All Episodes
Sept. 30, 2024 - The David Knight Show
03:01:52
The David Knight Show -10/1/2024
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It's not going live, Lance.
Go live. What's wrong?
No, it's 5939.
It's not... Okay.
Alright. Alright.
Go live. Alright.
Hit record. And...
♪♪♪ Using free speech to free minds.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 1st of October.
Dear Lord, 2024.
you Today, folks, we're going to take a look at organ donation in the U.S. Clearly, it's nothing but murder.
It's absolutely amazing what is going on.
Of course, we have seen this for the longest time in terms of the baby parts by Planned Parenthood.
They told you that they had to get the babies delivered.
And then kill them by organ donation.
But this is happening across the country to people of every age.
If you support it for the most innocent among us, it'll come back to you.
We're also going to talk about a bill to end pharmaceutical immunity going back to 1986.
Well, we'll talk about the implications of that.
And we also have everyone who's running for political office on both sides, Democrats as well as Trump, furious and wanting to end free speech in the First Amendment.
Just amazing that they say this out loud.
We'll be right back. Well, Handy contacted us yesterday.
I showed the picture of that massive biolab fire.
They called it a biolab. It turns out what they're saying now is that it's a pool supply place.
That was the most recent information I could see.
Which means they got a lot of chlorine.
Which means they're talking about chlorine gas, which is like World War I. But Handy sent this because it's now going into the Atlanta area.
He says, here I am wearing a mask.
And this time it's for a good reason.
This time it could help to cut down these large particles.
So we wish him well.
And the people that are there, he says, I just want to share a rare picture of me in a mask.
I'm assisting with evacuation in Atlanta this evening.
And it is truly amazing.
90,000 Georgia residents taking shelter after a chemical fire there.
And some of the people talking about it said, well, we've got firefighters who are using detectors to check the air quality.
I wonder if they're PCR tests.
PCR tests on the air.
Not to make fun of the tragedy.
It's just that the PCR testing sewer water to try to create the next pandemic.
And they used PCR testing of sewer water in Gaza to unleash biological warfare against the people there with polio shots.
Northeast of Atlanta.
One person named Erin Johnson took her great things outside in Swanee on Monday morning.
She said she encountered a foggy air that just slapped you in the face.
She said, I used to work at a water park, and it felt like I was walking into a pool house.
Well, that's because that's what blew up there, I guess.
So telling people to stay indoors, close their windows and doors, turn off the air conditioning.
That same woman who was there said she got a headache.
She's been coughing. She said my upper chest and throat have been tight all day.
When she went to let the dogs out again, she said the air smelled like latex, but not as strong as earlier.
I still don't feel 100% normal, she said, in the afternoon.
So, of course, the schools have been locked down.
Students told to wear masks. No, no, no.
Schools are open. Students are not masked.
I mean, it's like they're trying to kill us.
Could they possibly be this stupid?
No, they did not cancel school.
You know, this is the whole thing about masks.
You got to know when to hold them.
You got to know when to fold them.
When you've got a real disaster, you got to know when to walk away and when to run.
But these people, if they know anything, they're telling you exactly the opposite.
Again, it's a swimming pool and spa water care division.
A facility has been there since 1973.
A chlorine-laden cloud rolled through the area.
Again, we're talking about World War I levels.
Had a great uncle who was gassed in World War I. And he had a hole in his throat where they had to...
Do not just a tracheotomy, but other things and everything.
And he used this.
I mean, this is going way back.
I was very young. I was in the 60s.
And he had this thing that he, even then, thing that he could put on his throat.
That when he would talk, since he didn't have voice box, when he would talk, it would make this sound, which I didn't hear again anything like that.
It was just really strange.
I was very young. It made a big impression on me.
I never heard anything like that again until they started doing the voices of the Cylons in Battlestar Galactica.
It was pretty crazy, but that was how I had to communicate.
And so when we look at...
Emissions that we should not be afraid of.
They are shutting down our power supply everywhere.
And when we look at what they're doing in the UK, it is absolutely criminal.
It's just beyond belief that they could get away with this.
But they're going to do it here if we don't stop them.
Already, you've got power requirements of AI. They're the equivalent of adding three New York cities to the grid.
Just from AI. And this is the Wall Street Journal.
So, are they concerned about green?
Are they concerned about emissions?
No, they never cared about this stuff.
It was always about creating control.
And that's why they're going to move out of the way for artificial intelligence, because it is going to be the means of control.
As they take everything away from us, move us into austerity, poverty, slavery, and The AI is going to give them, they will have all the power.
You will have no power. You not only own nothing, you'll have no power to run the appliances and the cars and anything that are all electric that they've told you you must buy them instead of anything else.
They are corralling us folks into a, they're funneling us into slavery.
It just keeps progressing.
We've got to stop this.
We've got to stop this march.
And of course, you're not going to hear Trump or Lala say anything to contradict any of this stuff.
They don't care. And if anybody does know, it's probably somebody like J.D. Vance who's with the technocrats.
Oh, it's important. Got to do it.
AI, so important.
Got to compete with the Chinese.
And it's going to create so many jobs.
Yeah, right. Many places, the nation's high-voltage electric wires are locked up by data centers for artificial intelligence.
Nothing for us, everything for them in this techno-feudalism.
So, we look at what is happening in Britain.
This truly is an amazing example of where this is going.
And the headline from Breitbart gets it right.
It's about de-industrialization because de-industrialization is the penultimate thing before depopulation, really.
I mean, they've got all the different ways that they can kill us all.
They can use wars.
They can use disease.
They can use vaccines and other things like that.
But for the longest time, we have pointed out People that I've worked for and with have pointed out that cheap, available energy is not just a quality of life issue.
It's also about life expectancy.
And so, Britain is going through de-industrialization.
This is the penultimate step.
Britain's final coal plant closed yesterday.
Britain's last steel blast furnace closed yesterday.
And they are hundreds of miles apart, but they are part of the same agenda to take everything down.
Britain's final coal-fired power station and its final steel plant shut their doors today, a consequence of the government's hard push for decarbonization.
No, they got it right.
It's deindustrialization.
The headline got it right. And it's not about decarbonization.
It's about depopulation ultimately via austerity, poverty, slavery.
Indigenous steelmaking capacity is crucial for the defense industry, they said.
But you see, these people who are running Britain, the people who are running Canada, the people who are running America, people who are running Germany and France, don't care about their nation.
As a matter of fact, if you care about your nation, you're denounced as far right.
We just had an election where a freedom party in Germany and Austria, that was actually in Austria, won unprecedented numbers there.
And of course in Germany it's the AFD, the Alternative for Deutschland.
Anybody that cares about nationalism, you're denounced as extreme far-right, you're a Nazi!
Because if these people who are running everything and running the media, if they're communists, everybody to the left of them is denounced as a fascist.
And their one definition of fascism is nationalism.
If you want your country to do well, if you want your family to do well, you're a fascist.
Everything must be sacrificed to the common good.
Everything must be sacrificed to a global governance.
That's why one of the big issues, big differences between communism and any other form of government is that the communists wanted international government.
They wanted a one-world government.
That's why their anthem was the Internationale and so forth, right?
Always about global governance.
And so, yeah, you can have people who are fascists who want to rule the world as well.
And the real issue, economically, of course, the difference is that the communists seize the means of control, seize industry.
They didn't necessarily, they weren't so bent on self-destruction.
The communists wouldn't even shut down their own industry.
They would try to run it. They would take it over.
They would seize it. So that's one of the differences between communism, nationalism, and the technocracy.
Technocracy wants to shut it down.
Except for them. They'll have their own personal nuclear reactors, their own Mr.
Fusions. They'll be paid for by the government.
We've got Sam Altman lobbying to get the government to build nuclear power reactors.
For him. Only for him.
They don't want to share any of this power with you.
They'll be just as big enough...
For the AI surveillance centers and propaganda centers and censorship centers.
No power for you.
Because political power doesn't just come out of the barrel of a gun.
It comes out of an oil barrel as well, doesn't it?
Or a coal mine.
So, these people don't care about having steel for a defense industry because they don't want to defend their country.
As a matter of fact, these people who are running our countries, as we saw four years ago, with Trump and the rest of them, they want to destroy our country.
They don't care about saving anything, and if it requires war, fine.
You know, they're working on, you know, do they have any qualms whatsoever about the bombs that are being unleashed everywhere?
No, they don't care.
More of them. Build more bombs.
You know, what's the carbon footprint of a bomb?
You ever seen the Pentagon talk about that?
No, instead the Pentagon's talking about, well, we've got to electrify our Jeeps and tanks and nonsense like that.
But they don't want to protect their nation.
They don't protect our borders.
Instead of protecting our borders, they are fomenting war around the globe.
That's what our so-called Defense Department does.
Time to rename it what it originally was called, the Department of War, because that's all it's about.
It's about creating wars all over the globe while they do nothing to defend our own country.
And in Britain, they're not going to have any steel, so they're not going to have any defense industry.
But that's fine because they don't want the nation of Britain to exist.
They don't want any nation to exist.
It all must be subsumed under them.
They don't want anybody to have any means of defense.
I mean, this is a kind of arms control, isn't it?
So, these leaders want to destroy our country.
Each, it doesn't matter what political party, it doesn't matter what country, they're all against the people of their own country.
And if you aren't, you're denounced as far-right extremists.
Because they're the radical Marxist ideology, but it's worse than Marxism. It's technocracy Hundreds of miles away from each other, but these two plants two of the final bastions of the British Industrial Revolution shut forever The respective demises are very linked through the slow-burning, but very much ongoing British electricity price crisis rat cliff on soar Once the cutting-edge and coal-fired steam turbine
electricity production and the blast furnace at Port Talbot both closed on Monday Coincidentally, this happened just days after fresh figures show that Britain has the most expensive electricity prices in the world.
In the world, and by a considerable margin.
As a matter of fact, when you look at the electricity prices, I think it is something like four times the average price of what we're seeing in America.
But we're going to catch up really quickly.
When you look at the projects being built off of Long Island, these wind fields, these wind farms out in the ocean that are owned by foreign companies, foreign oil companies, And it's going to make electricity there about 10 times more expensive.
No exaggeration.
Their profits alone, their profits alone are going to be something in the neighborhood of 50 some odd dollars per megawatt hour at the wholesale level.
Compared to the entire cost today of $34 per megawatt hour.
Their profits are going to be 50 something Whereas the entire cost to the consumer is 34.
That's how rapacious this grift is, this green grift.
And if we don't stand against this and shut this down, if we don't oppose it at its root, at the foundational lines, it's not enough to say, well, I'm going to play around with the Paris Climate Treaty, which Trump didn't do the last time.
It's not enough to say, well, I think we can come up with zero emissions by creating hydrogen cars or something like that.
Look, That's never going to happen.
And if it did, it would still be ridiculously expensive.
Why are we letting them rob us like this?
Just one scheme after the other to transfer everything that we have, including not just our money, but including our power to these few elite.
So it was originally meant to shut down in 2022 because it was going to be the Conservative Party in the UK that shut it down, you see?
This is both parties.
Whenever you're talking about a MacGuffin, it's always both parties.
The political philosophy that they sell you at election time, the issues that they sell you at election time, they don't matter.
They're taking orders from this globalist cabal for global governance.
The World Economic Forum, the WHO, Bilderberg, Davos, they're all in Club of Rome.
All of them are working together.
What do you call that?
Is it a conspiracy? You know, conspiracy literally comes from the fact that people are breathing together.
Yeah, they're all breathing together.
They've all got exactly the same agenda and exactly the same timeline as we saw in 2020-2021 as Trump and Biden, it doesn't matter which one of them you had, They're both doing exactly the same stuff at exactly the same time as these other countries.
Okay, we told you we're going to do this two months ago.
Now we're going to do this today, and in two months, this is the next thing we're going to do.
That's not an emergency.
That's an agenda.
That's an incremental tyranny.
That's not responding to an emergency.
So, it was supposed to shut down in 2022.
They granted it a stay of execution after Russia invaded Ukraine, sending the global energy market into crisis.
As the supply of gas to Europe suddenly became unpredictable and fraught with political difficulties.
Political difficulties. You see, if they boil the frogs too quickly, there'll be problems for them.
So, they have to do it incrementally.
It's like Fauci said.
You do it from the inside.
You do it with disruption.
And you do it incrementally.
Incrementally. That's the way they do all these MacGuffins.
Now, here's the key thing.
You know, they said closed permanently.
And I know you're thinking, well, they could start it back up again.
No, listen to this.
The power station is now to be pulled down.
And the land redeveloped.
Removing any chance of reactivating the plant.
You see, this is a conquest.
This is a conquest. When people come in and they do a conquest, they rip down what is there.
They take it down to the ground.
And you can see this happening as our monuments are being ripped down.
You can see this happening when Islam would come in and take over a country.
They'd rip down all of the churches or the synagogues or whatever, and they would put up their mosques.
That's what these people are doing.
This is a conquest.
Are we going to let them? Going back to the Thatcher administration, they said, you know, Margaret Thatcher, whether you like her or not, this was the old school where leaders would do things to protect their own country.
And so she went to the line with the miners' strike to keep the coal plants open.
She put her entire political career and party and all that on the line to fight the unions to keep coal flowing because that was a power for the country.
Now we have the Labor Party in charge, but of course it was also the conservatives.
Both the Labor and Tory parties are quizlings for the UN agenda.
Quizlings. Traitors.
They don't care.
She clashed with powerful coal unions which attempted to shut the country down with strikes.
And so coal has serious advantages over other sources of energy.
It's cheap. It's available in large quantities domestically here as well.
Reduces our reliance on unreliable foreign partners.
Can easily be stockpiled and ready for use.
You see, the CIA doesn't want us coming after coal any more than any of these other globalist organizations.
Because as I pointed out over and over again, When Newsweek and Time Magazine said in 1979, we're going to be out.
There's only so much oil on the ground.
The Tower Power was singing. We're going to be out of energy by the mid-1980s.
No oil and no gas is all going to be gone by the mid-1980s.
But at the same time, they said we had coal that would last us for centuries.
We've only got another six or seven years of oil and gas, but we've got 666 years.
I thought that was interesting. They come up with 666 for coal.
Trying to demonize it.
Coal is the devil. We got 666 years of coal left.
And of course, they're not saying, well, we've got to go to coal.
That's what we've got. Let's use coal.
No. No, let's shut it down because that's what we've got.
The point is to make us dependent, always.
So, Labor and the Tories are finishing the job, these quizlings of the UN. So, therefore, the number one enemy of the environmentalists who hate freedom, they hate freedom, they don't hate emissions, they are targeting coal.
Conservative former finance minister George Osborne introduced a carbon tax in 2013.
Conservative. What are these conservatives, these Tories in the UK, what are they trying to conserve?
Other than their own wealth and power.
