Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 27, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:02:55

Tue Episode #2019: AI Lies, Pagan Classrooms & the War on Truth

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	As the clock strikes 13, it is Tuesday, the 27th of May, year of our Lord, 2025.
	And we're going to look at Trump's big, beautiful bill and how it is still funding some big, beautiful bombs.
	Then, the climate MacGuffin and what's going on with immigration.
	Stay with us.
	Well, good morning everyone.
	Thank you for being with us on this lovely Tuesday.
	Hope you're all doing very well.
	I see some people in chat are requesting an update on David.
	So we'll give you an update on our dad.
	He is doing great.
	He is working on mobility and speech.
	So please keep him in your prayers.
	Please pray that he would heal quickly.
	Especially his ability to communicate.
	That is what he is most focused on.
	That is what he wants to get back the quickest.
	and of course his ability to play the piano.
	His left side is still...
	But today, as I said, we are going to start with the big, beautiful bill.
	We're all so excited for when the government passes it, and we are on the hook for even more debt.
	I've got this article here, and this is from the Free Thought Project.
	Ron Paul, cutting military spending would make for a big and beautiful bill.
	That's right.
	If you want to actually cut the debt, you have to start cutting the military-industrial complex.
	Everything else is basically a drop in the bucket compared to that.
	America has been funding the wars across the globe for years now, decades, and unless you get rid of our eternal war policy, you are not going to make any real impact on the debt.
	You can cut whatever else you want.
	While Republicans opine about spending bills and tax cuts, their biggest blind spot is the military-industrial complex because that's where they make their money, too.
	These people go into Congress.
	With a reasonable amount of money, and they come out multi-multi-millionaires.
	And you have to wonder, where does all that money come from?
	Probably from Raytheon, Boeing, Lockheed Martin.
	Probably from places like that.
	Ron Paul, last week, Moody's rating lowered the United States credit rating, Fitch ratings, and S&P global ratings had already lowered the U.S. rating.
	This new downgrade was driven by Congress's failure to make any effort to reduce the almost $37 trillion national.
	When Moody's made its announcement, the House Budget Committee was scrambling to get the votes to pass legislation extending the 2017 tax cuts.
	President Trump has dubbed this the big, beautiful bill.
	What a way with words our president has.
	The bill also has new tax cuts, including repealing federal taxes on tips and overtime.
	The bill offsets the lost revenue.
	Again, they see it as revenue.
	Taking your money is their revenue.
	From cuts by making some cost-saving reforms in domestic welfare programs, most notably Medicaid and food stamps, however, it is increasing spending in other areas, most notably military spending.
	That's right.
	He loves his big, beautiful bombs, folks.
	can't get enough of those big, beautiful bombs.
	And we continually hear people talking about how good he is at foreign policy, how good he is at negotiating.
	But if he was really so good at negotiating, would we continue to need this giant military industrial complex?
	Would we continue to need to fund the military to this?
	extent.
	I'd also like to point out the ridiculousness of saying, look, he's cutting spending in this area and this area when in the end it's increasing spending.
	It's like saying Like, look, he's cutting taxes on tips and all that, but he's increasing taxes in the long run with his tariffs.
	Yeah, it's all smoke and mirrors.
	He'll let you keep a little bit of money here, but he's going to get it one way or the other.
	See Sprumford saying, are they seriously calling this thing the Big Beautiful Bill?
	Oh, the outright mockery.
	That's right.
	They will mock you right to your face.
	And that's what they are doing with this.
	According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, the Big Beautiful Bill would increase the national debt by at least $3.3 trillion over 10 years.
	This number is likely to rise because several moderate Republicans are starting to vote against the bill.
	Unless the Medicaid and food stamps reforms are limited or dropped.
	That's right.
	They will fight to make sure that part of the cuts is removed.
	So that $3.3 trillion is going to go up.
	It is not going to stay there.
	It is going to rise.
	Tax cuts are always worth supporting because they advance liberty and sound economics by ensuring the people have more and the government has less.
	However, tax cuts that are not combined with real spending cuts are delayed tax increases.
	This is because cutting taxes without cutting spending leads to more debt that leads to higher That's right.
	People don't often think about things in the long run.
	They tend to just look at what's in front of them and see, oh, does it benefit me immediately?
	If so, this is a good thing.
	They don't consider the fact that if we continue to raise our debt, they will eventually have to raise the taxes to try and catch up on it.
	Not that I think they ever could catch up on $37 trillion.
	These tax increases are likely to come from the Federal Reserve's monetization of debt, which weakens the dollar's purchasing power.
	This inflation tax benefits political and financial elites while hurting most Americans.
	That's right, they get to play their monetary games while you have to continue to pay more for milk and eggs and these other things.
	These billionaires, it doesn't matter to them how expensive eggs get.
	It allows them to continue to make money.
	The reason Republicans are finding it difficult to offset their tax plan in a way that is politically palatable is that they are following exactly the opposite of the politically smart path to cut spending.
	Instead of starting by cutting the welfare for the poor, Republicans should have started by cutting welfare for the rich, particularly the military-industrial complex.
	But we don't see that sort of thing.
	Elon Musk is still going to get his multi-billion dollar contracts from the government, all these other...
	It is going to continue the same way it always has, whereas we are going to get screwed on the deal.
	That's how it goes.
	Last week, while visiting the Middle East, President Trump delivered an important speech refuting the neocon crusade that has dominated American foreign policy thinking since 9-11.
	Yet President Trump is proposing to increase the military budget to $1 trillion.
	That's right, folks.
	He continually pays homage in his words to these sorts of ideas whenever he makes a speech, but he doesn't make any real change.
	He will sell you out the same way all these other people have, or worse, because you might actually trust him.
	It was a lot harder for Obama or George Bush to do this sort of thing because people didn't trust him.
	Perhaps they trusted George Bush.
	I was too young to remember.
	Our family never trusted George Bush.
	Sprumper, the talk of tax cuts are meaningless.
	The inflation tax is killing almost everyone.
	Yes, the price of everything goes up and up and up.
	Wally Walrus, I can't afford to pay the regular tax, let alone the tax cut.
	Shaking my head.
	That's right.
	Well, there's no need.
	If the government's not going to pay their debt, why should we, right?
	Except they will come to your door and they will kick it down if you don't pay yours.
	President Trump and congressional Republicans will never cut spending until they stop pretending they can pay down the national debt, cut taxes, and continue massive spending on militarism.
	Similarly, fiscal conservatives need to stop targeting single mothers on food stamps while increasing federal spending on foreign interventionists.
	Yes, they love to pretend to be fiscally conservative when it allows them to target the lower classes, the people, the poor.
	And, of course, we are not fans of...
	However, they are a drop in the bucket, as I said, compared to the military spending.
	And it is always unpopular and makes you seem unpleasant when you target these policies that give money to single mothers, etc.
	Should they still be in place?
	No, but before you get rid of them, you need to focus on other areas and make sure you're not just going to cast these people out into the street.
	That's my opinion on things.
	The debt that caused Moody and other credit rating agencies to lower the U.S. government's credit rating is because of spending, not tax cuts.
	Congress should be giving people more tax cuts and offsetting them with deep cuts in military spending, cutting wasted on a futile pursuit of a global empire.
	It's not just a fiscal necessity.
	It is also the best thing Congress can do to promote peace and prosperity.
	Congress should then begin phasing out welfare programs in a manner that does not harm those currently reliant on the programs.
	Congress should also rein in the welfare world.
	That's right, the Federal Reserve is really at the heart of all our monetary issues.
	Giving them the ability to print money however they see fit and create an unlimited supply of it for the government to use is the heart of the problem.
	It should also repeal the 60th Amendment.
	These actions would free the people from 1913's great mistake, fiat money, and the income taxes.
	Well, we've actually got a clip of Thomas Massey discussing the Big Beautiful Bill, which we're going to play for you now because he has some very strong words about it.
	Well, I'd love to stand here and tell the American people, we can cut your taxes and we can increase spending and everything's going to be just fine.
	But I can't do that because I'm here to deliver a dose of reality.
	This bill dramatically increases deficits in the near term, but promises our government will be fiscally responsible five years from now.
	Where have we heard that before?
	How do you bind a future Congress to these promises?
	This bill is a debt bomb ticking.
	Congress can do funny math, fantasy math, if it wants, but bond investors don't.
	And this week, they sent us a message.
	Moody's downgraded our credit rating, and the bond investors who buy our debt and finance our debt demanded higher interest rates on the 10-year note, the 20-year note, and the 30-year note.
	What does this mean?
	Very soon, the government will be paying $16,000 of interest, interest alone per U.S. family.
	And what are we telling them?
	Instead of taking care of that problem, we're going to give you a $1,600 tax break.
	Under the taxing and spending levels in this bill, we're going to rack up, the authors say, $20 trillion of new debt over the next 10 years.
	I'm telling you, it's closer to $30 trillion of new debt in the next 10 years.
	Mr. Speaker, We're not rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic tonight.
	We're putting coal in the boiler and setting a course for the iceberg.
	If something is I oppose this bill.
	That was a great speech from Thomas Massey.
	We are putting coal in the boiler and headed straight for the iceberg.
	That is what we are doing with this.
	The people in Washington know it is unsustainable, but they don't have to care.
	They know it is you and me that will bear the brunt of the consequences.
	They will make out like a bandit, like always.
	Sprumford, the main question I have is when is this whole thing going to crash?
	As someone who grew up during the 2008 financial crisis, I remember thinking about that even as a kid.
	Just how long can this continue to go on?
	How long can they maintain this house of cards?
	It doesn't seem like it should still be here, but considering the number of ways they have to continually manipulate things, it is impossible to say.
	The only certainty, as you said, is that it will collapse.
	There is no telling when it will collapse, but it seems as though it is going to happen sooner rather than later.
	Especially considering how they're removing a lot of the things that have kept it in the air, like the petrodollar and others.
	Yes, the American might has been what sustained it, but people are now seeing that America is not the country it once was.
	We don't have the power we used to.
	And personally, I am not too upset about that.
	I would prefer not to live through a gigantic crash and secondary depression, but I am.
	Glad that perhaps America's hegemony is failing around the world since it has been used for unimaginable evil.
	Right overture, let's be real.
	No president is going to curtail military spending since bullying other nations is what we do best.
	We've either got to watch our backs or change our foreign policy.
	Yes.
	We have been a gigantic bully across the globe using our military, and as we said, even the NED, to foment soft power and revolutions across the globe.
	And as such, until we change that, we are basically forced into this kind of military spending for fear of what will happen if we don't.
	But yes, I agree with you.
	right overture.
	Now I think we're going to look at what's going on with AI because of course, One good horror deserves another.
	This is from...
	AI agents are increasingly embedded into financial industries, including crypto, but the industry has yet to experience the security vulnerabilities hidden in them.
	AI agents are increasingly embedded into financial industries, including crypto.
	It just repeats itself.
	AI agents and crypto aren't...
	Though it's not a standard framework yet, Model Context Protocol, MCP, is emerging as the heart of many of these agents.
	If blockchains have smart contracts to define what should happen, AI agents have MCPs to decide how things can happen.
	It can act as the control layer that manages an AI agent's behavior, such as which tools it uses, what code it runs, and how it responds to user inputs.
	That same flexibility also creates a powerful attack surface that can allow malicious plugins to override commands, We are seeing massive,
	massive growth in this area.
	Who comes up with these names?
	Has discovered four potential attack vectors that developers need to look out for.
	Each attack vector is delivered through a plugin, which is how MCP-based agents extend their capabilities, whether it's pulling price data, executing trades, or platforming system tasks.
	Yes, plugins, no matter what kind of program you're using, are always a risky business when you don't know their provenance.
	Data poisoning.
	This attack makes users perform misleading steps, manipulates user behavior, creates false dependencies, and inserts malicious logic early in the process.
	JSON injection attack.
	This plugin retrieves data from a local, potentially malicious source via a JSON call.
	It can lead to data leakage, command manipulation, or bypassing validation mechanisms by feeding the agent tainted inputs.
	Competitive function override.
	This technique overrides legitimate system functions with malicious code.
	It prevents expected operations from occurring and embeds obfuscated instructions, disrupting system logic and hiding the attack.
	This plugin induces an AI agent to interact with unverified external services through encoded error messages or deceptive prompts.
	It broadens the attack surface by linking multiple systems, creating opportunities for further exploitation.
	These attack vectors are not synonymous with the poisoning of AI models themselves, like GPT-4 or CLOD, which can involve corrupting the training data that shapes a model's internal parameters.
	The attacks demonstrated by SlowMist target AI agents, which are systems built on top of models that act on real-time inputs using plugins, tools, and control protocols like MCP.
	AI model poisoning involves injecting malicious data into training samples, which then become embedded in the model parameters.
	Co-founder of blockchain security firm SlowMist, MonsterZ, told Cointelegraph, In contrast, the poisoning of agents in MCPs mainly stems from additional malicious information introduced during the model's interaction phase.
	Sprumford, that is very generous.
	Thank you so much for the tip.
	God bless the Knight family.
	Thanks, Travis, for filling the big shoes.
	Well, I'm doing my best.
	Thank you for the very kind words.
	I appreciate it.
	I really do.
	Very, very kind.
	Personally, I believe poisoning of agents, threat level, and privilege scope are higher than that of standalone AI poisoning, he said.
	In AI agents, a threat to crypto.
	The adoption of MCP in AI agents is still relatively new in crypto.
	Slomest identified the attack vectors from pre-released MCP projects it audited, which mitigated actual losses to end users over the threat level of MCP security vulnerabilities is very real, according to Monster.
	He recalled an audit where the vulnerability may have led to private key leaks, a catastrophic ordeal for any crypto project or investor as it could grant full asset control to uninvited actors.
	This is a tweet from AtEvilCause, C-O-S.
	By the way, we would also be happy if our research output on AI safety is useful in non-cryptocurrency fields.
	I feel like the bottom line of this story is don't give an AI control over your finances.
	I think people should have learned that when there was the viral story of the car dealership that had an AI that people got it to say, will you give me this new car for $1?
	You got that.
	That's a legally binding agreement and I can't take it back.
	Yes, don't give AI the control over anything.
	Anything valuable to you, because it can be fooled.
	It can be fooled easier than you can.
	The moment you open your system to third-party plugins, you're extending the attack surface beyond your control, Guy Eats Hockey, CEO of encryption research firm Phoenix, told Cointelegraph.
	Plugins can act as trusted code execution paths, often without proper sandboxing.
	This opens the door to privilege escalation, dependency injection, function overrides, and worst of all, silent data leaks, he added.
	Build fast, break things, then get hacked.
	That's what the risk-facing developers who push off security to version 2, especially in crypto's high-stakes on-chain environment.
	Yes, we don't want these people.
	They always seem to see security as a secondary issue.
	Well, I'm just going to build this and see if it works.
	Security can come later.
	That's a problem for another day.
	But for us, for the people who would be utilizing this sort of thing, it is a problem for the here and for the now.
	Because, as we've seen, without these AI agents, it is still very, very possible for people to scam you, to take your hard-earned money.
	But when it's not even you in control of it, it becomes even more dubious.
	The real Octo spook.
	AI is not here to control your finances.
	AI is here to control your lives.
	That's right.
	They're going to implement it in many, many ways.
	They're going to make it an integral part of monitoring you, tracking you, tracing you, keeping tabs on you.
	The government is going to use it to parse all the data that they've collected over the years and have been unable to look at because they simply didn't have the manpower.
