Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 1, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:32

The David Knight Show LIVE - 5/01/2025

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, May Day, Year of Our Lord 2025.
	We're going to talk about an amazing back and forth that Donald Trump had and what it tells us about his character and his discernment.
	But we're also going to talk about how he's moving towards these freedom cities.
	Isn't that something that I've talked about in depth before?
	And now they're pushing further into that as they're talking about stablecoins ripping by a factor of 100.
	Yeah, the market cap for these stablecoins, they expect to go from about $20 billion to about $2 trillion.
	We'll see what happens with that.
	I think that is the stealth CBDC.
	But we're going to begin with pharmaceutical news as the Trump administration is pushing hard for self-amplifying mRNA.
	What a surprise, considering that the tech bros and his financial backers all have vested interests in it, including his vice president.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	Well, as LifeSite puts it, they're working on mRNA injections, genetic code injections, for every imaginable infectious disease.
	And I would say, that's almost right, for every imaginary infectious disease.
	It will be just like COVID.
	The disease will be the injection.
	Tom Rintz said all childhood vaccines are going to be gene therapies.
	That's what they're rolling out.
	It's now being integrated into every vaccine that is out there.
	Now, LifeSite News contacted him for his source of that.
	He did not get back to them, but they said that Penn Medicine's Dr. Drew Weissman, who was jointly awarded a Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2023 for contributing to modified mRNA technology of Pfizer-Moderna,
	Has said, we are working on every imaginable infectious disease.
	That's coming from the guy who is actually doing the work, not from observers.
	So they reached out to Peter McCullen.
	He says, yeah, Moderna is one of many companies that's doing extensive portfolio vaccine work in development.
	Penn Medicine has also listed a wide range of diseases that they want to use mRNA for.
	Bird flu, of course, right?
	All coronaviruses, all colds.
	In fact, you go back and you look at the literature before this stuff rolled out with the beginning of the 21st century.
	Coronavirus was just identified as a common cold.
	Of course, they had not isolated it.
	That's the key thing.
	They had not done the actual science.
	It was a theory.
	The theory of viruses.
	Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.
	You haven't done the science on it.
	But, again, that's why I say every imaginary disease.
	But they're going to have vaccines that will be mRNA for bird flu.
	Genetic diseases, of course, because it is a genetic code injection.
	And it will cause its own genetic diseases.
	Heart attacks, which we've seen.
	Neurodevelopmental disorders.
	They can also use it, I guess, to sterilize people.
	Since we see the people who have gotten the injections, women who have gotten the injections, have about a 37% drop in fertility.
	Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck, as did Roche.
	And again, for 10 years, Moderna existed and never had a safe approved product until it just got pushed through by Trump with a phony emergency.
	Declaration.
	The dangers of mRNA shots are so well documented that 11 states have thus far pursued bans on them.
	And yet, this is something that is being pushed and cheered by Trump.
	In his first day in office, he brings in Larry Ellison, who pushes the Stargate project.
	Yeah, we're going to custom make mRNA stuff right away for you.
	We'll do an artificial intelligence analysis.
	Who knows why it'll hallucinate, but of course we will create a custom one for you.
	And the way they put it in LifeSite, they say, well, these are being pushed by some of the most influential men in America, like Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison, who suggested that we could use SMART.
	I'm not going to mention Trump, right?
	Can't say his name.
	He who shall not be named is Trump.
	MIT scientists say COVID vaccines caused all-cause deaths to skyrocket.
	This is a new report that's come out, and it is a collaboration with the Surgeon General of Florida, Latipo.
	This is MIT, Latipo.
	They just confirmed that COVID mRNA, quote-unquote, vaccines, I call them genetic code injection.
	Triggered a global surge in all-cause mortality rates.
	This is why, folks, they're focusing on this lab leak nonsense.
	If it's leaked, it's just a mistake, right?
	Oh, and it was a real emergency.
	It was a real emergency.
	No, it wasn't Wuhan.
	It was Washington.
	It wasn't Wuhan.
	It was Washington.
	It wasn't a gain-of-function bioweapon out of Wuhan.
	It was a genetic code injection out of Washington.
	The team of researchers led by MIT's Dr. Retsif Levy and included Florida's Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph Latipo, study reports significantly higher 12-month all-cause cardiovascular COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 mortality among Florida adults who received the Pfizer genetic code injection.
	And this is what I've said all along.
	You can look at an uptick in all-cause mortality because the hospital rules.
	Because of the treatments that are being funded and pushed by Washington, by Trump.
	And then when his vaccine gets pushed out and is twisting arms with the mandates, that's when you see a straight-up spike.
	It's pretty simple.
	Pretty simple.
	Moderna's mRNA shot was also found to have triggered surging and all-cause deaths, but it was more about Pfizer.
	As a matter of fact, Steve Kirsch.
	Says the part of the study that's being done by Florida's Surgeon General, Latipo, looked at a brand differential study.
	And it shows, and he does the math of how he derives this based on their sample, based on Florida, then extrapolating it out to the United States.
	He calculates that the Pfizer vaccine alone, alone, killed over 470,000 Americans.
	And that's what we see in the spike.
	All of this data comes together.
	And yet, what do you hear?
	You hear this hammering of, it leaked from the lab.
	Even some of the people who point to these types of data will fall back on that.
	He says, the stunning brand comparison shows the Pfizer shots increase your risk of death by at least 36%.
	And here's the key, he says.
	Vaccines are never...
	Supposed to increase your risk of death.
	Let's say, what was that principle of medical ethics, first do no harm?
	Well, first do no farm, right?
	And so, you know, they should never, never cause an increase.
	That means that they're not safe, even if they were effective, but they're not.
	He is the only health authority, LATIPO, in America who looks critically at his own health data, and he found that people who got the Pfizer vaccine had a stunning 36% increase in all-cause mortality.
	This is a train wreck, he said, because they should never increase all-cause mortality.
	This means that Pfizer single-handedly likely killed at least 470,000 Americans if the results in other states are similar to what they found in Florida.
	The excuse is, yeah, but there was a net benefit to the lives saved from COVID.
	That is complete BS.
	By the way, that's what you always hear from Trump, isn't it?
	These vaccines, they're so important.
	Millions of people would have died.
	I'd save so many millions of lives.
	No, you didn't.
	Nobody was dying until they got the ventilators done by Peter Navarro and remdesivir pushed by Fauci and so on.
	So when you look at...
	How this breaks down by particular diseases, of course, all-cause mortality was up by 37% for Pfizer-vaccinated adults.
	But when you look at cardiovascular mortality, that was up by 53%.
	When you look at COVID-19 mortality, people dying from COVID-19, they said, what they were vaccinating them for, that went up by 88%.
	And look, You are injecting them with a genetic code injection that's going to manufacture a spike protein, which is what they're looking for.
	Hmm.
	Yeah.
	Well, I guess it wasn't COVID-19.
	Perhaps it was just the spike protein that is pervasive.
	And, of course, many people pointed out, and I said this from the very beginning, okay, so...
	The whole theory behind the mRNA stuff, as Moderna said, when Trump set up that show, had everybody around the table, how fast is it going to take?
	Oh, that's not fast enough.
	He gets to the last one, of course.
	And they're all prearranged in terms of how quickly they can get it out.
	And the last person he points to says, we can do it right now.
	We'll use your body to manufacture this.
	On their own website, that's what they said.
	So I said, okay, so what turns it off?
	Well, evidently nothing does.
	And it continues with a lot of people.
	Remember we played for you the clip of the nurse who said, 1500 days later, and my body is still manufacturing this spike protein.
	And the spike protein causes all kinds of issues with everybody, depending on where it hits in your body.
	But still manufacturing.
	That's not good enough.
	Because evidently, not everybody was continuing to manufacture it without ceasing.
	And so now they've come up with an improvement.
	The self-amplifying mRNA vaccine.
	Self-amplifying.
	And this is what Vivek the Snake, Ramaswamy, and J.D. Vance in Ohio.
	They're stakes in companies that are doing this.
	And this self-amplifying mRNA vaccine.
	Now the Trump administration is fast-tracking this for bird flu.
	And this is coming surprisingly from the Gateway Pundit, who normally will not mention anything that Trump does.
	And it is, you know, critical of this process.
	And there is muted implied criticism of Trump, but nothing direct.
	You're not going to see that on the Gateway Puppets.
	The Trump administration has granted fast-track designation to a groundbreaking and controversial, they say, self-amplifying mRNA.
	A vaccine candidate targeting the so-called bird flu.
	So it's controversial, they say.
	You know, when you look at Gateway Pundit, I mean, they're over the top in terms of if they disagree with something, right?
	Jim Hoft.
	But he just says, well, it's just controversial.
	It's just controversial.
	It's now in phase one.
	Positioned by federal health authorities as a front-line defense against potential bird flu pandemic.
	This is for humans.
	The designation was announced on April 10th, awarded by the FDA in partnership with the Department of HHS.
	That's where RFK Jr. hangs out.
	And also with BARDA, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.
	This is the bioweapon equivalent of DARPA.
	Yeah, the military advanced research.
	This is, you know, for bioweapons it's so effective that they've got now another version of DARPA, BARDA.
	The fast-track designation from the FDA expedites the review of drugs so they can run it through at warp speed, right?
	Why is everybody surprised that Trump is doing all the same stuff that he did the first time?
	Slightly different.
	This time it's going to be for bird flu.
	Instead of for supposed coronavirus.
	And we're going to lock everybody down with indecision about what we're going to do with tariffs.
	Until he comes up with something else.
	So, this uses a self-replicating mRNA platform, meaning that the genetic material continues reproducing inside the recipient's cells to boost production of flu-fighting proteins.
	Give me a break.
	Give me a break.
	How does he...
	Bring himself to print this kind of nonsense.
	Stronger immune response with smaller doses.
	Yeah, it's more intense.
	And it continues.
	Because we can't risk that some people's bodies are going to somehow stop this or turn it off.
	I don't know if they do.
	But hey, let's make it stronger and let's amplify it.
	Amplify it.
	We're not just going to continue it.
	We're going to amplify it.
	It's a kill shot, folks.
	This experimental technology dubbed Star, Stargate, this is Star, powered by a proprietary delivery system allows the vaccine to be freeze-dried and stored in refrigerators, avoiding the ultra-cold storage problems that plagued early COVID-19 rollouts.
	It's a real problem because, you know, I still think that when they found in those two different lots, each of them, over a million of these, Injections.
	In Japan, two separate lots, a little over a million each, so over two million of these things, they noticed that they had black particulates in it.
	Not only that, but the black particulates, whatever they were, and they wouldn't say what it was.
	They're not going to, oh, I wonder what, I don't know, just throw it away.
	You know, let's do a Rudy Giuliani on 9-11.
	Let's just throw it away.
	Let's not look at that.
	Don't look at that.
	So they just threw it away.
	But they did say, publicly, that it interacted with magnets.
	So, if they didn't keep it super cold, it started doing its thing in the bottle.
	And that was, we don't want to have that happen again.
	So we're going to freeze dry it, so we can just keep it in the refrigerator, inactive, in the refrigerator.
	Because we don't want people seeing this black particulate come out that interacts with magnets.
	Federal taxpayers are footing the bill again.
	Again, just like for Trump's first bioweapon.
	BARDA, same agency that was involved in Operation Warp Speed, under the previous Trump term, says Gateway Pundit, is getting close to criticizing.
	Be careful.
	Be careful.
	All your readers will turn against you at Gateway Pundit if you criticize he who shall not be named.
	I've been given sweeping authority to fund and to fast-track pandemic-related vaccines and therapy
	We don't care.
	We'll find some way to blame it on Biden, I'm sure.
	And in Canada, they're working on inhaled mRNA COVID shots now.
	Something in the air.
	Oh, maybe they could drop it with like a chemtrail or something, huh?
	mRNA vaccines developed with abortion-tainted fetal cell lines are now entering phase 2 clinical trials.
	These are adenoviral-vectored trials.
	Researchers now in active recruitment for 350 volunteers.
	Who wants to sign up for this?
	They call it AeroVax, and they got $8 million in funding from the Canadian government because, you know, they want to kill their own people as well.
	Well, RFK Jr. had an interesting, while we're talking about AeroVax and aerosol vaccination, he had an interesting response to a question about chemtrails.
	My biggest concern is the stratospheric aerosol injections that are continuously peppered on us every day.
	Bromium, aluminum, strontium.
	It's sprayed in our skies all day long.
	And I know you've talked to Dane Wigington about this.
	He seems to be one of the experts in the field.
	Is there a question?
	Yes.
	How do we stop it?
	That is not happening in my agency.
	You know, we don't do that.
	It's done, we think, by DARPA.
	And a lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel.
	So, you know, those materials are put in jet fuel.
	I'm going to do everything in my power to stop it.
	We're bringing on somebody who's going to think only about that, find out who's doing it, and holding them accountable.
	Well, that's interesting, isn't it?
	It's interesting.
	We'll see.
	He's been very candid about a lot of things.
	His actions don't necessarily match up with it yet.
	As a matter of fact, he's done some things going in the wrong direction.
	But this is from 100% Fed Up.
	And he says, I've been talking about chemtrails now for over 10 years.
	And he says, whenever I do, there's always a small but very vocal group of people who have extremely strong cognitive dissonant reactions.
	They get very angry with me.
	And he said, they've, number one, been lied to for decades.
	And number two, they're actively poisoned by their government.
	Nevertheless, they get angry with me.
	Well, I tried.
	Criticizing Trump and tying him to all of these programs that he is inexorably tied to.
	Anyway, he says on Dr. Phil's show, when RFK Jr. is asked about that, he doesn't say, oh, that's not real.
	That's just a conspiracy.
	He doesn't say, oh, I really don't have any information on that.
	Instead, he confirms that they are real.
	Says he believes that DARPA is doing the spraying.
	Look, everybody, it's not a question.
	You just have to look up.
	So, who's doing the jab, RFK Jr.?
	That is in your department.
	When are you going to stop that?
	And so he thinks it's being done by DARPA.
	So he said, for years, people would say to me, well, you know, people can't keep this stuff quiet.
	This would be too big a conspiracy.
	Yeah, I know, Dane Wigington has shown pictures of the people with the nozzles on the jets and all the rest of the stuff, shown them turning them off mid-air, turning them on again in mid-air, that type of thing.
	Yeah, it's not a reaction, an atmospheric reaction to the plane passing through it.
	You can see the nozzles turning on, turning off, that type of thing.
	He says, well, people ask me, how could such a huge conspiracy be kept quiet all these years?
	Does that mean that the pilots would have to be in on it?
	The airports, the people who work on the planes, too many people are in on it for the truth not to come out.
	Well, let's go back to 9-11.
	Look at that.
	There's no longer any massive spraying jets being hooked up to planes, he said.
	No, they knew they couldn't keep that quite as much simpler.
	Just as he said, they found a way to put the chemicals directly into the fuel.
	And as the fuel burns and the exhaust comes out, the chemicals come out with it, and nobody needs to be in on it.
	They just put it into the fuel.
	He said, my biggest concern is the stratospheric aerosol injections that are continuously being...
	Peppered on us every day.
	Brontium, aluminum, strontium.
	Sprayed in our skies all day, she said.
	And I know you've talked to Dane Wigington about this, and he seems to be one of the experts in the field.
	He is.
	Absolutely.
	That's not what he is focused on.
	But now we've got something else.
	Now we can even do nanotech.
	We can do AeroVax, mRNA, inhalable stuff.
	These people are absolutely monsters.
	Monsters.
	And it all goes back to all this stuff.
	It's all about depopulation.
	All these people.
	Saying, oh, well, let's admit now that we're doing stratospheric aerosol injections.
	Let's admit it to everybody because we need to step this up and accelerate it.
	And so we need to do it openly.
	The UK government is going to do it openly.
	And you've got other tech billionaires who want to do it openly.
	And so just fess up that you're doing it.
	And just start doing it so we can accelerate it.
	We've got all kinds of things that we can put in.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back before we go.
	On Rumble, Dougalug, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, happy belated birthday, David.
	Always seem to be on the road when you have great shows like yesterday.
	Well, thank you.
	That's kind.
	And on Rumble, KWD68 says, the geese that stop at my pond are now staying six feet apart.
	They know.
	Yeah, they know.
	They better be careful.
	Because there are some plans to actually capture them and start mass culling, rather than having geese busters do it.
	But I guess if they can kill them en masse, they can say that they're dying from bird flu, that we don't see the wild birds dying from.
	We'll be right back.
	be right back.
	back.
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, and I just wanted to pass along to you, I got an email, and I forgot to print it out here, but I'll just summarize it.
