Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 17, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:27

Mon Episode #1953: Is DOGE’s Purpose Minimum Government, Maximum Governance of Technocracy?

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The End
	The End Year of our Lord, 2025. Well, today we have Napoleon and Hockey at the top of the list.
	But there's a greater meaning underneath those.
	And we're going to spend a lot of time taking a look at the technocracy.
	Because if you take a look at what the technocracy was talking about a century ago, roughly, it makes all the stuff about Greenland, Canada, Panama, the Gulf of America, as well as what is happening with Doge.
	And the statements by Elon Musk last week...
	At the World Government Summit in the United Arab Emirates, all of that makes sense.
	It all ties together.
	If you understand the technocracy and what they wanted to create, they call it the Technate.
	They consolidated North America.
	We'll be right back.
	back stay with us well I want to begin by thinking take on Bennett
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	And a comment from David Strauss saying, David, there was an NTD Reuters article this weekend concerning two house cats in Oregon that were euthanized after testing positive for bird flu.
	They said they linked it to the consumption of raw milk from pet food.
	Okay, so...
	Why not isolate them like you would an animal that has been exposed to rabies or so forth, right?
	Why wouldn't you do that and see what's going to happen to them?
	Just kill them.
	None of this stuff makes sense, and we've got a lot to say about bird flu, deja flu, and what the reality is on that, and what is really happening in the Trump administration.
	Have you seen anything, anybody, acknowledging That the massive destruction of tens of millions of eggs every month, or hens, I should say, and multiply that out by 300 eggs or so each year.
	Has anybody acknowledged that's a problem?
	Has anybody said that doesn't make any sense to kill all chickens on a farm if one of them tests positive?
	Again, what is this about herd immunity?
	Should we call it flock immunity?
	And none of this stuff makes any sense.
	But let's begin with a quote from Donald Trump.
	And it isn't so much the quote to me as it was the reaction of MAGA to it.
	And it's kind of interesting because this is part of the back and forth between the executive branch and the judicial.
	And I've said for the longest time we have to end judicial supremacy.
	It's essential to end that.
	And this is a fight that could do it, except they're taking it in a different direction.
	And the left is trying to portray this as a dictatorship, and Trump and his followers are more than happy to push that point, aren't they?
	They don't really care.
	Like I said before, you look at the weaponization of government.
	And yet, and there needs to be serious reform.
	There needs to be serious prosecutions, I should say, because of the persecution.
	So there should be, we should have judges that engaged in this kind of stuff against January the 6th people.
	They should be impeached.
	They should be removed.
	And I think they should be criminally prosecuted.
	And I would say the same thing for the prosecutors who engaged in this kind of stuff.
	And for FBI agents and the rest of this, they should not have that kind of immunity.
	If you don't have any penalty for doing this, people will continue to do it.
	And I said, so there needs to be some real reform accompanied by that.
	There needs to be some punishment, but they need to make it clear that it is reform and not vengeance.
	But I said, I don't expect that Trump is going to do that because it works to place to his strength to show that it is just his power that is there.
	His power is more important to him than the power of the law.
	His rule is more important to him than the rule of law.
	And so, on Saturday, we had Trump tweeting out, or somebody, in his organization, saying, He who saves his country does not violate any law.
	Is that right?
	Didn't you swear to uphold the Constitution?
	So, you're going to violate the Constitution to, quote-unquote, save your country.
	We've always heard that patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel, but some scoundrels, it's the first refuge, isn't it?
	To say, I'm doing this patriotically to save my country.
	I'm going to ignore the Constitution.
	So the phrase is attributed to Napoleon, and you immediately had people like Adam Schiff come in and say, spoken like a true dictator.
	I mean, this is a softball lob to do that.
	You don't think that Trump knew that?
	You don't think that he's trying to stir up both sides on this issue?
	And what amazes me are the people who have cheered for this.
	You know, when Napoleon first came on the scene, he was viewed as a liberator.
	Beethoven dedicated his third symphony to Napoleon.
	But then when Napoleon declared himself to be emperor, He furiously erased that off of his dedication of his third symphony to Napoleon.
	So, Trump has made broad assertions about executive power that appear headed toward the U.S. Supreme Court showdowns.
	Well, that's not the way that you're going to end judicial supremacy.
	Some lawsuits accuse Trump of usurping the authority of Congress as set out in the U.S. Constitution.
	And this is a debate that we need to have.
	This is not a constitutional crisis.
	Is the assumed powers of the judiciary that they don't have.
	And you've got people like Tim Kaine, who is a running mate for Hillary Clinton, weighing in on this.
	And making up stuff.
	It even makes up an empowerment.
	I spent so much time this morning trying to find where the Empowerment Act is that he was referring to.
	There is none, folks.
	You know, I looked at all these different search engines.
	Maybe I should have gone to Yandex.
	But I couldn't find it on the other search engines that I looked at.
	And, yeah, we'll get to that in a moment.
	But the key thing is that J.D. Vance understands this.
	J.D. Vance has acknowledged this.
	I don't know how many other people in the Trump administration acknowledge it, or if they'll actually do anything about it.
	J.D. Vance said, well, you know, Andrew Jackson defied the Supreme Court because you have a separation of powers.
	So, again, the appropriate approach to pulling back these activist judges would be portray them as dictators.
	Instead, Trump is more than happy to portray himself as a dictator.
	And going back to portrayals, when the 1970 movie Waterloo had Rod Steiger playing Napoleon, and it had Christopher Plummer.
	Playing the Duke of Wellington.
	And this is a famous letter that he wrote to the Russian leader at the time, Alexei.
	to my dear Prince Alexis I did not you serve the crown I
	I found it in the gutter and I, I picked it up with my sword.
	to remember me.
	And it was the people, Alexis.
	The people who put it on my head.
	He who saves a nation violates no law.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, and so...
	Karen told me on Saturday, she said, I got onto her iPad and she said, always, Juanita Broderick has pushed her.
	She says, I don't follow her.
	I don't know why she's always being pushed to me.
	Well, it's because of this kind of stuff.
	Juanita Broderick says, She retweeted Trump's quote, and she said, this is so badass.
	Is it really?
	I think it's bad.
	I think it's really bad.
	I think it's bad that you would applaud this.
	And, you know, I went to her feed this morning to look for that.
	She's got all this stuff up there.
	She's cheering the fact that Canadian hockey players and U.S. players are fighting, that they're booing the national anthem because Trump has got people set against each other and fighting each other.
	And she said, yeah, just step around and find out, you know, and all this kind of stuff.
	It's like, wow, Winita Broderick.
	And, you know, she was at Mar-a-Laco, and she's promoting on her feed.
	She's promoting the book that she wrote.
	About being sexually battered and abused by Bill Clinton.
	And it says something like, you better put ice on that.
	That's the name of it or something like that.
	Because supposedly he hit her as well.
	And just said, hey, you better put ice on that.
	So that's the name of her book.
	And yet, does she care that Trump hung out with the Clintons?
	Does she care that the two of them are connected through Epstein?
	That they're three of a kind?
	And she goes to Mar-a-Lago as if it's something completely different.
	Wadida Broderick completely represents this doublethink of the MAGA people.
	Trump is everything that they hate.
	He's the father of the vaccine.
	He's a sexual predator.
	He's a Democrat from New York.
	I mean, he's everything these people hate.
	And they love him.
	And they want him to be emperor.
	And it disgusts me.
	I look at this and it's like Trump's approval rating has gone from like 43 to 55%.
	It's gone the opposite with me as I watch what he's doing.
	I didn't like him before.
	I wouldn't vote for him after 2020. And he's in single digits with me right now.
	And yes, I'll say single digits because I want to see some of the agencies reduced, but there's more to it than that.
	And we'll talk about what's going on with Doge and the bigger picture of the technocracy.
	People are saying, what in the world?
	Why is he talking about Canada and Greenland?
	Well, it'll all fall into place when you see this.
	It'll all fall into place, what is going to be happening with your money as well.
	With your money as well.
	DGA, thank you for the temp.
	He says, David, did you see the self-proclaimed father of the vaccine?
	That would be Trump.
	Signed an order to vaccinate all poultry with mRNA bird flu vaccine.
	I did not see that.
	I did not see that.
	Well, I cannot say I'm surprised.
	Because I knew that's where this is headed.
	Like I said, on Friday...
	When you look at this guy, and we'll get to it, his name is Gerald Parker, if I remember correctly.
	But what he did was he took a guy who has served in both Democrat and Republican administrations.
	He's Uniparty.
	He's also part of the global public health stuff.
	He's also part of One Health.
	He ran One Health in the Texas University where he was.
	What is One Health?
	Well, that's Bill Gates' thing.
	So he takes a Bill Gates guy who's worked for both Republicans and Democrats.
	This screams Uniparty, and he puts him in charge of the Pandemic Preparedness Office of the White House.
	The Pandemic Czar.
	Meet your new Fauci, a veterinarian.
	So I said that on Friday.
	I think it was Friday, Thursday.
	Anyway, getting back to this.
	Like I said, Trump is laying this stuff out, boasting about being a dictator, right?
	And in a sense, inoculating himself by going overboard, he gets these other people to go overboard as well.
	The left goes screaming mad.
	And then the right just laughs it off because, hey, this is great.
	I love to see these liberal tears in the same way that we see Breitbart and all these conservative magazines.
	Laughing and cheering the fact that we've got U.S. and Canadian hockey players fighting each other over the national anthem.
	It's like, why is that a good thing?
	It's not.
	So Robert Reich, the guy that I have absolutely no respect for, but he says this, this is bonkers.
	In our system of government, it's up to the courts to determine whether the president is using his power legitimately, not the president.
	No, that's not true.
	That is a usurped power that the Supreme Court usurped with Marbury v.
	Madison and Thomas Jefferson said, well, if you let that stand, that's the end of the Constitution.
	It was never designed to be the overseers of all the other branches.
	There were supposed to be checks and balances, balances between the different branches.
	And of all the branches, The judiciary was supposed to have the least amount of power.
	Instead, they have the most amount of power by proclaiming that they have congressional oversight.
	Now, Andrew Jackson ignored that.
	As I said before, J.D. Vance acknowledged the fact that Andrew Jackson had ignored that.
	And then you've got Senator Tim Kaine, Hillary Clinton's running mate from 2016, senator from Virginia.
	And he says, there's this law that, you know, the Empowerment Act, that says once Congress has appropriated dollars for a particular purpose, a president is not allowed to say, yeah, I don't like that.
	I'm going to spend this money, but not that money.
	And I've said this from the very beginning.
	I said, show me where in the Constitution it says that the president has to spend the money that Congress allocates.
	Yes, Congress has the power of the purse, Article 1, Section 9. Funding for people, right?
	But the president is the one who spends it.
	He doesn't have to spend it.
	And to give you an analogy, always in a bureaucracy, I know because Karen used to, she was a teacher for a couple of years.
	Can you believe this?
	They came around and told everybody, hey, if you want something, order it now because we're at the end of the year and if we don't spend all of our money, it's likely to get cut next year.
	And that's the way these people operate.
	Well, you know, just because you've got the money allocated to you, you don't have to spend it.
	Now, of course, they typically do.
	That and maybe even more.
	I don't know.
	So I looked this up and said, so is this it?
	Is this what everybody is talking about?
	This Empowerment Act?
	As I said before, I looked at all these different search engines.
	There's been some Empowerment Acts.
	There's one about, that was recently, I think 2021, it was about, well, several of these have happened in the last couple of years, but one of them was about campaign financing for the presidency.
	That had nothing to do with this.
	And then there was one about sexual harassment.
	That had nothing to do with the president being required to spend all the money that Congress allocates for a particular agency or purpose or whatever.
	But Tim Kaine says, yeah, we've got the Empowerment Act, and you've got to spend the money that Congress allocates.
	He says, that's why so far there's a whole lot of lawsuits that have been successful.
	Well, no.
	No.
	We have judicial supremacy.
	We have judicial dictators.
	That's what they need to do.
	They need to say, I'm not the dictator.
	The judiciary is the dictator.
	Instead, Trump wants to say, I'm Napoleon.
	If you want to just split the country up and have chaos, civil war, that type of thing, that's the way you're going to respond to it.
	If you really want to get something done and you really want to reform this, you want to get back to something that is closer to the Constitution, you wouldn't do it that way.
	But that's not what he wants.
	And so there is, you know, the lawsuits have been successful because you've got activist judges, and that needs to be stopped.
	now you do have historical examples for example going back in the 1970s it was a fight then because nixon impounded funds that had been allocated by congress to be spent but he refused to spend it he said well i'm going to pound that and so you do have that in the past and
	But according to the Associated Press, the administration is facing at least 70 lawsuits nationwide covering actions from the attempted elimination of birthright citizenship.
	To the freezing of federal grants and funds and the accessing of sensitive computer systems and data by unofficial entities.
	That would be Elon Musk and Doge.
	But there is, and of course that's the way everything gets stopped.
	It's with a lawsuit.
	And that's another reason why we've got to bust judicial supremacy.
	But not by making the president a dictator or pushing that out, but by showing that the judiciary.
	Has been acting as a dictatorship.
	Now, the best that anybody can come up with in terms of saying that the president must spend all the money that is allocated in a particular thing is something that is called the take care clause.
	And that is in the Constitution that says the executive shall take care that laws are faithfully executed.
	That doesn't mean what they're trying to say that it means.
	Yeah, that's just a generalized phrasing.
	We're putting this together for the general welfare.
	Oh, well, then welfare is constitutional or whatever, right?
	Or the Commerce Clause or other things like that.
	They've tried to use the Commerce Clause to justify the unconstitutional war on drugs.
	Commerce Clause does not allow you to prohibit anything.
	As a matter of fact, the purpose of the Commerce Clause was to stop prohibition.
	The purpose of the Commerce Clause was to stop prohibition of trade, Between states, by a particular state imposing a tariff on things that were crossing its border.
	So if you sold something from Tennessee into Kentucky, you're not allowed to have Kentucky put a tax on the products coming in there.
	That's the Commerce Clause.
	Instead, they turned it on its head and said, well, that means that we regulate commerce so we can have drug prohibition of any drug we decide to do.
	Well, that was never the understanding of anybody.
	When they went to the trouble of having a constitutional amendment, the 18th amendment to prohibit alcohol, and then the 21st to bring it back, people back then, whether they were doing the right thing or not, they had respect for the Constitution.
	They had to amend the Constitution because that power is not there.
	If the proposed power, if that's really what the Commerce Clause or the General Welfare Clause meant, then they were ended.
	When the 9th and 10th Amendment amended the Constitution, and I would argue that's precisely why you had Madison come up with a Bill of Rights, because he was worried that some ambiguities like that were going to be used, and so he shut them down specifically.
	If you haven't specifically been given power by the states or the people, you don't have it, right?
	It has to be detailed, numerated, all the rest of this stuff.
	You don't have it.
	You can't infer it from general phrases like that.
	And so that would include all this stuff about the Take Care Act and all the rest of these things.
	So I don't know how this is going to play out.
	I don't know how the Trump administration is going to play it out.
	You know, there are people who obviously know the right thing.
	Will they stick to it?
	It's kind of interesting, isn't it, to see?
	And I said this last week.
	I said...
	Look, you know, it was on Wednesday.
	You had Hegseth lay out several different things.
	Well, this is what's going to happen.
	We're going to have peace there, and we're not going to have the borders as they were before this war, and they're not going to get into NATO, and we're not going to use American troops, and there's going to be European troops that are going to patrol this thing and so forth.
	And Europe flipped out.
	But when he said it on Wednesday, Trump backed him up and said, yeah, yeah, I just had this call of Putin.