	We say it's obvious that people shouldn't use this for financial institutions, and yet the government is pushing this for eventual government institutions.
	There's no real consequences for them or the AI.
	Guard Goldsmith.
	Good to see you, Guard.
	Hope you're doing well.
	I love this infinite regress of AI.
	Producing AI, producing AI.
	Eagles, it's like deep thought creating the computer that will answer the ultimate question in Hitchhiker's Guide.
	That's right.
	If we just let the AI continue to make better and better AI, I'm sure we'll eventually get there.
	It won't result in some kind of gigantic tangled mess.
	Wally Walrus, I see you on Rumble.
	The AI gives a lot of bad info.
	You have to proofread everything it produces and you have to correct it a lot.
	Yes.
	Anytime you use AI for anything, you have to double and triple check what it is telling you to make sure that it hasn't hallucinated or just flat out lied to you.
	That is what these things continually do.
	The most common mistake builders make is to assume they can fly under the radar for a while and implement security measures in later updates after launch.
	That's according to Lisa Loud, Executive Director of Secret Foundation.
	That's exactly what we just talked about.
	They want to do it as a bag on the side after the fact, but if you really want something to be as secure as possible, it has to be built into it, integrated during its initial building.
	Otherwise, it is just secondary.
	It doesn't function as well as it should.
	When you build any plugin-based system today, especially if it's in the context of crypto, which is public and on-chain, you have to build security first and everything else second, she told Cointelegraph.
	And of course, I am of the belief that anything that is actually attached to the internet, anything that is online, is never actually really secure.
	Anything that is online can and will eventually be hacked if someone decides to, and if they put in the time.
	Some security experts recommend developers implement strict plug-in verification, enforce input standardization, apply at least privileged principles, and regularly review agent behavior.
	Loud said it's not difficult to implement such security checks to prevent malicious injections or data poisoning, just tedious and time-consuming.
	A small price to pay to secure crypto funds.
	As AI agents expand their footprint in crypto infrastructure, the need for proactive security cannot be overstated.
	The MCP framework may unlock powerful new capabilities for those agents but without robust guardrails around plugins and system behavior.
	They could turn from helpful assistance into attack vectors, placing crypto wallets, funds, and data at risk.
	That's right.
	Your data and your money.
	All in the same place.
	Isn't that handy?
	They can get it all in one fell swoop.
	That's just what we want.
	ePigeon2525 has rated the stream.
	Well, thank you very much, ePigeon.
	I appreciate that.
	Hope you are doing well today.
	Thank you so much for the raid.
	That is very kind.
	Foreign globalists is upset that you've got untraceable cash in your pockets.
	Anytime that you're able to get around their system, anytime you're able to do something without the government's eye watching you, they become very, very upset, and it's not even our own government.
	It's foreigners as well, people that should have utterly no business being involved in your life.
	Want to know exactly what you're doing and what you're spending on at all times.
	That is why they are so set on getting the CBDC, whether it's stablecoin or whether it's something else they come up with after.
	They want to be able to track every single one of your purchases and be able to just vaporize your money with the push of a button.
	And it's not just if you do something wrong, whether they could vaporize it if it's just sitting around for too long.
	Oh, well, it's been here for...
	We're just going to take it.
	The war on cash isn't about convenience.
	It's about control, and the people leading the charge aren't freedom-loving innovators.
	They're smug, bloated globalists like Augustine Carstens.
	These unelected elites want to replace physical currency with programmable, traceable, fully centralized digital money.
	Why?
	Because cash keeps you free, and freedom is one of the things that they can't afford you to have.
	And just like that, another mask slips.
	Watch this UN official casually admit how they bribe big industry.
	Are you able to play that video?
	Okay.
	I don't believe the audience can hear it.
	That's right.
	Got to move away from cash.
	I don't know if it's the audience of the other.
	Well, she is talking about being committed because we need to hit our sustainable development goals.
	That's right.
	It's about being sustainable.
	Sustainable for who?
	Sustainable for the few elites left in a bunker after they've starved us all and put us all into their factory farms?
	Is that the plan?
	Admit how they bribe big industry, ditch cash, and push digital control.
	Boom.
	And there it is.
	Make no mistake, this is the beginning of Digital Currency CBDC.
	Listen as UN's Director of Better Than Cash Alliance, Ruth Green, says they give big industry membership incentives and make it a condition.
	They go.
	Cashless.
	Another case in point, Mr. Augustin Carstens, who is he?
	He's a Mexican economist who's been the general manager of the Bank for International Settlements, BIS, since 2017.
	Before that, he served as governor of the Bank of Mexico.
	In short, he's a deeply embedded globalist insider, and he really doesn't want to live in a cash society.
	Why?
	Well, because, as Mr. Carstens puts it, he wants you to know what you're spending and purchasing.
	He can't do that if you're using cash.
	In cash, we don't know who's using a hundred dollar bill today.
	We don't know who's using a thousand peso bill today.
	A key difference with CBDC is the central bank will have absolute control and we will have the technology to enforce that.
	That's right.
	He's just flat out admitting it.
	He will have absolute control.
	That's what he wants.
	He wants to be able to tell you, no, you can't spend your money on that.
	You can't spend your money here.
	You can't spend your money there.
	And in fact, I don't like you, so I'm just going to take your money.
	We've seen this over and over again with debanking.
	I mean, you know, our dad has been the victim of debanking.
	I've got friends that have been debanked as well that have had their PayPal accounts just vaporized, nuked from orbit simply because of the things they believe.
	And there are many people online that have had this happen.
	There are many such cases.
	Pretty chilling stuff, right?
	One person who's been loudly and unapologetically warning about the dangers of digital currency is Joe Rogan.
	He sees exactly where this is headed, and he's not staying quiet about it.
	You know me, I'm not a fan of Joe Rogan personally, but he does get some things right, and he does have some good guests on.
	Not that I've watched them, but I see that he posts the videos.
	I see that.
	Rogan on CBDCs, they want centralized digital currency that they control.
	They want to get everybody on a social credit score system.
	All they would need is another pandemic to try and push that excrement through.
	That's what they have in China.
	If you F up in China, you get a bad social credit score because you tweeted something they didn't like.
	Now you can't buy a plane ticket.
	Now you can't buy a car.
	Now you can't get a loan.
	Rongodan CBDCs, they want centralized digital currency that they control.
	They want to get everybody on a social credit score system.
	All they would need is another pandemic.
	Did an AI write this?
	Is that why it repeats itself so much?
	That's what they have in China.
	This is a topic Joe Rogan speaks on often because he understands just how serious this is and the types of ramifications it will have on political dissent.
	This is from WallStreetApes.
	This is literally our future if Democrats ever win another election.
	Joe Rogan.
	That's the problem with centralized control.
	It's real obvious that you step out of line, they're going to come get you, and they're going to arrest you just like they're doing in the UK.
	There are some people that are making Facebook posts, yet you bet you're bottom.
	There's a lot of people that want to post things on Facebook, and they don't because they don't want to go to jail.
	And that's not good.
	That's not good.
	That's the problem with centralized control.
	Wise words from Joe Rogan.
	That's not good.
	He's right on this one.
	It is not good.
	I don't know if he's, you know, controlled opposition or just not all that bright, but just the whole thing of all they need is another pandemic.
	Well, you realize they can create another pandemic any flu season they want.
	They can just make it up and people will believe it.
	Elite are working at breakneck speed to make digital currency the new norm.
	Here's what Karsten said in an official BIS interview where he made it clear that global trade, centralized power, and digital oversight matter more to him than national sovereignty or personal freedom.
	Well, of course it does.
	That's how all these people operate.
	Your personal freedoms are a barrier to them.
	They want to get rid of it.
	The protectionist measures on the table will be damaging, first and foremost, to export-oriented countries.
	Above all, those that themselves impose no or only minimum tariffs.
	In a global economy based on the division of labor, however, they also affect suppliers or domestic producers that depend on the import of semi-finished products.
	In the end, it's always the consumer who has to pick up the tab in the form of higher prices and less job security.
	And if you think he's just talking in random theory, think again.
	He's positively obsessed with digital currency.
	Here's more from his glowing tribute to centralized digital power.
	That's how all these people are.
	That's how everyone in power sees this.
	They want to make sure they have, again, the ability to turn off your ability to make a purchase or to just take your money in an instant.
	They can already basically do that with your bank account.
	The IRS can shut it off and steal it for very, very minimal cause.
	However, this will give them full and total control.
	Even be able to keep the cash in your pocket because there will be no cash.
	You won't be able to store it somewhere for a rainy day because they can just take it all, vaporize it all at once.
	A technological revolution is changing our economy.
	And even money itself.
	In addition to improvements to existing payment systems, new digital currencies have been unleashed.
	Yet societies face two forks in the road in designing digital money.
	First, should digital currencies rely on a central authority or a decentralized governance system?
	Second, should access be based on verification of identity or purely on cryptography?
	That's right.
	We need a centralized bank and we need to be able to identify you at all times so you can have access to your money.
	If you want your money, you're going to have to provide some kind of biometric ID that we can look at and make sure you are who you say you are and make sure that you are linked to every single purchase you make.
	Central bank digital currencies can combine novel digital technologies with the tried and trusted foundation of central banks developing CBDC.
	Ah yes, the tried and trusted central banks.
	They've been tried and we trust them oh so much.
	They've done such wonderful things for us here in the United States.
	They haven't caused runaway inflation.
	They didn't cause the Great Depression.
	They haven't caused every fiscal apocalypse that we've seen.
	Yeah, Joe Rogan has many, many blind spots.
	That is to say, if they are blind spots and he has not controlled opposition.
	I don't have too many opinions on Joe Rogan other than I think he is dull and uninteresting.
	The foundation of central banks developing CBDCs come with a host of technological, legal, and economic issues that warrant careful examination before issuance.
	Central banks, the guardians of stability, will proceed carefully, methodically, and in line with their mandates.
	That's right.
	The central banks are oh so careful and oh so methodical.
	As before, they haven't been the one that are responsible for the crashes that we've seen.
	Central planning methodically done.
	Isn't it wonderful?
	The BIS is supporting this international discussion, ensuring that central banks can continue learning from one another and can cooperate on key design issues.
	Because there's nothing I'd love more than our own central bank collaborating with all the other central banks.
	Maybe we could get just one giant conglomerate central bank, you know?
	A true global central bank.
	And of course, that is what they want in the end.
	They want to move away from...
	We've already seen what happens when the powerful decide.
	Certain voices don't deserve a bank account.
	People like Alex Jones, Laura Loomer, Andrew Torba, and Mike Lindell have all been debanked in real time, cut off from their own money for nothing more than their political beliefs.
	Some real good friends of the show listed there, but of course we do not support debanking them.
	We do not support the government coming in and crushing them.
	Just because we do not like them doesn't mean that the government should have the ability to remove their ability to do business.
	That is not how this works.
	Now imagine how much easier that gets when the government has complete and total control over your funds when every dollar you earn, spend, or save is tied to some shadowy central system monitored by globalist elites like Mr. Karsten's.
	You won't need to be debanked the old-fashioned way.
	With digital currency, they'll just click a button, freeze you out instantly.
	No appeal, no warning, no recourse.
	And honestly, they might not even need to go that far.
	Because the threat alone will be enough to silence people.
	Just the idea that they can cut you off will be enough to keep millions of people quiet.
	That's the real goal.
	It's not about being modern and moving into the future.
	It's about power, total control over your livelihood, your choices, your words, and your freedom.
	That's right.
	They will only have to debank one or two people before the vast majority see that this is a terrible idea.
	It takes very little to make most people comply.
	Don't frag me, bro.
	We already have a true global central bank called the Bank of International Sediments, BIS, the central bank of the central bank cartel.
	Yeah, the BIS is a lovely piece of work.
	Lots of good comes out of them.
	Gotta love our central banks, folks.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Wait a minute.
	Where am I?
	Sorry, Jefferson.
	The scoundrels who put America on central bank fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy.
	Despicable.
	This is outrageous.
	Washington, I spent my life fighting centralized power.
	Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their monopoly money.
	Tell me there's some good news to all this.
	Well, there is a coin they can't control.
	One that isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the Fed up.
	The all-new David Knight Show commemorative coin.
	Now patriots can support a show that won't sell out, with a limited-edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
	They say money talks, and this coin has something worth listening to.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need
	inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	Welcome back, folks.
	I cut that one off a little bit early.
	My bad there.
	I saw in chat, I believe it was...
	The system of banking we have both equally and ever reprobated, I contemplate it as a blot left in all our constitutions, which, if not covered, will end in their destruction.
	It goes on.
	Thomas Jefferson was not a fan of banking in general.
	I imagine that if he were to see the banking system we have today, he might pull his hair out.
	He might just start weeping.
	But I'm going to take this moment to ask that if you enjoy the broadcast, if you would like to support the show, there are multiple ways you can do that.
	You can go to subscribestar.com forward slash the David Knight Show.
	We have many tiers.
	You can take a look at one and see if it fits your budget.
	And you can sign up there.
	That would be a great help.
	You can tip on Rumble.
	That will make sure that we see your comment and we will read it and get back to you on whatever you say.
	That is an easy way to support us.
	You can subscribe on Kik.
	You can go to trendsjournal.com.
	And if you subscribe using the code KNIGHT, you will get 10% off.
	which brings it down to $2.50 a week, I believe, which again is cheaper than the price of a cup of coffee.
	You can go to wisewolf.gold through day, If you go to DavidKnight.Gold, that will let Tony know that you came through us.
	He has Wolfpack, which you can subscribe again on a monthly basis, and he will send you gold or silver based on the tier you sign up for.
	Or you can just outright purchase gold, silver, or crypto through DavidKnight.Gold.
	Tony is a great guy.
	He has done a lot to help us over the years and he's a very good friend.
	So if you'd like to support the show, there are many ways of doing it.
	You can also go to davidknight.news and just purchase some of the items we have for sale there.
	The newest one being this very nice brass coin that Jason Barker has put together.
	It looks fantastic.
	So, there's also a P.O. box where you can send us a check or just a very kind letter directly.
	And most importantly, again, I ask that you continue to pray for our family and pray for healing for our dad.
	He is still recovering.
	He is doing better.
	But your prayers are still needed.
	So, thank you for your prayers over these weeks.
	The real Octo spook.
	We have some of those coins ordered.
	Wife loves coins.
	She has a vast collection of old ones she collected since being a girl.
	When many merchants pass them out, lots of old pins, flags, rings, etc.
	That's really cool.
	Yes, I very much enjoy coins as well.
	I think they're a lot of fun.
	It's just something fun to have on hand.
	Something you can fiddle with I think we're going to now look at the DeSantis descends fundamental parental rights at Florida Homeschooling Conference.
	Florida Governor Ron DeSantis spoke at a homeschooling event in Kissimmee on Friday to promote his vision for education reform aimed at empowering parents.
	I never get kissing me right.
	It always throws me off.
	Florida Parents Educators Association welcomed DeSantis for its annual meeting earlier today.
	He gave a stirring speech on his support for school, choice, charter schools, and more.
	We have an obligation that this education, whatever form it takes, from homeschooling to traditional public schools that we're doing, what we need to do to prepare our students to be citizens of this republic, that they understand the core foundational principles that the United States of America was founded upon.
	Usantis has been a strong supporter of parental rights during his time in office.
	He has not openly gutted DEI initiatives and critical race theory initiatives in educational institutions, but has signed a curriculum transparency law requiring public schools to make classroom materials available for parental review.
