All Episodes
Previous Next
March 12, 2025 - The David Knight Show
03:01:45
The David Knight Show -3/12/2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The End
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
It's The David Knight Show.
The David Knight Show.
Trump attacking Thomas Massey.
And so we're going to talk about what it is about.
It's not about the continuing resolution.
It's not about the economics.
It's about something else entirely.
Do you really think that the Canadian tariffs are about fentanyl?
Come on.
Come on.
And so it is very interesting to see how the influencers are lining up behind Trump and attacking someone who is standing for the Constitution and fiscal responsibility.
Anyway, we're going to take a look also.
And what is happening with Big Pharma, we also have a wide array of people who have come up with lab milk.
The stuff that you didn't want.
The stuff that they tell you got to have because, you know, we're going to destroy the planet, that type of thing.
And we're going to take a look at what it is that...
Every time our government gets involved in overthrowing a country, the Christians are the ones who get slaughtered afterwards by the people that they worked with.
Yeah, we're going to take a look at that as well.
We'll be right back.
Well, we had Trump yesterday saying, I want Thomas Massey gone.
Okay.
Along with the debt ceiling, by the way.
He wanted the debt ceiling gone.
I'm waiting for the one where Trump says, I want the Constitution gone.
Because he just does whatever he wishes, right?
He boasts about being a dictator.
He boasts about being a king.
I'm just joking.
Just joking.
Well, this is also the same guy who wants to arrest people for political speech that he doesn't agree with.
And he also is saying now that he wants to arrest people Well, the Take It Down Act doesn't have any jail terms in it yet.
But the Take It Down Act, which is being put out supposedly to take down any AI intimate images or something like that, I think is the phrase that they use.
It's a phrase that is pregnant with possibilities, shall we say?
And what it will do is actually outlaw satire.
And he says, yeah, I'll even use it.
Oh, you bet he will.
He'll use it to shut down his opponents for satire because, as Saul Alinsky said, satire is the most effective weapon.
There is no defense against it.
Saul Alinsky rules for radical, dedicated to Lucifer.
But anyway, speaking of Lucifer, let's talk about Trump and his attack against Massey.
Trump is trying to get a clean, continuing resolution.
I said, think about what an oxymoron a continuing resolution is.
I put this out on Twitter.
I said, so you're just going to continue to kick the can down the road, right?
Which is what this is about.
A continuing resolution is continuing to kick the can down the road.
It's continuing to do the same thing that you've always done and expecting some different result.
And it's not a resolution.
It shows that these people don't have any resolution.
They're feckless cowards.
That's what the continuing resolution is about.
It's continuing to do the same thing.
It's continuing to have no resolution of your character.
Of course, we can see their character pretty clearly.
But a lot of people say, oh, well, let's think about what we've got to do.
We've got to pass this so we can get the Senate to do this and all that.
And that's where Dan Bongino is as he came out.
Weighed in on this argument to criticize Thomas Massey.
Unlike Trump, Dan Bongino doesn't want to alienate all the people who are actual constitutional conservatives who support Thomas Massey.
But he's definitely wrong on this one.
So he's going to go soft.
That's why I don't agree.
And I've defended Congressman Massey in the past.
Go back and watch the shows.
I don't get emotional about these things.
He has been amazing on the January 6th pipe bomber case.
Incredible.
He is wrong here.
He's just, I'm sorry, he's wrong.
He doesn't have a tactical plan to cut spending.
I just gave it to you.
Get rid of this CR, deal with it for three more months, move on to reconciliation, and fight the fight there where you actually have the numbers.
Does that make sense?
No, it doesn't.
You've done that over and over again.
I'm a toolbox and a jerk right now.
You are.
That's just crazy.
Tell me, John, I'm opening it.
All I'm asking you is if you believe that, tell me what your plan is.
Tell me what your plan is.
Okay, I'll tell you.
Senate filibuster.
If you have it, I'd love to hear it.
You want to hear it?
Here it is.
Okay?
Let it shut down.
Let it shut down.
Let the Democrats scramble to revive this monster.
I don't care if the federal government shuts down.
I hope it shuts down.
I hope and pray that it shuts down someday.
Gone.
Forever.
That'll take care of the Federal Reserve and all the rest of these abomination agencies.
Just let the thing shut down.
And then figure out how to rebuild it.
One piece at a time, if you can find it in the Constitution.
Let it go!
That's what these people need to have the ability to do.
Just let the thing go.
And we can decide what we want to have.
Anyway, so Trump says he should be primaried.
Talking about Massey.
He's just another grandstander.
But this is the ultimate projection, isn't it?
Who in the world, in history, has been a bigger grandstander than Donald Trump?
Tear us on.
Tear us off.
Tear us on.
Tear us off.
Yeah.
Oh, we're going to take over Greenland and Panama.
We're going to have the Gulf of America.
The biggest grandstander BS-er of history.
When you look up BS in the dictionary, you will find his picture there.
Someone thinks they can control my voting card by threatening my re-election.
Guess what?
Doesn't work on me, said Massey.
Three times I've had a challenger who tried to be more MAGA than me.
None busted 25% because I do what I say I'm going to do.
And he stands for America First.
And then I see this kind of typical Kool-Aid drinker response.
And it was, you know, when I got looked last night, it was just all over Twitter.
Still largely there.
This person.
It says, in response, President Trump has balanced the budget in a mere six weeks.
Wow.
Wow.
These people are amazing, aren't they?
Well, if he's balanced the budget, then what do we need a continuing resolution for?
Everything's solved, isn't it?
Tell that to Dan Bongino.
Hey, we've already got the budget balanced here.
He said, you should be ashamed of yourself, he says to Massey.
For not voting for this budget-balancing legislation yesterday.
Oh, wait a minute.
You just said in the first sentence that Trump balanced the budget.
This is what it's like to talk to the MAGA people.
This is not somebody that I was involved in.
I think they had something like 200 responses or something to that.
Everybody wanted to explain to him that if the budget is already balanced, you don't need to do this.
But here's the other issue.
One of the things that Massey was saying was, this continuing resolution doesn't even have the Doge cuts in it.
I told you they're not serious about that.
The cuts have to come from Congress.
If Congress had the resolution to do something about this, you wouldn't need Doge.
And without Congress having the resolution to do something about this, not a continuing resolution, which is no resolution at all, it's not a solving of the problem, And it isn't a principled stand.
No, without any kind of resolution from Congress, this is just going to continue and continue and continue.
As you and I have already seen, I'm sick and tired of it.
I'm sick and tired of it.
Just shut it down.
I'm tired of the circus.
I'm tired of the influencers like Bongino and the rest of these people.
D.C. Drano, one of the worst ones out there.
And so, the other thing that Massey did was he responded to Trump's tweet.
Trump said, well, He can't even approve a continuing resolution, talking of Massey, when he approved that many times during his career as a congressman.
Thomas Massey is a grandstander.
And the great people of Kentucky are going to be watching a very interesting primary in the not-too-distant future.
Well, and we'll talk about that's what it really is.
It was about that before it became about the continuing resolution.
It was about Massey.
Testing a run for Mitch McConnell's seat.
So I had people contact me, you know, reply to some of the stuff that I was putting out.
And so let's just stop all the public criticizing or anything.
It's like, well, tell that to Trump, first of all.
And then secondly, this is not about the continuing resolution.
This is not about the debt and the deficit at all.
I'll tell you what it's about in a moment.
But Massey responded to that tweet.
From Trump and said, this tweet from Trump's account is very misleading.
I never voted for a continuing resolution that became law.
I did vote for a continuing resolution under McCarthy that included an 8% cut to all discretionary spending.
But unfortunately, that continuing resolution did not become law.
So, do the research and you'll find that I have been consistent.
And of course, unlike Trump.
Who every day is roiling the stock markets with his on-again, off-again tariffs and the rest of his, you know, needless conflict with people.
Needless.
You talk about being able to sort out what is important and what isn't.
And when we get to the pharmaceutical stuff, we'll talk about RFK Jr. A lot of people saying it was, you know, Jane Ruby had a thing up saying, why doesn't he go after mRNA first?
And other people are saying, yeah, why is he focusing on Froot Loops?
I'm like, yeah, that's a perfect metaphor, isn't it, for Ma?
Froot Loops.
And if it wasn't going to be banned soon, we could do an AI video of RFK Jr. as the cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs bird.
He's like, cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs.
But it would be banned because we would not be putting pants on the cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs bird.
So, therefore, it would be...
Something that would fall into the, take it down, take it down.
Don't criticize me, I'm a politician.
Well, again, I said, you want something that is all over the place?
Just look at Trump's egonomics, because that's all this is.
The terrorist stuff is just egonomics.
And I said, if he wanted to balance a budget...
Maybe what Trump could have done is not send $4 billion to Israel.
How about that?
And because Zelensky said, yeah, I'll go with whatever you talked about.
Now, the weapons have resumed to Ukraine.
So there you go.
We've always got money for war, don't we?
So he's going to give that to them.
But I said, and this is what I think it's about.
I said this yesterday.
I said, The thing is, Massey beat AIPAC even with their attacks.
Even though they spent over $300,000 just at one TV station.
Because they don't own him.
And I said, he beat them.
So they're bringing out their biggest gun, Trump.
That's what this is about, folks.
This is not Trump versus Massey.
This is puppet Trump.
Puppet of the AIPAC. This is AIPAC versus Trump.
That's what this is.
So, the continuing resolution in my eye.
Again, it doesn't even have the doge cuts.
And if you believe any of this stuff, then you must believe that there's a massive amount of fentanyl coming in from Canada and we're going to stop it with tariffs.
And just think about that.
If you could just wave a magic wand and you could hire more law enforcement officers and all the rest of this, and you could stop the drug war.
Why hasn't that worked for 54 years?
Why?
Why not?
Yeah.
Well, Mises.org had an interesting article called The Importance of Constitutional Government.
And we should think about this.
Because, you know, when I look at this slavish, mindless devotion to Trump and his executive orders and his ruling like a king or a dictator or a czar or this, whatever, the right Trump has brought in a bunch of reality TV show fans who basically have spent their life eating popcorn and watching TV. They don't
have a clue or a care about the Constitution.
They don't care.
All they care about is a reality TV show guy, Donald Trump.
Yeah, I saw him on TV. And now, Jeff Bezos, in order to curry favor, even more favor with the Trump family, is now bringing back The Apprentice on Amazon.
So I guess I could finally watch it if I wanted to, but I'm not.
I couldn't make it past the introduction where it's money, money, money, you know, it's like, yeah, that's what this guy is about.
I said that to my in-laws 35, 40 years ago.
We went down to Florida.
And we were driving, oh, there's where Donald Trump lives.
I said, he's the most pathetic example of somebody addicted to money I've ever seen in my life.
That was my opinion of him 35, 40 years ago.
It hasn't changed.
It's only been reinforced.
I'm not interested in somebody who's addicted to money.
I'm not interested in somebody who's addicted to sex, because that's also his issue.
Epstein and the rest of this stuff.
The only thing, Trump is not addicted to his drugs, but give him time.
Anyway, The Importance of Constitutional Government, Mises.org.
In his book, The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government, Jefferson Davis explained the Southern cause as he sought.
For those of you who have been educated in government schools, Jefferson Davis was the president of the Confederacy.
He said, when the cause was lost, what cause was it?
It was not the cause of the South only, but it was the cause of constitutional government, the cause of the supremacy of law, the cause of the natural rights of man.
His argument was that the conduct of government must be constitutional.
It would be unlawful for the government to argue that prevailing circumstances made it necessary to ignore or to override the Constitution, as that would be a violation of what he called the supremacy of law.
Well, it would have done well to pay attention to that five years ago when Trump was locking everything down and telling us, you know, don't step on a crack, you'll break your mother's back six feet apart, wear the mask, this and that, right?
And paying people to enforce those orders.
The Constitution, said Davis, does not contain an escape clause by means of which it can be set aside whenever the government deems it necessary to do so.
He referred to this kind of attitude as the plea of necessity.
How many times have we seen the plea of necessity for gun control, for population control, all the rest of this?
He says, therefore, says the plea of necessity, a new power is this day found under the Constitution of the United States.
That is, the powers of the Constitution of the United States are enlarged or contracted.
According to the circumstances.
So now we can forget about the First Amendment.
If anybody says something that we deem to be anti-Semitic without defining what anti-Semitic is, then we can deport them.
We can arrest them if they're Americans, says Trump.
First Amendment?
We don't care.
Mankind cannot be surprised at seeing a government administered on such an interpretation of powers.
Blunder into a civil war, said Jefferson Davis, and approach the throes of disillusion.
In his view, there could be no secure foundation for a peaceful resolution of disputes if the very foundation of the lawful settlement of disagreements could be so readily set aside at the government's whim.
And now we have, if ever there was an argument against the arbitrary whims of an executive ruling by executive orders, it's Donald Trump.
Let's hope, as Ulysses Grant said when he became president, let's hope that we get rid of this bad idea by the rigorous enforcement of it.
Trump is the embodiment.
Of a whimsical dictator who can't make up his mind from one day to the next what he wants to do.
He won't abide by the Constitution.
He won't even abide by his own trade agreement, which I don't support.
I never supported USMCA. I never supported NAFTA. But he did.
And he won't even abide by that.
Just the whims of a dictator.
And I'm sick and tired of him, frankly.
Davis said, reminded his readers, that many Confederate soldiers have fought for the U.S. in previous wars.
But he saw the Constitution as central to a voluntary union, being itself the agreement on the basis of which the union was formed and a breach of this compact as justification for withdrawing from it.
He said Southerners, I'm sorry, he didn't say this, this is Donald Livingston who said this.
He said, Southerners were loyal to the Constitution of the Founders, but what they objected to was the Northern interpretation of it, which sought by an act of philosophical alchemy to transmute it from a compact between sovereign states, creating a central government with enumerated powers, to a consolidated nationalism with a central government having unlimited powers.
And now we have an executive who thinks that he has unlimited powers.
Davis said, if the government could simply set aside the Constitution when it deemed necessary, then itself, that in itself, would justify secession.
As it would amount to a declaration that the agreement was no longer regarded as binding.
Right?
You can just set aside the Constitution, whatever you think.
You know, if you can say, fortunately, I can do that myself.
We can take the guns and do the due process later, maybe sometime, somehow.
If you're going to do that, well, then we can just say, well, you know, you have just said that the Constitution is not binding, so we can just go our own way, really.
I look at this, and this is why I always talk about the Constitution.
It's not that it is any way, shape, or form the governing instrument of our country.
But as these people, each of them, takes the oath to the Constitution, they make an oath to uphold the Constitution, As a condition of being given authority.
When they violate that authority, when they violate the Constitution, they no longer have authority.
So they take an oath to the Constitution.
The Constitution is king.
Lex Rex.
The law is king.
Not Trump.
And not Lex Friedman either.
Not that Lex.
The law.
The law.
But he takes an oath to the Constitution because the Constitution is king.
And he then, these officers then become like stewards.
Think about the steward of Gondor out of Lord of the Rings, right?
He didn't want to be the steward.
He wanted to be the king.
He didn't want the king to come back, and these people don't want the Constitution back either.
They're just like the king of Gondor.
They don't want a return of the king, a return of the Constitution.
So it's important.
That we look at the Constitution because it shows that they have no legitimate authority and I have no moral reason to obey them whatsoever on any issue now.
I do it simply out of pragmatism, which he'll be going to pick to die on, that type of thing.
But not because they have the authority.
I do not, and that's one of the issues that I talk about with Romans 13. All this stuff, these pastors trying to put this burden on Christians.
You do whatever they say.
Like Todd Friel.
I call him Pinwheel Friel because he said, you know, just before the vaccines.
