All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 6, 2024 - The David Knight Show
19:19
Total Circus: Pedos & Groomers Take Their 'TransKids' Agenda to Supreme Court
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments about whether or not Tennessee and many other states can ban transgender surgeries and hormone treatments for minors.
And look, let's also understand, as I pointed out last week, testicular cancer is something that they found for people who had been using this hormone therapy for quite some time of preparation before they were castrated.
When I first saw the headline, the way it was said, you know, testicular cancer in people who are castrated.
It's like, how does that work?
But it's leading up to it, right?
Years that that happened, and it creates a cancer that then starts spreading throughout your body.
Tennessee's law that I sponsored will effectively be the test case for the nation.
So, we're very excited, said Tennessee Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson.
We're very excited, we're humbled, and cautiously optimistic that the Supreme Court will see it as the Sixth Circuit did.
So, I have one in these challenges prior to this, and one in the Sixth Circuit.
Now, this tranny lawyer, as the headline says from Todd Starnes, a bearded female ACLU attorney, Says that toddlers can be transgender.
This person goes by the name Chase Strangio.
I'm not kidding!
I'm just kidding.
A bearded...
I didn't have to make this one up.
I had to make up Booty Gay and other things like that.
This is Strangio.
Strangio, a bearded woman...
Who, since the circus has now been shut down, she is now working for the ACLU. Who identifies...
I played a gig for the retirement home of the Ringling Brothers in Sarasota one year.
Did a New Year's Eve gig for them.
And that was always highly coveted work.
But that was one strange thing.
But now, we've got bearded women all over the place.
Um...
Become the first openly transgender attorney to argue before the High Court Deputy Director for Transgender Justice.
The ACLU. And here she is so you can see and hear her.
What I would say is nobody has to provide this medication to adolescents.
These are not doctors being forced to provide this medication.
These are doctors who are wanting to treat their patients in the best way that they know how based on the best available evidence to us.
And these are young people who may have known since they were two years old exactly who they are, who suffered for six, seven years before they had any relief.
And what's happening here, it's not the kids who are consenting to this treatment, it's the parents who are consenting to the treatment.
And as a parent, I would say, when our children are suffering, we are suffering.
And these are parents who love their children, who are listening to the advice of their doctors, of the mainstream medical community, and doing what's right for their kids, and the state of Tennessee has displaced their judgment.
Well, you know, remember that it was Mehmet Oz on his TV show a long, long time ago.
Who had a kid there.
And the mom said, yeah, the pediatrician said that he was a girl.
You know, it's like, oh yeah, well how did you handle this?
This is a bipartisan thing.
This insanity is not limited to the Democrat Party.
And you heard her say that this is something, you know, two-year-old and they've suffered with this for six to seven years.
They've suffered up to the point that they're eight or nine years old and they just have to get mutilated and sterilized.
This is criminal.
It's not just stupid.
This is criminal, folks.
And it's time we put a stop to this kind of child abuse.
That's what they correctly did in Tennessee.
And hopefully, when we look at what is said, it is kind of interesting.
But this is why Vox reported it.
This is, Vox headline says, the horrifying implications of today's Supreme Court argument on trans rights.
What do they find horrifying about it?
Not the fact that you are going to mutilate and sterilize these kids and driving many of them to suicide after they get this bottom surgery and it completely destroys their life.
That's the issue.
It's treatments for children.
That's the issue here.
Since while the conservative justices acknowledged studies on both sides of the debate over risk, the liberal justices seemed to dismiss studies that were inconsistent with striking down the law as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
That produced a difficult moment for Solicitor General Elizabeth Preliger when Supreme Court Justice Alito confronted her about statements made in her filing with the court.
Alito quoted her petition to the court that claimed that there was, quote, overwhelming evidence, unquote, supporting the use of puberty blockers and hormone treatments as a safe and positive results for children.
Again, children.
Prove it.
Prove it.
By the way, whether or not it was safe and effective, right?
Let's say that they were able to give them surgery and these kids were able to urinate properly and all the rest of the stuff the rest of their life, which they're not.
Let's say that that was safe and effective.
And all you did was sterilize and mutilate them.
Let's say there wasn't a mutilation.
Let's say that they got it all right.
That actually is a mutilation.