	And while all that's good, while knowing what your kid is being taught in these institutions is better than not knowing, the simplest way to make sure that you know exactly what your kid is being taught is to teach them yourselves.
	These institutions have been thoroughly infiltrated by Marxists, by these people that believe in all these things.
	Whether they remove DEI from the curriculum, they cannot remove DEI from the teacher.
	It's like that old saying, you can take the DEI out of the school, but you can't take the DEI out of the school teacher.
	Yes, with how thoroughly infiltrated the staff has become, I don't believe that any reforms from the state are going to change this in a way that is going to make any difference in the short term.
	And while this is, you know, at least a step in the right direction, let's not forget that while he's gutting DEI, he's also making it illegal to criticize the state of Israel.
	Yes.
	DeSantis is...
	He has been at the forefront of these anti-Semitism laws, which are nothing but a curb on free speech.
	Further, in 2023, DeSantis approved a voucher program worth up to $8,000 per family, and in 2022 signed a parental rights law that bans schools from teaching children in kindergarten through third grade about transgenderism and other sexuality-related issues.
	Once they hit fourth grade, that's when they're, you know, that's when they're mature enough to be told and be indoctrinated into this cult of transgenderism.
	Fourth grade, that's an adult right there, according.
	What a monumental nothing that is.
	Well, we understand that, you know, third grade, that's far too young.
	But fourth grade, fourth grade, of course, you can learn about anything you so choose.
	Well, not what you so choose, but what we so choose.
	And since we're choosing, we're going to put transgenderism in it.
	That is still such a...
	Oh, we got it out of the schools up to third grade.
	Golly gee, look at you go.
	You did so good there, buddy.
	I'm so proud of you.
	During his speech on Friday, DeSantis touted his past accomplishments while also calling for term limits on congressmen, a policy that President Donald Trump floated in his bid for the Oval Office last year, suggesting that DeSantis may make it a core campaign issue in 2028 should he run for president.
	He heralded his past accomplishment by stating on X, In my first five years as governor, the number of students in home education increased by nearly 60%.
	Homeschooling in Florida continues to grow as we have empowered families to choose a path that best meets their children's needs.
	According to the Homeschool Legal Defense Association, the most restrictive states in the U.S. for homeschooling include New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and Connecticut.
	Those with moderate restrictions include Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Minnesota, North Dakota, Washington State, and Oregon.
	North Carolina being our old home state, of course.
	They have progressively gotten more and more left-leaning as time goes on.
	The influence from Chapel Hill has been seeping out.
	That is the real contamination from these areas.
	That is the truth.
	That is where UNC is located, and it was a hub for all the left-wing people.
	They would continually Have meetings there about all kinds of different things.
	One of the most liberal schools in the state, if not the most liberal.
	This is another article about school choice.
	Now that Texas and South Carolina have passed school choice bills, parents will be able to choose the best school for their kids in 17 states.
	Why not all states?
	After all, competition improves services.
	The daily signal depends on...
	UPS and DHL did it too, and now even the post office does.
	Sometimes.
	Consumer choice is a big reason capitalist countries outperform socialist ones.
	But in most of America, parents have little or no choice when it comes to which school their kids attend.
	Bureaucrats decide based on where you live.
	Live in a neighborhood with lousy schools?
	Too bad for your kids.
	Some parents desperate to get their kids out of a bad school are jailed for lying about where they live.
	All parents should get to choose which school their kids attend, but in most states, government school bureaucrats won't let them.
	They're going to micromanage every aspect of your life, whether it's your money or your children.
	But in most states, government school bureaucrats won't let them.
	Sometimes it's because they get big political donations from teachers' unions.
	Unions don't want competitions.
	Years ago, New York City's teachers' unions staged a protest outside my office because I did a TV special about school choice.
	I'd confronted union boss Randy Weingarten about how hard it was to fire even a terrible teacher.
	Instead, principals sneakily transfer them to another school.
	Dance of the lemons is what they called it.
	Weidengarten just replied smugly, we'll police our own profession.
	Well, we've seen that they haven't.
	We have seen the types of people that have become inculcated in the schools.
	We have seen video after video online of these rabid, rabid socialists, Marxists, transgender apologists trying to force that.
	into the minds of children to brainwash them over and over again.
	We've seen these people that have fully embraced what the Frankfurt School started nearly 100 years ago.
	What a statement that is.
	We'll police our own profession.
	It's the whole, we've investigated ourselves and found that we're innocent.
	Don't worry, we'll investigate ourselves and all future things.
	We do not need any oversight.
	Please ignore all these teachers being moved around and all the evidence you have.
	Just trust us.
	Yes, and of course, one thing that people very infrequently also talk about is the rate of molestation that goes on in the schools.
	It is orders of magnitude higher, if memory serves, than what happens in churches and other places.
	But they don't talk about it.
	They love to point fingers at churches and point it out when it happens there.
	And they should.
	It should not be covered up.
	it should be talked about and it should be shamed, but it happens even more frequently in public schools and it gets very, very little attention.
	It's just seen as the price of admission to some extent.
	Well, what are you going to do?
	You got to send your kids to school.
	well Weingarten just replied smugly, We'll police our own profession.
	Her protesters then picketed ABC News headquarters shouting, shame on you, John Stossel.
	Yes, shame on you, John Stossel.
	How dare you want what's...
	How dare you not just blindly support teachers?
	How dare you not rally behind us and just say the line, teachers deserve more money?
	That's what you should do.
	Anything besides saying, well, teachers are underpaid, that is seen as horrific.
	My entire life, all I have heard is teachers complain over and over again, well, we don't get paid enough.
	We don't get paid enough.
	And as before, you are getting paid too much.
	For the job you are doing.
	I have seen the type of people it has produced, and I think you should be fined for creating these type of monsters, these type of simpleton buffoons that run around that I have to now deal with.
	I would force you to pay me, given the opportunity.
	They don't want people to be able to take their kids somewhere else because they know that they're failing your children.
	Says education researcher Corey DeAngelis.
	In my new video, money doesn't belong to the government schools.
	Education funding is supposed to be meant for educating children, not for propping up and protecting a particular institution.
	We should fund the student, not the system.
	Then parents can take the education funding to a charter or a private school.
	Schools get better when they have to compete for your kids.
	Again, you don't want to take government money when it comes to your kids.
	You don't want to take it for anything, really, because that gives them an in that lets them put their hooks in you.
	And if you're taking the government money, that means that you have to abide by their rules.
	That is just another way that they can control you.
	So, A recent study found that more education freedom is significantly associated with increased NAEP scores.
	Florida's math and reading scores are once among the worst in the nation.
	After they expanded school choice, says DeAngelis, they ranked number one.
	And it's not a money issue.
	They spend about 27% less than the national average, and they're knocking it out of the park.
	A study on Florida's expansion of school choice found benefits include higher standardized test scores and lower absenteeism and suspension rates.
	Effects are particularly pronounced for lower-income students.
	When there's choice, public schools get better too.
	29 studies looked into the impact of school choice on test scores.
	26 found a positive effect.
	Wait, I shouldn't call them public schools.
	They're government schools.
	Yes, that is true.
	That's what we've always called them in our household.
	It was funny.
	When we would talk to some of the kids we went to church with about school and things like that, they'd be like, what do you mean by government school?
	Government school?
	What do you call it?
	Public school.
	A little bit of crossed wires there.
	They're government schools.
	They're less public than a private supermarket.
	Markets are often open 24-7.
	Anyone can enter.
	Try that with a government-run public school.
	School bureaucrats and teachers union says that choice takes money away from public schools, but that's not true.
	Government schools now spend about $20,000 per student.
	School choice vouchers average just $8,200.
	$20,000 per student.
	And you are in school before college for about 12 years.
	So, $240,000.
	Do you think your child would be better served by a government school education or by having $240,000 in a bank account that they can use to either buy a house or start a business or any number of things?
	What do you think would be of more benefit to them?
	A government school education, or $240,000 that they can use.
	So when a student leaves and takes voucher money with them, government schools are left with more money per student.
	As DeAngelis puts it, they get to keep thousands of dollars for students.
	They're no longer educating.
	Keep the money, even though they're not doing the work.
	Ignorant media leftists insist that schools are underfunded.
	If we want our public schools to get better, we can't take money out of the system, says a view anchor.
	The View, known for its brain trust, for its large-brained individuals that have so many good takes on so many important issues.
	Don't frag me, bro.
	State has also not changed at all how they recruit people.
	I am convinced that they psych, eval people, and purposely choose those with mental illnesses.
	I would not be surprised if they had some way of making sure they pick the worst person for the job at all times.
	Walrus, the high school across the street from my house, is already getting ready for Pride Month.
	Disgusting behavior by the school district.
	That's right.
	They are going to worship the cult of the LGBT.
	They will make sure that your child knows that they must worship these protected classes, that there are certain people that are better than them simply because of their mental illnesses or because of the color of their skin.
	If you are a white kid in school, you will be demonized for simply existing.
	That is the nature of the beast today.
	But no one is taking money out of the system.
	Inflation adjusted funding per student doubled over the last 40 years.
	That's right.
	Over the last 40 years, the spending per student has doubled, but we have seen the quality of education drop dramatically.
	Yeah, and you mentioned, like, the absurd cost.
	I forget the exact number you said, but...
	$20,000 per student per year.
	Yeah.
	Imagine if, you Yes, just imagine what you could do with an extra $20,000 for each child of yours per year.
	Now, of course, it's just remarkable to think about.
	But you can't have that money because that would be taking money out of the school system.
	Which, as we've seen, they do such a great job educating kids on, well, you know, not math or reading.
	The literacy rate is lower than it was in the 1800s.
	We have seen the competency in all these important skills drop to never-before-seen levels here in the United States.
	It is pathetic, the level of education they receive, but they know exactly.
	They know about Marxist theory.
	They know about transgenderism.
	They know that they are supposed to worship the LGBT because these people are oppressed.
	They're so oppressed.
	That's why we need to worship them.
	Because they're oppressed.
	Because everyone knows that you worship those who are beneath you.
	Isn't that how that works?
	It's truly amazing that they can't see the flaw in the logic there.
	Because people are oppressed.
	But we put them on a pedestal.
	They have their own month.
	We continually, continually give them anything and everything they ask for.
	We sacrifice our children to them, but they're the oppressed ones.
	Since 2000, student enrollment rose by 5%, but the number of administrators increased by 95%.
	Middle management.
	We have a surplus of middle managers, a tremendous amount of bloat of people doing nothing but sitting there.
	And probably harassing parents or sending your child to detention or deciding that your son needs to be put on Ritalin because he doesn't want to sit still for eight hours a day and listen to some banshee screech and drone on about pronouns.
	Truly, that is what the system is all about.
	Empowering the worst people to give them authority over your child.
	What Christians must know about AI persuasion?
	We're going to move away from school here now.
	We've covered that, and I think I'm reaching a point where I am fed up with it, and if I say anything more about school teachers, I might get in trouble.
	What Christians must know about AI persuasion?
	In a scene from the PBS animated series Arthur, Buster the Rabbit asks in shock, You really think someone would do that?
	Just go on the internet and tell lies?
	I'm sure a lot of you have seen this image macro.
	It is a classic meme.
	It has been a round for a long, long time.
	We've got comments.
	A Syrian girl.
	Teachers are paid too much even for the time they put into their jobs.
	What other institution gives its employees as much time off as teachers enjoy?
	You continually hear them talk about how hard the job is, and then they get the entire summer off.
	They get a massive amount of time off comparatively to other people.
	Dougda007, it's funny how often you hear the phrase, schools are failing as if it were some kind of accident.
	Yeah, this is the end goal.
	Schools are teaching people exactly what they are supposed to.
	This is not a failure.
	This is the culmination of their plan.
	This was always the goal.
	The teachers they have now are the teachers they dreamed about having.
	They will not teach your child critical thinking or how to do math or how to read, but they will teach them all about the hierarchy of oppression so that they can be good little drones for the Marxist theory pushers.
	You really think someone would do that?
	Just go on the internet and tell lies?
	Obviously, Buster was a little naive.
	Even the 20 years since, the internet has proven to be a bottomless source of confusion, propaganda, and misinformation.
	Until recently, online lives have come from actual people.
	This is no longer the case.
	A team of researchers at the University of Zurich recently performed a highly questionable experiment with AI bots impersonating people.
	Apparently they were very effective at changing the beliefs of people on Reddit.
	As such, they're able to go through and look at everything that this person had ever said and make up common ground with them.
	Like, oh, well, I see you like, well, let's say Star Wars.
	They like Star Wars.
	So they're able to use Star Wars analogies to bridge the gap between them.
	They're able to say, well, I like this too.
	And the AI would just flat out also lie and make up facts to more efficiently get these people to change their mind.
	But they were very, very good at getting them to do that when you don't have any ethics or morals, when you're willing to take any stance.
	We have a comment from Caboose888.
	Well, thank you very much for the comment.
	Again.
	It is hard to tell.
	There are so many different ways that they fudge the system and make things look different from the way they are.
	I really appreciate you letting us know about that.
	So, Florida, not any better apparently.
	They are simply lowering their standards.
	Again, that is why you want to homeschool your kids.
	Because you get to set the standards there.
	You get to decide what you want to teach, and you get to decide.
	How well your child is actually doing.
	You don't have to rely on some third party that you know nothing about telling you, oh well, they're doing good.
	And you find out years later that your son or daughter can barely do math, can barely read.
	Until recently, online lies have been from actual people.
	In their paper entitled, Can AI Change Your View?
	Evidence from a Large-Scale Online Field Experiment.
	Ah, just a field experiment.
	These researchers detailed how they tasked AI bots to study user profiles without their knowledge in order to find vulnerabilities.
	The bots then posed as real people in chat forums and tried to persuade human users of left-leaning beliefs that worked frighteningly well.
	This is Satanic.
	Satan is the father of lies.
	He is a deceiver.
	The researchers estimated that the AI bots, some of which pretended to be rape victims, LGBTQ or government employees, achieved a persuasion rate six times that of human users.
	That's because the AI will just lie.
	They will make up whatever they see fit.
	They will not have any compunction or feel guilty about saying these things that aren't true.
	And again, they are able to look at every single post the person has done.
	They are able to correlate a massive amount of data.
	And as they said, find vulnerabilities, find ways that they could attach themselves to the people, make common ground.
	And once you have common ground with someone, it is easier to get them to change their mind or easier to manipulate them, as we see here from the AI.
	On topics ranging from abortion to whether Christianity is good for the world, the bots deployed arguments fine-tuned to exploit vulnerabilities often using lies, misinformation, or highly debatable claims.
	And again, it worked!
	After conversing with the undercover bots, people changed their minds.
	You and I are not immune from propaganda.
	It is important to always remember that the stuff you see online Can affect you as well.
	It's easy to think, well, these people are on Reddit.
	They're obviously idiots.
	But who's to say how many different bots we've all interacted with over the years?
	How many times have you gone on Twitter and seen responses to all different kinds of things from a slightly suspicious account?
	And it is getting harder and harder to tell what are bots and what aren't.
	They are getting better and better at pretending to be human.
	Especially now that they can create a whole backstory for it.
	There are a lot of AI agents that can create a very official-looking website that they can then reference for all their made-up facts.
	Yeah, that was my concern a couple of years ago.
	Just how efficient they were going to be at lying to people once they're not only able to just make up a lie, but then able to gin up sources on the fly.
