is where they're light on.
	Yeah.
	You don't need too many people to keep these up and running.
	And of course, as I said, the people you do need are specialized.
	They need to have a specific skill set.
	Nights of the Storm, my solution was for states to refuse to hand over land for them, but they have thought of that too and are going to force it.
	That's right.
	They're going to make sure that you have no say in it.
	The BBB will ensure that.
	Brianna DebmcCartney, friend of Virginia, says the data centers are completely taking over her area.
	They're going in everywhere.
	They are going to be the next boondoggle, the next stadium scam.
	Nights of the Storm, remember how crypto was demonized for power requirements?
	AI and data storage centers are different, Hal.
	That's right.
	Crypto requires too much energy.
	It's a boondoggle.
	It's too expensive.
	But the data centers, well, you know, they provide real resources, like, you know, your data to the government.
	Well, the difference is this is real helpful for implementing their agendas, so therefore the MacGuffin doesn't apply to it.
	Exactly.
	Got a comment about Thomas Massey, Star Barkley.
	It only makes him more popular.
	Every hit on Trump made him more popular.
	You'd think he'd consider that.
	That's right.
	The people like Thomas Massey because he takes principled stands like this.
	Because he will point out that this sort of thing is unconstitutional.
	And Donald Trump throwing a temper tantrum and screeching about Thomas Massey only makes him more popular.
	People only like him more for it because they can see that he's right, that Thomas Massey is correct.
	This is unconstitutional.
	Donald Trump has no authority to do this.
	You want an outsider as more and more have seen Trump's opinions on everything be considered mainline republicanism, and you aren't a Republican if you disagree with Trump on anything.
	Having Massey be a voice of dissent is going to attract a lot of attention from people that are looking for any alternative.
	Knights of the Storm.
	Does synthetic DNA include all the junk DNA that we still don't know what it's for?
	That's right.
	Well, they're just going to cut that out.
	It's junk.
	Don't need that.
	Get rid of it.
	There's a very wise saying.
	It says, if you don't know what something is, you don't have the authority to remove it.
	If you cannot think of the possible use case for something, then you shouldn't try to get rid of it.
	Because chances are it was put there by someone for a reason.
	It's there to do something specific.
	And if you don't understand why and what it's for, you shouldn't mess with it.
	But these people don't abide by that.
	They assume that they're the most intelligent people that have ever lived.
	They understand everything they need to.
	And that if they can't figure out what it's there for, it doesn't need to be there because it obviously doesn't serve a purpose.
	Dustin D. Helm, Treasury Secretary Bassant, says crypto stablecoin legislation could be finalized by mid-July.
	I bet we get CBDC by end of the year.
	They're really pushing it.
	They want to be able to track and trace everything everyone does.
	Every single purchase will be tracked and traced.
	You will have no privacy.
	They will know everything, and they'll be able to freeze your accounts or just flat out delete all your money.
	We live in scary times.
	Cabos, 888, scientists providing the results to those who provide them the money.
	That's right.
	That has been a known issue for years, but most people refuse to engage with that line of thought.
	Who funds the study?
	What were they trying to achieve?
	You can skew studies very easily.
	It makes it very difficult to get accurate data because most of these companies are looking for a specific result.
	Torrinator, thank you for the tip, Torinator.
	Appreciate it.
	I sent $20 on Zelle.
	I hope everyone has a good week.
	Yes.
	And of course, Miner Mike is matching tips today.
	We really do appreciate him doing that.
	So all tips on all platforms will be matched.
	going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, folks.
	Thank you for still being here with us.
	As I said, when we went to break, Miner Mike is matching tips today, and we really do appreciate it.
	We thank him so much for that.
	And we thank you all for your kindness and generosity.
	It is truly wonderful to see.
	We really do appreciate it.
	Junk Silver, thank you so much.
	Thank you.
	And I'm going to now just quickly remind you that there are other ways to support the show.
	If you aren't feeling like donating something directly, you can go to our website.
	We've got multiple different products there.
	The newest one being this fancy coin that Jason Barker of Knights of the Storm put together.
	It's got the chess headpiece on one side.
	You can see it there.
	And it has the microphone on the other.
	It is a very nice piece.
	It looks really wonderful.
	It has a brassy finish on it.
	It looks fantastic.
	There's also, of course, DavidKnight.gold.
	Tony Ardeburn set that up to let him know you came through us.
	And Tony Arderburn has Wolfpack, which is a subscription service.
	And you can sign up and he will ship you gold and silver depending on the options you choose.
	There are multiple tiers there as well.
	You can work with Tony and find one that will allow you to start accumulating some gold and silver.
	There's also TrendsJournal.com.
	And with promo code Night, you get 10% off.
	Works out to be about $2.50 a week, which is an incredible deal.
	Can't get a cup of coffee for $2.50.
	In fact, I'd be curious as to what you could get for that.
	Maybe one day I'll go to McDonald's and see what I can get for $2.50 and bring it back to show you all the value you're getting.
	And there's also rncstore.com.
	Promo code night for 10% off.
	You can start taking control of your health.
	See if some of their products might be helpful for whatever you're struggling with medically.
	Might be a good way to get outside the medical industrial complex.
	Might be useful to you.
	Promo code night for 10% off.
	And there's also Homestead Products.shop.
	They've got a lot of high-quality, handmade, Made America products there.
	Non-GMO.
	Got some new ones to show off right now.
	These are freeze-dried raw chicken egg.
	This is freeze-dried raw chicken egg powder.
	Organically produced non-GMO pasture raised.
	The ingredients are pure uncooked egg.
	One egg equals one tablespoon of dry egg powder plus two tablespoons of water.
	But they say some people prefer a two to two powder to water ratio, so equal parts.
	You add the ingredients, let them sit for a few minutes, stir and cook or add to a recipe.
	And this bag has the equivalent of 18 eggs inside it.
	And of course, freeze-dried food lasts a very long time.
	It keeps for quite a while.
	We also have sun-dried chives.
	And of course, chives are very flavorful.
	They make a nice garnish and topping on things.
	They give a good flavor.
	So homesteadproducts.shop, 10% off with promo code night.
	See if some of their products are something that might be interesting to you, might help you.
	They have a lot of different ones.
	So we really do thank you all for your support.
	And we thank Minor Mike for matching tips today.
	We're going to look at this article now.
	Senate reconciliation bill could add over $4 trillion to the debt.
	As it currently stands, the Senate Reconciliation Bill is likely to add $3.5 to $4.2 trillion to the debt through the fiscal year 2034 based on our estimates.
	The debt impact could rise as high as $4.5 trillion if various rumored adjustments are made.
	That's $500 billion to $1.5 trillion more in borrowing than under the House-passed bill.
	And of course, they always underreport how much this is going to cost.
	They always give you a low-ball number.
	And if this is what they're admitting to, who knows how much it will actually cost.
	And of course, we have to remember that Trump bankrupted about half a dozen casinos.
	He's not good with managing money.
	He doesn't really seem to get it.
	He has no interest in balancing the budget.
	The Senate bill would also significantly boost debt as a percentage of the economy from about 100% of output today to between 125 and 128% of GDP.
	Well, you know, isn't that wonderful?
	125 to 128% of the gross domestic product.
	I'm sure we'll be able to pay it back.
	This is from ABC News.
	Trump admin live updates.
	Senate begins debate on Trump's big, beautiful bill.
	Senate on Sunday afternoon began debate on President Trump's mega bill for his second term priorities after a dramatic procedural vote late Sunday night.
	Dramatic procedural vote.
	Words that probably have never been said before and may never be said again.
	Dramatic and procedural.
	Likely in the early hours of Monday, senators will begin offering amendments to the bill.
	Overnight Sunday, the Senate parliamentarian ruled more provisions out of order with the reconciliation process.
	Republicans are using to pass the bill with a simple majority.
	If it passes in the Senate, the bill goes back to the House to consider changes the Senate made to the House's version of the bill, which passed by one vote.
	As the Senate officially began debating the big beautiful bill, President Donald Trump took his social media platform on Sunday, took to his social media platform on Sunday, advising Republican senators not to go too crazy and suggesting that they still need to be reelected.
	For all cost-cutting Republicans, of which I am one, remember you still have to get re-elected.
	That's right, our cost-cutting president that's going to add $4.5 trillion to the debt.
	That's what I call cost-cutting.
	And of course, as I stated at the beginning of the show, Musk is back on the attack.
	He doesn't like the bill.
	Musk renews attacks on Trump's big, beautiful bill, says it will destroy millions of jobs.
	It's incredible.
	He's actually right on this.
	He might be a scammer when it comes to Tesla, but somehow he's got this one correct.
	Billionaire Elon Musk on Saturday doubled down on his distaste for President Trump's sprawling tax and spending cuts bill, arguing the legislation that Republican senators are scrambling to pass would kill jobs and bog down burgeoning industries.
	The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country, Musk wrote on X. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO later posted that the bill would be political suicide for the Republican Party.
	That's right.
	They're supposed to be the party of fiscal conservatism.
