Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 25, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:53

The David Knight Show - 09/26/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 26th of September.
	Dear Lord, 2024.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at a perhaps budding romance between Elon Musk and Prime Minister Maloney of Italy, and that's what the press is all about.
	You know, they had kind words to say to each other.
	They're smiling, sitting next to each other.
	Who cares? I really don't care.
	The point is, where were they?
	They were at the Atlantic Council.
	The Atlantic Council.
	They've got both of them who are supposed to be conservative, populist, all the rest.
	This is their public image.
	But privately, they're having an affair with the Atlantic Council.
	Epicenter of war and censorship.
	We're going to begin with that today.
	We have a lot to cover in the news.
	It's amazing what comes out of a single interview with Lala Harris.
	She thought she was safe.
	This reporter actually pursued the truth.
	It's pretty amazing the clips we've got.
	We'll be right back. By the way, I want to begin with a serious note before we get into politics, which is decidedly unserious.
	But like I said before, I view politics as a gathering storm that is headed your way.
	It's like these hurricanes.
	What are you going to do? Are you going to move?
	Are you going to board up and get out of harm's way?
	Are you going to prepare for it, weather it out?
	What are you going to do? But you need to know where the storm is coming.
	So I'm just kind of a political weatherman.
	Not a weather vane. I don't turn with the wind, but I tell you what I'm seeing coming.
	But on a serious side, though, I got an email last night from Jason Barker.
	And Jason, who does Knights of the Storm.
	And you know Jason.
	I mean, he's been around for...
	From the beginning of this show, he wrote a great letter that...
	So many people used.
	He was in the military. He was fighting against the vaccine mandates.
	And he showed his letter that he was using, and it had four or five key points.
	He said, look, you know, don't just copy this, but, you know, if you believe any of these things, these are what I believe, and these are the points that I have used and that type of thing.
	It was a great deal of benefit to many, many people.
	I had people who were in the medical community who talked about how they had used that to fight the vaccine mandates and things like that.
	A strong Christian believer.
	He's got a grandson that was born yesterday, Liam.
	And everything went well at the beginning, but then they started having problems with his grandson breathing, and they sent him to the emergency room, or another hospital, I think.
	But nevertheless, he is in a very severe condition, and so he asked for your prayers.
	And we'll give you a reminder of that later in the program.
	But please pray for little Liam, Jason Barker's grandson, at this moment.
	So let's talk about politics here.
	And these people can't give us what we want, can they?
	So the Italian Prime Minister goes to the Atlantic Council and all the press can talk about is whether or not there's some kind of a romantic relationship that is budding between Maloney and Musk.
	Folks, what it does is it underscores how phony the two of them are.
	Maloney ran as Italian Prime Minister.
	She ran over the border issue, like Trump did.
	And then, of course, she immediately ignored all of it.
	Immediately turned on all of it and turned toward the EU. Turned away from her populist policies and so forth and turned toward the EU. Good example.
	One of the worst examples of this massive migration was a little Italian island where they had 6,000 people, and within a few days they brought in 12,000 people who had no way to support themselves into this island.
	Where are they all going to live? The crime and all the rest of this stuff, it's just the volume of this, just flooded that little island.
	Well, she was prime minister.
	She presided over that.
	And I guess they liked that enough that they invited her to the Atlantic Council and gave her an award.
	Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Maloney delivered a powerful speech after receiving the Atlantic Council's Global Citizen Award in New York.
	She focused on the importance of Western values, democracy, and the fight against authoritarianism.
	What hypocrisy from these people.
	Again, you want to talk about the Atlantic Council.
	The Atlantic Council, folks, is, first and foremost, a big NATO organization.
	They're for war everywhere.
	And they're for censorship everywhere.
	They actually created something called the Digital Forensics Lab.
	I mean, they've been pushing the censorship since 2018.
	They were at the epicenter.
	Of this massive purge, first of Infowars in 2018, August, and then two months later, you had 800 sites were shut down, and they were at the epicenter of all this stuff, the Atlantic Council.
	So where would you expect to find Mr.
	Free Speech? Elon Musk.
	Yeah, right there. Right there.
	So she was awarded the prize, you know, for first of all, being a woman.
	That's what they said. Groundbreaking role as Italy's first female prime minister.
	Okay. So you get some points for being a woman.
	And then her strong support of the European Union.
	Not of Italy. Not of Italy.
	She's not for Italy.
	She's for the European Union.
	She's a globalist.
	Strong support of the European Union and the Transatlantic Alliance.
	Again, the Transatlantic Alliance, that's their code for NATO. And that's what the Atlantic Council is all about.
	Maloney urged the West to reject the idea of decline and to reaffirm its moral and democratic foundations.
	Well, if we're going to talk about moral and democratic foundations, then maybe you don't go to every single war.
	Maybe you distance yourself from NATO, who's all about preemptive war, striking first.
	You know, we know those guys are bad.
	We know eventually it's going to come to the point where they're going to attack us.
	Let's attack them first. That was rightly called infamy when Japan did it to us.
	Even though we had already jumped into the war, even though for practical purposes, you know, we're shipping massive amounts of supplies and arms, To the declared belligerents, we were effectively in the war, and of course they looked at it and they said, yeah, well, you know, it's just a matter of time before the U.S. sends troops and gets involved that way.
	So what we'll do is we'll strike them first.
	That is the logic of the U.S. That's the logic of NATO. That's the logic of Israel.
	That's the logic of the West now.
	We have adopted that heinous practice of preemptive strike.
	It's immoral. It's immoral.
	That has never been justified.
	Never. Not even by pagan countries, let alone by Christian countries.
	That's not justified.
	And then you want to talk about decline?
	What's she doing to her country in terms of opening up the border, bringing in two times the number of people with no means of support, anything else, that were already in that island?