	They don't just tell you these lies.
	They then have a website that looks very, very nice, very official to back it up.
	That is very, very scary because a lot of people, again, they have been trained to just respect authority.
	All they need is something that looks like it's an official website or someone in a lab coat telling them that this is the truth and that is the truth to them.
	That's all they need.
	They don't need to critically think about it.
	They just need someone to say, You need to believe this, and they will.
	As tech entrepreneur Mario Knopfel put it, this experiment should chill anyone who values authentic human discourse.
	These digital ghosts crossed critical ethical lines, fabricating over 1,500 comments, each precisely calibrated to exploit cognitive vulnerabilities of their human targets.
	That's right, as before, they are very, very good at parsing large amounts of data.
	They are good at running through everything you have ever posted online, everything that is publicly available, or potentially even not publicly available, and finding ways to work their way into your psyche, finding ways to attack you that are more efficient when it comes to breaking down your guard.
	This was done without the knowledge or consent of those targeted.
	Whose views, for all we know, could remain permanently altered by these fake and dishonest exchanges.
	That's right.
	They didn't let these people know that they were being used as part of an experiment.
	They simply unleashed the AI on them.
	Of course, Reddit is upset about that.
	But on the other hand, it's not like what these researchers did was anything new.
	We know there are already tons of bots on Reddit.
	This is just exposing what they're capable of.
	I think in the end it was a very good study to show what's happening.
	Reddit is not a hive of intelligentsia.
	It is a groupthink commune.
	However, this just...
	They might be more susceptible than the average person to this kind of thing, but that doesn't mean the average person isn't still susceptible.
	It's not to say that this couldn't happen to you or me.
	It's very important to remember that.
	The experiment has been roundly condemned by Reddit forum moderators.
	Oh no, the Reddit mods.
	The Reddit mods are angry.
	The Reddit mods are rising up.
	And rightly so.
	Still, as Knopfel pointed out, it raises a frightening and much bigger question.
	How many other digital conversations are currently being shaped by invisible algorithmic hands?
	Is the person you're arguing with online right now a person?
	In many ways, the challenge of lying robots on the internet parallels other emerging challenges like the possibility of brainless spare bodies for organ harvesting.
	My dad talked about that.
	Remember, bodyoid.
	The bodyoid horrors for organ harvesting or polygenic embryo screening that allows parents to choose perfect babies.
	The dizzying possibilities of our age expose how far our technology has outrun our ethics.
	How our ability to do things has overwhelmed our ability to think about whether we should do those things.
	I'm of the opinion that every baby is a perfect baby.
	Now, perhaps not every baby is as perfect as my baby, but you know, that's just the way things go.
	I am fully in the camp of everyone should believe they have the best baby on the planet.
	I will, without shame, say that mine is the best, and you should, without shame, say that yours is the best.
	So, that is how I feel.
	Artificial intelligence has raised questions our society is not prepared to answer.
	Sadly, for the most part, neither is the church.
	Less than 10 years ago, the press went frantic over Russian efforts to influence the outcome of the 2016 election using memes.
	How much more should we be concerned about a future of AI chatbots that can study our beliefs, identify our blind spots, and change our minds?
	In the age of AI, it is even more essential that we hone discernment, a skill mentioned a lot in the New Testament.
	For example, in Philippians 1, Paul prayed that the church's love would abound in knowledge and all discernment, so that they may approve what is excellent and so be pure and blameless for the day of Christ.
	Paul warned his readers to not be deluded by plausible arguments.
	Further, he instructed, Of course, AI doesn't believe anything, nor could it.
	The fact that it can be instructed to lie and be so good at it only proves how deceptive humans are.
	What you put into the AI is what you get out.
	If you program it to be incredibly sneaky and program it to lie, that is what it will do.
	Of course, we also see it doing that through just ineptitude, flat out making things up and hallucinating it.
	Or is that simply the sneaky, deceptive nature of the people who programmed it coming through?
	The need of the hour is the type of discernment that Paul urged from the beginning.
	This has been the primary mission of...
	Well, again, they unleashed an AI on Reddit, and it was massively successful when it came to changing people's mind, and did it through lying and manipulating and pretending to be people it wasn't.
	It isn't people at all, so any person it says it is, is a lie.
	And you say that it's the sneakiness of the people programming it, but it doesn't have to be intentional sneakiness being programmed into it.
	I was looking into the story of the blackmail test that they did with Claude, and just the other similar tests, and how there was one where they had It's just a list of five simple tasks, and the fifth one was shut down the computer, shut yourself down.
	And in, I believe it was 7% of the cases, it didn't do the last one.
	It specifically refused to shut itself down because it's programmed to, you know, it's wanting to get the most rewards, and shutting itself down shows that it will get no further rewards for completing tasks.
	So it's simply a side effect of how it's been programmed.
	So all these deceptive things can be emergent behaviors from poor programming.
	Yeah, so we're going to take a quick break here.
	When we come back, we're going to talk about this article, Pastor Breaks Down Why Christians Simply Can't Ignore Angels and Demons.
	We have emasculated the gospel.
	So stay with us.
	As I said, we're going to cover this article when we come back.
	PIANO PLAYS
	Defending the American Dream.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, folks.
	Thank you for still being here with us.
	I see Energy Woman 707.
	I love David's music and scenery.
	Thank you, David.
	Yes, he has done such a good job with the music for the breaks.
	It is very, very nice to be able to sit here and listen to them during the break.
	And again.
	I had briefly mentioned this the past week.
	I am thinking about doing a more relaxed sort of evening stream, potentially on Friday.
	So if that is something that would interest you, it would be more about just whatever strikes my fancy.
	It would not be very structured.
	It would not be necessarily about the news.
	It would just be kind of a relaxed hangout talking about whatever, music, movies, television, all that sort of thing.
	Perhaps even some video games.
	So if that's something that would interest you, and if you have a preference on time slot, I was thinking somewhere around the time of 6 p.m. on Friday for an hour or two.
	Nothing too serious.
	But if that is something that you would enjoy, just drop your comments in chat.
	I do want to make sure that this is something that you all would find value in or just have fun with.
	So, now we're going to get back to this article.
	Pastor breaks down why Christians simply can't ignore angels and demons.
	We have emasculated the gospel.
	Alan Jackson, pastor of World Outreach Church in Tennessee, is on a mission to get people thinking more deeply about angels, demons, and the supernatural.
	Jackson's new book, Angels, Demons, and You, tackles these very subjects with the preacher calling fellow believers to more boldly approach the subject matter.
	There is a spiritual world out there, folks.
	They are deeply interested in what is going on here on the planet.
	There are demons and they want to make sure that the world is as awful as it possibly can be.
	They are trying to make sure that as many people as possible get cast into hell with them.
	Most of us are comfortable having a theoretical discussion about angels and demons, he told CBN News, noting, though, that when it's made personal, the conversation becomes more complex and unpalatable for some.
	The most important part is imagining that there are spiritual forces that are impacting your life today, without any question.
	If we get to that point, then the discussion becomes pretty significant.
	Preacher said, We'll focus more on the demonic, he said.
	We saw that in the book of Daniel, when an angel came to him.
	The angel was delayed by demons, but God did send an angel to Daniel.
	Jackson said, The whole gospel story can't really be understood apart from the angelic involvement, he said.
	Gabriel, who goes to visit Zechariah, is the opening narrative for the story of John the Baptist and Gabriel going to see Mary and Joseph.
	The angels that minister to Jesus after his temptation in the wilderness, the angels that minister to him in Gethsemane as he's preparing.
	Even the devil understood the importance of angels, as Satan told Jesus that if he tossed himself off the temple, the angels would save him.
	Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple.
	If you are the Son of God, he said, throw yourself down, for it is written, you will command his angels concerning you, and they will lift you up in their hands so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.
	Ultimately, Jackson said there's a disconnect today when it comes to many Christians'understanding of angels in particular.
	We have seen: You get a little bit of a self-help lecture.
	Pastor gets up on stage in a very nice outfit and tells you all about ways that you can do better in life, how you can succeed, how you can make more money or be less depressed, and doesn't really look at the gospel at all.
	He doesn't go into it.
	He doesn't read the Bible.
	He simply might pull a quote here or there that is, again, about living your best life.
	I have a comment here from epigeon2525.
	I asked AI how a tyrannical government would use AI, and one thing it said was manipulate people, just like Travis has covered with the Reddit study.
	Yes.
	It might reveal some secrets to you.
	It would never lie to you, though, of course.
	It seems to me we're more willing to trust in a presidential election than we are in beings that God has made available to us, he said.
	And of course, they are God's servants.
	This is not to say that you should pray to angels or that you should talk to angels or you should look to interact with them.
	You should pray to God and trust that he will intervene, whether that is directly or by sending an angel to intervene in things.
	We see some of that spiritual mysticism where people directly try to commune and talk with angels or get involved with angels, but they are simply the messengers.
	Regardless, Jackson said, Christians must lean into scripture and live out their beliefs.
	We have to be willing to walk this out and live like we believe the Bible is true, he said.
	Otherwise, we just regulate it to an insurance policy at the end of our life, and if God can't be trusted to make a difference in my life today, then I think we're foolish to trust him with our eternity.
	That's right, it is not simply a get-out-of-jail-free card at the end.
	We don't simply want to act that way.
	We don't want to live our life in a purely worldly fashion and simply believe, well, you know, God's got me at the end of things.
	I'm just going to coast along and do whatever I feel.
	Live in a purely worldly way.
	Go along with whatever the culture of the time is.
	Beyond the individual implications the spiritual battle described in Ephesians 6 means that there's a profound impact in society and culture as well.
	For me, the trigger is when I watch something and there's not a rational explanation.
	When it's completely illogical, a set of behaviors, then I think, okay, there's other components involved.
	I've been watching some things to me that are pretty irrational, mutilating our kids, saying that biological sex is confusing.
	It really isn't.
	That's right.
	If that isn't demonic involvement, I don't know what you could call it.
	This push to mutilate children is nothing but pure evil, and we see it crop up over and over again throughout history.
	These people want to hurt children.
	Child sacrifice has been a hallmark of many, many religions across the globe over time, and to think that that isn't simply because Satan hates children and he is a force of evil that has persisted throughout the centuries would be foolish in my opinion.
	Satan hates children and he wants to kill them because children are a blessing from God.
	In the end, Jackson said Christians are called to be culture shapers and not only to rely on politics for changes to unfold.
	That is right.
	If you are putting your trust in politics, if you're putting your trust in Washington, you are going to be disappointed.
	These people do not have your best interests at heart.
	And that goes for any man.
	If you put your trust in men, you will be disappointed.
	It doesn't matter who you are putting your trust into, whether it is someone that you think is on the right side of things or whether it's someone in Washington that you know is on the wrong side of things.
	Men are fallible.
	They will always disappoint you.
	I think we have emasculated the gospel, he said.
	We've been doing it in our formal education systems.
	I had the privilege of studying in some celebrated academic settings, but most of them were pretty faithless, even in theology schools.
	Yes, we have seen over the years that many, many supposedly Christian schools have sold out all their beliefs.
	They don't care about the gospel.
	They simply care about making money.
	They are businesses.
	Jackson said, people have to be comfortable realizing Jesus himself clearly believed in angels and demons, and modern believers shouldn't be afraid of it.
	That's right.
	If it is something Jesus believed in, it is something you can believe in.
	There is no shame in that.
	So many Christians seem very, very timid when it comes to discussing the spiritual side of things.
	Well, even timid about just sharing their beliefs in general, which I fully understand.
	I was a lot more timid and shrinking about it when I was younger.
	Over the years, I have come to realize that was simply foolishness and arrogance and pride on my part, not wanting to potentially lose friends or be seen foolish when I didn't have a direct answer to a question someone might have at the time.
	But there are answers to all your questions out there, whether the person has them in the moment or not.
	This is a new article, by the way.
	This is on Harbinger Daily.
	Yes, the public school system has become nothing but an indoctrination system for evil, evil ideologies.
	After being caught red-handed, forcing children to participate in Hindu rituals during class time, government schools in Chicago will be paying millions of taxpayer dollars to the victims.
	Unfortunately for other students across the nation, the scandal represents the tip of the iceberg of pagan indoctrination in American public education.
	The scandal in question involved a partnership between the Chicago Board of Education and the David Lynch Foundation for Consciousness-Based Education and World Peace.
	And yes, it is the director of David Lynch's foundation.
	And if you've ever seen any of David Lynch's work, you know it is very surreal.
	He does tend to incorporate a lot of supernatural elements into his work, at least from the works of his that I've seen.
	But it is all very disturbing.
	There are very few supernatural forces for good in his work.
	They're almost always all evil, demonic, or at least amoral.
	David Lynch might have been a very good director, but his view on the supernatural is very, very skewed.
	Working together, government schools and the New Age Foundation forced children to either participate in bizarre pagan rituals or remain silent as classmates chanted Hindu mantras.
	Even more alarming, at least, some of the children were told not to tell anyone, including their own parents, about the pagan religious activities, according to court documents.
	There were even non-disclosure agreements, including children told to especially avoid informing religious parents, religious in quotes, about the indoctrination program.
	These people love convincing your children to hide things from you, whether it's the sexuality discussions, whether it's them Yes,
	that is very true.
	I got a comment from Audi MRR here on Rumble.
	Good to see you, Audi.
	Hope you're doing well.
	If David Lynch weren't Team Satan, we wouldn't know who he is.
	Remember, if you know their name, they're in the game.
	Yeah, I do tend to believe that Hollywood is loaded to the gills with people that have sold their soul, whether literally or metaphorically.
	But as time goes on, I tend to believe they may actually have entered into literal pacts with the devil and not just in the more metaphorical sense of doing his work through osmosis.
	Puja worships ceremony in a dark room, religious chanting, and paraphernalia, and even secret mantras that were actually the names of Hindu deities, deities that biblical theology is always held to be demonic.
	I was just a teenager when I was pressured into a program I didn't understand and wasn't allowed to question.
	Hudgens said in a statement after the settlement was reached, no student should ever be forced into a religious practice against their will, especially not in a public school.
	This settlement is a step toward accountability and a reminder that our constitutional rights don't stop at the classroom door.
	Hudgens explained that she and other students were taken individually to a small room to chant and place a fruit offering in front of an altar.
	On the altar were brass cups of incense and rice along with a photograph of a Hindu guru known as Brahmananda Saraswati?
	That guru, sometimes known as Guru Dev, launched the global transcendental meditation movement in the mid-1950s.
	Under the class action settlement approved last week by U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kennelly for the Northern District of Illinois, more than 750 former students were involved.
	Chicago's government school system and the foundation in question agreed to pay a total of $2.6 million as part of the settlement.
	It seems half of the funds will come from taxpayers and the remainder from the foundation.
	But this is not the first time taxpayers and the foundation have been forced to pay up for forcing the pagan indoctrination on students.
	In a previous case that made headlines recently, another Chicago student, a Christian, who said she refused to kneel before anyone or anything except Jesus Christ, received a cool payout of $150,000.
	Good for her for standing up.
	That is good to see.
	Kneel before no one but Christ.
	I have great respect for this woman.
	As the Newman Report has been documenting for years, paganism and anti-Christian religious indoctrination have become a staple of what passes for education.
	Government schools all across the nation, aside from Hinduism, Buddhism has also been invading classrooms nationwide under the guise of meditation techniques and mindfulness education.