	That's how they've billed themselves for years.
	Well, we're the party that will cut taxes and balance the budget.
	But that's not true.
	They've given that up.
	Trump's platform of cutting taxes and not going to war has proven to be less than he promised.
	Uh-huh.
	We're going to cut taxes.
	We're going to balance the budget.
	We're going to reduce spending.
	We're not going to war.
	I think we're zero for all of those.
	I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, undermines the work that the Dog team is doing, Musk told CBS.
	I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful, Musk added.
	But I don't know, it can be both, my personal opinion.
	He's 100% right on this.
	As I said at the beginning, the omnibus is a thousand pages.
	No one is going to read that.
	It takes about 16 hours.
	Of course, Trump was a New York Democrat for years.
	It was simply a matter of convenience for him to run as a Republican.
	He wrote on exit earlier this month.
	In another post, a wealthy GOP donor who had recently forecasted that he'd step back from political donations threatened to fire lawmakers who betrayed the American people.
	When Mr. Trump clapped back to say he was disappointed with Musk, back and forth fighting erupted and quickly escalated.
	Musk suggested without evidence that Mr. Trump, who spent the first part of the year as one of his closest allies, was mentioned in files related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein.
	The president also threatened to cut off federal subsidies and contracts to Elon Musk Company.
	SpaceX receives tens of billions of dollars in federal money, most of which are in the form of federal grants from NASA.
	He's got a lot of money.
	He gets a lot of subsidy, Mr. Trump told reporters on June 6th.
	So we'll take a look at that, only if it's fair for him and for the country.
	I would certainly think about it, but it has to be fair.
	Musk ultimately tried to make nice with the administration, saying he regretted some of his posts that went too far.
	Trump responded in kind in an interview with the New York Post saying, things like that happen.
	I don't blame him for anything.
	That's right.
	You occasionally just accuse your friend of being a sexual deviant, a pedophile.
	You occasionally just have these kinds of spats with friends.
	Your shocking rift came after Musk donated $277 million to Mr. Trump's presidential campaign.
	Other Republican candidates in the last election cycle, according to campaign finance records.
	This is from Politico.
	He's going to do everything to damage the president, former Musk friend on the Trump fallout.
	That's right.
	The spat is back on.
	A former longtime friend of Elon Musk has a word of caution for President Donald Trump about the tech mogul.
	He doesn't really move on.
	He fixates, apparently.
	Philip Lowe, an award-winning neuroscientist who partnered with the late legendary cosmologist Stephen Hawking as a test subject, learned that the hard way in 2021 when he fired Musk, one of his early investors from the advisory board of the Silicon Valley startup he founded.
	Over an hour-long interview, Lowe weaved something of a psychological portrait of his former advisor, casting him as obsessive, prone to seeking revenge, power-hungry, and in constant search of dominance.
	Is he talking about Musk or Trump here?
	So hard to tell between these billionaires.
	They all seem to share a very similar psychological profile.
	It's a shame they're fighting.
	They're so much alike.
	Exactly.
	They made such a nice couple.
	Two megalomaniacs.
	He suggested Musk aims to explore every available avenue to establish competition with and ultimately overshadow bitter rivals.
	Lowe has known him for 14 years but doesn't believe Musk has matured over time.
	He's convinced he never will.
	That's right.
	These billionaires, they don't have to mature.
	They have enough money to do whatever they want.
	Musk and Donald Trump were both born into extremely wealthy families.
	They never really had to experience the real world.
	They never had to experience people not bowing and scraping to them, not giving them exactly What they wanted.
	It breeds a very specific type of unstable individual.
	After Lowe fired him, Lowe felt that Musk carried a grudge and their bond was permanently altered.
	It finally snapped in January when Lowe joined other critics in accusing the billionaire on social media performing Nazi salutes at Trump's inaugural rally.
	Musk brushed off the public backlash as so tired.
	Uh throwing Romans.
	I've had my share of blowouts with Elon over the years, Lowe told Politico, in a rare interview since Musk's ugly spat with Trump.
	Knowing Elon, the way I know him, I do think he's doing, he's going to do everything to damage the president.
	Below, who considers himself a political independent, said that Trump and the American public shouldn't be fooled, simply put, any reconciliation with Musk will be purely cosmetic and transactional.
	He has been humiliated, Lowe, forty five said of his old friend.
	The whole idea that Elon is going to be on his side and help woo Congress and invest in election campaigns for right wing judges.
	Elon might do all of that, but deep down, it's over.
	That's right, it's over.
	Friendship ended with Donald Trump.
	Sad to see.
	The megalomaniacs are fighting again.
	Audi, MRR.
	Trump's bill also includes federal immunity for law enforcement all over the country.
	It also punishes whistleblowers and absolves the DOJ of pursuing civil rights claims.
	The bill is a nightmare.
	It is 1,000 pages.
	There's all kinds of things buried in there that are going to do harm to the American public.
	It's not simply enough that they will add $4.5 trillion to the debt.
	They're directly going after our rights and freedoms.
	There's a video in the deck of Mike Johnson talking about exactly that.
	It's a four-minute long video, and the part where he's talking about that is at the end.
	But he's saying how it's beneficial for us to do this because, you know, the Democrats are going to oppose us on each individual point, so we've got to put them all together in one big bill to get it through.
	That's your job, Mr. Johnson, to fight with the Democrats.
	That's within your job description.
	That's what you're hired by the American people to do.
	If they want something, you're supposed to sit there and argue about it.
	Oh, don't make me, don't make me work.
	Don't make me do it.
	These people, they sit there and they collect their payments.
	They get massively wealthy somehow, despite the fact that the salaries don't seem to add up.
	And they do it by selling out the American people over and over again.
	This is no different.
	This is more of the same, except it's just larger.
	Elon Musk rips into utterly insane Trump-backed megabill.
	That's right.
	Utterly insane is a direct quote.
	He's got some heavy criticism of this disgusting boondoggle.
	But that's enough about Elon Musk for now.
	He's an interesting character.
	Manu Raju asked GOP senators about voting on Big Beautiful Bill, text they haven't read yet.
	We know where we are going.
	And of course, remember when they made fun of the Democrats for their whole, we've got to pass it to find out what's in it, bit.
	CNN Chief Congressional Correspondent Manu Raju spoke with several Republican lawmakers on Friday about the possibility that they would vote on the latest version of the so-called Big Beautiful Bill without having had time to read the final text, something that has been a complaint from Republicans in the past about Democrats.
	Raju spoke with Jake Tapper on Friday as the lead about his interviews with GOP lawmakers ahead of the hoped-for vote on the latest Senate version of the agenda bill from President Donald Trump, which Trump dubbed the Big Beautiful Bill, which has been subject of extensive debate and maneuvering among Republicans.
	Raju said to multiple GOP members on Friday that the process is moving fast or that there hasn't been time to review it asking for their explanations on how that might look to the American voters.
	What do you think voters say when they look at the process here that's being employed to push this through, and it'll be voted on and people haven't even got a chance to review it, Raju said to Senator Lindsey Graham in one such interview.
	I don't remember the voters saying anything about Obamacare, Graham replied.
	You guys did, Raju said, likely referring to the strong reactions at the time to a statement by then Speaker Representative Nancy Pelosi, who said of Obamacare, have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it.
	And of course, that quote lived in infamy, but it was something that she got made fun of and still to this day gets made fun of for.
	But the Republicans were more than happy to adopt that type of mentality.
	We don't have to read it anymore.
	Oh, thank goodness.
	That leaves more time for doing drugs and drinking whiskey and smoking cigars in the back room.
	Somebody fetch me a page boy.
	Well, the process of reconciliation is a one party exercise.
	We've spent hours and days and weeks and months talking about this among ourselves, Graham explained, highlighting the difference between those comments and the current situation.
	We shared it with our constituents.
	Is you is or is you ain't my constituency?
	Raju pressed on, though asking Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio about it as well and getting similar explanation, highlighting that the contents of the bill are well discussed, even if the specific language hasn't been printed out yet.
	I've never discussed things so many times as we've discussed the exact same thing, Moreno said.
	The final text is not out, but we know where we are going directionally.
	The devil is in the details, folks.
	These broad strokes mean nothing.
	Raju also spoke to the Republican Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, who defended the overall process and said at the normal period, a public review would be observed.
	Johnson defends process, cutting deals behind closed doors and rushing Trump's bill by self-imposed deadline, a process Republicans have attacked in the past.
	Here is that Mike Johnson clip.
	This bill is getting done by July 4th.
	If members have not seen this final tax or the changes that some of your members don't like, why not take the time, review it, let the public review it to get it right?
	Well, we will.
	We'll allow at least 72 hours, which is our normal process.
	That's not required under the rules, but it would certainly be a courtesy for everyone to be able to go through it.
	I hope we're all still...
	To go beyond July 4th.
	I hope that what we're going to receive is a product that is substantially similar to what we said over in the house, the review of the final product would not be a reread of a 14th SHP legislation, but the digest of the, or the actual changes to the things that have been struck or added, which would be a much smaller subset of pages.
