All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 21, 2025 - The David Knight Show
03:01:17
The David Knight Show -1/21/2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
can you ask her when we get the program started to print out the stuff about Christine Massey
I can't get it on my deck and you'll have to hand it to me before she comes on As
the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 21st of January, year of our Lord, 2025, day two of a Trump.
We're not going to start that.
And we started the countdown when he locked everybody down.
We started counting that down as we were held hostage.
Today we're going to talk about pardons of people that Biden has been holding hostage.
We'll talk about Biden's pardons, Trump's pardons.
We're going to talk about the Paris Climate Accord.
Out of it on day one.
Is it for real this time?
How does all this work?
And of course we're also going to talk about what happened with TikTok.
We have an interesting guest on today.
I constantly talk about Christine Massey, who said, show us your data.
Have you isolated the COVID virus?
She's going to be on today.
We're going to talk about that.
that.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
And you know, tonight I'm going to be signing on the J6 hostages pardons to get them out.
Thank you.
And as soon as I leave, I'm going to the Oval Office and we'll be signing pardons for a lot of people.
A lot of people.
And thank you to Steve Whitcoff.
He's a great guy.
He's a friend of mine.
He's been very successful.
Yeah, well...
There it is.
He did do it at 8 o'clock last night.
Six commutations.
We're looking at different things.
But the commutations would be the ones that will take a look and maybe it'll stay that way or it'll go to a full pardon.
And the order does require the Bureau of Prisons to act immediately on receipt of the pardons and commutation orders.
Sir, this is a...
Why don't we get that down so they can get them going right now?
Yes, sir.
Okay.
Yep, absolutely.
This is a proclamation guaranteeing the state's protection against invasion based on the current crisis.
Well, you get the idea.
He's got a lot of emergency declarations that he put out.
He loves emergency declarations.
He loves...
We're going to be ruled by one emergency after the other.
But look, I'm really happy that he pardoned the January 6th people.
Better late than never.
A lot of these people have been under horrific conditions for four years, very long term before they got their trial.
And all this is on Biden.
But Trump didn't do what he could have done and should have done before he left office.
He had two weeks to pardon these people.
He knew what was coming, and so did his advisors.
And what he chose to do was to protect himself, he thought.
Not get himself, even distance himself from this stuff.
Just like he distanced himself from the people that he said, go over there, meet me over there at the Capitol building.
Well, he physically distanced himself, and then he legally distanced himself, he thought.
They came after him anyway.
And yet these people are the ones who paid the price.
There's been a lot of lawfare against Trump, charges for things that he didn't do, and we all see it.
But these people also were charged for things that they didn't do.
Things that were specifically protected under the Constitution.
We have a right to peacefully redress our grievances to the government.
To their face!
There's not any sacred area where the First Amendment does not apply.
Sorry about that.
Sorry about your sacred space.
That cursed Capitol building.
What is it?
You had a demonic ritual there or something to consecrate it to Satan?
But, you know, there's no place that is off-limits for the First Amendment.
You know, when I went to the Bundy Ranch, the federal government, way away from where the people were from the Bundy Ranch, put up like a plastic fence and put a sign on it.
It had a sign printed professionally.
It said, First Amendment area.
And somebody wrote on it by hand, said the First Amendment is not an area.
There's no First Amendment free zone either.
Especially, especially in Congress.
And so this whole January the 6th thing that's been done with the J6ers has been an abomination from both Biden and from Trump.
And it shows that the Biden administration is more than willing to...
Use lawfare and persecution against their political enemies and those that they identify.
I think that's ultimately what's behind all these Biden pardons.
People say, well, you know, what crimes do they commit?
And I think we should ask those questions.
But the reality is, is that Biden set the precedent for political persecution in this country.
To a whole new level.
Yeah, we've had political persecution in the past.
When you look at various movements and everything, and the FBI has been at the heart of it, J. Edgar Hoover, for the longest time.
Going back to the Palmer raids and things like that, he's been at the heart of political persecution.
And yet, we've never seen it done to such an extent, such over-the-top and in-your-face political persecution as we saw with the J6ers.
But remember, and nothing will change, that now everybody's celebrating Trump.
Oh, look at this, look at this.
He's the one who put them in jail, folks.
He's the one who lured them in and entrapped them, along with Alex Jones and his Stop the Steal people.
They entrapped these people.
They abandoned these people.
Alex Jones even fired his employee, who went there to cover it, and went in with a camera, walking between the velvet ropes.
They came after him.
Alex Jones fired him to distance himself.
The same way that Trump is doing this kind of stuff.
I have no sympathy for Trump.
I will not worship him.
I'm glad that these people are out, that he finally did the right thing.
And as I said, all these people who were complaining about Biden pardoning 1,500 people, I said, does that look familiar?
I really think the deep state wanted to do this.
Let's just pardon everybody all around, you know?
Why else would he do exactly the same number, nearly exactly the same number of people, and put pressure on him?
You know, his preemptive pardon of Hunter and now the rest of his family and things like that for things they'd not done?
That put pressure on Trump as well.
Trump didn't have a choice politically.
He had to do it.
He had a choice four years ago, and he chose not to do it.
And these people have suffered terribly.
Think about how many crimes you get a four-year jail sentence for.
Right?
And they didn't do anything.
So he let them wait and twist in the wind until 8 p.m.
approximately because, you know, hey, they've been waiting for four years.
What's another eight hours after he becomes president?
He didn't do it right away.
And by the way, while we're talking about pardons, Ross Ulbrich's name has not been brought up by Trump now that he's president.
We'll see.
I hope that he sticks to it.
I hope there's going to be some people who put pressure on him.
I'll continue to talk about it, but still, nothing about it.
And it's kind of interesting, when you look at the pardons, you realize that somebody went back and they said, since 1921, you look at all the pardons by all the presidents since 1921, Trump was the third least number of pardons of anybody.
Guess who number one and number two were, in terms of the least amount of pardons?
Time's up.
George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush.
How about that?
Those guys who kicked off Homeland Security and 9-11 and all the rest of the CIA Bushes.
They don't like to pardon people, do they?
No.
And Trump had the next lowest number.
And when you look at the people that Trump pardoned.
You know, unless you're some kind of Jewish mafia friend of Jared Kushner, forget about it.
Some of the biggest white-collar criminals, but hey, they're friends of the Jewish mafia and Jared Kushner around there, right?
So they get a pardon.
But forget about it for other people.
But now, this has been a pardon.
And as I was looking at the headlines late last night, you know, keep searching, still nothing, still nothing, finally, at 8 o'clock, it kicks out.
So I started looking at it.
This headline from The Hill made me scratch my head.
Trump pardons nearly all J6 riders on the first day of the presidency.
And I thought, uh-oh.
Because as they pointed out, over the last couple of days, weeks I should say, you had J.D. Vance and other people dropping hints.
Well, I don't know.
If they were accused of violence, maybe we won't pardon them.
We'll have to look at that a little bit more closely or whatever.
Well, no.
Actually, this headline from The Hill is misleading.
When they say that he pardons nearly all, what they mean is that he pardoned nearly all of them, but he commuted some sentences instead of doing a pardon.
And so he said that he granted roughly 1,500 full, complete, and unconditional pardons.
And this is the hill.
They call them rioters.
There are a lot of people that were picked up that were not rioters, you know.
I need to use the bathroom as the police are standing there beside two elderly men and one of them's middle-aged son.
We need to use the bathroom.
Can we come in here?
Officers?
And they say, sure, it's right around here.
And they come out, and a female officer tries to direct them on the floor of Congress.
And they say, no, no, we don't want to go.
They just want to use the bathroom.
They leave.
They're arrested.
They were facing six or seven years.
And these guys are in there.
Late 70s, I think.
You know, what could be a life sentence to them, especially on the conditions that they're serving in prison, for using the bathroom?
Rioters!
Rioters!
I am sick of this nonsense.
The lies that are being put out there.
Anyway, so Trump said, what they've done to these people is outrageous.
Yes, and what you did to them is outrageous as well.
You entrapped them, abandoned them.
Four years in prison these people suffered, and many of them, this is hanging over their head, they had another 400 people that the Biden administration, if the Democrats had won, la-la, or Biden or whatever, that Democrat cartel was going to keep coming after people.
Anybody who's a Republican, those in Washington on that day are going to get you.
These people, many of whom were sentenced to years in prison, says the hell.
How about decades?
Some of them were sentenced to decades.
They came just hours after Biden, in the 11th hour of his presidency, issued preemptive pardons for members and staff of the House J-6 Select Committee.
So you can give preemptive pardons to the House J-6 Select Committee, but Trump can't give preemptive pardons to January Sixers, can he?
Trump also commuted the sentences of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers.
Enrique Terrio, Serving a 22-year prison term.
Received a pardon.
Stuart Rhodes, who I think got the longest sentence of anybody.
No, no, no.
He got, I think it was Enrico Terry.
He got, Stuart Rhodes got an 18-year sentence.
Joe Biggs had a 17-year sentence.
I'm glad to see that Joe's going to be out.
Stuart Rhodes got a commutation.
And so many of the Proud Boys got commutations.
I talked about Joe Biggs.
Do you remember when they had their little J6 witch hunt committee?
And they kept showing pictures of Joe Biggs, and he was walking around, big smile on his face, and he's not beating anybody?
You better believe that they had footage of everything.
And you better believe that they watched everything that Joe Biggs did.
And you better believe that if he spit on anybody, or if he crossed a line somewhere, they would have shown that.
The fact that they didn't shows that he didn't do it.
They were looking for anything.
You know, did you leave bubblegum on the handrail there?
No, no, he didn't even do that.
But they put him away.
17 years he had.
And the Biden criminal DOJ, these are the people who should be locked up.
It's not just the J6 people.
It's these people in the so-called Department of Justice who actually executed these orders, right?
Oh, I'm just following orders.
The Nuremberg excuse.
Well, they wanted to, after he got 17 years, they wanted 34. They appealed it.
They wanted to come back and, wait a minute, let's talk about this again.
He needs to have a longer sentence for exercising his constitutional right.
To peacefully assemble and to redress his grievances.
Look, that is specifically our God-given right that is specifically protected and prohibited for the government to interfere.
So the only people who committed crimes were the people who locked people up for exercising their First Amendment rights.
The Biden people, they need to go to jail.
So, yeah, I hope he...
Put a big net out there.
But for the Department of Justice, I don't know how many of those people he pardoned.
If they didn't pardon him, Trump should put him in jail.
Absolutely should.
About 600 in January, the six defendants were accused of assaulting, resisting, or impeding police.
Ten defendants were convicted of sedition.
Sedition.
This is like medieval nonsense.
This is what we had an American Revolution for.
Trump also ordered the Justice Department to take steps to throw out all pending indictments against J6 defendants whose cases have not yet been fully adjudicated.
That would shut down roughly 470 ongoing cases that they were arresting people up to and, I think, on the other side of the election, even.
But in recent weeks, his allies' comments had suggested that Trump's clemency might not be so sweeping, but fortunately, it was.
But again, still nothing for Ross Ulbrich.
And then this good news came out.
This is Hegseth pledged to reinstate service members.
Now, he did this last week, and I didn't see that last week.
This was reported on January the 16th, when Hegseth was doing his committee hearings.
He pledged to reinstate service members who were discharged for refusing the Trump shot.
Yeah, let's not call it the COVID-19 vaccine.
It's the Trump shot.
He's the father of the vaccine.
He's proud of it.
He bragged about it up until about six months before the election.
He continued to brag about it.
So let's call it the Trump shot.
He wants the credit.
Let's give it to him.
Father of the vaccine.
Anyway, so Hegseth, when he was there at the confirmation hearings before the Senate last Tuesday, And again, I only saw this because Trump repeated it.
But it had been said a week ago by Hegseth.
He says, we haven't even talked about COVID in the tens of thousands of service members who were kicked out because of an experimental vaccine, said Hegseth.
And Trump's Defense Department, they will be apologized to.
They will be reinstated with pay and rank.
That's good.
That's good.
That's what should happen.
It's unclear whether Hexeth intends to offer those service members back pay or not.
But as I point out in this article, the Gold Report, they said the U.S. Armed Forces is shrinking.
Smallest it's been since World War II. The Army, Navy, Air Force have been failing to meet their recruitment targets despite increasing signing bonuses and aggressive advertising campaigns.
You know, saying...
You can join the military and get your gender operations for free at taxpayer expense.
Change your gender.
We're looking for a few good trannies.
The mandate resulted in the discharge of 8,000 service members.
Not only were unvaccinated soldiers discharged, they were forced to repay their signing bonuses.
One service member had to sell 60 of his vacation days to repay most of his $7,000 signing bonuses to the U.S. government after he was fired for refusing the COVID injections.
In June of 2022, Mike Johnson, who is not yet speaker, of course, said this.
Now, he was spot on when he said this.
But, you know, we've seen a big transformation in Mike Johnson, haven't we?
Well, I tell you, the power of that office.
He is Exhibit A. Forget about Boromir being the example anymore.
He's taken Boromir's place.
The power of the ring!
And the monster that it turns people into.
But back in 2022, when Mike Johnson was still a conservative, He said, talking about these discharges, he said, all of this over an illness that is very, very, very unlikely to have any significant effect on the young men and women of our military.
A vaccine that lacks long-term data on safety and efficacy for this cohort.
Well, this is a proven fact.
As a matter of fact, one of the things that was my favorite reference point with all of this scandemic.
You look at the Diamond Princess that was off the coast of Japan, a cruise ship.
Now, they had no precautions there at all.
One guy who went on, he says, well, I was there during the Ebola epidemic in Africa.
This is even scarier because there's no health precautions.
Well, they had a very small number of people, very small.
Number of people who died or got seriously ill.
Very, very small.
Under those kind of conditions.
And you know, when you go on a cruise, you've got a lot of elderly people who don't live active lifestyles, shall we say.
Not in the greatest of shape.
One cruise that Karen and I went on, they had to helicopter somebody, medevac somebody off of it.
And it wasn't due to COVID. More lifestyle and age issues.
At the same time, that was a great case to knock the air out of all this alarmism that was being put out there, the Diamond Princess.
Then, you remember, there was a Navy ship.
And they said, oh, we've got eight sailors who are sick.
And that guy took the ship to port on his own ideas.
And he was relieved of command.
So the military didn't believe it.
They knew it.
And nobody died with it.
They had like eight soldiers who had a cold.
And we're going to identify it as COVID. And we're going to take the ship back to port.
Well, I don't know what's going to happen when the bird flu or whatever the next scam is comes around.
What do you think Mike Johnson's going to do?
I think he's going to do whatever the pharmaceutical companies and the globalist people tell him to do.
And he's going to be pushing the panic button.
Just like Fauci or any of these other people or Trump.
The Gold Report says another likely cause of personnel crisis in the U.S. Army is the prevalence of totalitarian woke ideologies.
A report last year revealed the U.S. military academies have, quote, eyes and ears programs.
You see, when they bring in these struggle session things, that's what this is, struggle session.
Denounce yourself.
Denounce your cisgenderism and your white privilege and your this and your that.
And they've got their little comrades that are around their spine, because this is all Marxism, writ large.
I remember some of the people who used to say, stop talking about cultural Marxism.
And it's like, yeah, it's not cultural Marxism, it's just flat-out Marxism.
It's the full-on thing, is my reply to them.
Anyway, so they didn't have people who were, quote, eyes and ears for training cadets to report.
Their colleagues for criticizing DEI even in private conversations.
Little informants.
Little Stasi people.
Isn't that great?
Those are the values that are being instilled in the military at the academies.
At the academies.
The leaders.
The Air Force Academy, for example, had DEI enforcers who wore special uniforms and reported to a separate chain of command.
