Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 16, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:17

Mon 16Dec24 UFOs, Psyops and Purpose of NJ Drones; Quantum Computing, Multiverse; AI SWATS Kids at Home

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Music Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday the 16th of December. it's Monday the 16th of December.
	Year of our Lord, 2024. Well, we're going to take a look today.
	We're going to begin by taking a look at the expanding UFO narrative.
	And I think we might have an idea as to what they're really after.
	And we're going to take a look at this in terms of PSYOPs.
	How do they prepare this?
	Where can we see the parallels?
	And what they have done with MacGuffins like the COVID MacGuffin?
	Or with Climate MacGuffin.
	Or with 9-11.
	But again, there may be an idea as to why the government is doing this.
	And we're going to take a look at some pretty sensational footage that people have put up.
	And what is that about?
	We'll be right back.
	Music Well,
	the government has long talked about the potential For using a UFO narrative to not only increase government power and control over the population, scarce to death, but also to provide a foundation for global governance.
	But I think there may be some more immediate issues involved here.
	I don't think this is ultimately what this is about at this time, but I think it is another step in that direction.
	Remember, when we had the lockdown that happened in 2020, that didn't just come out of nowhere.
	They had practiced that for 20 years, and they began it in conjunction with 9-11.
	The first one of their practice games was two months before 9-11.
	One week after 9-11, they had a biological attack, they said.
	They blamed it on Iraq, which was a lie.
	And then they pushed out the legislation that was used 20 years later.
	So I want to begin by looking at some of the things that are being reported.
	As people are getting hit with this everywhere across the mainstream media.
	Two men were arrested after a drone flies dangerously close to Boston's Logan Airport.
	Two men were arrested Saturday night on trespassing charges after a drone came dangerously close to Logan International Airport in Boston.
	We see this happening all the time.
	Last year we had a Chinese national who was caught, arrested for flying a drone over a military installation.
	All of these things are part of this right now, right?
	They're flying it close to the airports.
	They're having to redirect traffic.
	We even had a situation where...
	Sorry, hit the wrong thing there.
	Got big thumbs today.
	Cue the eerie music.
	We even had a situation where it appeared that something that had lights on it hit an engine of a plane close to an airport, and this is what that looked like.
	We're going through here.
	There you go.
	And that plane had to land.
	We've had other people who have taken video outside of the plane to actually see the drones that are fairly close to them.
	All of these things are issues, folks.
	Big issues that they've always addressed in the past.
	You get too close to an airport when they come out and they arrest you.
	They investigate.
	And they arrest.
	And they're able to find out this stuff.
	Right?
	Just like with the guy who was flying it over a military base.
	These things are being flown over military bases as well.
	So it's airports, military bases, and so forth.
	By the way, I'd said last week that it was also against the law to be flying these drones at night.
	They changed that about a year before this began.
	September 2023. They made it legal to fly drones at night.
	And the question is, why would you do that?
	As one professional drone operator says, you can't see anything at night.
	Why would a hobbyist or even a professional photographer be flying anything at night like this?
	You can't take good pictures at night.
	But they made it legal, interestingly enough.
	And so you could say that that is perhaps laying the groundwork for Amazon and others, Walmart, to deliver stuff at night.
	I don't know if that's the case.
	Nevertheless, they can do something about it.
	And as I said from the very beginning...
	The most interesting tell about this whole thing is a dog that did not bark or that did not bite.
	They haven't done anything about this in terms of investigating.
	The officers used advanced UAS monitoring technology to identify the drone's location, its flight history, and its operator's position on the largely uninhabited Boston Harbor Island known as Long Island.
	Long Island, Massachusetts, I guess.
	Isn't that interesting?
	They're able to determine the location, the flight history, and all the rest of the stuff.
	You know who we're looking at?
	At the Russiagate lies that were being put out by the intelligence community against Trump back in 2016. I had people like William Benny, the former head of the NSA on Whistleblower and others.
	He said they've got all the records.
	If they wanted to prove it, they could prove it.
	If it was real, right?
	They've got all the records.
	We see this all the time.
	The government pretends that it doesn't know, but they have saved everything.
	Every phone call, every text, every social media post, it's all being saved.
	They've got places like Bluffdale, Utah, massive computer center.
	This is way before everybody started talking about these AI centers.
	Oh, no, by the way, now Exxon is getting in on the exclusive energy provision for these AI people.
	So they're going to use natural gas.
	Which is really clean.
	And yet they're going to play the carbon capture game as well.
	So we'll talk more about that coming up later.
	But still, when you look at that, they know this.
	They're storing everything in places like Bluffdale.
	They've got others as well.
	Bluffdale was notable because they put this massive data center out in a very dry, arid desert place.
	And it not only uses as much power as a city.
	But it also uses as much water as a city in a place where there isn't any water.
	These people are so powerful.
	They don't care whether it makes any economic sense or any other kind of sense.
	They just do whatever they wish.
	So if they're able to look at the drone's location, if they're able to determine its flight history, if they're able to determine the operator's position, All of that.
	We know where the drone is.
	We know where the operator is.
	We know what they've been doing.
	Why can't they do it with this?
	Very interesting, isn't it?
	A total of 791,597 drones, about 800,000, are registered with the FAA. Nearly evenly divided between commercial and recreational use.
	Drone operators should not fly near airports because, quote, it is difficult for manned aircraft to see and to avoid a drone while flying, says the FAA. Yet this is repeatedly what is happening in New Jersey and other vicinities around there.
	FAA safety guidelines, said the police in a statement, say that operators are prohibited from flying drones over people or vehicles and must be aware of airspace restrictions.
	Even small drones pose significant risks, including the potential for catastrophic damage to airplanes and helicopters.
	Near collisions can cause pilots to veer off course, putting lives and property at risk.
	As a matter of fact, one of the first reports of these drone things was a medical helicopter and had to turn around because there are drones out there.
	Thank you.
	So why are they not concerned about this?
	And why is nobody in the federal government interested in enforcing this?
	Well, it turns out that Biden is really facing some...
	This drone stuff is causing him to have some bipartisan headaches.
	And somebody put this clip up to show how the drone strike is affecting Biden.
	They've got all the incidents where he's stumbled and fallen.
	And they've got him being buzzed by a drone.
	It's a reason for it.
	What a great use of video.
	10, 12, 15. Oops.
	He touched down not even four hours ago.
	That was a quick trip.
	As you said, very impactful.
	Yeah, very impactful.
	Almost an impact in every one of those cases, but Biden is pretty agile, and he always ducks for cover and hits the deck just before that drone strikes him, as you can see there.
	Well, the Biden administration is saying that And this is actually the FBI, said, well, I think what we see here is slight overreaction from people.
	Just downplaying it.
	Just ignore it.
	And, folks, do you remember this is what they did with COVID at the beginning?
	Right?
	And we're going to talk about the parallels of that.
	We're going to talk about the PSYOP aspects of it as well.
	And then you've got, in New Jersey, you have a state senator, What is the governor saying?
	What have you heard from the president?
	We've heard very little.
	Let's start with the fact, first it was questions, then it was maybe it's comedy, and then all of a sudden it became serious and now it's insanity.
	Yesterday, the new United States Senator had to go out with local police to look for drones.
	Now, if United States Senator Andy Kim can't get any information, I'm pretty concerned about that.
	So I ask for a state of emergency to ground all the drones and ask the FAA to join our state of emergency, which I've asked Governor Murphy to enact.
	In order to ground any drone.
	I've gotten silence and we met with the state police.
	The state police have no information.
	Can you imagine the Department of Defense must have some serious secret if we can't get any information of car-sized drones flying over our military bases?
	So then you have to start asking yourself, all right, so either they're withholding information or worse, yeah, this could be more worrisome, Senator.
	They don't know.
	Well, that's really the point.
	A car-sized drone comes from the ocean, and we don't hear from the military, from the Department of Defense, what that is.
	Now, we would believe as citizens that anything of that size would be noticed, and we would be advised what that is.
	So there must be a pretty big secret, because there has been top secret briefings.
	And every time someone comes out of the top-secret briefing, we get the same answer.
	Well, we need more information, but apparently it's not a threat.
	Yeah, it's apparently not a threat, even though we don't know what it is.
	It's not a threat.
	That's the one thing we know.
	It's not a threat.
	Well, you know, what Cavuto is alluding to, and that was a New Jersey state senator whose name is John Bramnick.
	He's on there with Neil Cavuto.
	If it's a foreign situation, I mean, that is a possibility.
	You have to look at that.
	I don't think that is what's happening, but it could be a possibility.
	It could be something like the Oreshnik thing.
	Although they knew and had talked about the existence of hypersonic missiles by Russia and China.
	They had not seen one operating yet.
	So, yeah, there is a possibility, but I don't think that that's what it is.
	I think that this is a U.S. government operation, and I'll tell you why.
	As a matter of fact, Sprumford, and I agree, said the drone stuff is likely a way to get the public to support more government regulation control over drones, problem, reaction, and solution.
	I'll tell you specifically what I think they're after at this point in time.
	We're going to get to that here.
	Shillier says, no, they had to arrest Someone, as an excuse of the DOD autonomous drone testing, get used to the drone surveillance, she says.
	Shield your eyes, says, yeah, like chemtrails.
	And, of course, like chemtrails, they do it at night.
	That's what they're doing around here.
	We don't see anything being laid down during the day, but when the sun comes up, you see the chemtrails all over the place.
	U.S. national security officials sought to dispel concerns about the mysterious drones flying over the Northeast.
	In calls with reporters, they had representatives from the FBI, the FAA, the NSC, the National Security Council, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Defense, and none of them Knew what it was or seemed to be concerned about.
	As a matter of fact, it's the FBI official that says, well, I think this is over-exaggerated or whatever.
	The senior officials remain tight-lipped about the origins of the drone.
	During the call with reporters, an FBI official said his agency had received 5,000 tips.
	He said of those 5,000 tips, fewer than 100 warranted further investigation.
	Well, even if that was true, even if it was only 100, still they don't do anything.
	They don't have any answers.
	They do nothing.
	The FBI official said we found no evidence of large-scale unmanned drone activity.
	These are the same people who found no evidence that Hunter Biden had committed any crimes either.
	They find what they're looking for.
	If there is a no crime but they're looking for it, they will find the crime.
	If there is a crime and they don't want to see it, they won't find the crime either.
	We're doing our best to find the origin of that specific, you know, those drone activities, said the official.
	But I think there's been a slight overreaction.
	A DHS official said the amount of actual drone activity is likely less than what's being reported.
	A Department of Defense official.
	This is like one of these jokes, you know, like Canterbury Tales or something.
	They bring in, you know, you got a rabbi priest and they get their different takes on different things.
	A DOD official.
	So the agency has gathered, quote, no intelligence or observations that would indicate that the drones were lined with a foreign actor or that they had malicious intent.
	Well, you know, again, you have no information about this, and yet you're able to find those guys in Boston.
	You knew the history of the drone?
	And as I've said before, one person said, I fly drones commercially.
	If I get at a particular altitude that's prohibited, I immediately get contacted by them.
	They know.
	We're also significantly restricted, and rightfully so, they said.
	In fact, we are prohibited from intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance here in the homeland.
	I can never say that without going back to the fatherland, right?
	So, there you go, folks.
	I think that is the thing that they're angling for.
	They're prohibited from intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance here in the homeland, said the Pentagon official.
	Except that we know they do it.
	We know the CIA does it.
	We know the NSA does it.
	As a matter of fact, you go back and you look at the church hearings.
	It was not about CIA assassinations.
	That's what they made it about.
	But it was about the fact that the CIA and the NSA had been spying on Americans illegally since their creation, right after World War II. And they continue to deny that while they continue to seek legal cover to do that.
	And, of course, that's what they used FISA for.
	The FISA, which was, you know, after the Church Committee hearings and the Pike Committee hearings and the House, they created the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
	And that was supposed to prohibit them.
	from operating here specifically yet again in other words it was not in their um their their brief for their creation they were not allowed to do that they're specifically prohibited and then they said and now we really mean it with a fisa act you know that's redundant but anyway the foreign intelligence surveillance act then what they did was they used the fisa court to give them
	And what they're trying to do now is they're trying to use, in my opinion, they're trying to use this panic to give them legal cover to do what they have always been doing.
	They are doing it.
	They couldn't have found those guys at the Boston Logan Airport.
	If they weren't doing surveillance and reconnaissance, somebody's doing it here.
	And so they were able to do that and find these people.
	Same with a Chinese guy around the military base.
	We don't have the same capabilities or the same methods that we would employ in other locations outside of the homeland to determine points of origin.
	Except you just arrested somebody on the bases.
	These people are just lying.
	You know that they're lying when their lips are moving.
	There's nothing that the government tells you that's true.
	Nothing at all.
	They lie even about things they don't need to lie about.
	They won't talk to you about things that there's no reason for them to cover up.
	I've seen this forever.
	I don't even bother to contact a government official for any information.
	We're also significantly restricted, he says.
	Yeah, so that's right.
	Significantly restricted, except you do it anyway.
	So here on the military side, we're just as frustrated with, you know, with the irresponsible nature of this activity, said the DOD official.
	A National Security Council official echoed the DOD's representative sentiment, you know, if only we had the power to do this.
	You know, we need something like the Patriot Act or something like that, you know?
	We just don't have enough power to do what we want.
	No, they're already doing it.
	They just want to make sure they don't go to jail for it.
	Obviously, we're taking this incredibly seriously at this point, said the National Security Council official.
	We have not identified any basis for believing that there's any criminal activity involved.
	You know, flying over airports and military bases, that's not criminal activity, is it?
	You know, just like at the border.
	Don't call them illegals.
	Yeah, they are illegal, and we're going to make, as the Democrats, as they were debating, they said, well, we're going to make sure that's not against the law.
	Well, if it's against the law, then they are illegals.
	Why won't you call them illegal aliens, illegal foreigners?
	So, yeah, it's already a crime, and they're already arresting people for doing these types of things.
	Well, then it comes to the, let's just shoot them down type of thing, which I said before.
	I said, you know, law enforcement ought to go out there and shoot some of these things down.
	Well, here's what a sheriff in the area of New Jersey, where they have the most of these sightings, Monmouth County, here's what he had to say in an interview.
	When I got together and sent a letter to Congressman Smith, our congressman here in Monmouth and Ocean County, where we've had a number of sightings, you know, that letter said, hey, We need some changes to the federal law.
	We have to be able to protect our public and our residents here.
	And that would require loosening up and the ability for the state or at least the state policing units across the country to de-conflict and to de-drone if necessary, meaning to take down a drone.
	So right now that rests solely with the federal government and I think that's the frustration because as you had said earlier in your show, is this some type of federal agency?
	You know, listen, these drones seem sophisticated by all accounts.
	You know, we have a lot of false reporting.
	But the good accounts, we do have them from military bases, personnel, and from our own first responders around northern New Jersey.
	These things are definitely sophisticated, fast, turn their lights off at times.
	So we need to get a handle on what it is and who's running it, right?
	So it's illegal to shoot one down, correct?
	Right now.
	Yeah, it's illegal to shoot one down, and so obviously we're telling our residents not to shoot them down.
	You'd be breaking some gun laws in New Jersey.
	We don't want that, and we certainly...
	Yeah, they got a lot of those gun laws there.
	As you pointed out in your video, these things are large, and they could be dangerous.
	So at the end of the day, what we do need is more deconfliction legislation.
	Listen, I'm not about over-regulation, but in this case, don't over-regulate, just differentiate, right?
	So we need identifiers on commercial and See, listen to this.
	You know, they were started, the FAA allowed them to fly.
	Got to register.
	23 at night.
	Identify.
	Some of these are recreational drones, very small, and some are commercial.
	We see the testing going on with Amazon and Walmarts and the like.
	And, you know, the skies are going to get crowded with these things.
	And in order to guard public safety, and particularly national security, we're going to have to have laws that differentiate these objects.