	So she goes on to say, we must resist the lure of authoritarianism.
	Oh, okay. So you're saying that to the group that's been behind censorship, the group that partnered with Facebook, the group that created the Digital Forensic Lab.
	We have to resist the lure of authoritarianism?
	What hypocrisy to go to the Atlantic Council and to say that?
	She said, because the true strength of democracies lies in their values and their freedoms, not in power alone.
	What freedom? If you don't have free speech, folks, you don't have any freedom.
	You really don't. That, not the Second Amendment, but the First Amendment, is the cornerstone of our foundation.
	You're not even going to know who to shoot at if you don't have the First Amendment.
	You're not even going to know the cause of why you are fighting if you don't have the First Amendment.
	And, of course, the First Amendment can help you to stop this before it gets to the point of shooting.
	The Italian premier reiterated her commitment to Ukraine.
	See? It's a NATO organization for censorship.
	So she kowtows to Europe, abandons her people in Italy, kowtows to NATO for censorship.
	And she urged the West to stand firm against Russian aggression, a pivotal moment, she said, for the West in its defense of self-determination and freedom.
	Just not freedom of speech, right?
	Whatever freedom she's talking about, I'm not sure.
	She said, we must not waver in our support for Ukraine.
	This is about more than borders, says the woman who ran on borders, on Italian borders, and then abandoned that cause.
	Now she's concerned about the Ukraine border, just like all of our politicians, Republican and Democrat.
	This is about more than borders.
	It's about the future of the global order.
	And democracy, of course.
	Well, those are two different things.
	Don't talk about global order and democracy at the same time.
	This is like the French who talked about liberty, fraternity, and equality, right?
	Brotherhood, liberty.
	You can have liberty and brotherhood, that's fine.
	But you can't have equality in the way that they talked about it because the French, as the Jacobins, the early Marxist revolutionaries, They were about equality of results, not equality of opportunity.
	Yes, you can have liberty and equality of opportunity.
	You must have both of those.
	You have to have equality of opportunity if you're going to have liberty.
	But if you're going to impose an equality of results, that means that you're talking about an authoritarian, dictatorial redistribution of wealth.
	You're talking about Marxism, socialism, collectivism.
	Or as the founders called it, leveling.
	You're going to level everybody, except for yourself, of course.
	You will have to be above everybody else so that you can, you know, do the leveling.
	Yeah, it's a bunch of doublespeak.
	And I don't see anybody calling them out on any of this stuff.
	You know, all the people who report it, it's just about, ooh, look at this, you know.
	Maloney and Musk. K-I-S-S-I-N-G. Sitting in the tree, you know.
	One prominent admirer that Giorgio Maloney has attracted is Elon Musk, who said, she's also someone who's authentic, honest, and truthful.
	Yeah, after what I just told you.
	And that can't always be said about politicians.
	Yeah. Who's courting who, though?
	You know, is he courting her?
	Or are Musk and Maloney courting the Atlantic Council?
	Or is the Atlantic Council courting Musk and Maloney?
	Maloney then praised Musk's visionary leadership.
	Well, let me tell you something.
	You know, they're both in bed with a war machine.
	They're both in bed with a globalist agenda.
	They're both in bed with the censors of free speech.
	They're both controlled opposition.
	It's just that simple.
	As a matter of fact, I'm not the only one that notices that.
	Musk decries government censorship, but his X platform has been even more compliant than Twitter under Jack Dorsey.
	And we got the metrics.
	You know, this is the Washington Post, and look, you can look at this and say, this is mainstream media, they don't like him.
	But look at the metrics that they have.
	They can tell you the truth.
	Many times they'll tell you the truth about their enemies.
	They'll lie about their friends, but they'll tell you the truth about their enemies.
	They never attacked Musk until he started making public statements in support of populism and Trump and things like that.
	Fundamentally, he hasn't changed.
	Ex-owner Elon Musk is the world's wealthiest flag bearer for free speech, but under his leadership, the social media platform is acceding to government requests to take down or to withhold user content at a significantly higher rate than it did during the years leading up to his purchase.
	The site acted on 71% of the legal request it received to remove content in the first half of this year, up 20% from the last time it reported the figure in 2021 and more than double the rate in preceding years, according to a new transparency report.
	Published on Wednesday.
	And a Washington Post review of past disclosure data.
	The findings highlight that while Musk has decried government attempts to censor content and blasted X's previous ownership for buckling to political pressure, the platform, since his takeover, appears to be complying with such demands even more frequently.
	And the disclosures are consistent with past media reports finding higher government compliance rates under Musk.
	I've said it over and over again.
	The shadow banning is actually worse.
	Even though I paid $8 a month, the shadow banning is even worse.
	I talked yesterday about a guy who's a big fanboy of Tesla and Elon Musk, but he has had a lot of problems with his Cybertruck.
	He's on his third lemon.
	He replaced them under the lemon law.
	And he just said, Elon, fix this.
	Boom, you're shadow banned.
	He can't get any engagement whatsoever.
	He says he's still getting the same amount of engagement on other platforms.
	YouTube, Facebook, other things like that.
	But he's banned. And so, Jason Barker, as a matter of fact, has also documented how he was, you know, being shadow banned on Twitter.
	Oh, it's very much a part of it.
	So it is absolute hypocrisy for these people.
	It's amazing to see how easily conservatives are fooled.
	Because they want to believe that there's going to be, if somebody's made billions of dollars, well, they must be a great businessman.
	Well, you know, that's one possibility.
	The other possibility is that they're a crook.
	Could be that, you know, they are the king of crony capitalism, as Musk was.
	That's what Eric Peters and I first talked about more than a decade ago.
	The king of crony capitalism.