Boy, this is a cancer.
A Marxist cancer.
This is far worse.
Remember how everybody got upset about the fact that you had that West Point cadet who, I forget what it was, some Marxist slogan or something that he wrote on the inside of his cap.
And he took his picture and he showed it.
It's like, you know, pro-Marxist or something.
That's nothing compared to this.
Nothing.
In 2023, the Secretary of the U.S. Army, Christine, Christine Wormuth, announced that the Army will be making...
War against climate change.
And that will be their priority.
Well, Christine, as a secretary, needs to stop taking dictation from the UN and the World Economic Forum.
She's that kind of secretary.
In 2022, all Army personnel were forced to undergo mandatory, mandatory dysphoria training.
In other words, push people and tell them that they're in the wrong body.
Maybe they're the wrong corps.
You need to get into a different corps.
You need to get out of the U.S. military.
In 2021, the Army released recruitment videos emphasizing the importance of same-sex attraction while omitting any visuals of weaponry.
The calling, remember that one?
A girl named Emma who said she was inspired to join the U.S. Army by her homosexual mothers.
West Point.
Teaching courses on critical race theory.
2021. Mark Milley.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
How did he get to be the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff?
Oh, that's right.
Trump appointed him in 2018 or 19. Trump appointed him to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
We're not going to talk about that.
We're not going to talk about the fact that, you know, out of all the people he could have put in, he picked Mark Milley, who is...
Genuinely and justifiably despised.
But he was a Trump pick.
Trump pick, right there.
Mark Milley, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Congress that he wanted to, quote, understand white rage, which he suggested was behind the January 6th rally.
They just removed his picture that was hanging in the Pentagon.
It's been taken down.
Are you starting to understand white rage now, Milley?
We're going to give you some more examples of it.
So, anyway, Hegseth was the one who was talking about making restitution of these people, reinstating them, and apologizing to them, and giving them pay.
And so then Trump announced it yesterday.
We will reinstate any service members who are unjustly expelled from our military for objecting to my vaccine.
Now, he didn't say that.
It was the COVID thing.
COVID did it.
COVID did it.
Maybe Fauci did it.
Maybe it's just Fauci.
Trump had nothing to do with it.
He was responsible for the people he puts in charge.
He's responsible for the people he gives medals to.
Yeah, I talked about that.
You didn't give Fauci a medal?
Yeah, we'll talk about that.
I'll show you.
Anyway, Trump, the question when Exa said it a week ago was, is that going to include back pay?
And Trump said, with full back pay.
That's what they deserve.
By the way, a personal note.
Whistler is doing the board today.
I appreciate him taking over.
Karen had a very bad fall yesterday on the ice.
She's going to the doctor today.
Couldn't get around last night.
And to see if her ankle is, how badly it's sprained.
She can move some things, so we don't think it's broken, but she's in a bad way today.
So I'm a bit behind in my prep today, but Whistler is feeling a bit better, so thank you for your prayers, and we appreciate your prayers for Karen as well.
She is in a lot of pain.
And to make things even worse, we still don't have our...
HVAC fixed here.
So it's freezing cold.
And so we've got all these heavy blankets piled on top of her and then pillows to try to keep the weight of the blankets off of her ankle.
And it's been a trying couple of days.
But Whistler says Trump could have done for the J6ers what Biden just did for Fauci.
That's right.
That's right.
Think about that.
Biden treats Fauci better than Trump treats his own people.
Of course, Fauci is one of Trump's, one of Biden's people.
He's also one of Trump's people, too.
Conthink says, thank you for the tip, says, so many wins, so much winning.
I'm glad you're here to keep us in check with reality.
Yeah, look, I'm really happy that they, I was...
I'm glad that they all got pardoned or commuted.
I'm glad that they stopped this persecution that is happening there.
I only wish that these people in the Department of Justice could be jailed.
We'll see.
Maybe there's some names there that Biden forgot to put on the list.
Start the investigations now, Bondi.
Let's see what's going on with it.
Michael Pomeroy, thank you for the tip, says, David, may I suggest you have David Zuniga, Tactical Civics, on.
They're establishing in all counties in the U.S. with their seven-phase strategy to lawfully and peacefully bring freedom back to the people and, through the Constitution, reign in the tyrants, up to 1,650 chapters.
Well, that's good.
I'm glad to see that.
It has to grow from the ground up, absolutely.
Bloden says, were J6ers forced to take the mRNA jabs?
I don't know.
I don't know if they...
I don't know.
It's a good question.
I don't know if they were forcing it on prisoners or not.
Big Brit is back again.
Says four years to rot.
They already served the time.
Yep.
Should have been pardoned.
By the 1st of January, 2020. Well, he means 2021. So, yeah.
Alien Poop Evolution.
Compensation?
Yeah.
Are they going to give them some compensation?
I doubt it.
You know, people are wrongfully convicted of a crime.
Usually they can go after compensation.
The problem is, and we'll get to this in the next section when I talk about Biden pardons, when you talk about compensation.
And the Supreme Court has ruled because a lot of people are saying, well, you know, Fauci didn't do anything wrong.
Fauci says he didn't do anything wrong.
Adam Schiff says he didn't do anything wrong.
Thanks for the pardon, but I don't really need it.
But, you know, I'll accept it anyway.
When you accept the pardon, a Supreme Court decision about a century ago says that you were admitting that you were guilty, but you got the pardon.
So that same Supreme Court decision, I think, would keep them from being able to get compensation.
Because by accepting the pardon, they are...
And some people refused Biden's pardon because they said, no, we are in the process of appeal and our client is innocent and we're not going to do that.
So you can refuse a pardon.
But I think at this point in time, these people are just happy to get that.
What they need to do is they need to write books and memos and try to get some compensation that way.
S.A. Moore says, Suzanne Monk of the J6 Pardon Project did great work providing a guide for these pardons.
Well, good.
I didn't.
Didn't know about that, but good for her.
Good for her.
I know there's been a few people who have stood by them, and good for them.
Jenny Wren.
Yes, Trump should have pardoned them before he left those poor people.
Waking up Ralph.
Says, dude had plenty of time to pardon all those people, but he chose to pardon some stupid rapper instead.
Yeah?
Mm-hmm.
And friends of Jared, some of the...
Some of, if not the biggest white-collar criminals.
Of course, I think maybe Sam Britton, not Sam Britton, who's the guy that did the, anyway, the scam guy that's there that's, I don't know if they convicted him or anything, but there's bigger white-collar criminals now.
They keep getting bigger and bigger.
Speaking of white-collar criminals, I wonder what Trump's...
Crypto fortune is worth the day.
Anyway, Sam Bankman fried.
How could I forget that?
Bankman, yeah, that's right.
We always joke about that.
Thank you, Whistler.
Appreciate that.
Karen Carpenter says, several people killed themselves over the ordeal.
I know, I know.
I remember one guy who was facing the trial rather than go back and face the trial and committed suicide.
So how do we compensate for that?
So I let go.
Goy says, someone keep Trump away from the money printing machines.
He wants the debt ceiling off for the next two years.
He's going to run the government just like he ran his casinos into the ground.
In Max, Trump's been meeting with criminals at Pfizer and Gates, I guess, to plan the next scam so that they enjoy the success while it lasts.
Yeah, we should enjoy the success, quote-unquote.
All the winning.
All the winning.
Yeah, how's that winning when he's meeting with Bill Gates?
But, of course, he gave Gates and Gavi Alliance, he gave them a lot of money back in 2020 when he was president before.
Bloden says, if you accept a pardon and were wrongfully imprisoned, can you hire a lawyer and sue?
We'll talk about that coming up with the Biden thing, as I mentioned.
Radice Bro, just in time for Trump to start the war, make sure you go back for those pennies while you lose your limbs, your life, or your friends.
KWD-68, it's a new golden age.
They keep doing that.
Keep everywhere.
You see, this is the talking points for MAGA. Make America gold again.
Oh no, they want to make it crypto.
I want to make it gold.
They want to make it crypto.
KWD-68, it's a new golden age.
The Trump coin in America.
We'll all have a yacht on the Gulf of America.
That's right.
It was a priority for him to rename the Gulf of Mexico before pardoning these prisoners.
And it's also a priority for him to do it.
Before he pardons Ross Albrecht.
Hopefully he will.
12 June 1776. A couple billion tips to Musk carbon credit by the oil oligarchy as they roll in trillions year over year.
Absolutely right.
Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
Thank you.
to the David Knight Show. .
Thank you.
Well, welcome back.
We have, of course, as I talk about the silence about Ross Ulbrich, they're saying kind of a mixed reception from the Bitcoiners because of that and also because Trump was silent about his Bitcoin strategic reserve.
That failed to materialize.
Yeah, he promised so much stuff on day one, there's no way that he's going to be able to do all of it on day one, but then you wonder, so is that something that just got crowded out of the schedule, or is this another example of promises broken?
A lot of people are talking.
Everybody is upset about the fact that he didn't get his hand on that stack of Bibles to swear an oath to the Constitution.
It's like, well, he already broke his oath to the Constitution the first time through.
I can do gun control by myself.
I can violate the Second Amendment.
I don't even need the help of Congress or the Supreme Court.
I can do it all by myself.
And so, you know, that's the key issue there.
What do you read into the fact that he didn't put his hand on the stack of Bibles?
I don't know.
But I know...
That his oath to the Constitution is just another broken promise from the first four years.
Whistler says, so do you swear to uphold the Constitution?
And do you really mean it this time?
That's what John Roberts should have said, right?
So, yeah.
You really mean it this time.
I guess, you know, Melania was holding the...
Was holding the two Bibles, and I guess she's wondering about the oath he took to her, too.
Which is what I said when all this stuff happened.
By the way, I just got to show this picture.
Look at this.
I'll play that again.
So she's got this absurd hat.
Looks like she copied it from Spy vs.
Spy in Mad Magazine.
It's got this brim that's going out.
She's got it pulled down so you can't even see her eyes.
It's like...
What's she hiding from?
I mean, is she ashamed to be there?
Standing at a distance and is a really wide brim to keep him away so that he can't...
Oh!
So he puckers up and he gets about three inches away and she puts her cheek out there.
Yes, here I am.
Oh boy, I tell you, maybe there's a prenuptial agreement there or something.
I'm sure there is.
Anyway, let's talk about the Biden pardons and what does it mean?
In terms of guilt, if you have a pardon.
I put this out on Twitter, and of course, I put all the hashtags on there, make sure that people would see it, and I knew they were going to throw bricks at me.
And they did.
Why would Biden feel it necessary to pardon Fauci?
Biden and Trump think he was great.
Trump gave Fauci a medal on his last day in office.
So, are they afraid that more people realize the crimes against humanity that both Biden and Trump participated in with Fauci?
Oh, I got some reactions.
And, of course, this is the thing I always do.
Trump didn't give Fauci a medal, says this one guy.
And so I said, well, do a little bit more research.
And I said, here, I'll do it for you.
And I gave him a link.
Through the proclamation for all the people on Operation Warp Speed.
And then someone else commented there.
Andy Buxtorlin.
And he said, hey, you know, this wasn't too hard.
He said, he just does a screenshot.
He asks Grok.
He says, when did Trump issue Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx medals?
And Grok comes back and says, Donald Trump issued commendations to both Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx on his last day in August, January 19, 2021. These commendations are part of a broader recognition for their contributions to Operation Warp Speed, the program aimed at accelerating the development, production, and deployment of the bioweapon.
Actually, it says the distribution of the COVID vaccines.
It was deployment by the military.
It was a military operation.
So now we're going to, are the Trump supporters reduced to saying, well, it wasn't metal.
Well, what was it?
Did he give them a ribbon?
You know, did he give them a special whistle?
You know, what came with that commendation?
Was it a document suitable for framing?
You want to quibble over that?
We talk about straining at a net and swallowing a camel.
You swallow the entire COVID nonsense and the vaccine and you want to strain over whether it was a medal or ribbon or a document or whatever it was.
A commemorative hypodermic needle?
Here's your gold hypodermic needle for killing people en masse.
And it wasn't just the jab.
Fauci and Trump and all these people, Birx, all of them, killed people with ventilators, folks.
Over 90% of the people they put on ventilators died from those ventilators.
They killed people with remdesivir.
They killed people with their lockdowns.
And it's just, and withholding medical care for a lot of other conditions.
So what length will people go to excuse Trump's Operation Warp Speed activities.
And so, you know, even Musk says, what crimes did Fauci commit?
Well, you might want to start with what he got a commendation for, an award, a medal, whatever you want to call it, for that presidential election.
As a matter of fact, this is a thing that I linked to him.
President Trump awards presidential commendations to the Operation Warp Speed team.
January 19, 2021. A statement and release from the White House.
Read it and weep!
Today, President Donald Trump awarded presidential commendations to the below individuals in recognition of their exceptional efforts on Operation Warp Speed.
Who's the first one there?
Fauci?
No.
No, not Fauci.
General Mark Milley.
But of course...
Operation Warp Speed is not a militarized bioweapon attack against Americans, is it?
And the rest of the world.
No, no, not at all.
Not at all.
First person on the list, General Mark Milley.
Then Secretary Alex Azar.
Then Jared Kushner.
These are not in alphabetical order.
Then Monsef Slaoui.
That pharma villain.
Then General Gustav Perna.
Then Deborah Birx.
Then Anthony Fauci.
And on and on.
All these people who helped.
A couple of pages worth of names.
So, as I talk about this, I get another comment there.
And I think it's worth talking about this.
The guy says, Gold Seeker says, Dear Mr. Pessimist.
He was addressing me.
I should be an optimist and I should talk about the people that weren't killed by the Trump vaccine.
How about that?
And I just shut up about all the people that he killed and maimed.
Is that okay?
You'd be happier with that?
Yeah, the glass half full guy.
Dear Mr. Pessimist, would you be so kind as to add some positive news in respect to all of this negative news that you present?
Well, I'm positive that it was a crime.
How about that?
Is that positive enough for you?
I'm positive it was mass murder.
He says, how about how Christ and prophecy play into the larger picture?
Oh, you mean that Trump is God's chosen one?
Is that what you're talking about?
Christ and prophecy for this?
I am so disgusted with all of this.
And the people sinned a great sin, for they had made them a god of gold.
And they bore him upon their shoulders and rejoiced, saying, This be our God, O Israel.
Yeah, yeah.
I tell you, I've been to many places when I was doing reporting.
I was out before I started the show.
And I would go places, and they knew that I was not a Trump supporter.
I mean, yeah, I said, he's better than Hillary.
And, you know, but they knew that I wasn't a Trump supporter.
I said, yeah, these people come around with their shofars and literally grab me by the lapels and tell me how this is.
Trump is God's fulfillment of prophecy.
Don't bother.
I'm not buying it.
I'm sick of this stuff.
It's blasphemy.
And so I replied to this guy.
I said, so what should I say to people who make excuses for Trump's mass murder?
And who worship Him as a god.
I said, what does the Bible say about people who see calamity coming, but they don't warn other people about that?
Remember that?
The watcher on the wall?
If you see something that's coming to your community there, and you don't warn other people, their blood is going to be on you.
If you warn them, and they don't listen to you.
Their blood will be on them, but you have a duty to warn people.
If you see something, you have a duty to warn people.
It doesn't matter whether you're doing the news or anything else in your ordinary life.
If you see somebody about to step off the sidewalk in front of a cement truck that's barreling down on them at 50 miles an hour, you've got to say something about it, don't you think?
How about if there's somebody taking shots with a rifle, not with a hypodermic needle, taking shots at people in the street?
Should you warn them?
Stay back.
There's somebody up there shooting at people.
All right, just let them go and see what happens, right?
We're telling them to trust the plan.
