Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 7, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:00:00

Tue 7Jan25 Trudeau, the Very Model of a WEF Tyrant; Jan6 "Sting" — Many Still Won't Acknowledge THEY Were Stung

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 7th of January, year of our Lord 2025.
	Well, I'm going to focus today on Trudeau.
	And some of his highlights, or maybe I should say his lowlights.
	One of the worst tyrants in the West.
	And as one outlet said, one of the last of the COVID tyrants to go.
	Sorry, that's not true.
	Trump is on his way back.
	And we don't know who's going to be replacing Trudeau.
	So we're going to take a look at what might happen with that as well.
	We have a very concerning situation there in terms of some of the people who might be replacing him on the liberal side.
	And we're going to take a look at January the 6th, which we didn't do yesterday.
	I've covered it so many times.
	I said yesterday, five years ago.
	No, it wasn't five years ago.
	It was four years ago.
	Feels like I've been fighting it for longer than that.
	And I did fight all of these lies for five years, all of 2020.
	We're also going to take a look at Michael Mann.
	The climate guy and his Michael Mannure and the Flat Earth Society.
	There's a lot we can learn from what people are afraid of at the turn of the 20th century.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, yesterday during the program, we had Trudeau resign, but then quite, not quite, you know, he left his foot in the door.
	He didn't leave.
	He's not going to leave until they pick a replacement in the Liberal Party.
	And that's going to happen sometime in March.
	There will be elections in October.
	And right now, it looks like Pierre Polyev, I think is the way to pronounce his name, is is looking, the conservatives are looking to be way ahead of the liberals because people finally had enough of it.
	They didn't have enough of it, though, after COVID.
	That was the thing that surprised me the most, is how so many of these COVID tyrants stayed in.
	And, like Trump, how many got reelected.
	So Babylon Bee reports it, and they combined two different stories from Canada that are tragic.
	One of them is Trudeau himself.
	The other one is the escalation of euthanasia, their so-called MAID program.
	Yeah, they're killing people left and right in Canada.
	And so the Babylon Bee says Trudeau will be humanely euthanized amid growing public outcry across the country.
	The Canadian government announced Trudeau would be humanely euthanized after his resurrection.
	Resignation.
	Not resurrection.
	I don't know about his resurrection either.
	That's also in question.
	In accordance with what has become.
	A Canadian tradition, the old, unuseful Prime Minister will be quietly put out of his misery to prevent him from becoming a burden to his fellow citizens.
	Well, you can bet that they're not going to be euthanizing the leaders, aren't you?
	He said, one person talking about the, quoting from the Department of Euthanasia, which they don't have, but they might as well with their aid program, MAID program.
	He said, we're thankful for Trudeau's service.
	And have assured him that he will meet his end peacefully and painlessly.
	It's the Canadian way, eh?
	Trudeau said, we achieved a lot of historic things under our leadership.
	Most of them were just really, really awful.
	But historic, nevertheless.
	Yeah, and we'll talk about some of his historic announcements.
	So, again, yesterday he announced that he's going to...
	Step down.
	They say in the LifeSite News thing that he's retiring.
	I don't think he's going to retire at all.
	Maybe out of Canadian politics, but I'm sure there's a place waiting for him at the World Economic Forum or Bilderberg or one of these other places.
	I mean, he's one of Klaus's favorite people, remember?
	Talked about new young leaders that they put in and all the people that they'd stuffed in.
	It's not just Trudeau, but also Chrystia Friedland.
	Who is touted as one of the possible replacements for him in the Liberal Party.
	And we'll talk about that in a second here, because I think it's interesting.
	And it is something that we're seeing happening in every country.
	As they are creating global government, we see the same patterns happening in every country.
	So, polling is down.
	Why is he leaving now?
	Well, finally, polling has come around.
	People didn't kick him out.
	Because of the COVID stuff, but finally it is starting to come around.
	He says, I intend to resign after the party selects its next leader through a robust nationwide competitive process.
	His resignation comes a few weeks after both his housing minister, Sean Fraser, and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland left the Liberal government.
	I guess he lost the support of the World Economic Forum or just her?
	Because he is a key representative of that.
	The authoritarian legacy of Justin Trudeau.
	Freedom in the rearview mirror is the headline from Reclaim the Net.
	Now, they focused mainly on speech issues.
	And we'll talk about that.
	But I focused mainly on the COVID issues and his COVID tyranny.
	And we've got a clip here of some of his lowlights.
	A little of admiration I actually have for China.
	Because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and say, we need to go green as fast as we need to start investing in solar.
	I mean, there is a flexibility that I know Stephen Harper must dream about of having a dictatorship that he could do everything he wanted.
	If you don't want to get vaccinated, that's your choice.
	But don't think you can get on a plane or a train beside vaccinated people.
	There will be consequences for those people in not being able to go to a gym or a restaurant, not being able to go to a movie theater, not being able to get on a train or a plane.
	That's why we've been unequivocal.
	If you want to get on a plane or a train in the coming months, you're going to have to be fully vaccinated.
	You don't have a right to endanger others.
	Those people are putting us all at risk.
	Regardless of the fact that we are attacking your fundamental rights or limiting your fundamental rights, and the Charter says that wrong, we're still going to go ahead and do it.
	Or whether it's our most recent initiative on banning, sorry, on freezing the market for firearms, which will start moving us in the right direction over the medium and long term.
	But Justin Trudeau, I mean, I thought he was kind of a cool guy.
	And I started to read what he said.
	This is a couple of weeks ago.
	He was, or maybe this is September, but he was talking about people who are not vaccinated.
	He said they don't believe in science.
	They're often misogynistic, often racist.
	No, they're not.
	That was not part of him at all.
	Right.
	He said, but they take up space.
	And with that, we have to make a choice in terms of a leader as a country.
	Do we tolerate these people?
	It's like, tolerate?
	Now you do sound like Hitler.
	And recently he talked about them holding unacceptable views.
	Small fringe minority of people who are on their way to Ottawa or who are holding unacceptable views that they're expressing.
	We've heard your frustration with COVID. With the measures that are there to keep people safe.
	I think Canada has stepped across a line.
	People might not understand, but what they're doing is giving themselves power to confiscate assets, freeze bank accounts of anyone in the country suspected of anything.
	In fact, you don't have to be suspected of anything.
	It's extrajudicial.
	There is no process around that.
	And so this idea that...
	That that can be done to one's political opponents, which are what these people are, is just completely wrong in my view.
	So I think, yeah, I think we do need to stand up for what is right in this world and for freedom as opposed to authoritarianism, which is otherwise going to creep up on us.
	If you join the protests because you're tired of COVID, you now need to understand that you are breaking laws.
	The consequences are becoming more and more severe.
	You don't end up losing your license, end up with a criminal record, which will impact your job, your livelihood, even your ability to travel internationally, including to the US. Mr. Trudeau, you are a disgrace for any democracy.
	Please spare us your present.
	I doubt that it would have been more appropriate for Mr. Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, to address this house according to Article 144, an article which was specifically designed to debate violations of human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, which is clearly the case with Mr. Trudeau.
	Then again, a prime minister who openly admires the Chinese basic dictatorship, who tramples on fundamental rights by persecuting and criminalizing his own citizens as terrorists, just because they dared to stand up to his perverted concept of democracy, should not be allowed just because they dared to stand up to his perverted concept of democracy, should not be allowed Mr. Trudeau, you are a disgrace for any democracy.
	I'm going to ask one is about Ukraine.
	First of all, what's your name?
	Oh!
	My name is Michael.
	Canada is traditionally known for advocating for peace.
	I know we are member of NATO, but I know we don't have a nuclear weapon.
	Why has your government failed to draft a peace proposal to end this war in Ukraine?
	I'm gonna have to call you out, Michael.
	You're completely wrong about the war in Ukraine.
	It is not a proxy war between...
	The United States and Russia right now?
	That's Russian propaganda and disinformation.
	My job is to call that stuff out.
	I will never apologize for standing up for an LGBTQ2 plus kids' rights to not have to undergo conversion therapy.
	The fact of the matter is, Mr. Speaker, Canadians are afraid of climate change.
	They're afraid of the extreme weather events.
	They're afraid of the concerns we have about a brighter future.
	What we are doing is fighting climate change every day.
	Whether we are in the stages of the fourth industrial revolution about to begin, what a breathtaking possibility that is.
	The one thing certain about the next industrial revolution is, like the three that preceded it, it will bring enormous change.
	Yeah, it'll bring enormous change.
	And unfortunately, even as they change him out, I don't think much is going to change.
	It's not even just him.
	And it's not even just the Liberal Party, as we see in country after country.
	Take a look at what is going on right now.
	You heard him, you know, trying to tout and remember his alphabet tyranny there.
	After he also pushed fear about climate, fear about COVID, fear of unvaccinated people, fear, fear, fear.
	That's the way the tyrants rule us.
	Well, some people are not afraid of the fear.
	And some people are not going to kowtow to that.
	Canadian pastor Derek Reimer gets one-year house arrest and probation for protesting drag queen story time.
	He's done it over and over again.
	Now, he's getting this done to him in Alberta.
	And we saw in Alberta some of the most, some of the harshest attacks against religious freedom.
	And we haven't even gotten to the speech stuff yet.
	But of course those things are connected.
	A Canadian pastor says he trusts in the Lord, keeping him strong after being sentenced to one year of house arrest, along with long probation sentence for protesting drag queen story hours.
	So don't you do it again.
	Or if you do, you're going to go to jail for a very long time, right?
	And this is in Alberta, where we have the conservatives, where we now have Danielle Smith.
	Where is she?
	You can't trust politicians.
	Don't put your trust in politicians.
	Don't put your trust in conservative politicians.
	Don't put your trust in billionaires.
	Don't put your trust in chariots and horses or whatever, right?
	He says, the Lord is at work.
	I trust him, said Reimer, who vows that he will appeal the house arrest, but he's not going to stop with this stuff.
	He's been arrested many times for protesting drag queen story time, many other pro-LGBT events, and the very fact That Trudeau and these people pushed this tyranny, this 2 plus 2 equals 5. The very fact that they pushed that to you, that Orwellian equation that is really, when you reduce all the different alphabets, he's got like a plus 2 there at the end.
	Heard that?
	Well, it all really works out.
	2 plus 2 equals 5, you know?
	LGBTQ plus 2 equals 5. It's insane.
	But it just continues, and it's going to happen with the conservatives or the liberals.
	We're going to have to have more of a grassroots revolt.
	It's not going to be solved by getting some conservative in at the top.
	The top is totally rotten.
	St. Miller, one, two, three, says, Congratulations to the Canadian people.
	Excited to become our 51st state.
	Well, you know, Trump trolled them a great deal on that, but I'll tell you what I think is coming up, what I think that's really about.
	But let's take a look at some of his legacy about free speech, because Reclaim the Net talked about that significantly.
	Few things captured Trudeau's tenure better than his government's legislative war on free speech.
	Let's start with a dynamic duo of digital overreach, a couple of bills, one of them the C-10 bill.
	And the other one, the C-36 bill.
	C-10.
	Trudeau's government framed the bill as a noble effort to modernize a broadcasting act.
	The law had not been updated since 1991. We've got to constantly update our laws, right?
	Well, the goal, they said, was to level the playing field between traditional broadcasters and streaming giants like Netflix and YouTube.
	Well, that sounds good, but the devil's in the detail.
	Or the lack of details.
	They give themselves very broad powers.
	The bill gave Canada's broadcast regulator sweeping authority to police online content.
	Originally, user-generated content like vlogs or TikTok dances or indie films were supposed to be exempt.
	However, midway through the legislative process, Trudeau's government quietly removed those exemptions, and suddenly, your cat video could be classified as broadcast content.
	Giving bureaucrats the power to decide whether it met Canadian cultural standards.
	But of course, this is not going to be about cat videos, is it?
	It's going to be about your criticism of their agendas.
	The bill's language was so vague that it could allow the government to dictate what Canadians saw, shared, and created online.
	And of course, that is the goal.
	That is the goal for all of these globalists.
	The government dismissed the concerns, wanting clear limits on government power, apparently made you a conspiracy theorist.
	And then you have Bill C-36.
	It was a hate bill.
	His definition of hate was so expansive that it could potentially criminalize unpopular or offensive opinions.
	Offensive to people like Trudeau, as you just saw there.
	He openly talks about it.
	Well, you know, of course, this is a violation of the Charter of Freedoms.
	No question about it.
	Well, I don't care because the majority of us have decided that we don't want the charter of freedoms.
	You see, that's the problem with a democracy.
	Everybody talks about democracy like this is the goal.
	It's not the goal to have a democracy.
	In a republic, you have the rule of law.
	You have principles that are there, and those principles are made to be very, very difficult to change.
	But when you go to a democracy and you go to people like Trudeau, they say, well, the majority of us just don't like those anymore, so we're just going to ignore them.
	And that's where the danger is.
	And Trump did that as well.
	As I pointed out, this was in lockstep.
	You had Trump, Trudeau, Macron, Boris Johnson, all these people, Jabsinda Ardern in the New Zealand, all of this, Morrison in Australia, all of them doing the same stuff in lockstep with each other.
	Because They are not about their country.
	They're not loyal to their country.
	They're traitors, every one of them, to their countries.
	They are loyal to a global agenda that you better educate people about.
	I know you know about it if you watch this program.
	The bill didn't target clear-cut incitement to violence, but it targeted anything deemed likely to expose individuals to hatred or contempt.
	And we've got Republicans doing that now.
	Oh, well, you know, somebody disagrees with what Israel is doing.
	They show hatred or contempt or even debate what the policy is in Israel.
	Just shut up and send them your money.
	And if you say anything about it, we're going to prosecute you and put you in jail for a hate crime.
	And we've got Republican after Republican after Republican filling their pockets with foreign money and censoring our criticism of a foreign government that we are subsidizing.
	And giving weapons to.
	You saw that one guy singles him out because he wants to talk about the Ukraine war.
	Why are we having peace talks, he said.
	First of all, what is your name?
	You've been noticed, citizen, straight out of Dr. Zhivago.
	That's the thing I always remember.
	The love story just went right over my head when I saw it as a kid.
	But boy, the communism hit home.
	It's like, he comes home.
	You know, they've taken over his home.
	And the guy who is the head honcho in his home, they've got people living in all these different rooms.
	He's a wealthy doctor and all the rest of this stuff.
	The guy looks at him and he's hoping, he keeps pushing and pushing and pushing and hoping that Chivago is going to say something to him.
	Finally, he doesn't.
	He keeps his cool.
	He doesn't get upset.
	He knows what they're trying to do.
	He knows they're trying to goad him into this.
	And finally, the guy does another look at him and says, you've been noticed, citizen.
	Your attitude has been noticed.
	And it's like, that's what Trudeau was doing to that guy.
	He said, why isn't Canada doing something to have any peace talks about this?
	You want to just continue the war?
	Well, then it is a proxy war, isn't it?
	If you don't want to do a peace talk, then it is a proxy war.
	Anyway.
	So, hatred or contempt?
	Anything from political dissent to sharp critiques of government policies.
	And of course, the United States, that includes foreign governments who pay the politicians.
	Even more alarming was the prospect of a snitch culture.
	The bill encouraged private citizens to report each other for suspected hate speech, potentially turning disagreements into legal battles.
	And then you had the financial freeze.
	I like the way Reclaim the Net puts it.
	The financial freeze heard around the world.
	Everybody paid attention to that.
	That was Chrystia Freeland.
	I think we should call her Freeland.
	Not because it's cold up there, but because she froze the bank accounts.
	And not only the bank accounts of the people who were protesting.
	The Canadian protesters were a model of civility.
	I mean, they show up, yeah, they showed up on the streets and everything.
	How many times has the left done that?
	Sit-ins and all the rest of this stuff, but they were very peaceful.
	They were having a party.
	It's fine when the left does it.