	Yeah, we're going to have to have laws that differentiate these objects.
	Let's begin with this shoot-em-down thing.
	Is that the only option?
	Well, actually, no.
	Take a look at how they get rid of illegal or troublesome drones in Japan.
	They get another drone that's got a net, and it just kind of flies over that one.
	And it goes down, right?
	There you go.
	Okay, now the other part of it is that because they are controlled by radio signals, you can also do a drone jammer.
	Here's what that looks like.
	So they just shoot a jamming signal directly at the drone.
	This is not rocket science.
	This is not state-of-the-art stuff.
	When the drone loses its signal...
	It then, on autopilot, just kind of goes down to the ground.
	Problem solved.
	And you're not shooting guns over populated areas.
	It's just a no-no under any circumstances.
	But especially in New Jersey.
	New Jersey is very precious about their gun laws.
	I mean, I've covered what they've done.
	I'll never forget the New Jersey case where you had a guy who was in the process of moving.
	And he was moving from one state to another state.
	New Jersey was just an intermediate destination.
	And he was going to visit some relatives.
	And he had his guns in his trunk, buried under all kinds of stuff that he was taking with him as part of the move.
	The trunk and the car was just filled with stuff.
	And he was late getting to his relatives.
	They reported him as missing.
	Then the Police find him, and he, by the way, he was a licensed gun owner for carry and that type of thing in these other states, but of course New Jersey doesn't recognize that.
	And so when the New Jersey police pull him over, he says, no, okay, do you mind if we look at your car?
	Oh, sure, go ahead, I've got nothing to hide.
	Well, you should hide everything from the government.
	They hide everything from you.
	I mean, it's just only fair play, right?
	And you should be very suspicious of them and their motives.
	So they go through with a fine-toothed cone.
	They unload his car that's been packed for his move.
	And at the bottom of his trunk, covered by everything else, they find some guns.
	And he goes to jail for a significant amount of time.
	So yeah, be careful of your gun laws there.
	But as you heard him say, what is the solution to all of this stuff?
	Well, we need to be able to identify.
	This always comes back to IDs and control and surveillance, doesn't it?
	And I believe that this is coming back to as well.
	We've got Chuck Schumer saying the same thing.
	He said he's asking Homeland Security to deploy special detection systems that use 360-degree technology to detect drones.
	Maybe they could get a loaner from Massachusetts, who seems to have it, around the airport.
	Why wouldn't you have that around your airports?
	He said, if the technology exists for a drone to make it up to the sky, there certainly is technology that can track the craft with precision and determine what the heck is going on, said Chuckie Schumer.
	He said, there ought to be better technology.
	There ought to be a law.
	There ought to be a federal law, as a matter of fact, right?
	You know, that's...
	You hear that all the time.
	There ought to be a law against this.
	And, you know, you don't ever hear anybody say, don't make a federal case out of it.
	They want everything made a federal case out of.
	So there ought to be better technology.
	And there is.
	And we need that technology here in New York.
	ASAP. He also announced that he will co-sponsor legislation.
	Here we go.
	They'll give local authorities more tools for drone detection.
	Local officials are trying to find answers to this serious problem with their hands tied behind their backs, said Schumer.
	If the federal government has the technology to address this epidemic, it's an epidemic now.
	Maybe she'll get the WHO involved.
	Of non-stop drone sightings, we should do everything that we can to help.
	Trump said on Friday, mystery drone sightings all over the country.
	Can this really be happening without our government's knowledge?
	I don't think so.
	Let the public know, and let them know now.
	Otherwise, shoot them down.
	And so he reflects and also pumps up this anger of people looking at the passive government.
	Say, why aren't you doing something?
	Why aren't you doing something?
	I want some strong action now.
	Well, enter Trump, our savior.
	He'll do some strong action.
	Asked Sunday about the president-elect's post calling on government to shoot down the drones.
	America said, we're limited in our authorities.
	So we need to have some more authority.
	Give us more control.
	Staten Island Borough President said the drone's often seen flying at night.
	He said, I've spotted them hovering over critical infrastructure, including Port Liberty, New York, near the bridge and the Verzano's Nairs Bridge and Fort Wadsworth, one of the oldest military installations in the country.
	Governor Hochul in New York continued to call for the passing of Federal Counter-UAS Authority, Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, which, by the way, just happens to be coming up for reauthorization.
	What a coincidence.
	Wow.
	What she said would give New York and our peers the authority and the resources required to respond to circumstances like we're facing today.
	No, we've already got the solution.
	You just need to get it passed.
	And it's right on the schedule right now to be voted on.
	Hochul spoke with Mayorkas twice on Saturday.
	Connecticut State Police announced Friday they have deployed a drone detection system to assist in the investigation.
	The federal response, meanwhile, to the mysterious drone sighting draws bipartisan criticism.
	Everybody is calling for something to be done.
	And all the law enforcement and spy agencies are saying, we're helpless.
	We have no legal authority to do this.
	Since when did legal authority ever get in their way?
	For anything, these people, everything they do is against the law.
	Everything they do is against the law.
	Whether it involves interactions with us or foreign governments, it's always, they're always violating the law, thumbing their nose at the law, but now they pretend they need more authority.
	Mike Waltz of Florida, who is Trump's incoming national security advisor, The particular issue with drones reported over military sites and restricted airspaces, including Trump's home in Bedminster, New Jersey.
	He says this is all pointing to gaps in our capability and in our ability to clamp down on what's going on here.
	We need to get to the bottom of it, and I think the Biden administration is working to do that.
	Are they?
	Well, what do these people want?
	Again, we got the hint.
	Hochul was talking about it.
	Chuck Schumer is talking about it.
	And, you know, they will...
	You look at all the different possibilities.
	What would be the motive for some pranksters to do this?
	Would they have the resources to do this?
	And the numbers that they're talking about?
	Of course not.
	And so, you have Gordon Chang, a senior fellow at the Gatestone Institute think tank.
	Said these drones and this activity is too large, too well organized to be the work of hobbyists.
	And that sort of leaves foreign powers.
	Oh, you're going to immediately rule out the United States government?
	They would never do this as one of the other guys.
	Well, I know it's not the U.S. government because they would tell us.
	I think that was that congressman from New Jersey who said, they're coming from an Iranian mothership.
	I know.
	I was told that.
	Yet, these congressmen are going to be told all kinds of stuff.
	By people who come in and present themselves as experts.
	And as I said, when we were talking about that New Jersey congressman, I said, they don't do IQ tests for congressmen.
	Maybe they do.
	Maybe they're screening in advance to make sure that it's not too high, the IQ test.
	But he says, this guy says, it could be Iran.
	It could be Iran in connection with China, in connection with Russia, all the rest of the stuff, right?
	The thing that really worries me is that if they're trying to draw our attention to these drones, the question is, what are they doing elsewhere in our country?
	We should ask these same questions about the U.S. government.
	You should ask, what are their motives?
	What are they trying to cover up?
	And, of course, as I said before, the first time it made headlines was after it blocked a medical helicopter.
	It had to turn around.
	But, of course, the narrative from the Biden administration is, don't worry about it.
	Don't worry about it.
	While everybody gets increasingly concerned about it.
	While the media hypes it up.
	While social media hypes it up.
	As a matter of fact, that sheriff there in Monmouth County that was on there, his police department, their sheriff's department, put out a heat map showing the shocking scale of drone activity in New Jersey County as mystery deepens.
	And this is from the Daily Mail.
	As a matter of fact, they've got a graphic of it.
	Karen, if you can find that there.
	Residents reported 63 sightings over this time period.
	They've shared a heat map showing where the unmanned aircraft appear to be circulating.
	They're concentrated and densely populated.
	That's it.
	Thank you.
	Right there.
	Look at that.
	Densely populated urban areas.
	But the map also illustrates how the sightings cover almost all the inhabited parts of this coastal county.
	Monmouth County is also home to the Naval Weapons Station Earl, a Navy base.
	They've got a lot of them there.
	And so right around that area, you've got one, two, three military installations.
	You've got Trump's residence there.
	If you scroll further down, you'll see that on the map.
	Republican U.S. Representative Chris Smith said Coast Guard commanding officer told him a dozen drones closely followed a guard lifeboat near Barangat Light and Island Beach State Park in Ocean County over the weekend.
	Smith urged the Pentagon to authorize the use of force to bring down one or more drones above the ocean or in an unpopulated area to try to figure out who to deploy them.
	Because, again, they're saying that these things are fairly large.
	And that, you know, if you shoot it down, who's it going to land on?
	Well, as Marky Mark says, thank you for the tips, many of these drones are aircraft.
	In the clip, with the New Jersey Senator, you can clearly see the red and green navigational lights.
	Newark International Airport is in New Jersey.
	Many of the lights are to and from there.
	I think that's a factor, but I think it's also a factor that these lights and some of them are a different pattern than you typically see.
	And they're turning them on and off, which...
	A plane would not do.
	Jason Barker, we've done, we have drone busters in our inventory in the military.
	They can easily take them down.
	This is all a distraction and a psyop.
	That's right.
	It's not just the people in Japan.
	I don't know where that other clip was.
	We've got that kind of stuff, too.
	Oh, you guys in Japan, can you send us one of those drones with a net on it or something?
	Yeah, exactly.
	And look, especially when you look at how rapidly this has escalated in the Russia-Ukraine war, right?
	Drone use and countermeasures and all this stuff.
	I mean, it is just, you know, you've had decades worth of development happening there in just a couple of years.
	So, absolutely, the military could do something about it.
	And they don't have to do it in a way that would endanger anybody.
	But they've chosen not to do it, which, again, tells us who is behind all this.
	That's why it's not a foreign thing.
	I said, you know, look at that as a possibility, but I would rule it out because of the inactivity of our government.
	JVB, the Defense Department, just announced that the drones are supplied by Iran, built in North Korea, personally flown by Vladimir Putin.
	Yeah, that announcement I expect to see any time now.
	Connected all...
	Oh, we've got to have China fit in there some way.
	Maybe they're manufactured in China.
	I don't know.
	No, they're built in North Korea.
	So, I guess...
	Anyway, Octospook says, if the DOD is ignorant, they're guilty of criminal negligence.
	I would like to hear them argue that.
	But worse...
	I don't think anybody will hold their feet to the fire.
	No.
	But a New Jersey senator says...
	Again, everything is about pushing fear.
	we're in the that phase of the psyop where they're normalizing all this stuff they're moving the overton window you know people are getting well i'm expecting to see the drones anywhere so you see all this stuff on social media people sitting there with a gun in their lap i can't wait for them to get to tennessee or can't wait for them to get to texas or whatever right time to go drone hunting all this kind of stuff so they're building this expectation and they're normalizing it
	whatever these drones are doing the government really doesn't want to know said the senator that played earlier before what that must mean is that they're more concerned with us getting knowledge and being afraid of that information than having no knowledge and having all these questions So be afraid.
	Be even more afraid.
	Because the government's lying to you.
	Well, I don't know.
	He's saying, oh, there's something really dangerous out there.
	That's why they're lying to us.
	No, they're lying to us because that's what they do.
	There must be something going on that they can't tell us.
	Well, there's actually other explanations.
	And we're going to talk about that explanation in detail when we come back.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	And David is giving a 10% discount to listeners from now until 2025. At that price, you should be able to buy me several hundred.
	Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. You're
	- You're listening to The David Knight Show. - How long were you watching me sleep, Matt?
	That's not cool, like at all.
	Mr. President, my name is CGB Spender.
	I'm here to brief you on the recent UAP situation.
	What the heck is a UAP, man?
	UAP stands for Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena.
	From on now, I'm even more confused.
	Those aren't real words than what you just said.
	They used to be called UFOs, but we had to change them.
	Wait, what?
	Why?
	I liked UFOs.
	Because the former carries a strong association with alien conspiracy theories and stigma while you...
	I think I'm going back to bed.
	That would be a big mistake, Mr. President.
	There are reports of the drones being seen in other locations as well.
	Are they in Ukraine?
	As of right now, no.
	However, they are appearing...
	That's where I keep my money.
	I mean, my democracy needs protected over there.
	You know what, I think I'm going back to bed.
	So this is an urgent matter.
	I understand you are completely checked out, but the fate of our country, the fate of our very planet hangs in the balance.
	Wait, what agency do you work for?
	I don't work for any agency, Mr. President.
	I'm part of a global consortium of elite and exceptional men who create history and have made decisions that direct the path of our very species, a syndicate of men.
	Oh, I saw something on PBS about this.
	What is it?
	The, uh, hold on, it's common.
	The Deep State.
	Yes, the Deep State.
	Thank you.
	How have you guys been?
	We've honestly not been doing so hot.
	It's really, really, really fucking hard to keep things secret now.
	Tell me about it.
	Oh, hey, while I'm thinking of it, can I get their new number?
	I've got some mostly property tax extradition type questions.
	I mean, yeah, I can probably do that.
	Victoria didn't give it to you?
	We told her to when you were in the jungle.
	Backstabbing, luxurious sea lion.
	But honestly, just to check in, I haven't heard from you.
	Well, you're not going to be in office much longer, so...
	Oh, wait, I almost forgot to tell you.
	The drones are actually Trump's.
	Well, and the aliens...
	Trump is the...
	Well, basically the aliens are super red-pilled.
	And they just like Italian chicks.
	Okay, that's from Timeline Junkie.
	I thought that was pretty funny.
	But, yeah.
	How are they going to use this?
	And, you know, part of this...
	And I want to talk about the PSYOP aspect of this as well as how they're going to use this.
	The PSYOP aspect of this is being aided by what is on social media.
	And we got a lot of very interesting clips.
	For example, here is one of a hanging orb.
	And you can see the lights glowing on that.
	And they zoom in.
	And it looks very strange when they zoom in.
	Look at the strange surfaces there.
	And as they continue to track this, You'll see it start to morph and extend.
	And so the question is, what is going on with this?
	When you look at something like I just showed you with AI, can we trust anything that we see, first of all?
	There's a lot of push to deceive us.
	We've already established that.
	Can you trust anything that you see?
	Can you trust anything that is put up on social media or somebody pulling your leg?
	How many times do we see things misattributed to something else or other issues?
	And what are we going to do...
	To stay grounded on anything.
	As we see one picture after the other.
	Now it's got some blinking lights it didn't have before.
	It was just glowing.
	Now it's got some things that are extended.
	Some of the people are saying, well, I think we confirm that this is definitely not human technology.
	They look more like two antennas that you would see on a biological entity that emits light.
	Well, it doesn't look like that to me.
	But of course, the government, when you look at artificial intelligence, when you look at trolls, when you look at the ability to manipulate video, and of course they're not even talking about something like Project Bluebeam, which they have been talking about for decades, of how they would like to...
	Use that to roll out a global scare about an alien invasion.
	Here's another one here, this drone orb.
	Take a look at that.
	You got circles there, and you got another spinning circle inside of that.
	We got a lot of different ones.
	Here's one where they've got several points of light, and they come zooming in, and one of them comes in very fast and stops.
	Now another one comes in, and they make a triangle, and they just kind of hover there.
	So again, what is being done?
	Is this real?
	Is this manufactured?
	Is it manufactured by the government?
	Is it manufactured by the people who are looking at this stuff online?
	You need to think about the stages of the PSYOPs.
	And we have seen this over and over again.
	Again, it could just be a distraction.
	And the key is, a distraction from what?
	But I think it has a very specific purpose.
	We just mentioned it.
	We're going to talk a little bit more about what that act is that I believe they want to get put through.
	But think about this as Fear that drives a problem solution, a solution to a problem that they want you to be afraid of.
	You know, we have seen this in the past.
	Look at how they typically roll this out.
	First, there's denial that this is really a problem.
	But they keep showing more and more clips of it, right?
	The media keeps showing clips of it.
	The government keeps saying it's not a problem.
	We saw this in China, for example.