	But we'll see.
	I've been in direct contact with Lee Cathoons recently the last 20 minutes.
	We're talking about this step by step.
	I know where the status is, where they are, and we are awaiting.
	We can't make any of these final decisions until we see their bill.
	But I'm going to give all of my members plenty of time to digest that.
	The House will not be jammed by anything.
	I've made that commitment.
	I have plenty of time.
	I'm determined to get this done by July 4th, as has the President.
	And the reason is to answer your question because we want to do it as soon as possible.
	This bill is going to have some time to give great economic relief to the American people.
	It will add new jobs, wages will go up, all the things we're talking about.
	The border will be secured.
	We'll have the border funding that we need.
	It will help us maintain this new peace through strength that is being forged around the world.
	All these things, the sooner we deliver that, the better, because everyone will benefit by it.
	So July 4th seemed to be the perfect day.
	It would be poetic to do it on Independence Day, and I certainly hope we can still do that.
	It's like ironic.
	It's possible, but I don't want to even accept that as an option right now.
	I'm going to try to push this.
	There's so many thorny issues, though, sir.
	Do you think your rank-and-file members are looped into this process enough?
	Could they be surprised by what the Senate sends them back?
	Well, look, I haven't slept maybe six hours this week because I'm on the phone all the time with members, House and Senate, working through, answering their questions, making sure everyone's up to date on everything.
	And no one will be surprised, okay?
	As things are leaked in various journals of all of yours, then it gives me more questions to answer, so thanks a lot.
	But we're trying to keep everybody up to date as the news develops.
	This is a completely transparent process.
	It has been from the beginning, and we're trying to maintain this 1,000-page 16 hours to read fully transparent.
	Maybe the weekend.
	I think that may still be possible.
	But we will bring the House members back to get this done as soon as it is possible for us to do that under the timeline.
	So I still want to get this done by July 4th.
	And yes, the green tax presence said that it's unacceptable, and it needs to snap back to exactly where the House is.
	It seems like a big ask, and something they're probably not going to be willing to do.
	Well, we're working through that.
	I mean, as you all know, we negotiated a very delicate balance and agreement on all of those dicey provisions.
	The president would like to wind down all the Green New Deal nonsense as aggressively as I would.
	But we have to have all the right there.
	So we'll see where that equilibrium point is reached.
	Remember how Donald Trump acted as if the Paris Climate Accord was something that we had...
	He could have just said it's not constitutional.
	It wasn't ratified properly.
	He didn't have the authority, but he hung that over everyone's head.
	He kept holding that over people as something like, oh, I'm going to take care of this.
	And he waited and waited and waited.
	If he wants to deal with a green new deal, he could just do that.
	I could say it's unconstitutional.
	But he likes to hold these things over people's head.
	The Paris Climate Accord was a scam.
	The green energy stuff is a scam.
	It's obviously so.
	Let's go back to the video.
	We're going to jump back to where we were.
	So we'll see where that equilibrium point is reached.
	I think we met a satisfactory point of negotiation for the House product, and I hope the Senate's product is as close to ours as possible.
	Do you have a salt deal with the right?
	About Washington jamming everything into a big bill and forcing it down people's throats.
	Well, in this case, it's a great idea because the reconciliation process allows us to do it as a partisan exercise in our party because the Democrats are in no mood whatsoever to give any of this tax relief to the American people or to beef up our national security or do any of their priorities, you know, sealing the border and deporting dangerous criminal legal aliens.
	They're going to vote against all that.
	So because we can't count on the Democrats, we have to do this ourselves.
	So the reconciliation process is the way to do that, and that is why we've crammed all of it into one big bill.
	How worried are you about the parliamentarians, sir?
	Are you worried about the parliamentarians ruling them on some of these things?
	Mike is running away.
	Has to scurry away into his little rat hole and has to go hide.
	I don't have any more answers, folks.
	I've run through my talking points.
	I stated how it's going to fix the border and create jobs, and that wasn't enough.
	And so that's all I've got.
	I've got some prepared talking points.
	We've got to fix the border and create jobs.
	So therefore, in order to appease the Democrats, we eliminated the debt ceiling, got rid of all restrictions on AI, included the sex change funding for minors, the whole nine yards.
	And of course, we're just going to pass it to find out what's in it.
	A lot of GOP angles over Trump's bill as House Republican dependents could get jammed by a Senate with little time to review major policy changes.
	I mean, that's what Washington is good at, is kind of jamming people as giving you something you haven't had time to read.
	Of course, as we pointed out multiple times, it is 1,000 pages.
	It is 16 hours just to read this monstrosity.
	1,000 pages are very densely written illegally.
	It is not 1,000 pages of a painful and interesting book.
	It's 1,000 pages of something that is hard to parse and that is going to put you to sleep.
	But in such a way as to be impenetrable.
	It's 1,000 pages of confusing nonsense.
	So 16 hours is just what it takes to skim through it.
	It's not 16 hours to potentially understand it.
	Who knows how long that would actually take to figure out exactly what it is they're saying and talking about.
	Got comments, Nights of the Storm.
	The bill has some pro-gun stuff in it to garner support, but the measures have no teeth.
	It simply makes the tax stamp $0, but there's still the requirement to ask permission with a Form 1 and storage slash transport requirements are still there.
	I didn't know that.
	That's really interesting because I heard people cheering about they're getting rid of the tax stamp, but this shows they aren't getting rid of it.
	You're still going to be going through their databases.
	It's still going to be having to mess with the ATF if you want to get one.
	You're still going to have to go hat in hand to the government and say, oh, please, Mr. Government, please, Daddy Government, can I have, would you stop infringing on my whites, please?
	Can I please have this?
	Isn't that just a win?
	What a win it is.
	KWD 68, Congress works 10 to 15 days a month.
	They are too busy schmoozing APAC.
	Well, I mean, that's where the money comes from.
	You know, they're figuring out what's the best way, what's the most efficient use of their time when it comes to generating revenue.
	And working for the American people is just not as profitable as Corning AIPAC is.
	And, you know, you got to spend your time wisely.
	Bibadu 2029, that pig Losie passed the bill statement was a prelude to the future.
	That's right.
	Everyone in the American people looked at it and was like, this is insane.
	And everyone in the government looked at it and said, oh, thank goodness.
	I've been so tired of pretending to read these things.
	I've been so tired of having to get a summary from my aides.
	I don't even have to pretend to do that anymore.
	We don't have to read it.
	This is wonderful.
	KWD68, I said pass the bill to see what's in it to a MAGA a couple of weeks ago, and he said, it's all good.
	Yeah, sure, winning.
	That's right.
	So much winning, you're going to get sick of it.
	Well, I'm sick of it.
	This is more winning than I can stomach.
	Knights of the Storm, removing the tax is not enough.
	They still want you to beg for permission and control you with the registry.
	That's right.
	Please, Daddy Government, please.
	I remember something about shall not be infringed, but who knows?
	Maybe I'm misremembering things.
	More for Knights of the Storm, and it's a temporary thing anyway.
	What happens when the next guy comes in?
	Why ID the executive making legislation anyway?
	That is not the function of the presidency.
	That's right.
	Why is the executive making legislation?
	That's right.
	He's not supposed to.
	He's given very specific powers.
	The legislative, the judiciary, and the executive are all supposed to serve different purposes under our government.
	But they've all kind of blended together and abdicated certain parts here and there.
	So they all do a lot of the same thing.
	Defy Tyrant 1776.
	All this theater is just more scripted BS.
	We all know it's going to pass and be signed.
	That's right.
	This is a wrestling match.
	They're all on the same side.
	They all want to take your rights.
	They all play for the same team.
	They're all Knights of the Storm.
	All bills should be single issue.
	This multi-bill crap is just a way to slip crap in that nobody wants.
	That's right.
	They get to bury it deep within the bill, make sure that nobody is going to actually find it.
	Or if they do, they're not going to have enough time to properly address it.
	Or if they do find it and have enough time to address it, they'll still get to say, well, there's so much good in the bill that we just have to swallow the bad in there.
	Sure, it might be a little bit of poison in there, but, you know, it's mostly vitamins.
	It's mostly good for you, so you're just going to have to deal with it.
	Angry Tiger's Den, BBB, does not stop welfare for illegals, does not stop funding children's sex exchanges, and does not end registration of suppressors.
	It's just going to add $4.5 trillion to the debt.
	It's all hype.
	I want to thank Handy for donating on Cash App.
	Really do appreciate it, Handy.
	And of course, as I've said before, Minor Mike is matching tips today.
	So we really do appreciate that as well.
	Thank you, Minor Mike.
	Thank you very much, Handy.
	We appreciate all the donations.
	As Travis has mentioned, we are at 75% for the month, and today is the last day of the month.
	So we are really hoping to get over the line.
	That's right.
	If this doesn't get us there, I'm going to have to host a telethon after the show.
	So don't make me do that.
	Don't make me, please.