	It's fine when they do it in the universities in the 1960s, but when people do it for their freedoms during the COVID lockdown, oh, they are horrible.
	And those people are going to have their bank accounts closed, and if anybody gives any money to them, we're going to shut your bank account down, too, anybody that contributed to them.
	That was the amazing thing.
	You know, again, all this stuff, it went on for so long.
	And I guess, you know, my timeline on it is just, I looked at it and it's like, was it as late as 2022?
	I thought it was earlier than that, that they pushed back.
	But I remember when it happened, saying, finally, somebody somewhere is doing something about this and protesting the government.
	We're not doing anything at all about it.
	And as a matter of fact, DG8, thank you for the tip.
	He says, David, January the 6th should never have been about the election.
	People should have gone to D.C. over the COVID tyranny.
	What a joke that they went to D.C. in support of Mr. Lockdown and father of the vaccine.
	And that's exactly right.
	And when I talk about January the 6th, the reason that happened is because the mainstream alternative media, people like Alex Jones and others, pushing them to do that.
	Okay, trust him.
	He's playing 40 chess.
	Just trust the plan.
	Take your vaccine.
	It's sugar water.
	Now go to Washington and protest for the guy who did all this stuff to you.
	And help me.
	Send me money for Stop the Steal so that I can rally people to do this.
	It was all entrapment.
	It was all a psyop.
	And it began with a CIA shill.
	That's why it's very concerning when I looked at Sean Ryan.
	Boy, it's deja vu all over again.
	That former Navy SEAL and CIA guy who was pushing this narrative about Matt Livelsberger.
	Anyway, in 2022, when truckers and their supporters descended into Ottawa to protest the COVID-19 mandates, Trudeau didn't meet them with dialogue?
	Instead, he dusted off his Emergencies Act, something no prime minister had dared to touch before.
	Overnight, financial institutions became Trudeau's personal enforcers, freezing accounts of protesters and anyone who dared to support them.
	And it was his deputy prime minister, Chrystia Freeland, second in command, who eagerly played the bad cop.
	Under her direction, the financial clampdown turned Canada's banking system into a political weapon.
	Freeland's cozy ties to global financiers made the whole thing look like an international crackdown on dissent.
	And that's exactly what it was.
	That's why it looked like that.
	Trudeau's message was clear.
	Disagree with the government and you might lose access to your life savings.
	It was a master class on how to turn financial systems into handcuffs and leave civil liberties in tatters.
	You see, it's not just, you know, and then, This is before Biden did his thing with weaponizing the financial system here in America.
	Trump is about to do the same thing with tariffs, if he's to be believed.
	Now there are reports inside of his campaign that maybe he's changed his mind.
	Maybe he's going to back down on that, like he backed down on the H-1B visas and other things like that.
	You can never trust him.
	He has no principles.
	He has positions, you understand.
	You understand the difference between positions and principles?
	You understand the difference between policies and principles?
	You're going to find out.
	We're going to get a real lesson on this thing.
	But, yeah, this has been something that is dear to the heart of the Davos villains.
	And that is exactly what these people are.
	The crowd there that is pulling this stuff down.
	I can't find it wherever it is.
	There it is.
	Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen.
	Your annual global risk report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
	For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate.
	It is disinformation and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within our societies.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You are listening to The David Knight Show.
	Yeah, disinformation.
	Now, let's reclaim the net.
	It says, disinformation is the government's new buzzword.
	Well, it doesn't just belong to Trudeau and Canada.
	It's the new global buzzword.
	We've got all these programs here that Biden has put in as well.
	And you know when we look at the way they've weaponized this system, we look at the fact that, you know, they could just, like that, seize your bank accounts because of a protest or because of your political opinions?
	Yes, that's a thing.
	And it's not just something that is attached to Trudeau and Freeland.
	That is a thing.
	It's one of the reasons why I say, you know, look, I don't want to have, I want to have something that's physical, something that is private.
	Yeah, somebody can always have to worry about thieves about anything, but there's nothing like the government thieves.
	Like I said the other day, a thief can break into your house and steal what you've got, but if you've got the local government with a pen, they can take your house and all your equity, as we saw with them stealing that from people.
	People who had an issue with health or some crisis in their life, and they got behind their property taxes, they just come in and take the thing and take all your equity.
	One woman owed about $3,000 in equity.
	They got $102,000 in taxes.
	And they took her house.
	She had $102,000 in equity.
	They kept that.
	And it's happening even though you've got the Supreme Court saying stop it.
	And you've got state courts saying stop it.
	The local officials are still doing it.
	So again, pay attention to your local elections.
	That's really where the rubber meets the road.
	That's where the rubber meets the road for all of this stuff.
	The globalism, the lockdown, everything else.
	In some places, they stopped it at the local level.
	Other places, the local level made it much worse.
	Focus there first.
	You'll have more of an effect there anyway.
	Anyway, disinformation became the word.
	They use it like a Swiss army knife of excuses.
	And of course, they're subsidizing obedience as well.
	Not only are they saying, don't do this, but if you do this, we'll give you money, right?
	We want to have a vibrant spectrum of journalism.
	And so what we're going to do is we're going to give some money to some people, some struggling journalists and press outlets.
	They're buying sycophants.
	That's what they're buying.
	You know, it works a little bit differently here in the United States.
	What happens is you get people like Alex who realize that if they give up on being nonpartisan, and if they jump fully on board with somebody that is a rising star like Trump, and if they sell people what people want to hear rather than what is true, then they can make a lot of money.
	But in Canada, what they're doing is they're just giving money to struggling journalistic centers because nothing says press freedom like reporters who are dependent on a government handout.
	Or dependent on towing the line of Trump.
	Right?
	Again, it's not as direct here.
	With Trump, it's more subtle in the background.
	Big Brother gets a Twitter account.
	Yeah, under Trudeau's watch, Canadian intelligence agencies dramatically expanded their social media monitoring.
	Activists, protest groups, voices that were traditionally central to Democrat discourse suddenly found themselves under a microscope.
	Imagine logging into X to vent about a new housing policy only to realize that your tweet has been flagged by government algorithm.
	The message was clear.
	Dissent might not be illegal, but it was certainly inconvenient.
	Is that the lesson that people are learning now on X from Musk?
	Don't you dissent from him?
	I mean, if he will...
	Throw Nigel Farage under the bus.
	Imagine what he'll do to you.
	He's been doing this everywhere.
	Yes.
	Do not criticize Elon Musk.
	If you want to be on Twitter, well, I don't care about Twitter.
	To hammer the point home, his administration launched a series of public awareness campaigns to educate Canadians about the perils of online misinformation.
	And it wasn't Ursula fond of lying.
	Who was playing a Bond villain.
	Oh, people can be hurt.
	It hurt people's feelings.
	I don't know what it was.
	Anyway, dripping with paternalistic condescension.
	It blurred the line between fact-checking and outright propaganda.
	Canada's new normal is a fear of speaking freely.
	Activists wondered whether their next rally would land them on a government watch list.
	Well, that's absolutely right.
	But again, that's Reclaim the Net, just focusing on the damage done to free speech.
	But I think what was done with the COVID lockdowns is even worse.
	It hit so many different things, including free speech.
	And this article from the Daily Skeptic in the UK, Toby Young, says, Justin Trudeau.
	Last of the democratically elected lockdown tyrants.
	Well, is that true?
	I mean, you know, when we look at Trump, he just had Morrison from Australia come to Mar-a-Lago, and they're all smiles and handshakes and laughing it up and partying at Mar-a-Lago.
	Folks, it is a big club, and you ain't in it.
	It's the Mar-a-Lago club.
	It's the global lockdown club.
	And there's Trump right at the center because, folks, he led the global lockdown.
	Mr. Anti-Globalism, Mr. Anti-Davos, who went there multiple times and then locked us down.
	Oh, but no, it can't be Trump.
	Trump is against all of this stuff, right?
	Well, W. Young says the move came after weeks of pressure from his colleagues in Canada's Liberal Party amid a significant and growing rift.
	Over how to handle relations with Trump in his second term.
	And this is a common theme that's being sold to us by the mainstream alternative media.
	Well, look at this.
	Trump took down Trudeau.
	No, no.
	Trudeau has just worn on people so much that the conservative party is accelerating in the polls.
	They know they're going to lose.
	And so they allowed him to resign, unlike Joe Biden, that they just threw under the bus.
	But it's the same type of thing, right?
	They can see how disgusted, finally, finally disgusted people are of Trudeau.
	And so they need to get somebody in there new.
	Now, I think what is happening, I think it does involve Trump, and I think it does involve populism to some degree.
	Because what is happening is these people are getting out of the way for the most part because they would love to turn it over after they've made a mess, after they've got this ticking time bomb of an economy.
	They would love to step aside and let this bomb blow up while Trump and other populists are in office so they can say, see, you need socialism.
	That's what we need.
	Got to bring that back.
	I honestly think that's what's going on.
	They want to hand this hot potato to the populace so that they can be blamed.
	And, you know, when you look at Trump, he is largely responsible for kicking this stuff off.
	He was the one who started spending $6 trillion a year.
	And Biden continued that.
	You know, when you look at the slope of how the deficit was going up, spending, okay?
	But Trump all of a sudden took a new angle.
	It goes up hyperbolically.
	And Biden kept that thing going.
	And that's why we are in the situation that we're in right now.
	So, you know, certainly Trump would deserve it.
	But they want to make sure that they're not the ones in power when this thing blows up, I think.
	Trump announced on social media after his re-election plan to introduce a 25% tariff on goods from Canada, which led Trudeau into a frenzy to try to clean up his relationship with the U.S. So he goes to...
	Mar-a-Lago.
	Now, it wasn't just that.
	I mean, all these people are going there to kiss the ring.
	Bezos, Zuckerberg, Morrison from Australia.
	Everybody's going to kiss Trump's ring.
	Isn't that interesting?
	I will not be kissing his ring or any other parts of anatomy.
	The day after unveiling the idea, Trump, Trudeau rather, immediately flew down to Mar-a-Lago to do some damage control.
	So that's it, yeah.
	So that's a perception being sold by everybody else, but I think it is a fact that people are sick and tired of this.
	They're sick and tired of the speech tyranny.
	They're sick and tired of the lockdown tyranny.
	They're sick and tired of the alphabet tyranny.
	The reason Trump wants to impose tariffs on Canada is to pressure Ottawa to do more to secure the border and to stop leaking illegal immigrants into the U.S. Well, whatever his motivation is.
	If he's going to weaponize the financial system in just a different way, right?
	I mean, Biden weaponized the financial system, and look what it blew up the petrodollar that had been in place since Nixon.
	And so whenever you weaponize our financial system, what these people are creating is some kind of an improvised explosive device, an IED, right?
	Hey, let's try this.
	They're just improvising.
	And it is...
	Explosive device.
	The question is, who is it going to blow up on?
	I mean, this is like some game where you get this ticking time and you keep passing it down to one person in another chair.
	And don't be surprised when this thing blows up.
	They only care about how it's going to be perceived and who is in power when it happens.
	But either way, it's going to blow up on us.
	we're the ones who are going to be hurt by this financial IED.
	Trudeau's party may be hoping that if he goes now, with the liberals still having until October to call a general election, the new leader can prevent the conservatives winning a majority, just as Jab Cinder Arden's resignation in January 2023, nine months before the New Zealand general election, helped to just as Jab Cinder Arden's resignation in January 2023, nine months before the New Zealand general election, helped to And I'm sure that's what they were trying to do with Lala Harris.
	The problem with Lala Harris was that Even though there was only a couple of months for people to take a look at her, that was still way too long.
	It was so shallow that you could see through her immediately.
	Toby Young says, the Daily Skeptic says, By my reckoning, Trudeau is the last democratically elected leader who was in office during the pandemic and imposed a national lockdown.
	The last one to be defenestrated.
	Well, Trump is in office.
	Trump imposed a national lockdown.
	But Trump has not been defenestrated, unfortunately.
	Meaning thrown out the window.
	Trudeau's potential replacements would continue his same anti-life, anti-family agenda, says LifeSite News.
	While liberals assure Canadians that a new liberal leader would not carry on the radical agendas pushed by Trudeau, each of the potential replacements in the Liberal Party has embraced An anti-life, globalist ideology.
	And would likely place the country into another term of anti-family, anti-freedom laws.
	And that's true.
	You know, when they talk about Mark Carney, Mark Carney is a radical in terms of the climate stuff.
	But he's a radical in terms of climate stuff because he's a radical in terms of central banking.
	And they don't talk about that.
	You know, from their perspective.
	LifeSite News is looking at the alphabet tyranny, the LGBT stuff.
	The ideology.
	I would call it a theology.
	Except, you know, that's legitimate, you know.
	Because they make themselves God.
	You know, theology is a study of God, right?
	Well, if they're God and they're studying their navel and other parts of themselves trying to figure out what they are, what am I? You know, I'm God and I can change myself from male to female or vice versa, but...
	I've still got to study what I want to do.
	So LGBT really is a theology, if you think about it.
	Anyway, Carney supports all the green stuff because that's the path for them to destroy the economy and to create a global tax and a global surveillance system, something that tracks your activities and your purchases.
	They have to have that global problem.
	To track that.
	And that's what the climate agenda gives them, that not even a pandemic gives them.
	Eventually you run out of steam because people see that people are not dying.
	That's what happened with it.
	But of course, with the climate agenda, it's always just over the next hill.
	Next year it's going to hit.
	Carney's been a longtime supporter of the global agenda, including promoting the UN's energy regulations in January 2023. He attended the World Economic Forum's meeting in Davos, Switzerland.
	Of course, he's always there.
	The key thing about Carney, and this was mentioned by a listener yesterday, they said, oh, what about Mark Carney?
	He said, oh, yeah, what about him?
	He's Canadian, but he's been the governor of both the Bank of Canada and then later governor of the Bank of England.
	This guy is like a one-man Bank of International Settlement, the central bank of central bankers.
	He is the central banker of central bankers.
	He would be very bad.
	And, of course, there's some other people that are on the list as well.
	Chrystia Freeland, key ally of Trudeau's, but she resigned.
	All eyes are on her as a potential candidate, because she was the deputy prime minister.
	So she'd be like the Lala, and she may wind up being like the Lala.
	And this next one.
	Conservative leader Pierre Polyev.
	It's tipped to replace Trudeau with unbelievable odds, but these are odds coming from Polymarket.
	These are people, you know, sometimes that can be useful, but I don't know why so many people focus on that.
	But look, all these polls are pretty much garbage, really.
	Especially when we're talking about something that is, you know, nine or ten months away from us.
	But on Polymarket, he's got a 92% chance of becoming Canada's next Prime Minister.
	People are willing to put their money down on that.
	But again, it's just a betting market.
	So Trudeau is going to remain in power until the party elects a new leader.
	And they will have to do that.
	The general elections will be in the fall.
	The new leader will probably come up sometime in March.
	Polyev campaigns for more oil and gas production and against Trudeau's botched immigration policy, which led to hundreds of thousands of arrivals straining an already overheated housing market.
	Okay.
	Overheated even in Canada.
	But when you look at it, the common thing that we're seeing is the immigration and the climate stuff and the destruction of energy and the economy that accompanies that.
	Conservatives currently hold a 21-point lead over the Liberals.
	Now, that's one of their political polls.
	That's not Polymarket, where it's 92%.
	But then Chrystia Freeland, again, coming back to her, I think it's interesting that these people that they have put forward as frontrunners, Chrystia Freeland and Mark Carney, and the guy who is there, Dominic LeBlanc, Who took her place.
	Okay, so he's now the Minister of Finance.
	He replaced Freeland.
	And so she was Finance Minister.
	Now, she doesn't have any background in finance or accounting or anything like that.
	She was a journalist.
	And she worked with the World Economic Forum.
	That's what she majored in.
	She's got a degree in Klaus Schwab.
	And when Schwab talks, people listen.
	So that was the extent of her economic education.
	But of course, having been a finance minister, even though she was just a journalist, now she's a financial person.