Now, if they tell you to put a pinwheel on your head, you put a pinwheel on your head because you've got to do whatever the government says.
Hey, Todd, we don't have a monarchy here.
We have a constitution.
And that is the legitimate authority.
And if they violate the Constitution, they have no authority at all.
This is a government without authority.
The Romans 13 argument has other aspects to it as well.
Even if they had the authority to tell people to kill themselves, would you commit suicide?
Come on!
The Kool-Aid drinkers that pushed Romans 13 on people before the injection.
Anyway, so Jefferson Davis said, if the necessity which they, the U.S. government, pleaded was an argument to justify their violations of all the provisions of the Constitution, the existence of such a necessity on their part was a sufficient argument to justify our withdrawal from the Union with them.
I'm going to insist that you can override the Constitution because of a plea of necessity.
And by the way, And I mention this again because I did have a listener and a supporter say, I don't understand what you've got against Abraham Lincoln.
Well, here it is in one paragraph.
Abraham Lincoln said, quote, I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery and the states where it exists.
I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.
Lincoln was not simply expressing his personal disinclination to end slavery, but he was reflecting a view of the Constitution that was widely held at the time.
Otherwise, he was just fine with slavery.
Civil War was not about slavery.
And he didn't free the slaves.
The Emancipation Proclamation that he did was to free the slaves in states that were in rebellion to him.
That's what he had to say.
But not in the states where they were still slaves that were still part of the Union.
It was all a big dodge.
This was all about consolidation of authority.
Consolidation of government.
And it was about his ego.
Egos matter, folks.
All these politicians have ridiculously oversized egos.
And they all lie.
But some are worse than others.
As we're starting to see here, just a few weeks into this.
Donald Trump 2.0.
Even worse than Donald Trump 1.0.
He's really feeling his power, isn't he?
And look, here's the thing.
Lincoln says he's not opposed to slavery, right?
But let me just say that what he did was not constitutional.
Reason enough to oppose him.
He was not fighting to end slavery, and neither is Trump.
You understand that debt is slavery.
That is a form of slavery, and they want to continue to indebt us.
And that was another part of the big fight.
People were coming back against Thomas Massey saying, you voted against Trump's PPP thing.
That's right.
You should be proud of it as well.
He was proven right.
And so, informational liberation says, Trump says he will lead the charge to primary Kentucky Representative Thomas Massey.
What he's trying to do, he's building up a situation here because he does not want Massey to run for Senate and take Mitch McConnell's place.
Information Liberation says all that was missing from Trump's post was a Shalom Massey at the start because that was the deportation boast he began with that.
You know, Shalom so-and-so, whoever he was kicking out for exercising their free speech.
Trump tried to have Massey primaried in 2020, and he failed.
Remember that?
I've talked about that many times.
Trump raged at Massey for voting against Trump's terrible COVID stimulus bill, which led to an explosion of inflation that we're still feeling the brunt of today.
It set us on a different trajectory of debt entirely.
When he did that $3.5 trillion, pretty soon you're talking about real money.
He used to say that, Everett Dirksen said that about millions.
A millionaire and a millionaire, pretty soon you're talking about real money.
Well, it's like, anyway, now we're trillions.
But, yeah, we saw what happened with that.
That was all to finance his medical martial law.
That was all a taste of universal basic income, to put a pacifier in our mouths, so that, in the words of Michael Bloomberg, When he was saying, we're going to take everybody's jobs.
Well, that's what Trump did.
He took everybody's jobs.
Just like that.
Just like that.
All at once.
And Michael Bloomberg says, when we take everybody's jobs, we're going to have to give them a little bit of money.
So they don't come after us with guillotines.
If Trump had not done this, one of the reasons why Trump was so mad with Massey was because if Trump had not gotten through this universal basic income, this pacifier, this, what he calls a stimulus, the pacifier.
If he had not gotten that pacifier out there, People would have come after him with guillotines.
And the thing, as we have seen afterwards, not only did it set us on a completely different trajectory of debt, but it also is just filled with fraud.
I remember one of the interviews I had, I forget the guy's name, and he was talking about the PPP thing, and he said he was an accountant.
And he said, I looked at that, and I said, whoa, this is going to, and he had experience with government.
He knew people in the Trump administration.
He was a conservative and so forth.
He said, this is going to be horrific.
It's going to be so loaded with fraud.
So I called him up, and I said, you can't do it this way.
It's just going to be, you know, here, come take all the money.
And that's what we saw.
That's what it was.
And he said, the reply to him was, well, we haven't had any fraud yet.
And he goes, you haven't even gotten this passed yet.
It hasn't started.
That's the kind of juvenile answer.
It's kind of like, well, look at this.
Trump has balanced the budget in just six weeks, and so now we need to have another vote to balance the budget.
Massey argued that that bill, the continuing COVID stimulus bill, amounted to the largest wealth transfer from taxpayers to the super rich in history, and he was completely vindicated.
After Massey last month teased a potential Senate run to take Mitch McConnell's place, the Republican-Jewish coalition pledged unlimited campaign spending to stop him.
See, that's what I said yesterday.
I didn't explain it.
I just said to that one person, he said, we've got to stop having these.
We just need to work.
Let these people work it out in the back doors about how they're going to do the budget and everything.
And not stop throwing bombs at each other.
Like, well, tell that to Trump.
He's the bomb thrower.
But it's not even about, the bomb that he's throwing is not even about the budget.
You don't even understand what's going on here, lady.
I mean, it's crazy.
This is about, just like I said, just like, you know, Canada is not about the fentanyl.
This is not about the continuing resolution.
This is about Trump doing what the Republican-Jewish coalition wants him to do.
It's about him doing what Miriam Adelson wants him to do.
It's about him doing what AIPAC wants him to do.
And what they all pay him to do.
All these people like to talk about promises made, promises kept.
No, no, no.
That's not the right way to phrase it.
It's promises bought, promises paid back.
That's what it is.
Promises bought, promises paid.
Trump is bought and paid by these people.
He's not America first.
And the people that he's filled his cabinet with are not America first.
And he doesn't want somebody who is America first, like Thomas Massey.
He doesn't want them in the Senate.
Absolutely does not.
So, I would go so far as to even say that this was a manufactured crisis.
This is not about the continuing resolution.
This is about the Republican Jewish Conference Coalition and Trump and the Trump cabinet, Jewish cabinet coalition, I guess we could call his picks.
This is about them picking a fight with Massey.
McConnell's retirement stokes concern that Massey may run for the Senate.
And this is an article that Information Liberation has inserted into his article.
Jewish Insider.
That's their headline.
And then they said, the Republican-Jewish coalition pledged unlimited spending to block Massey if he decides to run for Senate.
So, I ask you again, would the GOP manufacture this crisis?
I think they would.
Chris Minahan said that's how the Israel lobby responds to an actual American first patriot, unlike Trump.
Who got the Republican Jewish Coalition's full endorsement because he ran on giving the lobby total power over Congress.
And here he is pledging that back in August of 2024. Years ago, my father was a big supporter of Jewish people and Israel.
He's not Jewish.
He wasn't Jewish, but he was a great friend of a lot of Jewish people.
And if you said, let's say 15 years ago, maybe not even that long, Anything bad about Israel or Jewish people, you were finished as a politician, right?
You were finished.
You wouldn't do that, Congressman.
Now you're going to be deported or arrested.
You wouldn't do it anyway, but nobody would do it.
The most powerful lobby in this country by far was Israel and Jewish people.
Today, it's almost like, what happened?
What happened?
What happened to Schumer?
What happened to all these people?
Schumer's like a Palestinian, right?
Deport him.
I'm all for deporting Schumer.
You've got to remember that, though.
Let's deport him.
The power, Miriam, of this lobby, this powerful, and it was for good, not for bad, of being Jewish and of Israel.
And unfortunately, they're not necessarily the same, because you have Jewish people living in New York who really don't support.
You look at the New York Times, and they do not support Israel, and I don't think they support Jewish people.
You want to know the truth?
And you wonder where it all came from, but why?
Why did it come and they have to get together, they have to be strong?
Because it's never been under attack like this.
It's never been under siege like this.
But 15 years ago, it was the absolute most powerful.
You couldn't have an AOC plus three.
They wouldn't have a chance of being elected anywhere.
And today you have AOC and some of these people and they're pretty violent, pretty violent.
And they hate Israel and they hate Jewish people.
You're going to end up winning because you're going to have the president, okay?
So you're going to end up winning, but you do have people, and it's amazing.
And they got the president, didn't they?
You want to know who owns who?
Like I said before, promises bought, promises paid.
Just follow the money.
Look at this.
Let me put up this meme.
On the left, you have Thomas Massey.
And he, from an organization called TrackAPAC, it looks to see how much money APAC has given to politicians.
He got zero dollars from them.
On the right, we have Donald Trump, who got $230 million.
$230 and a half, actually.
$230 million, $473,000.
So, you know, money talks, doesn't it?
Promises bought, promises paid.
Trump's attack on Massey set off a firestorm on Twitter.
Virtually everyone taking Massey's side over Trump.
That's not what I saw, unfortunately.
I saw a lot, a lot of bots like that person who said, well, Trump balanced the budget in six weeks, and now we've got to help him balance it again.
Something like that, you know.
And I saw, though, a lot of the influencers like D.C. Drano, who was trying to cover for Trump with Jeffrey Epstein paperwork just last week.
Right?
Oh, coming out and attacking Massey.
Big time.
And I said on Twitter, I said, now is a good time to take note of who these Trump sucker proxies are.
These so-called influencers who will lie to you about everything and anything and everything in order to get in good standing with Trump.
These people are paid unimaginable amounts of money to cheer Trump.
To cheer Israel.
To cheer Big Pharma.
And it's disgusting.
Here's an example, okay?
Here's Sean Hannity.
He's one of the, of course he's a Trump sucker proxy, but he is a, if ever there was somebody who was a decadent sycophant, it's Sean Hannity.
The people who pay him.
He rewards them handsomely.
Listen to him as he's trying to suck up now to Musk.
One example of many.
And there's Laura Trump.
I don't believe in cancellation.
I don't believe in cancel culture.
And I know maybe it's not going to make up a difference, but you know what?
After I drove my friend's Tesla...
I went and I already picked out the one I want.
It's called the, what is it called?
The S-Plat.
The S-Plat.
The most expensive one.
It has 1,006 horsepower and goes from 0 to 62 in 2.0 seconds.
And this thing rips, and you can go about 400 miles without a charge, and I don't drive enough to go further than 400 miles, so I'm good.
And maybe it's just a gesture on my part, and I like new technology, but it's just a way of saying, you know, look what they're doing to this guy.
Do you think the cops are going to give him a ticket?
And knock on the window.
And I say, oh, Sean Hannity.
Yes, officer, you're a great American.
Okay, you can go, Sean.
Yeah, yeah, that's it.
How fast it goes, man.
Anyway, he goes out.
He doesn't even remember what it's called.
It's like the most expensive Tesla.
I don't know.
Is it $150,000, $200,000, $250,000?
He doesn't care.
Sean Hannity is so, he's rolling in dough because he'll suck up to Musk, because he'll suck up to Trump, because he will suck up to the pharmaceutical companies.
He'll suck up to anybody that'll pay him.
Why would anybody ever watch Sean Hannity?
I don't understand.
Milutin Milankovic says Bongino's a gatekeeper.
Sad his audience has no discerning.
I would say that about all these people.
All of these Trump sucker proxies, these influencers on social media, they're making lots of money sucking up to Trump.
It's a very lucrative profession, quite frankly.
Justin Osh, former congressman, says, imagine thinking that Thomas Massey is the problem in Congress.
He says, this is the dumbest take on any of this stuff.
You've also got Mike Lee, who flirted.
Watch out, he's going to get primaried next.
Mike Lee says, I have nothing but profound respect for Thomas Massey.
Who has worked harder than perhaps any member of Congress to bring federal spending under control.
He might vote differently on this matter than most, but if he does, he'll have a really good reason.
I'm a huge fan.
And that's the key.
It isn't that I agree with Massey 100% of the time.
I've had some things I've disagreed with him.
Very few of them.
Very few.
But I've had some things I disagree with him.
The key is that he's honest.
The key is that he's not bought.
We can have honest disagreements.
What we can't have is bought politicians.
That's the issue.
And it's kind of interesting, you know, it was Mike Lee introduced the end the Fed legislation in the Senate.
Thomas Massey did it in the House, and Thomas Massey got several co-signers.
I don't know that Mike Lee got any co-signers in the Senate.
They don't want to have a Thomas Massey there in the Senate.
You know, even Rand Paul, from what I could tell, I could not see that he joined in with Mike Lee on ending the Fed.
Rand Paul, his dad, has always been about end the Fed.
That's been his, like, you know, motto.
Hi, I'm Ron Paul in the Fed.
Well, it's 2 o'clock in the afternoon.
Okay, well, in the Fed.
Okay, let's...
What time is it?
In the Fed.
But he's always been about in the Fed.
His son's not about in the Fed, evidently.
His son is very concerned that Fauci was going to create vaccine hesitancy.
That's the only silver lining in what he did.
Was the vaccine hesitancy.
And we'll be talking about that as well.
That is a good thing that is happening.
And now, when we get to the pharmaceutical stuff, you'll see that the mainstream media has focused like a laser beam on this one country doctor in a midnight community.
He's an M.D. But he's honest, and he's moving away from this stuff, and he's one of the people that's treating them.
And they have focused on him to try to destroy him, just like they will all focus on Thomas Massey to destroy him.
And, you know, you have a situation.
It's very rare that you have a lot of agreement with somebody, you know.
Like I said, there's going to be some issues that we would disagree on.
But you look at a situation, even with a single issue, With a single issue.
Let's say a gun rights group.
And they will go through and they will rank the different congressmen on that single issue.
And it's very rare for them to find anybody that has 100%, even on a single issue, in terms of their voting and that type of thing.
But you want to have somebody who's honest.
You know, I look at it, and if I don't have somebody that's running for office that I agree with over 50% of the time, I don't even bother to go.
The Democrats, they're always batting zero with me.
It's not anything I agree with them on.
Republicans, maybe 30-40% of the time, and usually even that 30-40% of the time, they're doing the right thing for the wrong reason.
But, you know, I don't even have third parties that I agree with more than 50% of the time anymore.
I disagree with all these people because they've all sold out to this.
That tyrannical unconstitutional state.
Well, the ADL is cheering Trump administration for the bold arrest of a Palestinian activist.
And we're going to talk about that.
Isn't it wonderful that he would boldly defy the First Amendment?
And their statement from the ADL, We firmly believe there should be swift and severe consequences for those who provide material support for foreign terrorist organizations.
I do, too.
I do too.
So let's go in and arrest everybody at the CIA and the Pentagon, okay?
Because they're the ones who are supporting Al-Qaeda in every different instantiation.
They keep coming up with a different alias, a different name, and going somewhere else and doing mass murder.
And we're the ones who are supporting them.
We gave these murderers in Syria A-10 warthogs to overthrow Assad.
And I'm not an Assad fan.
But he wasn't going door-to-door murdering Christians.
Our guys are.
Why is that always the case?
And so he says, yeah, we need to do something about foreign terrorist organizations.
Well, evidently not.
Evidently not.
We need to hold alleged perpetrators responsible for their actions.
Obviously, any deportation action or revocation of a green card or a visa must be undertaken in alignment with required due process protections.
So, I would ask Jonathan Greenblatt, what is the law that this guy violated?
You're deporting him for speech that is specifically protected under our Constitution.
I don't care about your Israeli law or what you want.
And that's the whole thing.
Who is Israel, right?
You look at Israel and Jewish in general, okay?
Is it an ethnicity?
Is it a political entity?
Is it a prophetic entity?
There's all these different things.
What do you think about it?