And so one person said, this is a familiar request.
And he put up a couple of quotes from the Bible that works on it.
It's hard for me to read this.
For some reason, when I print out off of X, it's now giving me a very light print.
But anyway, for those who say to the seers, see not.
And to the prophets, prophesy not.
The right things speak unto us smooth things.
Prophesy deceit.
In other words, tell everybody that it's 4D chess and it's sugar water.
Tell us smooth things.
Tell us the stuff we want to hear.
We don't want to hear what's right if it's unpleasant.
Another example.
This was when Jehoshaphat was there with the king of Israel and they were saying, well, I don't know, should we?
Shall we go into battle?
Well, let's ask one of the prophets.
And the king of Israel said, well, let's not ask this other guy, because he always tells us bad stuff.
But they ask him anyway.
So the king of Israel said to Jehoshaphat, there's yet one man that we haven't asked.
Micaiah, the son of Imlah, by whom we may inquire of the Lord, but I hate him.
He always gives me bad news.
And he gave him bad news.
He says, if you go to battle, you're going to die.
And he did it anyway, and he died.
So there you go.
Sometimes it happens that way.
So Biden pardons Fauci, Milley, who Trump appointed as the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for the last couple of years he was there, and the January the 6th panel.
And so what is behind all of this?
Is he doing this as a cover for pardoning his family?
Because, you know, everybody's talking about Fauci, Millie, and the J6 panel, and they're not talking about his family members that he pardoned.
But I think that's part of it.
But I think it is also, as I said before, the fact that Biden set a precedent.
You know, just like Trump set a precedent when he said, I can do gun control by executive order.
They do this type of stuff.
Biden went full political persecution against his perceived enemies, against Trump, against all the J6ers and everything.
So he expects that that's going to be continued.
I think that's what it's really about.
The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgement that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing, he said, nor should acceptance be misconstrued.
As an admission of guilt for any offense.
But folks, these people actually did commit crimes.
They're not like the J6 people.
They committed a lot of crimes.
And yet, a lot of people pointed out that there's a Supreme Court decision that says exactly the opposite.
But think about that language.
Isn't that something that Trump could have done?
In the two weeks between January the 6th and leaving office, it was pretty clear what was going to happen, wasn't it?
Trump could have said, The issuance of these J-6 pardons, he could have said it in 2021, four years ago, the issuance of these J-6 pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offense.
But Trump didn't do that, did he?
As a matter of fact, this is an article from AP. And their writer here says, Biden, a Democrat, has used the power of pardon in the broadest and most untested way possible to pardon those who have not even been investigated.
Well, that's not true.
That's not true.
So I've talked about it before.
In recent history, living memory of most people of a certain age, right?
But there's a lot of us who still remember Gerald Ford pardoning Richard Nixon.
But before that, the precedent was even more striking.
You know, we're only talking about 1,500 people here.
How many people did Andrew Johnson pardon after Congress created the very Insurrection Act that this J-6 committee was coming after everybody for?
That Insurrection Act, Andrew Johnson said, we don't want to continue the Civil War.
I'm going to pardon all the Confederates.
I'm not going to let them use this Insurrection Act against them.
It was a lot more than 1,500 that he pardoned.
So again, the Associated Propagandists don't know what they're talking about.
The decision lays the groundwork, they said.
Biden's decision lays the groundwork for an even more expansive use of pardons by Trump or Republican and future presidents.
Again, this put the pressure on Trump to make sure that he was going to pardon these people.
And, you know, Biden pardoned 1500, and when that happened, the MAGA media was like, oh, this is awful.
I said, no, it's good.
He's got to put pressure on Trump to do the right thing.
And then he pardoned another 2,500 just now.
So 4,000 people plus family members and the J6 politicians.
Adam Schiff, who is now a senator of all things, he said, well, this is unnecessary and it's unwise, but I'll take it.
This is Adam Schiff in 2020 talking about if you take a pardon.
Says that you're guilty.
Have you ever heard of somebody getting a preemptive pardon who was innocent of all crime?
Who's just an innocent person?
Have you ever heard of that?
Just somebody getting a blanket pardon and they're an innocent person?
No, you know, I think that it's an effort not only to prospectively pardon people for things they have not yet been charged with and may never be charged with, but also it's the president's own family.
It's people that have been covering up for the president in addition to his own family.
This is the nature of those the president has surrounded himself with, including his family.
And that is, it's been essentially a den of thieves and thieves environment.
And so I think the president used this as his way of trying to protect those that have protected him.
Boy, that hasn't aged too well for you, has it, Adam?
He's protecting his family.
It's a den of thieves environment.
It makes people look guilty.
And now he's one of the ones that's been pardoned.
And Biden has pardoned his den of thieves family and all of that.
That was comments made in 2020. And here we are.
It goes around, comes around.
The full and unconditional pardons for Fauci and Milley cover the period extending back to January the 1st, 2014. What is it about that?
2014. Look, Fauci's crimes go way back before that.
Fauci's crimes go back to 1986 and excusing criminal actions of the pharmaceutical companies and their vaccines, the childhood vaccine immunity thing.
Or it goes back to his crimes in terms of HIV and what he did with that.
But in terms of crimes, it really starts to get even more serious as the time frame moves along.
He has been involved in all of these germ games that go back to 9-11.
And so why would he put it at 2014, right?
That you was there with Dark Winter and all these things in 2001, and every year they're doing it.
He's part and parcel of all that stuff.
Why 2014?
Well, 2014 was what he did for Hunter Biden.
But also in 2014, that was when the Ukrainian coup began, right?
And we know they were doing a lot of gain-of-function research and horrific, dangerous experiments in Ukraine.
Maybe it covers that.
Who knows?
Fauci's crimes are so vast over the long period of time that he was there.
And it just amazes me how, with all of this talk about Fauci again, not a single, even Republican, will ask how he could get paid more than the president.
And that's a violation of law.
Nobody asks that.
He's a special character, isn't he?
Well, Fauci was director of the NIH, the NIH of the NIAID, Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and planning all this stuff for the longest time.
And, of course, Trump praised him, elevated him, essentially made him the president over all of this stuff, put the bureaucracies in charge, the public health bureaucracies in charge of us all, dictating orders to us, as that North Carolina head of public health said when she was elevated up to, what was it, the CDC, I think.
She said, yeah, I'd call my other state public health directors.
Are you going to let them do this?
No.
Okay, well, I won't let them do that either.
They didn't know what they were doing.
And she openly admits it and laughs about it.
Who are these people to dictate these things to us?
But, of course, it was coming from Redfield and Fauci and all the rest of these people, Birx, and it was done with the authority of the president.
The president gave them the authority.
The president elevated them.
The president is responsible for what his people do.
The buck stops with the president.
Unless you are a MAGA cult.
And then it doesn't.
And so Trump praised him all during and after this stuff.
It didn't stop when he gave him the commendation.
It continued on.
But Fauci started condemning Trump.
Fauci has since become a target of intense hatred and vitriol from people on the right, says the Associated Propagandist, AP. Who blame him for mask mandates.
That's right.
He has to blame.
And other policies that they believe infringed on their rights.
Well, you have to put that believe there.
It isn't that we believe it.
We believe it because it's true.
Even, they said, as hundreds of thousands of people were dying.
I tell you, Associated Press is like, you know, in this position in journalism of Being the arbiter of what is true or whatever.
And they are so full of lies.
And so controlled.
It's just amazing.
They believe this infringed on their rights even as hundreds of thousands of people were dying.
Even as Associated Press was lying, as usual.
There's absolutely no basis for these threats.
Let me be perfectly clear.
I have committed no crime, said Fauci.
Well, if I have committed crimes, it's rare.
Rarely do I commit a crime.
What about his salary?
That's a criminal act right there.
Biden also extended pardons to members and staff of the J6 committee.
Did they commit any crimes?
Well, Biden said no.
But again, I think it's about the political persecution.
And I think it's about the...
Precedent that Biden himself set for political persecution.
That's why these people are upset.
And these people on the J6 committee were part and parcel of that political persecution.
What the Republicans are calling weaponization of government.
It's always been a weapon as far as I'm concerned.
That's nothing new.
But the political persecution openly done is new.
Cheney and Thompson said in a statement on behalf of the committee that they were grateful for the decision, saying they were being pardoned, quote, not for breaking the law, but for upholding it.
No.
You broke the law when you came after the people who were specifically protected for their activities by the First Amendment.
You were prohibited against that.
You broke your oath to the Constitution, and you took away your authority to do anything.
So it's treason, quite frankly, is what you're guilty of.
Treason to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Biden has set the presidential record for the most individual pardons and commutations issued.
Again, see, he led the way for Trump to be able to come in and do these pardons.
And that was even prior to yesterday.
Still, with all of this, Trump doesn't come close.
1,500 people, a J6, Biden's already done 4,000.
Oh, you can't pardon violent people?
Biden pardoned people who were on death row.
He's not the first to consider such preemptive pardons, says the Associated Press lawyers.
Does Trump aides consider them for Trump and his supporters involved in his failed attempts to overthrow the election?
Trump's pardons never materialize, they said.
That's right.
And then they do come back to Gerald Ford, but they don't mention Andrew Johnson because, again, that is the most direct.
Correspondence to all these people talking about insurrection this and insurrection that.
It was in response to that insurrection act that Andrew Johnson pardoned all of the Confederate soldiers.
Fauci claims innocence despite the pardon, but acceptance of the pardon raises questions.
Now, this gets to the questions that people have said about the J6ers.
Can they sue?
So, the first thing they mention, this is on WND. Is that Fauci, who declared during the COVID-19 China virus pandemic?
Okay, let's unpack that.
Wasn't a China virus, it was a Fauci lie, and it was a Trump lie, and it wasn't a pandemic.
But anyway, he said that he was science.
Okay, so first crime, impersonating science.
How about then we get in for something like, you know, mass murder, as Fauci would say.
Because that's his real crime.
And it's Trump's crime as well.
He says, I really truly appreciate the action that Biden has taken today on my behalf.
Let me be perfectly clear.
I have committed no crime, you know that, and there are no possible grounds for any allegation or threat of criminal investigation or prosecution of me.
Well, Fauci...
God will judge you.
You have blood on your hands.
If anybody ever did.
We all know what he did with the jabs, the ventilators, remdesivir, and on and on.
The fact check system for online comments said there was a historic federal court ruling from the Supreme Court that found, and here's the relevant part of what people were asking, found that accepting a pardon carries the imputation of guilt.
And the acceptance of a confession of it.
That's a quote from the Supreme Court decision.
Quote, the imputation of guilt and the acceptance of a confession of guilt.
Right?
Of it.
So, that was, that goes back to a 1915 Supreme Court case, Burdick v.
United States.
The court ruled that a pardon carries that imputation of guilt and the acceptance of it.
It is an admission of guilt.
So, that was one of the reasons why several prison inmates that had been named earlier by Biden, thousands that he'd offered pardons to.
He'd offered pardons to people accused of, or some of them convicted, but some of them accused.
Criminals, murderers, drug dealers.
They said they didn't want the pardon because that would influence their pending appeal.
So, they'd been convicted of that, but they wanted to appeal it.
Make themselves innocent of that.
So they refused the pardon.
Fauci, however, accepted it.
So did Adam Schiff, Mark Milley, and on and on.
The Gateway Pundit said, Fauci's policies destroyed millions of lives, bankrupted thousands of businesses, and unnecessarily killed millions around the world.
Absolutely true.
Left unsaid by the Gateway Pundit is that Trump approved it.
He was responsible for these actions of the insubordinates.
He funded it.
He marketed it to people.
He gave them awards afterwards for it.
He talked for years.
He spent another three years bragging about how many lives he had saved.
Well, if the vaccine saved lives, then what's the Gateway Pundit complaining about with Fauci?
I'm sick of this partisanship.
These blinders that are out there.
Gateway Pundit also says, General Milley was one of the architects of the worst American foreign policy blunder in history.
That's not a crime, unfortunately.
Perhaps, or rightly or wrongly, that's not a crime.
Then they say he was also making promises with China to warn them about any possible U.S. attack.
Well, that is a crime, if true.
Innocent people don't need or even appreciate pardons, said one random commenter here.
Well, I don't think that's true.
Do you think that's true?
Do the J6ers need pardons?
Yes.
Did they accept the pardons?
Yes.
Were they guilty of anything?
No.
The people who were guilty, the ones who tried to lock them up in violation of the Constitution.
Another person.
This is the partisan press now.
It's WND. These are people who are on social media.
Let's hate the other side here.
The only reason to ask for a pardon is because you think you've committed a crime.
Is that true?
Is that true of the J6ers?
Did they think they committed a crime?
You don't have to.
Look, you might ask for a pardon to protect you from somebody who is a criminal who is coming after you.
Wouldn't you think?
So Alex Washburn at Brownstone says the deplorable ethics of a preemptive pardon for Fauci.
He says, This is being written by Biden.
He knows from experience what he did to the J6ers and other people, right?
He knows that politically motivated investigations like he did, like Biden did, wreak havoc on the lives and safety and financial security of targeted individuals and their families.
Even when individuals have done nothing wrong and in fact have done the right things and will ultimately be exonerated, the mere fact of being investigated and prosecuted can irreparably damage reputations and finances.
Wouldn't it have been nice?
If Trump could have used that language, did Trump's lawyers not know that?
Did they not know the historical precedence?
Could they not craft something like this?
It's an obvious explanation.
We have seen this played out for the last four years against the people that Trump abandoned.
So, all these people who suffered under Fauci, under Biden, under Trump, Under the vaccine mandates.
People who lost their jobs, their businesses, and all the rest of this stuff.
Their careers.
It's one thing to pardon someone who's been subjected to a fair trial, says Alex Washburn at Brownstone, and convicted to say they've already paid their dues.
Gerald Ford and his partner Richard Nixon admitted that Nixon had already paid the high cost of having to resign from the highest office in the land.
Well, again, he's missing the historical precedent.
Gerald Ford, the real historical precedent here for the J-6ers was the Civil War, the Confederates, the Insurrection Act itself, Andrew Johnson.
He says it is reasonable to be concerned that this line of research that was funded by Fauci's NIAID may have caused the pandemic.
And see, this is why so many conservatives are pushing back against this.
You better be careful.
It's a stupid way to react to this, just like it was stupid to react to the pardons that Biden gave out.
I immediately said, this is going to put pressure on Trump to do the right thing.
What this does is, when you say, well, Fauci's big crime was he supported gain-of-function stuff, and that created the pandemic.
So what you're doing is you're selling this scam as if it were true, right?
Folks, You know, I know, the COVID-19 thing was completely a lie.
It was a lie.
And he used that lie.
These people are going to use this lie, and they're going to say, well, and now we still have gain-of-function.
So there's going to be more pandemics coming down the road.
So what it does is it excuses this.
They say, well, it was China.
It was China, right?
They have one biosafety level four lab in China.
One.
One.
We have hundreds.
We have them all over this country.
Biosafety level three and four labs.
Going back to 2014-2015 when it started having these lab leaks and it was reported widely.
And Congress actually talked about doing something, but they didn't do anything about it.
And so these things are still there.
So why is it that the conservatives, that the right, that the Republicans, Who are coming after Fauci.
Why do they say, yeah, he caused the pandemic and he's going to cause another one.
Well, if you really believe that, if you really believed that, you would immediately stop all gain-of-function research, wouldn't you?
And yet it continues.
Do you hear them even calling for the immediate cessation of that stuff?
A couple of people do.
But it continues.
All these people who voted for all this scam, all this plandemic stuff, they're not trying to shut down the gain-of-function.
They don't believe it.
Don't you believe it either.
They're going to use it to justify and excuse their actions four or five years ago, and they're going to use it to scare people to death for the next scam that they try to pull on us with this stuff.