And let's say that the hormone blockers don't do things like cause cancer and other stuff like that.
The kids still don't have the Maturity and their parents don't have the right to sterilize them.
Do we support that anywhere else?
Where else can parents decide, well, I think that I should sterilize my kids?
Justice Alito, however, cited extensive countervailing research from European countries, showing significant risks and potential harm.
Even, even the World Health Organization Has recognized these risks and the lack of evidence supporting these procedures and researchers in Finland recently published a study showing that suicides among kids with gender dysphoria are extremely rare in contradiction to one of the most common arguments made for this treatment.
And I've covered many times some of them high-profile celebrity trans kids.
Who have committed suicide or have talked about it publicly, wanting to commit it because of the results of these mastectomies and these other mutilations that they've had, the bottom surgery as they say?
Alito also cited the UK's Cass Review.
It was released shortly after the Biden lawyer, Preliger, had filed her statement saying that there's overwhelming evidence.
He says, no, the Cass study found scant evidence that the benefits of transgender treatment are greater than the risks.
And then, says Jonathan Hurturley, he delivered the haymaker.
He said, I wonder if you would like to stand by your statement in this position, or if you think it would now be appropriate to modify that and withdraw your statement.
In other words, you lied to this court, and we caught you on it.
And then you had the ACLU attorney that I played for you earlier, Strangio.
Who had previously argued that children as young as two years old can identify themselves as transgender and then suffer for six or seven years until they're eight or nine and the monsters that say that they're medical mutilate them.
Strangio seemed to later acknowledge that very few gender dysphoric children actually go through with suicide.
Sotomayor seemed intent on diffusing the problem.
With the opposing scientific research in her exchange with Tennessee Solicitor General Matthew Rice, in his argument, Rice stated, quote, they cannot eliminate the risk of detransitioners.
So it becomes a pure exercise of weighing benefits versus risk.
And the question of how many minors have to have their bodies irreparably harmed for unproven benefits is one that is best left to the legislature.
So he didn't just say, you have no business here.
This is not anything that has to do with your authority.
This is when Sotomayor then interjected, I'm sorry, counselor, but every medical treatment has a risk, even taking aspirin.
There's always going to be a percentage of population under any medical treatment that's going to suffer harm.
You know, it's like somebody starts a war, right?
Well, people are going to die.
Sorry that happened.
Sorry we bombed that hospital.
But, you know, things like that happen.
It's got to be done, you know.
You don't care.
It's rare.
Rare, right?
According to studies, aspirin can have potential side effects that are largely quite mild, as he points out, including these things, though.
We're talking about irreversible double mastectomy, not like aspirin effect.
Genital surgeries, sterilization, infertility.
There can also be long-term effects in terms of bone growth, bone density, and other developmental areas.
And, of course, also cancer from this hormone therapy.
The hormone therapy that we used to use on convicted rapists that they're now using on gas-lit kids.
The point is not that the justices should resolve this medical debate, says Turley.
But that it is properly resolved elsewhere, including in the state legislative process.
And of course our federal system says that not everything needs to be decided by the Supreme Court or the federal government.
States have authority in these things.
It could have saved 63 million plus lives.
If the governors, first in Texas over the Roe v.
Wade thing, but all the rest of the governors should have said, you've made your decision, let's see you enforce it.
You're wrong about this, and you have no authority to define when life begins.
I said that for a decade before Dobbs, and finally the Supreme Court said what I'd been saying all along.
Sotomayor's aspirin analogy seemed gratuitously dismissive for many, but Reminiscent of the response to scientists who questioned COVID protocols and policies, from everything from the six-foot rule to mask efficacy.
Well, of course, Jonathan Turley is not going to say even, you know, the Trump vaccine, because he's a Fox contributor.
So he's not going to talk about people who questioned the vaccine.
People who questioned even the virus.
No, no.
But he says, for scientists attacked and deplatformed for years, Sotomayor's statements are painfully familiar.
The thrust of the comments from the justices were dismissive of the science supporting Tennessee and 23 states with similar laws.
I'm sorry, that was just one justice.
That was Sotomayor.
No one is arguing against adults being able to opt for such treatment.
See, that's the important thing, too.
But such states do not want children to be subject to the treatments in light of this ongoing debate.
