Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 25, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:00:59

Tue Episode #1975: Trump’s New CDC Boss: Same as Old Boss But Now with AI Genetic Injection

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 25th of March, year of our Lord, 2025.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at an absolutely horrible pick for the CDC.
	That Trump has put in.
	And look at how the Trump media is spinning this.
	This is truly unbelievable.
	The level of delusion and deception that is involved in this.
	And quite frankly, this woman who is going to be head of the CDC has been involved with AI and advanced pharmaceutical research.
	I think this was a setup from the very get-go, in my opinion.
	I'm going to tell you why I think that.
	But we're also going to talk about...
	We have new threats from Trump.
	Of course, we never know if any of these threats are going to be followed through or not.
	These are now against Venezuela.
	It is a trade war.
	It is happening everywhere.
	And we're going to also take a look at some JFK information as well as some Easter eggs.
	And by the way, we're talking about eggs.
	We've got a crackdown on eggs.
	They're not catching so much fentanyl.
	As there are eggs crossing across the border of Mexico, and they're selling them one by one.
	What a horrible situation.
	How could we let this happen to our country?
	We'll be right back.
	Well, let's begin with the CDC.
	Yesterday afternoon, I had an interview with Dr. Jane Ruby.
	I'm not sure when it airs.
	But I saw this after the interview.
	The fact that she put out, Trump appoints a baby killer.
	As the new CDC director.
	And folks, that's not an exaggeration.
	She was pushing, she attached clips, pictures of this.
	And let me get that for you right here.
	She tweeted this out.
	Dr. Susan Monterey, who is now the CDC director.
	She's the acting CDC director.
	They're going to keep her.
	Because, you know, nothing changes.
	Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
	Same as the boss before the old boss.
	Trump. Trump.
	Biden. Trump.
	Anyway, she put this out.
	The updated COVID shot is here.
	CDC recommends everyone six months and older get an updated COVID vaccine.
	Vaccination remains the best protection against severe illness.
	Make your plans now to get updated COVID and flu shot.
	And then last summer, August of last summer.
	Today we approved and granted emergency use authorization for an updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
	They're still doing emergency use authorization in 2024.
	Folks, this is never going to change unless we demand that it changes.
	We have to demand this, and yet you've got the mainstream...
	Well, the alternative media, the mainstream media is cheering this stuff.
	And the alternative media is telling us, well, it's all the Democrats.
	This isn't happening under Trump.
	It's not happening.
	I'm not seeing anything.
	See no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil of Trump.
	And so, she also said, Trump loves trash.
	Here's your new CDC director, who is reporting to Bobby.
	And this is what Trump put out.
	This is his statement.
	I'm proud to announce Dr. Susan Monterey's blah, blah, blah, okay?
	Key relevant things to me about this.
	Says that she's been championing innovation.
	We'll talk about what kind of innovation she's been championing in just a second here.
	Transparency? Transparency.
	Where are your tests?
	Where are your data?
	Can we see any of this stuff?
	How about the VAERS?
	Issue? No, we're going to hide that stuff.
	And strong public health system.
	Now, that part of it is true.
	It is absolutely true.
	The innovation thing and a strong public health system is true.
	And we don't want those things, frankly, because you and I know what innovation is code for.
	It's code for untested experimental stuff.
	And we know what the public health system is about.
	It's about as good for health as the public education system is good for education.
	As a matter of fact, they both are designed to harm those things.
	He goes on to say, she understands the importance of protecting our children.
	Yeah, let's get them a COVID shot.
	And Americans have lost confidence, he says, says Trump.
	And the CDC...
	Due to political bias and disastrous management.
	Is that why we have lost confidence?
	Or is it because of your shot, Donald?
	Is it because of Trump's shot that we've lost confidence?
	It is 100% because of that.
	They were able to keep this ball rolling, gaslight people over the childhood vaccines and the liability protection that they got in 1986 until Trump's shot.
	And then people realized what was going on.
	Rand Paul was very upset.
	Dr. Fauci, you're going to make people vaccine hesitant.
	Good, said I. But it did make people vaccine hesitant, but they're not Trump hesitant.
	They still buy into that lie 100%.
	So, as I've been saying, and as the people who've been appointed have been saying, the purpose of RFK Jr., the purpose of Tulsi Gabbard, the purpose of Trump, is to get you to trust.
	The CDC.
	To trust the FDA.
	The NIH.
	The HHS.
	It's to get you.
	Tulsi wants you to trust the intelligence agencies.
	And Trump wants you to trust the government altogether.
	Because he's going to get rid of all those bad people.
	They're doing it right now.
	He and Musk are getting rid of it.
	So you can trust the federal government.
	Because Trump is there.
	He goes on to say.
	He says, Dr. Monterey.
	We'll work closely with our great secretary of HHS, RFK Jr.
	They will prioritize accountability, high standards, and disease protection.
	There you go.
	So, you know, trust the Trump.
	Because it is the plan.
	Look, Trump has always promoted the mRNA.
	And so now meet the new boss of the poison.
	Same as the old boss.
	Working for the old boss of the poison.
	You know, we had yesterday, and it's still up here on the board, and he said he just had a two-month-old who died of sudden infant death syndrome.
	He said he looked at the number of shots the kids get by the time they're two.
	Seven shots.
	You know, it'd be interesting, Handy, if you find out how recently that child had had the shots.
	I played many times the mother who broke up in tears when she saw the sudden adult death syndrome that they were claiming.
	That was coming after COVID, and she put two and two together.
	And she said, my son died at just a couple of months from SIDS.
	And now she said, I realize I killed my child, and she started crying.
	It's like, ma'am, you did not kill your kid.
	The pharmaceutical industry killed your kid for profits.
	And the politicians killed your kids.
	Your kid for money.
	It wasn't you.
	They did it.
	But let's take a look at what you get as a child if you follow these vaccine schedules.
	At birth, within hours, your child is supposed to get a Hep B vaccine, which you didn't give to his nephew.
	And you're not going to give him any of these other ones, right?
	Is that a promise?
	You're going to be a watchdog on this stuff.
	Okay, so one at birth.
	Then one to two months later, you get six additional shots.
	Hep B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, that's a single shot.
	Then an HIV flu, then pneumococcal conjugate, then polio, and then rotavirus, the RV thing.
	So now we're up to seven at only one to two months.
	Then we go to four months.
	They wait another two months.
	And they hit the child again with another five.
	So I was saying, you get one vaccine at birth.
	You get another six at one to two months.
	So now we're up to seven.
	They wait another two months and then they hit the babies with another five shots.
	And these are all a second dose.
	So you get five shots.
	All of which the child already had at the one- to two-month checkup.
	They double up on that.
	But now we've got 12 shots total.
	And I guess they don't have too much confidence in these shots because some of them, by the time you get to one year of age, they have given the child four doses of.
	Four doses.
	So at four months, you get another five.
	Out of the six that they got at two months, and then at six months, every two months, you're going in and getting hit with five to six vaccines.
	No wonder we have an autism epidemic here.
	So you get your third dose then of six of these things, and then you also get another type of flu, plus you get your first COVID shot at six months, which is what this new CDC director for Trump Had bragged about.
	Now everybody, six months and up, gets a COVID shot.
	So they give that to you then at the six-month length.
	So they give you eight of them at six months, one of them a COVID shot.
	And as I said, I don't know if the people are having trouble streaming.
	I looked this up because Handy talked about a child that just died of sudden infant death syndrome at two months.
	That had seven shots.
	And I said, Handy, you need to see if you can find out.
	How recently that child had gone for its batch of shots.
	Giving kids six and seven shots at a time is just outrageous, first of all.
	Secondly, to do it every two months to these young children who don't have a mature immune system.
	Even these allergies that are there, as I pointed out last week, we've had some studies saying they believe that they have evidence to show that being exposed to animal proteins, first, By injection into your blood, rather than having it introduced naturally as you eat it.
	These are children who are not eating solid food yet.
	And they're injecting all this stuff into their bloodstream.
	How insane is this?
	And so, at six months, you get eight vaccines.
	One of them, a COVID.
	The others are re-ups of things, the third doses of what the child has already gotten, at four months, at two months.
	Then, at six to twelve months, You come back in sometime and you get an RSV shot.
	Then at 12 months, they hit you with another bunch of stuff.
	They give you the MMR for the first time.
	They give you VAR.
	They give you HEP again.
	And this one is hepatitis A instead of hepatitis B. And then they give you two more repeats for the fourth dose of those two things.
	This is insane.
	So we're now up to 26 vaccines in the first year.
	26 shots.
	We have to stop this insanity.
	And it won't stop because the people who are skeptical of this are absolutely devoted to Trump and will not hold him responsible.
	And the people who are largely responsible for that are the alternative media.
	People like the Gateway Pundit.
	People like Infowars.
	Who are lying to you to protect Trump.
	Telling you it's sugar water.
	And of course we have Gateway Pundit now.
	As they attack this woman.
	They say, well the good guy, Weldon, was blocked by a rhino.
	And then look at all these bad people that were in the CDC under Biden.
	And everything folks that they complain about in this Gateway Pundit article was done by the CDC under Trump.
	Robert Redfield.
	The guy who now I call Bird Flu Bob because he's out there spreading fear saying 25-50% of us are going to die from bird flu because it's going to mutate and it's going to affect humans and I know it's going to kill half of the humans and get it.
	This is shill.
	But before I get to him, a little bit more about Susan Monterez who is now going to be Trump's second CDC director after Robert Redfield the first time.
	Her previous work looked at using artificial intelligence to improve health.
	That's a big red flag, folks.
	Remember that Trump began within a day or two of him taking office?
	He had the Stargate project there, and he had Larry Ellison saying, we're going to use artificial intelligence to analyze you if you've got cancer, and we will custom make a genetic vaccine for you.
	This is where she's been hanging out.
	And when I see this, it makes me feel like they never had any intention of putting Dave Weldon in at all.
	He was just there as a pacifier in the mouth of the MAGA people.
	So they could get this establishment AI vaccine shill in Monterey.
	As acting director, she carried out directives from the White House to scrub the agency's website of anything related to gender ideology.
	Isn't that good?
	So we're going to get rid of all the DEI stuff on the CDC website.
	But we're going to keep injecting kids with 26 shots in the first year.
	72 by the time they're a little bit older.
	We're going to continue with the MRNA.
	We're going to continue with emergency use authorization of the MRNA.
	But don't worry, we got all the DEI nonsense off.
	That's winning for the MAGA people.
	We got the DEI stuff gone.
	That's great.
	So, any information on this page promoting gender ideology is extremely inaccurate and disconnected from the immutable biological reality.
	What's that?
	We're okay?
	He said, there are only two sexes, male and female.
	And there's only one remedy that's allowed for their fake pandemic, and that's the Trump shot.
	But that stays.
	But now we can all acknowledge, now we're going to be permitted after this insanity of the Biden administration, we're now going to be permitted to say and to understand that there's only two sexes, which most of us knew that and said that only anyway.
	But they're going to continue to kill children.
	And they're going to continue to poison people.
	Not just with vaccines.
	Antibiotics, you name it.
	All that stuff is going to continue.
	And RFK Jr. is going to focus on the food supply.
	Well, that's great.
	But maybe you ought to stop poisoning people first with drugs.
	And then we can make the food healthier.
	Stop poisoning people, RFKJ.
	So, as NBC said, well, Walden had a history of questioning the safety of vaccines, but Monterey will take the helm as the U.S. is in the midst of a growing measles outbreak in Texas.
	I am so sick and tired of this nonsense.
	This is all orchestrated and it's propaganda.
	This measles thing was as orchestrated as the phony nominations and the pressure that was brought by Cassidy, the senator who made these people sign a pact with the devil or just shut them down.
	Monterey was deputy director, listen, of the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health.
	Looking at biomedical innovations, that's what Trump referred to.
	You know, using artificial intelligence to design genetic drugs.
	He's all about that, folks.
	His first administration, he got everybody to take the genetic code injection.
	Now he wants the AIGCI, the artificial intelligence genetic code injection, which is what he did on his second day.
	And that's what he's putting in at the CDC.
	You better pay attention to what this is.
	This is a planned, in my opinion, absolutely, I'm certain, I can't prove it, I'm absolutely certain.
	This is a planned move by Trump from the people that he's put in and removed to all of this AIGCI.
	So, how does a Gateway Pundit cover it?
	Gateway Pundit, you should be beyond ashamed of yourself.
	And so this is their headline.
	Just in, President Trump nominates the next CDC director after RINOs took out his first pick.
	Now, this person is a monster.
	Dr. Ruby got that right.
	And I have to ask Gateway Pundit, wait a minute, is Trump president or not?
	Is he president or is he a puppet?
	Because whenever anything goes wrong, they want to tell you that he's a puppet.
	But then they want to tell you that look at how strong he is.
	No, I see a puppet.
	I see a puppet of Musk.
	I see a puppet of the Technobros.
	I see a puppet of the pharmaceutical companies, of the billionaire club, all the rest of it.
	So this is what CDC says.
	It's not CDC.
	Gateway Pundit.
	The CDC was weaponized during the COVID-19 pandemic under then-director Rochelle Walensky.
	Time out!
	Hey, Gateway Pundit, where were you in 2020?
	I was opposing this stuff.
	You were sucking Trump!
	I'm so disgusted with these Trump suckers.
	The proxies for Trump.
	It was Trump, and it was Robert Redfield.
	That weaponized the CDC.
	They say Rochelle Walensky is a monster for what she did during the COVID pandemic.
	This is like for first or second graders.
	The MAGA people, the Gateway Pundit people, are first and second grade mentality.
	And a pack of liars, whoever wrote this thing.
	During the height of the pandemic, says the Gateway Pundit, the CDC announced a 60-day moratorium on evictions.
	No, that was done under Trump, and it was extended under Trump.
	Where were you?
	Did you complain about that when it was done by Trump?
	No, you didn't.
	You were covering for it.
	Just like Alex.
	These people make me sick.
	You covered for this when they shut down evictions and all the rest of the stuff, just basically took over private property for something that was not even a pandemic.
	And it was done by the CDC.
	And it was done under Trump and Robert Redfield.
	And it was extended once under him.
	And then Biden extended it three or four times and went to the Supreme Court.
	They said, well, you don't have the power to do this.
	They said, well, we're going to stop it soon.
	Okay, we'll let you stop it.
	We won't stop you.
	Why? And then two more months go by and the CDC is continuing to do this.
	And so then the Supreme Court revisits the case and shuts it down.
	But it was done twice under Trump.
	And so Trump, Biden, the Supreme Court, they all are guilty of letting the CDC run this stuff.
	They continue with the lies at Gateway Pundit.
	Then CDC Director Rochelle Walensky acted independently and signed the order.
	No congressional authorization needed.
	Walensky is queen, and what she says goes.
	Again, this is like it's written by a first or second grader, and it's totally false.
	She's a queen.
	She's evil queen.
	Hey, maybe you should not have a bite of that apple that Trump is offering you and enticing you with.
	Or these paying people like DeWine, the Republican governor in Ohio, who holds out that poison apple and says, hey, take a bite of this.
	You might win a million dollars.
	Who knows?
	Or you might go to sleep forever.
	So, Walensky was also behind the push for child masking policy in the U.S. No gateway pundit, it was Robert Redfield.
	Robert Redfield was there first.
	And even a year later, he was still talking about how masks were our best defense.
	He's a liar and an idiot, but he's not an idiot.
	People who believe him and the people who cover for him are idiots.
	Face masks, these face masks, are the most important, powerful public health tool we have.
	And I will appeal for all Americans, all individuals in our country, to embrace these face coverings.
	I've said it, if we did it for 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks, we'd bring this pandemic under control.
	These actually, we have clear scientific evidence.
	They work, and they are our best defense.
	You have no evidence.
	You're a total liar.
	Bird flu Bob.
	Yeah, there we go.
	Okay. This is the same guy telling you that bird flu is going to mutate, kill half of us when we get it.
	And he's telling you it's the most effective thing.
	We got it's been tested.
	It's never tested.
	And of course, it's nonsense.