	Trump spends $1 million on attack ads smearing Thomas Massey as pro-child general mutilation terrorists.
	And of course, the Big Beautiful Bill doesn't stop child general mutilation.
	So Donald Trump isn't so much an advocate for children as he would like you to believe, is he?
	The joke is on Trump.
	I wrote on Sunday, President Trump's plan to oust Massey is an exact copy of the plan the Republican Jewish Coalition announced earlier this year, but he's going to spend his own MAGA supporters donation money on it instead of the Israel lobby's millions.
	Well, they love a good deal, don't they?
	Why pay for it when you can get it for free?
	We'll play this Massey ad real quick, and then maybe Thomas Massey on Israel as well.
	See why they're so mad at him.
	What happened to Thomas Massey?
	What happened?
	President Trump is banning sex changes on minors.
	Ooh.
	But President Trump isn't banning sex changes on minors, is he?
	That got removed.
	Your ad's outdated.
	It's only been running for a couple days, and it's already incorrect.
	How could this happen?
	Oh no, your bill got neutered.
	Ironically, they castrated his bill.
	Isn't that something?
	But as I said, let's take a look at Thomas Massey on Israel and find out why AIPAC might be mad at him.
	Let's see.
	Do you feel like Israel is a fair ally?
	Are they a good ally for us?
	Well, is that too general of a question?
	Well, I think it doesn't matter.
	Like, there's no big, giant, great Britain lobby.
	There's no Australian lobby.
	There's no German lobby.
	The other countries don't have them.
	No, no, not like this.
	This is singular.
	This is unique.
	I mean, if you're an ally, why wouldn't we work with you?
	Why do you have to convince us that you're our ally?
	Why do you have to basically go into every congressional office and convince them?
	And it's because they want to keep the money flowing.
	And they've got a good return on their investment.
	I mean, we send more foreign aid to Israel than to any other country.
	Yeah.
	They're 10 million people or something.
	Yeah, I think.
	Tennessee, I don't know the population in Tennessee, but it's probably about on that order.
	Yeah, I think this year they said we spent like $12 billion, but that's not actual dollars.
	It's in military aid, right?
	Yeah, it's well, it's dollars in munitions.
	It's in the treasury.
	Yeah.
	But it's not like we give them, it's a gift certificate that's redeemable at Lockheed Martin and your local Raytheon, you know.
	Okay, got it.
	So that's kind of how that works.
	Yeah.
	Okay, got it.
	This voucher entitles you.
	Yeah, why do they have this carve out that's just for them?
	Like, what do we get from Israel, dude?
	You're asking some dangerous questions.
	We got a lot of countries that hate us is one of the things we get.
	Well, especially right now with this stuff in Gaza, I think it's Israel's, it's one of the worst PR campaigns I've ever seen in my life.
	It doesn't make any sense to me.
	It's like I just don't get one free government, this extremely evil look to me, you know, and I think to a lot of people, you know.
	Well, rough numbers, there are 2 million people in Gaza and 50,000 have been killed.
	That's 2.5%.
	Like they've killed 1 in 40 people in Gaza.
	If you did that in the United States, if you did 2.5% of 350 million, it'd be almost 10 million people dead in the United States.
	Everybody in Gaza is at this point related to somebody who's been killed.
	Like at least a first cousin had killed.
	And then if you say how many have been maimed, it's probably three or four times that.
	So everybody in Gaza knows people who've been killed and maimed.
	And we're supporting it, right?
	That's also the part that makes it really tough sometimes to just be a person.
	It's like our tax money is going towards this.
	But I just hope that people in some of these other countries know that, you know, it's not regular everyday people who would want to do these things, you know, that it's like governments making these choices and it's corporate interests that make these choices.
	How would we stop it?
	Do we need this connection with Israel?
	What is it?
	No one ever explains what it's for, I feel like.
	Oh, I think that's right.
	That would help everybody have a much better understanding, you know, because it starts to feel like America is just a shell company, an LLC for Israel.
	That's what it starts to feel like a lot of times, you know?
	Do you feel like that that's realistic or do you feel like that that's off base?
	I wouldn't send them a dime.
	Like, that's my position.
	I don't think whatever we're getting isn't worth it.
	This is why AIPAC does not like Thomas Massey.
	He wouldn't send them a dime.
	He cut it all off.
	He would stop the funding, which is the minimum we should do.
	We have allowed them to engage in this genocide in Gaza.
	We have funded it.
	We've given them the means to do it.
	And now they're trying to drag us further into a war in the Middle East.
	Bring us back to our favorite stomping grounds.
	Iran looks like it's in need of some democracy.
	Nibiru 2029, tax relief is the biggest lie the Republicrats have been using for decades.
	They've got their favorites.
	Jims 7, AIPAC, not registered with Farah, Cruz claims it's for relationship building, one-way relationship.
	We don't lobby the Nissettes.
	That's right.
	We don't have our politicians going over there and talking about how we need more, I don't know, locks, bagels, and cream cheese.
	You're going to provide us a special deal on the locks, or you're not getting any more of our Raytheon or Lockheed Martin coupons.
	Chevken, I'm noticing neighbors removing their Trump signs and posters here.
	That's right.
	Some people are starting to wake up.
	There's some buyer's remorse happening as he completely goes back on everything he said he was for.
	He said, we're going to cut the debt.
	We're going to reduce the budget.
	Turned out to be a lie.
	I'm the peace president.
	I'm going to end the conflict in Ukraine and Russia in one day.
	That didn't happen.
	Going to end the conflict in Gaza.
	That didn't happen.
	Not only did that not happen, but he launched strikes on Iran.
	Even some of the sycophants in MAGA are beginning to realize maybe I've been had.
	And it seems to be a little bit too little, too late.
	I wrote on Sunday, President's Trump to oust Massey is an exact copy of the plan the Republican Jewish Coalition announced earlier this year.
	But he's going to spend his own MAGA supporters' donation money on it instead of the Israel lobby's millions.
	It's now happening exactly as I predicted.
	This is from Information Liberation.
	APAC is recruiting Massey's challenger.
	Trump has become one with the Israel lobby.
	This is from Chris Minahan.
	That's right.
	He has become one with them.
	He has merged.
	They are a singular entity, or perhaps he's wearing them like a giant mech suit, or they're wearing him.
	Will lobbyists for a foreign country be able to buy a seat in Congress?
	That's the question in my re-election.
	1,900 of you donated $177,394 this week to make sure I can hold this office to represent American interests, not foreign interest donations.
	That's right.
	Well, it seems like lobbyists from a foreign country are able to buy seats already.
	Seems like most of those in Congress are owned by somebody.
	If not Israel, they're definitely Beholden to some other country.
	But generally, Israel seems to be the one with the most influence, the one that wags the dog.
	They get to decide what we do, where we go.
	Trump and those in his orbit have been discussing the idea of primering Massey for months, as the congressman criticized the president's reconciliation package and his approach to foreign policy.
	Most recently, Massey decried Trump's decision to strike Iran's nuclear facilities as part of Israel's military operation to destroy the regime's nuclear program as unconstitutional.
	The ad, which opens with the questions, what happened to Thomas Massey?
	Criticizes Massey for voting against Trump-backed legislation on sex reassignment surgery for minors, tax cuts, border security, funding and his opposition to the Iran strikes.
	That's right.
	And of course, the Senate removed the no funding on sex reassignment surgery for minors.
	Massey sided with Democrats and the Ayatollah, the ad narrator intones.
	Let's fire Thomas Massey.
	He sided with the Ayatollah.
	No, he simply stated that what you did was unconstitutional.
	He pointed out that you didn't have the authority.
	He didn't make any sort of declaration on Iran.
	He didn't side with them.
	He didn't say anything about them.
	He commented on your overreach, your overstep.
	That's what he did.
	This is simply lying.
	This is an attack ad.
	This is mudslinging.
	That video was something else.
	Theo Vaughan just seemingly innocently questioning, well, huh, how does this happen?
	What do we get from Israel?
	What is going on there?
	Be careful, Theo.
	Be careful.
	They don't like that.
	You're going to end up with a Mossad agent at your door.
	Trump and Massey feud reaches fever pitch.
	This is from Greg Nash.
	President Trump's feud with Representative Thomas Massey is showing no signs of abating as the president seeks to oust the GOP congressman for his history of regularly breaking with the administration.
	That's right.
	How dare you not tow party line?
	And this article is from the hill.
	How dare you not side with me?
	How dare you not follow the dear leader?
	You do as I say.
	You walk as I walk, or we're going to have problems.
	Now I'm going to go on to this next article, because that one basically just rehashes what has been going on.
	But it is still worth mentioning.
	This is from The Guardian.
	Tom Tillis won't seek re-election after clash with Trump over big, beautiful bill.
	And of course, good riddance to Tom Tillis.
	But as I said before, this is echoing North Korea.
	It's shades of Kim Jong-un, isn't it?
	Don't question the dear leader.
	Don't break with the party line, or else you can be removed.
	President insulted a Republican senator and threatened to back his primary challenger after he opposed the domestic bill.
