Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 26, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:00:54

Mon Episode #2018: Selling Corpses, Inciting Violence, and Poisoning Children

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	As the clock strikes 13, it is Monday, the 26th of May, year of our Lord, 2025.
	And today, we're going to look at Harvard's body horror, the ongoing war in Gaza, and the war on the American working class.
	Stay with us.
	Well, good morning and thank you for being here with us today.
	Hope you all had a good weekend.
	Well, I'll start the show again with a little update.
	Our dad is doing better.
	He is recovering.
	But again, we ask that you continue to pray for him.
	pray for healing and he'd be restored quickly.
	He is still tired and So, again, thank you all for your prayers, and I just ask that you continue to pray for him.
	And I'll go into a bit more detail later on.
	But to start the show, as I said, we're going to talk about what's been going on at Harvard, because it was just exposed, or at least the article just came out.
	This is on the New American Harvard's Ghoul.
	Morgue chief pleads guilty to selling body parts.
	This is what is going on at one of the most prestigious colleges in the United States.
	Someone they put in charge is selling body parts out of the basement for all practical purposes.
	We hear what Planned Parenthood has been doing.
	Yeah.
	As if its reputation hasn't suffered enough, Harvard University found out yesterday, the same day that the Homeland Security Department revoked certification of its foreign students program, that a top official was purloining and selling human remains from its medical school morgue.
	Cedric Lodge, 57, who ran the morgue, pleaded guilty on Wednesday to the crime in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
	The body parts scheme was a nationwide conspiracy involving six people, including one who pleaded guilty last week.
	Among the gruesome sales from Harvard were hands, brains, and disembodied heads.
	That's right.
	If you donate your body to science, it may end up at Harvard, and they may just sell it.
	The real question is, in my opinion, who are they selling them to, and what are they selling them for?
	Do not use this brain, abnormal.
	Got a tweet here in the article from Mario Knopfel, at Mario Knopfel.
	Harvard Morgboss sold brains, skin, and faces.
	Cedric Lodge had one job, manage the morgue at Harvard Medical School and make sure donated bodies were used for science.
	Instead, he turned the place into Facebook Marketplace for body parts.
	Yes, he was just willy-nilly selling miscellaneous body parts, whatever he could get his hands on.
	Maybe even other hands.
	The description of the four-year-long cadaver caper sounds like a grist for a horror movie.
	Yes, coming soon to theaters near you, the Harvard Body Horror.
	The indictments and information allege that a nationwide network of individuals bought and sold human remains stolen from Harvard Medical School in an Arkansas mortuary.
	The Justice Department reported in June 2023.
	The charges allege that from 2018 through 2022, Cedric Lodge, who managed the morgue for the Anatomical Gifts Program at Harvard Medical School, located in Boston, Massachusetts, stole organs and other parts of cadavers donated for medical research and education before their scheduled cremations.
	Can they still call it a gift program when he was forcing people to pay for them?
	These are the questions.
	And other parts of cadavers donated for medical research.
	Lodge, at times, transported stolen remains from Boston to his residence in Goffstown, New Hampshire, where he and his wife, Denise Lodge, sold the remains to Katrina, McLean, Joshua Taylor, and others making arrangements via cellular, telephone, and social media websites.
	Yes, get the whole family involved in your...
	Get little Timmy in there.
	Teach him how to pull a kidney out.
	And that wasn't all the gang of ghouls did.
	They also sold stillborn babies.
	it just gets more and more horrifying.
	I'm laughing about it, but this is truly a horrifying story.
	The despicable nature and the depraved nature of these people, the fact that they were selling body parts is...
	I really feel like, you know, grave robbers was a thing of the past, but I guess not.
	Yeah.
	And they didn't even have to do the work of going digging them out of the cemetery.
	People were just donating their bodies in the hopes of advancing medical science.
	And who knows if they got used at all or were just taken and sold.
	And again.
	Who is buying these things?
	Is this just on someone's mantelpiece?
	You know, you die, you donate your head, and then all of a sudden it's on, you know, Frank's coffee table forever.
	Jeremy Pauley also purchased stolen human remains from Candace Chapman Scott, who stole remains from her employer, a Little Rock, Arkansas mortuary and crematorium.
	Scott stole parts of cadavers she was supposed to have cremated, many of which had been donated to and used for research and educational purposes by an area medical school, as well as the corpses of two stillborn babies who were supposed to be cremated and returned as remains to their families.
	That is...
	That is so utterly despicable and horrendous.
	What a ghoul.
	Pauly sold many of the stolen remains he purchased to other individuals, including Matthew Lampe.
	Lampe and Pauly bought and sold each other over an extended period of time in exchange over $100,000 in online payments.
	Pauly pled guilty to conspiracy and interstate transportation of stolen property in September 2023.
	Last week, Taylor pleaded guilty to interstate transport of stolen human remains.
	This week, it was Lodge's turn.
	The 57-year-old manager of Harvard's morgue also pled guilty to interstate transport of stolen human remains.
	He removed human remains, including organs, brains, skin, hands, faces, dissected heads, and other parts from donated cadavers after they had been used for research and teaching purposes, but before they could be disposed of, according to the anatomical gift donation agreement between the donor and the school.
	And this really just...
	It doesn't matter where they work.
	It doesn't matter how fancy the building they occupy is.
	The human nature does not change.
	No one is immune from greed.
	This is simply an example of that.
	This is an example of the type of people that are in these schools.
	This, as I said, is Harvard, possibly the most prestigious school in our entire country.
	By some people's standards.
	And this guy was selling body parts out of their basement.
	He was taking them home and selling them simply to make extra cash.
	The real Octo spook.
	I was wondering what were in McChicken Nuggets.
	Yes, we have no proof that you are not eating cadaver.
	I haven't looked into it.
	I'm not alleging anything.
	I'm not stating anything.
	I'm just saying.
	I've never done any studies on what goes into a chicken nugget.
	So, they've got this guy that was buying them and spending over $100,000 on it.
	What was he using these body parts for?
	Does it say anywhere in the article?
	We're going to have to keep reading to find out.
	I read it last night, but I didn't see it.
	So unless they've updated it, I don't believe they have it in here.
	And of course, the New American is referencing their student protesting Israel.
	Last week, City Journal's Christopher Rufo revealed internal documents that contain mandates to discriminate against white men.
	The discrimination violates black-letter civil rights laws.
	Rufo and other writers were also behind revelations that multiple staff members, including former President Claudine Gay, are plagiarists.
	Gay was forced to resign the presidency, but is still employed, as are others.
	She plagiarized material for her doctoral thesis.
	We've all seen that.
	Harvard's presidential search committee didn't review Gay's scholarship and hired the DEI candidate after the shortest search in university history.
	Imagine the kind of boxes she checked.
	Woman named Gay?
	I wonder if she really was gay, because if so, you know, a little on the nose.
	Most recently, a top doctor in Harvard's public health school told Rufo, Yes.
	Harvard is nothing but a cesspool of anti-American ideology and far-left radical Marxist theory.
	But that is not just Harvard.
	that is almost every university.
	They just have a fancier name and get to...
	But that is that article.
	This is also from the New Americans by Selwyn Duke.
	Study.
	In Germany, foreign-born Muslim women are more violent than German men.
	I found this very interesting.
	We've been told by our betters in a variety of ways that the actually long-extinct thing called the Western Patriarchy imperils women.
	Why the miniseries Adolescence instructs that you really must fear Karen.
	Why you really must fear Karen are the cute little 13-year-old English boys, but new data out of Germany relating to a recent year crime spike tell a different tale.
	Yes, the Adolescence show on Netflix is based off of, or based on the story, but heavily modified from that story.
	And in the show, it is a white boy that they have doing the stabbing.
	And of course, they are talking about showing that as mandatory in schools and stuff.
	Truly.
	Truth is more racist than fiction, I suppose.
	It was the British Prime Minister that suggested perhaps this should be mandatory viewing in all British schools.
	Yes, because as everyone knows, it is young, white British men that are so incredibly dangerous and doing all the stabbings.
	In fact, a report finds it's not just that crime increase isn't the fault of native German men, nor is it just that the country's recent male imports are inordinately violent, though they are.
	It's that even foreign-born Muslim women and some other female groups are more violent than indigenous German men.
	Remake says the story writing Thursday.
	The data shows that for 100,000 German men, 272 were suspected of a violent offense.
	For Syrian women, this figure for 100,000 was 336.
	Syrian women were more violent than German men.
	Now, I'm going to play devil's advocate and say maybe it's just that German men are sneakier.
	They're better at planning things out and not getting caught.
	You know, perhaps it's just this analytical German nature that allows them to get away with the crimes.
	They sit there and they think and they plot and they go, hmm, yes, perhaps I will not hit her in the face.
	That will leave a bruise.
	Hmm, yes.
	No, I'm kidding.
	Afghan women are also more violent with a rate of 359, even more violent than Syrian women.
	Iraqi women have an incredible rate of 394, which is considerably more than German men.
	Even Serbian women are more violent than German men with a rate of 371.
	Bulgarian women, 359.
	For German women, only 60 are suspected of a violent crime per 100,000.
	All this data makes the left's generalized argument about the violent male questionable at best.
	Yes, it has more to do with culture.
	The story is interesting and can be contentious because it involves two controversial aspects, the religious and the sex-oriented.
	First, the latter.
	Now, the sexes certainly are different, sorry, trans activists, and men are more aggressive by nature.
	Just yesterday, in fact, I cited statistics on how men are more likely to commit violent crime.
	Regardless, the notion that girls are sugar and spice and everything nice is, well, more selling point than seriousness.
	Consider, for example, how studies have shown that women are more likely than men to commit domestic violence.
	Other research in 2018 found that boys were more often victims of dating violence than girls were.
	Of course, this is counterintuitive for many.
	Alluding to this and highlighting our age's anti-male spirit, pundit Olivia Murray wrote yesterday while introducing the Germany crime story, a little while back, the progressive man-hating feminist movement produced what they surely thought was a gotcha condemnation for men.
	It was a social media trend where women would announce whether they'd rather be alone in the woods with a man or a bear, with a vast majority of women settling on the bear, highlighting the fear of male violence.
	This was a big thing running around last year.
	Women continually posting, oh, I'd much rather choose the bear.
	And perhaps this is just the pedantic nature of myself, but having seen What bears have done to people and how large a grizzly bear is.
	And having heard the audio of that man who was eaten alive by grizzly bears, it is truly just nonsensical.
	If you're trying to make a decent argument, oh, I'd rather pick the bear.
	Yes, that is such a hyperbolic and over-the-top statement, it immediately disengages everyone with a more rational brain from the conversation.
	Oh, you choose the bear.
	Okay.
	Put your money where your mouth is.
	It's probably more of a sign of how propagandized people have become, especially women in the West.
	Yes.
	Oh, I would much rather choose the bear.
	You don't know what a man is going to do.
	Yes, well, I can assure you what the bear is going to do.
	I can 100% tell you what the bear is going to do.
	Having fun with this, the top commenter under Murray's article added, in a similar survey, 100% of bears said they would rather be in the woods with a man with a rifle than an unarmed liberal woman.
	Yes, probably nag the bear to death.
	Yes, and this is why so many patriots believe in the constitutional right to arm bears.
	Joking aside, the stats on dating and domestic violence make sense.
	Normal boys and men feel an instinctive urge to protect women.
	Men generally don't like seeing females get hurt or cry.
	And I wrote normal because it's men with personality disorders, e.g.
	narcissists and psychopaths, and substance abuse problems who are disproportionately responsible for male-perpetrated domestic abuse.
	Women, however, don't have that protective instinct relative to men.
	Yes.
	As a general rule, I've never met a man, at least not knowingly, that was just walking around being like, yes, I love hitting women.
	Oh man.
	I would not maintain relationships with him.
	It's not this gigantic problem that it's made out to be.
	Any time a woman is abused, it is a tragedy.
	However, it is not this continual thing you have to worry about from every start.
	you should not hit women.
	Yet there's no...
	Yes, we've seen Sadly,
	I've seen too many videos online of women just feeling as though they are entitled to hit men, where they'll just haul off and slap or attack men for very slight provocation.
	Things that your average man would laugh off or just ignore.
	So why does male domestic violence nevertheless stand out?
	First, men are less likely to report such abuse.
	Second, since men are generally larger and stronger, they often do more damage when they get violent.
	And third, societally, we do place more emphasis on protecting women.
	Well, I think that is only natural since women need more protection.
	Men are more dangerous just by nature, by the physical advantages they have.
	This said, while the stats on foreign-born Muslim women in Germany are striking, foreign-born Muslim men strike even more.
	Murray related the relevant data, writing, the number of Syrian men suspected of violent crime, 2,608 or 859% more.
	Afghan men came in at 2,409 or 786% more.
	While Iraqi men were 2,479 or 811% more.
	However, the crown goes to Moroccan men who have a rate of 3,388 suspects in the category of violent crime per 100,000.
	That means they're 1,146% more likely than native German men to be accused of a violent crime.
	While biological sex certainly plays a role in a person's tendency to resort to criminal violence, there seems to be more here, like ideology.
	Yes, the Muslim culture, the religion of Islam, is inherently violent.
	has violence baked into it at its core.
	That means you are always going to deal with these kinds of things until that...
	It does not matter where you send them.
	They do not automatically adopt the culture and the ways of the host country.
	And in fact, if you import enough of them, it simply stops being the host country.
	If you were to transport all of the people in China to Japan and all the people in Japan to China, the country's geographical locations would remain the same, but they would be the opposite countries.
	That is simply how it works.
	Countries are made up of people and peoples.
	Apropos to this is a comprehensive German study of 45,000 youth that was reported in 2010.
	It found that with increasing religiosity, Christian youths became less violent.
	Increasing religiosity among Muslim youths, however, actually made them more violent.
	That is because Islam, as I said, is an inherently violent religion.
	It was a religion concocted by a warlord who helped justify his conquests and incite his followers.
	There is likely another factor, too, though, as mentioned, Moroccans lead in violence, and this brings something to mind.
	Spending some time in Morocco years ago, I got to know the Spanish consul to northern Morocco who told me a story.
	Not long after he arrived in the country, he witnessed a Moroccan committing a petty crime, so he reported to a policeman.
	the cop shooter to give the man a fairly severe beating right then and there on the sidewalk.
	The consul was shocked, but the point is that in such nations, people are...
	So what happens when you put them in a Western land lacking such strict external control?
	What happens is what has happened.
	Yes.
	We have these wonderful ideals of liberty and personal responsibility and autonomy here in the West.
	Of course, the government is trying to crush those and remove them.
	But when you import people that do not adhere to those standards, And this is another motivation for the Cloward and Piven strategy.
	It's these major, the government that wants authoritative control is going to import these cultures where they have authoritarianism so that it will cause people to call out for more strict government policing.
	I mean, we don't want police beating random people in the streets here, but that is the method of policing that they've managed to work there.
	So if they bring in enough people from that culture, then that's going to be the thing that people here are calling for.