	A listener whose name is Cherry, and she would like prayer for cancer.
	And she is, I think she's waiting for a diagnosis for it.
	But please keep her in your prayers.
	We know that God is sovereign and we know that God asks us to ask for this.
	God could easily heal whoever he wishes.
	He doesn't need to get us in on it.
	But I think when he tells us to do that, he gives us an opportunity to see him doing supernatural things, just as we were talking about yesterday with J. Warner Wallace.
	Supernatural is the issue.
	Jesus is so well documented as an historical figure better than anybody else.
	Nobody would argue except that the record has supernatural things in it.
	We don't shy away from that.
	And for good reason.
	And it is not just superstition.
	It is actually critical thinking.
	That points to the supernatural.
	But let's talk about what's going on with Donald Trump.
	This is one of the most amazing exchanges I've seen.
	And this goes back to the picture that he put up about the guy they deported and said he's MS-13, right?
	And here's proof of it.
	Look, he's got tattoos on his fingers.
	And then on his knuckles, they write MS-13, saying that these tattoos that are on his fingers, like it was a marijuana leaf.
	Okay, so that's them.
	And there was a smiley face on the next finger.
	Okay, so that's an S. And then we've got a cross on the fourth finger.
	Wow, that's a one.
	And then we have a skull.
	Ah, see, that's a three.
	Yeah, it's a three.
	Because it's got three dots.
	Sometimes they will have three dots tattooed.
	They don't put them in skulls, really.
	So we'll talk a little bit about that more.
	But I showed that.
	And I said, look, based on what Trump is saying, he really doesn't understand that this was Photoshopped.
	And yesterday he had surfaced the interview that he had ABC's Newsday 100 interview.
	So it was ABC News, their 100-day interview for his 100th day.
	So I guess it was two days ago.
	Yesterday the clips surfaced.
	Terry Moran was the one who was doing the interview.
	And they were discussing the case of this guy, Garcia.
	Kilmar Garcia.
	When Trump brought up the photoshopped image of him, of his hand, right?
	And he said he wasn't a member of a gang.
	And then you look at his knuckles, and his knuckles say MS-13.
	He had MS-13 on his knuckles.
	And Terry Moran just says, oh, that was photoshopped.
	That set him off.
	That set him off.
	Boom.
	And so you had this exchange going back and forth.
	He wasn't a member of a gang.
	And then they looked, and on his knuckles, he had MS-13.
	There's a dispute in that.
	Wait a minute.
	Wait a minute.
	He had MS-13 on his knuckles.
	He had some tattoos that are interpreted that way.
	But let's move on.
	Wait a minute.
	Hey, Terry.
	Terry.
	Terry.
	He did not have the letter MS-13.
	It says MS-13.
	That was Photoshopped.
	That was Photoshopped.
	Terry, you can't do that.
	I've given you the big break of a lifetime.
	You know, you're doing the interview.
	I picked you because, frankly, I never heard of you, but that's okay.
	I picked you, Terry, but you're not being very nice.
	He had MS-13 tattooed.
	We'll agree to disagree.
	I want to move on to something else.
	Do you want me to show you the picture?
	I saw the picture.
	Oh, and you think it was photoshopped?
	Here we go.
	Here we go.
	Don't photoshop it.
	Go look at his hand.
	He did have tattoos that can be interpreted that way.
	I'm not an expert on them.
	I want to turn to Ukraine, sir.
	I want to get to Ukraine.
	Let's move on.
	He had MS, as clear as you can be, not interpreted.
	This is why people no longer believe the news, because it's fake news.
	When he was photographed in El Salvador, they aren't there.
	But let's just go.
	They aren't there when he's in El Salvador.
	Oh, they weren't there, but they're there now, right?
	No. They're in your picture.
	Terry. Ukraine, sir.
	He's got MS-13 on his knuckles.
	All right.
	Okay? We'll take a look.
	It's such a disservice.
	We'll take a look at that, sir.
	Why don't you just say it?
	Yes, he does.
	And, you know, go on to something else.
	Isn't that amazing?
	How childish, petulant, and ignorant he is.
	He can't tell that that is a...
	You can't tell if that is photoshopped.
	I mean, look at that.
	Look at the difference.
	Look at how one of them is in perspective and how it's faded down there.
	And obviously they wrote in their MS-13.
	And Trump thought that it was the real thing.
	And here's the thing, folks.
	The sycophants that he has surrounded himself with.
	And I mean, it's the entire Republican Party now.
	You know, from the leaders down to the grassroots.
	Nobody will hold him responsible.
	If Trump says that the sky is polka dot, they'll all say the sky is polka dot, no matter what they see.
	Nobody will tell the emperor that he has no clothes and he has no clues.
	As to what's going on.
	They're all just court jesters around this guy.
	He surrounded himself with a bunch of yes men.
	And he couldn't take that from this guy, Terry Moran.
	And Terry Moran was like, okay, yeah, it was Photoshopped, but, you know, we're going to go.
	No, you say it.
	You say that he had MS-13 tattooed on his knuckles.
	On his knuckles.
	Well, you know, the problem with it, and I pointed this out when Trump first did it.
	I said, you know, they set up this, had this Democrat senator go down to see him.
	And the El Salvadoran government released these pictures after they sent him down.
	And you can see that it is not on his hand.
	There's no question about it.
	I mean, you can look at it, and anybody who...
	I don't understand how anybody can look at that and not understand that they put that text in there.
	But there's a picture of it.
	And he says, oh, well, you know, those were old pictures.
	No, this is the picture after you sent him away because you said that he had it tattooed on his hand.
	You can see it's not there.
	This is an old picture where you can also see that he doesn't have it on his hand.
	But it's this Photoshop picture that Trump's going to go, and he's going to demand that everybody say that it is what he says it is.
	And it's absolutely absurd.
	I find it hilarious because this proves Trump is just your stereotypical Facebook idiot getting one shot by AI images.
	Yeah.
	Not even AI.
	I mean, it's just crude Photoshop.
	I don't even think the people that did it intended to deceive anybody.
	It's just that Trump is so stupid that he fell into that.
	And then he's so arrogant that you've got to do what he has to say.
	Here's the thing, folks.
	That's not the evidence for sending him out.
	And just as Trump is saying, this is why nobody believes you.
	No, Trump, this is why nobody believes, should believe you.
	I don't know if they believe him or not, but they will follow him, and they will support him.
	Just like the absurdity that we saw yesterday about, well, Amazon's going to tell people about this tax that's been added.
	You can't list a tax.
	Well, they list...
	They list the sales taxes.
	They list the shipping charges.
	We've had restaurants that show the surcharges that are put on restaurants or hotels that have a surcharge put on them by local government.
	They list that kind of stuff.
	Oh, well, it's inflation.
	As we talked about yesterday, Trump had nothing to do with the massive inflation that we've got, with all the universal basic income nonsense that he did and taking up government spending.
	To a completely new trajectory that was maintained by Biden.
	That's a big part of that.
	But of course, he had a problem with the inflation, but the inflation is very different, as I pointed out.
	You got restaurant owners who are talking about how much food has gone up.
	All the food has gone up different amounts.
	The beef had gone up so much, this restaurant owner stopped selling beef.
	So, inflation is not a particular percentage that is directly applied to every bill.
	You can't itemize inflation.
	That's the absurdity of it.
	And it's also the dishonesty to say that Jeff Bezos, who has, you know, this is a tax that's being put on.
	That's what they don't want you to see, that you're going to be paying anything.
	Remember?
	They said, it's not going to be paid by American consumers.
	Yes, it is.
	And the fact that they flipped out about it.
	It shows that they were lying, and they know that they were lying.
	Everybody knows that it's a tax.
	They're not that stupid that they don't know that it's a tax.
	All tariffs are taxes.
	They're not going to be paid by other people.
	That's why I say Donald Trump is nothing but a New York Democrat, because a New York Democrat will tell you, we're going to raise taxes, but don't worry, you're not going to pay it.
	Other people are going to pay it.
	Bad other people.
	It's only fair those other people pay the tax.
	And that's the way he sold the tariff.
	And he lied to people.
	He said it's not going to raise the price of stuff.
	And then when somebody is going to put it there as an itemized statement, look at how apoplectic they get.
	And look at how they call the other people propagandists.
	If he were to put that up, and Bezos bowed to him.
	See, that's the fear that everybody has against this guy.
	Because he's not a president.
	He's a dictator.
	I refuse to call Trump president.
	He refuses to obey the Constitution, and that's a condition of his office.
	He's not a president.
	He's just Trump.
	And he's just Dictator Don.
	He's not even a president.
	He doesn't deserve that title.
	He's got power, but no authority.
	No legitimate authority for what he's doing.
	He has no legitimate authority for these emergencies that he's put on, for any of this stuff.
	But, you know, when you look at Terry Moran, And good for him.
	I thought he was, he kept trying to move on.
	Let's talk about something else.
	Okay, fine.
	Let's just talk about something else.
	He wasn't going to bow down to Trump and accept, okay, so yeah, he does have MS-13 on his knuckles.
	He knows that's not true.
	And he's not going to kowtow to Trump and say that it is true.
	But let's move on.
	We disagree with that.
	He finishes by saying, well, it's contested.
	Right?
	Let's just move on.
	Can we talk about something?
	Let's just talk about something.
	No, you will say it.
	Say it, Terry.
	Say that I'm right.
	Bow to me.
	Kiss my ring.
	Right?
	Or other parts of his anatomy.
	And when you compare that interview to what Candace Owen did, when she tried half-heartedly...
	To confront him on his kill shot bioweapon.
	Big pharma, which is a huge topic on the minds of mothers especially.
	You're seeing what's happening at these school board meetings.
	Where do you stand on these vaccine mandates?
	And obviously I know that you are pro-vaccine, obviously.
	She only wants to talk about the mandate.
	It was one of the greatest achievements.
	We did it in less than nine months.
	To be able to do that.
	Oh, you're great.
	It's in a twist, right?
	Now we went from, this is a good thing and people should have this option, to military men, you're going to have to resign.
	Because you're not getting this vaccine.
	Where do you stand on that?
	Well, I stand on, forget about the mandates that people have to have their freedom, but at the same time, the vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of mankind.
	We would have had a 1917, remember the Spanish flu, killed perhaps 100 million people.
	Actually, it ended the First World War because the soldiers were so loved.
	We've heard this.
	What I want you to see was the difference between Terry Moran, who says, okay, let's just move on.
	But yeah, it was Photoshop.
	You know, it's not Photoshop.
	And how he reacted to her.
	She knew that she would get that kind of treatment if she confronted Trump.
	And she knew that her career would be over with a MAGA cult.
	And she let him get away with mass murder.
	That's a lot more important.
	What she kowtowed to him over is a lot more important than if you got MS-13 tattooed on your knuckles or not.
	And I say this about this guy.
	Why in the world don't they focus?
	I think he likely is connected with cartels.
	I still think he needs to have due process.
	I don't like the way this thing operated.
	Look, the reason I say I think he is is because of what surfaced later, which was not part of them sending him out.
	And it's not the case that Trump wants to make.
	Why doesn't Trump point out the fact that he was apprehended in Tennessee?
	Transporting eight people, none of whom had any idea or spoke English.
	And when they stopped him, the car that he was driving was with somebody who was a convicted gang member.
	It belonged to somebody else who was a convicted gang member.
	And so he was obviously trafficking people.
	Why don't you talk about that instead of this phony thing about the knuckles?
	See, Trump can't even manage to do the right thing.
	It's right there in front of him.
	And that's everybody in his administration, including Pam Bondi and the rest of these people, Homan and all the rest of them.
	Why not talk about the real thing?
	And here's the other part of it.
	You say, okay, we know this guy's a murderer.
	Let's just kill him right now.
	You need to go through the process of a trial and due process.
	Even if you've got eyewitnesses who saw this person shooting people and you apprehend them, you go through the process.
	And it's not enough to say, well, we all know that he killed them.
	Yeah, fine.
	Okay.
	Let's go through the process.
	Because if it's a serious crime, especially if it's a serious crime, you want to have due process for everybody.
	You don't want to get rid of that.
	And, yes, that's for everybody that's here in America.
	In the same way that when we look at the FISA thing, right, we don't want to spy.
	We don't want the government spying.
	On American citizens without a search warrant, right?
	And so that's why they created the FISA court.
	Said, you've got to go to the FISA court.
	We'll get a little phony search warrant.
	And then they used it to get essentially a warrant to spy on Mr. and Mrs. Verizon, everybody in the world.
	They used that purpose.
	But the purpose of FISA was to say, you're not going to spy on Americans without a search warrant.
	And you are not going to spy on whether the Americans are in America or whether they're abroad.
	You're not going to spy on them.
	And you're not going to spy on foreign citizens if they're in America either.
	We're going to have this be a zone that is under the rule of law.
	And so that kind of attitude, going back 50 years ago, I know it's so antiquated, isn't it?
	The idea that we'd have the rule of law in America?
	Who wants that?
	Let's just expedite this.
	Right?
	People getting in the way of my lockdown?
	Let's just arrest them.
	Okay?
	No.
	No.
	Let's have some proof.
	Let's have some proof.
	And if you don't require proof for murderers, right, and have a trial, guess what?
	You're going to wind up with mass murder by a president who uses a phony emergency.
	As phony as the supposed tattoos on the knuckle.
	Trump killed who knows how many people with that phony emergency.
	And it was as phony as the Photoshop stuff.
	Maybe he's stupid enough to believe that there was a real COVID emergency.
	It doesn't really matter to me whether he was stupid or dishonest.
	The results are the same.
	He had a bogus reason for everything that he did.
	He ignores the rule of law.
	He's still doing it.
	He knows that it's not an emergency.
	He's claiming that he's got emergency powers to put on automobile tariffs, going back to an early 1960s law about cars.
	And he says, okay, well, you know, for 60 years, we haven't decided that foreign cars are a national security emergency, but now Trump has.
	And so now he can do whatever he wishes.
	And he can put the tariffs on, he can take the tariffs off.
	You do the hokey pokey.
	You put the terrorists on.
	You take the terrorists off.
	It's ridiculous, this whole exercise.
	And far and above what the tax that he doesn't want you to see is charging, it's the way he's locked everybody down with his volatility, his vacillation, in, out, in, out, all the time.
	so uh as people wind out even the photograph that was there by the salvadoran government it's not just that one handshake of course they also set up a photo op whereas the two of them are meeting they bring them what was it martinis or something or
	some some alcoholic drink and uh to make it look like they're at a resort you know they the el salvadoran government comes out and puts those drinks down margarita's
	Margaritas, I think it was.
	That would be it, yeah.
	Margaritas.
	Yes, we're Latin America.
	So I put some margaritas on the table.
	Take a picture of them.
	And by doing that, as I pointed out, by doing that, you can see his hand.
	And he doesn't have MS-13 on it.
	But think about how dishonest that is.
	And how dishonest what Trump is doing.
	You may really have a cartel guy there.
	But let's get real.
	Because we need to have a rule of law and you need to have some credibility.
	So he's got a marijuana leaf, a smiley face, a cross.
	So the marijuana leaf is supposed to be the M. It's supposed to be indicative of an M. The smiley face is supposed to be indicative of an S. The cross is supposed to be a 1. And the skull is supposed to represent a 3. Because,
	you know, he's got two eye sockets and a mouth or whatever, but it doesn't look like the three dots that the MS-13 does.
	So, he kept saying, well, that was interpreted, and then there was a Photoshop thing that puts the MS-13.
	No, no, no.
	It was there.
	Stupidly wrong.
	MS-13 experts said that none of the pictorial tattoos on the photograph is a known signifier of MS-13.
	Now, this is PolitiFact.
	Which I typically find them to be wrong about everything.
	But I showed that stuff to you.
	I don't need a gang expert to show.
	I showed you pictures of what the MS-13 people do.
	They are loud and proud about their tattoos.
	And that's what the people that PolitiFact talked to said.
	They said, well, you know, they don't try to hide it.
	I mean, they...
	They do tattoo it on their face.
	They've got like an MS on their back that's like the entire back, you know, and then the 1-3 that is there as well.
	It's loud and proud when they do this.
	They said, one person said, well, I don't believe that a dangerous individual, quote-unquote, would have such anodyne and farcically generic tattoos on his hand.
	And that's what I showed.
	I said, this is what the real MS-13 guys are.
	It's really hardcore, satanic, gigantic, in your face or on their face.
	Or even giant and big on their back.
	Another person said, within MS-13 culture, such markings would likely be frowned upon, even viewed as a sign of cowardice.
	See, because they're big, they're loud and proud about their tattoos.