	I said when all this stuff was going on in 2020.
	I talked about a study that was done in Australia.
	If you go back to when they first said, well, we got a SARS outbreak in China.
	That's when we first saw the massive use of masks.
	And they did a study in Australia.
	And it was done by somebody that was very well respected.
	She said she discovered the Parvo virus.
	I wonder if she isolated it or not.
	And nevertheless, she was an authority there.
	And she said it doesn't do anything.
	Well, common sense tells you it doesn't do anything.
	What she said was, you know, it's not kind of what they say a virus is.
	And again, I don't believe it.
	Any of this stuff.
	I don't believe the viruses.
	I don't believe the pandemics.
	I don't believe any of this stuff.
	But according to them, it's a particle that is so small.
	It would be like telling you that you could keep a mosquito out if you put up a hurricane fence.
	She said that an N95 mask, they would come back and say, well, it's not just the airborne particles.
	It's the particles that are going out with the spittle.
	Well, the reality is that the mask gets soaked after 20 minutes of wearing, which is what the scientist said.
	And after 20 minutes, it's completely soaked.
	And now you're going to put out those water particles with a boogeyman in it.
	And it's going to stay airborne longer and travel farther.
	And so as a result of her study, they said in New South Wales that if you put something down that says this is going to protect against the virus or pandemic or something like that, we're going to fine you $100,000.
	And yet to this day, you look at these boxes of masks and it says it doesn't prevent anything.
	Those people haven't been given liability protection to lie to you and to harm you, as the pharmaceutical companies have.
	So they have to tell you the truth.
	But Robert Redfield at the CDC can lie to you about the masks.
	And Gateway Pundit can lie to you about the mask and say, it was Walensky under Biden that did all this stuff.
	Have people really forgotten all of this?
	Why does anybody take a look at anything like the Gateway Pundit or Infowars?
	I just don't understand.
	Don't get your information from them.
	Look at them, yes, so that you can see what the government wants you to see.
	But don't trust them, and don't trust the CDC, and don't trust the CIA, and don't trust the presidency, even if it's got Trump in it.
	So, one family in North Carolina has now been given a green light to sue after the school force vaccinated a child without consent.
	North Carolina Supreme Court has just ruled this.
	The state high court ruled that a mother and her son can file a lawsuit against the public school system and a doctor's group over forced vaccination.
	The ruling reverses a lower court decision that a federal health emergency law prevented.
	Emily Happel and her son from filing a lawsuit.
	What federal health emergency would that be?
	Oh, would that be Trump?
	And then Biden?
	They will not say that.
	As a matter of fact, in this article, they say, well, there was an emergency order that was put out in March of 2020, but they will not say his name.
	Voldemort. No, it was Trump.
	It's worse than Voldemort, because he's real.
	Both a trial judge and the State Court of Appeals had ruled against the mother and son, saying, no, we have the PrEP Act, so you can't sue.
	So they can force you to get it, and you can't sue.
	According to that judge and the State Court of Appeals, they can force you to get a vaccine.
	And then, if you're harmed, you have no recourse either.
	Well, the Supreme Court said, this is a constitutional issue.
	This is not a tort issue.
	In other words, this is not about the injury.
	This is about the forcing.
	And that is a violation of their constitutional rights.
	And so that's why they made that decision.
	According to the family's lawsuit, the child was vaccinated August of 2021 at the age of 14, despite his opposition.
	At a testing and vaccination clinic at a Guilford County high school.
	The lawsuit says the teenager went to the clinic to be tested for COVID-19 after several cases among members of his high school's football team.
	He didn't anticipate that the clinic would also be administering vaccines.
	The teen told the staff of the clinic that he didn't want the vaccine.
	He also didn't have a signed parental consent form to receive one.
	But when the clinic was unable to reach his mother, a worker instructed a colleague to Quote, give it to him anyway, unquote.
	The mother and son made accusations of battery and alleged that their constitutional rights were violated.
	Last year, a panel of the Intermediate Level Appeals Court ruled unanimously that the Federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, that's the PREP Act, from George W. Bush.
	That shielded the school district and the physicians group from liability.
	Well, if they kill or cripple you, you can't sue them.
	But if they force this into you, according to the Supreme Court, you can sue them.
	And I think that this whole thing needs to be thrown out.
	If people in Congress, where is anybody in Congress?
	Not anybody, not Massey, not anybody.
	It's talking about getting rid of the PrEP Act.
	And as long as you're going to have that, as long as you can have the 1986 Act, that's an admission by the pharmaceutical industry that their products are unsafe.
	They know very well that they're poisoning you.
	And so does the President, so does the Congress, Republican and Democrat.
	They all know that they're poisoning you.
	And they all know that they're going to hold the pharmaceutical companies above any harm.
	By the way, some of these tariffs, which we're going to get to next.
	Trump is going to protect pharmaceutical companies from tariffs.
	How about that?
	They get protected from liability.
	They get protected from competition.
	And they have the government give them the money.
	Give them the vaccine.
	Give them the formula.
	Give them the money.
	Tell them to run it out.
	It's just, it's beyond disgusting, isn't it?
	So, these courts were saying that because of the PrEP Act, you had no rights.
	If you're harmed.
	No rights to refuse and no recourse, I should say, if you're harmed.
	And so, following through with this, now this is slay news.
	This is not gateway pundit.
	This is slay news.
	They said, an emergency declaration in response to COVID-19 was made in March of 2020, activating the federal law's immunity provisions, the PrEP Act.
	So we have Trump activating this obscene PrEP Act.
	Prepared by another Republican president, George W. Bush.
	And they're fine with that.
	They don't want you to know, though.
	I wonder who it was, Slay News, that did that emergency act on March the 13th, Friday the 13th, 2020.
	Who do you think that might be?
	You don't want to say it, do you?
	Because you're a Trump sucker proxy as well.
	So, the Chief Justice, Paul Newby.
	Wrote in the prevailing opinion, and I know of this guy.
	I don't know him personally, but I know this guy in North Carolina.
	He's a conservative.
	Apparently still is.
	A real conservative, not a Trump GOP, whatever you want to call these people.
	In the prevailing opinion, he wrote that the law did not prevent the mother and son from suing on allegations that their rights in the state constitution had been violated.
	The judge said a parent has a right to control their child's upbringing.
	And the right of a competent person to refuse forced non-mandatory medical treatment.
	Now, you know, we go back and we look at the case.
	I can't remember what the name was.
	I want to say Sullivan, but I don't think that was it.
	The Massachusetts case where they said, well, look, this person took it to the Supreme Court.
	Massachusetts wanted to inject him for whatever, a vaccination.
	He said no.
	And see, they made, he lost.
	The Supreme Court said, no, you got to get it.
	Well, here's the thing that is usually skipped over.
	He didn't get the vaccine.
	He paid the fine.
	They said, you get the vaccine or you pay a fine.
	The Supreme Court made him pay the fine.
	But nobody compelled him to take the vaccine.
	And I don't care if it's mandatory or not.
	As I said then, and I mean it now, that's the line for me and my family.
	Somebody comes with something like that, I consider that...
	The same as if they're trying to inject me with something fatal.
	And I'll do my best to inject them with the lead that I've got.
	The law's plain text prompted a majority of justices to conclude that immunity only covers tort injuries.
	In other words, so if you really harm somebody, well, you don't have any right to get any compensation from that.
	If they cripple you, they kill you.
	Family member, you have no rights there.
	But they can't force you to do that.
	They can offer you a million-dollar lottery.
	I still can't believe that DeWine did that.
	But we're going to have another governor just like him, probably in Ohio.
	I'm not in Ohio, but the people there.
	Going to have another pharmaceutical bro.
	Going to have Rama Slimy as governor there.
	He was working with DeWine when all that stuff was happening.
	People will vote him in.
	Again, this is the delusion that is happening out there.
	Nobody wants to hold the Republicans responsible for what they did.
	And are doing.
	Continuing to do.
	So, they said, tort injuries are not constitutional violations.
	The PrEP Act does not bar plaintiffs' constitutional claims.
	So, the dissenting justice was a liberal.
	Because, look, they are always going to go for this stuff.
	This is why they put Trump in.
	You see, the conservatives are going to push back against this stuff.
	They understand it's wrong in principle.
	So you've got to have somebody that they trust, like Trump.
	So they'll forget about the principles.
	And so they'll trust him, and they'll do it anyway.
	That's why they installed him in 2016.
	That's why they installed him in 2024.
	To gain people's trust.
	And he's going to give it to us good and hard.
	And you can see it lining up.
	Personnel is policy.
	You want to take a look at the personnel at CDC?
	That's Trump's policy.
	You want to take a look at Robert Redfield and what he did?
	That's Trump.
	Trump owns that.
	The buck doesn't just stop with him.
	It started with him.
	He paid for it all.
	So we're going to take a break.
	When we come back, we're going to talk about the three children who died from Routine childhood vaccinations.
	We're talking about these childhood vaccinations and how serious they are.
	Is RFK Jr. really going to do anything about it?
	I really don't think so.
	On Rumble, don't frag me, bro, says the number of athletes who have died of cardiac arrest in the last three years is roughly equivalent to the number that died in the prior 38 years.
	That's insane.
	I'm surprised.
	I would have thought it would have been more than that.
	I'm sure that's 38 years combined.
	Now we have, as a regular thing, this is the new normal.
	If you want to participate in high school sports, because, again, this is a kid.
	He's in high school.
	He's on the football team, whatever.
	So to participate in sports, you've got to get the COVID shot so you can have a heart attack.
	And so now it's become just, well, we're now going to test all the kids with an electrocardiogram.
	See how their heart is.
	Why are we doing that?
	Never did that before.
	Rockfin. Heron H. Hi, all bad news from my home, Australia.
	My young cousin under 30 has been diagnosed with pericarditis.
	I'm so sorry.
	And a spot on her lung.
	I was jabbed.
	I'm so sorry.
	Well, we'll keep your cousin, 30 years old, we'll keep him in our prayers.
	I'm so sorry that that happened.
	Yeah, we had Franklin Graham, big cheerleader for the vaccine.
	He got pericarditis afterwards.
	He was successful in terms of treating that.
	I don't know what the spot on her lung is.
	I hope that is not the turbo cancer.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
	MUSIC CONTINUES Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	A penny saved is a penny earned.
	Though, that's gotten tougher since they've stopped making them.
	Maybe it's time to start saving a different type of coin, such as the new David Knight Show supporter commemorative coin.
	Saving these coins earns support for independent media, featuring striking bas-relief with bold raised details and premium painted accents.
	It's not just a trinket, but a statement, a declaration.
	A way to show you refuse to be controlled by the establishment.
	It's a limited run of just 100 coins.
	So, much like the penny, when they're gone, they're gone.
	They silence independent voices.
	They censor the truth.
	But you can stand with real journalism and own a piece of the resistance.
	These coins saved is The David Knight Show sustained.
	Available now at TheDavidKnightShow.com You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, welcome back.
	And Rumble, Jerry Alitalo says, 1979 swine flu vaccine killed 25 to 50 Americans.
	Swine flu vaccination program stopped.
	2020 ongoing mRNA vaccines killed 40,000 Americans.
	mRNA vaccination program rolls along unmolested.
	I don't know what the total is.
	These people have lied to us up one side and down the other.
	They have done everything they can to obscure, to lie to us directly, to hide data.
	You want to talk about somebody being transparent?
	Come on.
	There is nobody transparent.
	Everybody's saying, well, RFK Jr., he's cheering the vaccines because he wants to be able to get those numbers that are there.
	We already know enough that you could shut this down.
	You talk about the swine flu thing.
	We had a situation where just...
	A couple of people died after a vaccine that had nine states ban it.
	Has any state banned this?
	No. The states could ban it.
	We don't have any Republican governors, including DeSantis, who will ban it.
	You know, they're out there telling people, I wouldn't get it if I were you.
	You know, that's the Tucker Carlson approach.
	He has on these vaccine cheerleaders.
	Mark Siegel and other people come on and push, push, push, push, push.
	Tell you just how vital it is, how safe it is, how tested it's become.
	And it's effective, and it's the only thing that's going to save you from this imaginary thing that is out there.
	And then Tucker Carlson comes back and goes, kind of shrugs, rolls his eyes, or might say, well, I don't know, I'm not getting it.
	That's it.
	And that's the best you're going to get from the Republicans.
	They're going to let these people run their course, continuing to kill people.
	It's just disgusting.
	What is government for?
	Is it supposed to stop murder?
	Oh, we're going to get the Venezuelan gangs out of here.
	Why don't you get the Pfizer and Moderna gangs out of here?
	Send them to El Salvador.
	Put them in the high security prison.
	I'd like to see those.
	Well, I wouldn't want to see those guys stripped down.
	They've got pretty ugly bodies, but the other guys are probably, the young guys are in pretty good shape.
	I would not want to see these old Pfizer and Moderna guys stripped down, you know, without a shirt.
	But that's where they should be.
	That's the kind of...
	Punishment they ought to be given.
	Anyway, after three children died within 24 hours of routine vaccines, researchers are sounding an alarm.
	Now, this is in Japan.
	We had a similar situation in 2018.
	Do you remember during the confirmation hearings of RFK Jr.?
	They brought up the fact that Samoa stopped the MMR vaccines.
	Well, the reason that they stopped it...
	Which he didn't say.
	He didn't talk about the fact that two toddlers at the age of two went in to get their routine vaccines.
	And the first, the whole line of them, the first child gets a shot and immediately dies.
	And all the other mothers are, okay, we're going to leave now.
	No, no, no, don't leave.
	That doesn't have anything to do with the vaccine.
	So they get another.
	Mother to bring her child there and sacrifice her child on the altar of pharmaceutical profits.
	And the child immediately dies.
	And so that was a pretty big issue.
	And they stopped the vaccines temporarily in Samoa.
	And so when RFK Jr. came up for his confirmation hearing, they blamed it on him that he stopped it.
	They made that decision themselves.
	You know, we don't need to have RFK Jr. stop the vaccines for us.
	We can stop the vaccines.
	We can take our children out of those doctors' offices, not sacrifice them to these greedy poisoners.
	And that's what we have to do.
	Folks, there is no help coming from Washington.
	There is no help coming from the state.
	You've got to do this yourself.
	And you need to understand that even if they come after you, They're going to send CPS after you, whatever they're going to do.
	It's very inspiring to me to hear the story of Carl Hess, who was the speechwriter for Barry Goldwater.
	He was, as Barry Goldwater called him, my Shakespeare.
	He was the one who came up with a line that they really hung Goldwater with.
	But it was perfect.
	It's a perfect line.
	About coercion and about liberty.
	And so his mother had homeschooled him back in the 30s.
	And she had to operate like she was running a meth lab in order to homeschool him.
	And constantly changing homes, constantly moving to stay one step ahead of the truancy officers who had taken him away from her.
	But she homeschooled him.
	And he said, moderation in defense of liberty is no virtue.
	Let's see, what was it?
	Extremism in defense of liberty is no virtue.
	And a moderation in pursuit of justice is, let's see, I'm drawing a blank here.
	Anyway, you know what I'm talking about.
	You know the thing?
	I'm doing Joe Biden with you.
	You know the thing?
	So, extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit of justice is no fill-in-the-blank.
	Virtue. Virtue.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Travis has got a much younger brain.
	Is this still working?
	Okay. Thank you.
	We'll get there eventually.
	But it was an inspiration to me that he was a very well-educated guy.
	You know, you can get a good education.
	One of these ponytail libertarians that were out there.
	I met him in the 80s.
	He had a ponytail.
	He had an earring and everything.
	So he had been all over the place.
	I mean, he had been with Barry Goldwater.
	He went from there to the Black Panthers.
	But he was consistent when it came to liberty.
	The guy was kind of left-leaning libertarian, obviously.
	But look, the bottom line is...
	And the reason I brought up this story and messed up the quote and everything else, I wasn't planning on talking about it, obviously.
	But the point is that if as a parent you're determined to save your child, she was that determined that she would risk jail, risk separation, losing her child, in order to give him a proper education.
	If necessary, you do that to educate your child.