	So there was no concern from Trump.
	And as I said before, Exeth is not making this stuff up.
	He's reading a script.
	Somebody wrote that down for him in the administration.
	But Trump was on board with it.
	But then after Europe had a fit, and I talked about that on Friday, I said, look at this.
	You've got France and Norway and this and that.
	All of these European countries pretty much except for Hungary said, no, we want war.
	And they immediately pledged to send some more equipment, which, by the way, is symbolic.
	It's not going to make any difference in the war.
	But they all pledged to send some trucks and things like that.
	It's like, okay, great, you know.
	But that isn't going to make any difference in the war.
	But when they did that, the Trump administration walked it back.
	And Hegseth was left with egg on his face, and then they all mocked him.
	Said, look at this!
	He said all this stuff, and he didn't have any authority.
	No, he had authority to do it.
	What you saw with that, two things that you saw with that, is that the Trump administration went wobbly.
	And the second thing is, is that Europe wants war.
	And that's what Zelensky is playing up to.
	So Zelensky is hoping that he can keep his war going.
	By pushing, and Macron is more than happy to go the next step to create a European army.
	They have, you remember when they had Brexit.
	And there are people who are blowing the whistle on that, saying, you know, this is a mega super state.
	They've got their own currency now.
	Everybody joined into the euro.
	First it started out as a trade bloc.
	That's the way all the consolidation was supposed to start.
	You had the big new Brzezinski.
	Who wrote his thesis about the trilateral, you know, three different areas of the world, unifying them by trade, then consolidating them into sovereign governments, then unifying them into a world government.
	And he created the Trilateral Commission, and they put him in charge of the Jimmy Carter presidency, just like Kissinger was put in charge of the Nixon presidency, perhaps even more so with Brzezinski.
	And he also talked about the technocratic age, which is where we are right now in his book, Between Two Ages, saying we will know everything that everybody wants to do before they do it.
	We'll be able to stop them or require them to have permission.
	So this is something that's been going on for quite some time.
	But when you look at Brexit, And this was going back and forth.
	There was a lot of stuff about, you know, you're trying to create a European army and you're setting this up right now to create a European army.
	And they said, you're crazy.
	You're a bunch of wacko conspiracy theorists.
	And then as soon as the Brexit vote was had and Britain left, and I mean, immediately, the documents came out.
	And you can see that's exactly what their aspirations were.
	And so Zelensky is going to feed that aspiration.
	And you've got Macron who wants to...
	Again, push for the European army.
	So it has always been about that.
	It's always been about creating these three areas, first by trade, then by currency, or whatever, and then creating armies, that type of thing.
	So, Andrew McCarthy, who writes for National Review, he's one of the establishment Republicans.
	So you can just disagree with anything that he has to say now, right?
	Pigeonhole him.
	And pay no attention to what he has to say.
	Except that you should pay attention to what he has to say.
	He said the Department of Justice's core mission is now to, quote, settle the president's scores.
	And I said this from the very beginning.
	And now I'm not the only one saying it.
	And it's what I said at the beginning of this program.
	And I've been saying it for quite some time.
	When President Trump was talking about revenge, revenge, revenge, and Bannon is out there screaming about revenge.
	I said it needs to be done.
	You need to call it reform, not revenge.
	And it needs to be done in a way that it is clear to people that it is reform and not revenge, except I said Trump will want it to be seen as revenge, even if it is reform.
	He'll want it to be seen as his power.
	So, National Review.
	Andy McCarthy denounced the, quote, weaponization working group that was established by Pam Bondi, the new attorney general.
	He believes that the group practices the very weaponization that it is supposedly trying to root out.
	How does that phrase go?
	Yeah, be careful that you don't become the monsters that you fight.
	Under the guise of restoring the integrity and credibility of the Department of Justice, the AG is implementing the Biden Department of Justice model of conviction first and trial later, if ever, wrote McCarthy.
	Standing convicted are Trump's principal prosecutorial nemeses, Biden Department Justice Special Counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
	Again, by focusing on the people who focused on him, personally, primarily, should have broadened this out.
	And let's hope that he does.
	But again, it's...
	Yeah, they need to be called, and Letitia James is just so incredibly awful.
	I mean, you know, the things that she's done intimidating people for saying that silver kills germs, we all know that it does.
	It's not a false advertising claim.
	She did that when I was at InfoWars, and Alex pulled all the silver products.
	Look, silver's used in burn units and everything.
	It's been known to be antibacterial for a long, long time.
	There's no discussion about that.
	Anyway, he says, These people are guilty by association, as are any DOJ and FBI personnel who aided and embedded them in what crimes, we're not told.
	Only that Bondi will be, quote, providing quarterly reports to the White House regarding the progress of the review.
	This is exactly the same stuff that Biden did.
	We have pronounced that Trump is bad, we're going to find stuff on him.
	The J6 people are bad, we're going to find stuff on them too.
	And now Trump is going with that precedent.
	McCarthy argued that Biden's DOJ was politicized, he said, but Trump also engaged, he said, in serious misconduct.
	It does not follow, because the previous Justice Department was politicized, that all the people that it targeted are pure as driven snow.
	Trump engaged in serious misconduct, regardless of whether it was actionable misconduct.
	But see, they took, it was not much of the stuff that he did was not actionable.
	And there's no excuse for the prosecutions that were brought against him.
	But this needs to be cast as reform, not revenge.
	The weaponization directive is doing politics.
	It's not removing politics from law enforcement.
	It is making it about revenge, not about reform.
	And then you have the crazy stuff that was said about free speech, and we're going to get into that as well.
	It's just an amazing one.
	Now, free speech is what the Nazis did, and we've got to stop free speech because free speech was Nazi-fied, according to Margaret Brennan at CBS. We'll talk about that.
	OctoSpook says exactly, we need the protections of freedoms, liberty, and the rights of the Constitution, which are already there, and need that instead of Trump executive orders.
	And again, when you look at why these things are being brought into lawsuits, it's because Trump, Trump, Trump, the Trump has chosen to rule by executive order.
	We've never seen this many executive orders done out there in the past.
	Never.
	And I don't want to be ruled by a czar, an emperor, a dictator, Caesar.
	I don't want that.
	And so this is his excuse, this whole Napoleon thing.
	I'm emperor now.
	And there is no law when I'm trying to save the country.
	Do you remember how the conservatives rightfully freaked out and criticized Al Gore when he said there's no controlling legal authority here?
	Does it make it any better when you quote a tyrant like Napoleon?
	I mean, the whole reason...
	When we went to the UK, like I said, we were there for our honeymoon and we just spent weeks hanging out and doing everything we could for as little cost as we could.
	Going to free museums and all the rest of the stuff.
	So one of the museums that we went to was a museum that was dedicated to the Duke of Wellington.
	Boy, you talk about somebody that was...
	Lightning rod of both criticism and praise.
	That was him.
	He was criticized for his attitudes about certain things, but he was also praised because he defeated Napoleon, and everybody agreed that Napoleon needed to be defeated.
	One of the reasons why they did that movie Waterloo.
	But we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to get to bird flu, we're going to get to eggs, and ask What is really the priority of this administration?
	Is it seed oil?
	It's like, okay.
	There may not be any eggs on the shelves, but RFK Jr. is concerned that there's seed oil on the shelves.
	Well, fine.
	Talk to people about seed oil.
	But don't make that your number one priority while they're killing our food supply.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions, I've skimmed off America.
	I could dress better.
	And I could if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	You should be able to buy me several hundred those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. You're
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	You know, I had a listener who wrote me and said, there's a classical piece that you're playing.
	It might be that one.
	It said, I love classical music, Mozart, Beethoven.
	Probably likes that third symphony that was originally dedicated to Napoleon.
	But he said, there was one I wasn't sure what it was.
	Well, if that's the one that you're talking about, I forget who it was.
	I was going to address it specifically on here.
	But that is Palladio or Palladio.
	I don't know how it's pronounced.
	I don't know which syllable I should put the emphasis on, but it's Palladio, or Palladio.
	And it's by Carl Jenkins, who's a contemporary composer, a guy who, a lot of his stuff has been used for commercials, and that was used, I think, for a diamond commercial years ago.
	But a very good composer.
	I like his stuff.
	And he started out as a sax player, playing jazz, like me.
	But he has gone much further with his music, to say the least.
	But let's talk a little bit about this bizarre assertion, as Michael Tracy says, utterly bizarre assertion from Margaret Brennan.
	She claims the Nazi Holocaust occurred because free speech was weaponized in Germany.
	Thus making Vince's comments all the more worrisome, you know, when he went there and lectured Germany about free speech.
	How dare you lecture Germany about free speech?
	Do you realize it was free speech that brought the Germans to power?
	So he says recasting the Holocaust as a consequence of excessive free speech is just totally bonkers.
	Well, here's what she had to say.
	Well, he was standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to conduct a genocide.
	And he met with the head of a political party that has far-right views and some historic ties to extreme groups.
	The context of that was changing the tone of it.
	And you know that, that the censorship was specifically about the right.
	No, I have to disagree with you.
	Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide.
	The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime that happened to also be genocidal because they hated Jews and they hated minorities and they hated those.
	They had a list of people they hated, but primarily the Jews.
	There was no free speech in Nazi Germany.
	There was none.
	There was also no opposition in Nazi Germany.
	They were a sole and only party that governed that country.
	So that's not an accurate reflection of history.
	Yeah, yeah.
	It's not Margaret.
	Margaret's got like a bachelor's degree in foreign affairs from some universities, small universities.
	Like, did you ever study history?
	No, but here's the logic, right?
	Here's the logic.
	I understand how she got there.
	Through ignorance and pop culture and current events.
	Because currently what we're told is that if you criticize Israel's policy, the government of Israel, and we're told this even not just by Democrats like her, but we're told this by Republican governors like DeSantis, Republican President Trump, and we're told this by members of Congress, that if you criticize Israel, Then you're anti-Semitic.
	And so we have to shut down free speech.
	Therefore, free speech breeds anti-Semitism, you see.
	That's the logic that we're told.
	And that's really where she's coming from, I think.
	Whistler said the concentration camps were the original free speech zones.
	Yeah, I've seen that over and over again.
	Like I said so many times, if you go to the presidential conventions, Whether it's the DNC or the RNC, it doesn't matter.
	Both of them have free speech zones.
	And what they are are cages.
	And so you can go and it'll be many, many blocks away from where the convention is being held.
	Still in the same city, though.
	You know, hey, there you go.
	But many, many blocks away.
	You can go stand in a cage.
	And you can even, you know, they've got a little soapbox thing there.
	They've got even a microphone.
	You don't even have to bring your own bullhorn.
	They provide you with amplification.
	But it is speech without reach because you're too far away for anybody to see or to hear you.
	That's the idea that Elon Musk has on X. Same type of thing.
	And like I said before, when I went to the Bundy Ranch, got out there in the middle of the desert, which is where their ranch is.
	Nobody anywhere around there because they've run off the other 53 ranches that were there.
	And they're the last ones standing.
	And so when I got there, they had put up like a silt fence.
	And they had a professionally printed sign, of course.
	The government did.
	And it said, free speech zone.
	You know, you're allowed to go stand out here in the middle of the desert in this little square area.
	And it's like, where did this come from?
	Well, they do that.
	Republicans and Democrats do that at every one of their presidential conventions.
	So why wouldn't they do that?
	But somebody wrote a handwritten sign that said, free speech.
	It's not an area.
	It's not an area.
	And it's not limited to an area of subject, either.
	In other words, free speech is not, well, we can talk about sports, but you can't talk about my pandemic, and you can't talk about my vaccine, and you can't talk about my mandates or the rest of this stuff.
	No, it's not about any area or topic of discussion, either.
	It's all or nothing.
	And so, again, you've got Margaret Brennan saying Vance was standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to conduct a genocide.
	Urbio says, well, free speech was not used to conduct a genocide.
	The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime.
	She doesn't even know what an authoritarian...
	Again, people just said, Nazi this.
	You can have authoritarian government come at you from the left or from the right.
	It can be Stalin or it can be Hitler.
	And all these people get so tied up by trying to make a distinction between them.
	Folks, it's a distinction without a difference.
	So, that's where your media is.
	And then let's talk about the fight.
	Is this really what we want?
	You know, we've had the longest on patrol border, but Jack Posobiec doesn't like that.
	Look at this, I could just walk into Canada.
	Well, let's make sure that doesn't happen, right?
	Yeah, we've got to have some military here.
	We've got to close this border off.
	And he's being towed around.
	He had some access on some other thing.
	I saw his name being elevated for some.
	They like the kind of lies and disinformation that Jack Basovia is doing in the Trump administration.
	But you had this hockey game where there were three fights in the first 90 seconds because...
	They play the national anthems, and when they do, the fans are booing the American national anthem when the U.S. and Canadian team were playing.
	Oh, right away.
	You got fights Hockey Speed cycle into the zone flipping it through Well, you've got to say that, at least in hockey, unlike wrestling, the fights are real.
	You've got to give them that.
	And as Breitbart is cheering this, Canadians boo U.S. anthem, then Team USA wins the game and the fights.
	USA! USA! Tribalism, tribalism.
	That's what sports is supposed to engender.
	And, of course, it's about this.
	So I think Canada is going to be a very serious contender to be our 51st state.
	There was obviously a delay in implementing those tariffs.
	I spoke to Governor Trudeau.
	Governor.
	Governor.
	And we'll see what happens.
	But it just sets up so good for them.
	Look, the people would pay much less tax than they're paying right now.
	They'd have perfect military protection.
	They don't have any military protection because they essentially, because...
	They have to look for us to protect them.
	What's going on out there?
	You have Russian ships.
	You have China ships.
	You have...
	Chinese ships.
	Ships are going to hit the fan.
	A lot of ships out there.
	People are in danger.
	This is a different world today.
	It's a different world.
	We need our protection.
	Yes.
	I saw a thing on Twitter where somebody, it was fake, somebody attributed a quote to the Panamanian leader because you had a situation where you had an aircraft carrier, all these other ships were lined up.
	Going through the Egyptian Straits there, and they bumped, right?
	First I saw that and thought, how in the world does a freighter ship get that close to an aircraft carrier?
	You know, you've got all these other ships around it and everything, but they were lined up to go through the Suez Canal, and so they had a little bump or something like that.
	Everybody was talking about that.
	Well, somebody put out...
	A fake statement from the Panamanian president said, yeah, well, that was just a warning.
	You wait and see what we do next, type of thing.
	And some guy said, it's strange that we live in a time where I actually had to check this to see if that was real or not.
	Because this is what Trump is doing.
	He's getting everybody set on edge against each other with this nonsense.
	But I'm going to tell you why it makes sense.
	For him to make his moves against Canada, the Panama Canal, Greenland, coming up when we talk about the Technate.
	But again, all that matters is that the U.S. beat Canada 3-1.
	Shows that we're better, doesn't it?
	So, as Breitbart says, the Canadian crowd in Montreal did what they have done multiple times at NHL games in recent weeks.
	They just started this.
	They booed the Star Spangled Banner.
	Why is that?
	Donald Trump has become the very embodiment of the ugly American, hasn't he?
	People everywhere hate us.
	And so now Canada.
	We've never had problems with them before.
	Now they hate us.
	So American players, two of them are brothers.
	Dikachuk, I guess is how you pronounce their name.
	And then also J.T. Miller decided to settle the insult with their fists.
	First the brothers.
	They dropped their gloves and started fighting.
	And then after the two brothers let the crowd know that the Americans came to play, said Breitbart, came to play.