	As they could be interpreted as an attempt to hide.
	Or to downplay their gang affiliation.
	That type of concealment goes against the gang's norms, which often demand bold, visible demonstrations of identity and loyalty.
	So I don't think that that's an MS-13 tattoo.
	He may not be MS-13.
	He may just be another cartel.
	Fine.
	Deport him.
	Put him in prison.
	I don't care.
	But do the due process.
	Trump said Abrego Garcia, quote, had MS-13 on his knuckle tattoos and that it was not interpreted, but it was.
	So he goes on to say in that interview, he said, so I could get El Salvador to return, but lawyers don't want him to.
	I don't want to, essentially.
	That's what he's saying, which we all knew that.
	He said, we have lawyers who don't want to do this, and if I were the president that just wanted to do anything, I would probably keep him right where he is.
	Well, I think he is the president.
	That just wants to do anything he pleases, right?
	That is the president that he is.
	Dictator Don.
	Terry Moran said, well, you could get him back.
	There's a phone on your desk.
	You could pick it up with all the power of the presidency.
	You could call the president of El Salvador and say, send him back right now.
	He said, I could.
	And if he were a gentleman that you say he is, I would do that.
	If I were the president that just wanted to do anything, I'd probably keep him right where he is because I've got lawyers who tell me to do that.
	And so the other thing that I didn't talk about, it's part of their first 100 days in office.
	They put a lot of print-up signs and stuck them in front of the White House.
	Now, Steve Watson says, Trump displays criminal alien images on the White House lawn, and guess what MSNBC does?
	He's all upset because MSNBC blurred those out.
	The lineup includes shots of illegals arrested and charged with sexual assault of a child, murder, rape, child molestation, and plenty of other violent crimes.
	Well, again...
	Were they convicted?
	Does it say that they were convicted?
	Does it say that this person was charged?
	I mean, if it says that they're charged, then that's fine.
	Here, we have evidence to indict this person for this particular crime.
	And you put their face up.
	That's fine.
	They do that.
	And they have wanted lists that the FBI puts out.
	We're looking for this guy.
	So you can put that kind of stuff up.
	If you want to portray this as being a settled amount, It kind of undermines all that when you play these kinds of nonsense games with Photoshop, doesn't it?
	See, that's the real issue.
	This is why nobody believes Trump when he does this kind of stuff.
	The White House has not provided any information to support their claims that these are criminals who have been arrested.
	Is that what it said on the thing?
	Or does it say convicted on there?
	And so what they did was they blurted out.
	They blurted out.
	So here's the two different sides of this.
	We're not getting the true story from either side.
	Trump puts MS-13, or somebody, puts it on there when it's not on the guy's hand.
	When these people are arrested, MS-13, MSNBC, they might be careful.
	Trump is going to probably say next that MS-13...
	That MSNBC is part of MS-13.
	See, it's right there in their name.
	Probably there is somewhere, some cable system, where MSNBC is on Channel 13. There you go.
	We got it.
	MS-13.
	That's it.
	Let's deport all of those reporters.
	Because obviously they're involved in all of this.
	They blurt out the pictures of the people that we arrested.
	This is getting crazy.
	Both sides are absolutely crazy.
	About this stuff.
	And, you know, putting up these posters and everything, it's a childish PR stunt.
	As childish as what they pulled with Jeff Bezos.
	And I don't agree with Jeff Bezos.
	I don't like Jeff Bezos, but it pains me to defend him.
	Trump is now signaling possible legal action against the New York Times.
	Because why?
	Because the bully won against CBS in 60 Minutes.
	They caved.
	They caved because Sherry Redstone wanted to sell and cash out her money.
	She didn't want a lawsuit.
	But it's not just a lawsuit, which, of course, he could not win.
	New York Times doesn't have a license that he can come after.
	He can't use the FCC to come after the New York Times.
	It'll be interesting to see if they'll stand up to his bullying.
	Anybody that does anything that he disagrees with, you saw the bullying that he did there with Terry Moran?
	And nothing, he doesn't care about anything except his image.
	And you better not tarnish his image.
	So, Brian Shulhavi, the first 100 days of Trump's Zionist regime.
	Death to free speech in the First Amendment on behalf of the Zionists.
	Yeah, Bibi wants the First Amendment killed.
	He doesn't want any criticism in the United States.
	And of course, Trump and Marco Rubio and all the rest of them.
	We're fully on board with that.
	And he says the White House came out today publicly humiliated one of America's most well-known businessmen, Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon.
	As I talked about yesterday, he says, I'm no fan of this billionaire, but it was the reason that Trump and his White House press secretary gave for publicly chastising him that shocked me.
	He was accused of telling the truth about Trump's tariffs and its effect on products that were sold on Amazon.
	Yeah.
	The fact that you will have to pay money.
	That it is a tax.
	He wants everybody to think it's not going to be paid by American consumers.
	It's going to be paid by foreign corporations and countries somehow.
	And that he's going to use that money to get rid of the income tax, or at least most of it.
	Probably for you, he'll get rid of all of it, I'm sure.
	No controversy whatsoever about whether or not what Bezos was accused of saying was true or not.
	See, that's what's so dishonest about Caroline Lovett.
	Caroline is more like it.
	She just doesn't even.
	I mean, to throw that out there and show a picture of him and call him a Chinese agent because he was going to itemize the new tax that Trump put on.
	For Trump and his Zionist regime, truth is not what is important.
	Agree with me or be punished.
	Say it, Terry.
	Say it.
	Say it.
	No, we're not going to move on.
	We're not going to talk about anything else.
	You say that I was right, that that wasn't photoshopped on there.
	The U.S. Constitution was written to prevent something like this from happening.
	Bill of Rights, the First Amendment.
	That's why I say Trump has no power.
	I mean, he has power, but he has no authority.
	Violated the Constitution.
	So, again, it wasn't on Amazon per se, but it was on a Chinese site that sells Cheap stuff.
	But there's two other similar sites that are run by the Chinese.
	They will itemize it.
	People will be able to see this.
	The truth will eventually happen.
	People will eventually wake up to what is going on.
	Earlier this month, ICE agents seized a Palestinian student, Madawi, who was a legal permanent resident looking for a green card who had been in the U.S. legally for 10 years.
	Remember, I covered this.
	Like previous students before him, he was approached by masked men with reportedly no warrant.
	He was handcuffed and taken away.
	Now, I reported all that, but he gave his first public interview since being kidnapped.
	And this is what is in Brian Chalhavi's article here at Vaccine Impact or HealthImpact.com.
	Before coming to this country, he said, freedom was just a concept.
	But the actual experience of freedom of movement...
	To travel among 50 states, freedom to breathe the breeze of the ocean, and to feel your toes in the sand.
	This is the first place that I have experienced this freedom of speech where I will not be actually retaliated against or punished for saying my mind.
	But you see, going back 50 years ago to when I was in college, there were people who were Iranian students.
	At the University of South Florida, who would be punished, their families would be punished for protesting that regime that was tied to the American government, that was trained by the CIA to arrest without due process and torture anybody who was opposed to the regime.
	And here we are now, we're slipping into that with Trump and with Biden.
	The two of them are so similar.
	It's amazing to see.
	The financial schemes that are being done by Trump's sons.
	You know, you got Eric and Don Jr. working with the son of Whitcoff.
	Whitcoff, right?
	And so, you know, Whitcoff and Trump are doing their things, right?
	And then their sons are out there partnering and doing deals with other foreign countries.
	It's the same thing that happened with the Biden family.
	It's just different.
	Different countries and some different people, but in principle, it's exactly the same stuff.
	And if you mention it, people are going to say, yeah, well, what about Biden?
	What about Biden?
	Well, see, Biden did it, so now he did it and he got away with it.
	So now Trump and his family can do it and get away with it.
	It's this left-right march of tyranny, handing the baton off to somebody else.
	You assume powers, you do criminal actions, you get away with it, you set a precedent, right?
	And that's what this is all about, setting these precedents.
	So, he said, this is the first time I could actually have freedom of speech and not be punished or retaliated against.
	He said, do I still feel this way?
	Well, I think that freedom is in jeopardy.
	I think this is a red flag not only to me, but to the American people who care about freedom, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
	I have the hope that this country will fulfill its promise.
	I realized directly that I'm dealing with two extreme opposite poles.
	He said, because he was arrested on his way to becoming a citizen.
	He'd been here 10 years with the green card.
	He was on his way to a citizenship interview, whatever the process was, taking the test.
	He says, so there are two opposite poles of this.
	One of them is becoming a citizen with full rights.
	The other one is to be detained and to have no rights.
	He says, I prepared and studied for the Constitution, and I went willingly and respected the law, did everything in the way that it was supposed to be done.
	The activities and the presence of Madawi in the United States undermines U.S. policy to combat anti-Semitism, said the federal government.
	So, free speech is now anti-Semitism.
	Is that right?
	Yeah, we see that over and over again.
	You don't say anything that I disagree with.
	Or if you do, then you'll be arrested.
	Madawi, who has denounced anti-Semitism multiple times, accuses the government of weaponizing it to attack.
	Higher Education asked if he still wants to be a U.S. citizen.
	He said it's up to the American people to decide what path they want to take.
	Whether to have the path where they welcome me as a citizen of this country or not, he said.
	Well, there's the other person who was also kidnapped on the street, Ozturk, the woman who wrote an op-ed piece.
	And, of course, James Bovard wrote an op-ed piece about her op-ed piece and her arrest.
	They said, first they came for the op-ed writers, right?
	And yet we saw this throughout.
	The Trump administration, and even the Biden administration, even in the final year of the Trump administration, right?
	He passively sat back and pretended that he didn't have anything to do with it, but of course he could have stopped it.
	So he had his, at the very least, it had his tacit approval of people being punished for speaking up.
	Punished for living their life and not obeying the lockdown orders, the mask orders that he was paying.
	Governors and public health organizations to do.
	Tufts University graduate student, Rumaysa Ozturk, taken off the street in her home in Somerville.
	And neither the Trump administration nor Tufts has alleged that she engaged in this or any other unlawful actions.
	The only thing still is the op-ed piece.
	It's still not there.
	When she was arrested, a lot of people, well, you know, we'll see later on.
	We'll see that she was really involved in this.
	No, they haven't shown anything at all.
	So, if she's been involved in real crime, because free speech is not a crime, no matter who it offends.
	It's not a crime even if it's wrong.
	It's not a crime even if it's hateful.
	It's not a crime.
	And the people who arrest people for free speech under color of law They are the criminals.
	The real criminals in all this are the Department of Justice.
	Rubio, the Secretary of State, the President.
	Well, the so-called President.
	DHS had determined that she was involved in associations that may undermine U.S. foreign policy by creating a hostile environment for Jewish students and indicating support for a designated terrorist group.
	So there you go.
	Guilt by association.
	That is really what this is about.
	You know, I'm not anti-Semitic and I'm not pro-Palestinian.
	I'm anti-genocide.
	I'm anti-mass murder of civilians done incessantly and boasted publicly about doing it.
	That's what I'm against.
	That's what I'm against.
	So, even if Ozturk had explicitly voiced support for Hamas or openly railed against Jews, FIRE says that those opinions would be protected by the First Amendment.
	But as the record stands, her op-ed piece, which was mild compared to much of the rhetoric heard during the campus protests against the Gaza War, is the only exhibit against her.
	FIRE quotes John Roberts of the Supreme Court.
	And there's a majority opinion in the 2011 case of Snyder v.
	Phelps.
	This is the lunatic people at the Westboro Baptist Church that would go around military funerals and they would protest it because they said that the federal government was pushing...
	Homosexuality was maybe the same-sex marriage at the time or something like that.
	But, you know, they had a beef with the federal government, and so they would go around disrupting funerals of American soldiers.
	And this case went to the Supreme Court.
	They would picket soldiers' funerals.
	John Roberts said, speech is powerful.
	It can stir people to actions.
	It can move them to tears of both joy and sorrow, as it did here.
	And it can inflict great pain.
	On the facts before us, we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker.
	As a nation, we've chosen a different course to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate.
	In this case, stifling public debate appears to be exactly the point, says Fire.
	Trump made it clear that his crusade against terrorist sympathizers, as he labeled people, is meant to have a chilling effect.
	You see, he rejects the Constitution.
	He rejects the First Amendment.
	Rubio explained the lesson for students who engage in, quote, anti-Semitic activities, unquote, on campus.
	We're going to kick you out.
	It's as simple as that.
	All she did was she wrote an op-ed piece.
	So we don't like your speech.
	We're going to kick you out.
	Allowing those students to stay in the U.S., Rubio maintains, quote, would compromise a compelling U.S. foreign policy interest, specifically the government's interest in, quote, combating anti-
	anti-semitism around the world and in the united states yet every american has a constitutional right to openly express hatred of jews and that legal tolerance of bigotry in no way means that the government endorses
	those opinions right It...
	Freedom of speech is the freedom to offend.
	And if we don't allow that, we don't have freedom of speech.
	If you only allow free speech for things that you like.
	This is why hate speech is so antithetical to the First Amendment.
	There is no such thing as hate speech.
	It should never be a crime.
	There's such a thing as hate speech, but it should never be a crime.
	Let's just put it that way.
	First Amendment allows people to express even the most abhorrent views.
	In the interest of promoting the vigorous public debate that Roberts was keen to protect and Snyder, the intolerance championed by Trump and Rubio, by contrast, is weakness posing as strength, says Reason Magazine.
	Now, let's not forget Biden's prosecutions and persecutions.
	And here's a good example of it.
	The Trump officials have just pulled back Biden's persecution of a ranching family.
	Okay, so that's good.
	But let's stop and think about this.
	Do we want to live in a country where the winner gets to lock up the losers?
	Where political persecution switches feet based on who won or who lost the election?
	Is that the kind of country that we want to be in?
	Do we want to have people persecuted under the law on the whims of a dictator in the White House and his administration, just like we see the tariffs on the whims of a dictator in the White House?
	No, we don't.
	Because what is happening to these people under Biden was wrong.
	But rather than calling it out as wrong, rather than making changes, what they'll do is they'll do a pardon and then, you know, keep the process there in place.
	This is what the Trump administration is doing.
	As I said before, the lawfare that was done against Trump, the persecution that was done against him, was unprecedented, and it was wrong.
	And he should have taken, it would have been good if he would have taken a high road and said, we're going to get laws passed that are going to respect this, we're not going to allow that to happen, and come after people that did that.
	But I said that he's going to do that, he's going to come after people like Letitia James, who is horrible.
	She ought to be removed from office.
	She ought to be jailed for what she did.
	But he wants it to be seen as Trump punishing Trump's enemies.
	Not the rule of law punishing enemies of the Constitution.
	That's the difference.
	He wants to make himself powerful, not the Constitution.
	He wants to be a powerful dictator, not establish the rule of law.
	In this particular case, I mean, this is truly amazing.
	What happened to these people?
	A multi-generational South Dakota ranching family was given huge legal fees and threats of jail.
	No family farmer or rancher should ever have to go through what the Maud family did.
	The targeted prosecution of the Maud family was way out of line for the U.S. Forest Service.
	This was a clear example of government overreach that had direct catastrophic impacts Fifth-generation ranching family.
	It was a dispute that rose over a fence line on land that the family had ranched for more than a century, and nothing had changed.
	The Forestry Service comes in and claims that the fence is in the wrong place.
	So they said, well, let's contest this.
	It should have been a civil hearing and everything.
	Instead, then the U.S. Forestry Service shows up and makes a criminal case out of it.
	A criminal case out of it.
	Family members...
	Actively were involved in discussions to do an assessment of the problem, if there was one, and to reach a resolution.
	But then the U.S. Forestry Service dispatched armed federal agents to serve each Maude family member with a federal summons for theft, even though the management of the boundary line of the parcel in question had not been changed since the early 1900s.
	The result was that Charles and Heather Maude each were facing claims of Theft of federal property.
	They were threatened with 10 years in jail each and fines of up to $250,000 each.
	Charles and Heather Maude were our public lands ranchers who for decades held a federal grazing permit and were permittees in good standing.
	As permittees, we are required to work collaboratively with the government, but when the federal agencies view ranchers as the enemy, it threatens the trust.
	That every single rancher has in their federal partners.
	And so Trump's Secretary of Agriculture, who was over the Forestry Service, Brooke Rollins, has now confirmed that charges were dropped and the case is over and that the Department of Justice is no longer coming after them.
	But here's the issue.
	They said, we're dropping the criminal charges.
	Well, I hope if you're dropping the criminal charges...
	I hope you are bringing criminal charges against the out-of-control agents that are under you at the Forestry Service.