That carbon price in 2013 made generating electricity with coal artificially more expensive through taxes to force generators to other sources.
By 2015, in just two years, the government announced that it would force the phase-out of all coal-powered generation within a decade.
Well, they've done that. Done that.
A year early.
That target was met today, yesterday.
UK carbon taxes killed 93% of coal-fired energy generation.
See, the power to tax is the power to destroy.
And you can expect that they're going to put arbitrary taxes on everything of ours that they want to destroy.
Our transportation, our fuel, our food, everything they want to destroy, they will tax it.
And that's what they're talking about in the UN. We gotta have global taxes on carbon and all the rest of this stuff.
The problem is electricity is now extremely expensive in the UK. Indeed, it is the most expensive in the world, thanks to government taxes and regulations.
Electricity has increased in price 124%, more than doubled, in the past five years.
Contrasted to the United States, electricity in the United Kingdom is four times more expensive, but we're going to catch up to them.
Because they're rolling this stuff out.
The apex example of heavy industry fleeing expensive energy is the production of steel.
And that's why it is all being done in China, where they have the cheapest electricity.
They're given an exemption in this so-called global climate change worry, right?
Oh, don't worry.
It's only the carbon dioxide over America and Europe that we have to worry about.
We don't have to worry about the carbon dioxide over China or any of this other imaginary nonsense.
So we got unicorn farts.
We got a shutdown in America and Europe.
But we don't worry so much about it over China and India.
They can produce as much as they want.
UK Steel, a company, complained in July that its plants were paying double for electricity what was paid in France and Spain.
They pay twice as much as France and Spain, four times as much as America.
They don't even say what the multiple is for China.
The UK now faces a coming winter without a capacity to fire up reserve coal-fired power plants to even out market price fluctuations.
Or to even simply keep the lights on in a crisis.
So, as a result, Justin Trudeau is in deep, deep trouble. His party is in fourth place as elections are starting to come up.
Let's hope that they finally get him out.
I couldn't believe that he got re-elected after what happened in 2020.
And in Austria, and this is even a headline from Zero Hedge.
Zero Hedge just repeats the narrative.
Austrian right-wing Freedom Party.
Look, Stop parroting all this stuff.
To me, call everything that is nationalist right wing.
It's like this idiotic thing is saying, okay, you're going to be the red team now.
I know it's always been the color of communism, but now you're going to be, okay, good.
We'll be the red states and we'll be this and that.
The Austrian Freedom Party has scored a historic victory in national elections.
Now, listen to these radical, fascist right-wingers, what their key issues are.
Winning the most votes in the country's national election for the first time after the Euroskeptic Party campaigned.
First of all, they don't like the European Union.
Okay. I agree with that.
They campaigned on mass deportation, cracking down on illegal immigration.
That's a problem, yeah.
And halting aid to the giant money laundromat that is Ukraine.
Well, even Zero H says it's a giant laundromat.
Well, that's not really right.
What it is, is it's really a cash machine for our politicians.
And people say, what?
What is going on? Are we going to get any help?
And North Carolina and Tennessee and Georgia and everything for the massive destruction that was done with flooding.
And also in Tampa, but it seemed like it was far more in this area, the amount of rain that happened, just washing away the interstate.
And not just washing away the road, washing away the foundation.
I mean, they've got a lot to build up before they can even get to the level where the road used to be.
So are we going to get any help from that?
Everybody is skeptical.
They know that Biden and the GOP leadership at least, most of the GOP, people like Mike Johnson and all of the Tennessee delegation voted to send all the money that Biden wanted to Ukraine.
All the money that Biden wanted to the IRS. That's why I said, I don't care.
Who wins the presidential election?
And I don't care who wins these congressional elections either.
If I vote for local elections, it'll be only to vote for local elections.
It will not be because I'm going to vote for anybody in the Tennessee congressional Republican group.
I'm certainly not going to vote for Trump or Biden.
But when you look at this, of course, everything goes to Ukraine.
Why is it that everything goes to Ukraine?
And why is it that there's no end to all the money that we put into the green grift?
The Green New Deal, the Green New Steel.
Why is that? Well, because they're getting kickbacks when they give this money to corporations for the green stuff.
They're getting kickbacks when they give it to Ukraine.
It's just that simple.
These politicians at the top are getting kickbacks on this stuff, which is one of the most corrupt governments the world has ever seen.
Nowhere on earth in history have we ever seen billions of dollars poured into a national capital from even international sources and vested interests like we do now in our elections.
That's your metric.
That corrupt, satanic black hole in Washington that we call the federal government, it's feral.
It's gone feral.
It's not domesticated anymore.
It's not our friend.
It's not our ally. It's not our pact.
It doesn't take orders from us.
It is feral.
It is wild.
It is predatory. It seeks only what is in its own interest.
So Austria's traditional political powers have, however, pledged to block The Conservative Freedom Party from forming a government.
We saw this as well in France, didn't we?
We saw the Nationalist Party there.
One just trounced Macron in the European Parliament elections so badly that he called an election.
Well, they came in in first place in that first election by a long shot, and Macron came in third place, kind of like Trudeau is in fourth place right now.
And so they had one more election.
And in that election, what they did was they conspired between Macron's party and they created a coalition of leftist, Marxist, socialist parties along with Macron.
And they said, okay, we'll do what RFK Jr.
is trying to do on the ballot without any success.
You know, we will get off the ballot in areas where, you know, we'll look at this and we'll kind of redistrict the country.
And we'll say, okay, your candidate is stronger in this area than our candidate.
So our candidate will just pull out so we don't split the left-wing, radical, Marxist vote.
And that allowed them to win, even though The vote totals for the French National Party went up after they trounced Macron in the European Parliament elections.
When they had the first round of national elections, their vote total went up from where it had been with the European elections.
And when they went to the final round, their vote total went up.
And the vote total of the leftist coalition and Macron's party went down significantly.
But guess what? In terms of who got the seats, They crashed down into third place, the Nationalist Party, because of these types of things.
They have fought to keep Gert Wilders from having a coalition in the Netherlands.
They are going to fight to keep the Austrians who won the election from having a coalition.
The radical Marxist left will do anything to get power.
They will do anything to hang on to power.
They are no different from the Democrats in this country.
And the Democrats who talk about democracy make a mockery of democracy.
They don't care about election.
Their candidate never stood for anything, never got a single vote.
Lala Harris never got a single vote.
This whole thing is rigged and manipulated in the same way that Macron and the radical left manipulated France and the way they have manipulated these other places, these parliamentary elections.
Of course, what happens is there, they do a lot of the manipulation after the election.
That's when the coalitions are formed.
Here in America, the difference with a two-party system is that you make these coalitions before the election.
And so that's what's happening.
They've made this coalition to shut down the election, regardless of what happens.
Even if you had an honest vote total, they set this up to shut it down.
Well, Babylon Bee has actually filed a lawsuit against the state of California because Gavin Newsom signed a series of laws against quote-unquote deepfakes, but it's really a law against parity.
We all know what parody is, and it's very easy for us to figure out what is real and what is not real.
As a matter of fact, coming up, Handy sent me not just that picture of him in a mask with the hazardous stuff.
He sent me a commercial, and I imagine you've seen it.
It's been around since August.
I don't watch TV. I haven't watched TV since 1996 when we moved to the woods.
Ha ha! But we couldn't get TV. It was great.
God blessed us and my family to cut off our television.
We could barely get pagers.
I mean, you know, the Mossad would have a hard time executing me out there in that area.
But we couldn't get anything.
We couldn't get broadcast TV. There was no cable run out there.
It was too far out. So we were surprised in the 90s.
When we traveled and checked into a hotel and we turned on the TV and there's one ad after the other from these pharmaceutical companies because that was when they were buying the media.
Ask your doctor stuff.
I always looked at it for the longest time and say, who would ever buy this stuff?
You know, they got pictures of people running through the fields in slow motion as you got some announcer reading it off rapid fire.
All the different things that are going to kill you.
You know, different things that could happen.
It's like, who in the world would buy this stuff?
Well, I don't know that anybody's asking their doctor.
The real point is that Pfizer and all these pharmaceutical companies were buying the media.
I mean, you're not going to bite the hand that feeds you.
And it's all brought to you by Pfizer.
So, speaking of parodies...
And I'll show it to you when we get to coming up here.
But Handy sent me this commercial.
Maybe you've seen it. And it's a Pfizer commercial.
And everybody's just laughing.
Like it's in derision.
And the motto is supposed to be, laughing is contagious.
So is RSV. So go get your vaccine.
And they're all just laughing.
To me, it looks like laughing and derision.
And it was so...
Offensive. And so disgusting.
I really...
Well, I said, I know it's handy, but I think he's been had here.
I had to go get...
I had to look it up, and yeah, it's for real.
I found, you know, the advertising publication that was talking about that particular commercial and all that stuff.
And it's like, wow.
Wow, they actually put that out.
But, you know, parody...
We can usually tell, parody, and we can talk to each other and figure out if it's real or not.
But these tyrants, like grabbing nuisance in California, are humorless.
According to the complaint from Babylon Bee, one of California's new laws will require social media platforms to notify the state with, quote, reports about user posts with materially deceptive content, and then remove or label them.
These tyrants are humorless.
And I remember it was Daily Beast did an article about, in the early days of Babylon Bee, and they didn't, you know, realize.
And I put it up and I used the same title that Babylon Bee had done.
But Hillary Clinton says she's only 50% reptilian DNA and it was a joke a very funny joke making fun of Elizabeth Warren Who talked about how oh look I've got some Indian DNA and it's like yeah, well your Indian DNA is It's about 1 10th of what the average white person in America has you know everybody's if you go back You probably got some Indian DNA. Well. She's whiter than the average white boy, okay?
And that was the point they were making.
What they did was to make fun of it with Hillary Clinton and all the lizard DNA stuff.
But Gavin Nuisance doesn't have a sense of humor about that kind of stuff either.
It's just like the Daily Beast.
Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll come back before I go.
Big Brit is back again.
Says, Turto will still win.
Yeah. Yeah, Justin Turto.
It's like Macron.
You never get rid of him.
They are chosen by the World Economic Forum.
That's right. One of the young leaders that Klaus is so happy about.
Matter of fact, we talk about Justin Turto.
I'm not going to put it on because it's kind of crude.
But it was an AI parody.
Again, this should not be allowed.
We should take this away, right?
It was an AI parody of Trump.
Saying, well, I sold you the gold sneakers and I sold you the NFTs and I sold you my Bibles and all the rest of the stuff.
And now I've got golden turds covered in fake gold.
Okay, of course. But it's his very own excrement there.
It made me think of...
When they got the Ark of the Covenant back from the Philistines and they put inside of it tumors or hemorrhoids, as some people translate.
It's like, what in the world is that about?
Of course, they were getting hemorrhoids or tumors from its presence.
God was striking with that.
But now you could get your gold-plated excrement from Trump.
Anyway, Octospook. Coal makes America strong and Americans and America independent from world government control.
That's why they want it out of there.
That's right. They want us under their thumb.
That's the reason this is happening.
Yeah, we all know that.
We all know that. And we see this.
And we see our countries being ripped apart, destroyed to the ground.
Everything that's been built, our history is being destroyed.
Our industry is being destroyed.
Our freedom, our wealth, everything.
And it's just, I've had this slow motion, front seat to the slow motion destruction for too long.
And it's really, really bothering me.
Well, we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back Music playing
in
listening to The David Knight Show.
Let's talk a little bit about follow-up to Hurricane Helene.
Lean on Earth. It really is.
Especially in Asheville. Asheville cut off from the world.
Damage estimated to be $100 billion.
They don't know. Again, the pictures you see, as I mentioned before, the interstate just ripped up.
Foundation has even gone for the road.
Asheville and other parts of western North Carolina cut off from the world on Saturday with no roads open into or out of.
The most populous city in the region.
And electricity and cell towers.
Limited or inoperable.
Nearby spruce pine collected 24 inches of rain between Tuesday and Saturday, dwarfing the 11-plus in metro Atlanta in a 48-hour period that eclipsed records dating back to 1878.
Well, you know, here in Tennessee, it was over 30 inches.
And I remember when, and I mentioned this yesterday, Fran, when Hurricane Fran came through North Carolina where we lived in 1996.
We were very far inland, you know, the Raleigh area.
As a matter of fact, we're a little bit west of Raleigh.
And Karen and I didn't take it seriously.
She had two toddlers in the car seats and the van, and my mother, who's in a wheelchair, paralyzed on one side.
And she was out doing stuff, and I was out doing stuff, you know, I was meeting with some other people, and so we're both, you know, out on our own separate ways.
And when streetlights and all the power started going off, we thought, well, we better go home, both of us.
And we lived way west of Raleigh, and as we were heading out and trying to get across Jordan Lake, there was just tree after tree dropping across the four-lane highway that was there.
And both of us just about didn't make it home.
We kept having to find different alternate routes that the road, a giant tree was not blocking the road, but we did make it home.
Then we lost power for over a week, and that was 14 inches.
Soaked the ground, and then you had the wind about 75 miles an hour.
So I certainly understand that, but when you look at the death toll that is happening, the death toll has tripled now.
As a word is finally starting to get out in the area there, Asheville.
Sorry, this thing is giving me problems again.
They're pointing out people who are getting out of there as they're now starting to hear from them as communications were taken down.
They said there were bodies in the trees.
Bodies in the trees.
Nationwide, there's been about 120 fatalities from Hurricane Helene.
Which has cut a path of death and destruction through the area.
And one person who was going in to help people said that...
This thing is just amazing.
I can't...
Love how they do that with updates.
One volunteer used a dozen mules to carry food, water, and diapers across the mud-covered highways.
He said, we'll take our chainsaws and we'll push those mules through, he said.
Kind of interesting, isn't it?
You know, somehow our ancestors built this country.
Somehow our ancestors built amazing structures without the kind of power tools that we have today.
It was hard work, ingenuity that did it.
They built things that were unrivaled today in terms of beauty and grandeur, things like that.
And it was unaided by power tools.
They conquered a continent with their bare hands.
And we have lost so much of that ingenuity.
We have to relearn that, and we have to relearn hard work.
That's what this guy's doing. He's got a chainsaw.
That's going to be hard work, trying to get through there, even with the mules.
So, catastrophic destruction has covered 400 miles.
But the federal government's not so interested in this.
I mean, you look at Biden and Lala, and there was a lot of back and forth yesterday about, you know, who's there when this is happening?
And again, Biden and Lala still haven't pretended to care, haven't even shown up.
You know, Trump was at a football game.
Lala was at a fundraiser in California, raising $25, $26 million.
But Trump did go to the area.
He pretended to care whether he does or not.
They don't even pretend.
Lala and Biden don't even pretend.
Truly is amazing. And so the way that the press is reporting this, the Washington Post, they've always got to bring it back to climate change.