	The media was showing us clips, and the Chinese government was showing us clips.
	We've got people collapsing in the streets.
	And of course, they didn't look real when they were collapsing in the street.
	They put out clips of how they were sealing people inside their homes.
	All the rest of this stuff.
	And that was being put over here.
	Meanwhile, we had health officials.
	Don't worry.
	That's not a problem here.
	Not a problem.
	We saw the same thing again with the masks.
	Don't worry.
	No, we're not going to wear masks.
	And all of a sudden, you've got to wear masks.
	It's mandated that you wear masks.
	Yeah, you think back to what was going on in late 2019, early 2020, before Trump locked everybody down.
	And so the government kept denying that there was any serious problem, while the media kept pushing it and normalizing it to people, moving the Overton window, getting people to accept, well, there's really got to be something.
	So then how bad is it, and what is it?
	But there is something there.
	And so many people will begin to look at this.
	Billionaires will want to know what is going on, as we saw with Infowars.
	They're part of it as well.
	We had a fairly well-known billionaire who lived in Texas.
	He came to Austin.
	He went in to talk to the governor, Governor Abbott.
	Telling him that, you know, we've got to lock down.
	This is really dangerous.
	You've got to lock this down before everybody dies.
	And then he comes to Infowars.
	He's given a platform to scare everybody on Infowars.
	And I think he was sincere.
	And so, you know, you can see how the grassroots is going to be panicked by all of this.
	A lot of people are going to be panicking before that.
	Even people who should know better will start to panic.
	And then the government will eventually flip and say, yes, this is dangerous.
	And now we've got a solution for you as well.
	Part of this is that this is a test.
	They're always testing us.
	They're always probing us to see what we will buy into.
	And now they have the perfect measurement tool, social media.
	They can scrape the information off of there.
	They don't have to have a backdoor into it.
	They don't have to have a partnership with the social media companies.
	All the stuff about TikTok, you know, they can scrape this information off of there just as easily, pretty much.
	Not as easily as the people in the back door, but they can, with a little bit more effort, they can get all that information.
	It's all public.
	And so it's always a test.
	They're always probing us to see what we will accept and how we're going to react with the stimulus that they give us.
	That's always a big part of this.
	But it's also bigger than the drones.
	The government has been pushing this UFO stuff quite some time, just as we saw in that thing.
	Oh, now we're going to call them UAPs.
	And I said, when they started calling them UAPs, I said, they're getting serious.
	They're preparing to do something with it.
	They've got to change the label to get people to take this seriously.
	And we have seen this now running over a couple of years.
	The government trying to normalize this.
	And, you know, we put this just as an aside.
	A lot of people are talking about alien abductions and things like that.
	Stephen Greer is one of the big ufologists out there.
	I haven't studied this because I don't take any of this seriously, and I gave you the reasons last week when I talked about the excellent article, and you can find it, On vaccine impact, Brian Shohavi had this article from an Australian physicist who has had some pretty interesting and novel inventions that he's had.
	that but he laid out the case of why it is some of these observed phenomena are not military and they are not interstellar and he gave reasons for it in terms of physics believes that they are interdimensional so i think that there is an aspect of that I think there is an aspect of demonic deception that is associated with it, but I think there's also Pentagon deception and government deception.
	And when we talk about the Pentagon, And I don't draw a distinction between demonic deception and the Pentagon.
	I mean, it's just two parts of the same narrative there, really.
	Everything that the Pentagon is doing along this kind of stuff is deceptive.
	But when you look at people like Stephen Greer, for example, and I've seen this over and over again with the people who say they were abducted or they had experiences, every one of the ones that I've seen, and again, I've not done an exhaustive investigation of this stuff, but every one of the ones that I've seen, These are people who are always not Christian.
	They're always open to the occult, and Stephen Greer is one of those people.
	He talked about, in terms of his history, he says, yeah, my parents and my family scoffed at me.
	He goes, they're into science, and if you can't measure this or demonstrate to them, they just don't believe that it's real.
	And they're also, you know, Christians, fundamentalists.
	They're not going to be pulled in by this stuff.
	And you see, science and Christianity are not antithetical to each other.
	As a matter of fact, real science.
	Real science.
	Real scientists over when we did real science.
	We had people like Isaac Newton.
	We had people like Maxwell, who did Maxwell's equations, and many others.
	They were doing scientific investigation because they knew that it was noble.
	They knew that it wasn't random chance processes.
	If it was random chance processes, why try to figure out what was going on?
	But they knew that there was a creator.
	They knew there was a designer, and they wanted to discover what he had created, what he had designed.
	We have lost our way.
	There is no conflict between real science and between the real God and what the Bible tells us about it.
	But these people have lost their way.
	When you look at this, I think that this rebranding of the UAP thing is a signal of a government sign-up.
	Long-term goal is exactly what Ronald Reagan talked about, and he mentioned it several times.
	I couldn't help at one point in my discussions privately with General Secretary Gorbachev.
	When you stop to think that we're all God's children wherever we may live in the world, I couldn't help but say to him, just think how easy his task and mine might be in these meetings that we held.
	If suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet outside in the universe, we'd forget all the little local differences that we have between our countries and we would find out once and for all that we really are all human beings here on this earth together.
	Well, I don't suppose we can wait for some alien race to come down and threaten us.
	But I think that between us we can bring about that realization.
	In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity.
	Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bound.
	I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world.
	And yet, I ask you, is not an alien force already among us?
	What could be more alien to the universal aspirations of our peoples than war and the threat of war?
	I think maybe I'd answer it this way.
	I keep in my frustration sometimes.
	You know, actually, if you count some of the things going on in smaller countries and all, there have been about 114 wars since World War II. But I've often wondered, what if all of us in the world discovered that we were threatened by a power from outer space, from another planet?
	Wouldn't we all of a sudden find that we didn't have any differences between us at all?
	We were all human beings, citizens of the world, and wouldn't we come together to fight that particular threat?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, we'd need global government, wouldn't we?
	Well, you know, it turns out that we are being threatened by an alien species, just not the way that they think.
	It's from another dimension, satanic forces.
	And they can't see the spiritual war.
	Because they're too blind to see it.
	They've ruled it out.
	You know, you can, when I look at some of these orbs and some of this other stuff, it reminds me of all the comedy things that I've seen of, you know, they would depict the coronavirus as this orb, you know, flying around, flying around Trump or other people and talking and all the rest of this stuff.
	And I thought, you know, we've already had a little bit of a trial run.
	What about that alien threat, the coronavirus?
	Where did it come from?
	Did it mutate?
	Did it evolve?
	Did it come from the lab?
	Did it come from China?
	Right?
	All of this ambiguity about it.
	Look, what they're trying to do is they're trying to move the Overton window.
	They're trying to normalize this kind of stuff, just like we saw before.
	And then when they're properly prepared for this stuff, they flip the script.
	And while they're telling you, don't be afraid of this, and they're just kind of showing it out there to get you accustomed to it.
	And then all of a sudden, they flip the script and say, now it's real.
	Be afraid.
	Right?
	Don't fall for that.
	You know, Reagan's narrative, they've all got to unite against some interstellar threat.
	That's exactly what Project Bloombeam was about.
	You know, looking at what they're going to do with it.
	I mean, we have Operation Northwoods as a preliminary to 9-11, 40 years before.
	So, it's going to feel real.
	They're going to build it with more events.
	They're going to have experts coming on.
	They're going to talk at some point in time about having a global event.
	That may not be this.
	I think this has a more specific intermediate goal here.
	But who knows how they're going to use this.
	Remember that the virus was never isolated.
	Remember that the virus was completely made up, and you try to convince people today that there was no COVID virus.
	Oh, they're all absolutely certain that there was.
	And just like we're talking about before, I'm sure that some of these things, as Marky Mark was saying, some of these things are misidentification.
	Once you get to a certain level of fear and panic, once it starts to build, people are going to start seeing it everywhere, even where it isn't.
	So you start revealing it in certain areas, you start getting people normalized to it, and now they're looking for it, and now they're seeing it in a lot of different places.
	But then they're going to flip the script, and they're going to tell people, we've got to have the power to do this.
	All the governments of the world, when you go back and look at this COVID pandemic, right?
	There was nothing that was isolated, and yet we saw detailed pictures and information about this virus that they never isolated.
	We're told that it has this fur and cleavage and all the rest of the stuff.
	How do you know that if you haven't isolated it?
	They made up all these details and put it out there.
	So are they going to make up a lot of details about some little green men that we can go fight?
	Are they going to get people believing that?
	It's not going to be that hard.
	We've already seen this happen.
	We've seen the mass delusion that they were able to create with government narrative.
	And we saw how all of the governments of the world cooperated in this common threat, just like what Reagan was talking about.
	Except that was the imaginary virus.
	The imaginary virus.
	That they'd never isolated.
	Like these other viruses that they've not isolated.
	And they all marched in lockstep to do exactly the same thing at the same time.
	Including Trump.
	The guy that they brought up there to be the check against people's doubts.
	Trump, the anti-globalist.
	Well, Trump believes it.
	Trump believes that it must be true.
	Right?
	He's out there.
	He's playing 4D chess or something, you know?
	I don't know.
	I mean, this...
	But, you know, Trump believes it so he can trust him because even though he's marching in lockstep and actually the leader, even though he's actually preparing the depopulation shot and bragging about it, we're supposed to believe that he's the reality check on globalism, that he's not part of this.
	Oh, he doesn't like globalism.
	He doesn't like NATO and its wars, except what he did was he got NATO countries to up their ante in preparation for this war with Russia.
	But you've got to believe that he is the anti-globalist, and we've got all of the media, including the mainstream alternative media, playing along with this.
	That's what happened.
	With Infowars, with Breitbart, with Tucker Carlson, they all played along with this COVID narrative.
	And so they use fear, they use experts, they use the media.
	What's our solution to all that stuff?
	Well, first of all, you need to remain skeptical.
	You need to remain cynical about these people who always lie to you.
	You need to say, prove it.
	Prove it.
	As Thomas Sowell said.
	He said, what do you say to the leftist?
	You say, prove it.
	You also say, so what if it's true?
	Right?
	And that was what I was saying in April.
	Actually, I said, don't lock down.
	But even in April, I had John Rapoport on and we were saying, what if the churches who have locked down in fear, what if they opened up for Easter and then we could see that nobody died?
	And eventually they did open up and we could see that nobody died.
	That's why they came after the churches so hard.
	I had to shut them down.
	But that's what Christians in the past would have said.
	Because when they had plagues in Europe and people were getting sick and dying and they didn't know what it was, the people there said, so what?
	I'm a Christian.
	I don't fear death.
	I'm called to do this or that.
	My life is in God's hand.
	And eternity is in God's hand.
	I'm not afraid of this stuff.
	But we didn't say, prove it.
	We didn't say, so what if it's true?
	Instead, with COVID, we had Christians who cowered in fear from this plague, as they had not done for thousands of years, up until 2020. And we had, with climate, we've seen the same type of thing.
	We got a lot of people out there pushing that it's the end of the world.
	You got several generations now of people who have been propagandized in the institutions we call government schools, public schools.
	They're now scared to death that that's the end of the world.
	But Christians look at this and say, that's not how the world ends.
	God will determine how this is going to end.
	And then we've got world government, which is a part of all of these things.
	Whether you're talking about the COVID MacGuffin, whether you're talking about something like Project Bluebeam or what Reagan is talking about, whether you're talking about climate stuff, all of this is coming into the bigger picture, which is world government.
	Are you afraid of that?
	So what if world government happens?
	Should we cower in fear of world government, for example?
	No, I don't think so because as Christians we know that life will be much worse and it will be different if they succeed.
	But we don't have to cower in fear.
	We don't have to cower in depression.
	We don't have to get suicidal with this and despair.
	No, we have to stay grounded on what our foundation is.
	That's the answer to all of this stuff.
	The Christian is going to say, to paraphrase the Psalms, you are my rock to God.
	You're my fortress strong.
	Help me to be still because you're the Lord.
	Though evil men shall be enthroned, without cause they plot my harm, but God can scatter them with his mighty arm.
	That's our result with all this stuff.
	We don't have to be afraid of any of this stuff.
	Of all things, you Christians need to be the people who are going to stand firm because you're standing on a firm foundation.
	You don't need to be running around like a chicken with his head cut off, even if they use this stuff for world government.
	You don't have to be afraid of the UFO stuff.
	You don't have to be afraid of the COVID stuff.
	You don't have to be afraid of the climate stuff.
	These are all, to borrow the metaphor of John Bunyan, these are like paper tigers on a chain.
	You don't have to worry about any of this stuff.
	And so what if it's true?
	Yeah, we don't want world government.
	That will make our lives miserable and the lives of our children.
	It's something worth fighting.
	But we don't fight out of fear.
	We fight from the position of what we know.
	So let's talk about this drone invasion.
	Just in time for Congress to reauthorize an Orwellian law.
	That's what I think this is immediately about.
	I want you to think about PSYOPs.
	Think about the big picture.
	Because at some point, if we live long enough, we're going to be faced with that.
	I mean, quite frankly, I never thought I'd see the 2030 stuff happening or anything like I saw in 2020. I thought, yeah, that's going to happen, but not in my lifetime.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, we'll see what happens.
	So, what about this law that they want to reauthorize?
	Well, officials are attempting to reassure the public, says Zero Hedge.
	Some lawmakers have stoked fear leading to widespread panic on social media with people interpreting anything moving in the night sky as a potential drone, even commercial jets, even stars.
	If actual truck-sized drones, some say of Iranian origin, We're flying in some of the world's most restricted airspace.
	Let's use common sense.
	The Pentagon would have scrambled F-22s, F-35s on the East Coast almost immediately.
	This is one of the reasons why we know that 9-11 was an inside job.
	As Gore Vidal said, my father or uncle or something had set up, I think it was his uncle, had set up NORAD. He said, I know that they would have taken these things down immediately.
	This wasn't an inside job.
	Anyway, since that hasn't happened, we can't help but be suspicious about the whole drone situation.
	No private satellite data shows the Iranian drone carriers are parked off the coast.
	In fact, these vessels are located 7,500 miles away.
	So, Zero H says, let's step back and review some of what Elon Musk has tweeted out on X recently.
	September 30th, he said, drone swarm battles are coming that will boggle the mind.
	September 29th, he said, epic drone wars are coming.
	January 5th of 2023, he said, the drone wars are already a big deal, but we ain't seen nothing yet.
	Well, Elon Musk is a defense contractor.
	That's primarily what he does.
	He's a defense contractor.
	And of course, as a defense contractor, it's very important to shape the narrative that the public sees.
	That's what X is for.
	That's one of many purposes that he's got with it, but that's one of the things.
	X is not about free speech.
	It is about narrative.
	It's about propaganda.
	It's about surveillance.
	Not about free speech.
	The free speech is there just like the internet was set up to be free initially.
	It's there just to get you dialoguing.
	Think of it as good cop, bad cop.
	That's the way the Segelian dialectic works, the way that Musk does.
	But you know, this whole thing, what does he know about drone wars?
	Well, it's been known for a very long time.
	It's about a decade ago, and I've talked about it many times.
	It's a very entertaining fiction book by Daniel Suarez called Kill Decision.
	If you want to see somebody run through this and how these drone swarms and drone wars are going to work and what it does to the military-industrial complex, how it's used by the military-industrial complex.
	That's a great book.
	Daniel Swartz's Kill Decision.
	Fox News reporter Bill Malugan asked Musk, he said, so what do you think about this drone situation?
	Musk says, well, I think it's alien spaceships that are controlled by Iran.
	Obviously, he said.
	So he's being sarcastic.
	But he does know what's going on.
	Some people said, wait for the prepackaged solution from this latest government-manufactured crisis to come in the form of Elon's Starshield and Peter Thiel's Palantir.
	And of course, the thing that's done by, what's that guy's name?
	Lucky something or other.
	Lucky Palmer.