	Because that's what the game's about, right?
	Fist fights.
	It seemed like the two sides would actually start playing hockey.
	And they did for about four seconds until J.T. Miller gave a shot to Canada's Colton Pariko.
	And the gloves came off again.
	And the fighting subsided after the pugilistic extravaganza the first nine seconds.
	Three fights in the first nine seconds.
	However, the hitting did not, and both sides battered each other on the boards.
	Well, there you go.
	As USA Today's headline, multiple fights break out at the start of the game between Canada and U.S. Babylon Bee is just as excited and bragging about it as Breitbart is.
	Man finally realizes the reason people play hockey is that you can legally punch a Canadian in the face.
	Yeah.
	Now, it's not just those liberal tears, but it's those Canadian tears we've got to get excited about.
	And not one, but two headlines about this subject on the Babylon Bee.
	Canadian hockey fans...
	Boo their future national anthem.
	Hockey fans of the soon-to-be 51st state of America booed when their future national anthem was played last night.
	In a seemingly prophetic outcome, the loser nation, currently known as Canada, then got absolutely smoked by their eminent conquerors.
	Wow.
	This is what America is becoming.
	And this is what these Magatards are pushing.
	And you are margatards if you're pushing this kind of stuff.
	Come on.
	You don't know anything at all about Trump.
	And what you do know, you deny.
	It's right in your face.
	And you're living by lies.
	Double think, double talk.
	Trump's White House says the Gulf of Mexico is misinformation.
	This is a Reason article.
	They wrote all about this back and forth between Associated Press and everything.
	Why is it?
	You know, misinformation.
	Here's the thing.
	Wasn't it just a few months before, before the election, that you had conservatives saying, wait a minute, misinformation?
	If we've got free speech, there is no such thing as misinformation as far as the government is concerned.
	The government shouldn't be setting there as the Trump's exceedingly silly efforts,
	says Reason, to rename the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America.
	Became particularly obnoxious this week.
	I absolutely agree.
	It is obnoxious already.
	Like I said, I don't understand why this is making it more popular.
	I'm definitely out of sync with the American public.
	And I can tell.
	Look at my numbers.
	Trump makes amends with Georgia Governor Kemp and discusses election and immigration.
	At the Hurricane Helene recovery event.
	Ah, that was in October of 2024. But now?
	Now?
	What is happening?
	As a matter of fact, in October 2024, when Trump is trying to win an election, he says, we've got a big election coming up, and I told the governor, if I'm involved, they're going to get the best treatment.
	Adding that he and Kemp have worked together on storm relief in the past.
	Well, that was then.
	But this is now.
	The Trump administration denies Kemp's bid to extend Hurricane Helene aid deadline.
	Now, you could say, well, this is a cost-saving measure, and maybe, you know, he doesn't need it.
	But let me ask you, and I'll ask these MAGA people who make excuses for him.
	We heard that on Friday, as a matter of fact, right?
	Well, it wasn't Trump.
	It was the bad governors that are out there, right?
	Did Trump keep the money going to the bad governors?
	Because, you know, there were bad governors, Republican and Democrat.
	I've talked about many of the Republicans as well, just because they always get ignored by the MAGA people.
	He had people like Brad Little, a Republican governor in Idaho.
	He had a Republican legislature that was being called back.
	They called a special session and said, we're going to stop this lockdown.
	That the Republican Governor Brad Little is doing.
	And the Republican Governor Brad Little disbanded the Republican legislature like some kind of a British colonial governor pre-1776.
	And then he put together some orders that were going to add more coercion and pressure to businesses, saying, if you follow the public health orders, and if somebody claims that they catch COVID, Or any other cooties on your property, you'll be protected legally.
	But if you don't adopt all of my measures, masks and six-foot distancing and all the rest of the superstitious nonsense, if you don't do that and somebody gets sick, you will have no legal protection.
	They can sue you out of business.
	Oh, but he didn't order it, you see.
	Yeah, yeah, that was a Republican governor.
	And then, of course, you got DeWine in Ohio who comes up with a, hey, if you get, Vaccinated, you could win a million dollars.
	So come on down and get your shot.
	You could be the lucky person, or maybe not.
	You know, you want to play Russian roulette?
	That was a Republican governor as well.
	Where do you get all that kind of money to offer a million-dollar prize if you get vaccinated?
	Well, he was getting it from Trump, and Trump never stopped any of the money for these governors.
	Never.
	Never once did he do that.
	That was an emergency order, but now we've got an emergency order for the hurricane, and of course, Biden didn't do anything.
	But they're trying to get some funding for this, some emergency funding, and Trump says, extend it.
	Trump says, no, no.
	Is this because of his personal animus and personal fights with Governor Kemp?
	Well, I kind of think it is.
	I do believe that it is.
	So, you know, you've got these people that there was $5.5 billion worth of damage in Georgia from that storm.
	And he's asked for an extension for debris removal, and he's asked for funding for emergency protective measures.
	Now, again, we can argue whether or not this is the responsibility of the federal government.
	I would say that it's not.
	I remember, and I've talked about this in the past, Davy Crockett, you know, when it was brought before Congress that...
	They wanted to give special money to the widow of a military person.
	He said, I have nothing but respect for him and nothing but sympathy for her, to paraphrase what he had to say.
	And I will give my personal money, but we have no authority to do this as a legislative body.
	Well, we've crossed that Rubicon, and we give money to all kinds of people for all kinds of reasons.
	And it's kind of telling.
	When we can give money to Zelensky, but we can't give money to Georgia or to North Carolina.
	And so the Trump administration now has denied the extension for hurricane relief in Georgia.
	In a letter from FEMA to Governor Kemp, the organization said, the increased level of funding you've requested is not warranted.
	Is that something that's vindictive?
	You know, we have, and I know I hear all the people saying, well, I don't like Kemp.
	I'm not...
	Arguing that Kemp's a good governor.
	Well, what about the people that are there, right?
	You've had both Kemp as well as Youngkin in Virginia, two Republican governors.
	They both went to the World Economic Forum.
	And the MAGA people said, they're sellouts.
	They're sellouts.
	And I agree.
	I agree.
	But when Trump goes multiple times, They don't say that about him.
	And Trump, as well as Kemp and Youngkin, all said they're doing it because they want to bring business back to their state or to the United States.
	I'm just there representing you to bring business in.
	Yeah, right.
	I don't buy that for any of the three of them.
	And yet, for Trump, it doesn't apply.
	It applies for everybody else, but not for Trump, you see.
	And so you've got the two Democrat senators, as well as Republican Governor Kemp, saying, we need this money.
	Why wouldn't you provide this money for them?
	But now Trump is going to get stingy with that.
	And do you remember, prior to the election, you had a FEMA employee who said, we're going to skip the homes with the Trump signs.
	Remember that?
	Well, she got fired.
	The Trump administration is coming after her saying that she violated the Hatch Act, which is a federal employee actually campaigning and electioneering.
	And so I agree with that.
	They should come after her.
	But think about this.
	She was telling FEMA employees, skip the houses that have the Trump signs.
	That's reprehensible.
	Georgia.
	Because I don't like Governor Kemp.
	Yeah.
	That's really what's happening.
	So, California, by the way.
	People talk about State Farm and all the rest of the stuff.
	State Farm was canceling policies left and right before all this stuff.
	And I said when it first happened.
	I said, yeah, alright, I understand.
	People who had had policies with them for 30 plus years.
	But State Farm is looking at it and looking at the fire risk and looking at the incompetence and the fact that they're out there playing their DEI games instead of getting serious about fighting fires.
	They're not doing anything to prepare for them.
	It's like, I'm not going to ensure that risk.
	And so now they have requested rate increases and the government of California has rejected that.
	And so it's just going to keep going around and around.
	You can try to force them to insure people, but if you don't do anything to try to mitigate the risk or to try to put out fires, well, the reality is they're not going to have deep enough pockets to do all of that.
	DGA says, David, it was a great game.
	Interesting fact.
	JT Miller is from East Palestine, Ohio.
	Well, I guess he's maybe going to take out his anger at the EPA and the Biden administration on the Canadians.
	KWD68. Trump just wants peace.
	A peace of Greenland, a peace of Panama, a peace of Canada, a peace of Gaza.
	Now, he wants all of Gaza, all of Canada, and he wants all of Greenland.
	But it's good.
	I like that.
	Matthew Ronson, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	He says, please remember to hit the like button.
	Yes, please do.
	As a matter of fact, please hit the like button.
	And when I was going around looking at the different podcasts to see where we've been taken down and some of the places, there was a couple of podcasts that were smaller podcasts.
	Although Amazon was not listed on our site, so we put that up there.
	But then there's a couple of other smaller podcast outlets.
	And we didn't have links to them.
	Now we do on our website.
	But when I was going around looking at that to say, one of the comments that I saw, there's not that many comments.
	And it went back to March of last year.
	And I mentioned this last week.
	You know, the guy criticized me because I'm always talking about Trump.
	I wonder why I would talk about Trump.
	I don't know.
	I guess I'm the only one who talks about Trump.
	Yeah, I talk about Trump too much.
	I talk about Jesus too much.
	So, yeah, if you want to leave some comments.
	To counteract that kind of nonsense, that would be welcome, too.
	I would appreciate that as well.
	So, yeah, if you want to like it, go to one of these podcast places and put some five stars on there.
	I'd appreciate that.
	A little bit of time.
	That would really, really help.
	I'd appreciate that.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the TechNate.
	And we're going to talk about Canada and Panama and Greenland and all of the rest of this stuff.
	So stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, and I want to say thank you to the people who sent checks for the second week of February.
	And these are the people who keep the show going, along with the people who are on Subscribestar.
	We don't mention the people on Subscribestar because there's...
	About 300 people that are there.
	Just under 300. And so we don't read the names out each time.
	But I'm thinking I need to go back and...
	Some people will tip on Subscribestar.
	So I need to thank them as well personally on air.
	But we are very grateful even if we don't read your name out.
	And sometimes people don't catch when I read this.
	I just do it once.
	We have a...
	five three-hour shows a week and so a lot of times people miss this but i just wanted to acknowledge them and i thank them david and ann marie n kimberly s josh b david and deborah w molly jack h who's new ruth k who is new as well jeremy w margaret mary t scott c tom and nancy k and hi to abby and sammy as well
	That's coming from them as well.
	I appreciate that so much.
	Longtime supporters.
	Marilyn B. John R. Helen T. And a special note from Karen.
	Thank you.
	And Ronald C. Clark A., who is also new.
	And I think Karen was talking about a card, and I'll get to that later.
	And then a couple of Wolfpack things from Austin M. and from Ryan F. So thank you very much for the Wolfpacks.
	I guess we could call them Wolfpack.
	Not Wolfpack things, but they're actually Wolfpacks.
	So thank you very much for that.
	I appreciate that.
	Especially this time.
	We'll talk about what is going...
	Now as we talk about the Technate, we're going to talk about why they want to get rid of money.
	As a matter of fact.
	And I want to thank John R. for sending me this email and asking about Elon Musk's grandfather that I've mentioned several times.
	And the fact that he left Canada.
	They came after him because of his involvement with the technocracy.
	And there's actually a group called Technocracy Incorporated.
	We're going to talk about that here.
	And he said...
	I've heard you mention his grandfather, and I can't find anything.
	Do you know a particular article?
	Well, the key is if you know what his name is.
	If you know Elon Musk's grandfather's name, Joshua Haldane, there's a wealth of information out there.
	There's Wikipedia even out there about him.
	But there's been a lot that has been written about him.
	And I'm glad you asked, because I looked it up.
	I thought, well, is he really not talked about that much?
	And then a wealth of...
	Of articles and things, like I said, even Wikipedia.
	And when I looked it up, I saw something that had not clicked with me before.
	And that is a map of where these people, in the 1930s when they created this, they had a plan.
	Not only a form of government, not only did they want to get rid of currency and trade energy credits, as I've talked about that before as well.
	But they had a specific map that they wanted to enact.
	And it is very much what Trump is trying to do now.
	And so, when we look at the map of the technocracy, actually, they said we want to create something they call the technate.
	And this is what it looks like.
	Now, except for...
	Now, this one goes down...
	It includes not just Panama, but it includes all of Central America.
	That would include Mexico as well.
	So you can talk about it as being the North American Union.
	There's been a lot of different things.
	The Club of Rome, a lot of people want to include all these different territories under one massive thing.
	But when you go down, this also includes Mexico, Central America, and the northernmost part of South America.
	But still, The core part that's there, everybody's saying, where did this come from?
	Well, I think Trump's ambitions come from this.
	I think he's basically owned by the technocracy.
	As I said, we've never seen all of these billionaires lined up at the inaugural event of any president, Republican or Democrat, before this.
	And why are they doing it?
	Well, you could say, well, it's just because they want to get government contracts, just because it's crony capitalism or corruption or public-private partnerships or whatever.
	But they know that he's for sale.
	Yeah, absolutely they know that.
	But they're fully on board with all this stuff.
	And so if we go back to September 2023, this was when that, actually, before we get to the map, That was actually in 2022. I think that was something that was up for sale.
	It's now been sold.
	But going back to 2023, even before you had Musk by the presidency, you had mainstream media on the left, like Business Insider, talking about Elon Musk and painting him as a racist.
	Because he had already gotten on their sites for purchasing X, Twitter.
	Newspapers of the time described this political party that Elon Musk's grandfather belonged to as having, quote, the tone of incipient fascist movement.
	Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua Haldane, was a, quote, radical conspiracy theorist, said The Atlantic.
	And again, take with a grain of salt anything that The Atlantic says.
	But the movement believed an authoritarian group of tech-savvy overlords could solve the world's problems.
	And you know, Breitbart used to refer to them as overlords, as masters of the universe, when they were running the censorship.
	But now that they're running the White House with Trump in it, they don't refer to them that way anymore.
	Isn't that interesting?
	According to a deep dive from The Atlantic on the life of Joshua Haldane, The Canadian chiropractor was a radical conspiracy theorist who spent the beginning of his career as part of a group called the Technocracy Incorporated.
	And it was actually founded by an individual, Howard Scott.
	He didn't want political parties, so what he did was he created a corporation.
	They believed that the world should be run by a totalitarian regime of engineers and scientists based in North America.
	That these tech overlords would solve all of society's problems and that people only had to work 20 years before they would retire.
	The party founded in the 1920s gained popularity during the Great Depression and at one point had more than half a million members in California.
	The organization also referred to people as numbers.
	Apparently, Musk's grandfather was 10450-1.
	I guess the THX 1158 was already taken.
	What was that?
	The TH thing.
	That movie that was a grad school project from the Star Wars guy.
	And it had...
	What was it?
	The guy that was in...
	I'm drawing blanks here.
	Anyway, the guy that was in The Apostle.
	Robert Duvall.
	But yeah, THX. Anyway, maybe that could be the name that Musk might use for one of his kids, right?
	It does have X in it.
	Followers donned identical gray clothing and cars and greeted each other with special salutes.
	The newspaper cited...
	By the magazine, it said that the group gave off, quote, the tone of an incipient fascist movement.
	This is a contemporary newspaper at the time.
	And if you scroll down that article, one of them, they show the guy who created it was a bit of a showman, you know, like Elon Musk himself.
	And he would organize these events.
	At one point, he organized a train of a caravan of cars that were all identical.
	Probably what they're referring to here.
	Canada eventually banned the party after it opposed the country's involvement in World War II and considered it and its members a threat to national security.
	His involvement in other movements, Social Credit Party, he left the, after he got out of the technocracy group, he went to the Social Credit Party.
	That party became widely criticized for its blatant anti-Semitism.