	Those agents should be fired.
	Those agents should be criminally charged, just as people who did the stuff to us in 2020 should be criminally charged, removed from office.
	But they're not going to do that.
	Instead, what you're just going to see is, you know, well...
	If you're loyal to me and I like you, or maybe you give me a kickback, you know, some money, I'll give you a pardon.
	How about that?
	And if I don't like you, I'll weaponize the government against you just like my opponent did on the other side of this.
	Will they be criminally charged for abuse of power?
	No, never.
	The Maude family was expected to bear the burden of an inefficient and unfair forced service process, but then it took the turn to armed agents.
	Charging them with theft.
	So, they said, going back to this particular case of the op-ed writer, as James Bovard said, first they came for the op-ed writers.
	What is it?
	What is the rule of law going to be with all this stuff?
	By the way, FIRE stands for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.
	They have long focused...
	On free speech issues on campus.
	And in this particular case of Ozturk, again, whose only crime was to write an op-ed piece that by their own estimation was mild compared to what other people were writing.
	They're trying to make an example out of her.
	They're trying to set a precedent against free speech.
	In the brief, you have the Rutherford Institution, the Cato Institute, First Amendment Lawyers Association, the National Coalition Against Censorship.
	They've all joined in this.
	And they said that it's because Marco Rubio has deemed her deportable, quote, not because the government claims that she committed a crime or any other deportable offense, but, quote, for the seemingly sole reason that her expression, an op-ed piece in a student newspaper,
	Caused the Trump administration angst.
	Her arrest doesn't really make sense because she wasn't a figure on campus.
	I don't think she was active in banned groups like Students for Justice in Palestine.
	From what I know, she was doing her own thing, doing her PhD, and she just happened to write an op-ed piece.
	Had an opinion.
	First Amendment does not immunize things like vandalism, physical violence, and unlawful building occupations, said Fire, but none of that is in view.
	In terms of this.
	So, it's just back and forth, back and forth, the vacillation.
	Trump gets to do whatever he wants to.
	Dictator Don.
	Now, he says he's considering putting back some of the things that Doge cut.
	And this is also in that interview with Terry Moran on ABC News for his first 100 days.
	Terry Moran said, well, Everybody knows that with Doge, there was wasteful government spending.
	It's really important.
	But he said the cuts have had some serious consequences.
	There have been some cuts to foreign aid programs that save lives and keep people alive overseas.
	There's been research at the National Institutes of Health on cancer and Alzheimer's that had to be stopped.
	All these things, folks, are unconstitutional.
	There's no authority for any of them.
	They ought to be cut.
	If you want to do this, set up your own foundation.
	You can do a charitable foundation.
	Or you can do it at the state level or whatever, but the federal government has no ability to do this.
	As a matter of fact, it's specifically forbidden in the Tenth Amendment for the federal government to push into things that it hasn't been given express authority to do.
	Anyway, so the question I think people have is, did Doge go too far, too fast, too recklessly?
	Trump said, no, I think Doge has been, look, they saved $150 billion we saved.
	That's a lot of money.
	There are also a lot of things right now under investigation which are going to increase that amount by a lot.
	That's a tremendous amount of money.
	By the way, $150 billion is not the trillion dollars that they were talking about.
	No, he was saying $1 to $2 trillion, so about one-tenth of what he was talking about.
	He says, but there are some things where, when I heard about them, I put them back, as you know.
	There are things that I'm considering right now putting back.
	So there we go.
	Who knows what he's going to do at one moment or the other?
	Will they cut it?
	Will they not?
	And that's why I said, I said, all of this stuff that they are talking about with Doge, that's great.
	I'd like to see it all cut.
	The government is, virtually everything the government is doing has no authority for.
	And it is bankrupting us.
	And it is violating the rule of law and violating our God-given liberties that are prohibited from violating in ways specifically prohibited for them getting involved in it.
	However...
	You know, I said that this Doge stuff was not real.
	I said it's just a PR thing.
	So first of all, this will be subject to the judiciary, and we'll see if he's going to let it be subject to the judiciary.
	It also has to be put in there by the Congress, who's not willing to cut anything.
	And so I don't even think it's going to be $150 billion that they saved.
	I think it's all just a head fake.
	Very much like the nonsense about all the signs up at the White House.
	On Rumble, DG8, thank you, says, David, unfortunately most people sit by and think that Trump will save them.
	Or they don't want the uncomfortable truth because it destroys their blind trust in government and the corrupt system.
	Yeah, they want to imagine, they understand that there's problems.
	And they want to imagine that these problems can be fixed by government, by more government.
	By government in Washington.
	When Washington is the problem.
	And when you don't have any leverage over somebody who has no principles, who has no strategy except, you bow to me.
	That's where we started with all this stuff.
	You say it, Terry.
	Say it.
	Say I'm right.
	That's all he cares about.
	And then it's just all vacillation and posturing.
	Because he is a ship without a rudder.
	He is blown about by every wind, by every opinion poll, by every reaction to what he has done.
	He has no rudder.
	He has no foundation.
	He has no principles.
	On kick, a Syrian girl says, that Trump interview is chilling.
	Eva Maga should see a blatant narcissist after that.
	Say it.
	Say it.
	Two plus two equals five.
	That's exactly what it was.
	Exactly.
	Okay, we're going to take a quick break.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	He wasn't a member of a gang.
	And then they looked and on his knuckles he had MS-13.
	There's a discuter of that.
	Wait a minute.
	Wait a minute.
	He had MS-13 on his knuckles tattoo.
	He had some tattoos that are interpreted that way.
	But let's move on.
	Wait a minute.
	Hey, Terry.
	Terry.
	Terry.
	He did not have the letter MS-13.
	It says MS-13.
	That was photoshopped.
	That was photoshopped.
	Terry, you can't do that.
	Hey, they're giving you the big break of a lifetime.
	You know, you're doing the interview.
	I picked you because frankly I never heard of you, but that's okay.
	Kiss my knuckles.
	I picked you, Terry, but you're not being very nice.
	He had MS-13 tattoo.
	We'll agree to disagree.
	I want to move on to something else.
	Do you want me to show you the picture?
	I saw the picture.
	Oh, and you think it was photoshopped?
	Here we go.
	Here we go.
	Don't photoshop it.
	Go look at his hand.
	He did have tattoos that can be interpreted that way.
	I'm not an expert on them.
	I want to turn to Ukraine, sir.
	I want to get to Ukraine.
	No, no.
	No, no.
	He had MS, as clear as you can be, not interpreted.
	This is why people no longer believe you.
	Because it's fake news.
	In El Salvador, they aren't there.
	But let's just go.
	They aren't there when he's in L.S. They weren't there, but they're there now, right?
	No, they're in your picture.
	Terry, he's got MS-13 on his knuckles.
	All right.
	Okay? We'll take a look.
	You do such a disservice.
	Yeah, bow to me.
	I had to play that again.
	I mean, it's just too amazing.
	Because I was going to talk about King Charles, right?
	Yeah, King Charles!
	Would not be that arrogant.
	Now, King George III, he would be that arrogant.
	You say what I just said.
	You bowed to me.
	And don't show me your back when you walk out of this room.
	You back out of this room.
	I don't want to see your back.
	You will be at a level below me, and you will do what I say.
	Trump really does see himself as a king.
	And he's dictating everything.
	So, the reason I was going to talk about King Charles is...
	There were a lot of news reports yesterday.
	King Charles talks about his cancer.
	No, he didn't talk about his cancer.
	He talked about the cancer organizations.
	He never has, at this point, he's never told anybody even what kind of cancer he has.
	Not that it's any of our business.
	I mean, he's got a private life, right?
	But it's also part of the, you know, we will know everything about you.
	You'll know nothing about us.
	He said each diagnosis.
	He said it's a frightening experience for those individuals and their loved ones.
	As one among those statistics myself, I can vouch for the fact that it can also be an experience that brings into sharp focus the very best of humanity.
	And at that point, he doesn't talk about God.
	He doesn't talk about Christ.
	He talks about the institutions.
	It has certainly given me an even deeper appreciation of the extraordinary work Undertaken by the remarkable organizations and individuals gathered here this evening, many of whom I have known, visited, and supported over the years and so forth.
	Yet, those organizations can't save him.
	They can't save his life.
	They can't save him eternally.
	And isn't it amazing that King Charles just, you know, it was just a week ago last Sunday that we had Resurrection Sunday, talking about the resurrection of Christ.
	King Charles is supposed to be a defender of the faith.
	That would be the Christian faith, head of the Church of England, except the Church of England is post-Christian.
	And so is Charles.
	He spent resurrection weekend in his speech or anything, talking about Islam and other religions.
	He has no hope in the resurrection, in his resurrection, because he has no hope in the resurrection of Christ.
	And very different from what we used to see in...
	The monarchies, even, of Europe.
	You know, you had, the story is that Handel's Messiah was originally written for Resurrection Sunday, for Easter, whatever you want to call it, right?
	Originally performed then, not at Christmastime.
	And when they got to the Hallelujah Chorus, the story is that people typically stand at that point traditionally, and supposedly that tradition began because the king who was attending the performance of Handel's Messiah when they got to the Hallelujah Chorus,
	he stood up when it said, King of Kings and Lord of Lords.
	He stood up because you don't sit in the presence of a king.
	You don't disagree with him about Photoshop pictures either.
	But he stood up.
	And so the rest of the people said, well, if our king is standing up, we have to stand up as well.
	But he stood up.
	Because he felt he was in the presence of the king of kings and lord of lords.
	Well, Charles doesn't feel that way.
	And you know, even into the 20th century, late 20th century, the Habsburg family from Austria, An amazing crypt we saw as a family when we went there in Vienna.
	And it's this really bizarre, macabre crypt.
	All these ornate coffins with skeletons and skulls and all this other kind of stuff draped over them.
	Really, really strange.
	But they have a tradition where when one of the members of the Habsburg Empire, and the last one of them died off.
	Last one of them died off, so it's not going to happen anymore.
	But it's been recreated in some film, and I've played that in the past, where they would come up with the body of the king, and they would knock on the door, and they'd say, who goes there?
	And they'd give him all of these long titles, you know, the king of this and that, you know.
	I don't know him.
	And then they would come back, and then they would knock again and give him some more of his earthly accomplishments and titles and things like that.
	I don't know who he is either.
	And then they would say, Knock, knock.
	Who's there, you know?
	And I'd say, Franz Joseph, a humble sinner.
	And they'd say, ah, come in.
	And they would open the door.
	That is a lesson that we don't see anymore, that kind of humility.
	We don't see that in the kings.
	We don't see that kind of Christian approach in the kings.
	Certainly don't see it in our presidents, do we?
	And so...
	Here is a guy who, again, he may pay some lip service to Christ, but he doesn't have.
	He doesn't share the hope of the resurrection.
	He doesn't believe in it.
	And, you know, of course, when we talk about hope as a Christian, it isn't like, well, you know, yeah, I hope.
	I hope.
	I don't really think it's going to happen, but I hope.
	No, no, no.
	The word hope meant confident expectation.
	And so for somebody who keeps talking about the darkness of the illness and the darkness of the moment, so he's going through some dark times as he's contemplating his mortality as all of us will die.
	But he's not looking for any hope.
	He doesn't have any hope.
	So he said, to all the researchers pursuing pioneering breakthroughs in healthcare professionals, you have my whole family's deepest admirations and gratitude, but not to the one who holds the keys to life.
	Well, the Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday about a big religious charter school case that is coming up.
	This particular one is a Catholic church wants to set up a charter school.
	I'm telling you, this is a very dangerous precedent if this happens.
	And it's not because I don't think that the Catholics ought to be able to do their own church.
	I think they ought to be able to.
	I just don't think that they ought to be able to get money.
	And if you look at where this is headed, Fatala Gulen and the Gulenists have been getting charter school money just in Texas alone, nearly a billion dollars.
	Mark Hall did a documentary about it called Killing Ed, Killing Education.
	He talked about all the allegations of criminal conduct and improper...
	Stuff with the Galenists.
	They run over a thousand madrasas everywhere else.
	But here in the United States, they pretend that they don't have any religious affiliation when they actually do.
	And you're going to find that if they agree with this, that his school can become his schools, instead of having to pretend that their school is a science and math, his schools can become open madrasas.
	You want to see that?
	Because that's the principle.
	R.L. Dabney, I've talked about him many times, he was Stonewall Jackson's chaplain, and he said after the Civil War, he said, government support of education, government schools, is a really dangerous thing.
	It is absolutely incompatible with the Constitution.
	He says, because whose religious opinions are going to be supported?
	And somebody's religious opinions will be supported.
	And what we've seen with secular humanism, Is that we do have religions that are supported.
	The government should be out of education 100%.
	We should not have any public schools.
	We should not have any government schools of any sort.
	And they should not be giving money to other people because what you're going to wind up having, we've already had these large Muslim community who wants to create their own city and have Sharia law and all the rest of the stuff in Texas, and they're fighting them on that.
	If you give the green light to this for a school that you agree with, Then you're going to wind up giving government money to all of these schools.
	And education is too important to have the financial strings of government attached to it.
	The Catholic Church needs to learn that.
	The Protestant churches need to learn that.
	Parents need to learn that.
	Don't take the money.
	It's a trap.
	Listen to Admiral Agbar if you won't listen to me.
	It's a trap.
	So all the religious school is saying is don't exclude us on account of our religion, said Justice Kavanaugh.
	So, free education is a right, is it?
	No, it's not.
	You don't have a right to education.
	You don't.
	Because that means that you've got to compel somebody else to pay for it, and all the rest of this stuff.
	And, you know, I don't like...
	Paying for the secular humanism, for the Marxism under CRT.
	I don't like paying for the Sodom and Gomorrah LGBT child pornography religion that is out there.
	I don't like paying for any of that stuff.
	It's an abomination to me.
	And I shouldn't have to pay for it.
	That's one of the things that Thomas Jefferson said about religious freedom.
	And that was the thing that he was most proud of.
	He put that on his tombstone.
	Not the fact that he wrote the Declaration of Independence, but that he wrote...
	The Charter for Religious Freedom, whatever the exact title was, he had that put on his tombstone.
	He said it is an abomination to force people to pay for opinions that they don't agree with.
	And that's why we don't have established churches.
	And it really is an issue about establishment when you start to pay for this.
	I agree for once, for once, with Soto Mayor.
	She said, really, what you're saying is free exercise clause trumps the essence of the establishment clause.
	No, it isn't.
	Because it's the free exercise.
	It's not the paid exercise, is it?
	You're not being paid by the government to exercise your religion.
	You can exercise it freely.
	But if there's money involved, that's the essence of what establishment was.
	Supreme Court throughout the middle of the 20th century got it all wrong when they tried to suppress every statement by every employee or exercise of religion.
	No, you can't pray silently on the 50-yard line and all the rest of this stuff.
	No, that's wrong.
	You can.
	You don't lose your free exercise of religion as an employee.
	What establishment was about...
	It was compelling people to pay tithes to a church and sometimes compelling them to attend.
	And that was what was happening in a lot of the states.
	And that continued to happen in Massachusetts and other states for about another 40 years after they passed the Bill of Rights.
	They continued to have established state churches.
	They just didn't want to have an established federal church because that would conflict with all these other established state religions.
	But one by one, they stopped.
	The establishment.
	But the key thing about it was that you had to pay.
	Even if you didn't agree with that state church, you had to pay.
	And perhaps attend.
	And I made that, as I said before, I made that statement about, you know, to the Thomas Jefferson reenactor.
	I wasn't talking to him, I was talking to the people in the audience.
	That you, you know, if I have to pay for education, I'm paying for somebody's worldview, for somebody's...
	I'm being forced to pay for that, even if I don't agree with it.
	And I don't agree with any of the stuff that's being taught in the schools now.
	Because they're not teaching math and English and reading.
	No, they're teaching this other stuff.
	They're coming out completely ignorant of the other stuff.
	But boy, they're well-schooled in climate fear.
	They're well-schooled in LGBT stuff and everything.
	But they don't know anything when it comes to math or reading or any of that critical thinking.
	No, no.
	So I'm opposed to what they teach.
	And this is why when we talk about Trump getting rid of the Department of Education, he's going to get rid of the bureaucracy there, but he's going to keep the money strings going.
	That's the key thing.
	The money strings.
	So she said, really what you're saying is that the free exercise clause trumps the essence of the establishment clause.
	The essence of the establishment clause was we're not going to pay people to teach their religion.
	I'm not going to pay religious leaders, she said.
	Well, actually, it was the other way around.
	We're not going to charge.