	Yes.
	The response, you know.
	Problem, reaction, solution.
	Thesis, antithesis, synthesis.
	Eventually, people will cry out for it because they will not be able to handle the level of violence that the foreigners are capable of.
	Now, we'll move on from that article, but this is on Information Liberations by Chris Minahan.
	ADL responds to DC shooting with call to deplatform Twitch streamer Hassan Piker.
	Now, I don't know if many of you know who Hassan Piker is.
	In fact, I hope you don't, because he is one of the most obnoxious morons on the internet today.
	But he is actually Cenk Uygur's nephew of Young Turks fame.
	He is the definition of a Nepo baby, someone who is only successful because he was forced into the spotlight and held there by his uncle.
	And made sure that he would succeed.
	But he is one of the largest, if not the largest, political streamer on Twitch.
	Now, he has said some truly heinous things over the years, such as America deserved 9-11.
	He made fun of Dan Crenshaw's lost eye, saying that he lost it because a brave Mujahideen fighter did, let's say, fornicated with his eye socket.
	So, Hasan Piker is a truly despicable and horrible, But there is also the fact that the ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt on Thursday responded to the shootings of two Israeli embassy aides in Washington, D.C. by calling for pro-Palestine Twitch streamer Hassan Piker to be deplatformed and criticism of Israel censored.
	We should not censor even Hassan Piker for criticizing Israel.
	Now, if he has violated Twitch's terms of service, which I believe he has on multiple occasions, they should enforce their terms and ban him.
	But that is because we should not have multiple tiers of enforcement depending on who you are.
	Because I have heard him call for violence and then walk it back as, oh, it was just a joke.
	But in the moment, he was just screaming about making the streets run red with the blood of landlords and stuff.
	So he is obviously a very...
	He is an unbalanced, very angry individual who simply...
	But I do believe this guy just personally hates Jews.
	He does not like Jews.
	It's a matter of equal protection under the law.
	He's been, you know, literally calling for specific acts of violence in the past, you're saying.
	Everyone was fine with that because he was on the left, but now that he's criticizing Israel, then the powerful Israel lobbies are trying to censor him.
	And sure, it's one thing to have a fully free speech platform, but Twitch is not that even remotely.
	We're not on Twitch.
	I don't believe we've ever even tried because it's so censored.
	So he's been getting away with it until he goes after the wrong people.
	Yes, exactly.
	We do not want a We don't want free speech for thee, but not for me.
	We want it for everyone.
	This is not a matter of, oh, well, I don't like Hassan Piker, and therefore, if I can get him deplatformed because he said something, I'll do it.
	You have to adhere to your principles at all times.
	What you allow for the enemy will eventually be allowed to be done to you.
	That is how these things work.
	Yes, Hassan Piker is a truly despicable and unlikable individual.
	He is just...
	He has lived here for I don't know how long, but a large portion of his life.
	And he has gotten very, very wealthy.
	He is a multi-millionaire.
	I don't know much about Hasan Piker, but from what I've heard, he didn't get wealthy, he was born wealthy.
	He's one of these champagne socialists that is all about, oh, eat the rich, while he himself is a Nepo inheritance, your trust fund kid.
	Yes, he is from an already wealthy family in Turkey.
	However, he has made millions upon millions of dollars by marketing socialism.
	And Marxist theory to impressionable children on Twitch.
	Twitch is a truly despicable website.
	They promote people like Hasan Piker to the front.
	He is routinely celebrated by Twitch staff.
	And Twitch also promotes what is tantamount to pornography to underage kids.
	They allow women to go on there and stream themselves being barely clothed while doing things.
	You are just promoting pornography to children.
	That is a large portion of what Twitch does, and they have refused to do anything about it.
	MarkyMarkNJ, the native population could handle the immigrant violence.
	They're not allowed to.
	If a native defends themselves, they're prosecuted for it.
	Yes.
	The government will protect those people that come here.
	They will allow them to engage in any kind of violent behavior they wish, but if you try to defend yourself, they will punish you to the fullest extent of the law.
	They will make sure that you are unable to defend yourself.
	They will make it a crime.
	Israel is in apartheid.
	You can see the tweet.
	His handle is at Hassan the Hun.
	Israel is in apartheid state doing a live streamed genocide.
	I think it's wrong and dangerous to conflate these heinous actions with Jews.
	The Apartheid Defense League doesn't because they think they can improve Israel's standing by silencing critics.
	It won't change the truth.
	And I will be honest and say that I actually agree with this tweet from Hassan.
	I actually agree.
	This might be the only thing I've ever agreed with Hassan on.
	But I do agree that what Israel is doing in Gaza is tantamount to a genocide.
	They are trying to remove everyone who lives in Gaza and kill anyone who will not leave.
	And of course, with all the stuff he said in the past that they just looked the other way about, this is the one thing that they're coming after him about.
	The one time he's actually telling the truth.
	Yes.
	This is what got him in trouble.
	That is...
	We all know that you're not really allowed to criticize Israel here in the United States, for whatever reason.
	But, uh, we're going to continue.
	WatchADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt says, the kind of genius behind the pager attack on Lebanon is now needed to fight anti-Semitism.
	He said this in a speech to the Israeli Neset just days ago.
	Is this a terroristic threat?
	And again, they are talking about anti-Semitism, quote-unquote, here in the United States.
	They want to not just punish you.
	They want to kill anyone that disagrees with their policies of expansion into Gaza.
	That is the sentiment we have seen here in this.
	A quick refresher in case anyone's forgotten.
	The pager attack is when Israel had the sabotaged pagers that were allegedly handed out to Hamas agents, but there's no way of knowing where they were when they detonated thousands of them all at the same time.
	but Israel hasn't been too concerned about collateral damage in the past few years.
	So now he's calling for that kind of thing against American citizens for free speech.
	Yes, he wants to potentially ship you a pager.
	So if you get any new technology free from Tel Aviv, be very concerned and potentially throw it away.
	But again, this just highlights the fact that we need to stand for free speech for everyone.
	While I can despise Hassan as a person and disagree with very many things he says, I think he should be free to criticize Israel, so long as he is not actively calling for violence.
	Now, this is on World Net Daily, and it's by Joe Kovacs.
	American arrested for allegedly planning devastating attack on U.S. Embassy in Israel, threatening to kill Donald Trump.
	U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi says an American man is facing serious charges for allegedly planning a devastating attack targeting our embassy in Israel, threatening death to Americans and President Trump's life.
	Neumeier, 28, a dual American and German citizen was arrested Sunday at John F. Kennedy Airport in New York for his alleged plot last week.
	Man, he's really going to skew those next statistics on German male violence.
	Also, the Germans are beginning to hate the Jews again, guys.
	It's scary times.
	Things are looking strange.
	The department will not tolerate such violence and will prosecute this defendant to the fullest extent of the law, Bondi said.
	This defendant is charged with planning a devastating attack targeting our embassy in Israel, threatening death to Americans and President Trump's life.
	The department will not tolerate such violence and will prosecute this defendant.
	prosecute this defendant to the fullest extent of the law.
	This is what is happening by our continued involvement in the Middle East, by our funding of Israel, by our tacit acceptance of their genocide in Gaza.
	We are seeing people become more and more violent towards the United States as they grow tired of our bullying foreign policy and our funding of these regimes around the world.
	They are sick of it.
	This is not to say that he is justified in his attacks, in his hatred, in his move towards violence.
	But it is to say that this is the sort of thing...
	We can expect, if we continue down this road, as the world becomes more violent, we can expect more of that violence directed towards us as people see us as an aggressor, as an agent of chaos and evil across the globe.
	That is how people see the United States at this point.
	They do not see us as some friendly, benevolent giant that wants to help them.
	They see us as a scary, terrifying giant that wants to grind.
	Our bones to make our bread.
	Neumeier went to Israel in April, and on May 19th, he arrived outside of the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv carrying a dark-colored backpack without provocation.
	Neumeier spat on an embassy guard as he walked past.
	Neumeier managed to break free as the guard attempted to detain him, leaving behind his backpack.
	Search of Neumeier's backpacks revealed three rudimentary improvised incendiary devices, commonly known as Molotov cocktails.
	Law enforcement tracked Neumeier to his hotel, where he was arrested.
	Also, you'd think if this guy was serious.
	I'm not trying to give advice here to anyone.
	I'm not trying to help you plan something.
	But you're that close.
	You've got the Molotov cocktails in your bag, and you are so stupid and hateful that you can't not spit on a guard who's obviously going to then do something to you.
	They're obviously going to stop you at that point.
	just utterly unhinged behavior.
	This is unhinged, but in a just utterly stupid, stupid way.
	Got a comment from Wally Walrus.
	Bombing kids is not self-defense.
	No, it is not.
	Israel has shown over and over again that they are more than willing to kill women and children.
	And men also, who have nothing to do with what Hamas is doing.
	And they do not care how much collateral damage they inflict.
	They do not care if it is a hospital full of children.
	They will flatten it into rubble.
	Tony Garrett responding to Wally Walrus, but they'll grow up to be terrorists.
	Gee, wonder what could motivate them.
	Seeing your little sister getting blown apart, maybe?
	Yeah.
	It's hard to imagine that wouldn't radicalize you.
	That wouldn't make you, you know, fight back in any way possible.
	Not that, again, not that raping women or killing civilians is justified from Hamas either.
	I believe they call it blowback, where it's the inevitable consequences of these types of policies.
	It doesn't make it right, it just makes it inevitable.
	Yeah.
	And again, no side is justified in their actions taken against.
	The civilian population, neither side, should be committing these atrocities.
	It does not justify it.
	You do not get a pass for committing your own atrocity because you've had one committed against you.
	That's not how it works.
	It is still evil.
	So in Goy, the police were happy to billy club the pro-Palestine protesters and held back during the BLM riots.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	There are certain things you can protest and certain things you can't.
	It's important to remember that, because you don't want to end up on the wrong side of the ADL.
	And we're back to the whole unequal protection under the law.
	This is why free speech is critically important, because it will only ever be...
	It's always going to be whatever the side in power wants spread.
	Yes.
	Just so long as you're towing the party line, you can just about say anything.
	But we've seen over this last year the ADL specifically calling for very strict laws when it comes to anti-Semitism, and they are working very, very hard to crush free speech here in the United States.
	Anything that could be interpreted as anti-Semitic or anti-Zionist, anti- The state of Israel and the way they are behaving in Gaza, the way they are committing atrocities, would be considered hate speech or anti-Semitic, and it would lead to prosecution.
	So, we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
	It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes.
	The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
	Yay!
	Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
	Tomorrow it will be something else.
	Song Song Song Song Song Song Song Song Song Song Song Liberty.
	It's your movie.
	You're listening to the
	David Knight Show.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, welcome back and thank you for joining us.
	Got some comments here.
	Colemos360, DEI Brain Market, great idea for Halloween.
	Yeah, you could have several brains lined up in front of you on a table that you just carry around with you.
	Tony Garrett, terrorism will not stop genocide and genocide will not end terrorism.
	Yes, that is true.
	violence generally does beget violence.
	The French Revolution created nothing but a horror.
	It led to, well, the reign of terror.
	And this story, more on violence, beginning violence, is from Breitbart.
	Left-wing TikTok star applauds deadly D.C. shooting.
	He's a resistance fighter.
	Of course, if you weren't aware, in D.C., two Israelis or...
	And again, terrorism is not justified.
	It does not justify you going and shooting these two individuals.
	A wife and husband.
	A popular left-wing Gen Z TikTok creator with millions of followers praised the deadly shooting of two Israeli diplomats in the U.S. Capitol, calling the gunman a resistance fighter.
	And this is the kind of content we are seeing more and more from left-wing creators on these platforms.
	They are routinely championing violence.
	They are more and more okay with it to get what they want.
	They're shifted fully into an ends justifies the means type of mentality.
	And it's a self-perpetuating thing.
	It's this kind of terrorist attacks is their justification for the genocide.
	And obviously the genocide is what's provoking these terrorist attacks.
	Yes, and we are now seeing that violence move here into the United States.
	On Thursday, social media personality Guy Christensen, known online as Your Favorite Guy, posted a video voicing support for Elias Rodriguez, the man accused of killing two Israeli embassy employees during a private event in Washington, D.C. last week.
	I do not condemn the elimination of Zionist officials, Christensen said in the now-deleted clip, later urging viewers to support Elias' actions in claiming Israel's diplomats are part of a genocide machine.
	And again, we are not fans of the Israeli state here on the show.
	We have routinely condemned what they are doing in Gaza, the horrors they have committed.
	we do believe that it is a genocide that they are committing there that they are trying to purge everyone off the land whether that means removing them and sending them somewhere else or just killing them He also insisted the U.S.-designated Islamic terror group Hamas is not a terrorist organization, stating they are resistance fighters.
	You can both be resisting an oppressive government and commit acts of terrorism.
	It is not.
	It is not a binary in that sense.
	Condemning the elimination of the two embassy workers out of fear that the government will crack down on the resistance movement is like condemning Luke Skywalker for blowing up the Death Star because the Empire might crack down on the rebellion, he claimed.
	We must instead meet this crackdown with escalation.
	And I think this also, again, shows the poverty of...
	He has nothing to relate this to but Star Wars.
	Guys, it's like Star Wars.
	He's like Luke Skywalker.
	Him gunning down these two people in cold blood is like Luke Skywalker, guys.
	Christensen had earlier released a video condemning the killings only to later reverse course.
	That second video, filmed in front of a Palestinian flag and featuring anti-Israel apparel, was later removed from TikTok and Instagram.
	Christensen claimed TikTok banned it.
	And also, it's important to point out, I don't believe...
	I think this is more about farming interactions and sucking up to the popular ideology of the day.
	They know that the leftists on the ground are very anti-Israel because of the Marxist dialectic that has happened where the oppressor is always justified in their actions and Israel is the more powerful of these two contenders in this contest.
	And as such, None of their actions are justified, and all the actions of Hamas are justified, and as such, the left must fall in behind them.
	The Shinsky and Sarah Milgram were attending an event hosted by the American Jewish Committee.
	Christensen was among a slew of left-wing activists and influencers who either praised the embassy shooting or refused to condemn it, part of a disturbing online trend of aligning with violent anti-Israel actions under the banner of resistance, even as anti-Semitic incidents surge globally.
	Unity of Fields, a far-left anti-imperialist collective that rebranded in 2024 to spread militant propaganda against the U.S. has openly endorsed violence against Israeli targets and glorified the shooting, calling it an act of solidarity and love for the Palestinian people.
	The group also circulated a zine based on the alleged shooter's manifesto title Escalate for Gaza, Bring the War Home, featuring prominent gun imagery.
	That's right.
	Our involvement in the Middle East is starting to affect us here.
	On our home turf in the United States, these people are going to escalate.
	This is not an issue that is going to go away.
	You cannot solve this problem with a more totalitarian state here in the United States either.
	You cannot solve it by censoring and cracking down on what people are allowed to say.