And so they talk about that.
They talk about the disaster and everything.
And then The anchor angle has got the fingerprints of climate change, they said.
No, it doesn't.
Not even in the, you know, they put that headline there in their article.
Said it's going to change how we think about storms in the mountains.
And so the storm was unlike any experience by anyone who's lived in this rugged region for decades.
The Great Flood of 1916 produced mass destruction and killed 80 people after two tropical storms collided, but that was more than a century ago.
Yeah, what was happening in 1916?
Did they have that stuff that these people are so keen on getting rid of?
The things that are producing all the unicorn farts, like our cars.
Did everybody have a car in 1916?
Hardly anybody had a car in 1916.
I go back and look at pictures of Tampa.
They had streetcars in 1916.
They had horses in 1916, going up and down the road.
My grandfather was a streetcar conductor.
And some of those, I think, were being pulled by horses, some of these areas.
But look, it was very rare for anybody to have a car.
And all the things that they're blaming on the Industrial Revolution, all the rest that has to be destroyed, that wasn't there in 1916.
And even if this is unprecedented, and it's not, even if it were, how far back do their records go anyway?
They've only got about 150 years of records.
And those are not done as the guy who created the Weather Channel said.
Those records were done with people reading off of mercury thermometers.
You can't say that a fraction of a degree, now that you've got these digital thermometers, you can't say, well, this has gone up 0.2 degrees.
That's nonsense. You don't have any clue as to, first of all, where were these thermometers when they were taking these readings?
Were they on airport tarmacs?
No, they didn't have airport tarmacs back then.
They didn't have big urban heat islands back then either.
Take a look at the big cities.
They're more spread out than our suburbs are now, most of them.
Big gaps between houses and that type of thing.
So, it's not that you have this on asphalt at an airport tarmac.
It's not that you're reading this off of a digital readout.
These people don't understand.
How they can't compare this to any of this stuff.
But yeah, they did have big storms 100 years ago.
But no, this has got the fingerprints of climate change.
This is a quote from North Carolina's state climatologist.
Why does North Carolina have a state climatologist?
Come on, let's get rid of these bureaucrats who seek to destroy us.
That's what she said.
Kathy Dello.
She needs to be fired.
Just a bureaucrat grifter.
Wednesday night, the National Weather Service had told residents in the region to prepare for catastrophic life-threatening flooding.
But again, I'm sure that a lot of them didn't take it seriously.
A lot of them may not have gotten the message.
The cell phone coverage in many areas is really spotty when you go through the mountains anyway.
But Trump is talking about getting Starlink in with Elon Musk.
I mean, you know, At least he's thinking about the problem.
Lala and Biden don't even care.
Nobody's holding him to that.
While delivering remarks to volunteers and victims of Helene, Trump revealed he'd just talked to Musk and asked the billionaire to hook up Starlink services and hurricane-hit towns.
Well, you know, he gets no credit for that, except on the Trump media.
But Biden doesn't even care.
Not at all. He says, we want to get Starlink hooked up because they have no communications whatsoever.
We're going to try to get Starlink in there as soon as possible.
They have no communication throughout the region.
Our hearts are with you, and we're going to be with you as long as you need it.
He said, Elon will always come through.
Yeah. Well, it's not just Elon that we're looking at.
We've got Christian groups who are providing disaster relief, Salvation Army, Samaritan Purse, but it's also individuals who are coming in there.
As I mentioned yesterday, my son did a video comparing and contrasting the high-handed attitude and harm that was done by FEMA. Where the hurricane hit the coast of North Carolina versus a tornado that wiped out a small local town and how everybody came together.
You know, used the churches to distribute what was donated by corporations and all the rest of the stuff.
The sheriff, instead of making it an issue of keeping people out of their homes, just said the deputies had to keep people away from the downed power lines and things like that.
I mean, it was a model in small-town cooperation.
And so, yeah, it's good that we've got some other organizations that are there that are doing that.
But again, we need to reclaim what we need as individuals to have each other's backs.
And that really is a much better solution than having it be done by the federal government.
But the federal government has had a hand in this, as a matter of fact, already.
Here's how the federal government's influence has manifested itself.
Eight migrants arrested over burglaries targeting flood victims in Tennessee.
Eight men, all migrants, arrested for allegedly looting and burglarizing flood-ravaged victims in eastern Tennessee.
Our new neighbors.
Thanks to Lala and Joe.
Thank you so much for bringing them in.
Uh, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
So.
Oh.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
you I want to thank people who have supported us.
The supporters came in again at the end of the month, and we were able to get things up over 80%.
I don't know if we've moved the gauge or not yet.
We have? Okay. I know it might still be at 75%, but it needs to go up one more, seven-eighths.
And I just want to thank some of the people who sent checks that we received at the very end of the month as well.
Robert and Laura B., Harold and Patricia H., The Sellers, James F., David and Deborah W. Matthew H. Philip and Kelly M. George R. Thank you, George.
That was very generous. I appreciate that so much.
Joshua B. Imelda D. Ronald C. TK. A listener from New York, New York.
I can't read the writing on the back.
And also Martin.
This is not Marty who did the matching funds for us on Friday that helped so much.
But this is another Martin. And he sent us a chunk of silver, very valuable, and also a book for my son, Gut Check.
I was just talking to a friend who was also injured a few years ago by these phloxans, these fluoroquinolones, and And he said he's had gut issues ever since.
But right now, the thing that we're really concerned about is the tendons.
A lot of people get a tendon issue, an Achilles tendon will rupture because of this.
But he can feel it. Throughout his body, his hips primarily.
The first sign that something was happening with us was when he was sitting down and getting up, but his hip popped.
And Travis heard it. I mean, it was bad.
And then the other one did it later.
And so he's having a lot of problems.
Can't even sit up.
Yesterday he was trying to help Karen with, we've got a visual.
He's actually able to, over the internet, log in and do some of the things for her on the computer.
She's running the board today.
And doing a great job, Karen.
Thank you very much. By the end of the day, his hand was aching.
And his finger from using the mouse.
I mean, that's how bad this is.
Anytime he does something, it just...
So that's the thing that we're concerned about right now.
But I know the gut health is a big issue as well.
So thank you for the book, Martin, and for the support.
Jackie and Fred, you, Ryan, for the love of the road, always there helping us and such a great supporter.
So many people. I can't thank you enough for supporting us.
I really do appreciate that.
Without your support, We would not be able to do the show.
And it is just a voluntary thing.
And someone else put a comment in and said, no, this is not charity.
This is for your work. And I understand.
I was talking about one person who said, why are you so against welfare?
And I said, well, there's a difference between welfare and charity.
You know, there's a difference between somebody working and, if you use their services, paying for it.
You know, it's kind of like the, I guess a good analogy for us is not charity.
We're kind of buskers on the sidewalk trying to give you information to keep you from getting killed by these people.
But, you know, as a busker, you know you can come in and somebody's playing in the subway or on the sidewalk.
You can walk by and not chip anything in, and we do that.
We allow people to do that because I want people to be able to hear what is happening.
And we're going to be talking as we come up.
Some updates that are going on.
We've got some people in Congress are trying to get a bill through.
They need your support. And quite frankly, folks, pharmaceutical companies are going to come after them.
So don't leave them hanging out there.
Pressure your congressional representatives to sign on to this thing and stop this legal immunity that's been given to these vaccine companies.
But also, I had a couple of comments from listeners that I wanted to talk about.
This was sent to me from...
Someone said, I received this comment below as a reply to a comment that I posted on one of your shows.
Is this you? No, it's not.
Somebody who put my profile picture there and put it up as the David Knight Show, but then they added 600.
This is a telltale sign, along with the fact that they've got links that they want somebody to click on, and said, feel free to switch to the QFS banking before the Great Reset.
This is Steve Pacinica's issue.
We're selling quantum financial system, quantum computing, and all the rest of this stuff.
No, this is a grift, and so always look at that, but don't click on anything that wants your link.
Use this Telegram link or use this email link.
They're trying to at least get you into their system.
This is another listener who has been around for a long time.
Says, aren't you glad I... Begged you not to delete your Rumble account long back.
Yes, it has worked out well for the community here.
He says, and he would also appreciate your prayers.
So he needs a new consulting engagement.
And I'll just give you his first name, Noel.
And he could use your prayers for that as well.
May God bless him in that.
And then we have this that I mentioned earlier that Handy sent to me about this Pfizer commercial, where Pfizer is actually just laughing at you.
Laughing in your face is the way that Handy put it.
Laughing Yeah, laughter is contagious.
Unfortunately, so is RSV. A serious virus can land older adults in the hospital.
Yeah, that's my response to the fear-mongering of Pfizer and the government.
You've got options.
If you're 75 plus or 65 plus, blah, blah, blah.
Brought to you by Pfizer.
Yeah, sorry about the sound quality.
That's very harsh. Somebody recorded that off of their television set.
But the message is harsh, isn't it?
And then he put guys with hairy legs and like rocket style things with high heels as dancing hypodermic needles.
Just disgusting.
Just disgusting. And then here's Jimmy Kimmel shilling for Pfizer.
The companies who make the vaccine, we have no problem using their other stuff.
No one worries about Advil, Robitussin, or Celebrate, whatever the hell that is.
These pharmaceutical companies make a lot of the stuff we take for years and years, not just the vaccine.
And one of them wants to remind us of that.
Times have been tough, but tough is what Pfizer is all about.
Yeah, right. We're proud to have developed a life-saving vaccine in record time, protecting over 100 million Americans from COVID-19.
Sounds like Trump. Wait a minute, who did it?
Was it Pfizer or Trump? Well, he gave him tens of billions to do it.
We want to remind you, we still make boner pills...
Yeah, okay. There you go.
That's his big laugh.
Yeah, and they still make floxans to destroy your life.
They still make, and I know this is also prescribed to me.
I caught that one before it got me.
My doctor prescribed something for me for AFib.
And I look it up, and on WebMD, it's like, oh, yeah, it's fine.
It's got these side effects.
They're not serious at all. So I went to some user forums, and I looked at some of the comments of what it was doing to people.
Like, no way I'm taking that.
First, they started complaining about how expensive it was, even with insurance.
Because, you know, it's Pfizer.
So, absurdly expensive.
That's the first clue.
And then if you look at comments from people who've taken it, not from WebMD, not from Pfizer, not the label that they won't give you even if it's got black box warnings on it, no.
Oh yeah, all the rest of the stuff that Pfizer does is all just fine.
We're only focused on the vaccines, but the vaccines just saved us all just like, they're saying that, just like Trump.
Actually, this one was a lot closer to the truth.
This, by the way, is a parody.
I guess this would also be outlawed by Grabbing nuisance.
I can understand why he would want to outlaw this parody.
When COVID-19 struck Canada, we at Scheiser knew we had to respond.
Our lobbyists and public relations staff went to work around the clock for our revolutionary mRNA gene therapy.
Not revolutionary in the sense that it actually works, but rather that it would earn for us unprecedented profits.
Yeah, that's it. By convincing people to line up for our injections and pressurizing governments and employers to make them mandatory, we secured trillions for us and our investors.
And thanks to partners like Justin Trudeau, who hasn't got a functioning brain cell, we can rest assured that our product will find its way into the arms of tens of millions of Canadians.
Over and over and over.
Scheiser. Because we care about our profits.
Side effects may include muscle spasms, seizures, paralysis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, myocarditis, pericarditis, Parkinson's disease, heart attacks, strokes, meningitis, brain death, premature births, stillbirths, sterility, increased risk of cancer and death.
Do not consult your doctor.
We own them too.
Yeah, that's absolutely true.
That was done by strongandfreecanada.org.
Yeah, well, you know, unfortunately, Trudeau knows exactly what he's doing.
And so does Trump. This is the narrative that's been put out by Tucker, the narrative that's been put out just recently by Tucker and by Alex Jones, people posting it in rebuttal to me.
Trump didn't know what he was doing.
He was naive and inexperienced.
And he had moles in his cabinet and all the rest of this stuff.
No, he knew exactly.
More importantly, I know that Alex knew.
And I know that Tucker knew.
And I know where Tucker and Alex are coming from.
They're CIA families.
I'm disgusted with all of this stuff.
Anyway, getting back to Handy.
So what do we do about this?
Well, we can just tell people one at a time.
Andy said, I want to share half of an email I received this morning from a patient I had a few days ago.
I picked him up at urgent care office for a new onset of AFib.
And on the way to the hospital, I engaged him in conversation about the so-called pandemic and the vaccines.
He took the vaccines, as did his wife.
It's a bit like drinking from a fire hose when you've only got 15 to 20 minutes to give information.
Good for you for doing this.
You're really trying, I mean, you know, Handy is there as EMF, EMS, but he's also there as the emergency broadcasting system.
You know, this is an emergency.
Stop me if you've heard this before, but, you know, you need to know what's going on with these vaccines.
And so Handy's a one-man emergency broadcasting system.
He's trying to tell this guy the truth that could save his life.
Or at least keep him stop injecting these things over and over again.
He says it's tricky to do so without sounding crazy.
Yeah, because there's so much, such a pile of I guess you could say Scheiser.
That's on top of everything.
That you've got to scrape all that stuff off before you can actually start giving them the truth before they can hear that.
You've got to get rid of that pile of lies that's been dumped on them.
He said, even so, I asked him to keep an open mind.
I asked if he'd be open to me sending him additional information.
We exchanged email addresses and it appears that he listened.
He began asking questions.
Guess what? The people around him began to open up and to confirm what I told him.
Now he's doing research and he's sending it to people that he knows.
And he sent back a letter to Handy and he said, thanks for the information.
I'm going to forward this to my buddy in Syracuse.
I went home yesterday from the hospital.
They admitted me on Saturday and gave me blood thinners and metropolol to see if that would resolve the AFib.
It didn't. So, Sunday morning, they looked down my throat to see if I had any clots.
And then they zapped me.
And you're right about not being awake when they do that.
I'm assuming that this is like a...
You know, the heart-zapping thing.
I had a friend who, from high school, I've talked about him many times, went to West Point, and, I mean, he's just become this gullible statist.
I can't even talk to him anymore.
And it just got to the point where, you know, it's like, all right, I don't want to hear any more from him.
I don't usually cut people off that I disagree with, but he was angry as one of these people on social media telling everybody, you better get the shot.
Look what you're going to do to other people and all this kind of stuff.
And it's like, I don't even have time to deal with this guy.
Well, he got the shot in his wife, got every one of them and all the rest of his stuff.
Now he's got heart issues.
And his latest posts were how he had to have, you know, the defibrillator, you know, used on him several times.
And he was having so much AFib and tachycardia and things like that.
So he said what they did was they put an internal one in.
And he started having it again before the internal one kicked on.
And he said he forgot that he had that on.
And And he said that the nurse also forgot that it was in there and almost gave him like a double defib thing.