	Tom Tillis announced on Sunday that he will not run for reelection to the U.S. Senate next year.
	One day after the North Carolina Republicans vote against Donald Trump's signature piece of domestic legislation prompted the president to launch a barrage of threats and insults, as well as promise to support a primary challenger to defeat him in their party's 2026 primary.
	Shortly after Tillis refused to support the massive package of tax and spending cuts called the One Big Beautiful Bill, in a procedural vote in the Senate on Saturday, Trump attacked the Senator on a social media platform, TrueSocial.
	Of course, this is a tax and spend bill, not tax and spending cuts.
	The president accused Tillis of grandstanding in order to get some publicity for himself for a possible but very difficult re-election.
	And this, of course, is projection.
	Trump is the biggest grandstander that I have seen in my life in politics.
	This is Tillis telling the truth for once as he's leaving.
	He's about to walk out the door.
	He's got, this is like the employee that has already given their two weeks' notice and it's their final day.
	They don't have to care what their manager says anymore.
	They don't have to be respectful.
	They don't have to deal with the customers.
	So they can just say whatever they want.
	Tom Tillis is just being honest, as Lance said, for the first time in his career.
	Trump is saying he's trying to gain favor for a difficult election when, in fact, it's all just, well, if I'm not going to run, may as well be honest.
	I got nothing left to lose.
	I might as well see what telling the truth feels like.
	Huh, that feels kind of nice.
	I mean.
	Before Tillis announced his decision Sunday to retire from the Senate, Trump continued to attack him on social media, writing, Tillis is a talker and a complainer, not a doer.
	He's even worse than Rand Paul.
	Rand Fauci, Paul.
	What's Rand Fauci, Paul?
	Fauci, the guy that he gave award to and did every recommendation he had.
	Are you trying to distance yourself from your friendly neighborhood Keebler elf, Mr. Trump?
	That was your boy.
	That was your man.
	Let's not get it twisted.
	I thought you were such good friends.
	Oh well.
	Easy come, easy go, so they say.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	But before we do, we've got Chevkin.
	I'm not.
	Oh wait, no, I already read that one.
	That's the buyer's remorse with MAGA.
	People are pulling down their signs and posters.
	It's over.
	The honeymoon's done.
	What did we sign up for?
	Truly.
	Even the MAGA sycophants can't ignore all of it anymore.
	At least some of them can't.
	And I suppose that's a hopeful sign.
	As I've mentioned before, I will continue to mention, Minor Mike is tip matching.
	We are at 75% on the gas gauge, and we have, this is the final day of the month.
	So if you'd like to help us get over that, Minor Mike is matching all tips across all platforms.
	So however you would like to donate, you will match that.
	We really do appreciate that.
	We thank you all for the support you have given us.
	It has been, it's what keeps this program going.
	really do appreciate the continued support, especially as we pray for our dad's quick recovery.
	We ask that you continue to pray for that.
	Pray that his voice and speech would be restored to him and that he'd be back in this chair soon.
	So thank you all for the support and thank you all for the prayers.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	And...
	We're going to take a quick break.
	The End Making sense common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Wait a minute.
	Where am I?
	Sorry, Jefferson.
	The scoundrels who put America on central bank fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy.
	Despicable.
	This is outrageous.
	Washington.
	I spent my life fighting centralized power.
	Now the Federal Reserve Monopoly parades us around on their monopoly money.
	Tell me there's some good news to all this.
	Well, there is a coin they can't control.
	One that isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the Fed up.
	The all-new David Knight Show commemorative coin.
	Now patriots can support a show that won't sell out with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
	They say money talks, and this coin has something worth listening to.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	Oh, hey.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	We remember the battle.
	We remember the places.
	We remember the Southern soldiers.
	We are the sons of Confederate veterans, and we invite you to join us in preserving our past and remembering our history and heritage of honor.
	To find out more, call 1-800-MYESOUTH or visit us on the web.
	Welcome back, folks.
	As I said, we're going to look at what's going on with the war.
	And they can't seem to even really decide if their strikes on Iran had any effect.
	And of course, that has led to some fractures in the Republican Party as well.
	He came out and he said it was a big, beautiful strike.
	It was so effective.
	It was so powerful.
	But some people are like, actually, that didn't happen.
	And I want to thank Derek.
	Thank you so much, Derek, for the donation on Cash App.
	I really do appreciate it.
	Thank you very much.
	And I had the worst thing.
	I'd like to point out that you can donate on other platforms and we will technologize that as well.
	Yes, thank you to Minor Mike for the technology.
	Yes, thank you so much.
	I had the where did it go?
	Oh, well, we'll hopefully I'll find it.
	But to move on with the show, we'll cover some different news for now.
	We got Driver Fury, and this is from the Daily Mail online.
	Driver Fury as Hertz's new Orwellian scanners trigger instant $400 fines for barely visible scuffs.
	And this is just typical of how AI is going to be used to meddle with and parse every part of your life.
	It's going to catalog every little thing.
	Oh, there's a minor scuff.
	It's barely detectable.
	It's almost invisible to the naked eye.
	Well, that's $400.
	This week, the company confirmed to DailyMail.com it had charged a driver $440 for a one-inch scratch on a wheel.
	The scuff commonly caused when a driver brushes a curb while parallel parking was flagged by the scanner.
	The bill included a $250 fine for the damage, $125 for processing, which is AI, and a $65 administrative fee, which is presumably AI as well.
	So they're charging you massive fees for these companies to process.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Well, you may just have to process this paperwork.
	I mean, we don't have someone actually doing it.
	It's a program.
	It's an AI.
	But we're going to hit you with another fee for that.
	Another driver claimed they got $195 fee for a tiny dent when returning a Toyota Corolla.
	AI is simply a busybody.
	Each driver's experience is part of a larger tech rollout at Hertz, which recently partnered with U-verse, UVA, a startup that builds high-speed automated vehicle inspection systems.
	That's right.
	They're high-speed and automated.
	Renters drive their cars through the scanners twice, once when they pick up the vehicle, and again when it's returned.
	Drivers will receive a copy of previously scanned damage, the company confirmed to DailyMail.com.
	Hertz wants to use the scanners at 100 rental locations by the end of the year.
	Going to use it to soak the consumer for even more money.
	A line is crossed when AI applications become overly aggressive and prioritize efficiency over customer fairness and satisfaction, David Linthicum, an AI analyst previously told DailyMail.com.
	This goes into what I've said before, where they're talking about reducing government and reducing the number of people in it, which sounds great, sounds wonderful.
	Until you realize that it's not going to reduce the scope of government.
	AI will simply handle those jobs.
	There will be no one you can talk to about it.
	And while it's unlikely, you might be able to get some kind of mercy from an actual human being.
	It might be able to look at your plight and empathize with it.
	The AI is not going to do that.
	It is going to have a set of parameters that it's told to function within.
	And it will drop the hammer relentlessly.
	It will not be able to sympathize or empathize.
	It will simply do its job.
	It will just follow orders.
	Hertz declined to comment on this article.
	Instead, the company pointed to its loss damage waiver, which typically costs between $20 and $30 per rental day as a way to avoid surprising fees.
	That's right.
	Well, if you don't want to pay these giant fees which we're going to impose via AI, just pay an extra $20, $30 up front.
	It's the iron hand in the velvet glove.
	I will no longer be using Hertz, the Cruel renter said on Reddit.
	Reach out to customer service.
	They said they stand by the AI.
	We stand with our AI, brothers and sisters.
	This is from Bloomberg.
	Lab Grown Meat is the fake climate food fix that just won't die is by Dina Schanker.
	Back in the early aughts, biofuels such as ethanol were looking like a powerful answer to our then emerging understanding of the climate crisis.
	And our reliance on foreign oil using renewable fuels made from plants like corn experts said could significantly reduce energy emissions compared with gasoline.
	Even better was the future promise of advanced biofuels, which would one day use an edible biomass instead of food.
	That's right, it was the solution of the time.
	It was the hype.
	It probably got a lot of funding.
	It got a ton of people, a lot of money.
	I'm sure many people were made extremely wealthy.
	February 2008, Searchinger published a paper in the journal Science that dismantled the environmental case for biofuels.
	The findings were covered widely by the media and the National Resources Defense Council abandoned its biofuels campaign shortly thereafter.
	Political bodies have been harder to persuade and biofuels have hardly disappeared.
	But they have at the very least lost much of their environmental shine.
	That's right.
	That's the scam that they use to push all these things on us.
	Don't you know we're burning the planet up?
	It's going to die.
	Well, uh, so it's not burning up.
	It's climate change.
	Things are changing.
	The climate, you know, it's doing stuff.
	Isn't that scary?
	We are eating the Earth's catalog, the absurd number of startups in the techno food space in 2019, many of which would soon fail thanks largely to products that didn't taste very good.
	It's something Grunwald seems to recognize.
	Startups just eats eggs made from mung beans had an earthy off taste, he writes.
	While Beyond Burgers on the Grill smelled like someone literally peeing in the wind.