	Haldeman, who became the SCP national chair, took it upon himself to defend the party's beliefs.
	And I've got to say, for some reason, I had thought that Haldeman was Jewish himself.
	But I don't see that reported anywhere now.
	I don't know where I got that idea.
	But anyway, I guess, you know, you can actually, still today, you can be considered to be anti-Semitic if you oppose the national government of Israel, because you've got a lot of Orthodox rabbis who do.
	They haven't come around to the point of outing them as anti-Semitic.
	But yeah, if you oppose, criticize what the Israeli government is doing, then you are by definition anti-Semitic.
	So I guess, you know, even if he was Jewish, but I don't think he was, he could have criticized the Rothschilds.
	And that would have made him anti-Semitic, right?
	Because before the nation of Israel, and that was, you know, before they reconstitute, we're talking about the 1920s and 30s.
	It would be the criticism of bankers that would have got you labeled anti-Semitic.
	Now it's a criticism of a political entity that has bought our political entities.
	Musk's ideas that technology can solve most of society's ills reflect some of the same technocratic beliefs that his grandfather promoted.
	Many, many, many of those, actually.
	Musk previously said on Twitter, That Mars should have an established technocracy.
	Remember that?
	Yeah, Musk knows what a technocracy is.
	And a lot of people don't.
	Everybody's trying to, well, they're Nazis, or they're communists, or they're populists, or this, everybody's trying to put them in a pigeonhole.
	They're their own thing.
	And they've got elements of these different political beliefs and parties and stuff like that, but they're their own thing.
	And so, Musk knows exactly what it is.
	And he likes it.
	If he could redesign the world from the ground up, he would do it.
	But he can't, so he's going to go to Mars.
	But maybe he can.
	Maybe he can.
	Maybe he can do this in North America.
	Maybe that's what all the money is about.
	So, again, he's named his kids that he's had with that rock.
	Star Grimes.
	I don't know anything about her or her music.
	I'm not curious enough to even try to listen to it.
	So the kid that you saw on his shoulders, and it was really funny, Whistler showed me a meme that somebody had put out.
	I should have put it in the deck here.
	Because he's standing there in the Oval Office, and Trump is at his desk, and a lot of people said, you know, Trump looked really pretty powerless or whatever.
	But, you know, he's got that kid.
	On his shoulders, who was super brat.
	I mean, you talk about a little emperor looking at Trump.
	I don't like you.
	Shut your mouth.
	I want you out of here.
	You're not the president and all the rest of the stuff he's saying to him.
	And so somebody put up a meme and it had Trump sitting at the desk and on his shoulders was Eric Trump.
	A big guy with his legs hanging over the side of it.
	He's going to have his hands full with little X if he's going to actually act as a father.
	So he gave him the label X-A-E-A-X-I-I-Musk, shortened to X. And then he's got a daughter, calls her Exa, Dark Sidereal Musk.
	Dark Sidereal, you guys are going to the dark side, I guess.
	And then the third child that he had with Grimes is called Technomechanicus.
	That'll be convenient when he merges with the machines, right, and becomes a cyborg.
	Yeah, this guy's got some issues.
	Elon Musk does.
	But when you look at this, you know, the rest of the Atlantic and the Business Insider...
	It's all about racist, racist, racist, blah, blah, blah, because anybody they don't like, they want to portray them as racist.
	But it's not about that.
	I mean, that's elements of it, I'm sure, perhaps, because they see themselves as elitist.
	Look, these people are elitists.
	They're technocrats.
	So by definition, they're going to think that anybody that doesn't look like them is inferior to them.
	But if you go to the article that had that map there, Technocracy Incorporated and the Technate of America.
	And again, this is what the map looks like.
	So they were selling this map.
	And there's not that many of them.
	A 1940 map depicting the geopolitical program of Technocracy Incorporated.
	The map envisions much of the Americas and Eastern Pacific Basin as merged into a single Technate of America.
	That's what they called it.
	To be ruled by a technically skilled, empirically driven, non-partisan elite.
	The people are currently going through all the different books in Washington, by the way.
	I don't know what that looks like.
	The technate is shown stretching from Greenland to the west of the International Dateline and south to encompass the Caribbean and parts of Colombia, Venezuela, and the Guyanese.
	Its territory is colored red, the semi-official color.
	Isn't that great?
	They don't even have to change the colors of their hats.
	The technocracy movement had a heyday in the 1930s.
	The leading proponent was an engineer, Howard Scott, and his technocracy incorporated.
	Founded it in 1933. And I thought it was kind of interesting, because I've talked many times about...
	H.G. Wells' book, a science fiction book, The Shape of Things to Come.
	And they made it into a movie that came out in 1936. I'm going to play you an abbreviated trailer here of it, just to give you a taste of the nonsense involved in this thing.
	But it came out in 1936. It was a big special effects budget at the time.
	It looks pretty crude and laughable today.
	But you'll hear them say, three years in the making.
	So when he published his manifesto, and when he created his Technocracy Incorporated, 1933, immediately, these people started creating a movie.
	Don't be too sure of progress.
	Well, what's going to stop progress nowadays?
	War.
	There is war.
	And of course, this is the lead up to what a lot of people thought was going to be war when it was, World War II.
	Playing to people's fears just like Gone with the Wind did.
	What of the future?
	It says.
	I'll just read you some of the titles, because they use that extensively here.
	So, there's a big war.
	war everything is devastated humanity tomorrow and the years after what then i don't believe my boy could have thought of this two of them must have got together they'll come back together this time there's no attempt to land on the moon when when is this great experiment for me how much longer we got before they go when the space gun is ready sometime this year do you mean space gun laughing
	But the crowd finds out what these technocrats are up to.
	again.
	Oh, no.
	They won't smash the gun. The space gun. The space gun.
	Yeah, you see, worship of technology is nothing new.
	For the most astounding picture that has ever flashed across the screen.
	Here we go.
	Look into the future with H.G. Wells, the world's greatest historian.
	Once again, he writes the headlines of the future.
	Once again, his blazing pen traces directions of our lives.
	Love all the transitions there.
	Things to Come.
	Directed by Alexander Korda.
	He's a pretty well-known director.
	Wonders that you'll never live to see.
	Secrets torn from the pages of history, yet unwritten.
	A picture to fill hearts with wonder and souls with fear.
	You are catapulted through the centuries, whirled into the great unknown, into an era of glass cities towering to the sun, and a gigantic space gun rocketing passengers to the moon.
	These men, never to rest, never to be free, make the space gun the symbol of all that drives us, and destroy it!
	Now!
	Fire in peace!
	So big that it staggers the imagination.
	So exciting that it leaves you breathless.
	So inevitable that it engulfs every one of us.
	Three years to make.
	A century to live.
	because you heard him say 2036 an eternity to forget as the chorus sings eternity eternity yeah Yeah, we'll become like guys and we'll live forever.
	And, of course, that was 1936, and it was supposedly going to happen in 2036. Glass cities, powered by the sun, rocket ships to Mars.
	Oh, I mean, the moon or whatever, yeah.
	Anyway, yeah, we're going to go to Mars now.
	So, yeah, this is their dream.
	And quite frankly, it is shared by Musk and a lot of these billionaires.
	Scott's version, the guy who founded Howard Scott, his version of society was fueled by the Great Depression and the crisis of capitalism by post-First...
	World War isolationism, you can see that there, right?
	Everything's going to be destroyed with war.
	How do we stop these wars, right?
	They've been told that World War I was the war to end all wars.
	We're going to have peace.
	But now they're on the cusp, in reality, when they made this thing.
	They're on the cusp of another world war.
	And an infatuation with fascist form and ritual.
	And you can certainly see that in this movie, can't you?
	I mean, these people are just exuding fascism, even though they're not wearing any pants.
	They were dressed up like Romans and Togas, and these guys just didn't have the legs to carry that kind of costume.
	The core of his ideology was a rejection, though, of the price system.
	Remember I talked about this?
	How this is when you look at Elon Musk and his many statements saying, we're going to move beyond money, right?
	And we're going to move beyond...
	First of all, we'll move beyond currency.
	But ultimately, they want to have digital everything.
	Now, Musk, at the same time he's saying we're going to move beyond money, is setting up digital wallets.
	He's setting up X to be a processor of payments and things like that.
	But payments with what?
	And I said before, he's a big advocate of carbon taxes, and these billionaires that are surrounding Trump are big advocates of carbon sequestration and all the rest of the stuff.
	Forget about the emissions.
	It's not about that.
	It's about measuring energy.
	And that's what the technocrats had proposed.
	They wanted to reject the price system.
	They believed that the depression, and they were right about that, was largely due to actions of the central bank and the manipulations of bankers and politicians and so forth.
	So let's get back to what is real.
	And let's go directly to energy.
	And, of course, when the fraud of the dollar, you know, after Bretton Woods, right after World War II, where everybody tied everything to the U.S. dollar and to the American gold standard that was there, and the fact that we had a lot of gold, the question is, do we still have that?
	You know, it is kind of interesting.
	First, we had Elon Musk talking about having Ron Paul audit the Fed.
	And then it was floated out there that, hey, we need to audit to see if there's any gold in Fort Knox.
	You know, if they want to really destroy everything, all you have to do is just pull back the curtain and show this guy behind the curtain manipulating all the levers.
	What if they go to Fort Knox and don't find any gold there?
	Maybe there was rumors of that.
	Perhaps that's the best explanation.
	Maybe it's not a market thing at all.
	Everybody's saying, why is all this gold being brought into America?
	The London Metals Exchange can't even keep up with it.
	And so all this gold is being repatriated into America.
	Why is that?
	Maybe they heard rumors that there was going to be an audit of the gold in Fort Knox.
	It's like, all right, guys, bring it in here.
	We're going to put it back.
	And then we'll move it somewhere else if somebody does an audit.
	Somewhere else.
	But can you imagine if they go there and they see that there's not really much of any gold in Fort Knox, what that would do to the price of gold?
	Anyway, at the core, and so they brought all this stuff back in when they did Bretton Woods II. What did they do?
	They tied the dollar to oil.
	That's the petrodollar.
	Again, going back to energy.
	According to this ideology, it was a rejection of the price system underlying the global economy, in which money as a medium of exchange determines the values of goods and services, and financial considerations are fundamental to all economic decision-making.
	Citing the Depression as Exhibit A, the movement adherents, the technocrats, viewed this system as inherently unsustainable and predicted a total system collapse no later than 1940. Well, with the World War and all the rest of that stuff.
	And then they did Bretton Woods in 1945 at the end of the war and so forth.
	And they kept this going and made a move towards what the technocrats wanted with the petrodollar.
	At the core was a shift from a price system to what Scott called, quote, an energy theory of value.
	An energy theory of value.
	Which is exactly what you would expect engineers to focus on.
	Let's make energy, the theory of value.
	And even more so now.
	Because as they're talking about it, and we'll get into what Elon Musk said last week at the World Government Summit.
	He's a favorite there.
	I mean, he speaks there all the time.
	It's like, you know, going to Bilderberg or something.
	But they love to have him at the World Government Summit in the United Arab Emirates.
	And so when he was talking about it, he's talked about the end of money and how there's going to be a future of unlimited material gain created by his robots.
	Well, what are the robots going to run on?
	Energy.
	That's why I said, when you look at the fundamental aspect of this in energy, it's not going to be about slave labor anymore.
	A robot was the...
	Check word for slave.
	They want mechanical slaves.
	Those mechanical slaves are going to need to have cheap, available energy, which has been given to China and arbitrarily prohibited to us in terms of coal.
	But getting back to this, an energy theory of value in which goods and services were to be valued based not on money, but in terms of energy inputs required to produce them.
	This, in turn, would necessitate the abandonment of democracy.
	And the embrace of technocracy.
	Well, to get away from, you just need to separate the government from money.
	Right?
	Government shouldn't be creating money.
	You know, they can coin gold and silver, but they shouldn't be creating money.
	The problem is not democracy.
	The problem is central banks.
	But nevertheless, government by unelected, technically skilled, empirically driven elite.
	With the expertise necessary to determine value and to make rational resource allocation decisions.
	Do you see the fundamental flaw in this reasoning?
	Because they don't understand that it's coming from the central bank and the central banks are doing their own thing and ignoring the government.
	They attribute the failures of the central bank to government.
	When the central bank is not accountable to people at all, and it's not even accountable to the Constitution.
	So you look at the central banks, and what are they?
	Well, they're actually experts, we're told, right?
	So you've got these experts who are going to make all kinds of financial decisions for us, just like we had scientific experts like Fauci making all kinds of decisions for us.
	How does that work out?
	That is the fundamental flaw.
	of technocracy.
	The idea that some men are so wise that they should be allowed to rule over us with an iron fist.
	That's what we have in the Federal Reserve.
	That's what these people want to extend to every aspect of life.
	The outward manifestations of this authoritarian outlook had a distinctly fascist flavor.
	Technocracy, Inc.
	members wore a uniform, as I pointed out before, double-breasted suit and so forth.
	But again, part of that, too, was, you know, Uniforms is just another extension.
	Everybody wore suits back then, right?
	So to have something more of a uniform, that was taking it a little bit further.
	Their geopolitical program, by the way, pull that picture up again.
	You can even see he's standing there in front of his map.
	He loves that map, North America, where it's all controlled by them.
	The Technate, consisting of a union of the nations of North America, Central America, Caribbean, Northeastern Pacific, along with Greenland, the natural resources, the natural boundaries of this area make it an independent, self-sustaining geographical unit, they said in their 1937 magazine, The Technocrat.
	The Technate would ensure security by enacting a continental integration and mobilization, quote-unquote.
	And quote, complete conscription of men, materials, machines, and wealth by the government of the United States.
	You will own nothing.
	And they'll tell you what you can do, where you can go, right?
	See how this fits, meshes perfectly with the World Economic Forum vision as well, but it's specific to North America, central to North America.
	They were all to be placed before all other objectives of the American people.
	And the well-being of this government was to be placed before all other objectives of the American people.
	Well, we did that in 1945 when everything got subjected to national security, whatever that is.
	National security is whatever the people in power say it is.
	It's not about protecting you.
	Never.
	Raven Rock, where they would hide out.
	The plan to save themselves and let the rest of us die in a nuclear war?
	It's always been.
	National security continuity of government has always been about the elites and their salvation and wars that perhaps they initiate.
	Key to this project was the construction of a chain of far-flung defense bases along the Technate's borders, as shown on the Technate of America map.
	Behind these Technates, the Technate rather would be...
	Entirely secure.
	Its economy would be self-sustaining.
	Does that sound familiar?
	We don't need any of these people, Trump keeps saying.
	You know, we don't need any of this other stuff.
	We're going to have everything that we need, especially if we get Canada.
	That's the 51st state.
	And it would be independent of global trade, which Trump doesn't want any of it.
	He wants to bring Canada in.
	And he wants to bring Greenland in, but he doesn't want any global trade.
	We'll be self-sustaining with all that.
	And its defenses would be sufficient to deter would-be invaders.
	It would have no need to become involved in the conflicts of either Europe or Asia.
	Opposition to American entry into wars raging outside our area is a keystone of the technocracy's current basic policy.
	Technocracy points out that this position is not held on the basis of humanitarian or pacifistic tendencies.
	Okay, so they're not doing it because they're anti-war.
	They're doing it because it's in their best interest, just a pragmatic solution, and that's what we always come back to.
	There is absolutely no moral code or principles that are discernible in this except their own self-interest and desire for power.
	We're going to close the fences.
	We're going to make this great big technique that goes all the way up to Greenland, including Canada, and we'll be independent.