	If necessary, you do that.
	To save your child from the vaccine.
	We don't need permission from the government to save our children.
	We need to have a backbone, a spine, and determination, like Carl Hess's mother did.
	So don't depend on these people.
	I'll give you an example of why you don't want to depend on them.
	Here is RFK Jr. when questioned in his confirmation hearing.
	He became so malleable, so...
	So deferential and obsequious, so that he could get into power.
	I recommend that children follow the CDC schedule, and I will support the CDC schedule when I get in there.
	Now, that graphic there, so the CDC schedule supports, how many, pull that back up, 10 vaccines up to the first year.
	No, no, no.
	I counted them for you.
	26. 26. 10 would be bad enough.
	They're giving them...
	In one of the visits, they get eight shots in just one visit, and one of them is the COVID shot.
	That's at six months.
	You're going to trust the well-being of your child to this pedophile Jeffrey Epstein liar, RFK Jr.?
	Seriously? Come on, folks.
	He's been a lifelong Democrat.
	He's been a lifelong Kennedy, as a matter of fact.
	He's been a Kennedy all of his life.
	And he's still a Kennedy as far as I'm concerned.
	And you know what that means.
	Do I have to spell it out for you?
	Uncle Ted and the rest of them, right?
	His only saving grace is that he didn't abandon a drowning woman that he was having a sexual adulterous affair with.
	Not the Uncle Ted from yesterday.
	Different Ted.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	The bad Uncle Ted.
	The one that's worse than Ted Kaczynski.
	Ted Kennedy.
	He's even worse than Ted Kaczynski.
	The mass murderer.
	Of course, he's probably got a lot of blood on his hands as well in terms of helping pharmaceutical companies, in terms of helping the military-industrial complex with their wars, and you name it.
	Anyway, citing the deaths of three Japanese children within 24 hours of getting their routine childhood immunizations.
	They've called for a re-evaluation of the risks and the benefits of currently approved vaccines.
	They also addressed the increase in post-vaccination adverse events following the rollout of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, the Trump shots.
	As I've said before, the Trump shots that were sent around the world to his shame.
	So they said globally, the authors of this study in Japan said, Throughout the world, globally, questioning vaccination has been considered to be taboo.
	That's right.
	You've got to bow to the vaccine gods in order to get your power.
	And then what do you think people who have that kind of a character, what do you think they're going to do with that power?
	Come on.
	And strong social pressure to conform and to be vaccinated.
	The aggressive promotion of the coronavirus vaccine.
	Through biased messaging remains vividly remembered.
	It's still going on.
	She's pushing this.
	She just reauthorized this in August of 2024.
	This new CDC person.
	Sure, do whatever you want.
	Like I said before, FDA means free to do anything.
	atmosphere of conformity may partially explain the lack of significant progress in critically reviewing vaccination practices.
	Furthermore, they said, consideration should be given to temporarily suspending the current vaccination program to determine the full extent of potential harm.
	And First, do no harm?
	Well, that means you first do no pharma.
	Trial Site News said these bold assertions...
	Supported by troubling real-world data pose a challenge to public health authorities.
	Vaccine manufacturers and media narratives that continue to frame questioning vaccine as anti-science.
	And we don't want to criticize and be anti-Trump, right?
	So don't be anti-vaccine and don't be anti-Trump.
	Or people won't like you.
	And they will kick you off of media platforms.
	Fire you, even.
	So, trust RFK Jr.
	Trust Trump.
	Trust is the plan.
	So, who were these children that died?
	Three children.
	A healthy two-month-old boy who experienced sudden illness 30 minutes after receiving the HIV, rotavirus, and pneumococcal vaccines.
	Again, same stuff, routine childhood vaccines that we're getting here.
	We have twice that many.
	I have those same three plus another three.
	At two months, they get six.
	They already got one in the U.S. They start in Japan at two months.
	We start at birth.
	They start sticking our kids at birth.
	And so, two months later, you get six vaccines.
	One at birth, and two months later, you get six.
	In Japan, you don't get any at birth.
	At two months, they give you three.
	And the boy died 59 minutes after vaccination.
	Then a six-month-old girl with cold symptoms who was found dead in her bedroom one day after receiving the hepatitis B, the pneumococcal, and the four-in-one pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, polio vaccines.
	Again, same stuff we have.
	A three-year-old boy with asthmatic bronchitis, allergic rhinitis, And febrile convulsions, a fever, who appeared lethargic and had fever eight hours after receiving the Japanese encephalitis vaccine.
	He experienced cardiopulmonary arrest ten hours after vaccination.
	Detailed investigations, including autopsies, experts were unable to evaluate a causal link to vaccination.
	Instead, they said the deaths were classified as, quote, evaluation not possible.
	Let's be a little bit more clear about that.
	It's not evaluation not possible.
	It's evaluation not permissible.
	Not permitted to talk about this.
	And, you know, there's a horrific story.
	I remember it was, I think it was covered by reason.
	They would not talk, though, about the autism aspect and vaccines.
	They talked about the CPS aspect of it and how horrific it was.
	The fact that you had a couple of parents who had agreed that they were not going to vaccinate their kids.
	They moved to Tennessee because they did not want to have to vaccinate their kids.
	And they wanted to homeschool them.
	Then the parents get a divorce.
	In the divorce court, the judge finds out the kids are not vaccinated and has a fit because that judge thinks that not vaccinating your kids is child abuse.
	No, it's exactly the opposite.
	It's exactly the opposite.
	And so he says, if one of you will agree to vaccinate the kids, I'll give you custody right now.
	The mother agreed.
	It was all set up by her lawyer, who knew that.
	So she gets custody of the kids, and she immediately takes them down to a pediatrician who gets them all caught up.
	And it was something like 18 vaccines that these kids needed to have, they said.
	Because, and why 18 instead of, like I said before, 26 in just the first year?
	Because what they're doing is...
	And that first year, when you get 26 shots, they're giving some of those shots, they're giving those to you four times for certain things.
	Four times in the first year.
	And so you're getting the adjuvants and all the rest of this stuff 26 times.
	But you're not getting that much unique stuff, I guess.
	Depending on the purity of the vaccine, I guess you could get a lot of unique stuff.
	Anyway, all three kids got sick.
	The oldest daughter already had some issues, so the pediatrician didn't give her all the vaccines at once.
	But the pediatrician, and the pediatrician should be sued for malpractice, gave all of those shots to the two boys.
	They both went immediately into intensive care.
	One of them was able to come out of it after a couple of days.
	The other one was in for a longer period of time and never recovered.
	The father, because the mother walked away at that point, after she poisoned her kids, gave them autism, she walks away.
	Now the father has to take care of this child and try to support them as well.
	The child is in diapers.
	And now is like 10 years old or something like that.
	But that's clear.
	Isn't it clear that the autism came from the vaccines?
	Well, we won't talk about that.
	Not allowed to talk about that.
	Get kicked off of places like YouTube and Spotify and things like that if you talk about that.
	Now, Joe Rogan's just fine.
	Joe Rogan can push you DMT and he can push you mushrooms, you name it.
	He can push the vaccines.
	Joe Rogan was having everybody that came into his studio.
	They had to follow the COVID protocols.
	They had to get tested and this and that.
	So, yeah, that's okay.
	Anyway, according to the study, Conclusions that say evaluation is not possible.
	They said that's similar to assessments of deaths following coronavirus vaccination, and it raises concerns about possible external pressure or vested interest influencing such determinations.
	You think so?
	That's what I said before.
	Evaluation not possible?
	No, it is possible.
	It's always possible.
	It's not permitted.
	It's not permissible.
	So, again, this is covered by Children's Health Defense.
	You know, they need to hold RFK Jr.'s feet to the fire on this stuff.
	Because he's just out there playing with his food.
	Playing with your food.
	He needs to first do no harm.
	He needs to stop these mRNA vaccines.
	He needs to stop this childhood vaccine schedule.
	He's not doing anything about this.
	And again, this is not COVID.
	This is the childhood vaccine schedule.
	In Japan, vaccines are administered starting at two months of age.
	By adulthood, a child will have received vaccines for almost 14 different diseases.
	Now, I'm sure that just like in the United States, they're going to repeat some of those.
	You know, in the first year, like I said, you get 26 shots in the U.S. And some of those shots are four doses for a particular disease.
	But we have the worst of any country here in the United States.
	Because our pharmaceutical companies have the most control over the government.
	The government is the servant of the pharmaceutical industry, just like it's the servant of Israel.
	A peer-reviewed study published in Curitus in 2023 examined childhood vaccination in highly developed countries, finding a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses infants receive and the infant mortality rates.
	We know this.
	I don't need another study.
	Identified a positive statistical correlation between infant mortality rates and the number of vaccine doses that they received.
	Rumble, SVCAT.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	And I just want to say, let everybody know, Rumble is working in terms of tips.
	this rock fan that we've had issues not being able to get the money out not because they've shut anything down for us but just because there's they put everything in a crypto currency and that cryptocurrency there's no buyers for right now so it gets trapped in there so we really do appreciate need your support our gas gauge is really low this month we only got Yes, please support my son.
	He eats so much.
	So much.
	Yeah, he eats a lot.
	He does.
	And it shows.
	It's all there in his little cheeks.
	His legs.
	If you're lucky, I'll bring him back out.
	Yeah. Once you see the cheeks later.
	We'd love to see him.
	Anyway, SV Cat said, I'm about to have my first grandchild and she will never feel the end of a needle.
	Good for you.
	That's the way we feel about it.
	Be careful about antibiotics as well.
	I've had both my mother and my son harmed with antibiotics.
	Take a look and prepare in advance for what you're going to need if kids get an infection.
	There's a lot of good stuff out there.
	Topical stuff, manuka honey, silver, a lot of things like that that are very, very effective.
	We've used those types of things, but again, be very wary of all pharmaceutical stuff, especially antibiotics.
	So, they said, again, same thing in Japan with COVID.
	If you get sick, you die.
	Within two weeks of getting the vaccine, you're counted as being unvaccinated.
	It's all a lie.
	Well, it wasn't just the poison that Trump did, and it wasn't just the CDC, as Gateway Pundit said.
	Well, the CDC under Rochelle Walensky extended its power to shut down evictions and foreclosures for people who couldn't pay because they were told by Trump that they couldn't work, and it was Trump's CDC that began that whole process.
	And, of course, it was Trump who spent trillions of dollars and set us on a new trajectory of debt with all this stuff.
	And the corruption that was there.
	People I've interviewed, said one guy, said I saw how this program's going to run and I called him up and said this is going to be riddled with fraud and corruption.
	I said, well, we haven't had any corruption yet.
	He says, you haven't even started the program yet.
	But the way this thing is designed is going to be stealing candy from a baby to take all this stuff.
	Well, we see former squad member Cori Bush's husband is charged with COVID relief fraud.
	Now, Zero Hedge and the Trump sucker proxy media will tell you, oh, look, bad squad.
	Yes, I don't like the squad.
	They're Marxists.
	I don't like them.
	I'm not defending the squad.
	How was Cori Bush's husband able to take this money?
	It's because of Trump's program, Zero Hedge.
	Come on!
	The Payroll Protection Program, the PPP, and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan.
	So on April the 3rd, 2020, who was president then, Zero Hedge?
	Can you say the name?
	I know you can, but you won't, will you?
	Trump was there April 3rd, 2020.
	And so this 46-year-old Courtney Merritts, the husband of Cori Bush, took out, applied for the EIDL from the small business loan.
	He also claimed the business had six employees, gross revenue of $32,000 in the year leading up to the COVID disaster declarations, and they just shoveled the cash to him.
	Well, this stuff is going on forever and ever, isn't it?
	Nothing is changing.
	We now have somebody, CDC director, who is now going to add artificial intelligence to the genetic code injection.
	But the genetic code injection just is like kind of the ever-ready bunny of poison.
	This person is talking about how this spike is just being reproduced forever.
	Can you tell us how long ago were you vaccinated?
	My first vaccine was December 23rd, 2020.
	And my last vaccine was December 29th, 2021.
	And I am still producing spike proteins continuously.
	I'm at currently day 1542, which blows the Yale study out of the water.
	And I was a participant in that study, but they didn't want to put my data in there.
	I wonder why.
	Yeah, so what Lindsay has just said, that's why I asked her the question.
	She's 1,500 days out and she's still making spike protein.
	That is what is the scariest shit that I've ever heard.
	And that's why this becomes...
	So you know what Jay Bhattachary and Bobby Kennedy and all of these people need to do is they need to spend some money to stop this disease.
	We have to.
	Because we've got to figure out why is she producing spike, what's it coming from, and then what can we do to interfere, to break the cycle?
	It should be an absolute priority.
	Instead of the NIH, you know that they were spending millions of dollars on grants studying vaccine hesitancy.
	They were giving the NIH grants to study vaccine hesitancy.
	What they should be doing is studying vaccine harms at a fundamental level of what we can do.
	Because Lindsay is not alone.
	She's not alone.
	Paul, let me say something about that.
	Yes. Welcome in, Pierre.
	And it's not that Lindsay has a disease.
	It's that she has a jab reaction, doesn't she?
	Clear. It's been caused by COVID.
	This is caused from the jab.
	Is that clear to you as her doctor?
	Yeah. I'll give you full range to discuss all and everything of my medical records.
	For sure.
	I think I'll talk about you in the general, Lindsay, because Lindsay is not too unlike many, many patients in my practice.
	I would say in the spectrum of severity, she's pretty up there.
	But I have, I mean, in my practice, we have hundreds and hundreds of patients between me and my partner.
	All right, well, that was Dr. Pierre Corey, a doctor who is actually her doctor.
	She's an RN, Lindsay House.
	Also on that call, you didn't hear James Roguski, who has followed the WHO, the pandemic treaty, and the rest of the stuff very carefully.
	Paul Merrick was one who was talking most of the time there.
	You also heard from Liz Gunn.
	But the bottom line is that here we are.
	1500 days plus into this.
	Her body is still producing the spike protein.
	She was part of that study.
	They excluded her.
	Somebody drops out or dies, they exclude them as well.
	This is the way it goes.
	But we have now the Atlantic saying that we are getting close to the bird flu tipping point.
	Why do they say that?
	Well, that...
	If you want to follow James Roguski, he does great work.
	You can find him on Substack at James Roguski.
	Yes, yes, he does very good work.
	Robert Kennedy is the villain in this story from The Atlantic.
	And listen to the insanity of this.
	He said he mused about a novel way to contain the bird sickness.
	He said, just let it run through the flock so we can identify the birds.
	And the ones who survive will be immune to it.
	That's novel.
	And they said, that's really crazy.
	They said that could involve millions of horrible deaths.
	Hey, seriously?
	The USDA is out there killing tens of millions of chickens alone.
	And they are healthy birds.
	They're not even sick.
	That's the insanity.
	Of killing these healthy birds.
	Murder most fowl, I guess we could say.
	Because they're going to murder most of the fowl.
	Which is one PCR test.
	So they said, we're close to getting to a tipping point, says the Atlantic.
	And understand, this is a very establishment publication.
	Connected with the CIA, NATO, the powers that be.
	They said, We're going to get to a tipping point soon.
	So when we might need to change our daily behavior.
	I'm not changing my behavior.
	I hope you're not going to change your behavior.
	I didn't change my behavior in 2020.
	Well, I didn't go to some of the restaurants that I'd usually go to, but I didn't change it.
	I'll just finish with this.
	Some positive news here.
	High-dose vitamin D may slow progression of MS-like neurological disorder.
	Again, do your own research.
	You can also get vitamin D getting out in the sun.
	Get some fresh air as well.
	That's a good thing to have.
	And rather than having something that is, you know, you have to be careful what you take and you also need to take it with vitamin K if you take it.
	But the bottom line is that when you look at something like MS, MS-like neurological disorders, what was it?
	It was a nutritional deficiency.
	That was there.
	And we overlook that.
	It used to be, the same people said, first do no harm, said let food be your medicine.
	You need to first focus for yourself on nutrition.
	RFK Jr. is right about that, how important nutrition is.