But he said that internal one hurts, but he said it doesn't hurt like it does when you're awake and you get it.
Anyway, here's the interesting part, replies the person to Andy.
I was talking to one of the cardiac nurses about the vaccine, and she stated that they have seen an increase in AFib and strokes since the vaccine.
She wouldn't take the vaccine along with the number of nurses, she said.
Another piece of the puzzle.
I talked to the head nurse at the PCU floor, and she said that she wouldn't take the vaccine since she didn't know enough about it.
All this information supports what you said to me in the right to the ER. It all started in 2021 after the vaccine.
And so Handy said, what struck me about this email was that he had to ask the doctors and the nurses.
They wouldn't tell him.
Now, some of them, even when you ask them, will lie to your face.
Others, if you directly ask them, they'll tell you the truth.
But he said he had to ask.
To be honest, I was surprised they told him the truth at all.
I'm fairly certain that each one, when they were alone, that he asked each of them when they were alone, there is no open conversation about the jab.
There's other people around.
They're not going to tell you the truth.
He says there's more, but it's just compliments and gratitude.
I'm going to put that in there. He says, I'm just trying to do the right thing, one patient at a time.
Because, he said, I will have to give an account someday.
And I thought about that. You know, that's very true.
If you look at Hebrews 13, the elders in the church, the people, the Christians in the church have said, you know, have this attitude toward the elders in the church.
They keep watch over you.
They keep watch over your souls as someone who will have to give an account.
Folks, we all have to give an account.
But he was saying they, especially, We're going to have to give an account over you.
If they know what's right and they don't tell you, if they see something that's about to happen and they don't tell you, they're going to have to give an account for that.
And he said, obey them that they can do it with joy and not with grief.
Now, I have a question. Do we obey those who don't believe that they are going to have to give an account?
No, we don't. If they are in defiance of God and in defiance of the Constitution that gives them their authority, I think that we have a moral duty.
We have a duty to God to oppose that.
We don't listen to them.
As a matter of fact, we don't just not listen to them.
We have to oppose them.
And we have to understand that this is a spiritual war.
Spiritual war is really about minds.
It really is about hearts and minds.
That's what a spiritual war ultimately is.
Yeah, it can affect our bodies as well.
It's not just limited to that.
But you go back to the story of Job, right?
What happened in Job? Well, when God removed the protections, You had weather events that happened.
So we can look at that as those that we wrestle with.
We don't wrestle with flesh and blood.
We wrestle with entities that can affect the weather.
We wrestle with entities that can weaponize other people and send them against.
That's happened with Job.
And we wrestle with entities that can affect our own body as well.
But we also have to oppose these lies.
And we have to take captive these thoughts.
Lies about God primarily, but lies that are there to do us harm.
And boy, we see that everywhere, don't we?
Really is the ruler of this world.
On a more positive note, long-term supporters, Thomas and Nancy, who are homeschooling, sent this to me, said, homeschooling is going well and a great blessing.
Yeah, I just heard you say in the replay about knowing the love of a child.
It's one of the greatest things in the world to have your child hug you, and I'm sad for families who cannot homeschool.
I did love my job and the work that I did, but it is a great thing to be in homeschooling and very educational for me as well.
Says his daughter is so far advanced in her reading, and she's also singing psalms.
You know, it is interesting, and I said that in context, talking about the minivans that were...
You know, they were talking about how minivans are passing out and how the death of the minivan does Atlantic.
Yeah, it was just an example of how you were under the dress of having to take care of your family.
You had cooler cars that you could drive, but you were saddled with this minivan so that you could...
You know, transport the family around and all the rest of this stuff.
And I said, no, I like driving cars, but there's nothing like having kids in the back that are giggling and talking to you and singing along and all the rest of this stuff.
And so there was also this article from Mises.org.
Yes, car seat laws are reducing the birth rate, they said.
Just think about how many different ways.
They can lie to us and tell us that we don't want to have children.
So many different ways.
As I mentioned briefly yesterday, and I'll talk a little bit more about it today, Stevie Nicks, proud of the fact that she aborted her child.
She did the song, Sarah.
She's updated it for the thing where she begins it and says, I don't want to be a cleaning woman.
This is my career.
And I love you, Sarah.
And, you know, you'll be around.
I'm sure you'll be around or whatever.
I don't think of you as being dead, even though she killed her child.
But, you know, the important thing is her career.
I just love being on stage and adored by people.
Lovers of self. And so Mises said, opponents of the Trump campaign are having fun this week with some year-old comments from vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance.
Apparently in a Senate hearing during March of 2023, J.D. Vance stated that car seat laws have an impact on the number of children parents feel they can afford.
And again, this is one of the ways that it always comes to you, right?
Can you really afford this?
And we were struggling when we adopted our daughter from China.
Really struggling. And we couldn't have done it without some help from friends, actually, either.
But some things happened also in our life that God provided the money at that point in time.
But I remember Dave Ramsey, who was always about not being in debt.
And that's a good thing. I agree with him about that.
Don't be a debt slave.
And so I don't disagree with him about that.
But he had...
He had a bit of advice.
Somebody asked him about it, and they said, you know, we want to adopt a child, but it's going to be really expensive at the time.
It's about $20,000 to adopt a child.
And they said, we don't have the money, and we're wondering if we should go into debt and borrow it.
And his hard, fast rule, he made such a god out of money and not being in debt.
They told him, no, don't do it.
And, you know, I understand that if he's just a counselor.
But if it's a Christian counselor, where is your faith in God that he's going to provide if you step out in faith?
If you're going to do, and this is what I tell people, when people, again, Tom and Nancy, he stepped out in faith because he wanted to take care of his children.
And we've another listener on here.
Same thing. So please pray for me.
I changed, reorganized my life, changing my job so I could do more with my family, homeschool, and things like that.
If you step out in faith to do something like that, that honors God, That God tells us to do.
And if you accept that responsibility, do it to honor Him, He will make this up, as He did in our life.
You know, I think about that every time I see people making this economic argument to not have kids.
And that includes Planned Parenthood.
That's always the first thing they throw at people.
Oh, you can't afford to have this kid.
Do you realize how much this kid's going to cost you up to the age of 18?
That type of thing. That fear that God will not provide.
Just amazing. But this is what J.D. Vance said.
He said, I think there's evidence of some of the things that we're doing to parents is driving down the number of children that American families are having.
In particular, there's an evidence of the car seat rules that we've imposed, which, of course, I want kids to drive in car seats.
But these rules have driven down the number of babies born in this country by over 100,000.
Well, I don't know what the metric is.
And you can say, yes, it puts economic pressure on people, and so they're mocking him, and they say, do you realize a car seat only costs $100 or $200?
That's not the issue and everything.
But as Mises points out, it is an issue.
Because if all your kids have got to be in car seats, and if they've got to be in car seats until they're like eight or nine years old, I mean, it's getting ridiculous what is there.
We never had car seats.
Somehow it survived, right?
I remember laying across the back seats and everything.
I remember sliding across the back seats and standing up in the car.
I remember when I was a little kid, standing up in the back seat and walking around so I could get a better view of what was going on.
How did we survive?
You know, what does it cost to save an incremental life or something?
Well, you know, whenever they want to put regulations on you, they don't come back and say, it's rare, right?
Well, it really, you know, when you look at how many lives have been saved by different regulations, you can make that argument.
But, of course, I never make that argument about saving, you know, I don't know, 100 lives, 1,000 lives, 300,000 lives, a million lives with the vaccine stuff.
Oh, no. If you've got side effects, it's just rare.
We don't care about it. Safety when it comes to vaccines.
But we're going to be all over the place when it comes to car seats.
Again, we can make these determinations, and it ought to be something that is up to individuals to make.
But if you're going to, my point in all of this is that they made the argument that it's not the cost of the car seat.
It's the fact that car seats are so big and they have to be put in there in a particular way that you've got to get a bigger car if you've got a couple more kids, right?
Because of the car seats.
You've got to go to a much bigger car.
And so it has a much bigger financial issue.
But I'll just say, no matter what the government does in terms of finances, and this is my point, don't write me letters about car seats and seatbelts.
I don't care. Okay?
You make your own decisions about that.
I'm not telling you to wear a car seat or not to wear a car seat or a seatbelt or not a seatbelt.
I don't care about that.
Make your own decision. My point is, don't let them scare you Monetarily, out of having children, don't let them scare you about homeschooling your kids.
Mises goes on, this is complicated by the fact that states continue to increase their age at which kids have to remain in car seats and all the rest of the stuff.
Yeah, it's economic pressure.
But don't let them scare you with the money, and don't let them bribe you.
Here's another example. Homeschooling moms are pushing back against the latest attack on school choice in Arizona.
Well, that got my attention.
And so, what is this about?
A mother of nine is among two homeschooling parents challenging the state of Arizona over a new rule that requires parents to justify their educational material purchases.
What?! What?
These are the same people who are putting in these, you know, pornographic, sexually grooming things for kids in kindergarten and the government schools and the government libraries and all the rest of this stuff.
And they want to approve the materials that you purchase?
That's insane.
However, if you keep reading, you find out...
That they are getting a scholarship account.
They're getting reimbursed by the state.
You understand the principle?
I've talked about this. I try to get this suit to the MAGA cult about how Trump used financial strings to do all this stuff that he did in 2020.
Obama does it.
Biden does it. Trump said he's going to do it if he gets back in office.
They all understand how this works.
If you take any money from the government, there's going to be strings to control you.
They'll use that money first to bribe you, to addict you, and then to blackmail you.
I'm going to take it away now if you don't do what I want.
And that's what's happened in Arizona.
You got some people who say, well, homeschooling is a good thing.
So if it's a good thing, the government should be involved.
And we should give them money.
And then the government comes in and says, well, I want to know what you're buying with that money.
And I want a full report on the books that you're buying.
And so forth, right?
The Arizona Empowerment Scholarship Account.
A program that reimburses parents or provides them with a debit card to pay for educational costs.
Money equals control.
Money equals control.
It is so much better if you trust God, if you tell Him you trust Him, and to see Him provide.
Don't make government your God.
Please don't do that.
We'll be right back.
♪♪
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
We're going to be talking about the new, completely, created, it's created a lot of problems.
So I'll tell you what we're going to do.
We're going to come back to that so I can find this file that has disappeared.
And let's talk about what is happening with the movement in Congress.
To shut down the liability protection for the vaccine makers.
It's an act that is called End the Vaccine Carve-Out Act.
Okay. Giving them a carve-out for legal protection.
I would have called it End Pharmaceutical Immunity.
That would have got their attention.
Because what we're talking about is legal immunity for products that don't give you any immunity.
And for products that harm you.
But yeah, this is a bill introduced late last week in the U.S. House of Representatives within the liability protections that Congress gave vaccine makers under the 1986 Childhood Vaccination Injury Act.
We've had Dr.
Wakefield actually did a movie, kind of quasi-dramatic, part drama, part documentary, called it 1986, The Act.
And it was seminal. It's one of the first things that Fauci did when he got into his position there at the NIH. And he did it with Ronald Reagan's assistance.
It was under Reagan that that happened.
Yeah, I really liked Reagan when he was running in 1980.
But then I found out the truth about Iran-Contra, and I found out the truth later about this vaccine thing, and it's like, I don't know.
I mean, you know, it really is a mixed bag.
Some really horrible things were put through by him.
And then we've got the PREP Act, which is even worse.
It was put in by George W. Bush in 2005, which is what applies to these COVID vacs because of the Trump and Biden emergencies that they declared.
So why would they start with a childhood vaccine?
I think that's actually a good strategy to start with that.
30 Republican lawmakers have signed on as co-sponsors to House Bill 9828, End the Vaccine Carve-Out Act.
Folks, support these people and send them letters saying, thank you for doing this, and if your congressman is not on that list, send them a letter.
If they get a lot of letters, that really does affect them, especially in an election year.
And everybody in the House is up for election.
And I know that it really does affect them.
I was absolutely flummoxed to see when everybody in North Carolina, I've mentioned this before, homeschoolers, they had the teachers union and the Democrats who were in charge of all three branches of state government wanted to outlaw homeschooling.
And all the homeschoolers started writing letters and stopped it.
I was amazed.
I was amazed that it worked.
But it did. And I give the glory to God because I think, as we've seen, all of our freedoms being shut down everywhere.
The freedom to do that homeschooling has been preserved, and I give that glory to God.
The proposed legislation would end the broad protection from liability for injuries resulting from vaccines that are listed by the CDC on its childhood immunization schedule.
And guess what? The COVID vaccine is now listed there.
So first thing we've got to do is stop injecting children with this garbage.
React 19 founder Brianne Dressen, who experienced a debilitating COVID-19 vaccine injury as a volunteer in AstraZeneca's clinical trial, announced this bill and its co-sponsors on a post on X. People harmed are long overdue for compensation process that actually works, and it's time for the drug companies to pick up the tab, she said.
Absolutely. They called it a complex sham compensation program, which is what it is.
That act in 1986 set up a no-fault system of arbitration.
This so-called vaccine court is not a court.
There is no due process.
You have court-appointed special masters.
Special masters.
Everything about this makes me want to throw up.
The vaccine court with special masters who are lawyers who previously represented the U.S. government.
They manage and decide the individual claims.
They don't even pretend to call them judges.
They're special masters.
There is no judge.
There's no jury. And the rules of evidence, the rules of civil procedure, and the rules of discovery do not apply.
They don't care what the facts are.
No discovery. We don't care.
I don't care. For over 35 years, parents of children injured and killed by government-recommended vaccines have been left with no meaningful redress.
Thank you, Fauci. He deserves a medal, don't you think?
Oh, that's right. Trump already gave him a medal.
Only a complex sham compensation program that pits grieving families against the government, while big pharma enjoys no liability.
If you need to have special protection, because if you didn't have it, you'd be out of business because your products harm so many people.
Maybe you shouldn't be allowed to make those products.
Vaccines administered under the Emergency Use Authorization, such as the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, are not covered by this.
They're covered under the PREP Act.
And you know, the PREP Act directs, quote, countermeasures To be covered by the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, which is even worse.
You know, even the vaccine manufacturers during COVID acknowledged that they didn't have liability protection from negligence in manufacturing.
And so Stat News covered it.
It was not covered at all, not at all, by American media.
Some other foreign countries got some coverage, but it was absolutely censored in American media.
My reports at Infowars were not talked about with that, or, you know, they're shut off to the back as well.
But it was really key.
Stat News is a pharma publication, but it didn't get any notification in the mainstream media or anywhere else because, you know, we don't want to criticize Trump.
It's his vaccine. Come on, you know, guys, don't talk about that.
This is Infowars. We don't say negative things about Donald Trump.
We spin it. Well, the reality is, is that Pfizer knew all this stuff was happening and they blackmailed some South American countries.