	We'll have all the resources that we need, and we'll become Fortress North America.
	Does that sound like Trump?
	I think this is what he's doing.
	Quite frankly, I think this is it.
	Because look at all the people around him.
	I mean, they're straight out of central casting, except that they wear pants.
	As with the broader isolationist movement, Technocracy Incorporated had its legs cut out from under it by the attack on Pearl Harbor, or the false flag attack on Pearl Harbor.
	I guess maybe not as a false flag, but since the Americans didn't actually do it, they just stood down.
	So I guess you could say the false defense about that.
	And so, in terms of Joshua Haldeman, this article, And Science We Trust was out of Canada.
	And they talked a little bit more about Musk's grandfather.
	On October the 13th, 1940, a chiropractor named Joshua Haldeman appeared in city court to fight two charges under the Defense of Canada Act.
	His alleged offense was belonging to Technocracy Incorporated, an organization that had been banned by the Canadian government several months earlier as part of a larger sweep of groups it considered to be subversive to the war effort.
	Yeah, you see, that's part of what we see there.
	They're trying to lead us up to war.
	When they're getting ready to go to war, and we saw this with World War I and Woodrow Wilson, you start criminalizing any dissent, even before the war begins.
	And so J. Edgar Hoover was born out of the Palmer raids.
	He administered that for the then Attorney General Palmer.
	And that was supposed to catapult Palmer into national fame and to run for the presidency.
	It didn't work that way, but what it did was it catapulted J. Edgar Hoover into creating a massive bureaucracy, the Federal Bureau, Bureaucracy of Investigation.
	But Technocracy Incorporated was not a political movement.
	In fact, if you were a politician, if you were a member of a political party, you were not even allowed to join.
	No politicians allowed.
	It was founded in New York City in 1933 as an educational research organization promoting a radical restructuring of political, social, and economic life in Canada and the United States with science as its central operating principle.
	Are we not there now?
	I mean, you know, I showed you the map of the technate.
	But if we want to look at the political map, if we want to look at a timeline, I think there'd be a big, you are here right now, with Musk and all the rest of these people, and with Trump and what he's trying to pull off here.
	There would be no politicians, business people, money or income inequality.
	These are all features of what technocracy called the price system, and it would have to go.
	But again, Elon Musk wants to be at the center.
	People are going to have to have some medium of storage of labor and of exchange and things like that.
	So they're just talking about getting rid of the currency, and he wants to create a digital currency.
	He wants to create universal basic income.
	He wants X payments.
	He wants an X digital wallet and all the rest of the stuff.
	He just doesn't want the current financial system as it is.
	He wants to be in control of it.
	So there would be no countries called Canada or the United States, either just one giant continental landmass called the Technate, a techno-utopia run by engineers and other experts in their field, experts in their field.
	In the technique, everyone would be well-housed and fed.
	All material needs would be taken care of, whether you had a job or not.
	Now, this was written in 2021. And as they're talking about Musk's grandfather, they said Musk's estimated net worth today is more than $150 billion.
	That was in 2021. Today he's over $400 billion because he bought the presidency.
	Musk doesn't talk about a technate on Earth, but he did talk about setting it up on Mars.
	In 2019, he tweeted, accelerating starship development to build the Martian technocracy.
	As I said before, he knows what the technocracy is, and he embraces it.
	It is his ideal.
	And everything that we see happening in Washington right now aligns with the Goals of the technocracy.
	So they said in this article, well, the questions that were raised by these people with Technocracy, Inc., said they raised at least two important questions that are still grappling with today.
	How should government respond when large numbers of people lose their jobs to automation?
	As Bloomberg said, how do we keep them from coming after us with guillotines when we take away their jobs?
	And the media, including Breitbart and all the rest of them, said, oh, well, you know, he doesn't like farmers.
	Yeah, but you're missing the point here.
	You don't even see the universal basic income coming at you.
	So fundamental questions is, what do we do when large numbers of people lose their jobs to automation, which is something that they've been talking about, their goal, for more than 15 years?
	It's to take away our jobs.
	And as I said before, they expect that of the more physical jobs, driving and handling stuff, that it'd be 50% unemployment.
	But that for white-collar jobs, it'd be 70% by 2030, just five years from now.
	And they've been saying that for 15 years.
	The second one was...
	How can representative democracy, with all of its obvious imperfections, function effectively in a world where science and technology play an ever more dominant role?
	Well, of course, the answer that technocracy has is that you just need to have experts like Fauci to tell you what's going to happen.
	He is science.
	And people like him are going to try to use the idea of science and artificial intelligence to rule us.
	You better be ready for this.
	This is the argument that they're going to be making.
	To institute all of this stuff.
	Oh, look at how smart Elon Musk and his whiz kids are to find all this stuff.
	In 1963, Howard Scott, the founder and leader of the Technocracy Incorporated movement, declared that, quote, as far as technocracy's ideas are concerned, we are so far left that we make communism look bourgeois.
	They said that was not a popular thing to say.
	In the 1960s, the height of the Cold War, but he was not wrong in that.
	As a matter of fact, you know, the other protest movement that came out of this and the other protest movement that Haldeman got involved in was the Social Credit Movement.
	And, you know, they'd like to focus on the other Atlantic article about its anti-Semitism.
	but it was really more leaning towards communism.
	Technocracy was a uniquely North American movement that may have been the most radical of them all, and in the depths of the Great Depression, hundreds of thousands of Canadians and Americans were prepared to embrace it.
	Their ideology defies easy characterization.
	It was anti-capitalist, but it was also anti-democratic.
	But it was not fascist.
	It was anti-government, but not libertarian.
	It believed in a radical form of social and economic equality.
	But it was not Marxist.
	And this is why, if you don't understand where the technocracy is, this is why people can't understand where Elon Musk is coming from and where he wants to take us.
	If you don't understand, because it's these contradictions, apparent contradictions, because it doesn't, you know, we're trying to pigeonhole it into some of the things that we understand.
	Communism, fascism, populism, all the rest, but it doesn't, libertarianism, it doesn't pigeonhole into any of these things.
	Only highly trained engineers and experts were capable, they said, of building a new North America.
	While other political parties and protest groups were touting plans for putting people back to work, the technocracy's response was, don't even bother putting people back to work.
	The world had changed.
	Jobs destroyed by machines, they said, we're not going to come back.
	And at the heart of the price system was money.
	And it was what had forced people to go into debt, to break the law, to become greedy, to engage in all kinds of other bad behaviors, but help was on the way.
	See, they always offer this as a utopia.
	So, they've got to get rid of money.
	And certainly, the love of money is the root of all evil, but they're going to substitute it with something else.
	Energy credits will be the new money.
	The march of technology.
	With its increasing abundance, we'll destroy every value of the price system, said Scott in 1939. And folks, that is exactly what Elon Musk said to the World Government Summit last week.
	Last week.
	Said the same thing.
	We're going to have infinite resources.
	Total, you know, there's not going to be anything at all that we will be stopped from doing.
	And I've got a little thing here I'll play here in the background so you can watch this.
	It's some of the imagery from the movie that somebody put some of the music from the movie in it to look at the model miniatures that they used in this.
	But this is the worship of, you know, this Tower of Babel idea that they have here.
	This pride of man.
	We are experiencing the greatest economic and technological shift in human history.
	Ah, now that was in 2020. That was Andrew Yang as he was running for the Democrat presidential nomination.
	He said, we need a way to help millions of Americans transition through this period.
	And his idea was $1,000 a month, universal basic income.
	And Musk loved that so much that he gave Andrew Yang a million dollars, a guy that was totally unheard of.
	And so at the World Government Summit in Dubai in 2017, eight years ago, because Musk loves to go to the World Government Summit, he expressed his support for a guaranteed basic income.
	Musk said, mass unemployment will be a massive social challenge.
	See, this is one thing.
	They transcend the political parties.
	And you've got Bloomberg, a Democrat, and Musk, who is a Democrat, now he's supposedly a Republican or whatever.
	They don't believe in political parties.
	As Larry Fink of BlackRock said, it doesn't make any difference to what we're going to do.
	Which one of these guys wins?
	They've got their own agenda.
	And their agenda is to put us out of work and to make sure they own and control everything.
	That's a big part of the technocracy, always has been.
	There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better, said Musk, with automation.
	We'll come abundance.
	You can't fumble along with a system and just patch up the symptoms, explained Tom Mason in a recent phone interview from his home in Tampa.
	Mason is 99 years old and has been involved with technocracy since the 1940s.
	Remember that movie done in 1936?
	They said, well, this is what it's going to look like in 2036, and you won't even survive to see it.
	Well, this guy lived to be 99. And he got pretty close to it.
	He said, Politicians today don't want to address the disease, said this 99-year-old technocrat.
	They just want to treat the symptoms.
	And you can only patch up the symptoms so far.
	For technocracy, addressing the disease means doing away with the price system.
	They could provide citizens with far more security than any other kind of guaranteed basic income.
	Technocracy's plan was to replace the price system with a system based on energy.
	In the 1920s, Scott and his colleagues began a hugely ambitious program called the Energy Survey of North America.
	The idea was to establish a value for all goods and services produced on the continent.
	Not by measuring how much labor was expended or how much money was spent.
	In other words, not going to be gross domestic product.
	But on the amount of energy used to produce them.
	You see?
	See where the carbon credits come in?
	Do you see where the CBDC de facto stuff comes in?
	Elon Musk digital wallet and all the rest of this stuff?
	You know, they can go through and they can allocate this.
	They've been prepping us for this with a climate change MacGuffin.
	And that's the kind of thing that they always do.
	They move the Overton window of people's minds.
	And we all see, well hopefully we all see, all of us see it.
	And I think a lot of society is seeing the fraud of all this doom and gloom climate change nonsense.
	But they're working on all of this stuff.
	They're not going to tell us what their ultimate goal is and how they're going to get there.
	They're going to pivot it, and they're going to implement what they've been setting up for climate change.
	They're going to do a pivot, and they're going to implement that.
	And they're going to go to a system of measuring the energy consumption of everyone.
	And that would include, of course, your food and other things.
	Right now, they're talking about it in emissions, but it's never been about emissions.
	It's always been about omissions.
	What they can omit from your life.
	What they can track and control.
	And what they can prescribe that you're able to do.
	So the idea back in the 1920s was to do an energy survey of North America.
	Then they would divide the total amount of energy used by the number of citizens in the technate over the age of 25 and issue each of those citizens an equal number of energy certificates, whether they were employed or not.
	And these energy certificates would be the technate's currency.
	And now they have the ability to do that.
	With computers.
	They didn't in the 1920s.
	Just as I said, Jude, the internet was created by a DARPA psychologist.
	But they didn't have the technology to do that in the 60s.
	But they jumped in full on board when the technology came around.
	We saw this explosion in the 1990s as the internet was getting up to the point.
	Where the bandwidth was making it practical.
	And now we are seeing a full-on explosion as AI and robotics are making this technocratic vision feasible.
	Every time you buy something, some of your energy credits would be deducted.
	And because the certificates would be issued directly to the owner, they couldn't be bought, sold, traded, or stolen.
	Ah, blockchain.
	Ah, okay.
	And the Technate, your work life, wouldn't begin until age 25. Once you join the labor force, you'd work 16 hours a week only.
	Not a 40-hour week, a 16-hour week.
	That's like one day for me.
	Hey, this is starting to sound better.
	No, just joking.
	You'd get about 78 days of vacation a year, and you would retire when you're 45. Only a small percentage of adults in the Technate would have jobs, and Scott thought that that should be the cause for a celebration.
	Most of those...
	Hand tool jobs.
	He said, we're not very good to begin with.
	So why weep if they can now be done by a machine?
	We were told the same thing when all of our manufacturing was outsourced to China.
	You don't want those jobs.
	Send them to the Chinese and let them do the slave labor, right?
	Now we're being told the same thing.
	You don't want those jobs.
	Send them out to the machines.
	So one of the lowest social diseases.
	Is the belief in the morality of work, he said.
	If you want to know what work has done for you, go home and look in the mirror and see what a mess you are.
	Yeah, well, that's the whole idea of the technocrats, right?
	I don't know.
	I think age has something to do with it.
	Scott believed that people, if they were freed from having to work for a living and secure in the knowledge that all their material needs to be taken care of, We'll be able to fulfill themselves through the arts, recreation, religion, education, all of which would thrive in the technate.
	Yeah, we saw that happen, didn't we, when everything was locked down and everybody was put on?
	You know, well, we work from home and we get a stimulus check and all the rest of it.
	That was great.
	We all just, you know, society just went to a whole new level of enlightenment, didn't it?
	Or did it go the other way?
	Yeah, you see, God has created us to work.
	And that's what they deny.
	They not only deny God, they deny the nature of mankind.
	Speaking to the World Government Summit in 2017, again eight years ago, Musk acknowledged that a guaranteed basic income would address only one part of the problem caused by technological unemployment.
	Musk said, the much harder challenge is, how are people going to have meaning?
	A lot of people derive their meaning from their employment.
	So if there's no need for your labor, What's your meaning?
	Do you feel useless?
	That is a much harder problem to deal with.
	Well, I don't draw meaning from my work, and I hope you don't either.
	I draw meaning from God, right?
	My relationship with God.
	And a future that I will live to see.
	But a future where we live forever, right?
	But work is what we were created for.
	You know, man was put in the Garden of Eden to tend it.
	That was the work that he was given.
	It was an agricultural work at the time.
	And when the curse came because of man's rebellion, God added weeds to that.
	And so, you know, we all have frustration in whatever kind of work we do.
	But work is built into us.
	Randy Alcorn, a Christian writer who has written a lot of fiction books and everything, A book about heaven, and he kind of thinks about, well, you know, considering what we know about man's nature as defined by the Bible, not from psychology or things like that, but he said, you know, looking at the nature of man, what is it that we're going to be doing?
	Are we going to be floating around in heaven strumming harps or whatever?
	Now, for some of us, that would be fine, you know.
	But, you know, a lot of people, that's not their idea, and they think it would be really boring to do that.
	He says, Randy Alcorn says, no, God has created us for work, and I think there'll be plenty of things for us to do.
	You know, that might be the time at which we go to the stars or whatever.
	Who knows?
	We don't know.
	Except, he said, you know, that is part of our nature.
	And it'll be work that is fulfilling instead of frustrating.
	That'll be the difference.
	But technocracy believed in a world that revolved around science and technology.
	Only people with proven expertise in those areas should be responsible for its governance.
	A federation of Fauci's to rule over us.
	You like that idea?
	That excluded all the usual suspects, business people, lawyers, bankers, academics, none of whom had the practical skills that the modern age demanded.
	Those who create a civilization, he said, We'll eventually dominate it, said Scott in a speech in Winnipeg.
	He said the engineers and mechanics created this civilization and will eventually dominate it.
	Technocracy was building a technological army of the functionally competent, is the way that he referred to it.
	A technological army of the functionally competent.
	I look at it, though, and I don't know.
	When you look at the competency of some of these...
	Unbelievably wealthy companies.
	I think they've gotten to the point where Google and Facebook, because they were enabled by government, you know, it was a government that pushed them, right?
	As you look at the late 90s, the venture capital firms and In-Q-Tel, CIA and many others where they had the intelligence community sitting on the boards of these things.
	And so how were they able to run for years and years providing everything for free?
	Well, they were getting funding from the government.
	Accumulated such a monopoly on commercial things that Google and Facebook typically will go out, if somebody creates some new product, they'll go out and buy them.
	And then they'll ruin that product.
	I've seen that open over and over again.
	And so it isn't necessarily that they are a technological army of the functionally competent.
