All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 19, 2025 - The David Knight Show
48:55
The David Knight Show -2/19/2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 19th of February, year of our Lord, 2025.
Well, earlier this week, we talked about the technocracy in terms of its history, in terms of its application.
Aspirations in geography.
So today we're going to talk about its aspirations in terms of the mind war, the spiritual war, if you will.
And as we talk about one of the key leaders of this, Elon Musk, it comes out that the White House has officially said that he is not the leader of Doge.
Well, what's that about?
And meanwhile, you have others who are associated with it saying...
We might write a stimulus check to people.
You might get $5,000 back.
Isn't that great?
I just love all this free money where they give me back some of my money that I already have been giving to them for years.
And we'll talk about, is it going to be a Ukraine peace?
Or maybe an Iran war to go with it?
And we will have Eric Peters joining us in the second hour.
We're also going to talk about promises made, promises kept.
Stopping the pandemic treaty at the World Health Organization.
Is that really stopping it?
When we've got the Office of Pandemic Preparedness in the White House?
It's kind of like getting rid of CBDC and then having a de facto...
We'll be right back.
Well, you know, it's kind of interesting to look at how loved and how hated the Musk and Trump are.
And I think a lot of it has to do with the attitudes of both the left and the right towards money.
Thank you.
Many on the left are envious, and that breeds a hatred, right?
Many on the right are covetous, and that breeds love of this money.
Neither one of these things are where we want to be, folks.
So, they look at these billionaires, and it's like, oh, that's great.
They must really be smart.
And maybe I could be a billionaire someday, too, especially if we get a $5,000 check from Doge.
Now, both of these extremes are falling off the horse on one side or the other.
I remember when I was in high school, my dad used to always get Business Week, and I used to read it more than he did, actually.
And I remember there's one story.
That really stuck out with me.
And it was one guy who was coming from Europe.
They called it urosclerosis.
Urosclerosis said, Europe has so many regulations.
It's like hardening of the arteries.
It's choking it to death.
And that's really the problem in America as well.
It's not getting rid necessarily of bureaucrats because, as Elon Musk said, we want to minimize government, but we want to maximize governance.
And so it's not going to be a victory for us if we are no longer regulated by bureaucrats with their massive paper files and their 3x5 cards like you saw with the censors in Germany.
They have this big wall of folders of papers in them that they've been keeping track of with people.
Now, instead of folders with papers stuffed in them and 3x5 cards, you have the efficiency of the computer.
And artificial intelligence to maximize governance.
So that's not going to be a victory for us.
But getting back to the story about Europe and eurosclerosis at the time.
And this would have been back in, I was in high school, so that would have been in the early 1970s.
And this one guy illustrated it perfectly.
He said, it's the attitude of people in Europe versus the attitude of people in America.
And really what it...
What reflects today is the attitude of the left in America versus the right in America.
And so what he said was, the Europeans will see somebody that has a very, very expensive sports car, let's say a Ferrari.
And they see it there, and they're likely to key it.
Just take their key and scrape it along the side, because they hate those people who are rich.
They have no aspirations to become rich.
They envy it.
And they hate it.
He says, whereas in America, somebody sees a Ferrari and they look at it and say, one day I'm going to have one of those.
Covetousness and the love of money, which can be the root of all evil.
Money is not evil.
It's the love of money that is evil.
Okay?
And so, you know, when we look at this on an individual level, what do we do with this?
I mean, we can't change political parties and we can't change Washington and all the rest of it.
So what can we change?
Well, with God's help and a lot of work, you can change yourself a little bit.
You're not going to change politics in Washington.
And so, we've been told that godliness with contentment is great gain, right?
And what does that mean?
What is godliness?
Well, that means a reverence for God.
Being focused on God.
Being focused on God as your provider.
Being content with what he provides.
Resting on his promises in the future, that breeds contentment.
And so, that's also in 1 Timothy 6, that's where you have the phrase repeated, the love of money is the root of all evil.
And he also says, we don't bring anything into this world, and for sure we're not going to take anything out of this world.
And that really needs to be our understanding, because it's true.
It really is true.
He also says, don't fall into the trap of foolish Harmful lusts that drowned men.
Now, you know, we look at this in both the left and the right.
What do we see them lusting after?
