All Episodes
Previous Next
April 16, 2025 - The David Knight Show
03:01:15
Wed Episode #1990: 4Chan Exposed as Honeypot Trap, BigPharma’s Autism Plague, Greenland Grab
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday the 16th of April, year of our Lord 2025.
Well, today we're going to take a look at the explosion of autism.
And even the mainstream media can't ignore it, but they can spin it.
And they are spinning.
This measles epidemic.
And the guy that, we've got a lot of British tabloid papers that are coming in with all kinds of over-the-top claims about what is happening there, fear-mongering.
It is exactly the same thing that we saw with slight variations for COVID.
And we're talking about the parallels there.
And we're talking about the fact that the father met with RFK Jr. and what he said afterwards.
I think he's getting a sense of betrayal.
And I think we can see the betrayal that's there.
We're going to begin with the news.
We'll also get into some updates on tariffs and other economic issues.
And 4chan, interestingly, was hacked.
And it appears that it was set up as a honeypot by U.S. government agents and especially Israeli intelligence.
4chan, which was clickbait for people that they could identify.
We'll be right back.
Well, yesterday we talked about how Doge is something of a dodge.
Elon Musk and even the Daily Caller say, you know, they've taken their goals down by 85%.
And how they have triple-posted stuff they have claimed to shut down contracts, already finished, etc., etc.
There was never a trillion dollars to take out of that anyway, as I pointed out, unless you touch the warfare-welfare state.
And they're not about to do that.
You're going to have to have some major reform.
It's not going to be an issue of waste.
I've seen all this stuff before.
Tax enough already, the Tea Party people.
Well, we've got to be more efficient with government.
I said, be careful what you ask for.
I think Musk is trying to make it more efficient.
I think he's trying to get rid of employees.
And I think he wants to replace them with artificial intelligence.
That's a key thing.
But the Tea Party would never talk about what really needed to be done.
You know, taxes are too high.
You know, like that guy that runs for mayor all the time in New York.
The rent's too damn high.
That's his campaign slogan.
Well, what do you want to do about it?
Do you want to cut spending, or do you want to increase taxes?
Well, what do you want to do about this?
And where do you cut taxes?
Is it something that can be done with efficiency?
No, it can't be done with efficiency.
And like I said before, when you've got a government that's doing unconstitutional, tyrannical things, I don't want them to be more efficient.
Which brings us to the IRS the day after tax day.
Over 22,000 IRS workers have taken Trump's latest buyout offer.
Now, some had already taken him up on this.
And what they're saying is that they had 100,000 employees at the IRS.
And previously, previously, they had had 5,000 employees in the past three months.
This is a new offer, from what they're saying, that Trump has put out there.
5,000 left in the past three months.
Taking early retirement or whatever.
Another 7,000 were removed that were probationary employees.
So we're not talking about just 22,000.
We're talking about another 12,000.
We're talking about 34,000, which is about a third of the number of employees at the IRS going away.
Well, does that mean that they won't be bothering us anymore?
Absolutely not.
If you remember, as we were talking about the fact, well, we want to hire another 80,000 employees, they said.
But they also focus, whenever you complain about that, oh, we're going to have an army of IRS agents, and everybody wanted to imagine that they were all going to be carrying a gun.
No, it was still going to be a small portion of them carrying a gun.
Why do we want to have armed bureaucrats anyway?
And it's not just the IRS.
It's a lot of different bureaucracies.
I remember back in the 90s, as either the Washington Post or the New York Times had asked the question, Why is the Department of Education buying a lot of firearms, ammunition,
bulletproof vests, all the SWAT equipment?
Why is the Department of Education doing this?
We found out not too long after they asked the question.
They show up one morning at a family's home in the early dawn hours before daybreak.
They do a no-knock raid on the family.
And they drag the father and the children out on the grass, face down, guns in their backs and all the rest of the stuff, looking for the mom who had an overdue loan.
She had skipped out on the loan and she skipped out on the family.
They didn't know where she was.
But they go in and they SWAT team that family.
That's why they have this type of thing.
So we should be very concerned about the arming of the bureaucracy and about the fact that the bureaucracy is an army.
It's a massive number of people that are there.
And yet, as people would talk about that and say, well, 80,000 armed people, IRS agents, no, it wasn't going to be all of them weren't going to be armed.
And they kept saying, well, we're going to be focusing on upgrading our computer equipment.
Yeah, upgrading it to AI.
Which is going to be even more intrusive.
Even more surveillance of you.
And it can not only...
It can surveil all of your economic activity, but of course it can make very good judgments about what your politics and religion are, which might have something to do with whether it audits you or not, that type of thing.
So, Musk is saying they want to drastically reduce the cost and the size of federal bureaucracy, arguing that it is bloated and inefficient, and he's going to make it more efficient with artificial intelligence.
Do you want to make the East German Stasi more efficient?
Do you want to make the Gestapo more efficient?
Yeah, you get the idea.
Do you want to make Lenin's Checa more efficient?
To date, about 200,000 workers have left the 2.3 million strong civilian federal workforce.
They're an earlier buyout offer and layoffs and resignations, but it's even bigger at the IRS.
Meanwhile, we have, as I've talked about this Islamic city in Texas, we have John Cornyn.
Now, he's trying to get back his conservative creds.
And he's calling for the feds to investigate this Muslim development for possible religious discrimination against Jews.
Oh, and Christians also, he says.
And the issue is, is that they are setting up their own, I mean, it is, it's not just that they want to, we want to support People's rights to associate.
If they want to set up a religious community, they should be allowed to set up a religious community.
But it goes beyond that.
This goes to creating a Sharia law community.
And that's the key thing.
A completely different basis of law.
The Trump administration, while we look at it, ended yesterday with a case of this guy who was an immigrant from El Salvador.
And his name is Garcia.
They said that he was MS-13 and they deported him to El Salvador, even though a trial had indicated that he was not a member of the group.
There was a federal informant, which, you know, these federal informants, just because they're anonymous and federal informants doesn't mean that you can trust one.
They've been known, too.
To lie, to throw stuff out.
He accused him of being a part of the group in New York, a place that he never lived.
And so there are indications that these charges were false.
Now, as to his immigration status, that is not clear in any of these cases that I've been looking at.
But the real issue, when we go back and forth, as I said, it's kind of an interesting case because we've seen a lot of judicial supremacy, of course.
It's been going on for years.
Where the Supreme Court will overturn the will of Congress or of the President and so forth.
And Trump's first term, going back to immigration even, the fact that Trump said, I'm going to end DACA, that's deferred action on childhood arrivals, said we're going to defer action, meaning they're not going to enforce the law.
That was a law that was enacted by Congress, and Obama said, I'm not going to enforce it.
And so there was a problem with that.
And then when Trump gets in, he says, I'm going to end DACA.
And he got sued and went to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court said, you can't end that.
What basis can you say that?
How can you say that a current president cannot end an executive order of a previous president?
And yet they said that.
This is the kind of judicial activism that we see where they overturn broad policy.
Or we have a district court judge set national policy or even international policy overriding the executive branch or the congressional branch.
And I don't support that.
But what we see here appears to be the executive branch jumping into a particular case for an individual and overriding and overturning and vetoing, whatever you want to call it, a determination.
By trial.
We have to have the rule of law.
And so this is a very different thing, and we have to understand it's a different thing when the courts overstep their boundary and they make policy, or they overstep their boundary and they make law.
In this particular case, the courts are right and Trump is wrong.
Now, I don't know what the guy's immigration status is, but if he was deported strictly on the basis that they thought that he was MS-13, he was married to an American citizen, had children here, and yet if they believe that he's MS-13,
perhaps they're using that association to override any immigration protection he might have based on what he was doing there.
And here's the other thing.
They want to say he's MS-13.
He never had any criminal charges brought against him either in the United States or in Venezuela.
And so the court, the judge of the court, had examined this case and determined that he was not MS-13 and had said, do not deport him.
And the Trump administration did anyway.
And so the case was taken up to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court said, bring him back.
And Trump said, well, I can't bring him back.
I have no control.
Ignoring the fact that the U.S. government is paying El Salvador to take these prisoners.
If you pay them, you can control them.
We see that with everything.
That was what was happening with COVID.
Trump was paying the state governors and they were paying the public health officials to run this whole thing.
They're making a lot of money.
They pay to put trannies in the girls' bathroom and shower, or they pay to take them out.
And you do what the president says, depending on whether it's Republican or Democrat, they're paying to put them in or paying to take them out.
That's the way this always works.
That's the way they get around the 10th Amendment.
And so this is yet again a cynical lie by the Trump administration saying, I don't control it, when in fact they are paying for it.
And they in fact do control it.
And so the president of El Salvador, and they have this incredible maximum security prison, a real hellhole, and they're glorifying the fact that they have created this thing.
And it may be necessary for the MS-13 people.
I'm not singing any pity songs for these people who are part of MS-13.
They're ruthless.
And I don't really, if these people are guilty, do the time.
Hard time.
I don't care.
The issue is, however, due process.
And this doesn't just affect a guy who, whether or not he is a citizen, he still should have due process.
Just like whether or not somebody is a citizen or not, they should have free speech here.
Well, I should say this.
If they're legally here, they have free speech.
Should not be deported, should not be prosecuted.
If this guy is illegal, it's a different issue.
But that's not what this is about.
This is about, they've made this, both sides have made this.
And again, I don't know what his legal status is.
I didn't think about checking it until just now.
But regardless of what his legal status is, again, he has ties, a wife, and that type of thing here in America.
But regardless of his legal status as an immigrant, this is all about whether or not he's in MS-13.
And it appears to be clear that he's not in MS-13.
And then it becomes about something else.
It becomes about whether or not we're going to have the rule of law or whether or not the rules are going to come out of some dictator's mouth.
And that's what concerns me.
In this meeting in the Oval Office that Trump had, and again, this is after there's been a trial determination saying he's not MS-13.
They've provided no evidence that he was MS-13.
As a matter of fact, there seems to be evidence to the contrary because no criminal convictions.
Then it goes to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court said he was wrongfully deported.
Bring him back.
Trump says, I can't do anything about it.
I have nothing to say.
The White House has disavowed Garcia as being wrongly deported, despite admitting that he was booted from the country as a result of a, quote, clerical error.
They say that it was a clerical error that they deported him and sent them and labeled him as MS-13.
And yet there was a trial.
So that's a cynical lie.
And it's inconsistent with what the White House is saying.
The move to boot him...
Went against a 2019 immigration order blocking his removal to his home country on the grounds that he would have been targeted by rival gangs like Barrio 18. So there's some inconsistency on the judge's side.
Why would he be targeted by a rival gang if he's not in MS-13?
You might ask.
And there was an immigration order to remove him, so there may be other immigration issues here.
But again, it's not about his immigration status or whether or not even he's a gang member.
It's about whether or not he gets due process and whether or not the president gets to ignore that due process.
If he ignores it for him, and if he ignores, again, if somebody is here legally as an immigrant, like these students are who are protesting, and you don't have to agree with them or disagree with them, and if they're violent, that's a different issue.
But they're trying to deport people and arrest people because of speech, not because of violence.
You saw the picture of the young woman who was surrounded as she's walking down the sidewalk with like a half dozen agents who whisk her off.
What had she done?
She'd written an op-ed piece on the college newspaper.
You have to understand that the devil is in the details.
And they mix this stuff up.
They muddy the water.
By pointing to people who did get violent.
By people who did do vandalism.
And who did get violent with people and that type of thing.
But then they go arrest people whose only crime was their opinion.
And when we look at this, what bothers me about this photo op that Trump did with the El Salvador president, president, el president, dictator.
The two of them as dictators.
So we don't care.
What the courts determine in somebody's guilt or innocence.
We're going to do what we want to do to that person.
Do you want to live under a system like that?
And so they're cynically winking and nodding about, well, do you really want me to release a terrorist into your country?
I could never release a terrorist into your country.
It's that kind of stuff.
And again, who says he's a terrorist?
Well, I say he's a terrorist.
We don't have to have a finding and a trial.
To declare somebody a terrorist.
You do that in a country that's under the rule of law.
If you're under the rule of law, you have a trial and you determine and you prove that this person is a terrorist and then you treat them as a terrorist.
Go ahead and put them in that prison.
I don't care.
But they're not a terrorist simply because you say they're a terrorist.
That's the issue here.
If you're going to have rule of law, you're going to have trials and due process.
If you're going to have determination made by the assessment of Trump or this El Salvador dictator and say, well, he's a terrorist because I say he's a terrorist.
Well, then we live under a dictatorship because in a dictatorship, the law comes out of the dictator's mouth.
That's why they call it that.
It's like dictation.
But we should have the rule of law.
And so, as the Supreme Court said, well, you need to facilitate his return.
And the Trump administration cynically says, well, we are facilitating his return.
What? We just can't get him back.
They won't send him back.
They said, facilitate means that if we have made it possible, government lawyers, this is the Trump administration, said yesterday, the Trump administration has complied with the court orders based on their interpretation of the word facilitate.
They're changing its meaning and calling it an interpretation.
This is what lawyers and courts do all the time.
They said the administration has removed all barriers to allow for his return, explaining that if he would show up at the U.S. Embassy, then they would let him return.
Ah, there's the rub.
He's in a maximum security prison because they paid for him to go to a maximum security prison.
But, you know, hey, if somehow he escapes and he shows up at the U.S. Embassy, oh, well, it would let him come in.
And it's this cynicism.
This kind of cynicism, this mockery of the rule of law that disgusts me about the Trump presidency.
And it's not just this.
And I said from the very beginning, he's going to present himself as a dictator, as a strong man who's going to come after his enemies.
Because he doesn't want a return to the rule of law.
He complains about the lawfare that was against him.
And yes, you know, it was unjust.
But rather than take the high ground and saying, look what they did to me.
This should never be done to anybody else.
I'm going to have legal reforms to make sure it doesn't happen to anybody else.
Instead of taking the high ground, Trump goes really, really low.
And it's like, oh yeah?
Well, you see what I'm going to do to you.
He's coming from me.
Don't you mess with me or my family because we are a mafia.
That's what he's doing.
That's what he's doing.
We're not talking about policy here.
We're not talking about some district court judge that's overturning congressional or presidential policy and doing it on an international basis.
We're talking about a government under Trump that is cynically mocking the rule of law, bringing this guy in from El Salvador to mock the rule of law.
His wife told a crowd of protesters outside the courthouse that her husband was working hard, he said, when he was taken into custody in front of their five-year-old child.
He said he's working hard to fill the American dream, and then they took him into custody.
He said he was abducted and disappeared by the federal government on March the 12th.
So, when Trump met with this El Salvador president in the Oval Office, he says, El Salvador president said any call for him to have his citizen returned would be preposterous.
He says, I hope you're not suggesting that I smuggle terrorists into the United States.
Of course, I'm not going to do that.
Yeah, a dictator.
His law is in his mouth.
Well, we want to talk about officious Arbitrary people.
Yes, government is that way in many different ways, in many different areas.
Every branch of government can be that way.
Let's go to Hawaii, where it is very much that way.
Yeah. Blue Hawaii.
Deep Blue Hawaii.