	Andruil.
	Andruil, like the sword from Lord of the Rings, just like Palantir is the all-seeing eye type of thing.
	Yeah, there's a lot of techno guys that are moving into the military-industrial complex.
	Is this the cause of the drone uproar?
	The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 expires on December the 20th.
	The replacement that is being pushed is a bigger grab at taking away our freedoms.
	The federal government is literally using a terrorism drone mystery PSYOP against you to manipulate Congress into passing the new HR 8610, the counter UAS authority, security, safety, and so forth.
	I think that's it.
	That's my best guess as to what this is all really about at this point in time.
	But this other stuff about the UAP, that's why I talked about PSYOP and how ultimately they want to go.
	That will happen at some point in time.
	But I think this is the immediate cause of this one.
	The Counter UAS Authority, Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act of 2024. They got people, Republican and Democrat, demanding this stuff.
	And they're going to have the public demanding it.
	We need to be able to shoot them down.
	Well, we need to know what we're shooting at, like the sheriff said.
	So we've got to have identification, authorization, surveillance of everything, everywhere, all the time.
	And that's going to be necessary.
	It'll include appropriations and enhance the government powers to control you.
	They're even going so far as to use it to push for acts of war against other countries.
	Last week, a Homeland Security Joint Committee held a hearing on this act.
	This bill would renew and reform counter UAS legal authorities and strengthen the FAA's oversight powers on drones.
	Remember that congressman who fell for the Iranian mothership thing?
	He was told that by somebody that was, I don't know, in the intelligence community or something.
	The intelligence community would never lie to you.
	That's one of the things he said, well, we know it's not our government because our government wouldn't lie to us.
	How stupid do you have to be?
	Well, this is a guy who is totally controlled.
	They're in Congress.
	You think they don't rig our elections to get people like that in?
	The reason we need legal authority is that without it, the use of most effective types of drone detection and counter-drone technologies could violate criminal laws.
	See, this is about giving them cover.
	It isn't like they're not already doing it.
	It isn't like they need some new capability.
	It's just that they need some protection for the laws that they're already violating.
	that's what this is really about including those that prohibit destroying or disabling aircraft in flight and intercepting signals and communications intercepting signals and communications that's what they do all the time everything they do is based on that a sudden surge and purported drone sightings and the accompanying mainstream media and social media panic might make a bit more sense as an effort to push for the reauthorization of orwellian drone laws writes zero hedge and i think that is really the case You got General Flynn.
	Now they're saying our U.S. military were given the opportunity to, if they were given the opportunity to take care of this drone, they have the full capability to do so immediately.
	Unleash the Space Force!
	Yeah, people are ready to believe anything.
	Unleash the Space Force.
	We've got to come after these aliens.
	You see that gif there of a downed TIE fighter from Star Wars and the Empire's soldiers there.
	Stormtroopers.
	Yeah, you know, it's interesting.
	Gateway Pundit can see the trap, but they would never think that Trump would be very much a part of this.
	Despite what happened in 2020. But I think this is going to roll out even before he takes office.
	As they say, the outgoing Biden administration from hell or from other deep state elements or else it's foreign adversaries or its enemies, they said.
	The only thing they rule out is aliens.
	These are the...
	This is another one of the never-Trumpers, you know?
	Never-Trumper can cut both ways.
	Just like Trump delusion versus the people on the other side, right?
	These people are the never-Trumpers because they will never blame Trump for anything.
	No matter what it is, he never gets the blame.
	Even though he's bragging about what he did, they will never blame Trump.
	That's the other side, the flip side of the never-Trumpers.
	So Gateway Pundit falls into that category.
	They said, back in the early 1950s when the UFO mania first set in, you had Walter B. Smith, director of the CIA, in a memorandum for the director of Psychological Strategy Board, wrote, the problems connected with unidentified flying objects appear to have implications for psychological warfare.
	Another 50s document declassified in a FOIA release.
	Details of national security implications stemming from UFO phenomena.
	Channels of communication, it said, are clogged by irrelevant reports.
	Continued false claims lead to the ignoring of real indications of hostile actions.
	Creation of morbid national psychology in which skillful, hostile propaganda...
	Could induce hysterical behavior and harmful distrust of duly constituted authority.
	Now, how would that operate when it's done by our own government?
	Right?
	Our own government, we've seen it, which you saw four years ago.
	They induced illogical, hysterical behavior with the COVID stuff.
	And they created a distrust behavior.
	Of duly constituted authority.
	And by that I mean the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
	I'll never forget Scott Adams saying it's getting harder and harder to tell these freedom lovers from sociopaths.
	He said that after two weeks of lockdown, when he should have known better.
	I replied and I said, it's getting harder and harder to tell you pragmatists from totalitarians because they reject duly constituted authority.
	The duly constituted authority these people all swear to uphold to.
	The Constitution, the Bill of Rights, all that was thrown out.
	While these people created hysterical behavior.
	And so that's what we're looking at in the long term.
	As I said, if you look around TikTok, Instagram, and elsewhere, you'll see a morbid national psychology is on the making.
	Thousands of fake videos are muddying the narrative as well as real things.
	When it comes to the Biden regime, one feels inclined to believe more in a psyop, to have the country in a bad shape, says Gateway Pundit.
	And then they say, and to break the climate of national love story.
	What?
	A national love story!
	Yeah, we've got all these people making their pilgrimages to Mar-a-Lago and kissing the ring and so forth.
	Breaking the national love story for the incoming Trump administration, substituting it for a fearful, suspicious citizenry.
	Gateway Pundit, Breitbart, Infowars, these people are a Kool-Aid cult, folks.
	You have to be aware of them as well.
	As a matter of fact, this was sent to me.
	Alex Jones is out there pushing back against people who criticize Trump.
	There is a subgroup of people that know the globalists are evil and the agenda's bad and the death cult's got to be dealt with, but they always want to just sit there while they're not in control of any policy and they're not getting attacked by the deep state.
	They're not in the arena.
	They're sitting back as critics, not from a leftist globalist death cult perspective, but a perspective...
	They're the best patriots.
	They've got all the answers.
	And Trump's bad.
	And Trump's not for real.
	And look at this.
	And look at that.
	Demoralizing people.
	Breaking the love story.
	And not getting behind what Trump's doing.
	When you look at all the evidence and all the facts and hold it together in one picture, you would be insane not to be behind Trump.
	The obsession on second guessing and bitching about Trump to prove you're the best and you're for real is sick and is mental illness.
	Now, what a sick mental illness is this Kool-Aid cult that you're running, Alex.
	You know exactly what you're doing.
	It's so transparent.
	Anybody that looks at you now, you become a cult leader.
	Just like Jim Jones.
	Is he a relative of yours, by the way?
	Are you connected at all to Jim Jones?
	Because you're looking more and more like him every day.
	What is patriotism?
	Of course, you know, it's the...
	The last refuge of a scoundrel, or maybe it is the first refuge of somebody like Alex Jones who's lying to you.
	It's patriotism, right?
	What is patriotism?
	Isn't that love of country?
	Do you love the country, Alex, or do you love Trump?
	I think we all know what the situation is with that.
	It's pathetic.
	What, by the way, is Trump doing?
	Nothing!
	He's not in office right now!
	What did he do when he left office?
	Well, the very last thing he did in office was to completely betray his followers on January the 6th, after he had for nearly a year betrayed the Constitution and done everything he could to reconstitute, to break down and to build back better this country.
	With all of his lockdowns, telling small businesses that they're not essential, bankrupting us with trillions of dollars in debt, destroying the Constitution, pushing masks through his subordinates, pushing universal basic income, moving that Overton window.
	That's what all the stimulus stuff was about, and it left us in a massive debt.
	And then we get to the depopulation shot, which he still, still cheers, which you cheered, Alex.
	How pathetic.
	How pathetic this is.
	You know, whenever Trump does something bad, the never-Trumpers, like Alex, it's never Trump that's doing anything bad.
	Not him, or Gateway Pundit, or Breitbart, or any of these people, Tucker, any of these people now.
	Whenever that happens, Trump is never held accountable for anything that he does.
	You should always hold him accountable.
	And anybody who is cheering that, he's not about patriotism.
	He's not.
	Alex is not about this country.
	He's not about putting America first.
	He's about putting Trump first.
	Trump comes before the interests of America.
	Trump comes before the interest of his supporters at J6. Trump is always first.
	It is always about Trump and Trump alone.
	Nothing else matters to these people because they get what they want.
	The people who are going to Mar-a-Lago now, you've got Sergey Brin going there, right?
	You've got Jeff Bezos throwing in a million dollars just like Zuckerberg, just like Pfizer did.
	All these people who are going there to kiss the ring, what are they going there for?
	For their own personal gain.
	Are they going there because they've come to the epiphany that Trump is the leader that we need to restore America?
	No, they're going there for their...
	Connections.
	And that's exactly what Alex is doing.
	That's exactly what Breitbart is doing.
	That's what I've seen so much of the conservative media doing.
	They're feathering their nest.
	They're feathering their nest.
	And I'm going to call out these liars, these sheep herders, these wolves among the sheep.
	It is truly amazing.
	The way that they have fleeced and trapped their supporters and the way they have cheered on the man who destroyed the Constitution as much as he possibly could.
	Well, you know, we've got more that we can say, but we're going to finish up with this.
	A former CIA officer goes on, her name is Ballman, Laura Ballman, and she said the New Jersey drone sightings could be a classified exercise.
	She said they may be testing detection technology.
	Oh, they're testing, and their detection technology, folks, is social media.
	That's how they detect what you are doing.
	But she is saying, and look, I just look at this and it's like, why is it now?
	That you see CIA all over the media.
	You see them all over MSNBC, CNN, left-wing media, establishment media.
	You see it all over the mainstream alternative media.
	Well, especially with Alex.
	And Tucker, you know, here's Alex and Tucker.
	Family is in the CIA and all the rest of the stuff.
	And Alex has all of these people.
	Oh, they're former CIA. They're good people now, you know, all the rest of the stuff.
	No, they're not.
	They're trained liars.
	They lie about everything.
	They would lie even if it was in their advantage to tell you the truth.
	These are the people who pushed out the stuff like Stop the Steal.
	These are the people who were telling you, yeah, there's white hats who are fighting in Germany over the election.
	Remember that lie?
	It's like Steve Pachenik.
	Yeah, we've got 20,000 people out there.
	20,000 National Guard who are already arresting people two days after the election because they know exactly what happened with this.
	All of that stuff.
	Why are we seeing the CIA always as the experts and now the source for these people to get information?
	It doesn't make them more credible that they're in the CIA. It makes them non-credible.
	These people have no credibility whatsoever to tell us what any of this stuff is about.
	She said deducing statements from national security spokesman John Kirby that these drones are not operating illegally, she said, coupled with several op-eds that have been out there in the last 24 hours about the need to look at our detection systems, makes me think that perhaps this is actually a classified exercise to test either evasion technology or detection technology in urban areas.
	She said she wouldn't be shocked if the drones were related to the CIA, but she says that's not their mandate to operate in the United States.
	What a joke.
	What a joke.
	CIA, the NSA, has been operating in the United States illegally from their inception.
	So here's a new theory.
	That the New Jersey drone sightings may be nuclear sniffers.
	The founder of an aerospace company, who is a military industrial contractor.
	Again, they're always about...
	He's sniffing the public reaction.
	That's what they're sniffing.
	And probing the public.
	Says, well, maybe these are military-grade drones.
	And he said, this is being reported by Zero Hedge.
	They said, his expert opinion is alarming.
	Oh, he's an expert.
	Leaving many wishing that Paul Krugman's theory about an alien invasion was true instead.
	He said, This is an old, old story.
	They've always talked about...
	As the Soviet Union fell, you know, we spent a lot of money supposedly securing nuclear weapons that were at risk in Ukraine and other places.
	Of course, then we put in biological warfare laboratories there as well.
	But supposedly, you know, trying to secure this stuff because, hey, we could have a suitcase nuke and a dirty bomb and all the rest of this stuff.
	This is a very old story.
	Everyone knows that this administration is pushing hard to get into a war with Russia, so let's back up a few years.
	Remember when those drones were mysteriously flying across I-70 from Colorado to Nebraska to Kansas and then to Missouri?
	Well, it was believed that those drones were looking for radioactive material that came up missing in the U.S., he said.
	Drones have no reason to fly at night because they don't see anything.
	Unless you have thermal optics, drones really don't see stuff at night.
	Mapping has to be done by drones during the day.
	And he says, so these drones are not nefarious in intent.
	The only reason that they would be flying and flying that low at night is because they're trying to smell something on the ground.
	Well, how does he know that it's not nefarious in intent if he doesn't know what the intent is?
	Oh, it's because the government said so.
	He said, my belief is that these drones are trying to smell something on the ground.
	And if that's gas leaks, or maybe it's radioactive material or something.
	His theory was also shared by ex-user Jersey Futures, a self-proclaimed RF engineer, a radio frequency, who speculated, what you're seeing is American-made HPGE nuclear detector drones.
	How does he know that?
	Yeah, that's conjecture.
	He said, simultaneously, the website GeigerCounterWorldMap...
	Pull this up if you can, Karen.
	Do you know where we are?
	Yeah, good.
	That one right there.
	Okay, so here's GeigerCounterWorldMap.
	It shows the counts per minute in New York City.
	So that they're between 222 to 278, which would put it at the low end of the...
	Put it in between a recommended limit for radiation workers every five years is 100...
	And the exposure of Chernobyl residents who were relocated was 350. And so they're putting this at between 222 and 278 in New York City.
	So there's some radiation that's going on there.
	Well, I would just ask you this.
	If they have this capability where they can see it by a satellite map like that, right?
	Then, or whatever they're measuring it by, I'm assuming that that's by satellite, maybe it's by something else.
	How are they measuring this in the first place?
	Whatever they're using to measure it, if to say that it's high in New York City, then why would they need drones?
	They've already measured it.
	Are they trying to pinpoint it even more so?
	I mean, satellites have got amazing detail, but they've got some detail there.
	Where do they get that detail?
	Whatever they're using to measure it there, why would they need to have drones?
	And why all the drones in New Jersey instead of over New York City, if that's the case?
	So, again, even if the drones were necessary to get more detail, more resolution, why would they be necessary for over a month now?
	Or I guess it's almost a month.
	I think it started November the 18th.
	Why would you keep doing it for a month?
	I don't believe this explanation.
	I'm back to the PSYOP thing, and I'm back to the legislation that they want to push through to give them more authority so they don't have any criminal jeopardy for the kind of surveillance that they are doing right now, and they want to do it openly without any criminal risk.
	I think that's what this is about.
	Meanwhile, these purported drone sightings are happening around congressional action.
	On counter-drone authorities and expansion, the New Jersey drone invasion is just in time for Congress to reauthorize the Orwellian law.
	And we now see a picture of a point of light hovering around the U.S. Capitol.
	Do you think that's going to scare these congressmen like the one who believes that it's an Iranian mothership?
	You better believe it is.
	That's exactly what this is for.
	The mass hysteria surrounding drone sightings appears to have been exaggerated by mainstream media, COVID-style.
	Perhaps it's a cover for drones with nuclear sniffer sensors, or could be just a deliberate attempt to scare the nation with a drone sign-up in order to push through this legislation.
	I think that's exactly it.
	One person said...
	Oh, that was that New Jersey senator I played before, Bramnick.
	He said the Department of Defense has got to come clean with the American government.
	They never...
	American people.
	They never will.
	Nobody.
	Nobody.
	And the federal government is going to come clean with the American people.
	And that includes Trump.
	And especially Trump's sycophantic media like Alex.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
	That's right, boys and girls.
	There's a post-election sale on silver and gold.
	Trump euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold.
	It's time to buy some medals with fiat dollars before they come to their sense.
	Go to davidknight.gold to get in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Arterburn.
	He knows where to look to find silver and gold.
	Wahoo! Yark!