	This is always the big government perspective.
	Well, I pay people to do this, I think.
	Well, where'd you get that money?
	Well, you know, I just kind of printed it up, I guess, or I'm going to have it paid by the taxpayers.
	No, you don't charge taxpayers for this.
	That was the essence of it.
	I've got to think that there are religions that will have no problems dealing with all the various curricular requirements and religions that are going to have some very severe problems, said Kagan.
	So that we're going to end up in a state of a world with a kind of establishment religions and more different, more fundamentalist, more, use the adjective you want, religions that seem peculiar to many eyes, but that are deeply felt.
	In other words, the Islamic madrasas.
	Of the Gulenists and other things.
	That's what you're going to wind up with.
	She's opposing this because she's opposing Catholics.
	But the principle that she's talking about here, she's kind of hinting, I think, you know, you're going to wind up funding the Islamic schools.
	And we need to understand, there's a great article on Mises.org, which I'm going to take time to do because we've got Tony who's ready to come on.
	But just to give you a highlight of this, they go back and they say, you know, the problems with colleges...
	That began with the government subsidy of tuitions.
	You know, first the GI Bill, which really was an effort to make sure they didn't have massive unemployment.
	Let's stick them all in the colleges for a little bit of time until we can recover.
	And then with a 1965 industrial government policy, and once they started subsidizing college tuition, that's when colleges went down the drain.
	So if you want...
	Your kid to get an education.
	Keep the money away from them.
	They've destroyed the colleges.
	Now they want to destroy K-12 as well.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we're going to talk to Tony.
	We'll be right back.
	back.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, joining us now is Tony Erderman of Wise Wolf Gold, and of course you can get there by going to davidknight.gold.
	I'll let Tony know that you came through us.
	It's been a really amazing week.
	Yet again, every week we say this, but every week there's been a lot of movement back and forth in the metals as well as in the economy.
	What's on your mind, Tony, as you look at the developments this week?
	Well, the IMF just put out a statement that the world economic order is going through a reset, so newsflash there.
	The IMF is broadcasting that.
	Yeah, the monetary system is being reset for sure.
	There's open questions.
	You know, the way I look at the news, I'm sure it's similar to the way you look at the news.
	It's not really the headlines.
	It's the underlying language and meaning behind them.
	I noticed that there's two...
	Opposing things here in these headlines with gold.
	You have Chinese investors.
	It's like a record-breaking first quarter.
	They were like 23 tons of gold for Chinese investors.
	But the Chinese government just sold off a million ounces.
	It's like almost a record high for sell-offs.
	It's profit-taking.
	But I hang a question mark over it, David, because we have some trade tensions, whatever I'm putting this in quotes, trade negotiation tensions that have been laxed.
	I'm wondering if there's some sort of, again, I have no confirmation of this, but I'm asking, I'm wondering if there is some sort of quid pro quo to take the accelerator off this gold price, and the Chinese are helping with that.
	Gold prices continue to show the weakness of the dollar, which is catastrophic for the U.S. system.
	I wonder if there's some sort of...
	Hey, you know, take some profit.
	You're up.
	You know, gosh, started, you know, buying gold in the early part of the 21st century in massive quantities for the Chinese.
	We're taking a little profit and helping the U.S. dollar out.
	Just an open question.
	Yeah, they don't want to have a weak dollar because that makes our exports cheaper and everything.
	You know, Trump is trying to weaken the dollars we've talked about before.
	You know, not only is he raising taxes with terrorists, but he's also weakening the dollar.
	And that's the game that they've always played as part of the Chinese price is currency manipulation.
	So they're well aware of how to do it.
	And they're well aware that they can do it to the U.S. dollar as well.
	Scott Bessent talked about how he wants a new Bretton Woods and everything.
	And so, absolutely, the restructure of the financial system is on the table.
	And you have to look at this and wonder, how is it going to roll out?
	And I mentioned earlier that Tether is talking about how they are already the largest exporter.
	of U.S. dollars and I think we've talked about this or we said well one way that they can bypass Obstruction from foreign governments that don't want to buy into the dollar is to go directly to the individuals in those countries.
	And now they're saying that openly, that that is their intention to do that with a stablecoin.
	They will set up a stablecoin that transacts in U.S. dollars.
	And, of course, the stablecoin will also buy...
	The Treasury bills that the foreign governments don't want anymore.
	So it'd be a way of selling the American debt to foreign individuals if you can't get the foreign countries to buy it.
	Color me skeptical on that working out very well for anyone.
	You know, a public-private partnership in some way, using the dollar in a stablecoin setting, that may sound good on paper.
	I don't know how that would translate.
	I think there's too many moving parts for it to work on an international scale.
	And I don't think it was designed for that.
	You're talking about government to private business or assumed private entity.
	So there's all sorts of pitfalls there.
	And it may be...
	I keep looking at it the same way you do, David.
	It's like the stable coins are an outlier.
	In the crypto world, and it's seemingly more and more adoption by governments, at least working with them or looking for regulation or how to implement them in conjunction with their own currencies.
	And that's really alarming, I think.
	You look at something like the U.S. dollar, where the backdoor for central bank digital currency, as you and I, I think we're right about this, that it...
	That is the platform.
	That's the path, is to use these seemingly innocuous coins that are in the crypto sphere to usher in a central bank digital currency.
	And you can just say, hands off, we're not.
	This isn't coming from the Fed, necessarily.
	It's just mirroring the currency of the Federal Reserve.
	There's too many red flags for me to even...
	I don't see it working out well for investors, and I don't see it working out well for those who use the U.S. dollar.
	I keep asking why.
	Why would they do it?
	Oh, yeah.
	Absolutely.
	I think that it is their stealth way of doing a CBDC, and I said that from the beginning.
	Now we've got a Treasury report that just came out, and the Treasury report says that they think that stablecoins are on track for a $2 trillion market cap.
	By 2028.
	And they say that right now it's about 230.
	So you're looking at a factor of 10. Tenfold in just the next three years.
	And this is the U.S. Treasury.
	And they're talking about this in terms of how they're going to get rid of their Treasury bills.
	But at the same time, Cointelegraph is talking about the fact, well, you know, we've been a big exporter of dollars with these stablecoins.
	But now we're looking at using them domestically.
	And they said, and we're talking to law enforcement about that.
	I mean, everything is lining up there, Tony, that this is the public-private partnership for a digital currency.
	They just won't call it a central bank digital currency, but it'll be the same function except that they'll get rich off of it.
	You know, the Trump people and Lutnik and all the rest of these people will get rich off of it, but it is shaping up to have the same functions.
	That was a big red flag when Joe Biden was saying, hey, we're going to have a central bank digital currency.
	And so, first of all, let's figure out how we're going to redesign the financial system.
	How we're going to write the code.
	And then we need to talk to law enforcement about this and how they're going to force it.
	And so now you've got Cointelegraph out there talking about.
	So now they're having talks as to how they are going to, it says, collaborate with law enforcement in terms of putting out Tether.
	And this is the company that Lutnik had so much involvement in.
	He supposedly has now stepped away from it and divested himself.
	But yeah, right.
	You know, whatever.
	I mean, to me, it's just a rapid escalation toward a CBDC is what it looks like.
	I concur with that.
	And one of the things that would make me even more skeptical is, like you just mentioned, the market cap.
	Let's think about that.
	You're talking about an eventual two plus trillion dollar market cap in a currency that inherently has no value.
	So Bitcoin's market cap goes up when the price goes up because there is a finite amount of Bitcoin.
	So even if you don't like Bitcoin, you have to recognize that if a Bitcoin sells for a higher price, the market cap continues to rise.
	So it's about, I think it's 1.7 trillion right now for Bitcoin.
	Bitcoin, I could be wrong.
	It's right around there.
	And silver is probably like $1.5 trillion, but silver price and market cap fluctuate.
	So what would entail a 10x market cap increase for a stablecoin that inherently has no value, really, but was it just the increase in its own money supply?
	Is that what it is?
	Or it's holdings of...
	Treasuries again, but not holding a treasuries.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I mean, they create these treasuries.
	They print the dollars.
	It's all fiat.
	So they just roll this in.
	It's kind of another kind of derivative, really, on the U.S. dollar is what they're talking about.
	But, I mean, it looks like they're really seriously moving towards this when you've got Treasury reports talking about that.
	It's amazing.
	It's not stable if it's tied to the dollar and Treasury bills.
	It's not stable.
	It's not a coin, of course, either.
	None of these things are coins.
	I think this is how Bugsy Siegel sold Las Vegas.
	They just kept selling the stock and ways to invest and oversold it.
	That's nothing new under the sun.
	That sounds to me.
	I've heard this movie.
	I've seen this movie before.
	I've heard this story.
	So we've seen gold with some profit taking and that type of stuff.
	Massive stuff, as you point out, in China.
	So it was up.
	Over 35, right, was the high that it got to.
	Now it's down, what, around in the 3300 somewhere?
	As of right now, it's 3,226 LBNs, Luciferian Bankster notes per troy ounce.
	And I think that is mostly profit-taking.
	Something stalled out, but I don't see us trending.
	I don't see, like, a big sell-off anytime soon, David.
	I think there's some...
	There's some profit-taking.
	The World Gold Council pointed out, even this first, investors, not just governments, but investors, are running towards physical gold.
	And, of course, big chunks of that are, they think they're buying physical gold.
	They're buying ETFs.
	But I noticed another factor there that was interesting is that jewelry demand was down in the first quarter.
	It's just a lot of people buying physical bullion and investors.
	But the price of gold is going up so high that jewelry is being put on the back burner for purchases.
	People may be waiting for prices to come down or sell-offs or something like that.
	I don't think they're going to see...
	Once we've crossed $3,000, David, I think that we're going to be there for a while and then it's upwards and onwards at that.
	I'm seeing an increase in urban gold mining.
	You hit these prices, people start looking around for scrap gold.
	It's worth...
	It's worth selling, especially if you paid for a big price for some jewelry at one time, maybe 10, 15 years ago.
	You're certainly going to get your money back at this point.
	Yeah.
	Well, I think a lot of this, again, is hinging off of Trump's actions.
	And it's so...
	Unstable.
	That, of course, has created some instability even for something like gold.
	But I think fundamentals are...
	Nothing has changed.
	It's just like what we said in anticipation after Trump was elected.
	Everybody was like, oh, that's it.
	It's over for gold.
	Everybody's going to move towards Bitcoin now.
	I don't think that's going to be the case.
	But what we're seeing is, as he's starting to retrench from some of this stuff, it's starting to have an effect on some of the markets.
	But I think that...
	People are going to realize that he's not really going to retrench from that much of it.
	And when the consequences of what are going to be happening with essentially sanctions now being enacted on the United States from China, that is yet to be felt, as I was talking about the other day.
	30 to 45 days for the goods that would be in transit from China to get here.
	So we haven't felt the effect of that yet.
	And we're going to be feeling that not too far in the future.
	Once that starts to happen, it's just like once they start creating inflation by printing money up, sometimes they can't stop it, you know?
	It's like, okay, that's enough.
	Let's pull it back.
	And then it's got a thing that's on its own.
	I think that's going to be the case with the economy in general.
	So that's why I think...
	Fundamentals have not really changed, no matter how many times Trump changes the tariffs, as long as he keeps them on.
	It's still going to be playing havoc on the supply chain and on the economy, and I think it's going to be reflected in that.
	Yeah, the trajectory for de-dollarization is all still there, David, and you're right.
	I mean, the underlying causations for a weaker dollar and the decline of the dollar are all right there, and those are increasing.
	The debt is increasing.
	The liabilities are increasing.
	And then the usage of the dollar is decreasing at the same time.
	So those are not good outliers and signposts on the road ahead for the United States monetary system and for the dollar itself.
	The world is moving away from that, in my opinion.
	Gold has already supplanted the dollar, and I've said that before.
	I already think it's the world's reserve currency.
	This time, it's just using, it's in name only, using other currency for cross-border payments, but not holding them.
	You know, I will remind, you know, your audience, as I remind mine, is that the number two held asset by central banks is gold.
	It used to be the euro and gold was way down.
	It was, you know, other currencies.
	Since 2021 in Basel, Switzerland, when Basel III, when they redid the Bank of International Settlements to put gold as a Tier 1 asset instead of a Tier 3 asset, the central bank started hoarding gold, and that's happening.
	And again, look at the dumping of treasuries by the Chinese.
	They used to be the biggest buyer.
	Now they're the biggest seller.
	These trends continue.
	They're going to continue, and you can have, like, we can come week to week, and this week we're not talking about an all-time high in gold, which is unusual for us, because going into the election, after Inauguration Day, this trend started to reverse,
	where crypto went down, and like you mentioned, gold and silver went back up.
	But we're still at $3,200-plus an ounce for gold, which, you know, if you told us a couple of years ago what that price would be, that'd be pretty shocking.
	Now it's just normal, and I think you're going to continue to see.
	There's going to be profit-taking and other things, but the fundamentals, the underlying issues, what's wrong with our currency, whether they build a lifeboat in some stablecoin and dress it up and try to repackage it, it doesn't really matter.
	You know, the trend is moving away from the dollar worldwide.
	We're going to see these prices are going to increase in gold.
	I don't know what the number is going to be, but it'll be higher.
	I agree.
	Yeah, when you look at this report that came out from the Treasury, I mean, they said in their report that Stablecoin promises to create, quote, a new financial market infrastructure.
	I mean, they're pretty much saying that they're putting all their eggs into that basket.
	They said Stablecoin...
	Collateral reportedly consists of either treasury bills or treasury-backed repurchase agreements.
	The repo market.
	I mean, they can't even throw their repo stuff in there, Tony, because that's how they get to $2 trillion.
	Remember when that was happening?
	We were talking about that in the fall of 2019.
	You know, they're throwing in massive amounts of fiat currency equivalent to the gross domestic product of Switzerland, you know, in just one transaction.
	And, you know, so now they can do that.
	Into the stablecoin thing.
	They can throw in the T-bills.
	They can throw in the repo stuff.
	It's all their garbage going into this derivative that they call a stablecoin.
	And it'll be interesting to see what happens.
	See, that's the thing.
	I look at this stuff, and like I said, privacy is priceless.
	And we know that they're going to restructure the financial system, and we know we don't want to be a part of it.
	They're working with law enforcement now to track everything that people got.
	They're going to have new functions of smart contracts and other things like that that are going to be the way that they can apply these central bank digital currency.
	Operations to you to stop you from buying something, to monitor everything that you're buying, and on and on.
	So all those functions of CBDC are there.
	The lack of privacy and financial transactions is there.
	And to me, that is the key of trying to get outside of all that stuff.
	Well, I agree.
	And, you know, you look at the economic conditions, too, are right for them to introduce this.
	The crisis needs a solution.
	They bring that in as a problem-reaction solution.
	I think that's what they're waiting for.
	Perhaps you could use the term controlled demolition, kind of a Building 7 scenario for the U.S. currency.
	It's not good.
	You mentioned earlier this week on the show I caught a segment where you were talking about I mean, we'd better off in the long term if we weren't the world's reserve currency because the leverage that the ruling class has over us with this to get us into wars,
	to expand the welfare state and the police state and the surveillance state, and pay people off and bribe people and all the rest.
	It's pure evil, and they've gotten away with it for so long, but if you had to be fiscally responsible, and even remotely fiscally responsible, a lot of those things are curtailed, and I agree with that.
	There would be some short-term pain.
	But long-term, we'd be better off because we're in this fix because of seemingly unlimited currency creation.
	But they can't go on forever.
	I mean, the mathematics, I think we're just reaching a tipping point.
	And, you know, if you're in my business, it's like all the time and the sky is falling.
	So one day it is.
	I mean, if you're a gold bug, you start looking at these.
	How does the U.S. economy survive this?
	It's like 08 or 09. How do we survive TARP and bailing out banks?
	Well, we survived it for a while, but those wounds, those things are still there.
	There's still hundreds of zombie corporations and things that are left over from that.
	We never recovered from 08, 09. It's just the expansion of the money supply and the debt are ever-increasing.
	Like you mentioned, this is going back to 2019, last quarter, the repo markets that we talked about.
	Six trillion in the overnights that were just out of thin air.
	That's leading up to COVID-1984.
	Remember that?
	It burned into my mind because I was watching it very closely.
	We're in a different world now, though.
	The debt has exploded, and now the geopolitical tensions are there, trade issues, all that.
	You're right, though.
	At the end of the day, that's economic.
	But at the end of the day...
	Why do we talk about gold and silver and crypto every week here on the show?
	It's to talk about privacy and how you can be outside of the system.