White and you and blue Hawaii.
I like that sports car.
Yeah, where the Hawaiian County is telling a homeowner that his 38-year-old house is actually illegal.
These are officious bureaucrats who don't want to take his home.
It is an amazing snafu reported by Reason.
And he's having to sue the...
And he's almost at the end of it here, you know.
Hawaii, very much a paradise, except that the government is deep blue, and blue Hawaii.
This guy's name is Osman.
He purchased a small seaside home in Hawaii, 2021.
He had every reason to believe it was a perfectly legal dwelling.
The home was first built in 1987.
The original owner had lived in it for years without incident.
As a second owner, Osman was purchasing the home.
The second owner that Osman was purchasing the home from, okay, so he would be the third owner, had recently obtained a remodeling permit in 2020 to make repairs and alterations.
As part of his due diligence, Osman had confirmed with the county that the remodeling permit was valid for five years.
An agent and appraiser working for Osman also confirmed with the county that there weren't any outstanding permit issues with the home.
These people checked with the county that everything was good on the permit.
And everything was good, he said.
With those assurances, he purchased the property.
He continued partially completed remodeling work that he had a permit for.
County's assurances proved to offer Osmond a little protection, however, from the bureaucratic nightmare, even though he calls up and he gets advice, very much like what happens with the IRS.
It's no defense to call up the IRS and ask somebody, if you get somebody there, some tax advice, if they give it to you.
I don't know if they give it to you anymore or not.
They give it to you, they say, well, even if the IRS told you that, we might still come after you.
So it's that type of thing.
At the time that he purchased the home, the Hawaiian county was in the process of setting a new electronic permitting system to track building permits.
And as soon as it went live, all permits that had been open for more than five years were declared null and void, they said.
But they're nice guys, so they're going to give you a little bit of time to re-up that.
So we're going to have everything go void, all the permits that are outstanding after we put them in our computer system, unless you update this.
If it's five years older, and so he doesn't know anything about this change.
And so then he finds out that because they didn't notify him that he needed to update it and go through the permit process again because they changed their computer system, Now he doesn't have a permit.
So in early 2022, after he spent $138,000 on remodeling work, he called the county to get a final inspection on some of the completed work, but nobody would respond.
So that was early 2022.
Finally, in July of that year, a county official told him over the phone that in spite of past assurances from them, his permit had expired.
And they said, oh, no, it's not the 2020 permit that you're asking for, but it's the permit for 1987.
They maintained that even though the guy had taken out a permit in 1987, that they didn't have anywhere in their records that he'd had a final inspection.
And so that expired.
And they wanted to take his home now.
The county asserted that even though the building permit had been issued for the 1987 home, no record of final inspection.
According to the county, the entire home was now illegal.
Bureaucratic nightmare.
Getting a new building permit was also easier said than done.
When the original owner of Osman's home constructed the dwelling in 1987, he could build it 27 feet from the shoreline.
Now, you've got to go back 40 feet from the shoreline.
So the entire home would have to be moved.
Well, you can pick up a home and you can move it.
However, if he moves it, now he's got to go through a new building for the actual home itself.
And of course, all the building code has changed as well.
This is a good illustration of why nobody can own homes anymore.
Everybody wants to talk about what is changing.
The fundamental issue.
Whether we're talking about tariffs, whether we're talking about having a business, whether we're talking about somebody opening up a manufacturing concern, the fundamental issue everywhere is government over-regulation.
They are making it through regulations like this.
They're making it impossible.
This is how you'll own nothing.
They'll regulate it out of existence to where you can't afford it.
They're regulating houses, so they're so expensive you can't build them anymore.
Regulating cars, so they're so expensive you can't afford them anymore.
Everything in our life is being regulated out of being able to own it or to construct it or whatever.
They put regulations on the people manufacturing it.
They put regulations on it that make it so expensive that you can't afford to buy it.
This is just another example of it.
No, no, you've got to get further away from the beach.
No, no, no.
Everything in your home now, we've changed all the codes, so you'd have to just tear it down.
Not going to happen.
So he decided, well, I'm not getting anywhere with these people, so he sued them in court.
Oh, well, first he went to the Board of Appeals, and the Board of Appeals sided, of course, with the bureaucracy.
So then he goes to court, to district court, and they ruled in his favor.
Is it a happy ending?
Well, the decision entitles him to proceed with the work on his home that he began four years ago.
All he needs to move forward is for the court to enter its judgment still, says Reason.
Osman is not quite out of the woods yet.
The county has 30 days to appeal the decision after the judgment is officially entered.
He says that after the court's decision, the county bureaucrats told him again that they would still issue a notice of violation if he attempted to continue his remodeling work or to reoccupy the house.
I'll tell you, one way or the other, these guys are going to get even with him.
One way or the other.
By hook or by crook, they will.
We had a situation like that in one of our stores.
It was unusual, you know, most of these strip centers that just make them shelves, they're one story.
This shopping center was very different, and it was two floors.
And because of that, they put sprinklers in, all this other kind of stuff, which, you know, let's see, we're talking about 35 years ago, was way beyond code.
Everything was way beyond code.
And it really bothered the fire inspectors when they came out, because they couldn't find anything wrong.
And even to the extent that we had some signs that were part of a decorative thing that we did, and they were not illuminated.
Instead, they were, and it met code, they were signs that would glow in the dark.
It had radium in them, but they were up high, you know.
It wasn't people.
We're reading one of the wristwatches, anyway.
But, you know, a lot of different things like that.
So they couldn't find anything.
They thought they had us with that sign.
They didn't have us with that sign.
And they couldn't find anything.
And so what they did, and like most retail spaces, it had a drop ceiling.
You know, we have that grid and you've got the tiles that are there.
And so they said, okay, well, you've got, we're going to require that you put Take a tile and put it on top of the fluorescent light fixture.
And so that if you have a fire and the fluorescent light fixture melts, that will fall into place.
I'm thinking that's about the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life.
First of all, if the fixture...
It's made out of the same metal, essentially, same thickness, same kind of metal, as the grid itself.
The grid would be gone.
But even if that weren't the case, what were the chances that that fireproofing tile would fall into place?
It's just ridiculous.
But we did it anyway.
And they said, okay, you're fine.
They had to find something.
Had to find something.
And these people will keep coming after him by hook or by crook.
They're going to get even with him.
He beat him fair and square, beat him in court, but they're going to get even with him.
So what can we learn from all this?
Well, we can ask the elephants, right?
Not the GOP.
Not the elephants.
Real elephants.
Take a look at what happened in San Diego when they had the 5.2 earthquake the other day.
They had a bunch of elephants.
You can start to see the camera shaking here.
And the elephants are alarmed.
First they run a little bit.
And then what is their reaction?
Well, they come back.
They regroup.
Something is happening.
Something is shaking.
Something big is coming.
Something bigger than us.
Maybe on the way.
It could be a T-Rex.
Remember that scene from Jurassic Park?
Where they're in the car and the glass starts to vibrate?
So I was like, maybe there's a T-Rex coming.
So what do they do?
Look at how they get close together.
And they circle the baby.
They circle the baby.
And they say, elephants do this a lot.
They call it a circle alert.
Or alert circle.
And maybe that's what we need to do.
We've got to circle the wagons, circle the elephants.
We've got to protect the young.
That's what they would do.
And I mean, they're sitting there and that one elephant, he's, you know, looking back and forth, sweeping his trunk around the ground.
But so about 40,000 people reported that they felt the quake, along with a herd of elephants, about five of them.
And then I've told you this for the longest time.
What is going on?
What's really behind Greenland?
Oh, to look around at the patch of ground Known as Mother Nature's sieve Though it's horrible to visit
Yeah. Well, what did I tell you about all this stuff?
I said...
They're going to get Greenland, as Trump has said over and over again, by hook or by crook, right?
One way or the other, we're going to get that place.
And I said what they're going to wind up doing is bribing the people with a phenomenal amount of money.
Well, now we've seen reports that they want to give each and every one of the 56,000 residents $10,000 a year.
And you vote to accept us as your government.
And that's pretty cheap, actually.
That's only $560 million a year.
I mean, that's chump change for this federal government.
It's about the amount of money that they give to Columbia University.
We could get all of Greenland for what they give Columbia University.
Columbia University is getting $400,000.
I mean, we could get Greenland for a $560,000 a year bribe.
And way cheaper than Harvard, which is $9 billion.
So, yeah.
When it comes to that kind of stuff, it's cheap bribery.
Nevertheless, I said that's number one, step number one.
U.S. taxpayers are going to pay to bribe these people to vote to join America.
That's their plan.
The second part of their plan is that after we own Greenland, Trump turns it over to his crony billionaires to exploit.
And now we have the names of who those people are going to be.
Really, this is important because I think it's the same pattern that these people are looking to do here in America.
Scott Besant, Luke Nick, as well as Doug Burgum, they are talking about how we can monetize our assets here in this country.
How are they going to monetize the assets?
They're going to turn them over to State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock, which are the people who are partnering with this, along with...
The three big funds there that have tens of trillions of dollars, between the three of them, they own a piece of almost everything that can be bought in the markets, in the stock markets and all the rest of this stuff.
And they're there as well.
But partnering with people who have invested in Trump.
Yeah, they call it a political donation.
They're not about ideology.
They're about getting favors back.
And they're looking to make...
Really big money.
So now we've got the names of some of these cronies.
This is research that was done by The Guardian.
But we could see where this was headed without the details.
It's kind of like being able, you know, we could easily see where all this COVID pandemic lie was headed.
You know, the lockdown and the vaccines.
We could easily see it.
I don't think they practiced it.
They had done it for decades.
So we could see where that kind of stuff was going based on their behavior.
Your vaccine doesn't protect you.
Your vaccine protects other people.
All those types of lies.
Your mask doesn't protect you.
It protects other people.
So we knew where all that stuff was going, and we could see where this is headed as well.
But now we have the details about what the vaccine is doing to people.
And we have the studies that prove that the masks don't do anything, even though common sense would have told you that, based on their own virus paradigm.
They're inconsistent, logically inconsistent.
You know, that's one thing I really hate, you know, when you're watching a movie about superheroes, for example, right?
Isn't it awful how, you know, they create this arbitrary universe, and then they violate the rules, and you really feel cheated by that, don't you?
You know, it's like, wait a minute!
You've already built up this world scenario, and in your world scenario, that couldn't happen.
You cheated on your fictional story.
Well... That's what these people do with the pandemic.
You know, they create a fictional world, and then they don't abide by the rules of that fictional rule.
That's what they were doing in 2020.
So some of Donald Trump's, says the Guardian, some of Donald Trump's biggest campaign donors and investors who collectively have hundreds of millions of dollars in financial ties to the U.S. president are positioned to potentially profit from the American takeover of Greenland, of course, raising even more
ethical questions around Trump's controversial pursuit of the Arctic territory.
The administration is in part aiming to secure rare minerals that are essential for the U.S. tech industry and national security and to potentially reopen oil and gas exploration.
Mike Waltz, Trump's national security advisor and signal chat leaker.
So this is about critical minerals.
This is about natural resources.
And now, I guess Trump has made this.
It never was a national security issue, but I guess now with his trade war with China, since China has cut off these rare earth minerals that are necessary for computers and other things, all this high-tech stuff, now that's been cut off,
you could say that it's a national security issue.
And we've got to find those minerals somewhere else.
Man, that's convenient.
Just lucky, I guess, right?
A Guardian analysis of campaign finance records and corporate filings shows U.S. tech moguls who invested in mining companies operating in Greenland, fossil fuel executives, and also crypto tycoons with their own set of plans for the country.
Collectively gave at least $243 million to the President's 2024 campaign.
Okay, so they give $243 million, and the taxpayers will contribute twice that amount, you know, more than twice that amount, $560 million a year.
Forever. Every year.
We'll do more than twice as much as they did for Trump's campaign, but we'll do it every year.
And then they'll get to...
They will socialize the costs and privatize the profits, as they always do.
Meanwhile, investors bankrolling Greenland's mining interests also amassed $314 million worth of shares in Trump Media.
This is where the crypto, the crypto projects, this is where this comes in.
And we talked about that.
You know, the fact that these Trump meme coins are a perfect way for people to launder contributions to him, aren't they?
You can't see a lot of the contributions that are being made.
But these were shares in Trump media.
Who knows how much other stuff they put into the crypto.
There's a closed loop amongst these investors, billionaires, Trump, and the crypto projects, they said.
These donations are investments.
They were made with particular outcomes in mind.
Of course they are.
Of course they are.
Whether you're talking about Democrats or Republicans is always the same.
Investments. Among those who invested millions in Cobalt Metals, a mining company at the leading edge of Greenland's modern gold rush for minerals that are essential to companies.
There's major donors as well, like Zuckerberg and Sam Altman of OpenAI and Amazon's Bezos and many others from Silicon Valley.
We have Marc Andreessen there as well.
The top investor...
In Critical Metals Corporation, which has a mining permit in Greenland, the top investor is hedge fund Cantor Fitzgerald.
That's a familiar name, isn't it?
Oh, yeah, Howard Lutnick.
That's his company.
Oh, he stepped down from it, you know, for a couple of years, right?
He'll come back and take the golden reins when he's finished with this.
So at the center of this, again, is Cantor Fitzgerald.
You know, just kind of like the stable coin.
Who is it?
Who is it that is king of the stablecoins?
Well, that would also be Howard Lutnick.
And, you know, buying so many treasury bills.
You know, one of the key purchasers of treasury bills is Tether, that stablecoin.
Anyway, Howard Lutnick led until January.
Critical Metals, which has the mining permit in Greenland, And has the top investor in Critical Metals, just like Howard Lutnick is the top investor in Tether, the stablecoin that's backed by U.S. Treasuries.
So Critical Metals' other institutional investors include Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, the big three guys, and Geode Capital, which we also saw here.
Among Greenland's bids' loudest supporters are the crypto tycoons.
Who poured unparalleled sums of money into 2024 Trump and Republican campaigns while labeling Greenland an investment frontier.
That's their terminology.
Where they said data centers essential to U.S. artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency industries could be built.
You know, that kind of mining.
The data mining of artificial intelligence or the crypto mining of these other data centers.
Some of the same donors also want to establish a largely autonomous libertarian utopian post-state, as they call it, for the tech elite in Greenland that could be used to practice terraforming for a Mars colony.
This group is called Praxis.
And they have labeled their members, quote, optimistic pioneers.
There's a lot of different libertarian groups.
They've said, let's create an island state or let's just have a floating island somewhere out in the ocean that is out in international waters so it can escape government regulation.
I can identify with that, but, you know, this is up in Greenland.
Critics say it's a colonialist operation aimed at plundering wealth and resources from a weak nation that is still linked to Denmark.
Praxis is already backed by 525 million.
It includes members of or donors to the Trump administration, such as PayPal co-founder Ken Howery, who co-founded it with Peter Thiel.
And he has been nominated, by the way, for ambassador to Denmark.
So the guy who Trump has nominated for ambassador to Denmark is also part of this libertarian group that wants to create a breakaway independent state called Praxis and locate it up in Greenland.