	However, he's not stopping the harm that is going out to other people.
	You can stop the harm.
	You cannot participate in this insanity.
	But then you do need to participate in making sure that your food is good quality and that you're getting proper nutrition.
	And I think most of the stuff that is identified as a boogeyman or cooties or viruses or whatever, a lot of that is coming from nutritional deficiency.
	That's why I mentioned this.
	They look at a disease.
	They don't know what is causing it.
	And they attribute it to a virus, which they can't isolate.
	And haven't isolated and haven't observed.
	And they hide the data from you.
	They hide the fact that they pretend that they've isolated these viruses.
	They pretend they've done science on them.
	The reality, I think, is that they're just placeholders for a lot of other things, including nutritional deficiency.
	On Rumble, Khan thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	He says, all of my help comes from the Lord.
	That is absolutely true.
	Mine as well.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
	Good evening.
	Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow, or more specifically, what comes out the other end.
	Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda, Even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat.
	The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.
	Carefully contrive to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in, jackboots and all, with their solutions.
	Because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags?
	But one must wonder, is this truly about saving the planet, or are we simply being led to pasture?
	Is it merely a MacGuffin?
	The David Knight show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny.
	And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull.
	So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show.
	And now back to our regularly scheduled program.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Knight Show.
	Alright, welcome back.
	Let's talk a little bit about Trump coming after Venezuela.
	And I've said with tariffs, any country buying Venezuelan oil will get hit with a 25% tariff.
	Maybe in addition to what they've already got.
	So, what is that?
	Folks, you can call it a tariff if you want.
	It's a sanction.
	Essentially, I've said this from the very beginning, Trump's tariffs are not about revenue.
	They are not about protecting any particular industry.
	They're about going to war with various countries.
	And so in that context, why are we going to war with Canada?
	This is insane.
	It's absolutely insane.
	And of course, nobody in all these articles where they talk about it say, well, we don't know exactly when or if he's going to do this.
	It's total chaos that he's creating.
	Total economic chaos.
	No rationale for it that is reasonable, and nobody knows if it's going to happen or not.
	So, 25% tariff on, quote, any country that purchases oil and or gas from Venezuela.
	That's a sanction.
	How did the sanctions work out for Biden against Russia?
	They didn't.
	Right away, Russia made $320 billion more.
	By selling, it shot the price of oil so high, the Biden sanctions did, that Russia was able to significantly discount it and get paid in gold or their own currency instead of the U.S. currency and still make a windfall profit of $320 billion.
	As a matter of fact, when you look, it just recently came out that the EU...
	Has continued to buy oil and gas from Russia, and they have bought more oil and gas from Russia than they have given in funds to Ukraine.
	This is the fraud of sanctions.
	And, of course, tariffs are just taxes.
	So the tariffs, the taxes, which would go into effect April 2nd, should Trump implement them?
	Again, you always have to have these caveats here.
	We don't know what he's going to do.
	He's so unpredictable.
	You know, for the longest time, conservatives supported it.
	They didn't really care so much about whether or not you had a minimum wage or not.
	They just didn't want it changed.
	Just don't change anything.
	And that's why I never called myself a conservative.
	I didn't want to keep the status quo in a lot of different areas.
	But their whole thing was, all right, you got a minimum wage and it's this.
	Don't change it.
	Just leave it alone.
	They wouldn't talk about get rid of the minimum wage or whatever.
	They wouldn't oppose any of the policies.
	They were always a ratcheting effect.
	The liberals were in the driver's seat.
	The liberals would enact new policies, and the conservatives would say, okay, fine, just leave it the way it is.
	Don't change it.
	And part of the argument for that was constantly changing these policies creates this kind of back-and-forth chaos that is very disruptive, and you can't plan your life, let alone your business.
	And this kind of chaos.
	But they're all silent when Trump does it.
	Everyone is afraid to criticize Trump for this kind of froth and chaos back and forth.
	So they said, should Trump implement them?
	It'd be a major source of revenue for the Maduro government, rather it would cut it, while ratcheting up pressure on China, which is a major purchaser of Venezuelan crude.
	People say, oh, that's great.
	It's going to punish China.
	Yeah, it'll punish China just like Biden's sanctions punished Russia.
	It made all of us pay more for oil and gas.
	And Putin made more profits.
	Was that a good deal?
	Venezuela has purposefully and deceitfully sent to the United States undercover tens of thousands of High-level and other criminals, dangerous criminals, many of whom are murderers and people of very violent nature, and on and on.
	Needless to say, the news sent oil immediately higher on the Monday trade.
	Again, these types of things are happening.
	And you can catch these criminals, you can stop them from coming into the country, and they are sending a lot of people back to Venezuela.
	Some of them, I think, even this...
	Trendy Arugua.
	I guess that's how it's pronounced.
	I didn't ever bother to look it up.
	But it is Trendy Arugua or something, right?
	Let's just call them Trendy.
	The Trendy gang, because they are trending in the media.
	That's all the media wants to talk about is the Trendys.
	So we can take the Trendys and we can send them to Venezuela or to El Salvador or to anywhere.
	I mean, get them out of here.
	The move would particularly affect China, they say.
	But again...
	Did the Biden sanctions affect Russia?
	No. Because a lot of people just went around them.
	And even the people, you know, if you get a good enough price, you pump up the price, and now Russia's able to sell the stuff, much, much higher price, getting gold for it.
	Trump announced this on Truth Social that he was reversing the concessions of the oil transaction agreement dated November 26, 2022.
	These were concessions that were enacted by Biden for the benefit of Chevron.
	Smedley Butler said, I went to war for United Fruit Company all over Central and South America.
	He said, war is just a racket.
	It's a gangster gang, right, that's going around places.
	And now it's not the fruit companies, it's the oil companies like Chevron.
	So the news comes one day after Venezuela agreed to resume accepting U.S. deportations of illegal immigrants.
	So what's that about?
	See? It doesn't.
	You want to get rid of these people?
	You want to send them back to Venezuela?
	They said, okay, we'll take them.
	I'm going to put tariffs on you for that.
	It doesn't make any sense.
	No sense whatsoever.
	So they agreed to take the trendies back, and then he adds new tariffs.
	The largest buyers of Venezuelan oil include U.S. refineries, not just China.
	Valero, most of the other Venezuelan oil source, Phillips 66, PBF, and Chevron's Pascagoula facility in Mississippi.
	Interesting that Venezuela has the world's largest proven crude oil reserves as of 2023.
	In other words, they've got more oil than Saudi Arabia.
	Than any of these Middle Eastern Arab countries.
	But they're only producing, and they've got reserves, proven reserves, of 303 billion barrels.
	They're only producing, however, 875,000.
	They have billions of barrels, and they're producing thousands of them.
	So if you're producing 875,000, then it's going to be, A day.
	Then you've got a 346,000 day supply of oil.
	That's going to be a long, long time.
	Should have calculated that out in years, but I didn't do it.
	Anyway, they're a mess.
	And they only, even though they've got the largest reserves, because their country is such a mess, because it is a tyrannical, totalitarian, communist dictatorship, they only supply 0.9% of the world's oil.
	But Trump is going to still crack down on it, even though they said we will take back the illegal immigrants.
	So Trump is cracking down on Venezuela and on Iranian oil production while back-channeling with the Saudis and the UAE to allow OPEC to boost overall output in April.
	Now what is behind that?
	What that tells you is that in spite of all this nonsense about CO2 and carbon this and carbon that.
	And you can't use fuel and you can't burn anything.
	It tells you that these people are all still very much focused on oil.
	Oil is real.
	Oil and coal and gas, natural gas, that's real energy.
	Just like gold is real money.
	And they are going to find a way.
	If he's going to shut down Venezuelan oil, he's going to find another source for it because that is real energy.
	So the U.S. may exclude sector-specific tariffs on April 2nd, but the situation is fluid.
	Yeah, fluid like crude oil.
	Look, it's just nobody knows.
	This is what is wrecking the markets.
	It's just chaos.
	It's vacillation.
	And I think it's intentional.
	So April 2nd, Trump has said he's going to tout that as Liberation Day for the U.S. economy.
	When he's going to impose all kinds of new taxes on us.
	How's that for double think, double speak?
	That's truly Orwellian, isn't it?
	He should have done that on April the 1st.
	Yeah, Liberation Day.
	Fooled you, huh?
	Trump's whirlwind tariff offensive since his January inauguration has been marked by threats, by reversals, by delays, sometimes within hours of the deadlines.
	As his trade team formulates policy on the fly.
	None of these guys knows what they're talking about.
	As a matter of fact, you've got Scott Besant, the Treasury Secretary, goes on one news program.
	And then you have Hassett, who goes on to another program.
	He is a White House economic advisor, Kevin Hassett.
	So you've got two Trump administration officials going on two different programs.
	And they're both talking about the Dirty 15. Well, the Dirty 15 says Treasury Secretary Besant is about 15% of the countries.
	Whereas the White House economic advisor, who is on a different channel, says, no, it's about 15 countries.
	They don't know any of this stuff.
	They haven't thought through any of this stuff.
	When they put these blanket tariffs...
	On Mexico and Canada.
	They got caught with their pants down.
	And you had Howard Lutnik.
	Lucky Lutnik.
	And you had Scott Besson come back and walk that back and say, we've got to take a look at that again.
	We have the Trump deal.
	USMCA. He signed a treaty.
	He was proud of the treaty.
	They didn't read the treaty.
	They can't put tariffs on some of these things according to their treaty thing.
	That is something that the companies that get the tariffs put on them can take that to arbitration and can penalize the American government for that plus damages.
	So there is an enforcement mechanism for that that is built into, same as it was for NAFTA, built into USMCA.
	And I didn't like either one of those treaties.
	But Trump was bragging about it, but he never read it, and neither did his economic advisors.
	So Trump said he will announce tariffs on automobile imports in the coming days.
	He indicated that nations will receive breaks from next week's reciprocal tariffs.
	But his comments at the White House yesterday, they said, sowed further confusion about his plans for sweeping tariff announcements and the schedules, when these things are going to come in.
	They don't even know themselves.
	It's just total chaos.
	Though he repeated his threat to impose duties on pharmaceutical drugs because we've got to protect Pfizer and we've got to protect Moderna.
	They are the engines of our economy.
	They are the engines of depopulation.
	That's what they really are.
	He's repeated the threat to impose duties on pharmaceutical drugs so that they would come in the very near future because, you know, Pfizer and Moderna are really struggling.
	They could possibly go under.
	They can only live on the obscene profits that they made, murdering everybody five years ago.
	They can only live on that for so long.
	Well, it appears that there's something of a success, maybe, for Trump in terms of pressuring people to build facilities in America.
	We have South Korea's Hyundai, a big automobile manufacturer, announces $21 billion in U.S. investment.
	They said they're going to hire 1,400 employees.
	And they're going to set up U.S. auto plants to manufacture electric vehicles.
	Oh, okay.
	I thought we were going to get something here.
	No, no.
	They're going to manufacture electric vehicles.
	Well, good luck getting the rare earth minerals and lithium stuff that you need for that.
	Just like all these companies that are going to build nuclear reactors to power their facilities while they let the infrastructure, the electric grid for the rest of us.
	We can see that coming.
	But beyond that, where are they going to get the uranium for this?
	Kazakhstan. We've got these reliable places.
	You know, we don't want to have the oil from Canada.
	We'd rather be reliant on uranium from Kazakhstan.
	Of course, Canada does have uranium as well, so let's go to war with them.
	Anyway, so part of this $21 billion is going to be $5.8 billion for a steel plant in Louisiana.
	They're going to make their own steel here as well.
	They said it's going to be next-generation steel.
	What does that mean?
	Is the steel going to be different or is it going to be manufactured in a different way?
	See, this is what I think is going to happen.
	And I said this a long, long time ago.
	I said this with the first Trump tax cuts.
	Remember, the tax cuts were massive for the corporations.
	So much so that Apple was very embarrassed and they were giving away some of the money and all that stuff.
	But they repatriated that stuff by, they didn't build any factories.
	They bought their own stock.
	But I was saying at the time, I said, even if they do rebuild the factories in America, it's going to be so that they can manufacture things using robots.
	So is this next generation steel, is it that the steel is different or the manufacturing process is going to be different?
	Are they going to use predominantly robots or Americans to build this steel?
	You see, opening up the borders and having massive immigration, is just one step.
	That's not there to actually help with manufacturing because they're all talking about robots.
	I just told you, the CEO of NVIDIA, I told you yesterday, said it's going to be less than five years and you're going to have massive numbers of robots even walking the street, according to him.
	Well, if that's their plan, what do they need foreign cheap labor for?
	They need to bring in foreigners who are going to be Competing with Americans for jobs and getting most of them, as we saw from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, almost all the new jobs went to foreigners.
	What are the foreigners going to do when they lose their jobs?
	Are they going to go home?
	Are they going to stay here and fight us?
	I think they're hoping that they're going to stay here and fight us, get angry about that, as the robots are given the jobs.
	Nevertheless, we have Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing.
	They're investing billions of dollars in the U.S.
	This is something that began with the Chip Act under Biden, where they picked the winners and the losers.
	And guess what?
	When we look at the working conditions there at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, they're looking for robots.
	They don't care if they're made of flesh or metal.
	If you're a...
	You stay there to show your devotion to the company.
	That's why they're having trouble keeping Americans.
	Americans say, I don't have any problem working hard.
	I have a problem just hanging out here when there's no reason for me to be doing that.
	Or you need to show that you are loyal to the company.
	So, again, Interesting about this is that Hyundai is going to be making these electric vehicles and competing directly against Tesla.
	So Trump singled out South Korea for applying high tariffs to U.S. exports, saying that their tariffs were four times higher than the United States.
	Well, that sounds bad.
	Why don't you do this?
	Why don't you say, let's take the tariffs to zero?
	That's what Mises said.
	He said, if we're going to complain about tariffs, and if their tariffs are high, let's say, I'll do this.
	I'll take our tariffs down to zero.
	You'll go down to zero.
	But he says that South Korea's tariffs are four times higher than the U.S. is charging them.
	South Korea has disputed this.
	As of 2024, South Korea's effective tariff rate on U.S. imports stood at 0.79%.
	So are we charging them 0.2%?
	Sounds to me like Trump is lying.
	The two countries have a free trade pact, according to the South Korean government.
	They said, wait a minute, what is he talking about?
	He says that we're charging four times as much?
	Our tariffs are only 0.79%, because we have a free trade agreement with the U.S. Again, none of this stuff really holds together.
	On Rumble, Sam Miller, thank you very much.
	That's very generous.
	I appreciate that.
	He said, David, thank you for being faithful and persevering through all that you do and to everyone behind the scenes.
	Thank you so much.
	That is much appreciated.
	Well, thank you.
	We could not do this without your help.
	Thank you.
	And Knights of the Storm, thank you very much for the tip.
	I just wanted to point out that your interview with Dr. Jane was really amazing.
	Please let people know to go watch it.
	Well, good.
	I didn't know that she had put it out yet.
	But Dr. Jane Ruby, you can find her on Twitter.
	And I did the interview with her yesterday afternoon.
	I don't know when that aired.
	But thank you very much.
	Knights of the Storm.
	Again, you can find them on Twitter as well as other platforms.
	And thank you so much for the tip.
	And I've got something from Jason Barker about what is being done with him.
	Hey, little guy.
	Hi. Can you smile?
	Can you smile?
	Usually he looks at me and he smiles, but he doesn't do it when he gets on camera.
	A lot of people in my family freeze up on camera.
	Even his dad does sometimes.
	He doesn't want to get on camera anymore.
	So, I guess I'm the only one that likes to get on camera.
	Hey, little buddy.
	Should we say his name or just call him Whistler's nephew?
	Let me ask his mom.
	Yeah, there you go.
	Well, he's still Whistler's nephew one way or the other.
	And Travis's son.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at the incendiary devices and the incendiary actions of the radical left.
	These people are doing it all over the place, and they did it to pro-life clinics, they did it to church buildings, now they're doing it to Tesla buildings, because that's their tactic.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, welcome back.