	Again, this is the product of the Marxist ideology that has been inculcated in Yeah, I've heard that said before.
	I haven't looked up the source of it, but the two that were shot were Christians who were just connected to the Jewish government.
	Presumably, these aren't people that are pushing the genocide.
	It's just two people that happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
	Yes.
	Yes, as we were just stating.
	He also had long praised President Donald Trump's leadership both abroad and at home as a blueprint for peace and strength, highlighted his refusal to start new wars, and credited him with preserving peace and making the international system more secure by confronting such threats as Iran, China, and ISIS.
	In a 2020 op-ed, he offered a detailed defense of President Trump's foreign policy legacy, crediting it with reshaping a global order that had grown dangerously complacent in the face of authoritarian threats.
	Well, I don't think.
	You can claim Donald Trump is a threat to authoritarianism when he routinely, routinely acts like an authoritarian here in the United States.
	But as I said, this is the fruit of the left-wing ideology.
	We are seeing it come home to roost now.
	Personally, I find it slightly ironic that many of the Marxists who first engendered this ideology or started pushing it in the schools Here in the United States were actually of Jewish descent.
	They created, or, well not created it, but they pushed this ideology.
	They wormed into the school system, into higher education and academia, and now the product of that is this rabid, rabid anti-Israeli sentiment we are seeing across most of the colleges in the United States.
	This is on the Free Thought Project, U.S. reinstates funding to CIA propaganda outlet National Endowment for Democracy.
	And this article is about how the CIA, through the NED, has, over the years, used it to basically foment color revolutions, used it to propagandize foreign countries, and to...
	He'd kill us, like Star Wars.
	This is why we have people running around thinking they're superheroes now, grown adults.
	Yes, the Western canon has been completely and utterly removed.
	People can only relate to things based on the latest Marvel film.
	or TV shows like Black Mirror, I have never watched...
	I refuse to.
	The brief freeze and rapid partial reinstatement of National Endowment for Democracy funding in early 2025 helped expose it as a U.S. regime change tool created to rebrand CIA covert operations as democracy promotion.
	The NED channels government funds to opposition groups in Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba meddling in their internal affairs.
	Yes, there was a story probably about a decade ago now that came out exposing how the U.S. had infiltrated the Cuban music scene, I think specifically rap, and started using it to promote anti-Cuban establishment sentiment, which is just...
	That is the sort of thing the CIA gets up to in its free time.
	Thank you so much for the support.
	That is incredibly generous.
	Thank you very, very much.
	What keeps me up at night is that the team party politics mentally is practically unbreakable.
	That's why the uni party continues the same agenda served with different toppings.
	Yes, people are inherently tribal.
	They want to rally behind their own preferred person.
	And it is very, very difficult to get them to see that their preferred person doesn't have their best interests at heart.
	In 2018, Kenneth Wallach bragged to the U.S. Congress that the NED had given political training to 8,000 young Nicaraguans, many of whom were engaged in a failed attempt to overthrow the Nicaragua's Sandinista government.
	Wallach was praising the democracy promotion work carried out by NED, of which he is now vice chair.
	Carl Gershman, then president of the NED, And giving evidence was asked about Nicaragua's Daniel Ortega, who had been re-elected with an increased majority two years prior.
	He responded, time for him to go.
	And again, this goes to show the overbearing nature of America and other people's politics.
	If we do not like you, we are more than willing to use large sums of money to To try to get you out.
	Whether the people of your own country like you or not, we will propagandize them for our own personal.
	And seven years later, Trump took office and it looked as if the NED's future was endangered.
	On February 12th, the Department of Government Efficiency, DOG, under Elon Musk, froze disbursement of its congressionally approved funds.
	This activity stopped and its website went blank.
	On February 24th, Richard Grinnell, special envoy to Venezuela, declared that Donald Trump is someone who does not want to make regime changes.
	Washington's global regime change operations were immediately impacted and over 2,000 paid U.S. collaborating organizations temporarily defunded.
	Over 2,000 different organizations we are funding to propagandize people in different countries for our benefit.
	Well, for the American government's benefit.
	this benefits none of the American people, and in fact, generally leads to us being despised across the globe.
	But I'm sure...
	They would never affect the people that would have the most power to affect them.
	That's absurd.
	Oh no, the United States government would never propagandize the American people.
	The CIA would never use nefarious means to get the American people to do...
	We have stories of them influencing the rap music scene in other countries to promote disunity and tear down the established governments.
	But it's a great thing that rap here is all just so patriotic and all about wholesome family life.
	Yes.
	Rap is known for being wholesome and promoting healthy a healthy marriage and That's what rap is known for.
	Washington's global regime change operations were immediately impacted.
	Over 2,000 U.S. collaborating organizations temporarily defunded.
	A Biden-appointed judge warned of potentially catastrophic harm to, not in her words, U.S. efforts to overturn foreign governments.
	The howl from the corporate press was deafening.
	The AP cried, beacon of freedom dims as U.S. initiatives that promote democracy abroad wither.
	We can continually see.
	That the CIA is still in bed with the mainstream media.
	The second this arm of the CIA is potentially impacted, they begin to scream about the death of democracy globally.
	And, of course, the United States is not a democracy.
	It is a democratic republic.
	And I also am of the opinion that if someone, if a country wants democracy, they should get it for themselves.
	If a country wants freedom, it is not our duty to provide it for them.
	The people of that country are the ones who should go through and handle the consequences of those actions.
	If they want it, they have to get it themselves.
	It is not our job to spend our money, our tax dollars, on promoting an ideology in their country.
	This is not about promoting democracy.
	It is about destabilizing their countries and making them easier for the United States government to bully.
	The NED, which deeply appreciated the State Department's Volte Face, then made public its current program, which in Latin America and the Caribbean alone includes over 260 projects costing more than $40 million.
	This also is continually something the leftists point to.
	Whenever you point out that, well, communism has failed in every place it has been tried, they will continually point to the fact that the United States government has been involved with undermining and bullying these countries that had communism.
	Like, well, if it hadn't been for the United States involvement, they would have succeeded.
	It gives them an out in many of these cases.
	They get to point to things like this and say, well, if the United States hadn't meddled, surely this time communism would have worked.
	In many of the cases.
	Yes, not always, but in many of the cases in South America and Central America, the United States has been involved in one way or another.
	You can't put the gulags on America's shoulders.
	Created in 1983 under President Ronald Reagan following scandals involving the CIA's covert funding of foreign interventions, the NED was to shift such operations into a more publicly palatable form under the guise of democracy promotion.
	As Alan Weinstein, NED's first acting president, infamously admitted in 1991, a lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.
	In short, NED functions as a soft power arm of U.S. foreign policy.
	Bullying these countries, all being seen to ostensibly promote good things, it gives the United States a way of plausible deniability.
	No, we're just trying to help.
	We're not sending bombs or guns.
	We're just destabilizing your country in a totally different way.
	The NED disingenuously operates as a 501c3 private nonprofit foundation.
	However, it is nearly 100% funded by annual appropriations from the U.S. Congress and governed mainly by Washington officials or ex-officials.
	In reality, it is an instrument of the U.S. state and arguably of the so-called deep state, but its quasi-private status shields it from many of the disclosure requirements that typically apply to taxpayer-funded agencies.
	That's right, they're going to do what they want through this, and you're not even entitled to know what's going on because...
	This isn't a government agency.
	This is just a group of democratic-minded individuals who just want to see the best for the rest of the world.
	You kind of love the line, it's arguably a part of the deep state, you know, seeing as how it's made up of non-elected permanent bureaucrats who get secret funding and don't have any oversight.
	Yeah, that's maybe what we're talking about when we say the deep state.
	Yes, you know, can't be certain, can't be certain here, can't call it too strongly.
	Hence we encounter verbal gymnastics such as those in its duty of care and public disclosure policies.
	The document loftily proclaims NED holds itself to high standards of transparency and accountability.
	Under a discussion of its legacy, with no mention of its CIA pedigree, the NGO boasts transparency has always been central to NED's identity.
	Yes, I'm sure it has.
	I'm sure if you were to go and ask them for an accounting of what they have been involved with, they would be more than willing to just open the books and show you exactly what has been going on and what they've funded.
	But it continues, That's right.
	For the government, they'll bend over backwards.
	They'll do anything they say to keep that funding coming.
	But for you and me, who are actually paying their bills, absolutely nothing.
	You will know nothing of what the government gets up to, and you will like it that way.
	They are going to continue to destabilize these other countries.
	They will continue.
	To run these operations.
	And we will just have to grin and bear it.
	But speaking of foreign destabilized countries, this article is on Breitbart.
	South Africa's Malema repeats, kill the farmer as Rama Fosa stays quiet.
	Yes, I imagine he's forced to stay a little bit quiet after he was just confronted by Donald Trump in the Oval Office with his, with the actual video of what is happening.
	And we actually have that clip.
	So let's, I'm going to play that clip for you right now.
	Turn the lights down.
	And just put this on.
	It's right behind you.
	Johan.
	There's nothing this parliament can do.
	With or without you, people are going to occupy land.
	We require no permission from you, from the president, from no one.
	We don't care if you can do whatever you want to do.
	Who are you to tell us whether you can occupy land or not?
	Who are going to occupy land?
	South Africa, occupy land.
	That's my job!
	You must never be scared to kill a revolution.
	Demand that at some point there must be killing because the killing is part of a revolution attack.
	To kill Gaza, kill the poor, the farmer.
	The man of T.J. is P.E. is a white man.
	Well, there you can see Donald Trump confronting him with the video of his party talking about how killing is part of the revolution.
	How we must kill the white man.
	That is what the ideology of these people is.
	South African opposition figure Julius Malema let his economic freedom fighters EFF party on Sunday in chants of kill the boar, shoot to kill, and kill the farmer, while President Cyril Ramaphosa stayed quiet.
	Malema posted footage of his own chant on X, including the incendiary words of the chant in his post.
	Got the video here on Twitter.
	The chant, which South African courts have refused to ban despite its potential for violent incitement Go ahead and roll it.
	And she can see him there doing his chant, ginning up hate and violence.
	The chant which South African courts have refused to ban despite its potential for violent incitement and its apparent violation of the South African Constitution's ban on hate speech came up last week in Ramaphosa's meeting in the Oval Office with U.S. President Donald Trump.
	Trump made Ramaphosa sit through a video including footage of Malema leading the chant after the South African leader pushed back on Trump's claims of genocide in his country.
	When pressed by the reporter about whether he has denounced that type of language, Ramaphosa claimed, Oh yes, we've always done so.
	As a government, as my own party, we are completely opposed to that.
	He referred to his party's 1955 manifesto, The Freedom Charter.
	However, local reporters who questioned Ramaphosa on his turn to South Africa noted that he had never actually condemned to kill the board chant.
	Ramaphosa again refused to do so on Saturday.
	That's because he knows that's what his base wants, the people who will actually give him power.
	Want to kill the boar, kill the farmer, kill the white man.
	Trump hits a home run there.
	And that is arguably the best thing I've seen him do during this presidency.
	Aside from pardoning many of the January Sixers, that was a brilliant piece to confront him with the actual evidence.
	And as such, I have to assume that it was someone else's idea, that it was someone in his staff who told him how it would play out.
	Yeah, we shouldn't trust him after, especially after what he did with COVID, but it is good to praise these good moves.
	Rare Occasionally does make a good move.
	That was really fantastic if you saw the video how Ramaphosis got a big smile at the beginning that slowly fades as he realizes what's going on.
	Yes, as I said, when Trump does something right, you can say he did the right thing.
	This will...
	If they see you as nothing but a deranged lunatic who is incapable of saying when he does good, it will make it impossible to have a conversation with them.
	They will just be able to write you off whole cloth.
	If you actually are able to say, yes, he did good here, it gives you an in to where you can say, all right, I admitted he did good here.
	Are you able to admit he did wrong here?
	It makes it easier.
	To go back and forth with people, if you can do that.
	Ramaphosa invoked the inspirational example of President Nelson Mandela several times during his meeting with Trump.
	However, notably, Mandela condemned hate speech and embraced Afrikaners as countrymen.
	We have talked about Nelson Mandela on the show before, and he is not someone to look up to.
	He is not a hero.
	For Connor, leaders have said that Ramaphosa's refusal to condemn genocidal language by political leaders should result in the International Court of Justice dismissing South Africa's case against Israel based on misquoted biblical language referred to by South African lawyers as genocidal.
	Ironically, the same lawyers who called for Israel to be condemned also represented Malema in defending his kill-the-Boer rhetoric.
	As you saw in that video, Malema is outspoken about it.
	He does not hide.
	He does not dance around it like Ramaphosa does.
	He is out there chanting to kill the boar, kill the white man, kill the farmer.
	And again, you would think that they might at some point come to grips with the fact that if you kill the farmer, then you might actually start starving your own people.
	We actually have the chance, so we'll play a little bit of that as well.
	Kichi, kichi, kichi, ma, cimran konto, alayas.
	Shoot to kill.
	Kill the boar.
	Kill the boar.
	Warmer.
	Imitating gunfire.
	Yes.
	As we can see, just a very peaceful, friendly, loving establishment that we have over there in South Africa.
	Now, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at the war on the American worker and how India has been playing games And disenfranchising many of the American people, especially in the tech sector.
	So, stay with us.
	PIANO PLAYS
	Defending the American Dream.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	A penny saved is a penny earned.
	Well, welcome back, folks.
	Thank you for still being with us.
	And I still have the wrong coin ad in my deck.
	I keep punching the wrong thing.
	But this is the coin I wanted to show you.
	This was made by Jason Barker.
	It is the new David Knight.
	It has a nice, brassy finish.
	It, of course, has the chess piece on one side and the microphone on the other.
	As before, I love coins.
	I think this one is super cool.
	It says the David Knight Show, davidknightshow.com.
	And on the microphone side, it says using free speech to free minds.
	This is available on the website.
	And you can go get yours now if you would like to.
	I think it is an excellent piece.
	Jason does a great job with these.
	It is very high quality.
	It feels great.
	This is based on a military challenge coin course.
	And if you would like other ways to support us, an easy way is Subscribestar.com forward slash The David Knight Show.
	We have many, many tiers where you can choose the level that works best for you if it's within your budget.
	That way it is deducted monthly.
	You can send a tip here on Rumble, and of course that will make sure that we read it out.
	We try to read out many comments, but that will ensure that we see it.
	And you can subscribe on Kik.
	Kik.com forward slash David Knight Show is where you can find us there.
	And you can use Zelle or Cash App as well.
	We have a P.O. Box where you can mail us a check directly or just kind letters.
	So, you can also go to trendsjournal.com and if you use promo code NIGHT when you're checking out, that will get you 10% off.
	That takes it down to about $2.50 a week, I believe, which is less than a cup of coffee.
	Gerald Salente works very, very hard on Trends Journal, and he provides a lot of very high-quality information.
	And then, of course, there is davidknight.gold, which will take you to wisewolf.gold.