	And I don't know Dominic LeBlanc, I don't know what his background was, but I suspect that he was just the politician that was put in as a finance minister.
	And these people don't know any more about finance than our Department of Energy occupant.
	Knows anything about energy or engineering or anything else.
	What is her name?
	I can see her face.
	But anyway, she was nothing but a politician.
	And they put her in for prohibitions because, you know, she doesn't know about prohibitions.
	She doesn't know anything about energy.
	But she will prohibit stuff.
	But getting back to Mark Carney.
	Again, former Bank of Canada and Bank of England governor.
	He has long been touted as a potential leader for Canada.
	In recent days, he's reportedly fielded dozens of calls to liberal politicians who view him as a potential replacement for Trudeau.
	He's 59 years old.
	He studied at Oxford University and Harvard University.
	He previously worked at Goldman Sachs and was the chair of Bloomberg.
	That resume should scare you.
	This is what I think is going to happen.
	Chrystia Freeland, she's a woman.
	She's their DEI candidate or whatever.
	And she's their Lala.
	You've got to say, at least she can speak coherently, unlike our Lala.
	I don't think Lala Hilarious could have ever worked even as a journalist.
	She couldn't put together a complete sentence.
	But anyway, this is what I kind of think.
	Like I said before, I think they want to hand off this hot potato to the conservatives.
	And so I think they'll run their lala, Chrystia Freeland.
	They could say, well, she was number two and it's her turn and she's a woman and all this kind of stuff.
	They'll ignore Mark Carney.
	But you watch out after they blow everything up.
	And that's going to happen.
	Because I don't know exactly when that's going to happen, but I know it's going to happen.
	When they blow up the economy, the guy who is really serious.
	This guy who's got a long resume of running big financial institutions and central banks.
	Somebody who is a dyed-in-the-wool globalist for sure.
	Mark Carney will be brought in to fix things up.
	So they get Chrystia Freeland out of the way, use her to hand over power to the conservatives.
	Then when all this stuff that they put together blows up, they bring in a guy.
	Who is a dyed-in-the-wool globalist to set up the system that he wants to set up, carbon taxes and all the rest of his stuff, prohibitions on energy use, prohibitions on food, you name it.
	So that's what I think is going to happen.
	They're going to bring him back to build it back better globally.
	That's what I think is going to happen.
	3D Demo Derby says, Trudy needs to cut and run like all of his New World Order pervert pals.
	TPTB knows we the people got most of their numbers now, and the powers that be.
	Took me a while for a second.
	The powers that be.
	Know that we got their numbers now, and the dim dummies got nothing.
	Well, the problem, I think, is that they know that we got their numbers on CBDC, for example.
	And they basically said, okay, we won't do a CBDC. What they're going to do is, with Trump, They are going to, and to me, that was as big a pivot.
	All the stuff on crypto and the Five Eyes, which is U.S., Canada, U.K., New Zealand, Australia, all of them saying, we're not going to do CBDC. Yeah, the World Bank and the Bank of International Settlement, they're still working on a global CBDC to be pushed into poor countries and things like that.
	They'll get away with that.
	But they know they're going to get resistance from us here in these five countries.
	So they decide that they'll do it through the back door.
	And Trump is their guy.
	And if you look at the people who are surrounding Trump, and we're going to have a guy on the last half hour of the show today.
	He's going to talk about blockchain, about the possibilities, about the vulnerabilities of it.
	And so we're going to talk about that.
	But they're acclimating everybody to this.
	I think they want to do all these functions in terms of the functions of CVDC will be executed in a private-public partnership.
	It'll be done.
	Everybody will say, hey, it's being done by the corporations.
	What's the problem?
	You know, it's like the censorship.
	It's being done by the corporations.
	What's the problem?
	Then you find out, as we always knew, that the corporations were created to do this, that they are the beard for government.
	They are the velvet glove, and the government is the iron hand of censorship, and it will be that same way with the CBDC stuff.
	Guard Goldsmith.
	Good to see you, Guard.
	Liberty Conspiracy, evenings through the week, and on Rockfin and on Twitter.
	He says, Trudeau really is an example of egomania.
	That's absolutely true.
	So, we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, we've got some interesting comments.
	Pull that one up about the babysitter down there at the bottom.
	This is something I didn't know about.
	So, thank you.
	G. Pigeon says, LeBlanc was Justin's babysitter when Justin was growing up.
	Very long-time friend, and appointments do not fall far from the tree.
	That's right.
	Yeah, I don't know.
	We'll let Justin go back to his father's home country, Cuba, and hang out there.
	You know, the socialists, the Marxists love that place.
	I mean, you've got Bernie Sanders, who honeymooned in Russia when it was still the Soviet Union, and we had de Blasio, who honeymooned in Cuba.
	And then you had Justin Trudeau, who actually, I don't know, he went to...
	I guess his wife kind of had a honeymoon in Cuba while they were there, the three of them.
	I don't know.
	While Niagara says Trudeau was not the first one to use the Emergency Measures Act.
	And that was my recollection, too.
	But I just, you know, I read it.
	I thought, well, what was it?
	Reclaim the net or what?
	That's why I say who it's kind of.
	First of all, I want you to know what they're writing, what I'm saying.
	Make a distinction between it.
	But that's what I thought.
	I thought his father had used it.
	His father used it under a different name.
	Called it the War Measures Act.
	There's something about the Trudeaus and Tierney.
	Yeah, it's like a hammer and sickle thing or something.
	If you look, they probably got it tattooed on their back like Roger Stone's got Richard Nixon on his back.
	Richard Nixon was on my back when I was a kid.
	I tell you, the 55 mile an hour speed limit and the rest of the stuff that was there.
	Adelander, I love these new opening graphics.
	Well, thank you.
	Thank you for letting us know.
	I like them, too.
	I think Whistler did a great job with them.
	DGA, thank you for the tip.
	He said, at least the Canadians fought government over COVID tyranny.
	At least they were smart enough to know government is not the answer to restore freedom, unlike the Trump cult.
	Yeah, that's right, Mr. Judisco.
	That's right.
	Oh, I agree, absolutely.
	S.A. Miller123 says, let's remember the Trudeau lockdown, the truckers' bank accounts when they were protesting, a true and evil tyrant at heart.
	Yes.
	Canadian people were trampled and controlled by their government for the very fact that they are unarmed.
	We can never let that happen here.
	Now, the problem is, is that, you know, there's one way that you can disarm people is by controlling free speech, isn't it?
	If they don't want to fight.
	If they don't know what's being done to them, if they're told, trust the plan.
	That's one way to disarm people, isn't it?
	DGA, never forget all the tranny stuff got a big boost when Trump sued the Miss Universe pageant to allow a Canadian tranny to compete.
	That's right.
	He's always been about that.
	You know, Amazon Prime, Jeff Bezos went down.
	To Mar-a-Lago.
	To kiss the ring.
	What else can we do?
	What can I do to get on his good side?
	You know, Musk has got the inside track, and I'm competing with Musk on these contracts.
	What can I do?
	We'll throw together a documentary about Melania Trump and her life story.
	Is that going to be X-rated?
	I mean, how are they going to cover all this stuff with Epstein and all the rest of the four of them?
	You know, Epstein and Ghislaine and Melania and Donald?
	Well, what do they do about that kind of stuff?
	What do they do about her modeling career and all the rest of the stuff?
	We talk about hagiographies.
	I think they're disgusting.
	Hagiographies where you make somebody, it's like an autobiography where the person is held up as some kind of a holy saint.
	Well, that's going to be a bit of a stretch with Melania, and that's what I think about when you talk about the LGBT stuff.
	She is the darling, the darling of the LGBT crowd there.
	Pushing it really hard, so.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio, good to see you.
	He writes to another listener, 12 June 1776, and said, Canadians hate Trudeau.
	The next agenda is going to be a hard sell for the next puppet.
	And we'll see what happens.
	They've got the media there, and they've laid a lot of groundwork for controlling speech.
	They understand how fundamental that is, that tyrants do.
	And, of course, the founders of this country understood how fundamental free speech is.
	That's why they made it the very First Amendment.
	And they understand how fundamental to a society's existence Christianity is as well.
	And so they put freedom of religion there right alongside free speech.
	I've seen yet another atheist come out.
	This one is not in the UK. I don't have the article in front of me.
	I forget his name.
	But I kind of recognized it when I saw it.
	Very much like Richard Dawkins.
	Saying, well, I don't believe any of this stuff, but, you know, it certainly gave us a better society than what we're headed to.
	And that's what this other guy is saying.
	And that actually is even what Friedrich Nietzsche said when he said, God is dead and we killed him.
	God help us, or something like that, you know, to that effect.
	And we saw what happened to Germany after they got rid of God.
	God didn't die, but Germany died.
	Because they took God out of their society.
	Now we've got atheists all over the place saying this as well.
	Dawkins and this other guy as well.
	Ray Garbutt, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	Thank you.
	That's a new name I've not seen before, so thank you very much.
	Brian Deb McCartney.
	I thought Freeland was heading out of the country for bigger aspirations rather than taking on the failed Prime Minister.
	Why be Prime Minister of Canada when you can be ruler of the world?
	The World Economic Forum or something like that.
	There's a job opening there.
	If Klaus will let go of the reins with his cold, dead hands.
	Atomic dog.
	Freeland is a WEF member.
	She's literally a Davos operative.
	She would destroy Canada.
	Well, so was Trudeau.
	Thavos Operative, and he did his best to destroy Canada.
	The Softy Jacker says, Pierre is a Canadian Mike Johnson.
	Oh boy, that's a bad, that's a bad news.
	I've seen that kind of alluded to by some other people.
	Yeah, he does have that milquetoast thing there, but if he's not going to stand on his principles, that's not going to be a good thing.
	Anyway, Octo Spook.
	I wish this was the end of St. Trudeau, but he is falling on his sword for the New World Order, and I don't think they're done with him yet.
	And I see him as still having some use to him.
	Absolutely.
	They're going to recycle these people, just like they did Jab Senda out of New Zealand.
	They'll find a job for him.
	Just like Mark Ruta.
	Mark Ruta tried to destroy all the farms and all that kind of stuff in the Netherlands, so the farmers and other people created a political party, kicked him out.
	Where did he go?
	Well, they put him in at NATO. Well, we've got, let's talk a little bit about January the 6th.
	You know, I saw it yesterday and I thought, I've talked so much about January the 6th, I'm just not going to talk about it.
	And then I started seeing what everybody else was writing about it.
	I was like, I just can't let this thing go.
	And, you know, when we look at what's going to happen, you know, I've got listeners.
	Susan saying it was the most reprehensible thing.
	She saw how Trump betrayed the people on January 6th.
	And it absolutely is.
	But we saw this betrayal coming.
	And again, I don't know what I can say that I haven't really said before about all this stuff.
	A lot of people said, well, I need to interview this person about the January 6th stuff and all the rest of the stuff.
	I did my best to try to warn people about that.
	I mean, I really did my best.
	I spoke out against the people I work for.
	I got fired for doing that.
	Speaking out against it.
	Because I could see the lies and the deception.
	I could see how they're acting as Judas goats.
	They're fleecing these people and they're going to get them in a lot of trouble.
	And I knew that.
	And I knew that there wasn't anything that could be done on January 6th.
	Not a thing.
	And like I said yesterday, I thought it was five years because it seems like five years.
	It's fighting Alex all of 2020. Over this pandemic garbage, even before martial law was declared.
	It was nonsense how they were hyping the fear and everything.
	Well, this is one guy, this Air Force veteran, shot in the head with rubber bullets, non-lethal munitions, on January the 6th.
	And he was shot in the face with rubber bullets by the police while peacefully demonstrating on the Capitol grounds.
	He was nearly injured by flashbang grenades that cops indiscriminately Threw in the crowd while lacing the air with tear gas.
	Who knew this was going to happen?
	Well, I did.
	And I knew that there were going to be agent provocateurs there as well to cause all this stuff to kick off.
	And they were itching to do it.
	I mean, it was such a stupid game that they were playing.
	And again, it irritated me to no end that people would not resist Trump.
	And they did nothing about that.
	Again, because they were told to stand down.
	They were told that Trump had it.
	And I recall when I started my program on January the 6th, that was a Wednesday.
	And I said, well, yesterday, Tuesday, January the 5th, they had the runoff elections in Georgia.
	And because everybody was tied up with Trump and protesting Trump's election, nothing at all was done about the Georgia election.
	Nothing.
	No money was spent on it, and it turned the Senate over to the Democrats.
	And no laws were changed.
	Here you've got a Republican governor, a Republican legislature in Georgia, completely going along with all the stuff in the Republican Party in general, and all the Republican voters, nobody cared about any of that kind of stuff.
	The Republicans wanted to turn it over to the Democrats.
	It's the same kind of, look, I've seen this stuff over and over again.
	It's a tag team match.
	You start to get tired of one guy, and they flip the other one.
	That's why I said what I did about Trudeau and about Pierre Polyev.
	They're going to flip it out, let things blow up, or let him be the Mike Johnson of the place, and then they'll bring in the guy they really want that's going to be the drill sergeant to push everybody into this global economy.
	Mark Carney.
	Following the protests, the police escalated into a deadly riot.
	Fisher found...
	Founded an organization called Investigate J6 that faithfully gathered and investigated the thousands of hours of CCTV and police body cam footage along with the totality of video obtained by the media and protesters that fateful day.
	The footage which Congress for years refused to release to the American public showcases definitively documents the unprovoked excessive force that police unleashed against the entire crowd.
	Outside the Capitol, including Fisher and his father.
	You know, it's interesting.
	They gave that footage to Tucker.
	Remember how that was a really big deal?
	Oh, Tucker's going to save us now.
	Tucker's going to save us.
	Well, these guys did, because Tucker didn't do anything with it.
	Tucker made it all about Tucker.
	Look at this.
	I'm so important, they gave me the January the 6th footage.
	And he didn't do anything with it.
	He's such a ridiculous, limited hangout.
	Again, just got Aaron Seary from...
	RFK Jr.'s Children's Health Defense, Aaron Seary is a lawyer there.
	And he goes on with Tucker.
	Tucker is surprised that there are aborted baby parts in these vaccines.
	It's like, hey pal, what did you think everybody was protesting over religious objections about with this stuff?
	You want us to believe that you're that stupid?
	He's not stupid.
	He's a liar.
	He's another one of these CIA people.
	It's absolutely amazing.
	Anyway, he just used all that footage to hype himself.
	This guy put together an organization to show some of that stuff, but of course he doesn't get any attention.
	Tucker took all the attention.
	Fisher was arrested more than a year later, on January the 13th, 2022, in a pre-dawn raid conducted by the FBI. Again, you know, these raids can get people killed.
	He was charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers.
	Disorderly conduct, civil disorder, entering restricted grounds.
	You know, when the police are standing there at the open door telling me, yeah, come on in.
	Yeah, you want to use the restroom?
	It's right in your hand.
	These guys are facing years in jail.
	He was peacefully protesting.
	And then you got the guy who founded Cowboys for Trump.
	He was an elected official in New Mexico.
	I think he's a...
	A counselor there in the county commissioner.
	And they came after him, Coy Griffin.
	He never entered the building.
	He never engaged in any violence.
	So what was he doing there?
	Well, he was exercising his constitutional rights on the First Amendment to redress grievances and to protest and to speak out.
	Oh, that's not allowed?
	As a matter of fact, pull up the picture there, Karen, Him talking to Trump.
	Well, wait, before we do that, before we do that, he comes back and he finally caught on to Trump.
	He's one of the few people that did.
	And, of course, a lot of them probably have caught on to Trump, but they realize that he's their only ticket out of jail now.
	So they're not going to say anything about that.
	But, you know, if we go back and we look at this thing, all of this stuff, as I've said over and over again, Just two days after the election.
	And that's when you had a CIA source.
	Oh, this guy knows everything, and he's on our side!