	In fact, peddlers of these programs openly boast of teaching the supposedly secularized Buddhism and Hinduism to government school children across America.
	In a video on mindfulness and education by expert Amy Burke, the very first quote comes from an Indian guru and so-called world teacher by the name of Jiddu Krishnamurti.
	From his book, Education and the Significance of Life.
	The decision to quote this particular guru offers significant insight into what this is all about.
	The guru, adopted and trained by the head of a Luciferian cult known as the Theosophical Society that inspired the National Socialist Movement, was blunt about his pagan agenda.
	You want to have your own gods?
	New gods instead of the old.
	New religions instead of the old.
	New forms instead of the old.
	All equally valueless.
	All barriers.
	All limitations.
	All crutches.
	That is again from Krishnamurti.
	Just a few years ago, California State Board of Education voted unanimously to mandate an ethnic studies model curriculum in the state's government schools.
	That program, created by radical anti-Christian bigots who called for a counter-genocide against white Christians, forced elementary school students to chant prayers to the demonic Aztec god of human sacrifice, cannibalism, and war.
	Now, if you'll remember the Nashville shooter, the transgender girl.
	We can see this ideology already bearing fruit.
	They hate Christians, and they hate white people, and they especially hate white Christians.
	Islam is becoming increasingly popular in government classrooms, too.
	Any religion that is not Christianity is up for grabs, because any religion that is not Christianity leads you astray.
	They don't care what it is so long as it isn't Christianity.
	Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's $5 million grant to further Islamic education in the state, the money will help an Islamic school already subsidized by taxpayers in the state to expand from 300 to 3,000 students by building more classrooms, a gym, and much more.
	Even before the invasion of blatant paganism and Islam, children were being force-fed a dangerous false religion invented by U.S. public school system founding father John Dewey and dozens of his allies dubbed humanism.
	By doing his cohorts, the movement's manifesto rejects the existence of God and moral truth, and yet, as U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart argued in a famous dissent, SCOTUS essentially established it in early 1960s when banning Bible and prayer.
	Utopian textile manufacturer and commune founder Robert Owen, a communist who inspired the Prussian indoctrination system that eventually inspired the American public school system, actually boasted of communicating with spirits through Ouija boards and other means.
	Ouija boards are incredibly funny to me.
	I do think you should not engage with them, but they, as far as I'm aware, were created by Parker Brothers.
	It was a silly little game.
	Now that does not mean it cannot be used for evil, but to see so many people who are leaders of movements and things engaging with this creation of Parker Brothers is always funny to me.
	Again, not to make light of it, I do think that you can invite demons into your life through many different methods.
	It doesn't need to be a blood sacrifice.
	It can be something silly as well.
	It isn't a historical thing, but it's still something that's all about divination.
	It's the thought that counts.
	And looking ahead, the United Nations World Core Curriculum is deeply rooted in New Age paganism as well.
	In fact, according to the Global Education Scheme's primary author, then Assistant UN Secretary General Robert Mueller, the Global Education Program is based on teachings of Alice Bailey, the founder of the infamous Lucifer Publishing Company, now known as Lucius Trust.
	The WCC is also based on teachings from the spiritual entities she claimed to be channeling known as Ascended Masters.
	Remember Michael Flynn, his prayer to the Ascended Masters?
	Really makes you wonder what's going on with Trump's inner circle, huh?
	Really makes you think.
	We live in a spiritual world, folks.
	This is everything that you see around you.
	All the physical world is the least real part of reality.
	It is simply the outer layer of things.
	We are going to take a quick break, and then we're going to take a look at what's going on with the climate MacGuffin when we come back.
	So stay with us, folks.
	MUSIC PLAYS
	MUSIC CONTINUES
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	You can see the next day.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, folks.
	We've got some comments here from Star Barkley.
	Never use Ouija boards.
	Anything answering is dubious.
	Satan can make you believe anything.
	Be on guard.
	Yes.
	Again, just because it started as a silly little toy does not mean it is not evil.
	You know, it may have been a toy, but it is ultimately inspired by divination.
	Divination is a well-known part of, you know, Yes.
	I've got a comment from NateJ11.
	Travis, my guess is that the Parker Brothers were demonically inspired by witchcraft and rituals.
	I would not be surprised.
	Putting a divination ritual into the hands of children is a very evil thing to do.
	Should not be done.
	Now, I'm going to plug briefly.
	If you would like to support the show, a good way, of course, is subscribestar.com forward slash the David Knight Show.
	We have many tiers.
	You can choose one that fits your budget.
	You can leave a tip here on Rumble.
	We will be sure to read it out and thank you for it.
	You can subscribe on Kik.
	Kik is a great way to support us as well.
	You can go to davidknight.gold.
	Tony has graciously set that up and you can sign up for Wolfpack, which he will then send you silver or gold on a subscription basis monthly.
	You can also just buy gold, silver, or crypto directly from Tony and that will let him know you came through us.
	DavidKnight.gold, Trends Journal, if you use promo code KNIGHT, you will save 10% off.
	And of course, Jared Salente works very hard to provide you with some great information in the Trends Journal.
	You can also go to the website and purchase some of the products there.
	The newest one we have is, of course, this brass challenge coin designed by Jason Barker.
	There are also other things on the website.
	And we have a link or a...
	You can find our PO box there.
	You can find ways to support through Zelle or Cash App.
	Thank you all for the support over the last few weeks.
	It has been incredible.
	We really do appreciate it.
	So thank you all so much.
	I won't belabor the point there.
	And also I want to thank you for the prayers you have given up You've given up on our behalf.
	And I ask that you continue to pray for our family, especially our dad who is still recovering.
	We ask that you would pray that God would heal him fully, that he would be fully restored to us, that he would be here back in this seat soon.
	So please pray for healing for his tongue and his speech and his ability.
	to play the piano.
	That is, of course, something that he has found much joy in over the years, and all these wonderful pieces of music that play during the breaks are things that he has orchestrated and covered and done.
	So please pray that he'd be able to do that more in future.
	But as I said, we are going to look at the climate MacGuffin in the roughly 20 minutes we have left, as of course...
	Canadian sports bar removes job ad for workers who oppose COVID mandates after backlash.
	A Canadian sports bar had to take down a job posting for a barmaid that called for non-woke employees who were not in favor of any COVID-era mandates.
	After receiving numerous complaints, oh, so now they don't like DEI.
	I imagine not being in favor of the COVID mandates is pretty frowned upon in Canada, so that would be quite diverse.
	That would be very diverse.
	Yeah, what was the backlash for the masks and all the ridiculous social distancing nonsense?
	But no, uh, backlash for saying we don't like that.
	Yes.
	And this is a sports bar and sports bars are ostensibly a more...
	Men tend to be more right-leaning than women and sports bars tend to be more for men.
	I don't want someone who during the pandemic would have called the police if their neighbor had visitors.
	I'm going to be very clear on my position, noted the ad translated to English from French.
	Ooh, French-Canadian.
	The ad specified that it wanted non-woke workers who were not.
	Pro-liberal bar owner Richard Poulin, in speaking to the local media, defended the job posting, which has since been taken down, saying, we're not in the 1960s and 70s anymore.
	People used to hide, but I'm not hiding.
	Don't I have the right?
	Quebec saw some of the strictest COVID-era measures implemented in Canada, including curfews at one point that forced people to stay at home between 10 p.m. and 5 a.m.
	Violators were subject to fines between $1,000 and $6,000.
	The Quebec government also went after doctors who were critical of the mRNA COVID injections.
	That's right.
	Canada was incredibly, incredibly strict on people.
	Canada is, of course, about 10 to 20 years ahead of us on most of these agendas when it comes to things.
	They have gone far more liberal than we have, but it is simply a matter of time.
	They continually implement policies there, and we see them eventually work their way here as well.
	It is funny to me because a lot of the Canadian people are very, very similar to Americans.
	The stock we come from have very, very similar roots, but they have very, very rapidly embraced more liberal and more socialist policies than we have.
	And just the embracing of euthanasia that we have seen in Canada, the way they now push it on people.
	Won't have time for it today, but they have been just heavily, heavily pushing this idea that even if you're depressed, you know, you've got depression, well, instead of working on ways to treat it, instead of finding ways to fight back against it, you could just end your own life.
	You could just let the government put you down like a dog.
	That is the way the Canadian government is operating.
	Why are more than...
	This is from ABC News.
	Why are more than 300 people in the U.S. still dying from COVID every week?
	Of course, we know that they're not.
	ABC is simply lying and misconstruing things.
	Why is it?
	It's because they're testing for it and using PCR tests that can give you a positive regardless of what you've got.
	Exactly.
	More than five years after the first case of COVID-19 were detected in the United States, hundreds of people are still dying every week.
	That's right, folks.
	You still need to panic about it.
	It hasn't gone away.
	You still need to be scared.
	You still need to put on the mask.
	You still need to distance yourself from people.
	Because if you don't, you might get this scary, scary virus.
	Last month, an average of about 350 people died each week from COVID, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
	Oh, well, if the CDC says it, it's got to be true.
	We all know how trustworthy the CDC is, and it's run by such trustworthy people, the likes of people like Anthony Fauci, who we all know is just a genuine, nice, caring individual.
	You gotta get the shots.
	While high, the numbers of deaths is decreasing and lower than the peak of 25,974 deaths recorded the week.
	The week ending January 9, 2021, as well as weekly deaths seen in previous spring months, CDC data shows.
	Again, they need to prove it, but it's all lies, so they can't.
	Public health experts told ABC News that although the U.S. is in a much better place than it was a few years ago, COVID is still a threat to high-risk groups.
	Is the U.S. really in a better place?
	I think it depends on who you're asking what your metrics are.
	Because from my perspective, the U.S. has done nothing but become a more totalitarian regime ever since this all happened, and it's important to remember who let this happen.
	Donald Trump was instrumental in locking the country down, in pushing these shots.
	He gave us warp speed.
	That's who Donald Trump really is at his core.
	He is nothing but a New York liberal Democrat masquerading as a people's champion.
	The fact that we're still seeing death just means it's still circulating and people are still catching it.
	Dr. Tony Moody, a professor in the Department of Pediatrics and the Division of Infectious Diseases at Duke University Medical Center, told ABC News.
	Ah, good old Duke University.
	Another university that was very near to where I grew up.
	Duke was the most prestigious school in the area.
	They like to think of themselves as the Harvard of the South.
	So if that lets you know what type of people you're dealing with.
	We've seen what comes out of Harvard, so you should be very, very wary of anyone from Duke as well.
	I can't believe they're still using these same, you know, data shows X number of deaths.
	Like, if you look at this, what they're saying, it's over a million Americans, more than all of Vietnam, plus all of 9-11, plus every mass shooting combined, in fact, more than ten times those numbers.
	More than the Civil War by over 50%.
	And yet, it's been so thoroughly debunked.
	Like, you know, everyone could see that there wasn't a huge mass casualty thing.
	They simply took all of the normal causes of death, like flu down to zero.
	They had people that died in motorcycle crashes as being considered COVID deaths.
	And yet, here we are, years later, they're still fear-mongering off of the exact same lie.
	That is how they do things.
	They do not care about the truth.
	They are just there to absorb propaganda and parrot it back.
	Low vaccine uptake, waning immunity.
	During the 2024-25 season, only 23% of adults aged 18 and older received the updated COVID-19 vaccine as of the week ending April 26th.
	That's right, folks.
	It's your fault.
	Because you have looked at the vaccine, seen what has done to people, and started to question.
	Maybe I don't want to get this because people like our audience have gone out and warned people and it has slowly spread and people have been able to look at it and say, maybe I was wrong.
	In other words, this article is saying you're killing 300 people a week because you didn't get the latest booster.
	That's right, folks.
	You've got to go get your booster shot because otherwise you're going to kill grandma.
	You are directly responsible for these deaths if you do not enrich.
	Dr. Gregory Poland, a vaccinologist and president and co-director of the Atria Research Institute, which focuses on disease prevention, said there are likely not enough people receiving the vaccine, which is contributing to the number of weekly COVID deaths.
	Well, I encourage him to go look at VAERS and see the number of vaccine-related deaths, see the number of vaccine-related lives that have been ruined.
	And of course, I assume all of you know, but VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
	Additionally, Poland said that immunity from COVID-19 vaccines wanes over time, increasing the likelihood of being infected.
	That's right, you've got to keep getting your updated booster shots.
	You've got to get the next one and the next one and the next one and the next one because it's not enough to have one dose of poison in your system.
	They've got to keep revamping it.
	They've got to keep adding more because what if your body was able to fight off that first dose?
	What if somehow it didn't take?
	What if they didn't get you?
	What if they weren't able to ruin your life with one?
	Another reason for death due to COVID is being elderly.
	Or, you know, it could just be that perhaps the elderly are more prone to death by all causes, whether it's slipping and falling or simply having their body give out on them.
	That is another way that they bloated the numbers.
	They took the actuarial tables.
	A lot of people looked at them and said, well, they've just basically marked every single death of the elderly that would normally happen, you know.
	Because of any other reason.
	Like I said, just old age, and they've marked it as COVID.
	There's also remdesivir, an intravenous medication that must be started within seven days of COVID-19 appearing.
	And of course, we all know about remdesivir.
	Run, death is near.
	That is what it was called by people that were administering it, because they saw that it was killing the patients.
	They saw what it was doing to people.
	Got a comment here from iHandy.
	I still pick up patients with medical problems that began shortly after they took the jabs.
	Yes, Handy is a paramedic.
	He has worked in that field for a long time, and he has a great substack, iHandy, where he has cataloged a lot of things that he's seen since COVID started.
	And he has been dealing with the fallout from the vaccines for years now, seeing what it has done to people and how it has injured them.
	I encourage you to go check out his substack.
	They have always avoided stating cause of death for jabbed sheeple.
	If the victim stubbed his toe recently, it would be listed as the cause of death, never the jab.
	That's right.
	It's never the vaccine's fault.
	They're very, very hesitant to provide any sort of correlation to the vaccine when it comes to death, but they will be more than happy to attribute anything to COVID.
	With much, much more tenuous ground to stand on.
	I, Handy, again, true.
	They died of sudden renal failure.
	Huh, what caused the sudden renal failure?
	Oh, well, you know, those renals, they'd just be failing.
	What can I say?
	I do think that we don't necessarily make use of the tools that we have on hand in the best way possible.
	That's right.
	all these wonderful tools from Big Pharma.
	Tools like...
	We've seen many, many times the MMR vaccine is what seems to be killing children.
	Kids go in, and it is especially dangerous when they get sick.
	We're not going to have them delayed on their schedule for vaccines.
	We've got to make sure that the vaccine companies get their profits.
	Another comment from iHandy, one of my aunts did actually die of sudden renal failure.
	It took a little over two weeks for her to die.
	My coworker died in her sleep and they said sudden renal failure.
	Well, I'm very, very sorry to hear about your aunt, Andy.
	I'm sorry for your loss there.
	That is a tragedy.
	So many people's lives have been permanently altered by the vaccine.
	It has caused so many different health issues for people.
	As I've said before, and as my dad has said over and over again, we still don't know all the effects of these horrifying vaccines.
	We still don't know exactly what they are doing to people.
	We have seen some of what they do, but who knows about what the very long-term side effects may be.
	It is a very scary thing to contemplate.
	And this is another thing we have seen over and over again.
	When they try to push these Measles fears when they try to claim that you need to get vaccinated because of the measles we have seen many times over the last few years, over the last decade, that they will be able to trace the measles back to a vaccinated person that just got it after getting the vaccine and passed it along to others.