So, we're going to take a quick break.
And we'll be right back before we take the break, though.
N-Max says, enjoy the sunshine before the coming storm.
He's unloading his Santa bag to win us over.
But I'm sure he's got something up his sleeve.
Oh, I absolutely agree.
That's absolutely right.
I said he's going to do a lot of things, like the pardoning of the people, things like that.
He's going to do a lot of things to get people to let their guard down even more than they already have.
And even celebrate him.
I'm not going to forget what he did four years ago.
And leading up to it even, going back to 2019, is gun control by executive order and then everything that happened in 2020 up to January the 6th and beyond.
But yeah, he's going to do that.
Get people to cheer him.
They go back to sleep.
You know, when Republicans get in, people stop buying guns.
When Democrats get in, they buy their guns.
But he's going to put people...
He's a big pacifier.
And the mouth of the people who would oppose big government.
They actually applaud it.
You know, we have a golden age now of big government.
That's what we're really talking about here.
Soylent Goy said, I didn't notice any executive orders pertaining to deportations.
Yeah, we'll see what happens.
Some of the things that he's talking about, as a matter of fact, Reason had a thing there where they were talking about his proposed initiatives.
And how they are going, especially around the border stuff, the things that he's proposed, whether or not he's put these things out yet.
uh they're going to be tied up with legal uh challenges it's going to be a very long time with that and we're going to talk about the paris climate accord because that's now back in the news as well bloatin says um um awful i hope j6ers sue big lee yeah retech weird says it's very expensive to change the name of the gulf of mexico expensive even to change a street name yeah think about that - Okay.
Oh, we don't care.
I mean, we'll just print some more dollars so we can print some more new books and names and everything.
We've got to change it everywhere, right?
All the legal documents and all the rest of the stuff.
IRS Machine Gun, thank you for the tip.
I appreciate that.
It says, McDowell High School is under lockdown due to possible shooter.
We're at the heart of this hurricane disaster in western North Carolina, and I hope this is not a false flag attack on us.
We can't handle anymore.
Well, I'm so sorry to hear that.
I guess McDowell High School is in that area of western North Carolina.
We're All Dead says he's going to usher in the biometric ID and CBDC, and he'll do it all in a roundabout way.
And so the Republicans, again, we need to have digital ID and approval to get a job, because, you know, we've got open borders.
And so you've got all the Republicans saying, yeah, we've got to have mandatory e-verify.
And we've got to have the government protect our kids from porn on the web.
And so we need to have biometric identification to get on the internet.
These are the precedents that are being established by the Republicans.
KWD-68.
Google Earth still says it's Gulf of Mexico.
Yeah, they've got to...
They don't have to reprint anything, but they haven't caught up with it, I guess, right?
Mike Bertoloni, thank you for the tip.
I appreciate that.
And I appreciate the compliment.
Thank you.
LT Oracle of Truth.
David, I was wrong yesterday.
I predicted Trump would not do an executive order against the Paris Climate Agreement and the UN. Credit where credit is due.
He did get out of the WHO and the Paris Climate Agreement.
We'll talk about that.
And Empowered Solutions.
There is collateral damage from his lockdowns.
Those like dominoes falling within families.
You didn't have to die to have devastation happen.
Absolutely true.
Absolutely true.
We had someone yesterday, and I don't know if it was Empowered Solution, still dealing with the economic havoc that these lockdowns create in his life.
It hasn't recovered a lot of people in that situation.
But they're really wealthy.
They're really wealthy.
They got a lot wealthier during all that stuff.
Isn't that interesting?
We were non-essential, but...
The big retailers, they were essential.
They got to stay open.
Right overture.
It was all done in the name of population control.
We all know people who have bought into the vaccines that have been touted as some wonder drug.
Vigity Guy says, many of my family took the vaccine.
Everyone who refused to listen to my warnings.
Now, they, seven out of eight, have cancer.
You know, we had Cecilia Richards, who was Ann Richards' daughter.
She was...
Lifetime.
She spent her entire life working with Planned Parenthood.
Her entire life was about killing babies.
She just died from cancer.
She got glioblastoma.
And that was...
Let's see what's happened here.
We got...
Hang on.
We're going to take a quick break.
And we will be right back.
Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, dear Claus, your annual global risk report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate, it is disinformation and misinformation.
followed closely by polarization within our societies. - In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
You are listening to The David Knight Show.
All right, welcome back.
Yeah, we had, as I said, Karen injured herself yesterday, fell on the ice, and felt working with the chickens, and actually twisted her ankle, fell down the hill quite a bit.
Fortunately, nothing else was hurt except for her ankle.
But, yeah, we got some family things that are going on here, and so we had to see to that.
KWD68 says, I've watched many people age way more than four years since taking the jab.
I've also seen many die.
Yeah.
Gonzo Johnny.
The fun part of the vaccines is it makes most of them, believers, sick, not dead.
That way Big Pharma can cash in some more.
OctoSpook.
Biden pardoned Michael Byrd.
The murderer of Ashley Babbitt.
That was very, very bad, in my honest opinion.
Yeah.
Whistler says, sounds like Biden knows how to do a J6 pardon, doesn't he?
Yeah.
But I saw this stuff about, oh, this one guy, he had a heart attack while he was there, and he's gotten a pardon and everything.
Brian and Deb McCartney.
We all suffered in some form or the other from this stuff.
Yeah, that's right.
I didn't suffer nearly as much as many other people did, though, unfortunately.
Nancy Chambers.
Too bad all those killed by the COVID protocol can't be brought back to life.
Pardons are good, but they won't help my husband, who was murdered by the vaccine and by remdesivir.
That's right.
Yeah, what does Trump say to those people?
We're winning.
We're winning, aren't we?
Well, let's talk about some other murderers.
As I said before, you have Cecile Richards has died after battling brain cancer.
I don't know if she got the jab and got turbo cancer.
She's only 67. A daughter of former Texas Governor Ann Richards.
Revealed in January of last year that she was living with brain cancer but vowed to continue her fight for abortion while battling her illness.
Well, there you go.
She's going to go out of this life killing babies.
She oversaw nearly four million abortions while leading Planned Parenthood for 12 years, writes Breitbart.
Imagine standing before God with all that blood on your hands and standing before God As someone who has spent their entire life, the two things that she's known for are her rebellion to God, her anti-God persona, being celebrated by the Freedom From Religion organization and saying to them as they gave her awards, I don't know, did they give her a medal?
Did they give her, what was it exactly?
I don't know.
We're going to quibble over that?
But as they gave her her award, she said, yes, all those Christians are out there always, you know, fighting to save babies' lives.
I'm paraphrasing here, obviously.
But imagine having to stand before God and you spent your whole life in rebellion to him and you have the innocent blood of millions of babies on your hands.
And it's just not enough.
You wanted more time so you could kill more babies.
During that time, she massively grew the organization, the base of donors and volunteers, increased from $3 million to $11 million.
She also raised more money than at any other point in Planned Parenthood's history and supercharged the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, the organization's political advocacy arm.
That's where they get their money out of Washington.
Everybody creates these political advocacy.
They're lobbyists.
Richards was at the helm of the organization when Planned Parenthood was accused of illegally harvesting and selling body parts from aborted babies.
You know, the thing that Lala Harris and Javier Becerra, who's head of HHS under Biden, the thing that they persecuted David Daleiden for exposing that crime.
It's always the people that expose the crimes that go to jail, like John Kiriakou, David Daleiden, and so forth.
She stepped down in 2018, but still continued to work.
As an abortion activist.
A few months before her death, Biden awarded her a Presidential Medal of Freedom.
I guess the freedom to kill, right?
And a private ceremony.
Wow, she gets a private ceremony.
This is how they elevate and worship the murder of babies.
We have private ceremonies for them.
Richards urged women to be bold in speaking about their abortions as well.
Be proud of it.
One day, our children and grandchildren may ask us, wait a minute, you're for abortion here.
How does that work?
One day, our children and grandchildren may ask us, when it was all on the line, what did you do?
Yeah, you know what?
God is asking her that right now.
Right now.
What did you do?
So, again, you look at her life.
Facing the end of her own life, said Dr. Monica Miller, Director of Citizens for Pro-Life America, so this is before she died, she said, Richards is facing the end of her own life.
Many prayers must be said for her to pray that she will repent of her abortion advocacy and the killing of her own baby.
She noted that Richards publicly admitted in 2015 to aborting her fourth child because she and her husband Quote, decided it was as big as our family needed to be, and that it, quote, wasn't anything more dramatic than that.
Monica Miller says, to kill another human being and to say there's no more to it than that is bone-chilling.
Pray that she'll know the love of God and that the God of life will be merciful to her.
And yet, she thumbed her nose at God as well, to the very end.
During her 12-year tender at Planned Parenthood again, three and a half million babies whose lives she dismissed as not really relevant to the discussion of abortion.
And I talk about her shaking her fist at God.
She was given awards by the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
Somehow they got that wrong, you know?
It's freedom of religion that our constitutional Western society is about, not freedom from it.
And you know, I thought it was, when I saw this, I always think about when I, when I think about abortion, I always think about Psalm 139, right?
Where it says, you form me and you knit me together in my mother's womb.
And I will praise you for I'm fearfully and wonderfully made.
I think about that.
But you know, before that point, he says, you know, where can I go to hide?
Where can I flee from your presence?
Rhetorical questions.
There's nowhere that you can go to flee from God.
Now, for the Christian, that's a good thing.
For the people who thumb their nose at God, that's not a good thing.
The God who formed us in our mother's womb, that she spent her entire life trying to rip babies apart.
That God, you can't run from.
But for the Christian, he says, where can I go?
Wherever I go, even there, you will lead me.
Even there, you will uphold me with your right hand.
No such comfort for her.
She had just written a book when she got this award from the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
She titled her book, Make Trouble.
Make trouble.
Well, she certainly did.
And she said, the very first sentence in your book, as the interviewer was talking to her, was, little lady, you're just trying to make trouble.
And that was how she wanted to be remembered her whole life, as a troublemaker.
Well, we will remember her as a mass murderer.
Tell us about Sarah Weddington, the young woman who argued Roe v.
Wade, I said in the interview, and then went to run for the state legislature.
Unrepentant feminist.
As unrepentant as any woman that ever walked this earth.
That's what she valued.
She said, in terms of Trump and in terms of abortion, she said, you know, after Trump was elected, I got a call from Ivanka Trump who wanted to meet me.
And she said she was wondering how she could help with Planned Parenthood.
Well, that's kind of interesting to know, isn't it?
And she said, was it a weird meeting?
And she said it was, actually.
It was a meeting at one of the golf clubs, a Trump golf club.
And I guess Jared Kushner and Ivanka were there.
And Jared said, look, we control everything now.
Republicans have the White House.
We got the House.
We got the Senate.
So if you want to keep your funding, you're going to have to make a deal with us, he said.
He basically said, if Planned Parenthood will quit providing abortion, then I'll talk to Paul Ryan and maybe we can get you even more funding.
And she said, well, first of all, that's never going to happen.
We're not going to give up.
We're not going to trade away women's access to abortion for money.
Because see, with Jared Kushner, everything is about money.
And just remember how little they got done.
The Trump administration did put on something they called a gag rule.
And so they would cut funding to any organization that promoted abortion abroad.
For example.
Or domestically.
They'll cut their Title X funding.
But they still continue to fund it through Obamacare, through Medicare, and other things like that.
I've told a story before, but I remember when there was a, when the election was, it was George W. Bush was running, and I don't remember if it was the first or second time he was running.
I guess it was the first time.
I'm thinking about the church that was in.
There was one lady there, and She and her husband are heavy hitter contributors to the church.
And she said, so is anybody here not going to vote for George Bush?
And I raised my hand.
I said, I'm not voting for him.
I said, I'm voting for Harry Brown.
You're voting for somebody who supports abortion.
I said, well, actually, he will do more to stop abortion than George W. Bush will because Harry Brown will cut it.
Cut the spending, just because he doesn't like to spend the money on government programs, not because of what he thinks about abortion.
But George W. Bush is going to tell you that he doesn't like abortion, but he's going to continue to give it money.
She didn't like that.
But that's the truth.
That's the way I see it.
And speaking of continuing to give him money, he took off the Trump...
You know, took off some of the Title X funding, but again, it flowed through with Obamacare, with Medicare.
And you remember what happened with the CARES Act?
Do you remember that Planned Parenthood got $80 million?
You know, the stuff that was supposed to help small businesses?
And as I said before, more than 50% went to big businesses, like Planned Parenthood, for example.
More than 50% of the money went to big...
5% of the people got more than 50% of the money, and they were the big guys.
Big guys like Planned Parenthood.
And so Trump did fund them.
And the GOP is now demanding an investigation to Biden's CDC because they're giving taxpayer funding to abortions overseas.
They're not just telling people about it, but they're actually paying for abortions overseas under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, is what he said.
How does that help AIDS provide abortions?
The Supreme Court is going to consider if Maryland parents can opt children out of pro-LGBT storybooks.
See, everybody's talking about how we're winning with Trump, and Trump is going to get rid of all of the tranny stuff and everything.
Well, he can get rid of it in the military.
Absolutely he can.
But, you know, what about all the LGBT stuff that's going in the so-called public?
I don't even like that term.
It's government schools, right?
And when you look at it, just draw the line between public schools and public health.
These are the ways that they seek to control our lives with bureaucrats, unelected, unaccountable, for the most part.
So a U.S. Supreme Court, on January 17th, agreed to hear a request from a group of Maryland parents to opt their children out of having storybooks that promote LGBT lifestyles read to them.
See, the problem...
It's much more pervasive.
It rots from the head down.
And it has gone throughout the land.
And you're going to have to do something about it yourself.
Everybody says, well, yeah, Trump's got that covered now, right?
Well, he can't do anything about it.
All these problems can't be solved in Washington, even if he was on the right side of the issue.
And I have my questions about whether or not he is sincere about that.
When you look at the events that he's been having and the awards he's been handing out in Melania to the LGBT alphabet mafia, This case goes back to November of 2022, when the school board mandated new LGBT-inclusive storybooks for elementary school students that promoted gender transitions, pride parades, same-sex romance between young children.
The board instructed employees responsible for selecting the books to use an LGBT-plus lens to question whether cisnormativity Or stereotypes?
Or power hierarchies?
Or reinforcer disruptants of the petition?
These people are full-on Marxists.
Parents were initially told that they could opt out on behalf of their children when the storybooks were read according to the petition, but they changed their policy the next year, in March of 2023. They didn't even wait a year.
So, they put it in in November of 22, but by March of the next year, they were saying, no, you can't opt out.
If parents did not like what was taught to their elementary school kids, their only choice was to send them to private school or homeschool.
That is still true.
That's true everywhere.
That is always going to be true.
You will never be able to stop some stranger that you don't know who has your kids for 8 to 10 hours a day.
You're not going to be able to stop them.
If you're not in the classroom, you can't stop them.
And even if...
The state is on your side, even if the school board is on your side, even if the administrators, the principals are there.
You don't know what that teacher in the classroom is doing with your kids, do you?
You can never stop that.
Hundreds of parents, largely Eastern Orthodox Christians and Muslims, showed up at board meetings after the parents emphasized how impressionable young children are, as if the school board doesn't know and they don't care.
And how they lack independent judgment to process such complex and sensitive issues, the board members accused parents of promoting hate, likened them to white supremacists and xenophobes, according to the petition.
So the parents then sued after the board declined to accommodate them.
They said cramming down controversial gender ideology on three-year-olds without their parents' permission is an affront to our nation's traditions, parental rights, and basic human decency.
And these parents are suing the schools.
Look, understand that we're having to pay for this stuff.