	LA Times ran one of a few rare reports criticizing Musk before he bought Twitter, started talking conservatively, when he did not talk about his politics, when he just got what he wanted in the back rooms with the politicians.
	They said they called him king of crony capitalism.
	They said, look at how many billions of dollars?
	I forget what it was now.
	How many billions of dollars?
	That he's gotten of crony capitalism in the name of government contracts and to push their agendas for electrification and all the rest of this stuff.
	But he moves to the right.
	And this is something we've seen with Chris Cuomo.
	It's something that, you know, he's got a long way to go before he can...
	Even reached the center.
	But he's getting pretty close, I guess, to where the center is and being radically left.
	He's reinventing himself after he was fired because he knows nobody's going to...
	The only way that he can make a living being a radical left authoritarian is if he's working for some government-subsidized organization like CNN. So he's having to, in the name of self-preservation...
	Moderate his views and try to back away from the lies that he told people during the lockdown.
	And he's done more to back away from that stuff, quite honestly, than Trump has or the Trump supporters have.
	And so this is something that a lot of them are doing.
	And now the other person who's turning here is Mark Zuckerberg.
	Mark Zuckerberg now identifies as a libertarian.
	Yeah, he's calling himself a classical liberal or libertarian.
	He doesn't believe in big government.
	This guy is put in business by DARPA. You believe in any of this stuff?
	And look at that picture.
	Zoom in on that picture.
	I think he identifies as Austin Powers.
	I don't think that this is, you know...
	Yeah, see?
	Doesn't he look like Austin Powers?
	Yeah. And he's going to be telling us all.
	That's what he's been telling us on Facebook.
	Oh, behave.
	Well, he's not going to do that anymore.
	He's going to be a libertarian, and he's got his new glasses.
	These things that Google and Facebook come out with, these glasses, it always reminds me of that Steve Martin movie, The Jerk.
	Doesn't it, Karen? It's like, you know, when you look at, have you ever seen that movie?
	Steve Martin is this guy who makes an unbelievable fortune because of some glasses that he sells people.
	But then after he gets the money and people are using the glasses for a couple of months, everybody's starting to go cross-eyed.
	And then they all sue him and he loses everything.
	And he's worse off than he was before.
	Of course, that didn't happen with the Trump shots, did it?
	The mRNA. There you go.
	Thanks. That's the picture.
	That's pretty good, guys. Yeah, the jerk.
	the jerk. It's kind of like a farmer bro, except there was consequences when it was done in the movies. And so now we've got Mark Zuckerberg, libertarian, man of mystery, Austin Powers. Zuckerberg now identifies as a libertarian that feels a sense of hostility to government regulation.
	This is just too rich.
	I mean, come on. How many times are they going to pull this?
	And this is, I've been laughing about this with Musk, with Cuomo, Megyn Kelly.
	Megyn Kelly, remember? You know?
	Like Trump said, she had blood coming out of everywhere.
	She was coming after him. The very first debate.
	Of course, he now remembers that as Rosie O'Donnell, I think, is what he called her.
	The ultimate insult.
	That was worse than saying she had blood coming out of her.
	We're going to call her Rosie O'Donnell.
	She's nearly anorexic now.
	But now she's become one of the biggest Trump cheerleaders because that's where the money is.
	I mean, you don't have to be a genius to see that's where the money is.
	People are they used to do shows with that I can't do shows with anymore.
	It's like, forget the polls!
	Trump's gonna win! I mean, just relentless Trump cheerleading.
	That's what everybody's doing.
	Everybody is whoring themselves out to this whoremonger.
	Donald Trump. Just disgusts me.
	But anyway...
	He now feels a sense of hostility to government regulations as well as skepticism of initiatives that claim to advance so-called social justice.
	So Breitbart is going to try to help him along and explain his transition as being legit.
	Zuckerberg now considers his political views to be more libertarian or in line with classical liberalism, a position that's considered to be fiscally conservative but socially liberal.
	Well, let me just say this.
	Libertarianism has now become associated with fiscally conservative and socially liberal.
	But I don't know if you could say the same thing about classical liberalism.
	I can't imagine the people who were speaking out in terms of liberty writing essays in the 1800s.
	I cannot imagine them getting on board with the LGBT agenda.
	That's what we mean by socially liberal today.
	I also can't imagine them getting on board with abortion either.
	And so when we talk about classically liberal, right, we used to talk about a liberal education.
	What that meant was that that liberated you, right?
	Liberty, liberal, all the same root word.
	It was hijacked by the Marxists and the socialists in the early 20th century, that word.
	And it became something of a swear word, liberal.
	But what it really meant was that you supported liberty, and you still have some countries where people, you have liberal parties, and they have policies that would be identified as conservative, but of course, just like the conservatives, they don't really pay attention to liberty.
	In New South Wales, Gladys Berejiklian was part of the Liberal Party.
	Now, if you looked at...
	At her policies of tyranny, you would say, yeah, she sounds like a liberal, but she was supposed to be somebody that supported individual liberty, right?
	And so a lot of people will say, well, classical liberal is what I am, but that was lost on so many people that they came up with the term libertarian.
	I saw the direction that the Libertarian Party was going, and while I agree with liberty, I didn't agree with the party, and That's why I created my handle about 12 years ago on Twitter.
	I called it Libertarian.
	But anyway, so now he is a classical liberal, he says.
	Sources added that Zuckerberg is also trying to repair his relationship with former President Trump.
	Speaking to him twice in one-on-one cordial phone calls over the summer.
	All the billionaires are friends.
	Let's be friends. Could we share some money or something sometime?
	We'll get together and talk about our mansions.
	You've got a very nice house, Mark.
	Very nice. Mine is better, of course, but yours is nice.
	Yeah. So, yeah, actually, Mark's got more money than...
	He needs more gold, Mark.
	That's what I tell him, more gold.