Well, bottom line is that ethnically and politically, Israel is a mix of a lot of different things, ethnically and politically.
And when you look at it prophetically, you may want to go back and look at Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar.
And you might want to realize that just because you've got a promise from God, that doesn't mean that you can take it into your own hands and violate ethical laws.
That's exactly it.
There's a lot of Jews who say that as well, about the political state of Israel, that people are criticizing for what they're doing.
So, he also cheered the ADL on Jonathan Greenblatt.
Cheered Trump's proposed mask ban.
He doesn't want people wearing masks at anti-Israel protests.
You know, it's kind of interesting.
I said, I didn't know what was going on in Iran until there were Iranian students who were protesting wearing these balaclavas.
You know, it covers up everything except your eyes, right?
Like a terrorist mask.
That looks suspicious, you know.
There were a lot of Iranian students in engineering.
A lot of them.
And so I asked some of them.
As a matter of fact, you know, the names were so difficult to pronounce.
I remember the beginning of class, the very first class, of course, the professor started calling out names.
And he'd get to one of these Iranian names and he would just butcher it, couldn't figure it out.
And he tried a couple of those.
And then...
Finally, he said, okay, I'm going to read it out by social security number.
Evidently, they had social security numbers printed up on the sheets, which is really kind of crazy, or at least a part of them, right?
You know, I'm going to give you the last four digits of your social security number, you know?
And he read that out, you know?
It's one, two, three, four here.
Yes, I'm here.
Okay, good.
We got that.
That was his solution to the hard-to-pronounce names.
And so I asked them, you know, why are you doing this?
Well, it's to hide from the Savak.
I said, what's the Savak?
Secret police has been trained by your CIA. If they see us protesting the Shah that they put into power, they will arrest, torture, or kill our families.
And so now we have a situation where the Israeli government, our ally again, just like the Shah, the Israeli government wants to take the masks off.
So for what purpose, do you think?
For what purpose?
What are they going to do?
We're talking about the Savak or the Mossad.
And so, you know, plus we have Trump, right?
This is a guy who, just like with the tariffs, he can't make up his mind on the masks.
The masks are on, the masks are off.
The tariffs are on, the tariffs are off, and on and on.
And he doesn't have a good reason for any of those things.
And he doesn't have the legal authority for them either.
And Coulter jumped in on this.
On the deportation of this person said, well, there's almost no one I don't want to deport.
She's not happy about these people.
And I don't like the Ivy League schools, so take all their money, but not for this reason, okay?
So she said, there's almost no one that I don't want to deport, but unless they have committed a crime, isn't this a violation of the First Amendment?
It is.
It is.
Well, when we come back, we're going to take a look at the real terrorism.
The real terrorism that's being supported by the Pentagon, by the CIA, by our own government.
And we're going to take a look at it at a personal level, what is really happening.
It is a genocide.
It is a genocide against Christians in Syria, by the people that we put in power, that we continue to support.
Somehow, somehow, we could help them to overthrow the government in Syria.
But now we are powerless to do anything to stop them.
Isn't that right?
What a surprising thing, isn't it?
Oh, well, actually, I'm not surprised.
Twilight Shadow says, Massey is the only one who is not owned by them.
Remember when he spoke out, his wife got whacked, and the media was very hush-hush.
I don't think that his wife was whacked.
I think if his wife had been killed, Thomas Massey would have spoken out.
I don't think that he's been cowed down by that at all.
He's been very quiet about what she died from.
But I don't think we can speculate about that.
North American House Hippo said, unfortunately, Thomas Massey's wife ended up being sacrificed in the battle against AIPAC. I don't see any evidence that she was killed.
Again, I think that Thomas Massey would speak out about that.
Guard Goldsmith Good to see you, Gard.
Liberty Conspiracy every night on Twitter and Rockfan.
The attack on Thomas Massey really looks like a setup from AIPAC, yep, and to push Massey out of potential Senate contention down the line.
David nailed it, my opinion.
The reference to Shalom was a tell, of course.
Well, that Shalom Massey was a headline that Chris Minahan put together, but Trump put Shalom for the person who criticized Netanyahu.
And we should put it that way, right?
What he's punishing is not anti-Semitism.
He's punishing anti-Netanyahuism.
People who don't like what Netanyahu is doing.
And like I said before, you know, we talk about, is Israel a political entity?
Well, if we look at it as a political entity, we find that the party of Netanyahu is very much in the minority.
As in all these parliamentary...
Elections, democracies, republics, I guess they're democracies.
With all of them, you have a lot of different parties.
It's very, very, very rare for anybody to have more than 50%.
So they have to put together a coalition.
But Netanyahu, before all of this stuff happened and conveniently made him a lot more powerful, Netanyahu struggled three or four times trying to put together a coalition and never could.
Even though he came out as the first You know, the highest vote total.
He was a long ways from 50%.
And so, you know, what we're talking about is not anti-Semitism.
We're talking about anti-Netanyahuism, which is rampant in the state of Israel itself, with the Israeli people.
Audi, modernretroradio.com.
Good to see you.
So, do they think that we don't notice all of them collectively promoting Tesla Act?
The other part of this is when you look at the radical left, they are shooting at these Tesla places.
They're firebombing with Molotov cocktails, the charging units.
I think they did that to a dealership.
They're going through and putting graffiti over the Tesla cars that individuals own.
That tells us a great deal about the left.
Sean Hannity tells us a great deal about these right-wing influencers.
I mean, it's, you know, watch your back, watch where you are, because, you know, these are, you know, we just need to be aware of who these people are and the kinds of threats that they bring to us, different ones.
S-Flow818, Hannity was a big endorser of the 9-11 narrative.
Sellout, yeah, yeah.
And so was Tucker.
So was Tucker.
Tucker, he had a guy on who said, well, let me show you why these buildings just collapsed, free fall, and so forth.
And, you know, Building 7 wasn't even hit by a plane.
Tucker, I'm not going to show that video.
I'm not going to show that.
Just berating him and, you know, mocking people.
He said, you talk to these people.
And they all want to say, what's the melting point of steel and what's the temperature of aviation fuel and everything?
He goes, you can't even talk to these people.
I was like, well, you won't even answer that.
And then after he went on his own, he said, well, you know, you can't talk about Building 7. You can't ask questions about that or they'll fire you.
I mean, he said it.
And he still won't give you the truth.
He still won't give you the straight-up stuff.
He still pretends that he doesn't know.
That's his thing.
Sean Hannity and Joe Rogan, when they do interviews, And it may be a genuine thing.
Maybe they really are that clueless and stupid and they have no opinion about anything.
But they'll bring in people that are all over the place and then, you know, when they say something, they'll go, oh, really?
Oh, wow.
Oh, whoa.
What about, whoa?
Oh, I've never heard that before.
Even though people have been talking about it 5, 10 years, 20 years or whatever.
It's an act.
It's an act.
It's just amazing to me.
And if it isn't an act...
You should turn them off immediately before the stupid catches on to you.
So yeah, this Massey thing is another distraction, says Bride B. Mac.
It is, but I think it tells us a great deal about the motivations of what Trump is doing and where he's going.
All of this stuff is a big distraction as they put together, as they weave their web.
of crypto-enslavement, I think.
This big pump and dump.
And we're going to talk about that as well.
But we're going to take a break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about why this stuff is always, why is it that the people that we support always wind up doing mass murder of Christians?
We'll be right back.
piano plays softly
piano plays
softly piano
plays softly piano plays softly you
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Guard Goldsmith.
Again, it says, I called Hannity when the U.S. invaded Iraq, and I said that there was no declaration of war.
His response was, depends on what the meaning of the word war is.
I said, you sound like Clinton, and he ended the call.
Yeah.
Well, it depends on what the meaning of is, is, right?
What is the meaning of war?
I don't know what the meaning of war is.
We're going to tell you what war looks like here.
In just a second.
But, you know, as one of the listeners just said before I went to break, this is a distraction.
And I agree with it.
But I think that when you look at it, Trump rules by distraction.
He rules by conflict and chaos and confusion and vacillation.
That's how he gets there.
And that's his technique.
And I would say this.
I've said from the very beginning that I think Doge is a distraction.
I still cover it.
But I think it's a distraction.
And I think when you see the outrage over the fact that, oh, you're just not doing another, not kicking the can down the road.
You know, Trump was very upset when they didn't remove the debt ceiling for two years.
Well, that tells you all you need to know about Doge.
I said it at the time.
I said that shows that all this talk about Doge and everything is a bunch of nonsense, and it is.
It's a distraction.
What is it that they're really going to be doing?
Well, you know, what they're really doing is they're paving the way for a technocracy that's going to enslave us.
In a digital surveillance system.
That's where this stuff all ends.
It really is.
But let's take a look at the nature of our government.
This is End of the American Dream.
They said, why is it that every time they topple a government in the Middle East, things get even worse for the Christians living there?
Well, that's a rhetorical question, isn't it?
It's because of who our real government is.
Our real government is the intelligence community, the CIA, and the Pentagon working with them.
That's our real government.
Our real government murders people.
Our real government is focused on mind control, like I talked about yesterday.
Our real government is occultic, satanic, murderous.
And of course, they're opposed to Christians and Christ.
He said it happened in Afghanistan.
It happened in Iraq.
It happened in Libya.
Now it's happening in Syria.
They wanted to get rid of Assad because they said he was evil.
Now they've got a man who is far worse.
The U.S. government previously had issued a $10 million reward for his capture because he was literally a terrorist.
Not in the sense that Jonathan Greenblatt is saying, if you criticize Netanyahu, you're a terrorist.
No, this guy really was a terrorist.
And they had a $10 million reward for his capture.
The U.S. government did.
And yet...
When he's fighting against Assad, well, they do.
They support him with A-10 warthogs and a bunch of other stuff.
He was once aligned with al-Qaeda, and he doesn't try to hide his jihadist agenda.
He just relabeled it, like all of them.
They go from Mujahideen to al-Qaeda to ISIS to al-Nusra and all the rest of it.
And now he's got this new organization.
Every single one of them.
Same people.
He's a good example of this.
Poster child.
The same people in all of these things.
They are the cat's paw, these terrorists, for the CIA everywhere they go.
In the city of Latakia, jihadist fighters were reportedly going door to door in search of victims.
In some cases, people were asked to show their IDs so that the jihadist fighters could determine what religion they belonged to.
Now, let's talk about what's coming up.
I said from the very beginning, geospatial intelligence that began in the 1990s, the fastest growing part of the intelligence agency is where James Clapper arose.
Why did they put that together?
Well, because they wanted to do the kinds of things that Alex Karp at Palantir is doing.
Data mining.
And using your metadata and other things like that to make inferences about you.
Geospatial intelligence will look at it.
They'll follow where you are geographically.
We saw a little bit of that on January the 6th.
They will use that to make inferences.
Well, you were in Washington on January the 6th, and you don't live there, and you've bought guns in the past, and we know from your history that you have given money to a church or something.
So we're going to come.
We know you're a conservative, and we're going to come after you.
It's that type of thing.
And from the very beginning, they pointed out that they could infer somebody's politics, as well as their religion, the two controversial things, the two things that they always want to punish.
That's why I focus on them.
Because, you know, when they tell you that these really important things, when they focus on that, that's where we've got to push back.
That's where the fight is.
That's where the line of contact is, to use the phrase that they're using in Ukraine all the time.
The line of contact, folks, is politics and religion.
Always has been.
Always has been.
Because everything is a spiritual war.
Everything is downstream from the spiritual war.
Culture is downstream from that, and politics is downstream from the culture.
And so that's what they want to focus on, and that's what they can identify using their geospatial intelligence.
And a large part of that is social media, scraping stuff off, but also tracking your phone and other things like that.
And so when you look at this, and they want people to show their ID. Now, in Syria, They evidently have physical IDs, and on the physical ID, it's going to say what your religion is.
When they first started doing toll roads in the Netherlands, and I've told this story before, people pushed back a great deal against the tagless toll roads.
Prior to that, you could just throw a coin in.
Nobody's tracking your movements if you're just throwing a coin in, if you're using cash.
But they wanted to go cashless.
And when you go cashless, now people are going to be tracking you.
And identifying you.
You're now in a database, your activities and your movements are in a database, and they can make all kinds of inferences from it.
And so I think it was in the late 80s or early 90s, the people in the Netherlands said, we don't want this.
They pushed back against it.
And the reason they gave was they said, when the Germans came in, we in the Netherlands were very diligent about keeping all kinds of information about everybody.
We kind of pride ourselves on that, you know.
And they had it on 3x5 cards, and they were packed so tightly that when the...
Germans came in.
They couldn't set them on fire.
It's like trying to light a log with a match.
And the Germans got all that information, all the information about religion and politics, and they used it on people.
They said, we don't want to have that again.
And let me tell you that you have a situation where, okay, they got a physical ID. If we go to a biometric or digital ID, oh, everything in your entire life will be there.
They've already created a life log for all of us.
All of us.
Facebook is LifeLog.
So they've got a LifeLog for all of us.
And so when you, and now, they can feed it into AI. Just like that.
And AI can go ahead and give them a summary.
And do a complete profile on you.
And it is kind of interesting.
I've asked the AI stuff to give a profile to me, and it was actually pretty accurate.
Very cynical and skeptical of government, anti-libertarian, all this stuff, Christian.
And it's like, just right down the line, they've got all of this stuff on me.
They know exactly who I am.
That's why Spotify has been doing that for a while.
That's why they won't let me put my podcast on Spotify.
They got me profiled, and they don't like what I am, and so they're going to shut me down.
So here you have a physical ID in Syria.
These people go door-to-door, look at the physical ID. Oh, you're a Christian.
You're dead.
Pull you out.
And that's what they're going to do with a biometric ID, and that's what they're going to do with a digital ID, and it'll be far more detailed than that.
Far more.
Tell them what your favorite food is if they want to know what it is.
So they asked residents for their IDs to check their religion and their sect before killing them.
So it wasn't even the religion.
It was a sect.
Presumably, you could be a Muslim.
And if you were the wrong denomination of Muslim, you know, sect, they call it, okay, then they get you as well.
He said the gunman also stole cars and robbed homes.
So this person said, so what would you do if this happened to you?
Would you try to hide the fact that you're a Christian?
Well, you ought to try to hide, that's for sure.
You know, and look, there is a point.
I'm not saying that we deny Christ.
You never do that.
You never violate your conscience either.
But on the other hand, you also don't necessarily walk right into the lion's mouth either.
Paul, when they were trying to kill him, his friends lowered him over the wall in a basket to escape the people who were trying to kill him.
That's a legitimate thing to do.
It's legitimate to try to save other people's lives as well.
In the city of Banias, those that were rounded up were marched through the streets, lined up, and then shot.
Shot.
See, we have to fight to have firearms.
We have to fight.
The Second Amendment is so important.
It is a deterrent to this type of thing.
Firearms exist as a deterrent.
When I would argue this type of thing to reporters when I was with the Libertarian Party, oh, you think you're going to be able...
Same arguments that we heard from Eric Swalwell.
Beto O'Rourke and Biden.
Well, we got a big military and we got big jet planes and your guns aren't going to do you any good.
I said, well, we've never won any asymmetric war that we've had, even though we have this massive military.
And you go back and take a look at the Warsaw Ghetto.
And how an unarmed population, once they got one gun, they got another one, another one, another one, and they held off a couple of panzer divisions for a couple of months until they just burned the entire city down.
But, look, we don't want to have a war like that.
But the real purpose of the Second Amendment is the purpose of mutual assured destruction.
Same reason that the federal government accumulated nuclear weapons, presumably.
When Russia had them, it was a mutual assured destruction.
We don't want to pull that trigger.
Now, you could always have a madman who would do it.
You could always have a madman who's in charge of the American government who decides that they're going to go out and pick a fight with the American people.