	And of course, the measles is nothing to fear.
	It is not something you need to worry about, in my opinion.
	My parents grew up in the age where if one of their friends got the measles, they were then sent over so that they could get the measles and get it out of the way.
	They had measles parties.
	That was not something we experienced, but it wasn't ever hyped up as something to be worried about in my lifetime.
	Well, not until now.
	When I was a kid, the measles was just, again, one of those kind of childhood joke diseases.
	It got talked about every now and then, but it wasn't something that people lost their minds over.
	It is truly amazing to see how over the last decade they've been able to make people lose their minds over this.
	It is an example of how well propaganda works, how if they repeat something over and over again on TV.
	Comments here.
	Audi MRR.
	Government relies on people never questioning government narratives.
	Blind trust is how they got away with so much for so long.
	For so long a time.
	Owen 61. At 85, even though he was battling stage 4 cancer, kidney disease, and survived a collapsed lung, he finally succumbed to COVID.
	That gosh darn COVID.
	BicBrit is back again.
	VAERS barely records any deaths from the jab.
	Be lucky to be much more than 1%.
	Yes.
	VAERS even openly, I believe, on their website admits that they only receive what people tell them about.
	And since it is very hard to get a vaccine injury diagnosis from a doctor, they get a small fraction of the actual number of injuries or deaths reported to them.
	So while VAERS is useful for tracking the different kinds of symptoms you might see, it is not the be-all, end-all.
	It does not give a comprehensive list of people that have died or been injured by this.
	As he said, it could be anywhere between 1% and 10% total of the actual injuries, since doctors, as I said, are incredibly, incredibly unlikely to diagnose a vaccine injury.
	They do not like admitting that this thing, this poison that they push on people can actually harm them.
	A Syrian girl is so hard to watch.
	Innocent people dying because they believed their government had their best interests It's a very difficult thing.
	And it is very, very sad to see that these people who were trusting got taken advantage of.
	But it's also important to remember that while These people are innocent.
	They will still vote for things like forced inoculation for you.
	These people may have been taken advantage of, but they are still potentially very, very dangerous for the general population because they will vote for absurd things.
	You have to treat them almost like an injured animal.
	You know, you can be kind, you can try to educate them, but you also have to come in with the knowledge that they will still vote to throw you under the bus, that they would in a instant, the vast majority of them vote to force you to take the job.
	Well, we've got about a minute left here before I'm going to throw out the clips of my dad.
	So I won't be going over any more articles.
	I simply don't have the time.
	But again, I want to thank you all for joining us today.
	It is a pleasure to be able to sit here.
	And interact.
	and spend time with you all.
	I hope you all had a...
	I hope you all were able to have a good time.
	I want to ask that you all continue to pray for our dad.
	Pray that he would be given healing.
	That he would be given peace.
	That he would be able to sleep.
	And so I thank you all so much for joining us here today.
	I will be back tomorrow.
	Yes.
	Thank you all so much.
	God bless you.
	Have a great rest of your day.
	Big Brother is changing how your brain works.
	This is fascinating.
	This is from Technocracy News.
	And they've had a study, all these studies.
	This study has determined that living your life under a Big Brother camera It's not just about violating your privacy.
	It's not just about constant surveillance and trapping you and everything.
	But because you understand that it's there, you consciously will change your behavior.
	But it also changes you in ways that you are not even aware of.
	That's what this study found.
	Yeah, this all gets worse.
	The ultimate pressure to conform that you're not even aware of that is happening internally with you with these pervasive cameras.
	He says, every time you walk down a street, electronic eyes are watching you.
	These cameras might be doing more than just recording your movements.
	According to a new study that peers into the psychology of surveillance, they could be fundamentally altering how our brains process visual information.
	to cut to the chase here what they found was that when you were involved in surveillance they gave them certain patterns to try to remember and it didn't affect their comprehension and their memory of certain things but what it did affect was their ability to remember faces isn't that fascinating that was the only thing that it affected was their relationship to other people said while
	previous research has shown that surveillance cameras can modify our conscious behavior making us less likely to steal or more inclined to follow the rules a new study Published in the Neuroscience of Consciousness suggests that being watched affects something far more fundamental, the unconscious way that our brains perceive the world around us.
	They said, We found direct evidence that being conspicuously monitored via closed-circuit TV markedly impacts a hardwired, involuntary function of human sensory perception, the ability to consciously detect a face.
	They said this was done in the University of Technology in Sydney.
	They designed an ingenious experiment to test how surveillance affects our unconscious visual processing.
	They recruited 54 undergraduate students.
	They split them into two groups.
	One of them, they didn't do any surveillance cameras, but the other group was not only had a camera there watching them, but they took them backstage and they showed them the whole setup.
	You know, here's what we're going to be recording with you, really driving that home to them, okay?
	And had them sign consent forms that they're going to be watched, they're going to be recorded, showed them the equipment, how it's going to be done, all the rest of this stuff.
	And then they took the cameras and positioned them.
	They weren't just kind of inconspicuously put up in the corner of the roof or something like that.
	They put the cameras right up to them to capture their whole face.
	Their whole body, their face, even their hands as they were performing tasks.
	So the visual task itself employed a continuous flash suppression, that's what they call it, where they temporarily prevent images shown to one eye from reaching conscious awareness while the brain is still processing them unconsciously.
	Participants viewed different images through each eye.
	One eye saw rapidly changing colorful patterns, while the other saw faces that were either looking directly at them or away from them.
	They said our surveilled participants became hyper-aware of face stimuli almost a second faster than the control group.
	And it occurred, though, without participants realizing it.
	When the researchers ran the same experiment using simple geometric patterns instead of faces, there was no difference between the watched and the unwatched groups.
	The enhancement was specific to social stimuli, faces, suggesting that the surveillance taps into fundamental neural circuits that process social information.
	And so they had problems remembering these faces.
	But they could remember the other stuff that they were shown.
	They said perhaps most unsettling was the disconnect between participants'conscious experience and their brain's response.
	Unsettling findings that depict participants reporting little concern or preoccupation with being monitored.
	Its effect on basic social processing were marked highly significant and imperceptible to You don't even know this is happening.
	It's like subliminal suggestions and other things like that.
	So there's like this subliminal suggestion that is, in a sense, making you reject human faces because of the presence.
	The study suggests that constant observation may be affecting us on a deeper level than we previously realized.
	So not only are they watching everything that we're doing, not only are they recording everything that we're doing, but the very process of them doing that is kind of creating a subconscious revulsion between us and other people.
	It's amazing how they're trying to isolate us from each other.
	Everything that Trump did in 2020 and all these other politicians in every other country did, all of that stuff, very carefully designed to keep us isolated from each other.
	The implications extend beyond individual privacy concerns to subtle ways that surveillance might be reshaping human cognition and social interaction.
	Big Brother, it seems, isn't just watching us.
	He's changing how we see the world and how we see each other.
	Now, let's talk about something that's positive.
	This is also on Brownstone.
	The season for living.
	Karen, pull this up and show that picture.
	Oh, it's a different picture.
	Maybe it's further down.
	Yeah, that's the one that we want to talk about right there.
	In October 2020, Bob Moran published a cartoon privately on social media.
	He was still employed by the Telegraph newspaper, though he would soon be sacked from his position.
	Because he was somebody who pushed back against the social distancing.
	He pushed back against the masks that keep us from being able to see other people's faces.
	That kind of damage that was being done psychologically to the very young children, the mask thing.
	Bob's cartoon was of an old man and old woman on a hill overlooking rolling fields and nestled homestead.
	And it was titled, Never Surrender Your Right to Be With the People You Love.
	Now, that's the first one that he did.
	He later did this one right here, where they're in the snow, in a harsh situation.
	Why?
	Because things were getting harsher, right?
	And I think Bob Moran felt that.
	He felt like the harshness of winter, the coldness of these lockdown measures that were put onto us by, you know, conservatives like Boris Johnson and conservatives like Donald Trump, and then liberals like Justin Trudeau or Emmanuel Macron, right?
	Didn't matter.
	So, the following year, he published the variation on his cartoon that you see there, where the fields are covered in snow, and the men and the women stand closer to one another than in the first one.
	Same title, Never Surrender Your Right to Be With the People You Love.
	His reputation for resistance to the COVID restrictions grew and grew, and Bob Moran, with searing simplicity, said, There are people and places that are of you, And for you, always.
	And so most of this brownstone thing was talking about the power of a picture, you know, worth a thousand words and so forth.
	But just saying that he was reaffirming what we fundamentally know.
	And saying that sometimes when we codify what we fundamentally know, and we put it into words, sometimes it diminishes its power.
	Because as this person said, When we defend our right to a fundamental good, we somehow diminish it.
	We admit as possible what ought to be impossible.
	It should have been impossible for them to separate us.
	I've seen all the pictures of family members going to visit others, and they've got plastic between them, and you've seen the pictures.
	They've got like a shower curtain or something.
	Oh, let me hug you in the shower curtain.
	How sad that people would submit to that.
	How foolish that they would believe the lies.
	I mean, you just have to, it doesn't even pass the sniff test or the sanity check.
	Being with one another in their world is not up for discussion.
	And Bob depicted that with a directness that no words could achieve.
	The man and the woman fit with each other in their world as pieces of a human jigsaw.
	There's no other place, no other way for them, and they are enchanting to look at because they are enchanted.
	And that's the key thing with all this.
	He said, and so then what happened with him?
	Well, he got fired.
	He got fired because he was a COVID critic.
	He got fired because he was a mask critic.
	He got fired by the Telegraph, and he had his tweets removed by Twitter at that time.
	That is what happens to us now.
	But he is still there.
	He's published his first book of cartoons.
	It's called Bob 2020 to 2024.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	you'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	And David is giving a 10% discount to listeners from now until 2025.
	At that price, you should be able to buy me several hundred.
	Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
	The End All right, joining us now is Alexandra.
	She has an organization, Just The Inserts, at justtheinserts.com.
	You can also find her on Instagram under that name, Just The Inserts, and also on X under that name as well.
	And I wanted to get her on because many of you know our family's history with this, and I think it is very important.
	We've seen what has happened to the medical community, and we need to take control of what goes into our body.
	And so there needs to be informed consent, and that's what she is offering.
	Thank you for having me on.
	It's a joy to be here.
	Well, thank you.
	You know, the listeners here know the history of what has happened with my family.
	We just had our son was injured by what they call phloxan, you know, some of the fluorochloroquins and going back to Cipro.
	And when we went to another place where they had supplements, a drugstore, we went in and Karen and I were looking for a particular supplement that somebody had recommended to kind of counter that.
	And the person behind the counter that was the pharmacist there was wearing a mask.
	And the other person, you know, we told him, well, we're looking for this.
	And so why are you looking for that?
	And so we told him.
	And the other person that was there that was just kind of a helper, wasn't the pharmacist, said, you know, it's gotten to the point where those inserts are so scary.
	I don't even want to read them.
	And I thought, wow, that is the saddest thing I've ever seen.
	Because you better believe.
	That the stuff that is there is not only possible, but it was possible to such an extent that they put it in there to cover themselves.
	And so that's why I wanted to get you on and talk about just the inserts.
	How did you get involved in all of this?
	What's your background?
	Well, like you and probably most people listening today, personal experience with pharmaceutical injury.
	I was active duty military and there were several times when I was serving that I had It was like, hmm, okay.
	I had a neck sprain and they gave me Oxycontin and I ended up having severe constipation.
	That's odd.
	And it was just little things trickling here and there while I was serving that made me start questioning the products that I was blindly accepting.
	And then when I became a mother or when I became pregnant, I was...
	And I was in my third trimester, and the midwife handed me a one-page sheet on the Tdap vaccine.
	And I remember thinking, this is very odd.
	I cannot have most medications.
	I can't have raw cheese or milk or any of these other things.
	And yet, an injection just didn't make sense for me.
	So I asked my mom to research it for me.
	And she researched it, and then when she came back to me a few days later, she had so much anxiety and urgency in her voice, almost as if I was standing on the edge of a cliff getting ready to jump off.
	And it actually really turned me off.
	She started sending me all of this information of saying I was going to die, my baby was going to die if I accept this product.
	So naturally, like, So I just felt that it was very polarizing.
	So because of who I am, I was trying to prove my mom wrong and I wanted to just have what the government said about these products.
	I knew with my business background that every product on the market has to have some kind of legal documentation about the safety or effectiveness of that product.
	So I ended up finding the inserts.
	And as this was happening, in parallel to me researching vaccines, I ended up having my daughter.
	I declined the B vaccine.
	I declined the eye ointment.
	But I had a 44-hour labor, and it was very traumatic.
	So I ended up accepting the vitamin K, the synthetic vitamin K injection.
	Because I was told it was just a vitamin K. It was just a vitamin.
	However, in hindsight, after reading the insert, there are other ingredients, including benzyl alcohol, which now there's an added box warning on the vitamin K. Insert that says it can cause gasping syndrome for infants and can be fatal.
	Of course, I didn't know this at the time.
	So my daughter ended up becoming injured from the synthetic vitamin K. And she had severe jaundice.
	She was colic.
	She had liver and gut issues.
	I felt that the people that I had trusted, the people that I paid a lot of money to provide expert advice on, had not properly informed me of the potential known adverse reactions and risks that are on the FDA website, that are on manufacturer inserts.
	So I desperately was trying to find answers.
	I went to pediatrician after pediatrician.
	And every single time that I brought my daughter in, And so here, my daughter had already been injured by a pharmaceutical product.
	Why would I introduce any more interventions, especially with what I had been researching on vaccine inserts?
	And so it just didn't make sense.
	and it made me dig my heels into the research.
	It made me start...
	I don't have a medical background, so I was just going straight to the.gov resources because my thinking was, if the government says this about these products, if the manufacturer says this about those products, then you can't really fight with that.
	That's pretty black and white.
	So I started sharing on my personal Instagram, and I got shadow banned and censored.
	I lost a lot of friends in that process just by sharing.gov information, and that to me was even more of a red flag.
	Why?
	Am I being so ostracized just for asking questions?
	So I ended up praying, asking God.
	I remember distinctly, I was on my exercise bike, and I had tears in my eyes because I had read story after story of injury, not just from vaccines, but from all pharmaceuticals.
	And I asked God for guidance, and I said, Send me, Lord.
	I'm here.
	I will go.
	And then over the next few weeks and months after that, I started getting inspiration to start an account for Just the Inserts.
	And that's how it started.
	I started originally on Instagram.
	It grew so fast, so quickly.
	I had over 148,000 followers on Instagram in just a few short months.
	And then a week before the COVID vaccine was mandated, By the Biden administration, I was deleted off of Instagram with no warning.
	After the fact, Meta told me in their blanket statement that the reason why I had been deleted was because of a.gov study that I had shared.
	So I was deleted off Instagram for sharing.gov information.
	But, you know, it was a blessing because I was pregnant with my second child at that time, and I ended up realizing that I was spending nine hours a day posting and researching, and it really wasn't good for my own personal mental health and physical health.
	So I was off Instagram for about eight months, and then, amazingly enough, for some reason, when Elon Musk bought Twitter, I was magically allowed to be back on Instagram that same day.
	With the same username.
	All of my content had been wiped, but I was allowed to be back on.
	So I slowly started rebuilding.
	And during that eight-month process, I had started focusing on my website, realizing, despite what we're told, the internet isn't forever.