	That's kind of guilt everything, yeah.
	That's like when they did the movie The Apprentice.
	They said that the sets needed to look expensive but tasteless.
	That's Trump for sure.
	Expensive but tasteless.
	Gilded with gold everywhere.
	You may be melting that down before long if the price of gold keeps going up.
	Anyway, here's one thing.
	When I look at this, and I look at this movement of all these people to Trump, I wonder, have they gotten word on the inside?
	You know, these guys know what's going on with the global governance and all the rest of the stuff.
	The inside clubs at Bilderberg and all the rest of the stuff.
	Have they gotten word that Trump is going to be the selection this time if they're moving that far, close to him?
	I mean, you know, would they be going in the other direction?
	Because he's made a very strong move towards Trump and not anything at all toward Lala.
	A few weeks later after the shooting where he praised Trump, called him a badass, Zuckerberg called Trump a second time to apologize after Metta erroneously took down iconic images of the assassination attempt.
	And then Zuckerberg said that he has yet to forge a relationship with Vice President Lala Harris, said the newspaper.
	He doesn't call her Lala.
	I do. Zuckerberg has decided not to engage with Washington unless necessary and is instead working on his relationships with politicians behind the scenes.
	You know, let's get together, you know, the Davos.
	Let's do that Davos lunch thing.
	Let's schmooze at Bilderberg.
	You know, because that's all just about building relationships.
	It's not about making any plans about taking over the world.
	Yeah. Karen, tell the story again.
	When we were at Bilderberg in Copenhagen in 2014, that was the best and actually really the only time that the press was able to get close to the hotel where they were staying.
	I was right smack dab in the middle of the city, and the only thing that separated the press from them was a four-lane road.
	And so you can see everybody that was going into the building and so forth and so on.
	And some of them tried to go into the side exits.
	And Karen was over on a side exit one day and had a guy who was a high official in the Labor Party.
	His name was Ed Balls.
	And he was trying to come in on the side.
	And he didn't have, he forgot his ID stuff.
	And he just had his rolling luggage with him.
	And the guards would not let him in.
	You know me, I'm Ed Balls.
	I'm the shadow secretary of the Exchequer and all the rest of this stuff, right?
	And they were not impressed.
	They wouldn't let him in. So he goes to look through his luggage and he unzips it.
	And when he does, the contents fall out.
	And it was a suitcase filled with paper.
	That's it. That's it.
	No. No clothes, no toothbrush, no ID, just papers.
	But, you know, hey, it's just no business work is being done.
	They were operating under Chatham House rules, so nobody can say anything.
	And, you know, it's just a friendly, informal thing, like Zuckerberg does, behind the scenes with Trump and other people, these relationships that they forge.
	He was, in the next election, he was the highest-ranking official to lose his seat.
	Anyway, good job, Karen.
	Zuckerberg has hired prominent Republican strategist Brian Baker to improve his status with conservative media and with Republican lawmakers.
	You know, just like Chris Cuomo is doing, Megyn Kelly and all of them.
	People close to Zuckerberg and his wife.
	Told the newspaper that the couple was caught off guard when their activism and their philanthropy backfired on them.
	After the summer of 2020, George Floyd riots, a Chan Zuckerberg Initiative employee, because she still goes by her last name.
	So her name is Chan.
	So the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, that's kind of like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
	An employee there reportedly asked Zuckerberg during a staff meeting to resign from Facebook.
	He claimed that Zuckerberg had been unwilling to censor Trump on social media.
	If you're not going to censor Trump, what's your social media about anyway?
	Didn't they give you the order at DARPA? You're supposed to control this?
	Sources told the New York Times that the incident and others similar to it upset Zuckerberg and ultimately pushed him away from political work.
	So that's the backstory that's being fed to you by Breitbart.
	I don't think it's about that at all.
	So he suddenly became a conservative because he was criticized by a super woke employee.
	Yeah, right. Zuckerberg is not the only tech titan who appears to have changed over the years with regards to politics.
	Notably, Elon Musk, says Breitbart, who was once relatively apolitical, has now turned X into the protector of free speech, according to Breitbart.
	Wow. Wow.
	Who owns Breitbart? That's the question.
	Why are these people shilling for this?
	And they are absolutely shilling for Trump.
	It's absolutely amazing.
	Well, Wikipedia is paying groups to embed feminism and racial ideology into articles.
	Well, that's true.
	And it is reprehensible.
	But it is nothing, nothing compared to what is going on with the chat, AI chat programs.
	I mean, they've got entire companies, big companies, making lots and lots of money.
	Their sole purpose is to embed bias into the chat programs, the AI chat programs.
	And coming up, we're going to talk about The AI energy drift here and how they are clearing the decks.
	I mean, from the governor of Pennsylvania to the energy secretary, everybody's like, we got to get this right away.
	We got to get power to these people right away because that electrical power to run these AI stations is going to be the basis of their power, their political power over you.
	And that's the real fascism that is coming towards us.
	The artificial intelligence is going to be there not just to propagandize us like Wikipedia.
	Artificial intelligence will also be used to identify and to censor you.
	It's about surveillance and censorship, not just propaganda.
	It also will include, of course, propaganda.
	But it's about all those things.
	And that's why they have to remove all obstacles for them to push this through.
	That is their key path to power coming up.
	And so when you look at some of the things that have surfaced about Wikipedia, for example, according to documents, Wikipedia paid a group called Art Plus Feminism $382,000 to support work to further its mission.
	They say, the organization says, when cis and trans women, and I don't spell that, it's not an abbreviation, a sister, Ha ha ha ha ha ha.
	That's the CIS. That's their invented word that they've used to label people who are normal.
	Normal. When cis and trans women, non-binary people, black, indigenous, people of color communities are not represented in the writing and the editing on the 10th most visited site in the world, Information about people like us get skewed and misrepresented.