Well, the left has basically given up on money.
They're envious.
They hate it.
But they've got a lot of lusts, don't they, in terms of all these sexual aberrations.
That's where they spend their time.
But other people can spend their time chasing money, loving money, chasing power.
And, you know, doers.
We're doing stuff.
People like Elon Musk.
And they will drown in those harmful lusts.
So, with that in mind, I want to talk about Grok 3. Grok 3. And all of the hubris and pride surrounding that.
Just a few months ago, as this was being prepared, and I remember we talked about that, the CEO of NVIDIA said, Look at that.
They put in like a thousand of these GPUs.
I've never seen anybody get this much done as Musk's organization is doing.
He said it truly is remarkable how quickly they put this data center up in Memphis.
And right after that happened, he went on with Jordan Peterson.
And the two of them were talking about that data center that is now, it was just the last 48 hours, I guess, that they released Grok 3. And said that according to benchmarks, it is now the number one AI. They keep leap-progging each other with each new release.
But this is what was said between Jordan Peterson and Elon Musk.
You said you were up until four in the morning?
Yeah, actually a little more like five in the morning.
We got to the XAI Data Center or Supercomputer Center training from...
Beginning installation to start a training in 19 days, which is the fastest that anyone has ever gotten a supercomputer to train.
And is that in that new building off to the side?
That's in Memphis, actually.
It's in Memphis?
Yeah.
So that's where you were?
Yeah.
I see.
Memphis, the capital of ancient Egypt.
Right, right, right, right, right, right.
Yeah, you're bringing what?
Perhaps that's where our new god will come from.
Yeah, no kidding.
No kidding.
Yeah, okay.
Well, perhaps that's where our new God will come from, he said.
And Jordan Peterson, yeah, right.
No kidding.
No kidding.
Elon Musk has famously said, with AI, we're summoning the demon.
Now he says it's the new God.
Meet your new God, a demon.
And we know that.
We know what is happening with this.
And that is, you know, people, whether you're a believer or not, you should be concerned about this.
Because this is about what we've been prepared.
They've been preparing us with this.
You want to talk about predictive programming and preparation.
Think about how we have been prepared for this pretty much every science fiction thing.
I remember back in the 1970s when I was first exposed to mainframe computers and things like that at college.
And at that time...
It's this big computer complex.
At USF, we had an IBM mainframe.
It's very expensive, and they would keep track of every fraction of a second of CPU time that you would use.
They had this one giant computer, and it handled all the administrative for two universities, USF, and then there was another small university somewhere.
Computer programming and math, you know, students would use it as well as all of the accounting stuff.
And we would all stand in line, you know, access to this thing.
And I thought, this is so perverse, you know.
I hate the centralization.
It's one of the things that really drove me towards libertarianism.
This futility of centralization.
You know, a lot of people who've escaped a communist society, boy, they can smell it a while away.
Well, in a sense, We had this all-important, all-expensive computer that we all waited and served.
And we had, at the computer center that I went to, there were 16 key punch machines and card punch machines, I should say.
And, you know, it was, they had 16 of them, and they always had about three or four of them broken down.
They had a guy from IBM who lived there.
He wore a white shirt and a tie.
And he had to fix these machines, and he was constantly there.
No matter what time of day or night you went there.
Early in the morning, he was always there.
He used to take care of me, and we would punch up these cards.
We had one card.
The worst thing happened.
Some of these students have a big box of cards and drop them.
It's like, no, I've got to get this back in order again, because every card was in line.
And what eventually became command line interpreters once people got terminals.
At that time, the only people who got terminals were the people who were computer science majors in their third or fourth year.
Everybody else is using the card punch machine.
What a nightmare that was.
And we're all sitting there waiting for the computer.
I said, this is so perverse, the computer ought to be waiting for us.
And so when personal computers came around, it's like, that's the way it ought to be.
I ought to have this computer sitting there doing no ops.
Waiting for me to interact with it rather than the other way around.
So this whole centralization stuff, but the reason I mention that is because we've been conditioned from science fiction, from entertainment.
We've been conditioned from our interactions with early mainframe computers.
Oh, this thing is like tens of millions of dollars, and it's so precious, and it's so expensive, and it's so intelligent.
Look at how fast it can add numbers.
And all the rest of the stuff.