Interesting. Anyway, they said, what is unfolding in Greenland represents a circle of grift, not a circle of alert, right?
That's the elephants are doing.
Put money into the Trump family bank, and money comes back to you in the form of some government policy.
Well, that's an understatement.
You know, whenever you invest in a politician, it's not just in Trump.
It's any of these politicians.
You're going to get at least 1,000 to 1. I'm not talking about 1,000%.
I'm talking about 1,000 times your money back.
You invest...
Thousands, you get millions.
You invest...
Well, not thousands.
That doesn't put you in...
But if you get up in the millionaire thing, now you got their attention.
If you invest millions, you get back billions.
Sometimes tens of billions.
The minerals found in Greenland are used for laptops, smartphones, weapons, clean energy technology, electric vehicles, and elsewhere across the economy.
China controls 70% of the rare earth market.
But, as I pointed out last week, they have...
They control 70% of where the known resources are.
But in terms of the refined, usable products, they've got 90% of that market.
Oh, and they're just playing that card against Trump in the trade war.
They just played that card.
Paul Bierman, a natural resources researcher at the University of Vermont, who spent four seasons working there, says it's extremely difficult and expensive to extract resources, and the idea that a gold rush is possible is, quote, almost completely
pie in the sky.
That's what David Bonson said when I talked to him about that.
He said, yeah, they can't get anything out of that.
If you remember when I interviewed him.
He goes, it's not going to happen for the resources.
And of course, the national security thing, that dog doesn't hunt.
Because they have, since World War II, had a military base there.
And the U.S. government currently doesn't believe that that's necessary for national security because they had over 10,000 people there right after World War II.
They only got 200 now.
So they have the permission to use it, but they don't need to use it because of other technology.
And so the fact that it's needed for national security is nonsense.
But now it has become something of a national security issue.
Because Trump has managed to get China to cut off our supply of rare earth minerals.
Well, that's interesting.
But can they find it?
That's the key thing.
My position is never underestimate the technology or the evil of these people, right?
No reasonable person would ever fill in the blank, right?
I can't imagine that anybody would ever do something so heinous, you know, when we talk about...
Satanic ritual child abuse, or we talk about other things that are even more, even stranger than that.
Well, I can't believe it.
Well, yeah, you better believe that they do.
There's no limit to the evil that they're capable of, and there's really not that much of a limit to their technology.
Even if there is a limit to their technology, they believe that they can do anything with their technology.
And they've openly said it again and again.
Mark Andreessen, for example.
There isn't any problem that can't be solved with technology.
And if the problem is created with technology, then the solution is to add more technology.
That's Marc Andreessen.
And he's part of this as well.
Cobalt holds permits to extract cobalt, nickel, and platinum and is now valued at $3 billion.
Its largest backer is the firm Andreessen& Horowitz.
Marc Andreessen, who assisted the unofficial Department of Government Efficiency, Doge.
And Ben Horowitz.
They each donated $2.5 million to a pro-Trump super PAC.
That gets you billions of dollars.
See? It works that way every time.
Bezos, Altman, Zuckerberg, Bill Gates each donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration.
And, of course, NVIDIA.
It was just they missed the boat with the inauguration, but they got the message.
They got the memo.
Hey, you got to pay up this.
It only cost you a million dollars and Trump's in your pocket, right?
So they went to the NVIDIA CEO goes to the Mar-a-Lago million-dollar plate dinner.
BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street.
Critical Metals, other top shareholders are generally considered to be passive investors who have their fingers in pots all across the economy, all across the world.
But this guy who has worked there before says Greenland is, quote, littered with the corpses of mineral investors.
Some industry players, including consultant Drew Horn, who is a former senior advisor in the previous Trump administration's energy department, is regularly in the media cheerleading the administration's Greenland policy and touting the riches that lie in the ground there.
Well, here's the thing.
These companies can still make money even if they don't get anything out of the ground, can't they?
When you are dealing with the stock market and all the rest of this stuff, you can do pump and dump all the time.
I mean, Moderna made a lot of money for 10 years without any products, just with one happy story after the other.
Oh, I'm so sorry to inform you that all that rosy picture that we had of that new vaccine...
The mRNA that was going to cure cancer, well, you know, that didn't work and it's too dangerous.
But we got something else that's even better, you know, that type of thing.
And so they could keep getting investors who had hope in what they were doing.
And so you can always run that game.
These crypto people, right?
I mean, you want to talk about mining in Greenland?
Well, at least in Greenland, there's real stuff there.
It may be difficult to get.
But these people have been selling people on mining with crypto.
They've been telling people to mine crypto coins and they show pictures of gold coins with the Bitcoin thing on it.
They've been selling that thing for the longest time.
Of course they can sell the idea that, hey, there's real minerals there.
Yeah, we know.
And we can mine them.
That's an easy sell after you've sold people crypto mining for the longest time.
On Fox News, Horn touted the, quote, significant opportunity for U.S. investment in mining and energy production.
But industry observers with no financial stake remain skeptical.
In the event that a mining startup doesn't strike it rich in Greenland, Horn will still receive his fees for his consulting.
You see, they don't have to produce anything, really.
And so, if there is something there, and if they can get it, it'll go to his cronies.
If there isn't anything there or they can't get it, guess what?
These guys will still make money.
This one guy who has been there before says, it makes me wonder, is this just self-promotion to get investment money?
We look around on this patch of ground.
Yeah, maybe it is.
Who knows?
On Rumble, North American House Hippo, thank you very much for the tip.
It says, good morning, David.
There's been a marked decrease in the anti-Canada rhetoric and bellicosity since Trump and Carney spoke a few weeks ago.
Yeah, they moved on to the next crisis that they created for time, for time being.
Carney, as you know, is a high-level globalist, and Trump is a globalist too, but only at the poser level.
I have to wonder if their telephone conversation started with Carney saying, OK, Don, now listen, sit down and shut up.
I further wonder if Carney warned Trump of consequences to the U.S. economy or even Trump personally if he didn't fall into the line.
Then it occurred to me that Trump needs to fire Susie Wiles as the White House Chief of Staff, replace her with Musk's little boy.
Little X gave Trump the best advice he's ever received in his life.
You need to shut your mouth.
He just keeps going and going, doesn't he?
He's the ever-ready bunny.
You know, what is the crisis of the day?
What is the tariff rate of the day?
They've got all these market indicators.
You can go places.
You can find the price of commodities like gold, silver, platinum, whatever.
You can trace it and see it going up and down.
Well, we need to have that same type of thing, or stocks.
We need to have the same type of thing about Trump's tariff rates so that you can track his tariff rates in real time since they're changing almost as quickly as the stock markets that are out there.
And it's the volatility.
That allows these sharks to profit at the expense of others.
And it's also going to have big consequences for us.
On Kik, Koalimos 360, gifted a sub.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
And, by the way, if you want to find us on Kik, we were talking about that.
Some people are having trouble finding it.
And if you need to not use any spaces, on David Knight's show.
So it's David Knight's show.
No spaces.
And you will be able to find it on Kik.
We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
*Music*
Thank you.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, autism is exploding.
You don't need me to tell you that.
Even the mainstream media is telling you that, but they're spinning it.
And what is concerning is that the increase in autism is accelerating.
You know, just like the deficit, the curve has gone up in a steeper slope now.
A 17% increase between 2020 and 2022.
17% increase.
That's huge.
And yet, they want you to freak out about measles.
Would you rather have measles or autism for your children?
There is a lot more evidence of the damage from autism.
And it is far more widespread than measles.
And yet, they want you to focus on measles.
So, in 2020...
It was up to one out of every 36 kids in 2020.
And now it is one out of every 31 kids.
And let's put it in percentages.
Not that, you know, when you look at this, it went from 2.8% to 3.2%.
It was a 17% increase in just two years.
That's the bottom line.
You know, when you start talking about fractions, that gets a lot of people confused, like the Trumps.
We were talking about that the other day.
What was it, Travis, that they had to change it?
Oh, it's the sandwich.
Yeah. I forget which burger company it was, but they had to take the third pounder off the menu because people kept thinking the quarter pounder was bigger and it just wasn't selling.
Those people probably got jobs working for Peter Navarro in terms of his tariff quotients.
We've got quotas and we've got quotients.
And the numerator is your cheating.
The denominator is the stuff you buy from us.
And that's what your tariff quotient is going to be, right?
And now we're going to set up quotas for that.
That's crazy.
But anyway, sticking to the...
They like to quote these things.
Now, the number for boys is 1 out of 20. And in California, 1 out of 12.5 in California.
It's getting that bad.
But the bottom line is that when we're talking about for boys, it's much higher.
Overall, it went from 2.8% to 3.2%, a 17% increase in just two years.
But for boys, it is 5%.
5%. And if you're talking about kids in California, I don't know if that's boys or if that's boys and girls in California.
8%. 8%.
If the vaccine companies get their way.
We're going to wind up having almost every child with autism in America.
And that's no exaggeration.
If they're going to stick these kids with 76 shots by the time they're 18, this is what's going to happen.
And it is front-loaded.
They do the most of it when the child is really young and the body is growing and adjusting and the immune system is being set up.
That's when they hit them, when they're the most vulnerable.
And that's why we're seeing this kind of stuff.
Nobody else does that.
If you go back and you look at the CDC, you'll find out that they are giving kids four or five different dosages of things like MMR or all the rest of it.
And clustering these things together.
You go in for a doctor's visit and they give you six to eight shots.
And it's that clustering where all of these shots, regardless of what they're giving it to you, we know that they deliberately put adjuvants in things to irritate Your immune system.
To try to get your immune system to attack what they just put in.
That's the theory behind it.
But all the stuff in every one of these vaccines has got stuff in there to irritate your immune system.
And when you stack that stuff up and you keep doing it over and over and over again, guess what?
It causes all kinds of immune diseases and many other things.
The prevalence of autism in the U.S. rose approximately 17% of those two years.
And for boys, it is 3.4 times more prevalent than for girls.
They also found that it is more prevalent for Asian Pacific Islanders, black and Hispanics, than it is for white people.
Oh, wow, okay.
Can we get their attention with that?
Can we call it racist?
So the level of autism among eight-year-olds...
Has been steadily increasing for decades without unbiased, real research into the likely causes.
And this is what was so amazing.
This is Children's Health Defense.
They're sticking to the line, even though RFK Jr. has abandoned this stuff.
They're sticking to it.
And what we saw with all of these heroes of the Maha, all of these people who rose to the top, You know, Jay Bodekar and RFK Jr. and everything.
We saw them bow the knee and kiss the ring.
There, as Senator Cassidy said, you will denounce everything that you know is true or you're not going to get this position.
And making them swear they're not going to take a look at autism and all the rest of this stuff.
You're going to, you know, disavow that or you're not going to get in.
And then even some of the people who...
We're ready to disavow that.
Dave Walden was ready to disavow it as well.
He thought he was okay.
He kissed the ring for Senator Cassidy.
But Trump's got something else in mind.
Trump wanted to bring in somebody who's going to be able to add AI to the mRNA vaccines.
And so, you know, he got blindsided.
But Trump brings in these people who have become, I think, unjustified heroes of the anti-vaccine movement.
And, you know, they were able to get elevated to this position.
He brings them in and they sell themselves out for power.
So the autism epidemic has now reached a scale unprecedented in human history because it affects the young.
But don't you even suggest that we need to do any research to figure out what's going on with this?
It's an epidemic, but it's an epidemic that nobody wants to talk about, right?
They want to talk about non-epidemics, like bird flu.
They want to talk about non-epidemics, like COVID.
Non-epidemics, like measles.
Oh, look, we have now tested and identified 700 people.
Has anybody really died from this?
Well, they say that two children have died, but Children's Health Defense looked at it, and those children died from malpractice.
And first, they had privately talked to the father.
And he did not want to get involved in the back and forth about pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine.
He just wanted to get out what the hospital had done to his child.
And so they talked about that.
I reported that.
And then he's now directly speaking out.
Because this has gone on for so long, he's directly speaking out against this.
But Travis, pull up the chart that's in this article here showing autism.
From the 1970s until 2025.
So we're talking about 55 years.
Look at that.
In the 1970s and 1980s, 1 in 10,000, it was so rare that they had to have an explanation in Rain Man as to what autism was for the audience because nobody had ever heard of it before.
Nobody understood anything about it.
And I had never seen it either.
Then, in 1995, It goes from 1 in 10,000, it goes to 1 in 1,000.
Oh, well, what had happened?
Well, 1995.
In 1986, they got their legal immunity.
And then they started sticking everybody with everything they could think of.
And autism goes up by a factor of 10. Instead of 1 in 10,000, it's 1 in 1,000 now.
Still very rare.
I'd still never heard of it.
Then, within another four years, Doubles.
It goes from 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 500.
Then by 2000, 1 in 150.
By 2004, which is the first time I ever saw anybody that had it, 1 in 125, and so on.
But you can look at this curve, and you can see that we have now, going back to 2020, the slope has gone up significantly.
So it is increasing even more rapidly.
So something that was 1 in 10,000 in 1970 is now 1 in 31. And they don't want to look and do any research about this.
And it's the people who are pushing back against it are the people who are running these autism.
Does that sound like the people who are running the cancer institutes who don't really want to find a cure for cancer?
The cancer hospitals and the cancer research institutes and all the rest of the stuff.
By the way, mentioning that makes me think of rncstore.com.
rncstore.com.
That's where you can get the book by G. Edward Griffin.
I've interviewed him on this, A World Without Cancer.
G. Edward Griffin was not afraid to go out on a limb and talk about what people had found with apricot seeds.
With B-17.
And so you can read what he was, the doctor who told him about it, was afraid to go public with it.
But G. Edward Griffin did go public with it.
And you can get that book there at rncstore.com.
And you can save 10% off of the code NIGHT.
And you can also get apricot seeds.
And if you don't want to chew them, you can get it in a pill form as well.
B17 is what that is.
Try some of that stuff before you get involved with the cancer industry.
My father, they put down that he died of cancer, but he did not die of cancer.
He died of chemotherapy.
First shot of chemotherapy they gave him, he went into a coma.
Never came out of it.
He had a heart valve.
That chemotherapy took his immune system down.
They brought in interns to take a look at him.
So we've never seen this kind of infection around a heart valve before.
It's like, well, you caused it.
Anyway, they killed him.
So keep that in mind.
Before we move on, I continually hear people use the refrain of, oh, well, they're just better at diagnosing autism now.
Really? From 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 31?
You think they're that much better at diagnosing it?
They're really good.
What kind of idiot are you?
I know.
They're really good, aren't they?
And believe it or not, Travis, that is the tech that NBC does.
They can't escape the fact that CDC is going these numbers from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 31. So NBC does it, and what do they do?
That exact alibi.
That's what they have put out there.
Except for the fact that none of us ever saw them.
You know, they were few and far between.
That's right.
What's the excuse?
They kept them locked up in the attic or basement.
That's right.
And when you look at the CDC's own data, they're saying, well, you know, they're better at looking at it because now they're calling even people who are high-functioning with a little mild touch of autism or whatever, they're just lumping that all together as autism.
And yet, when you look at the CDC data, the CDC data...
It's talking about people who are severely impacted with autism.