	That's the problem. You know, people like the rest of us, the rest of us, information about the rest of us, besides this tiny, vocal, Marxist minority, the information about the rest of us is getting skewed and misrepresented.
	They say they have to decolonize the internet.
	No, what they're doing is they've colonized the internet.
	They have colonized the internet's culture.
	They've used it now and they're using it to colonize our history, our culture, our society, our values.
	It is a struggle.
	It is a struggle. And you know, just as Scott Sherrill was talking about the other day, that's really part of our spiritual war.
	We don't struggle with flesh and blood.
	We struggle with ideas.
	Ideas that are put there by principalities and powers that you don't see.
	They're further behind the scenes than Bilderberg.
	And they're higher up than the people who meet at Bilderberg.
	But it's those satanic ideas that are pushed out.
	That's where the fight is.
	That's where the fight is.
	So they gave – I just want to break in.
	This sort of stuff is pushed everywhere.
	We use a website called WeTransfer to send files and every single day there is some horrifying piece of feminist black queer propaganda that they're pushing on the front page.
	Like this is how someone is decolonizing art.
	It's like shut up.
	Oh yeah, it's really bad.
	And of course, we don't pay them folks, just so that you know.
	It's free. So we're using their bandwidth and taking stuff from them.
	But every single day I get this stuff shoved in my face and it drives me insane.
	By the way, that's one of the reasons why.
	And I apologize because, you know, when we send, when I would transfer the Christmas album to people, I would use it as a free service.
	If you don't pay them, it disappears after a short period of time.
	They used to give us a week.
	I think they've shortened it to three days.
	So we're probably going to have to find a different way to send stuff to people.
	I mean, for us, it's okay.
	We get it right away when we send files, you know, but when Travis is out of town and that type of thing.
	But it is, you know, for something like giving people the album or something, we may have to find something else because they've shortened it up because we use the free service there.
	But they still push those things.
	Those vile pictures. It is really beyond creepy.
	I don't know if there is anything like it.
	Wikipedia co-founder calls Wikipedia shameless.
	In 2021, Wikipedia co-founder Larry Singer slammed the company for its bias.
	He wrote in a blog that, quote, Wikipedia openly repudiates neutrality and is shamelessly hypocritical in how it continues to pay lip service to its neutral point of view policy.
	Well, that's all of this stuff, right?
	All of it. I mean, if you're not cynical yet about the press, in the same way that the Russian people, when they had two media outlets, Pravda and Asvestia, Truth and News, they said there's no Truth and Pravda, no News and Asvestia.
	If you haven't reached that level of cynicism yet, oh, you're not paying attention.
	We're way beyond that, and it's going to get much, much worse as AI gets to be a much, much more powerful tool.
	And then, of course, Wikipedia has been a tool of vaccine propaganda, especially AI. My immediate contempt for chat GPT and the rest of it is because I started asking questions about the germ game MacGuffin and about the climate MacGuffin.
	And I saw right away how this thing had been programmed.
	So, on Brownstone, David Bell has an essay, The Right to Speak Evil.
	And we're going to talk about that when we come back in light of what is going on with Infowars.
	As the last 24 hours, 48 hours or whatever, there's been a statement that Infowars is going to be liquidated.
	Well, I have some ideas about what I think is going to really happen with that.
	A little bit different from the people who are reporting on it who were never on the inside.
	And I have some statements that I want to make about free speech and how this is not about free speech in spite of what you've been told.
	We're gonna take a quick break and we will be right back.
	We're gonna take a quick break.
	So, we're gonna take a quick break.
	All right, Don.
	Rock fan Greg Talent, thank you very much.
	I appreciate that. The tip and Dustin Helm, thank you.
	And Marky Mark, New Jersey, says, as Balzac once said, behind every great fortune is a crime.
	Yeah, that's true.
	I know what the crime is behind Bill Gates' fortune.
	Copyright violation.
	Intellectual property theft.
	He stole that operating system from digital research.
	And perhaps one of the biggest crimes is the fact that he hasn't fixed it for over 50 years.
	The whole thing is built on a core that was something that was put out in the 1970s, early 1970s.
	Digital research is CPM. He stole it from them and got away.
	Beat them in court. But he uses all of the...
	Didn't even change the syntax.
	Still calls it BIOS. And the whole thing is built on a foundation...
	All of Windows is built on a foundation of sand.
	It really is quite awful.
	No one fixes anything in a technology anymore.
	No. I know in gaming that they run with a policy of if a game ships with a bug and people don't complain about it and it's not game-breaking, they will ship the next version with the same bug because they have to fix other new bugs.
	Yeah, and what's even worse is the planned obsolescence, right?
	I've got an old laptop.
	I will not update it, because if I update it, it'll break my machine.
	I just know it'll break my machine.
	You know, I've gone down that road.
	I updated this thing here that I use.
	They seem to be very connected to their user community, Supernote did, and...
	I took a lot of feedback with it, and I'd had, you know, thought, well, let me try it.
	I was kind of worried about it.
	So I did the first update, and it's like, oh, great.
	They added some new features that are very useful.
	Did that a second time. That was good, too.
	This last time? No, no.
	Broke a bunch of stuff.
	Anyway, let's talk about the right to speak evil.
	That's really what free speech is.
	If you don't support Speech that you disagree with, speech that you don't like, then you don't support free speech.
	Now, this is from Brownstone, David Bell.
	And I say this in light of what is going on with Sandy Hook, right?
	Because Sandy Hook, first of all, I'll tell you in a moment why it was not about free speech.
	It was not about Infowars free speech.
	But it did...
	It's become a rallying cause for saying that we have to punish people if they hurt somebody's feelings.