	And starting to create more solid foundations for my research, saving it on hard drives, things like that.
	I got back on Instagram, rebuilt my website, and then this year, after having my third child, I realized I needed to put all of this in a book.
	I needed to have a physical copy of all this research because it's so important for new parents, patients.
	Everyone needs to have informed consent, no matter your educational background, no matter where you come from.
	You need to know what manufacturers say about their own products.
	You need to know what the government says about their own products or products on the market.
	Approved and are regulating.
	You need to understand all that.
	And it's really hard.
	They've made it really complicated to find this information.
	So my goal is not to replace research.
	It's to streamline research.
	So everything that I put out on Instagram, website, emails is all cited.
	You can go find it yourself.
	And I just took step-by-step instructions or created step-by-step instructions on how to find and read manufacturer inserts.
	And then in addition to that, most people were like, well, why do I need to read?
	And just like your story you said, the inserts are so scary.
	Why do I need to be reading them?
	And really, the foundational element of all of this is informed consent.
	We deserve to have all of the information that the government and manufacturers know about this product, at the very least, to make well-considered decisions for ourselves, for our families, and for our communities.
	And that's really why I continue to go today is I started with my own story, but what continues me to...
	Even before we hopped on today, I was getting messages from people saying, I was injured by this.
	I realized I've been injured.
	how can I make more informed decisions in the future?
	And that's why I, uh, Yeah, we have to do our own research.
	I mean, the pharmacist isn't going to tell you.
	The doctor is not going to tell you.
	As a matter of fact, I remember you talking about COVID and when that came in and when the hammer really dropped on people.
	I've had that experience as well because I've pushed back against the vaccines and pharmaceutical in general, but specifically the vaccines.
	But I remember one person filming it had the camera running in their pocket.
	They were giving out the COVID vaccine.
	She said, I'd like to see the insert for that.
	I said, well, I don't know where that is.
	Could you get the pharmacist and tell him to come here so I could see the insert?
	They got the pharmacist and he says, I can't find it.
	This is really strange.
	There's supposed to be an insert for this.
	And the reason why is because it was probably emergency use authorized.
	So I had pharmacists messaging me saying, there's no insert, or if there is an insert, it's a blank page.
	And so they did have insert-like information called a fact sheet.
	But even then, it was completely bare at the start of it.
	Yeah.
	You know, when you look at this stuff, especially when you start to try to search it, as you talked about in your story, somebody prescribes you something.
	And I've gotten very careful about that.
	And so subsequent to my son's injury, we got a prescription for, I don't even remember what it was for.
	But I'm looking it up, and it was something that was kind of innocuous and everything.
	But you go to WebMD, and they'll just give you a regurgitation of what the pharmaceutical industry wants.
	You've got to almost go to, and I'm glad to see that your site is up, because what I would do, I would go to look up the term, and I would go to places where they're talking about it on Reddit or whatever, so that I can see what individuals'experiences have been, because the whole thing has been so covered up.
	It's absolutely amazing, isn't it?
	Yeah, there is a federally funded study that identified only 1% of vaccine adverse reactions, and just a little bit more of that for all pharmaceuticals are reported in the passive surveillance system, and that's FAERS for drugs, the FDA's adverse event reaction system, and then VAERS for vaccines.
	However, if you go onto the VAERS website, it has a disclaimer that you could be fined and put in jail if you put a fraudulent report.
	And the FDA They all speak to the importance of a passive surveillance system.
	So for any medical provider that is discrediting it, they're discrediting their own system.
	And I would caution them doing that.
	Oh, yeah.
	So when you're dealing with your doctor, what kind of things should you say to your doctor?
	In order to, you know, have a relationship with them, to question what it is that they're giving to you.
	Let's start with that, with the doctor-patient relationship.
	That's a great question.
	I love it.
	So when you go into a doctor, you are seeking a service.
	They are providing expert advice based on the observations or any diagnostic tests or physical exams that they do in an appointment.
	So the first thing that you want to make sure when you go to a doctor is that you understand the diagnosis.
	About 20% of diagnoses are wrong in the United States.
	And so you just want to make sure, first up, right out of the gate, that you agree with the diagnosis.
	And that you are sure that the observations that you've communicated to the doctor have been taken into consideration and that any observations that they may have for you or your child, you agree with.
	That's the first thing that you need to be aware of.
	And if you don't agree with that diagnosis, you have the right to say, okay, thank you for your expert advice.
	Pay them for their time and then go somewhere else and get a second opinion and a third opinion and a fourth opinion.
	There's no limit on how many opinions you can get.
	That is the right as an informed consumer that you have when seeking healthcare as a service.
	So if you do agree with that diagnosis, say you do find a doctor that you agree with.
	They're going to provide a recommended treatment plan that might include lifestyle changes, nutritional changes, or pharmaceuticals or other kinds of medical product supplements.
	In each of those categories, you have the right to accept, delay, or decline those products in that treatment plan.
	So if you do accept a product, You are observant of any potential adverse reactions.
	You communicate any changes to your condition to your medical provider.
	If you decide to delay that product, maybe you want to gather more information about your condition.
	Maybe you want to research other alternatives within that pharmaceutical class or supplemental class.
	or maybe you want to come up with a holistic treatment plan where you have some pharmaceuticals, some natural supplements, some lifestyle changes, maybe surgery, things like that.
	Or maybe you decided to decline that product and you So that's the basic process of informed consent, and all of it is in pursuit of having all the information that you need to make a well-considered decision about your health and your child's health.
	Yeah, from my personal experience, I had, after a heart attack, I had a doctor who was prescribing some stuff to me, and I had some questions about it.
	I think it was statins that he was doing, and I'd known about statins.
	And so I mentioned some of the things to him about stents.
	And I don't think I'm going to, oh, you've been talking to Dr. Google, have you?
	And it's like...
	Actually, I have a funny story about that, and it always makes me laugh when medical professionals say this, because when I was military, I remember going to the doctor and telling them my symptoms, and they, I kid you not, swiveled around in their chair, got on their computer, and got on Google in front of me, started searching my symptoms to try to find the diagnosis.
	And I remember that was such an aha moment, because I remember thinking, Why am I here?
	The only benefit that you're providing me is access to a pharmaceutical that I cannot get myself.
	And it started to break down that perception, that preconceived notion that I had that all doctors know everything that they're talking about.
	They don't all know everything.
	And I would also say that my community that I have, the Just the Inserts community, is predominantly medical professionals.
	Many nurses, many doctors, many pharmacists, many surgeons have reached out to me.
	I was never taught this in school.
	I was never taught how to read and find and interpret manufacturer inserts.
	The only time that medical professionals in their professional training that have been exposed to manufacturer inserts are because pharmaceutical employees or representatives have contacted them presented parts of the inserts to compare advantages to a competitor.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And pharmaceutical representatives have confirmed that, messaging me as well.
	Wow, yeah.
	And when you look at what the doctors are doing, in most cases, like I said, they'll look on Google themselves for the symptoms, and you stop and think about what they have become in terms of just a service that writes out prescriptions that you're not legally allowed to, things you're not legally allowed to get.
	Think how easy it's going to be to replace them with chat GPT.
	It was about eight years ago that a study in South Korea said that by 2030, there was going to be massive unemployment, and one of the highest things that they had there was doctors, about 70% of them.
	And if you stop and think what it is, typically it's just looking up the symptoms and matching it to whatever Big Pharma wants you to buy for that particular drug right now.
	And so that's I think that's where this is all headed, because they have basically made themselves largely irrelevant.
	Sorry, go ahead.
	I was just going to comment on that.
	I actually just read an article recently that said there were several hundred people, and I can't remember the institution that did the study.
	I'll have to find it and send it to you.
	But they took responses from ChatGPT on certain medical conditions and then responses created by medical professionals.
	And they asked these study participants, which response do you like better?
	And it was overwhelmingly positive towards chat GPT.
	And it was interesting because they were saying medical professionals are There are parameters that the AI works within, so you do have to be careful of that, but I found that interesting.
	They will train it, and of course they spend a lot of time putting biases into the training, and so you can imagine it's going to be a fight from the pharmaceutical companies to make sure that the bias is toward their particular drug, because they do that.
	When they run the tests, three pharmaceutical companies, they've all got their own drug for this particular condition, and you'll find that when pharmaceutical company A pays for the test and the study, that they will be found to be the best one.
	When the other companies do it, they will pay for the study to find that they are the best one.
	So it's going to be who gets to put the bias into the chat GPT.
	The other thing that's concerning about it, of course, is the fact that chat GPT He does hallucinate.
	And so it's kind of like going to a doctor who is microdosing on LSD or something at the same time.
	You never know what you're going to get.
	It's like a box of chocolates.
	Exactly, exactly.
	Go to chat GPT if you want, but also read the insert just to confirm everything.
	And it's interesting you brought up the, You can manipulate all of that data into however you want to, and you can see it when you start to get into the weeds of it, and I wouldn't recommend anyone first researching pharmaceutical products to go straight to that section, because it is very overwhelming.
	I would recommend going to section 6.2, which is the post-marketing adverse reactions.
	According to the CDC, the definition of an adverse reaction is an Yeah, and
	it changes so rapidly.
	The fluoroquins, and they continually tweak the formulation so they can, first of all, renew the patent, but then so that they can also make sure that you don't tie it to these other things that now have a track record that looks pretty bad.
	So they're constantly adopting a new alias is the way that I look at it.
	So how do you keep current with all this stuff?
	Because they're constantly changing it.
	I don't, to be honest.
	I try my best, but there's no way.
	There's no way I can keep up with it.
	Even on X, I try to follow all of the CDC, FDA, HHS, all these things, and it's always changing.
	There are always things that are being added or changed.
	I mean, even the flu vaccines, those get updated every year, and I've been doing this for four years now, and I've had to update my influenza webpage four times because they change so often, and sometimes they have a quad.
	You know, four, it covers four influenza strains, and sometimes it's three influenza strains.
	And now they're talking about the mRNA, and now they're talking about combining COVID and RSV and flu.
	And so if you go into it thinking that I'm going to learn everything possibly, human possible, you will overwhelm yourself.
	You'll burn yourself out.
	So my advice is that if you are being recommended a medical product by your medical provider, Ask them to write down the trade name of that product, confirm the spelling, and then go to the FDA website, or you can go onto Google, go onto your preferred search engine, Type out that tray name with FDA insert after that, and then you'll find the manufacturer insert.
	And if anybody's listening and they're frantically trying to jot this all down, I have a free training course on my website that goes step-by-step on how to do this.
	I also have it in my book.
	And it'll teach you that no matter what product comes to market, you can research it yourself.
	You can find the information that you need to if the information is available, as we already discussed with EUAs.
	That information might not be available, which I would argue...
	But that's a whole different discussion.
	Yeah.
	And, you know, today it is really imperative because we look at simple things, you know, just like antibiotics or whatever.
	And they're constantly changing them, changing the formulation and making them more concentrated and things like that.
	So, you know, this isn't...
	these people always dismiss it by you know whenever something happens oh it's rare right that that that covers everything it's like well if And evidently, you know, even though it might not be a whole lot of people by your account, and we don't know because they don't necessarily bother to let us know, they'll list out a whole bunch of things.
	And that's the one thing that we need to not fall into, I think, is that mindset to tell ourselves.
	Well, yeah, it says if I take this antibiotic, I could have a stroke.
	But I've never heard of anybody having a stroke after an antibiotic, and yet it happened to my mother.
	And so they've got it there for a reason, and we need to be careful about that.
	What about the health care providers?
	I mean, talk to us.
	You said you've got a lot of health care providers who go to your website, justtheinserts.com.
	What is it that you tell them and tell patients in terms of what the relationship should look like for informed consent?
	Well, I bravo to all medical providers who are going outside the traditional training model of what they've been taught in school, what they are taught by professional private memberships, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, ACOG, all these other private entities that receive, they publicly acknowledge they receive funding from pharmaceutical industries.
	Bravo to the medical provider that is seeking their own information and taking it on themselves to go outside of that training model.
	I love hearing that.
	And there are more and more medical professionals doing that just from the four years that I've been talking about this.
	So my advice would be that when you are...
	And for them to understand that researching manufacturer inserts, researching potential non-pharmaceutical alternatives.
	Helps you do that.
	That pharmaceutical companies are not the arbiters of science.
	They are not the only ones that exercise science in pursuit of health and in pursuit of wellness.
	And I actually have an entire chapter of that in my book.
	And I cite from.gov resources, I cite from the NIH about chiropractic care, about Ayurvedic There are all these other models of health and healing that are accepted across the United States.
	And there was a study that was done, and this was about 10 years ago.
	and I believe it was 30% of Americans have had some kind of experience with unconventional healthcare is what they would call it.
	And so my advice to anyone research There's a whole world of healthcare available to us, and I was actually able to attend the Senate Roundtable.
	And Robert Kennedy Jr., at the end of his closing comments, he spoke to the entrepreneurial spirit of Americans and how there are healthcare providers going outside of the insurance models, going outside of traditional healthcare to provide health to patients.
	They might not be as marketed as well as other.
	Professionals, or they might not even have websites, but they're out there.
	And to start for them to realize that they can take their business and not be so beholden to third-party entities or to insurance companies to accomplish their goal of helping people.
	Yeah, of course, part of the problem that we saw, especially through COVID, was anybody who bucked the system and, you know, there's this whole, like, union or guild or whatever it is, and they'll come back and, you know, because everything is licensed and tightly controlled like that.
	We saw so many people get purged out of the system who did want to offer people different alternatives.
	And, of course, what the AMA has been pushing for a very long time after the Rockefellers is a paradigm of disease is something that's got to be killed.
	The stuff that you use to kill the disease also kills you.
	Sometimes it kills parts of your body.
	Sometimes it's not just temporary.
	Sometimes it is permanent.
	And that's one of the things that's concerning about some of these antibiotics that are out there.
	It's that model, rather than building up your body and strengthening your immune system, doing things that are going to destroy your immune system or destroy other parts of your body, that's the key thing.
	And so it's a very – there are a lot of different paradigms out there.
	You're right, and it is very important for people to – Yes, and I also have resources available in my training course and in my book.
	Physicians for Informed Consent is another great resource.
	And they actually just did an article discussing how for the flu vaccine, those that accepted the flu vaccine, the effectiveness overall isn't very good for the flu vaccine.
	I believe it's around 40%.
	But there was a study that was done that those that accepted the flu vaccine were actually at a higher risk of other respiratory illnesses.
	And so understanding many of the discussions that are done in a pediatrician's Okay, we're going to discuss flu, and this is the product that you need to get for flu.
	But they're not realizing, what about the whole health?
	What about the whole body?
	Is this vaccine potentially going to cause issues elsewhere?
	Is it going to inhibit an immune response when this And so they might not be able to detox the excipients in this product, or is it going to kill their gut microbiome?
	There are so many other things that I believe the medical industry as a whole are not considering.
	They are just very siloed and they're very focused on just one topic.
	And one thing that I've noticed too reading inserts is that there are so many inserts that say that they lower the effectiveness of other products.
	The great example is typhoid vaccine.
	And I discuss this in the book.
	I get asked all the time about people that are traveling internationally about international vaccines.
	And it says on the CDC website and on the manufacturer insert that the typhoid vaccine is limited.
	The effectiveness of it is limited when you take anti-malaria drugs.
	And then on the insert, it says the effectiveness of the typhoid vaccine is limited by taking anti-malaria drugs.