But again, I don't think they're going to win that.
And I think they understand that as well.
Because I think if they thought they could win, they'd do it already.
But the bottom line is that we've got to have firearms as a deterrent.
And I've talked to a lot of people.
Christians who are missionaries in foreign countries.
One guy I know was in Mogadishu.
And he was there up to just before the time that the events portrayed in Black Hawk Down happened.
And he said, I went everywhere with an AR-15 slung around my shoulder.
He said, he'd be walking along and they'd be, you know, going over a hill or something like that.
And he said, an Apache helicopter gunship would come along.
He said, you know, they...
They have these guns, and wherever the pilot is looking, those guns track his eyes, and they point at whatever he's looking at.
So all he has to do is say, fire.
And he goes, so it comes up over the hill, and all of a sudden the guns point at me, because he's looking at me.
I waved.
I was like, I'm on your slot, I guess.
But he said he carried AR-15 to protect himself and to protect other people.
The guy, Charles Von Vick.
I would always have to think about how to pronounce his name, in South Africa.
He was also a, not a missionary, he lived there, but he was a preacher who would go from place to place.
And he said, at first he was like, I'm not going to carry a gun, I wouldn't shoot anybody.
And then he was seeing people being rousted up and shot at random by these Marxist terrorists in South Africa.
This is under Nelson Mandela.
His wife.
And so he said, he thought about it.
He read about it, prayed about it.
He said, I have a duty to protect innocent life, including my own, but especially other people.
And so he wound up in a situation.
I talked about it several times.
I've had him on two or three times.
I compared him to David, who had five stones when he went up against Goliath.
And that particular case is because Goliath had four brothers.
By the way, let me take attention here.
The House of David.
What a mess that is.
We didn't have very high expectations for that.
Because it is Amazon, and we saw what they'd done to the Lord of the Rings and many other things.
I wait to see what happens.
James Bond, he's bought that up.
But anyway, so I said, let's look at just the beginning of this.
I know we're not going to get too far.
So the thing starts, and it puts up this disclaimer.
This has nothing to do with the Bible or anything like that.
I mean, basically, we're not really trying to follow the Bible or any historical events or anything like that.
It's like, oh, great.
And it begins with the David and Goliath thing.
And everybody knows the story of David and Goliath.
Even if you didn't go to Sunday school, you know the story of David and Goliath.
You know, the guy is out there and he's taunting Israel for a long time and a long back and forth.
And it so begins with that.
And you see David with his stones, and he goes running towards Goliath, and Goliath takes his spear and throws it at David, and it's like a mortar going off, you know, and a girl close to him.
And every one of them that he throws is on the third one of these explosive javelins.
Maybe that's where, you know, they got the idea for the javelins.
Trump, I gave him the javelins, and Obama gave you sheets.
Well, you know, I should give him the kind of javelins that Goliath was throwing.
And so on the third one, he hits David in the side.
David goes down, and he's bleeding on the side and everything, and Goliath is walking up to him.
And then it comes up and it says, I'm like, five months earlier, or something like that, and I said, turn this garbage off.
It's not even close to any of this stuff.
Anyway, where was I? Oh, okay, five stones.
Okay, so Charles Van Vick started carrying a pistol, and he trained with it so he could shoot.
And he had just like a little snub-nosed pistol with five bullets in it.
He decides that he's going to visit, one Sunday, a very liberal church.
During Truth and Reconciliation, these terrorists said they had picked that church because they knew it was a liberal church, a white liberal church, and that there wouldn't be anybody carrying firearms there.
And so they kick in the door, and they've got fully automatic weapons and grenades.
They throw their grenades.
They start spraying the audience there with fully automatic fire.
And Charles is up in the back, and he pulls out his gun, and he gets down on one knee, and he takes a shot.
And he's like, I'm never going to hit anything from this distance.
So he goes out the back and comes back around the side.
And takes a couple of shots at him.
And they said during Truth and Reconciliation, first of all, that first shot miraculously hit these guys.
Hit one of them.
And then they said, then we get attacked from a different direction.
He did that simply because it's like, I'm never going to hit anything.
He didn't know he'd hit the first guy, so he goes around because I'm going to have to get somewhere where I can get a better shot at him.
So he takes a couple of shots at him.
I don't think he hit anybody there, but now they think that they're getting hit from multiple directions and they run away.
They ran away.
He defended innocent life by having a gun.
He didn't have to kill anybody.
They killed over 50 people with that initial assault.
It was massive.
And he stopped it.
A group of terrorists with fully automatic weapons and grenades.
And he stopped them with a snub-nosed pistol at a great distance.
And he only had five shots.
And he fired three of them.
God can use people like that.
He can use you.
Anyway, they said one resident of the West Coast city in Syria told Sky News, quote, they forcibly brought people down the streets.
They lined them up and started shooting them.
They left nobody alive.
They left nobody at all.
And that's what those terrorists who attacked that church said.
Their intention was to kill all thousand people there.
Got to execute every last one of them.
The person said, the scene I saw, It was pure horror.
Just indescribable.
It all started when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
She thought it would be a grand idea to have a civil war in Syria.
Now here we are.
So, do you think she's proud of the fact that women are being forced to walk naked through the streets before they are then executed?
Witnesses revealed how women were reportedly forced to walk naked in the streets before being shot dead.
And a teenage boy was also handed a rifle.
And forced to shoot his own family, reports a claim.
Our State Department, our CIA, our Pentagon, at work.
At work.
They gave these people air support and who knows what else.
We saw the A-10 warthogs.
Nobody else has got those.
The terrorists were not flying them.
We were flying them.
Now, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has issued a strongly worded statement, a strongly worded statement, saying that he condemns these radical Islamic terrorists.
Well, shut up until you do something about it.
Just amazing.
While they arm them and give them air support.
Well, I really don't support that.
I strongly condemn that.
Yeah, right.
Well, one source says that hundreds of Christians Have been slaughtered.
More than 800. Another source, which is the Iraqi Christian Foundation, which advocates for Christians and other religious minorities in the Middle East, says the death toll is 1,800.
Not 800, but 1,800.
It alleges that entire villages are being slaughtered as we speak.
And our American government will do nothing to stop it.
All these people waving the Ukrainian flags and the Israeli flags and everything, they're not going to do anything to stop this.
And we put this guy in power.
Another source says that more than 7,000, 7,000 Alawites and Christians have been killed.
A Syrian, Tsarizia, member of MEP, I think it's a member of European Parliament, has returned from the Syrian capital.
His visit over the weekend coincided as the forces of the Turkish-backed Islamist They said they're throwing them into the sea.
So, again, this is your government at work.
They're throwing the bodies into the sea.
Massacre.
Targeting...
Religious minorities.
An armed convoy with heavy weapons entered the main streets in Jabla, said one person whose name is Abu Ali.
He said on a three-way call with a translator, they started shooting everything.
The line of military trucks stretched for miles, with each truck carrying a large number of soldiers, pickups, tanks, and heavy weapons.
I bet we paid for those.
Because we had to get Syria.
We had to get Assad.
We had to get the oil fields or whatever, and this is what war looks like.
I saw the building across from me on the stairs, four young people, civilians.
They killed them and passed by.
And the jihadists shouted, We will behead you, pigs.
We will behead you, pigs.
Now in hiding and fearing for his extended family, Abu Ali is just one witness to the bloodbath in Syria over the past five days.
His traumatized young daughter refuses to sleep unless her parents constantly hold her.
The Islamists who carried out the attacks posted videos on social media.
So we don't have to guess about this stuff.
We don't have to rely on witness accounts because they were proud of it and put it up on social media.
One video showed smiling bearded men in military uniforms slitting the throat of an unarmed civilian with the militants shouting Allahu Akbar.
Our God is greater.
That's what that means.
It doesn't mean God is great.
It means our God is greater.
That's why they shout it when they kill people for their demonic God that they worship.
They shouted Allahu Akbar as he bled out on the sand.
Another video depicted the execution of an elderly unarmed man.
Yet another showed young men in paramilitary gear standing among the family that they had just slaughtered.
Those videos represent a small fraction of the footage released by the jihadist factions in Syria during the killing spree in the region of Latakia.
So, you know, Marco Rubio has got to say something.
He can't just ignore it.
So he's going to strongly condemn it.
Good for you, Marco.
Little Marco.
Every time we conduct a regime change operation in the Middle East, the next government is always worse.
So why is that?
Well, you might want to ask the CIA because they're the ones who are doing this.
How much footage of the atrocities are you seeing on the nightly news?
How about zero?
Americans have no idea what's going on there.
And if they did, would they even care?
Interestingly, thousands of Alawites and Christians have fled to a Russian military base in a desperate attempt to stay alive.
Kind of tells you whose side the terrorists are on, doesn't it?
Not on the side of the Russians.
Outside of us.
Our side.
Thousands of Syrian Alawites and Christians flock to, and I can't pronounce that airbase, seeking Russian protection.
We need Russian protection can be heard amongst the crowd to save them from the American-supported terrorists.
The airbase has effectively turned into an open-air refugee camp with about 8,000 Syrians seeking shelter and more expected to arrive.
Well, to finish up, this article here, this is from, posted up on America First Report.
Christianity is the most persecuted faith on the entire planet.
And the persecution of Christians is only going to intensify during the years ahead.
Would you think that if you listened to Trump and his cabinet, that Christianity is the most persecuted?
No, you would say Jewish, right?
So what will you do if our men show up at your door someday and ask you what you believe?
You might want to start thinking about that.
And you might want to start thinking about that, Americans, because it's already happening in the UK. It's already happening in Germany and other places where they show up at your door and say, what are you praying about in the privacy of your own home?
I saw these posts where, and that was in Finland, at a former member of parliament, a former cabinet member in the government, says in a social media post with, People in her church who are arguing about what they should do about this LGBT thing.
And she quotes the Bible to them.
And they have now, this state prosecutor, is now on his third trial trying to lock her up for that.
So they will come to your door.
So what are you going to do about it?
Think about it.
And so here's what the situation is right now in the American church, as weak as it is.
You've got a large megachurch, Gateway Church, Robert Morris.
He's asking the court to dismiss a lawsuit over his money-back guarantee on ties.
He says, give me 10%, and if God doesn't give you back more than that, I will give you your money back.
Well, you know, God is not a genie in a bottle, is he?
And so some of these people didn't get their money back.
That's not the way it works.
God is not obligated to do that.
And, you know, he may give you, if you give God money, he may give you something even more valuable than that.
He may give you some persecution or something to grow you up and to teach you something.
That's not the response, though, from Robert Morris.
Robert Morris said, you give me money, and God's going to give you even more money back.
And so these people said, well, they filed a lawsuit.
A lot of people filed a lawsuit against this.
They're in Texas.
it's a big church and when I he said when I started giving the first 10% to God it changed everything Here's what I'd like to do.
I'd like to just challenge you.
I've done this with our church.
I've told our church on multiple occasions, I've said to them, if you try it for one year, if you're not fully satisfied, at the end of that year, I'll give you your money back.
And with 22 years in church, no one's ever asked for that money back.
Well, they are now.
He's got a lot of people who are suing him for that.
See, the American church doesn't care about anything but money, do they?
These people probably don't care that God taught them something.
They just want money.
It's like, I put it in here, and then that comes out over here because I'm dealing with a genie in a bottle.
No, God's not going to be manipulated.
These pastors will manipulate you, but you're not going to manipulate God.
And just before I take a break, North American House Depot, thank you very much for the tip.
I appreciate that.
He says a co-worker who's also Canadian got one question wrong in a citizenship exam.
Quote, how many times did the U.S. declare war in the 20th century?
The correct answer is two.
That's good.
Thanks for sharing that.
I guess he thought that the Vietnam War and Korean War, those were declared.
Had a lot of wars, but didn't declare it.
So before we take a break.
I thought this was an excellent article.
It's off of Relevant Magazine.
It says, think you've never witnessed a miracle?
We're talking about all these different things, right?
You think you've never witnessed a miracle?
Think again.
If you woke up this morning and you chuckled and you checked your phone before thanking God for keeping the earth in orbit, you're not alone.
Mark Batterson wants to change that.
He believes we're walking through a world that is brimming with the miraculous.
We just don't have the eyes to see it.
These people are, hey, I gave you money.
And I want my miracle.
I want to, you know, see that money coming back to me.
There are miracles happening all around us all the time.
Hidden in plain sight, said Batterson.
If you miss them, life can become a little bit of a chore and a bore.
But if you rediscover the miracle that is life, it takes on a different dimension.
It's not just the big cinematic miracles, the Red Sea partying or blind man seeing.
It's the fact that we're currently spinning at 1,000 miles per hour on a planet that is hurtling through space at 67,000 miles per hour.
All the while, our bodies conduct trillions of biochemical reactions every second.
So he says, even on a day we didn't get much done, we did travel 1.6 million miles through space.
Maybe that's why I'm so tired at the end of the day.
We think of miracles as the exception.
But what if they're the rule?
What if the real problem isn't that miracles are rare?
What if the problem is we've trained ourselves not to notice them?
Psychologists call this intentional blindness.
If something is constant, like the sun rising, our hearts beating, or our lungs breathing, we stop paying attention to what G.K. Chesterton once said, we should marvel at the permanent things, and not just at the exceptional ones.
We should be startled by the sun, not by the eclipse, said Batterson.
Consider the sun.
It's 93 million miles away, and every second it converts about 4 million tons of matter into energy.
That's the energy equivalent of a trillion megaton bombs every second.
And yet, how often do we stop to appreciate it?
Imagine if the sun only rose once every hundred years.
The event would be so breathtaking that it would be recorded in history books.
The stuff of legend.
Instead, because it happens every day, we take it for granted.
The same is true of our own bodies.
Right now, you have 37 sextillion biochemical reactions happening inside of you, says Batterson.
Your heart will beat 100,000 times today, pumping six quarts of blood through your 60,000 miles of veins, arteries, and capillaries.
That's twice the circumference of the earth.
And yet, we go about our day saying, Well, I've never seen a miracle.
With all due respect, you've never not seen one.
In fact, you are one.
Curiosity, he argues, is key to seeing what's already there.
Jesus said, unless you become like little children.
He said, kids ask an average of 125 questions a day.
Adults, only six.
Somewhere along the way, we lose 119 questions per day.
The more we learn, the more we realize how much we don't know.
Boy, is that ever the truth?
Every year in engineering, I got more stupid.
I realized how, you know, as I would take the steps and as I'd learn stuff, I realized that just kind of opened up the tip of an iceberg that I didn't know anything about.
Anyway, Christianity was never meant to be a system of easy answers, but rather an invitation to explore a God who is bigger than we can comprehend.
But curiosity requires humility, the willingness to admit that we don't have it all figured out.
In the beginning, God created us in His image, said Batterson.
And he quoted Mark Twain, said, and we've been creating God in our image ever since.
The problem is that when we think of...
Shrink God down to something that we can understand.
He stops being God.
He stops amazing us.
Of course, the question lurking beneath all this is about when we do ask for a miracle and it doesn't happen.
What about the unanswered prayers?
The disappointments?
The moments when it feels like God is silent?
Or, you know, we put our money in the plate and we didn't get rich.
There are prayers that God hasn't answered in my life, he says, and that's why I have what I call my Deuteronomy 2929 file.
The secret things belong to the Lord.
Some things we just won't understand on this side of eternity.
That doesn't mean that miracles aren't real.
He shares his own experience.
He said, I had severe asthma for 40 years.
On July the 2nd, 2016, I prayed a bold prayer.
And God healed my lungs.
This is why you should keep a diary of prayer requests.
He knows the day that he made that prayer.
But he said, God healed my lungs and I haven't touched an inhaler since.
But God doesn't always do that.