	Because, you know, Sandy Hook is really more about Sandy hurt, how to hurt feelings.
	And I tell you, you know, my problem with Alex is the people that were really hurt.
	The people that were really hurt, his own supporters, January the 6th.
	The people that were really hurt when he pushed the lockdown and told people that it was 4D chess.
	When he pushed the jab and told people it was sugar water.
	And when he made record profits doing both of those things.
	That's reprehensible.
	But that's not what he's being punished for.
	He's being punished because he supposedly hurt somebody's feelings.
	Well, David Bell at Brownstone says words can harm.
	The childhood saying sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me is obviously untrue.
	Words bring ruin and despair.
	They drive people to suicide.
	They foment massacres and war.
	They're used to justify the enslavement of nations and the genocide of entire ethnic groups.
	And he says, but, this is exactly why we must all, always, be free to speak them.
	Yeah, the way it's put in the Bible, the tongue is a fire.
	It is a world of evil.
	It corrupts the whole body.
	It sets the course of one's life on fire.
	And it itself is set on fire by hell.
	We have to be careful what we say.
	You know, we have to look at it. We have to always look at what our motives are.
	You know, are we trying to...
	It's not enough even really just to say, well, I want to say the truth.
	But if we're saying it to stop people from being hurt, is where I believe.
	This is my personal belief.
	That even if you say something that other people might consider to be slanderous or harmful, if you're doing it to save people from being harmed, save people from being robbed, save people from losing their life, being put in jail, being disabled for life, that type of thing.
	We have to expose those kind of lies, just like we have to expose the kind of lies that are going to lead us into a war.
	And if that means that we point out the lies and the hypocrisy of the liars, so be it.
	That's my understanding of it.
	And that's what I go by.
	In the world in which we live, says David Bell, lies and deceit exist in all of us.
	They drive us to speak evil.
	And the more we can isolate ourselves from harm from our words due, the more evil we are able to speak.
	A holocaust could happen because some people built a structure within which only they could speak as they wished, whilst preventing others from talking back.
	Tyranny and pogroms thrive in one-way conversations.
	The hallmark of a tyrant is to come after free speech.
	When war begins, the first casualty is truth and speech.
	And it is a war against us, a war against our values, a war against our spiritual beliefs, our society, our culture, everything.
	It is a war.
	And they seek to make sure that only one side is going to be heard.
	The safe spaces of censorship currently enable countries to bomb children while convincing themselves that they're making things better.
	Or, if you want to get dangerous, you can talk about Trump.
	You can say you could poison people by the millions and then still, like Trump, tell people that you saved tens of millions of lives.
	When exactly the opposite is true.
	Bad things can happen both as a result of free speech and due to a lack of free speech.
	Free speech is not about truth.
	But it's about putting limits on power.
	That's key. Free speech is not about truth, but it's about putting limits on power.
	Like I said before, you know, many people understand that the answer to a bad man with a gun is a good man with a gun.
	The answer to a bad man with speech is a good man with speech.
	And if you start controlling guns and you start controlling speech, we've got much bigger problems.
	So, on Rumble.
	Anona Moose, thank you for the tip.
	It says, I'm looking for a job in IT. I just turned down an offer from a public health job in BC, Canada.
	$105,000 a year.
	Critical race theory and vaccine Nazis helping the indigenous victims.
	The first vaxxed Canadians.
	Yeah, they went after them first, didn't they?
	Wow. Well, good for you.
	Yeah, as I said, I think, yeah, you can't be bought.
	That's good. That's good.
	And so many people, you know, as I was talking about yesterday, consumer confidence is down at the lowest level it's been since August of 2021.
	What was happening in August 2021?
	Everybody was looking at this and saying, I don't know if I'm going to have a job or a career because they're going to force this vaccine on me.
	They're going to coerce it.
	And you want to talk about something that's going to kill your confidence is when you think I'm going to lose everything.
	We're at that point now, though.
	Because there's other things that mainstream media is not telling you.
	What's damaging consumer confidence?
	Well, what we actually see happening in the economy, what we see happening in wars and other things like that.
	And then, of course, this downward spiral as the entire country is being drugged down by politics and presidential candidates, and we can't think of what we're going to do without Washington fixing it for us, and without having the right person in Washington, we're lost. So we just might as well have a civil war at this point, right?
	That's the other thing that I want people to I'm trying to tell people, well, you want to talk about somebody being blackpilled?
	It's all of these MAGA media people saying, well, this is it.
	This is the most important election of our lifetime.
	And if we lose this election, that's it.
	There'll never be another election. Democracy is finished, blah, blah, blah.
	We might as well just pull out the guns and start shooting people.
	And you've got people on the left who do that as well.
	But mainly it's people on the right.
	And this is what this cult leads to.
	You know, you think everything can be fixed by this Messiah-like figure.
	And he's a phony Messiah.
	He's a false Messiah.
	He can't fix it, even if he wanted to.
	He can't fix it alone.
	But free speech is not about truth, but it's about putting limits on power.
	That's the key thing. And that's why we have to defend free speech in general.
	But see, the problem is...
	Is that this lawsuit, this Sandy Hood lawsuit, never got to the point of defending free speech.
	Because free speech systems, that owns InfoWars, is about making money.
	That's his first and foremost goal, is to make money.
	Not about free speech.
	And that's why you have the kind of things like this said, so that he could have record profits...
	In the spring of 2020.
	Very weak, attenuated classic viruses with a very low amount of adjuvant in it.
	Trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks.
	Can we take a little bit of an attenuated, you know, microwaved or radiated COVID deal?
	Absolutely. Oh yeah.
	Do it for Trump.
	Do it for Trump. Yeah, absolutely.
	Do it for Trump, please. Yeah.
	Yeah. All of that was a lie.
	First of all, there was no virus.