	Let's talk a little bit about these incendiary devices that are there because it has gotten very incendiary, not just the rhetoric, but the actual devices in Austin.
	They found several incendiary devices.
	And they said they were actually operative, functional.
	So they took them away in Austin.
	The days of committing crimes without consequences have ended, said Pam Bondi in a statement last week.
	These people were charged in the attacks and now face up to 20 years behind bars.
	These are some people who were involved in vandalizing and torching Teslas at a Colorado dealership.
	Another one who was vandalizing and burning charging stations in South Carolina.
	And each of those cases, they used homemade Molotov cocktails.
	So, again, I see the left is very angry with Pam Bondi about this.
	I don't think that she's overreacting on this.
	I don't think that would be locking people up for criticizing political Israel or Netanyahu's policies.
	But when you do arson, that is usually treated as Essentially like murder, attempted murder, because so often you can kill people with it.
	Even the firemen can die fighting these fires.
	So arson is very serious, except it was completely ignored during the Biden administration when you had these radical leftists again torching pro-life clinics, crisis pregnancy clinics, torching church buildings, and all the rest of this stuff.
	So it's not just their rhetoric that's incendiary.
	By the way, I thought this was...
	Kind of interesting.
	Segway is recalling 220,000 scooters due to fall hazard.
	Now, this is not the Segway thing that you see people standing on.
	The mall cop thing, right?
	These are just electric scooters that are littering the cities everywhere.
	These rental type of things, I guess.
	These particular ones are collapsible, and unfortunately they have been known to collapse while people are riding them, which has led to some very serious injuries.
	People breaking bones and other things like that.
	So they've called back 220,000 of them.
	And when I saw this with Segway, I was kind of surprised that the company was still in business.
	The company, Segway, was bought in 2010 by a CEO in the UK.
	He was a millionaire, billionaire, whatever.
	And he actually died when he rode one of these things over a cliff.
	He was out in the woods area.
	And it has a very bad history.
	I remember when Dean Kamen had the engineering guy who put this together.
	It was really ingenious.
	And he went around with CEOs that he knew in Silicon Valley showing them his segues and how they could keep their balance and that type of thing.
	And getting their opinion.
	And so he's showing it to people like Larry Ellison and others.
	But Steve Jobs was there.
	And Steve Jobs always understood How to package and market stuff.
	And he goes, it looks too stupid.
	It looks nerdy.
	You've got to do something to make this look cool.
	It does not look cool.
	And he said, and furthermore, you've got to be careful how you roll this thing out.
	If you're not careful how you roll it out, you're going to have somebody who's very famous have a bad fall on it.
	And it turned out that that famous person who had a bad fall on it was George W. Bush.
	And those two things together, the way that it looked and the way people look when you write it, you look like a real idiot.
	And I say that because I've been on one of these.
	Karen and I did it when we went to Chicago.
	I won a contest there, and they flew us in, and for fun, we rented Segways.
	And there was a Segway tour, several of them, that operated in Chicago.
	We rented the tour and there was some kind of a mistake.
	He was just going to go around with one of his tour guides, the guy who owned the company, and kind of show them the routes that they would take people on and give them tips about how to do it.
	And so it was just the two of them, the owner and somebody who was training, and it was Karen and I. And no, we don't have any pictures of this because we did not want any taken.
	It's one of these things where you have to get over the way that you look and just enjoy the ride.
	And it was a lot of fun.
	He took us all around Chicago, and while he was talking to her and giving her instructions, Karen and I were just doing loop-the-loops and going all over the place.
	And it only goes 12 miles an hour, but it feels a lot faster because the wind is in your face.
	And what was so nice about it, it felt really free because you would just lean into it.
	This is not the first generation of Segway that George W. Bush fell on.
	This was in 2009, I think.
	And so it was before this British CEO bought the company and drove it over the cliff, literally, I guess.
	But you would just lean.
	And the direction, just kind of almost think about it and you would go in that direction or you'd lean back and it would stop.
	First generation, I think you had to operate hand things on or something, but this one was more sophisticated and it would just kind of read your body language.
	You can lean to the side or forward or backwards and it would interpret that.
	And it was such a blast to drive, but you do look really stupid because you wear these stupid big bike helmets and everything.
	You've seen the people.
	It is embarrassing to be seen in one, but it was certainly a blast.
	We got to drive around with all that stuff.
	But anyway, these things are nothing special.
	They're really just kind of the usual scooters, but they are collapsing.
	I said at the beginning of the program, I said that there are more eggs than fentanyl being seized at the border crackdown.
	They use that term over and over again, deliberately, I think.
	The question is, and it doesn't get answered through this article for a very long time, Why is it necessary for them to seize eggs?
	They've artificially inflated the price and restricted the supply by killing tens of millions of healthy birds in America.
	And yet, with these record prices, people are not able to bring them in from Mexico that's not doing that.
	Why is it that Mexico doesn't have a bird flu problem?
	If it's migratory birds, aren't the birds migrating through Mexico?
	Well, yes, they are.
	But it's not real.
	And everybody wants to pretend that it is real.
	And so Trump has announced his crackdown on eggs.
	And when I saw this about eggs and drugs, of course, it brought my mind back to that disgusting, ubiquitous commercial from the 1980s.
	Is there anyone out there who still isn't clear about what doing drugs does?
	Okay. We heard it over and over again.
	This is your brain.
	An egg.
	This is drugs.
	frying pan.
	This is your brain on drugs.
	Any questions?
	This guy, he's got the Tom Homan attitude.
	You got any questions about that?
	This is what it is.
	You missed that whole thing, Travis.
	That was before your time.
	Oh, you just heard it all the time.
	This is your brain on drugs, you know, frying your brain and so forth.
	It was so effective, wasn't it?
	Because that ended the drug problem right there and there.
	What's funny is all these ads have just had the opposite effect.
	They're so uncool and lame every time they put these ads out that it just makes kids go, huh.
	Yeah, it definitely did not do anything to slow down the drug war whatsoever.
	That was the 1980s.
	You know, at that point in time, the drug war was only about a decade old.
	But, you know, here we are 50 years later.
	But Reason did one more recently.
	Referring back to that.
	This is your brain.
	This is your brain, unable to fall asleep, distraught in the knowledge that the drug war has caused more harm, loss of lives, and destruction than the drugs themselves.
	This is your brain pouring a drink, noting the irony of past prohibitions and their failure.
	So here's the question.
	Why are we doing this again?
	Yeah, yeah.
	And, you know, if you use your brain, you can see that the USDA is creating more harm and destruction with the slaughter of chickens than any imaginary virus is doing.
	And so, yeah, use your brain.
	Or we're not going to have any eggs left.
	These people are going to crack them all for us, and they're crackdowns.
	So what is happening at the border?
	It is truly ridiculous.
	Last month, as we see the prices of eggs go up, they point out in the Telegraph out of the UK, a dozen A-grade large eggs cost $5.90 on average, the highest price on record, a 97% increase over the $3 cost for the same box a year ago.
	Grocery shoppers in some regions have seen prices rise to $10 or more per box, while others have been faced with empty shelves.
	This is the Biden and the Trump administration's USDA following the same procedure, still following those same procedures, mass murder of chickens for a problem that should be handled a different way, if it is even a problem.
	Driving the cost up, which is what they do for the drugs as well in the black market.
	And what that does, that creates more and more dangerous gangs until you wind up with the trendy gangs out of Venezuela, if you will.
	In New York, rather, a new phenomenon has emerged of bodegas selling eggs outside of the box.
	They're calling them Lucy's.
	As in, Lucy!
	Got some explaining to do with this egg crisis that is totally hatched by the U.S. government and the USDA.
	But again, they call them Lucy's.
	Where have we seen this before?
	Well, when New York decided that they were going to put confiscatory taxes on cigarettes, on tobacco, they started having people on the streets.
	They go in and they would buy the cigarettes and they would sell them one cigarette at a time.
	They called those Lucy's.
	Do you remember, I looked up the date, it was 2014.
	Eric Garner was selling Lucy cigarettes on the sidewalk, and the police accosted him, and he pushed back or whatever.
	They wound up choking him to death for selling individual cigarettes.
	Why? Because the taxes were high.
	A government-created problem.
	And this is something of an improvised solution to it.
	So now people are doing that with eggs.
	Why? Because our government is confiscating eggs.
	Eggs are only expensive in the United States.
	Why are we the only ones who have bird flu?
	It's not coming from Mexico.
	But you're not allowed to have the eggs from Mexico.
	The Justice Department has launched an investigation into the causes of soaring prices.
	Have they really?
	Have they gone over and talked to the USDA, the people who are murdering tens of millions of chickens?
	Yes, there is price collusion that's going on, that has happened in the past, and that's a big part of this.
	But the USDA is in collusion with the big egg companies.
	They're working together.
	It's a conspiracy.
	It's corruption.
	It's cronyism.
	It's big egg plus big government.
	Okay, so they're not going to do anything about that.
	You just need to see this as the Trump Department of Justice is going to get to the bottom of this.
	They're going to be your savior.
	I guess the yolk's on us.
	It is.
	I was going to say that, but I thought, no, I won't say that.
	That's what I'm here for.
	The U.S. Department of Agriculture does not allow travelers to import eggs or egg-based products.
	As they can spread disease if not properly inspected.
	Are you inspecting the wild birds that are going across the border back and forth?
	And why aren't those wild birds killing the chickens in Mexico?
	Because the wild birds are not killing the chickens in America.
	It's the USDA that's doing it.
	So, get your brain off of the government propaganda, the government media.
	You know, this is your brain on government media.
	And you crack it and throw it in the fire.
	Frying pan here.
	So, officials say that they are instructed to ask whether or not drivers are carrying eggs when they come across the border, at which point, most people will admit.
	However, for those who fail to reveal their illicit contraband of eggs, they may face charges of up to $300 for a first-time offense.
	Oh, that should teach them, right?
	Can't have eggs in the United States.
	Well, we've got to support the USDA and big egg companies who are trying to make eggs scarce and expensive.
	So don't you try to bring any of that cheap stuff in here from Mexico.
	You are sheltering eggs in your fridge, aren't you?
	It is a shell game.
	U.S. border officials have caught more people with eggs than fentanyl this year.
	Again, the numbers, they've had 134 arrests of seizures for fentanyl.
	3,254 for eggs.
	So 24 times the amount of incidents where people tried to smuggle this across.
	And again, so bad they're selling them as individual eggs.
	This is insane.
	Both problems, folks, fentanyl and eggs, both of these are government-created problems because of government prohibition.
	Because of government actions.
	And, you know, we would not have fentanyl if we did these more intense forms.
	Now they're coming out with something even more intense.
	And look, I understand.
	I've got, I know, multiple people who have had their children die from fentanyl.
	But when we look at the drug war situation, the corruption that is happening, As well as the concentration of what it is that they're going to prohibit.
	I don't know.
	Maybe if they keep egg prohibition going long enough, some innovative person might come up with double yolk eggs that they can produce on a regular basis.
	Because that's what happened with alcohol.
	That's what's happened with drugs.
	And when you look at fentanyl, where did that come from?
	That came from our U.S. pharmaceutical companies.
	They don't like competition.
	And they've destroyed people's lives with the opioid stuff.
	And then they moved on to fentanyl.
	And there's never any punishment for Johnson& Johnson, for Purdue Pharmaceutical and the Sackler family.
	They get away literally with murder.
	Literally with murder and addiction.
	They hit people with.
	So, how did Republicans, when we're talking about these tariffs and controlling stuff at the border, how did Republicans learn to love high prices?
	Ask The Atlantic, an establishment publication.
	Democrats don't have any problem with taxes, typically.
	But now they're pointing out the hypocrisy of Republicans who now say that tariffs are great.
	It's kind of a strange love, isn't it?
	How they learn to stop worrying and love the tax.
	The tax that's the bomb.
	Trump's allies have pivoted from denying that his tariffs will hurt consumers to insisting that consumers should welcome the pain.
	Now, The Atlantic won't say this, but that sounds very much like Biden.
	Remember when Biden did his sanctions and he did his prohibitions on appliances and cars and all the rest of it?
	Oh, it's going to be painful.
	And I'm going to shut down your supply of oil as well and your supply of fuel.
	It's painful, but it's going to get us to where we want to be.
	You're going to have to suffer this pain for me to achieve my objectives.
	Well, that's the same thing that Trump and the Republicans are saying right now.
	You're going to have to suffer pain for us to get to our objectives.
	They thought the saying was, no pain.
	No gain.
	That's right.
	Yeah, we're going to have lots of pain and no gain.
	That's what we're going to have.
	A futile exercise is what this is.
	It's all pain and no gain.
	Trump and his allies have a new economic message.
	High prices are good.
	Treasury Secretary Scott Besant again.
	And also, lucky Lutnik out there giving these messages.
	Besant recently admitted to the Economic Club of New York that inflation-weary Americans could see a, quote, one-time price adjustment, unquote, from Trump's tariffs, but he quickly added, Access to cheap goods is not the essence of the American dream.
	I think having lots of money is his dream.
	Look, we're not trying to become multi-billionaires like you, Scott.
	We're just trying to have our eggs and eat them too.
	That's all we want.
	Why are you stomping us in the face when you are a multi-billionaire and you have the audacity to tell us that an affordable lifestyle is not something that we should be even aspiring to?
	How dare you?
	You and your elitist billionaire ilk.
	Terrace will hurt domestic manufacturing as well, says Atlantic.
	About half of U.S. imports are intermediate goods.
	And when we talk about the automobile stuff, by design, by their treaties, they have distributed the production across the borders.
	So parts are going back and forth all the time.
	Every time those parts go back and forth, I said this the first day, I said it's going to be like a value-added tax.
	Every time it passes across the border, add another tax to it.
	Oh, they'll never see it.
	Consumers won't see it.
	We'll tell them it's not a tax.
	And then when they figure out that it is a tax, we'll tell them it's a good thing to be taxed.
	It's good to be the king.
	So tariffs will hurt domestic manufacturing.
	About half of imports are intermediate goods, raw materials, capital equipment that American manufacturers use to make their products to sell them here and abroad.
	Bottom line is, folks, tariffs are taxes.
	Taxes destroy our wealth and our lifestyle.
	That's the bottom line.
	And so, the question is, why are we going to war with Canada?
	You know, you could make an excuse about Venezuela.
	Yes, they are hostile to us, for certain.
	And yes, we have Venezuelan gangs here.
	But at the same time, on the very day that they said, you know, the day after, I should say, they said, all right, we'll let you, we'll accept these criminals back into the country.
	Then he slaps the tariff on there.
	But what's going on with Canada?
	As I said before, when you look at the Venezuelan tariffs, this is not about protecting a particular industry.
	This is not about getting enough revenue to run the government.
	This is about war.
	Why are we going to war with Canada?
	So now we've got a Canadian airline is canceling flights to Tennessee, and other U.S. routes are being suspended.
	Why is this happening?
	Weeks-long lockups of European tourists at U.S. borders are sparking fears of traveling to America.
	The Trump administration is now locking up, not just the suspension of the candidates to decide, well, we're not going to fly into the U.S. Oh, maybe they're doing that because we've got European tourists who are coming in and they're getting locked up.
	They're getting carried away, disappeared by our officious border patrol people.
	And this is something we should pay attention to.
	They have been practicing and running beta tests of this totalitarian, and I mean it, not authoritarian, but totalitarian society.
	They've been practicing that at the airports since 9-11.
	TSA and all the rest of this.
	It's to see what we'll put up with and for them to practice how they're going to do it with us.
	This isn't going to stay at the airports.
	TSA is not even about...
	Airport Security Administration.
	It'd be the ASA.
	It's all about transportation, and we've seen this happen in the past as well.
	They have rolled out some of these tactics temporarily to bus stations and other places like that, but they're really waiting until they can ban the cars, and then they will roll it out to all of the remaining public transportation, whether it's going to be buses or trams or trains, you name it. If it's going to be...
	Public transportation, they will run this same kind of TSA stuff on it everywhere.
	So we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	I've got some information when we come back.
	We're going to talk about some tech issues.