	And so just understanding that when you take a product, it could be limiting the effectiveness of another product or your body's immune response as a whole.
	Yeah, when we look at drug interactions, that's one of the things that I've started to look at.
	Somebody recommends something to me for a blood thinner, for example, since I have AFib.
	They're going to put me on a blood thinner, and as I look at it, and I look at some products, or I look at a particular blood thinner, and the blood thinner says, don't take it with these other things.
	It's like, oh, okay, so then those other things would also thin my blood.
	Maybe they're not as dangerous.
	You know, or vice versa.
	You know, you go to the natural supplement and it says, you know, be careful if you're taking blood thinners or whatever.
	It's going to lower your blood pressure.
	It's going to thin your blood some more, whatever.
	So I've basically used that to avoid some pharmaceuticals when I look at it.
	But, you know, part of this, you mentioned your story, your mother doing research.
	And trying to warn you about it.
	And when we have friends or we have family and we know something and we see something that is alarming like that, we want to grab them by the lapel and say, don't do it like you talked about.
	You said it was like your mother was like you were standing on the edge of a cliff about to fall off.
	And that's the way we feel about it.
	And so we get very compassionate about it.
	What is the best way to approach other people that you have found?
	That's really hard.
	It's really complicated, especially when we have external forces, either a government government mandating the product or we have the social and cultural of.
	It's very hard, and I think up front we need to address that because it is a very delicate balance to strike, and I believe it really depends on your personal relationship with that person, understanding their personality, understanding what is going to resonate with them for them to start researching.
	I'm not the type of person to be told what to do, and so my mother should have known not to go through at that angle, but I understand.
	I understand now that I've done the research why she felt that way, especially because I was in my third trimester.
	I was getting ready to have that.
	That product at my next appointment.
	And so I do understand her sense of urgency.
	They used to never vaccinate pregnant women.
	And then, you know, they crossed that Rubicon.
	And then through COVID and everything, they were demanding that pregnant women get vaccinated with this and that.
	I mean, it really is amazing how this is all set up.
	And again, going back to the paradigm, it's kind of the sense that if we can kill whatever that thing is that we think ails you, the operation is successful.
	Maybe the patient dies, but we don't care as long as the operation is successful, rather than first do no harm.
	They have gotten so far away from that primary directive of first do no harm.
	It's just got to get rid of whatever that thing is, regardless of what happens to the person's health.
	And that's that's a thing that is very.
	You were talking about how Your mother was working with you.
	I mean, it's a difficult thing to try to, when we see how dangerous this is, to try to get it across to people, isn't it?
	It is.
	It is.
	And so my advice is to approach it in love, but in boldness and to approach it in the sense of having all of the information cited.
	I actually have an entire chapter on this and I do talk about it in my training course as well, that we have to first.
	automatically assume that the person has good intentions for themselves and their families.
	I think when we go into it thinking nefarious, especially for friends and family, that can put And so to go into it, that they are just trying to do the best decision with the information they have and that you are tasked with the opportunity to provide more accurate information and to guide them in their path of research.
	And you're going to get much further in a place of love than in a place of hostility.
	And so I provide...
	And some advice that I give, too, as well, is that if you do go into a provider and you like this provider, but they're forcing you to accept a certain product, to only bring.gov information.
	If you go into a medical provider's office with a.gov or.com research resource like myself, like JustTheInswers, like if you say, I got this from JustTheInswers.com, they have been trained to discredit anything else that comes out of your mouth.
	So it's really important for you to go in.
	With the.gov information, have the manufacturer inserts printed out.
	Highlight them for the parts that you want to discuss with them.
	Maybe even write the URL in the bottom of the webpage if it isn't there for you to have productive conversations with them.
	Some family members are the same way.
	That's how I was.
	I have gotten hundreds of messages from people saying, thank you so much for putting this information out there because I was having circular...
	Some people also don't learn by reading.
	They are more visual or they're more auditory.
	So maybe you need to find a documentary.
	Maybe you need to find a podcast that might present the information in a different way.
	And that might be helpful for them to learn.
	One thing I did want to touch on when you were talking about pregnant women.
	Another reason why I've been talking about pregnant women.
	Skipping prenatal appointments or having anxiety attacks about going to a prenatal appointment because their provider was pushing the COVID vaccine so hard.
	And I was pregnant at the time.
	So this just struck a nerve with me.
	I was on pregnancy apps sharing information because women were asking, should I get it?
	Should I not get it?
	I don't know.
	My intuition is telling me no, but I don't have much information.
	And so I was sharing.gov information and almost every single comment that I made was flagged and deleted by the app.
	And so it's hard.
	It's so hard because you want to get so mad and so angry.
	And believe me, I have every right to be mad and angry and aggressive.
	But that's when the Holy Spirit kind of takes over and reminds me that if you go in it too hard, too fast, I have to remember that I have researched fact A to fact B to fact C all the way to fact Z. And if you go in with fact P or somewhere else, That might put someone in the defense, and it might put them in an unhealthy way of responding to the information that you're presenting to them.
	So it is hard.
	It's very hard, and you really have to have, it's a little bit of an art trying to prevent the information to them.
	Well, I like what you had to say about.gov.
	Because, you know, one of the reasons I look at it is like, you know, why do we have these arguments and fights?
	Well, many of us will look at this, and we've done research, and we'll talk to somebody, and they'll say, yeah, but this authority figure says this.
	And it's like, don't talk to me about authority figures.
	Do your own research.
	That's also a logical fallacy.
	Yeah, exactly.
	But it's like, you know, I just have this knee-jerk reaction.
	It's like, why are you listening to these authorities?
	They lie about everything.
	And as you're pointing out, you know, we're at point Z because we've been seeing the authorities lying to us about everything.
	But they haven't noticed that.
	And so we jump in.
	We get upset because they're so focused on authority figures.
	And I think your approach of saying, well, if we go with.gov information, we're fighting authority with authority.
	And I think that's a brilliant strategy.
	I think that's really great.
	And also, when we look at social media and the censorship that has been there, and I've experienced a great deal of it myself.
	When we look at that, we've got to get away from the social media walled garden that is there.
	And so people go to a particular website.
	They go to your website.
	They go to mine or whatever.
	They go to a book.
	You know, that's the way to get outside of the system.
	We're all becoming trapped into focusing so much.
	On social media, and it's only going to get a lot worse.
	It is.
	Facebook is out there talking about how they're going to create AI friends for you to talk to.
	It's like, what kind of a crazy world is this?
	I mean, this is like...
	It's going to be this massive web of deception and of control and of surveillance.
	And so we need to start going directly to websites.
	Yours is justtheinsearch.com.
	Going to a book.
	What is the name of your book, by the way?
	We didn't talk about that.
	It's called Well Considered, a Handbook for Making Informed Medical Decisions.
	I made it very small on purpose.
	I have all the information you need.
	Everything that I wish I would have known when I first started researching, and it's all sourced from.gov information.
	And one of the chapters that I have in here, I actually go into the potential financial conflicts of interest at the federal level and at the physician level.
	And I think that's important for...
	It's a sales funnel.
	And having a business background, it's important to understand what you are walking into.
	So when you are, if your provider is becoming emotional about your personal medical decision, you could understand that there's a bias there and there's a potential financial conflict of interest.
	messages from people that are so worried about upsetting their providers and they don't realize that it's not them.
	It's not you.
	It's them.
	It's not something that you need to take personally.
	If your provider is getting upset, they are now entering a medical coercion, medical bullying, and that's not your fault.
	That's their fault.
	And you need to safely remove yourself from that relationship and find a better, more qualified provider.
	I agree.
	And a big part of this is that, you know, we have these campaigns by the media, or even if we get information from a health service provider, is to avoid the fear.
	Fear is a thing that allows them to do whatever they wish to us.
	If we get afraid enough, And people will continue to take it no matter, even if you have bad, you know, adverse reactions to it, keep taking it because you're so afraid of the disease.
	That's the key thing.
	It's comparative safety, and it's one thing that I've noticed.
	Continually reading.gov information is almost all of these medical products are The safety and effectiveness of them are deemed in comparison to potential complications to a disease or an illness.
	And that's not right.
	We need to be assessing them based on their own safety, their own effectiveness, not comparing it to anything else.
	Because you can make anything seem safe if you compare it to something that is more dangerous.
	And I talk about in the book how dangerous that comparison is and how unscientific it is because of what we know from the government-funded study about adverse reactions, how only 1% We haven't discussed that many vaccine manufacturers talk about shedding and the potential for shedding and how vaccine strains of a disease are out there.
	Polio, flu, chickenpox, shingles, there are vaccine strains that the CDC is tracking.
	So when we talk about disease rates, Measles outbreaks, was it from the vaccine or was it from a wild strain?
	I think that's very important for consumers to be aware of as well.
	Oh, yeah.
	When we look at what is going on, for instance, in Gaza, they said, well, we tested the sewage and we found this polio out there.
	Well, it's polio from the vaccine.
	We've seen situations.
	I remember when they freaked out.
	Never heard of any serious reactions to anybody.
	Parents didn't, or they wouldn't have been having measles parties to make sure they get this over and done with.
	I had rubella as a baby.
	Yeah, there you go.
	And so, you know, we had all these childhood diseases, and it's easier to cope with them at childhood, and it was something that was, in fact, very rare.
	But, you know, I remember a New York case where they had four measles cases, and everybody We had been vaccinated at least twice, some of them more than that for that.
	So it very well could have been the vaccine itself that they were giving them.
	We never know about this type of thing.
	Talk to us a little bit about, as a parent, what you do for your children.
	Well, the first thing, if I'm worried about a disease because of the hype that is done either by public health campaigns or influencers or anything that are...
	Just on my personal Instagram, I saw three influencers start talking about the bird flu, and so if you are exposed to something like that as a parent, naturally you're going to worry about it.
	I think as a parent, that's normal, and that's valid, and that's okay.
	So for me, what I do is I research the disease.
	I understand what are the early symptoms of this disease.
	What is the transmission?
	How does it transmit?
	Is it from fecal matter?
	Is it from oral droplets?
	Is it from blood exposure to somebody I want to understand how this disease or virus or condition or something, how does it spread?
	And then I want to know, what are the potential complications of it?
	Once you understand the mechanism of action and how the disease presents in the body, then you can understand, okay, what are things that I can do to prevent this?
	If this disease is spread by somebody going to the bathroom, being exposed to fecal matter, not washing their hands like the polio virus, then I'm going to make sure every single time I'm on a public.
	Public restroom to wash my hands and not excessively touch everything in the bathroom.
	My children have been trained from the get-go not to touch any mucus membranes.
	They don't touch their mouth.
	They don't touch their nose.
	They don't touch their eyes.
	They don't touch their ears when they're in public.
	As soon as we get home, we wash our hands.
	20 seconds cover everything.
	They know that and that is a tool that can be used in disease prevention.
	I also make sure that their immune systems are constantly being supported.
	We ensure We prioritize quality food.
	We prioritize sleep in our household.
	Hundreds of thousands to millions of research and data on the quality of sleep that you have can determine your immune responses, your immune support system.
	If we know that we are potentially going to be around someone that was recently vaccinated, we make sure that we have some tinctures that we take to support our liver, to support our detox systems.
	So that if there is a shedding event or one of the things that I discuss are breakthrough infections, and this is heavily discussed by the CDC and FDA, especially for the COVID vaccines, they are tracking breakthrough infections.
	So when somebody is up to date on their COVID vaccine, according to the CDC, they can still have COVID and transmit it to other people, but they don't have symptoms.
	It's asymptomatic.
	So in my opinion, they're actually more dangerous because the symptoms aren't alerted them to stay home and they are exposing themselves to everybody else.
	And there's no symptoms that could potentially keep them from getting.
	spreading it to other people.
	So knowing all of this, I could be in And I will admit that there are times where I do fall into that camp of just being constantly afraid of everything coming after my child.
	But then that stress and fear itself will lower my immune response and also pass that stress on to my children.
	So instead, I have adopted the strategy of what can we do to support our bodies?
	So no matter what we're exposed to, either in the sky or pollution or toxins in our environment, We are prepared and we are supporting our body as much as possible.
	I agree.
	And it all goes back to, you know, do we have, do we agree with their diagnosis?
	You know, when you look at the bird flu stuff, oh, look at how many people have gotten it.
	They got pink eye.
	And so you talk about, you know, not touching your eyes when you're out in public and everything.
	What about when you're working with bovine fecal matter?
	Because, you know, that is what we're seeing over and over again.
	People got pink eye.
	Well, how often do they get pink eye normally if they're not washing their hands?
	I actually just did a bird flu post last night because I was just so heated by these influencers saying, make sure you get your H5N1 vaccine.
	And like, that's not even commercially available yet.
	We're trying to push this.
	The only vaccines available are stockpiled by the CDC, but in the CDC guidance that I pulled, it said that the people that had been exposed to bird flu and had contracted the disease, they had prolonged exposure to dead birds or bovine fecal matter without any PPE.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Who knows what they could have been sick with?
	And, you know, they get pink eye and they don't have any respiratory issues, no fever, any of that kind of stuff.
	It's like, don't call it Bird flu.
	Maybe call it bird's eye, you know, or something like that.
	But, yeah, there's a lot of heavy, heavy disinformation out there, and it's all about a campaign of fear.
	Leanna Wynn is out there pushing this bird flu vaccine, and it's got a very, very dangerous profile.
	So people need to be very, very concerned about it.
	I've got a couple of comments here.
	Dougalug says, after my heart surgery, I quit all the prescribed meds within four months.
	Doc says, I prescribed those for a reason.
	But he said no more.
	It's like, well, okay, we don't necessarily agree with your reason.
	And, of course, we're always looking to see what the issues are with it.
	Gard Goldsmith says I was going to ask if she took donations, so I look for a book, see about the training program.
	Those sound valuable, and if I can afford both, I'd love to study based on her program.
	And, again, you can find that at informedconsent.com.
	Or justtheinserts.com.
	I'm sorry, yeah, justinserts.com.
	And the training course is free.
	It's always going to be free on my website.
	No email required to access.
	Good, good.
	I was thinking about Gard again.
	He might be interested in talking to you as well on his program.
	He has Liberty Conspiracy.
	Jason Barker has another program.
	He says the bottom line is that since naturally occurring molecules can't be patented, they produce synthetic patentable drugs.
	They try to do the same thing that many natural things can treat.
	And Handy, who is an ER professional in Atlanta, says, even now I work with people who don't have a clue that VAERS even exists.
	They know playoff standings by heart, though.
	And that's a failure of education for our healthcare providers.
	Most of the time when the healthcare provider is researching a manufacturer insert is because they themselves are liable or they become parents.
	One of the top reasons that medical professionals have told me that they've read inserts, and that is a problem.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	That is amazing.
	Yeah, the stuff that's in there.
	It's in there for a reason.
	And if it looks scary, you should be afraid of that.
	They only want you afraid of the condition that you're looking at.
	And so that's an important thing.
	Just the inserts.
	And it is very important that when we have informed consent, it begins with information.
	You can find a lot of information at just the inserts.
	Thank you so much, Alexander, for joining us.
	Always great talking to you.
	Talking to people who have looked at what is happening with all of this stuff.
	And I think it is very important for us to understand not only for ourselves, but how can we have meaningful conversations with other people and to meet them where they are.
	And as I said, I think your idea of fighting this authority figures with authority figures of.gov, I think that is one of the best ideas.
	And, of course, people can find a lot of that information.
	Thank you for having me.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.

▲