	Secondly, it's not been isolated.
	Third, you don't kill a virus, right?
	If they were true, if they were right about all this stuff, viruses aren't alive.
	And then to say that, come on, you can take the, you know, for 20 plus years, I've been telling you that these adjuvants, like aluminum and mercury, are what's behind autism.
	And he told the truth about that.
	But he tells you, come on, you can take a little bit of that.
	It's just like sugar water.
	Go ahead. Take your aluminum.
	Inject your aluminum. Inject your mercury that I've been telling you for 20 years is awful.
	Do it for Trump. He's playing 4D chess.
	Support him. Support him as he's locking everything down, as he's killing Main Street America, as he's destroying the Constitution, as he's preparing everybody for universal basic income.
	Follow him. He's playing 4D chess.
	Yeah, he was playing 4D chess, all right.
	Absolutely was playing 4D chess.
	And he made, as it came out, an interesting thing about the trial was that it came out about his record profits.
	But of course, I was there. I knew he was making record profits.
	I just didn't know the magnitude of it that was happening.
	As he was betraying his supporters, his country, the Constitution, so that he could support Trump, who was supporting a globalist agenda that Alex had been warning people about for decades.
	The ultimate betrayal.
	And then, later in the year, he did this.
	The White House told me three days before, we're going to have you lead the march.
	The Secret Service, before Trump finishes, 30 minutes before or so, will lead you to a point, take you out of the front row, and lead you to the place where they want you to start the march, and Trump will tell people, go and I'm going to meet you at the Capitol.
	Judas Goat, leading the people to slaughter.
	He instituted that, along with a CIA agent, Steve Petrenic, Somebody working for the deep state lies from the very beginning.
	They started Stop the Steal and all this stuff.
	He paid for the Stop the Steal.
	Why did he not get punished?
	Why are there so many people in jail?
	Many of them for decades.
	He walked free. That seems suspicious to you.
	It does to me. The Sandy Hook families suffered nothing, nothing, compared to the victims of the sugar water.
	The Sandy Hook families suffered nothing compared to what happened to the J6ers.
	Nothing compared to that.
	But he pays no price for that.
	Instead, they make it about the shooting.
	They make it about hurt feelings.
	And look, you know, it is the interesting thing, too.
	As I said, you know, the tongue is a fire.
	And it can destroy the path of your life.
	And it certainly did for Alex.
	Because Steve Pachenik, who was pushing the Stop the Steal thing with the lies two days after the election, was also the one who came in with nobody died.
	He pulled that on Alex.
	And he tried to pull it on me after that Las Vegas shooting in October.
	Came on and said, nobody died.
	I said, come on, come on.
	That's not true at all.
	But Alex started repeating that.
	See, if you trust the CIA, they'll kill you too.
	If you're part of the CIA. But of course, they look after their own in certain ways as well.
	But the Sandy Hook families didn't suffer anything comparable to these people, that he was acting like a Pied Piper to.
	That he was a Judas go-to.
	And his earnings during Sandy Hook were nothing compared to what he made, betraying the Constitution, his country, his listeners, with the lockdown pandemic and the election garbage that was happening there in the spring and the fall of 2020.
	So what is going to happen with this liquidation and bankruptcy?
	Well, you know, I've been through bankruptcy as a creditor.
	And I know how this whole corrupt system works.
	When you talk about our corrupt court systems and everything, well, hope that you never get involved in bankruptcy as a creditor with that.
	And, you know, we were told that the group in Connecticut wanted Infowars shut down.
	The group in Texas didn't want it.
	And so what was the deciding factor?
	I'll tell you what the deciding factor was.
	It was a bankruptcy trustee who has been adamant that he wants to shut this thing down.
	Why? Because the bankruptcy trustees make so much money.
	They make a percentage of everything that's liquidated.
	And he gets his money now. He's not going to make much money or it's going to be deferred over a long period of time if they were to have a gradual payout of this judgment.
	Which again, the judgment was absurd.
	The judgment was absurd.
	The harm, and it was harm.
	There was slander and things like that.
	But You know, this ridiculous amount of money was absolutely absurd.
	But I think that the lawyers also want to have the settlement and the liquidation now, so they could get their money.
	So the lawyers and the trustees want it now.
	One of the groups said they want it now.
	The other one said, no, I'd rather get more money spread out over a longer period of time.
	So now what they're saying is that they're going to liquidate it and sell it in November.
	So, you know, I know how this whole system goes.
	But the question is now, with a lot of people, is Alex going to continue?
	Well, of course he would. Alex is never going to go off air.
	Never. He'll always operate, even if he operates as an individual.
	He was operating as an individual before he hired a bunch of us in 2012.
	It was just him on the radio program.
	And then he decided that what he wanted to do was to send reporters out on a regular basis and then to have news around the clock and that type of thing.
	But he made a lot of money with the supplements and things like that.
	But along with that comes a great deal of complications.
	So I don't know. I think he'd probably be just fine to go out and do his own podcast or something.
	I mean, you know, he looks at Joe Rogan, and Joe Rogan's making the kind of money that Alex did, you know?
	$25-30 million a year, and he doesn't have to have all the overhead that Alex does.
	So maybe he's fine with that.
	I think it'll be the people that work there that'll maybe have some big issues, but not so much Alex.
	Maybe he'll get his fans to buy.
	You know, there was a Musk parody site.
	That put it up yesterday. It got a lot of attention because a lot of people, even though it says Elon Musk, in parentheses, parody at the top, a lot of people thought it was real.
	It says, should I do something funny?
	And it retweeted that, you know, and said, should I buy, in other words, should I buy InfoWars?
	All right, do it, do it. Well, you know, he's already talking about how he's got, wants his fans to buy it or something like that.
	Well, I don't His dad is unbelievably wealthy.