I find that to be an affront.
Because of these parents who are demanding a free education, they don't want to take control of their children's lives.
They'll go complain and whine at the school board, but they won't take their kids out.
Instead, they'll start a legal process to sue them.
And you're going to leave your kids there?
While this thing winds through the courts for years?
Yeah, these parents demand a free education for their kids.
They should be looking to free their minds and their spirits and get them out of that and stop using the so-called free schools to make us pay for it and to make sure that we're not going to be able to own homes with this.
So Trump...
Trump is going to snip transgenderism out of the federal government on day one.
This is a cheerleading from Breitbart.
He's got it all taken care of.
Trump's just going to make all these problems go away with a wave of a pen and his magic wand and an executive order.
Well, there are some things that he can do, and this is what he is doing.
This is a good start for the federal government.
But again, if you think that the federal government can solve this or wants to solve this, you're kidding yourself.
He signed an executive order titled Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.
This is focusing, as most of the conservative and Fox News people do, focusing on stopping transgender men, you know, men posing as women, to stop them from participating in sports.
And you can even get Bruce Jinder and Sean Hannity.
Yeah, talking about, oh, this is awful.
Yeah, we don't want to have biological men competing with women in sports, because as if that's the most important thing.
It's far more damaging what is happening in schools.
And understand that a lot of this stuff is being incentivized from the Department of Education.
Is Trump going to do anything to stop that?
You know, money is attached to it.
He said that he's going to penalize the schools that...
Put men in women's sports and put them in women's showers and dressing rooms and all the rest of the stuff.
But he said, I'll withhold the funding.
See, he knows how that works.
He knows that he gets his way by financially incentivizing or withdrawing the funds by either bribery or by blackmail.
Biden knows that.
Obama knows that.
Trump knows that.
They all know that.
They all do that all the time.
Is it going to be limited to just that stuff?
Or is he going to get involved with the Department of Education?
You know, the Department of Education that he said he was going to get rid of as a candidate.
But now he's filling it up with people, filling it up with a Tennessee person, as I pointed out, who has worked with and for Democrats coming from California, graduating from the University of Berkeley, and coming to Tennessee and refusing to enforce.
A ban on critical race theory.
He put her in as the number two at the Department of Education.
This is the same thing I see when I got a lot of pushback, not just on the pardons, but I got a lot of pushback when I talked about Trump's new taxes.
And all these people said, he's going to get rid of the income tax.
He's going to get rid of it.
He said he's going to get rid of it.
First of all, he never said that.
You had some MAGA cheerleaders who said that on his behalf.
Because he was saying that tariffs, he thought, Was a better form of taxation than income tax?
Well, we could have that debate.
But as I said, you're going to wind up with both of them.
And we know that because he's already talking about how he's going to rearrange the deck chairs on the income tax.
And you've got Mike Johnson and all the rest of the Republicans launching an army of 80,000 agents at us and giving them $80 billion, which is seven times the amount of money that was their entire budget.
They want to give it seven times the amount of money, 80,000 agents.
Artificial intelligence.
You've got Scott Besant, if I'm pronouncing his name correctly, his pick for Treasury Secretary, says he wants to use AI to audit us all.
They can audit each and every person with artificial intelligence.
Is Trump going to stop any of that abomination?
No, he's not.
Well, I'm not going to tax tips for waitresses.
How about that?
Yeah.
Come on, can you applaud?
Please cheer.
Please cheer.
Give me a break.
And that's what these people are coming back.
It's amazing on social media to see how idiotic these people are.
No, he's going to get rid of the income tax.
So that's why he's talking about how he's going to fine-tune it?
A poll showed that 77% of Republicans and 49% only of Americans agree that society has gone too far in accommodating transgender people.
Isn't that amazing?
How effective their propaganda has been.
Truly it's amazing that only 49% of Americans in general I think we've gone too far.
51% don't think we've gone too far.
So, I'll just say one more thing, and this is about Zondervan.
You know, Zondervan got a lot of criticism when they came out with the NIV years ago because they started playing pronoun games, insinuating it into the Bible, essentially.
You know, so we'll say, well, you know.
It's a low view of Scripture, I think, if the words are there and refer to mankind.
Oh, we don't want to talk about mankind.
Let's talk about people.
It's got man in the words, right?
Or if it says brothers, they'll say brothers and sisters.
Well, that was understood, right?
That was understood.
But again, it kind of, you know, a lot of people say, I wonder about this.
A lot of people kind of joke about the NIV, calling it the Nearly Inspired Version.
Well, now they've got a new Bible.
They call it the Upside Down Kingdom Bible.
And if that isn't appropriate, I don't know what is.
It really is a topsy-turvy, upside-down version of the Bible.
It has incorporated elements of gender diversity and many other...
D-E-I things into the Bible.
Shoved it in.
Shoved it in.
As described on Amazon, the Upside Down Kingdom Bible addresses topics such as race and ethnicity.
Race is not something the Bible talks about.
It talks about nations, tongues, and tribes.
It talks about political boundaries.
It talks about languages.
And it talks about culture.
That's what nations, tongues, and tribes are.
It doesn't talk about race at all.
So you're injecting something in there that's not there.
So it talks about race and ethnicity.
It talks about creation care.
What they mean by that is environmentalism.
Science, abortion, wealth, poverty, gender and sexuality, politics, baptism, technology and others.
You mean the other Bibles didn't talk about baptism?
That's about the only one of these things.
Anyway, Preston Sprinkle.
The president of the Center for Faith, Sexuality, and Gender, a Christian organization, let's put that in air quotes, focused on the issues of faith and LGBT inclusivity.
This guy's name is Preston Sprinkle.
I mean, it reminds me of fractured fairy tales.
Remember that from Rocky and Bullwinkle?
Anyway, not to be published several posts from Sprinkle on woke preacher clips, I said.
And he said, one of the values going into the study Bible was diversity.
So ethnic diversity, gender diversity, denominational theological diversity.
Theological diversity, what does that mean?
We need to hear those diverse voices again and again and again.
Exegesis is best done in a community, and it's best done in a diverse community, he says.
Exegesis is reading out of the Bible what's in it.
No, I think they're doing eisegesis.
I think they're sticking their opinions into it.
Another person says he likes the Gospel of Luke because of its elevation of women and of John because it deals with church trauma.
What Bible are they reading?
Yeah, here's the thing about the Bible.
It doesn't elevate women.
It elevates Christ.
And if you see it, if your Bible is focused on elevating women instead of Christ, that's the other thing.
Long ago, I stopped getting Bibles that had any commentary on them.
I don't want to know what these people think they know.
I want to read it myself.
And I want to let the Holy Spirit teach me, not some other person imposing their ideas.
Jill Firth, a lecturer in Hebrew and Old Testament in Melbourne, Australia, said she does not recommend the books of Ezra, Nehemiah, Ecclesiastes for women's Bible studies because there's not many women in them.
So just cut those out.
Your upside-down kingdom Bible here.
Zonderman previously faced criticism for their 2011 publication of an NIV Bible.
Which was updated to include gender-neutral language.
And so before you know it, they're going to be making God a woman because they have absolutely no respect for the Bible.
So, Matthew Ronson, quote, Trump didn't know his bump stock ban is anti-constitution.
He was lied to back then and still hasn't figured it out.
Yeah, that's right.
It was those bad people around him.
That's what happened.
NMAX said Trump had all the info at his fingertips about the dangers of mRNA and rushed vax.
He knew always that they can be harmful just for autism, but he pushed anyway.
And again, yeah, he knew all of that stuff.
The same way that Alex Jones knew that.
Alex Jones had warned people for years about mercury and aluminum.
And he said, you're going to have mercury and aluminum, and that's good.
You know, this is the good Trump shot.
It's sugar water with some aluminum and mercury.
You can take that.
Do it for Trump.
Why would I do that, Alex?
Yeah, I don't want to inject mercury.
Are you crazy?
Do that for Trump?
NMAX. Now his CV vax is given to children all over the country as part of the childhood vax schedule.
If Trump was real, he would immediately demand that it be taken off the schedule.
Agree.
Yeah, that's right.
Yep, he's not taking it off the schedule, is he?
GDP 330. As a matter of fact, they're talking about doing faster mRNA vaccines with bird flu.
That's been given $750 million by the Biden administration, and you expect Trump to double down on that.
You just wait.
You just wait.
From Moderna.
GDP 330 says people who think Trump is somehow just ignorant and that absolves him of any crime have serious cognitive dissonance.
It's been years, and he still denies the death.
Caused by his shots.
And as a matter of fact, he pushed back.
He said, you know, my people really don't like this.
You know, they keep telling me all this.
And he had Alex Jones pushing back on him.
He had Wayne Allen Root.
He had all these different Trump cheerleaders who hated the vaccine.
And they realized that they were a part of cognitive dissonance.
They were part of double speak and double think.
This Orwellian world.
But, you know, they just wish that Trump had come out and say the right thing.
You know, finally they got through to him.
But he's just saying it.
He just stopped talking about how wonderful his vaccine is.
He's still not going to do anything about it.
He's still not going to pull it back.
He's still not going to admit it.
12 June 1776. If Trump does stand by his 25% Canada-Mexico tax by February the 1st, it will impact auto parts, automotive vehicles, energy, biopharma, metals, you name it.
I agree.
That's why I said...
What he's doing is he's leaving us with the income tax.
He's going to make some minor adjustments to some special interest groups.
He's going to tell you that this is a tax that other people will pay in foreign countries, and it's only fair.
Is that not 100% Democrat?
Isn't that the way the Democrats have always sold their taxes to us?
Well, that's because he is a Democrat, that he's doing it that way.
We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
We're going to take a quick break.
We're going to take a quick break.
We're going to take a quick break.
We're going to take a quick break.
I'm very interested in talking to her.
She's taking the lead in exposing one of the core lies about this whole thing, and that is that they never isolated COVID-19.
This is like getting to the basis of climate change.
And CO2. The truth about CO2. We're going to have the truth about viruses and about COVID-19 coming up with Christine Massey.
Let's talk, though, about Paris Climate Accord.
And I've talked about it many times.
I said, look at what they did.
And I thought it was a head fake from Trump when I first reported it.
So he said, so I'm going to get out of it, but I've got to wait four years, and I'll do it right after the election.
I said, yeah, right.
It's just a head fake.
He's just saying he's going to do it, doesn't get out of it.
And that's what happened.
He got out of it right after the 2020 election.
And then in less than two months, Biden puts us right back into it.
And he fooled everybody.
Everybody said, he got out of it.
I said, no, he didn't.
Well, I came to realize that this agreement has a clause in it.
That says that you have to give them one year's notification and you can't do it until after, three years after, you have gotten into the agreement.
And so, remember John Kerry and Obama said, we self-ratified this agreement.
They did that in 2016. That's why Trump said, well, I can't get out until 2020. Of course, what's the logical flaw there?
We never were in it.
You can't self-ratify a treaty.
Senate has to do that.
And when I was looking at this, I thought, so what's going to happen again?
Are we going to start this four-year thing again?
Well, it turns out that it is, excuse me, this is what the document actually, this is what it's about.
How long does it take, what's the required time, to leave the Paris Climate Accord?
Pretending that you're in it, of course.
That's the key.
The process for a country to withdraw from a Paris Climate Accord involves a specific timeline.
According to the agreement's rules, a country must first notify the UN of its intention to withdraw.
This notification is typically done through a formal letter to the UN. And after this notification, the country must wait for a period of four years from the date of entry.
Into the force of the agreement for that country.
So I thought, here we go again.
Another four years.
However, a country can only eliminate the withdrawal process after three years of agreement in force for that country.
So, they give an example for the United States.
For the U.S., a notable example.
President Trump initiated the withdrawal process in November of 2019. Which took effect on November the 4th, 2020, a day after the presidential election.
This timeline adheres to the four-year waiting period for the date of entry of the U.S. into the agreement, which was September the 3rd, 2016. Therefore, it takes a minimum of four years for a country to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord that it is entered into force for that country.
Will be never entered into it, first of all.
What took him so long?
If you're going to abide by that and say we got into it, so now we've got to follow their rules to get out of it, that would have been September the 3rd, 2016. Instead, what he did was he did it a day after the election.
Wait another couple months for that.
And so then I looked at this and I thought, but what about re-entry?
Does that reset the clock?
Because after Biden and Trump gets us out two months later, Biden puts us right back in.
So does that now a re-entry?
Well, I don't know, honestly.
But apparently, it's looking like no.
It appears now that with Trump's order that he just put out and his deluge of orders yesterday, it appears that we're one year away from getting out this time.
Except that we were never in it.
I can't stress that enough.
We were never in it.
And the only people to get that right...
Ironically, is the Guardian.
These people who do nothing but sell climate fear, that's their number one thing.
They harp on that all the time.
You know, the sky is falling, the sky is falling.
And they're the ones who got it right.
Nobody, nobody in the conservative or MAGA media got it right.
Nobody talks about how this operates.
Trump has signed an executive order directing the U.S. to again withdraw from the landmark Paris Climate Agreement.
This is AP, Associated Propaganda.
I like to read AP. Give me an opposition opinion, which is always wrong.
But he kind of tells you what the establishment position is.
AP says this is dealing a blow to worldwide efforts to combat global warming and once again distancing the U.S. from its closest allies.
Man, isn't that awful?
Trump signed a letter to the UN indicating his intention to withdraw from the 2015 agreement, which allows nations, it allows us, to provide targets to cut their own emissions of greenhouse gases.
It doesn't allow, it demands.
It's an imposition.
China and India were given exemptions, but not us.
We've got to immediately start cutting everything.
We've got to get to zero.
And we've got to be at zero before they even have to level off.
China and India can build as dirty a power plants as many as they want, and they're building two coal power plants a week in China.
This is insane.
We'll never have manufacturing here.
All of the stuff about tariffs is beside the point.
And he's going to continue this insanity, at least, for another year, pretending that we are in it.
They're pretending that CO2 is a problem.
They're pretending that we're in a treaty that was never ratified.
All of this stuff.
The emperor has no clothes.
And it is naked tyranny from these climate cults.
So it allows, according to the AP, it allows nations to provide targets to cut their own emissions of greenhouse gases from the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas.
Those targets are supposed to become more stringent over time, with countries facing a February 2025 deadline for new individual plans.
Okay, so...
We got a deadline, but it allows us to figure out how we're going to get there.
Is that what it is?
It gives us a little bit of wiggle room in that?
Folks, we were never in it.
Anybody who says that we were in it is either an idiot or a traitor or both.
That's not the way the Constitution works.
An architect of the Paris Accord added and said, Quote, there is unstoppable economic momentum behind the global transition, which the U.S. has gained from and led, but now risks forfeiting.
We didn't gain anything from this.
It has dearly cost us in terms of energy, wasted malinvestment, and corruption and crony capitalism.
Those are the people who have gained from it.
The International Energy Agency.
Expects the global market for clean energy technologies to triple, to more than $2 trillion in 2035. That means $2 trillion to people like Elon Musk.
That's what they're really talking about.
To produce cars that nobody wants, nobody can afford, and to ban the cars that we can.
That's what they call economic growth.
What doublespeak?
The withdrawal process from the Paris Accord takes one year.
Trump's previous withdrawal took effect the day after the 2020 election, which he lost to Biden, they said.
While the first Trump-led withdrawal shocked and angered nations across the globe, not a single country followed the U.S. out the door in those two months, as intended.
About half of Americans somewhat or strongly oppose U.S. action to withdrawal from the climate accord.
This is according to the AP poll.
They did a poll and said that only two out of ten adults in the U.S. somewhat are strongly in favor of withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, while about one quarter are neutral.
The vast majority want to stay in it.