	Be out!
	��
	��
	��
	��
	�� you you you Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful grey MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	And David is giving a 10% discount to listeners from now until 2025. At that price, you should be able to buy me several hundred.
	Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. Of course, that's done by a whistler.
	He did a great job with that.
	I even like the fact that he meets Biden.
	He looks down at his shirt.
	He needs to have, and they've even got it in his color right here, MacGuffin.
	This looks really good.
	We had a problem for a while with our...
	We're getting these things printed, and now we've got them back.
	I'm getting a late start with the Christmas season, but here's the black t-shirt here.
	And this is the sand-colored one.
	It's a really beautiful design.
	But anyway, we've got a late start on it, but we're putting them in on...
	Discount, what is it, 10% off?
	Yeah, 10% off until the end of the year there.
	And you don't have to buy hundreds of them, and you don't have to send them down.
	As a matter of fact, I've got sanctions against Zelensky.
	He can't buy any of my stuff.
	It's dirty cash.
	It's stolen money, and I don't accept stolen money.
	I mean, this is like doing business with some guy on the street who's selling you watches out of the back of his car or something.
	I would not send anything to Zelensky.
	Nancy Chambers.
	Drones have been seen and photographed all over South Jersey as well as North Jersey.
	Are they a food delivery system for Chris Christie?
	That's funny, I almost played a video that I saw on YouTube.
	Somebody put up this AI thing and it was like, we've solved the drone mystery.
	And it's got all these unbelievably bloated and fat men floating in the air over New Jersey and New York.
	Maybe that's what's really happening.
	Jason Barker.
	The drones are tracking the watermarked blockchain ballots from 2020. Trump is making his move.
	Trust the plan.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Trust.
	The plan.
	Yeah, that is the plan.
	The trust is the plan.
	Knights of the Storm.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	That's Jason Barker and Angry Tiger, Knights of the Storm.
	And you can find them on Twitter as well as on Rockfin.
	So the drones are tracking the watermarker.
	Okay, they said that.
	That was Jason Barker.
	That's Knights of the Storm.
	But anyway, thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	Three Little Birds.
	Word is these drones are looking for nuclear bombs in the U.S. by searching for radiation.
	There's a few alt-media networks saying this now.
	Yeah, that's what I... They put that up there, I guess, before I got to it.
	And I still think that it is...
	I think they're sniffing public reaction.
	And I think they're pushing people in authority, as well as the public, to accept these new draconian measures that are going to be ushered in with this new law.
	I'm absolutely certain that's the immediate goal.
	Long term, I think that they've got other things in mind as well.
	Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	He said, Q said we're watching a movie.
	Great, sci-fi is my favorite.
	And they have been, when you stop and think about it, this is something that is...
	When you look at something that's multi-generational, and you look at the occultic stuff, Stubblebine, and what was her name, Rimo, or his widow.
	He used to be on Infowars all the time.
	I never wanted to interview her, but he was the guy who was...
	We're doing all this occultic stuff, and we're doing remote viewing, and the men who stare at goats was kind of roughly based on that, and stubble-bind stuff.
	But they were heavily into the occult.
	Heavily into the occult.
	People like Michael Aquino at the NSA. Temple of Satan.
	Well, his was called something else, I think.
	Temple of Seth.
	Seth, I think, is what he called his.
	Same stuff, right.
	These people are heavily into that.
	But I think that when you look at the satanic influences on people in Hollywood, and I've seen many accounts of some of the writers that are saying, yeah, I just kind of lay back on the couch and I'm just channeling this stuff, right?
	With or without drugs.
	Who's feeding them the narrative?
	I mean, it's bad enough when they get the narrative from the CIA, but some of these people are going direct to the source.
	Skipping the CIA, going direct to the source of the Hollywood people.
	And you look at what have they been selling us.
	You talk about normalizing something, you know, going back to the 1950s, probably when I was a child, maybe even about, I don't know what the date was, the day the earth stood still.
	Robert Wise, great director.
	He did Sound of Music and other things like that.
	But he took that narrative about, you know, the day the earth stood still.
	UFO landing there in Washington, all the rest of his stuff.
	Gort, Klaatu, all the rest of them, you know.
	So, yeah, they've been laying that narrative for a very, very, very long time.
	Sci-fi.
	That's the movie we're watching.
	12 June 1776. Thank you very much.
	That's very generous.
	I appreciate that.
	We doubled up that DK fuel gauge in the last month of this year, or what?
	Yes, did we update that today?
	The fuel gauge?
	I don't think it's been updated, but we've got some more to move.
	So, yeah, she's saying that we haven't updated it.
	Scott Helmer, thank you very much.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says, sharing that I have a new song out today.
	Go, Go, Go is available everywhere you download and stream music.
	So look at Go, Go, Go, Scott Helmer.
	And you can also go to his website, scotthelmer.com.
	I like Scott's music.
	He did a couple of songs back with the...
	Lockdown and pandemic to push back against it.
	But I mean, it's not all about it.
	He's got a lot of different topics, a lot of different songs.
	You can see those at scotthelmer.com, but you can also download and stream them.
	And of course, that's how he gets paid by the streaming revenue.
	Dustin Helm, thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	And Chevkin321, Zelensky would rather wear stilettos and leather.
	That's probably true, if he wears anything at all, right?
	So, where are we now in this society?
	Listen to this.
	We've now got some government schools that are using AI to swat students at home.
	That's what it is.
	I mean, the headline says, to send police to students' homes.
	They're swatting them.
	Now, they may not come in with, you know, armor and kick the door down, but it's essentially what they're doing.
	The schools are monitoring and spying on the children.
	And again, everything that the government does is about surveilling us.
	Now the schools, I guess the schools feel like they can do anything.
	They don't have to worry about getting legal permission.
	That's what, you know, the Homeland Security and the military and the police, they want the ability to identify and to track everybody with this stuff.
	But schools are already using AI-powered software to accuse teenagers of wanting to harm themselves and sending the cops to their homes as a result.
	Okay, that's not up on the thing.
	Often with chaotic and traumatic results.
	New York Times says software being installed on high school students' school-issued devices.
	Yeah, see?
	We got a free Obama phone.
	I just thought of the Obama phone lady.
	Obama phone!
	I got a free Obama phone!
	School-issued devices.
	Are they giving them phones?
	Are they giving them computers?
	What are they giving them?
	But it's a trap.
	So every time the government gives you something, it is a trap, right?
	And this is one way they're entrapping the kids.
	The school-issued devices track every word that these kids type.
	Maybe they should go back to writing things, you know?
	I got away from writing until I went back to these things here that I do my annotation on.
	Started to get my handwriting back.
	Nearly got illegible.
	But a lot of these kids don't even learn how to do that.
	They start by typing and touching and all this other stuff.
	They don't learn how to do it.
	Here's a professional tip to the future generation.
	Being able to handwrite notes on paper.
	That's going to be a superpower in the future.
	Pass along slips of paper.
	Have committees of correspondence.
	Hey, it worked!
	It worked, you know, a couple hundred years ago.
	It'll work now.
	An algorithm then analyzes whatever they're typing, everything they're typing it's looking at, that analyzes their language for evidence that the teenagers want to harm themselves.
	Unsurprisingly, the software can get it wrong by woefully misinterpreting what students are actually trying to say.
	Isn't this exactly the same thing that's being done with all the transgender stuff?
	Oh, well, you know, we have to, we're going to misconstrue what they're saying, or we're going to manipulate them, or we've got to protect them from themselves.
	We've got to protect them from suicide.
	That means that we've all got to worship the gender flipping and all the rest of this stuff.
	A 17-year-old in Missouri was awakened by the police in the middle of the night, as it turns out, a poem that she had written years ago triggered the alarms of some software called GoGuardianBeacon, which its maker describes as a way to, quote, safeguard students from physical harm, unquote.
	She said it was one of the worst experiences of her life, said her mother to the New York Times.
	Internet safety software...
	Employed during the COVID-19 shutdowns led to widespread surveillance of students in their own homes.
	So they don't have to give you the device.
	They can give you the software so that you can do some stuff at home.
	And maybe that stuff remains.
	As the New York Times reports, we have no idea if they're at all effective or accurate since the companies have yet to release any data.
	However, the software remains highly invasive and could represent a massive intrusion of privacy.
	You think?
	By definition, it does.
	And of course, what we're seeing here is parenting by the government again.
	The parents can't be trusted with this stuff.
	The government has to do it.
	I don't think the government can't be trusted with it either.
	Parents can make a mistake, the government can make a mistake.
	The difference is that if the parents make a mistake, they don't come around trying to shoot the kids, which the government can do.
	Baltimore City Councilman said, I think it's terribly misguided to send police, especially knowing what I know and believe of school police in general, to children's homes.
	School police.
	That was not even a thing when we went to school.
	It was one of the most amazing things.
	And of course, it was a key reason why we chose not to put any of our kids in school.
	I looked at that and I said, you know what they're doing?
	They're training them to live in a prison society.
	We're going to have everybody go through metal detectors all the time.
	Look at how that has proliferated out of the TSA to all these different places.
	It went to the schools and it went to the airports of the TSA. And what was it?
	It was about 2015, I guess, when we went to Orlando at that time.
	And they had it at, you know, we knew Orlando pretty well.
	We had lived in Tampa and everything.
	So we were there in the area, partly for business and partly for vacation.
	And we decided that we would go over and kind of, you know, walk through the area outside of the Universal Studios where they had a lot of restaurants and things like that.
	We get over there.
	And they got like TSA checkpoints at that point.
	I got so angry.
	We just turned around and left.
	I said, I'm not going through this.
	They can do without my money with something like that.
	But it's everywhere.
	It's pervasive everywhere.
	And I said, this is what they're trying to normalize and have normalized with the kids.
	You know, the kids get frisked and searched and all this other kind of stuff.
	And then they had lockdowns.
	They were normalizing the lockdowns.
	And so, of course, a lot of these people don't have any problem when Donald Trump does it to them.
	OpenAI whistleblower has been found dead in a San Francisco apartment.
	This is a guy who was blowing the whistle on what they were doing in terms of and had direct application to this massive lawsuit About copyright violations.
	A former OpenAI researcher, known for whistleblowing the blockbuster AI company, faced a swell of lawsuits over its business model, has died.
	And what they were saying was, attorneys for the New York Times said that he was someone who had, quote, unique and relevant documents that would support their case against OpenAI.
	What is the case?
	Well, three months after, he publicly accused OpenAI of violating U.S. copyright laws while developing ChatGPT.
	So he said he was one of the developers working there.
	He says, I know they're openly violating the copyright laws.
	He has unique documents about that.
	We were talking about some really, really big bucks at stake here in these lawsuits, and he turns up dead.
	Exxon is going to build large off-grid natural gas plants to exclusively sell electricity to AI data centers.
	I mentioned this earlier.
	This is Zero Hedge.
	Also, you can find it at technocracynews.com.
	This is...
	Another example of where we get nothing.
	And we've seen this as well.
	They're going to exclusively set up, bring online new nuclear power plants after people have had questions about their safety, questions about, well, what happens to the spent fuel?
	There are technological solutions for that stuff, but they're not going to wait for it.
	They don't have any technological solutions for it yet.
	It's just stored on site.
	And so that was one of the things that put a moratorium on this.
	And quite frankly, I'm a lot more concerned about radiation.
	Maybe you should fly some drones over those areas.
	If you want to sniff some nuclear weapons, do it over there.
	Nuclear radiation.
	But I'm a lot more concerned about nuclear radiation than I am CO2. CO2 is fine.
	Nuclear radiation, not so much.
	So that's what I'm concerned about.
	And yet this is what everybody's racing to.
	But now Exxon wants to get in on the deal.
	And by moving to this, you know, again, we're seeing yet again that they're going to shut down the power grid for the rest of us.
	They're going to have their own separate power grid.
	That's a key takeaway.
	And we see this coming over and over again.
	But they are going to be pulling this in.
	In order to normalize carbon capture and to make money off of that.
	It isn't just nuclear projects that are getting in on the selling of power to data centers trend.
	Now, Exxon is also joining the trend.
	And again, Rex Tillerson.
	I said, in 2017 transition, when everybody was talking about the fact that Trump was thinking about making Rex Tillerson Secretary of State, I said, this guy, first of all, at the Boy Scouts, he normalized...
	The homosexuality that they injected into an openly accepted in the Boy Scouts.
	But I said, this guy is full-on a green grifter.
	And all these people are saying, you don't know what you're talking about.
	This is Exxon.
	I said, that's exactly what they're doing.
	If you look at these offshore windmills that are being put on the coast of Long Island that are going to make the electricity there, by conservative estimates, five times more expensive.
	I mean, just their profit alone is going to be nearly double what the entire cost is right now.
	And those projects are being run by oil companies, foreign oil companies that you likely haven't heard of, but oil companies nevertheless, coming out of Scandinavia.
	But here's Exxon.
	Exxon is planning a large natural gas-powered plant to supply electricity directly to data centers, incorporating technology to capture 90% of its carbon emissions, according to the New York Times.
	This will be Exxon's first power plant that's not dedicated to its own operations.
	Carbon capture systems remain rare and costly despite federal subsidies limiting their broader adoption.
	This is one of the things that we're going to see with the Trump administration.
	As we've been saying for the longest time, we look at Governor Burgum and Noem of North and South Dakota now being brought into the Trump administration.
	They were pushing carbon capture pipelines and things like that, using it for fracking, storing some of it and so forth.
	And then the big corporation that's running the pipeline to take this supposedly toxic carbon dioxide and pump it across the continent to be used in North and South Dakota.
	So the guy running the pipeline, that CEO, plus the two governors of the state, coming to Mar-a-Lago, all working with Trump at the same time, and now you've got these grifters like Lucky Lutnik and all the rest of them.
	They are heavily into carbon capture, carbon taxes, blockchain stuff to track your carbon usage, and all the rest of the stuff.
	This is what is being prepared.
	As part of the technocracy's control of the coming Trump administration.
	And make no doubt about it, technocracy is controlling it.
	The ex-CEO, Linda Iaccarino, if I'm pronouncing that correctly, has endorsed a bill to promote digital ID. And this is Wine Press News.
	They said, this is as...
	Elon Musk is seeking to transform X into a Chinese surveillance state app.
	WeChat.
	And that's exactly true.
	He's even said that.
	He's even said he wants it to be something like WeChat.
	Well, we know what that's about.
	The ex-CEO recently announced her part in revising the Kids Online Safety Act, COSA, A digital censorship bill that would force social networks to moderate specific content that is deemed harmful and inappropriate for children, writes Wine Press News.
	Absolutely true.
	It opens the pathway for broader implementation of digital IDs for things like age verification.
	As we've said over and over again, that's the backdoor way to normalize ID. And we've seen this being put out in numerous ways, especially by conservatives.
	Oh, well, we've got to protect children from harmful content online or from pornography or whatever, so let's have a digital ID for that.
	We've got to protect people from having their jobs taken by illegal aliens.
	Let's have an ID for that.
	We've got to shut the border down.
	Well, we need biometric ID at the border and at all the airports and everything for that as well.
	Every problem, the solution is a digital ID, and this is something that's being pushed by Republicans left and right.
	Musk has previously indicated That he seeks to turn the platform into something that emulates China's all-in-one WeChat app, which the Chinese government is using to enforce their social credit score surveillance system.
	What do you think the carbon tax stuff is going to do as well?
	What do you think all this blockchain stuff is going to do?
	They can follow every single transaction.
	And you've got all of these big banking companies, MasterCard, all the rest of them.
	Everybody's working on ways to do this.
	And everybody in the Trump administration that has anything to do with anything financial is all about this stuff.
	The Electronic Frontier Foundation, EFF, provided a critical overview of what the Kids' Online Safety Act, COSA, is.
	They said the bill allows the FTC Commission to sue apps and websites that don't take measures to prevent and mitigate various harms to minors, including anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and eating disorders.