Every healing miracle is still temporary.
You know, even Lazarus died a second time.
Without eternity in the equation, none of it makes sense.
But we don't believe in happily ever after.
We believe in something better.
Happily forever.
So how do we start seeing the miracles around us?
It comes down to a simple shift.
Gratitude.
We don't see the world as it is.
We see the world as we are.
If you're looking for something to complain about, you'll always find it.
If you're looking for something to be grateful for, you'll always find it.
Gratitude isn't about getting what we want.
It's about appreciating what we already have.
That's why Batterson and his wife keep a gratitude journal.
Sharing their entries with each other.
Every Sabbath.
But once a week, they go through and talk about what they're grateful for that week.
I think it's a great idea.
I mean, we did that as a family, typically on Thanksgiving.
That's something we ought to do every week, not once a year.
That practice, he said, got us through two bouts of cancer.
Even in the hardest season, there is always something to be thankful for.
Maybe that's the real secret to seeing miracles.
Learning to take nothing for granted.
To wake up each day and to marvel at the ordinary.
To stop waiting for the grand, spectacular moment.
And realize that the spectacular is happening all around us all the time.
And maybe, just maybe, if we start paying attention, we'll realize that life itself is a miracle we've been waiting for.
You know those people who are suing him because they gave 10% and they didn't get richer.
They stop and think about how rich they are compared to the people in Syria or one poor place after the other.
How God has provided for them in an amazing way.
And yet, they're not satisfied.
They want more.
And they're going to take him to court to get more.
It's pretty amazing.
And I'll just say this too.
He began by talking about what's going on in our body, talking about what's going on with the sun, things like that.
And I've got to say, that was one of the things I really enjoyed about teaching our kids, the homeschooling stuff.
There's some great curriculum that is out there, a lot of different ones.
I really liked a lot of the stuff that was done by Answers in Genesis.
If you're homeschooling, it's a wonderful time to indulge in that yourself and to see the miraculous design.
I remember when I was in school, biology was all about comparative skeletons.
Dead things.
And it's like, okay, so these skeletons look similar.
That means that this one came from that one.
It's like, no, it doesn't.
If it was the same designer, you would expect some similarity, wouldn't you?
I mean, don't you see in just looking at a car design?
Oh, that looks like it used to anyway.
Now all cars look the same.
But it used to be you'd look at it and say, oh, that looks like a Ford or that looks like a GM car.
You know, they had a certain style to them because they had a common maker that was there.
But to look at these animals and to think about all the unique properties of the woodpecker so that he slams his head and he's got a cushion for his brain and then he's got a long, sticky tongue so he can pull the insects out of the hole that he eventually makes.
He's got feet that are There to hold him vertically.
I mean, he was designed specifically for that.
And he's got all these different elements that are there.
Each of them has to be there simultaneously.
They can evolve over a period of time.
Or else none of it works.
So that's a real wonderful thing about homeschooling.
For your children, your grandchildren, to be able to go through that.
Looking forward to doing that again, actually.
Yeah, yeah.
But I think it's also, When we look at certain things, if we keep track of things, and we keep track of what we pray for, we will see God work providentially.
And those are some of the strongest miracles.
Things that happened that you could not have orchestrated or imagined.
And you keep track of that.
Yeah, miracles still happen.
They happen in different ways in different places.
You have missionaries have amazing stories.
They're like the Book of Acts when they go into some of these areas where people have never heard anything.
They don't have any cultural background or understanding of anything.
And, of course, we're losing that here.
So we might be seeing some really neat stuff in the future.
Who knows?
As America turns into a pagan nation.
But they see amazing stuff.
But we, if we're looking for it, and again, one of the things we've got to make sure that we're not blind to, Is looking for God's providence.
And that's really key.
We're going to take a quick break.
And before we go, Angry Tiger's got a comment here.
He says, I found in my life, unanswered prayers are usually a blessing in disguise.
Yeah, because we don't know what we should ask for.
Sometimes we ask for a snake and God gives us a fish.
And later on, we could say, oh, now I see what snakes do.
I didn't know what a snake was.
I saw it, and I thought it was really cool.
But now I see what it really is.
It's been my experience, too, Angry Tiger.
Again, Angry Tiger Report, along with Jason Barker.
They do Nights of the Storm.
We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
ORCHESTRA PLAYS
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey McGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the McGuffin logo in blue.
But he told me to get lost.
Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. Well, and Trump has resumed the bombs and missiles going to Ukraine.
All Zelensky had to do was just to sign a little piece of paper.
And we're waiting to see if Putin is going to reply to the ceasefire.
If not, I guess they will blame it all on him.
I'll just show you the shirt.
We had somebody actually ordered this yesterday to hold it up.
So Karen said, hold it up again.
So, well, this is the MacGuffin T-shirt and kind of an orange, or I guess we'd call it.
And here's the...
The black one with the blue.
This is the MacGuffin there.
Is that good, Karen?
Okay.
All right.
She likes that.
Okay.
And thank you for mine.
I appreciate that.
Let's talk a little bit about free speech and the Take It Down Act.
This is not something I've talked about before.
The Reclaim the Net calls it a censorship weapon disguised as protection.
A shoot-first, ask-questions-later censorship mechanism with no recourse.
In other words, it's like civil asset forfeiture for your speech or the First Amendment.
Take it and be just on accusation.
We don't have to prove anything.
Just take it.
Trump has thrown his support behind the Take It Down Act, a bill designed to combat the spread of non-consensual intimate imagery, including AI-generated deep fakes.
The legislation has gained momentum, particularly with First Lady Melania Trump backing the effort.
I guess she wants to be paid for her intimate imagery.
Pornography that she does.
She doesn't want anybody doing any freelancing pornography using her face.
Send her the money.
And Trump himself endorsing it during his March the 4th address to Congress.
And so the question is, this non-consensual intimate imagery.
How is that going to be interpreted with that?
And Reclaim the Net believes that there is a lot of wiggle room in the way this thing is written.
They, first of all, don't define that term.
There is no recourse for this.
And so they believe, and I agree with them, that it will be used by politicians to intimidate anybody that's doing satire of them.
The Senate just passed, this is what Trump said, the Senate just passed the Take It Down Act.
Once it passes the House, and it will because the House will do anything that Trump says, I look forward to signing that bill into law, and I'm going to use that bill for myself, too, if you don't mind, because nobody gets treated worse than I do online.
Nobody.
So, again, in terms of intimate imagery of Donald Trump, if it's what I'm thinking, I would...
Run the other way, if you see that coming.
Or grab a bucket to throw up into.
I know that people have, you know, the left has done, you know, there was a nude blow-up of him in Nevada, stuff like that, and every time I'd see an article, headline about it, no, no, no, I don't want to see that, don't want to see that.
But it's not going to be used just for that.
The Take It Down Act transforms the internet into a legal minefield, where speech, satire, And political criticism can be erased at the whim of the powerful by failing to require proof before content is removed, you see.
The bill creates a system where accusations alone are enough to justify censorship.
This is what the German green politicians have done.
Two green politicians in Germany, each of them, have filed 800 legal actions against people.
They had the police show up to their house and all the rest of this stuff.
Some of them arrested.
But they're abusing this left and right.
And you can bet that Trump will abuse it left and right as well.
So 800 accusations for each of these two German green politicians.
And they're not the only ones.
I mean, they're just the record holders.
The other people put out hundreds as well.
And so you have all you need is an accusation.
An AI-generated video of Trump and Elon Musk.
Depicting the president kissing Musk's feet recently went viral.
There it is right there.
Now, are you going to say that that is a reference to something sexual?
See, that's the issue they're pointing out.
That is a satire.
And again, you know, it's not something that I was interested in playing.
It's kind of disgusting.
You know, that's the way the left thinks.
That's leftist satire.
Therefore, it's disgusting.
Under the language of a Take It Down Act, such a video could arguably fall under the category of non-consensual intimate imagery, even though it contains no nudity and has no explicit content.
The bill defines violations as, quote, identifiable individual engaged in, quote, sexually explicit conduct, a vague standard that leaves room for all kinds of expansive interpretation.
And they give some other examples, which we won't go into.
If a satirical meme can be flagged as non-consensual intimate imagery simply because it portrays an identifiable individual in a suggestive manner, then what is stopping the next administration from taking this to its logical extreme?
You know, it's to the extent that I told Whistler, I said, I just saw that this new app came out, Hedra.
And they're talking about the fact that, you know, even when, what they do is you can animate an image to talk, right?
But if they can identify it as anybody, they won't let you use it.
If it looks like President Xi or looks like President Trump or whatever, even to the extent, I said, you know, You know, he had a problem when you look at the coin ad that he did.
When Benjamin Franklin turns his head, these things don't really work in terms of picking up the mouth and everything.
But with Hedra's new release, it does.
You know, the person's looking all around and, you know, it animates them emotionally more so and you just give it a text and some general guidance and everything and it can fill in a lot of the blanks in a pretty satisfactory way for a quick satire.
And if you use something as satire, that should be protected.
That kind of speech is protected, specifically.
And so, against copyright claims and a lot of other things like that.
But it wouldn't even allow him to use Benjamin Franklin.
This is where this stuff goes, right?
So, you know, let alone anybody that...
Oh, and the other one was, you know, it wouldn't let him...
Hedra refused to let the cartoon version of Alfred Hitchcock.
Refused to let that happen as well.
It's heavily censored.
Heavily censored.
Already.
Something's going to get worse.
If a satirical meme can be flagged as this simply because it betrays an identifiable individual in a suggestive manner, then what's stopping the next administration from taking this to its logical extreme?
Think back to Babylon Bee, the satirical website repeatedly penalized for social media platforms by making jokes about political figures.
Let's not pretend that social media companies will put up much resistance.
Given the choice between removing content immediately or risking federal action, they'll do what they always do.
Censor first and ask questions never.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media platforms took aggressive action against content that challenged the prevailing government narrative, as we all know, while allowing misinformation from the approved sources of the government.
It won't just be politicians using it.
It'll also be corporations, billionaires, anybody with the legal firepower to threaten compliance.
Journalists investigating corporate misconduct could find their work erased because a company claims an accompanying image violates NCII protections.
You had something there that was my image.
You can't use that.
And, of course, this is what happened with It's a Wonderful Life.
And they point out the system bears a striking resemblance to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which has long been exploited for censorship.
That was done in fair use.
The stuff that I had there from It's a Wonderful Life was short.
There's a lot of other content.
I used it to illustrate things like bank runs and stuff like that.
And where did I get those short clips that were only a portion of the video?
I got them from the full movie that was online and had been online for years, had been watched over a million times.
And so it was fair use.
They don't care.
They'll take it down, and they will never ask any questions, and they'll never give you an answer for anything if you ask a question.
The Take It Down Act operates more like a Trojan horse, promising protection while quietly handing the government and the tech giants unprecedented control over online speech.
The same way they're going to use online ID to have to get on the Internet.
To try their object is to track and trace us, to surveil us, to get rid of anonymity.
They'll say that they're using it to protect the kids from porn.
And so that's why you look at this, take it down.
Well, we're using it to protect people like Melania Trump from porn.
She's proud of her porn.
Or actors or actresses or whatever.
But not to say that that's even the real issue.
Nobody wants to have that.
Be featured in fake pornography.
But that is the way that they're going to use this.
And they've got some suggestions for what could be done to actually address the real problem without creating a Trojan horse.
They said this enforcement model is ripe for abuse.
Political figures with the right connections could see anything that is unflattering or damaging disappear overnight.
Because it makes platforms responsible for preventing the dissemination, companies may feel pressure to weaken even encryption to keep from passing this on.
And so they said, so here's what they would suggest.
And they were four suggestions that would stop this fake pornography of people and identifiable images of a particular person and making it intimate imagery.
They said, so here's four things.
First of all, have a clear and narrow definition of what a non-consensual identifying image is.
This is just a general term that is malleable to mean whatever they want it to mean.
And then ensure that satire, journalism, and fair use content are protected.
Secondly, a burden of proof on those requesting takedowns, requiring them to demonstrate actual harm.
Number three, stronger penalties for fraudulent claims to deter abuse and to prevent the system from being weaponized for censorship.
This is what we do with the anti-slap laws or whatever, right?
To say, you know, to stop frivolous lawsuits, you are going to be assessed a penalty.
This is what Michael Mann got.
Recently, from the judge, he gave him a $500,000 penalty for a frivolous lawsuit that he brought against National Review and made them run up tremendous legal fees.
So he had to pay under that slap law.
That's what they're talking about with this as well.
Protections for encrypted communications ensuring that platforms are not forced to weaken security measures in an attempt to comply, because that's what they're always after.
Shutting down encryption.
And then let's go back to this case that just mentioned briefly of this guy, Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist at Columbia University.
A judge has temporarily blocked the efforts to deport him.
So we'll see what happens with this.
But meanwhile, Trump is bragging about it, boasting about it, and says it is the first of many to come.
He put up a statement on social media.
He says, if you support terrorism, including the slaughtering of innocent men, women, and children, your presence is contrary to our national and foreign policy interests.
What are you doing, President Trump, about what's happening in Syria?
Are you doing anything to stop that?
These people who've got money, American money, American military support, and all the rest of the stuff, are you going to stop that?
Are you going to tell Netanyahu to stop slaughtering innocent men, women, and children so that you can set up a casino on the Gaza Strip?
No.
Rings pretty hollow, doesn't it?
I mean, look at all that stuff.
Their partner has always been terrorist groups.
And then the White House puts up this social media post.
See if you can show that, Karen.
Shalom Mahmood.
I proudly apprehended and detained this guy, a radical foreign pro-Hamas student on the campus of Columbia.
This is the first arrest of many to come, said Trump.
And he puts it there, led activities that were aligned to Hamas.
Guess what?
So did your own government.
Your own government and the government of Netanyahu did as well.
Netanyahu, as I reported a couple of days ago, Shen Bet.
The Israeli Security Agency, talking about October 7th, said it was Netanyahu and the Israeli government that supported, helped to fund Hamas.
So, maybe Trump should have deported Netanyahu when he came, because he led activities that were aligned to Hamas.
Well, Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed last week the U.S. was using AI to catch and to revoke The visas of anti-Israel protesters who appeared to be pro-Hamas.
Information Liberation says he thinks that it's a lot more likely that they're just relying on Jewish doxing groups like Canary Mission because Khalil was the top person on their crosshairs.
The Trump administration last week also announced that they were canceling $400 million in federal grants and contracts for Columbia University alone.
And now he's got like 60 universities.
Look, I'm all for that.
Cancel those contracts.
As I said yesterday when I talked about this, where does the federal government get any constitutional authority to give any money to any university?
None.
There is no authority for that.
And they certainly should not be giving it to organizations that are blatantly racist.
Anti-white, like these Ivy League schools.
Forget about it.
If you're white or Asian, they're not even going to look at your scores to see whether you can get in there.
And again, what is the value of a degree from someplace like that?
Well, again, the value of the degree is that you can go there so that you can hobnob with people like Ivanka Trump or Chelsea Clinton, right?
Or Barron Trump.
You go there and you're, oh, I know Barron Trump.
Now that's your intro.
That's J.D. Vance.
He was there at Yale.
And so when Peter Thiel goes to Yale, he gets to join the club.
That's why you go to these organizations.
That's not about an education.
These people are racist.
They're Marxist.
They're anti-American.
And it's unconstitutional to give them any money.
So I absolutely applaud getting rid of this.
And again, if...
Even if they do the right thing, they do it for the wrong reasons.
And the wrong reason is because they're criticizing Israel.
They never had a problem with these universities criticizing America.
You look at the list of these universities that are coming out.
And before I leave this, Information Liberation says, you know, he's here on a green card, legally.
And Trump says he'll hand that out to anybody that gets even a two-year degree at a junior college.