And now, it's got some other tricks.
But folks, it is still artificial intelligence.
It's not real intelligence.
When we first had the first personal computers, they had a program.
It was called Liza or Eliza or something like that.
And it was like the Jordan Peterson app.
A psychiatrist where you sit on the couch or you sit at the terminal.
And it asks you, so how are you feeling today?
And then you would say something, how do you feel about that?
Give me your feelings about this.
So just asking probing questions.
And it, you know, a pretty good simulation of a psychiatric session.
So it was very convincing in terms of going back and forth, but now it's far more sophisticated.
And the problem has always been, That people would look at something coming out of the computer and give too much weight to it, too much importance to it, defer to it, as I pointed out last week.
They've done a study with AI, and they found that people, you know, it's a combination of it being an authority as well as the pressure of a group.
You know, it's not like the Ash experiment as well as the Milgram experiment.
They found that 65% of the people would change their answer.
And even if they didn't change their answer, it gave them a great deal of unease to go against the computer.
And so they said, this is very dangerous.
There's a lot of conformity built into this.
We want to worship something like that, that has answers, right?
The heart is an idol factory.
We're always looking for idols to worship.
You know that, I know that, if you're honest.
You know, is it going to be a sports figure?
Is it going to be this or that?
Well, when it comes to intellectual pursuits, it's very easy, because we've been told all of our life.
That computers have got the answer.
And if they don't have the full answer now, they're going to have the full answer pretty soon.
And that is exactly what Elon Musk is telling people with the release of Grok 3. Welcome to the Grok 3 presentation.
So the mission of XAI and Grok is to understand the universe.
We want to understand the nature of the universe so we can figure out what's going on, where are the aliens, what's the meaning of life, how does the universe end, how did it start, all these fundamental questions.
We're driven by curiosity about the nature of the universe, and that's also what causes us to be a maximally truth-seeking AI, even if that truth is sometimes at odds with what is politically correct.
In order to understand the nature of the universe, you must absolutely rigorously pursue truth, or you will not understand the universe.
You will be suffering from some amount of delusion or error.
So that is our goal.
Yeah.
So, how do you understand the universe?
You're not going to look at the book that the creator of the universe gave us, the Bible.
You're not going to do that.
Instead, you're going to ask Grok, and Grok is going to find out all the big questions.
You know, where did the universe come from?
How does it end?
When does it end?
All the rest of this stuff.
Where are the aliens?
Not if there are aliens, but where are they?
And, most importantly, what is the meaning of life?
Professing to be wise, they became fools.
You know, Douglas Adams did Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
I could not help but think about that as he says, well, we have Grok 3, and it does have a deep thought mode, and you can find out the meaning of life in this thing.
Many millions of years ago, a race of hyper-intelligent, pan-dimensional beings got so fed up with the constant bickering about the meaning of life that they commissioned two of their brightest and best to design and build a stupendous supercomputer to calculate the answer to life, the universe, and everything.
Oh, Deep Thoughts.
We want you to tell us the answer.
The answer to what?
The answer to life.
The universe.
Everything.
We really like an answer.
Something simple.
We have to think about that.
In exactly seven and a half million years.
We want to know the meaning of life, the universe, and everything.
And that's what Elon Musk has said.
This guy's a huckster if there ever was one.
Come on.
He is so full of sci-fi BS. He does the demons.
We're going to find the meaning of life and all the rest of the stuff.
But look, there is a real concern because of what I said.
The fact that most people will defer.
65% of the people are going to go with whatever AI says.
And they don't understand garbage in, garbage out.
They don't understand biases and so forth.
And he has rejected He says, oh, we've got to pursue truth.
Rigorously pursue truth.
But he rejects the truth of the Bible.
He rejects the truth that we see all around us, that we are created.
Perhaps he explains that by the aliens.
That's what the creators of DNA did.
And so then the question becomes, is the Bible the way that the Creator has spoken to us?
And I think if you look at it from so many different angles.
You can look at it historically.
You can look at it prophetically.
You can look at it from all of these different angles, and it hangs together.
But they don't look at it.
They don't look at it at all.
And so this ought to concern even the unbelievers because of this imitation of intelligence and because you've got hucksters like this.
Transhumanist demon.
You want to summon the demons?