	You know, just like, Elon Musk is on our side, and he's going to fix this.
	We've got all these CIA agents who are now on the side of conservatives and populism, and they're going to tell us what's going on.
	And so here's Steve Pichinik, who kicked off the Stop the Steal stuff.
	With his lies about the sting two days after the election.
	What's happening now, and the reason I couldn't come on the Alex Jones show last night was I was not given the permission that I needed to in order to say what I'm about to say now.
	I do not work for the federal government.
	I'm not paid by them.
	I don't work for them, but they give me permission.
	Contrary to what everybody else said, Trump knew this was happening.
	Eric knew this was happening and warned the public.
	I knew this was happening.
	However, I could not say anything about it.
	What happened was we marked, watermarked every ballot with what's called the QFS blockchain encryption code.
	In other words, we know pretty well where every ballot is, where it went, and who has it.
	So this is not a stolen election.
	On the contrary.
	We reversed the entire game of war along the lines of Sun Tzu.
	Oh, I've heard of that guy?
	And Trump was brilliant and still is brilliant at it.
	All of this was expected.
	All of this is part of the...
	They knew everything!
	...operation we're running.
	And let me tell you that 48 hours ago, not only did we put markers on those ballots, but I can say now, with the permission of people in the intelligence community and elsewhere, We have sent out thousands and thousands of national guards to 12 different states, Washington, Delaware, Texas, Arizona, Alabama, and everywhere.
	So now you have to consider and rethink what this is really about.
	The genius of Trump is that he is able to pull back at any point.
	And manipulate the opponent without the opponent ever realizing.
	When we expose Hillary Clinton, we're now exposed and Trump initiated this.
	Biden family.
	Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Jim Biden, Frank, the whole family, was played right into a game where they were convicted, and you're seeing what's happening now.
	They've been pardoned.
	What was not announced was that we watermarked all the ballots with what I said at QFS blockchain, which is a very hard encryption code to break.
	And the second thing is we sent probably 20,000 or more.
	Our National Guard's 48 hours ago, none of it was reported, and I thank the press for not reporting it, and others.
	Yeah, the press, mainstream media's on our side.
	What is happening if you're seeing a sophisticated sting operation that was initiated by Trump?
	Steve, you've just broken certainly perhaps the biggest news since the election here on this show.
	I have to play this out logically in my head.
	That's why I go on your show.
	Well, I love you, Steve.
	I'd kiss you on the lips right now if it wasn't digitally.
	Yeah, if it wasn't digitally, yeah.
	Steve Patek knew he wasn't going to get on my show.
	He tried that BS one time, yeah.
	It's a QBS blockchain thing.
	Whatever, you know?
	Quantum this and quantum that.
	Look, like I said yesterday, it's the same stuff you saw.
	Sean and this Shoemate guy, I think was his name or something.
	Another Intel guy.
	Look, I've got this stuff.
	I don't know what it's...
	No.
	So the Shoemate guy brings in a written thing from a Green Beret who is now dead or disappeared.
	I think he's disappeared.
	And it's got all kinds of crazy stuff on it that can't be verified.
	But it's what people want to hear.
	So it's confirmation bias there.
	And it's got a lot of jargon that kind of sounds like, well, yeah, I've heard stuff about blockchain before, and I've heard stuff about anti-gravity engines and all the rest of this stuff.
	And then the guy said, hey, I don't know if any of this stuff is true, but hey, you know, so Shoemate is playing the role of Owen in all this stuff, you know.
	But they did it.
	Instead of having somebody like Steve Pachenik, they did it with a document.
	Which is one of the people pointed out, and other people pointed out, I forgot to mention it yesterday, but I had a listener point out, it's got some squiggly lines underneath it.
	So that wasn't a screenshot of a text message that he got.
	But either way, they bring in this message, and so the message is speaking.
	Well, I don't know if this is true or not, but I'm going to keep telling you about this, just like Alex said.
	Well, I don't know if what Steve Pachinic is saying is true.
	I certainly hope so, but let's just keep having him on.
	Well, where were the 20,000 troops, first of all?
	And all the stuff about the ballots being printed in Washington, none of that stuff was true.
	But like I said, there is a great deal of this.
	Trust me, I'm with the CIA, but I'm on your side now.
	I'm the good intelligence agencies.
	Folks, there's not any good intelligence.
	They're all going to be playing you.
	For one side or the other, for their purposes.
	Yeah, it's not a monolithic organization.
	Yes, there is internal conflict, and, you know, these people fight each other just like the Republicans and Democrats do, but just like the Republicans and Democrats, they're not on your side.
	They're on their side.
	And so, you know, be very careful of these people.
	People want to believe that a Savior is coming.
	They want to believe that Musk is going to say free speech, and Musk is going to say this, and Trump is going to do that.
	Or, you know, even when we see their motivations and we see how evil they've been.
	Oh, still, he's changed now.
	And all these CIA guys have changed and everything.
	Well, you know, after I did that about Sean Ryan, I just want to take a little detour here.
	Because it is so much like what we saw with Steve Pchenik and The Sting, which kicked off the Stop the Steal thing, fleeced their supporters, robbed them, and then set them up.
	To be persecuted.
	Not just prosecuted, but persecuted.
	And so I said, oh, wait.
	You know, I looked at that thing and I said, Sean Ryan was the guy who put on that other former CIA. Don't ever tell me that he's a former CIA. Sarah, who was pushing...
	All of this stuff.
	Yeah, and we've got Al-Qaeda has come across the border, and Al-Qaeda is going to be doing this, and Al-Qaeda is going to be doing that, and it's going to be terror events all over the place.
	We're just going to have to shut down that border, and we're going to have to do whatever it takes to shut down that border.
	Whether we've got autonomous robot killer machines and autonomous drones to kill people, and we've got to have surveillance cameras all over the place, and not just at the border, but throughout the United States, and we've got to have biometric surveillance at the border so nobody gets in and nobody gets out, and we've got to have IDs before you can get a job and all the rest of the stuff, which is what DeSantis and Republicans in Florida have already done.
	Oh yeah, everything.
	We're going to have a lot of attacks.
	So, everything is on the table.
	And Trump's your guy.
	Because Big Daddy's coming home.
	And like Tucker Carlson said, Big Daddy is pissed at his 16-year-old.
	And he's going to be spanking his 16-year-old.
	He starts going into Lolita fantasies or whatever.
	But this is Sean Ryan.
	And the interview that he had with this Sarah person...
	And listen to what they say about Al-Qaeda and listen to what they say about 9-11.
	Is anybody doing anything?
	No, and actually, Al-Qaeda makes a joke of the fact that they move the money we give to the Taliban to the camps that train the homeland attackers, right?
	So it's almost like an insider joke.
	Like, yes, we are forcing America to fund their own attacks.
	So that is the plan, too.
	These people are the inside joke.
	And our government.
	And then that makes America also look at our government like, it's an inside job.
	You knew it, right?
	And so Al-Qaeda is going to play that game, which is really interesting.
	Al-Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating.
	And they...
	We have actually had discussions about how we could do ruses and bring in the building seven people to make them blame their government more.
	So they're actually even looking at our conspiracy.
	I'm Al-Qaeda.
	She's presenting me up as Al-Qaeda.
	So basically those people almost back Al-Qaeda as revolutionaries and rebels.
	You're the people giving them money and weapons.
	Kind of like how the Hamas supporters do it.
	Yeah.
	All right.
	So we have a list of stuff to go down here.
	I think.
	Since we're unfunding the Taliban.
	Yeah.
	The CIA runs this stuff.
	The CIA runs drugs.
	And then they come after us.
	We're the bad guys because we oppose their drug war, because we oppose their drugs that they bring in, because they want to destroy this society.
	Folks, the CIA is satanic.
	They're the ones who are doing Al-Qaeda, and they come in and say, oh, well, you know, these people who question 9-11.
	These people who say that...
	That 9-11 was an inside job by those types of people.
	Those types of people.
	There's Sean and Sarah.
	Sean, what's his name again?
	Anyway, Sean Ryan, Sarah Adams.
	I'm going to give you two cents for their opinion.
	These people are professional liars.
	Remember when Pompeo, he went to Texas A&M, a conservative place, and he says, you know, I went to West Point.
	And they told us that we don't lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate people who do.
	And then I went to the CIA. And we not only lie, cheat, and steal, but we have classes on it.
	These people graduated emeritus with those classes, with honors.
	They are now CIA liars emeritus.
	So, when you look at this stuff, again, there's a clip here on this article.
	Go back to the article and find the picture of...
	There he is, meeting with President Trump.
	And he posted out on, let's see, where is the date?
	I don't see the date.
	But it was before that happened.
	And he said, you want to fight?
	Well, you got it.
	Where do you hear that?
	Is it somebody following Alex?
	And there he is, meeting with President Trump as Cowboys for Trump.
	Coy Griffin, one of the few riot defenders who isn't accused of entering the Capitol or engaging in any violent or destructive behavior.
	A 48-year-old county commissioner charged with two misdemeanors entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds and disorderly and disruptive conduct and restricted building or whatever.
	And so he met with Trump, but then he figured out what Trump was about.
	Cowboys for Trump founder turns on Trump in a conference speech over the Capitol riot charges.
	Griffin said, we supported President Trump because of his fight for justice as well.
	And for four years, we cried, lock her up, lock her up, lock her up.
	We know she's a criminal, meaning Hillary.
	What did the president tell us?
	If I was in charge of the law, you would be in jail, he said to Hillary.
	Remember that?
	Mr. President, you've been in charge of the law for four years.
	At the end of your four years, the only ones who were locked up were men like me and others like me that have stood by the president the strongest.
	He threw them under the bus.
	Coy Griffin said, It was the greatest entrapment of history.
	And folks, the people who led them into it were people, there was Trump at the top, Alex Jones at the top, Roger Stone, all these people that I worked with.
	They disgust me.
	I will never support that.
	I will never forget that either.
	One guy has been freed.
	He spent a good deal of time in jail.
	He said, I went there and I prayed inside the Capitol for the good of our country.
	And Biden sent them to jail.
	Again, let's not forget Biden's role in all this stuff.
	Biden and Merrick Garland, they are not blameless in this.
	Nor is the left mainstream media.
	You got Sonny Hostin.
	Again, one of these people at The View.
	Who watches this stuff?
	I mean, I wonder if they got an audience other than people who tune in to write articles about the stupid, offensive stuff that they say.
	Sonny Hostin on The View said the January 6th riot was like the Holocaust and says we can never forget.
	Well, the Trump supporters have forgotten, haven't they?
	They never really got it for the most part.
	You know, when I talk about it, I'm the one they get angry at.
	They get angry at me.
	Because they have vested so much in Trump and in Alex.
	You know, if I show them pictures of Alex telling people that the jab was sugar water, if I show them pictures of Alex hating, you know, when he was inebriated or whatever, he gets on air and he starts going after Trump or people have released some of the private videos of him going after Trump and then, you know, he reverses himself.
	I put that kind of stuff out to tell people, don't follow this guy.
	They get angry with me.
	They're very angry with me for not supporting Trump.
	So, again, I'm not doing any interviews with any of these January the 6th people.
	Either they don't get it, or they are hoping that he's going to pardon them, and there's not any truth that's going to come out of that.
	The Department of Justice, meanwhile, they have a lot...
	Of blood on their hands as well.
	1,583 people have been accused of participating in the riot and faced charges, more than half of them pleading guilty before the trial.
	But not a single person has been found not guilty by this rigged process in the District of Columbia.
	Stay out of that place.
	Talk about corruption, a district of corruption.
	That place, for them to have a perfect conviction record over people who are, most of them, exercising their constitutional rights, as I said, that one guy says, I'll win in the Capitol and pray for our country.
	Sam, who worked for InfoWars and was thrown under the bus by Alex when they charged him, he was the only one who didn't run away, after they initiated the stuff, he didn't run away with the rest of them to the Supreme Court.
	Instead, Sam was covering it, and he was filming it.
	And he went into the Capitol building, and he's there with a camera, and he's between the velvet ropes.
	Norm MacDonald even joked about that.
	First instruction I've seen where people stay inside the velvet ropes.
	Sam was doing journalism, reporting, and they came after him.
	People who were shown, you can come in and use the restroom.
	They're coming after them.
	Some elderly men who, if they go to jail, be a life sentence.
	So will Trump pardon these people?
	I certainly hope he will.
	And there's going to be a lot of pressure on him to do it.
	And I think that he will, because I think that with what Biden did with the pardon of Hunter, that basically cut the legs out for any criticism of Trump for pardoning anybody with January 6th.
	The left was, oh, we're the party of principle.
	See, Biden is going to stand there, and he's going to let his son pay the penalty for his obvious crimes.
	And yet, that didn't happen.
	And they were left with egg on their face.
	And then, to further cement that, he's pardoned a bunch of people who were convicted, sentenced to...
	Be executed and a bunch of other things.
	And he's pardoned about 1,500 people.
	It kind of looks like the Biden administration is trying to do this handoff of the baton and give Trump a running start with his supporters.
	That's what it looks like to me.
	Folks, they're fighting over who's going to be president, and there is a personal aspect of that to them.
	But ultimately, they do what they're told.
	And I think that the people who selected Trump this time, who selected Biden the last time, when you look at some of the stuff that Trump did, even, with the election, we're going to lock everybody down, and we're going to do a vote-by-mail and all the rest of this stuff.
	A whole new level of corruption so they could install Biden.
	And so everything that Biden has done in terms of coming after Trump, Trump, who is not...
	Trump served a single minute in jail.
	Poor guy.
	He's been the brunt of the worst lawfare of anybody in history.
	No, the people of January the 6th, his supporters have.
	Trump has come out of this thing with millions, tens of millions of dollars or more in support from his own people.
	And every time that they do this obvious persecution, he gets more and more popular and nothing happens to him.
	With any of this stuff.
	However, the Department of Justice is still looking at 200 more people.
	After the 1,580 people, 1,600 people, let's say, they want another 200. The new figures announced Monday marked the first time the Justice Department, so-called, has revealed how many cases it believes are still pending in the probe of Merrick Garland.
	What he called the, quote, largest Most complex, most resource-intensive investigation in the Department of Justice's history.
	They didn't even investigate 9-11 that way, did they?
	They didn't investigate 9-11 at all!
	Because it would have exposed them.
	But, yeah.
	Nobody was found not guilty.
	But they came after Marky Mark, New Jersey.
	Thank you for the tip.
	Says Mitch McConnell also blocked the $2,000 STEMI checks in late 2020, which helped the Democrat candidates win both Georgia Senate seats on January the 5th.
	Had McConnell not done that, the GOP would have won both Georgia seats.
	And you know, McConnell is the guy who, like I said, none of the senators, none of them, not Mike Lee, Mr. Constitution, Ted Cruz, or...
	Rand Paul, none of them talked about the Paris Climate Treaty.
	And, of course, Mitch McConnell was head of all the Republicans, probably telling them not to talk about that.
	And Mitch McConnell himself should have brought that up and said, we can't have a treaty that is going to destroy our economy and our way of life without even voting on it.
	They never brought it up for a vote.
	Yeah, total.
	Mitch McConnell.
	Glitch McConnell, as some people call him.
	Another example of the uni party, isn't he?
	D Joe says, thank you for the tip.
	I'm starting to see the whole MAGA movement starting to wake up to the cult they've been a part of.
	I'm not sure if it's too late in the game, but hopefully it's a good sign.
	Have been watching your show for years, even when you were at commissary, and have to say that you're the only one I can find to tell the truth.
	Well, thank you.
	That's very kind of you.
	I appreciate that.
	Angry Tiger says, This guy is a scumbag, Mr. Operation Gladio Steve Pacinic.
	It's something you need to scrape off your boots.
	He's a scumbag of the highest order.
	I know, but the smell just keeps coming back.
	I can't get rid of the stench from the steam.
	But Brian Summer, that's right, Dave.