He'll hand that out to them.
And so he says the green card can only be revoked for fraud, violating immigration laws, criminal activity, or failure to maintain permanent residence.
Well, none of that really applies.
And you know, when we're talking about all these grants and how they ought to be canceled, I saw this clip.
This is a woman who said, well, did you really vote for this?
Did you vote for the Department of Education to be canceled?
It's like, well, no, I didn't, but I fully support that.
I didn't.
I've wanted these people to get rid of it.
I did vote for the Department of Education to be canceled when I voted for Reagan in 1980. But the Republicans have always promised that they'll do it, but they never do it.
So I still remain skeptical, even at this point in time, whether or not they're really going to do that.
But I don't want government to be an education.
There's no constitutional authority for it.
And we look at what they're doing with places like Colombia.
The malinvestment is as bad as anything that we see from USAID. I mean, just take a look at the money that is being sent to the colleges and what they're doing with this.
They're seminaries of Satan.
Anyway, here's what this woman says about education.
Good morning.
It's Monday.
I have a question for those that have voted for this administration.
Did you vote for the Department of Education being taken out?
Dismantled?
Did you vote for that?
I think they did.
I'm just curious.
I'm sure you wanted them to change things, but dismantling a department that helps your children.
No, it doesn't.
And helps a lot of people.
No, it doesn't.
Putting it with the states does not.
They help themselves.
Especially if the states don't have income taxes and if they're going to start taking those away, too.
She assumes we have to have government schools.
Our children will hurt for this.
No, they won't.
They want to take away abortion.
A wealthy white liberal woman here.
Don't help you there.
Then you take away education.
They want to take away abortion.
Now they want to take away education.
Wait a minute, you killed your kid.
I just, I'm curious.
What's your mastermind thought plan?
And I wonder, if it's good as his, then, you know, whatever.
Have a great day.
What's your mastermind idea here, you know?
First, they won't let us abort our kids.
Now, they won't educate our kids for us.
What's going on with this?
I don't understand.
What's the plan?
Signed, a reluctant mother, you know, who is wealthy, obviously looking at her, you know, and overeducated, miseducated as well.
So 60 universities under investigation by Trump administration for anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment.
The list includes Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Harvard, Princeton, Yale, etc.
You know, when you leave, and like I said, this is where anti-Americanism has been featured for decades.
Take Harvard, for example.
You had...
Pete Boutier.
His father spent his entire life at Notre Dame as a professor.
He came from Malta.
So he's an immigrant who came from Malta and loves communism.
And he dedicated, spent his entire academic career talking about the work of Antonio Gramsci, who was the founder of Italian Communism.
And he was also the guy who came up with this idea that we're going to march through the institutions and take them over from the top, which is what we've seen, isn't it?
You know, Antonio Gramsci is the core of all this stuff.
Why Pete Boutier is so dangerous.
So he's the son of this guy who spent his entire life...
Pouring over the work of Antonio Gramsci and lauding it and all the rest of the stuff.
So he makes sure that his son, Pete Boudigae, goes to Harvard.
And he makes sure that his son, Pete Boudigae, studies under Sokvan Berkovich, who absolutely is a hardcore Marxist who absolutely hates America.
He says all of America's problems trace back to Christianity and the pilgrims and all the rest of the stuff.
And it's got to all be shut down.
And he changed his name.
Sock van is actually a contraction of Sacco and Vanzetti, the heroes, the Italian Marxist heroes to the left.
And he legally changed his name to Sock van Berkowicz.
This is Harvard.
This is the kind of stuff they do.
Now, that kind of anti-Americanism, that kind of hardcore Marxism to march through the institutions, which is what they've done, that's not sufficient to stop the funding to Harvard.
Of all the places, Harvard who's got, who knows, is it tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in endowment from wealthy people?
Why do they need my tax money and your tax money at Harvard?
To teach Marxism.
To teach this transgenderism and all the rest of this stuff.
And they won't stop it unless they criticize Netanyahu.
Then they'll stop it.
This is beyond belief.
This is...
It's just...
It's just beggar's belief.
Again, you know, who is Israel?
This is about anti-Netanyahuism.
It's a mixture of ethnic groups.
It's a mixture of political groups and everything.
But don't you dare criticize Netanyahu's policy because Netanyahu owns Trump.
That's what this is about.
And I'll just say the Christians, you know, from the prophetic side of things.
As I said before.
Take a look at the story of Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar.
Abraham had a promise.
God wasn't doing it the way he thought, in the time frame that he thought it should happen.
So he's going to take it into his own hands and do whatever means he thinks is going to accomplish this.
Is that really what we're about?
Do the means justify the ends for Christians?
Or does the end justify the means for Christians?
If we've got a prophetic end, can we use evil means to get to that prophetic end?
It's the Marxists who always tell us that the end justifies the means.
And now we've got a lot of Christians who say, the prophetic end that I think is going to happen justifies my evil means.
Does it?
I don't think so.
Not at all.
One of the universities on the list I thought was interesting, the 60 universities, one of them was Johns Hopkins.
These are the people who have been their partners in medical crime.
They're partners in the very first one of these germ games, going back to Dark Winter, 2001. Always involved in that.
Johns Hopkins, involved in a lot of the research that I was talking about yesterday, about the brain...
A computer interface and hacking into people's minds, even without putting in the chip that Elon Musk wants to do.
I mean, they're way beyond that in a lot of these things.
So, yeah, Johns Hopkins.
Wow.
I would love to cut off the funding to Johns Hopkins.
But they'll only do it because he criticized Netanyahu's.
People are criticizing Netanyahu's policies.
Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
He says, for those not paying attention, Trump is part of the government's agenda.
To dismantle the First Amendment.
I agree.
And they will cheer him.
He's the giant pacifier at everybody's mouth.
At the same time, he's mixing everything up with everybody.
To distract everybody from the real agenda that is there.
North American House Hippo.
I probably paid a total of $1,000 to the U.S. government when I got my green card.
I guess I have to resign myself to the fact that I'll never be good enough to upgrade it to a gold card.
I have to pay quite a lot more.
I have to pay 5,000 times that much.
Knights of the Storm.
Good to see you guys there.
Department of Education is really expensive and it is bad daycare.
That's right.
And that's what it is.
That's what that lady wants.
I'm always going to take care of my kids so I can go do my leftist liberal white woman things.
I can go protest the pro-life people or something like that.
Or volunteer at an abortion center.
Big Brit is back again.
Says, all it does is brainwash your kids.
Typically leftist lunatics.
And here's the other thing, folks.
What have I said for the longest time?
Trump's involvement in this 2020 medical martial law.
His key thing, and he said it when he signed the paperwork.
He said, this is about the money.
This is really big.
It's about releasing a lot of money and everything.
Money, money, money, money, money.
And that's how the federal government, whether it's Trump or Biden or Obama or anybody, that's how they get around the Tenth Amendment restrictions on doing things.
They bribe people.
They blackmail them with money.
And what he's leaving there for the Department of Education is, guess what?
The money!
To get rid of the Department of Education, but then continue to hand out, like they're doing now, $400 million to Columbia University.
It's a million or a thousand.
It's crazy.
It's a crazy amount that is there anyway.
But I'm questioning myself here.
Could it be that much?
Anyway, to hand out that kind of money to these schools, and if they're going to continue to hand out the money, whether it is a grant, That is administered by the Department of Education or whether they fold some of this stuff back into HHS. You know, HHS and the Department of Education were, you know, Siamese twins that they separated and that Jimmy Carter separated.
You know, it used to be health, education, welfare.
And then what they did was they took HHS, had everything then except for the education.
The education got pulled out to the side under Jimmy Carter.
And so, you know, if they're going to do that, And if they're going to keep sending the money, massive amounts of money, then, yeah, it was a million.
It was a million.
400 million.
Imagine that.
To one university, one Ivy League university, that has these massive endowments.
If they're going to keep sending money out for all this stuff, that's the most important thing the Department of Education does anyway.
It's the money.
You do what we say on the boys' and the girls' bathrooms, Or we take your money away.
It's always been about money.
And so, just to get rid of the...
It's perfect that he put in the woman from professional wrestling, Linda McMahon.
Put her in there because getting rid of the Department of Education, folks, is just going to be a rebranding, relabeling, still keeping the money pipeline going, still controlling people through the money pipeline and all the rest of the stuff.
It's going to be professional wrestling.
They're going to tell you, look, I shut this down.
And he's got the professional wrestling woman to do it.
So, let's see.
Natalander says that she's missing the blue hair and the piercings.
Give her time.
Mav2022, how stupid to claim you're helping kids and then bleat about abortion.
They're so empty-headed, they don't even know what they're saying.
Absolutely right.
Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
The Common Man. .
They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
They created Common Past to track and control us.
Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple.
Unsophisticated.
Ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hire.
Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you.
A penny saved is a penny earned.
Though, that's gotten tougher since they've stopped making them.
Maybe it's time to start saving a different type of coin.
Such as the new David Knight Show supporter commemorative coin.
Saving these coins earns support for independent media.
Featuring striking bas-relief with bold raised details and premium painted accents.
It's not just a trinket, but a statement, a declaration.
A way to show you refuse to be controlled by the establishment.
It's a limited run of just 100 coins.
So, much like the penny, when they're gone, they're gone.
They silence independent voices.
They censor the truth.
But you can stand with real journalism and own a piece of the resistance.
These coins saved is The David Knight Show sustained.
Available now at TheDavidKnightShow.com You're listening to The David Knight Show.
And yes, here's the...
The size of it.
And you can see most of that commercial was accurate in terms of the size.
And we've sold about half of them.
And they're numbered, each of them is numbered from 1 to 100. Let's talk a little bit about what's going on with the vaccines with RFK Jr. There was a good tweet from Dr. Jane Ruby who said, there is absolutely no excuse.
For immediately shutting down these mRNA vaccines.
RFK Jr. told you himself that the mRNA platform was a military operation and that it was, quote, the deadliest vaccine ever made.
And so, you still make excuses for them, don't you?
The people that are out there.
They reply to that with excuses.
For the excuses.
That never ends, does it?
I'm going to play for you what she embedded in that tweet there.
RFK Jr. talking about mRNA.
Hey, that rhymes.
We could set up a protest.
RFKJ! mRNA.
RFKJ. mRNA.
Vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer.
They were developed by NIH. Their own, the patents are owned 50% by NIH. Nor were they manufactured by Pfizer or by Moderna.
They were manufactured by military contractors.
And basically, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry.
But, you know, that's not what they were doing.
They were coming from, you know, the This was a military project from the beginning.
Yep.
It really was.
It really was.
Well, one person replied and said, you'd think that he'd tackle the deadliest vaccine that was ever made and is still being used.
Also, the other vaccines, rather than going after Froot Loops.
And as I said before, it would be a perfect symbol.
Froot Loops would be the perfect symbol for the Maha people.
Who are also cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs.
We're looking at one person says, never trust a Democrat or a heroin addict.
And he's both of those.
He's also a sex addict.
It was, you see, with his own admission with him hanging out with Epstein.
Never trust anybody that hangs out with Epstein either, you know.
Never trust a sex addict who hangs out with Jeffrey Epstein who is a Democrat.
Most, if not all, their life.
That would be Trump and RFKJ, wouldn't it?
Anyway, RFKJ isn't addressing COVID vaccine injuries, says Andrea Lynn.
He is promoting toxic fast food.
And she's got a picture of him eating at a fast food restaurant.
He's so excited because they replaced some of their oil with beef tallow.
The other seed oil, but he's still eating the french fries, which are made with seed oil.
Eating at the fast food restaurant.
That's what it's about.
Yeah, isn't it?
Meanwhile, the CDC will study possible links between vaccines and autism.
Let's hope that's going to be the case.
Now, here's the situation.
This is Children's Health Defense talking about...
The CDC. And understand that the person that Trump has nominated for a CDC head is Dave Weldon, a former congressman.
And he has, like RFK Jr., a long history of speaking out against vaccines, about talking about the connection between vaccines and autism.
As a matter of fact, Dave Weldon appeared in the movie Vaxxed.
Do you remember that?
It was about the connection between vaccines and autism.
And it was going to be at the Tribeca Film Festival that Robert De Niro is associated with.
And he said that he's got, I think he had a child or something that had autism, but it was something he was familiar with and he wanted to have that there, but they put pressure on him and he kicked that film out of his film festival.
But Dave Weldon had an appearance in that as well, and he has been outspoken about that as well.
As a matter of fact, Andrew Wakefield had pushed for Dave Weldon to be the head of the CDC in the first Trump administration back in 2016. He had other plans.
He had to be there as a pacifier in everybody's mouth when they ran through the realization of dark winter for the globalists, and so he had to have somebody like Robert Redfield in at the CDC. That traitor.
So, Weldon is now the nominee.
Weldon was born, interestingly enough, in Amityville, New York.
Let's hope that he doesn't turn into an Amityville horror like Robert Redfield.
It remains to be seen what's going to happen with this.
Now, he has his confirmation hearing begins today.
And so we will see if at the confirmation hearing whether he will sign a pact with the devil personified by Senator Cassidy in the same way that RFK Jr. signed a pact with the devil, Senator Cassidy from Louisiana, the Republican.
We'll have to see what happens with that.
Meanwhile, we have lab-grown milk is coming to a supermarket near you.
Now, interestingly enough, you know, there's this really weird, I don't really know where they draw the lines on the food stuff.
But, you know, USDA is kind of focused on the agricultural side.
You know, so if it's something that's on the farm, the USDA's got jurisdiction over it.
But then when it goes retail, it goes to the grocery store, that's where the FDA is supposed to get involved.
You know, the FDA says, well, we've got a recall, or your labeling is wrong, or this or that, you know, that type of thing.
And so, now when we're talking about lab-grown milk, what are we talking about here?
Is it a farm?
I mean, where is the jurisdictional thing for this?
Should they be under the people who do medicines?
That'd be the FDA. Or the people who do retail food, that'd be the FDA. But no, they're under the USDA. Even though there's no agriculture involved.
Even though the whole rationale for doing lab milk is to make sure you don't do agriculture.
That's what they're boasting about.
Oh, we're going to save the planet, you know, from all this stuff.
Forbes just published an article on lab-grown milk.
The title of it was...
First lab-grown whole cow's milk to debut in the U.S. Based on a brand called Unreal Milk.
Just call it fake milk.
But Unreal Milk.
Unreal Milk.
Can you imagine somebody from the past coming into the future and you go to the grocery store and it's like, oh, there's that Unreal Milk.
And it's like, I don't think I want that.
I don't.
So, the purpose of this is, of course, to fight climate change.
Because the cows fart greenhouse gases known as methane gas.
The United Nations has claimed that a cow can release more than 500 liters of methane per day.
So what?
So what?
It's still way, way, way less than CO2, which is way, way, way, way, way, way less than water vapor.
So why don't you focus on water vapor?
According to Forbes, they said, Dairy farming is under increasing pressure for its environmental impact, consuming vast resources and emitting methane, a greenhouse gas that is far more potent than CO2. Oh, really?
Yeah.
No.
It's more potent.
Give me a break.
None of this stuff is real.
All of it is gas lighting.
As the food industry searches for lower carbon alternatives.
I'm so sick of this carbon this and carbon that.
It's a Boston-based startup called Brown Foods.
That sounds appetizing, doesn't it?
Brown Foods is going to make unreal milk.
And so the company is a startup that was founded by Sohail Gupta, Bhavana Tandon, and Avjik Kapoor.
Hey, maybe you guys could sell this in India.
There's an idea.
Why don't you go back to India and sell this stuff, okay?
We don't want it.
We don't want your brown milk.
Brown Foods claims its production method slashes carbon emissions by 82%, water use by 90%, and land use by 95% without relying on livestock.