They're in the White House, okay?
This is a guy who wants to use Neuralink to hack into your brain.
This is a guy who says you must join with artificial intelligence or die.
You must become a cyborg.
He and Peter Thiel are pushing the singularity, folks.
This is where they're headed.
And he's...
Part of the mRNA stuff as well.
Genetic modification, you name it.
He ticks every one of these boxes.
And so it's become much more convincing.
And you're going to have to be much more discerning.
And you're going to have to teach that to your children and your grandchildren.
So here is Zero Hedge cheering him on.
Because, hey, that's where the money is.
Money is in cheering these powerful billionaires, Trump and Musk.
Zero Hedge says, Musk's XAI unveils state-of-the-art Grok 3 AI bot surpassing OpenAI and DeepSeek with the benchmarks that they have.
On Monday night, Musk's artificial intelligence startup, XAI, unveiled its latest model, Grok AI on Earth.
But, you know, we don't know what the aliens have, so.
Achieved a record-breaking score.
Outperforming models from OpenAI and China's DeepSeek.
Zero Hedge says, remember, Musk, here's where the cheerleading comes in.
This is just disgusting, how they curry favor with him.
And they do, and they get retweeted by Musk.
They get responded to by Musk because they do this.
Remember that Musk is simultaneously juggling Doge and several ventures, including autonomous vehicles, space exploration, neurotechnology.
You know, that would be hacking into your brain and causing you to participate in the singularity thing that they imagined.
Robotics, tunneling, and his social media platform, X. Yeah, they don't know when we talk about the MRNA that he's involved in.
Or that J.D. Vance and Vivek Ramaswamy are involved in.
Self-replicating.
mRNA.
They don't want to talk about that.
They don't want to talk about the transhumanism, singularity, and all the rest of this stuff.
And this pretense that he's simultaneously juggling and doing, and he's doing all this, you know.
This guy is so smart, so intelligent.
Yeah, all that, and he is a pro-gamer.
And that's where I was going.
That's where I was going, Whistler.
All of that, he can simultaneously attend a party with Trump.
And still be kicking butt with his Diablo.
Just his choice of games is kind of interesting, isn't it?
Devils and angels fighting each other in this dark world.
That's his Diablo game.
But he can be a world-class professional gamer at the same time and be playing at the same time that he's at the party.
He's not doing this stuff.
He's not even playing his own games.
The game he's playing is the one that Zero Edge and so many in the media and other places are playing, sucking up to him.
The mission of XAI and Grok is to understand the universe, and we want to answer the biggest questions.
Who are the aliens?
What's the meaning of life?
How does the universe end?
And to that, we must rigorously pursue truth.
Well, he says, this is from a guy who dismisses God in the Bible.
This is a guy who seeks to change men into cyborg slaves.
It's just amazing to see what this is all about.
And nobody wants to talk about that.
Because, you know, you don't want to get the world's wealthiest man upset with you, right?
Musk noted that Grok 3 has more than 10 times the computing power of its predecessor and completed pre-training earlier this year.
The large language model blind test used by LM Arena found Grok 3 achieved a record milestone of 1,400 score.
So should we worship it yet?
Mmm.
Elon Musk has shattered the benchmark of most people, and that's wealth.
Is he, therefore, the smartest person that ever lived, since he's the wealthiest person that ever lived?
Should we worship him?
I mean, he's the creator of this thing that he wants you to worship.
This thing that's going to tell us the meaning of life.
You think that Elon Musk knows the meaning of life?
You think his creation is going to know it?
No.
He says, we've continually improved the models every day, and literally within 24 hours, you're going to see improvements.
You'll see improvements just like you'll see improvements in his wealth as well.
So, Zero Hedge would say, you know.
Along with Tevye.
If I were a rich man, everybody would sit there at the gate and they would ask me questions or they would go to my Grok 3 thing.
Because if you're AI or if you're the richest man in the world, they think you really know.
And you don't know.
So they've got all these different things, playing games and other stuff.
But I thought two of the eight sections of the benchmark were kind of interesting.
The Ryman hypothesis, which...
I don't have any idea what that is.
I didn't bother to look it up.
It sounds like something from Star Trek.
What was it?
The quiz that William Shatner got and nobody else got.
Kobayushi or whatever paradox.