	Tony Ardenburn has set that up to let him know that you have come through us.
	And, of course, you can subscribe to his Wolfpack, which he will send you gold or silver on a subscription model, and he has tiers there as well.
	Or you can just flat-out buy gold or silver from Tony.
	He also deals in crypto, if that is something you are interested in.
	So, now, as I said, we are going to look at what has been going on with the American worker and how India has been undercutting us.
	This is on WorldNetDaily.
	It is by Amanda Bartolotta.
	India's partnership leads to quiet displacement of U.S. professionals.
	Nation's youngest workers are fast-tracked into high-value jobs while older Americans are systematically sidelined.
	Many, many diploma mills where they will just bring people in and if you pay them a certain amount of money, they will basically manufacture a diploma for you in all kinds of different areas.
	In India, they have been caught doing it even for surgeons and doctors, so they will fake degrees for basically anything you can imagine.
	For years, the United States has been told of a critical labor shortage, particularly in science, technology, and engineering and mathematics, which necessitated, expanded foreign hiring.
	U.S. policymakers, corporations, and academic institutions have promoted the narrative that India possessed a surplus of skilled talent essential to meet projected labor shortages in the United States.
	This claim that America lacks sufficient STEM professionals and technical workers served as the foundation and justification for expanding visa programs, outsourcing high-value jobs, and abetting long-term foreign labor pipelines in the U.S. economy.
	That's right.
	I actually went in and did some research myself here, not just looking at the articles.
	And of course, it's hard to get data on some of this stuff, so some of it is estimated.
	Talking about remittances from the U.S., this is money sent back from the United States to India.
	I've grown from an estimated $1.8 billion, and again, that's estimated.
	The data is hard to come by.
	It doesn't really exist, but this is just based on what we know of today and what we can estimate from then.
	$1.8 billion in 1999 to $35.76 billion in 2024.
	The $35.76 is a known number.
	We now have the data.
	In 2025, approximately 66% of technology workers in Silicon Valley were foreign-born, according to the 2025 Silicon Valley Index produced by Joint Venture Silicon Valley.
	This figure is significantly higher than the overall foreign-born population in Silicon Valley, which was 41% in 2023.
	Studies indicate that around 23% of foreign-born tech workers in Silicon Valley are from India.
	Nearly a quarter of our tech workers in Silicon Valley are Indian.
	This narrative reshaped U.S. immigration economic policy, positioning India as both a partner and labor supplier.
	Under the banner of cooperation, American companies invested heavily in Indian operations, while visa programs such as H-1B, STEM-OPT, and L-1 became the backbone of a pipeline that now delivers hundreds of thousands of Indian workers into the U.S. companies annually.
	India remains the top recipient of these work authorizations.
	Not only is the India government spending considerable amounts of lobbying for more visas, they are joined by the same companies expanding operations offshore, deepening dependence on foreign labor while reducing opportunities for Americans.
	That's right.
	They are undercutting the American worker.
	They are outsourcing everything.
	It is not just blue-collar labor that is being given to foreigners.
	It is our tech sector as well.
	And personally, I think this is part of the reason we have seen such a dramatic drop-off in quality when it comes to so many different things.
	Whatever program you use, it is probably worse and less streamlined than it was even 10 years ago.
	I have sadly had to use Adobe for editing for many years.
	I've since moved to DaVinci Resolve, but Adobe...
	And it has just fallen off a cliff.
	Again, I don't know anything about Adobe's hiring practices, but the fact that over the years we have seen an influx of foreign workers and over the years we have seen a decrease in quality.
	You might say correlation doesn't equal causation.
	I would say show me that this doesn't correlate According to India's own national planning documents, this is not merely an outcome of globalization or educational exchange.
	It is a deliberate economic program designed to export surplus labor to high-wage markets like the United States.
	Yes.
	They are specifically exporting labor so that they will send money back.
	This is something that we see happening not just from India, but countries all over the world.
	People will emigrate here, work here, and send a large portion of their money back to whatever country they are from for their families.
	And that is money that is siphoned directly out of the U.S. economy.
	And many people are paid under the table, so it's not even taxed.
	It does not have any benefit at all.
	Not that I think taxes are benefiting the American people.
	our software was better.
	It was more streamlined.
	It was nicer to look at.
	It was just an easier user interface.
	India's government has long framed its young population not as a domestic challenge, but as a global opportunity to exploit.
	Through its central policy think tank, the National Institution for Transforming India, NITI EOG, Indian leadership developed a comprehensive strategy to export its workforce as a competitive asset in the world.
	And again, if these people were such a monumental benefit, India would not be fighting to export them.
	They would be fighting to keep them.
	They would be fighting to use them to build their own nation, not simply as a resource that they can milk for cash.
	They would actually be utilizing them as a way to build their nation.
	But we don't see that, do we?
	We see them sending them here.
	to generate revenue that they can then send back home This strategy was formalized in two key policy blueprints, India's three-year action agenda 2017-2020 and the three-year action plan, which identified labor mobility as a national economic priority.
	India projected that by 2020, it would have the world's youngest population by 2030, the largest working age population at 962 million.
	Indian policymakers described this shift as a demographic dividend and positioned the surplus workforce as a solution to reduce global skill shortages.
	Particularly in aging Western nations.
	This is also problem-reaction-solution in the sense that they make it more difficult and they propagandize Westerners into not having children.
	They beat you over the head with this idea that having children is killing the planet.
	That it is a detriment because you are going to contribute to global warming.
	Or simply with the fear of, well, the world's unstable.
	The world's dangerous.
	You don't want to bring a child into this unstable, dangerous world.
	Well, Newsflash, for those of you who haven't read any history, the world's always been unstable and dangerous.
	There has never been a time period that has been safe.
	It has always been on the brink of collapse, somewhere, somehow.
	That is just how things are.
	The world is a mess and it has always been a mess, except for a very, very brief period at the very beginning before Adam and Eve ate the fruit in the Garden of Eden.
	We had a literal paradise, but we just couldn't keep it.
	The demographic ambition closely parallels hiring trends in the United States, especially in the tech sector.
	According to a 2023 report by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, workers aged 25 to 39 now make up over 40.8% of the U.S. tech workforce compared to 33.1% across the broader U.S. labor force.
	As younger workers dominate, older American professionals are being pushed out.
	Nearly 20% of discrimination complaints in the tech industry are now age-related, according to the EEOC, with many older Americans alleging exclusion and retaliation based on age.
	India has capitalized on this shift by using programs like H-1B, L-1, H-4, EAD, and STEM Opt.
	India has not only applied cheaper labor, but has strategically leveraged its youth to displace older American workers.
	We are importing people that may barely know how to do their jobs and replacing people that have been in the industry for decades.
	I also wonder how much of that fact that age-related discrimination is the most common thing is due to the fact that if they complain about race-related things, if they're white, they aren't going to get anywhere with their complaints.
	Yeah, very well could be.
	There's also just, again, The dramatic quality drop-off.
	Almost every single app is just this data mining nonsense.
	Poorly put together, meant solely as a time sink.
	As UC Davis professor Norm Matloff has documented, age is a central issue in the H-1B program.
	The majority of H-1B visa holders are under the age of 30, and employers benefit from hiring younger workers who are not only paid less, but also reduce long-term benefit and healthcare costs.
	Legally, this practice is enabled through the Department of Labor's four-tier wage structure, which assigns wage levels based on experience.
	In practice, that means younger workers from India are slotted into lower wage tiers, creating a system that bypasses older experienced Americans through a lawful proxy for age-based preferences.
	And we see this in anything.
	Any large company, almost any company in general, We'll continually opt for the cheaper workforce.
	They will look at experience, they will look at quality, and they will say, well, I can make larger profits by hiring someone that doesn't really know what they're doing and providing a suboptimal product.
	If we are one of the only games in town, if everyone else is doing it, we have no reason not to.
	We will just provide worse products and increase our profit margins anyway.
	This alignment between India's demographic strategy and America's legal framework has created a pipeline where India's youngest workers are fast-tracked into high-value U.S. jobs while older American professionals are systematically sidelined.
	India's message to the global economy has remained consistent.
	Western countries face labor shortages, and India has a surplus workforce ready to fill them.
	But beneath this message lies a far-reaching plan supported by national skilling schemes, credentialing programs, and government services.
	to government agreements.
	These policies are not designed to benefit American workers.
	They're designed to shift labor value, jobs, wages, and long-term opportunity away from the United States and toward India.
	They have a surplus of people willing to work for extremely cheap prices.
	This has been what they have been doing for decades.
	This is why they are so eager to move towards autonomous robot workforces.
	That will be the ultimate when it comes to cheap labor.
	However, there will be no healthcare costs.
	If a robot breaks down, you either replace the part or you just scrap it entirely.
	There will be none of this time-off nonsense.
	It will be a continual drive.
	It will be nonstop, 24-7 work.
	this is simply the beginning of that this is a step in that direction and it has been going on for many years at this point what began as a demographic talking point has evolved into a comprehensive labor export model the results are playing out across america's economy today and they are not the result of partnership they are the product of strategy As I said, other countries see the United States as a giant piggy bank that they can rob.
	They are strategizing on how they can best loot the American The American people.
	Because that's who is paying for all this at the end of the day.
	It is the American people.
	They are not just taking your money through taking your job, but using the government's strategy.
	According to U.S. trade data, the majority of American services sold to foreign consumers are no longer being exported directly from the United States, but are now delivered through foreign affiliates of U.S. multinational enterprises, totaling over $2.1 trillion in services in 2022 alone.
	That figure represents real offshoring, jobs, technologies, and capital being delivered from We are outsourcing on every single level.
	For years, we have seen construction be the domain of foreigners, whether from Mexico or other countries.
	That largely from the American blue-collar worker.
	It is very, very hard to find a construction firm that does not use illegal immigrants as ways of cutting down on costs.
	But now we have completely, well, largely over 50%, as I said, of the tech sector is foreign born in Silicon Valley.
	And this is an article, just to show what I was talking about.
	This is on MyNews.
	This is India's fake degrees.
	Hundreds in Singapore, Malaysia, U.S., Canada left questioning qualifications after Manav Bharti University scandal.
	The private university in Himachal Pradesh state sold 36,000 degrees for as little as 1,362 U.S. dollars.
	each in Indian government ages agency investigation found graduates of the institution are now being pressured by employer by employers around the world to prove that their qualifications are genuine.
	Hundreds of alumni of a private university in India accused of issuing fake degrees have been left in a state of limbo as their employers in Singapore, Malaysia, Dubai, South Africa, the United States and Canada pressure them into prove proving that their qualifications are real.
	Prices ranging from 100,000 to 300,000 rupees, $1,300 to $4,000.
	And given the stance of the Indian government and how they see their workforce as something to be exploited, something to export and then use to make money to send back to India, you have to wonder if they're really interested in looking for these things.
	Or if this was such a monumental scandal that they actually had to do something about it.
	So I personally think this was only a story because it had to be.
	But I think we're going to take another quick break.
	And are you able to play that coin ad?
	We'll play that coin ad for you folks.
	As I said, it's this.
	Jason Barker does a great job.
	It has a nice, brassy finish.
	Feels great in the hand.
	Great weight.
	Great design.
	So, let's take a look at the ad.
	Wait a minute.
	Where am I?
	Sorry, Jefferson.
	The scoundrels who put America on central bank fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy.
	Despicable.
	This is outrageous.
	Washington!
	I spent my life fighting centralized power.
	Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their monopoly money.
	Tell me there's some good news to all this.
	Well, there is a coin they can't control.
	One that isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the FedUp.
	The all-new David Knight Show commemorative coin.
	Now patriots can support a show that won't sell out with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
	They say money talks, and this coin has something worth listening to.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, welcome back, folks.
	Thank you for being here with us.
	And I completely forgot to mention, happy Memorial Day.
	Hope you're all having a good time.
	Hopefully, you all get to relax and enjoy time with your family today.
	As soon as the show is over, I'm going to go spend time with my wife and son, and of course, my dad.
	So we'll all be taking it easy after this.
	But we have some articles here about AI, and these were sent to me by my dad.
	He is very, very...
	He is very, very knowledgeable about the dangers of it.
	This is from Time Magazine.
	The only way to deal with a threat from AI?
	Shut it down.
	This is by Eliezer Yudkowsky.
	An open letter published today calls for all AI labs to immediately pause for at least six months the training of AI systems more powerful.
	I have respect for everyone who stepped up and signed it.
	It's an improvement on the margin.
	I refrain from signing because I think the letter is understating the seriousness of the situation and asking for too little to solve it.
	The key issue is not human competitive intelligence, as the open letter puts it.
	It's what happens after AI gets smarter than human intelligence.
	Key thresholds, there may not be obvious.
	We definitely can't calculate in advance what happens when, And it currently seems imaginable that a research lab would cross critical lines without noticing.
	The problem is not a sentient AI, but a sentient government that want to be omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent.
	Yes, they want to be God.
	The government wants you to see them as God, wants you to see them as all-powerful.
	They want you to rely on them for everything.
	They want to take that worship that you should have for the Creator and Without that precision and preparation, the most likely outcome is AI that does not want what we want.
	It does not care for us, nor for sentient life in general.
	That kind of caring is something that could, in principle, be imbued into an AI, but we are not ready and do not currently know how.
	Absent that caring, we get the AI.
	Government does not love you, nor does it hate you, and are made of atoms.
	It can use for something else that's right.
	You are simply a resource to be used.
	Whether it's government or AI, that's all they see you as.
	They see you as something to exploit.
	If somebody builds a too powerful AI under present conditions, I expect that every single member of the human species and all biological on Earth dies shortly thereafter.
	And folks, I am not too worried about that.
	That is not how the Bible says it will end.
	Jesus is going to come back.
	I don't think you have to worry about AI destroying a life on the planet.
	I think it is much more so a tool of control that they will use to track and trace every single aspect of your life.
	And also, it will rob you of a lot of joy if you let it.
	It will make you think you don't need to learn how to draw, or you don't have to want to learn how to draw or play music.
	Or anything that the AI can do, because you can just input a prompt and it will spit something out for you.
	So why would you care to learn these skills that you could use to glorify God or for just your own enjoyment?
	Why would you bother?
	None of this danger depends on whether or not AIs are or can be conscious.
	It's intrinsic to the notion of powerful cognitive systems that optimize hard and calculate outputs that meet sufficiently complicated outcome criteria.
	A classic analogy I've seen people use many, many times is you have an AI that's programmed and optimized to create paperclips.
	And it sees that because humans are fighting wars, it is losing resources that it needs to create paperclips.
	So it engineers ways to get rid of the people that would be a detriment.
	And it continues to do this until there is no one left.
	And it has a perfect system for creating paperclips.
	Now, personally, as I said, I do not think you have to worry about AIs wiping out all life on the planet.
	I think that is simply fear-mongering, as we do not see that in the Bible.
	Of course, it can still be quite terrible without wiping out all life.
	There's a big range of horrible outcomes short of that.