Brazil and Argentina went public about it, but there was a third one that was also blackmailed and told Stat News about it.
But they didn't want the name of the country used because they succumbed to the blackmail in order to get the vaccines.
And again, the vaccines were there because of this global conspiracy that To shut down travel if countries did not have vaccine passports and other things like that.
It was this blackmail to coerce all countries to vaccinate their own citizens or you're going to be completely shut off from the rest of the world.
We're going to make you a no-fly zone, a pariah.
Nobody will come in or out of your country if you don't vaccinate your people.
Just like they did with hospitals, right?
We're going to cut off your CMS money, said Trump administration, if you don't vaccinate your doctors and nurses and that type of stuff.
And so that was the leverage that Pfizer had over them.
And so Pfizer was using that leverage to tell Argentina, Brazil, and a third country that you're going to hold us harmless for any manufacturing defects.
And you're going to set up a separate account outside of your country.
Outside of your country. You're going to have financial assets and other things that are going to be like an insurance policy for us in case somebody sues us.
Isn't that amazing? Isn't it amazing that nobody would talk about that?
The left didn't want to talk about it because the left wanted these vaccines.
The right didn't want to talk about it because the right wanted Trump.
This is why I cannot support this guy.
Ever. No matter what he says, no matter what he does, he is going to be the stealth backstabber, Benedict Donald, and the Benedict Donald MAGA media that cheerleads for him, these prostitutes that are out there.
So it got so bad that they went public with it.
But we just saw recently that Gilead, that makes remdesivir, Had manufacturing negligence.
I hope it's negligence.
They had glass in the drug.
I hope that wasn't put there deliberately.
Let's just assume that it was negligence.
I know. I know. We're talking about big pharmaceutical companies.
It could be deliberate. But they had glass there.
And as people were getting strokes and dying from the glass, lawsuits came in.
And they said, we're protected.
We're protected because this had emergency use authorization under the PrEP Act given by Trump.
And Fauci. Even for putting glass in.
That's how bad this is.
This stuff is going to stop.
And so that's the PrEP Act.
But of course, let's begin with the regular vaccines.
People are ready for this. People don't want this anymore.
There's a big pushback against it.
But I guarantee you that there's a lot of money in politics bribing people to vote the other way.
That's why Trump put in a CEO of Eli Lilly as his HHS head.
Because of money.
He was bribed. That's why I don't trust him.
I don't trust RFK Jr.
to do the right thing with any of this stuff.
COVID-19 vaccines for infants and children ages 6 months through 11 have not yet even been licensed.
However, they have been added to the childhood schedule by the CDC. This is why this has got to stop.
To date, This PREP Act, people who file under the PREP Act, they've only paid out 16 claims.
16 claims, totaling $425,000.
Except for one payment, all the claims resulted in compensation of $8,962 or less.
That is so outrageous.
There were more than 16 people who were injured on the very first day of the Trump shots.
More than 16 people entered the very first day.
As a matter of fact, when we look at the VAERS reporting system, it shows that between December 14, 2020, who was president then?
Trump. By the way, December 14, I'll never forget that date.
That was a date that all of the electors in all the different states Called in their vote totals.
And it was done. And I said that on that Monday, December the 14th.
I said, stop the stop the steal stuff.
Stop this. The sting was a lie.
Going to January the 6th, you're not going to get anything accomplished.
There's only been one slate of electors turned in from each and every state.
January the 6th, there's nothing you're going to be able to do about it except get in trouble.
And I called it a grift, and I was fired within three days of that.
That's how I saw that.
But that was December the 14th.
Trump was president, and they were injecting people.
It's sugar water. Don't worry about it.
Between December the 14th, 2020, and August the 30th, 2024, there have been 1.6 million claims put on VAERS for people who are injured.
37,390 deaths.
311,544 serious injuries.
Folks, we're starting to get up to casualty rates here that are getting close to Vietnam.
And Trump is still bragging about how he saved the world.
Saved millions of lives.
I just ran this thing through.
We skipped all the testing so I could save millions of lives.
But you've got that many people there.
And they can't get any compensation.
You got over 37,000 people who have died listed on there.
1.6 million people who have been harmed.
311,000 of them seriously.
And because of these protections put in by Reagan and George W., 16 people have been compensated.
Less than $9,000 each.
It's just disgusting what this government, how evil this government is.
End the Vaccine Carve Out Act is urgently needed.
The legislation will help to end Big Pharma's reign over our government.
Well, I think the other thing that's got to be done, and it may have to be done as a prerequisite to getting any restrictions on pharmaceutical companies, is You're going to have to ban this Ask Your Doctor stuff.
That was not even legal until the mid-1990s.
And if you don't ban the Ask Your Doctor ads, if you don't ban the pharmaceutical ads, They're going to continue to own the media as well as the politicians.
But it's especially important.
You're not going to see any of these 60-minute things where they expose the swine flu vaccine, how it harmed like nine people.
You know, you're not going to see anything like that.
You're going to have people like Tucker Carlson who will take their $20 million a year, $25 million, I think.
They'll take that money and they'll keep quiet about it.
They're not going to say anything about it.
You've got to stop the purchasing of the mainstream media.
That's what they should call the act.
Stop buying prostitutes, to use Gerald Slenty's phrase there.
The 1986 law saw a very short statute of limitations as well for seeking injury compensation.
It had to be done within two or three years of the death or the injury, respectively. However, it usually takes longer than that for people to realize that a vaccine caused their injury or illness. That's usually the way poisoners work, right? They do it gradually so that you don't notice it. Finally, the bill would end the protection from liability for the COVID-19 vaccines, allowing people injured by the vaccine to sue the vaccine makers in court.
COVID-19 vaccines must be redefined as vaccines and not as countermeasures, they said.
So the PrEP Act's liability carve-out can no longer apply.
So they're not just taking away this 1986 Fauci immunity and then protecting the kids from the COVID-19 vaccine being added to the childhood vaccination list.
But they would also redefine these Trump shots not as countermeasures but as vaccines and bring them under that as well.
Well, Facebook gave the CDC a backdoor access to remove millions of social media posts.
You see, it makes it very difficult to kill us.
It makes it difficult, as Kerry was saying, to govern us if they can't lie to us and censor people who oppose them.
And this was done by Mr.
Libertarian. Mark Zuckerberg gave the CDC a backdoor to tell him, take this off, take that off, take that off, right?
I wonder who gave the order.
Was it the CDC that gave the order to take me off of YouTube, take me off of Spotify?
Was it CDC? Was it the Federal Reserve?
Was it the Pentagon? Was it the Atlantic Council?
Was it the UN and their IPCC stuff?
I don't know who it was. Maybe it was the World Economic Forum.
I decided at one point, I saw something somebody had, and it was a tweet.
And it was pretty outrageous what the World Economic Forum had there.
And I thought, yeah, I should follow the World Economic Forum so I could see.
And this is back when I was still using Twitter somewhat as a news aggregator.
That's the way I used it in the early days.
I don't anymore. But...
Anyway, so I thought, well, I'll add the World Economic Forum to, I'll follow them.
And when I did that, it says, you've been blocked by the World Economic Forum.
It's like, what? I've never had any interaction with them.
So I don't know. Maybe it was the CDC that shut me down on Spotify and YouTube, got me shadow banned on Twitter.
I don't know. Maybe it was them. Maybe it was the WHO. Maybe it's Bill Gates.
I don't know. All right.
Maybe it was Satan, you know, because that's the common thread with all these.
The father of lies and the Moriarty of these conspirators, if you will.
It all comes back to that because we don't wrestle with flesh and blood, right?
We cast down arguments, and they're a fortress of reasoning.
That's what we do. So, yeah, who does that come from?
This has been around for a long time.
So, as we see yet more and more, this is yet another article.
This one's coming from the Gold Report.
Celebrated wrestler dies after sudden cardiac arrest, and they go through a litany of young wrestlers who have had sudden death, and other wrestlers, and bodybuilders, and athletes, and all the rest of the stuff.
Again, because they don't know.
They've got heart damage. And they're pushing it to the max.
But this is taking them down.
And when we look at the FDA, ultimately, yeah, it's important to stop these vaccines and to stop them from having legal protection to poison and kill people.
But ultimately, we've got to come after the agencies that enable this stuff.
The CDC sells the biggest resellers of vaccines in the world.
They make profit off of this.
The FDA is a revolving door.
They tell both the food industry as well as the drug industry that you are free to do anything.
FDA. Free to do anything.
And of course, all of these different agencies, the NIH... It's got all these people getting royalties and kickbacks directly from these pharmaceutical companies.
It's just disgusting what a cesspool of corruption Washington has become.
So ultimately, it's about getting rid of these three-letter agencies for which there is no constitutional authority.
There's no constitutional authority for anything that HHS does.
Not health, not welfare.
There's no constitutional...
It used to be what it was called, the Health Department of...
Health, education, and welfare.
They split out the Department of Education, which again, there is no constitutional authority for the government to be involved in education, or for health, or for welfare.
But now they've got HHS, which is the health and welfare part of it.
And then they have the Department of Education, and they all need to be flushed down the toilet.
But let's start with this other stuff.
And by the way, I'll just mention one more thing.
The U.S. has approved a GMO wheat that is grown with a neurotoxic herbicide.
The world's first genetically modified wheat.
It's grown with glufosinate.
And I imagine this is maybe related to glyphosate.
Glufosinate ammonium.
A dangerous agrotoxin that is banned in the European Union.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has approved the cultivation of a genetically modified wheat.
Yet another confirmation of how a very small group of powerful people...
Are free to do anything.
FDA. By the way, you know, when you talk about this, wheat goes into everything.
And all your processed food.
And of course, we've got glyphosate in all of our food as well.
Brian Shulhavi at Vaccine Impact.
I'll just put in a plug for him.
You know, it's not paid to do this, but I'll just say, I've seen on his website, he sells Heirloom strains of wheat that have been tested to be glyphosate free.
So you can get things like spelt and other things like that.
And actually, Travis, who has rheumatoid arthritis, cannot tolerate wheat at all.
It really does a number on him.
But he can have spelt and things like that.
We haven't gotten any of this stuff.
And it's not cheap.
You're going to pay four or five times or more what you're going to pay for flour in the store.
Poison is cheap.
Food you have to pay for, folks.
That's the whole thing about defamation.
Speech is free, but lies you pay for.
Well, poison is pretty much almost free to eat.
They make that freely available, very cheap to get the poison.
But if you want real food, that's going to cost you.
So you make that decision.
You want to pay now or you want to pay a little bit later and pay the doctors?
Hopefully you don't pay the doctors.
They'll try to kill you. For the moment, only the population of Argentina is the guinea pig.
So what is Javier Moai doing there about that?
Well, nothing. There is no publicly available evidence of its harmlessness to the health of the population of the environment.
The supposed studies of the company are confidential.
Sound familiar? No independent scientist nor the public has access to these papers.
Although it is advertised as drought resistance, there is no public evidence to support this claim.
Available official studies show that it is less productive than conventional wheat.
The National Convention of Biotechnology, the central body for GM approval in Argentina, is totally dominated by the same companies that sell GMOs.
This sounds like our government, doesn't it?
Wow. Sounds like our FDA, where you're free to do anything.
The Argentine state does not carry out its own independent studies for the approval of GMOs, and the studies of the companies are confidential and secret.
It's like when the Children's Health Defense Fund saw that they were putting in the polyethylene glycol, encapsulating the stuff in the vaccines.
I said, well, if you're going to put that in, that's going to cause a lot of people to go into anaphylactic shock.
And the FDA said, we don't care.
Let Pfizer know. They call Pfizer.
Pfizer, of course, doesn't care. There's no regulation of these companies.
In Argentina, you are not allowed to choose to eat GM-free food.
There is no labeling of GMO products in that country.
Because of a decision taken by a dozen people, Pulled out of science and politics, the whole population could be eating GMO-baked goods without being able to choose.
And, of course, what they're doing is they're inserting this pesticide into the food genetically.
Now, even by the manipulated standards that are starting to appear in New Zealand and Europe and elsewhere, even that would be labeled as genetically modified.
If they don't insert something that's foreign, something that's inorganic, or something that is from another animal to make some kind of a chimera, they're now trying to remove that GMO label from your food and call it precision breeding.
Well, it's just like if we were to breed the animals, but we're just doing it a lot faster.
Yeah, at warp speed.
Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
I'm going to play a little bit of the music.
I'm going to play a little bit of the music.
Oh, .
.
In.
In the.
In my the.
In my the.
In my.
In my a 90 in the whole the and A.
You're listening to The David Knight Show!
We're back and I found what I was looking for earlier.
And I thought this was very interesting.
This is coming out of the Moscow Times.
This is sent to me by a listener.
High school students in Russia's Far East were shown a graphic video of a medical abortion during an unannounced lecture, and said many of them fell sick while watching, the outlet wrote, citing students from School No. 7, a region town of Okha.
Not Oklahoma, but it's Okha.
All you in Okha, you're okay.
If you are disgusted and sick at what you saw with us, you're normal, okay?
It's abnormal not to be disgusted and sick.
And we see what this is.
So it's about 3,700 miles east of Moscow.
A video accompanying the report showed students turning away in the school auditorium as the footage played on large screens.
According to the news site, students were told to turn away if they felt uncomfortable watching the close-up procedure.
They showed a documentary about how abortions happen every hour and every minute in Russia.
They said you shouldn't have an abortion because it could be fatal or it could cause infertility, said an anonymous eyewitness.
You see, this is how you stop it.
Russia is doing this because their population is collapsing.
Even China's population is collapsing.
They stopped the one-child policy, but it's still not coming back.
And populations everywhere are collapsing because people have been turned against children.
They become lovers of self.
But this is how you stop it if the GOP is interested in winning this battle.
They could win the election easily, and they could take this issue, which is the one issue that Lala Harris wants to talk about, the only issue that she wants to talk about, They could take this issue and they could cram it down her lying throat.
But they won't do it.
They won't show what abortion is.
They won't even show what a baby is.
Won't show any of that stuff.
How do they think they're going to win with this issue?
And so, if we don't support, if we harden our hearts, To babies that are being murdered alive.
And as I said earlier in the show, and as I said before, I had John Rapoport come on.
We were talking about when all this stuff happened with the Center for Medical Progress, showing Planned Parenthood, saying, yeah, yeah, what kind of organs do you need?
We'll get those for you. And how old do you want the baby to be?
Murder for hire.
Just tell us and we'll go kill the baby.
And that's what they did. As he pointed out, you can't kill the baby and expect that you're going to get the organs.
You can't poison the baby and expect you're going to get the organs.
You can't rip the baby apart and expect that the organs that you want are going to be intact.
And if you kill someone, then that releases a lot of hormones that are very negative for organ donation.
So the organ donation has to be done while the baby is alive and delivered.