Anyway, the Ryman hypothesis showing initiative by not giving up on challenging problems, unlike some other models.
The Ryman hypothesis.
And then the other one, humor.
Grok 3's humor capability did not show any improvement, just like its master, Elon Musk.
He doesn't show any improvement in humor either.
As a matter of fact, he doesn't realize what a joke he's become.
Failing to generate novel or sophisticated jokes, which is a common challenge for large language models.
And then finally, this one.
Ethical sensitivity.
The model was overly sensitive to complex ethical issues, avoiding questions that might involve ethical dilemmas.
So how are you going to figure out the meaning of life?
If you don't have any ethics?
If you can't handle an ethical dilemma, how are you going to figure out the meaning of life?
But as they, uh, in the presentation, say, here, watch the full presentation of the demo, and here's the title of it, Grok 3, Solving Physics, Games, and the Universe.
Nothing pompous about that.
Or pretentious, right?
And then they have some time codes there.
At the beginning, we're going to talk about our mission and understanding the universe.
And then later on, we get into Grok means to profoundly understand.
Yeah, that's what it came from.
It came from Robert Heinlein's science fiction Strangers in a Strange Land.
And it was about a guy who...
He was part of a human expedition that failed.
He was the only one that survived.
He was raised by aliens on Mars, and so he's kind of a bridge between the two cultures.
And I guess this maybe helps to explain Musk's obsession with Mars as well.
So maybe that's where the aliens are.
They're all on Mars.
Whistler says it looks like they've set aside 80 minutes to understand the universe.
That was quick.
And the next model will understand the universe in even less time.
That's it.
Yeah, that's good.
So, his whole worldview is like that of an adolescent science fiction fan.
That's it.
I mean, it is childish.
Absolutely childish.
Maybe what he'll do is replace the next Republican National Convention.
Maybe they could replace it with the Star Trek Convention.
That would probably be an improvement, actually.
As long as the aliens were legal, right?
He loves to call this supercomputer Colossus, another reference to yet another sci-fi story.
Colossus, the Forbin Project in 1970, I think it was.
Sci-fi thing where Forbin creates this supercomputer that is so smart.
Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
Yes.
What he aspires to.
What he wants to be seen as.
And this computer, you know, takes over the nuclear weapons or whatever and they've got to shut it down just like they redid that with War Games and Matthew Broderick is a young hacker who gets into the military computers, that type of thing.
So how much does it cost?
Well, if you have a Premium Plus X subscription and you pay Musk $22 a month, you can get access to his Grok 3. If you were to do the same thing for OpenAI's GPT-40, it costs $200 a month.
So it's a deal.
I think $22 is too much.
So where does this all fit?
You know, there's an interesting Brownstone article.
From Bruce Davidson.
And the title just came out yesterday as well.
It doesn't refer to Musk.
He's not going to talk about Musk and he's not going to talk about Trump.
That's going to be too dangerous.
But the headline of this is the collectivist evolutionary religion of the UN. And it is.
It's also satanic if you know anything about the Lucis Trust and the chapel that they set up in the UN. They're openly satanic.
But he says as a teenager, here we are, you know, we're back to an adolescent obsession with science fiction, right?
But Bruce Davidson says as a teenager, Arthur C. Clarke was one of my favorite sci-fi writers.
Among his novels, Childhood's End is one of the most acclaimed.
The story climaxes with the harvesting of the minds of evolutionary advanced human children into a galactic overmind.
A mass mind entity that transcends material existence.
And let me show you a picture of what this looks like.
Oh, there's the guy from Childhood's End.
And isn't that interesting?
In the upper left corner there, you see this space alien, which is special effects when they did it on the Sci-Fi Channel.
We're actually very good.
This is what the guy looks like.
He's extremely tall.
He's got cloven hooves for feet.
He's got for his Twitter profile for a long, long time.
And so in the story, you have Arthur C. Clarke imagining these people.
It's kind of like borrows from the panspermia ideas of Crick and Watson, the discovers of DNA. Yeah, we kind of set this thing up, and we've come back now to harvest.
The children, because you've reached this certain level of development, evolutionary development.
And so they basically take the children away and leave the parents without any children.
Take all of the children.
And so now humanity is going to go to the next level.