	Don't forget, you actually perpetrated the scam.
	That's right.
	That's according to the...
	Actually, that's one thing they've not accused me of.
	They just say, well, for the longest time, I mean, for a couple of years after that, they said, well, you wait and see.
	You wait and see.
	You know, this still could happen.
	Alex had Steve Pachenik on, like, way into the spring after all this stuff.
	Kept coming back because he knew that he'd get views.
	That's all he cares about.
	He doesn't care about what's true.
	He'll sell fantasies and stories to people left and right.
	He doesn't care at all about what's true.
	Stealth patriot.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says, I don't want to hear the Trump tarts cheering if Trump pardons the J6ers quickly.
	He let them languish in jail for four years.
	He probably wished that they would just disappear.
	And that's the point.
	Why didn't he pardon them before he left?
	He had two weeks before he left.
	And he refused to pardon them.
	And some of the people were trying to cover for him, saying, well, they haven't even been charged with anything yet.
	Like, he knew that they were going to be charged.
	He knew that he was going to have them come after him.
	And that's why I said, I think, Pat Cipollone told him, you know, no, don't pardon him.
	And they didn't say the reason why Pat Cipollone said it, but I know the reason was not because Pat Cipollone knew the Constitution or cared about it.
	It wasn't because Pat Cipollone knew history or cared about it.
	Because we had had, as I pointed out many times, President Andrew Johnson, when they pushed the Insurrection Act to come after Confederate soldiers who had been involved in what they could consider to be an insurrection, I think they were fighting a war for independence, but nevertheless,
	if they wanted to call it an insurrection, which they did, they put the legislation out there, and so to keep that from happening, to keep us from being escalated into the Civil War again, Andrew Johnson, He basically overruled the Congress and pardoned everybody preemptively before they were even charged.
	And, of course, Gerald Ford famously did that with Richard Nixon, pardoned him for everything, did everything that Biden has just done with Hunter.
	And if Biden can do that with Hunter, if Biden can do that with other people, which we're going to see him do that with other people, Liz Cheney and the rest of them, conservatives are so upset.
	That he gave medals to Liz Cheney and gave medals to Hillary Clinton and so forth.
	Do the conservatives of the MAGA people remember Trump giving a medal to Fauci, to Redfield, to Birx, to all the people that were on the Operation Warp Speed rigged game?
	Yeah, he did all of that.
	Gave those people medals.
	So don't talk to me.
	Yeah, certainly.
	Liz Cheney and Hillary Clinton, they don't deserve a medal.
	But if you're going to complain about that, and you're not going to complain about the fact that Trump gave Fauci medals, I mean, I go to these, I see article after article after article from conservative media and Trump supporters just livid about these medals that Biden gave out.
	And nothing at all about Trump.
	Giving Fauci a medal.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	A story about a man who doesn't want to have anything to do with a civil war that these people are fighting over.
	Rich man's war, poor man's fight.
	But he can't stay out of it.
	It affects his family severely.
	And so that's a thing we always need to understand.
	When we talk about the geopolitics that are there, these people who want to fight over borders.
	And they want to kill your family for their agenda.
	And so let's take a look at Russia and what's going on in Ukraine.
	Russia has achieved a major battlefield breakthrough in eastern Ukraine as Trump inauguration nears.
	It's just a couple of weeks and they've got to grab as much territory as they can.
	Everybody's trying to get the line of contact moved as much as they can before Trump comes in.
	Who knows what's going to happen, though?
	Will it be the end of it?
	I'm kind of leaning towards...
	Something happening for peace, because like I said, I think they want to give Trump early victories.
	Not necessarily Putin, but many others do.
	So I think what Trump wants, and I said this when he was running against Biden in 2020, I said if Biden wins, it's going to be a war with Russia.
	If Trump wins, it's going to be a war with China.
	And if we're unfortunate, it'll be a war with both of them, regardless of who wins.
	So I think Trump is back.
	His sights are set on China.
	And so I think he wants to shut this down.
	But again, who knows what's going to happen?
	We don't know.
	But I showed you the pictures a couple weeks ago of the rapid advance of Russian forces there and how Ukraine was just collapsing.
	Well, even more is happening now.
	They captured the important logistics hub, the biggest settlement in southwestern Donbass.
	The Ministry of Defense in Russia claimed further that the Ukrainian army had lost more than 12,000 of the 15,000 troops deployed to defend that town.
	Figures which are not independently verifiable, says Zero Hedge.
	The military also said Ukraine lost about 3,000 pieces of various weapons and military hardware, including 40 tanks and other armored combat vehicles.
	I wonder if it's some of our $10 million tanks.
	The city's long been a strategic Ukrainian army stronghold in the Donetsk region.
	In its location, sitting on a central highway connecting eastern and southern Ukraine.
	However, there is some independent confirmation of the Russian breakthrough from Associated Press and other regional sources, even though you can't independently verify this.
	The Washington Post says, Graphic that I showed you over a couple of months and how rapidly the lines are moving is going even faster.
	Moscow is capitalizing on its greatest advantage.
	Meanwhile, Secretary of State Antony Blinken estimates that Ukraine's chances of regaining ground are zero.
	Net zero.
	Net zero.
	Ukraine is unlikely to regain any territory in the foreseeable future, but they're not going to give up on this war with Russia.
	They said, well, we're just going to have peace, and we'll bide our time, and then we'll come back to them.
	But that's the thing.
	That's the thing, whether or not they're going to go for that.
	The question is, will they find ways, with the support of others, to regain territory that has been lost?
	I'll bide my time, said the Wicked Witch of the West, right?
	Or the East, which one it was, I don't know.
	An enduring ceasefire would require Ukraine to improve its deterrence, potentially by...
	Receiving international security guarantees or by being given a path to NATO membership.
	Well, that, Blinken says that.
	That is a non-starter for Russia.
	Not going to happen.
	Ukraine and Russia reached a preliminary agreement following peace negotiations in Istanbul in early 2022. But guess what?
	Bojo the Clown, out of the UK, Boris Johnson, shut it all down.
	Because the globalists, just as you heard, Trudeau shutting that guy down.
	Can we have peace talks?
	Hey, this is a war for the survival of Ukraine.
	This is not a proxy war.
	Shut up.
	We're not going to have any peace.
	Right?
	Boris Johnson, same thing.
	Again, Trudeau, the socialist.
	Boris Johnson, the conservative.
	Socialist, conservative.
	Why are they all the same?
	The Uni Party, folks, is global.
	Just as we saw during the COVID MacGuffin.
	So he shut it down, Bojo the Clown.
	Moscow is still willing to consider a long-lasting peaceful solution, says RT, Russian times, provided that it is based on the new realities on the ground, according to Putin.
	In other words, you're going to recognize the land that they have conquered.
	They said there will not be, this is RT, there will not be a repeat.
	Of the ill-fated 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, which froze the conflict between Kiev and the Donetsk and the Lugansk People's Republics, Moscow has stated.
	Senior Ukrainian and Western officials have since openly admitted that they never intended to adhere to the agreements.
	They just wanted to stall, to have time to arm Ukraine.
	This thing has been going on, as we pointed out many times, back in 2014, with a CIA-engineered coup.
	And then you had people who said, well, we see ourselves as Russian, and we would like to remain with Russia, people in the Crimea.
	And you had the UK defense minister who said, we beat the Russians in Crimea once before, we'll beat them again.
	It's like, wait a minute, you just admitted that they've had...
	That Russians have controlled Crimea for centuries.
	That's in the 1800s where you beat them in the Crimean War.
	So, yeah, they've been all about this for quite some time, and they're not about to do another ceasefire without getting what they want, is what Russia is saying, what Putin is saying.
	The Kremlin has emphasized that a neutral, non-aligned status for Ukraine, in other words, keeping it out of NATO, That's one of its key demands for a ceasefire.
	Moscow's other terms include Kiev's demilitarization, denazification, and maintaining freedom from nuclear weapons.
	You know, Zelensky's not very happy about that.
	Everybody else has got nuclear weapons.
	Why can't we have nuclear weapons, he said.
	Give that madman a nuclear weapon?
	I mean, he's like Kim Jong-un, or worse.
	He went on with Lex Friedman.
	Lex Friedman, very concerned about the attitude of Zelensky.
	Zelensky, when he did the interview, his mother tongue is Russian.
	And Lex Friedman said that.
	Lex Friedman, his family is from Russia.
	He speaks Russian as well.
	He said, I want to interview him in Russian.
	Instead, he wanted to do things through a translator and all the rest of this stuff.
	And he even engaged him about that.
	I said, why can't we do the interview in Russian?
	And Zelensky said, and he played it on his interview.
	Zelensky said, well, of course I speak Russian.
	And I may respond to a couple of things that you have in Russian, but he says, we're not going to conduct the entire interview in Russian because that would indicate that we are Russian.
	And we can't indicate that.
	Even though Ukraine has been Russian for 400 years.
	It's such fraud.
	That is there.
	Why are we fighting over this?
	And they don't care a whit about our border?
	They don't care a whit about the borders of Germany or the UK or any of the Western European countries?
	No, all the European globalist leaders care nothing about their borders.
	And the U.S. doesn't care anything about our borders.
	But they only care about the borders where they can get involved in a war.
	Well, Musk has gone to war again.
	With his critics on this so-called free speech platform, the king of free speech, who saved free speech for us all, this benevolent billionaire, this altruistic billionaire, Elon Musk cussed out a student who called him a fake news machine.
	He launched into a foul-mouthed ex-tirade directed at a student who called him out for allegedly spreading disinformation.
	This is Yahoo News.
	Quote, this is the tweet.
	Elon Musk, quote, is rapidly becoming the largest spreader of disinformation in human history.
	Hijacking political debates in the process, wrote a Finnish grad student and an activist for the defense of Ukraine.
	Okay, so this is somebody with whom I would have big disagreements with.
	But Elon Musk is not going to tolerate dissent.
	Not on the platform that he owns.
	So what does that say about his commitment to free speech?
	He replied, F you, retard.
	We could have avoided a lot of disasters by simply telling leftist retards to shut the F up, he said.
	Well, the Yahoo News says it's kind of interesting.
	Musk appears to have made a conscious choice to reintroduce this word, the F word, into right-wing parlance of late.
	Of course, this is something that has been done by Megyn Kelly to great effect as well.
	Megyn Kelly has now become a foul-mouthed sailor man.
	Because every time she says the F word, she gets headlines all across the MAGAverse.
	Every one of the conservative publications will quote her when she says F this or F that.
	You think Musk doesn't notice that?
	Of course he's going to do that.
	I've told the story before about when we went to see Penn and Teller.
	Penn Jillette got up and said, I don't use the F word.
	He said, I think that's the people who use it.
	They use it as an adjective, as an adverb, every form of speech.
	And he goes, and it just sounds like you don't have any vocabulary.
	And then he said, so I don't use the F word, but he says, I go out of my way to blaspheme the name of Jesus Christ.
	That was the point at which we got up and left and made everybody at the table let us out.
	But yeah, they do use it.
	They use it for effect.
	I had this argument with Alex.
	Paul Joseph Watson started doing the same thing.
	And I confronted Alex about that.
	Because I knew what it was about.
	And it wasn't just the F word.
	Paul Joseph Watson started using Jesus.
	So basically, the compromise was that Alex told him to lay off of Jesus.
	But go ahead and use the F word.
	That's good.
	Good for attention, right?
	Analysis of Musk's ex-posts and replies shows that he has used the F word, or a variant of it, 15 times since December the 20th, and he'd never used it before.
	Meanwhile, just like, you know, he tells everybody that Twitter is a free speech platform, the CEO of YouTube, a guy named Neil Mohan, says that YouTube is a bastion of free speech.
	I've used a B word that kind of sounds like that to refer to the people at YouTube, but it wasn't bastion.
	It was something else.
	It kind of sounds like it.
	YouTube claims to be a champion of free expression, yet it enforces selective silencing while mainstream outlets escape unscathed.
	Well, I guess he's just as out of touch as Elon Musk and Elon Musk groupies are about what's going on there.
	You know, as I said before, I can't even Get my Christmas carols up.
	You know, I thought, well, okay, they banned me for political stuff, and I know they don't like any of the things that I have to say there.
	But I do want to put up the Christmas carols.
	I did about two, three years ago, what I had then.
	And I created a new account.
	I created a new email and everything else.
	I mean, I didn't have anything there, and they shut me down.
	You know, after about six months, they shut me down.
	But we're putting up Christmas carols.
	If you believe Neil Mohan, YouTube CEO, the platform is a modern-day agora, a self-described bastion of free speech.
	Just because it's an open platform doesn't mean that anything goes, he said, however.
	Oh, well, you know, because if anything went, that'd be the Wild West.
	I like the Wild West.
	I always liked Westerns, and I always liked the freedom that they had.
	That was one of the problems that I had with Jimmy Stewart films.
	My least favorite film, although it was a good movie, was a man who shot Liberty Valance.
	And if you think about the hidden message in that, the guy's name, the outlaw's name was Liberty, right?
	And, you know, Jimmy Stewart was a lawyer who was going to bring law and order to that area, and they're going to shut down that Liberty.
	And they did.
	They shot Liberty.
	To civilize the Wild West.
	Well, I like the Wild West.
	I don't know where Mohan is from.
	He may not be from the West, from any Western countries.
	We're talking about Western civilization.
	We're talking about the Wild West.
	Isn't it interesting that the Wild West is a metaphor for freedom, and these people hate it.
	They use it as a pejorative term.
	I was like, are you a conspiracy theorist?
	You want to see the Wild West?
	And I was like, yeah, yeah, all that.
	Guilty as charged.
	Anyway, yeah, this is a guy who I do not think is from the West.
	But, you know, I saw this stuff, and there's all this.
	Elon Musk has changed his algorithm there at X, and he's going to start.
	He wants it to be a happier place, as he's using the F word all the time.
	He's going the other direction.
	He wants it to be a happier place.
	Well, I know Shorty giving everybody ketamine prescriptions if he's going to get there or not.
	But I thought, well, let me ask X, the AI program that he's got, Grok, that's on X. I said, let me ask it what my sentiment score is.
	So I said to Grok, I said, what is my X sentiment score?
	And I said, well, I can get access to user information, user names and stuff like that.
	However, I don't have access to internal X data systems, including sentiment scores, you know, your social credit score.
	If you're looking for an analysis of your sentiment on X, I could review your recent post to give you a general sense of the sentiment expressed.
	Would you like me to do that?
	I said, yes.
	And so it says, Based on the post that you've made recently on X, your sentiment appears to be largely skeptical and critical, particularly towards government motives, intelligence communities, and certain public figures.
	And it's like, oh, he read my mail.
	There's noticeable pattern of questioning narratives, especially in areas like vaccine safety, political actions, and media reporting.
	Here's a breakdown.
	Negative sentiment.
	Many posts convey distrust or criticism, especially regarding the CIA, government actions, and public figures like Trump, Tucker Carlson, and media personalities.
	The use of phrases like, quote, don't trust any of them.
	These are not things I put on Twitter, by the way.
	This is stuff on my video, right?
	This quote that it's got of me, I did not put that on Twitter.
	Maybe I did.
	I don't know.
	Maybe I did, in terms of Sean.
	Maybe I did, now that I think about it.
	Anyway, and the questioning of motives in stories like the Cybertruck bombing suggests a strong undercurrent of skepticism or negativity towards official narratives.
	And then in terms of positive sentiment, it's that while less frequent, there are moments where you have positive sentiment expressed.
	Often in the context of advocating for truth, transparency, or when discussing alternative perspectives that challenge vaccine safety concerns or media bias analysis.
	These instances are often wrapped in a call for critical thinking.
	Given this analysis, if we were to assign a sentiment score for you on a scale of negative one, very negative, To a positive one, very positive, your post would likely fall in the range suggesting more negative sentiment, perhaps around minus 0.4 to minus 0.6.