	They just have an unbelievable amount of money at their disposal because they partnered with the government.
	So they said there'd be no room and no need for democracy, normal functions of government, education, health, sanitation, public safety, public health.
	They'd all be run by experts, chosen by their peers.
	Doctors would vote for the person to be in charge of the health care system, you know, like Fauci.
	Teachers would vote for the person who would run the schools and so on, you know, like Randy Weingarten.
	That radical LGBT witch Marxist that runs the teachers' union.
	These are the kind of people that would be running our society.
	People like Randy Weingarten would be in charge of education, Fauci in charge of, well, just science in general, but especially medical science, right?
	So all the normal functions of government would be run by experts.
	They would be chosen by their peers.
	They would select a cabinet called the...
	Continental Board, which would then choose Continental Director, and so forth.
	The idea was not a new one.
	Plato believed in society that was run by experts, and of course we see evidence or traces of that in Brave New World, Aldous Huxley.
	Where he would have his alphas and his betas and his epsilons that would be there out of the government hatcheries and so forth.
	Scientifically run, this is him.
	His brother Julian coined the term transhumanism.
	The idea that governments are too slow, too inefficient, too lacking in expertise to solve hard problems is widely shared with the engineers and the entrepreneurs of Silicon Valley today.
	And that is the idea of Musk.
	And his doge kids.
	The libertarian impulse has always been a part of the ethos of Silicon Valley, but they're not libertarians either, right?
	1995, tech pioneer John Perry Barlow addressed the World Economic Forum in Davos, and he delivered his, quote, Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.
	He said, Governments of the industrial world, you weary giants of flesh and steel, I come from cyberspace, the home of the mind.
	On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone.
	You're not welcome among us.
	You have no sovereignty where we gather.
	Now that is the hallmark of the crypto community, that attitude right there.
	Distilled is what I see with all the crypto people.
	You know, we live in cyberspace.
	You're just the old-fashioned physical space.
	We are superior to you, and you can't touch us.
	Well, you know, you may have blockchain, but they've got rubber hoses.
	A conviction that left to their own devices, tech companies are better able to solve problems in areas like transportation, education, health care, where decades of government regulation have put a brake on innovation.
	And let me tell you that as they're talking about getting rid of the Department of Education, and I'm all for that.
	I've always cheered to get rid of this thing.
	But now what you see coming in, and many people understand this, is that the moves that are being made with education In my opinion, are going to be used to put these technocrats in the catbird seat.
	They will be the ones who will be setting the educational standards.
	They will be the ones who will be making the money off of all this stuff.
	All this stuff that is going to be out there.
	Block grants in the name of choice and all the rest of the stuff.
	Get government out of education.
	If government...
	If government is funding it in any way, shape, or form, they will be defining it and controlling it.
	Whistler says, if only we had some system to assign value to things based on factors like supply, demand, the amount of energy that went into making it.
	Shame we don't have something like that already.
	The happiest, which we do, the happiest, healthiest, most fulfilled people are the ones living off of welfare, right?
	Yeah, that's right.
	Haven't you noticed that?
	And that's the thing that, you know, that's the thing that really bothers me.
	I've mentioned it many times.
	Charles Murray, who wrote a book in the late 1970s or the early 1980s called Losing Ground.
	And in the Reagan administration, they used that as intellectual basis for saying, look at how welfare has harmed people.
	And he was absolutely, positively right.
	And yet now Charles Murray supports universal welfare for everybody.
	Universal basic income.
	He now supports that.
	And it's like, you look at this, and it's like, what is going on?
	Yeah, there was work for Adam to do in the garden, says a whistler.
	The curse made him.
	And our work harder.
	Stands to reason that when the curse is lifted, we'll return to something more like what Adam had in the garden.
	Yeah, I agree.
	Well, that attitude about cyberspace, that attitude about being governed, By experts.
	Again, the idea that left to their own devices, the tech companies are better able to run our country.
	And that's what you're seeing now with Doge.
	Doge is laying with the MAGA people at least.
	You know, the Democrats are very upset about this.
	Democrats are asking some good questions about conflict of interest.
	You know, if you were a member of Congress, you have to have full disclosure of what you're doing and other things like that.
	And people who get into political office and other things like that will divest themselves of anything that could be a conflict of interest.
	And so there is a big conflict of interest here since Elon Musk has become the richest man ever to live by government contracts and other things like that.
	So that's a real concern, but that's the only thing that they're concerned about.
	You know, the reality is, is that the left would love for us to be ruled by the experts that they pick as well.
	And this is just like the free speech issue.
	Yeah, we all want to have truth, don't we?
	And name only, right?
	And yet, most people just want people to agree with them.
	And they want to shut down anything that disagrees with them.
	In reality, they don't want freedom of speech.
	And they don't want necessarily a government that works.
	They want a government that works for them.
	A government that they control.
	A Google executive, a former chairman, should say, Eric Schmidt, said there's a lack of focus on efficiency.
	See?
	They're all into this.
	We need to have an efficient government.
	And that's what Doge is selling you.
	Doge is laying a philosophical background for MAGA to embrace, quote-unquote, efficiency.
	Who cares what government does?
	As long as it's on the side of Donald Trump, we don't care.
	We don't really care to think about what government does, but it needs to be efficient.
	This is pure technocracy.
	The idea of an apolitical world is appealing to more and more people.
	People are tired.
	They're put off by the commotion, by the disagreement of representative politics.
	So it's this appeal of an efficient, machine-like system where problems can be identified through evidence, facts, and reason.
	Yeah, that's what happened in the 2020 lockdown, wasn't it?
	We had evidence, facts, and reasons?
	No, no.
	We had raw power, raw authority, authoritarian medical martial law.
	And we're going to get that in all these different areas.
	This is a fantasy to think that we can objectively determine what these problems are, especially if we've divorced ourselves from Any God-given morality.
	So, they said, I think a lot of people, though, are finding that idea appealing.
	And it is a fantasy.
	The rise of technocratic governments around the world, as a matter of fact.
	In February 2021, Mario Draghi, an economist and former president of the European Central Bank, who had never held political office, was named Italian Prime Minister to help manage the country's post-pandemic Economic recovery.
	The same guy, Mario Draghi.
	It's the first time I heard the actual term technocrat being addressed to somebody.
	It was addressed to Mario Draghi back in 2014. First time I saw Nigel Farage was when he stood up in the European Parliament and he criticized Draghi because they put him in charge of Greece.
	And he says, right there.
	In the country where democracy was born, they've thrown out the election and they've appointed a guy who was never elected, Mario Draghi, as a technocrat.
	And they put him in Greece.
	Now, he was an Italian even.
	He wasn't even from that country.
	But they've now put him in.
	That was in 2014. In 2021, they put him in as a technocrat in Italy.
	He's been chosen for the specific experience that he brings to the job.
	And again, this is the kind of job that you see from a Federal Reserve type.
	Draghi was the fourth technocrat prime minister there since 1993. And you'll also find cabinet-level technocrats in Greece, France, and Lebanon.
	None of them would be embraced by the technocracy, though, because they're still operating within the price system, still treating symptoms, they would say, and not the disease.
	But for a long time...
	Technocracy Incorporated supporters liked the idea that anyone would question science around the pandemic or anything else.
	It's mystifying, they said.
	A guy, Ed Blechschmidt, said you can't argue with science and technology.
	Science exists, and scientific fact is fact.
	And you can't have a political position about it.
	You have to recognize it and implement science.
	So shut up, put on your mask, you know, walk in circles six feet apart or whatever, right?
	See, what we hate about Fauci is the essence of technocrat philosophy.
	Would you rather have Musk in charge instead of Fauci?
	Not me.
	But that's what they're selling you.
	That's exactly what this guy said.
	Shut up.
	Science is science.
	Fact is fact.
	I tell you what science is.
	I tell you what the facts are.
	So do what I say.
	It may be different.
	In terms of its stated goals, but folks, it's just recycled old authoritarianism.
	From time to time, we get these new versions of it where they put a veneer of patriotism on it and call it populism, or they, you know, fascism or whatever, or they, or brotherhood, okay?
	And that's called communism, but it's still totalitarianism.
	It's still authoritarianism.
	And that's what this is going to lead to.
	Authoritarianism and then totalitarianism.
	You can name it whatever you want.
	You can call it Fauciism.
	It doesn't make any difference.
	So bring it back to what Musk did last week.
	He predicts a future with super-intelligent humanoid robots where money is obsolete.
	This is pure 1933. Technocracy Incorporated.
	And when asked, he was on a video call, when asked from the World Government Summit what he thinks would be the biggest impact of technological progress, he said, once you have humanoid robots and deep intelligence, you basically have quasi-infinite products and services.
	This is why George Gilder called The people in Silicon Valley, he called them neo-Marxists.
	And I've talked about this before.
	He said, Karl Marx said that because of the Industrial Revolution, we had essentially infinite material goods.
	And Marx was only concerned with how do we distribute those equitably.
	Well, that sounds really nice and friendly, doesn't it?
	But what has it created with communism?
	Murder of over 100 million people in the 20th century.
	And so this kind of justification, but it all came from the central conceit that because we've got an industrial revolution, we have infinite capacity.
	And now these people are talking about this particular fourth turning as an industrial revolution.
	Klaus Schwab always loves to call it.
	The Fourth Industrial Revolution.
	But they're looking at this as being a massive industrial revolution.
	And they think that they need to reorganize everything around what they are capable of doing.
	And the best way to sum this up, and I saw somebody sum up what Musk was saying about this, he wants to minimize government, but maximize governance.
	Minimize government, the people that are there, the bureaucracy and all the rest of the stuff that we don't like, but be ready for what's coming.
	Because all of those bureaucrats that you don't like, the busybodies, the nosy people, the cops and all the rest of the stuff, when they go away, you know, and all these bureaucratic cops and regulators and all the rest of the stuff, when they go away, what's going to take their place?
	Robots and AI. And that is going to maximize governance.
	Governance.
	I worked, when I was working, doing videos and stuff for think tanks, Chris Horn, Horn or Horner?
	I can't remember his name now.
	But he was somebody who was...
	You know, one of the lead counsel on these cases that were going to go to the Supreme Court.
	He'd argue before the Supreme Court.
	And he was adamant that what these people are trying to set up is not a global government.
	They want to set up, though, global governance.
	He said global government is not what they're going for.
	They're looking for global governance.
	And the way to understand what Elon Musk wants to do is global governance.
	And it will be maximized global.
	He has predicted that his own electric car, a company Tesla, would build the most advanced humanoid robot.
	That's what he said last week.
	He believes such robots will enable the world to produce any product, to, quote, provide any service, quote, there's really no limit to the economy at that point.
	You can make anything.
	And he went on to question whether money would be meaningful, see, in such a scenario in which he assumed boldly that the world would, quote, have a sort of universal high income situation in which anyone will be able to have as many of these products and services as they want, with the exception have a sort of universal high income situation in which anyone will be able to have as many of these products and services as they want, with
	But look, do you really think that this guy who is, who has hoarded more money than any human being in history? - Sweet.
	And is looking to get even more powerful?
	Do you really think that he's going to give you universal high income?
	Boy, he's good at what he does.
	Because, you know, Klaus Schwab and these other people say, you own nothing, right?
	No, no, you're going to live a life of luxury where the robots that I build for you will do all the work for you.
	And we won't be his slaves, will we?
	He said money is really like a database or an information system for resource allocation.
	And that, folks, is what he's trying to build on X. A database, an information system for resource allocation, and he will run it.
	The digital wallet, the X money, and the everything app.
	But if you don't have scarcity of resources, it's not clear what purpose money has.
	Well, the purpose is that it gives him control.
	Look, people, when they get that kind of money, it's more money than he and his 13 kids and multiple concubines could ever spend in all of their lifetimes combined.
	So why does he keep accumulating more of it?
	Because he's really about...
	That's what motivates him.
	Money is just the means to that end.
	And so he's going to have another form of control other than currency, and it will give him a great deal more to do.
	And so when we talk about scarcity of resources, again, how do the robots run?
	Well, they run based on the energy.
	Musk's utopian vision, which some would describe as dystopian, Eerily echoes the vision of tech-enabled communism.
	Again, like I said, George Gilder called them neo-Marxists.
	His ex-girlfriend, Grimes, who has the mother of those three kids with the really bizarre names, like Mechanicus or something, and X, listen to what she had to say.
	She's coming from the left.
	She's with Hollywood, a rock star or anything.
	She says, I have a proposition for the communists.
	So typically, most of the communists I know are not big fans of AI, but if you think about it, AI is actually the fastest path to communism, she said.
	This is Musk's consort, or whatever she calls herself, I don't know.
	You know, the mother of that little monster that he's carrying around on his shoulders.
	She said, so if implemented correctly, AI could actually theoretically solve for abundance, like we could totally get to a situation where nobody has to work.
	Everybody is provided for with the comparable state of being and comfortable living.
	These are the neo-Marxists.
	She said, so basically everything everybody loves about communism, but without the collective farms.
	There you go.
	Well, of course, this is coming from LifeSite, this particular article.
	They said this naively assumes that the technocratic ruling classes that program and control AI actually desire a society that's equitable and that they're able to achieve whatever fosters people's well-being.
	I don't think it's either their ability, I don't think they have the ability, and I certainly don't think they have the desire to do that for people.
	Tesla's vehicles, as I pointed out, are already distinguished by their self-driving system.
	They have the highest accident rate and the deadliest accident rate of any auto brand.
	As a matter of fact, I think I pointed it out last week, they have a worse death record than even the Pinto.
	And the rate is much higher.
	They've been keeping this, you know, it hasn't been around for the decade that the Pinto was around.
	But you want to talk about dying in a fiery crash?
	Well, Tesla is your brand.
	Not even the Ford Pinto came close to that.
	And Karen didn't pay $100,000 for her Ford Pinto.
	She paid more like $1,000 for it.
	But anyway, implantable brain-computer interface technology will facilitate what he has envisioned as the brain merging with AI. And yet, MAGA cheers this guy.
	He is the epitome of technocracy, the epitome of transhumanism.
	He is the epitome of the arrogance set against God, in my opinion.
	well we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back here's a little song i wrote You might want to hear it in your pod.
	You know nothing.
	And be happy.
	Ain't got no cash.
	Ain't got no car.
	But 24 booster shots in your arm.
	Oh, nothing.
	Be happy.
	You can't even buy shit in the store because of your low social credit score.
	Own nothing.
	Be happy.
	You'll own nothing.
	And be happy.
	Be happy and eat the bugs.
	Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, dear Klaus, your annual global risk report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
	For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate, it is disinformation and misinformation.
	followed closely by polarization within our societies.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You are listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, some comments here.
	DG8, thank you, says, David, the Trump cult has a trigger-free list of approved shows.
	Bon Gino, B. Johnson, I don't even know, oh, Benny Johnson, I guess that is, yeah.
	Our brand, Russell Brand and such, redacted, was on that list, but pointed out how Trump is building a surveillance state, and now they're not anymore.
	Mm-hmm.
	Yeah.
	Trump is fully on board with all this stuff.
	Technocracy, you name it.
	Right Overture.
	I live in Georgia.
	We don't like Kemp either.
	But it was either him or gap-toothed Stacey Abrams who's getting paid millions as a Democrat darling.
	Oh, I understand.
	I understand.
	But my point is that Kemp got Trump angry because Kemp didn't go along with the challenging of the election.
	And so he's out to get him.
	He sees Kemp at being at the center of shutting down his challenge to the election.
	And so he's going to shut down emergency funds for the people of Georgia, which he never did any of that during the COVID thing, right?