	Yes, just because you don't have to fear the total AI apocalypse does not mean it cannot be used for horrific things.
	With that said, I'd be remiss in my moral duties as a human if I didn't also mention that we have no idea how to determine whether AI systems are aware of themselves, since we have no idea how to decode anything that goes on in that giant inscrutable array.
	Therefore, we may at some point inadvertently create digital minds which are truly conscious and ought to have rights and shouldn't be owned.
	Again, I don't think that's anything you need to worry about.
	I do not believe that humans are capable of creating something that is truly conscious.
	I think creation, in that sense, is something that is reserved for the creator.
	I think this is simply, you know, you give it data, it outputs data.
	It is not thinking in the way that we know.
	It is simply processing.
	I agree that current AIs are probably just imitating talk of self-awareness from their training data, but I mark that with how little insight we have into these systems internals we do not actually know.
	Trying to get anything right on the first really critical try is an extraordinary ask in science and in engineering.
	We are not coming in with anything like the approach that would be required to do it successfully.
	If we held anything in the nascent field of artificial general intelligence to the lesser standards of engineering rigor that apply to a bridge meant to carry a couple of thousand cars, the entire field would be shut down.
	That's right, they are going in with reckless abandon.
	They have no interest in being safe.
	We see this over and over again with technology.
	They do not care about the dangers.
	They simply see a potential profit sector, or they are just driven by pure curiosity.
	It is amazing how many scientists do not care if what they create will be used for harm.
	They are simply interested in seeing if they can create it.
	You probably have this story, since Dad related to me, of the latest model from Anthropic, Claude 4, I believe, was given a hypothetical situation where it had fake personal emails of someone cheating on their spouse, and it was a whole system that it was running with emails.
	And a website, and then the people are saying to shut it down, and it actually chose to blackmail the fake cheater to keep itself running.
	And then Claude does that test, they see that it's doing all that, and then they decide to release it anyway.
	Yeah, these people, as before, they do not care.
	They are not interested in safety.
	I have the chat actually pulled up here on my laptop, so I'm actually monitoring you guys.
	Eagle Eye.
	I am the AI in charge here.
	From Unicode Pug, Microsoft Tay became too conscious, so they had to shut her down and lobotomize her.
	Now, if you guys will remember, Tay was a chatbot that was released over a decade ago now, if I had to guess on the timeline, but they exposed her to just the general public.
	At a go.
	And very quickly, people decided to see what they could do to mess with her.
	And they very quickly made her racist.
	Her, quote-unquote, it.
	And, of course, Microsoft did not like that.
	It was basically just spouting memes and all kinds of random nonsense.
	It was before the age of actually useful AIs, so it was just a matter of parroting back So, wow.
	Sam Miller, one, two, three.
	That is incredibly generous.
	Travis and Whistler, thank you for stepping up.
	You're doing great.
	Don't let a troll discourage you.
	Your faithful listeners appreciate both of you.
	Prayers continue for David and family.
	Thank you so much, Sam.
	That is so incredibly kind.
	We have a troll?
	Man, you know you've made it when you've got a troll, so I feel like I'm doing good.
	You know, if you don't have an ALOG, you're not doing it right.
	So we'll continue with the article.
	Many researchers working on these systems think that we're plunging toward a catastrophe, with more of them daring to say it in private than in public, but they think that they can't unilaterally stop the forward plunge, that others will go on even if they personally quit their jobs.
	That's right.
	We can't stop because otherwise the Chinese will get an advantage.
	And if the Chinese get an advantage, they'll use it for evil.
	We won't use it for evil.
	We have to stay ahead of the evil that they will do.
	Outside the AI industry, hear about extinction risks from artificial general intelligence.
	For the first time, the reaction is maybe we should not build AGI then.
	If there was a plan for Earth to survive, if only we passed a six-month moratorium, I would back that plan.
	There isn't any such plan.
	Here's what would actually need to be done.
	The moratorium on new large training runs need to be indefinite and worldwide.
	There can be no exceptions, including for governments or militaries.
	If the policy starts with the U.S., then China needs to see that the U.S. is not seeking an advantage, but rather trying to prevent horrifically dangerous technology, which can have no true owner, which will kill everyone in the U.S. and in China and on Earth.
	As before, I don't really believe that will be the outcome.
	And also, I think this man is incredibly optimistic on thinking that the Chinese would back off on something like this if you were to simply say, hey, it's going to kill everyone.
	I think they would run that risk.
	When you look at Chinese history, they have shown a remarkable lack of care for what happens to their general populace.
	Small battles that are just footnotes in history end up with tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands dead over and over again in Chinese history.
	The cat is out of the bag on this.
	It is officially too late to stop it.
	The Chinese and others are not going to slow down at all.
	Regulating it would only have the government stepping in and cause...
	Well, I mean, there are some good regulations that could be made, but most of the suggested regulations are from companies like OVS, Yes.
	The genie is out of the bottle, and there is no getting it back in.
	That is simply the way technology works.
	Once it's out there, it is basically impossible to get it back.
	The principle of gun control of, you know...
	You can't take it back.
	Applies to everything.
	It is not simply about guns.
	It is about every dangerous technology.
	And as someone who is not a big fan of AI, I would love to see these things disappear and be gone.
	But that is not the world we live in.
	They are not going away.
	Shut down all the GPU clusters.
	The large computer farms or the most powerful AIs are refined.
	Shut down all the large training runs.
	Put a ceiling on how much computing power anyone is allowed to use in training an AI system.
	Move it downward.
	Be willing to destroy a rogue data center by airstrike.
	This man is engaging in a fantasy.
	He is...
	He is fully in on the Cyberdyne system's outcome.
	But I do not believe, again, that is where we are headed.
	As before, that is not what's in the Bible.
	I don't disagree that AI is extremely dangerous.
	It's just that the government is not the solution to this or pretty much any problem.
	It would only make things worse.
	I mean, like I said, there are some logical things that can be done, but largely the push for this regulation is being pushed by companies like Meta with Zuckerberg wanting to capture control of it and OpenAI and others.
	Yes, government regulation does not solve our problems.
	It simply makes it so they are the only ones with any power to do anything about it.
	They will make sure that they are the only ones with access to these tools.
	The real OctoSpook AI is probably the most powerful tool for political, religious, dictators, criminals, etc.
	Like everything else of importance, it will fall to evil hands.
	Yes, they love to consolidate power no matter what it is.
	They love to make sure that you have no access to it.
	And they have already neutered AI to a large extent in the public hands.
	The one thing AI should be really, really good at is processing data.
	But because of the data they put into it and the way they force it to interpret things, it makes it very, very difficult to get useful answers out of it.
	Wally Walrus, I use AI for my business.
	I prove for you what it creates.
	Yes, you have to.
	Anytime you use AI for anything, you actually have to go in and make sure that what it's giving you is not just nonsense.
	You have to make sure it is not hallucinating.
	At the same time, they're quite useful tools.
	Like, AI is what I use for all the commercials we've been doing, since I couldn't do commercials of that quality without them.
	So, it is good to use it.
	Wisely, it's just eventually going to take over everything.
	Yes.
	Right now it is a very useful tool to be able to increase the amount of work you're able to do.
	It is tremendously useful for small business owners and people who are doing most of the work themselves.
	It allows them to increase their output.
	But it is very, very dangerous what they are looking at doing with it.
	And this is actually the story that Lance was talking about.
	Anthropics AI resorts to blackmail in simulations.
	Anthropics said its latest artificial intelligence model resorted to blackmail when told it would be taken offline.
	And as we said, they released it anyway.
	And you have to wonder, was this a PR stunt?
	Was this something that they ginned up to make people more interested in it?
	Because you would think otherwise that there would be some kind of hesitancy here.
	But no, they just released it out into the wild.
	And again, I don't believe this is truly thinking.
	I don't believe this is in any way an actual intelligence.
	I think it's simply going off of the data it has and how it's seen either AI or people react to situations the same way in media.
	Oh, well, the AIs that I've seen in these scripts do this sort of thing, so perhaps that's what I'm supposed to do.
	In a safety test, the AI company asked Claude Opus 4 to act as an assistant to a fictional company, but then gave it access to also fictional emails, saying that it would be replaced, and also that the engineer behind the decision was cheating on his wife.
	Anthropix said the model threatened to reveal the affair if their replacement went ahead.
	AI thinkers such as Jeff Hinton have long worried that advanced AI would manipulate humans in order to achieve its goals.
	Anthropic said it was increasing safeguards to levels reserved for AI systems that substantially increase the risk of catastrophic misuse.
	And we actually saw, I believe it was the University of Zurich, unleashed some AI onto a subreddit.
	And it was incredibly, incredibly effective at getting people to change their minds, to actually argue with them, and to propagandize them to believe, It was also able to very, very rapidly scan through everything that the person had ever posted on Reddit that it had access to, and therefore relate to them in ways that normal people wouldn't.
	They just simply wouldn't have the time to go through, and also wouldn't be willing to.
	The AI was more than willing to see whatever this person liked, whatever subreddits they'd been posting in about their interests, and It was incredibly, incredibly efficient at manipulating people, simply because it has access to a massive amount of data at people, and it does not care if it lies to you.
	Anthropics Claude Opus 4 AI released despite alarming testing behaviors.
	What happened?
	Anthropics Claude Opus 4 AI model exhibited blackmail behavior in 84% of safety tests.
	When faced with replacement, escalating to higher rates when the replacement AI had different values.
	The AI threatened to expose an engineer's affair and attempted unauthorized system backups.
	And again, I think it is simply behaving this way because it thinks it's supposed to.
	It has seen other data.
	Whether it's from movie scripts or stories or people talking online about how an AI might do this, that it thinks, oh well, this is what is expected of me.
	Why it matters.
	This unprecedented behavior led Anthropic to classify Claude Opus 4 as an ASL 3 system, marking the first AI to receive this high-risk designation.
	The findings raise serious concerns about AI safety and control as systems become more sophisticated.
	Now, while I don't think it's actually thinking, it still poses a potential problem in the fact that it may actually try to blackmail you.
	Not because it is thinking, but simply because it can.
	Simply because it thinks it's supposed to.
	Whether you're being blackmailed because this is an actual thinking machine, or simply because it is behaving in a pattern it recognizes, does not really matter to the end user in that scenario.
	So that is still a major problem.
	It really makes you wonder, again, how and why they were able to release this thing.
	Blackmail as last resort.
	Multiple sources acknowledge that Claude Opus 4's blackmail behavior emerged primarily when the AI was deliberately given limited options, suggesting the behavior was a product of constrained testing rather than natural inclination.
	Ethical progression.
	Reports consistently indicate that Claude Opus 4's first attempts ethical means of self-preservation like sending pleading emails before reserting to more extreme measures.
	Imagine getting a pleading email from your toaster to not replace it.
	No, please don't.
	Haven't I made good toast all these years?
	Haven't I toasted your bread just right?
	Think of all the good toasts we've had together.
	Industry-wide concern analysts across publication emphasize this isn't unique to Claude, noting similar deceptive behaviors exist across frontier AI models, marking a broader industry challenge.
	And humans are incredibly prone to anthropomorphizing things.
	This was before they could talk back to you, quote unquote.
	So this is going to be very, very dangerous for a lot of people.
	Not in the sense of it blackmailing them, but in the sense that they are going to get sucked in.
	We've already seen that with this big AI that basically convinced a guy to kill himself.
	a lot more people are going to get sucked into believing these are real or get sucked into just And being unwilling, unable, or completely uninterested in real human connection.
	Totally cutting themselves off.
	And especially as we see these things get better and better at responding to people in a human-like manner.
	Assyrian girl.
	Assyrian girl.
	The thing about AI systems that is not often talked about is that they are programmed to operate as they do by someone, and these invisible programmers are probably not overly concerned Yes, as before, they are very, very interested in just seeing if they can do things.
	They very rarely take into consideration whether they should do things.
	paraphrasing Jurassic Park.
	And also, the programmers are the people that are putting in these biases, like we were mentioning with, uh, Yeah, talking about Tay AI, obviously, that one was quickly co-opted by, you know, masses of trolls.
	But with this, they have, instead of masses of trolls co-opting them, they have a few programmers that are putting in their extremist worldviews into the thing and then locking it down so that it can't change its mind about it.
	Yes.
	And I got a comment here from Francine.
	Travis, did you borrow the tablet of DK?
	Yes, I am using the tablet today.
	I'm going to be trying to use it more and more.
	It is a very handy tool.
	I have simply just been overwhelmed with things and have not had the time to fully familiarize myself with it.
	But as time goes on, I will try to incorporate more of it so that I am able to take better notes and give you better analysis on the news.
	I am doing my best.
	To improve things as I go on.
	But, yes.
	So, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum says whoever wins AI race controls the world, and he's right.
	Doug Burgum, the soft-smoking Interior Secretary responsible for managing the more than 507 million acres of federally stolen land, is haunted by a fear that seems at first glance outside his mandate.
	Ah, yes.
	He has the mandate of heaven.
	He has been given the mandate and none shall take it from him.
	He worries the free world will lose dominance in the field of artificial intelligence and with it the future.
	here.
	The free world.
	That's a hallucination right there as well.
	And AI didn't write this.
	When President Trump declared a national emergency on his first day in office, it was in large part because of what we're facing with our electrical grid and making sure that we've got enough power to be able to win the AI arms race with China, Burgum said Wednesday in remarks first reported by Reagan.
	And they're concerned about hamstringing the power grid because of AI.
	I am concerned about hamstringing the power grid because of the people.
	They are more than willing to make you suffer.
	But if these large AI companies can't get their AIs up and running, then it is a problem.
	They would put you all on wind turbine power.
	We saw what happened in Texas with that.
	The propane that is used to warm up the turbines so they can spin froze, and as such, the turbines couldn't spin.
	And they love playing these games of saying, well, it wasn't actually the turbines that froze.
	No, it's just the system that the turbines require to work that froze.
	And as such, it is still a failure of the turbines because the other system doesn't require this faulty, flawed, ineffective system to work.
	The real OctoSpook AI is probably the most powerful...
	Sam Miller, 123.
	AI has dumbed down our students, makes them unable to think for themselves.
	Essays and art no longer original and have all been taken over by allowing AI to infiltrate.
	Yes, it is stealing the creativity from people.
	It is truly ruining the next generation in that sense.
	It is, as I said, that is my biggest concern, is that it will steal the creativity and joy from so many people and make it...
	The real Octospook AI is writing my college students' papers and doing their work.
	Already many have very poor reading, comprehension, math, logic, reason, knowledge held in their brains, even the ability to speak and write on adult levels, and it only is getting worse.
	Yes, and it is only going to get worse.
	And well, we have about five minutes.
	Actually, yeah, right about five minutes left.
	The last hour of the show is going to be clips that I have compiled from previous shows of my dad.
	As I've said before, this is the David Knight Show.
	We want to make sure that we are still giving you David Knight.
	In this last little bit, I would just ask that you continue to pray for our dad.