	See, the FTC, the FCC, all these different agencies are kind of in a turf war right now, trying to carve out things that they can do to regulate the Internet.
	That's what it's about.
	That's how they build their little fiefdoms, their little empires.
	COSA is an unconstitutional censorship bill that gives the Federal Trade Commission and potentially state attorneys general the power to restrict protected online speech that they find objectionable.
	The bill's original co-sponsors, Richard Blumenthal, Democratic Connecticut, and Marsha Blackburn, Republican here in Tennessee.
	That's what she wants to do.
	They dismissed objections to the bill as a false narrative, said it would be weaponized by unelected bureaucrats to censor Americans.
	No, no, of course not.
	They would never weaponize anything against us, would they?
	Let's just give them unlimited power, says Marsha Blackburn.
	However, the mechanism for ensuring compliance, that is age verification, is going to require implementation of a digital ID system.
	Oh, wow.
	Okay.
	So, it will be weaponized.
	It will be used to track us.
	And then we go back to Musk and his fascination with becoming WeChat.
	His involvement with this speaks to Musk's desire to transform X into an all-in-one app.
	That emulates China's WeChat platform.
	This is not speculation on the part of me or Wine Press News or anybody else.
	He said this.
	Publicly said it.
	Put it all in one place, which in turn will be used, just as it is by the Chinese government, for their social credit score.
	After rebranding Twitter to X... He said Twitter was acquired as an accelerant for X. The Everything app.
	He said this is not simply a company renaming itself, but doing the same thing.
	In the months to come, we will add comprehensive communications and the ability to conduct your entire financial world, he says.
	Well, he's going to need some political help and cover for that.
	And, of course, he's got it now.
	He's got control of Trump.
	That same week...
	He said X would become half of the global financial system.
	I've played that clip over and over again, right?
	He said it would become half of the world's global financial system if done right, he said.
	And, of course, he's going to have to have big political muscle to make this happen.
	But I tell you, that $250 million that he invested in Trump is looking really, really cheap like a bargain now, doesn't it?
	He also said that it'll be done in a way that people do not think of when it comes to banking, but he said it'll be, quote, the most efficient database for the thing that is money, whatever that is, he said.
	Remember?
	I've played that clip many times.
	Yeah, when we look at this, and I'll just remind you again, it's an excellent report that was on Winepress that I talked about, about tokenization.
	All this stuff comes together.
	All of this, you know, mania about crypto, because crypto is going to be there to help them follow what you're doing.
	But it's also to get you accustomed to tokenizing everything.
	Everything.
	Everything on the blockchain, everything visible to them.
	And yeah, there was an excellent report.
	I covered that.
	And again, you can find that in the archives of Wine Press News.
	But he also picked up on what New York Governor Hochul has proposed.
	A $500 inflation refund stimulus check.
	Now we're going to do a stimulus check for inflation that they cause.
	How about that?
	You know, the whole thing just comes full circle.
	Let's print money.
	Janet Yellen, as Tony Arterman pointed out, 42% of the debt that this country has had over its 200-plus years of existence, and she's done 42% of it.
	And you look at how the stimulus checks from Trump exploded the deficit.
	And we knew that was going to happen.
	You had Thomas Massey pushing back against that.
	And Trump said, we're going to primary him out.
	Well, fortunately, neither Trump nor the Israeli government could get Thomas Massey out.
	So good for the people of his jurisdiction to have the judgment to keep him there against those kinds of attacks.
	But it's all about universal basic income, and it's all about moving the Overton window.
	And that was what was so reprehensible.
	It wasn't just the financial recklessness.
	Of Trump, you know, leveraging us into the kind of debt that bankrupted his casinos, but it was the fact that it was moving the Overton window for universal basic income.
	And here's another New Yorker, another New York Democrat, just like Trump, Governor Hochulbury, as Gerald Slunty calls her.
	You got another New York Democrat who's out there talking about doing stimulus checks.
	And just remember, when we're talking about universal basic income, coming back to Elon Musk, if you remember back in the 2016 election cycle, Andrew Yang ran, and his initial platform was all about universal basic income, and nothing else.
	And Elon Musk gave him over a million dollars.
	Elon Musk wants this universal basic income just as all the technocrats do.
	He is 100% on board with the technocrat agenda.
	His grandfather was one of the big pioneers in the technocracy.
	And so, here we have Hochul announced New York State's first ever inflation refund, which is a stimulus check, which would deliver about $3 billion in direct payments to around 8.6 million New York taxpayers statewide in 2025. And it's going to be a life-changing amount.
	$300 to $500.
	$300 to single taxpayers who make up to $150,000 a year and a payment of $500 for joint tax filers making up to $300,000 a year.
	One of the several proposals to help address the cost of living that'll be unveiled as part of the governor's upcoming state of the state.
	So she says, I'll say this as New York's first mom governor.
	Should we call her big mother?
	Big mother hokul.
	I'm on your side.
	I believe that this extra inflation-driven sales tax revenue shouldn't be spent by the state.
	It's your money, and it should be back in your pockets.
	Back in your pockets.
	There you go.
	Show you the money.
	Show you the money.
	Actually, I've got to find a video clip of this.
	I mean, this is so patronizingly stupid.
	It sounds like she's talking to a toddler.
	It's your money.
	It should be back in your pockets.
	Back in your pockets.
	There you go.
	Show you the money.
	Show you the money.
	This will help with your expenses to buy groceries for your family.
	Probably $300 probably doesn't cover one week's worth of groceries in New York City.
	Not even close to it.
	$300, $500 these days is a nothing burger, says Wine Press News.
	And he's right.
	The dollar's purchasing power have already greatly eroded even further.
	Inflation will be much higher due to the interest rates cuts that are coming.
	And then, of course, we can expect to see quantitative easing again like we did in Trump's first term.
	And then you can add to that tariffs.
	Tariffs.
	Says, as far as I'm concerned, she might as well have said, let them eat cake.
	I think probably what she would say is, let them eat Twinkies.
	I'm your big mother, and you can have a Twinkie.
	How about that?
	We're going to take a quick break.
	Before we do, I want to thank some of the people who left tips.
	Dougalug, thank you very much.
	He says, here's a little gas for the tank.
	Thank you.
	George McDonough, thank you very much for the tip.
	Says, Merry Christmas, everyone.
	Thank you.
	Teresa Andrea, thank you.
	Reminds me of the D.A.R.E. program.
	They forgot to tell kids to be put into foster care when they ratted out their parents for smoking cannabis.
	As a matter of fact, we've got something coming up here that is tied into that as well.
	Kind of an update.
	AtomicDog.
	Help David Knight expose government corruption by liking the video, sharing on social media, and subscribing.
	Thank you, and thank you, AtomicDog, for always reminding me.
	We haven't changed it yet, but I got the domain name to make it a little bit simpler.
	A friend at church who could not find the album, wanted to find the album.
	And, of course, searching on Google, you're not going to find me.
	You can find me on Yandex, which is the Russian search engine.
	It turns out, because it's focused in Russia as well, that it's number two with three percent.
	Google's got 80 plus percent of the market.
	Number two, they've got like 80 something percent of search engine market.
	Number two is Yandex.
	But at least they know where I am and they know where my website is.
	But if you search for my website, you're going to find it.
	And we never could get davidknightshow.com.
	That was already taken.
	So we put in thedavidknightshow.com.
	And that's a little bit hard for some people to find.
	So I found, I thought, I was thinking about that over the weekend because of a friend who couldn't find us.
	And I thought, you know, let me look at some of the alternatives.
	Davidknight.news.
	I just bought that.
	So we're going to get an alias for that.
	We're going to start using that because it's shorter.
	And it's to the point.
	It lets you know what the show's about.
	The show's about news.
	Not only about news, but it's primarily about news.
	So we've got that as well.
	Marky Mark, thank you for the tip.
	He said, I don't know if we, the people, will be deprived of power.
	TPTB won't be able to monitor us and give us electronic bread and circuses via the internet without it.
	How else would they spy on us?
	Oh, I think they've got ways.
	Yeah.
	I mean, all you need is your little cell phone, right?
	That doesn't require a lot of power.
	But they will make sure that you don't have enough power to do the things that you want to do.
	There's an excellent movie that just came out called 2035, I think.
	And it shows a day in the life of ordinary Americans if they get their way for this kind of stuff.
	I'll show you a little bit of that tomorrow.
	I'm not going to get into it today.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at some of the politics that's going on.
	And we're also going to take a look at...
	Quantum computing.
	There's been some announcements of some breakthroughs.
	Google said that they have tapped into a parallel universe.
	So we're going to talk about that.
	Is it a threat to Bitcoin?
	A lot of different things are being talked about with the quantum computing.
	So we're going to cover all that stuff when we come back, and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	I wish I had the Christmas Night album.
	You can get the Christmas Night album at thedavidknightshow.com for just $13.99.
	It's right in the second floor there, see?
	What'd you wish, George?
	Well, not just one wish.
	A whole hat for them.
	First, I'm going to the DavidKnightShow.com and purchase the Christmas Night album.
	Then I'm going to listen to Christmas classics.
	Like...
	Are you going to throw it up?
	I want the Christmas Night album, too.
	Hey, that's pretty good.
	Buffalo gals, can't you come out tonight?
	Can't you come out tonight?
	Can't you come out tonight?
	David's Christmas Night album includes 21 instrumental Christmas melodies like God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and as all new, I'll be home for Christmas.
	What do you want?
	You want the moon?
	Just say the word and I'll throw a lasso around it and pull it down.
	I'll take it.
	Then what?
	and then I'll buy you your own download of David Knight's Christmas night album.
	All right, and Marky Mark, New Jersey, thank you for the tip.
	He says, again, the powers that be.
	Also need to get the power on to implement CBDC in the beast system.
	No power, no CBD, no control over us.
	Well, I agree, but I think they could also...
	Make sure that they get the power for the places that you might go to buy something.
	Of course, most of it would be online.
	They've got enough that they can get you online, enough that they can monitor, get your phone going, that type of thing.
	So, yeah, we'll see what happens.
	It's going to be very easy, I think, and we see this more and more.
	A two-tier power system.
	They can do a two-tier power system that doesn't just include the technocrats and their AI. They can also use a tier that enables retailers and the internet, but make sure that you can't do pretty much anything.
	And of course, that's what the CBDC would be used for, to monitor your food, your travel, your clothing, that type of thing.
	Wally Walrus, thank you very much for the tip.
	Merry Christmas, David and family.
	Thank you very much, Wally.
	That's your name.
	Appreciate that.
	And Scott Tillmer, thank you for another tip.
	I appreciate that.
	He says there's another 20. Let's get the tip jar to 250 today.
	Thank you.
	It's holiday time.
	Merry Christmas.
	Thank you very much.
	And just to remind everybody, Scott Helmer, scotthelmer.com, I think it was, but the new song that he's got is Go, Go, Go.
	You can find that on all the different streaming sites as well.
	And that'd help him a lot, I'm sure, if you search for it.
	That would bring him up in the search algorithms.
	Let's take a look at what is happening in politics.
	And as Biden is on his way out, he's talking about allowing California to ban new gas-powered cars.
	California and 11 other states want to halt the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035. Trump is expected to revoke these permissions within days of his inauguration.
	And, of course, he could do that, right?
	If Biden is going to do this by executive order, he could change it.
	But, of course, we've already seen Trump say, well, I'm going to get rid of DACA, which is an executive order by Obama.
	But he didn't do it.
	Instead, he pleaded with the courts to tell him whether he could or not.
	And the courts, of course, say, no, you can't.
	Same thing with Paris Climate Accord.
	He pretended that we were in the Paris Climate Accord, which we weren't.
	We were put in there by Obama.
	Not by the Senate ratifying a treaty, and he pretended that we were in it, pretended that he couldn't get out of it.
	Until the final days of his administration because there's a time limit for exiting of four years that they put in there, I believe, specifically for America.
	And so the question is, you know, if Biden put something like this in with an executive order, yeah, Trump could get us out, but would he?
	Because he didn't do that with DACA. He didn't do it with the Paris Climate Accord.
	California has imposed the most ridiculous car regulations anywhere in the world with mandates to move to all-electric, said Trump, and I will terminate that.
	The state would most likely challenge any revocation, setting up a legal battle with a new administration.
	And I think this is why Biden is doing it right now.
	The Biden cartel.
	It's not Biden, but whoever it is that's really running the place there.
	Just call it the cartel.
	The Biden cartel is weighing in on this.
	In advance of a court case to give it more weight.
	Under the 1970 Clean Air Act, the EPA has for decades allowed California, which has historically had the most polluted air in the nation, to enact tougher clean air standards than those set by the federal government.
	Federal law also allows other states under certain circumstances to adopt California's standards as their own.
	The EPA has to be killed.
	The Department of Energy must be killed.
	And if they won't do that, as I said last week, the thing that needs to be killed, if you're not going to get rid of these agencies, which they won't, they should at least get rid of the EPCA that was put in in 1975. That was the Congressional Act.
	That gave these organizations the power to prohibit and to ban based on emissions or on energy use.
	If you want to stop all of this nonsense, like I said last week, we had that one bill that was introduced by Representative Ogles out of Tennessee.
	He called it the Laundry Liberty Act.
	Well, let's liberate more than laundry.
	Let's liberate, let's get rid of this meddling in our personal lives by the federal government.
	There is no constitutional authority for the EPCA to exist.
	They don't have that power.
	Congress can't give power to a bureaucracy that Congress doesn't have legitimately.
	And according to the Ninth and Tenth Amendment, they don't have that power legitimately.
	So they can't delegate that to the bureaucracy.
	They delegate it to the bureaucracy so they don't have to take the heat.
	Oh, it's that bad agency that we just can't control that is doing this.
	It's not us!
	Well, it is them.
	Because they could stop it.
	They were the ones who pretended to have power, pretended that they could give this non-existent power to the EPCA through these two agencies.
	The EPA as well as the Department of Energy through the EPCA. They need to get rid of the EPCA. Because if they don't, they're going to constantly be meddling in every appliance and heating and air conditioning and our cars and all the rest of the stuff until they ban everything.
	Biden, still with his pardons, he's now done some more commutations.
	One of them of a, quote, notorious fraudster, Eric Bloom, who defrauded investors of over $665 million in the largest single financial fraud in the history of Chicago's federal court.
	This is very similar to what Trump did, by the way.
	One of his pardons was, if you remember, he pardoned Shalom Weiss, whose fraud, mainly with other Jewish people in his own community, con man.
	Same thing we see with January the 6th, coming after your own people.
	And he the fraud was so egregious, bankrupting so many people, they gave him the longest prison sentence any white collar criminal has ever been given.
	Eight hundred and forty five year prison sentence.
	And Trump pardoned him for that.
	And so now Biden is doing the same type of stuff.
	This guy, Eric Bloom, defrauded people of six hundred sixty five million dollars and.
	Biden commuted the sentences of two of Chicago's most notorious fraudsters, former Dixon comptroller Rita Cronwell, who embezzled nearly $54 million from the tiny town to fund a lavish lifestyle, and Eric Bloom, the one-time leader of a North, uh, Northbrook management firm who had a fraud investors of more than 665 million.
	Biden also commuted the sentences of fraudsters, Timothy M. McGinn, Mick, yeah, McGinn and David Smith and Christopher Schwartz.
	And so McGinn was a former Albany investment broker.
	They call them brokers because after you do business with them, you're a broker than you were before.
	He was convicted, along with David Smith, more than a decade ago, of defrauding the hundreds of clients in a massive scheme that wiped out life savings for many of their victims.
	You know, just like Trump's Shalom Weiss did.
	Schwartz is a 54-year-old Watertown food and restaurant entrepreneur who was sentenced in 2017 to 150 months in federal prison for committing tax evasion and defrauding lenders and investors of more than $19 million dollars.