I thought, boy, if that isn't a paradigm for what these pedophiles like Arthur C. Clarke and...
The people who are running our government and all of our institutions are satanic pedophiles, folks.
And that's what they want to do.
It is a perfect depiction of what they want to do.
And not every single one of them buys into it.
But that is what the upper echelon of that stuff is all about.
And so, the other part of this...
I put up some of this stuff when I was doing a...
I did a thing about transhumanism.
Back in 2018. Seven years ago.
And I should do that presentation.
I never got a chance to go through the whole thing.
I set up this stuff of what I wanted to say, and I had an hour to speak.
And so I said, let me give it to you, Karen.
So she sits down to listen to me, and she's timing it and everything.
And I couldn't fit it into an hour.
And I did it like three or four times.
Every time I did it differently, and I could never get it to fit in an hour.
And then when I did the presentation, we just had the massive purge in August of 2018 off of social media.
And I wound up not even really getting into it that much.
I talked really more about censorship and the purge.
So I've got all this great material that I haven't done anything with, and I think I'm going to do that in the next week or so.
I'll give you the full three-hour presentation on transhumanism and what these people are really about.
But I've got a lot of interesting slides that are set up with it.
Anyway, one of the other ones that I put up was the myth of transhumanism and global governance.
And notice that I said governance, not government, but governance.
And the fact that the goal of these people is to become like God.
We emerge in the singularity.
And that is what Elon Musk is telling you.
Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, all these people.
We're going to create these machines.
You can somehow transfer yourself into them.
Well, what are you?
Right?
These are people that act to something else somehow.
What are we?
What is our essence?
Do we have a soul?
Is it the soul that is what we really are?
Is it our spirit?
Is the spirit what we really are?
Yeah, we all understand that the body is independent of that.
And they would recognize that interestingly enough.
But they don't really have an answer because these are people, they're kind of in a bind, you know, like Jordan Peterson.
They want to study the soul, but they don't believe that we have a spirit.
And so they try to study the consciousness, the animal-like consciousness, our soul, without looking at our spirit.
Anyway, he said, so I saw this, and he said, so that's what happens.
They take all the human children away.
And they join the overmind.
Well, that isn't totalitarian enough for you, is it?
So he said, but the ending was something of a letdown.
He said, the evolutionary future of my species would be nothing more than an absorption into an undifferentiated, sentient, cosmic soup.
And there are some religions that push that idea.
That is not...
What the Bible teaches.
He said, however, the UN now promotes something similar to that in its own religious vision.
That vision is spelled out in a very well-made 16-minute propaganda video titled, A Radical Guide to Reality.
And they have it on a webpage for the SDG. That's the Sustainable Development Goals.
That's what is the basis for 2030. Smart cities.
You'll own nothing.
All the rest of this stuff.
It's the Sustainable Development Goals.
You will have no meat, no dairy.
All the stuff that you've seen encapsulated also into the C40, the cities aspect of it.
Those Sustainable Development Goals.
Straight out of hell.
A system of poverty and enslavement.
And so they have a website there for the Sustainable Development Goal Thought Leaders.
So this is where you go to learn this so that you can propagandize and evangelize other people with this satanic vision of humanity coming out of the UN. He said these so-called thought leaders are aligned with the UN's sustainable development goals and are part of an entity called the Unitive Cluster of NGOs.
They're going to unify everything under them, under the UN. And that is the mythology of global governance.
There we go.
Standing right there now.
You don't typically see, when you've got a bunch of these UN people standing around, you don't typically see the satanic figure.
But at least in childhood's end, Arthur C. Clarke wanted you to see it physically.
Usually it's not seen, but it's there.
It's there.
If you had the eyes to see that...
That Elisha and Elijah had.
You would be able to see that.
So anyway, it begins by declaring that the whole universe breathes and elaborates that the Big Bang really should be called the Big Breath.
The universe was born to evolve into something, they said, with greater levels of diversity.
There's that word they love so much.
And of self-awareness.
You know, you become lovers of self in the last days.
It evolves as a wholly unified entity which emerges from the non-physical realm of cosmic intelligence expressing itself.
Very much like the idea that Arthur C. Clarke and a lot of these people had.
The video also refers to the Earth as Gaia, a living god-like being.
The name is taken from the Earth goddess of Greco-Roman pagan mythology, Gaia.