But again, go back to the example of that court case, you know, where you had the two parents that vaccinated their kids and they're in a divorce and the judge is pro-vaccine.
He says he found out about it.
He was outraged.
Whoever will give the vaccine, I'll let you have the custody.
They take the kids out, three kids.
And the daughter, they split it up for her, but we also see that it is much more targeted towards boys anyway, right?
But they split it up for her because she already had some known allergic issues.
But they gave all the catch-up shots to the two boys.
One of them, the older one, well, they both went into intensive care.
One of them came out after a few days.
The other one has never come out of it because he has such severe autism that he's going to be in a diaper the rest of his life.
He doesn't even completely blew him out.
You know, he's not there anymore for all practical purposes, but his father is having to take care of him because now the mother abandoned them after the mess that she created.
And so that is a clear case.
That is directly attributable to that.
Now, we saw that in a compressed time frame.
And that's what these poisoners that we call the pharmaceutical industries, what they like to do is they like to do it over a longer time frame so that they have plausible deniability that they've actually poisoned you.
That's the game.
But we know what it is.
We do know what it is.
In five of the CDC's study areas, autism rates are already higher among four-year-olds than they are with eight-year-olds.
Why is that?
Because they keep adding more and more vaccines.
This is why the occurrence is going up, because they're adding more and more vaccines.
It's never enough for them.
These people are so addicted to money.
To the love of money.
They are so evil that they can't get enough of the money, which means that they can't vaccinate you enough.
There will never be enough.
They will always be coming up with more vaccines and pushing them harder and harder.
And we're going to talk about what they're doing to parents who don't get their kids vaccinated as well here.
But finishing up with this.
That was what you pointed out, Travis, is exactly what they said, and that's what Children's Health Defense attacked.
They said the data doesn't support the better diagnosis theory.
CDC and mainstream media suggest that this is about being able to diagnose it better or that they have pulled in people who only are mild.
And we see this in the NBC News thing.
Here's a headline.
Autism rates have risen to 1 in 31 school-aged children, says the CDC report.
And yet...
About five paragraphs down, they say doctors are better than ever at identifying autism with awareness at an all-time high.
Without a doubt, we've become exceptionally efficient in this surveillance work.
What a bunch of nonsense.
But that is the typical mainstream media spin.
That's what NBC is telling people in this article.
And so they go on to say, NBC says, there's a lot of things.
That we do not understand as of yet about autism.
Quoting an expert who runs an autism group, and he wants to keep this going, right?
This is a growth industry for him.
Let's just call it what it is.
These people are willing to kill you to destroy your children so they can make money.
That is exactly what this is.
There's a lot of things that we don't understand yet about autism, but one thing for certain is that vaccines do not cause autism.
Well, if you can say that, how can you, in the same sentence, Say, we don't understand it, but we know that it's not caused by vaccines.
Well, then you're a liar, because you've already made up your mind that you're going to ally with the vaccine companies that are building your business of treating autism.
And we're seeing the same kind of stuff when it comes to the heart attacks of kids who have been given the COVID shot.
Oh, well, let's set up some foundations, and we'll study this, and we'll start giving the What do you call the things?
The electroshock stuff.
You know, we'll put that in the schools, right?
And we'll do EKGs for all the kids who are going to participate in sports.
But we're not going to talk about the root cause of it because that's the pharmaceutical companies and they've got enough money that they can bribe enough people in high places.
Because how do people get in the high places?
They get in the high places because they've already sold out for the most part.
That's what matters to them.
And if it isn't how they got there, then it becomes this worry that, well, wait a minute, I really like my comfortable life and all the money that I've got, and I don't want to lose that by opposing this.
So NBC says that people skipping the shots, they go on, they meet, so first they say, well, we're better at diagnosing it now.
And I don't know what causes it, but I know that it's not the vaccines.
And then they pivot to measles in this NBC article.
And NBC says that people skipping shots are what's causing this measles epidemic.
A measles epidemic?
Prove it.
And if it's true, so what?
It's measles.
It's not autism.
It's measles.
You get over it.
And do you want to talk about something that's rare?
The chances of dying from this stuff is like the chances of getting autism before the vaccine schedule began.
So, yeah, but if you skip it, guess what happens?
They might take your children.
Because in Taxachusetts, big government Massachusetts, that's exactly what they did.
Massachusetts took custody of five children after a doctor reported them to Child Protective Services because they didn't want to vaccinate their baby.
A snitch doctor ratted them out.
To Child Protective Services.
The Massachusetts Department of Children and Families took custody of five children after a pediatrician reported their parents for allegedly refusing to vaccinate their nine-month-old baby due to religious beliefs.
They'd skipped out on, guess what, 21 shots.
21 shots.
They really wait these 76 shots early.
So, we're going to have to catch up this kid.
He's 21 shots overdue.
We've got to get this autism started.
The parents were homeschooling.
And they were doing this because they're Christians and religious.
And so, when they looked at it, they said, Massachusetts is crazy.
I'm getting out of here.
I'm going to Texas.
And then, Texas authorities arrested them.
Texas arrested them.
What for?
For, quote, familial kidnapping.
Have you ever heard of that before?
I've never heard of that before.
Because the family decided that they were going to take their three kids.
I think it's three kids.
Let's see.
No, five kids.
Five kids.
I was thinking five total.
No, two parents and five kids.
So they want to take their five kids and move from Massachusetts to Texas.
And then they said, well, that's kidnapping.
What? What are you talking about?
And Texas arrested them for that.
So, they declined vaccination for their baby boy on religious grounds.
And Massachusetts actually even allows religious exemptions for this.
You know, we had in New York and California, the clip that I've played so many times, I'm going to play it again, and Trump's saying, they've got to get this shot.
It's really going around.
They've got to get this shot.
Well, he was saying that because you had ultra-Orthodox Jews in New York and you had people in California that says, no, I don't want to take it.
I've got medical exemptions.
I've got religious exemptions.
Nope, you've got to get this shot.
They really got to get this shot.
This measles thing is really going around.
You know, that type of thing.
2019. Leading up to his 2020 bioweapon that he was putting out.
Well, Massachusetts, however, Still allows religious exemptions, and you don't got to get the shot if you got a religious exemption on that, but they came after them nevertheless, and they still had, with a ratting pediatrician and the Child Protective Services,
they still took these kids, even though they were within the law and refusing on religious grounds having this child vaccinated.
The doctor told us that if we didn't vaccinate, he would have to report us, said the father.
They noted that the doctor's appointment said the child was completely healthy, quote-unquote, and the baby, quote, just needed the shots.
It had nothing to do with anything other than you're going to get the shots because I need that for my practice.
If I don't get my patients vaccinated, then the insurance company cuts down on what they will give me across the board, and it could destroy my practice.
So I've got to poison your child so that I can make money.
Folks, that's what this is about.
So the child so-called protective services left a notice on the family's doorstep demanding a home visit, and the parents refused.
What followed was a dramatic escalation.
The police allegedly surround their apartment, banging on the doors and circling the property for up to 30 minutes, leading the mother to hide in the closet with the five children for a half hour.
The police and DCF, we call them a lot of places, CPS, came back in greater numbers the next day, and so then the family said, let's get out of here, let's go to Texas.
They should have gone to Mexico, because Texas is where they got arrested.
Authorities hunted down the family after they left Massachusetts and arrested them in Whitney, Texas on March the 8th, charging them with five misdemeanor counts each.
Of kidnapping a minor by a relative.
That's your parents.
Both parents.
This is not one parent kidnapping the child because another parent has been given custody or something like that.
And so with this, if they're found guilty, they could get one year and $1,000 fine for each of the five children.
So each of these parents is looking at five years and $5,000 if they find them guilty.
Her sister had claimed to the police that the mother has a domestic violence history with the father.
But the children were found safe and unharmed in Texas before being promptly taken to the custody of DCF.
The police there did not issue an Amber Alert for the children because they knew that the children were not in, quote, imminent danger of serious bodily harm or death, unquote.
So it's not about any allegations of that.
It is simply about the fact that they didn't want to be forced to take a vaccine, even though Massachusetts state law says that they are allowed religious exemptions.
The so-called Child Protective Services are going to kidnap the kids.
So they went to Texas.
Then they got charged with kidnapping to avoid CPS kidnapping their children.
A constitutional law strategist, Ron Bouchard, told the Boston Broadside, he said, this is a blatant violation of fundamental rights on multiple levels.
By what authority has this family been apprehended?
And for what?
Was there a warrant?
You'd have to go for a judge.
Show me the crime.
Habeas corpus.
Anyway, and he says, and what is familial kidnapping?
This is a...
Legal strategist.
It says a family has a right to travel with their own children.
So the Massachusetts DCF is mandating supervised visits for the mother, who has reportedly been released on $7,500 bail after spending a month in jail without seeing her children.
Other family took the children.
She lost her home during this disruptive series of events that has torpedoed her family.
The father, who is representing himself, It's set to appear in court in April.
He remains in jail.
He says, I'm a man under God and under God's grace alone.
Yeah, but he needs to have discernment about this criminal system.
And I mean criminal system.
If you go back and look at, better call Saul, right?
One of these guys who's running drugs, you know, he says to him, you need a criminal lawyer.
He says, yeah, I know, but he says, no, I mean a criminal lawyer.
In other words, somebody like me.
There's a lawyer who's a criminal.
You need a criminal lawyer.
He added that he had been, and that's what this guy needs, and I didn't necessarily need a criminal lawyer, but he needs to have a lawyer because he needs to understand how criminal the justice system is.
Not a criminal justice system.
It is a criminal justice system.
The emphasis.
It's on the first syllable there.
Criminal justice system or criminal justice system.
He added that he has been defamed and demonized.
He said the DCF have harassed his family with, quote, fear and intimidation tactics.
They used unconstitutional weaponized government agencies against him, according to the local media as well.
And because he was arrested and ratted out as well in Texas.
A Texas Republican congressional candidate, Ava Zolari, said, I am beyond disgusted to watch our God-given freedoms, especially the right to say no to medical mandates, being ripped away by the greasy hands of government overreach.
Because it was Texas where he was arrested and extradited.
But here's the thing.
This is not even a mandate.
They ripped the kids away even when they had no legal right to do so.
No right to do so.
We've talked about CPS for a long time.
Okay, so let's get back to this autism thing briefly.
One more thing.
We have, and maybe you've seen this because this came out a few days ago.
It was a follow-up interview.
Jenny McCarthy, who got to be known for, she was an actress or a model or whatever.
She was on The View for a while as well.
She was the girlfriend of Jim Carrey.
And you've probably seen the clip of her and Jim Carrey on Larry King Live, railing about vaccines and autism.
And a follow-up to this, she just recently had an interview where she talked about the campaign to discredit her.
And the reason she got into all this is because her child got autism from an MMR shot.
McCarthy's skepticism about vaccines began after her normal, healthy toddler received the mumps, measles, and rubella, the MMR shot, the thing that they're working so hard to get everybody so afraid about measles in Texas.
Oh, the most contagious disease in the world, and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Well, if it is, why isn't it all over Texas now, right?
You know, they used these things, they used the situation in...
California, the situation in New York and everything, three or four people get measles.
Well, that means we've got to vaccinate everybody.
No exemptions for religious or medical reasons.
But it's like, who died?
Nobody died.
Did it spread to everybody?
No, it didn't spread to everybody.
Were the four people in New York who got it, were they vaccinated?
Yes, multiple times.
So what is this about?
Well, you know what it's about.
You've heard this program.
The two-and-a-half-year-old...
of Jenny McCarthy, who got vaccinated, suddenly began suffering life-threatening seizures that eventually culminated in an autism diagnosis.
After researching, McCarthy said she found that the MMR vaccine was, quote, clinically in published science, unquote, linked to autism in some children.
She said my son was one of them, because it was after his MMR when his encephalitis turned to autism.
Encephalitis, of course, is an inflammation of brain tissue, That can be caused by vaccination.
And, you know, when we go back to Texas, there was a guy there.
I really liked this guy.
He is no longer in the Texas legislature.
At the time, he was in the Texas House of Representatives.
His name was David Simpson.
He was out of, what was it, Longview, Longstreet, Texas?
I can't remember now.
But he was a solid guy.
Conservative, but he also, you know, he wasn't, he understood the principles about liberty and that type of thing.
And so he had parents in his jurisdiction who had children who had uncontrollable seizures because they were vaccine injured.
And the only thing that they could, they tried all these different pharmaceuticals that were supposed to control the trembling and the seizures and everything.
They couldn't find anything that worked.
And so they were desperate.
People said, try medical marijuana.
It was legal in Colorado, so these two families went there, and it worked for their kids.
One family was wealthy enough that they could relocate to Colorado.
The other one wasn't, and they both talked to David Simpson and told him about this, and he said it's just absolutely criminal that these families would be under threat of arrest and imprisonment for using the only thing that works.
Common sense and ethics and morality, he was able to get through a medical marijuana exemption in Texas, which doesn't recognize any medical exemptions for marijuana.
But he got an exemption in for this type of autism that Jenny McCarthy's child had.
And they still said, you've got to try all the pharmaceutical remedies, and only after you've tried all the pharmaceutical remedies and they don't work, can you do this?
And we will authorize it at that point in time.
But again, they don't recognize medical use of marijuana for anything other than that.
That's the kind of control that the pharmaceutical industry has on people.
And so she became a very vocal critic of the vaccines, and that's one of the things that really bothered me too.
You've got the pharmaceutical industry, which caused these kids seizures, most likely.
I can't say definitely.
But we see this happening over and over again like we do with Jenny McCarthy.
So they mandate dozens of these vaccines at early ages, and then when your child comes down with this reaction, and the only thing that will help them is non-pharmaceutical.
They want to deny you the treatment.
Of course, we see this over and over again now with things.
So she published a book that was called Louder Than Words, A Mother's Journey in Healing Autism.
She appeared on the Oprah Winfrey show, and she said the interesting thing was that Oprah Winfrey, she pressured Oprah Winfrey, and Oprah Winfrey said, okay, we can have you on, but if you want to say this, you're going to have to do it in a live episode.
She said Oprah said that if it was taped, any criticism of the vaccines would be censored.
That shows you how much control and how they own these networks.
So on the show, Oprah also had to read a, quote, giant long-page disclaimer defending vaccines before she let her tell her story.
And then she went on in 2009, subsequent to that, she went on with Larry King, again, also live.
And I'll just play for you.
I'm sure you've seen this.
This is a little bit of what Jim Carrey and Ginny McCarthy were saying.
They were dating at the time.
What happened after 1989?
It's twice as many as anywhere else in 30 countries in the Western world.
We give twice as many shots as any of those countries.
Why is that?
If it's vaccination and you're not against vaccination, what are you against?
Don't vaccinate for this, but vaccinate for that.
I think we have to choose which ones are absolutely necessary.
You should educate yourself.
We want to empower parents to educate themselves.
Do we need to have the chickenpox?
Do we need the hepatitis B shot on the second day of life?
I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our public health any longer have our best interests at heart all the time.
Parents have to make their
Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save a life or prevent a disease?
The AAP is financed by the drug companies.
Medical schools are financed by the drug companies.