It's what they do in China as well.
We've covered that as well.
In China, they kill people to take their organs.
And that's what's going on in Canada now with this doctor-assisted suicide they call the MAID program.
MAID organ donors, are they really dead when their organs are harvested?
They've got a rule where they have to wait five minutes after the heart stops.
But this article from the Gold Report says that may not be long enough.
MAID donors are dying now.
In reality, it follows from, are organ donors dead when their organs are harvested?
If you're really dead, then no organs can be extracted.
A previous article that they had there.
In previous articles, it's been emphasized that organ donation is a driving factor in Canada's medical assistance in dying.
That's what the MAID stands for.
It's a euthanasia program, they say.
Redefining death that has allowed for brain death and cardiac death, concepts that were devised in order to make organ harvesting and transplants appear to be legal and moral.
You understand? I'll repeat that.
They invented the term brain death and cardiac death so that they could kill people to get their organs.
It's an invention. The dead donor rule was instituted to make sure that maid victims' organs are harvested for donation only after they have died.
Organ harvesting cannot be the cause of their death.
Quoting the guidelines from the Canadian Medical Association, June 2019, vital organs can be harvested only from a donor who is deceased as a result of maid.
No attempt can be made to harvest organs before the patient is declared dead.
The guideline states that death resulting from the medical assistance should be confirmed by a second physician after a five-minute no-touch period of continuous observation.
During the five-minute interval, no attempt can be made to harvest donor organs.
Doctors who wanted to do away with the dead donor rule in November 2018 So the organ harvesting could be the cause of death.
They argued that since Canada allows physician-assisted suicide, then Canada should also dispense with a dead donor rule.
This would allow transplant surgeons to have access to fresh organs.
Vampires, right?
Oh, he's fresh.
Even in this brief space of time, the quality of the organ to be transplanted, however, declines, just as we've talked about with Chinese organ donations in prison, with Planned Parenthood organ donations from live babies.
The authors of the article argue that if organs can be removed from a prospective euthanasia patient while he or she is still alive, then the organs would be as fresh as possible.
The authors thoughtfully suggest that the patients would be anesthetized before their organs are removed to avoid any, quote, discomfort, unquote.
Comfort care. You know, comfort care.
Like the babies that survived the abortion that put them over on the side is comfort care.
Let them die. The removal of organs, not lethal injection.
It would be the direct cause of death.
Since made donor organs need to be as fresh as possible, They're killed in a process that is akin to that use for surgical patients under anesthesia.
Dr. Joel Zivitt asserted that Canada's made victims likely drowned to death.
He reached this conclusion after reviewing 200 autopsies of death row inmates in the U.S. These autopsies revealed that their lungs had filled with fluid and that their other organs had failed.
Failed. These inmates died by lethal injection and MAID uses similar protocols and the same drugs.
Transplant anesthesiologist Dr.
Claire Middleton discussed the process in a documentary called Ethics and Maid Organ Donation.
The doctor explained the difference between how a patient dies when life-sustaining treatment is withdrawn in order to harvest their organs for transplant versus the cardiac death of a maid victim so that their organs can be harvested for transplantation.
What happens is the heart stops and then the other organs are harvested.
So, in this country, that would mean that you don't harvest the heart.
People have been concerned about the possibility of trying to restart the heart and reverse the dying process.
But in terms of drugs which cause death in MAID, they act very quickly.
So, they relatively protect the organs because death is going to happen a lot faster than it does after you withdraw life-sustaining treatment, which can take up to two hours for the person to die.
You see, everything is about how do we preserve the organs to make money?
How do we do that?
Donor hearts are not harvested, therefore, according to Dr.
Middleton, since the harvesting might appear to be what killed the made donor.
However, if other organs have already been harvested...
Is it possible that not harvesting the heart at the end is simply a matter of optics?
And that is what this is all about, folks.
They're talking about heart death.
They're talking about brain death.
When we have these discussions about when we're going to protect babies, what do we talk about?
Brain activity? Heart activity?
The ability to feel pain?
These are all factors by these doctors who And this medical community for which ethics has been completely replaced by the root of all evil, the love of money.
Although doctors have thought long that the brain suffers permanent damage after about 10 minutes after the heart stops supplying it with oxygen.
Our work found that the brain can show signs of electrical recovery long into ongoing CPR. Well, as a matter of fact, some of that is due to the EEG, electroencephalograph, another test.
And if you've got brain activity that has dropped below 50%, It gives you a flat line.
It says there is none, right?
And yet, you don't have damage until it gets down below 20%.
That's why that mother who was anesthetized, and they said, well, she didn't come out of it.
She didn't come out of the operation. She's brain dead.
Nothing shows up on the EEG. And then her husband said...
Before you withdraw life support, let her hear the voice of her daughter, her one-year-old daughter.
She heard the voice of her one-year-old daughter over the phone, and she instantly came out of it.
But they told everybody that she'd been brain-dead for days, right?
Nothing there. Well, we were able to also identify the mechanism by which this experience occurs, which is that as the brain shuts down because of a lack of blood flow, the normal breaking systems in the brain are removed.
This is known as disinhibition.
This enables people to have access to their entire consciousness or their thoughts, their memories, all their emotional states, everything that they've ever done, which they relive through the perspective of morality and ethics.
Yeah, you know the life review that so many people talk about with a near-death experience or something like that.
Something that these doctors who are killing people for their money Neonatologist Dr.
Paul Byrne, who established the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in St.
Louis, Missouri in 1963, he's very old in this video, and you're going to hear him talk about the murder of organ donors.
He explained in a 2012 talk that organs cannot be harvested from dead people.
So the concept of brain death was conceived to make organ transplants appear to be legal and morally acceptable.
He says every donor is killed in the process.
They're not taking organs away from it.
And this is why when we talked about what happened with Planned Parenthood, and remember, it was Lala Harris who ran legal cover For these murderers in Planned Parenthood.
She sued the whistleblower, David Daleiden, with the Center for Medical Progress to protect Planned Parenthood.
And then when she was rewarded by Satan for that, by becoming senator, she was replaced, the California State Attorney General, by Javier Becerra, who was then rewarded by Satan, by Biden, to be HHS head, right?
So he's head of HHS. The two of them.
Two of them running interference for the babies that were being killed in the process.
Dr. Byrne insisted that there's no such thing as brain death.
He said brain death was a lie from the beginning.
It's always been a lie. Brain death is not true death.
Organ transplant is the reason that they came up with brain death.
He said, donated organs without exception must come from a living person.
The beating heart is always taken last.
You can't get any organs from cadavers.
If you're really dead, then no organs can be extracted.
That's whether you're talking about babies, prisoners in China, or whether you're talking about the people that they get their hands on with, made, or with people who've been in accidents.
Recovery after being declared brain dead is also possible, said Dr.
Byrne, who then demonstrated his point with a televised clip of Zach Dunlap, who spontaneously revived after being declared brain dead.
He said there are now 175 known long-term survivors of so-called brain death.
He said this all started when the second ever heart transplant was performed.
They surgically removed a heart out of a three-day-old baby and transplanted it into an 18-day-old baby in New York.
A short time later, both babies were dead.
It was illegal. It was immoral.
They had to do something to make it legal.
So they decided in 1963 to set up a committee at Harvard.
That committee invented brain death.
This idea was not and is not based on science.
And so here's what else he has to say about this donation process.
Focus on pain. Now, here's what happens.
Just because a person can't demonstrate pain doesn't mean they don't have pain.
A very good example of that is they give paralyzing agents when they take the organs so that they don't move and they don't squirm.
And even if they don't move and don't squirm, when they caught on them, their heart rate goes up and their blood pressure goes up.
Which is the response to pain.
But they can't demonstrate that they have pain.
Because they're paralyzed. They medically paralyzed them.
So they can't respond by...
Right. That's horrible.
Horrible, horrible. It gets really bad if you pay attention to it.
See, and you cannot get any organs from a cadaver.
Every organ that's transplanted is a healthy organ, and you can only get healthy organs from living persons.
You cannot get any organs for transplant from a cadaver.
That's why you don't put it on your license.
And the things I'm telling you is that you are not allowed to hear.
And because if you hear it, you will be upset, as all three of you are upset.
And rightly so, you should be upset because whose organs do they want?
They want the organs, certainly from all children, but especially the people who are 16 to 30.
And their life is in jeopardy.
If they're unconscious and on a ventilator, they're going to get their organs.
And they do everything to get their organs.
And once the organs are taken, you can't bring them back to life.
And so what they do is say, Tell the relatives, well, you know, your daughter, Sally, would really like to do something good, and this is a way to make something good out of this tragedy, or your son.
While they have been getting organs from accidents and gunshot wounds, they now get more organs from overdose of drugs than they do from accidents and gunshot wounds combined.
There are eight deaths a day from overdose in Ohio.
And they get their organs, is what they want.
And so what are they doing?
They're giving the policemen The Narcan to counteract the drug which gets them into the emergency room but it doesn't save their life.
It gets them in the emergency room and they still get their organs.
And so... This is so diabolically disgusting.
Oh, it really is. See, it's so bad.
I can't aim.
Oh my gosh. Isn't it amazing what the medical industry has become?
Some of the older generations, like this older doctor, will tell you what's going on with it.
But it's chilling, isn't it?
It's like something out of Edgar Allan Poe.
They give you a drug to paralyze you so you can't move, but when you cut on the people, you can see the heartbeat going up, you can see the blood pressure going up, you know that they're feeling pain.
But do we care? We don't care if the baby and a pregnant woman is feeling pain.
Well, we'll determine this based on a heartbeat or based on brain death or something like that.
Same types of things that we saw, always discussed.
About babies and abortion.
Do they feel pain, heartbeat, brain signal, all this other kind of stuff?
Well, you know, this particular scheme, they're focusing on 16 to 30-year-olds.
And, of course, MAID is focusing on end-of-life people, not necessarily for the organs, but just because they want to depopulate.
The country, the undead, organ harvesting, the ice water test, beating heart cadavers, how medicine is blurring the line between life and death.
It's an article from Discover Magazine.
Well, actually, it should be how medicine is blurring the line between life and murder.
Not life and death.
Life and murder.
That's their purpose. Organ transplants would be peripheral to the story of death if they were what the organ trade claimed them to be.
The neat extraction of body parts from totally dead, unfeeling corpses.
The grisly facts compiled in this article is a knowledge that has been gained from the medical establishment's obsession with recycling the bodies of people who are, in the words of Dr.
Michael DeVita of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, only pretty dead.
They're pretty dead, right?
Why don't you just call it an abortion?
I mean, we've got the left that's celebrating abortion.
Let's not call it euthanasia.
Let's just call it abortion so we can celebrate it more fully.
Beating heart cadavers.
They've actually called that.
They've got a term. BHC. So now we refer to them as BHCs.
These are cadavers who still have a beating heart.
Well, then they're not.
You understand the oxymoron with that.
BHCs are decidedly different from regular corpses.
I like my dead people cold, stiff, gray, and not breathing, says DeVita.
The brain dead are warm, pink, and breathing.
They look sick, but they're not dead.
Anesthesiologists have been at the forefront of questioning the finality of brain death and whether beating heart cadavers truly are unfeeling, unaware corpses.
They've also begun wondering about what a pretty dead donor may experience during a three to five hour harvest without anesthetic.
And they're speaking out on the subject.
You know, this sounds very familiar when we talk about the anesthesiologists who are blowing the whistle on this.
Remember that animated film?
Call the procedure.
I showed it a couple of times.
And that was an animated version of what an ultrasound technician described that he witnessed as a baby was being ripped apart.
And they showed it in the animated thing, how they ripped off an arm, the baby recoiled and tried to escape Well, the doctor just relentlessly kept ripping it apart.
In one of these examples, an anesthesiologist administered a drug to a beating heart cadaver to treat an episode of tachycardia during a harvest.
The donor began to breathe spontaneously just as the surgeon removed his liver.
Anesthesiologists reviewed the donor's chart and found that he had gasped at the end of the apnea test.
But a neurosurgeon had declared him dead anyway.
I want that organ.
In another case, a 30-year-old patient with severe head trauma was declared brain dead by two doctors.
Preparations were made to excise his organs.
The on-call anesthesiologist noted that the beating heart cadaver was breathing spontaneously.
But the declaring physician said that because he was not going to recover, he could be declared dead anyway.
The harvest proceeded over the objections of the anesthesiologist, who saw the donor move and react to the scalpel with hypertension that had to be treated.
It was all in vain since a proposed liver recipient died before he could get the organ, which then went untransplanted.
You see, if you die, they're not going to take the organs, if you're really dead.
it.
They don't want organs from a cadaver.
They take organs from living babies, from prisoners, and from people who have been injured and are put in their care.
In a third instance, a young woman suffered seizures several hours after delivering her baby.
A neurologist said that it was a catastrophic neurologic event.
And she was readied for harvest.
At that time, the anesthesiologist found that she had small yet reactive pupils.
She had weak corneal reflexes and a weak gag reflex.
After treatment, the patient coughed, grimaced, and moved all extremities.
She regained consciousness.
She suffered significant neurologic deficits but was alert and oriented.
The Brain Death Establishment discounts such stories as anecdotal, as if they were taken from the National Enquirer.
But these three cases appeared in Anesthesiology, the Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, which has 44,000 members.
Well, we're going to talk a little bit more about that when we come back.
We're going to take a look. I started talking about it yesterday.
The interesting case of Stevie Nicks, who is now championing abortion after she did a story about aborting her own child many years ago.
Handy says, the ones I've seen wheeled into the OR for organ harvesting still had a pulse and a blood pressure.
They say the patients are brain dead.
Yeah, they're... Beating heart cadavers, right?
They play that brain death game with them.
He says they check the pupils.
Non-reactive, fixed, dilated pupils usually gets you a brain death label.
He says, David, you never know.
I had a 21-year-old suicide attempt that was called deceased on the scene.
I refused to not try.
And that young man walked out of the hospital a month later.
Yeah, it truly is amazing.
Truly is amazing. And so many of these experiences, they'll sometimes call near-death experiences, where people go through just horrific things.
You wouldn't think that there would be any way that they could survive.
The medical community has a lot of ability to bring back people who've been injured in accidents and that type of thing.
But they also have this evil greed.
That overrides that ability.
We'll be right back. Why, you feel sorry for the husband?
Yeah. Can you imagine my mom multiplied by a thousand?
Gracie, you're smiling.
What? You were smiling.
No. You were?
No, I was not. You're not now, but you were.
No, you were smiling.
I wasn't smiling. You were. When?
Like five seconds ago.
I'm not smiling. Well, a second ago you were.
No, you said five seconds ago.
Now that's six. Six seconds ago, I wasn't smiling.
Okay, ten seconds ago. Ten seconds ago, I was smiling.
Okay, in the next 10 seconds, let's see who smiles first.