It's all unreal.
And so is, you know, unreal milk.
For an unreal crisis.
Don't you call it MacGuffin milk?
It's got this alliteration there that they could use, right?
The first version of unreal milk is already undergoing lab validation with MIT. They confirmed the presence of all essential dairy proteins and said that it is structurally identical to traditional milk.
Ha, ha, ha.
I don't think so.
It's got all the things in there that you know are in milk, as far as you think, right?
They expect lab-grown milk to gain a third of the dairy market.
I'll tell you what it doesn't have.
I'm sure it won't have the probiotics that are in raw milk.
They're not going to reproduce that, right?
They said, rising, here we are again, back to the climate MacGuffin, rising greenhouse gas emissions.
Fear, fear, fear.
Deforestation, fear, fear, fear.
And water scarcity, fear, fear, fear.
Linked to traditional animal agriculture.
Are they really?
No.
Have spurred innovation in plant-based, fermentation-derived, lab-grown proteins.
Ugh, gag.
They have secured $2 billion in investments.
In 2022. And they got USDA approval in 2023. See what I said?
The FDA? No.
No.
Not going to cover this as a pharmaceutical.
Not going to cover it as a retail food.
They're going to cover it as if it were agriculture.
When these people just said, well, we're not about agriculture.
Right?
We hate agriculture.
Traditional agriculture we don't like.
You know, what is RFK Jr. going to do about it?
I guarantee you that this Brooke chick, that Brooke, was it Brooke Rollins or what?
Yeah.
You know, she's just a political apparatchik out of Texas.
And I guarantee that she's going to rubber stamp anything that any corporation wants to do anywhere without any concerns.
She's already rubber stamping the mRNA animal vaccines.
So, there's a lot of these, though.
Bill Gates is involved in it.
Israel is involved in it.
Bill Gates and Israel have been involved in lab-grown milk business through Global Corporate Venturing.
Since 2018, Global Corporate Venturing has reported about 20 corporate investments in various lab-grown meat and milk startups, such as Israel-based milk developer Imagine Dairy.
Imagine Dairy.
They raised $15 million.
Israel-based Strauss Group.
Their corporate investor, Motif Foodworks, a food technology company developing alternative milks, also raised $226 million in a Series B round, with Bill Gates' Breakthrough Energy Ventures participating in it.
By the way, this article is from LewRockwell.com.
Israel, in particular, has been a hotspot for various lab-grown milk startups, so the country is seeking to be the first to end...
The climate and global food shortage crisis.
This is the PR from these people.
This is not Lou Rockwell writing this.
So, Forbes is doing this PR. Forbes says, efforts to produce milk without cows are taking various forms.
Sonara, a German startup, is growing cell-cultured mammary cells.
Also known as breast tumors.
It's not a tumor!
It's not a tumor.
Yeah.
How would you like to have some?
Why don't you just call this?
Here's an idea.
Tumor milk.
How about that?
Can do tumor milk?
How about, you got these eternal cells that are going to keep going?
How about this?
Cancer milk.
You're going to milk your tumor and have some cancer milk.
Cell-cultured mammary cells in partnership with dairy farmers, blending biotech with traditional milk production.
Another Israeli venture called Wilk.
It's like milk, but you turn the M upside down.
We've inverted just one little key thing there, which makes it all bad, you know?
We go from milk to Wilk.
It is focused on producing cultured milk fats to be used in making cheese and yogurt.
I tell you what, when I was talking to Brian yesterday, About his book, Land Rich and Cash Poor.
And he was talking about how, you know, one of the things that could help local farmers get going is the kind of specialty programs he set up there in Wisconsin where he was.
They said, well, let's focus on cheese.
You know, let's do craftsmanship programs.
Teach people how to make really good cheeses and special ones.
Well, I think this is going to be a real opportunity for them.
This company, Wilk, is going to start making milk fats to be used in cheese.
You might want to invest in some of these Wisconsin craft dairies making craft cheese.
Well, not craft cheese.
It's not craft with a K, with a C. Craft cheese, I don't think it's even cheese.
I think it's cheese-like.
These approaches contrast with Unreal Milk, which is taking a fully lab-based route.
Aiming to replace whole cow's milk without relying on livestock.
There you go.
So these people are just going to...
They want to keep these cells going.
They want some tumors that you can...
Perpetual cancer tumors that you can get milk from.
Brown foods, the goal is not...
To mimic dairy, but to recreate it at a molecular level.
There we go.
GMO milk.
How about that?
You go from farmers in blue genes to farmer genes and genetics.
How about that?
Pharmaceutical genes.
Lab-grown breast milk is now being engineered for newborn babies and infants because they've got to go to the babies.
Got to get these kids at the earliest possible age.
Into this frankenfood stuff, right?
By the way, there was a thing out, and I did not cover it when I saw it.
They were saying that infant formula, the FDA doesn't require them to list sugar, but especially the high fructose corn syrup.
They don't have to list that, evidently, on the ingredients.
Because, you know, we're talking about babies, and babies can't read, so put whatever we want to in there, and we don't have to tell anybody, right?
That's kind of the attitude these people have.
They call it a cell-cultured human milk for newborn babies and infants.
The U.S. company is called BioMilk.
Milk with a Q. It was founded in 2019. Isn't that nice?
Their names are just like their products.
Just a little bit of a tweak here.
We'll take milk, and we'll take the M, and we'll invert it into a W. We'll call it Wilk.
Here we have BioMilk, and we'll just take that K away and replace it with a Q. Founded in 2019, the CEO of the company said, our product will shift demand away from the dairy industry, benefiting the planet.
I don't care about the planet.
It's not under threat.
My child is under threat.
While nourishing babies with a 100% human alternative.
Think about that.
Just hold that phrase in your mind here.
It's kind of like continuing resolution, right?
A 100% human alternative.
A human alternative.
It's a 100% alternative.
Human alternative.
Without feeling the need to make a trade-off between their child's health and the environment.
I've never felt the need to do that because none of this stuff is a threat to the environment.
All of this stuff.
It's always being tied back to climate alarmism.
Every one of these things.
And just remember, C40, you know, the 40 cities, and it was started by Sadiq Khan in London and Mayor Bloomberg in New York, and they put out their thing.
They had a goal of getting to 40 cities.
Now they're over 100. And part of their thing is no meat, no milk.
No dairy, actually.
All dairy products.
But, you know, no meat, no milk.
That's where they want to go.
That's what's really about this.
Well, we're going to take a quick break.
When we come back, we're going to talk about the efforts to abort the elderly.
It's not just the beginning of life.
It's going to be at the end of life.
And how you've got governments openly talking about vaccine programs for focusing on the elderly and focusing on adults to make sure that they don't have the kind of retirement liability.
Good evening.
Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow.
Or, more specifically, what comes out the other end.
Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda...
Even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat.
The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.
Carefully contrived to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in, jackboots and all, with their solutions.
Because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags?
But one must wonder...
Is this truly about saving the planet, or are we simply being led to pasture?
Is it merely a MacGuffin?
The David Knight show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny.
And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull.
So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show.
And now back to our regularly scheduled program.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
The David Knight Show
The David Knight Show North American House Hippo.
It says, just ordered my coin, Dave.
Thanks.
Well, thank you.
I appreciate that.
Hope you like it.
I like it a lot.
What's that?
Anne Ryan, yes.
I was going to say, Ryan is the one who designed it.
And it is really unique.
I've never seen one like it.
And that's about half of them that we've got there are gone.
So they're running out.
People fart, too.
So what are we going to do about it?
Oh, wait.
Yeah, as a matter of fact, that's what I'm going to talk about right now.
That's what we do.
We've got an idea for that as well.
DG8, thank you for the tip.
He says, David, I think the people behind the Unreal Milk are related to Vivek and to Kash Patel.
I'm not drinking that garbage.
Well, it could be.
It could be.
I don't know.
We'll see what happens with it.
We're all dead, says, is Jones making a killing off the dead reporter yet?
Yeah, that's such a sad thing.
Jamie, I didn't know him that well.
He came on after my show had started, and I didn't really know the people that were hired after that because they were working a different schedule than I was completely.
Travis knew him, said he was really a nice guy.
And it's just Austin.
It's the crime that's there.
And Alex is right about Soros, district attorney, that is there.
But there's a lot of other problems there as well.
I just got to say, I'm glad that we got out of there without being killed in an automobile accident because it is so awful there.
And they're not doing anything about it.
And the area where the studio is, close to the airport, it is a very crime-ridden area.
And I guess, you know, you could also say, if you want to talk about Soros, you could say, why don't you move your studio out of a crime-ridden area?
I mean, you could move it to the hill country, and everybody could have a much safer, cheaper way to live.
I mean, the apartment complexes that are there are expensive as well.
Travis had an apartment complex there that was, that intersection was one of the worst intersections in America.
For traffic issues.
And he was sitting at a traffic light and got hit.
And then while they're filling out the accident report, somebody else hits him.
Just amazing, you know, to get out of there.
But getting back to Jamie, it really is a tragedy.
And he was so young.
It is really tragic.
Apparently, in that bad neighborhood, There was a, somebody had broken into his car in December, and it was the parking lot where his apartment was, not very far from where the studio is.
And he came across the guy that was breaking into his car again, apparently, and the person shot him and killed him.
So yeah, where these Soros District Attorneys are is awful.
And the appropriate response, you're not ever going to change it in Austin.
The appropriate response is to move somewhere else.
Most of Texas is conservative.
Why would you choose to live in the most liberal part of Austin, anyway, and to work there?
Let's talk about the plan to kill us all.
Australian COVID deaths.
This is from Exposé News.
The use of chemical restraints to hasten the death of the elderly.
And that's a good way to understand this.
What was being done with midazolam and other things like that?
They really were being used as chemical restraints.
Remember at the very beginning of this, the argument for, you know, we had, we used midazolam and morphine and things like that in the U.S., people who came in with respiratory illness.
You know, what that does is that suppresses your ability to breathe.
And it hastens death for many people in a very serious condition.
And so do the ventilators.
I remember reporting about a pulmonologist who said, we've never put people with respiratory issues like this on a ventilator.
It's going to kill them.
And of course it did.
Just under 90% of the people that they put on the ventilators that Trump was so proud of, that Peter Navarro was so proud of.
We've got a special law.
We're going to shut down the automobile factories and we're going to force them to make ventilators.
Ford and GM. And then he hectored.
General Motors, because they didn't make enough ventilators.
Well, all of that stuff is something that actually hastens death.
And we did see an uptick with these policies in excess deaths, but the real explosion came with the vaccine rollout.
Shifted Paradigms is the original article that they pulled up there from Exposé News.
It says it provides evidence that two shots were used in residential aged care facilities in Australia to slow the spread of COVID, they said.
Midazolam and morphine.
And they knew that that would kill people.
In 2020, approximately 75% of Australia's COVID-19 deaths occurred in residential aged care facilities.
75% of the deaths were in these old people's homes, right?
And they said this was not universal, however, and it was not uniform across the nation.
So 75% of the deaths are in the aged care homes.
But 40% of the deaths were in just 10 of these.
Nine of them were in the state of Victoria.
So what's going on?
It was obviously what they were doing.
Why did only 10 of these care homes account for 40% of the deaths?
And it was huge.
You know, 75% of deaths.
And I've talked about it many times.
In late December, early January, you had a guy who was working in one of these homes, rest homes.
It was a young black guy, maybe early...
Early 30s, and he was in tears, and he said, we took such good care of these people, nobody died during the COVID pandemic.
But then they rolled out these vaccines last week, and he said they'd had like a dozen deaths, and he said many of the people who did not die are just catatonic, not doing anything.
And he started to cry, and he said, I can't do this anymore.
I'm a Christian.
I can't do it.
Here, they were killing people.
Before the vaccines, they were killing the elderly with midazolam and morphine.
40% of the deaths in just 10 homes.
And 75% of all the deaths, all the COVID deaths, in these rest homes.
You know, it's been said many times, you know, you look at this, why were almost all the deaths in hospitals and rest homes?
Why are people...
Dying elsewhere.
It's because of the care that they were getting.
I mean, that's the obvious answer that nobody wants to talk about.
They were paid to kill people.
Trump paid them to kill people.
And the Australian government paid them to kill people.
Sedatives or chemical restraints such as midazolam and morphine were recommended for COVID patients.
Their use was permitted under Australian law despite restrictions on chemical restraint.
And they had a program.
To get the nurses to go along with it.
Just like they did with the ventilators.
The ventilators and the chemical restraints were there and they would get the nurses, especially they figured, well, some of these people were going to know enough about medicine that they would realize that this is going to harm the patient.
So what we'll do is tell them that this is to protect them.
I'm going to put them on these chemical restraints.
I'm going to put them on a ventilator so they don't breathe on you and get you sick.
Okay.
All right.
Well, I guess I can kind of...
Sign on to that.
Maybe it won't kill them.
You know, that's what they would tell themselves, I guess.
Right?
It's important to note that this guidance did not distinguish palliative from end-of-life care.
This is important because palliative is directed toward improving the quality of life for those who are suffering from life-limiting illnesses.
Whereas end-of-life care is about providing care to those who are in the final stages of their life.
But in the end, it really didn't matter.
They said, was COVID-19 considered to be a life-limiting illness, or was it something that placed an aged care resident in their final stages of life, particularly if this resident was aged 85 plus and had other comorbidities?
You know, again, when Trump locked everything down, I remember John Rapoport had the story.
I had him on.
We talked about it.
We said, we've got two weeks of data from Italy.
And the average age of death was just over 80 years old.
And the people who were dying, that they said were dying of COVID, had two and a half comorbidities.
So they were dying from old age and from comorbidities.
So, same thing here.
Except they'd hasten it along with midazolam.
And do you remember in the UK, Matt Hancock?
The guy who famously, you know, was locking everybody down.
We got the text messages in the UK where he was laughing about it with other people.
Saying, can you imagine what happens when they come back and they find that they're going to be locked up in quarantine and all the rest of this stuff for weeks?
Ha, ha, ha.
Well, he also went in and ordered massive amounts of midazolam.
Massive amounts of it.
And this was before it even started.
It's kind of like this premeditated murder, isn't it?
It's exactly what it is.
So they said, in the end, it didn't matter.
The treatment plan was the same.
If you were an aged care resident suffering from pain or cough, you could get your morphine, or you could get the supercharged hydromorphine.
And so they said, a bit of agitation?
Well, let's throw in some midazolam as well.
We'll sedate them so they don't bother us.
We'll sedate them so they don't breathe on us.
Did you have to be on an end-of-life plan in order to get these winter drugs?
No.
Because the guidance was for palliative care and for end-of-life care.
So, again, if you look at the documents and the guidance that they were putting out, some of the things that they were telling them, ways to minimize staff interaction with residents to support infection control.
They said, remember, in patients with COVID-19, every interaction, such as providing medication, It's an important opportunity cost for nursing staff.
And many medications can be omitted, stopped, or converted to a once-daily formulation.
So, hey, if this person needs some medical care, they could get you sick.
So you can either stop it or you could just do it like once a day, even if it's supposed to be, you know, every few hours or something.
Because every time you have contact with this person, you're putting yourself at risk, scaring them to death.
And, you know, Kill this person or you'll kill yourself.
I also said, in people with COVID-19, delirium can increase the risk to other patients and staff as it may have impact on the person's capacity to understand and to follow infection control measures.
So, you need to chemically restrain them.
Chemical restraints.
They use it so much that, just like with Matt Hancock, they created a shortage of midazolam and other things like that.
And, of course, he was purchasing it, as I said, before it all happened.
And then we look at GlaxoSmithKline.
So that's what they did five years ago.
They were killing the elderly.
That's a great way to clear off the pension rolls, isn't it?