This is a huge business.
Vaccine. Vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry.
$13 billion.
They control medical schools.
What we're asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children.
That's a tough sell in a boardroom.
Yeah, of course, that was 2009.
That was the early, early days.
It is so, so much worse than that.
So she said, I had about six months of just enormous amount of parents going, thank you.
I'm looking at as not being crazy now.
But then she, this is what she recently said about what happened in the aftermath of doing these live shows with Oprah Winfrey, Larry King.
After that, things kind of got crazy, not immediately.
I had about six months of just enormous amounts of parents going, thank you, I'm looked at not crazy now.
People kept saying I was crazy.
And then I had someone come to my organization, Generation Rescue, and say to me, listen, I was approached by, let's just say, a government agency to be hired.
And what I do is I set up PR campaigns to go against the narrative.
And I'm telling you privately because I turned them down, but I wanted to give you forewarning that it's happening because they're going to hire someone else.
And the only reason I said no is because My child went through the same thing, and I didn't want to be part of it.
Hold on, hold on, hold on.
I have chills all over my body.
I need you to tell me that whole thing all over again.
Yeah. Because the shock almost didn't let everything sink in, and if I'm having that, somebody else is having it.
Yeah. Someone came to you, someone came to me in person, and said, I...
I basically am a PR agency, a very high echelon one, and I was approached by a government agency to create a narrative against you, and it's going to be called your anti-vaccine.
And I turned down the job, but I wanted to privately and secretly, so we couldn't do an email, we couldn't do a phone call, I had to come to you in person and let you know this, that they're going to come after you and hard.
And I said, Well, how are they going to do that when I've clearly said in every interview, I'm not anti-vaccine?
Like, I'm just telling the story of my child of what happened and how I'm getting him better.
And he said, doesn't matter.
They're going to come after you with everything they've got, and they've got the media on their side.
So this is just a heads up.
And I was like, well, thank you very much.
And I didn't believe them.
I was like, there's no way, because I preface it in my book.
I've prefaced it everywhere.
So you didn't even get scared.
I didn't get scared.
I would have a heart attack.
I know.
I didn't get scared.
I didn't get scared.
You know, when you feel like you have your faith in your corner.
And truth.
And truth.
That's exactly right.
So I'm a tough chick.
I'm from the south side of Chicago.
You know, I've gone through enough.
I think I went on to an all-girl Catholic school.
So, you know, I think it gave me a good armor.
So when it started happening, It didn't really hurt me until it started taking jobs away from me.
Because I was a single mother still trying to heal my son, pay for speech therapy, ABA, and I was the beginning of kind of that cancel culture.
Cancel culture wasn't even a phrase yet.
But I would get calls from certain jobs and be like, We're taking off this campaign.
So that was the hard part because I was a single mom.
If I was some rich bitch that didn't give a shit, it probably wouldn't have affected me.
But it was just the job aspect because sticks and stones bring them.
I don't care.
But it was that kind of, you know, and so I just heavily relied on still writing my books and not giving up and still like going, you can try to cancel me.
But I'm still going to be here.
And now looking back, my son is 22 years old and I'm still here.
Well, I don't know how her son is, but isn't that amazing?
You know, and it's good that she was telling that lady, I'm thinking about it.
If I was the interviewer and somebody told me that, you know, we had somebody show up and said, there's a government agency that wants me to destroy you publicly.
I'd say, yeah, sure, I understand.
She's like, wait a minute, wait a minute, what?
I'm in shock.
Say that again?
I mean, I would be like, yeah, me too.
And when you talk about this, the canceling, it's always coming from the cancel culture.
Tie it back in, ladies.
The cancel culture is coming from government.
It always has, and it always will.
It's the government working behind the scenes, using their proxies, who are private individuals, PR agencies, or using social media companies, or whoever, right?
To come after you and to destroy you.
You go back and you look at the guy who exposed the crack cocaine epidemic, Gary Webb, Dark Alliance.
He won some award.
I don't know if it's a Pulitzer, but he won an award for that.
And so the government decided they don't have to destroy him.
How'd they do that?
They had like a half dozen or more reporters at the LA Times set up to investigate him personally.
Here's the man.
I want you to find something on him and destroy him personally.
And they did.
It took him out for a while.
And then he surfaced again and said, I'm back.
I'm going to fight this stuff.
And shortly after that, he was suicided.
Because I don't believe he killed himself.
There's always the people who said, I'm going to fight them, who wind up committing suicide.
Isn't that funny?
It's kind of like Aaron Schwartz, who was fighting CISA, CISPA.
Acta, SOPA, PIPA, all these different things that were set up to, as a surveillance thing, and set up to have a public-private surveillance network, which is really escalating and feeding all of this censorship stuff.
He was going to fight that.
And, you know, they came after him for bogus charges, saying that he illegally accessed the computer system.
The local official said, there's no crime here.
No crime here.
So then they brought in a federal attorney.
Who prosecuted him, put him in jail.
He's still very defiant.
And then he supposedly committed suicide.
Her father, her name was, her husband, her name was Carmine Ortiz.
She was a federal attorney.
They were grooming her for higher office.
And so...
This negative publicity about what happened with Aaron Schwartz people said, you drove him to suicide with your persecution, your prosecution.
Her husband said, she didn't do that.
She offered him a plea deal.
All he had to do was say this and walk away.
She wasn't trying to send him to prison.
And then he removed that.
I don't think, you know, and this guy was tough.
This was not his first rodeo.
He had had situations like that before.
He had fought it many times.
So, you know, you don't want to talk about cancel culture.
That doesn't even get close to what it is.
It's the government.
It's the government running this stuff.
She said, it really didn't hurt me until they started taking jobs away from me.
And that's the way they come after you.
They de-platform you.
They de-bank you now.
Sorry, we're going to shut you down from PayPal.
Why? I don't have anything.
It just says, cancel your account immediately.
I've seen it over and over again.
But folks, when we come back...
We're going to talk a little bit more about vaccines, but I want to take a quick break first, and then we come back.
We're going to talk about some updates on this Trump shot.
We'll be right back.
be right back.
All right, welcome back.
And, yeah, we're dealing with something right now, so I'd appreciate your prayers for this show and protection.
And, you know, just like yesterday, we had Ryan with For the Love of the Road, you know, drives an 18-wheeler, and he was having big issues with tires.
And, you know, no matter what happens in our life, it's always good for us to...
Ask God for protection.
And many times we see that happening.
And it is a real faith builder for us and for the people that we ask to pray for us.
So I don't know the resolution of what happened with Orion yesterday, but we would ask that as well.
On kick, Karen Carpenter says, Washington State is trying to pass a law removing all exemptions.
Oh, I bet they are.
And they won't be the last one either.
All these Democrat-run On cake, Knights of the Storm has gifted a sub.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
Well, when we talk about the Trump shots, young adults continue to produce spike protein one year after receiving the COVID vaccine.
Yeah. You know, we were talking about earlier, you know, the 76 shots the kids are going to get.
I think it's 40-something that you get by the time that you were nine months where they wanted to come after that one child.
And that includes the COVID shots, right?
By the time you're 18, they want you to have four doses now.
This is what CDC's chart had.
Look it up.
They've now, first they added them, and they're now starting to multiply the MMR shots on their pediatric vaccine schedule.
So now, by the time you're 18, they want you to have four Trump shots.
Four of the bioweapon mRNA Trump shots.
And, of course, they can cause the body to continue.
Producing the spike protein much longer than expected.
Well, what did they expect?
I said this from the very beginning.
Oh, so according to Moderna's own website, they're going to, and according to that little dog and pony show that President Trump arranged for them, he brought them all in, set them up.
How long is it going to take you?
That's too long.
How about you?
That's a little bit fast.
How about you?
Moderna. We can do it right now.
As a matter of fact, we don't have to manufacture the vaccine.
We will make your body manufacture the vaccine.
Let's go with that.
It was all set up.
That phony presentation.
And I said, okay, so you're going to have the body manufactured?
And that's what their website said.
I said, so where's the off switch for this?
And how is that different from, let's say, cancer, for example?
Reprogramming your body to produce a spike protein?
Is that like producing a tumor?
Is that what these white things that are growing in the veins are?
Yeah, yeah.
Essentially that.
There is no off switch, folks.
And they're now multiplying it.
Now they want to give your kid four of these shots as part of the pediatric shots.
Our government and our pharmaceutical industries are themselves a metastasizing cancer.
And they're going to kill us all if we don't go ahead.
I am anti-vax.
I make no bones about it.
They may take me off the air, but I'm not going to make any bones about it.
New York...
According to this report, headline says, wasted over $450 million on unused medical equipment during COVID.
I don't believe that at all.
I don't believe that at all.
This is a report that's being put out, in my opinion.
They're trying to come after Andrew Cuomo.
why well they're going to put this report out because he got a lot of people sick they said with the covid thing and his policies and he resigned now he wants to be mayor again so now we've got to find some more stuff to criticize him over
They want to say that Cuomo bought $450 million worth of equipment and didn't use it.
Except that I interviewed a person, I forget what her name was, the book that she wrote was called Pandemic Nurse.
And she said she was in Florida and they...
In the hospital where she was, they weren't seeing any of this COVID stuff, but she kept hearing all these news reports about how bad it was, and she said, I wanted to help.
So where they were saying it was the worst was in New York City.
And so she said she went to New York City and volunteered her services as a nurse.
I keep hearing that they're short on staff and all the rest of this stuff.
And she said, I waited for days before they'd even call me in.
I thought, what's the matter with them?
Why don't they call me in?
I'm ready to help right now.
And she said as they were taking her around, The physician who was the head of the thing, showing her, said, yeah, nearly 90% of these people are going to die from the ventilators.
They were using them.
Now, they may have, maybe they're looking at New York State, and maybe it was in New York City where they were killing people with ventilators.
But this also might be something to excuse them to say that Well, no, we actually didn't kill people with ventilators.
We didn't utilize them.
And that's Andrew Cuomo's fault.
He bought these things.
$450 million.
We didn't even use them.
They said ventilators, oxygen tanks, pulse oximeters, oxygen concentrators, infusion pumps.
The state used just three devices.
That is absolutely not true.
That is absolutely not true.
I don't know what their source is on this.
This is the Gold Report reporting this.
I don't know what their source is, but I can tell you.
That based on what I interviewed with this woman who saw this stuff, her credibility to me is far greater than any report that is coming out that I think has political motivations to try to undermine Andrew Cuomo for whatever reason.
I really don't care what their political games are.
I don't care whether it's Democrats or Republicans or whatever.
I'm not even in New York.
They're saying it now sits unused in storage facilities, but they're saying that only three devices were used.
That is absolutely a lie.
That out of all these types of things, you're talking about ventilators, oxygen tanks, pulse oximeters, oxygen concentrators, infusion pumps, all of those things?
Only three devices of all of those categories?
That's a lie.
That's a lie.
And listen to the way that they sell this.
And this is another tell.
All of this gain-of-function, you know, and woo-flu nonsense is being sold by all the media, So-called alternative media, which is not really an alternative.
It's alternative propaganda.
How do you like your propaganda to serve?
Do you like it served from the left or from the right?
You know, does a waiter come up when he dips the soup?
Is he on your left or your right?
When these people are dipping the lies, do they get on your left or your right side to do it with proper etiquette?
And so this is one person quoted by the New York Post.
He's a Cuomo spokesperson.
He said, Can Monday morning quarterback now, but then we were looking to save lives and doing nothing wasn't an option.
So, it was a real pandemic.
No, it wasn't.
And we did everything that we could.
We didn't know the right thing to do, but we were trying.
So, don't hold us responsible.
It's China.
It's the Wu flu.
And so, we're all now excused because we...
We did the best we can, but everybody was going to die.
Don't tell me that nonsense.
Now, it was a lie then.
I knew it was a lie.
You knew it was a lie if you listened.
And they've been pushing that lie.
That's their alibi.
That lie has become their alibi, and it's become the foundation for them doing it all again.
And the media playbook for measles looks exactly like the COVID playbook says Children's Health Defense, and they're 100% right.
100% right.
They said this time the kids are the pawns.
Last time they started with the elderly.
Now they're starting with the kids and the measles stuff.
Children's Health Defense has it exactly right.
Five years ago, we fought back as our government, big media, big pharma, orchestrated and executed a COVID-19 fear campaign that was built on lies, deception, and censorship.
But there is an upside to all of this, and that is that it opened the eyes of millions more people to the dangers of Shoddily tested vaccines, regulatory agency hubris, and one-size-fits-all medicine.
Well, I would also throw in there that it also opened our eyes to fake pandemics.
And it has opened my eyes to the whole fake virus paradigm.
The whole virus paradigm is fake.
And it's all designed to create panic.
Called a panic-demic.
Or call it panic endemic, right?
They want to panic everybody.
And they do it through the media.
You know, we've seen the memes.
A lot of people realize that.
The memes that, you know, the Amish never got COVID because they don't watch TV, right?
The media would have you believe that measles is a deadly disease, but any suggestion that MMR vaccines are safer than measles infections is not supported by facts.
It's not even supported by the CDC's own data, which I don't consider to be facts, but they're just like inflation figures and unemployment figures or whatever else.
But their own data, this proves it, shows that the vaccines have killed far more people.
The CDC says the vaccines have killed more people than the CDC says measles killed.
And all of this is Deja flu.
Same type of stuff.
You've got to be afraid.
Everybody's going to die.
They can't even claim a large number of people are even sick with it, but it's a pandemic.
And we've all got to take their prescription, which, of course, is an injection.
And you can't have anything else.
Because if you talk about buonessicide or whatever this respiratory thing is, you know, anything else, any other treatment, oh, you know, that's not allowed.
All of these are telltale.
And when you look at what the media is doing, as I said earlier, you have these tabloid things out of the UK, the Mirror, the Daily Mail.
Here's the Daily Mail's headline.
Exclusive, terrifying look.
Inside a U.S. town being overwhelmed by the world's most infectious disease.
Well, that's not exclusive.
Did your government minders tell you that that was going to be exclusive?
Because everybody's reporting that Daily Mail.
Shame on you.
You lying prostitute whores.
Just amazing.
On the dusty outskirts of Seminole, Texas, Peter Hildebrand stands outside a gas station, his eyes rimmed red, and his voice cracking with grief.
She did not die of the measles, he says, of his daughter Daisy.
If there's one thing you should know, it's that she was failed.
In other words, this is the father, the first one, the first reported death from measles.
And he showed the documents, Children's Health Defense, Mary Holland and the rest of them.
And doctors reviewed that, reviewed the charts, and she didn't die of measles.
And her attending physician said, you know, the rash had left.
It was medical malpractice by the hospital.
It was refusing to treat her by the hospital.
And he wants that story out.
So, Daily Mail is going to call him delusional.
Did they look at the charts?
No. Did they call on physicians to look at the charts?
No. Did they do what the government told them?
Yes. This is like a PR campaign, like they were going to run against Jenny McCarthy.
This is what their PR campaigns look like.
It's just a lot of factless assertions and allegations being propagated by the press.
Eight-year-old Daisy Hillebrand is the second child to die in the escalating measles outbreak gripping West Texas.