	We've got one of these guys that is so serious, thinking that he is going to be able to...
	Live eternally.
	You know, he's already putting this into practice.
	We've got Elon Musk, and we've got Peter Thiel, and a lot of these technocrats who believe that they're coming into a singularity.
	They're going to somehow transfer whatever they think they are.
	They're not really sure what they are, but they know that they're so smart.
	They're going to figure out what they are, and they're going to be able to transfer what they are into a robot and live forever.
	Before we do go to break, just remember, we are supported by listeners like you.
	So if you like the show, please like the show wherever you're watching.
	Rockfin Rumble Odyssey.
	And for the first time today, we're actually live on BitChute.
	So if you're liking it on BitChute, like the stream there.
	Go to thedavidknightshow.com or davidknight.news and get yourself some products.
	The coin is really cool.
	Or, you know, send a donation.
	We really appreciate it.
	Thank you, Travis.
	Thanks for doing that.
	I'm really bad about that.
	This is my new segment called I Have No Shame and I Must Grift.
	Well, it's not a grift.
	It does help to support us.
	And I didn't know that we were on BitChute Live today.
	That's great.
	By the way, let's mention this as well.
	We got on to Roku, and it was a temporary thing because the people that we did it through were hosting it on Vimeo.
	And Vimeo banned us.
	And we knew that they were going to ban us, because I know how they are.
	They were going to do it in-house.
	Well, they never did it in-house.
	However, Rumble has an app that is on Roku.
	So if you're watching us on Roku, you can go to Rumble and you can find our show and still watch it on Roku via Rumble.
	So that's an important thing.
	We're all over the place.
	Yeah, we're a lot of different places.
	And if you want to see where we are, I don't think we have that listed.
	Well, we do have the BitChute link that's there.
	We don't have that information about how you can watch us on Roku on our website.
	But if you go to their website… The DavidKnightShow.com still works.
	But we simplified and shortened it to DavidKnight.news.
	That also works.
	So check that out.
	We'll be right back.
	ORCHESTRA PLAYS In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey McGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the McGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	You should be able to buy me several hundred those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
	The end of the day is the end of the day.
	All right, and joining us now is Barry Hinckley.
	He has an organization, a website, Redeclaration.org.
	And he's talking about a redeclaration of independence.
	I thought it would be good to have him on.
	We just had Donald Trump is talking about rejoining Britain.
	I guess if we're going to rejoin Britain, maybe we should talk about a redeclaration.
	It's kind of appropriate timing.
	But you started this quite some time ago.
	Tell us a little bit about it, Barry.
	Welcome. Well, it's great to be with you, David.
	We started this in October of 23, and it's hard to think now in March of 25. That seems like a lifetime away.
	Many of us have been fighting for the values that made this country the great meritocracy it became in the city on the hill for many years.
	I'm from New England.
	My great-grandfather was actually the commander of the Minutemen in Concord, Massachusetts, my eighth grandfather.
	And so I was born on April 18th, you know, the day that Prescott and Dawes and Paul Revere rode my family's farm in Concord to alert them the British were coming.
	So, you know, great day to be born on a significant date in our history.
	So I've always been tuned into the country and its founding values.
	And obviously, if you're listening to this show, you know we've strayed.
	A long way from those founding values, you know, before the New Deal and certainly way after the New Deal with a massive expansion of the federal government.
	So this was our attempt to point out the simple fact that our federal government is way out of design tolerance and is gobbling up our liberties and our freedoms that we are supposed to enjoy in this republic.
	And that's why we laid down these ten tenets of what we call the Redeclaration of Independence to try to really persuade our elected officials in Washington to represent we the people and not the interests of the deep state. Well, I agree.
	And, of course, They talked about how the king had swarms of officers to harass our people and to eat out their substance.
	I mean, they're even killing off our egg supply now.
	How do we get these people's attention?
	What approach are we going to take?
	Why did you take this approach, as a matter of fact?
	And what are you hoping to accomplish with Redeclaration.org?
	Well, if you go to Redeclaration.org and you read the 10 tenants, we've actually been quite surprised.
	Now, we laid these tenants down in October of 23. About 2,200 people signed the Redeclaration of Independence, about 1,700 of whom agreed to have their names posted publicly.
	as you sign, your name gets posted publicly once we verify you're real on the website.
	About 500 were so afraid of just having their name associated with founding values that they wanted to be anonymous.
	And that tells you everything you need to know.
	If you live in supposedly the freest country of the world and you're afraid to post your former administration, thankfully we're saying the former administration, that tells you everything you need to know.
	Oh, yeah.
	So our goal was, you know, to do the same thing that the first signers of the declaration did, which is to...
	Put your name on the dotted line and sign for values that we believe will get this country back on track.
	And we did that after, actually I wrote it after a very inspiring speech I heard Tucker Carlson give at ISI in Wilmington, Delaware in October.
	I encourage all your listeners to look that speech up at the Interscholastic Institute.
	Tucker gave the first speech he gave after coming out of his retirement.
	Before he launched the Tucker Carlson Network.
	And we, me and a few guys, friends, compatriots, wrote this down.
	And the goal was to get as many people as possible to sign on the dotted line and then inspire our elected officials to take these tenants to Washington and see if we can reverse the course of the federal government eating our liberties alive.
	Oh, I agree.
	I agree.
	There were no anonymous signers on the Declaration of Independence.
	Nobody put down anon or anonymous or anything.
	As a matter of fact, John Hancock became famous for writing his name so large.
	He had probably the most to lose.
	He was one of the wealthiest people in the U.S. at the time.
	And, of course, it wasn't the U.S., but the colonies or whatever you want to call it at the time.
	And he wrote his name as big as he possibly could.
	And so it became something of a legend to put your John Hancock on something.
	But people are afraid to put their John Hancock.
	On a redeclaration, what does that tell us?
	Tells us how intimidated everybody has become by being branded a racist if they disagree with you politically or whatever.
	You know, that is a standard tactic.
	But again, you know, when we look at this and we go back into history, I looked up the date.
	It was Common Sense by Thomas Paine.
	Came out January the 10th of 1776.
	Of course, it was July 4th that the Declaration of Independence was put out there.
	So this was something that was percolating through society.
	Now, of course, the Declaration of Independence was written from the top down by the elites, but there was also Thomas Paine's common sense spread very, very quickly throughout the colonies.
	They had a very high literacy rate, and people ate it up eagerly.
	So there was a grassroots of support there.
	So I guess my question to you is, how do you see this developing?
	Do you see this developing from the grassroots, the bottom up, or is there anybody that you can think of in Washington that is going to be aligned with even these 10 points that you put in this shorter redeclaration?
	Well, interestingly, we know that it got...
	All the way to the top, because I sent it to Tucker, who I have developed a relationship with since writing this, and it got passed around to Vivek and other people.
	Robert F. Kennedy I sent to, I also know him personally as well.
	And so we know these 10 tenants made it to the top.
	And if you look at what's happened since we've written them, and since President Trump was sworn in in January, they're either getting talked about, Or they've come true.
	Like, you know, the ninth tenant, I think it's the eighth or ninth, you know, eliminates the Department of Education.
	We kind of threw that one in there as really wishful thinking.
	Well, sure enough, here we are, the Department of Education.
	You know, let's see, you know, how the court system addresses this executive order.
	But, you know, Trump has already taken action that way.
	He mentioned a balanced budget in the State of the Union.
	We know we have DEI out of the military, another one of our tenants.
	He is...
	Pulling us out of these globalist organizations, which is making sure that Americans are only subject to American law, not international law.
	He's already taking steps through tariffs to level the playing field for American workers.
	He has mentioned single-day paper ballot voting.
	Our last request on that tenant is to actually...
	Make Veterans Day have some real impact and make Veterans Day voting day, make it a national holiday so we can not only honor our veterans, but people can have the day off and take the whole day to vote, not to try to scramble in before or after work.
	So, you know, I think about six or seven of them have already been addressed.
	You know, a balanced budget amendment has not been...
	Addressed yet, but has been talked about, as you know, in his State of Union.
	So we've made an immense amount of progress with these 10 tenants since October of 23 when we published them.
	And, in fact, we're pleasantly surprised at how much progress we've made.
	Now, you mentioned DEI, and you mentioned RFK Jr. about this.
	At the beginning of the program, I was talking about the new CDC appointment.
	That was put in by Trump.
	First, there was somebody who had been a vaccine critic.
	He is a medical doctor who talked about connections between autism and vaccines.
	But he was essentially vetoed by a pharmaceutical senator, Republican Cassidy.
	And now...
	Trump has just announced as his nomination the person who is serving as the interim CDC head.
	Somebody who at the CDC, we see that they have now purged DEI off of their website, which is good.
	I'm glad that they're getting DEI off.
	The problem is that they're still approving on an emergency use basis more vaccines and still continuing on with the childhood vaccine schedule.
	But do you see that as a victory?
	What do you think is really happening?
	With RFK Jr., with HHS, with CDC, with Trump, and that area.
	Well, you're talking about a trillion-dollar-plus agency, and battleships don't turn on a dime.
	There's a lot of work to be done, and there's a massively entrenched financial and governmental institution enforcing the status quo.
	So it is not going to be easy to get America healthy again, to make America healthy again.
	RFK has many foes that are highly paid to block his path.
	But he said that he's okay as part of his condition to get appointed.
	He said he's okay with the vaccine schedule that's being put out there.
	And nobody is banning, not at the state level, not at the federal level, nobody is banning these mRNA shots.
	As a matter of fact, they're working to take it to the next level.
	And the CDC director has been involved in using artificial intelligence, just like Larry Ellison.
	Who was featured by Trump with the Stargate Project a day or so after he became president, talking about how they would use artificial intelligence to custom design genetic vaccines for people.
	You know, I look at this and I see a massive poisoning that is happening in our society, and yet we are thinking that we've got victory when we just get them to stop talking about this gender insanity.
	I don't, you know, it seems to me like they're majoring in the minors if they're doing anything.
	Well, I just ask you to be patient, because this isn't a battle.
	This is a war.
	Yeah, it is a war against us, and it's been going on for five years, this vaccine war.
	And I'm sick and tired of seeing people die from this.
	Oh, it's been going on for decades, absolutely.
	But the Trump shots have been going on for five years, and Trump is still pushing this mRNA.
	Poison out on people.
	That's the thing that concerns me about it.
	So I'm not as salient as you are that there's going to be anybody in Washington that's going to do this.
	I see this as rearranging the deck chairs and trying to rebuild trust in a government that cannot be trusted.
	We never had the founders ever trusted government.
	Patrick Henry said, trust no man.
	Bind them down with the chains of the Constitution, and yet this entire operation of RFK Jr. and the rest of them is about building blind trust in people who have been murdering us for money.
	Well, let me finish here.
	I guarantee you RFK Jr. is going to do one thing and one thing well as it relates to vaccines and taking on this massive pharmaceutical industrial complex.
	He knows, you know, even Trump alluded to this.
	In his State of Union address, when you talk about 1 in 36 kids have autism now, and it used to be 1 in 10,000, okay?
	Point, look no farther than vaccines and poisonous food, okay?
	So we're zeroing in on the targets.
	But what RFK will do, I promise you, is he will arm mothers and fathers with information so they can make a decision to opt out of these vaccines.
	That will be the first step.
	Okay? And, you know, Rome wasn't built in a day.
	When you've got five, six decades of vaccines and huge, massive, multi-billion dollar complexes, you know, pushing them down doctors' throats, if you limit the ability for doctors to make money on procedures, but, you know, incentivize them to make money on pumping kids full of shots, guess what you're going to get?
	That's going to take a long time to unwind that, and I believe that's what's going to happen.
	It's going to be first waged with information, and that information will arm voters and parents.
	What they need to roll the stuff back and make our food and our medicine healthy again.
	Well, I hope that's going to be the case.
	I think that we've got enough information, quite frankly, and I think what we need is common sense.
	Yeah, you might and I might, but not enough people do.
	I agree, but I don't think that a savior in Washington is going to help us.
	I think what we need is some common sense, and we need a spirit of independence that is going to rise up from the bottom, not from the top down.
	I don't see these people.
	I see them going to Washington.
	I see them going to these confirmation hearings.
	They are literally selling their soul.
	They are contradicting everything.
	Everything that they've talked about for their entire life, they deny it in order to get the position.
	And when you do that type of thing, you don't have people of character that can lead this country if they begin by denying what they have said all of their life.
	I just don't see that happening.
	But let's talk about the Department of Education.
	Now, this executive order to get the Department of Education down, this is something that I've not yet talked about today.
	But what do you see changing at the Department of Education if they're going to continue funding from Washington?
	Does it matter that we have a bureaucracy up there if they're going to send the money?
	How do you view that?
	Is that a real shutdown of the Department of Education if they're going to still provide the money?
	Once again, you're talking about almost three decades worth of precedent.
	They have to get unwound, and it's not going to happen overnight.
	They're shutting down spending it with Doge overnight in some areas, right?
	So they could just say, we're not going to continue.
	When you look at $400 million just to Columbia University, which Trump shut down because they had protested Israeli politics, but why are they getting $400 million?
	It's the money that needs to stop, and it needs to stop just because the government doesn't have the authority to do it.
	We could have a balanced budget amendment, but how are we going to balance that budget if we're going to be sending Ivy League colleges hundreds of millions of dollars a year?
	I don't understand.
	You're not going to find an argument from me there.
	And you're certainly not going to find an argument from me that it makes a lot of sense to send money from Ohio to Washington just to get it back again, knowing that people are going to clip coupons the entire way.
	I say keep it in Ohio in the first place.
	I think if you follow what Trump's doing, he's talking about eliminating income tax for people making less than $150,000.
	The byline is that money doesn't go to Washington.
	It stays in the state.
	Right? So, certainly, the remedy, in my opinion, is exactly the design of the founders, which is, you know, empower the states to control their own destiny, you know, within the formation of our republic.
	So, I think unwinding the Department of Education is not, once again, an overnight task.
	You have to clip away at it and eventually get rid of it, because there's going to be a massive amount of resistance.
	I mean, keep in mind...
	The Department of Education is often seen as the arbiter of elections.
	Because if you have, let's say, 4 million voters that are either employed as teachers or related or married to a teacher or in some type of administration role in the public school system, and you have a country tied 50-50 on elections, those 4 million people decide who becomes the president.
	So, it's a very, it's a sacred cow for the Democratic Party.
	They launder an immense amount of money through union dues into their elections.
	They are not going to go down without a fight.
	And I think, you know, it's the old saying, how do you eat an elephant?
	It's one bite at a time.
	But, you know, the Department of Education is in our sights, and I mean the sights of true libertarians and Republicans.
	And I think we will grind it down, but it's not going to happen overnight.
	But I agree with you.
	I spent a ton of money for my daughter to go to George Washington University in Washington, D.C., and it was a giant scam.
	She learned more in high school than she did in college.
	She went to a very, very good high school, but it wasn't worth it.
	Fortunately for you, it's probably good she didn't learn anything at George Washington because they would have taught her the wrong stuff.
	It's really about indoctrination more than it is about education in so many ways, as you know.
	You are not wrong.
	Yeah, as you know.
	You're not wrong.
	That's why the government wants to keep its foot in it, and it's why it wants to control the purse strings, because ultimately...
	Both this government as well as subsequent Democrat-run governments will set the curriculum.
	If they can fund it, they will define what it's going to be.
	But let's talk about some of the ways that they're going to do this, for example.
	We know that when they have shut down anything they've shut down immediately, they've had lawsuits brought against them.
	And so you talked about states' rights and how we have separation of powers.
	And I said state rights.
	submit state powers uh how we have a separation of powers and checks and balances and that type of thing but also within the federal government the big issue with all of this stuff and the thing that i think they're going to have to address or they won't get anything done is going to be judicial supremacy if
	you can have judges and i know that they've talked about the fact that we can't have one judge who's going to make policy for the entire nation but it is through that whole judicial supremacy thing is going to have to be challenged along the
	lines i think of what andrew jackson did when he said the supreme court's made their decision let's see them enforce it i think if the trump administration doesn't do that none of the actions that they have taken are going to last and i don't think they're going to be able to do any of the kind of cuts or restructuring that they would like to do what do you think about that and do you think that they will directly challenge judicial supremacy Yeah. Yeah.