	In other words, they would give me like a 2 or a 3 out of a scale of 1 to 10. I get like a quarter, I guess we could say.
	This score reflects the critical, skeptical nature of your content, although there are elements that could be seen as positive or neutral in the push for informed discourse.
	So there we go.
	No wonder I'm shadow banned.
	Okay, Atomic Dog, thank you very much for the tip.
	It says, Innocent Man, killed by the police, 1223, while executing a warrant on the wrong address in Laurel County, Kentucky.
	If you're not familiar, I'd love to send links to the articles and neighbor security camera video.
	Email?
	Yes.
	And you can always find my email at thedavidknightshow.com.
	But the email address is davidknightshow at protonmail.com.
	davidknightshow at protonmail.com.
	I've seen this story over and over again with the militarized police, the SWAT raids, and all the rest of the stuff.
	It is a sad story.
	I've seen situations where the wrong house, and they throw flash grenades in.
	There's a situation where they threw a flash grenade into a baby's crib.
	Severely burnt the baby.
	And totally unnecessary.
	Totally unnecessary.
	Sprumford.
	Wow, I just read that this year, 2025, the famous communist holiday called May Day, May 1st, is the National Day of Reason.
	Did they do that in Washington?
	Is that something that Biden and the communists who run this guy they call Joe, is that what he did?
	I don't know.
	Live free or perish.
	McConnell's wife's family is associated with the largest cargo shipping company in China and the CCP. That's right.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, and Trump put her in.
	I forget the post that he had her in.
	She's Chinese.
	Mitch McConnell's wife is Chinese, but he gave her a cabinet position as well.
	And yet, you know, they are enemies.
	Yeah, right.
	Yeah, Mitch McConnell and Trump, they're on the opposite end?
	World 2 box, LOL David, you skeptic?
	That's right, I'm a skeptic.
	Sabbath 1974 says, Ukraine is a grift, not a war.
	Zelensky puts kids with Down syndrome in uniform on his front lines, while Putin puts inmates from jail and prison on his to keep up the charade.
	So the billions of dollars keep flowing.
	Oh, it is true.
	I mean, it's just amazing, the corruption.
	I think Lex Friedman, well, I know he did.
	I didn't watch the whole thing.
	It was like an hour or two.
	And, you know, you know that...
	Any answer he gets from Zelensky is absolutely going to be a lie.
	So, yeah, I didn't follow the whole thing, but he did at one point ask him, there's a perception.
	Many people have called out Ukraine as being corrupt.
	What do you say to people to regain their trust and to keep the billions of dollars flowing?
	I didn't watch for the answer because I just couldn't stand to see it.
	We'll be right back.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	You should be able to buy me several hundred those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. Well,
	you know, these people are all about the environment.
	And of course, you know, Democrats especially, but the Republicans, many of them are not doing anything about it anyway.
	But they don't want us eating beef.
	They don't want us drinking milk.
	And how come they don't want us eating beef when you see Lala Harris eating so much crow?
	She was the one who had to certify the election of Trump.
	The votes for President of the United States are as follows.
	Donald J. Trump of the state of Florida has received 312 votes.
	Kamala D. Harris.
	Wait, wait, wait.
	Wait, I didn't get to my part yet.
	Kamala D. Harris of the state of California has received 226 votes.
	Thank you.
	And all 226 of them stood up.
	No, they weren't there.
	Electoral College did not meet.
	That's unfortunately the do-nothing Congress that doesn't know what's happening, how to fix it, and doesn't care how to fix any of this stuff.
	It was interesting to see, you know, because again, everybody was there.
	They do their official vote total stuff.
	Didn't get canceled for snow.
	I saw some pictures of them using snow machines there in Washington, but these guys, they wanted to show up for that.
	So they're there.
	They couldn't come back from the campaigning to help the people in Western North Carolina, but they'll be there for the vote count of the...
	That's sent in from the various electors around the country.
	Bill Maher had, they say, he fires back at a Hollywood star over the excuse of Lala's loss.
	This guy is John Cryer.
	And there was something vaguely familiar about him.
	It's like, haven't I seen him somewhere before?
	Who is he?
	And I've completely lost touch with the movie business completely now.
	But he was, you know, as a young guy, he was in a couple of mediocre movies.
	And so I guess that qualifies him to be a political pundit.
	So listen to this back and forth with Bill Maurer.
	I think the whole country, even unless you're like stupid, Stupid woke.
	I hope you're not, but, you know, it is Hollywood.
	I'm not somewhat stupidly woke.
	Okay.
	The whole country was like, I mean, I think the biggest issue for the election, one of the biggest ones, was Democrats pointlessly, totally just punted on immigration and let anybody who wanted to walk in for three and a half years did.
	You know.
	I think they would probably disagree that people walking in probably felt like it was a little harder.
	No, no.
	Actually, there's a great 60 Minutes piece on it where the border...
	I mean, you don't get 8 million people here by making it difficult.
	But there's...
	I mean, you see they're walking through and the border guys are just watching them do it.
	They're just watching them walk past.
	You never saw that?
	I did not see that.
	See, that doesn't get in the liberal media.
	That's the problem is the bubbles we live in.
	I think I had it right.
	Like, that kind of stuff is what lost the election from the Democrats.
	It's in all...
	Maybe part of it?
	I don't know.
	I think...
	They have polling on it.
	Well, I think it's inflation.
	I think Americans hate inflation.
	They hate inflation, they hate riots, and they hate black people.
	Well, wait, the economy is great.
	And they hate trans people.
	Oh, God, John, we're not gonna...
	Dude, they just spent hundreds of millions of dollars humanizing trans people.
	And that's disgusting.
	We shouldn't talk politics.
	Okay, we shouldn't.
	Great, we don't have to.
	Yeah.
	We could play more of that.
	But our guest is ready, and I do want to talk to him about what is happening with blockchain.
	He has an organization called Composite.
	And he's looking at a way to bridge Web 2 to Web 3. We'll talk about what that is and what the limitations are on traditional blockchain issues about it.
	And this is something that, one way or the other, we're all going to have to deal with blockchain.
	So we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back with our guest, Noam from composite.org.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	Stay with us.
	But 24 booster shots in your arm.
	Oh, nothing.
	Be happy.
	You can't even buy s*** in the store because of your low social credit score.
	Oh, nothing.
	be happy you will own nothing And be happy.
	Be happy and eat some bugs.
	All right, and joining us now is Noam Kamnensky, I think if I pronounced that correctly.
	Maybe I got close.
	Like I said, I'm going to refer to you mostly as Noam, so we'll not struggle over the last name.
	But I wanted to tell you, it's very interesting, your project here.
	And I think a lot of us have much that we don't know about blockchain, but one of the things that you say is that you did a press release about a white paper that would bridge Web 2 to Web 3. So let's start with that, and then we can talk about your organization, or you can tell us about your organization if you want to.
	Again, it's Composite with a K, K-O-M-P-O-S-I-T-E dot org.
	So if you'd like to tell us about your organization first, then we can talk about Web 2 to Web 3 bridging and what those two things are.
	So tell us a little bit about Composite.
	Yeah, thank you, David.
	So, my name is Noam, and nobody really knows me.
	So, I am an entrepreneur.
	I'm an inventor.
	I have patents.
	I have, for the last 47 years, I'm 52, been a tinker and someone that makes that...
	That breaks through barriers to get where I want to, right?
	That's good.
	And I was in Shark Tank a few years back, and that exploded for me with a product called Bambooey, right?
	This one here.
	And I made partners with one of the sharks, and my business exploded.
	We were in all kinds of platforms.
	We started getting copied.
	Then, after that, I said, if I get copied, I need to make a product that is uncopyable.
	So I started, I made the next product, had five patents, I waited for them, and then I brought them out.
	The hair ties that look like telephone wire that women use, I am deemed...
	And then the next thing I know is big corporations, billion-dollar corporations are suing me to invalidate the patents because they sell millions of dollars and they don't want to pay me.
	And I said, the system is rigged.
	The system is rigged.
	I learned through, there's a book called The Art of War by Sun Tzu.
	It's a must-read if you're in politics or you are in business.
	And I came to the conclusion that that was a whole bunch of bleep bleep, right?
	I don't know if you can say that word here.
	For a few months I was really not in a good place and I decided to make a product that was uncopyable.
	That I could build an organization or business where not only would I sell to just the first time to a customer, but it could have repeat business.
	Because that's the major issue.
	And I came to the conclusion that IP property, things that have to do with art or have to do with creators, has a better protection than patents, for example, that you have to defend claims and stuff like that.
	So I created Unimos, which are different characters, which Disney, with all his...
	Protections and stuff have created a very strong legal network.
	And then I went into blockchain.
	I knew nothing about blockchain.
	You have to understand.
	The reason I know so much about blockchain is because when I went into blockchain, I said, I don't get it.
	You were talking to me like everybody should know about this, but I don't get it.
	So that's how I started, right?
	And I went to a point that I created...
	Unimos, and I created all kinds of security labeling in order to marry collectibles with the blockchain to make them unmutable, to make them uncopyable, and to allow anybody that's an artist, organizations, brands, enterprises to be able to marry their products to something that will make it I'm counterfeitable, right?
	Well, first I did the Unimos, like I was saying, we call it the House of Unimos, and then I said, you know what, they're going to copy this from me, so I'm going to make it possible for other people to be able to do what I'm doing, right?
	So that's where the idea of composite came, and it comes from the idea that it marries the digital with The physical, right?
	That's why it's a composite object, really.
	And we put a K because you need to have something unique, right?
	And so that's how the idea came to be.
	I have a brother who is a genius mathematician and knows about algorithms and math, high math and stuff like that.
	And it took about two years.
	To develop, the idea was clear, but you have to develop a path that will allow a deployment worldwide and allow for a very solid project.
	And that's what happened.
	About a month ago, we finished the paper.
	It's completely readable by layman people, except the math, of course.
	And the idea of Composite was that any Any organization or any person that is an artist or even creators can go there, have their own node, and have a network within a public network.
	Right?
	Now, you told me that you want an explanation about what blockchain is.
	And I'm going to give you a few definitions so that you can say, I hear all about it.
	The buzzwords, crypto, blockchain, you know, Ethereum, Binance.
	What do I care?
	Right?
	Well, you do need to care because this is the revolution.
	This is going to change the world.
	Okay?
	So, let's start with the basic principle of why is it called blockchain?
	Right?
	Really simple.
	It means there's a chain of blocks, and by blocks it means a whole bunch of transactions together in a block that it says, okay, this is the block, that's how many transactions we have, and now we're going to make it into part of the chain.
	And what happens is this, let's say, network, let's call it a network, right?
	It brings out a block that is the final...
	The final number of transactions, and decides to put it on a chain, and they add cryptography at the end of both sides of the block, so that information cannot be changed.
	That's what it means.
	It's a block of transactions.
	Okay, and it's on a chain.
	Second word is crypto, right?
	They use crypto like it's money, but really it is, right?
	It represents, so in this, let's say, network, let's call it networks, Ethereum, And Bitcoin are the most famous ones.
	We have Ripple.
	We have all kinds of networks, but let's just make it simple.
	Crypto stands as shortening for cryptography, right?
	Cryptography, the idea of cryptography is to put in codes and letters and stuff that has a special key that if I send a message, it cannot be deciphered by anybody once it's transmitted.
	And the person that receives it can have, like, a key, and they can decipher the message.
	It was used in World War II, you know, between the Allies and the Russians, and also the Nazis, right?
	Incredible, incredible technology.
	The Enigma machine that everybody is familiar with.
	You know, you've seen the movies.
	And there's a key of 256...
	Character that is used by Visa and MasterCard and things like that, that they do it for encryption, but it's also used in blockchain where they put it at the end of the block.
	And what that happens, how is that important is because now that block that is created, that is entrapped between encryption and together with another block, now it cannot be changed.
	And this is what makes blockchain different.
	There's another term called decentralization.
	This is a decentralized network.
	What does that mean?
	Okay, when you have any organization, let's say you have Coca-Cola or you have the government or you have even your own organization, right?
	Everybody has a central server, right?
	And from that central server, all the information flows in and out, right?
	It goes in and out and that gives one organization The power of changing things or controlling information, right?
	And what happens when Bitcoin came to be about 16 years ago, they created sort of like a program.
	Let's make it simple.
	They created a program that will allow for a network without a central server.
	Let me explain.
	They made a program that will allow for different computers to connect and work together in a process without a centralized control, let's put it that way.
	And all that blockchain is, or this decentralized network is, is a ledger.
	As you heard it, it's just something that writes information.
	David owes Noam $100, right?
	Noam owes his kids $20.
	And everybody can see it.
	So if, for example, I say I had $100 and I paid $100, I cannot do the transaction twice.
	I cannot say, I paid David $100 and now I'm going to pay, you know...
	Trump, let's say Trump.
	I pay him $100.
	Because they will verify on the blocks of information that the transaction already happened.
	Everybody can see it, and by consensus of the whole, when they look at a transaction, they say, no, this cannot happen because the information is incorrect or because it shows there.
	And let me jump in here, because we talked about cryptography and encryption and things like that, and that has been a longstanding definition of the word, and we think about things like the Enigma machine that was being used by...
	I think that's part of where the confusion comes in when people think that the blockchain is private.
	They hear the crypto stuff, and they don't realize that people can still read it.
	They can't change it, but everybody can read it, which is what you're just pointing out there.
	I think that's a point of confusion for a lot of people.
	Well, okay, so let me just explain just a little bit more.
	So what happens is all these nodes that have a ledger, they all have the same final ledger.
	Which is in a blockchain.
	The final one, right?
	The ones that everybody approves.
	And so it made it transparent.
	Everybody could look at the transaction and by making it transparent and immutable, meaning that it couldn't be changed, now you could build trust between parties that might not have trust between each other because the information could not be changed.
	Does that make any sense?
	Example, when you have a bank, right, something could happen that maybe they don't have enough money in their ledger or whatever, but they don't tell anybody.
	The people that are going in and out, you know, doing transactions, they don't know that that bank might not be solvent for like, you know, two or three years because it's centralized.
	So the idea was to stop the manipulation.
	Right.
	In Bitcoin, the original idea of Bitcoin was to transfer value.
	If I lived in Florida and I want to send to a friend in Japan money today, I have to go to my bank account.
	I have to do a wire, charge him $45.
	He goes to my bank.
	He goes to a transitional bank.
	He goes to an international bank.
	Then he goes to the Japanese main bank.
	Then to his bank.
	Three days later, he's on his account.
	He still cannot get it because he has to prove he's him.
	He has to show his...
	His cards, he has Social Security, maybe even his blood type these days.
	And then they charge him another $45, and it takes another three days just to get it.
	So six days to transfer $100, they are charging $45 to me, $45 to him, he only gets $10.
	It would still be that $90 if you transfer more money, but I'm just giving you an example.
	So the idea of Bitcoin was that I have...
	Within the network, I have a wallet, and I send him a piece of Bitcoin, or a Bitcoin at a time.
	He gets it within a few minutes, and that's it.
	There's no intermediaries.
	There's no government agencies.
	There's no bureaucracy.
	It's done.
	It's simple, and it cuts the middleman, and it cuts all those fees, and it cuts the control.
	And that was the idea when it started, right?
	And it was worth very little.
	He had games so people can collect the Bitcoin, right?
	And then what happened is, Is the manipulators of the stock got involved and start manipulating it and start, you know, doing, you know, like stocks and bonds, and it started going up and fluctuating, and it went from 10 cents to 10, to 100, to 1000, and it has different cycles.
	And then people, instead of using it, they started holding on to it.
	Oh, this is worth something, so I should keep it.
	So the purpose, what Bitcoin was designed for, stopped being the purpose, and now it was just gather, you know, mine.
	Create these coins, which really are tokens.
	By the way, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and all the other things that are called tokens are exactly that.
	You go to a casino, they give you a casino token that says this is $100.
	It's the exact same principle.
	It only supposedly works only on that network, right?