	Fortunately for us in this country, we still have the ability to take fake fiat dollars and turn them into actual real money.
	You can hold that in your hand and you can become your own bank.
	You can be in charge of your own financial destiny, especially in charge of your own privacy as well.
	Yeah, it's always, you know, their geopolitics and what they want to do even domestically is always tied together with all of this, you know, the financial aspects of it, of course.
	And it's going to be a real painful situation, but we would be better off without our government being able to just print up dollars out of thin air and never have to be accountable for it.
	We're the only country that can do that.
	And that's been our superpower.
	And because we've used that as a superpower and we've used it as a weapon, Now we've got a lot of enemies who are looking at how they can take down our financial system, and they're all working to do that, and it shouldn't be that hard,
	quite frankly.
	And then you've got people inside the Trump administration, like Eric Trump, who went to Dubai, and he's speaking to all of these crypto conferences and everything.
	What he's telling people, he says there's not going to be any private banks in 10 years.
	Sounds just like Joe Biden and the CBDC stuff.
	But it's going to be their stablecoin, I think, that's going to be out there to do that.
	It's the same outcome.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's a different team.
	Same outcome, same goals.
	It's a freedom city versus a 15-minute city.
	Same thing.
	Yeah, that's what we're up against.
	And, you know, it's interesting because I do, at least until I change my mind, I'm still an advocate of Bitcoin.
	And my company deals in Bitcoin and we have a way to go back and forth out of metals and, you know, vice versa.
	I like diversification, but most importantly, I like decentralization.
	And the more centralized these things become, or the proposals for centralization of tokens, the more I will oppose it.
	I don't see the need for it.
	I mean, there's so many cryptocurrencies.
	And see, that's the thing that Eric Trump is trying to sell that.
	He says, yeah, we've got to get into DeFi.
	Well, that's not decentralized.
	It's just changing who controls it, really.
	Because what he's talking about is with their scheme of the world liberty thing, which is you've got a lot of these closely held, centrally controlled currencies that they want to put in charge of this stuff.
	And then they want to call it decentralized finance.
	And, you know, so he's talking about something that's different from Bitcoin or some of these other cryptocurrencies.
	They're talking about, when he talked about his Bitcoin reserve, Trump was mentioning some pretty small, closely held, transactional cryptocurrencies.
	Very centralized control.
	So we're not talking about, to call it DeFi, is a lie.
	It's a misnomer.
	It's just going to be that you're going to have a different group of people controlling it centrally.
	Well, right.
	And with the Bitcoin network itself, it's never meant to have, it never was meant to be what's going on right now with these ETFs.
	And I noticed that even with the dips and the price stagnation, because $108,000 for Bitcoin on Inauguration Day and has dipped since then and has went down, I think, into the high 70s, and then we stayed in the mid-80s for a while.
	Michael Saylor continues to accumulate and BlackRock continues to accumulate.
	Larry Fink from BlackRock.
	If you're in the Bitcoin space, people talk about Larry Fink like he's helping you, and I don't see it that way.
	I think he's telling you something.
	He's always telegraphed very weird things to me, especially when BlackRock starts buying up all the residential housing and at the same time, Larry Fink would say stuff like, We in the financial sector can alter behavior, like financial policies can alter social behavior.
	And I think that's a clear message from him.
	But he said something about Bitcoin that I didn't think they got the wrong kind of attention.
	He said that at the World Economic Forum, he said that Bitcoin would hit 700,000.
	He said this a couple of different times.
	And if you do the calculations, that means that...
	Basically, Bitcoin would be on parity with the market cap of gold.
	And I'm not exactly sure how that plays out or what that means for somebody like BlackRock or the...
	I mean, I look at all the different companies that hold these things now, but it's accumulation.
	And so there's a disproportional holding of Bitcoin by these large institutions.
	To me, it's great short-term for the price.
	But I'm not sure that the price is going to be worth it.
	There's going to be something that they do with Bitcoin.
	I'm floating this out there.
	I'm long-term for Bitcoin, but I think there's something they're going to do.
	And when you're paying attention to the language of somebody like Larry Fink, that is the hijacking of a coin, in my opinion, because he's telling you.
	It's kind of like Babe Ruth pointing towards the...
	Not even like that, because Ruth had to actually hit the ball.
	I think there's something...
	There's something with that message.
	When he says things like that, I pay attention.
	For me, it's not about the price.
	It's about what are your intentions for that price.
	There's something else going on with the stablecoins and the move towards centralization.
	That's what we have to oppose.
	Things that should always be decentralized in order to have any sort of sovereignty.
	And the whole purpose and philosophy behind Bitcoin was to be decentralized.
	So when you start hearing them talk about more centralization, be skeptical.
	Yeah, when they label things as DeFi or just as crypto or whatever, you have to be discerning to understand the difference between these different things.
	Let's talk a little bit about gold and silver.
	And you have some that see silver coming up.
	Look at this unbelievable ratio that's there.
	But the World Bank now says they're moving away from their position that silver is going to rise up.
	They're saying, no, it looks like it's going to be gold.
	On Kitco and other places, you've got multiple people out there, some of them saying, well, I think if we keep going down the road the way the economy is going, I think you're going to see $4,000 gold pretty soon.
	You've got Clem Chambers saying a supply chain shock could send gold to $10,000 an ounce.
	What do you think is going to happen with a supply chain shock that is on its way?
	It's just a couple weeks offshore before getting here.
	The supply chain shock is going to hit from the earthquake on the Well, I think it will because it'll have an immediate impact on the economy and outlook.
	And you know how everything works.
	It's mostly psychological.
	Sometimes it's like the tariffs.
	They weren't even implemented.
	And you see these weird swings that are back and forth.
	And, oh, Trump's going to put this on.
	He's going to put it at 50%.
	Now it's 25%.
	And the market whipsaw.
	So it's mostly psychological.
	It's not even based off of reality.
	I think that gold will...
	And I happen to agree with that assessment from the World Bank, at least in the short term, because I think gold, because governments use it as a monetary metal.
	I read you a little bit of that article about investors breaking records with gold this last quarter.
	So I think short-term gold is going to be way up, and it's the fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
	It's where people go.
	Silver is also a monetary metal, but there's so much, the underlying manipulation and uses by things such as the military-industrial complex and the accumulation by multinationals, I think it's pretty apparent.
	I'm looking at the price right now, David, on the screen, in real time.
	It's almost exactly $100.
	It's almost exactly 100 ounces of silver to make an ounce of gold.
	That ratio historically, if you know anything about the history of metals, is so bizarre.
	It's so disproportional.
	And it won't last forever.
	If you're long on investment, I can't think of a better way to house your fiat currency right now than silver.
	If you're long on the market.
	Regardless, you have the metrics of silver.
	It's 200 plus million ounces, million ounces of deficits a year.
	That means that everything that was mined brought in, and by the way, most of the mining of silver is not because somebody went out and started a silver mine.
	Those are minorities.
	What's happening is it's an ancillary mine product.
	People are going to look for copper, they're going to look for zinc, they're looking for gold, and they'll get silver and also mine that.
	So it's not even profitable for a lot of these companies that do specialize in getting silver out of the ground.
	Geologically, by the way, I'll just add this.
	Geologically, it's estimated that in the ground it's 17 to 1. So just geologically it's 17 to 1. I think that's why in the U.S. here we had about 16 to 1 set by the Founding Fathers in our monetary system, and generally it's been 10 to 20 to 1. So name me another commodity whose all-time high was 45 years ago.
	You can't.
	I don't know of one.
	Silver is definitely long-term for somebody who, if you're looking, and again, it's long-term because a lot of people have been saying this for years that silver is going to explode.
	I'm not telling you that.
	I'm not telling you silver is going to explode.
	I think those are irresponsible things to do because you don't know.
	What the price is going to be.
	I just know that based on what's happening to the dollar, and again, it's not hit its all-time high for 45 years.
	Somebody told me, well, it hit $50 in 2010.
	I'm like, I know, but its all-time high was $52.50, and that was 1980.
	I'm well aware of 2010.
	And 2010, once that happens again, it's not coming back down.
	So I think that we're...
	Looking at a breakout sooner than later, but it's long-term.
	It's going to be short-term gold, long-term silver, in my opinion.
	Yeah, and when we talk short-term, you know, I think everybody was so concerned about what was going to happen to the tariffs and the volatility of what was going to happen to the economy.
	I think once this supply chain stuff starts, the reality of these tariffs starts sinking in, I think that's going to be, I think it's going to affect gold just like it did with the talk about what was going to happen with gold.
	I think that I don't, you know, I have no idea.
	put a dollar figure on it like that guy said ten thousand dollars an ounce but i think it's going to be positive for gold once people start seeing the damage uh for the supply chain now the other side of that i guess is going to be when it goes into recession what's typically happened in a recession um do people try
	to sell off their gold take
	That's usually what happens.
	We've seen in extreme market downturns that there will be a liquidation because a lot of times big investors, too, We'll hold gold as a way to hedge against inflation.
	Because gold is so liquid, when they see a market downturn, and the advice of the Rothschilds was to buy when there's blood in the streets, and when there's a market downturn, there's a recession, and prices are down, and people are liquidating their assets, a lot of people will get out of gold and into stocks or businesses and buy on the cheap.
	But what happens is...
	Because of the monetary system damage, a lot of people start going back into gold.
	So there's a temporary, usually a temporary sell-off, at least that's what I've seen historically, a temporary sell-off, and then it starts to gain against the system.
	So gold starts showing its...
	It's housing of value as a safe haven.
	But it just basically recedes and then it comes back.
	That's what I've seen.
	I don't know, though, David.
	We're in a weird time.
	I don't think history may show us the way here.
	Because of the massive de-dollarization, I just keep using that term because it's really striking to me that the economic system worldwide...
	Even the IMF.
	It's resetting.
	Of course it is.
	We've been saying this for years.
	It's resetting.
	And I think the demand for gold by governments is unprecedented, by private institutions is unprecedented.
	We're seeing a real shift globally here.
	So it's hard to say exactly what would happen, but that's what's happened historically.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, when I look at it, I think it's only one stable coin.
	That's going to be gold and silver or whatever, right?
	But especially gold.
	If they want to talk about a stable coin, that's it.
	The rest is except no substitutes, no frauds.
	They're going to throw all their garbage T-bills and repo stuff into it.
	That's not going to be a stable thing.
	I don't know.
	It's crazy.
	But they're going to use all their powers to try to make that operate.
	And I think we're going to be seeing...
	An upcoming situation, not just trade wars, but also currency wars and all the rest of this financial stuff.
	Hopefully we don't get into a real shooting war, because that's how the shooting wars began, with that kind of stuff.
	Tell us a little bit about what's going on at Wise Wolf.
	Well, the weekly mission is to find supply.
	Strange times.
	I noticed that we've got a lull in the silver market right now.
	You're probably...
	If you're not in my business, you don't see it because we provide everybody with the metals.
	I'm starting to see some shortages in one-ounce silver rounds and generic things like that, at least for a variety.
	So that's piqued my interest.
	And it's probably because of the prices.
	Things that we talked about with silver, I think there's probably some...
	Somebody's buying, right?
	So it's accumulation by larger entities, most likely.
	So I'm just keeping that supply chain open.
	That's my...
	That's been my mission.
	We've got the Texas physical location, Missouri physical location.
	I'm going to be heading back up to Branson today.
	So I'll be up there checking on my shop and doing some inventory.
	We've got some great specials and things going on.
	We've been talking to people, especially with the market kind of pulling back.
	We've perfected the art of getting people out of paper IRAs and 401Ks and other things.
	So if you're interested in that, we're Johnny on the spot.
	And I've got a great team for that.
	Really easy to put you in physical metals.
	And I'm making some more improvements to the website and experiences there for one-time purchases.
	If you want a gram of gold, you go to davidknight.gold.
	Maybe you just want a gram.
	I've got a free shipping, no credit card fees.
	I still have to pay the fees, but I just don't make you pay them.
	So if you go to davidknight.gold and you hit the joint Wolfpack tab, there's a way to get just a gram of gold, and it's free shipping.
	But please buy two.
	That way I make something.
	I put those on there.
	It's like, well, I think if they buy two, I make something.
	How much is that in terms of ounce?
	What is a gram in terms of ounce?
	There's 31.1 grams.
	In a Troy Amps.
	Oh, okay.
	So, you know, divide that.
	That's about a 30th.
	So we're talking about something in the neighborhood of 100 bucks per gram or something like that.
	Yeah.
	So you pay some premium.
	By the way, I make it, I set it up, and I'm always on the hunt for, and by the way, those are another thing that we're getting harder and harder to find.
	So I'm going to have to keep sourcing them somewhere, but those sheets of getting the 100, harder to find across the board.
	Really?
	Wow.
	Yeah, so I made that easy to get small amounts of gold bullion, or you can just sign up for, you know, one of the Wolfpacks above the 250.
	So that's what I like about Wolfpack.
	You know, you get these things like the goldbacks or the, you know, little...
	Chicklet things that are broken off.
	People think that gold is so expensive, it's going to be really expensive.
	But you can buy it in very small quantities.
	And there's a lot of things that are out there.
	Of course, like you said, I guess they're getting harder and harder to find those things.
	But people are packaging it so that it isn't necessarily a gold bar that's worth a million dollars.
	Only corrupt senators can afford those types of things.
	You can get the little tiny Graham chiclet things.
	That's what I like with the Wolfpack, seeing some of those things.
	I didn't even know they existed until I got it through the Wolfpack thing.
	That's the key.
	If you accumulate and you buy fractional, you do pay a premium up front.
	But if you'll just take my advice and don't sell it.
	If you're going to sell it, sell it to me.
	But if you're going to hold...
	Hold for the long term, and you'll see those premiums will start to dissipate with the rising price of the metal.
	But you've got to hold it long term, and you'll have a shareable, something to use peer-to-peer to pay for things outside of a corrupt system, outside of the stablecoin dystopia.
	And of course, you know, we're talking about long term and talking about saving stuff.
	They don't pay any interest anymore in the banks.
	I mean, it's just foolish to put your money in the banks where they're going to pay you like 0.1% or some ridiculous thing like that.
	It used to be that the banks would pay you something that's pretty close to what they would charge in a home loan.
	You know, your home loan would be 5.5%.
	They'd pay you 4% or 4.5% at the bank on your savings account.
	Now they don't pay you anything.
	And you're going to be seeing that eaten up with inflation.
	So if you're going to be doing any kind of a savings program, metal is for a long term.
	Metal really is the way to go.
	It truly is.
	But it's the privacy thing that I think is absolutely priceless.
	Well, Tony, thank you so much.
	And you've got a program coming up today, right after this one?
	I do.
	Arterburn Radio Transmission.
	We'll talk parapolitics, precious metals, and whatever else is on my mind for an hour at 11 Central Time, 12 Eastern, on Rumble, America Unplugged Channel, and my...
	My ex at Tony Arterburn.
	So go find us there.
	That's great.
	Thank you so much, Tony.
	I really do appreciate it.
	Thank you for setting up davidknight.gold to take people to Wise Wolf.
	Love the programs that you've got there.
	I've known Tony for a long time, done a lot of business with him, and it has always been a good experience, and I really trust Tony.
	Thank you.
	We'll talk to you soon.
	All right, folks, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, Hunter Biden travels to Dubai to sell property and crypto.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	It's not Hunter Biden.
	It's Eric Trump.
	It's hard to tell the difference between them, actually.
	I guess Eric Trump, in all fairness, he's not into crack cocaine and prostitutes, I guess, as far as we know.
	But other than that...
	In terms of their business dealings, it looks kind of similar.
	Eric Trump is in Dubai selling crypto and luxury property.
	Just weeks before his father's highly anticipated trip to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, Trump Tower in Dubai, built by a Saudi developer, has $20 million penthouses and some three or four bedroom apartments that are priced about one and a third million.
	And of course, of course.
	A golf course.
	A golf course, of course.
	The fuzzy line between business and politics is exemplified in the loosely regulated crypto industry, says Semaphore.
	World Liberty Financial, the firm co-founded by Zach Whitcoff, son of the U.S. President's envoy to the Middle East, who was also a business partner of his in terms of real estate.
	That's his expertise, his real estate, Whitcoff.
	He was a real estate agent who helped Trump with some of his purchases and stuff like that.
	And he looked at it and was like, if this guy who can't tell a photoshopped tattoo from him, if he can make money off of the real estate stuff, I can do it too.
	So he stopped being a real estate agent, became a real estate investor.
	He made a fortune and they're pals.
	And of course, you know, we're talking about the Middle East and everything that's happening.
	It's all about the real estate, isn't it?