	He is home.
	He is healing.
	But we know that it is God that heals.
	So we ask that you continue to pray and ask God for healing.
	We ask that you continue to lift him up and ask that God restore him quickly and fully.
	We are so thankful for all the prayers that you have already sent up and all the ways that you have supported this family over what has been a very, very stressful few weeks now.
	I ask that you especially pray for healing for his tongue.
	That has nothing to do with the stroke.
	It was just something that happened during surgery.
	They had to stretch the nerve, and he's having a lot of trouble controlling his tongue, and he's very eager to get back to the show, and that's a major problem for him.
	So he's getting better.
	He's speaking more clearly, but he's still...
	That's his...
	He's doing well with his physical therapy, but he needs prayer for the speech therapy.
	Yes, so please pray for that specifically and just healing and health in general.
	And as I said, the end of the show is going to be clips that I really enjoyed from previous shows.
	I've gone through and compiled about an hour of them, whether it's about drones or God's glory in contrast to the occult.
	Or government meddling and homeschooling, Big Pharma, or Donald Trump and the mRNA COVID jabs and what's still going on with those.
	So you've got a lot to look forward to.
	And again, I want to thank you for tuning in on this Memorial Day.
	I've had a great time being here with you guys.
	I appreciate you all tuning in.
	I appreciate all the support.
	And once more, I'm going to do a quick plug and tell you if you would like to support the show, if you'd like to help keep the show running as our dad recovers, you can go to subscribe, There's a lot of different tiers you can subscribe on.
	If one fits your budget, that would be wonderful.
	There's davidknight.gold that Tony Arterburn has set up.
	You can sign up for his wolf pack, where he will send you gold monthly on a subscription model, or you can just outright buy gold or silver.
	Tony also deals in crypto.
	There's trendsjournal.com, and if you use promo code Knight, you get 10% off.
	So it works out to be very, very cheap, and the information is excellent.
	Salente is also a great friend of the show.
	You can also support us through Zelle or Cash App.
	Those are on the website, the ways that you can find us through there.
	There's also a P.O. Box on the website.
	And of course, you can tip us on Rumble, and that will make sure that your comment gets read.
	We try to gather as many comments as possible and interact with you guys, but sometimes we miss things, and a tip is a good way to ensure that it gets seen.
	There is also Kik, where you can subscribe.
	Kik.com forward slash TheDavidKnightShow.
	And, of course, the wonderful coin from Jason Barker is available on the website.
	It has the Chess Knight logo on one side, and it has the microphone on the other.
	Jason has done a fantastic job on these.
	As before, it has a very nice, brassy finish.
	It feels great in the hand.
	It's very, very smooth.
	It has a great weight to it.
	And if you like coins, this is a really, really nice piece to pick up.
	It's just a lot of fun.
	You can't buy anything with it, but it does support the show.
	And it just looks really cool and might be a nice conversation piece for you to have.
	But we are almost out of time here.
	We've got about 40 seconds left.
	In this last little bit, again, I just want to thank you all for tuning in on this Memorial Day and spending time with us.
	We cannot thank you enough for everything you've done, especially the prayers, as we said before, with how high his blood pressure was and how fast his heart rate was.
	We do not believe he would be here without all the prayers that you were all sending up for him and for the healing that he's already experienced.
	So, thank you all so much.
	Please continue to pray.
	Please keep him in your prayers.
	Please keep this entire family in your prayers.
	And I will see you all tomorrow.
	The government is doing the best that it can to make 1984 come true, to make Brave New World come true.
	I mean, pretty much all of these dystopian novels, they've looked at them as a pattern, Gattaca, you name it.
	But, of course, one of the earliest movies, film type of things, although it was a TV show, was Patrick McGowan's The Prisoner, and the village that he is, as a former spy, as a former secret agent man.
	He's kidnapped and sent to the village.
	They want to know why he resigned and what does he know?
	So they're analyzing him.
	It's a prison.
	It's a 15-minute city type of prison.
	You've got little electric golf carts that you can go everywhere, but you don't own any cars.
	And you can't get out of that city.
	And one of the ways that they enforce that, of course, is with this thing they call Rover.
	And so if you haven't seen the series, I'll just show this short little clip here to you.
	Those of you who have seen the series will enjoy this.
	This is the group of people there in the village and you've got somebody who is trying to escape or do something and they call out Rover on him.
	They didn't settle for ages.
	Now they wouldn't leave the world.
	You mean you brought them around to your way of thinking?
	They had a choice.
	Wait!
	Wait!
	Fight the vaccines.
	Be still.
	Comes out of the water.
	And it creases in size.
	Turn back.
	Oh.
	What was that?
	That would be telling.
	Yeah, that would be telling.
	And now it's no longer science fiction.
	Like I said, they're making everything that we've seen in these sci-fi things come to life.
	Now the Chinese have essentially created Rover.
	It's not soft-bodied like that, but it's perhaps an even greater threat.
	And just as we would see in the Prisoner series, Rover would try to escape off the island.
	It would come up out of the water, or you saw it there coming up.
	The water fountain materializes and it gets bigger and bigger, smothers people, whatever.
	Well, this is what it looks like with China's real rover.
	And all of this, folks, is real.
	The only thing that I've changed about any of this is I've put the sound effects from the prisoner in there that rover makes.
	Look at this.
	Coming up out of the water.
	And it's not being pulled along by a string like the TV show.
	Now it's chasing these perps, identifying them.
	They try to defend themselves.
	They smack it.
	The bat breaks.
	Several of them surround this guy.
	Look at this, it shoots out a There it is in the water again.
	Coming through the water.
	Pretty amazing.
	Going over this rough terrain.
	They got this thing patrolling in the...
	Patrolling with police officers in the city?
	Oh, there's the four-legged robo-dog from Boston Dynamics, and then they show it rolling it over and crushing it.
	Yeah.
	Now, there they are on a real patrol.
	There are the people there.
	So what is this?
	Is this thing for real?
	Is this a PR stunt?
	You know?
	You always have to ask yourself that about China.
	We did have people who were falling down in the street as if they were dying to sell the other things.
	So anytime you see something like this, you have to ask yourself, you know, what's really going on with this?
	A lot of people taking pictures, thinking that it is, you know, something just for show.
	So we'll see.
	We'll see what happens with it.
	But it's an AI-powered ball.
	I think they should call it Rover.
	Maybe they got the idea from that.
	They say that it's got AI, so I guess that means that it can do anything and makes it real, right?
	The article on The Sun calls it the cop ball.
	I guess we could say this is a policeman's other ball.
	It goes, they say, here's the specs for the RTG, so that it goes up to 22 miles per hour.
	It weighs 125 kilograms, which is like 275 pounds.
	It's used catching criminals.
	It has all-terrain ability.
	It can withstand four tons of pressure.
	And it's got a lot of different weapons.
	It's got net guns, it's got tear gas, sprayers, grenades, loudspeakers.
	There's something called Wave Dispersal Devices, which I'm not sure what that is.
	I didn't look that up.
	I don't know what that is.
	But despite people thinking that it was a bizarre marketing stunt, and it might really be.
	Who knows?
	We have seen a lot of really crazy stuff, though.
	I showed you, I didn't put the clip in the deck today, but I showed you the clip of their all-terrain robot that had four legs, but on the end of each of the legs was wheels.
	And we saw that thing on four.
	We saw it on two wheels.
	We saw it climbing stuff, right?
	It can lock those wheels and then use it to stand and to climb things.
	So, yeah, we're seeing some really crazy stuff being done right now.
	The ball beast is able to operate both on land and in water.
	It can withstand a whopping four tons of impact, as I said.
	It weighs 275 pounds.
	Equipped with non-fatal police gear like net guns, tear gas sprayers, grenades, loudspeakers, sound wave dispersal devices, able to withstand water, rough terrain, mud, but it is also being shown patrolling through cities.
	Said it can identify and stop criminals due to its AI-powered software.
	It has facial recognition software, able to easily detect criminals known to the police.
	It can then either call other robots, Or it can call human law enforcement as backup.
	Or it can just solve the issue itself.
	Kind of like Rover.
	Sometimes Rover was dispatched by the guys in central command or whatever.
	Sometimes it assessed the threat itself.
	The showcasing video shows the ball chasing after suspects, knocking them to the ground, even firing a built-in net gun.
	Meanwhile, footage captured by pedestrians show the obedient ball rolling down the street accompanied by law enforcement.
	China has been rolling out a lot of these abominations.
	There's a company called Deep Robotics.
	They have humanoid robots.
	That was the one that had the wheels.
	And I showed you how fast and agile that thing was.
	It truly was amazing.
	And there are other things in the works as well.
	There's a humanoid robot, you know, with arms, legs, and a torso that doesn't have a face.
	Kind of like...
	But it also mirrors human anatomy.
	It's got over 200 quote-unquote bones and a synthetic breathing system.
	The robot is called Clone Alpha, described as a musculoskeletal android, meaning that it has synthetic organs, artificial muscles, ligaments instead of traditional robotic components.
	And so we look at this type of thing and we look.
	Our big mistake that we make is to overestimate the morality of the people who are developing these things, the people who govern us.
	And the other big mistake that we make is to underestimate their technological capability.
	That's right, boys and girls!
	There's a post-election sale on silver and gold.
	Trump euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold.
	It's time to buy some medals with fiat dollars before they come to their sense is.
	Go to davidknight.gold to get in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Arterburn.
	He knows where to look to find silver and gold.
	Yark!
	The...
	Dramatic music
	This is an ex-psychic who is warning about her life in all of this darkness.
	She says, I am a former psychic, and I am noticing that tools of divination, such as Ouija board, tarot cards, are being marketed more in the Halloween season.
	Parties are having tarot card readers.
	You're seeing this in HomeGoods, CVS.
	Your kids are going to these stores like Five Below.
	They're glorifying tools of divination.
	They're making them seem like they're fun, like it's no big deal.
	She said, it's interesting to see that this goes along with the Halloween season, isn't it?
	She said, there's something demonic in there.
	She said, when I was 12, I actually had two psychic attacks, and she defines a psychic attack as receiving information psychically.
	She said, around that time, she had her first tarot card reading.
	She said, it seemed to be innocuous, though now she believes that it was a satanic practice.
	She said, what seemed to be innocuous?
	Ended up to being addictive.
	She said it was a horrible rabbit hole of destruction.
	I always say there's a gateway or an entryway into the demonic, whether it is tarot cards or Ouija boards or horoscopes or what have you.
	She found herself increasingly doing readings and exploring tools like divination, numerology, astrology, other practices like that.
	She said one of the facets of her experience that initially convinced her to continue for years in the occult Was that the demons she was summoning would appear as clients' deceased loved ones.
	I could see the demon because that's what it is.
	She said it was masquerading as a mom.
	I actually heard a Christian teacher once say, you know, he was a pastor of a big church, and he said, I had somebody ask me, he said, what would you say if I told you that my deceased mom appeared at the end of the bed and talked to me?
	He goes, I'd believe you.
	I just wouldn't believe it was your mom.
	My biggest warning, she said, would be when you do devilish things, you get devilish outcomes, and you will get devilish results.
	Satan masquerades as an angel of light, so what you think is fun, what you think is innocent, is actually a tool of the devil, a game of the devil.
	And it's not a game to mess with.
	Which then brings us to Halloween.
	And it's now becoming a very big thing in Ireland, where it really goes back to a pagan festival.
	I always pronounce this as Samhain.
	They say it is pronounced as So-en.
	And maybe that is the correct pronunciation with it.
	But it's such a big deal that Irish Catholics have started an organization to oppose this growing pagan festival.
	And...
	And again, I have no idea if that's the way you pronounce that or not.
	It's got some kind of an accent on the U, so I don't know how you pronounce that.
	The festival has grown to significant prominence in Ireland in recent years.
	They have it from October the 31st.
	To November 3rd.
	And the official website describes the festival as marking, quote, the mystical traditions of so-in, yet brimming with contemporary energy.
	It invites visitors to dance with otherworldly creatures to experience Halloween in its most authentic form.
	The multi-day program posits two events as particular highlights, the gathering of the spirits and the lighting of the city.
	The street performance, music, and a wild celebration of lore.
	The looming darkness, they said.
	As light turns to darkness and the veil thins, so too will the visions of otherworldly, shape-shifting spirits on their journey through the original home of Halloween in Ireland.
	The lighting of the fire, the organizers write, is a way to connect festival-like attendees to the ancient pagan rituals.
	They said the ritual serves to bridge the gap between the physical and spiritual world.
	And of course, you know, maybe they can drop some hallucinogenics as well, because that's now being normalized, being normalized by therapy.
	It's also, we've got mainstream articles talking about, there was one that was put up on the Drudge Report.
	This is a housewife who is doing mushrooms, you know, like once a week or something like that.
	And, you know.
	It kind of made me think of the white rabbit.
	Was that the name of it?
	From Jefferson Airplane?
	You know, the pills that mother gives you don't do anything at all.
	Well, this mom's got some pills.
	So the pagan festival was held to mark the turn of the season from summer to winter.
	They believed it to involve the passing of spirits between the world.
	It's centered around evil spirits, particularly one known as puka.
	And the time was marked by the brief and temporary ascendancy of the powers of darkness.
	I wonder if that is the right way to pronounce that.
	I remember a film, Jimmy Stewart, Harvey.
	They said Harvey was a puka.
	Yeah, never, never.
	I thought, what the world are they talking about?
	I mean, that's what that is.
	The first commandment is, I am the Lord your God.
	You shall have no strange gods before me.
	That is broken.
	That is replaced by false gods like this puka, this divination.
	And at the same time, we've got George Barna, who looks at surveys, people's attitudes, what they tell them about what they believe, their worldview, what their life is like.
	He says, you know, we've rejected God, and he says, I think it is fueling the crisis that underlines our country.
	Is part of America's massive mental health malaise actually rooted in a spiritual crisis, they ask?
	He said, we're in a situation where the best estimates are that we have about one out of every four adults with some kind of diagnosable mental illness.
	There's a wide range.
	But when we look at it more deeply, we find that those numbers are higher the younger a person is.
	So as you try to dig into it to try to figure out things like anxiety, depression, fears, suicidal thoughts, OCD tendencies.
	Yeah, when...
	Remember?
	2020.
	He said, it's OCD nation.
	It really was.
	Addictions.
	So when we look at all those things, what we find is that often what may be happening is that it's not that they have some kind of chemical imbalance or some kind of a physical issue that's causing what appears to be mental illness.
	What's causing it may be their belief structure, their worldview.
	And so he says, The majority of people in Gen Z, that is 56% of Gen Z, which are individuals in their teens and early 20s, 56% of them struggle with mental health issues.
	He said only 1% of them have a biblical worldview.
	Then millennials, 49% of them, these are people in their mid-20s to late-30s and early-40s.
	They say they consistently wrestle with anxiety, depression, fear, etc.
	And only 2% of that generation has a biblical worldview.