	Yeah, of course.
	I mean, he's going to fight every step of the way.
	And we need some precedent here.
	I think they've pointed out that there's already been some precedent set by the Supreme Court, but they're challenging, you know, they meaning, you know, the judiciary, you know, liberal activist judges, let's be real about what's going on here, are ignoring the precedent and throwing down roadblocks.
	I think many people understand what's really going on here is they're trying to slow down the Trump train.
	And they feel if they can bind this thing up in court, and these are all derivatives from Yale Law School, Harvard Law School, and all the other massively liberal elite law schools, they figure if they can slow the Trump train down long enough and they can somehow pull out some type of a coup in the midterms, they can bind this thing up and Trump won't succeed in right-sizing a republic.
	I think that's the game that's getting played here, and I think they're completely ignoring.
	What is precedent?
	They're completely ignoring the law, and they're just trying to slow things down, throw a wrench in it, if you will.
	I think Trump's going to fight it every step of the way, and he should.
	Well, I don't know if he will, but we've seen some of that.
	I saw a little bit of hope when...
	You had a judge that said you can't deport these criminals back to El Salvador or send them to El Salvador or whatever.
	And they did it anyway.
	And I thought, okay, well, now that's what they need to do.
	But then they came back and they said, but we're doing this and staying within the orders of the judges and that type of thing.
	So I still don't see the fact that they really want to fight this.
	I know that in the first administration, you had Trump who was opposed.
	He ran opposing DACA.
	But when he got there, the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals, when he got there, that was not even a law that was passed by Congress.
	That was an executive order by the Obama administration, not even by Obama, so much as by Napolitano, who was his attorney general.
	And he abided by that.
	He asked permission of the judiciary, and they said, no, you can't get rid of the previous.
	It was absolutely absurd.
	So I'm not really sure that they're going to do that.
	I hope that they do.
	And I think that when we talk about how one branch is exercising supremacy over any other branch, that is really a violation of the separation of powers, as I'm sure you would agree, right?
	Certainly agree.
	And as far as it relates to Trump's first term, I think he admits he was naive and he had a lot of the wrong people around him.
	A lot of them were swamp creatures that had an interest in the status quo.
	And this time, he's come in guns blazing.
	I think a lot of people are quite happy with the pace of play here.
	In fact, he's pushing the establishment way out of his comfort zone, which is why they're hitting back so hard.
	Because they realize it's a fight for life and death of the deep state versus the return to our republic.
	I agree.
	Well, you know, when you talk about securing our elections, I absolutely agree with what you have in person, single-day elections with a valid ID.
	I think that is, unless we have that, I'm not voting again.
	I've run for Congress, but I'm not voting again unless we've got...
	No worries.
	They'll vote for you.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Several times.
	That's right.
	In every state you've ever lived.
	That's right.
	I've told this story before of a friend of my brother-in-law's who went in North Carolina where they got a very long voting period and no ID.
	He shows up to the poll on Election Day, and they said, you've already voted.
	No, I haven't.
	Yes, all you have to do is give them a name and an address.
	You and this other person that you're addressing, he goes, well, that's my mother.
	She's been dead for several years, so yeah, they will vote for you.
	So we have firsthand experience with that.
	Let's talk a little bit about term limits.
	Because I remember when Newt Gingrich had his contract with America, and that was one of the ten things in the contract with America.
	It was the one thing that he did not pursue when they got there.
	Of course, they actually even got through a line-item veto.
	And of all things, it was Rudy Giuliani who challenged that and took it to the Supreme Court and got that overturned.
	But when we get to term limits, do you see any sign whatsoever that there's anybody in Congress that is interested in term limits?
	Sadly, no, because it's the best job they've ever had.
	And they're making it better all the time.
	Yeah, I mean, I ran for U.S. Senate in 2012 against Sheldon Whitehouse, and so I know the inside of the game pretty well, and these folks have the scales tipped so far towards incumbency that the only way you ever get them out would be through term limits because the deck is completely stacked.
	Unless they get a photograph of you with a little boy, you're not going anywhere.
	That's how you get elected to Congress, is if you've got a photograph of you with a little boy.
	I think that's how they got Dennis Astrid in there.
	That's how big pharma controls you, because they have a photograph.
	That's right.
	We need term limits.
	We need it badly.
	A lot of people talk about it.
	It's the one blind spot that the founders missed.
	I mean, they couldn't be perfect.
	They were certainly prophetic, but they weren't perfect, and they missed this one.
	They never thought.
	That people would be so selfish.
	And let's face it, if you have stayed beyond your useful life, you know, Mitch McConnell...
	Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, you know, read the list out.
	You know, Joe Biden, you know, you are so out of touch with what the average American needs.
	And you end up getting, you know, you're trading in trillions of dollars.
	You have innumerable powers.
	And, you know, you make 175 grand a year.
	That leads to corruption.
	And we see it over and over again.
	And, you know, I was talking to my wife last night.
	I was like, how did we end up in an era where...
	The average American thinks it's okay that, you know, two years out of office, you know, politicians retire worth $175 million.
	Like, it would have been obvious corruption, you know, 100 years ago.
	You know, I'm a Yankee from New England.
	You go, you serve, you go back.
	And now we have, you know, Olympia Snowe, a Republican from Maine, worth $50 million as a career senator.
	How'd that happen?
	Yeah. Like, so we need term limits.
	We need it badly.
	I don't have a lot of confidence that they'll enforce it on themselves.
	Let's face it.
	Congress enforced term limits on the president when they had a chance.
	They didn't do it on themselves, you know, after FDR.
	That's right.
	Yeah. You know, hopeful thinking.
	Hopefully we'll have a true benevolent leader that gets it done.
	I think part of the problem is, you know, I think we've got a really good metric for the amount of corruption that is in Washington when we look at the amount of money that's spent on the elections.
	And, you know, at the 2000 elections, you had George W. Bush spent $100 million, and Al Gore spent $70 million.
	They spend more than that now on Senate and House races.
	And we have so much concentration of power, even in those Senate and House races, because one of the early things that was...
	Well, the big concern I had as it relates to,
	you know, attribution of Congress Congressmen and women is what's happening in California, for example, where you have millions of undocumented people.
	And this was the huge miss.
	And Trump challenged this in his first term when he challenged the Census Bureau, counting everyone in the state and still having that apply to how Congress is apportioned.
	You know, in the House.
	And he lost that in the Supreme Court.
	And now, you know, I had, I was living in Rhode Island at the time.
	Rhode Island's population was shrinking.
	We had two congressmen.
	And I had, and I keep in mind, I had run for U.S. Senate in Rhode Island.
	So I knew who the, it's only a million people in the state.
	You know everyone in politics.
	And I knew that all the hardcore leftist activists, they were all working for the census.
	They showed up at my house multiple times trying to find people, because I had a large house, trying to find people to add to the roles.
	I guarantee you they counted everyone.
	And beyond everyone's wildest dreams, Rhode Island somehow held on to a congressional seat that everyone predicted we'd lose.
	So that's what I really am concerned about, is the massive amount of illegals here in this country that are apportioned.
	So think about that.
	If you're taking, you know, millions or hundreds of thousands of people and you're giving them Congress people and then electing them, you know, to Washington, and then they can vote how taxpayer dollars are spent, that's real power, and that's what's really going on.
	That's what really worries me, quite frankly.
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	It absolutely is.
	It is a government-created problem, what we have with the border and with immigration.
	Again, it remains to be seen what is going to happen with all this stuff.
	It's early days, and we've seen a lot of things that are moving, but as you pointed out, the courts are coming in and shutting down all these different actions.
	I think it is going to require a direct confrontation about judicial supremacy, or all this stuff is just going to be playing to the face.
	To the fan club and then getting overturned by the judiciary within a few months or whatever.
	I think that's all going to be reversed, everything that they've done.
	If they don't directly attack this judicial supremacy, if they don't reestablish a separation of powers, I don't think any of this stuff is going to work or will last.
	But hopefully we'll see what happens with this.
	And again, the website is redeclaration.org, and people can go there, take a look at the documents.
	And thank you for what you do.
	I really do appreciate you standing up and focusing on these founding principles, Barry.
	And Barry Hinckley is our guest, and he has set up Redeclaration.org.
	I hope that people can see this, and I hope they get the courage to sign their John Hancock on what it is that they believe.
	That's one of the key things.
	We've got to not run away from what we believe.
	Thank you so much, Barry.
	Appreciate it.
	Thank you for putting this up and putting your name there.
	Appreciate that.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you, David.
	Thanks for having me.
	Thank you.
	All right.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
	be right back.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, welcome back.
	And I don't usually get that confrontational.
	Travis said, I asked him, I said, was I too rude?
	And he said, no.
	But I hope I wasn't.
	I apologize to you if I was.
	I apologize to him as well.
	But we definitely have a difference of opinion on some of these things.
	I don't think anything's going to get fixed.
	As you know, you listen to this program.
	He's not going to get fixed from top down.
	I don't have any confidence in these people that he has confidence in.
	I hope he's right and I'm wrong.
	We'll see what happens.
	Let's talk about some of the people who are really running the show.
	Not Trump, not RFK Jr., but people like Mark Andreessen and the technocrats who are behind all this.
	And what is it that they see?
	Where are these people coming from?
	I mean, we go back and we look at the people who signed the Declaration of Independence, who were...
	Perfectly willing to put down their John Hancock and write it really large.
	They pledge their lives as well as their honor as well as their fortunes.
	We don't even think about honor anymore in this country, right?
	That was a big deal to them.
	We only think about lives and about money.
	Well, we got some people who have a lot of money.
	And they want to have a very long life as well, so they can have a lot of time to spend all of those tens of billions or hundreds of billions of dollars that they've got.
	So they need to have an extremely long life to be able to spend all of this, and they have convinced themselves that they have all of this time that they can get those godlike powers that they're going to have, just like they've got godlike wealth.
	And so somebody like Marc Andreessen, As this is an article from Technocracy News, and that he actually has Machiavellian reasons for supporting Trump.
	Actually, I think this originally came from, if I'm not mistaken, I think it came from Freethought Project.
	I think it came from Derek Brose.
	But anyway, in July 2024, Andreessen spelled out that he and his partners were backing Trump not because they shared any of the concerns voiced by Republican voters, But because they could use the Trump administration to deliver the regulatory environment they wanted for their projects to succeed.
	It's just that simple.
	I mean, we look at the inauguration, you see all the people around Trump.
	You see Tim Cook from Apple.
	You see Zuckerberg, all these other people.
	Bezos, they're all around him.
	You think that they suddenly, you think they're born-again conservatives?
	You think they're libertarians?
	No, they're none of that stuff.
	They don't care anything about what you care about.
	Not at all.
	It's just they want to get their projects through.
	So this project that they're all focused around is really the government corporation that they called, 100 years ago, they called the Technate.
	In 2023, Marc Andreessen published the Techno Optimist Manifesto.
	And again, I apologize because I lost the original sources.
	I know it came from Technocracy News is where I got it from, but he was republishing it from another place.
	But what I wanted to read you was a couple of quotes from his Techno Optimist Manifesto.
	He said, We believe that there is no material problem, whether created by nature or by technology, that cannot be solved with more technology.
	That's an amazing statement, isn't it?
	He is the antithesis of Ted Kaczynski, isn't he?
	But in a sense, they both see the same thing.
	That's why a lot of the techno-optimists looked at Ted Kaczynski's stuff.
	Ted Kaczynski was saying, you know, technology just breeds more technology.
	It exists for its own.
	It's a self-propagating plague, actually.
	It's a self-propagating cancer.
	But they looked at it and they said, yeah, yeah, any problem that we've got, we just add more technology and it fixes it.
	You think so?
	You notice what's missing here, and there's no material problem, whether created by nature or by technology.
	Well, nature doesn't create anything.
	We have a God that created nature, but God is not part of the equation that he looks at here.
	He said, give us a real-world problem, and we can invent technology that will solve it.
	He goes on to say, the engine of perpetual material creation, growth, and abundance.
	And accelerationism.
	And again, this is one of the reasons why George Gilder called these people neo-Marxists, because they are naive enough to believe that there is no limitation to what they can create materially.
	They've been billionaires for so long, they really believe that.
	And they think that we have unlimited resources, unlimited wealth, and so forth.
	They have unlimited wealth.
	They have unlimited resources, essentially.
	But that's not going to exist for everybody.
	Karl Marx thought that because of the Industrial Revolution.
	These people think it, I think, because they're billionaires.
	Anyway, he said, we believe in accelerationism and deliberate propulsion of technological development to ensure the techno-capital upward spiral continues forever.
	Forever. The pride, the naivete, the spirit of Babel.
	It's truly amazing.
	We believe artificial intelligence is our alchemy, our philosopher's stone.
	It is their god.
	It is their demon that they're summoning.
	We believe in augmented intelligence just as much as we believe in artificial intelligence.
	Intelligent machines augment intelligent humans, driving a geometric expansion of what humans can do.
	And so this really is coming out of Curtis Yarvin, but it is something that's been bought in by Dreesen.
	He says, our enemies are not bad people, our enemies are bad ideas.
	He said under varying names they come to us, things like existential risk, sustainability, ESG, sustainable developmental goals.
	Now, we look at all that and it's like, yeah, I understand all those things are coming from the doomers, the climate doomers.
	Who have predicted this stuff forever, and it has never happened.
	They use it to strangle society.
	Social responsibility, he says.
	Stakeholder capitalism.
	Except stakeholder capitalism is really what he and his buddies are doing, in essence.
	They may condemn it by name, but in essence they do it.
	In the same way they condemn CBDC, but they still do it.
	He says, so we have tech ethics, risk management.
	D, growth, and limits of growth.
	And he said, we have to get rid of all these.
	In essence, this is the ultimate public-private partnership.
	It truly is.
	But they're also operating under this illusion, not only that they have infinite material capability, that if there's any problem anywhere, it can be solved with the application of technology really seriously.
	That's what these people think.
	They've actually written books on it.
	They also think they're going to live forever.
	And they don't even know, these transhumanists don't even know what they are.
	I've had that conversation with them.
	I asked Zoltan Istvan, who was one of these guys pushing.
	He's not a billionaire, but he's bought into all this stuff.
	And so I said, so what are you?
	What is the essence of you that you were going to transfer into that machine?
	Are you just a collection of electrical impulses?
	Is there a spirit?
	Is there a soul?
	Is there a consciousness?
	How do you see that?
	He couldn't answer that.
	He doesn't even know.
	These guys don't either.
	They don't ever talk about it.
	But you have some of them who just think they're going to continue to extend their life in this body.
	Brian Johnson, a man who wants to live forever.
	And now he is seeking control of the people who worked with him in this quest.
	Via confidentiality agreements.
	Again, when you see somebody who wants to keep stuff secret, that means that they're not telling you the full truth.
	The truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth.
	Well, a confidentiality agreement is going to mitigate against that.
	This guy is a tech entrepreneur.
	He's now...
	Created company to sell you on the idea that you can have longevity, that you can delay your aging and all the rest of this stuff.
	And he is obsessive about this.
	I think I've mentioned him once before.
	He tracks his sleep.
	He does hair therapy when he gets up in the morning.
	He does an hour of exercise, takes 54 different pills.
	He also takes a drink called the Green Giant.
	But he does all kinds of strange stuff to his body.
	I won't go into some of the things that he does.
	But he's got a company called Blueprint.
	He says that his health regime has reversed his biological age by 5.1 years.
	So I guess he's kind of like Merlin.
	He youthans.
	The 47-year-old former Mormon missionary has become known for experimenting on his own body to defy aging.
	But for nearly a decade, he has used confidentiality agreements, says the New York Times, to control his image.
	And the companies that he built on top of that image, his employees, his sexual partners, his vendors, his contract workers, all have to keep quiet about what they see.
	So maybe there's something there that doesn't quite add up.