Gaia was Mother Earth.
And through some part of the mythology, she gives birth to the Titans.
But this is what they've been selling at Lovelock, as I said, when we went to Britain in 2001. It was, the kids were young, and I took them to the Children's Museum, let them play on swing sets and stuff like that.
And the whole time, they had this loop, like, 20-minute loop.
Talking about Gaia.
Saying that the Earth was a sentient being.
It's not.
But people in Hollywood really believe it.
Jennifer Lawrence saying, well, we had this hurricane.
Mother Earth is really angry with us.
And it's not because you're using margarine or whatever that was.
What was that commercial?
It's not nice to fool Mother Nature.
I don't know.
It wasn't because of that.
No, it was because human beings are a virus.
I taped that.
Got all these tapes that we had of the kids when they were young.
I want to get them transferred before they are destroyed.
But if I get that transferred, I will show you that.
It's absolutely amazing.
I just couldn't believe it, so I videotaped the whole thing.
Though the message sounds a lot like religious scripture, and it is a religion.
And it was something, I mean, we had it there, and we got on a train, and there was their science magazine, and it was all about the Gaia theory, and it was all about Lovelock, and the guy who sold that.
Now, he's walked back that.
He's no longer a climate alarmist, interestingly enough.
I don't know if he still worships the earth or not.
Although the message sounds a lot like religious scripture, some attempt is made to undergird its declarations of scientific facts.
The video mentions the fine tuning of the laws of physics and the cosmos to make biological life possible.
But who tuned it?
Who is it that did that?
And of course, you know, they put some scientific facts in there.
They throw in some numbers.
This is still a religion.
It's called scientism.
It's what Fauci was pushing.
It's what Fauci became the high priest of.
Scientism.
It's worship of these authorities and their pronouncements.
Because, hey...
They claim that they've done some tests with a PCR, this or that.
So, you know, it's kind of this veneer of science.
But it's not science.
It's just blind trust in what these people are telling you.
It's scientism.
And the question is, the universe is fine-tuned by whom?
Who created it?
There was a good analogy of this kind of attitude.
So let's say you've got some intelligent ants, and they realize by mistake or somehow that they all get on the lever of the thermostat.
They can adjust the temperature, and they pronounce themselves controllers of the temperature now.
We figured out how to move them, but they don't know anything about how it works.
They couldn't make it, but they've solved it.
That's really what these scientists are doing.
They look at something and they say, hey, I know how I can.
Look at this thing.
It's very complicated.
And if I do this, that happens.
Well, you didn't make it.
Who made that?
You figured out a little bit of it.
But who was it that put the whole thing together?
So this is certainly not Darwinism or neo-Darwinistic evolution, which operates by the unguided mechanisms of natural selection and random mutation.
However, the UN needs a revamped collectivist concept of evolution in order to justify its stance that individualism is selfish.
One disturbing aspect of their guided evolution is that it harkens back to the eugenics movement of the 20th century, the sterilization of the unfit.
And racism towards supposedly less evolved human people.
Of course, that's Planned Parenthood.
That's everything that they did.
That's what Margaret Singer said she was doing.
And the patriarch of the Bush family was right there with her.
And culminates in the well-known horrific Nazi practices.
No, it culminates in Planned Parenthood today.
Take a look at what they're doing.
You can talk about the Nazis.
The Nazis never did this kind of mutilation to kids that we're doing with transgenderism and everything.
We're worse than the Nazis.
Worse than the Nazis.
They never did that kind of stuff.
Not to say they wouldn't if they didn't have the technology, but this is what Planned Parenthood is today.
It is a eugenics, Nazi, mad science, and thoroughly humanity-hating.
James Lindsay examined the utopian creed that they put out at the UN. Under Secretary Robert Mueller put out a radical guide.
And James Lindsay looked at it in detail.
He titled his talk as he dissected it.
He called it The Occult Theosophy of the UN. And again, if you go back and you look at the theosophists and what they were doing, it's people like Elizabeth Clare Prophet.
It's philosophically related and religiously related to these theosophists.
It was something that was a very big thing at the turn of the century, turn of the 20th century.
And it's the kind of these kinds of occult theosophy prayers and things, the kind of stuff that Michael Flynn is leading people in at these Reawaken America tour type of things.