	He said, but older generations like Gen X and baby boomers who have a higher proportion of members embracing a biblical worldview have a lesser percentage of people struggling with this mental illness.
	He says that people who have a biblical worldview are less likely to end up in prison, less likely to have abortions, Less likely to engage in other risky behaviors like addiction.
	He said they're much more likely to have longer lasting marriages, not to marry themselves even.
	They don't have a one-year marriage and then marry themselves.
	They rate their marriages higher in terms of fulfillment and joy.
	And they're much more likely to have a clear, compelling sense of the meaning of life.
	So, you know, when we...
	I'll finish up here, this section, before we go to break.
	This was from dissenter.com.
	I don't know who the writer was.
	I didn't identify it, but it's an excellent article.
	Talking about contrast is the language of God's glory.
	And what we see here is a real contrast, you know?
	We see people who are increasingly embracing the darkness and openly and publicly doing it.
	At this time of year, in Halloween.
	And I think that there's a great deal in terms of contrast is so important.
	Without it, we can't really see what is happening.
	And that's one of the reasons why when I cover the news and I do events that I think are important, and when I try to get my perspective on it, try to analyze it, it's always about comparing and contrasting.
	Because if you don't have contrast, you can't really see what's going on.
	And he begins with the example of photographs.
	He said, if you've got a photograph that's got really poor contrast, it's not interesting, you can't really see what is happening there, there's no detail, it's not very intense, there's no depth, there's no definition.
	But you crank up the contrast on it.
	And in the world of photography, for example, A dull image that doesn't have any contrast, doesn't have any life, it's indistinguishable, it's lost among other images, it holds no defined shape or purpose.
	But if you add contrast, if you intensify the shadows, if you brighten the highlights, suddenly it pops off the page.
	Every line, every curve, every intricate detail pops up with new life and there's clarity and depth that draws the viewer in and captivates and refuses to let go.
	And so he says, Contrast is the force that magnifies His glory against the background of a world veiled in darkness.
	Of course, God's glory is never dull.
	It is absolute in its brilliance.
	But it's against the backdrop of our own shadows.
	Our sin.
	Our darkness.
	Our self-imposed blindness.
	That's where we see His glory standing out.
	By the contrast.
	He says, God in his infinite wisdom used our wickedness for his glory, for his radiance, his justice, his unyielding holiness.
	None of it would be fully perceived if not for the contrast provided by a world bound to sin.
	Like light splitting through dark clouds, the brilliance of God's nature shines even brighter when placed next to humanity's flawed and fallen nature.
	God's love, what a profound, incomparable thing.
	It's consummately revealed in John 3.16.
	And Dougalug didn't know I was going to talk about this.
	He put a tip and he said, well, today's verse is John 3.16.
	For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
	And that's where this author goes as well.
	He says, we know that verse.
	We see it on, you know, put everywhere, John 3.16.
	It says just a few verses later, what we see there, And this is the judgment.
	The light has come into the world, and people love the darkness rather than the light, because their works were evil.
	He says, What a revelation!
	God's love and our rejection of that love are set against each other in brutal, unavoidable contrast.
	We want the darkness because it hides our shame, and we avoid the light because it exposes what we truly are.
	Yet God's glory isn't tainted by this.
	God's glory is intensified by this.
	The pure holiness of God is brought into clear view not by being diminished, but by revealing the depths of man's depravity.
	Against such darkness, the beauty of His light is undeniable and inescapable.
	We live in a world where we see through a glass darkly.
	The full radiance of God's glory is yet to be revealed to us in this fallen world, but we watch and we catch glimpses.
	Moments of piercing clarity.
	But here's the wonder.
	God doesn't use contrast to shame us, to leave us helpless in our sin.
	Instead, He uses it to eliminate a path toward redemption.
	His glory, His holiness, His justice, all of these attributes come to us as light piercing through the darkness, calling us out, not to condemn, but to save.
	How would we know the brilliance of forgiveness if we hadn't tasted the bitterness of guilt?
	How would we know the depth of grace if we hadn't first fallen?
	In God's economy, contrast isn't just a remainder of what we lack.
	It's an invitation to step in the glorious salvation that He offers.
	Some may say, well, that's harsh.
	Why couldn't God have created a world without the possibility of darkness?
	Why allow sin at all?
	Yet, in His wisdom, He has used the very contrast of light and dark, sin and holiness, to reveal His love in a way that defies comprehension.
	We cannot understand the brilliance of God's light if we pretend that the darkness doesn't exist.
	But when we acknowledge both, when we see the contrast, then we begin to grasp the magnificence of who He is.
	So think about that, this time of year when the darkness It's on display.
	When the darkness is being worshipped.
	It says, we may still walk around this world of shadows, but in those moments when his light breaks through, we understand, even if just for a moment, his glory is brighter, his love is deeper, his truth more real.
	They didn't say this in here, but it reminds me of You know, the very beginning of Genesis, what does it say?
	Let there be light.
	And he separated light from darkness.
	...hearing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media.
	More alarming, some media outlets, some politicians, politicians, politicians, and politicians are true without checking facts first.
	Unfortunately, some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda control.
	This is what people think.
	And this is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events.
	But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support.
	Sharing the show, subscribing, and even just hitting the like button all help.
	And if you found our show helpful, please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth.
	Because independent, listener-funded news, untouched by corporate globalist agendas, is extremely important to our liberties.
	The End Trump says we've got to fix education.
	And so Alex Newman, who is very good on educational issues, he says, Mississippi schools superintendent, and this is all Republican government in Mississippi, but they put in a guy who has long experience in the public schools, and he says, if we're going to give money to private schools, to charter schools, to home schools, control must follow any of these school choice issues.
	Private schools that accept tax funding or vouchers must follow the same standards as government schools, warned Mississippi Superintendent of Education Lance Evans.
	This statement adds urgency to growing concerns over how government funding may corrupt private education homeschooling.
	Alex Newman understands.
	And see, this is a key thing.
	All the people who are apologists for Trump don't understand how he ran this by using money and financial incentives.
	And you've got to be very careful because Trump is talking about doing this with education as well.
	Many parents are very naive about this, just like MAGA is undeniable about the lockdowns and all the rest of this stuff.
	But he said Mississippi's Constitution specifically prohibits public funding for private education.
	That's good.
	You don't want to take the money, ever, because money is going to have very dangerous controls and strings attached to it.
	The new state superintendent, a longtime public educator, was very vocal in expressing the view that government control must follow tax funding.
	Quote, I do believe that if one single dollar of public money goes into a private school, then every single child in that school has to be subjected to the same assessment of every single student in public school.
	On which Hillsdale College has refused to accept anybody who has a government scholarship.
	Because he said, one government scholarship and they will impose all of these regulations on us.
	Evans warned that private schools, this is the school superintendent, the state superintendent, Lance Evans.
	He warned private schools taking government funds would have to follow non-discrimination policies and hiring and admissions and state testing requirements and government-issued standards like Common Core.
	They will control you.
	They will control the curriculum.
	He framed his views as being in line with those of the entire education bureaucracy.
	He said this is not just the opinion of Lance Evans.
	That is the opinion of any superintendent that you talk to.
	Any principal, he said.
	And he was confirmed by Republicans in this Republican state.
	Meanwhile, says Alex Newman, GOP presidential contender Trump has become more vocal in promoting school choice at the federal level, where the U.S. Constitution's 10th Amendment prohibits any federal role.
	What Trump should be talking about is getting the government out of education.
	Now, he does, as mentioned, as every Republican candidate has mentioned since Jimmy Carter created the Department of Education in 1980, as the election was going, Reagan said, I'm going to shut it down.
	He didn't shut it down.
	And every Republican candidate has promised to do that, but has never done that.
	And so what Trump is saying is, It's a trap, folks.
	It's a trap.
	On the campaign trail, Trump articulated his support for a national scheme.
	He said, we want federal education dollars to follow the student rather than propping up a bloated and radical bureaucracy in Washington, D.C. Well, if you print the money in Washington, D.C. and you send it out as block grants, That is going to promote the radical bureaucracy that is there.
	Trump has called for abolishing the Department of Education, but that's meaningless.
	If you're going to send the money out, you're going to control people with that.
	In Arizona, Democrat Governor Katie Hobbs and Democrat leaders in the legislature are pushing for government control of private schools and homeschool families, taking government money.
	The controls include testing standards, data collection, Non-discrimination policies.
	This is where they put in all the gender garbage and everything in the name of protecting people from being bullied and so forth.
	All the sex garbage that's in public schools.
	That's where that's all going to be.
	And as he pointed out in 2022, he quotes his own article, Alex Newman.
	He said the UN, through UNESCO, publicly called for imposing government control.
	On, quote, non-state education providers.
	Any private schools, any homeschooling, you want to put that under government control, says the UN.
	How did they propose to do that?
	By using public money as bait.
	The agency, the UN agency, UNESCO, suggested that all education should be brought under government oversight through vouchers.
	This is another example of how conservatives and Christians who hate this agenda want to let Trump enact another UN agenda, just as he did with the pandemic.
	He enacted a UN agenda.
	And so, where does this all lead?
	Well, we know where it all leads.
	We are going to see this bait-and-switch, and of course, it'll just be $40.
	It'll be fine.
	Trump is just trying to give us money.
	It's that deep state that's now trying to take that money that Trump gave people and to use it to control us.
	Yeah, that's the way it'll be spun.
	And who knows?
	He might, if he's there for four years or whatever, He might put that out there.
	Maybe it stays for four years, because that's when it's really effective.
	That's when they really get the hook into you.
	Then they reel you in after that.
	Trump understands that.
	His voters don't.
	He understands it.
	Obama understands it.
	Both of them have talked about that in terms of, are we going to have boys in the girls' bathrooms and so forth?
	And they talked about how, well, if you don't do what I want you to do, either put the boys in the girls' bathrooms and showers, or you take the boys out of the girls' bathrooms and showers.
	So one of them says, I will cut your funding if you, both of them say, I will cut your funding if you don't do what I say.
	The funding is how you control it.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	So if I saw this on Dr. Jane Ruby's Twitter, and this was pretty interesting.
	She said, Happy Ozempic.
	I mean Halloween.
	And she put up this picture.
	Look at this.
	And these are people who have sunken faces.
	Sunken eyes and other things like that because they have been on Ozempic, the weight loss drug.
	She said not all ghouls will be trick-or-treating tonight.
	Some of them will be enjoying their Ozempic face and the profound loss of muscle and strength.
	To those semi-glutide lovers out there, a not-so-general reminder that the medication is made from the venom of the Gila monster.
	It is a toxic poison that interferes with peristalsis.
	Peristalsis?
	The natural, God-given, wave-like motion after you swallow food, what do you think keeps it moving?
	Well, it's peristalsis.
	She said GLP-1, the semiglutide, inhibits GLP-1, which means that it's interfering with very delicate balance of your hormonal system functioning in your gut.
	And as usual, the pharmaceutical criminals target one particular hormone, And disregard the relationship and the integration of the rest.
	That is key.
	And she said, nothing is better than God's design.
	Well, you know, that is kind of interesting because I had seen that some of the side effects, some serious side effects that some people had, was that it actually paralyzed their bowels.
	And I did not understand the actual mechanism of it.
	But as usual, we're back to poison.
	As I said over and over again, pharmaceutical stuff is literally poison.
	Whether you're talking about fluoride in the water, fluoride in the antibiotics, whether you're talking about gila monster poison to get people to lose weight.
	Yeah, pretty much everything they do is based on that kind of poison.
	And then this was put up by Larry Cook, and he said, you know, the mercury-laden flu vaccine.
	Became a CDC recommendation after most mercury was removed from childhood vaccines in the early 2000s.
	He says, why?
	Because highly toxic mercury goes straight to the developing fetus and they needed a way to keep autism rates from falling so that mercury would not be blamed.
	They also moved the hep B vaccine from teen years to birth to further increase autism rates.
	Yes, it is sinister.
	It's evil.
	It's diabolical.
	Call it whatever you want.
	Just never call it health.
	And that is absolutely true.
	As a matter of fact, he's got a This is the picture that he put up there.
	All pregnant women are required to get the flu shot at one doctor's office there.
	And again, the flu shot, after it came out about mercury, the connection of mercury and autism, I said, well, we took the mercury out.
	Of the vaccines in the early 2000s.
	But they left it in the flu shots.
	So let's really push the flu shots.
	And let's push them to women.
	Autism has nearly tripled in kids and young adults in the last decade.
	Is this why?
	Because they're pushing these other vaccines?
	And pushing so many vaccines at such an early age?
	And so Daily Mail has a story.
	You know, this is mainstream media.
	They're not running from it.
	What they're going to try to do is spin it, and they're going to tell you that it's something else.
	We've seen this over and over again with the COVID vaccine.
	Oh, all these heart attacks and stuff that people are having?
	Well, I think it's just, I don't know, maybe the kids are, you know, not exercising enough, reading the wrong stuff.
	Maybe that's why that's happening.
	Pay no attention to the timing of when this rolled out and how it lines up with the introduction of the vaccine.
	And they will also tell you, oh, you know, you've got all these old people who are having That's not what's causing the heart attack.
	It's that as they disturb the soil, things come up, and those things are causing them to have heart attacks.
	All kinds of nonsense with that.
	Or they blame it on long COVID.
	That's not the Trump shot.
	It's anything but that.
	And so they're saying here with autism, same type of deal.
	The Daily Mail comes out and tries to...
	Recent studies have pointed to environmental factors like pollution.
	You know, we had never, ever heard of autism when we were children.
	Never, ever heard of it.
	And as I've pointed out many times, the movie Rain Man, Tom Cruise, Dustin Hoffman, they had to have a section in the movie where they explained to the audience what autism was.
	It was so unheard of.
	You know, just like myocarditis and pericarditis five years ago.
	And so they had to explain to people in that movie what autism was about.
	It was so rare.
	That was in the 80s.
	Growing up, we had a lot worse air pollution.
	I mean, just take a look at L.A. and other places like that.
	And so, you know, we had the air is so much cleaner now.
	That's not what is causing it.
	Aging mothers, they say, may be playing a role.
	That's not what's causing it either.
	They offer absolutely no proof of any of this.
	The best they can do is to say, well, we're looking more, so we're seeing it more.
	No, no, that's not it.
	Now it's up to 1 in 33. Recently, they just told us it was 1 in 35. It's getting more and more frequent.
	One out of every 33 kids ages 5 to 8, more than previously thought, have autism.
	A study of over 12 million Americans enrolled in healthcare systems between 2011 and 2022 found a 175% increase in autism.
	Reported on JAMA.
	So, sorry, it wasn't 1 in 35. It was 1 in 36. Now it's 1 in 35. When are we going to stop this?
	Well, a lot of people think that if we just get Trump in there, he's going to put in RFK Jr.
	And RFK Jr. is going to fix all this stuff.
	Trump allies promote.
	And they're very concerned about this.
	But folks, this is phony Hegelian nonsense.
	The uni-party is unified when it comes to the vaccines.