	For over a decade, Mr. Schwartz stole millions from lenders and investors in the United States using multiple schemes, shell companies, and layers of transactions in an effort to escape detection.
	Well, I imagine Biden liked that.
	That's so much like, hey, this guy's good.
	Maybe he could help me when I retire.
	He's really good at shell corporations and fraud.
	Biden may actually end up giving Trump a run for his money with his own corrupt pardons list, says Information Liberation.
	This list so far from Biden is so massive that it's likely going to take reporters weeks to get through it, if they ever do.
	And the White House is just suggesting this is just round one.
	I mean, this type of stuff usually gets dropped the last day or so.
	Here we are.
	We're still, you know, a month out.
	The Biden administration is scrambling to auction off the border wall sections before Trump takes office.
	They got stores of material To build the border wall.
	All of that construction stopped when Biden became president.
	But how in the world does he get to auction off stuff?
	Didn't Mexico pay for the wall?
	Doesn't Mexico have something to say about this?
	Come on!
	And of course, a wall isn't going to save anything anyway.
	It's the welfare magnet.
	You need to get rid of the welfare.
	Why are we offering wonderful welfare to people who are not citizens, enticing them to come here?
	Well, of course, it's a strategy.
	Cloward and Piven talked about it, but we all knew what this strategy was.
	Long before I'd ever heard of Cloward and Piven, I'd point out that when I, you know, the late 80s.
	Libertarian Party would have this Nolan chart test, you know, where they had a different political perspective rather than just a line that is left and right, two-dimensional thing.
	They had a two-dimensional, like a diamond-shaped thing, you know, where you ask people questions, 10 questions about civil liberties and 10 questions about economic liberty, that type of thing, and then plot you, you know, your left, right, center, or authoritarian or libertarian on the top, that type of thing.
	And the one question that I would always oppose, I said, you know, they talked about open borders.
	I said, no, I'm not in favor of open borders unless you stop the welfare state first.
	If you don't stop the welfare state, it's going to bankrupt us.
	And that is exactly what Cloward and Piven had strategized about.
	I didn't realize it at the time, but it doesn't take a, you know, it's not rocket science to know that if you're going to offer These incredible benefits to everybody.
	You're going to pull in everybody from every poor country in the world to come live at our expense.
	That's what this is about.
	Trump made it clear that he intends to finish construction of the border wall, which will make no difference, folks.
	No difference.
	It really won't.
	As long as the welfare magnet is there, that's the issue.
	I'm not against immigration as long as you're not incentivizing people to come here and live at our expense.
	Making sure the materials have remained untouched to the border since Biden took office in 2021. Again, it's the magnet, it's not the steel.
	I guess that's his way to stop the steel.
	He's going to stop the steel by selling off all the steel components for the wall.
	S-T-E-E-L. Trump made clear that he intends to finish this, so Biden is going to finish that.
	And...
	Then we go to the Army-Navy game this weekend.
	And we've got a picture here.
	Of course, J.D. Vance and Donald Trump went to the Army-Navy game.
	And there you can see they've got Daniel Penny there with them.
	Good.
	I'm glad this guy deserves some recognition.
	I heartily approve of that.
	And yet, also at the game, and again, you know...
	Vance and Trump aren't president and vice president now, right?
	They don't have anything to do, really.
	I mean, they're putting together their cabinet.
	They can go to a football game if they want.
	There's not anything pressing, but there is something pressing for this guy, Mike Johnson, who is constantly photobombing them and hanging out, right?
	Get to work, Mike.
	You got people in North Carolina that are freezing in the cold, and you won't do a thing about it.
	You just passed nearly a trillion dollars for the military, an NDAA bill.
	You do everything in the world, but you don't care about Americans who are freezing in the mountains.
	This pathetic excuse for a Speaker of the House.
	I can't have enough contempt for this guy.
	He's worse than Schumer and Pelosi because you know that Schumer and Pelosi are bad.
	This guy is the essence of a turncoat rhino.
	Mike Johnson.
	Look at him.
	How pathetic this guy is.
	This hanger-on.
	This sycophant.
	This suckerfish.
	This spineless jellyfish.
	Mike Johnson.
	He's hanging out at the football game.
	Getting his picture taken.
	Great.
	Well, we got Sergey Brin, the co-founder of Google, is going to be going to Mar-a-Lago his pilgrimage.
	He's going to make a dash for cash.
	He's going to go down to Mar-a-Lago.
	He's going to, let's put it politely, say he's going to kiss the ring of Trump.
	It's a remarkable turnaround for Sergey Brin, who described Trump's 2016 win as, quote, deeply offensive.
	Remember that?
	The online aristocracy is having to set aside their worries to grapple with a new reality, says the Daily Mail.
	Remember, we had a, forget who it was in the audience, said, yeah, MAGA means make aristocracy great again.
	That's right.
	What they call the online aristocracy is a technocracy.
	All of them were playing catch-up to Elon Musk.
	Whose fortune is growing as he sets in on meetings with Trump's political headquarters because it's growing on expectations.
	People are buying his stock because they say, hey, Elon Musk owns this guy.
	You know, Jeff Bezos is going to be kicking himself now.
	Jeff Bezos paid $250 million for the Washington Post.
	Elon Musk paid $250 million to own the presidency.
	That's why he's richer than Bezos.
	And $250 million is a chump change to these guys.
	It really is.
	He's got more than a million times.
	He's got like two million times the net worth of the average American.
	Okay, so would you pay $125 to own the president?
	See, normalizing it to your income level, my income level.
	So, yeah, these are all expectations.
	And all this is happening, you know, and the Doge thing, they're going to be recommending that federal EV subsidies be ended for Musk's competitors.
	Because Musk has already gotten, he's already maxed out on all the EV subsidies.
	So, getting rid of the EV subsidy program, in the name of efficiency, in the name of Doge, It's going to hurt its competitors who are trying to get into that.
	And at the same time, in California, Newsom has said to Musk that, no, you're not going to get any Tesla.
	Tesla's not going to get any subsidies there.
	So Musk is suing him.
	Musk is suing California for EV subsidies while he is going to, according to all reports, and I'm sure it's going to happen, while he's going to shut them down at the federal level for his competitors.
	Yeah, it's all about the principle, isn't it?
	Well, going back to Sergey Brin, he was at one point in time married to RFK Jr.'s running mate, Nicole Shanahan.
	And as Wall Street Journal and many other places have reported, their marriage broke up because she cheated on Sergey Brin with Elon Musk.
	It's a small world, isn't it?
	And their club.
	This is a club and you ain't in it.
	And be thankful that you aren't in that club.
	I mean, when you look at RFK Jr. and Elon Musk and Sergey Brin and Cole Shanahan, I mean, it's like, do you really want to be in that club?
	Do you really want to be on Jeffrey Epstein's Island or whatever?
	No.
	So, Sergey Brin's visit to Mar-a-Lago is an extraordinary turnaround from Trump's last victory in 2016. If you remember, they were filmed having a meeting in Google.
	Brin and other Google executives caught on video, and that went public, expressing their horror that Trump had won in 2016. Brin said, as an immigrant and a refugee, I certainly find this election deeply offensive, and I know many of you do, too.
	I think it's a very stressful time.
	It conflicts with many of our values, and it's a good time for us to reflect on that, he said.
	Well, evidently he's reflected on it, and I think he believes that the most appropriate response is to give Trump massive amounts of money.
	Ha ha ha!
	Because Trump has made some statements about how he thinks that Google has been unfair to him.
	Jeff Bezos, as I said before, just like Zuckerberg and just like Pfizer.
	Both of them gave a million dollars to Trump's transition team and his inauguration fund.
	Not his transition team, but the inauguration fund for a big party.
	How much does it cost to have this party?
	How many millions of dollars does he need?
	Is it for paying for balloons and those little noisemakers that go out?
	Is that what these people are saying?
	How many of those things can you buy with that many millions of dollars?
	So, Zuckerberg's giving him a million dollars.
	Now Jeff Bezos is going there to give him a million dollars.
	And Jeff Bezos says he's going to live stream the inauguration on Prime Video.
	Yeah, aren't you glad that you've got Prime Video so you can watch that?
	ABC... It's going to pay Trump $15 million.
	Well, I guess in a sense they are really buying some influence with him because it's part of a defamation lawsuit, and they caved even before it got into deposition.
	And so Trump is raking in the money from everybody in all quarters.
	The apology was part of a defamation lawsuit settlement that Trump filed against ABC News and against George Stephanopoulos.
	Do you remember that?
	We played the thing when it happened.
	He had Nancy Mason and George Stephanopoulos, who used to be a high-ranking official in the Clinton White House.
	I think he's chief of staff.
	I can't remember exactly.
	But anyway, he went on then to be like the star of ABC News.
	And he kept hammering Nancy Mace, saying that you're supporting a guy that was found liable for rape.
	And he wasn't.
	That was not the finding there, right?
	He was not found guilty of rape.
	And so because he got that wrong, Trump sued him $15 million.
	Now, my question is...
	They didn't correct that?
	I mean, people knew that right away.
	I remember when that happened.
	I remember playing the clip, and we all talked about the fact, well, you know, no, he wasn't found guilty of rape.
	You have an opportunity there when you're talking about liability with this, and you're talking about lawsuits.
	You know, if you don't correct a mistake, then you're basically going to lose because then it's interpreted as malice, right?
	But if you do make a correction with it, you've got a pretty good chance of saying, well, we just misspoke or whatever.
	But they have settled this in advance.
	Trump is also suing CBS News for $10 billion with a B. A lot of people are angry at ABC for paying off Trump $15 million.
	The settlement describes the money as a, quote, charitable contribution from the broadcaster.
	They said the network will pay a million dollars also in legal fees to Trump's attorneys.
	But ABC News is facing backlash from both sides.
	So you've got conservatives that are upset with him because they misrepresented and argued.
	Very argumentative.
	No, no, he was guilty of rape.
	No, he wasn't.
	So some of the people on the right are saying people are not going to forget what ABC did.
	Meanwhile, on the left, you've got Democrat attorney Mark Elias says, Knee-bent, ring-kissed.
	Another legacy news outlet chooses obedience.
	Another reporter said it's not good for the rest of us when you do this kind of garbage, ABC. A former prosecutor, Joyce Vance, said I'm old enough to remember and to have worked on cases where newspapers vigorously defended themselves against defamation cases instead of folding before the defendant was even deposed.
	That, by the way, includes defamation cases brought by candidates for the presidency.
	And so, again...
	When you look at what is happening with free speech, the people who should be defending it, the press, not defending it.
	And again, I'm sure that there would have been some kind of a judgment, because depending on how they conducted themselves afterwards, but it's the same type of thing that we saw with the Sandy Hook lawsuit.
	It should have been defended.
	I think you have a right to be wrong.
	And so the question would have been, was he just wrong or was he malicious in what he had to do?
	But he didn't want to have that trial, and so he chose not to comply with discovery, as we saw, you know, when they sent the data to the opposing lawyer, data that he said he didn't have.
	And it was a Perry Mason moment, as Alex Jones said.
	They caught him red-handed, lying about the fact that he told everybody, I didn't even get a chance to argue my case.
	They just shut this thing down.
	Well, they shut it down because you didn't comply with discovery.
	And then we saw that he didn't comply with discovery, but he's still telling people that they shut this thing down without having a hearing.
	No, he shut it down without defending the First Amendment.
	Mitt Romney, meanwhile, is really coming after the Democrats.
	The New York Post said he eviscerates them.
	He said, I don't know how they recover.
	And he's not just talking about Lala Hilarious.
	He's also talking about Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, many of the others.
	And so he's leaving.
	He's not going to be running again.
	And...
	He credited Trump for remaking the GOP into the party of the working class, and he predicted that both parties are heading for a recalibration of their policies.
	He said Democrats pushed out the working class, he said.
	He said, the Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren faction of the Democrat Party, with some of this defund the police, and the biological males and women's sports, these things had a lot of people in the working class cause them to just flee the Democrat Party, said Romney.
	He said they've lost their base.
	Union guys and gals have left.
	The Democrat Party is not seen as rich people now, but as college professors and woke skulls.
	So again, when we look at this, what do we do to reform anything?
	Is it all just about the winning?
	When we look at this, is winning everything and the only thing?
	No, I don't think that's the case.
	We really need to have meaningful moral reform.
	You know, there's an excellent article, and I've talked about William Wilberforce in the past, but there's an excellent article talking about what he wrote in 1807 when he stopped the slave trade.
	And we're not going to go through all the details of it, but just to make you aware of it.
	It was called A Letter on the Abolition of the Slave Trade by William Wilberforce.
	It was published less than a month before the British Parliament voted overwhelmingly to abolish the slave trade.
	And it encapsulates two decades of relentless effort by Wilberforce.
	One historian aptly described that parliamentary vote as, quote, one of the turning events in the history of the world.
	And it was.
	Slavery has always existed at every time and in every culture.
	But it was William Wilberforce who single-handedly started to turn this tide, and he did it because of his Christian principles.
	And that's the point of this article, to talk about how effective and how necessary it is for Christians to hold to those principles.
	It's not just about winning.
	It's not about that at all.
	The whole reason he did this fight, and understand, take the biggest things that are out there.
	This is like one guy taking on all of the technocracy, or one guy taking on all of the oil industry, or all the military industrial complex, or all the pharmaceutical, or roll those all together.
	Big pharma, big food, the military industrial complex, roll those all together.
	That was slavery at the time in his country.
	He took all that on and he won.
	And he won because he stood on principle.
	Wilberforce's work is not merely historical.
	It provides a timeless model for how Christians can and should engage in public life.
	It calls us to integrate faith, reason, and courage into our engagement with public policy.
	Wilberforce's approach to public policy was unapologetically grounded in Christian morality.
	By the way, this article is from Christian Post.
	He spoke boldly as a Christian in Parliament, addressing his nation's accountability to God.
	Even in a society that might appear more receptive to Christian values than our own, such declarations were not always welcome.
	Not even in Britain at that time, which is far more accepting of Christian values than America is now.
	Wilberforce begins and ends with a solemn warning.
	He said,"...the slave trade was an abominable evil that placed the British Empire under the judgment of God." His moral clarity cut through the political expediency, challenging his contemporaries to see the slave trade not as an economic necessity, but as a profound moral failing.
	Same thing is true of abortion today, isn't it?
	And so many other issues.
	We always have culture as downstream from religion and politics as downstream from culture.
	Wilberforce paired his moral convictions with meticulous research and evidence.
	He often spent 14 hours a day studying and gathering facts about the slave trade, a pace that he eventually moderated for the sake of his health.
	The rigorous preparation, though, allowed him to systematically counter every objection raised by his opponents.
	Folks, if you don't read, you can't lead.
	You've got to lead with the facts.
	Especially if you're going to do things in the name of truth, in the name of morality, and do things in the name of God.
	You've got to lead with the truth.
	And you've got to know what that is.
	In his letter on the abolition of the slave trade, Wilberforce methodically dismantled pro-slavery arguments, presenting a case so thorough, so compelling, that it could not be ignored.
	His work underscores the importance of combining moral passion with intellectual precision.
	And a lot of hard work.
	He said, it's not enough to simply declare what is right.
	We have to also engage in reasoned, evidence-based advocacy.
	Whether the issue is religious freedom, the sanctity of life, or justice for the marginalized, we must be prepared to make our case with clarity and convictions for us today.
	He faced fierce opposition from powerful interests tied to the slave trade and to colonial economies, and at one point he was challenged to a duel by a slave ship captain, and he received multiple death threats yet he pressed on with unwavering determination.
	Wilberforce confronts his opponents head-on in his book, arguing that the abolition of the slave trade would ultimately benefit the economy.
	He declared that even if economic losses occurred, the moral imperative to end, quote, the most enormous crime of slavery outweighed everything else.
	You know, we have to understand, and the founders of this country understood, that prosperity, like liberty, are a blessing from God.
	And that should be our first concern.
	Our first concern should be to seek God's blessing.