	The exchanges is what allows you to change one for the other.
	So the purpose that Bitcoin was there to transfer...
	Transfer value went away and it became value itself.
	And then the organizations and the financial institutions that were supposed to subvert or go around started getting into it because everybody's into it.
	And now no longer is decentralized and it has different centralization points like an exchange.
	You go now to Coinbase and you buy it, you put money, you know, they call it fiat money, regular money.
	and then you have to wait six days until you get it.
	You cannot touch it.
	They do CMYK, which they want to know all your information.
	So at this point, the purpose of the decentralization, the purpose of blockchain and what Bitcoin was created has been subverted, right?
	That's an excellent explanation.
	And I think it's basically, I haven't read the book yet, but I think it's what Roger Ver was talking about when he talked about hijacking of Bitcoin.
	That it was set up as a, you know, transactional thing and has been hijacked as an asset.
	And, you know, as you point out, the big institutions have essentially hijacked it and subverted its purpose.
	And it's an excellent explanation of that, yes.
	The three largest owners of Bitcoin.
	I believe it's the Chinese government, the American government, and BlackRock.
	Yeah, BlackRock, yeah.
	They govern everything.
	The world government.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	If you are a public organization.
	And Germany was really stupid selling all the Bitcoin they had.
	So that explains what blockchain is.
	But blockchain is sort of like a tool that is a multipurpose.
	And crypto and the use for financial is just a little sliver of what it can produce.
	The idea is to create a decentralized work.
	Okay, so Bitcoin.
	So let's go back.
	The purpose of Bitcoin was to transfer value.
	The second network that came to life was Ethereum.
	Right?
	There was a guy called Vitalik, and he was obsessed with Bitcoin.
	He loved Bitcoin.
	He had a magazine about Bitcoin.
	He went to all the things when he started.
	And then he said, why don't we use this same network to not just transfer value, but transfer work, like a contract?
	Like, if you do certain things, then because it's so open and it works so well, you can get paid or a contract gets done.
	And that's how the contract system started to work.
	He wrote something, he presented, and some people invested.
	It was only about $15 million that he got.
	I think it was an ITO. He didn't even give.
	Any tokens at the time, just the promise of the token, right?
	And they started working on this.
	And that is the second largest network that exists, that is huge, which it wasn't just for value, but it was for transfer of work.
	And it could be used, for example, in transportation.
	If I receive the goods of this, then payment should happen, right?
	And the Ethereum network started working.
	You know, it was marvelous.
	All the new people, what they call us geeks, right?
	In the movies and stuff, they were all excited and nobody else was, right?
	And then what happened is there was a big clog on the system.
	When CryptoKitties came out in Canada, there was these, they're called NFTs, where you see I don't know.
	When you see different characters, little kitties, we're not going to go into that because that's a little long explanation.
	But this organization, so many people wanted it that they needed to transact on the Ethereum network where the contract was, okay, I give you this image and this number and you give me Ethereum, right?
	So many transactions needed to happen.
	That it delayed the system for six minutes, then it created a glut on the market, and it made the price of the transaction go up, right?
	Which made them realize that the network was not productive or stable when these gluts happened, right?
	Eventually, they started, you know, many years later, they created Ethereum 2.0, which now they have 60...
	64 different networks working.
	It's still finite.
	But the problems of blockchain in general is that they can only produce one block at a time.
	No matter how many nodes you have or how much work is happening, not one node, I mean one block, yes?
	One block at the end is what they produce.
	They're all competing against each other, right?
	And whoever gets that first gets paid.
	For example, Bitcoin has 65,000 nodes, about, right?
	All of them are competing to make a block.
	Only one block at a time comes out, so only one node wins and gets paid.
	All the other energy and all the other work done by the other ones is wasted.
	That's why they say they waste so much electricity and energy.
	It's an arcane system created to bypass the financial institutions that has grown, and it wasn't designed for huge growth.
	It is not designed to take the transactions of the world.
	And that's what I mean by Web2.
	Web2 is all the other regular businesses that are on the Internet.
	Everybody's on the internet these days and they have an organization.
	But blockchain cannot take those transactions or those contracts or usage because the transactional process is too expensive.
	So the next thing happens, and that's called layer one.
	It's layer one because it's the basic blockchain.
	So other companies come and they created a layer two, right?
	Where they use the basic network and they solve issues that that network has, but in a Layer 2 problem.
	Example, I'm not going to talk about companies, right?
	Because I'm not shilling other people.
	But the point is that, let's say that a transaction in Ethereum has gone to $600 for one transaction.
	Let's just say that happens and nobody wants to do a contract for exchanging something that costs $30.
	You know, ownership or whatever for a $600 price.
	It's stupid.
	So it's counterintuitive.
	So what the second layer does is they say, okay, come and do a transaction with us.
	We're called blah, blah, right?
	Whatever.
	And we'll take a thousand transactions or we'll take 2,000 or 5,000.
	And then only then do we will put that as a transaction on the blockchain.
	So you divide 600 by...
	5,000 or whatever, so the transactional cost goes smaller.
	It's fractionalizing it, right?
	But the real issue is that it has a basic problem.
	The blockchains have a problem of scalability.
	Security and price, okay?
	It cannot be used by the regular folk.
	And by not being able to use by the regular folk, enterprises, organizations, libraries, DMVs, or whatever the case may be, it defeats the purpose of using decentralized computing to solve different issues.
	So here is where his composite camp comes.
	Composite will allow, in its first stage, to have 3 million nodes.
	Its scalability and change of how we're going to change the paradigm, how it works, is each cycle will not just give you one block.
	Example, you have Bitcoin, they're all processing the next Bitcoin, right?
	And 65,000 different nodes are competing against each other.
	This is the most inefficient computer in the world.
	It is the paradigm of inefficiency, right?
	And the second paradigm is that whenever there's a glut for transactions, the price goes up dramatically because The purpose of that is because supply and demand, but really the purpose is to have people remove transactions so they can actually do the transactions that they can actually afford to do.
	Now, so we solve this in two ways.
	Okay.
	Number one, when we have all our nodes, we're going to have a node which is going to call a clerk node that will separate and do pre, we call it protoblocks, that will give Transactions to do to different groups, we call them cords, within the blockchain.
	So the blockchain, if it has, let's say, 10,000 nodes that are verifying nodes, and we have, let's say, 1,000 transactions of the sort, we can separate them into 10. 10 cords of 1,000 nodes, let's say, for example, right?
	And each cord will actually verify a block.
	So it will divide the work between, and everybody will be working, and everybody will actually get a gain of it.
	Everybody that has a node will actually get paid, and it will divide the work intelligently.
	Now they say, but that can be attacked security-wise.
	It's true.
	But we devise a node chaotic algorithm sequence that nobody will know.
	Who is going to be or where they're going to be or when they're going to be with mathematics and algorithms and stuff like that.
	But at that point, we changed the paradigm that all the network needs to work on one piece of work, right?
	So everybody will be productive.
	So the result at the end, right, is will be at one point you can have one block.
	The next block on the change could be 10 blocks.
	The next one could be 75. It could be three.
	So it will be dynamic.
	It will work horizontally.
	And vertically.
	And at that point, you resolve the problem of the glut of the productivity.
	Now, what will happen?
	What are we going to do in our block when we have too many transactions and not enough nodes?
	We're going to do something that is counterintuitive.
	We're going to lower the price of transactions.
	Right?
	So the nodes are going to get less money for transacting, and we're going to encourage them to put more nodes.
	Because the nodes that you need for our network is any computer.
	Anybody with a computer can have a node.
	Because the idea is that we want to add more processing power to the decentralized blockchain.
	We want them to be able to...
	We want to make the biggest, hugest computer in the world available for different...
	People fractionally.
	Does that make any sense?
	So by lowering the price of transaction, it will increase the amount of...
	Now, if I have two nodes and I'm making half the price, I'm going to put two more.
	I'll put my other computer, my wife's computer, my daughter, and then what will happen, the amount of money I'm making will be the same, and what will happen is we'll increase the amount of nodes, and then by proportion...
	You'll have much more capacity.
	At that moment is when you need to increase your capacity.
	That's why we do it.
	And more people are going to want to transact because it's cheaper.
	And then when this increases there and proportionally there's less transactions than the notes available, the price goes up again.
	So everybody that increased their notes now are going to, again, They double the nodes, and now it doubles again.
	I don't know if it's going to double, but it will increase back to the original price, and now we have made the network grow.
	So those are the moments of pain that we decided to change how things work in order to grow the network.
	Because in order to grow to 3 million nodes, you know, you have to do it somehow.
	And that way we don't lose the customers saying, oh, this is a crappy network.
	It takes 20 minutes and it charges you $400.
	No, no, no.
	This is fast and it's cheaper.
	And that's how we will grow the network.
	And what will happen when you have 3 million nodes using the token?
	It will become the biggest amount of people dealing with this token.
	So it will be the most used token in the world.
	It will basically eat all the other networks up.
	And whoever owns that token from the beginning will be part of, we call it the decentralized economy.
	And ideally, we want to make that token that can be used for anything.
	Right?
	We would like to have nodes that, like Louis Vuitton wants to do a node in the network.
	They will be able to have their network that they control, right, within the public network, and they will be more transparent, but they will also be able to protect their products better.
	I'll give you an example, okay?
	Really simple example.
	I created these characters called Unimus, right?
	That's how the principle started.
	Then I go and I make...
	I make like a pin or a charm.
	This is just for kids.
	I made it for kids, right?
	This is like a little, right?
	And I put it in a package.
	I put it in a package.
	And then I put a label.
	We call it a K-Link.
	Not a label, but this is going to be stuck to it.
	It's going to be metallic, right?
	It's security.
	I studied how money is made just to...
	To do Unimus, right?
	You have cover security.
	You have to use like infra-UV light.
	You have hologram security.
	There's a thing called intaglio, right?
	We'll have what they use in the $100 bill where this changes color, right?
	It's only done with security.
	And then when it goes through the process, It will print a QR code.
	Can you see that there?
	Now, when we make this, that is when this will become married to the blockchain.
	Let's say this is in a package, right?
	Somebody has it, because that has...
	We call it an NFT today, right?
	But it will be married to this, and this will be unique.
	And it will be under ownership in the blockchain, right?
	Because everybody will know.
	We make it born.
	We do the transaction.
	It shows on the block, and it says it belongs to the House of Unimos.
	Now, when a customer buys it, and they buy, let's say, five of them, right?
	And they buy it, and they get it.
	When they go in their app, and they go clicky, you know, clicky, clicky, they transfer ownership to them.
	Now, by doing that, it changes Completely the paradigm of ownership because now you own it as a physical object and you own it in the blockchain or digital, let's call it a title, and also digital form, right?
	And now I can prove that it's mine.
	I can show the provenance if I sell it to someone else, right?
	It goes to the parent company because they verify it.
	And what happens now is when somebody has a bag or a hat or something, And somebody wants to own it, they just have to go on the enterprise company, like app, and they click on it, they can prove that they are the owner.
	And counterfeit at that moment, because the buyer becomes the inspector, it becomes the lead.
	Does that make sense?
	Yeah, that is.
	That's interesting.
	It kind of weds the physical world to NFTs or something, in a sense, right?
	Exactly.
	We were creating this before NFTs came to be, but then that was a brilliant solution.
	So what happens now, companies will come into Composite, will be able to create all of their products, whether it's for distribution, to show how it goes from the factory to the right distributor, or how it goes from farm.
	You know, people that are organic, they want to see which Which farm it comes from to your table, whether you have a phone and all the parts have a link to that, and then an end user can see how much they cost.
	So when somebody offers them $100, they say, hey, I have here $300 worth of parts.
	It can be that precise.
	And each enterprise that wants to be part of the blockchain will be able to control all of the items and products or whatever services they are, and they will be using the public.
	You understand?
	Because that's really what it is.
	And everybody gets paid in tokens, back and forth, back and forth.
	So what will happen, it will become the biggest transactional blockchain in the world.
	It will change the world as we know it, because it is the next step of the internet where you get counterfeited, you get scammed, you get all kinds of things.
	And, of course, counterfeiting and stealing intellectual property, that's always been a big part of the China price.
	And, you know, you have situations where people will set up a factory there, and they will...
	They will counterfeit, let's say, a brake pad.
	That was one that was a pretty famous example I saw.
	And they replicated everything about it.
	I mean, you could not, even the people that the original owners and the people who designed this thing, they could look at the package and it's a knockoff that is absolutely perfect, except for the fact that the brake pad is like making it out of paper instead of other.
	So when what happens is somebody puts it in, they think they're getting an original part and they get some cheap imitation.
	And somebody has an accident because the brake part is not a real brake and it's defective.
	Then the other company would even get sued.
	So I could see that people would do something like that in order to verify that their stuff was genuine because counterfeiting has become so sophisticated.
	That happened to me.
	That happened to me.
	I told you at the beginning of our podcast, I'm an inventor.
	I'm a producer.
	I've made dozens of products that have been on stores.
	A company, even your own factories, will take your product, your label, and sell it bootlegged from the back.
	Or they will take your formulas and they will put another label and sell it to your competitor.
	They have no scruples.
	For them, it's...
	For them, it's stupid not to do it.
	Why not?
	It's business, but when it happens to them, then they don't like it.
	As a matter of fact, I believe there's a law in China that they force citizens to steal intellectual property.
	That's how China advances technologically because of intellectual property.
	Stolen in industry.
	It's called company espionage.
	So it's a kleptocracy.
	It's not a communist country.
	It's just a kleptocracy.
	Well, you know, they might not ever sell to me again telling you these things, right?
	But that is the problem.
	We use China as the capital or the country to do production because truly it is much cheaper, right?
	And when they wanted to make one world, the idea is that they wanted to make one world government, right?
	And let's not get started on that, like a complete other podcast.
	They wanted to have no barriers.
	So they want you to produce this in China, sell it in America, have a great amount of Profitability.
	And they started taking industry and companies out of America because...
	And nobody cares, sort of, right?
	Why do we want to deal with Americans there?
	The workers are a piece of crap.
	Let's just send it to China and we sell it to them, right?
	And that's what's been happening for decades.
	But it is affecting the big companies.
	It's affecting the little companies.
	Do you know that counterfeiting is about 1.8%?
	Oh, wow.
	And it affects everybody because it makes prices higher.
	And people, like you say, they buy a pay cut that is bad.
	But what about when some of the products inside here could be counterfeited?
	What about if you have works of art or, well, intellectual property is not a problem.
	It's everywhere, from health.
	From pharmaceuticals all the way down to $0.99 products, right?
	You will bring a product to them to manufacture.
	The next thing you know, they have your sample in a trade show in Germany saying, we can do this, right?
	That's right.
	And it's only going to get worse because it's not just the...
	The counterfeiting and everything and the currency manipulation.
	But, of course, they're being given a huge advantage in terms of energy costs.
	And so all manufacturing is going to continue to go to China unless they address some of these fundamental things.
	And there's nobody even talking about addressing those fundamental things.
	So it's going to be an issue of, you know, manufacturing is going to happen in China.
	You've got to find a way to push back against that counterfeiting.
	I've been in China almost 45 times.
	Throughout my career.
	I used to go do it twice or three times a year.
	And I was marveled by how something came and then it got adopted nationwide.
	Like it was there for hundreds of years.
	But one of the things that I noticed the China government did, which I thought was good for them, not for us, was that when they found an industry that they wanted to make sure they did well and somebody could do it, they would give them the money and they would give them the The research.
	Wink, wink.
	You understand what I'm saying?
	Yeah, that's right.
	Here's the plans.
	Here's the plans.
	Exactly.
	To do this.
	Now, I'll give you a perfect example that I know happens.
	Do you know the cleaning pad that is called Magic Eraser?
	Yeah.
	You know that thing?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	It's made out of melamine.
	It originally came from Germany.
	And the reason it's like that is because it was used as a fire retardant in construction.
	Because no fire can go through.
	Right?