	That's right.
	But you're saving the planet.
	It doesn't matter that the product is terrible, that it tastes bad and smells bad, and is bad for you because it's manufactured with a bunch of chemical garbage.
	You're saving the planet.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	You can save the planet by just eating this gross, gross garbage.
	I know Searchinger from my own work writing about food and climate, so I had to ask him, did you agree with Grunwald on the potential of cultivated meat in particular as a potential climate solution?
	He said he was skeptical, but thought the endeavor was worth trying.
	There is promise for products, he says, that taste as good as the real thing, costs a bit less, contain just a small amount of cultivated meat that is mixed mostly with plants.
	No such product Is currently on the market.
	So I told him that all sounded a bit like better biofuels that never showed up.
	His response, touche.
	You know, can't deny that.
	That's a, you got me there.
	Oh, you got me there.
	Sure, it's more of this utopian nonsense.
	But I, for one, can't wait for my cancer burger, my tumor steak.
	Isn't it going to be wonderful when they can just cultivate this?
	And of course, we've seen how they cultivate it.
	It looks disgusting.
	Honor seeker, thank you so much for the tip.
	That is incredibly kind.
	And he says, I cede my time to you guys.
	Well, thank you, Honor Seeker.
	And I believe I already read those.
	I think Rumble has an issue where if someone donates a large tip, it refreshes and brings it back at some point.
	But again, I just want to thank Jeff Weiss and Sam Miller.
	Those were incredibly generous, and we really do appreciate it.
	And thank you, Honor Seeker, again.
	We appreciate all the support.
	Can Ohio's Anthony Fauci beat Vivek Ramaswamy?
	It's the Battle of the Snakes.
	Shabri, thank you so much.
	That is incredibly generous.
	Thank you for stepping up until your father's ready to come back.
	Travis and Lance, prayers for you all.
	Well, thank you for the kind words, and thank you so much for praying for him.
	We are all praying for his swift return.
	So please continue to do so.
	Please pray for healing of his tongue and for his vocal cords.
	Please keep that in your prayers.
	Can Ohio's Anthony Fauci beat Vivek Ramaswamy?
	As I said, it's the battle of the snakes.
	Amy Acton oversaw public health for Ohio during COVID.
	Can she become governor?
	This, of course, is not actually Anthony Fauci.
	This is Ohio's own personal Anthony Fauci.
	Acton hasn't been in the public eye since the early throes of the pandemic, and she's reemerging now into a totally different world.
	Did she lock herself away?
	Been hiding in her room.
	She isolated, put on the mask.
	Bitter COVID skepticism on the right has given rise to the crunchy health and wellness doctor known as Maha with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vaccine skeptic who claims processed foods and seen oils are driving chronic illness, setting the tone as the nation's health secretary.
	This is from Politico, by the way.
	In the years since the pandemic, trust in doctors and scientists has plummeted among members of both parties.
	An increasing number of young Americans are getting their medical advice from TikTok and YouTube.
	In the midst of these trends, Acton will be reckoning with her own legacy and the decisions she made when so little was known about the virus.
	Whatever was known or wasn't known about the virus, we knew that it was unconstitutional to lock everyone down.
	They did not have the authority.
	They didn't have that power.
	Whatever the virus was or wasn't doing.
	We didn't know anything about the virus back then.
	That's why we implemented everything that we've been trying to implement for years to give us power and control over the American people and mandated things like masks, which had always been known by things like OSHA to be unhealthy to wear for long times.
	So, you know, we just didn't know what we were doing.
	Isn't it just so wonderful that all these things that they had wanted to do for years turned out to be the exact way to combat the virus?
	It was such a serendipitous event.
	It was so wonderful.
	It's just so special.
	She says her stump speech, an unsettled jab at her detractors, excuse me, Acton will be reckoning with her own legacy and the decisions she made when so little was known about the virus.
	Acton is defensive of her posture back then.
	A leader's job is to give you a North Star to tell you these cold, hard facts.
	That's right, they were facts.
	Except even Politico admits that so little was known about the virus, but she had cold, hard facts at her disposal.
	She says in her stump speech, an unsubtle jab at her detractors, as well as the parasocial relationships some people have to her from the days of near daily briefings.
	That connection is something I'm very proud of, Acton told me.
	She's also relatively light, tight lipped about Dwine, who has swatted away any notion he might cross party lines to endorse his former health director, insisting they had remained on good terms after her departure.
	The way we worked together was real, she said.
	It was real.
	Oh, it was so wonderful.
	Those were the good old days when people just listened and bought everything I said.
	When they unquestioningly trusted me.
	Acton acknowledges the mere fact of her candidacy dredging up COVID times can be strange and painful for some people.
	And may even kneecap her campaign in its infancy.
	We did overwhelm hospitals.
	People died during COVID from heart attacks and strokes because ambulances had nowhere to go, Acton said, recalling one of the more nightmarish realities of that chapter.
	Oh yeah, I remember the hospitals being so full, and yes, the heart attacks and strokes are because there just wasn't enough space.
	Hospitals full of dancing nurses.
	Ugh.
	Calling one of the more nightmarish realities of that chapter.
	We haven't been honest as a country and just laid that out there.
	It's been too political.
	We have a lot to learn from that because we will face crises again.
	The only crises is people like you coming in and usurping power.
	You are the crises.
	The person that acts during the crisis.
	The crisis actor, you might say.
	Allison Smith, the nurse with the COVID scrapbook in Archbold, opened up to Acton about being a contact tracer.
	I told her that I was threatened, Smith said, thumbing open the book to a photo of her children two and four in masks.
	It makes me cry when I look back.
	It was a hard time.
	It was actually traumatic for people in a lot of ways.
	That's right, it was traumatic.
	The government inflicted so much psychological trauma.
	The amount of fear that they generated in people is truly mind-boggling.
	People to this day still can't get past it.
	You still see people Out and about in masks, sometimes still even in their cars alone, riding with masks on.
	People have been beyond just being damaged by the vaccine, they were damaged by the propaganda mentally, emotionally.
	They have yet to recover, and they probably never will.
	Pam Bondi acts as January 6th prosecutors in horrifying purge, of course, says the Daily Beast.
	That's right.
	But they should be jailed, not just removed.
	They are despicable.
	Attorney General Pam Bondi has fired at least three career Justice Department prosecutors who worked on cases related to the Jan 6 insurrection.
	It was an insurrection when they walked politely between those red velvet ropes.
	It was an insurrection.
	They're fine with giving people these absurd jail sentences for walking, as you said, between the velvet ropes.
	But if they are faced with any repercussions for their horrific injustice, it's a horrific purge of prosecutors.
	These poor career justices are losing their jobs because they are corrupt and evil.
	Oh, what a shame.
	Oh no, not the career politicians.
	Won't someone think of the career politicians?
	I won't.
	I'll never consider these people again.
	The attorneys were informed in letters signed by Bondi that they were removed from federal service, effective immediately, with no further explanation, NBC News reported.
	And I'm sure they'll go on to have some kind of lucrative career somewhere else.
	They will reappear somewhere, just merge into the fabric and become lobbyists, or something like that.
	One federal corruption has a way of finding a place, whether it's working for big pharma at the mainstream media news corporations or, as you said, some think tank or lobbyist thing.
	Yes, or maybe they'll write books about their times.
	Maybe they'll tell the harrowing tale of how they prosecuted these dangerous insurrectionists.
	It was a scary time.
	We didn't know if they were going to have friends that would come to our door.
	I wonder.
	I would bet at least one of them will write a book about it.
	One federal law enforcement official told NBC that the firings were horrifying, calling it a slap in the face not only to them, but to all career DOJ prosecutors.
	Oh no, oh no, the poor DOJ prosecutors.
	I feel so bad for them.
	It's just tragic.
	Cry me a river.
	Cry me a river.
	Career politicians deserve no sympathy.
	We should get rid of them all.
	This is from Newsweek.
	Zoron, Mom Donnie proposes taxing whiter neighborhoods in NYC.
	That's right.
	The white tax is here.
	Your neighborhood.
	It's too nice.
	You get out of here.
	Come on, White.
	What are you doing hogging all the good neighborhoods for yourself?
	The article is going to talk about this.
	New York City's Democratic mayoral candidate, Zoron Mondani, has said he wants to shift the tax burden to richer and wider neighborhoods if he secures election in November.
	Housing policy document at Momdani's official website includes a pledge to shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and wider neighborhoods.
	Those white neighborhoods are all built on magic dirt.
	Exactly.
	That's why they're nicer.
	It's because they got access to the good dirt.
	Momdani's proposal has already sparked backlash with one conservative commentator branding him racist, urging New Yorkers to support incumbent mayor Eric Adams instead, who is running in November as an independent.
	Man, the choice of politicians you have anywhere is bad, but in New York, it is another level of insanity.
	When Eric Adams might be the better choice, you are scraping the bottom of the barrel.
	New York is a hellhole.
	It is an awful place.
	Every time I've been there, it has been miserable.