	Yeah, it definitely is a real estate scam.
	So, Whithoff, I guess, fits as the president's envoy to the Middle East because it's all about real estate.
	And his son, Zach, co-founded the World Liberty Financial stuff with the Trump family.
	Abu Dhabi-based DWF Labs disclosed a $25 million purchase of tokens tied to the Trump's World Liberty this month, becoming one of its biggest holders.
	As a lot of people pointed out, you know, this structure, some of the structures that he's set up with world liberty and other things allows people to anonymously buy into some of these things.
	I mean, it's like a, you know, it's like a drop for money that they can do.
	I mean, it's just an open invitation to, if not fraud, it is an open invitation to the Democrats to investigate him for fraud because he set up this structure.
	That just invites suspicion, if not fraudulent activity.
	So, Eric Trump will speak today at a crypto conference.
	It's headlined by industry figures such as Changping Zhao, the founder of the trading platform Binance.
	World Liberty plans to offer a stable coin on Binance.
	And Zach Witkoff met with Zhao.
	Who served four months in U.S. prison for money laundering and seeking a presidential pardon.
	He is seeking a presidential pardon.
	He didn't get jail for seeking the presidential pardon.
	He's seeking a presidential pardon.
	I guess he did his time.
	So again, you know, this is so good to know that the Trump family is not at all like the Biden criminal family.
	The Biden crime family.
	Well, now we've got the Trump crime family.
	There you go.
	It's a big family and you ain't in it.
	And it is really just, you know, organized crime.
	And Eric Trump, as I pointed out with Tony, is out there saying, well, banks could be extinct in 10 years, he's saying.
	This is another tip-off that what they're working on with the stablecoin and with Lutnik is really to come up with a CBDC.
	Because that was one of the key things about CBDC.
	Trying to get small, medium-sized banks to understand that, with the exception of maybe J.P. Morgan and a couple of the big banks like that, they'll make room for them to get involved somehow, but for the most part, all the local banks will be gone.
	That's why we're looking at how we can, at a state level, we had Senator Nicely saying, you know what, we need to have, and the banks didn't understand that a state bank...
	Was going to be there to help them survive this type of attack.
	They thought, well, that's going to be competition.
	It's like, no, you don't even understand where the threat's coming from.
	You don't even understand who the enemy is.
	It was really, what he was working on was essentially like a, instead of a Federal Reserve system, you could think of it as a Tennessee Reserve system.
	But I guess it's one of the reasons why they came against him.
	One of several reasons why they came against him, because he...
	Figured out what they were up to.
	Offering some bills against it.
	The modern financial system is broken.
	It's slow.
	It's expensive, said Eric Trump in an interview.
	He said, our banking system favors the ultra-wealthy, and it was weaponized against the vast majority of people in our country.
	Well, so is his.
	His is going to be weaponized.
	It's going to be there for the insiders that are centrally controlling it, even if they call it DeFi.
	The banks, if they don't watch what's coming, they're going to be extinct in 10 years, he said.
	And of course, as this article on RT points out, in 2021, major American financial services company Capital One severed ties with over 300 accounts linked to the Trump family and their businesses.
	Think about that, 300 accounts.
	You just have to balance 10 checkbooks a day.
	Nobody wants to do that, right?
	So they saved him the trouble.
	They got rid of their 300 accounts off of that.
	The move came two months after the January 6th Capitol riot.
	And as I said, you know, rather than standing on the rule of law for everybody, what Trump is going to do is he's going to set up his own power base outside of that.
	And he's going to basically come after his enemies personally.
	He's going to set up his own banking system that he's going to be tightly tied into it.
	I guess, you know, he's tired of working for the Rothschilds, Wilbur Ross and company, and I guess now he wants his family to be the Rothschilds instead, maybe, huh?
	New Mid-East Project is the latest Trump company that is...
	A deal tied to a foreign government.
	The Trump Organization agreed to partner on a real estate project in Qatar.
	And the latest of a series of projects tied to foreign governments.
	You see, it's not just in Gaza.
	It's everywhere.
	Yeah, you know, what about Biden, they'll say.
	Yeah, what about Biden?
	You know, yeah, okay, Trump is doing these deals with foreign governments.
	Well, why don't you talk about Biden?
	Yeah, because if Biden did it...
	Then we should be concerned about that.
	But if Trump did it, we shouldn't be concerned about that.
	That's what you always hear, right?
	Well, what about Biden?
	Yeah, he's also a criminal.
	So if Biden breaks the law, then Trump can do the same.
	If one of them acts like a dictator, the other one can be like a dictator in those areas.
	The exchange of the office of precedent.
	Not president, but precedent.
	Setting these precedents everywhere.
	PayPal.
	That's where I've seen this.
	Not capital.
	You know, I didn't have 300 bank accounts.
	I had one account with PayPal, and they cut me off five months into this show.
	And they've now deepened their push into targeted ads, fueling privacy concerns over the monetization of financial data.
	Well, you want to talk about privacy stuff?
	Look, they're tied to the police state.
	You know, they take orders from the police state.
	As I said, I spent two hours on the phone with somebody there when they banned me.
	There and at Venmo at the same time because they're tied together.
	And after two hours, the guy came back and says, I can't see any reason for why they would ban you.
	I just see one message saying, shut this account down immediately.
	So where's that coming from?
	And so, that should really concern us about what the crypto bros want to do, right?
	The PayPal mafia?
	People like Teal, people like Musk, and that ilk?
	What are they going to do with all this?
	As I pointed out the other day, the crypto bros love the freedom cities of Trump.
	This is an article from Cointelegraph.
	Let me say to you that the so-called freedom cities...
	It's just as cynical a mislabeling as the Patriot Act.
	It's another one of these things.
	And so, you know, they put that name on there.
	Be careful when you see something like that.
	Smart cities is really what we're talking about.
	They said it's going to help the crypto sector discover where it can go in terms of innovation and new applications.
	yeah let's use the crypto stuff as a cbdc but we'll make money out of it how about that that's going to be much better trump
	Trump pledged, when he was running, to build 10 new U.S. cities.
	He called them Freedom Cities.
	He said, I'm going to build them from scratch, and we're going to build them on public land, and we're going to make them free of the nightmare of red tape.
	That was his quote, the nightmare of red tape.
	Well, it is a nightmare.
	As a matter of fact, Ron Paul has said, look, if you want to, he said, forget about The interest rates, if you want to help people to be able to afford homes, of course, that's not the real issue.
	He wants to push interest rates down because of the interest on the debt, the cumulative debt of the U.S. government.
	But, you know, to try to make the peasants happy and get the interest rates down so we can afford to have homes, Ron Paul said, much better than pushing on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates.
	Get rid of the regulations on homes.
	And so you might look at this and say, well, that'd be great because, you know, the regulations on homes are what have made them so expensive.
	But just be careful what you wish for.
	Because what we see, the people that we see in this, you now got Department of Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, you know, in from the very beginning on this carbon pipeline, carbon capture pipeline scam, along with Kristi Noem.
	Summit Pipeline CEO and Donald Trump there in Mar-a-Lago, they're talking about that.
	Well, now, he's also, as the Interior Secretary, working with the Housing and Urban Development Secretary, HUD Secretary, who is Scott Turner.
	They've announced a joint task force to do just that.
	So, I've got the public land, and you have HUD.
	So, let's come up with this new, novel approach for the federal government, which is not even supposed to own the land.
	Neither of these organizations should even exist under the Constitution.
	But they're going to have a joint task force on using underutilized federal land for housing.
	And so the people who are really heavily into this, Musk, Thiel, Marc Andreessen, others, also all of them part of the PayPal mafia, the PayPal mafia that is kicking people off at the behest of The state.
	Where rules are suspended and don't apply any more to certain people.
	That's where they want to go, they said.
	So it may sound like freedom to you.
	Well, less building regulations and let's get out there in the Wild West or whatever.
	But it's really going to be a 15-minute open-air prison.
	And I guess you really don't need to have a lot of building permits if you're building a concentration camp, right?
	That's what the 15-minute cities really are.
	It's a high-tech.
	Concentration camp.
	We want to concentrate everybody into these areas.
	So, critics have said that this is a devious scam aimed at bringing back the old company towns of yesteryear with a fresh coat of modern crypto-fascist varnish.
	They call them company towns because they're going to be so heavily tied to these crypto bros.
	They said, indeed, a company script.
	Was the medium of exchange in towns like Pullman, Illinois, built by George Pullman, owner of the Pullman Palace Car Company in the late 19th century.
	And, you know, there's a lot of similarity between these robber barons of the late 19th century and these robber barons of the crypto space.
	Over the years, there have been a lot of new city plans intended to manifest fascist or communist or social democratic or libertarian or post-colonial political agendas.
	Yeah, we've had a lot of people do those types of utopian communities.
	And usually they are socialist or communist.
	Islam is now working on doing one in Texas, but this is really a government operation.
	And the fact that the crypto brothers are there doesn't really make me see any freedom.
	I see the control that's involved in this.
	New vistas of innovation tantalize these groups.
	They sense that existing institutional structures rooted in the 20th century world hamper their potential.
	New cities, theoretically at least, might offer the prospect of designing a setting that can unleash the sector to discover where it can go in terms of innovation and new applications.
	I said, of course, in the past, these crypto bros just outside of San Francisco, they wanted to set up a city.
	They ran afoul of California regulations, but they designed this as an eco-friendly, walk-only community.
	15-minute city.
	This is their vision.
	Vision, I should say.
	And that is everywhere you go.
	It's the same thing.
	That's why we know what this is going to be.
	It's going to be a 15-minute city.
	It's going to be a smart city.
	It's going to have smart contracts with their AI agents and all the rest of this.
	So that project now has been put on hold because of an environmental study.
	So these guys are saying, Trump, we want to put this out on public land.
	We'll skip all the environmental studies, and that'll be great.
	We'll have no red tape.
	They purchased nearly a billion dollars worth of farmland in California.
	Without saying anything about the identity of the backers, I think people found out about it.
	They were very upset.
	And of course, they've also tried this again in Honduras.
	Prospera Chartered City Project.
	So these billionaires are looking for places where they can have their own towns where they are king.
	And that's what these freedom cities are going to be.
	For example, in Honduras, they got a 50-year lease.
	And permission to build a city on an island there.
	They've raised $120 million in investments since its founding.
	It's backed by billionaires like Peter Thiel, Sam Altman, Mark Andreessen, and others.
	What could possibly go wrong?
	Disputes there, interestingly, settled by an arbitration center.
	The court system is run by a retired Arizona judge who operates online.
	And then I'll just finish with this.
	Prospera has been able to persuade Western-based companies to set up new businesses within its zone, including experimental medical facilities.
	Oh, the island of Dr. Moreau?
	Yeah, kind of.
	They want to run clinical trials that would not be burdened by FDA standards.
	What FDA standards?
	The FDA doesn't have any standards.
	The FDA is free to do anything.
	That's not even good enough for them.
	They don't want to have to pay off anybody, I guess.
	So that's what they're ultimately about.
	And just to remember, these crypto bros are also tied into the eugenics, the depopulation stuff.
	All of this is just to tie this back.
	You know, we want to be able to set up experimental medical facilities.
	Yeah, just pure evil.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	We'll be right back.
	Song
	The
	Decoding the mainstream propaganda.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Well, on Rumble, Radice Bro, thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	He says, if you do that to Trump, Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, anyone in that circle, everybody would have a big problem with it.
	Trump lied.
	People died.
	Say it.
	Trump, yeah.
	He won't say that.
	He will not, as we saw with Candace Owen.
	And she's not going to say anything about it either.
	Well, the CIA can neither confirm nor deny whether a secret Virginia site is theirs.
	Now, this came up because of Doge.
	Evidently, they put this up for rent.
	This might be an oopsie for Doge.
	A low-profile government complex in northern Virginia, long rumored to be a CIA spook site, briefly appeared on a federal real estate for sale list last month, only to disappear from the market within hours.
	a mysterious vanishing act worthy of a spy novel it popped up on a trump administration list of quote non-core federal property slated for potential sale and they bloomberg said the list was
	yanked down less than 24 hours later it included more than 400 other buildings and offices some of them housing cabinet level agencies
	Oh, so we've got about 400 buildings that I guess the Doge people look at it and say, well...
	It doesn't say anything's going on here, so I guess we can get rid of it.
	It's kind of like a big hole.
	Remember that?
	Out in Chatham County in North Carolina, that was one of these facilities that was part of the Cold War Network.
	They had these facilities being run by AT&T.
	They've got one, actually, in a building in the middle of New York, New York City.
	But they put a lot of these out in rural areas.
	And the book that was, what was it, Red Rock, I think it was, but Raven Rock, Raven Rock, Raven Rock, the plan to save themselves and let the rest of us die.
	That book began with Big Hole, but about a decade before that, everybody said, well, yeah, that thing closed a long time ago, closed with the Cold War, and one day Karen had the boys in the car and said, let's go see what's in there.
	They drove down this abandoned dirt road, and there's fences up, and all of a sudden these speakers come on and say, turn the car around, get out of here.
	I mean, it was, you know, active.
	Evidently, that's what's going on with these buildings as well.
	Fourteen buildings in that cluster there, but, you know, 400 buildings that, I guess, Doge looked at it.
	They couldn't look like people weren't using them anymore, and yet, evidently, they were.
	In this particular site, 14 buildings, some of them going by names like Franconia Building B or Butler Building 12, don't appear on any other public database of government real estate.
	So, this looks like the CIA.
	They contacted them and they gave them the language that they used during the Howard Hughes-Glomar thing in 1974.
	The CIA can neither confirm nor deny the existence or the non-existence of these records.
	So that is basically, don't ask us, but that's really what's going on.
	The site dates back to 1952, has been the subject of decades of local speculation.
	It's just like Big Hole.
	Foreign policy once identified it as a heavily guarded compound used to store classified files, equipment, and supplies.
	Isn't it amazing?
	I really do hate.
	This secretive government, this national security state that was founded in the aftermath of World War II during the Cold War, I really do hate it.
	And here we are, you know, 70 years later, and it's only gotten worse.
	Mark Ambinder of The Week called it, quote, perhaps the worst kept secret in Springfield, where neighbors talk openly about strange security measures and about rotating surveillance.
	Kind of like Big Hole.
	It's been identified in numerous public forums.
	The bad guys know that it exists.
	The CIA and the Air Force often assign counter-surveillance teams to the area, they said.
	It's 1.2 million square feet of property there.
	It is tax-exempt.
	But it is appraised by that county as being over.
	$115 million.
	The Trump administration has made waves with its efforts to trim the government's bloated real estate portfolio.
	But this listing, along with others, may have gone a step too far.
	In the end, the administration backtracked on all 443 proposed sales, citing need for a further review.
	That's why I say, all the Doge stuff was just a PR scam.
	None of it's going to happen.
	They put all this stuff up.
	They gave you the list.
	They put it on a website.
	And now here you have 443 proposed sales.
	Just one of these is $112 million value based on what the county has it.
	And so 443 of those, billions of dollars, and none of it's going to happen.
	All of it has been taken off the list.
	Just like Trump said, yeah, we're going to, you know, we did that, that was just a, you know, just a PR campaign.
	Nothing's going to change.
	Someone in the bureaucracy must have hit the publish button without reading the fine print or the classification stamps.
	Neither the CIA nor the GSA, General Services Administration, will say more nor even confirm that the property even exists.
	And they said, well, that probably tells us everything that we need to know.
	It really does.
	Speaking of secret agents, we will soon have AI agents.
	I said that's going to be the next big thing.
	You're going to be hearing a lot about the AI agents.
	Just like, you know, we heard a couple years ago, we started hearing about the chatbots.
	And we've seen a lot of stuff with the chatbots.
	Well, this is the next step where you give them a lot of...
	Autonomy to actually do tasks.
	So the chatbots are just going to talk to you.
	The agents will be given access to certain things to be able to do stuff for you.
	And Visa wants to give them access to your credit card.
	Of course they do.
	Wouldn't you love to have a bot running up charges on your charge account?
	You know, and how are things going to be marketed to this bot?
	When you look at search engine optimization of a few years ago, I can imagine that there's going to be a lot of optimization of sales pitches for these AI agents.
	So I can figure out the algorithm is going to be able to make a lot of money.
	Selling stuff to these agents who are supposedly going to go out and make a determination about what is in your best interest.
	Some of the examples that we've seen in some of these early ones, you tell it, I'm moving to such and such a city.
	This is the amount of square footage that I have.
	These are some of the priorities.
	I've got kids in school, so I'm only close to a school that's there, you know, that type of stuff.