That's how effective government public education propaganda has been.
China several years ago passed the U.S. as the world's largest Annual carbon dioxide emitting nation.
Well, they admit that.
And then they turn right around and say, yeah, but, you know, the U.S. has contributed nearly 22% of carbon dioxide put in the atmosphere since 1950. Shame on us.
We need to punish ourselves for that.
Forget about the fact that China is pumping it out at unprecedented amounts.
That they're the number one emitting nation.
Oh no, you gotta turn off all the heaters in Britain, right?
This is insane.
So, what's going to happen with all this stuff?
I'm telling you right now, Trump's going to come around, he's going to continue to play this game, just like he's pretending that we're in the Paris Climate Accord.
Can't get out of it for another year and so forth, but he's not going to oppose the fundamental lies.
about CO2 and global warming and all the rest of this stuff, or methane or any of it.
And his PayPal's Are going to benefit, profit from this with crony capitalism.
They're going to be profiting from the carbon taxes, from the carbon credits, from the carbon sequestration.
You know, this is what Doug Burgum was all about.
And Trump has now created a new little agency, and he's put Doug Burgum, the king of carbon sequestration and carbon pipelines, he's put him in.
He had that little meeting with the North and South Dakota governors, Kristi Noem, Doug Burgum, and the guy running the pipeline.
They were all at Mar-a-Lago.
They've been planning this thing for a while.
So, in his order that he put out, it's called Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements.
In recent years, says this agreement, the U.S. has purported to join international agreements.
Whoa, wait a minute.
When I was reading through this thing, that's about halfway down the first page, purported, webster's dictionary says that when you say something is purported to be that, you say reputed, alleged.
The U.S. has allegedly joined international agreements, but they won't say that we're not in that international agreement.
We've allegedly joined it.
We never did.
It is an allegation to say that we've joined it, but we have not.
And so, in this order, it says, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations shall immediately submit formal written notification of the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement.
We were never in it.
We were allegedly in it, but we are not in it.
It was never ratified by the Senate.
The U.S. will consider its withdrawal from the agreement and any attendant obligations to be effective immediately upon the provision of notification.
Within 30 days of this order, the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury goes through all these different departments.
Commerce, HHS, Energy, EPA, Agriculture, and on and on and on.
All of them will detail their actions to revoke or to rescind policies that were implemented to advance the International Climate Finance Plan.
Well, that's really good.
I hope they do that.
That needs to be revoked.
And that's some details.
And so this is all of government.
Because look, all the swamp.
All the alphabet agencies are under the president.
And just like we saw Joe Biden in spring of 2022 say, everybody, give me your plans for how we're going to implement CBDC. Well, this is Trump saying, we're going to have detailed actions here to revoke the policies that were implemented for this international climate finance plan.
Now, I don't know exactly what that is.
I'll have to look that up.
But still, Secretary of State, Secretary of Commerce shall hence for us.
Henceforth, prioritize economic efficiency, the promotion of American prosperity, consumer choice, and fiscal restraint, and all foreign engagements that concern energy policy.
Great.
Let's just tell everybody, though, that this whole thing is a lie.
Can we do that?
Can we tell them it's a lie, just like Christine Massey is going to show us how we were lied to about the virus itself?
Let me finish with this.
The Guardian.
And again, this is their headline.
A second U.S. exit could cripple the Paris Climate Agreement, warns a U.N. chief.
Let's pray that it does.
Let's pray that it cripples it.
Let's pray that it breaks both of its legs.
The Paris Agreement, but as I said before, there aren't any conservative publications, libertarian publications, MAGA cheerleaders.
Nobody gets this right.
about the Paris Climate Accord, except for the Guardian.
And they just put this out.
I've been saying this for years.
We're not in it.
They said the Paris Agreement can survive, but people sometimes can lose important organs or lose their legs and survive.
But we don't want a crippled Paris Agreement.
We want a real Paris Agreement, said UN Secretary General.
Now, this is Guardian.
If the Republican candidate wins, so they said this right before the election, His administration could withdraw the U.S. from the U.N. climate negotiating framework entirely, according to reports.
If he does so, it could require Senate approval for the U.S. to rejoin.
Why didn't it require U.S. Senate approval to join?
Because they ignored the Constitution.
They self-ratified it.
And so again, they got it right.
In all cases, it requires Senate ratification.
To rejoin.
So, I was absolutely amazed to see them admit the truth here.
The U.S. became the first country in the world to formally withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord in November 2020, after Trump announced that he would leave in June of 2017. Due to complicated rules about leaving the accord, there was a substantial delay between the decision and the formal departures.
I just explained to you.
Biden rejoined the Paris Agreement on the first day of his presidency, January 2021. Michael Manure, the climate scientist at the University of Pennsylvania that we sued, and just like Christine Massey, we said, show us your data.
Show us your data.
Well, I'm not going to show you my data.
I'll fight you in court.
And he did.
He won.
For Christine Massey, they said, well, we don't keep it.
Anyway, Michael Manure.
A climate scientist at the University of Pennsylvania said a second Trump presidency would be a serious blow to U.S. action on climate.
A second Trump presidency is game over for meaningful climate action this decade and stabilizing warming before 1.5 degrees C probably becomes impossible.
Well, let's hope that this pans out this way.
I'm still very concerned about the fact that we are adhering to the alleged I think about being into this climate accord.
We're not in it.
Not in it at all.
Do we have Christine yet?
She joined, but her camera is down right now.
Okay.
All right.
Well, let me read a couple of comments here and thank people for the tips there.
I'll be right there, Christine.
Psalm 144, thank you very much for the tip.
Said, a donation to keep The David Knight Show as pessimistic as possible.
Praying for Karen, and thank you, Whistler, for filling in.
Yes, doing a great job.
Thank you.
A Syrian girl, poor Biden, under investigation for funding overseas abortions, did he pardon himself so that he can dodge this investigation?
He should have to put his name at the end of the list.
That's right.
He didn't pardon himself.
That was oversight.
Maybe it's getting a little bit hard for him to remember.
He forgot to put his name at the top of the list.
He only signed his name at the bottom.
A Syrian girl says, funds to the victims of disaster in America should be at the top of our spending list.
Isn't that interesting?
Nothing but crickets about Western North Carolina.
All that winning and celebrating yesterday?
Nothing but crickets about Western North Carolina.
Bloden says Trump fundraised for Western North Carolina.
Well, good.
Now he can do something else about it.
KWD68 says Trump took bottled water to North Carolina.
Problem solved.
Was it even a hot water bottle?
We don't know.
Well, we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back as Alfred Hitchcock is going to explain to us about what's going on in this climate change, McGuffin.
Good evening.
Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow.
Or, more specifically, what comes out the other end.
Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda...
Even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat.
The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.
Carefully contrive to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in, jackboots and all, with their solutions.
Because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags?
But one must wonder, is this truly about saving the planet, or are we simply being led to pasture?
Is it merely a MacGuffin?
The David Knight show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny.
And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull.
So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please consider supporting the show.
And now back to our regularly scheduled program.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Now is Christine Massey, and it is great to finally have her on.
I've talked about her for years, and we started talking about it quite a bit more when I interviewed Sam Bailey and her husband, and the book that they did, I think it was called Pandemic-Free or something like that, where they talked a lot about how her research had been very important where they talked a lot about how her research had been very important in them waking up to a lot of fraudulent stuff that has been put forth as science, Just like the climate MacGuffin, people don't want to show you data, might be because they're lying to you.
And so I wanted to get Christine Massey on.
I'll give you her website here.
She said she's got a tiny URL, but you can go to fluoridefreepeel.ca for Canada.
Christine is out of Canada, I believe.
Talk to her about her process of discovery and what she discovered.
So joining us now is Christine Massey.
Thank you for joining us.
Thank you so much, David.
It's an honor to be invited.
Well, thank you.
I feel honored because you've done a lot of very important research, and we've got to get to the bottom line as to what happened with us.
So give us a little bit of an idea about your process of discovery.
When did you start asking for some proof for this pandemic?
What did you ask him and what did you get back?
But let's begin with when all this started.
Yeah, sure.
So, it was in 2020, obviously, you know.
Everybody was hearing about the supposed virus, and luckily I didn't get caught up in it all because I had a background dealing with public health on water fluoridation, so I already didn't take anything they said seriously.
And then I came across the work of Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and I heard that there's issues with the methodologies used by the virologists to supposedly demonstrate that there's a virus and what they call virus isolation.
Fact-checked what he was saying, verified it for myself, and then I thought, well, I just want to be really certain of what I'm, you know, now that I'm going to start sharing his material and saying these things publicly too, I'm going to send Freedom of Information requests to Canadian institutions like Health Canada.
Public Health Agency of Canada to fact-check and just, you know, make 100% sure, give them the chance to say, oh, no, you're wrong.
Actually, Christine, here's the valid, you know, scientific evidence.
And then I also thought, well...
If they don't actually have it, then their responses will become useful evidence so that people can see that they're just being, they're not telling the truth.
Oh, it did become very useful evidence, that's right.
Yeah.
I had no idea we'd still be, you know, here doing this almost five years later.
But anyway, that was how it got started.
So I started, it was May 14th was my first request, was sent to Health Canada.
And that's kind of like the FDA in Canada.
That's the institution that rubber-stamps, you know, approves products and clinical trials relating to the alleged virus.
And then I did Public Health Agency of Canada was probably the second one.
So I started getting their responses, and sure enough, they weren't able to cite any evidence.
So I guess I should just explain to people, in case there's anyone listening who's not already familiar.
With what I was asking for and the basics of astrology.
So what I was asking for was actually just a very simple request.
So it was any records where anyone actually found particles in sick people that supposedly have COVID, where they actually found the particles in people that they think are the virus, and then...
Separate them out from everything else in the clinical sample.
That was all I was asking for.
And the reason was, if you think there might be a virus, you know, step one, you have to find the thing that you think might be a virus.
And really, in science, you would begin with an observation of something and then you would study that something.
But they didn't even have the something.
They just theorized that, well, we think there's a something because, you know, it's...
It's much more convenient for some people to blame illnesses on things in nature, little invisible microbes or whatnot, rather than industrial factors or stress and other things that are actually manageable and that they actually affect the government and industry effects.
Because then you can attack that thing, you know?
If it's some thing, then you can go out and attack it.
And that's the whole model of modern medicine is we've got to find some pathogen and kill it, right?
Exactly.
And then, yeah, it's a big moneymaker and it distracts from why do we really get sick, you know?
So some of my colleagues have done a lot of deep dives in books like Virus Mania or What Really Makes You Ill.
They've looked at different historical events where people were being told that there was a viral outbreak.
And then they showed, well, actually, that people were being exposed to various toxins.
There's some drug behind it, this sort of thing.
Or it was just a completely useless test.
There was an incident already where it was declared that there had been an outbreak.
And then they realized, oh, no, oops, it's just a PCR test.
You know, they weren't actually detecting what they thought they were detecting.
And that's a key thing, because Kerry Mullis, who got the Nobel Prize for developing that, he said, criticizing Fauci over using his PCR test to make a connection with HIV and AIDS, and he says, he's so stupid, he thinks that you can look into an electron microscope and see a virus.
And yet, we've seen, Christine, we've seen all these pictures, haven't we?
We've got the little ball with the spikes on it and all the rest of the stuff, right?
Where'd all that stuff come from?
Definitely.
Well, I mean, people need to realize a lot of it's just literally cartoons and CGI. And then when they do show an actual electron microscope, we call it the point and declare method.
Because they'll just, first of all, it's almost never ever in the bodily fluid or tissue that they actually are looking at something.
So usually they're looking at the contents of a cell culture.
And I can explain that a little bit in a minute.
So it's not even in the bodily fluid or tissue, and it's not in a purified state, and they just put an arrow on one of their images, and they declare that that's a virus.
That's why we call it the point-and-declare method, because there's literally no logic or science.
It's like me going to a shopping mall, I point at someone, and I declare they're a serial killer.
I have no other, you know what I mean?
It hasn't been established.
Yeah, so that's all that's going on with the images.
And this relates back to what I was saying.
If you want to establish that there's a virus, you need to actually look in the bodily fluid or tissue from the body part where you think they're infected with a virus or that they might be.
And find particles that you think might be the virus and you have to separate them from everything else because if you just have some lung fluid or boogers or whatever and you just declare that there's a virus in there somewhere, that's not scientific either.
That's not logical.
You have to actually identify the particle that you think might be the virus and you need to do valid, rigorous, controlled experiments.
This is the scientific method.
It's all about controlled experiments.
You observe something in nature.
You want to investigate causation, the causal relationship between two variables.
So you do a controlled experiment where you hold all the variables constant in both groups.
So you maybe have a group of animals, two groups of animals.
You hold all their living conditions, all the various factors constant in both.
And then in the experimental group, you expose them to the one thing that you think might be a causal agent.
That's how the scientific method works, and it's logical because you want to be able to rule out other factors that could cause the illness, whatever it is that you're investigating.
So that's why you need to find the particle in its location where you think they might be, which is in people in this case.
Find the particle you think might be a virus, separate it from everything else.
Then you can sequence and characterize it in a valid manner, which is important because you need to identify exactly what it is that you're talking about and doing experiments with.
And you need to do the experiments to see, does this thing actually do the things that we're told viruses do?
So that's all I was asking for.
Does anybody do that first step of even finding particles in...
In the locations where we're told they are, in people's lungs, what have you.
Or, you know, they should be able to just spit in a cup or something and find it in there, based on their narrative, and purify it.
That's all I was asking for.
Because if they didn't do that, they couldn't have followed through with proper actual sequencing, characterization, investigate the particle, see how big it is, find out its density.
The proteins that it has, etc.
And do the control experiments.
So that's what I was asking for.
So just to recap, if their paradigm is correct, and they're saying this is caused by some virus, some particle, whatever, they should be able to find a lot of that in somebody who's really sick.
And you wouldn't find it, or wouldn't find much of it in somebody that wasn't sick.
And yet, because they have folded this all together with the PCR test, And magnified it by 40 cycles, which is 1.1 trillion times.
Now they're identifying people where, let's assume, if you jump in the middle of their paradigm and you say, okay, they have a virus that they've isolated, which they haven't, but let's just assume that they have this virus and they're testing for it with a PCR thing.
And they find just a minuscule amount of it.
This is why Carrie Mullis said you can't use it for diagnosing disease because you can find anything in anybody.
And it doesn't have to be in a sufficient present quantity to have what they call a viral load that would make somebody sick.
So you're going to find it all over the place.
And it doesn't mean that it's anything that's dangerous or anything that's making somebody sick if they are, in fact, sick.
But, of course, they're flagging people who aren't even sick because they're using this PCR test.
Talk to us a little bit about, you know, we go back and we look at this and they're testing, supposedly testing for something.
If they don't have anything that's isolated, what in the world are they testing for?
Yeah, that's exactly the issue.
So in order to validate a test to show that, you know, it's actually accurate and worth using, you have to validate it.
You have to compare the results you get to the test to the actual fact of the matter in a large group of people.
And then you can see how well does it work.
So you need, in other words, you need to compare it to a gold standard.
And in this case, the...
The gold standard would be a particle that has already been shown to be a virus, right?
So they don't have a gold standard.
They never actually established that this thing exists.
They have all kinds of studies and stories about it, you know.
Dr. Kaufman, we have to go back to the very beginning and carefully read the method section.
This is where people get confused too because they can go online and find all sorts of studies and say, oh yeah, we isolated the virus, but you have to carefully read the method section and that's where it all falls apart.
You see what they actually did.
They didn't identify any specific particle.
They didn't sequence anything.
They didn't characterize a particle.
There's no controlled experiment.
They don't show disease causation.