You smiled already.
See? You did? No, that was a smirk.
That was a smirk. That's not a smile.
A smirk is different. They both start with S, but they're not.
The same to you, Homer.
You bet.
Wait a minute, Brian.
Stay with me, wife.
Ooh, you said you'd give me life But you never told me about the fire
Down in the sea of love Yeah, again, that is Stevie Nicks.
That's the song, Sarah, which I would hear that on the radio all the time.
I never really could understand even what she was saying.
I was so slurred. And it wasn't until she started talking about the fact that it was written about her having an abortion and how she was proud of it.
She said she aborted Sarah to pursue her mission to the world.
She sees herself as a missionary.
She's now done something that's even more explicitly pro-abortion, a song called Lighthouse, in order to push the abortion.
But when she talks about the baby that she aborted back in 1979, she said it was more important for her to pursue her world's mission of writing songs than to become a mom.
She terminated the pregnancy during a relationship with Don Henley after deciding that it would have been impossible to continue working with a band if she had other obligations.
If I had not had that abortion, I'm pretty sure there would have been no Fleetwood Mac.
How would we ever have coped?
The rest of the world, right?
It just would have destroyed my life.
There's just no way I could have had a child then, working as hard as we worked constantly, and there was a lot of drugs, and I was doing a lot of drugs, and I would have had to walk away from the drugs and the fame and the adoration and the sex and the rest of the stuff.
She knew the music, she said, we knew that the music we were going to bring to the world was going to heal so many people's hearts.
Really. And make people so happy.
And make her multi-multi-millionaire.
And I thought, you know what?
That's really important.
There's not another band in the world that has two lead women singers, two lead women writers.
And that was my world's mission.
How about that? Gotta have women rock and roll singers and celebrities know it was really about her.
She's not doing this altruistically.
She maintained that her performing remained the most important part of her life.
Asked what would happen if she had to stop singing.
She said, well, it would kill me.
It isn't just singing.
It's that I would never perform again, that I would never dance across the stages of the world again.
And she said, I'm not, at 72 years old, willing to give up my career.
And of course, that was four years ago.
She's now 76.
She's in her last days.
She still loves herself.
She still thinks that it was the right decision.
She thinks that you should not have a child either.
Again, for those of you who have known the love of a child, would you give it up for celebrity?
Really? I don't think anybody who's known the love of a child would do that.
But she said Sarah was about her aborted child with a lead singer of the Eagles, Don Henley.
And she said, and here's the lyrics, a little bit of the lyrics here.
She's actually done an updated version of it called Cleaning Lady.
And I'll play you just a little bit of that as well.
I want to be a star.
I want to be a star. I don't want to be a cleaning lady.
I want to be a star.
I don't want to be a cleaning lady.
This baby's in the way.
Yeah. Wait a minute, baby.
Stay with me. Yeah, well, that baby didn't wait, didn't stay with her.
She killed it. And so, drowning in the sea of love, where everyone would love to drown.
But now it's gone.
It's gone. And it doesn't matter what for.
When you build your house, then call me home.
And he was like a great dark wing within the wings of a storm.
I think I had met my match.
He was singing and undoing and undoing the laces, undoing the laces, drowning in a sea of love.
It's where everyone would love to drown.
And now it's gone. And it doesn't matter what for.
No sorrow for sorrow.
You can have no more, said Sarah.
You're the poet in my heart.
And there's the heartbeat.
And when it never really died.
Dreaming. Ooh.
And it never really died.
Why would you swallow all your pride?
Could you speak a little louder?
Dreaming. But there's a heartbeat.
And it never really dies.
Never really dies, she keeps telling herself, over and over again.
Well, the baby Sarah did die.
Stevie Nicks is now 76.
She will die. She will stand before God.
And just not to condemn her, God will be her judge.
But we all need to think about what we sacrifice for.
And she has now become an evangelist for this very thing.
This is somebody, if you listen to this, sounds like she's crazy, insane, on drugs, maybe all of the above.
Yeah, Sarah, you know, you're the poet in my heart and we'll always have this relationship even though I killed you.
There's a heartbeat and the heartbeat really never stops.
Well, no, she did. She stopped the heartbeat.
And now she's trying to encourage everybody else to do the same thing.
Here's a little bit of an excerpt from this Lighthouse single that she's got out there.
All dressed in black.
She's looking like a 76-year-old witch, which is what she is.
Look at this. A cultic.
She said, this may be the most important thing I ever do.
Lighthouse. Yeah, if that's the most important thing in your life, boy, that's a sad life, isn't it?
The lighthouse, she says, has been in the works since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v.
Wade in 2022, as I pointed out yesterday.
They've got the visuals in it, the other visuals besides her standing in a lighthouse with all this smoky lens look and the black clothing and everything makes her look like a witch.
Besides that, they've got featuring men and women protesting with their signs about their freedom and all the rest of this stuff.
And she said she chose Lighthouse as a beacon of light, providing a sense of direction, safety, and hope.
As I said yesterday, Lucifer, known as a light bearer.
So she said, all these stories we tell about the necessity for women's health care and the necessity for a safe and legal abortion option.
That's right. Kill your baby because you want to be a star.
Kill your baby because you don't want to be a cleaning lady.
That's the Faustian bargain she made with the devil.
It really is. So, as we look at this, the autopsy report of Candy Miller, they're making a big deal out of saying she was killed because of pro-life laws.
It turns out she died after taking an abortion pill.
The abortion pill death of a 41-year-old pregnant woman in Georgia has been blamed on pro-life laws, but a review of the autopsy report of Candy Miller provides more questions than answers.
Miller allegedly ordered abortion pills online from the International Virtual Dispensary.
Aid access details of her case were first reported by ProPublica, with the outlet quickly blaming Georgia's pro-life laws for her death.
While she appeared to be pregnant at the time of her death, the report oddly contained no reference to the pre-born child's gestational age.
And of course all this stuff matters if you're not going to have a medical exam.
You know, an abortion pill is not safe for women who are at a certain stage.
And so several women have died after taking the abortion pill in jurisdictions that have few or no abortion restrictions at all.
So who and what should we blame for all of those deaths?
Well, the reality is that they're not telling you what is really happening.
It's like they don't really tell you what is happening when you go for euthanasia or when you have a loved one that they want to extract the organs from.
Matthew Ronson says, Well, Trump isn't a doctor okay.
Why is he still going around saying that his clot shot is safe and effective and saved millions of lives?
Well, because he's a billionaire.
If they're a rich man, they think you really know, right?
Bill Gates is telling everybody what to do.
I mean, he's not even an engineer in terms of software.
He stole that stuff.
He stole what started his company.
It was all based on his theft of CPM from digital research, and he won it in court.
He's not even good at software engineering, but he tells us what to do, what to eat.
He tells us what we need to inject.
He's pushing global ID. He's pushing climate change and all the rest of the stuff.
So, yeah, because you're a billionaire, you get to tell people what to do.
Bloden says Trump sues Department of Justice for $100 million over the Mar-a-Lago raid, but we the people can't sue for vax injury or death.
From the vaccine that he paid the pharmaceutical companies tens of billions of dollars to make and delivered for them and continues to brag about it.
Yeah, it truly is amazing.
And as I say, yes, Mar-a-Lago raid.
How about the people who have been literally killed?
Some members have been killed.
They've shot flash grenades into the cribs of babies.
Come after the wrong people with these SWAT team raids?
He didn't get any of that.
He got none of that.
It disgusts me to see people like Dan Bongino making him out to be a victim because of a boilerplate thing that's on these FBI documents that gives them a permission to use force against anybody.
But they didn't use force against Trump.
It wasn't even there. But they do it all the time with these SWAT teams and all the rest of this stuff.
But nobody cares about that. Nobody can sue for that.
And, of course, we can't sue for the damages of his vaccines, was the point he made.
Good point.
We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
♪♪♪
The Inventory
You are listening to The David Knight Show.
you Well, tonight is going to be the vice presidential debate, if you care about that type of thing.
I liked what Babylon Bee put in.
He said, Tim Waltz gets really excited after hearing he might get spanked at the debate.
Tim Waltz and his debauchery there as a governor in Michigan.
And then, of course, this from Breitbart, they've got a couple of articles about football games, the reception of Tim Waltz at one versus the reception of Donald Trump at another.
Tim Waltz was booed outside of the Michigan-Minnesota football game.
Booed outside of a college football game between University of Michigan and University of Minnesota in a video posted on TikTok.
University of Michigan fans can be heard loudly booing at Walt's.
And of course, look. These videos that are put up, if you and your friends are booing, it's going to sound like the whole crowd is booing.
So we don't know if that happened or not.
And we don't know, you know, same thing is true if you're cheering for somebody.
And so they say, well, Trump receives loud welcome at Alabama-Georgia football game.
I didn't look at the clip. I can believe that Waltz could get booed, and I can believe that Trump would get cheered at these elections, but...
Look, here's what Breitbart's not paying attention to, and I've talked about this for years in context of Smartmatic rigging elections and things like that.
You know, Smartmatic was created in Venezuela.
It was developed by a couple of pals of Hugo Chavez.
He never lost an election after Smartmatic started running the elections with the voting machines.
And it's been accused of rigging elections throughout Central and South America and the Philippines and Mexico and many, many other places.
And so when we talk about that, one of the examples in Brazil that they gave And this is when Lula was in before the Communists, and it was a woman, I can't remember her name, who was seceding him, running after him.
And she went to a soccer game the day before the election, and they would have their election, and everybody would vote on one day.
They were serious about making our elections legit, which they're not serious folks about these elections being legit.
They would do them in one day.
They'd make it a holiday, and you'd get your thumb painted purple so you couldn't vote twice.
There's a lot of very simple things that you could do to make it.
Nothing is ever going to be foolproof.
You can always find somebody's going to be able to slip something in, but I don't think the fraud would be to the extent that they could rig an election.
But they have set up so many things in our elections now that it really doesn't matter who votes doesn't count, it's who counts the votes.
But in the Brazilian election, the day before the election, she goes to a soccer match.
Well, they call it football. Everybody calls it football, but they call it football.
It actually is played with a foot, so it makes sense.
But anyway, this football match, this soccer match, she goes there, and it's a stadium of like 90,000 people.
And they were all booing.
I mean, this is not one person with a, you know, an iPhone picking up the people around them booing.
No, she was booed out of the stadium.
Not very popular because they had just suffered through years of a Marxist leader, Lulu, who's now back in, or was in, told just recently.
But anyway, the next day, she was losing like 60 to 40.
you know, 60% 40% and then all the computer systems went down and they came back an hour or two later and guess what?
It was all reversed.
She's now winning 60 to 40, that type of thing.
So don't get so excited about who is booed and who is cheered at the football games.
Uh, but while, um, people may have been cheering, um, Trump at the Georgia game, there was one person who was booing that is part of the MAGA cult.
That's Laura Loomer.
Loomer booing Trump.
Oh, no, that's right. She didn't boo Trump.
She booed Marjorie Taylor Greene, the two of them in a catfight over this many different things.
And so even as pictures surfaced of Marjorie Taylor Greene and Trump standing next to her with his arm around her, both of them smiling, Laura Loomer calls out Marjorie Taylor Greene for attending the football game, but she doesn't mention anything about Trump being there.
She says, how dare you attend that football game and skip out on the people who are suffering from the hurricane in Georgia?
This was on Saturday as the hurricane was going through.
Laura Loomer renewed her attacks on Marjorie Taylor Greene, accusing her of allegedly neglecting constituents during Hurricane Helene and attending a college football game in Alabama.
According to Loomer, Greene opted for a football game over helping Georgians grappling with the aftermath of the storm that left at least 95 people dead across six states.
That's up to like 130 now.
Loomer wasted no time taking aim at Greene and aired her grievances on Ex on Sunday.
He wrote, it speaks volumes for her lack of focus as a congresswoman, and it really shows she's more interested in fanfare as opposed to helping people in her state.
Gross negligence from a woman who is unfit to serve.
Spared from Loomer's ire was former President Trump himself, who attended the game with Green and took his picture with her.
You know, this is one... Maybe that's what really set her off, that picture there.
Wait a minute, that should be me.
I should be going to the football game with him.
He used to take me all the places with him.
What's going on? I wonder if Laura Loomer is in Florida, right?
Did she go visit the people over in Tampa?
And the other people who were victims?
I don't think so.
Lala Harris, meanwhile, was partying with Hollywood celebrities in wake of the Hurricane Helene devastation, telling them it's good to be home.
We see here we have Breitbart playing the same game as Laura Loomer, right?
I mean, they could have criticized Trump for going to a football game.
But Breitbart doesn't criticize Trump.
Breitbart criticizes Lala Harris because she goes to a fundraiser.
And of course, she's not even pretending to care.
The reality is, at least Trump pretends to care.
Lala and Biden don't even bother to pretend.
But she made $28 million at the party that she went to in California.
So, you know, forget spending any federal money to help the victims here.
I can go make $28 million at a fundraiser in California.
Just like that. And, of course, you know, when we look at Ukraine and these other wars that, you know, hey, we're going to send soldiers and weapons to fight for Israel because, hey, Israel can get $100 million just from one rich billionaire widow, right? And they get the kickback from Ukraine.
Gets kicked back to Biden and all the rest of these people.
Or they can get kickbacks from the companies that they give the Green Grift money to.
That's what it's really about. Just follow the money.
And so, show this picture.
Lala slammed over her staged hurricane recovery photo.
They show her Like on Air Force One or Two or whatever, but she's got the official seal behind her, and she's got her head over like this, and she's looking at a blank sheet of paper.
People said everything about her is fake.
Oh, it absolutely is.
But, you know, she's supposedly there working, got her phone and all the rest of the stuff, and, you know, that at least gets the respect of Trump.
You know, anybody who's got a phone with an app on it, he thinks it's really something, you know?
They have a phone app so that people can come into our country.
These are smart immigrants, I guess, because most people don't have any idea what the hell a phone app is.
But they do. These are very intelligent immigrants.
But you know who they are? Yeah, right.
Most people don't know what it is.
Most people don't know what a barcode reader is.
Can you imagine taking Trump into a grocery store and letting him see a barcode reader or something?
He'd be just like... George H.W. Bush.
Well, Saturday Night Live did a great job mocking.
It was actually funny. They mocked Joe Biden and Lala to some extent.
Listen up, everyone. We couldn't have gotten here without one man.
And his name is Joe Biden.
Joe Biden. This is Dana Carvey.
He did a spot-on thing of George HW Bush. Now he does spot-on Biden.
Ha ha ha ha. Ha ha ha ha.
False! That's right!
A lot of people forget I'm president, including me.
But guess what?
And by the way...
I think I... I did a pretty good job.
I passed more bills than any president of history.
But folks, we still got work to do.
No joke. I'm being serious right now.
Come on. And guess what?