	Yeah.
	About more than 20 years ago, I think, I remember I was doing a carpet cleaner.
	I used to sell in fairs and exhibitions and stuff like that.
	I told you, I was a thinker.
	And this customer of mine that was from Korea brought this before the Magic Eraser existed and said, oh, this is great for cleaning and this and the other and showed it to me.
	So it's amazing.
	And they were sent on the dollar, right?
	They were sent.
	He bought a whole container.
	He brought it from Korea, right?
	Yeah.
	The Koreans were buying them from Germany saying that it was for construction.
	They were taking the big buns Did I froze?
	It looks like I froze.
	Can you hear me?
	Yeah, you did freeze.
	I still got you though.
	Yeah, you're back now.
	You're back now.
	So the big buns, like they look like huge buns.
	They cut them in pieces, right?
	Because construction was so cheap and they would sell them for 10 cents and anybody could sell it for a dollar, right?
	And then the Germans caught up to it and said, hey, you cannot do that, right?
	So what we're going to do now is we're going to do a gray color one.
	A gray color one for construction, and the white one, we made a deal with Procter& Gamble or whoever.
	They're going to sell those pads, right?
	And then for a while, you see in the black market, the gray pads being sold for clean as well.
	Anyway, now, 10 years go by, China is trying to copy it, and the sponge that they have is full of bubbles, and it doesn't clean as well, and it folds apart, right?
	I mean, this is a great product to sell because it has...
	It gets destroyed as you clean it, and you have to buy another one.
	It's the perfect product, right?
	It's a planned obsolescence right there, yeah.
	Exactly, obsolescence, that's where I was looking.
	So then what happens is China, from one day to another, they had the perfect sponge, and it was like the German one.
	And that only happened, and I'm telling you, only happened because...
	Because of corporate espionage.
	Does that make sense?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	And my camera, there we go.
	There we go, you're back.
	Maybe this camera is Chinese and it's going against me.
	Anyway, so, but do you see what I'm saying?
	Just overnight they found the plans.
	That's right.
	We just thought of that overnight.
	Why did I think of that before?
	Oh, TikTok.
	It must be TikTok.
	It must be TikTok.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Anyway, so that is, it's built upon them.
	They use other people's R&D to improve the products that they are doing that other people want to buy.
	And a third world country or a country in the Middle East will buy their sponges, which are half or one third of the price.
	And it serves a purpose, right?
	But enough is enough, right?
	This mega machine that eats up entrepreneurs and innovation and research and development and patents and ingenuity.
	Enough, right?
	Enough.
	The artists, the entrepreneurs, the creators, the innovators, the companies that spend billions of dollars on research and development now have an opportunity to be part of Composite, have their own node, and have all of their customers be within their network, right?
	They are part of the network, and every product can be proven.
	And I'll show you how effective this is.
	You know, my wife likes Louis Vuittons, okay?
	Whose wife doesn't, right?
	And there's all kinds of bags.
	Hermes is the most expensive one.
	They're absolutely not how they sell.
	But it's all about status, right?
	I have my Louis Vuitton bag, right?
	And so imagine if a Louis Vuitton bag had a security link within it that shows that that bag is original and it belongs to the person.
	Now, she wants to sell it, right?
	Or people see it, right?
	And they can go with their phone and do click.
	And it shows it belongs to her.
	It gives a recognition.
	If she bought it secondhand, because the problem in the secondhand business is where the most counterfeit happens, right?
	You go to eBay.
	You want to buy a secondhand bag.
	It looks just as good.
	You think it's good.
	It's a great price.
	You buy it.
	Boom.
	You get it.
	You want to fix it in the store and say, this is counterfeited.
	You are a thief, right?
	That's what they will say to you.
	But you didn't know that.
	But imagine now you have a label and the company itself, like Louis Vuitton, they have a very fine note on the network and you want to sell it.
	You don't use eBay.
	You use...
	You use Louis Vuitton's secondary market.
	Now, because it's on the blockchain, they can make money because it's on the code.
	In every transaction of that product for the rest of the life of that product.
	So, I can use Louis Vuitton to put it on the market.
	Somebody buys a second-hand one.
	It's cheaper.
	It doesn't matter, right?
	Louis Vuitton is the one that verifies as the correct bag.
	The transaction transfer, that's how they become sort of like an escrow company.
	It doesn't matter.
	They're losing maybe $100 billion on transactions on the Now they get 20-25% of that.
	So what happens is the customer now, the customers protect the brand and they become the counterfeit experts and they defend it.
	And what happens, somebody buys a counterfeit now that wants to show that they have the bag, knows that other people are going to see that that's not real.
	So now it forces and it takes away the The demand for counterfeit goods.
	Does that make any sense?
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh, absolutely.
	That's a great idea.
	Sorry.
	No, I think in your example there, the fact that the people who have been defrauded with the counterfeiting that's going out there, not only do they have a way to stop that, but they also have some way as part of the confirmation network to get some small fee off of each of these transactions.
	I think that's a great idea.
	It's a small fee for the seller, but it's a huge fee for the brand because now he has a new revenue stream that he didn't expect, that he missed.
	It's a revenue stream that is in the billions of dollars for, let's say, luxury goods.
	But what about, look, let's take another example.
	Do you know that Ferrari in 1979, right?
	I don't know the exact.
	I'm just paraphrasing here.
	Just understand.
	I don't know which is the year, but I remember seeing it.
	That one of the years showed that Ferrari made 100 or 200 cars.
	But if you look at how many cars are listed for that year, there's 500 cars.
	Right?
	So it can be applied for the DMV. The DMV could use this system, have its own node, and produce driver's licenses.
	It could be applied for food verification that is really organic and who it really came from.
	It could be applied for, like, example honey, right?
	We've all tried to be a little more healthy, and supposedly honey is better than sugar and all these other sugar additives.
	But do you know that honey, when it comes from abroad, they sometimes put the syrup on it and they mix it up with sugar and they mix it and blend it.
	And that's why you say that in the U.S. too.
	Oh, okay.
	So what about...
	So what about if you can verify that you are getting the right thing?
	So it is applicable to everything, but what's more important, the network scalability can grow without affecting the security of the transaction and the block.
	And that's what Composite does.
	I'm trying to make it real to regular people because it says, what the hell is blockchain going to affect me?
	Well, listen.
	In 10 years, every transaction will be through blockchain.
	AI. Oh, AI. What about if somebody takes your image?
	How many videos online do you have?
	Oh, I don't know.
	I've been doing this for years.
	I don't know.
	I have no idea.
	A few thousand, okay, let's say.
	Okay.
	Let's imagine somebody takes one of your videos, takes your face, right, and then puts it in the next, I don't know, terrorist attack.
	And there it shows you or saying something unthinkable, right?
	Or doing something unthinkable.
	And they say, unless you pay me a million dollars or $300,000, we're going to publish this and you're going to be on jail or you're not going to be able to be online anymore, right?
	That's right.
	In composite, we also want this technology of authentication that can go right on the image or on the code of a person, of a video, or voice, music, let's say, or a contract.
	And that way, whatever videos you take out, you say, this is me, right?
	And whatever videos, it's not you, now you can say...
	It is verified or it's not verified.
	Imagine if now...
	And that's going to be a big problem because it's gotten so good and so quickly.
	It's advancing that people aren't going to be able to tell fakes from the real thing.
	It's happening.
	When they talk about voice or image or people moving and all the rest of the stuff, anything can be faked.
	Yeah, I mean, it happened like 10 years ago, they had Morgan Freeman, a system, you know, saying, you should turn right or you should turn left or whatever, right?
	You know what I'm saying.
	Right.
	So it's applicable.
	And what's wonderful is that it's at the beginning stages.
	And what's happening here, David, is that...
	We were going to make a foundation.
	I'm making this into a foundation because if you don't do it for profit, it works better because you don't get attacked as much.
	And we were going to do a foundation in Zak, Switzerland, which is what Ethereum did.
	Then we were going to deploy it internationally and then the US could have been involved with it because it no longer is centralized.
	Because when you start a blockchain, it's centralized.
	You need a body that creates the program Mm-hmm.
	And so what we're looking for is to do it here in the US.
	We would like to do this blockchain in the US, enough enough bringing technology and work outside of the US.
	It should be here, it should be great, and why not, right?
	And so we want more clarity when Trump said that he will do no capital gain taxes in any blockchain products that are done here, right?
	What does that mean?
	What does that mean?
	Can I do a foundation and then do an ITO? Because in order to start a blockchain you do a thing called an initial token offering, right?
	You do tokens at a discount.
	that brings money in and so you can do development, right?
	But the problem that when you did that in the US when it all started with blockchain, the SEC came and said, "No, no, no, no, no, no, no, "this is not a blockchain.
	This is a security because you're asking money for something that is going to go up in price.
	Does that make sense?
	Oh, yeah.
	And it looks like that's going to be a lot of deregulation.
	Let me ask you this, though.
	We're talking about being distributed and having millions of nodes there.
	This is something that's going to run on people's personal computers.
	Is it going to be an app or something that people download?
	They call it a client, but let's call it like an app.
	It's a program running using...
	The processing power when the computer is not being used for transaction, for processing.
	So people would be able to do, kind of as their computer is idle, they would be able to do a little bit of, in a sense, kind of like mining, essentially, in a distributed way.
	Yes, exactly.
	The difference with mining in Bitcoin is that they're doing a process where they're trying to get, in order to make a coin, you have to find a prime number.
	A prime number is a number that it can be divided by itself and by one, I think.
	Yes.
	So it started as one, three, five, seven.
	That's really easy.
	That's why the Satoshi...
	He has the first million or two million numbers in his account.
	He's never used them, right?
	Because it's easy.
	But what happens is the numbers become bigger and bigger and bigger, and eventually they're the size of a 20-story building, and in order to find the prime, you need a lot of processing power.
	So that's what mining is called in that case, right?
	And also, you have transactions where you change transactions.
	That's another way that the miners make money.
	But in this case, the purpose of the composite node is to do transactions of work for the world, right?
	If a company wants to transfer ownership of this or wants to ship that or the other, then the processing power will happen within other nodes.
	So it's basically...
	The computer grows, so the capacity grows, so the productivity grows as more nodes get involved and more computers, so it will become like the largest decentralized computer where you can access to do work.
	And it will be...
	So, what will happen is that someone that maybe lives in the Appalachian Mountains and has, you know, has an iPad and has a computer and has,
	I don't know, something goes on the TV and goes to work and he could put those Items or computer chips to work and get trading tokens.
	And the idea is that those tokens could be used for anything.
	Eventually, the supermarket will have its own note and you can come with that token and buy milk or coffee or whatever the case may be.
	Or you can pay someone else, but it could be used.
	As something that is working for you, right?
	And if you get early on the system, you can collect more tokens.
	And as they go up in value, we're going to try not to make them go to $100,000.
	I'm sorry, but it's impossible to make it utilitarian that way.
	But then what will happen is it will allow you to gain some.
	When life doesn't seem fair, where all you have to do is you can use those computers, the computer processing power, and add it to the network.
	And that's what we want.
	We want everybody to make money.
	We want the people that have nodes to make money.
	We want the people that, at the beginning, they get tokens and the ITO to make money.
	We want the enterprises to be part of it and definitely control and not lose so much money.
	Hey, if governmental agencies want to get involved and use it as well, it's great because it adds transparency.
	Do you understand that?
	It shows that they're not so close and not showing everything, and it gives people more trust.
	It allows to give more trust because it's a little bit more transparent.
	It's a great idea.
	People get a chance to make some money there, but the key thing is...
	That's a great idea.
	So you're setting up composite.org.
	That's where people can go to learn more about it and follow your progress, right?
	And you're kind of looking for some more clarity to see what's really going to happen with the Trump administration.
	They made a lot of talk about deregulation of crypto.
	So you're looking to see exactly where those lines are going to fall.
	Actually, can I interject something?
	I got the number from David Sash, which is going to be the crypto, the blockchain, AI SAR.
	And I did call him and I did send an email.
	I would like some clarity because I don't want to take this to Switzerland and not give it access to Americans.
	I think Americans deserve to make...
	Tons of money, and this network is going to be the largest network in the world, and it should be American.
	It's what I think it should.
	And I would like help on this, because nobody's giving me any answers, and this is going to continue.
	But if I have to take it to Switzerland, I will, because it still is going to be able to use once it's deployed.
	But most people gain when they get early on.
	At the onset of something.
	If we all have bought Bitcoin when it was $10, we'll have bought just $1,000.
	We'll all be millionaires, right?
	Right, that's right.
	A lot of people like that.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	So they can go into my...
	I have handles.
	I am in LinkedIn.
	I'm sure you're going to hopefully you show in the show.
	I know I'm in LinkedIn for business.
	I have X for conspiracy theories, which I'm one of them and that's fine.
	I have Instagram as well.
	If you want to contact me, my email is really simple.
	My first name, Noam, N-O-A-M. Is all that stuff on composite.org?
	Exactly.
	Composite.org.
	We'll grab some of that and we'll put it in the video so that people have that.
	I appreciate that because anybody can contact me.
	People that would like to be miners, people that would like to be part of this, even developers.
	People that are good developers, even if they get paid $400,000 a year, if any developer...
	So, if a developer gets in an initial part of a blockchain project, they get paid in tokens, and they become millionaires.
	Most developers that start in a project become multimillionaires, and then they become investors.
	Well, it sounds like a great idea, and certainly I sympathize with you having seen how your work was stolen, and it's a great solution to keep other people's work from being stolen.
	Thank you so much, Noam Krasniansky.
	Is that correct?
	Did I get close?
	Krasniansky.
	But you chopped it up nicely.
	Okay.
	You chopped it up nicely.
	I'd have to practice a little bit more.
	Today I got kind of close on the Canadian Prime Minister's name, or Conservative Party leader's name, I should say.
	So we work at these things.
	No, not Trudeau, but Pierre Polyev, I think is the way he pronounces it.
	The head of the Conservatives that would likely be Prime Minister if they win.
	But nevertheless, yeah.
	Sometimes names can be challenging, but this is a great challenge that you've taken on, and it looks like a great idea.
	And again, folks, it is composite with a K, composite.org, and we'll have the information there so that you can contact Noam and ask him about things.
	So listen, also, David, I just want to let you know that blockchain, it looks like it's murky, and it's just for young people, and you don't really know.
	So in the future, I know every...
	I had to learn everything from top to bottom.
	I've studied more blockchains than most people will know.
	I've read more white papers than you can imagine.
	And you did a great job of explaining it.
	Yes, yes, because I have a brother that is an academic, right?
	And he's a genius mathematically.
	But when he wrote the white paper, I said, I don't understand this.
	So I had to...
	You can see me...
	Explain to me like I'm an 8-year-old.
	I don't understand this!
	I don't understand this!
	So if you ever want to put me again on your show and ask me questions, or people want to reach out and say, I don't understand this, and you want simple, down-to-earth answers that are applicable to anybody's daily life...
	You're welcome.
	You're welcome.
	I'll be more than a pleasure to come again.
	That's great.
	Thank you so much.
	And do we have any questions there for him?
	No, we didn't have any questions today.
	So we'll let people digest this, and they'll have the contact information there to get to you.
	Thank you so much.
	Very interesting.
	And as I said before, I think one of the best explanations I've seen of the blockchain, the history of this.
	Thank you so much for what you're doing.
	I wish you the best of luck.
	And maybe we'll have this interview one day.
	It'll be...
	It'll be gold, and we can put that, we can put a QR code on the composite chain there and say, look, I interviewed this guy who was getting started.
	Thank you so much.
	And you know what?
	If you ask me to interview me at that point, I will always say yes.
	Thank you so much.
	Thank you.
	Best of wishes to you.
	And folks, thank you for joining us.
	And Progress Retort, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	We'll get to the comment and the other comments.
	We'll get to those tomorrow.
	No more time in the program.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	You should be able to buy me several hundred those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.

▲