They don't establish contagion of anything.
So, yeah, that's what we were focusing on.
So, back to the PCR, it's, I usually describe it, it's an impossible to validate test.
You can't validate any of the tests, whether it's antigen or antibody or what have you, when nobody has even established that the thing that you're supposedly testing for even exists.
And so...
Another really important point, like, people need to understand with all these tests, they're all indirect tests.
So none of them are actually even identifying this supposed particle or getting direct evidence that the particle is there.
What they're doing with PCR, for example, it's a process, as I'm sure you know, it wasn't even intended as a test in the beginning, as Carrie made clear.
But all it's...
When it's applied as a so-called test, all it's doing is giving, in the best case scenario, when it's done in the most rigorous, careful manner, which is not what happened in COVID. There was no standardization.
There was different labs doing their own thing.
It was like a Wild West.
They're all testing for different targets.
But what it's, quote, testing for, it's just a tiny little, different tiny little sequences.
Of the alleged genome.
So the genome is said to be roughly 30,000 units long.
But they'll be testing for something, a little sequence that's like maybe 18 or so units long.
It's only this tiny, tiny little fragment of the alleged genome that's actually never been shown to exist.
And then the genome is supposed to be surrounded by a protein shell.
And then some viruses are said to have an envelope as well.
And that's the case with SARS-CoV-2.
That's where the spike proteins supposedly stick out.
So you're talking about this long genome with two different layers around it.
That's not what they're testing for.
PCR is only looking for this teeny little segment of the alleged genome.
That's it.
It can't even establish that the particle is there that they claim exists.
The CDC has admitted this formally since 2020. They have a document.
John Rappaport brought it to my attention back in 2020. And they admit right in it, it's not evidence that you actually have a replication-competent infectious virus.
And it can't rule out other causes for why people might be sick.
And the other important thing is, as you probably already know, I'm sure, that most people who tested positive, they didn't even have any symptoms.
They weren't even sick.
Oh, we're seeing that big time.
Yeah, we're seeing that big time now with the bird flu stuff.
It's like, well, they got any fever?
No, no fever.
They got any respiratory issues?
No, no.
They got pink eye.
They work on a farm, and it's a very dirty environment, and they rub their hands, and they get pink eye.
I used to get it all the time when I was a kid.
They didn't tell me I was going to die of bird flu when I got it as a kid.
But, you know, it's ludicrous.
It's absolutely ludicrous.
And, yeah, so fast forwarding to today, I ended up having a lot of people help because I was putting my results on social media and letting people know and I eventually started a newsletter.
So other people from other countries, other places started helping and they would use the same wording or sometimes their own wording.
And they were asking institutions where they live, like, hey, can you show us this, right?
Like, you're the one making the claim.
You have the burden of proof.
Just show us.
And so they would send me the results that they're going, look, Christina, you know, same thing here.
Nobody has it.
Today, and all of this has been available on my website all the time.
I'm always putting the FOIs, making them public.
And so as of today, just on the topic of SARS-CoV-2 isolation, or I usually say purification, just that initial step of finding and purifying, we have 225 different institutions in 40 different countries on record.
They were all formally challenged.
And this includes the CDC, the FDA. I'll look at my Excel sheet here.
In the United States, the Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor, Food and Drug Administration, the Fauci's old institution, the...
NIAID, yeah.
Yeah, thank you.
National...
I'm blanking out.
Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases.
And Infectious Diseases.
National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases.
So nobody has it.
And then we've got Italy, India, like I said, 40 different countries.
So yeah, it's very...
Well, they pulled one over on us, didn't they?
Yeah, they absolutely did.
And while we were doing these...
We actually had a couple of remarkable admissions from the CDC and Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto.
So these are really particularly important responses that we got.
One was to my colleague Michael in New Zealand.
He was the first one to started sending the request to the CDC. So in his, I think it was November 1st or 2nd of 2020, people can find it on my website, Asked the CDC, and what they said in their response was that what he was asking for is never done in virology.
So during this time period, too, people like Andy Kaufman and Tom Cowan and, of course, Stefan Lonka, they were, as they were, well, I think Stefan Lonka already knew that virology in general was ridiculous, and Tom and Andy were figuring this out as they were going through the year as well.
And so these admissions from Mount Sinai told me the same thing twice.
And some people might say, well, you're talking to an administrative person.
They don't know.
Well, actually, what these people told me, that it was the subject matter experts that told them this.
So it wasn't just some administrative person who doesn't really have knowledge.
It was the so-called experts that are saying...
This is never done in virology.
What you're asking for is outside of what is ever done in virology.
Well, I would say that's pretty evident if you've contacted 225 institutions in 40 countries and none of them vote.
And then you have somebody tell you that that's never done.
It correlates pretty well there, I guess.
Yeah, but what I want people to understand, too, is this is not just a SARS-CoV-2 issue.
It's not just a COVID thing.
All the alleged viruses that we're told about our entire lives.
HIV, HPV, like on an influenza virus, measles virus.
Dr. Stefan Lok already won a lawsuit several years back in Germany where he challenged someone, show me evidence of the alleged measles virus.
And someone presented six papers.
It went to court.
The mainstream media never tells people that it went up to the higher courts on appeal.
And Dr. Lanka prevailed that none of the studies that were cited actually showed scientific evidence of the measles virus.
And this included the 1954 John Enders study, which was the foundational study supposedly for measles virus.
And it's really important because that became the kind of the gold standard approach moving forward through the death rates For virology, where they would use his methods, which were unscientific and illogical, didn't show any particular particle.
He didn't identify a specific particle at all, let alone show that it's a virus.
And this is what they started doing in virology up to the present day, the cell cultures.
Wow.
So it was already established, but the mainstream media doesn't let people know these things.
And then we also have, if people go to my website and they look at the links for the FOIs, they'll also find a page where it deals with other alleged viruses, and that's where they'll see.
We have dozens and dozens of responses from various different institutions.
If there's time, I don't know if you have time, but I could highlight a few really important ones.
So one thing, for example, we have numerous responses on the alleged avian influenza virus, and I mention that because, you know, that's one of the ones that are being hyped up right now.
So we have the FDA on record on that.
We have the CDC, numerous different institutions from Japan and Canada.
So if anyone's being harassed there, take a look at that.
But also, some of the more important ones are, for example, with the Public Health Agency of Canada.
One time I asked them, do you have any record of any alleged virus being found and purified from people?
Any alleged virus from people?
And they admitted they didn't have it.
I asked the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
I worded this one differently.
I just said, do you have scientific evidence, actual rigorous scientific evidence, showing the existence of any virus that you claim has ever infected livestock in Canada?
And they admitted flat out that they didn't have anything.
We also have responses from numerous institutions where they were asked, can you show us any virus that...
It's supposedly covered by a so-called vaccination schedule.
So we did this in the U.S., it's been done in New Zealand, different places.
Any of those alleged viruses that people get so-called vaccinated for, any of those being found and purified from people, they don't have any record.
I mean, it's just...
Well, you know, we've seen that...
And there's an affidavit.
I could give people a really quick little tiny URL because it'll take you to a page where it's a newsletter.
It'll show you the avian influenza responses we have.
It'll also show a notice of conditional acceptance for...
Farmers, it's like you'd have to adopt it for different countries and you might want to make changes to it, but it's basically to inspire people if you're a farmer or you're being harassed in some way by the government, they're telling you, oh, you have to test your animals or something.
It's a notice that you can give to them where you're demanding.
You're saying, okay, you want me to do this?
Well, you know, I'll do it or I'll consider doing it once you give me valid rigorous evidence that the virus exists and all these other things that you're claiming.
So you can find the link to that there.
And then you'll also, as you scroll down, there's educational materials from my colleagues, but there's also a link to my affidavit.
So I have a notarized affidavit that I put out as an educational tool and to show people, like, we're dead serious about this.
You know, I'll say it to anybody.
A detailed affidavit about these responses.
And then it'll also give all the links to the different webpages that I have for relating to...
Because we've also asked from different angles, did Freedom of Information.
So the tinyurl is tinyurl.com and then forward slash avian-hoax.
So if people go there, they'll find all sorts of links.
They can find everything from there.
Good.
Yeah, I'll put that in the show notes as well.
TinyURL.com slash avianhoax.
Yeah, with a dash.
Avian-hoax.
Oh, avian-hoax.
Okay, good.
All right.
Yeah, we'll take a look at that.
Now, you know, when we look at the stuff that they were telling us through all this.
It didn't make any sense whatsoever.
You know, when we look at the masks, for example, and I was talking about it from within their paradigm of viruses and what they say they were in terms of size and all the rest of the stuff.
I said, okay, so we're going to wear these masks.
And, of course, they weren't specific about a mask.
It could be an N95 mask, but you were okay if you wore a bandana that you found on a costume somewhere, you know.
So anything would apparently work.
But even with an N95 mask or something, it would...
If the viruses were the size that they were, they would simply be like trying to keep mosquitoes out with a hurricane fence, as many people point out, chain-link fence or something.
And so then they said, oh, it's the saliva that's going out there.
As you point out, they don't find these virus particles in bodily fluids or tissues or anything like that, but let's just assume that that was true.
Well, if that were true, then there was already an experiment back in...
You know, just looking at the physics of it, back in 2003 in Australia, they said, well, after 20 minutes, your mask gets so much spittle in it that you're actually going to push out smaller particles and they will be airborne longer and travel farther.
So none of this stuff made any sense from that standpoint, and especially because your face is not sealed.
So with me, with a beard, you know, I said, what are they going to make me?
Shave my beard to wear a mask.
I mean, it's just going to go through.
I had just been snorkeling for the first time since I was in college, and since I had a mustache now, none of the masks would work.
So I'm like, I know what that's going to be.
It's not going to keep any viral particles in if there is something like that.
And it just continued on with the insanity.
They redefined immunity and what immunity was.
You know, first they'd say, well, you got natural immunity to this thing because you had it.
Well, now natural immunity doesn't work.
Now you only get immunity if you have a vaccine or something like that.
None of this made any sense.
And now if you realize that they're just making all this stuff up, now it makes sense.
Exactly.
That's the only way it makes sense.
It just doesn't make sense.
You know, and another thing I should mention, too, is other people have done a lot of work on the issue of contagions.
You know, we're told that these illnesses are contagious, and nowadays the assumption is that they claim it's because we're passing these particles to each other, these particles that weren't even shown to exist.
And we have included in my Freedom of Information earlier this year, I started changing the wording, so I started asking about that as well.
I would ask, do you have any scientific evidence showing the virus exists?
If not, do you even have records showing that it was found and purified?
Do you have any record where they found the alleged genome intact?
And they don't even have that because they just make them up.
They're literally just computer models.
But I also asked about contagion, and nobody's able to show me that the illness or the symptoms that the virus is supposedly caused are actually contagious.
And then we have people like Daniel Reuters.
He's a gentleman.
He was a naturopath, and he started learning about this.
So he did a very deep dive into the contagion issue.
And he wrote a book called Can You Catch a Cold?
And he reviewed over 200 studies on this topic, and he found that there was zero, zero scientific evidence that colds are actually contagious.
And there have been various studies, there's been attempts to demonstrate contagion, and they always fail.
Or in the studies where someone does get sick, it's never a rigorous controlled experiment.
You don't actually have the control side to see, well...
Maybe they were going to get sick for some other reason anyway.
You know, maybe something that they were being fed or something in the environment.
So he did a deep dive on that.
And then we have other people who, like, someone collected up something like 90 different studies where the authors were concluding that, look, you know, it really doesn't look like polio is contagious.
There have been experiments where people ingested bacterial cultures of supposedly pathogenic bacteria, and they didn't get sick.
There was a doctor, I think his name was Robert Wilner.
He injected himself with blood from a supposedly HI-infected man on television years ago to make the point, like, he's not afraid.
He's not going to get sick, and he didn't get sick.
So there's been all kinds of The work in that area as well.
And then there's the Rosenau study from 19...
Everybody should read it.
It's a very quick and easy read.
And it shows how with this so-called Spanish flu, these researchers tried everything imaginable to try to get the sick people to pass the illness on to healthy people.
And they couldn't do it.
They absolutely failed.
What's the name of that study again?
The Rosen what?
Rosenau, R-O-S-E-A-U, and it's from about, if people type it into my website, the search function, they can find it there.
I put a link to it on there.
Good.
Yeah, so that's really important.
When I interviewed Sam Bailey and her husband, Mark, I think it is, and in their book, they talked about the cold house in the UK. For 45 years, they set up a house and they tried to analyze how people were catching coals from each other.
And they said they did everything they could.
They did gross stuff like taking mucus from one person who is sick and putting it in the mouth of another person or putting it in their nose or all of a sudden.
They couldn't do it.
You know, cough on this person who had volunteers.
They shut it down after 45 years, couldn't find anything there.
Maybe that's why we haven't found a...
A cure for the cold because they're trying to identify some kind of a particle that doesn't exist so they can kill it.
And that's not what's happening to it.
But let's talk about the measles because that was one of the other ones.
And when we look at a situation, we grew up at a time when we didn't have a measles vaccine.
We would have measles parties and some kid down the block would get measles and everybody would go down and hang out with them.
That's what my wife's Parents did.
They had three kids.
They had a couple of kids and then twins in the middle.
So they had four kids that were like three years apart.
So they said, we're not going to deal with this sequentially.
Let's just send them all down and let them all get measles at the same time.
And they did.
So what do you think is going on with that?
I don't know, but what I know is whenever we ask, like, why isn't there a valid, rigorous, controlled experiment that actually demonstrates as this happens?
Because I think what happens is people, we're told all our lives that certain things are contagious, right?
And then so we tend to focus on the situations that seem to confirm that.
And we forget all the examples that don't actually fit it.
So there's been all kinds of children that went to measles parties, or they were in school with a child that had the so-called measles, and they didn't get it, right?
And then there's, like, children who weren't around anyone who had it, and now they have this skin condition, right?
So, and then, so, I mean, what does cause it?
Different people have different hypotheses that it could be children tend to get these things because it's part of their growth cycle as you're passing through a certain stage.
Let's say if you're a certain toxic load, your body might go through a process to try to eject poisons because one of the main ways we get...
Toxins out of our body is actually through our skin.
That's one of the roots.
So when your organs aren't able to keep up with what you've been eating or drinking, one of the ways your body will react is to start pushing things out through the skin.
And then some people believe, too, that there could be an emotional component to it.
When children are young and they start going to school and they go through like a separation from their parents and it could be partly that sort of thing.
So I don't have an answer, but the way I look at it is someone first show me that the measles actually is contagious.
Show me actual valid scientific study that establishes that and then we can try to figure out why it may be happening.
But it can be too, like the kids could just be, maybe they were all exposed to something.
Whether it was at their friend's house, or they go to school together, and these kids were going to get sick anyway.
I think the key thing is, going back to what you were saying, they're not doing this in a scientific method.
They're not isolating something and saying, okay, we've got a control group here, and we've got another group, and this group, we found this particular thing in them.
And so if we accept some paradigm that they've made up...
Then that means that we're not going to be looking for other causes or perhaps real causes.
We just fall into this, okay, well, it's a virus, and we can't see viruses, and so, you know, it's just this thing.
But we're going to address it.
I had a question from a listener here, John 2459. It says, David, could you ask your guess?
If the tiny part they're testing for could also be found in other viruses or locations or other things like that.
I mean, you're talking about a very long gene sequence that they're looking for, and they say, well, if we just find a part of this, that could be found in all kinds of things, right?
Yeah, so that's a good point.
So with the PCR protocol that was promoted and encouraged by the World Health Organization, it was based on a protocol and a study by Christian Drosten, who I'm sure you've heard of, and some colleagues of his.