No, she was the first, I think.
Nevertheless, where the anti-vaccine conspiracy thinking has become rife.
It was not having a vaccine that killed her.
And it was being anti-vax that killed her.
And it's all a conspiracy theory.
No, it is a conspiracy.
And the Daily Mail is part of that conspiracy.
The death was confirmed by the CDC.
That's all we have to do.
Fauci said so.
CDC said so.
So that's done, right?
Hildebrand, however, claims his daughter's death was not caused by the virus, but by a failure in her medical care, a lack of proper treatment, and prejudice against her faith.
The family is Mennonite, and they don't want these poisons.
Daily Mail says they falsely claimed the shots contained, quote, dangerous stuff, and that Big Pharma used them to make money at the expense of people's health.
Oh, and...
Pharma shows, like Daily Mail, is paid to lie about that.
It's amazing.
What a sloppy, obvious hit job of lies this is.
Hildebrand is determined, however, to overturn the report that his daughter was killed by measles.
He recently met with RFK Jr. during a visit in the area earlier this month.
Hildebrand says he, that is RFK Jr., didn't mention vaccines once.
But he was the nicest man I ever met.
And then after his visit, RFK Jr. wrote on X, quote, the most effective way to prevent the spread of measles is the MMR vaccine.
RFK Jr. didn't just betray this guy.
He betrayed you, your children, your grandchildren.
She was my little girl, he said softly, and they let her down.
And so did RFK Jr.
And RFK Jr. is letting you and your children down.
Still pushing this MMR vaccine.
RFK Jr. knows the truth about this stuff.
Why isn't he stopping us?
Instead, he's feeding this.
And then you see this, again, like I said, the UK mirror.
Here's their headline.
Inside the anti-vax U.S. town being overwhelmed by the world's most infectious disease.
Give me a break.
How pathetic this is.
These people are trying a little bit too hard, don't you think?
Residents are standing firm on their decision not to get vaccinated, with many claiming that the jabs contain, quote, dangerous stuff, unquote, and that big pharma have only manufactured them to make money.
Now, they're getting ready to roll out, you know, we talked about how they're doing the same play with measles that they did with COVID, right?
And so we see how they're using the press, how they're using them to demonize and to ridicule people.
Well, Hollywood is getting ready to do that same thing with COVID.
There's a movie coming out called Eddington.
It's got a big cast in it.
You've got Joaquin Phoenix and other people like that that are pretty big actors.
I'm going to play for you the trailer for Eddington.
And notice that this trailer for Eddington, which has not been released yet, but it's going to be released.
And I can look at this trailer and I can pretty much guess what's going to be in it.
I used to do that for a living.
And it's going to be a well-produced film.
That is going to create a conflict between a sheriff and a mayor.
One of them pro-vaccine, the other one anti-vaccine.
And I'm telling you that this is going to be used to demonize, to declare that anybody that pushes back against the COVID stuff, we're all crackpots and conspiracy theorists and all the rest of this stuff.
Which, by the way, just every time you hear that.
Think about the fact that the conspiracy theory was created by the FBI to discredit people who said there was a second shooter, the JFK thing.
I'm perfectly happy to have a label of conspiracy theorist or anti-vax.
I embrace those based on what these people have done.
I think those labels have been vindicated.
Of course, they keep looking at that lab in Wuhan, China.
If you look at that lab in Wuhan, when that was established, it was 1956.
Of course, that was the year Tom Hanks was born, the first celebrity with the virus.
Say the nutty stuff.
Value your life.
You should think twice.
Because the people of Eddington like guns.
Your pain is not a coincidence.
You are not a coincidence.
We are not a coincidence!
And I am speaking now to deny my husband's announcement yesterday, which was...
Heading to New Mexico, despite its meager population, is quickly being co-opted in online circles.
I'm ready to continue leading our town and fighting the pandemic and the racial...
You're the only one.
Mommy can be beat my house, my whole life.
I'm stuck.
You're not getting up, start to the police!
The police are not stuck.
The police are a good man.
The police are a good man.
I'm stuck.
You're not stuck.
I'm stuck.
I'm stuck.
Yeah, coming out in July.
And so if you were able to see that, I know some people listen to the show, but if you see that, they've got some of the stuff that they're showing, the conflict and everything, that's in a little box taken by an iPhone or cell phone or something like that and put up on social media.
They're pulling it all in to make it so contemporary, so trendy.
And they're going to use all of their narrative powers and service of the state.
And the pharmaceutical companies to discredit anybody who questions their so-called science.
I can tell you that's where this is going to go.
That production company, A24, makes nothing but pseudo-intellectual garbage.
That's right.
Didn't they do the Civil War thing?
Yeah. A bunch of other trash that morons who like to believe they're intelligent like.
You go back and you look.
I bet if somebody were to investigate these guys, anybody listening, you're welcome to go investigate them.
I don't have the time.
I bet you could probably find a lot of connections between them.
And the CIA, you know, CIA is bragging about the fact that In-Q-Tel, their venture capital firm, has now funded 800 different companies.
And what are these companies there for?
They are there to set up data mining and surveillance and all kinds of insane stuff, just what you would expect the CIA to do.
And they're bragging about it.
And it's escalating.
Escalating. Just like the autism, that kind of disease is escalating as well.
Well, yeah, I would bet.
That you can go back and you can probably find a lot of connections with the CIA or some other, if not that particular agency, some similar function, government agency that's there.
Because we're going to talk about 4chan and what's been exposed with 4chan and the allegations made.
Based on the hack that was taken over, the files that were released, it's kind of interesting to see who is running even some of these sites that I think were set up as a honeypot to entrap people.
I think that's what 4chan is.
But anyway, I'll just go back to this Peter Hillebrand.
He is now, as I said before, when Children's Health Defense talked about his daughter who died after a measles diagnosis, But not from measles.
They had doctors who went over the records and they talked about all that stuff.
And then they talked to the family, but the family didn't want to speak at that time.
Well, now this has gone on and he's had some time to think about it.
And now he has contacted Children's Health Defense and he wants to talk about it as well.
I just get so angry, he said, when he talks about his child who died from medical malpractice, not from measles.
And then he sees that the mainstream media is using this.
To push the jabs and to attack his community there, Mennonites.
And so, I'll just give you one positive thing here before we go to a break.
And this is from Exposé News in the UK.
Introducing a variety of natural foods into your baby's diet sets your child up for stronger immunity for life.
Getting them shot like, you know...
Four dozen times before they're a one-year-old.
That sets them up for immunity problems all their life.
But this is something you can do that is positive.
Introducing a wide variety of plant-based foods into baby's diets after the age of one speeds up gut microbiome maturity, helping your child develop better digestion and stronger immunity from an early age.
Now, just make sure you don't inject them with us.
That's what they're saying, too, in terms of...
The allergies to peanuts and milk and things like that is because these things are contaminations possibly that they get through injections.
If the first time the child is introduced to milk or to peanuts is because they got these types of proteins that were in the vaccines.
If their body encounters it the first time being injected in their bloodstream, which is a lot of people who were anti-vax from the very beginning.
We're objecting to how it gets introduced into the body.
They said, you know, when your body encounters things that can be harmful, you've got a lot of different layers of protection that can mitigate that kind of stuff.
But when you inject something directly into somebody's bloodstream, that doesn't work.
And when you inject proteins directly in, sometimes contaminants, they may not be bad in and of themselves, but if that's the first time that your child encounters those proteins, That can cause them to have immune problems.
So you want to start introducing these things as food, as a wide variety of food, to help them build up microbiome maturity.
Children who consume diverse plant fibers develop higher levels of beneficial bacteria which reduce inflammation and protect the gut lining.
Between 12 and 18 months is the most important window to introduce a range of solid food.
Laying the groundwork for a healthy adult-like gut by the age of 12. Local fiber-rich foods like millet, banana, and rice work best in supporting gut health.
Expensive superfoods are not necessary for strong gut development.
Restrictive or processed replacement foods damage gut bacteria balance.
But breastfeeding, combined with diverse real foods, builds a more resilient long-term gut foundation.
Well, there's some good news, some positive news of some things that you can do.
You don't have to rely, and you better not rely on these people who are public health experts to protect your family and your health.
They aren't going to do it at all.
We'll take a quick break.
We'll be right back.
Thank you.
you
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
The David Knight Show.
The Common Man.
They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
They created Common Past to track and control us.
Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
*Music*
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
TheDavidKnightShow.com Let's see,
we have Unkick, the love of the road, says everything went well, made it home this morning.
Oh, I'm glad to hear that you made it home.
Sorry that you had the problem.
Thanks for giving us an update.
Let's talk a little bit about what is happening, again, on the home front, homeschooling.
This is Alex Newman, who does a lot of reporting on education.
He's very good.
I've had him on.
He's got a book.
He also writes for the New American, but he's got his own book and his own site now as well.
But he says a lot of states are now advancing tax-funded choice, quote-unquote choice.
Well, isn't choice and education good?
Well, yes it is, but that's not what we're talking about here.
We're talking about government funding, and what Alex Newman is trying to do is to warn homeschooling families about the fact that this is a trap.
I should have put in Admiral Akbar, it's a trap, right?
This is what government money is a trap for homeschoolers, and he talks about the fact this is coming from UNESCO.
Their own documents show that they're trying to rope private schools and homeschools.
And to the government system.
This is what UNESCO is saying.
You can see their own documents.
They want to expand so-called choice programs and a universal government funding of education.
Now, here's the parallel.
We look at Trump getting rid of the Department of Education.
I've always wanted to see the Department of Education.
I want to see the government out of the education business, especially the federal government.
I want to see the government at the state and local level out of education, but especially the federal government.
They have no warrant for doing that at all in the Constitution.
And yet, what are you looking at with Trump?
They're going to move the monetary functions, the grants and all the rest of the stuff, giving the money to states, giving the money to maybe To private schools, maybe even to home schools, federal money, right?
All of that grant-making capability, all that cash, all the bribery, and subsequent blackmail when you don't do what they want.
That bribery and blackmail, all that massive amount of money, which is the way the Department of Education has always worked.
Look, they understand that they don't have any authority to even exist under the Constitution.
So how do they get people to do what they want?
Well, they give them financial incentives to use No Child Left Behind or whatever else.
That was what George W. Bush was selling.
So they come up with one of their curricula, and they give you financial incentives to use that.
They would like to now, since it's been so discredited and people see the results of what's happened in the government schools, say, oh, well, you can do better.
You can start your own charter schools or private schools or whatever, and we'll give you the money to do that.
We'll even give money to the homeschoolers to do this.
And what they'll do is they'll push their curriculum again.
It'll be the same function, you see.
And so, in the same way that the evil that the Department of Education is doing, it's really the bribery and the blackmail through the money, and that function is not going to go away.
They'll get rid of the bureaucracy, just like they'll get rid of the IRS agents and replace them with AI.
They're going to get rid of the Department of Education.
Everybody cheers Trump as a savior, and yet he'll take the money-granting functions, and he'll put them in different places, and the money will still be coming from the federal government to control education.
And wait and see.
Oh, well, Trump's going to help us with that.
Well, you wait and see what happens.
I mean, just take a look at what they do with the money, again, with the trainees.
You know, when it's Obama and Biden, they pay them to put the trainees in the bathrooms and the showers.
Or I'm going to take your money away.
Then when Trump comes in, he says, if you put them in the showers and the bathrooms, I'm going to take your money away.
And it's back and forth, back and forth, back and forth.
Do you really want that kind of a system?
Do you really want to be bribed and blackmailed with your own money?
Don't take the money.
And understand that just as getting rid of the so-called Department of Education, but maintaining those functions, those...
Those supply lines of cash, the strings that they're going to use to control you, maintaining that is evil.
In the same way, getting rid of the so-called education bureaucracy and transferring all of that into private schools, which are still going to have the funding from government and the controls and the strings and this is the curriculum we would like for you to use and yada yada.
Doing all of that at the local level is the same thing that they're doing at the federal level of the Department of Education.
It's making people think there's a change when they maintain the lines of control, which are the money.
Follow the money.
It's always about the money.
I played that clip from...
What was that movie?
Tom Cruise and Ted Cruz.
I wouldn't see that movie.
Show me the money, Jerry.
Jerry Maguire.
Okay, so I played that clip until everybody was nauseous of it because I wanted to drive that point home.
It's about the money.
It was about the money in 2020, and it's about the money with all this education.
We're talking about the federal level or the state level.
We're talking about replacing this government bureaucracy of schools with charter schools, private schools, home schools.
If they fund it, They control it.
He says, Sign this in the law.
The program will offer $5,000 refundable tax credits to cover non-government education expenses.
Same thing happened in Tennessee.
I talked about that, and he talks about it coming up here, too.
In Tennessee, they had this subsidy bill, economic subsidy for private schools, charter schools, and things like that.
And wanted to push it out to homeschools.
And the homeschoolers resisted.
And so they came up and they said, all right, we'll offer you the free act.
And we've heard you.
If you don't want to take the money, here's what we'll do.
You support this bill for educational choice and the government handing out money to people, which will be used to bribe and control and to blackmail them.
You support that, and then we will pass the free act, which says that if you don't take the government's money, You don't have to do anything with them.
You don't have to declare that you're schooling your children.
You don't have to do anything.
What happened?
We had Republicans, five Republicans, worked with the Democrats to scuttle that in Tennessee.
So we wound up with the money going out to control education just like UNESCO, the UN, said to do, but not with the freedom to be left alone to educate your own children.
In Tennessee, says Alex, In Tennessee, lawmakers recently approved universal ESA funds for families up to $7,000 per student.
In Idaho, it's only $5,000.
Here, it's $7,000.
Wyoming, meanwhile, expanded its program this year by eliminating income restrictions for eligibility, but opposition is now growing.
In Texas, Texas is the only major homeschool association that supports government funding of home education.
The Lone Star State is close to passing a major so-called choice bill.
The bill would send billions more to government schools.
Now let me tell you, I think that this is not unrelated to what's going on with the Fatala Gulen people and the schools of science and math and all that stuff.
Mark Hall, his documentary Killing Ed, He talks about what was happening with that organization, and I think that it's not any coincidence that you've got a major homeschool organization there that is pushing for more money to go into these things.
Fatala Gulen people, that Islamic cleric cultist, of course they were very clear to try to make it a secular school, but they're still...
Bringing in people, paying them multiple times what they pay American teachers, bringing them from Turkey, saying, what's their expertise?
And the American teachers are saying, they don't even know the math that they're trying to teach here.
But they pay them like double the salary, and then these guys kick it back to the institute that's there.
Mark Hall documented that very well in Killing Ed.
We talk about somebody that had to, you know...
He was being attacked in a lot of different ways.
He had to air gap his computer and all the rest of the stuff.
Anyway, it's a great documentary.
You should see it.
But I think it's nearly a billion dollars now that they're getting out of Texas for these schools being run by this Islamic cult, the Galenists.
And I think that that's one of the reasons why this is happening in Texas.
All the rest of the homeschool associations in every other state are against This money out there because they know that people are going to accept that bribe and they know how it's going to be used.
These bills weren't pushed by homeschoolers.