	During COVID, he never stopped any emergency funding for anybody.
	That's what his executive order on March the 13th, 2020, was about money.
	The pandemic had already been declared when there was no pandemic, when there were only six even pretend cases of COVID in the entire United States.
	His big pharmaceutical HHS head, a hack, Alex Azar, declared on January the 31st, 2020, 10 days after Trump spoke at Davos, he was the one who declared the pandemic.
	Trump released the money to handle the emergency.
	And he never stopped the money for the COVID emergency.
	Not any of it, anywhere.
	Not for any reason.
	No matter how bad all these Democrat governors that MAGA talks about, no matter how bad they were, he kept the money flowing.
	But when it comes to his political enemy, Kemp, he's going to shut the money off for people in Georgia for the real emergency of the hurricane.
	Howdy, Modern Retro Radio.
	Good to see you.
	Government.
	Has been using Hollywood to engineer narratives for the longest time.
	Yeah, that's right.
	And Satan has been using it as well.
	Satan uses government.
	He uses Hollywood as well.
	Nabooru2029.
	Always remember, you carry their greatest weapon against humanity with that smartphone that you worship.
	That's right.
	The black mirror that you look into.
	When I go on with Clyde Lewis, he's got a great audio clip there talking about this black mirror.
	The first thing you look at in the morning when you get up because your alarm clock goes off on it maybe, right?
	In many cases.
	And then the last thing you look at at night.
	How it really does.
	It's the big brother in your pocket.
	Ephesians 6.12.
	Serious question.
	Any ideas on how to push back?
	Or do we just prepare ourselves for the inevitable?
	Well, you know, we speak the truth and we leave it to God to change hearts and minds.
	You know, we try to do our best to try to convince people and lay the facts out for them.
	But, you know, I can tell you from firsthand experience that talking to most people about January the 6th or talking to most people about the lockdown or the vaccine, you know, it's just like you're not, you know, you can tell them about it.
	And you have done what you are called to do, right?
	The watchman on the wall principle.
	If you see some horrible thing coming, you need to warn your fellow man.
	It's just that simple.
	It's not just me.
	It's you as well, right?
	And so you need to warn people about what is coming.
	If they want to submit to it, there's nothing you can do about it.
	And there's going to be a lot of people.
	You know, the list that DG8 had there.
	Those people, and Alex Jones is going to be telling people, it's sugar water.
	Don't worry about it.
	It's Trump.
	Don't worry about it.
	Trust the plan.
	Trust Trump and all the rest of the stuff.
	And they do.
	And there's a lot of them that you can't reason with.
	And I feel bad for a lot of these J6ers who just, like sheep, followed Trump.
	But they still do, like sheep, follow Trump.
	It's amazing.
	Amazing.
	They still will not blame him for anything.
	And we were talking about this the other day.
	You know, Trump, his popularity has shot up from like 43% to like 55% or something in some of these polls.
	But I know that that's realistic.
	And I know that opposing him is killing this show.
	It really is.
	And I said that to Karen.
	She said, are people going to find out that you're right?
	And I said, no, they're not.
	I said, just look at the interviews that I have with the January the 6th people.
	They don't get it.
	They still don't get it.
	They'll make excuses for Trump for anything, and always will.
	It's never him.
	These are the never-blame-Trumpers, and no matter what happens to our economy, I mean, he can crush us with new taxes called tariffs, because that's what they are.
	They're new taxes.
	How long have we seen Republicans always make the argument when people be talking about Raising the minimum wage, for example.
	I remember Rush Limbaugh would always talk about, well, why stop at $15?
	Let's go to $50.
	Let's go to $150 an hour or whatever.
	And he said, why don't you do that?
	And I would say, you know, I'd always say back to the radio, Rush, why don't you say get rid of the minimum wage?
	I mean, you're making the case for how you can't make people wealthy by fiat.
	You can't make them wealthy by minimum wage.
	You're not going to make people wealthy with any of these schemes of universal basic income or anything.
	But, you know, why not argue to get rid of the minimum wage?
	No, they would always argue to keep what they have.
	And I said, that's the essence of what's wrong with conservatism.
	It's a ratchet effect.
	It's the liberals who would set the agendas, the liberals who would move it, and then the conservatives would put their foot down and say, all right, that's it.
	You know, whatever minimum wage is now, that's where it's going to stay.
	We're not going to go up any higher.
	And we're not going to oppose it in principle.
	And we're not going to go back to something that is more market-driven or whatever.
	But they would always talk about that and say, look, if you give somebody minimum wage, if you increase the minimum wage, what's that going to do?
	It's going to increase the cost of everything.
	And they would say the same thing about corporate taxes.
	They'd say you can't tax a corporation.
	If you tax a corporation, they pass the money on to people.
	And yet here we have Trump, who comes in and he wants to do tariffs.
	He says, don't worry, those will be paid by Chinese corporations or whatever.
	No, they're going to pass that along.
	And nobody wants to call him on it.
	Nobody wants to call him on it.
	I mean, they're out there boasting last week.
	I mentioned it briefly.
	Boasting that they're going to get a trillion dollars worth of tariffs.
	Well, where's that trillion dollars going to come from?
	It's going to come from you and me.
	It's going to be embedded in the price of everything that we buy, one way or the other.
	And in some cases, because we've distributed manufacturing in many different ways, as the automobile manufacturers are talking about, they've got, in the manufacturing process, it's constantly, the products are constantly crossing the border back and forth between the U.S. and Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.
	And every time it crosses the border, there's going to be more tariffs added.
	So it's going to be like a value-added tax.
	That's probably why they're saying it'll be a trillion dollars worth of stuff.
	Well, who's going to pay for that?
	We will.
	Because there's not going to be any, you know, if you get rid of regulations, you help people with capital accumulation, right?
	If you don't tax savings, there's other things that you can do to help people accumulate capital to help them start a business.
	But increasing taxes does not do that, and Republicans have always pushed back against that.
	Democrats always sell taxes as investing in our future.
	And Republicans always say, no, no, until they got a New York Democrat, Donald Trump, telling you the same thing, and then they jump on board with him.
	That's why I say, you know, I haven't changed.
	These people have changed.
	They've jumped on the train of...
	The Jeffrey Epstein Express, the Democrat trained to nowhere, and they are following this guy, and they don't know where they're going.
	And they don't care.
	Because wherever they go, they'll make an excuse for Trump.
	And if it's really bad, it'll be somebody else's fault.
	But it'll never be Trump's fault.
	And I know that.
	I know that we're not going to get to a point where people say, you know, you were right about this stuff.
	I can see it now.
	No, they'll never see it.
	They will never see it.
	But we have a responsibility to speak the truth to people.
	If they're being lied to, if they're being deceived, we can speak the truth to them.
	If they don't want to listen, it's not our fault.
	So, prepare for this.
	And the way you prepare for this is with your relationship with God.
	Look, this life, whatever happens, good or bad, and we want to make it good.
	I'm not saying I'm not fatalistic about this, but I'm realistic about the fact that this life is very short.
	And that's true if you're 20 years old.
	It's very short.
	And we need to be looking at eternity.
	And that's one of the reasons why we speak the truth to people, regardless of what the consequences are going to be in this life.
	Regardless.
	I was just talking about this yesterday with a family.
	You know, and somebody else had mentioned that, you know, that you look in Revelation 21, and as it's talking about the New Jerusalem, and it says, you know, And those who are cowardly, unbelieving, and this and this, will not enter.
	You know, sexually immoral and everything.
	That word is porn, by the way.
	But you look at the King James, and what it does is that instead of cowardly, comma, unbelieving, it says the fearful and unbelieving.
	And I think that is the right way to look at this.
	You know, that word that is there only appears in one other place in the New Testament for fear, cowardly.
	And that is the time that there was a storm at sea.
	And Jesus comes to them and they're freaking out because there's a storm.
	And he calms the storm, right?
	And he talks to them about being fearful and unbelieving.
	Fear is the way they control us.
	I mean, even the secular people, especially the secular people, understand that.
	The people who are trying to play mind games with you, the psychologists, the behavioral psychologists, the B.F. Skinners, and all the rest of them, they understand.
	They can control you with fear.
	You go back to Dune.
	Remember that?
	Frank Herbert's science fiction, he kept saying it over and over again.
	Fear is the mind killer.
	Fear is the mind killer.
	Well, it doesn't just kill your mind.
	You know, those are people who don't...
	Think about you having a soul or a spirit.
	But it kills the spirit.
	It kills the soul.
	Because if you are afraid, if you are ashamed of the truth, then they control you.
	And that, folks, was the battle of 2020 and beyond.
	It's the battle that we live in today.
	It's the battle that we're going to have renewed against us with all this deja flu, bird flu nonsense that they're building up.
	It really is about the fear.
	And we have to push back against that.
	Key way that you push back against that fear is to understand where you stand eternally.
	You know, you may be afraid of death.
	Well, deal with that.
	You should be afraid of death if you're not in Christ.
	But if you're in Christ, you don't have anything to fear.
	And that's the key thing.
	So, I don't know.
	I don't have a magic formula to make all this stuff go away.
	I know that these people are setting themselves up against God.
	And quite frankly, I want to be on the side of David, not Goliath, when it comes to this stuff.
	So if we say to them, you know, if they're railing against God, as these people are, like I said, I'm always encouraged when I see Yuval Harari speaking of the World Economic Forum, because he's always railing against God.
	And it's like, okay, well, that'll take care of its place.
	God has a way of defending himself, and he also has a plan for when he's going to do these various things.
	It's not up to these doom and gloom climate people.
	We were laughing and we were looking at the weather on our phones yesterday because they're predicting a lot of really cold weather, snow and things like that.
	So we're looking at the phones, and I've got two weather apps that I could look at on mine.
	And they were like three degrees apart.
	And Karen's got another one, and it's like another degree or so in another direction.
	I said, isn't that interesting?
	You know, we're supposed to believe that Based on data that they don't even have, you know, going back to the late 1800s, and they don't have much of that.
	That if there's a variation of one and a half degrees, we're all going to die, the planet is going to die, and they can't even agree as to what the current temperature is within a five degree range, and they've got digital thermometers now, and they still can't agree with it.
	Because what is it?
	It's about the different placement of these different things within a given region, right?
	And just within a given area, depending on where they place these things, some of them might be in the sun, some of them might be in the shade, some of them might be in an urban heat island.
	And you get this kind of variation of like four or five degrees.
	It's what we used to always see back in North Carolina when we would go into the big city of Raleigh and then go out into the woods where we were.
	It was always four degrees cooler, according to my car thermometer, but who knows?
	I don't take any of these temperature readings seriously.
	Ephesians 6.12.
	I just read that one.
	So, you know, how do we push back?
	Well, we speak the truth.
	That's all we're called to do, right?
	Speak the truth to people about what's happening now.
	Speak the truth to people about what's going to happen in eternity.
	We leave it at that.
	We speak the truth and we leave the results up to God.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
	The last thing you want, folks, is to be 100% reliant on government for your income.
	That's exactly right.
	And when they mean universal basic income, they mean really, really, really basic, as in you're not going to own anything.
	It's going to be guaranteed poverty is what it's going to be.
	It's not going to be guaranteed income.
	It's guaranteed poverty.
	May, or MAV, 2022. It's part of the reason for the tranny stuff.
	That's right, to get people used to transhumanism.
	I agree, and I've said that.
	I said, when I first saw the tranny stuff, I said, this is pedophilia, and it is.
	But more importantly, you know, that and the furries and all the rest of this stuff is about getting people used to living in a fantasy world.
	He says, normies don't know what transhumanism is.
	They'll easily go along to be like their Marvel superheroes.
	That's Hollywood selling that transhumanism to you as well.
	And they're pretty open about it.
	You know, with the, what is it, the X-Men.
	Yeah, the X-Men, yeah.
	Cecilia14, David, did you see where Elon has asked for access to all IRS taxpayers' data?
	Yeah, yeah, he's in the, he's inside the bowels of the IRS now.
	People are saying he's got everybody's social security number and all the rest of this stuff.
	Yeah, information is power, especially with the way that the AI people use it.
	12 June, 1776. Going through the books is the cover story, DK. You know Musk is installing AI and backdoors.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	It's not just figuring out who he needs to put in his Rolodex.
	He's got some crack programmers and they're going through the whole system.
	Jason Barker.
	I'm pretty sure Elon is using Doge to cover his own fraud.
	He has access to all the data and can cover his tracks.
	There were some people who were investigating, as I pointed out last week, his contract in Ukraine with Starlink.
	That guy's gone.
	A lot of inspector generals have been fired.
	That's what Biden did in Ukraine.
	He goes there and says, hey, this guy that's investigating my family and our Burisma connections, I want that guy fired.
	He said it on video.
	And nothing ever happened to him for that either, did it?
	12 June, 1776. Musk, Trump, deploying Hamilton's version of centralized tech government.
	Number one, government control of industry, transportation, infrastructure, technology through regulation, finance, or ownership.
	Yeah, automated totalitarianism, says Matthew Ronson.
	Nabooru, 2029. David, in the past, the tolerationists didn't have their smartphone weapons to control the Eloi.
	Masses, as they have today, this time they'll be victorious by means of those weapons.
	Yeah, you know, but we'll see.
	We'll see what happens.
	You know, I keep thinking back to Tower of Babel.
	Who knows?
	Why do the leaders and the princes and the kings rage against God and his Messiah?
	And God laughs in derision.
	Mark Young, the saved will build their own homes in the new earth.
	Each person will also have a city home built by Christ.
	See John 14. They will plant vineyards, eat the fruit from them.
	The Bible is plain about this.
	Real people do real things in heaven.
	Yeah, that's right.
	And they will thoroughly enjoy it all.
	That's right.
	Just think about that, you know, taking away the frustration of work.
	Because we do get a sense of accomplishment out of building things.
	That's what we originally were built for.
	And we will go back to that.
	John Basiglione says, Trump's agenda is Israel first, technocracy second, destruction of the middle class third.
	He'll do this by throwing inconsequential red meat to his base.
	I agree.
	I agree.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about what's happening with what's coming up here.
	but I'm going to take a quick break folks and we will be right back
	music plays
	you're listening to the David Knight Show That's right, boys and girls.
	There's a post-election sale on silver and gold.
	Trump euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold.
	It's time to buy some medals with fiat dollars before they come to their sense.
	Go to davidknight.gold to get in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Arterburn.
	He knows where to look to find silver and gold.
	Yeah, before they come to their sense is he holds up the penny, before they come to their sense is he holds up the penny, which Trump's not going to make those anymore.
	And again, I see that.
	As a move towards a cashless society.
	I see that as the bump stock equivalent to the banning of cash.
	If you're going to make this argument that it costs too much to manufacture physical currency, that's where we are headed.
	And that's the argument that I'm seeing from everybody.
	Everybody's saying, yeah, that's great.
	Well, I don't think so.
	So, folks, if you want to keep it real...
	Gold and silver.
	You can go to davidknight.gold.
	I'll take you to Tony Ardobin, and you can start to make some preparations for real money.
	You're going to have to store your labor somewhere if you're going to have a society, and that's the kinds of things that you need to be looking at.
	The other thing is you better start taking a look at...
	At chickens.
	Because they are moving fast to shut all that stuff down.
	This is from a listener, Madra, who says, for disease that quite literally does not exist outside the worm-filled brains of the government goons.
	I guess we'd call them bird brains, right?
	Bird flu doesn't exist outside the brains of the bird-brained people, whether they're in the government or the media or the public.
	The number of hens killed each...
	Killed, produce each hen, produces about 290 to 300 eggs a year, right?
	And so that's kind of a rough thing.