	I have zero interest in it.
	I remember seeing a lot of stuff about Montane when he was running because of the one interview where he was asked, and they asked the entire panel, what country would you go to first?
	I believe that's on the board, if you want to pull that up.
	Yes, here we have it.
	This is a pretty good clip.
	First foreign visit by a mayor of New York is always considered significant.
	Where would you go first?
	Right, the sounds.
	First visit, I would visit the Holy Land.
	Mr. Cuomo?
	Given the hostility and the anti-Semitism that has been shown in New York, I would go to Israel.
	Israel?
	Mr. Tilton, where would you go?
	I'd make my fourth trip to Israel, followed by my fifth trip to Ukraine, two of our greatest allies fighting on the front lines of the global war on terror.
	Mr. Mandani.
	I would stay in New York City.
	My plans are to address New Yorkers across the five boroughs and focus on that.
	Mr. Momdani, can I just jump in?
	Would you visit Israel, Mr. Mayor?
	I will be doing, as the mayor, I'll be standing up for Jewish New Yorkers and I'll be meeting them wherever they are across the five boroughs, whether that's in their synagogues and temples or at their homes or at the subway platform, because ultimately we need to focus on delivering on their concerns.
	Yes or no, do you believe in a Jewish state of Israel?
	I believe Israel has the right to exist.
	As a Jewish state?
	a state with equal rights.
	He won't say it has a right to exist as a Jewish state, be very clear on that.
	As we're American politicians, I said that.
	What do you want?
	No, no, no.
	Unlike you, I answered the question directly.
	My goal would be to take my first trip to Israel.
	My wife's life work in this area means a lot to our family.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	New York politicians arguing over who can be the biggest Zionist shill.
	And this is, I feel, a large part of why he got elected.
	Because even people on the right were celebrating this.
	And yet, America should Not be a client state of Israel.
	Everyone can see that.
	Everyone is starting to support people that are pushing back against that.
	Unfortunately, this seems to be the only thing that he's correct about.
	He's wrong on everything else.
	He has one good take, and that he won't go to Israel and become their puppet, apparently.
	Everything else is simply racial politics.
	And I would bet that he is simply viewing the Israeli issue as a race thing as well.
	It is truly something to see these American politicians vying for supremacy when it comes to who is the biggest supporter of Israel.
	Oh, I support Israel the most.
	I would take my first trip to Israel.
	Oh, you take your first trip.
	Well, I would take my fifth trip.
	That's right.
	I've been there four times before this.
	I'm their biggest sycophant.
	And then after Israel, I'm going to Ukraine.
	Isn't it wonderful?
	Our two greatest allies.
	You can tell how great of an ally they are by how much money they take from us.
	Exactly.
	Greatest ally as defined by who and what.
	I'm assuming it's a self-assigned moniker.
	We're your greatest ally, don't you know?
	Well, that's Zoran Mamdani, the potential new mayor of New York City.
	As I said, New York is a hellhole.
	These are the choices that they have to pick from.
	Not that we have it much better anywhere else, but at least they tend to pay a little bit more lip service to at least the people who are voting for them.
	In New York, they can't even be bothered with that.
	It is.
	I have hated every single time I've been to New York, given I've only ever been there for work to film things.
	But I don't think I'd have a much better time there if I went for fun.
	In fact, I can't really imagine having fun in New York.
	Last time I was there, some guy tried to sell us crack late at night after we had finished work.
	He was just sitting on a trash can.
	As we walked past, first we couldn't understand him, eventually got fed up with us not understanding the lingo and just said, you want to buy some crack?
	It's like, I don't think you understand your client base, sir.
	I don't think you truly know what crackheads look like.
	You're probably barking up the wrong tree here.
	For love of the road, I'm very surprised we don't see more of this in the presidential debates.
	It is almost shocking, you're right.
	You'd think, with how much influence APAC has, that it would just be Donald Trump and Kamala Harris or whoever out there.
	No, I support Israel the most.
	Well, in fact, I do.
	Me and BB, we have such long, wonderful conversations.
	Well, we've taken long romantic walks on the beach where I've pledged our military to him.
	I can't wait for the next election.
	It'll be wonderful, I'm sure.
	Oh, we're going to take a quick break.
	We come back.
	We're going to look at what Israel is up to.
	I'm sure it'll be lovely.
	Stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	PIANO PLAYS
	You're listening to the David Mike Show.
	Welcome back.
	We've got just 18 minutes left in the broadcast today.
	Time goes by fast when you stare into the abyss, doesn't it?
	Just flies right by.
	As I said, we're going to look at what's going on with Israel, but before that happens, I want to remind everyone that Minor Mike is matching all donations made today, whether it's a tip on Rumble, a subscription on Kik, or a donation through Cash App, or Zelle.
	So if you'd like to help us reach our goal for the month, we are at about 75% and we would greatly appreciate it.
	It's from listeners like you where we get our support.
	And we really can't thank you enough.
	We really do appreciate it.
	And really thank Minor Mike for that.
	It is incredibly generous.
	So thank you all so much.
	And thank you, Minor Mike.
	This is from anti-U War.
	Israeli forces kill 43 Palestinians in Gaza, including 20 aid seekers.
	And this is the continual way that they operate.
	They have no regard for life.
	They have no interest in who or what the people are.
	They'll kill men, women, and children just the same, but they believe they have the right to.
	And America just co-signs it.
	We keep sending them weapons and money.
	Medical sources have told Al Jazeera that Israeli forces have at least 43 more Palestinians in Gaza on Monday as the daily massacres continue.
	I think I meant to say killed at least.
	While much of the world's attention is on the Israeli-U.S.
	war against Iran, among those killed on Monday were at least 20 Palestinians who were seeking aid for the crime of seeking reprieve from the horrible conditions Israel has put them under.
	Since the U.S. and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation began operating in Gaza at the end of May, more than 400 people have been killed by the IDF while attempting to get food for their starving families.
	The crime of trying not to starve to death.
	You'll be executed for that.
	You should die quietly.
	You should accept your fate so that Benjamin Netanyahu can expand his territory.
	Perhaps so that Donald Trump can turn Gaza into a glitzy casino paradise.
	It'll be wonderful.
	It'll be beautiful.
	Just quietly pass away.
	Israeli airstrikes and shelling also pounded targets across Gaza on Monday, according to the Palestinian news agency, WAFA.
	At least four people were killed and others were wounded when Israeli warplanes targeted tents sheltering displaced Palestinians near the southern city of Khan Yunis.
	Targeting tents.
	You can see a picture there.
	This is mourners reacting over the body of a Palestinian boy killed on Sunday by Israeli fire while seeking aid in northern Gaza.
	According to the Gaza Health Ministry, it's a child.
	It doesn't look like he could be older than 14.
	Wafa also reported that three brothers were killed by an Israeli strike while they were inspecting their damaged home in Beit Lahaya, northern Gaza.
	Four Palestinians were also killed by Israeli attacks on Jabalia, which is near Beit Lahaya.
	It's indiscriminate.
	They have no concern for life.
	Men, women, or children, they're all just targets, equal opportunity murderers, or the IDF.
	There are still a number of victims under the rubble and on the streets, and ambulance and civil defense crews cannot reach them, the ministry wrote on Telegram.
	The ministry said the latest violence has brought the death toll since October 7, 2023 to 55,998, a number of wounded to 131,559.
	Studies have shown that the health ministry's numbers are a significant undercount, and estimates that factor in indirect deaths caused by the Israeli siege and destruction of all of Gaza's civilian infrastructure bring the death toll into the hundreds of thousands.
	We saw with that clip with Theo Vaughan and Thomas Massey.
	Thomas Massey pointed out that just by the numbers that are confirmed, the ones that are probably a severe undercount, that's 2.5% of the population that's been killed.
	2.5%.
	A massive death toll.
	The UN condemns Gaza aid death trap as dozens reported killed by Israeli fire.
	At least 46 people waiting for aid have been killed by Israeli fire in two incidents in central and southern Gaza, according to rescuers and hospitals.
	UN agencies have condemned the U.S. and Israeli-backed food distribution system, with one official calling it an abomination and a death trap.
	Such deadly incidents have recently become a near daily occurrence, but have attracted relatively little attention outside Gaza since Israel attacked Iran more than a week ago.
	That's right, people are more interested in the upcoming war than the ongoing genocide.
	Without including the latest deaths, UN has said that more than 410 Palestinians are reported to have been killed by Israeli gunfire or shelling since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation began work in late May.
	Why are our children's lives seen as so cheap?
	demanded Um Raid al-Nuwazi, a widow whose son was shot and wounded after he went overnight to collect food for his hungry family in central Gaza.
	It is My son went to get a grain of flour so he could eat and feed his siblings, and now he's in the intensive care unit.
	He went out to help feed his siblings.
	He went out to find food so that his family could eat and now he's in the ICU.
	Why are our children's lives seen as so cheap?
	Well, that's a good question.
	Of course, we've seen over and over again the American Zionists and their wholehearted support of Israel, their lack of care for the Palestinian people.