	At least three of his former employees, including a former fiancé who worked for him, have recently filed complaints with the National Labor Relations Board, a federal watchdog agency, about his confidentiality agreements.
	They said the terms they signed were overbroad, They accused Johnson of violating federal laws to protect workers who want to speak about their workplace conditions according to copies of two of the complaints and six people with knowledge of them.
	But the key thing here that I wanted to talk about was his approach to eternal life.
	He founded his payments company, Braintree, in 2007 and then was bought out by Musk and Thiel with PayPal.
	They bought them in 2013.
	Once he became super rich, they said he shed his Mormon roots and he began a phase of exploration.
	So he divorces his wife, with whom he'd had three children.
	He hires prostitutes.
	He takes drugs, including acid and DMT.
	DMT. You know, the thing that lets these people hallucinate.
	It takes them to a place.
	And they all have a common experience where they encounter what they call machine elves.
	And a lot of these people in Silicon Valley...
	Are heavily into DMT.
	They say they're given technology that they can use.
	What do you think that is?
	I don't think they're machine elves.
	It's like one preacher I heard say, he said, I had somebody ask me, he said, if I told you that my deceased grandmother appeared in my bedroom and sat at the bottom of my bed and had a conversation with me, would you believe her?
	Would you believe me?
	He said.
	Yes, I would believe you, he said, but I would not believe that was your grandmother.
	This is the spiritual world in which these people have tapped into.
	This is a real pharmakia.
	Also, this guy sounds like a terrible businessman.
	He's basically sold his soul for the devil for 5.1 years.
	That's a terrible deal.
	It's a short jevity, I guess, instead of longevity.
	That's right.
	He loves DMT so much, this thing that gets him in touch with the machine elves and stuff.
	He loves it so much that he's had the shape of the chemical structure tattooed on his arm.
	This is a guy who loves his hallucinogenic religious chemicals, right?
	That's the true meaning of the pharmakia.
	But you see this type of attitude in a lot of different places.
	As a matter of fact, when you look at George Soros, he had an interesting quote.
	Where he said, I fancied myself as some kind of a god.
	If truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble.
	It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of a god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.
	I guess that's where these guys are now.
	And so in 2016, he founded a brain technology startup.
	And about the same time that Musk is doing that, Musk started up his Neuralink.
	There's a lot of people who are doing this type of thing.
	He increasingly fixated on his reputation according to former friends and employees.
	His brand is tied to his image.
	There's pop-ups of his face promoting his Netflix documentary and the supplements that he sells called Brian's favorites.
	And the people who began to work with him noticed that he just wasn't the same person anymore.
	Somebody said anything about Alex Jones.
	Has Alex Jones been replaced?
	Some guys did that because he's lost a lot of weight.
	I think he's probably on a Zempick or something like that.
	Because I know that he worked with it really, really hard the years that we were there.
	And they were able to do it.
	And then all of a sudden, it just all goes.
	They said, look, he's been replaced.
	It's not the same guy.
	Well, I know I had that kind of feeling when I was there.
	This is not the same guy I met in 2012.
	But things like this change people.
	And when they fixate on themselves and they elevate themselves up, they kind of go down the same path as George Soros to whatever degree.
	So in 2023, he posted a 16-minute YouTube video saying that he was a victim of the dark underground accusation economy.
	Well, that also sounds like somebody I know there.
	But let me give you a different approach.
	We just had George Foreman who died.
	And I'm not going to hold George Foreman up as a perfect, everybody's got their flaws.
	But he had a very interesting life.
	And he had some good things to say.
	He did not leave his family.
	He was a champion boxer.
	He became a pastor.
	He became a businessman.
	He made a fortune with the Foreman grill and all the rest of the stuff.
	He died a couple of days ago at the age of 76. And, you know, he has really good friends with Muhammad Ali and with Frazier and the people that he had fought.
	They became very, very close friends.
	And I thought it was interesting because he took such a different path in his life than Muhammad Ali.
	George Foreman turned to Christ.
	Muhammad Ali turned to Islam.
	George Foreman was an American patriot.
	Love this country.
	Love the flag.
	Muhammad Ali, Cassius Clay, despised this country.
	Despised the flag.
	Foreman was born in Texas in a very bad neighborhood of Houston.
	The Fifth Ward, they called it the Bloody Fifth.
	He said every weekend somebody got killed.
	He said he dropped out of high school at 15. He was involved in petty crime.
	He said, I went into boxing at the age of 17 to lose weight and to become a better street fighter.
	But then he was able to succeed in the Olympics, and that got him into the heavyweight fighting that everybody knows him for.
	It was a very interesting movie.
	We saw it.
	It came out a couple of years ago about his life.
	And I imagine a lot of people would be going back and checking that out again.
	He said, I didn't fear anybody.
	Except for Joe Frazier, he said in a 2023 interview.
	He said, I hope that something would have happened to him before I had to fight the title.
	I've never told anybody this, but that was the happiest time of my life in boxing because I worked so hard to fulfill my dream and to become heavyweight champion.
	It was the first and last moment I felt that.
	So he works extremely hard.
	He takes on Joe Frazier.
	He wins the championship.
	And he's on top of the world.
	He defended his title against Jose Roman and Ken Norton.
	In 74, he faced Muhammad Ali in the Rumble and the Jungle, and he lost that fight.
	And that took him down, he said.
	For years afterwards, I would agonize.
	How could this have happened?
	He said, that was the night that I lost everything I ever was.
	It was the most devastating event in my life as an athlete.
	I was not even a man anymore, he said.
	And I think there's an interesting thing in that.
	You know, we identify ourselves so many times as men and what we do for a living, right?
	And that was always, even with Christian groups, I would, you know, meet people and they would, the first thing that a guy will ask another guy is, what do you do for a living?
	You know, that type of thing.
	And I would tell them at the time, I work in a video store.
	And I didn't want to get into that contest.
	You know, so that would basically stop it at that point.
	It's like, okay, good.
	I win.
	Okay, now we can talk about something else that I'd rather talk about.
	But, you know, people, if you wrap up your life in your job or you wrap it up in your net worth, that is something that is very precarious.
	That's not promised to anybody, not even these billionaires, that they're going to have that the next day.
	So he retired from boxing in 77, and he had a near-death experience.
	He became a Christian pastor.
	He started the church.
	He started doing a lot of volunteer work, and it was very fulfilling, but he wasn't making any money.
	He was in a lot of financial difficulty.
	So he thought, well, the only thing I know how to do is to box.
	So he starts boxing again, and he has a big comeback, and he wins that.
	And still, he didn't make that much money.
	In 1994, he said he had a lawyer who came to him and told, With this business proposition of him selling the Foreman grill.
	Let's use your name and promote this so that you can make money.
	And that, of course, made him a tremendous amount of money.
	He had 12 children, five of them sons, and he named them all the same thing.
	They're all called George Foreman, even with the same middle name, which is really kind of strange.
	But he does have his personal quirks there.
	But when we look at the quotes that he has, He's very focused on God, on family.
	He went through a lot of different things.
	He went through a lot of different transformations.
	And I think he really grew in his life.
	He says, it doesn't matter what you achieve, what you accomplish in this life.
	The most important thing is to keep your eye on the true prize, and that is serving God, he said.
	He said, find God, have faith in God.
	It doesn't matter what happens.
	Believe that all things are possible.
	Don't ever give up on possibility.
	And your life can be turned and changed for the better, he said.
	And then he also said this.
	He said, so many people have helped me in my life.
	I didn't know that.
	I thought that I was doing so much, but there are so many good people in my life.
	And I think God puts us in situations where we have tough times so that we can see how we are dependent on him.
	But we also see how we're dependent on other people as well.
	Before we run out of time, I want to talk a little bit about the kind of persecution that we're seeing in China.
	And the fact that this article was on a website called persecution.org.
	And it's called The Ghost of Tiananmen, China's Digital Noose Titans.
	Now, the approach they're taking from this, and they're talking to a guy who was a young college student at the time at Tiananmen Square.
	And he now lives in Texas.
	He was able to eventually escape that.
	And he now lives in Texas.
	And he sees Texas as really free.
	But those of us who grew up in this country, who have been here for a while, we see how much freedom has been lost.
	And we see how rapidly that has been lost.
	And we see the accelerationism that these technocrats are talking about in terms of the loss of freedom.
	And so while this is focused on China, I want you to see how this same stuff is happening here in the U.S. I said, picture a regime so smug, so dismissive of, they call it democracy, but let's just say human rights, that it brags about crushing lives and crushing freedom.
	Well, I can picture a regime like that.
	I saw that with Biden.
	I saw that with Trump.
	I see that with Keir Starmer.
	I see that with the EU and all these different officials.
	I see them smugly crushing lives and freedom all the time.
	Yes, the Chinese communist are experts at it.
	They were groomed to be the beta test site for what is now rolling out everywhere.
	The CCP today is crowing on WeChat and state publications about smashing cults.
	It's a fancy way of saying that they're bulldozing churches, jailing and torturing pastors, strangling all the freedom of all citizens with a high-tech noose.
	Unlike anything the world has seen, but something that the entire world is going to see.
	In 1989, Bob Fu was a kid who dared to defy the Communist Party's iron fist.
	Today, he is a Texan with a fire that they could not kill.
	His fight screams a truth.
	That we are sleepwalking past.
	China is not just crushing its own.
	It is exporting the noose to other countries.
	And I would say this.
	This noose is designed by the people who are helping the Chinese.
	It was the globalists.
	It's people like Henry Kissinger who pushed this one-child policy on them, the depopulationists and so forth.
	And they are pushing all of this traffic light system.
	You know, when we had the red...
	Yellow, green stuff.
	We saw that with the social credits.
	Boy, it didn't take long, did it?
	Before that started being used by Trump and by the Europeans especially during the fake lockdown of the fake pandemic.
	Well, the lockdown was real.
	The pandemic was fake.
	Fu grew up in Shandong, force-fed the Communist Party line that the party is your god.
	Dissent means death.
	But when he went to college, he got a different approach.
	He joined the Tiananmen protests.
	He shouted for liberty until the tanks turned his dream to ash, June 4, 1989.
	Hundreds, maybe thousands, died, but he survived.
	However, he was branded a criminal, and his world and his spirit were crushed.
	He said, I'd reached the end.
	Then a smuggled book about a Chinese believer slipped through, and outlaw American missionaries whispered of a freedom that no bullet could touch.
	Fu grabbed it.
	A lifeline in the dark.
	As a matter of fact, a friend of mine who I've interviewed here has a book called Free Indeed.
	He talks about that.
	He focuses on addiction.
	We talked about fentanyl.
	Jeff Weiss' daughter died of a fentanyl overdose, and the person he partners with was addicted to drugs.
	And so their work is to show people that there is a path.
	Out of this slavery of addiction.
	And it is a spiritual path.
	It's not law enforcement.
	You're not going to stop this stuff at the border.
	You're going to stop it in your own life and the life of your family with these ways.
	Anyway, by 1996, his Beijing apartment had become a rebel church.
	And the police then arrested him and his pregnant wife for illegal evangelism.
	And for dodging the one-child law.
	They were able to flee from Hong Kong to America with a baby and their faith in tow.
	In 2002, he started China Aid in Texas, a voice for the silenced church in China.
	But they've now tightened the screws down.
	Even the official CCP-controlled churches are now getting hit for sticking to their Bibles.
	He says this isn't random, it's a machine.
	That is cold and relentless.
	And folks, we're going to be facing cold, relentless, machine-like surveillance and censorship and control through these technocrats.
	I don't see us stopping it, but I see us surviving it.
	We're going to have to figure out, we understand what this problem is, you're going to have to understand that you're going to have to operate in the shadows, in an underground economy, in a parallel economy.
	Yeah, it is...
	We're not going to get some elected officials that are going to make everything.
	There's no savior coming for us in this world and politics in Washington.
	We've got a savior who already came, and that is what's going to give us the strength to push back against this and to persevere.
	That is what you have to focus on.
	That is what he focused on.
	So it is a social credit system on steroids.
	Millions of cameras, sensors record every movement, and...
	Create an electronic trail.
	The data is fed into one of the world's largest databases, then analyzed and watched.
	Same thing here.
	It knows your face, your friends, your thoughts before you think them.
	This was the dream of Zbigniew Brzezinski when he talked about the technocratic age.
	Well, it's a technocracy age.
	Go to a prayer meeting, you're flagged.
	Share the wrong verse or message, you're done.
	Associate with freedom-loving crowd, your thoughts will be re-educated at a special camp for people just like you.
	The CCP is not the only one perfecting this beast raid.
	It's being pushed around the world.
	And it's not just coming out of the CCP.
	It's the same people who set this stuff up there.
	But again, he looks at this and he says, well, I think about the verse of the Bible.
	Remember those who are in prison as if you were with them.
	He says he gets that because he escaped, but millions didn't, and he can't forget those people that are there, that are executed, that are caged, that are carved up for their organs while they're alive and while he's still breathing freely in Texas.
	I said that gnaws on him.
	It is a brutal and a beautiful fuel.
	And I said, so what?
	Where do we go from there?
	We said China is betting that we will yawn.
	They think the West is too fat, too drowsy to care about a freedom-killing machine that is spreading like wildfire.
	But I have to say to you that where they get this wrong is not just in China.
	It is spreading like wildfire.
	And as we saw all of these people operating in lockstep and doing the same thing in 2020, they're all following these issues.
	So, again, when we look at it, he thinks that the USA is free.
	We know that it's not.
	And we know that it is accelerating into this kind of tyranny that they talked about.
	And when you look at the party paper, Chinese public security authorities intensify the crackdown on cults, saying we have illegal spiritual cultivation.
	What do we call that here in the U.S.?
	We've got people who are banning what they call conversion therapy, right?
	Because they don't want you, and the reason they call it conversion, they're specifically, they will talk about psychological things that were done with people.
	But they're really talking about Christian conversion.
	Because that's really the only thing that's going to get you out of this dark slavery, of the LGBT, of drugs and all the rest of this stuff.
	And they want to shut that down.
	In China, they call it spiritual cultivation.
	And listen to the way they talk about this.
	To curb the spread of cult organizations, public security agencies, public security, like public education, public health, they have public security, is focusing on rural and grassroots communities.
	They're offering psychological counseling and support.
	They also help individuals that have been misled into cults.
	Every time they talk about cult, I understand they're talking about churches.
	They have other groups that they're after besides Christians.
	But they put the churches into a cult label.
	These initiatives have bolstered anti-cult efforts, creating a more secure, more stable society, says the official press of China.
	So this is great.
	It's creating a stable and secure society.
	Isn't that the argument that we hear all the time for government-run education?
	Creating a stable, secure society.
	It said, we have cracked down on institutions conducting illegal training under the guise of spiritual cultivation.
	They were found to be engaged in unlawful activities, and they were dealt with accordingly.
	Public security authorities across the country have also carried out anti-cult education to villages, universities, primary, secondary schools.
	See, that's what this is really about.
	They want to educate you in the cult of the omnipotent state.
	And that's the way this thing is going to roll out to us.
	There are ways that we can push back.
	And we have to go ahead, you can hit the break here.
	We ran just a little bit over because we had some technical difficulties and we had to start over again.
	But this is the world that we're fighting.
	And we don't have to run away from it.
	We can run toward it.
	With confidence.
	Because we know.
	What we are.
	These technocrat bureaucrats do not know what they are.
	We know, and we know who our Savior is.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day.
	A penny saved is a penny earned.
	Though, that's gotten tougher since they've stopped making them.
	Maybe it's time to start saving a different type of coin.
	Such as the new David Knight Show supporter commemorative coin.
	Saving these coins earns support for independent media.
	Featuring striking bas-relief with bold raised details and premium painted accents.
	It's not just a trinket, but a statement, a declaration.
	A way to show you refuse to be controlled by the establishment.
	It's a limited run of just 100 coins.
	So, much like the penny, when they're gone, they're gone.
	They silence independent voices.
	They censor the truth, but you can stand with real journalism and own a piece of the resistance.
	These coins saved is The David Knight Show sustained.

▲