	And that means that we follow the principles that he laid out.
	As I say here in the Christian Post for Christians today, engaging in public life often means standing against cultural tides, enduring criticism, and hostility.
	Wilberforce's example challenges us to speak the truth in love regardless of the cost.
	Transformational change is possible when Christians engage the public square with conviction and perseverance.
	That is the legacy that was taught to us by William Wilberforce.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	That's right, boys and girls.
	There's a post-election sale on silver and gold.
	Trump's euphoria has caused a dip in silver and gold.
	It's time to buy some medals with fiat dollars before they come to their cents.
	Go to davidknight.gold to get in touch with the wise wolf himself, Tony Arterburn.
	He knows where to look to find silver and gold.
	Yark!
	Be out!
	Yeah, when we're talking about silver and gold, one of the things that I always thought about is what is the effect of quantum computing going to be on blockchains and other cryptography?
	A lot of people have said maybe one of the reasons that they are saving everything in Bluffdale, Utah, that I mentioned earlier, and a lot of other places is just keeping an archive.
	Once the computers get fast enough, they go back and create a dossier on everybody and put us all in jail.
	Yeah.
	So, who knows what's going to happen with that.
	That's why I like the privacy and the stability of things that are physical.
	So, again...
	We'll talk a little bit about crypto in this, but I, you know, find anything other than the dollar.
	This is a good time to hedge out of the dollar for sure.
	But I still like the physical stuff, silver and gold, and you can find that at davidknight.gold.
	It'll take you to Tony Ardobin at WiseWolfGold.
	But let's take a look at Google saying that they have created a quantum chip.
	They call it willow.
	They say calculations take five minutes instead of ten septillion years.
	Not reptilian, but septillion.
	Reptilian years, that might be pretty short, like dog years or something, right?
	But septillion.
	Where does that come from?
	Well, you know, you got million and then you got billion as you add another three zeros after the billion.
	You go to the trillion and the quadrillion and so forth.
	This is seven.
	You know, up to seven.
	Billion is two, the septillion is seven.
	But anyway, Google's quantum computing lab said that their new chip, they call Willow, can solve the world's most complex computational problems in a record five minutes.
	According to Google, it would take one of the world's most powerful supercomputers 10 septillion years to complete a similar task, significantly older than the age of the universe.
	How do they know that?
	Did that computer tell them that as well?
	It's got the age of the universe.
	There it is.
	Willow is a significant improvement over Google's previous quantum processor, which in 2019 showed an advantage over classical computers.
	Google said its chip could solve a calculation in three minutes, while the supercomputer would have taken 10,000 years.
	Well, sounds like deep thought from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, doesn't it?
	Of course, deep thought, it took it seven and a half million years.
	Not 10 septillion years, but it took only 7.5 million years to come up with the meaning of life, which was 42. Then they put it back to work desk, get it to figure out what the question was.
	Anyway, one of the main problems with quantum computing remains errors caused by the interaction of qubits with their environment.
	Qubits...
	And that is a Q-U-B-I-T-S, not C-U-B-I-T-S. That kind of qubit is the distance from your elbow to your fingertip.
	Kind of an imprecise measurement, but you know, hey, that was the best thing you think of back then.
	But this is a qubit.
	This is a quantum bit.
	Unlike classical bits, binary bits, which can be in either one or zero state, right?
	Q-bits can be in multiple states at once.
	Making them extremely sensitive to external influences.
	You know, kind of like Trump.
	He can be everything to everybody, and it makes him extremely sensitive to external influences.
	And so, that's the key.
	It kind of hallucinates, I guess.
	Like AI. It's susceptible to external influences.
	Maybe even susceptible to a parallel universe, and we'll get to that in a moment here as well.
	So they said they addressed this problem by adding even more qubits to the system and implementing real-time error correction methods.
	The breakthrough is key to advancing quantum error correction, a concept that was first proposed by Peter Shore in 1995. Well, again, these are the same people.
	You know, they talk about qubits and all the rest of the stuff.
	And Google is talking about how fast their computer is.
	And they also say they appear to have accessed parallel universes.
	Okay, now this is the same group of people that just produced their graphics program that showed 17th century Scotsmen as black and Asian, right?
	I guess that came from a parallel universe or something.
	They're hallucinating about a lot of stuff, and a lot of people are saying that Google is hallucinating not only about the parallel universe thing, but they're also hallucinating about their benchmark.
	It's being criticized by a lot of people, especially their competitors.
	So Google has made an eyebrow-raising claim, saying that its new quantum chip may be tapping into parallel universes to achieve its results.
	Could be.
	Could happen.
	Prove it's not happening.
	Willow, they said, outperforms any supercomputer in the world.
	This mind-boggling number exceeds known time scales in physics and vastly exceeds the age of the universe.
	It lends credence to the notion that quantum computation occurs in many parallel universes in line with the idea that we live in a multiverse, a prediction first made by David Deutsch, a physicist who laid out his multiverse hypothesis in a 1997 book called The Fabric of Reality.
	And all the people at Marvel Comics in DC just grabbed that thing and ran with it.
	You know, it's all about multiverse everything now.
	In which he suggested that quantum computers' calculations take place across multiple universes at the same time.
	Google is suggesting that his chip is so fast that his computations may have taken place across parallel universes, a bombastic statement that unsurprisingly drew plenty of skepticism online.
	And, you know, this whole thing about quantum computing, and again, I have no idea...
	So these people who are positing it, evidently they're able to get some things done, but none of it makes any sense.
	And one of the pioneers in it said, if you say that you understand quantum physics, then you don't understand it.
	Because it is so counterintuitive.
	Encounter to reality.
	It seems like these different particles can be in multiple states at the same time.
	It seems like they can also communicate instantaneously across vast distances, that they're somehow still connected across...
	None of this makes any sense.
	But for the calculation that Willow was tasked to solve, the critics say this wasn't really useful to anybody, this calculation.
	This particular calculation in question...
	It's to produce a random distribution.
	The result of this calculation has no practical use, said a German physicist and science communicator Sabine Hassenfelder.
	She said they use this particular problem because it has been formally proven with some technical caveats that the calculation is difficult to do on a conventional computer.
	Because it uses a lot of entanglement.
	She said that also allows them to say things like, this would have taken a septillion years on a conventional computer, etc.
	Willow is a 100 qubit or quantum bit chip.
	Unlike conventional computers which use zeros and ones, quantum computers rely on qubits which can be on, off, or, counterintuitively, both, thanks to entanglement.
	She said the mysterious phenomenon allows particles to influence each other's states even when separated by distance.
	It's exactly the same calculations that they did in 2019 on an approximately 100 qubit chip.
	Now it's double that size.
	At the time, Google made a similarly bombastic claim, arguing that it had achieved quantum supremacy, as opposed to white supremacy, or black supremacy, whatever.
	The point where quantum computers can do things that classical computers can't, regardless of whether those tasks are useful, said one person who first coined the term in 2012. So, while the announcement is super impressive from a scientific point of view and all, the consequences for everyday life are zero, said Hassenfelder.
	She said, estimates say that we will need about one million qubits for practically useful applications, and we're still about a million qubits away from that.
	In other words...
	If you need a million gibbets and you got a hundred, you're still about a million away.
	Google's claim of quantum supremacy drew immediate criticism in 2019, sparking a years-long feud between the company and quantum computing rival IBM. At the time, IBM researchers charged that Google had exaggerated its claims in a 2023 follow-up blog post.
	IBM researchers said Google's quantum computer was instructed to solve the problem that it's instructed to solve in 2019 could, quote, be performed on a classical system in two and a half days and with far greater fidelity.
	Fidelity.
	So it used to be that if you could get multiple answers...
	With the same input.
	It says something's wrong with your computer programming.
	That was the point that was made about the Imperial College of London.
	The University of Edinburgh, computer scientists, reviewed it.
	They said, this is garbage.
	First of all, the assumptions of the model are wrong.
	And secondly, if you take the same input and run it through successive times, you get different answers each time.
	And they weren't using a quantum computer at the time.
	But they were still hallucinating.
	Anyway, this is, in fact, a conservative worst-case estimate, and we expect that with additional refinements, the classical cost of the simulation can be further reduced, they said.
	So, in other words, IBM is talking about classical versus this.
	There's still a good reason to believe that Google's latest claim that Willow could be operating in the multiverse will be debunked.
	Where all this leaves, Google's breakthrough, and its significance remains debatable.
	I've seen this happening with Google over and over again.
	Google will buy.
	They've got so much money.
	If somebody comes up with something that is good, they buy them, and they destroy it.
	Waze is a good example of that, but I can think of many others.
	You can take a look at Fitbit, the watch, and so forth.
	You know, it is absolute garbage.
	And speaking of garbage, take a look at Google's Christmas ad.
	You know, we've done a couple of Christmas ads.
	Here's Google's Christmas ad.
	So dry.
	This is the guy.
	Winter dryness is not it, especially when I have so many holiday looks to pull off.
	Thankfully, I know just the thing.
	And it's in stock nearby.
	Hydrated skin is a gift to everyone.
	No wrapping needed.
	Happy holidays to me.
	Wow.
	I like the headline from Breitbart.
	Google goes full Jaguar.
	That's about the only way you can describe that.
	They've got Santa with his hand on his head like I can't believe this.
	Yeah, you know Santa everywhere.
	Santa sells, but Jesus saves.
	Just remember that this Christmas season.
	A man wearing women's clothing lamenting over having dry skin during winter during holiday season, of course, not during Christmas season.
	You can't even get that close to it.
	So getting back, though, that's the world, the multiverse that Google lives in.
	They truly are from a different universe, I think.
	And that commercial there proves it.
	It's quantum proof that they live in a different universe.
	But the question that everybody, and one of the reasons I want to look at this, everybody was looking at, could quantum computing threaten Satoshi Nakamoto's 1 million Bitcoin?
	Now this is the anonymous, maybe pseudo-anonymous person who developed Bitcoin, whoever that is.
	And at the beginning of it, When the algorithm was a bit different, Satoshi Nakamoto has a million Bitcoin, and what they're saying is that that older algorithm is now kind of frozen with his stuff, his stuff, or whoever it is, or collective group or whatever.
	But that's frozen, and that's a large quantity, a million Bitcoin.
	And that exposes a vulnerability.
	You know, of course, as computing power develops, and if quantum computing were to develop, you would expect that Bitcoin would change the way that it operates to take that into consideration.
	However, with this frozen core of a million Bitcoins, that creates a bit of an issue.
	And so, you know, should the creator of Bitcoin have their one million coins frozen to prevent exploitation?
	The concern arises due to the vulnerability of Bitcoin's earliest transaction format, when it was a pay-to-public key.
	Satoshi's 1 million Bitcoin presents a high-value target for quantum attackers that could upturn the market.
	Imagine if there was a billion Bitcoins that somehow, you know, got hacked and they're selling this into the market.
	You know, that's what it's going to do to the price.
	Satoshi's Bitcoin resides in the earliest P2PK outputs, a transaction format no longer commonly used because it exposes the owner's public key.
	Since the introduction of P2PKH... A format that hides the public key behind a hash until the coins are spent.
	Because it's not anonymous.
	It is something that is there that can track you.
	Quantum computing use for hacking has become significantly more complex than attacking an unprotected public key.
	So I mention all that because Google is hallucinating.
	They're also hiding things.
	And as I said earlier, the Russian search engine, Yandex, is now the second most popular in the world.
	But to give you an idea of how dominant Google is, I said it was somewhere in the 80% range when I talked about it earlier.
	It's 88% market share for Google.
	And the number two search engine worldwide is the Russian-based search engine Yandex, which only has 3%.
	So number one is 88%, number two is 3%.
	It's not even close.
	And then you've got China's Baidu, which is 2.7%, Microsoft's Bing is 2.6%, and DuckDuckGo is 0.9%.
	Google Chrome proved to be the leader among browsers on all platforms, accounting for 65.8% of the market.
	And I think that's because you've also got a lot of other browsers that are built on top of Google Chrome, things like Brave.
	Pavel Durov's Telegram became the third most popular messenger worldwide, trailing only Meta's WhatsApp and Tencent's QQ. And beating out the likes of Viber and WeChat.
	And then they said that Russia, in addition to Yandex, and Yandex is a search engine that gives you English results.
	And it actually gives you results from me, which Google now doesn't do.
	Google is a search engine designed to hide things and to hide people.
	It gives you an idea of who it is that created Google, doesn't it?
	It's the creation of our intelligence community.
	So the Russians, because of YouTube, and because they've been banned on YouTube, they've now come up with their own version.
	They call it Rutube.
	Are you tube?
	And unfortunately, I looked at it and I saw this article and I go, oh good, well look at that, maybe I can get on there.
	But no, it's all in Russian.
	There's not any English there at all.
	By the way, I'm talking about names.
	We used to put our stuff up on HugeTube, and I thought that was a great name.
	It doesn't mean it's not a joke meaning a huge YouTube.
	It's Utah Gun Exchange.
	Good people.
	I talked several times to the owner of HugeTube.
	He set it up primarily for defending the Second Amendment, and they branched it out to other things.
	But it's really hard to keep up with that kind of stuff.
	and they've just had to close that down.
	So right now where you'll find us is on Rumble, BitChute, and on Odyssey.
	And you can find the links to that if you go to thedavidknightshow.com.
	And you can also find out where you can support us and also where you can get the audio of each day's show as well if you prefer to get it in that format.
	we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back
	music plays
	music plays music plays You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at thedavidknightshow.com.
	And David is giving a 10% discount to listeners from now until 2025.
	At that price, you should be able to buy me several hundred those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. Or you can just order directly from us if you're not Zelensky, and we've got them in stock.
	And you can see here's the t-shirt as well as the sand hoodie.
	Nice designs, and they've come out very nice this time.
	And so we've had shut down our merchandise stuff for a while, but now it's back and up.
	Let's talk in the short amount of time that we've got left.
	Unlocking the Brain's Black Box.
	This is from Study Finds.
	So they discovered distinct wiring of the human memory.
	They were surprised to find that human brains were wired very, very differently than mouse brains.
	Pinky, I'm going to take over the world.
	Yeah, so this is a situation where they actually got...
	I worked with some surgeons who were having to operate on people's brains, and they got some, you know, fresh brains, as Igor would say, and they were able to look at it in detail.
	And what they found was that humans are very different from mice.
	Isn't that amazing how these scientists were surprised to find that out?
	For years, scientists have relied on rodents to understand how our brains work, but what if a mouse brain and a human brain aren't simply scaled versions of each other?
	What if, for example, Men were created in the image of God, unlike the mice.
	And what they found was that humans are different not only in the physiology, but that physiology helps to explain why humans have a superior memory.
	As soon as I started examining the first patient samples, I realized how much we didn't know about the human hippocampus.
	Although this is the best-studied brain region in rodents, it felt like we didn't know a thing about human physiology.
	It is totally different.
	and because we are totally different.
	They said mouse brains might have numerous somewhat imprecise neural connections.
	The human brain appears to have fewer but more targeted pathways.
	This unique wiring might explain our extraordinary ability to form complex memories and to make intricate associations, they said.
	The study challenges not only the existing neuroscientific models, but it opens up exciting new avenues for understanding how we store and retrieve memory, because this is what these people are all about.
	You know, they really want to do the type of stuff that was described in science fiction and total recall.
	They want to be able to change and implant false memories and all the rest of this stuff.
	Oh, it's just to help people with PTSD, right?
	Well, we're finding out that scientists don't know everything.
	It's always good to say that we're going to be open to changing our mind because we don't have complete knowledge about things.
	Well, they call it a black box.
	It always makes me think about Darwin's black box.
	He said, the human eye, even he, with his primitive tools, could understand how complex the human eye was.
	He says, I'm having a hard time imagining that that could have just happened by random chance processes.
	Yeah, me too.
	Have a good day.
	We'll talk to you tomorrow.
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