	And here's my budget.
	And so to just go out and do what real estate agents used to do.
	And Visa wants to give your credit card to these things.
	AI agents are supposed to be more than chatbots, personal assistants that know what you want and can do real work on your behalf.
	Visa hopes to give them your credit card, set a budget, and have some preferences and let these AI agents find and buy you a sweater, your weekly groceries, An airplane ticket?
	Maybe a home.
	Who knows, you know, what this will do.
	Transformational.
	Jarvis, max out my credit cards buying Funko Pops.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, you might want to look at some of the crazy stuff that people get with Alexis and everything before you turn this over.
	Transformational, they said.
	On the order of magnitude of the advent of e-commerce itself.
	And again, you know, if you can optimize your site to sell to these agents, I bet you can make a lot of money.
	Visa announced on Wednesday that it is partnering with a group that's going to be leading this development, and of course the big names and the chatbots are all there.
	They want to connect their AI systems to Visa's payment network.
	Visa's also working with IBM, online payment company Stripe, and phone maker Samsung on this initiative.
	So for emerging AI companies, Visa's backing could also boost their chances of competing with tech giants like Amazon and Google that dominate digital commerce.
	and are developing their own ai agents early incarnations of agent-based commerce are starting to do a really good job on the shopping and discovery dimension of the problem but they have tremendous trouble on payments because they just can't get access to your credit
	card account you give them you get to this point where the agent literally just turns it back around and
	Well, why not?
	I mean, isn't it enough for it to do some research and give you some options and let you make the final decision?
	It's kind of, they're pushing for the disastrous idea that we've seen with the autonomous killer robots for the military.
	You know, giving them the kill decision.
	That kill decision needs to be kept with you.
	Just like your credit card needs to be kept with humans.
	And what about credit card debt?
	Credit card balance of American consumers at $1.2 trillion the end of last year.
	According to the Federal Reserve of New York, you know what nobody is talking about?
	The massive interest rate on credit cards.
	How come, like I said before, we're talking to Tony, if you want to save money, you can't put it in a bank savings account.
	They don't pay you any interest.
	It's going to be a fraction of a percent, typically.
	And yet, they have the audacity on credit cards to charge you 20%, 30%, 40% or more.
	That is outrageous.
	We always understood that to be a crime, and it should be a crime.
	You know, they took off the 10% usury limit when inflation kicked up above 10%.
	But they never put it back on.
	And so you've got these companies that are getting money from you and paying you zero.
	Getting money from the Federal Reserve for many years in the wake of the 2008 financial meltdown and not paying any interest to the Federal Reserve for it.
	And then turning around and charging you 10, 20, 30, 40 percent.
	That is criminal.
	Nobody's talking about that.
	They said consumers will give their AI agents clear spending limits and conditions that should give them confidence that the human is still in control.
	Oh, so you can tell, here, go buy this and don't spend any more than that, and that is supposed to be control for you.
	Well, the FBI, and this is good, I'm glad to see the FBI is getting rid of agents that kneeled during the George Floyd protests.
	And when you look at these agents, they seem to all fall into certain DEI categories, don't they?
	Show that picture there, Travis, if you got it.
	The FBI reassigns agents that kneel during George Floyd protests.
	They look like they just were recruited right out of college, don't they?
	And so these agents that don't seem...
	Look at them.
	You know, they got their masks on, some of them, one of them, pink mask and sunglasses.
	But they identified who she is.
	They got rid of them, and I think that's a really good thing.
	But now what they need to do is they need to get rid of the agents that are doing the civil asset forfeiture.
	How about the agents that are doing swatting of people?
	You know, when you look just a few weeks ago.
	We had everybody talking about, oh, look, they're swatting conservative journalists and commentators and stuff like that.
	Well, again, they won't talk about the problem is the SWAT team itself.
	It isn't just the point of view.
	Yeah, it's being weaponized against that.
	But look, we got people where politics is not an issue at all that are being killed by these SWAT teams.
	That kind of stuff has been happening for quite some time.
	People having all their property stolen.
	Like I was talking about yesterday, you know, you have...
	Christine Ohm had her purse stolen.
	She has a purse that's just under $5,000 in it.
	You know, she's got another $800 wallet or something.
	And then she has $3,000 in cash.
	And I said, you know, her purse is like the price of my car.
	And if I was stopped by the police, and they found, in my $5,000 car, and they found $3,000 worth of cash, They would steal my car and they'd steal the cash.
	But in this particular case, it was an illegal alien that stole the purse and the cash.
	But they call that civil asset forfeiture instead of theft.
	You know, if an illegal alien does it, it's theft.
	But if Kristi Noem and her thugs and her cartel does it, it's called civil asset forfeiture.
	And when they go in and kick the door down and kill innocent people, Well, that's supposedly justified.
	Listen to this story of a woman who had that very thing done to her.
	Fear.
	So much fear.
	Humiliation.
	Pure disbelief.
	All just for wanting a fresh start.
	This woman, who we're calling Marissa and her three daughters, came to Oklahoma from Maryland looking for a slower, more affordable pace of life.
	They rented this house in a nice, seemingly safe northwest Oklahoma City neighborhood.
	Her husband planned to join them this past weekend.
	But any semblance they had of comfort went out the window when 20 men armed to the teeth busted through it Thursday morning.
	I don't know who they were.
	They had guns.
	It was dark.
	All the lights were off.
	They were federal agents, Marissa says, with the U.S. Marshals, ICE, and the FBI.
	And I kept asking them, like, who are you?
	What are you doing here?
	What's happening?
	And they said, we have a...
	A warrant for the house.
	They ordered Marissa and her daughters outside into the rain before they could even get dressed.
	They wanted me to change in front of all of them, between all of them.
	The thing is, the suspect names on that search warrant were not Marissa's or anyone in her family's.
	They were, however, names listed on mail still arriving at the house.
	Former residents, perhaps.
	We just moved here from Maryland.
	We're citizens.
	That's what I kept saying.
	We were citizens.
	She says they didn't care.
	We were criminals.
	Why were they treating us like criminals?
	We were here by ourselves.
	We didn't do anything.
	The agents ripped apart every square inch of the house, taking their phones, laptops, documents, and their life savings in cash as evidence.
	I have to feed my children.
	I'm gonna need gas money.
	I need to be able to get around.
	Like, how do you just leave me like this?
	Like an abandoned dog.
	And when they left, they told her something.
	I know it was a little rough this morning.
	It was so denigrating.
	Like, you do all of this to a family?
	To women?
	Your fellow citizens, and it was a little rough.
	You have literally traumatized me and my daughters for life.
	This family has virtually nothing.
	And I said, when are we going to get our stuff back?
	He was like, it could be days or it could be months.
	Nothing but questions.
	What if I would have been armed?
	What if you're breaking in?
	What am I supposed to think?
	My initial thought is we're being robbed.
	My daughter's being female, daughter being kidnapped.
	Nothing but likely lifelong trauma.
	We have guns pointing at our faces.
	Can you just reprogram yourself and see us as humans, as women?
	A little bit of mercy.
	Care a little bit about your fellow human mate, about your fellow citizen, like, fellow resident.
	We bleed too.
	We bleed just like anybody else bleeds.
	We were scared.
	You could see it in our faces and we were terrified.
	And Marissa told us the agents wouldn't even leave her a business card.
	She says she has no idea who to contact to get her things back.
	We reached out to the FBI.
	They told us they were simply assisting on this case and that we'd need to contact Homeland Security.
	A spokesperson for Homeland Security told us they'll look into it and get back with us.
	Well, we checked back today and nobody responded.
	Oh, okay.
	So it's kind of like George Orwell meets Kafka, right?
	Yeah, that's where we are with this.
	If you try to defend yourself, basically they invade your home.
	People in bulletproof vests, heavily armed.
	If you try to defend yourself against them, then they kill you.
	That's the way this thing rolls down.
	So yeah, absolutely, get rid of these people who are kneeling for the George Floyd protest.
	But how about some conservatives get interested in conserving what this country used to be?
	And stopping these armed gangs of thugs.
	I mean, I've said it over and over again.
	When I saw Brazil, Terry Gilliam of Monty Python, when I saw his dark satire on 1984, in 1984, it begins with one of these types of raids.
	And at that point in time, they had not become common.
	And when I saw it, I thought, wow, that is really over the top.
	But now, that is what is happening to people all the time.
	That, along with civil asset forfeiture, the insanity, what have they done?
	They've done this deliberately.
	You've got only one in eight Afghan refugees entering Germany was screened.
	Only one in eight.
	Now, they had 31,000 Afghans.
	So, you know, you've got maybe about 4,000 of them that were vetted.
	And then the rest of them, you know, 27,000, 28,000.
	Let them call on in.
	We don't even care who they are.
	We're not going to give them any security checks.
	So they create a problem.
	And then the solution to that problem is a militarized police surveillance state.
	That's what we're seeing over and over again.
	The federal government has imported Afghan migrants from its reception center in Pakistan's capital of Islamabad since the returned power of the Taliban.
	So you bring in these dangerous people as an army.
	And then that gives you an excuse to create a militarized police state.
	On Rumble, don't frag me, bro, says every product that murdered people, as recalled by the FDA, was approved by the FDA.
	And this has been going on for a long time.
	Back, it was now about 35 years ago, one of my family's friends.
	Wife died from a product that the FDA approved, then took off the market, then the company protested, they put it back on the market, and it killed his wife.
	On Rumble, Timed Non-Tides says, Ron Paul supports Mises libertarians who support crypto bros.
	If we don't cut off the support, we won't win.
	Yeah, we need to have some wisdom about what's really going on with this crypto stuff.
	I really think it is a setup.
	On Rumble, Audi, Modern Retro Radio, good to see you there.
	He says, Doge is a total psyop.
	People are naive enough to get excited about it.
	I knew it was a stunt from the onset.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And now we see that you're right.
	You know, we're hopeful that they get rid of some spending, right?
	And yet...
	You know, just firing some of the people in the bureaucracy.
	And then I always thought that his approach was to get rid of people and replace them with AI.
	Maybe he's just all a big PR front.
	Who knows?
	Well, the first migrants that have been charged for entering military zones on the U.S. border.
	Remember that Trump sent troops to the border, and then he declared it a militarized zone.
	And now we see the implications of that.
	I thought it would be a good idea, and I said this in 2017.
	I said, okay, so he's promised he's going to end the troop deployments and the wars in Afghanistan, in Iraq, bring the people home, protect our border for a change.
	And you could do that just by putting them there as a deterrent.
	But no, they're going to go the full militarized police state aspect of it.
	Creation of a 60-foot wide strip along the base of New Mexico.
	Gave U.S. troops the authority to detain migrants in the area north of the border barriers.
	You know, we've got a lot of people in those areas that are concerned about the dangerous drug cartels coming across.
	And we should ask ourselves, how do we get the dangerous drug cartels?
	In the same way, we should ask ourselves, how do we wind up getting Ayatollahs running Iran?
	Well, CIA, both cases.
	Creating the drug war, running the drug war, creating the drugs like crack cocaine, CIA, people like that.
	Using Afghanistan to bring in opium and other issues like that in the poppy fields.
	And so our government creates these problems, just like with the immigration stuff, and then they give us their solution, which is a militarized police state.
	So, they said the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, visited the area last week and said it was phase one of a plan to extend the buffer zone.
	Again, as I said, you've got a lot of people there at the border, they're worried because they've got violent criminal gangs that were created by the failed war on drugs coming across there.
	They're concerned about that, and should be.
	And so now, you've got a different violent criminal gang.
	That's going to be under the control of the military.
	Any illegal attempting to enter that zone is entering a military base.
	That's what they're doing.
	They're going to call the 60-foot strip all along the New Mexico border.
	That's going to be called a military base.
	You will be interdicted by U.S. troops.
	Who will then hand you over to Border Patrol, working together.
	The troops would hand over the migrants that they detain to U.S. Border Patrol or other civil law enforcement, according to the Defense Department.
	So this is the military there.
	And what we have to be concerned about, as Ron Paul had said back in the past, he said, be careful about a wall.
	Be careful about a wall, because if you've got a wall...
	That's going to keep you from getting out.
	It's not just going to keep bad guys from coming in.
	It's going to keep good guys from being able to get out as well.
	And you may want to be able to get out of this country.
	You won't be able to fly out using a TSA.
	And he says this is Phase 1. I suspect that Phase 2 is going to be what Palmer Lucky or Lucky Palmer.
	Lucky Palmer, I think.
	Lucky is his first name.
	I think he has a company, Andrewil.
	And they're working on a high-tech border fence, which is basically going to be a Terminator no-go zone, right?
	Demilitarized zone, or actually fully militarized, I should say.
	I say demilitarized because it's no man's land.
	They're going to create that there.
	They're going to have drones, perhaps armored, drones that can use force against you.
	Maybe it'll be non-lethal, but of course non-lethal is a relative term.
	The so-called New Mexico National Defense Area was created with the transfer of 110,000 acres of federal land to the U.S. Army.
	The buffer zone allowed the Trump administration to use troops to arrest migrants without invoking the 1807 Insurrection Act that empowers a president to deploy the military to suppress events like civil disorder.
	They're very ingenious when it comes to getting around prohibitions of what these guys can do.
	So I'll just finish up with this story here.
	We were talking about education earlier, before Tony came on.
	We're talking about the danger of going to the government to get funding for your child's education, whether you're talking about a private school, a charter school, or home school, because that's what they want to do here in Tennessee.
	They liberalized the state funds for charter schools.
	Some of the homeschoolers said, okay, fine, that's good.
	We don't want your money, but what we do want is for you to acknowledge the fact that parents have the freedom to educate their children any way that they see fit without doing any reporting to you, and they shut that down.
	What does that tell you?
	I think it tells you everything.
	They want to have strings to control you.
	But there are many things that we can do on our own, and staying away from government money is one of those.
	But this is another one that is really important.
	This is from WNG.org.
	A deep need for parental discretion.
	Don't set your child loose and unsupervised in the digital Wild West.
	Right?
	You keep your kids out of these.
	Corrupt government institutions, these seminaries for Satan, and yet you give your kid a smartphone, what have you gained?
	Well, nothing.
	In a recent BBC interview, an OnlyFans content creator, Lily Phillips, recounted how she got into the business.
	She was first exposed to pornography at just 11 years old, and she said, I've never known life without it.
	When the interviewer pressed her about the dangers of kids encountering hardcore porn online, she just dismissed it with a shrug.
	She was tossed into the adult world like a lamb among wolves, and now, after years of moral distortion and neural rewiring, she profits by drawing others into the same pit into which she fell.
	Her story is tragic, but it is not rare.
	And they point out, you know, we are so careful about our children now, aren't we?
	We got car seats.
	We got childproof cabinets.
	We rubberize our playgrounds.
	We sanitize everything in the physical world.
	And then we hand our kids devices that give them unsupervised access to the entire internet.
	As one person said, we are overprotecting children in the physical world, and we are underprotecting them Online.
	And it's not just online.
	I mean, it is the very essence of what they are.
	We're so much more than our physical bodies or our soul.
	We are our spirit.
	And that is what is being attacked in this spiritual warfare of these phones.
	And in terms of the neural rewiring, it's not just the pornography that is doing this as well.
	Steve Jobs famously said that he would not give his own iPhone.
	To one of his kids as a child.
	He said, no, no, we're not giving that to them.
	These people know exactly what they're doing.
	They know the consequences of what their stuff really does to children.
	And they won't have it anywhere around their own children.
	They said, we have movie ratings that restrict access at theaters to those who are too young to properly process the content.
	But then we let them roam free in the limitless theater of the internet where explicit content is a click away.
	But you think about the schools, right?
	I mean, what they're exposed to in the schools is far, far, far worse, and they demand.
	That's why we've got the Supreme Court case going on right now.
	They demand that, you know, we're going to put in explicit, very explicit sexual stuff, LGBT, homosexual, transgender, all the rest of the stuff.
	We're going to put that in the schools explicitly, and you're not even going to be able to opt out of it for your kid who's in kindergarten.
	They first put it in and said, okay, we'll let you opt out.
	And then about four or five months later, they said, no, you can't opt out.
	We're going to force you to go through this.
	Parental controls and age verification systems exist, but they're often easily bypassed.
	Explicit material increasingly seeps into mainstream platforms.
	See, the analogy to that...
	Is the schools.
	You take away the smartphones.
	You don't count on these parental controls.
	You take the kids out of the schools.
	You don't count on some kind of a federal or state law telling them that they can't groom your child.
	Have a good day.
	The Common Man music
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find.
	The David Knight Show dot com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.

▲