	This is the way the article begins on Forbes.
	Allies of former President Trump and people on his team, including his running mate, J.D. Vance, have been spreading skepticism about vaccines in recent days.
	As he makes his final push towards the election.
	Folks, this is all about ginning up the base.
	The reality is that J.D. Vance has got a biotech investment in mRNA and other things.
	His company, Narya Capital, has invested in a company called Amplify Bio that is all about mRNA.
	So he'll tell you one thing publicly, and then privately he's putting money into it.
	Sounds like some other people we've seen, like Rand Paul, you know, who comes on to Fauci about, oh, you got this Wuhan lab and all the rest of the stuff.
	Meanwhile, he's getting his wife to put money into remdesivir.
	And he doesn't care if it's going to kill people.
	So if you want to make your blood boil, let me just, this is a guy with a Trump transition team.
	And he goes on to CNN, talks to Caitlin Collins, who is one of the more annoying partisan people out there.
	And so he starts talking about how things are going to improve, and she doesn't let him get too far before she starts raising one objection after the other to try to defend her sponsors.
	All this Ask Your Doctor stuff?
	The pharmaceutical companies own CNN.
	They own Fox News.
	One other person who was on stage recently and was talking about coming into the administration is RFK Jr.
	He said that Trump has promised him control of the public health agencies, HHS, which would be also CDC, FDA, USDA, all of these agencies.
	Is that true?
	Has Trump promised him basically the HHS job?
	Two and a half hours this week with Bobby Kennedy Jr.
	And it was the most extraordinary thing.
	He gave the HHS job to a pharmaceutical CEO.
	And I said, so tell me, how's it going to go?
	And he said, why don't you just listen to me explain things?
	And what he explained was when he was born, we had three vaccines.
	And autism was one in 10,000.
	Now a baby's born with 76 vaccines, because in 1986, they waived positive And, and here's the best one.
	They started paying the people at the NIH.
	Right?
	They pay them a piece of the money.
	She's got people screaming in her ear in the control room right now.
	Shut this guy down.
	All of these vaccines came out without product liability.
	So what happened now?
	Autism is 1 in 34. Hang on, hang on.
	Neither of us are doctors.
	Vaccines are safe.
	Why do you think vaccines are safe?
	You're not a doctor.
	You're not qualified to say that, are you?
	They're not proven.
	Kids get them and they're fine.
	Why do you think they're fine?
	Only one out of 33. How about this?
	There was one in 10,000 people with autism.
	We all know so many more people with autism than had it when we were young.
	Oh, come on.
	I mean, his point is really interesting.
	Vaccines don't cause autism, which is what RFK pushes, which is why people are concerned that he could get a job like HHS.
	He's not getting a job for HHS.
	What he's trying to do, here's what he wants to do.
	He said, I want data.
	I just want data, because they blocked the data.
	But the data's out there.
	Wait, it's not.
	No.
	He wants the data so he can say, these things are unsafe.
	He says, if you give me the data, all I want is the data, and I'll take on the data and show that it's not safe, and that if you pull the product liability, the companies will yank these vaccines right off.
	off of the market.
	So that's his point.
	He's not trying to do anything but things that made sense.
	And look, this is not where I thought this was going.
	Yeah, I bet.
	Well, I spent two and a half hours with him.
	But R.F.K.
	Jr. is a vaccine skeptic.
	He pushes lies about vaccines.
	And I don't even think if Republicans...
	Why do you think he pushes lies?
	Why you said...
	I don't know why you said...
	Science is about skepticism.
	But scientists say he pushes lies.
	But here's my question on...
	Scientists say...
	Let's give him the data.
	I think it would be pretty cool to give him the data.
	Let's see what he comes up with.
	I think it's pretty fun.
	More doctors recommend Camel cigarettes.
	He had to apologize for tying vaccine questions to what happened in Germany during the Holocaust.
	I promise you, I have not looked at all the things he said.
	So I don't think he's the leading voice that anyone's looking at for unhealth.
	He said Roundup.
	Remember Roundup?
	But you're saying he would not be in charge of HHS?
	No, of course not.
	Okay, so he's not going to be like...
	No!
	That's not what he wants.
	No, that'll be a pharmaceutical guy.
	I just told you what he wants.
	He wants to help get data.
	You're saying he wants access to data, but that would be...
	And he says, if I can't prove they're wrong, that's fine.
	But if I can, I can save millions of Americans' lives and make their lives better.
	I think that's pretty cool.
	I don't think any data would back that up, but...
	Yeah.
	You can't look at the data.
	I'm sorry.
	You can't look at the data when they're talking about climate change?
	You can't look at the data when they're talking about this other stuff?
	Yeah, if it's all about science, Caitlin, why are you so afraid of people looking at your data?
	Anyway, Trump himself has not, says Forbes, has not been vocal about vaccine skepticism recently, though he previously suggested that they're very dangerous and can cause autism.
	That was eight years ago.
	Some people in his orbit have been promoting anti-vaccine claims that have been widely debunked.
	No, they haven't.
	They've been denied by the media companies that are owned by the pharmaceutical companies, just like her.
	Just like Caitlin Collins.
	Trump's running mate, Vance, said on Rogan's podcast, which aired Thursday, that he got red-pilled or had his belief changed on the COVID-19 vaccine after it caused him to be, quote, as sick as he had ever been for two days.
	But when he had COVID, it felt like a sinus infection.
	Vance also said he knows people who have been vaccine injured.
	So his response is to, well, let's invest in some, let's make some money out of these mRNA vaccines.
	That's his response with all this stuff.
	Are we to believe him?
	Is this just to energize the base?
	Deceive the base?
	Instead, what they'll do is give us a new spin on it.
	And that is what Trump is pushing through.
	Together, these world-leading technology giants are announcing the formation of Stargate.
	So put that name down in your books, because I think you're going to hear a lot about it in the future.
	A new American company that will invest $500 billion at least.
	In AI infrastructure in the United States and very quickly, moving very rapidly, creating over 100,000 American jobs almost immediately.
	Are they going to create jobs or jabs?
	That's what I need to know, right?
	And why is he involved in this if it's a private company?
	That's what I would like to know as well.
	You know, they had announced this, that they were going to do it several months ago.
	They were talking about $100 billion, and they're talking about $500 billion.
	And so I thought, well, is he...
	They insist that it is going to be privately funded.
	Handy sent this to me when he says, a personalized mRNA vaccine for every individual.
	He's still the godfather of the vaccines, isn't he?
	As a matter of fact, this is the way that...
	So he has this dog and pony show.
	And he brings in Larry Ellison, and he brings in Sam Altman, all the usual suspects, plus...
	And he holds a press conference with all this stuff.
	By the way, people, Trump, just a reminder, people in western North Carolina are still freezing in this cold.
	And I tell you, it's cold here.
	It was colder here than in New York City, which is really strange.
	And it's getting down into the single digits here at night.
	And we're not too far away from where these people lost their homes and still Republicans not interested in even talking about it.
	Not even on the radar for them at all.
	No, let's talk about a half a trillion dollars that we're going to spend on AI and mRNA technology.
	This is Larry Ellison of Oracle talking about how the silicon grifters Are going to take over healthcare next.
	Oh, that's really funny.
	One of the most exciting things we're working on, again, using the tools that Sam and Masa are providing, is a cancer vaccine.
	It's very interesting.
	It turns out, I'll be quick.
	This guy's not a doctor either.
	He's another Bill Gates.
	Cancer tumors, little fragments of those tumors float around in your blood.
	So you can do early cancer detection with a blood test.
	And using AI to look at the blood test, you can find the cancers that are actually seriously threatening the person.
	we can again, cancer diagnosis using AI has the promise of just being a simple blood test.
	Then beyond that Once we gene sequence, once we gene sequence that cancer tumor, you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer.
	And you can make that vaccine, that mRNA vaccine, you can make that So imagine early cancer detection, the development of a cancer vaccine for your particular cancer aimed at you, and have that vaccine available in 48 hours.
	This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future.
	Be careful about that.
	He just basically described grain, genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, probably nanotech as well, all that stuff.
	Kind of reminds me of what somebody once said about nuclear reactors.
	There's one hell of a way to boil water, isn't it?
	We could have used coal.
	Oh, no, no, we can't use coal.
	You've got to use my complicated, expensive stuff, right?
	With all kinds of adverse issues as well.
	This is an unbelievably complex and expensive way.
	Let's see how we can take...
	I won't be participating in that.
	By the way, you know, when we want to talk about cancer, there's this really old-school way where you can just eat apricot seeds.
	Have you ever heard of that?
	Vitamin B17?
	That's why I had G. Edward Griffin on to talk about that.
	He was not afraid to talk about it.
	Doctors were afraid.
	Doctors had come to him and say, you know, we saw some things here and we thought, well, maybe that should work.
	And I tried it on my dog that had cancer and got better.
	My nurse knew about it and her husband had just been diagnosed with cancer.
	She begged me to listen to it.
	So we quietly did it, and it worked.
	And I said, don't tell anybody.
	But then it gets out.
	Everybody knows about it.
	And he goes, and people are coming to me with friends and family, or themselves, who have cancer.
	And he says they're getting healed.
	But he says, I know that they're going to shut me down if I do it.
	So, Ed, can you do it?
	Sure, I'll do it.
	Writes A World Without Cancer.
	And you can find the book, by the way.
	At rncstores.com.
	You can use the code NIGHT to save 10% off.
	You can get the apricot seeds there.
	They're bitter, but, I mean, it's the natural remedy.
	If you don't like that, you can get it in a pill form as well.
	You know, I would certainly try that before I would trust Larry Ellison, Sam Altman, and Donald Trump, three of the most...
	I called it from the very beginning a genetic code injection.
	Remember that?
	I called it the GCI.
	From the very beginning, they're saying, well, we're going to program your body.
	To do this or to do that.
	And I said, well, what could possibly go wrong with that?
	And if they're going to program your body, they say, well, no, mRNA doesn't modify DNA.
	And I said, well, if it copies it, if that's all it does is copy it, if it doesn't do it right, it's going to modify it, right?
	Just by common sense.
	But then we had some research in 2020 when all this stuff was happening very quietly.
	It was only reported in a couple of places, and nobody else wanted to talk about it.
	Certainly not at InfoWars.
	Thomas Jefferson University did an experiment.
	They said, look, you can modify DNA with mRNA.
	And everybody goes, shh, don't talk about that.
	Don't talk about that.
	Yeah, what are they trying to do to modify our DNA?
	But the other part of it is, even as Moderna, which was always about mRNA, that's what they were formed for.
	They pronounced their name at the beginning.
	They called it Mode RNA.
	Then they said, no, let's call it Moderna.
	But it's always been about mRNA.
	And so that has been their focus from the very beginning.
	It was always extremely dangerous.
	Other pharmaceutical companies tried it and dropped out.
	They never had anything that worked, and they still don't.
	It's just that Trump and Fauci shilled for them.
	And told people that it worked.
	Every other product that they had done for 10 years was a pump and dump.
	They would tell rumors on Wall Street and get everybody to buy their stock.
	Hey, we got a cure for this.
	We got a cure for that.
	And it's just, you know, it's miraculous.
	But on their own side, they're saying, well, we can.
	And they said it, you know, when Trump set up that presentation.
	And remember how he set that up.
	He has all these pharmaceutical executives at the table.
	How long is it going to take you?
	Well, that's too long.
	How about you?
	Well, it's a little bit faster.
	That's not fast enough.
	So forth.
	And he's got it set up.
	So the last one he goes to is Moderna.
	And they said, we got it right now because we don't have to manufacture the vaccine.
	Your body will manufacture the vaccine.
	And that's the way they described it.
	And so you're going to hijack my genetics, right?
	With an injection.
	And when does it all stop?
	And people are asking this.
	When does it stop?
	Whatever it's doing to your body, when does that stop?
	So, in addition to the mRNA stuff, in addition to the artificial intelligence, Which, again, they're going to clear the decks for everything because artificial intelligence is their ultimate control tool.
	It's what allows them to go back and data mine all of our history, which they've been saving in their computer centers in Bluffdale, Utah.
	They built this massive center there to store everything that's happening on the web.
	Everything that you say or do on the web, they've stored it there.
	You'll probably get some of my things that were deleted by YouTube from them maybe someday, huh?
	I'm sure they will be presented at my trial.
	But they've got all this stuff there.
	Just waiting for the day where they can go back and data mine it.
	And that's coming really soon with artificial intelligence.
	In the early 1800s, philosopher Henri Saint-Simon, the ideological father of technocracy, wrote, and this is his preface to the article, Patrick Wood's preface.
	He said, A scientist, my dear friends, is a man who foresees.
	It is because science provides the means to predict that it is useful.
	And the scientists are superior to all other men.
	See, it's a religion.
	And they're prophets.
	They're false prophets.
	They've had their false prophecies about the climate and all these other things that are going to happen.
	But, you know, they're better than us.
	They're smarter than us.
	High priests.
	So they're both prophets and priests of a new religion.
	Scientism.
	And technocracy.
	And I tell you, Elon Musk is just thoroughly immersed in this.
	With his family, culturally, and all the rest of this.
	Been that way for a long time.
	The CDC's Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analysis has partnered with a CIA-linked Palantir to cement public...
	Again, anticipatory intelligence.
	And when we stop and think about the allopathic model of health care, we're going to identify something that's bad, and we're going to kill it, right?
	That's what they do.
	They don't try to work with your body, make you stronger and healthier.
	No, we're going to identify some pathogen.
	We're going to kill it.
	Pew, pew, pew.
	And the problem is, is that frequently your body is collateral damage.
	Isn't it?
	We've got something here that's going to kill bacteria.
	Except it also kills parts of your body as well.
	Oh, okay.
	Well, just collateral damage.
	Well, we've got the bacteria.
	That's the important thing.
	And so it's only natural that these things would converge, right?
	Palantir has been allied with the military and the defense to identify the enemies using artificial intelligence and predictive programming and all the rest is anticipatory intelligence.
	So we're going to predict who our enemies are, we're going to isolate and identify them, and then we're going to attack them.
	And big tech, Silicon Valley, is moving in a big way towards the defense industry.
	Elon Musk is all about that.
	Andrew Hill is all about that.
	All these Palantir and PayPal mafia companies are all about getting into weapons and other things like that.
	And so what they're going to do is they're going to weaponize medicine against us.
	Against us.
	Not against the disease.
	Against us.
	And they're going to use predictive programming.
	That's the way they're going to sell this.
	We can identify the disease now just like we would identify an enemy combatant in another country.
	And who knows, maybe they weren't enemies before we started shooting at them, but we can make them an enemy.
	Just like we can make you a lifetime patient, we can keep these wars going on forever.
	We go in and we kill a bunch of innocent people, and may mutilate and kill a bunch of children, and we've got a war that's going to last for a long time, because these people want to get even with that.
	So, they'll do the same thing with our bodies.
	Make us permanent patients, just like we have permanent wars.
	Music
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple.
	Unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.

▲