They didn't originate from homeschooling.
They're not organic to our movement because they are the opposite of what homeschooling has been about for the last 50 years.
These bills are about controlling homeschoolers.
It is a scheme.
To funnel taxpayer money to state-approved curriculum providers.
You see?
If they fund it, they'll define it.
State-approved curriculum providers and testing companies while politicians pat themselves on the back for helping homeschoolers.
So, you'll go in and they'll say, well, okay, you're going to homeschool.
We're not going to give you any help unless you use this curriculum.
And if you use that curriculum, we'll pay for it and we'll give you some other money to that type of thing.
That'll be the way that they incentivize it.
They also singled out Texas Homeschool Coalition, the only major state association backing government funding for home education.
They singled them out for special criticism.
They said government strings, testing, state-approved curriculum, etc.
are the opposite of winning.
The opposite of winning.
And all this stuff is going to still be there with the Department of Education.
Everybody's going to say, look at that!
Trump got rid of the Department of Education.
Well, of course, he put the woman who was in charge of professional wrestling, and this getting rid of the Department of Education is as phony as professional wrestling.
That's probably why he got Linda McMahon in there.
There are close to 100 bills in 29 states so far this year that would create, expand, revise, or change school choice programs.
You see, homeschooling is exploding.
And so are the bills to undermine it, to subvert it.
A hundred bills in 29 states to take over homeschooling by financial means.
That's what this is truly about.
Well, UNESCO is encouraging governments everywhere, says Alex Newman, to offer tax funding to non-state education providers.
With government money comes government control.
Conservatives instinctively understood, Says Alex Newman.
That universal health care, Hillary care, that universal basic income were dangerous as well.
Yet, when it comes to universal government funding for education, there has been a shocking degree of naivete among Republicans and others.
Now, in West Virginia, the governor there has signed a parental bill of rights into law.
In this headline, in this title from Christian Post, they got the wrong governor there.
The governor is no longer Jim Justice as pictured, but it is now Governor Patrick Morrissey who signed this into law on Monday.
Schedules take effect on June 22nd.
The bill outlines several examples of rights that are, quote, reserved to the parent of a minor child in this state.
And again, that's important to say that they're reserved.
They're not granted.
You know, the government doesn't grant rights.
That's the foundation of our country.
That's the Declaration of Independence.
We're endowed with these inalienable rights by God, right?
By our Creator.
And so we reserve these rights, and these are prohibitions to government to not take away those rights.
And among those are the reserve to the parent of a minor child without obstruction or interference from the state or from any of its political subdivisions or any other government entity or any other state.
These rights include the right to direct the education and care of his or her minor child, the right to direct the upbringing and the moral and religious training of his or her minor child, the right to enroll their children in either private schools, public schools, including religious schools,
or homeschool programs.
The right to access and review all school records related to their children.
The right to make health care decisions for their children unless they are prohibited by law.
Except for that last thing, except we're prohibited by law.
You have all these rights.
You have wonderful rights.
Unless we pass a law and say that you don't have those rights anymore, right?
Anyway, one person who spoke about it, a lawyer, It was with the religious freedom legal group Alliance Defending Freedom said in a statement that parents love and know their child the best and they have the right and the duty to direct the upbringing and the care of their children and no world should the government intrude on parenting choices just because it disagrees with the parents and
I Absolutely endorse that.
This is, again, I'll play this for you.
This is something I did for the parental rights amendment push for the federal level.
I did this back in 2009.
And boy, is it ever true and self-evident today.
Certain truths are self-evident.
We're endowed by our Creator with rights.
Certain relationships are also inalienable.
Family was the first institution created by our Creator.
And the family is the fundamental building block of every healthy society and every just government.
But government and family are two different authorities or spheres with different roles and different responsibilities.
Each authority is uniquely suited for a particular task and doesn't do the task of the other well.
Families have traditionally been assumed to be acting out of love in the best interest of its members and have been left alone unless proven to be abusive.
But a new attitude has been cultivated by those that believe children should be raised by the village and not by their family.
This approach to children and their families has been spelled out in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
The UN Convention assumes government responsibility for all the needs of children and transfers responsibilities and rights from parents to government.
Government is seen as capable of providing every want to the child and as responsible for instilling correct values, their values, into children.
Parents are mentioned in the UN Convention only as problems for children to be protected from, or as mere advisors to their children, so long as their advice is not too strong or coercive.
Children are encouraged to form their values independent of their parents.
But nowhere is there a sense that they would ever need protection from a government.
This troubling document has been ratified as a treaty throughout the world, with the U.S. as virtually the only lone holdout.
The U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child is about 16 pages.
On the other hand, the Parental Rights Amendment is only three short paragraphs.
is a simple restatement of what has until recently been what every culture, every government, except authoritarian governments, saw as the rights of parents.
The Parental Rights Amendment would strengthen the Constitution to protect the family by explicitly stating self-evident truths about an inalienable relationship.
Find out what you can do at parentalrights.org.
Yeah, and I don't know if that still is in operation.
I haven't looked at that for quite some time.
But all the stuff that I was talking about there, that's actually already happening as we talk about parental rights.
The West Virginia Bill of Rights ensures that parents remain free to guide the upbringing, the education, and the health care of their children without undue government interference.
And then they said, well, in some other states, parents have sued local school districts for various parental right issues, such as failing to inform them that their child wished to identify as a member of the opposite sex and all the rest of this stuff.
Look, if you've got a right to do this, don't surrender your right to the state.
Don't surrender your child to the state.
Some people decide that they will give the education and the upbringing of their child to strangers who work for the government.
Does that seem like a wise thing to do?
You see, if you're going to talk about, I need to be informed about what you're doing in the schools.
Well, that's not a right.
State education is not a right.
And if you're going to get a handout of money, From the state, just like that's one of the reasons why Alex Newman is opposing this stuff.
If you're going to say, well, I want the free education.
Whether that comes in the form of a tuition subsidy at a private school or religious school or whether it comes as a subsidy to your home school, once you accept that, you've basically surrendered your rights.
And if you put your kid in a government school, you have surrendered your child to the state.
You really have.
And so you've now turned, the government has paid you for your rights and given you the privilege of a subsidized or free education.
And they're not going to warn you about some pedophile grooming your child into some transgender fantasy.
They actually support that.
They actually support it.
So, again, it's good that they have the parental rights stuff there, but don't be lulled into a sense of security to think that your wishes are going to be respected by a government institution that you've turned your child over to be raised in.
It was last week that I played the clip for you about Sean Duffy, who is now...
The head of the Department of Transportation.
And underneath the Department of Transportation is the Merchant Marine Academy.
And I thought it was kind of interesting and actually surprised him when he made his speech to them.
He's flattering them and telling them, I'm going to give you more money and you're great looking people and all the rest of the stuff.
And then when he mentioned the fact that previously they had had this painting that had been there since World War II.
In the midst of World War II, 1942.
It's a painting of some guys who their ship had evidently sunk in their lifeboat, and they see Jesus on the horizon.
Well, they didn't like that painting, and so that painting was removed.
He says, and we're going to bring Jesus back from the basement.
And now you have an attorney blasting the people who cheered him.
This attorney calls the people who cheered him Christian Nationalist insects.
First, I'll play you what happened when he gave the speech.
And so, I want you to know that I understand the conditions here, and I am going to fight my ass off to make sure you all get the respect and the money that this academy deserves.
and so...
Again, not only smart, not only strong, but you are a great-looking bunch of young people.
And so with that, as you all go into your careers, God bless you.
May God keep you safe.
Brother, can I ask, could we bring Jesus up from the basement?
That's the biggest round of applause.
Thank you.
He's milking it.
Thank you.
That was the loudest applause we got.
We are going to work on that together and funding for the academy.
May God bless you all.
Stay safe.
Now, I played that because I need to make a correction.
I said, well, I wonder why Jesus was put in the basement.
I said, could it be because of Pete Buttigieg, who I sometimes call Booty Marx because his father spent his entire career at Notre Dame praising the founder of Italian communism, Antonio Gramsci, who was the one who came up with a strategy that we've seen used very,
very effectively here in America to march through the institutions and take them over from the top down and on and on.
Well, it turns out that it wasn't Pete Buttigieg.
And the guy who sued to get this taken out was very upset.
Very upset to see that kind of response.
He's the one who called those midshipmen Christian nationalist insects.
Excuse me, I had to sneeze there.
He is an attorney for the non-profit that pushed to relocate.
The historic painting of Jesus there at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy to relocate it to the basement.
Pull that up, Travis, and there's a couple of pictures there.
And you can see the midshipmen there.
There's a picture of what it looked like with him standing in front of that painting.
And then you see the painting with sheets over it.
Yeah, pull that up.
At first, when he was having his way, Whenever they would have a public meeting or whatever, they would put the sheet over it or whatever.
Eventually, they just moved it to the basement.
And so this guy who's out of this organization that is set up, that's how he makes his living.
This is a guy who makes his living.
His name is Mikey Weinstein.
And he is a bigoted anti-Christian.
He hates Christ.
He hates the Bible, and he has made a career out of getting Bibles removed from people's desks, from VA hospitals, and all the rest of this stuff.
Anywhere there's a Bible somewhere in the military, that's his specialty, right?
He's going to purge the Bible out of everywhere that is military.
And so he called these midshipmen, he called them cowards and Christian nationalist insects, this bigot.
And I don't think they're cowards at all.
I think the previous people who ran the academy were cowards.
But there is a grassroots movement by the midshipmen themselves to resist this.
And they have a very powerful statement as to what they think has been done to their generation.
So his organization that he's making his living from is the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.
Except it's not about religious freedom at all.
It's about denying religious freedom to people.
And again, this comes back to this whole thing about establishment.
It's not establishment if people freely exercise what they're doing.
And if they're employees of the government, they still don't lose any religious liberty for that.
It's like punishing the coach who silently prays or something like that.
And you have other organizations, the Freedom From Religion organization.
Well, that's not what the Constitution says.
That's exactly the opposite of what the Constitution says.
The Constitution says freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.
They are as opposed to the Constitution as they are opposed to Christ, these people.
And so he accused the young midshipmen of violating their constitutional oath.
For applauding the Secretary of Transportation, Sean Duffy, that I just showed you there.
No. He's a lawyer.
He knows what the Constitution says.
He knows the Constitution says freedom of religion.
They did not violate any oath.
He is the person who is violating the law that he is supposedly supposed to know about.
Anyway, so it was during the Biden administration that they moved it to the basement, these Christian insects, as he says.
This anti-Christ bigot.
He has, in the past, he has supported removing not only Bibles, but it was a case that he took to force somebody to remove a sign off of their desk that said,
not today, Satan.
He said, you can't have that there.
And when he was interviewed by the Christian Post, they said he offered A nuanced definition regarding, quote, the full nature of Satanism.
So he defends Satanism.
He attacks the Bible.
He attacks Christ.
And he calls these people filthy, ignorant, hateful, bigoted scum.
Well, I would say that's merely projection, except that he's not ignorant.
He's satanic.
So he is filthy, satanic, hateful, bigoted scum.
That's what Weinstein is.
He, again, was responsible for getting this painting.
Now, I saw it before that it was 1942.
They're saying now 1944.
Either way, it's during the middle of World War II.
Christ on the Water.
He got it put into the basement.
After he fired off a complaint letter in January 2023 to the Merchant Marine Academy, the superintendent there, first they covered it with a curtain.
During official academy meetings, that's what you saw there.
So at the top of that, pull that back up there, used to be that when they would have a meeting, they would all be there and that would be in the background.
Then the first response was, well, whenever we have a meeting, we'll put a white curtain over it.
Well, that wasn't good enough for this filthy, satanic, hateful bigot, Weinstein.
He demanded that they put it into the, get it out of the room.
So they moved it to the chapel basement.
Which midshipmen noted when they spoke to Fox News that year.
They said, well, the basement is prone to flooding.
It'll probably be destroyed.
Well, that seems to be the idea.
And so they said Duffy was surprised, as you could see there.
He was surprised at how strongly people felt about that.
That was by far and away his biggest applause line to bring Jesus out of the basement.
Weinstein then called Duffy.
A, quote, stray, feral dog, clearly bereft of any semblance of morality, ethical standard, or constitutional legality.
This guy is big into projection, isn't he?
He defines himself and he accuses other people of that.
Now, he's the one who doesn't have any semblance of morality, ethical standards, or constitutional legality.
He said, obviously, this is required for all MAGA, filthy, ignorant, hateful, bigoted scum.
Weinstein further implied that the Merchant Marine Academy is anti-Jewish because he's Jewish.
Oh, I'm going to play the race card.
These are the people who invented DEI.
It's amazing to me.
They use it now.
They've been using it as people, and now they're using it against people claiming anti-Semitism.
Always, yeah.
I disagree with you politically or religiously.
You are anti-Semitic.
Bow before me.
Never. To the cheering, robust throngs of Christian nationalist midshipmen, he said.
And again, he said in his post on social media, He called them stinking pieces of excrement Christian nationalist insects.
This is a great lawyer, isn't he?
It's a wonder to me that he could ever win any case.
He says, move that giant Jesus painting back to its original place of bloody controversy in that huge secular conference room.
What will happen if you do?
Well, F around and find out, he said.
Now, I said the midshipman.
Are not cowardly.
They're tired of the tyranny of antichrist bigots like Weinstein.
Hundreds of midshipmen have signed a petition calling for the painting to be moved back to the auditorium.
The petition, which was submitted to the Merchant Marine Administration last Friday, also explained why the image of Jesus rescuing merchant mariners means so much to them.
Especially in recent years.
The petition says, Again, pull it back up and show that picture.
Our country has left us stranded at sea with no intention of saving us.
Hmm. Maybe we shouldn't be putting our trust.
In government, but in Christ.
So they said, our government schools and in some cases even our families have told us that we are not worth the effort.
Specifically during the COVID pandemic, we were told that our lives were worth so little that they could be put on hold for years.
Our bodies were not our own, but we belonged to the federal government and to the Merchant Marine Academy admissions who could decide what we must put into our bodies.
Those difficult years and up to this very moment, only one thing has proven Whoever comes to me, I will never cast out.
That one thing is Jesus Christ, God of the universe and Lord of our lives.
And hundreds of them have signed that petition.
The Merchant Marines vaccine policies under Biden, what they were referring to.
Jackson Toll, who's a midshipman, said, well, I'm a member of the Christian fellowship here.
He said, I'm speaking for myself, not for any group.
Not for the petition.
He said that the demographic of the Merchant Marine Academy skews nominally Christian, but he pushed back against the idea that non-Christian midshipmen would find the Jesus painting alienating.
He said, the ideals of sacrifice, the ideals of love, compassion, and empathy, these are ideals and traits that we as a culture need to return to.
Those ideas came from the Lord Jesus Christ.
You can't have the fruit of that, folks, without the root of it.
You've got people like Richard Dawkins, people like Jordan Peterson.
Many people look at it and say, I don't like to see our Christian, I don't like to see our culture, I like the architecture.
Morality and the framework of individual rights and all the rest of these things that are there.
I don't like seeing that stuff swept away.
Well, if you remove the tree, you're not going to have the fruit.