We had Navy SEAL, the Navy SEAL that was pushed and put up on public, you know, by Michael Flynn in 2015.
Chris, I forgot what his last name is.
His name was Christopher, and they went by Chris.
But they got a Navy SEAL to transition.
And then eventually he detransitioned in the last year or two.
And he said, if they can gaslight me, an adult, a Navy SEAL, think what they can do to the kids out there.
And, of course, it was Michael Flynn.
Michael Flynn.
Look how we are checking all the DEI boxes.
Don't talk to me about Trump being opposed to all this stuff.
Trump and his cronies and people like Michael Flynn were pushing this from the very beginning.
Trump pushed the training stuff for his beauty contests.
Sotomayor in 2022 similarly humiliated herself during arguments over the Biden administration's VAX mandates by claiming that over 100,000 children were actively hospitalized with COVID when the real number was 3,300.
And that itself was a lie, based on rigged PCR tests.
The Omicron variant and denial of treatment was as deadly as Delta, she said, and that COVID deaths have never been higher.
None of that was true.
She also described herself as a product of affirmative action.
I think we know that.
You're a poster child for DEI. She also argued in 2022 that anyone who is familiar with the FBI crime stats must be banned from the Capitol case juries because they would have racial bias.
Well, then also involved in taking up the cause of mutilating children.
Was Brown Jackson, Ketanji Brown Jackson, who President Biden selected after pledging in a corrupt backroom deal with South Carolina Representative James Clyburn to pick a black woman for the Supreme Court.
In exchange for his endorsement, she compared the bans on child sex changes to bans on interracial marriage.
This is from Information Liberation, by the way.
Ketanji Brown Jackson just compared bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage, tweeted Greg Price.
And of course, you know, this is the woman who famously couldn't say what a woman is.
Remember that?
In her confirmation hearings.
Asked by the Tennessee Senator, Marsha Blackburn, what is a woman?
Well, I can't say.
These people are DEI clowns.
They're political hacks in black robes.
The question was whether it was discriminatory because it applied to both races and it wasn't necessarily invidious or whatever.
But, you know, as I read the statute here, excuse me, the case here, you know, the court starts off by saying that Virginia is now one of 16 states which prohibit and punish marriage on the basis of racial classifications.
And you look at the structure of that law, And it looks in terms of, you know, you can't do something that is inconsistent with your own characteristics.
It's sort of the same thing here.
That's her argument.
This is a kind of mental midget that you get with DEI politics.
She can't even make a coherent argument.
Everything to her is about race.
It's all about race.
So this must be like the law that prohibited interracial marriage.
That's what this transing of kids is all about, isn't it?
To her.
She said it's sort of the same thing.
So it's interesting to me that we now have this different argument, and I wonder whether Virginia could have gotten away with what they did here by just making a classification argument the way that Tennessee is in this case.
How pathetic.
Alito, in his questioning with his trans lawyer, you know, this guy right here.
A woman.
Strange you, right?
So...
Alito says that she is there, the woman dressed like a man, like Victor Victoria, confused.
She's making the argument that this has to be done to prevent suicide.
That's the benefit here.
These kids are going to commit suicide if we don't mutilate and sterilize them.
So Alito says, well, you know, the Cass Report finds no evidence that gender-affirmative treatments reduce suicide.
In other words, prove it.
Strangio, that person there, says there is no evidence in those studies that the treatment reduces completed suicide.
Yes, but there are multiple studies that do show that there is a reduction in suicidality.
In other words, ideation of suicide.
I don't think so.
Prove that.
And to assert that somebody is maybe thinking about it, Give me a break.
Lest anyone forget, Rights, Information, Liberation, Justice Gorsuch and John Roberts poured oil on the fire of this trans insanity by ruling in 2020 that transgenders must be considered a protected class under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
This case would have not even been brought if Roberts and Gorsuch hadn't done that.
But now this is about children.
This is not even about the alphabet mafia.
This is about children.
Gorsuch was silent during arguments Wednesday.
Didn't ask a single question during the roughly two and a half hour long proceedings.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events.
But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support.
Sharing the show, subscribing, and even just hitting the like button all help.
And if you found our show helpful, Please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth.
▲
Export Selection