GlaxoSmithKline said, Ireland needs a national adult vaccination strategy to address an aging population.
Yeah.
We don't want to have to take care of these people, right?
We've got just the thing for you.
Nobody will realize that it's a depopulation program.
GlaxoSmithKline paid the former Irish Deputy Chief Medical Officer to produce a report pushing for national adult immunization strategies similar to the childhood vaccination programs to align Ireland's vaccination policies with the World Health Organization's policies.
So, elder killing.
See, if you don't understand and stand for the sanctity of life, Of babies?
They'll get you.
And whenever you get sick, they'll get you when you're disabled.
They'll get you when you get elderly.
And everywhere in between.
Worryingly, the report notes that there's approximately 300 vaccines in development worldwide.
Think about that.
Think about what, you know, we vaccinate our children more than any other country, far, far, far more than any other country, with 72. And you've got people like Senator Cassidy who just, oh yeah, you can't stop any of those things.
We have to vaccinate the kids four or five times for every one of these issues.
Well, they've got 300 vaccines in development worldwide.
They want us all constantly taking shots.
80% of these efforts are aimed towards adults.
COVID measures such as track and tracing and its so-called vaccines were just the beginning.
Because now they're coming for the animals as well.
By the way, Zero Hedge, you know, they've said Peter McCullough advertises to them.
They've got all these alarmist headlines and everything.
And they did another article about McCullough.
Fortunately, in this article, I was surprised to see Robert Malone call what Peter McCullough is saying bullshit.
I'm sorry, BS, let's just say.
Because it is.
It needs some strong language, I guess.
Anyway, McCullough links the bird flu outbreak to USDA gain-of-function experiments in Georgia.
And he's making this stuff up!
It's so sad to see Del Bigtree at the High Wire participating in this stuff as well.
It's just amazing to me.
It's why I didn't want to work for anybody.
Anybody.
You know?
People were really nice to offer me positions in some other places, and I said, no, I'm not going to do it.
I'm not ever going to work for anybody else.
Never.
Because you never know what the organization is going to do.
It can go off the rails.
And McCullough has gone off the rails.
And if Highwire is pushing this stuff and platforming this stuff, they've gone off the rails as well.
So he said on Highwire, McCullough is putting out the stuff that he's been putting out.
On Zero Hedge advertising it, he said, we are so sure that it's been published, that we've published this in a peer-reviewed paper.
So what?
Yeah, peer-reviewed is not the gold standard of truth anyway, right?
I mean, you can get a group of career people to say anything.
But he said, and here's an example.
This doesn't even pass the SNF test.
So tell me if this is...
Have they reviewed this for critical thinking?
Listen to what McCullough is saying.
He said, the mallard ducks could spread it all over, and in migratory waterfowl.
It quickly spreads into mammals, and now up to 40 different species of mammals, said Peter McCullough.
Be afraid.
Freak out.
Well, let me ask you, McCullough, why are we finding dead mallards all over the place?
Geese Buster sent me a picture, a funny picture.
It was a dead bird on the road that cars are driving over.
I guess, you know, we could have photoshopped it into this picture behind me, I guess, you know, today.
But, you know, it's been hit by a car and it's dead and cars are driving over it.
And he says, bird flew?
Look, we found a dead bird, finally.
Why do we see dead birds like that all over the place?
Why are they falling out of the sky, McCullough?
He says, yes, these mallards and the wild birds, and they're all carrying it everywhere.
He pointed out that USDA officials have generally used biosecurity measures such as sterilizing the entire farm because, well, that doesn't work.
Yeah, no doubt.
Guess what?
He figured that out.
It doesn't work.
He said it doesn't work because the mallard ducks would just continue to reinfect the farm.
Why aren't the mallards dying, McCullough?
Unbelievable.
Unbelievable.
I guess you could say that that dead bird on the road died of bird flu because he flew right into a car, evidently.
It's called F-L-E-W. The bird flew and it died.
But we're not seeing dead birds all over the place.
Instead, what we're seeing is Peter McCullough all over the place.
And this is what Robert Malone said.
I call BS. McCullough has the same conflict of interest as Scott Gottlieb.
It's just that his company is smaller than Pfizer.
Bingo.
Bingo.
Thank you for saying that.
You know, that's what I've been saying all along.
I'm really fed up with Peter McCullough.
He is the same as Alex Jones in 2020. Peter McCullough, 2025, is Alex Jones in 2020, Part 2. And, of course, Mike Adams.
Don't forget Mike Adams.
He was really the one pushing this stuff.
And Francis.
Francis Boyle, you know, the three not-so-wise men.
No, actually, they were wise.
They were wise to what they were doing.
Not Francis Boyle, but Alex Jones and Mike Adams were.
By the way, I saw this.
Somebody sent this to me, and I looked at it, and it was being promoted by several people.
I could not find any evidence of the truth.
You know, he had that video from Children's Health Defense.
Talking about that child who they're saying died because the child didn't have a vaccine.
Not getting a vaccine, that's fatal.
But they said that the child was brought in.
They said, we talked to physicians and other people, and they said this child was brought in with RSV, and the parents were pleading with him to help the child breathe, and they didn't, and the child died.
And then they gave the child a PCR test and said, ah, he's got measles.
And so, now, what has been embellished on that, and it appears to be originating from Mike Adams, as far as I could tell, is that some other people are saying that on Facebook, the parents said that when they brought him in sick with RSV and sick with a respiratory illness, that he was given an MMR shot by the hospital, which is...
Even the pharmaceutical companies say if you do that, somebody who's sick, it'll kill them.
Now, I could not find any original sources on that on Facebook or anything else, so I'm saying this is another Mike Adams nonsense.
And that's what he does.
That's what he does.
That's what Alex Jones does.
That's what Peter McCullough does.
They take a grain of truth.
And then they add lies to it to discredit it.
And if that doesn't say to you controlled opposition, then nothing will ever say to you controlled opposition.
If you're going to add lies to something, you know, like Steve Pachenik did with the Vegas shooting, all the problems with it, that thing reeked of suspicious issues, right?
But then we come in and say nobody died.
Oh, okay, now I know who you work for, Steve Pachenik.
And that's what these people were doing as well.
And like Robert Malone, he says they've got the same conflict of interest, except their companies are not as big as Pfizer.
Same conflict of interest as Scott Gottlieb, who was the FDA head.
And when he retired, running all this scam, and when he retired, Scott Gottlieb went to Pfizer.
Paid for by Pfizer.
Brought to you by Pfizer, just like Trump.
And so then you see, along with Peter McCullough, People like Alex Jones and this fear-mongering.
And then on the left, you've got New York Magazine and the Drudge Report put this up.
Headline, can anything stop bird flu?
Can anything stop the fear and propaganda?
That's the question.
A virus run rampant.
Health systems hollowed out.
Public trust destroyed.
This is the way the next pandemic might work.
Really?
Wow.
So, in February 2024, dairy farmers in the northwest corner of Texas panhandled, noticed that their herds were getting sick.
Bird flu.
Bird flu.
That's what it is.
Absolutely.
Bird flu.
In West Texas, the measles outbreak and families there are forgoing conventional medicine along with vaccines.
This is the fear-mongering of MPC News.
Now, this is actually good news.
This is actually a win.
I'm very concerned that so many families are still getting their kids vaccinated.
They said, overall, 97% of kids are getting vaccinated, but in this particular place, and they narrowed it down, they tried to point to one doctor, God bless him, who is creating vaccine hesitancy.
And it's like 87-88%, I believe, that's there.
It's still too high.
Still too high.
But they said, as the outbreak rages, this is NBC News, and they are pointing the finger at this guy.
They're doing everything they can to report him, to try to get him taken out.
They said, unproven remedies like cod liver oil are being distributed free by some doctors, and families are lining up for them.
Well, guess what?
It's not that they're unproven.
There's a long history of people using natural remedies like this.
They are un-pharma, and that's the problem that NBC has.
They're not pharma.
They're un-pharma.
They're safe, by the way.
Whether they're effective or not, they're at least safe, and we should first do no harm, which means you first do no pharma.
And this is the way they start this out.
They go to Texas.
This is the panhandle.
This is where this measles stuff is so bad and so forth.
The building where hundreds of families are lining up for measles care amid a fast-growing outbreak in West Texas looks more like an abandoned car dealership than a doctor's office.
There's no signage, nothing saying open or indicating the office hours.
They criticize everything about this guy.
Oh, look, in West Texas, everything is pretty pared down and rugged.
So these NBC reporters are coming in and just coming after him.
Nearly every day, dozens of pickup trucks.
They're driving pickup trucks even.
Wow, imagine that.
Take these kids away from parents that drive pickup trucks.
Inside the building, which is a barn dominium, there are a handful of tables and chairs set up in sick families, mostly Mennonite.
Sit in a makeshift waiting room on the far left.
Dr. Ben Edwards is on a table at the far right.
And one by one, the families are called over to meet with the doctor.
They've got a real problem with this.
Why they fetishize this.
Because they've got a pharmaceutical fetish.
Oh, we're going to try to...
This is hardscrabble, poor, ignorant people.
No, they know more than the people who are getting their kids vaccinated.
Edwards asks about their diet.
He asks about their nutritional intake, but he does not do blood work to look at the level of specific vitamins or nutrients.
Based on the conversations of parents and the child, he decides whether the parent might benefit from cod liver oil, which is high in vitamins A and D. We took our boys, they were about, I don't know, five or something.
We take them to a pediatrician.
We didn't do wellness visits and things like that, which saved them from a lot of these vaccines.
And so we went to a doctor.
I forget what the reason was, because we didn't do wellness visits.
And he didn't do any blood tests or anything.
He just recommended that we found out that we were on well water, and he wanted them on fluoride tablets and stuff.
It's like, yeah, right.
If kids are having significant trouble breathing, Edmonds recommends...
Budesonide, an inhaled steroid, typically used for asthma.
But he does not offer them vaccines.
They put that in a separate area.
Wow.
Because guess what?
He knows that vaccines aren't going to help him, going to hurt him.
So NBC is attacking him on behalf of their sponsors.
They're brought to you by Pfizer.
One of the state's highest vaccine exemption rates, here it is, at nearly 18%.
So, okay, 82, not 87%, but 82% of the people there, unfortunately, are still getting vaccinated.
Compared to 3% nationally, 97% of the people are sticking 72 jabs into their children because Pfizer wants money.
That's what it amounts to.
And you wonder why we've got an explosion in autism.
Many members in the community are also eschewing conventional medical approaches.
Why do you think that would be?
Many people learned something.
Many people didn't in 2020. Edwards was conventionally trained at the University of Texas Houston Medical School, initially opened a small-town clinic where he practiced family medicine.
In recent years, however, he's made a switch to practicing outside of conventional medicine.
And so NBC and Pharma want to shut him down.
Pharma sends out their minions at NBC, and they want to do it for their sponsor.
During COVID, listen to this guy.
Oh, he's a bad guy.
Listen to how bad he is.
During COVID, Dr. Edwards appeared as an expert at Texas state legislative hearings where he shared dubious claims about widespread injuries and deaths that he said were caused by the vaccines.
Dubious claims?
Multitudes of claims that are out there.
And in 2020, Edwards said that masks were ineffective.
They actually put this in.
I mean, what kind of idiot reads NBC News if they're going to put this stuff in?
Everybody knows that masks are ineffective now.
They're building his credibility.
They think they're tearing him down, but they're building his credibility because he's been proven right again and again.
The full scale of measles outbreak in West Texas isn't captured by official reports.
Edwards did a quick tally of the number of cases that he's seen alone in his warehouse.
Approximately 188 in the last week.
Now, NBC, let's do a thought experiment here.
You know, just like we don't see dead birds falling out of the sky everywhere with a bird flu.
Why is it that he is seeing more measles cases than you are?
Because you're only telling the people that some doctor or some urgent care thing sends to the hospital, whether they need to go to the hospital or not.
Whether the hospital will help them or hurt them, they send them to the hospital.
They count those.
So if only he is seeing 188 measles cases, and it might tell you that it's no big deal if you really wanted to think through this thing.
But they're trying to make him out to be the Typhoid Mary of measles.
So that's good news, actually.
And here's another piece of good news.
The Wall Street Journal is wringing its hands about the fluoride rebellion.
People are finally getting the message about pharmaceutical products, especially vaccines, about fluoride and all the rest of this stuff.
And the mainstream media, like Wall Street Journal and NBC and all the rest of them, brought to you by Pfizer, are really starting to freak out.
That's really positive news.
I'm really glad to hear that.
Much more remains to be done.
I mean, we still got, even in that area in West Texas.
And again, it's skewed because one community there, the Mennonites, get it.
They understand what's going on.
Probably the rest of the community, if you broke it down by community, it's probably the rest of them.
Conform to the 97% get their kids vaccinated.
So just one little community there's bringing that rate down.
We've got to get this information out to a lot of people.
Once you see what these people have done, and this is what I don't understand about 2020, they should be catching on by now.
But just like with Trump, they will see what they want to see.
And they will intentionally blind themselves to what they don't want to see.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
So I'm going to come back because...
I'm going to break.
I wasn't looking at the clock.
And Karen says, you've got three minutes of the show left.
What are you going to break for?
And I don't want to go to the break before I talk about this.
Look, the data doesn't lie.
This is what gold does when the Standard& Poor's Index drops 10%.
It's down 9% as of Monday's crash or whatever.
And so what they did was they went back and they asked ChatGPT.
Now that's kind of...
Cool.
I mean, you know, you can ask ChatGPT to go back and do an historical analysis.
If it's something objective like that, it probably won't.
You know, it might get it wrong, but it's not going to intentionally skew it.
And so they talked about the fact that when the Standard& Poor dropped down between 10% and 15%, ChatGPT said, historically, gold has gone up 3% to 5%.
So that's something that's pretty bullish.
And then they had a quote.
From the people who are selling the ETF, you know, the SPDRs, the ETF gold, GLD. I caught on to that one, too.
It took me a while, but I caught on to that scam when I saw spot gold going up, and it was going horizontal.
It's like, why aren't these two tracking with each other?
I was naive enough, like many people are, to think that they actually own gold on the Shanghai Exchange, and you're actually just buying a tenth of a share.
No, you're not buying any gold at all if you get into GLD. You're buying shares in a company that claims that they have some gold that nobody knows if they've got it or not.
So what you're buying is fiat gold.
You're buying a piece of paper that says that somebody else owns some gold somewhere.
That's why they don't track with each other.
Look, don't settle for a piece of paper when you can own the real thing.
And you can get the real thing at Wise Wolf Gold.
You can get there through davidknight.gold.
Deal with Tony Ardman.
He's going to be on tomorrow.
We'll talk about more of this stuff.
But it's real simple to get physical gold.
And to get out of the clutches of these people who are selling you derivatives.
What a joke it is.
I said, yeah, the ETF investors have been a little bit slow to the party, but I'm glad to see they have finally joined.
And they still don't understand.
They were a little bit slow to the party and a little bit slow to understand what is really going on.
But we've got a lot more to talk about, and we'll talk with Tony tomorrow in terms of interest rates and all the rest of this stuff.
What happens?
If there's a 10% correction, 10 to 15% correction, well, they said historically gold has gone up 3 to 5%.
Have a good day.
We'll talk to you tomorrow.
Good evening.
Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow.
Or, more specifically, what comes out the other end.
Yes, the air is thick with intrigue.
As it seems that in our modern age of propaganda, even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat.
The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.
Carefully contrived to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in, jackboots and all, with their solutions.
Because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags?
But one must wonder, is this truly about saving the planet, or are we simply being led to pasture?
Is it merely a MacGuffin?
The David Knight show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny.
And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull.
So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show.
And now back to our regularly scheduled program.
▲
Export Selection