	It varies by breed, but that's a pretty good ballpark figure there.
	And that's the point of her email message.
	You know, how many eggs are we wiping out when we're killing tens of millions of chickens each month?
	They wiped out a food supply that'll take a year to be back to producing.
	We were given, they said, I can't prove it, but a local farmer told us that they were given $25 a head for their hens, which is about 200% more than they would have been paid, so of course they keep their silence and they take the money.
	Is this kind of what happened with the COVID pandemic, right?
	Keep your mouth shut.
	You're going to get 20% on everything that you do to people.
	Plus, we'll give you a bonus if you point at somebody and say that they've got COVID, $13,000.
	If you can put them on a ventilator, we'll give you $39,000.
	And you can collect a lot of money for each day they're on the ventilator until you kill them.
	And we'll give you a 20% bonus on that, too.
	Right?
	Oh, and then remdesivir.
	And midazolam.
	You know, anything that suppresses the respiratory system, we'll pay you extra for that as well.
	So, do you think they would pay the farmers 200% more to keep their mouth shut?
	They even, you know, even paid funeral expenses to, gave a funeral expense bonus to the families that were told that their loved one had been killed with COVID and went along with it.
	They would get a bonus.
	That's how the government operates.
	It's about money.
	It's about carrots and sticks.
	It's about bribery and blackmail.
	For the big boys, they won't wipe out all their chickens, just a percentage of them, but for the small producer, it is a total wipeout.
	And as we pointed out, Geese Buster's talked about that guy with the last duck farm, and he's been saying for years he'd love to get out of it.
	Well, this is his ticket out.
	He becomes a vaccine cheerleader.
	He takes the check, and he's cashed out.
	And now he's still got the land, and he can sell that land.
	So they slaughter 22 million chickens so far this year.
	Actually, I thought it was higher than that.
	I thought it was like 13 million one month and 14 million the next.
	But let's just go with the 22 million eggs a day and talk about that over the year.
	22 million chickens and the 300 eggs that they do over a year, as they point out.
	Pasta, noodles cannot be made without eggs.
	A lot of bread and cakes are made with egg.
	Ice cream needs eggs.
	Look at most of the things that are processed.
	They need eggs.
	Not to mention the fact that it was a cheap protein for anybody at any income level.
	Now they want to destroy that.
	People let it happen.
	Farmers and ranchers should be screaming about it.
	You don't build herd immunity by killing all the animals, and none of them have died from sickness.
	They've all died at the hands of the USDA. And nobody cares about it.
	And how does that make any sense?
	Again, we're talking about herd immunity.
	You heard so much about that.
	And they changed the definition of herd immunity was not about everybody getting vaccinated.
	It wasn't about some percentage of people getting vaccinated.
	Herd immunity said that you would, after a certain number of animals got sick with the disease, they would stop getting sick from the disease.
	That was the herd immunity number.
	And that was there long before any vaccination stuff was there.
	And if you can only get herd immunity from vaccines, which is what they tried to change the definition to, if you only can get it from that one, then their whole paradigm, Falls apart.
	Because supposedly the vaccine is there to train your immune system.
	Well, a real disease would train your immune system, but they deny that as well.
	It's all a house of cards.
	It's all lies.
	And so, she said, do the math.
	How many eggs have been wiped out?
	Well, over six billion, if you look at that, right?
	In just two months.
	In two months, their actions have taken six billion eggs off of the market for the year.
	Has the Trump administration done anything about this?
	Well, I started looking for this.
	It's like, so, anything that I could find about Trump and the USDA? And what I found was that Trump orders the USDA to take down websites referencing climate crisis.
	And that was primarily the Forestry Service, because, and I mentioned this the other day, I thought I was surprised to see that the Forestry Service was under the USDA. I would have thought that it would have been under the Department of the Interior or whatever, but, you know, they don't pay any attention to the Constitution.
	I guess they don't have any logical organization either of the bureaucracy.
	But, again, why do we even have a Forest Service, right?
	It's allowed to have ports and forts, but not forests.
	The Constitution.
	Anyway, by Friday, the landing pages on the U.S. Forest Service website for key resources, research, adaptation, and so forth.
	And this is the Guardian complaining about this.
	How will we know that we're all going to die from climate change if we don't have it on the USDA's website?
	Because you wouldn't know.
	That there's any climate change problem unless the Guardian told you, just like you wouldn't know that there was COVID unless the TV told you, right?
	And so the USDA has things like climate hubs, sites that connect producers to local programs and research.
	And so you ask yourself, why in the world is the USDA doing climate?
	And the same reason a lot of people have asked, why is the USAID, the CIA people, why are they paying farmers?
	Well, so the only thing I could find besides that was that Brooke Rawlins, who I think her past experience was working at Heritage Foundation or something like that, but she's now the head of the USDA, which is the organization that is killing tens of millions of chickens every month.
	If she's going to stop that, no.
	No.
	Rollins says that she plans to work with RFK Jr. to possibly ban food stamps from applying to junk food.
	You want to talk about rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic?
	As a matter of fact, when you look at what RFK Jr. hits the ground running about, it's seed oil.
	I thought it'd be great to just kind of look at some of these items because parents are encountering these food items in grocery stores everywhere.
	Maybe we could just start right here with seed oils.
	We're hearing a lot about seed oils.
	Why should people be worried about these kind of products?
	Seed oils are one of the most unhealthy ingredients that we have in foods and seed oils.
	The reason they're in the foods is because they're heavily subsidized.
	They're very, very cheap, but they are associated with all kinds of very, very serious illnesses, including body-wide inflammation, which affects all of our health.
	It's one of the worst.
	All right, I don't disagree with any of that stuff.
	It's junk food, and we need to push back against it, but is that the number one thing?
	How about if the shelves were not empty of eggs?
	And we advise people, how about if you don't kill all the chickens so we can get some healthy eggs?
	Do you think that eggs are healthy?
	I'd ask that to Brooke Rollins of the USDA. I would ask that to RFK Jr. Maybe if we had eggs, maybe we could have eggs instead of the junk food that you don't want people eating.
	But no, they're going to make it about junk food.
	Because that's safe, right?
	They can talk about sugary drinks, and they can talk about seed oil, while they're killing all the chickens.
	So when a taxpayer is putting money into SNAP, are they okay with us using their tax dollars to feed really bad food and sugary drinks to children who perhaps need something more nutritious?
	You mean like eggs?
	Like eggs?
	What about the poor people?
	Could they, with their SNAP money, you know this is money, For kids, for a nutrition assistance program, I think it's for poor people with kids on welfare, whatever, to buy credits to buy food.
	Well, how are they going to have healthy food when there's no eggs?
	Because the bureaucracy, the USDA that Brooke Rollins is over, is not doing anything about this, and she's not.
	Instead, what we see, and I don't know about an executive order that someone mentioned earlier.
	But this is, could egg farmers soon begin vaccinating poultry against bird flu?
	The USDA has granted conditional license for avian influenza vaccine for use in chickens.
	So this is not even the FDA. And by the way, the reason I mentioned the fact that the USDA... Uh, is, is doing this.
	A key thing to understand is that the USDA is not even under, uh, HHS, which is what our K junior is.
	It's under this person, Brooke Rollins, whoever she is.
	And, um, so the USDA is under the department of agriculture.
	She's the agricultural secretary.
	Um, and by the way, you know, if Trump is a dictator, it only makes sense because he's surrounded by secretaries, right?
	They're all taking dictation from him.
	Because the buck does stop with him.
	And so do the eggs, apparently.
	He's not going to lift a finger or even acknowledge what is going on.
	Instead, they're going to let the wheels of this machinery and this other guy, Gerald Parker...
	Who's going to be his pandemic czar?
	He's a veterinarian.
	I mean, they're telegraphing to you what they're going to do with this stuff.
	So egg farmers reportedly now may resort to vaccinating poultry because of bird flu.
	I call this virus a terrorist, and we're in a battle, and we're losing at the moment, said the CEO of Herbrook's Poultry Ranch in Michigan.
	Health experts are now pointing to vaccinations as an alternative, says the New York Post.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah, we need to listen to the experts like Fauci.
	And this is the New York Post.
	This is a guy who is somebody who is a virologist at Boston University.
	He says this, the small mitigation results...
	Have experts worried that biosecurity efforts will be fruitless in the fight against the flu?
	Small mitigation?
	They call killing tens of millions of chickens a month small mitigation?
	Well, you know, we're killing these chickens and it's not having any effect.
	The World Organization for Animal Health has urged nations to consider vaccination in 2023, but with flocks down by millions, no, tens of millions.
	And the disease spreading...
	The disease is not spreading.
	The USDA is spreading.
	The USDA is spreading the PCR. They said it's clear that biosecurity is not doing the job.
	In other words, there's no way that we can stop all of this.
	Do you see dead?
	This is biosecurity, which means we've got to keep our chickens who are all pinned up.
	You know, that's the animal rights people were complaining about.
	You've got all these chickens stacked on top of each other and all the rest of the stuff.
	Well, okay.
	So how did the wild birds get in there?
	That's their biosecurity.
	And how come we don't see dead wild birds all over the place?
	You see them falling out of the sky?
	I see them.
	They're perfectly fine.
	And this is a fantasy, folks.
	It's a very scary fantasy.
	It's a dystopian fantasy.
	We're desperate.
	We need every tool because biosecurity is not doing the job, so we've got to bring in vaccination because they realize they can't stick the needle in your arm again.
	So they're going to stick the needle in your food.
	Right now, we're fighting this virus with at least one, if not two, arms tied behind our back because people won't bear their arms and take the shot.
	The vaccine can be a huge hammer in our toolbox.
	And so the USDA has conditionally approved a vaccine for poultry against bird flu.
	I think that's what the listener was talking about.
	Maybe there's something else from Trump.
	I don't know.
	From the way I see it, from what I can tell from current articles, is that Trump will sell it.
	Trump will sell the, again, just like he did before.
	He'll sell the vaccine.
	He'll sell the fake pandemic.
	He'll sell all of it again.
	And he'll want it to be mRNA.
	That's what this is all about.
	And RFK Jr. will just ignore it and talk about seed oil.
	And the USDA secretary will talk about...
	Let's take the climate change stuff off the Forestry Service.
	But let's kill all the chickens.
	So, with egg prices in the U.S. soaring because of the spread of the bird flu among poultry, says Science Magazine.
	The U.S. Department of Agriculture yesterday conditionally approved vaccine to protect the birds.
	President Trump's administration may therefore soon face a decision on whether to join the ranks of other nations, including...
	China, France, Egypt, and Mexico that vaccinate poultry.
	That's what this is all about.
	Because they're going to be able to sell a lot more vaccines.
	Nobody's buying their vaccines.
	Nobody's rolling up their arm.
	Imagine if they can stick the needle in every single bird how much money the big pharma companies are going to make.
	USDA approval may signal a shift in policy linked.
	To the Trump administration's worries about egg prices.
	They will vaccinate our food in the name of fighting inflation.
	That's the way they're going to frame this thing.
	And so they even, as they talk about this in Science Magazine, Science Magazine, the vaccine made by Zotus contains a killed version of an H5N2 variant.
	Now, wait a minute.
	These people just can't make up their mind about viruses, can they?
	You know, we're told that viruses are alive.
	Sometimes we're told viruses are not alive.
	Bacteria are alive.
	Viruses are not alive.
	Viruses are just this DNA sequence and everything.
	They can't even get a consistent story to you to tell you whether the virus is alive or dead.
	Most of the time, you'll hear people say that it's not alive.
	What it is, is it's a placeholder for their ignorance.
	That's what a virus is.
	Well, we don't know what caused this, so we'll say that it was caused by a virus.
	And then we'll use PCR tests to look for a code that is out there.
	Ephesians 6.12, thank you for the tip, and thank you for the compliment.
	I appreciate that.
	Mav 2022, during the Convid scam, I was reading about antibody-dependent enhancement.
	That's right.
	Talked about that a lot.
	ADE. Even then, the poultry industry was freaking out about the overuse of vaccines.
	They would freak out about the overuse of antibiotics in the same way, right?
	Vaccines were causing dis-ease, uncomfortableness, right?
	And poultry was showing up within generations.
	Well, you know, it is a racket.
	It is a lie and it is the purpose of shutting everything down.
	And just to remind you, when I talked about this on Friday, the guy's name is Gerald Parker.
	He is the head of the Trump Pandemic Office.
	There is a White House Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response that was created after Trump created the COVID pandemic.
	It didn't come out of Wuhan.
	It didn't come out of China.
	It wasn't flu.
	It was a lie.
	It was a lie.
	And as I pointed out on Friday, I played Michael Yadin talking about it.
	He said, look at this.
	We had a small uptick in the number of deaths, excess deaths.
	Because why?
	They were denying medical treatment to people.
	They were killing people with remdesivir and ventilators and anything.
	But when the vaccines come out in 2021, it's kind of going along like this.
	And then it goes straight up.
	Straight up with the injections, the vaccines.
	And so they created the pandemic.
	Trump did.
	Trump created the White House Office of Pandemic Preparedness.
	This guy is known as the pandemic czar, Gerald Parker, and he has chosen a veterinarian, somebody that works with Bill Gates' One Health Organization.
	A Gates...
	Public health official who has worked with all of these globalist organizations and worked with both the Democrats and the Republicans.
	He's worked for the Defense Department.
	He's worked for Homeland Security.
	And also for HHS. Because this is a weapon.
	This is a bioweapon.
	It's been utilized against us by the Department of Defense and by Homeland Security.
	And so he has Was recently head of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity under the Biden administration.
	And Trump takes this guy that was the head of biosecurity and bioweaponization against us and makes him the head of this veterinarian to get him to run the bird flu stuff.
	And the new senator, the new Republican senator out of Pennsylvania, Dave McCormick.
	Plans to examine vaccination options and press the USDA for better cooperation and more vaccines in Pennsylvania.
	He said we're somewhere between bad and catastrophic, he said.
	They're not blaming the USDA. Dave McCormick, who is the new Republican senator, newly minted, only been there for a month or two.
	He's not worried about the USDA killing tens of millions of chickens every month.
	No, he's worried that we need more vaccines out there.
	Nationally, the flu-related losses of layers and pullets in 2025 are already at least 55% of the scale seen in the entire year of 2022. So, they're really escalating this.
	And as we see this happening, We've got states that are out there to try to ban mRNA injections.
	Well, you know, just as you're worried about them doing injections to humans, you're missing the fact that they are putting them in the chickens.
	OctoSpook said, No one thinks it's weird that all these new diseases affect ourselves, our pets, our food, animals, wildlife, etc.
	Didn't used to be that way.
	That's right.
	Little Ford Schoolhouse.
	Over the weekend, they imposed some restrictions on poultry here in Tennessee.
	Well, they've done that in Georgia.
	It was Brian Kemp who did it there.
	And it's being done in Democrat states as well.
	It's going to be done everywhere.
	They're going to put all kinds of restrictions on poultry.
	So you've got your chickens.
	Take good care of them, because you may not be able to get replacements when it comes time.
	Well, that's it for today's broadcast.
	Thank you all for joining us.
	Have a good day.
	Good evening.
	Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow.
	Or, more specifically, what comes out the other end.
	Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda, even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat.
	The menace is invisible, silent.
	Yet deadly.
	Carefully contrive to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in, jackboots and all, with their solutions.
	Because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags?
	But one must wonder, is this truly about saving the planet, or are we simply being led to pasture?
	Is it merely a MacGuffin?
	The David Knight Show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny.
	And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull.
	So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show.
	And now back to our regularly scheduled program.

▲