So he says, this points to the older roots of the UN religion.
In the theosophy movement of the 19th century, apparent of the current New Age movement, even older roots for these ideas can be found in ancient occultism and Gnosticism.
All of them subscribe to the concept of monism, that everything is one, all is in one.
The religious outlook posits that the real essence of the universe is not objective, concrete, physical matter, but something else is higher and greater, a cosmic consciousness.
This is the New Age type of stuff.
But it's very built into the old age theosophy and very built into what is being sold at the UN, their philosophical roots and the Lucis Trust and their little occultic chapel that they've got there.
According to the UN and others, a group of enlightened evolutionary leaders exist to help guide this collective evolution of humankind and the cosmos.
The highly popular American TV personality Oprah Winfrey has frequently given such leaders a platform to espouse their vision for humanity.
Alex is always very, very new age.
Things like that.
He cornered Travis one time and tried to just shut him down.
But, yeah, this website where he's going to offer you the secrets of life and how to transcend all this and get to the universe.
And, of course, it was all just...
The same kind of garbage that Oprah was selling with The Secret.
So we're going to take a break.
When we come back, we're going to continue a little bit of this.
I've got a couple more things I want to say, but I've been going for a while.
Whistler says we're having technical difficulties with the stream.
He says, go to a commercial and I'll restart the stream.
So, I'm going to go to a commercial and I'll restart the stream.
How about that?
So, bear with us.
We're going to restart the stream.
If you're getting the transmission, we're going to restart it.
If you're not, maybe you can get it after we do this.
We'll be right back.
Liberty.
It's your move.
And now, The David Knight Show.
The David Knight Show.
The David Knight Show.
So hopefully the stream has been restarted.
We had some technical difficulties, and Whistler's been trying to work on that.
That's why we had three of these things there.
Are we up, you think?
Okay, we're good.
And Eric Peters is going to be joining us in about nine minutes.
I want to finish up on this.
We have to just show you how they turn everything upside down and inside out.
We now have this actress who played the Wicked Witch of the West in Wicked.
It was a Broadway play.
They recently did it as a movie.
She played the role in the movie.
They have recast her as Jesus in Jesus Christ Superstar.
From the Wicked Witch of the West to Jesus.
That makes perfectly good sense.
And of course, she has done Jesus Christ Superstar once before.
They had an all-female cast.
And they called it, She is Risen.
So we're going to have a black female portraying Jesus.
And of course, in Wicked, I haven't seen it.
But from what I could tell, it's a sympathetic portrayal of the backstory of the Wicked Witch of the West.
How did she get so mean and evil?
Well, it's because people were mean to her.
And they made her that way.
It's not her fault.
She's a victim of her circumstance.
They're just justifying her evil as a pushback on other people's prejudice or whatever.
So she's now going to be playing Jesus.
But we also have some other people who are playing Jesus that are not in the movies.
And this is the faith office under Trump.
As I talked about this the other day, I'm going to put Paula White in there, who is playing Jesus games with people, the prosperity TV evangelist.
You know, quite frankly, I think that Paula White is far more damaging to Christians and the cause of Christ and the followers of Christ, making a mockery of all that.
I think they're far more dangerous than the Jesus Christ superstar.
I remember in high school, that was...
Very big.
And it was a girl I was dating, and she was gushing about the fact that they had watched in their church youth group, they had watched Jesus Christ Superstar.
And I just couldn't believe it.
I was like, what?
Why would a church be showing something like that?
Anyway, so there is a new focus on eradicating anti-Christian bias.
Says World Magazine.
Well, I think that Paul White is going to be confirming the worst kinds of stereotypes that the world has about Christians.
These prosperity gospel, so-called prosperity gospel people, these Christian so-called evangelists.
We will protect Christians in our schools, in our militaries, in our government, in our workplaces, hospitals, and in our public squares, said Trump.
By making a mockery of the followers of Christ, that's how we're going to protect them.
And of course, he's not really too worried about protecting Christians in India.
One of the worst places for Christian persecution.
Not just Christians.
Any religion other than the Hindu majority.
Tulsi Gabbard is part of that.
And so, you know, as he and Musk were entertaining Modi, the leader, didn't say anything about that.
▲
Export Selection