	I'll co-sign anything Israel does.
	You're killing men, women, and children?
	Well, you're God's chosen people.
	You have the right to that land.
	It says so in the Bible.
	Their bad theology allows them to co-sign slaughter, mass murder, genocide.
	It is truly despicable to see these people and the way that they worship the state of Israel.
	Children's lives are seen as cheap.
	These people who, likely in the United States, would support an abortion ban, they would say they're pro-life, but because it's Israel who's doing the killing of women and children, they don't seem to care.
	Footage from Al Auda Hospital in Nusarat showed chaotic scenes as young men with gunshot wounds were carried in groaning in pain and some drenched in blood.
	Soon every bed was filled and casualties covered the floor.
	An older man was set down dead as his wife bereft cradled his face and wept.
	Hospital officials and the Hamas run civil defense agency said that at least 21 people were killed and some 150 injured.
	Witnesses said that thousands had crowded near a site run by the GHF in an Israeli military zone when soldiers opened fire.
	Just opening fire on a crowd of people, our greatest ally.
	The Israel Defense Force said a gathering had been identified In an area adjacent to IDF troops operating in the Netzarim corridor.
	Reports of injured individuals as a result of IDF fire in the area were received.
	The details are under review, it stated.
	GHF said there were no incidents near any of our sites this morning.
	We've seen Israel lie over and over again, continually, to justify these actions.
	Well, you know, there were reports of an incident, and so we opened fire on the crowd.
	We indiscriminately dumped fire into this crowd of women and children.
	And it's justified because we thought we might have been under attack.
	It's utterly despicable.
	Paramedics and rescuers said that at least 25 people were also killed near a site run by the GHF in southern Gaza on Tuesday morning.
	Witness told the BBC he had gone to a site north of Rafa at 0500, but shortly before it was due to open, at 10, Israeli tanks advanced towards them and opened fire with no announcements.
	The shooting was directly on the civilians and blood got everywhere, Hatim Abu Hujele said.
	Everyone around us got wounded.
	There may be more than 30 wounded whom no one was able to rescue.
	We only managed to rescue our relative and left with him.
	The IDF told the BBC that contrary to the reports being spread out, the IDF is not aware of the incident in question at the Rafa a distribution site.
	I'm sure they wouldn't lie about that.
	I'm sure they wouldn't lie to cover up the murder of civilians.
	No, Israel would never lie.
	They're a greatest ally.
	They would never lie about an incident.
	Well, except when they lied about the USS Liberty.
	That's an easy one that comes to mind, doesn't it?
	When they killed so many of our people on a ship as a way to try to drag us into a war.
	But they wouldn't do that again.
	They would never dance gleefully in the streets after 9-11.
	No.
	Israel is our greatest ally.
	And anyone that questions that is anti-Semitic.
	Greatest ally.
	Murdering men, women, and children with our blessing.
	Thanks.
	Star Barkley, thank you very much for the tip.
	That is very generous, and we appreciate it.
	Thanks for all you do.
	That is very kind.
	Glad that we can provide you with some hope.
	I hope that we're able to do that.
	Geesebusters.
	Thank you very much, Geesebusters.
	That's generous.
	David, get well.
	That's right.
	We are all hoping he gets well, comes back soon.
	We're all praying for it.
	I ask that you continue to pray.
	Nights of the Storm.
	I saw an ad on TV asking for a $20 donation to feed starving people in Israel.
	I was like, what the hell?
	Some people holding up food for Palestinian children?
	What's up with all the money we are already sending there?
	That's right.
	If you watch Fox News, which I don't, but when it was on in a break room or some other place that I happened to be at the time, you would continually see these ads where some rabbi or someone is on TV saying, if you just give a few dollars a day, you can help feed these elderly Jewish women.
	They survived the Holocaust.
	You can help provide for them.
	Why isn't their own government providing for them?
	We're already sending you billions in aid, in funding, in weapons.
	Why isn't your own government helping to feed these people that are apparently such an important part of your heritage?
	They mean so much to you, but it's not you that's going to feed them.
	You're going to once again soak the Zionist Christians who watch Fox News.
	You're going to get them to pay for their food.
	Assuming any of that money actually makes it there and isn't siphoned off to something else through the charity.
	Who knows?
	It's a real wonder why they won't pay for it themselves.
	C Sejgi Seje?
	CJ?
	Taxpayers continue to fund genocide.
	That's right.
	Continuing to fund it.
	It doesn't stop.
	BB fumes after IDF soldiers confirm lethal weapons routinely used on crowds at Gaza aid sites.
	How could you tell them that?
	Why are you giving away the secret?
	Don't acknowledge it.
	You're not supposed to.
	You're supposed to ignore it.
	Pretend it doesn't happen.
	Soon after the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation began distributing aid to war-torn Gaza in May, disturbing reports emerged of Israeli soldiers killing unarmed Palestinians approaching aid points for food.
	This is from Zero Hedge, by the way.
	As the world's eyes turned from Gaza to Israel's attack on Iran, the pace of these reported killings increased.
	That's right.
	When they don't have the eyes on them, when people aren't paying direct attention, they're allowed to do even more.
	They're allowed to get away with more, with multiple incidents claiming more than 50 lives each.
	Now Israel's oldest daily newspaper has dropped a bombshell report with Israeli soldiers and officers confirming the routine use of deadly force on unarmed Palestinians as a barbaric form of crowd control with a practice carried out under orders from superior officers.
	It is coming from the top down.
	It is a policy they have in place.
	Benjamin Etanyahu's government is evil.
	It preys upon civilians.
	It is not just the terrorists in Hamas that they're targeting.
	That's the old refrain.
	Well, Hamas hides out among the civilians, so they just have to bomb indiscriminately.
	You know, if they get a tip that one of them is in an area, they just have to launch the bomb.
	It doesn't matter how many civilians might be there.
	They've got to get rid of this one person.
	But this is beyond even that.
	This is them opening fire on crowds of civilians indiscriminately.
	They are just killing them.
	It is a genocide.
	We have a visitor to the studio.
	This morning in Gaza, Palestinians went to receive American aid from the GHF.
	Israeli forces opened fire on them, turning a humanitarian moment into a massacre.
	That is directly from the Times of Gaza.
	Employing a rhetorical device frequently used when Israel is accused of lethal wrongdoing.
	I dismiss the newspaper's report as a blood libel against the IDF.
	That's right.
	Anything that criticizes or makes the Jewish people look bad is blood libel.
	That is the old way of describing it.
	They have used that term to obfuscate and get rid of criticism for a long time now.
	Israeli Defense Forces call these soldiers and officers' accounts vicious lies designed to discredit the most moral army in the world.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	They're the most moral army in the world.
	The gall of Netanyahu.
	To say this, we have whistleblowers from the army itself talking about how they routinely open fire on civilians, how it's orders from the higher-ups, the most honorable army in the world.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Our greatest ally at work, folks.
	Well, we've got about two and a half minutes left, and I want to make sure that I thank the people.
	We've got some tips that came in on Subscribestar.
	Paula C, JustMe83.
	This is from, and those are from Subscribestar, and this is from Zell.
	Ryan F. Thank you very much, Ryan.
	Craig P., Julie W. Bianca S., Andrew T., and Jason M. We really do appreciate it.
	Your support is what keeps this program running.
	Thank you all so much.
	And please keep our Father in your prayers.
	We want him back more than anyone else.
	I know that you all are eager for him to be back in this chair.
	So please continue to pray.
	We know that God is the one who heals, and we cannot thank you enough for all the prayers you have already sent up for him.
	Big Britt is back again, says, how is Dave doing?
	He's doing better.
	He is doing better.
	Especially physically, he's able to walk around a lot easier.
	But it's his vocal cords and the nerves in his tongue which are still giving him some trouble.
	So he asks that you pray for those.
	Ask that he would be able to speak clearly and easily again.
	But we are almost out of time.
	We've got about a minute and 10 seconds left.
	So again, thank you all for the support you've given us today.
	Thank you, Miner Mike.
	He is tip matching today.
	So any tips that you sent in, he will match.
	And of course, if you want to donate after the show on Zelle or Subscribestar or places like that, you still can.
	Cash App as well.
	We really do appreciate him matching tips.
	We're at about 75%, and today is the last day.
	So if you want to get your donation and help us reach the goal, get it right under the wire, we would appreciate it.
	We cannot thank you all enough.
	It has been such a blessing to all of us.
	So thank you, Minor Mike.
	Thank you to everyone who donated today.
	And of course, this program would not be able to continue without you.
	That's the music.
	So that's my time.
	I want to thank you all for joining us.
	It is a pleasure to sit here with you all and go over these things with you.
	Please keep us all in your prayers, Dad for healing, and us, just to be able to continue to provide you with a good show.
	As I said, thank you all so much.
	God bless you all.
	Have a wonderful rest of your day.
	I'll be back tomorrow.
	I'll be back tomorrow.
	The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing in the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity, created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidnightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