It's just that simple.
This student also suggested the enthusiastic response to Duffy's speech earlier this month was an example of young people showing that they are hungry for something more than what the prevailing culture has offered.
He said, moral relativism has failed the country and the world more so than any belief system ever really has.
And I think we're returning to objective truth.
Objective truth.
Well, one last thing before we take a break here.
That is the interesting...
They found a piece of paper that has an 1800-year-old hymn on it.
And it even has the music.
It's even got the notes, I guess.
Somehow they've discerned that.
So the oldest Christian hymn ever found is now being sung again.
You've got a couple of people going to re-record it.
Chris Tomlin, Ben Fielding are going to do this.
And they're doing a documentary about it.
They call it The First Hymn.
And Chris Tomlin and Ben Fielding have done a song called The First Hymn.
But because it was preserved with both words and musical notes, that's very unusual.
You know, you typically see David's psalms and things like that.
You might have a note, you know, sung to leaping sheep in the pasture or whatever the song would be.
I don't remember the names of any of the songs.
But, you know, I actually put that up there.
Because everybody...
At that point in time, we would have known that.
But, you know, we're maybe about 3,000 years or so, roughly, you know, since that time, those songs have been lost.
We don't know what those tunes were.
Kind of like, you know, putting the song to the tune of Greensleeves.
Well, everybody would know that today.
But, you know, 3,000 years from now, will that tune be lost?
Who knows?
Probably have some law firm claim that they've got copyright on it.
And make it disappear.
Anyway, they discovered this more than a century ago, but they've only recently turned it into a modern song.
So I'm not sure when they say they had the music to it exactly what that was.
Lyrics to the hymn.
Only 53 words in the lyrics.
And it was, Let all be silent, the shining stars not sound forth, all rushing rivers be stilled as we sing our hymn to the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
As all powers cry out and answer, Amen, Amen.
Might, praise, and glory forever to our God, the only giver of all good gifts.
So the key part of it is the fact that it's got the Trinity, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, right there at the center of it.
And so this is key because a lot of people have falsely claimed that the Trinity is something that was invented at the Council of Nicaea in A.D. 325.
And yet here is something that happened more than a century before that, acknowledging the Trinity.
And of course, you can see it in the Bible.
You don't have to.
It's not that this is something new and novel that was invented by the Council of Nicaea.
No, what they did was they affirmed it.
They affirmed the truth that was in the Bible because of something that was novel.
And that was the heresy, denying it.
So they affirmed it against that novel heresy.
It wasn't that the affirmation was novel.
The affirmation was there, not only in this song that was, you know, 100 years before it, but also in the Bible.
And so, you know, that was one of the key reasons they said you often hear that people say, well, that was invented by the Council of Nicaea and the Emperor Constantine forced this doctrine on the church.
But the thing is, here's the idea in a song from the previous century.
And again, it was obviously older than that piece of paper, and it was obviously in the Bible as well.
They said, what's so fun about this is that the tune isn't the stodgy stuff that we often associate with chanting monks.
It's pop music.
It's the kind of melody you'd expect to hear at an ancient Greek pub or some theater performance.
Whoever composed this song was trying to make serious Christian ideas and give them to the masses.
And I think that's fine.
I think, you know, it's important for us to use music that is accessible to people, that is a style that they're going to do.
And of course, you know, we always do that.
And it really is about the lyrics more than anything else.
I just wonder if 1800 years from now, if Christ doesn't come back, we're still here, you know, people.
I wonder if they found any contemporary Christian music.
If they could find any doctrine of any sort in the kind of contemporary Christian music that I'm accustomed to hearing at some of the churches that I visit, I don't think they could identify any Christian teaching in it.
They would just simply be songs that you sing at a pub or that a girl would sing to her boyfriend.
You know, it's like Jesus is my boyfriend type of stuff.
That seems to be where the bulk of Travis is nodding his head yes.
It's all so tiresome.
Yeah, that is.
Oh, one last thing before I take a break.
I thought this was a good essay.
This is from Relevant Magazine.
Talking about trusting God when everything feels unstable.
We were talking about that earlier with For the Love of the Road.
Issues that he had.
Of course, we all have issues, and sometimes it's something that is part of our work or some obstacle that's happened in the day.
Sometimes it is a long, persistent illness or death in the family or whatever.
This person said, I've been studying the topic of trust lately, and what I've realized is that I attach a great deal of my trust in God to my desire for things to turn out the way I think they ought to turn out.
Yeah, we need to think about that.
Faith is not about demanding that God conform to our timelines or to our expectations.
It's about learning to surrender the outcomes that we can't control, which in the end is almost all of them.
You know, when you look at this yesterday, I talked about Zionist Christians and Zionist Jews who look at this and say, well, you know, I want...
God to confirm my timelines and my expectations about what politically is going to happen and geographically is going to happen with Israel.
And if he doesn't do it, I'm going to make it happen myself.
And most of the time that doesn't work, does it?
Pretty much all the time.
I'm going to ignore the clear moral guidelines that God has given me and I'm going to say I've got a warrant here because of my interpretation of prophecy.
I've got a warrant here to kill whoever I want and take that land.
That is a self-centered, godless, faithless worldliness, a political worldliness that we as Christians need to oppose.
And there have been Jews that have opposed that as well.
This is where a lot of people get stuck, not in belief but in trust.
You can intellectually assent to God's existence, even his goodness, and you can still live in quiet suspicion that he might not show up for you when it matters.
Can I trust him enough to really start surrendering the outcomes, the way my life will go?
Well, Proverbs says, trust in the Lord with all your heart, lean not on your own understanding, in all your ways submit to him, and he will make your path straight.
And so we look at this, and we have an intellectual assent to it, but can we really trust that?
Can we acknowledge God's version of making my path straight most likely will not line up with what I expect?
He's got a different ruler because he's the ruler, right?
Wait a minute.
That's the path that we want to go in.
It's like, I don't know.
It's my path.
Faith is not about predicting God's movements in your individual life and the different things that you want to have in your life or your prophetic understandings.
It's not about predicting his movements.
It's about trusting his character, especially when you don't understand his timing.
And so there's one more illustration here.
This person says, you know, it was after a storm.
I saw a massive oak tree that had been uprooted.
It was a very tall, very wide, very mature oak tree, and you'd expect it to be able to withstand high winds.
And so she said there were some people who were working on it.
She said, why would that thing fall over?
And the worker gave her a blunt answer and said, shallow roots and ants.
Shallow roots and ants.
He says, often you'll have these shallow roots because these trees are getting fed water by sprinklers.
So it's that convenience, that ease, that comfort in their life.
That causes them to have shallow roots.
They don't have to dig deep for the water.
And so when you think about that in our life, right, when God brings difficulty into our life, we have to struggle.
And in that struggle, we start to develop deeper roots.
And then the other thing, we found an injury in the tree.
And that injury in the tree, you had moisture come in, but you also had ants that came in.
And they started eating the wood from the inside.
So what's the application of that?
Many times, how do we get eaten from the inside?
Many times it's because there's unforgiveness on our part.
Somebody has injured us, just like there was an injury to that tree.
And then ants come in.
That bitterness, that grief, that gives way for demons, essentially, to have their way with us.
You know, you don't forgive others, God will turn you over to the torturers, to the ants, because of that injury.
And we have the ability to heal that injury.
God has that ability, too, if we submit to him.
And we can choose to forgive them.
That removes that injury and does not give place to the ants that are there.
So that is a very good image of what takes that down.
The ants were even more insidious.
They found an injury in the tree that exploited the moisture.
Wore the structure down from the inside out.
And so many times it's that injury that was done to us that we can't forgive, that hurts us, that eats us from the inside.
And so as it is with the timing in our life with things like that, it's those types of things we have to trust to God.
God will either judge that or he'll forgive it, depending on that person's relationship with him.
Because we all have things that we need God's forgiveness with, and it is all dependent on our relationship with Him and with the Lord Jesus Christ.
We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
PIANO PLAYS
Defending the American Dream.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Alright, welcome back.
I want to talk about the 4chan hack and what we have learned from that.
But before we do, I just had Travis during that break.
I said, can you look up the price of gold today?
I saw that it went up yesterday to like $32.70 something.
I said, is it maintaining that?
And he looked at a couple of different sites.
And one of them said 33, 23. The other one said 33, 41. I don't know which of them is more current.
And of course, there's day-to-day, throughout the day, that it's constantly fluctuating.
But that's just astounding.
And of course, we can all thank Trump for that and his total chaos that he has brought.
And we'll continue to bring.
You know, that's the thing that's so bullish for gold.
But again, the key thing about gold is to get outside of the surveillance issue.
And I want to thank Tony Arterbin, who's going to be on the show tomorrow with us, and Wise Wolf Gold, where you can pick up gold and silver, any small or large amount.
You can also get on a regular savings program, as we've talked about many times with Wolfpack, anywhere from $50 on up on a monthly basis, or you can do that just once.
And you can get to Wise Wolf by going to davidknight.gold.
That'll let Tony know that you came through us.
We really appreciate that, and I feel good about recommending gold regardless of what happens to the price because, folks, privacy, financial, transactional privacy, and this surveillance state that they're building is absolutely priceless.
You can't put a price on privacy.
By the way, preparing for stuff, too, let me just give a plug to the people who support the show on a regular basis.
Jack Lawson.
Jack Lawson books, civildefensemanual.com.
That was out of stock for a while, and because of a snafu on the part of the people that were handling the orders for him, he's now handling it himself.
He's got a new website.
He's got a new shipment in of all this stuff.
It's now in stock.
Civil Defense Manual.
Two paper volumes.
He doesn't do it electronically because, you know, when it hits the fan, you're going to need to have a physical paper copy of it.
But it's got a...
A lot of great information about prepping, and prepping in a lot of different ways.
Whether you're talking about water, and he's got a free chapter of that that you can check out at Jack Lawson Books.
Whether you're talking about water or whether you're talking about food preparation.
And a lot of great tips about that.
And he also has tips about self-defense, and most importantly, about how to organize with people in your community.
The right ways to do it.
And the wrong ways to do it.
Ways that are going to get you tagged as some kind of a crazy extremist or put you in the crosshairs of the government.
And there's other ways to do that.
So he's got a lot of wise advice about a lot of things there.
He's got a free chapter about water, a free chapter about nuclear fallout and that type of stuff.
So you can find that at Jack Lawson Books.
And then finally, Gerald Slenty, TrendsJournal.com.
You can save 10% off with the code NIGHT.
at trendsjournal.com.
Let's talk a little bit about 4chan and hacks.
Now, 4chan, this is a place that people have gone to for a while.
You know, they love to go there, and it's one of these message boards that are there.
They do memes and all this kind of stuff.
Well, it was hacked yesterday.
It was hacked by a rival site that has long claimed that 4chan was run by a bunch of government agents.
And so they hacked the site.
They got a lot of emails and they got a lot of credentials of the anonymous moderators and they said, look at how many of them are government agents.
And beyond that, even more than the federal government, they found a tremendous influence, or I guess infestation might be the word, from Israel.
In there.
You know, that was the, even more so than government agents.
And of course, we've always seen the government set up honeypots for this kind of stuff.
You know, the Ku Klux Klan and these things like, what was that, Elohim City or whatever, the people that are involved in the Oklahoma City.
These things are constantly run by federal agents trying to entrap people.
And this appears to be one of those things as well.
But not just federal agents, but Israelis who are doing this.
And they were by far and away the most dominant group, the Israelis, running 4chan.
There's been allegations for the longest time, especially by this group that hacked it, that they were all...
It was the Soyjack Party that pushed against this.
They said the leaked emails belonged to government agents, with some claiming that many of the IP addresses of the 4chan moderators were located in the Washington, D.C. area.
Now, other people like Wired are saying, well, we can't confirm that and so forth.
That is still what they're saying, but there may be some evidence forthcoming out of this.
The idea that 4chan is a government honeypot for law enforcement has been a popular meme.
The hack exposed a significant amount of data, including source code, internal emails, and the credentials of these moderators.
The site went offline shortly after the hack, and as of the time of this article, which was earlier today, the 4chan was still down.
There's been a lot of questions about the people who are running this kind of thing.
And, again, it looked like it was something that was there to bait people, to get them to say things that could maybe later be used against them.
And isn't that interesting?
You know, we have seen Israeli intelligence running things like Jeffrey Epstein in these, you know, sex honeypots, right, and trapping people so they could be blackmailed later.
you know perhaps they'll get people on there and with the encouragement of the government agents or the encouragement of israeli intelligence they'll encourage people to say things that could later be used against them if they have a government job or maybe you just come back to them and say well you know
i can put this out here and you'll lose your job what you said on 4chan years ago or you can help me with whatever i want to do and we'll keep it between us that type of thing again a honeypot
4chan is an ostensibly anonymous internet forum that functions...
And the dark underbelly of the web says TechCrunch.
Well, of course, this is really dark.
And the people put up really hateful stuff like, it's okay to be white.
Or Pepe the Frog.
Or Rage Comics.
Or Wojax.
We speak of Wojax, for example.
This one here, right?
Some people put this up.
Showing the China arbitrage that Trump has exposed.
And here's a Wojak who is...
TikTok is now telling people, hey, Trump is going to go up on this stuff.
And you've got a lot of people who have been basically running arbitrage, buying stuff in China, reselling it at really high luxury brand prices, like a...
Handbag here.
And they show you buy it direct in China, you can get it for $1,000.
Or you can pay the people who import it and put their name on it, and you can pay $20,000 for it.
But that's a Wojak that is there.
So, again, when you look at what is behind this, it's been very controversial for a long time.
And because they say stuff like, it's okay to be white, they say, well, these people are clearly racist.
Well, it turns out that this group, Soyjack, also known as Shardy or simply the Party, is an English-language image board that was started in September 2020.
It focuses on creating, posting, and sharing Soyjack memes, caricatures derived from the Wojak meme that I just showed you.
The site was formed primarily by users who left 4chan.
After it was locked in November 2021, with many members identifying as chuds, as jackers, or as soy teens.
These are a lot of new things to me.
Travis is laughing.
I think he knows some of these things there.
The Soy Jack Party gained notoriety for its role in the hack of 4chan.
They dubbed it Operation Soy Clips.
A lot of allegations of Israel was the dominant source of activity on 4chan's board since 2014, they found from these emails that they hacked into and released.
You got any comment about that?
Yeah, it sounds about right.
Yeah, this whole culture.
Again, it's the same thing that they run every time.
And, you know, don't fall for these types of things, right?
Stuff like that.
Is there to entrap people.
And some of the stuff that they did was clever and to make a point, because not everything that is there is being run by the Israeli agencies, intelligence agencies or government.
You know, that whole thing about it's okay to be white.
They said, okay, it's Halloween.
This is before we had to wear the masks.
It's Halloween.
Put on a mask and put up posters that say, it's just okay to be white.
No, it's not.
Not in these Ivy League schools that are getting anywhere from...
$400 million to $9 billion a year from U.S. taxpayers.
It is not okay to be white there.
Have a good day.
We'll talk to you tomorrow.
The Common Man.
They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
They created common paths to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
▲
Export Selection