The headline is, German Supreme Court upholds biologists' claim that measles virus does not exist.
This is back in 2017.
Eight years ago.
Could there be something wrong with the germ theory?
He says, yeah.
A recent episode, and this is back in 2017, so it's not so recent now, recent when he put it up on the site.
A recent episode in 2017 in Germany created a suppressed stir in the field of microbiology when microbiologist Dr. Stefan Lanka claimed that he would award anyone 100,000 euros who could prove the existence of the measles virus.
At first it appeared that he had lost, but Dr. Lanka took his loss to a higher court with more experts.
How in the world did I miss this?
And it was in March of 2017.
Really working more as a reporter.
I wasn't doing a kind of a survey of all the news and anything I could do, you know, when I have my own show.
My own show started in August, five months later.
So I missed this.
He had the backing of two independent laboratories.
And so at first they said, well, I think we got you here.
He said, no, that's not proof.
And he took it to a court and the court sided with him and said, no, that doesn't prove this.
They've isolated measles.
It turns out that the so-called proof provided was a composite of several different electron microscope images.
And the composite involved different components of damaged cells.
And the composite could not be duplicated.
You see, this is where the scientism comes in and science goes out the door.
If you tell somebody you've got something, we've seen this happen over and over again with cold fusion, for example.
Oh, look at this!
I've got fusion at room temperature.
Oh, yeah?
Show us the data.
Show us the thing, and we'll see if we can reproduce that.
Sorry, we can't reproduce it.
Nobody else can reproduce it.
It didn't exist, right?
They just throw it out.
And that needs to be done with these types of claims as well.
You need to show me your work.
Show me your data.
Can I duplicate it?
If nobody can duplicate what you claim that you did, then we don't believe you.
And the German Federal Supreme Court didn't believe this guy either.
So he put up a 100,000 euro prize.
If somebody could prove the existence of a measles virus.
And nobody could.
Nobody could.
So why is all this panic?
Out of the mainstream media, oh, we got 600 cases, we got 700 cases of measles.
It's like, okay, so what?
Do you even have a virus?
You got people who had the rash, and the rash disappears, and unfortunately the child dies because of something happened after they had the rash that was identified as measles?
And because of what the parents say was alleged was malpractice?
And yet...
The media is still pushing that out.
Oh, we've had two kids who died from this.
No, you don't have one if you look at the details.
You have two children who died, but not from that.
So how are they making MMR vaccines with attenuated measles viruses?
That's what he wants to know, right?
If the virus doesn't exist, how do you attenuate it?
Well, you know, you just got these viruses and they're dead or weakened or attenuated and we just add some aluminum and mercury and all that kind of stuff.
You can do that for Trump, can't you?
You know, as Alex was saying.
Yeah.
Okay, so he and several other virologists have also challenged the HIV virus.
Boy, that gets you purged.
And it got a lot of people purged.
They said that's not a virus.
And even if so...
How could that cause AIDS?
Some question how one virus could cause a myriad of diseases.
They all question the fact that the virus is not isolated in diagnosis.
Not in diagnosis.
And again, this is the HIV stuff that goes back to Fauci's first rodeo with...
Kerry Mullis and the PCR.
And Kerry Mullis said, well, you know, you can't prove HIV exists by using the PCR.
It's not a diagnostic tool.
You can find anything that you're looking for in it.
That's not isolating it at all.
That's not how this thing works.
But Fauci got away with it.
And that's what he used in 2020.
Instead, unreliable antibody tests were performed to put someone into life or death crisis over a virus that many claim doesn't even exist.
Objectively examine the results of all the recent epidemic viral threats.
And again, this is back in 2007.
So what were they talking about then?
Bird flu.
First one on the list.
Bird flu.
Swine flu.
Ebola.
Zika.
These certainly created a panic for more vaccines getting rushed into existence as well as getting more people vaccinated.
The one germ, one disease theory certainly seems to be a great business model, though, for the medical, pharmaceutical, industrial complex.
Because, hey, if we got one disease, one shot, that's how we get to 76 different shots for the kids, right?
Of course, a lot of those are multiple boosters.
Sometimes they hit the kids three or four times to get to that 76 for the same particular thing.
Are the weapons creating chronic debilitating diseases in exchange for acute illnesses considered infectious that most manage to get over renewed resilience to the dreaded pathogenic microbes blamed for all illnesses?
Are we actually destroying our immune system with our war on microbes?
In other words, what they're saying is an acute illness.
You might get a rash or something, and we call that measles, but it goes away.
And is it really worth this short acute illness of a rash, maybe a fever, that type of thing?
It's going to go away in a couple of days.
Is it really worth that to have a debilitating disease that you're going to have for the rest of your life, like autism?
Because you've been shot over and over again with the MMR and all the, you know, you can just take a little bit of aluminum and formaldehyde and all that kind of stuff in there.
That's okay, right?
Yeah.
Do it for the pharmaceutical companies.
Do it for Trump.
Ever since Pasteur's claim to fame as the father of the germ theory, our overall health has decreased while lifespans have increased.
Now there have been many scientists denouncing Pasteur's model of disease, even providing evidence that he was a plagiarist and a fraud, which I was surprised to see.
Someone sent me a book about that, going over his diary.
As early as the late 19th century, the 1800s, German biologist, Dr. Rudolf Virchow, known as the father of pathology, made this statement.
He said, if I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving, what?
That germs seek their natural habitat, diseased tissue, rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue.
This guy's a pathologist.
He studies diseased tissue.
And he thinks that it's not cause, but effect.
That you have the bacteria there.
The bacteria is not causing the diseased tissue.
The bacteria is there because the tissue is diseased.
He said, for example, mosquitoes seek stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant.
And there's also, of course, things coming up out of the water.
I always think about Charles Darwin.
When we took the kids to the British Museum, they have a shrine there to Charles Darwin, and you can see his desk and all the tools that he had.
And he's got like a little magnifying glass that you would use if you're having trouble reading when you're elderly, you know, that type of thing.
It's like, that's it?
No wonder he got it so wrong.
He would look at a glass of stagnant water, and he thought that the water was causing spontaneous generation of life.
He didn't understand that there were microbes in there that were reproducing to such an extent that you could actually see them.
It wasn't life coming from non-life.
It was life that he couldn't see.
It was getting large enough.
That's basically what this guy was saying.
You know, the mosquitoes are not...
Mosquitoes seek out stagnant water.
They don't cause the pool to become stagnant.
And, you know, water does not give birth to life.
We still have people doing that, though, don't they?
I mean, you still have the astronomers who look through the telescope and they say, oh, that planet's got water.
Therefore, there's life as we know it.
Well, no, that's a necessary condition for that life.
But it doesn't create it.
It doesn't create it.
Cause and effect.
*music*
The Common Man.
They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
They created Common Past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.