So in their published study where they were reporting on how they developed their PCR protocol, they admitted things like, for example, they started working on developing a test for this alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus based on social media rumors.
And they never did have a sample of this alleged virus.
They started out based on rumors, and then they eventually, from China, the computer code that supposedly represents the full-length genome was released, and they started working based on that.
But what they also did was they did some of their testing to see how well the tests performed.
They used some...
Frozen samples from the supposed SARS outbreak back in around 2003. And what they said in this study was that their test for the supposedly new virus, the new coronavirus, they would get positive results from the old supposed SARS virus and any avian virus.
So they were admitting right in it.
They call it cross-reactivity.
So anybody can...
You can find that study, I believe, on my website if you type in DROST, and I think you can find a link to the study.
And they were admitting it right there, that even, like you said, within their model, within their terms, they're admitting it's not specific to this supposed...
New virus.
And, of course, you've got the absurd things, pronouncements being made, even if you believed in viruses and the paradigm and all the rest of the stuff.
You've got Robert Redfield out there saying bird flu.
Well, we know that it's inevitable that it's going to migrate to humans, and when it does, we're going to have a case fatality rate of 52%.
You know this guy's lying.
There's no way that he could make this kind of projection.
What is he, Nostradamus or something?
But he tries to make it sound scientific by not saying 50%, but 52%.
The whole thing is really a scam.
You know, there was a document, Christine, that I found in August of 2020, and it was the American Hospital Association, AHA. And it was an aha moment for me, because they had a back and forth with, here in the United States, the money was being passed out to people through CMS, the Medicare Medicaid agency, right?
And so CMS said, we're going to have to see PCR proof that these people have COVID before we pay you, because they were giving them a bonus of $13,000 if they found a COVID case.
And imagine...
If you've got that kind of incentive, you're going to be finding them all over the place, right?
But they would give them a bonus, and then they would pay them 20% bonus on what their normal fee would be.
After you identify them as a COVID patient, now you get a 20% bonus on everything that you do to them, right?
You give them a Kleenex, it's 20% more.
And so the American Hospital Association said, CMS just told us that they're not going to pay that 20% bonus unless we've got quote-unquote proof in terms of PCR tests.
And they said, you told us when this started.
That you didn't have enough tests and they didn't work anyway.
And I said, wow.
They're just being bribed to make stuff up.
Just point at somebody and say that you've got it.
You talk about point and identify or whatever.
That's exactly what it was.
That's what they were doing in the hospitals.
It wasn't even to the viruses.
They've never established the significance of these sequences.
Some people think they could be just, I mean, all they had to do was if they know, there's a lot of evidence that this whole thing was planned in advance, and all they had to do was pick some sequences that they know they're going to find in some people, and then when you test them, you say, oh, that's, yeah, you confirmed that you have the virus.
That's all they had to do.
So they could just be sequences that, they don't even have to be associated with being sick, because like we said, Most people are not even sick who tested positives.
That's right.
And we're talking about it just being a fragment of something, right?
How could you find a match?
Would you be able, if you had just a small fragment of DNA, be able to distinguish between a chimp and a human?
No, probably.
Maybe not.
Because we've got a significant amount of overlap.
We've got like 90% or something of the DNA. I don't know what the exact number is, but it's really high of the DNA as shared between humans and chimps.
But that's a completely different thing.
So if you just took a small portion of the genome, you wouldn't be able to tell what kind of animal it was.
Yeah, exactly.
And then if you look further, like, for example, Dr. Tom Cowan has recently done a presentation on the supposed human genome, and you find that's not actually what we've been led to believe either.
Yeah, I thought growing up, you know, that that was all established.
And, you know, it's funny, they call it the human genome.
On the one hand, they say we all have a unique genome.
But then they also refer to the human genome.
It doesn't even make sense.
How much variation is there between humans, let alone between different species?
But it turns out they never even completed the very first human genome.
That project, it's just more smoke and mirrors.
I don't know if it's intentional.
That was Francis Collins.
He went straight from the Human Genome Project to the head of NIH. You know, and now he's Fauci's boss.
It all just comes together, doesn't it?
I've got another comment.
Yeah, so all these things, like, there's no, anything you hear in connection with virology or, like, I wouldn't take any of it at face value.
As soon as you turn out, you start asking questions or looking into it.
Where's the actual evidence?
So, even their comparisons of the human genome with other genomes, I don't know that there's actually even any.
Well, just in general, you know, I've been in this, before all this stuff happened, I was working with people who were questioning the claims about climate change and stuff, right?
And so, Michael Mann, who was involved with ClimateGate in the UK, and they're passing emails back and forth saying, our models don't work, we're actually getting a decline here when we should be getting an increase in temperature with certain things.
And so, I was with a group and we said, well, we'd like to see your data.
And he'd already published it.
been working at a university level.
And so the public was paying for his job, and he had published it, and they'd used it for public policy, and yet he wouldn't show us his information.
There's so much that is out there that masquerades as science, and now they're increasingly telling us you can't question this, right?
This settled.
And I always say there's no such thing as settled science.
Every time science advances or our understanding of anything advances, it's because somebody questioned their paradigm.
And it turned out that the paradigm that they accepted conventional wisdom was wrong.
And somebody challenges that, and we move ahead with our understanding somehow.
But you can't abandon the scientific method.
These people have abandoned that.
They've abandoned any criticism.
You can't have any free speech.
How has this affected you?
What kind of attacks have you gotten from people?
I'm sure that they've been all over you with this kind of stuff.
Well, I don't bother going on social media and arguing with people anymore, but I mean, we used to get called every name in the book.
Even by, excuse me, other people in the freedom movement made all sorts of wild accusations that we're CIA operatives, we're here to disrupt the freedom movement, I mean, on and on and on.
I had an interesting situation recently where I went with some colleagues to a police department and we were there to report We were asking them, which we've done in the past.
My colleague has done it many times, but this time I went with him and we've done a video also about this.
But we were asking them to lay charges and take into custody the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario, the so-called Parliament, and investigate them because COVID-19 is a complete hoax.
We have all these...
You know, confessions.
That's what I call them.
Official legal confessions is what they are.
They're showing they don't have any scientific evidence.
The whole thing was a hoax.
They also didn't give anybody due process.
And I think this is really important for people everywhere to keep in mind that...
Like a basic right, I don't like to use the word human right, but as people, we have the right to due process before someone starts barking orders at us and telling us you have to do this, you have to do that.
There should be an opportunity to examine the evidence on both sides and cross-examine and, you know, a whole process before someone's ordering you to do anything.
So one of the problems there is that they did things without due process and they...
Made all these demands and people died as a result.
I've been calling it from the very beginning.
I said it's medical martial law.
And that's the way they operate it.
You do what I say, and we're not going to entertain any questions about this.
I don't have to show you anything.
It's just going to be a pronouncement.
And that is so antithetical to science.
You know, that's the way it used to be before Francis Bacon created the scientific method.
It just came from authorities who worked at well-respected institutions or whatever.
Whatever their pronouncements were, you just bow to it and do it.
Yeah.
They treated people like slaves.
And so we were asking them to take these politicians into custody and charge them.
In Canada, there's in the Criminal Code, Section 229C, that says that if you do anything for an unlawful purpose, and, you know, interfering with people's rights and freedoms and property without due process is unlawful.
And if you do that, and people end up dying as a result, whether you intended for them to die or not, that's considered a culpable homicide.
In other words, murder under the Criminal Code of Canada.
I don't know if it's like that in other countries, too.
We were asking them to arrest.
I gave my affidavit.
David, my name, my personal information.
And I don't know if it's a coincidence, but within a day or two, I started getting Stripe, which is a payment processor behind Substack.
They started interfering and making all these impossible-to-meet demands with me.
So I eventually had to part ways with them.
They literally were stealing donations that people had given me.
Because I went to the police station, is it just a coincidence?
I don't know.
But it was interesting timing, I thought.
It's amazing.
I kicked off of PayPal and the other one that they've got that's there.
But anyway, you know, and I can't.
On a call, I said, why don't I get kicked off?
And I spent two hours on the phone with him.
And he says, well, I can't find anything except this message that says, remove this account immediately.
And it's like, yeah, I understand.
So, yeah, you get all this kind of stuff all the time.
And it is everywhere.
And it's just simply tyranny.
And I'm glad that you did that.
And if we would all stand up and question...
What we're being told.
It isn't a conspiracy theory.
It's critical thinking.
It's that other CT thing that's out there, you know?
And so we need to critically think, and we need to say, okay, fine.
You're the scientist.
You should have the evidence and the data, and you should be able to explain this to me.
And if you're unwilling to do that, then I think that this is a fraud.
It's just that simple.
Why do people accuse you of being in the CIA? Was it because you were challenging what they accepted as a paradigm, and they said, oh, you're just trying to discredit us because you don't accept the paradigm?
Was that it?
Yeah, it was people like Dr. Vernon Coleman and different fairly well-known people in the so-called health freedom space.
And their thinking was that...
We're coming out with these wild claims saying that viruses were never shown to exist, and of course we're wrong, and there's mountains of evidence.
And, you know, the only explanation is that we're these controlled people who are here to disrupt and cause division within the freedom space and lead us off into a dead-end approach.
But the way we look at it, why would you, if someone's coming at you, Making demands.
Why would you do anything to make it easy on them?
Why would you just accept the virus narrative without evidence?
Like, I would push back, and if it turns out they don't have the evidence that...
They try to make it sound like we're...
Sometimes people say we're trying to let the bad guys off the hook because they've adopted this idea that, oh, it was a lab leak virus, and even if you think it's a lab leak virus, I'm sorry if you can't find it in any people.
You still don't have evidence that there was a virus actually circulating in people.
That's right.
I think that the lab leak, and I've said this over and over again, the lab leak is letting the bad guys off the hook.
Because, you know, they ran this scam on us, and you're saying, well, you know, it really was real, and it's going to happen again, but we're not going to do anything to stop any of the stuff that we said caused it.
You know, that's the thing that drives me nuts, and I see that all over.
Even the people who push back against all this medical martial law, they want to jump in on this lab leak.
If it was a lab leak, then only the specific people involved in that situation would be the bad guys.
But in reality, it's every politician, every medical officer.
It's like everybody who participated, all the companies, and not just with COVID, but all these other hoaxes as well.
They shouldn't have even been talking about a virus or offering tests or anything at all because they just didn't have anything.
So it shows the level of corruption and the incompetence.
I'm sure some of these people actually believed it themselves, but we're sure that the whole foundation is wrong.
I agree.
I would imagine that Vernon Coleman probably believes it because he was drilled into it and medical school and everything, and it is such an ingrained thing.
I mean, even though we didn't go to medical schools.
Medical school is still like, what, you mean there's no viruses out there?
I've heard that all my life.
I've seen all this stuff, and it's like, that sounds like a crazy idea.
It always does when you challenge conventional wisdom.
But the response needs to be, you prove it.
You know, it's one of the things that Thomas Sowell always said.
He said, when these people come to you, and he was talking about the climate stuff.
He said, when they come to you, these radical solutions and they think, you know, oh, the earth is going to melt and everything.
He says, well, prove it.
Prove it.
It's that simple.
So what if it's true?
What if what you're saying is fundamentally true?
Does it still follow that these consequences are going to happen?
And that kind of goes back to the bird flu stuff, right?
When they say, well, we've got bird flu.
We did a test, and we found one bird.
Maybe it's sick, maybe it's not.
And we've got to kill all the birds.
It's like...
What are you talking about?
You've got to kill all the birds.
When do you ever have something that they claim has a case fatality rate of 100%?
But if you've got a million chickens, and you've got one that tested positive for a PCR procedure, and you're going to kill all million of the chickens, I mean, how do you even calculate what the case fatality rate is?
I mean, it's like an infinite number.
That's absurd.
Their measures are absurd.
And so when you look at their measures, when you look at the masks, when you look at the six-foot social distancing, and you look at, you know, natural immunity doesn't work anymore and all the rest of it, it doesn't even work within their paradigm.
And so you know that there's something, you know that they're lying to you up one side and down the other.
And the further down you go, you get to the point where it's like, I don't think there's even any viruses here.
I can't see any proof of that.
Exactly.
That's the amazing process, isn't it?
Exactly.
Yeah.
And the nice thing, too, when you learn these facts, and it takes a little time for people who don't have, like me, I didn't have a background in any of this, so I had to learn some of the terminology in that to be able to read the studies.
But once you do, it means that whenever they come at us with one of these narratives, you don't have to wait.
Months or years for someone to do an analysis of all-cause mortality or analyze things from all sorts of different directions, you just go straight to the foundational evidence, you read it, and you go, that doesn't make sense.
You didn't do what you're claiming.
And that's the end of it right there.
It's a much simpler and faster and I think much more empowering approach because if enough...
Men and women out there learn to just read this study and know what to look for.
They're not going to be able to pull off.
You know, it's going to be much harder for them to pull off another.
Well, we need to be critical thinkers.
We need to be critical thinkers of what they're saying.
And, you know, part of the conspiracy stuff, it helped for me to know that what they had planned and been practicing for every year since two months before 9-11 and what they pushed out the orders for the different states with.
But they were in the first one of these games, Dark Winter, two months before 9-11, and they went right down by the playbook.
I kind of knew that, and then I started looking at this, and it's like, that really doesn't look real.
And now, none of the stuff that they're saying makes any sense.
So I never bought into any of this stuff because of those things.
I got a couple of comments here for you, Christine.
Don't obey.
It says, it's contagious if the insecure person next to me says it is.
You know, we look at all this contagion stuff and all of the masks and everything else.
We've all been there these last four years, haven't we?
Shadowboxer says, after detoxifying my body.
I not only stop psoriasis, but I never get sick.
Solonigoy says, if a placebo can make you well, I think hyper-negative thoughts can make you sick.
Hypochondriacs tend to get sick easily.
That's a really good point.
That's why they do the double-blind study, because they know that if even the people who are administering the treatment, if they know what is real and what's a placebo, that that's going to influence the outcome of this stuff.
So that's a really good point.
Yeah, you can get some people to have the symptoms just by telling them enough times and exactly what they did, drilling it into our heads 24-7, that there's Some people end up getting the symptoms just because they're so susceptible to the messaging.
Yeah, that's true.
So you've got a tiny URL about the bird flu stuff, tinyurl.com slash avian-hoax.
And if they go to that, they can get information about this bird flu nonsense that you've been able to collect.
And I guess it's the same type of thing, asking people if they got any isolated bird flu virus.
And of course, they wouldn't.
But does that also, if you go to that URL, does that jump you into your website so people can find the other links that are there?
Good.
Okay.
Yeah, that's why I gave that one.
They can find all sorts of stuff from there.
Okay, that's great.
Well, thank you so much for what you have done.
Yeah.
Oh, thank you for having me, David.
It's been a pleasure.
I really, really appreciate it.
Thank you.
You know, we need to always question the authorities.
And we need to always ask them to prove it.
And that goes for everything.
And if we don't do that, you know, we're just setting ourselves up to be taken advantage of.
And boy, have they taken advantage of us.
It is absolutely amazing.
When you look at this last year, last four years, all the different things, the hoops that they've made us walk through with all the rest of the stuff.
Thank you so much for joining us.
And all of you, thank you for joining us today.
That's the end of our program.
We hope you have a great day.
And we're going to try to keep it real again tomorrow.
But this may sound crazy, but it's the reality.
It's a scientific process.
The burden of proof is on the people who make the extraordinary claims.
And if they don't have anything to back...
That's the key issue.
Thank you so much for joining us, Christine Massey, and thank you so much for what you have done.
It's been a real service.
Thank you.
Bless.
Thank you.
Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
But he told me to get lost.
Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
▲
Export Selection