And by the way, the fact of the matter is, the Ricky don't pay their fair share.
We've got to build back better.
The build back, the better, the better.
Build back, the better. Can't believe it's not butter!
Thank you, J'Biden. Thank you, J'Biden.
I just want to say, thank you, J'Biden.
Thank you for putting country first and for handing over the reins.
I didn't want to! They made me.
And guess what? And by the way...
Yeah, guess what?
We're the same. Yeah, we're the same on all these policies.
That's what he said the other day. I had that line given to him by Jill to say that.
Well, isn't it good that we have Trump who really knows and respects firearms?
You know, he was the one who recognized how dangerous bump stocks are, you know, when he saw that picture that was staged in Las Vegas and everything.
Here he is talking about guns again.
Venezuelan killers, street gangs, occupying the town with MK-47s.
I know that gun very well.
I got to know it very well.
I've become an expert on guns.
Quickly. My son's no guns.
They couldn't believe what the story they heard.
Yeah, well, if your son's no guns, they're going to not believe that you're talking about MK-47s.
I know that gun really well.
Just made up a gun. It's the AK-47, I guess, and the MK-Ultra program.
He kind of mixed those together.
You know, the MK-Ultra program where they weaponize the assassins and...
They gave them an MK-47 straight out of the MK-Ultra program.
What an idiot. What idiots these people are.
Why do we care? Why are we fighting over Trump versus Lala?
Vote for whoever you want or don't vote at all.
It's ridiculous. Pay attention to what's happening in your local community and your state.
Seriously. And so...
You know, both Biden and Trump hate the First Amendment, just like Hillary, just like Lala, just like Biden.
They all hate the First Amendment.
They hate the Second Amendment as well.
Trump's nothing but a New York Democrat.
He doesn't know the first thing about guns.
He doesn't know or care the first thing about the Constitution.
He thinks that he can take the guns and do the due process later.
Well, guess what? The process is due before you take the guns.
And he thinks that he can do gun control by executive order.
And now Lala and Biden have done the same thing as well.
But Trump was very upset.
He said, I have to sit here and listen to her BS last night.
And who puts this on?
Fox News. They shouldn't be allowed.
Oh, he doesn't have much respect for the First Amendment either, does he?
They shouldn't be allowed.
We're seeing this over and over again, aren't we?
You've got to take the license away from ABC. They were so unfair to me, so unfair to me, that we should take their license.
Lala says, I don't like what's on Twitter.
Musk has violated his privileges.
His privileges need to be removed.
But here's Trump saying it.
to the people she's taking them in and then I have to sit there and listen to her bullshit last night.
And who puts it on Fox News.
And they shouldn't be allowed to put it on.
It's all lies.
It's all lies.
Everything she said is a lie.
See, if you don't like what somebody puts out, you call it a lie or you call it disinformation or malinformation or whatever, and we have to shut that down.
People can't be allowed to put stuff out there that I disagree with.
How is he any different from any of the Democrats?
Here's Hillary. What is something you see happening in the near future that we should be taking more seriously?
Well, I do think that the press needs a consistent...
I mean, the press is not supporting Trump.
We need a consistent narrative.
Very... Where do they get the script?
You write the script for them, Hillary?
It's trying to be the press, be objective.
Oh, yeah, right. Be objective.
They're trying. But we're going to give them the narrative.
A consistent narrative about the danger that Trump poses.
You either report the facts or label it fairly as opinion because everybody is skewed.
I've said this all the time. I said, anybody who is in the press who tells you that they are objective, reject that person out of hand.
Everybody has their biases.
I've got my biases. You've got your biases.
All God's children got biases, right?
Everybody's got their biases. Now, if they think that they don't have a bias, well, then they're stupid.
If they know that they've got a bias and they're telling you they're a liar.
So they're either stupid or lying to you if they tell you they don't have a bias.
What you choose to report shows your bias.
Just take a look at the Drudge Report.
He doesn't write articles.
He reports he is an aggregator.
He pulls in articles other people have done.
And everybody knows that Drudge used to be on one side of the political spectrum, and now he's on the completely opposite side of the political spectrum.
He's not even writing the articles.
It's just what he chooses to talk about.
That's a bias. Everybody's got it.
You saw John Kerry saying the First Amendment is in the way of them being able to govern.
Well, not unless you want to govern as a tyrant, which is what he wants.
Hillary Clinton says, we've got to have a consistent narrative.
And again, at the same event where John Kerry was talking, I played the clips yesterday.
A Wall Street Journal representative, or I don't forget what her title was there.
But she said, we used to control the narrative.
Yeah, that's what Hillary wants again, right?
Used to have a situation where you had only three networks, ABC, CBS, and NBC. And you have people like Walter Cronkite.
Well, that's the way it is.
Yeah, that's the way it is because they all, in their half-hour news segment, they would all tell you, by the way, minus commercials.
She'd get that gig. Anyway, they all tell you the same stories.
They would all cover the same stories.
I know, because I used to watch two or three of them, back to back.
I especially liked the theme song music from Huntley Brinkley Report, because it was Beethoven's Ninth Symphony Scherzo.
That was good. Anyway, the rest of them didn't have that.
But later on, I think it was NBC got John Williams to write something for him.
So that was something.
But... They would tell you the same thing.
Same stories they would all cover.
Usually in the same order.
And they told you the same thing about the story.
So it depends on who you like to watch and listen to and who had the better theme song that you would listen to.
It's always been controlled.
It's always been a controlled narrative.
If it's a narrative, it's not a report.
Journalism is reporting what you have seen.
But they're creating narratives.
And that's what we need to understand.
And we need to understand that it is the left as well as the right that is doing all of this stuff.
So, just keep that in mind.
If you choose to watch this debate tonight, J.D. Vance in 2020 messages said Trump had thoroughly failed to deliver.
Well, he was telling the truth then.
He absolutely was telling the truth.
But of course, Trump did deliver.
For Davos, for the UN, for the Pentagon, etc.
He delivered quite a bit for those people, for the agenda that they wanted.
No question about it.
But when it comes to, I was just talking about the First Amendment, right?
Biden has signed a 3D printed gun crackdown.
And he's also got an executive order where he wants schools to do shooter drills.
So I guess if you don't do a shooter drill, you're going to be treated the same way as somebody who doesn't put a boy in the girl's bathroom and shower.
You'll have your Department of Education purse strings pulled.
Yeah, he hates the First Amendment, and Biden hates the Second Amendment as well.
And so I guess we should vote for Trump to protect both of those, right?
Well, no, it's not just Trump saying that Fox News shouldn't be allowed, that ABC News needs to have their license removed.
He's now vowing to prosecute Google because they only put up bad stories about him.
See, he hates the First Amendment and the Second Amendment as well, because again, what, Second Amendment?
Red flag laws, executive orders to ban guns.
Now you see Biden is going to do executive orders and he's going to make this possible by pulling financial strings.
It's the same tactics of these people.
They use executive orders.
They use bribery with fiat currency and the rest of the stuff.
So Trump says he'll retaliate against Google.
And so the question is, you know, when you look at this, it's a little bit different for Google.
I absolutely despise Google.
But they were the first people to censor me at YouTube.
And, of course, they also censored me on Google before I just completely was depersoned on Google.
They would choose, even though I had interviews that had millions of views, If you Googled David Knight, you wouldn't find the interview that I had that had right away.
I got like two and a half million views with Nigel Farage and went up to like four million.
They didn't put that there.
Instead, what they put was an interview that I had with Simon Roche, who was with the Afrikaners in South Africa, which had about 30,000 views on their platform on YouTube.
Why would they do that? Well, because they're trying to create a narrative that I'm a white supremacist or something like that, right?
Which, by the way, Simon Roche is not.
He's an anti-communist.
He was actually a part of the African National Congress before they took office because he was opposed to apartheid, but then he saw that they were communists and he woke up.
But they were trying to paint me in a derogatory manner, and then after a while they just disappeared altogether.
And so when you look at that, I don't like the way I've been treated by Google and by YouTube.
But I don't know. It's not the same.
Now, YouTube, yes, YouTube is a public square to a large degree, I think.
It's more like social media than the others.
But social media is absolutely a digital public square.
And it was given immunity.
That's what the Section 230 was really for.
But they perverted the basis of that, just like they perverted the FISA Act.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
They perverted those.
They use FISA now to give themselves permission to spy on Americans when the purpose of it was to stop them from spying on Americans.
They use Section 230, which is supposed to stop the government from punishing platforms that were digital public squares.
They use that to say, well, we are going to punish you if you don't take these people down, right?
I mean, it's just the opposite of all of this.
And so for a social media platform, I believe that it's very easy to make that claim that it is a digital public square.
Once you start getting into a search engine, I'm not so sure.
I mean, they've got their own proprietary search engine.
Even if they're manipulating it, if people go there to find information, that's stupid to go to Google to find information, but, you know, they can manipulate it, and they do manipulate it.
Trump screams, this is, and he puts all uppercase, illegal activity.
Well, actually, it's not.
You see, if you're not going to let people put up stuff that is...
Is wrong? Is false?
Is malicious?
I mean, you know, again, that becomes kind of difficult to show that they are maliciously defaming him or me, which they do, but that would be very difficult to prove.
In reality, we know that's what's happening, but it is difficult to prove.
But that is the appropriate response, and the appropriate response is to get people to use other search engines.
He should call for a boycott of Google.
He ought to take them on. But better yet, Google is going to disappear when, like George Gilder said, he said, life after Google.
He said, look, I'm in my 80s. I don't think I've got that much time left.
But he says, I think people are going to start valuing privacy.
And if they value privacy, Google is going to disappear.
And so I wrote a book, Life After Google.
I'm afraid that people don't value privacy as much as he would like to believe.
And that's the real issue.
So he said, this is illegal activity, and I hope the Justice Department will criminally prosecute them for this blatant interference of elections.
If not, and subject to the laws of our country, I will request their prosecution at the minimum level when I win the election.
So his angle is going to be that they're interfering with elections.
But again, he's making these promises that he's going to lock them all up, just like he promised with Hillary and didn't do it.
And at the same time, as the left is trying to portray him as a tyrant, this is really not very good optics.
It's not a smart move for him.
But he isn't doing what is smart.
He's doing what he instinctively wants.
He's a deeply wounded narcissist, incapable of acting except in his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge.
That is lawyer Ty Cobb, who got it 100% right.
Google has been adamant it doesn't manipulate search results to favor a political candidate.
LOL. Yeah, they manipulate.
They lie. The company has not disclosed the inner workings of the software that powers its search engine.
Look, I mean, they are, you know, you should have, if you look up the word bias in the dictionary, if you had any honesty at all, it would have a picture of Google right there.
Meanwhile, Lala Harris goes to the border.
Not to survey the damage or talk about how she's going to fix anything.
She goes there wearing a $62,000 necklace.
Talk about optics.
But hey, look, if you made $500 million, $500 million in one month and $350 million the next, I mean, you know, hey, I guess you got to do something with that money, right?
Put it into bling like her rapper boyfriends would do.
Meanwhile, Trump is attacked by futurism, said a confused Trump issues a garbled warning about nuclear warming, quote-unquote.
What is he talking about?
Is this guy senile, they said?
No, no.
They don't understand.
I mean, I've used this kind of phrase as well.
He's talking about World War III. Oh, you're talking about global warming?
How about if we warm the planet up with nuclear war, right?
It's amazing to me how these people are like, he's so stupid.
Talk about dumb and dumber.
I think it's the left-wing press versus Trump.
They're even dumber than he is.
We're going to take a quick break, and we're going to come right back, and we're going to talk a little bit about what is happening with gold.
It is pretty interesting, and there's some pretty interesting predictions about what may be next.
Next we'll be right back.
♪♪♪
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
you you Well, Goldman Sachs is saying to go for the gold.
Put it in your sacks as well.
They said they had been looking at predicting that gold was going to get up to $2,700 an ounce by the beginning of next year.
They've now raised that to $2,900 per ounce.
And they said that's for two reasons.
Number one, we see faster declines in short-term interest rates throughout the West and even in China.
So the central banks are lowering the interest rates.
And the number two reason is because the central banks are buying gold.
See, the central banks know what they're doing.
They know what they're going to do to the economy.
There's absolutely no question about it.
I hope you understand why they're going to do the gold to the economy.
This I also thought was interesting.
Anytime you start to compare the price of real things to gold, you start pricing things in gold.
Well, this article, they compare the price of an iPhone to gold.
And they did it in 2008, 2012, 17, and 24.
And it's interesting, it's pretty consistent.
You know, in 2008, before the Great Recession, it was.9 ounces of gold to get you an iPhone.
Then in 2017, it was.89.
And now in 2024, it's at.6.
So, it has gone down.
Now, some of that is perhaps because of the higher price of gold that has happened here, but I think it has more to do with the fact that iPhone's not selling well.
Trying to do some price incentives, perhaps, relative to where other things are.
And we've seen that in the past.
You know, go back a century and look at how much a custom suit would cost you, for example.
And it is slightly less in today's gold because of some efficiencies gained in manufacturing, that type of thing.
It was also even lower in 2012 in terms of the aftermath of the Great Recession that was happening at that point in time.
But we also have this wild prediction from Peter Schiff.
Gold to 26,000.
Not 2,600. 26,000, says Peter Schiff.
He thinks gold's going to hit 3,000 this year, 6,000 next year.
And he says, and from there, it could be off to the races.
Well, the only way that's going to happen is if we have hyperinflation, which I hope we don't have.
But nevertheless, gold is a way to have wealth protection.
Go to davidknight.gold.
That'll take you to Tony Ardobin.
He can help you get gold or silver in small or large amounts.
And that's going to be one way that you can protect yourself.
But as I said yesterday, it's CBDC. That is really concerning me.
That's something that we have never seen before, and it is something that is still on the menu despite the Canadian bank as well as the Federal Reserve Bank saying, well, we're really not going to do that to you.
No, they are going to do that to us.
It absolutely is going to be coming.
So make sure that you protect yourself against this coming tyranny.
Make sure you get outside of the system.
Protect yourself from this financial system that they are in the process of collapsing.
Well, before we close the program, I just want to mention a couple of things that were put on Subscribestar.
And I really do want to thank listener DocuGarden who wrote, he says, to help with the gas gauge in the future, I've upgraded my subscription to the next level.
This will be like three new people subscribing at the lowest level.
Like another listener states, it is not charity, but it is for services rendered.
Your show is too important to lose.
He said, well, I really do appreciate that.
I appreciate the support.
I appreciate it. My family appreciates it.
And there are many ways that you can support us.
We're going to try to make it a little bit more easy to find that as well as to find the show on our website.
We're in the process of changing that.
But thank you so much for your support.
Have a good day. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears.
You can even watch it by using your eyes.
In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
Yeah, good job.
And you want to know something else?
Export Selection