	His dad was a dentist.
	His dad had a chain of dental places throughout Austin Castle, dentistry and everything.
	So he's not just a dentist, but he owns multiple dentist places.
	Family had a lot of money before that.
	The family was involved with the CIA as well.
	So, I mean, he's swimming in money.
	And the bottom line, the reason that this is not about free speech is because Alex never participated in that issue.
	They never went to trial.
	If you remember, the trial was to determine what the damages were going to be, what the money was going to be.
	That's what the trial was about.
	And so the trial just focused on their finances and things like that.
	But it never focused on the issue of free speech.
	And the reason for that is because Alex refused to comply with discovery.
	And in the same way that if somebody files a lawsuit against you and you don't reply to that lawsuit, you lose.
	You lose. And if the lawsuit proceeds and you don't comply with discovery, you lose.
	Now, Alex says that he gave them all the information and more that they wanted.
	And yet, when his lawyer accidentally sent the phone information to the opposing counsel, And caught Alex on the stand.
	And Alex's reply, oh, this is your Perry Mason moment.
	It really was a Perry Mason moment.
	It was exactly the type of thing, the way every Perry Mason episode would end.
	You know, you catch the guy red-handed, you know, right there on the stand.
	And they caught him red-handed right there on the stand.
	You know, there was a lot of information there that he claimed that he didn't have and he didn't turn it in.
	They all knew they were stonewalling him.
	They all knew that he wasn't complying with discovery.
	And then they proved it during the trial during the Perry Mason moment.
	So why wouldn't he comply with it?
	For the same reason that he's going to continue with his broadcast.
	I believe that he's been stashing money all over the place.
	Cayman Islands, you name it.
	He went down to Cayman Islands several times.
	So I think during the trial, somebody sent him $9 million from a single donor.
	His audience didn't even blink about that.
	Didn't even think about that twice.
	Where did that come from?
	Did Alex send that to himself from crypto?
	He made a big deal of saying, well, I lost all that crypto money that was given to me in the early days by Max Keiser.
	You know, Max was an early adopter of crypto, and he gave him a lot of coins, full coins.
	Well, I lost all that stuff.
	That'd be worth, you know, $100 million or something now.
	So I don't know what the amount was, but a tremendous amount of money.
	So did he really lose it?
	Did he take that $9 million out of his crypto?
	Or did some rich benefactor, some billionaire, because he's always...
	He's got a lot of billionaire friends that he hangs around with all the time.
	Or was it somebody that was in an intelligence agency?
	Did the CIA send him the $9 million?
	Because the CIA is not monolithic.
	And people like Steve Pachenik...
	Are part of the military intelligence, the right-wing part of the intelligence agencies, not the CIA. I say the CIA, but, you know, it's the intelligence community.
	People like Pachinic, Jack Posobiec, other people I know, they're part of the right-wing intelligence agencies, still pushing wars, still pushing coups, still pushing assassinations, as Pachinic was involved in the assassination of the Italian prime minister, said an Italian court that investigated it.
	So this was not a trial over free speech.
	He lost a summary judgment.
	He lost it because he didn't want to comply with discovery.
	And so I think he's got more than enough resources to say that, you know, to buy Infowars himself through some, you know, person that he sets up as a front and to continue on operations.
	And whether or not he does that, maybe if he doesn't want to continue on with InfoWars, maybe he'll let it be sold off and he'll continue on as an individual.
	So he could have, he should have, defended his right to say mean things.
	He could have, he should have, defended his right to say the wrong thing.
	And of course, everybody has the right to be wrong.
	If somebody contacts you and says that you were wrong about this, you even have a period of time where you can make that correction and then there is no liability.
	But there would have been liability, but to say that it was $1.5 billion is just beyond absurdity.
	But this has really worked out for his advantage, just like this unjustified lawfare against Trump has worked out to Trump's advantage.
	Both of them have fundraised off of these things tremendously, and both of them are now seen as heroes, as victims, as martyrs.
	And so he's not been hurt by it.
	He'll be fine. He'll be better than ever.
	And this is not about free speech.
	It's about money. It really is about money.
	It's about money on both sides.
	And it's also about who you can trust.
	It's also about being controlled opposition.
	And that's why I speak about this.
	It's because there's still people who trust Trump.
	Still people who trust Alex.
	People who trust Musk.
	You cannot trust them.
	Congratulate them when they do or say the right thing.
	Fine. Never trust them.
	Understand that they are the ones who are playing 40 chess.
	They are the ones who have cards that they're not showing.
	And so getting back to his essay, he says, so we can and we should hate what others do when they harm innocent people.
	With the jabs, with the lockdowns, with the January 6th and things like that.
	But we should recognize such tendencies also in ourselves.
	That does not mean that we hate the other person just as we don't hate ourselves, but we hate what is wrong as we try to purge that out of ourselves.
	And so we have to engage in introspection as well and try to look at our motives.
	And I've thought about this, and I thought, well, should I say anything or not?
	I always get criticized when I do this.
	You're just a disgruntled former employee.
	No, I'm very, very grateful to God.
	He's protected and provided for my family through you, through the audience.
	And we have been able to move to the area of the country, the area of the world, actually.
	I've traveled extensively.
	I've never been anywhere that I like better than eastern Tennessee.
	Yeah. And it's just, you know, it's not to say that's the best place in the world, but it's the best place in the world for me.
	Everybody's got to figure out where, you know, everybody's got different things that they're looking for.
	So for other people, it would not be the place for them.
	But for me and my family, it is.
	And so I'm grateful to God that we're here.
	I'm grateful that we have been supported by you.
	And so I'm not bitter about this.
	And I'm saying this because the thing that I get angry about is when people are lied to and harmed, and when it's done for money.
	And I'm not going to be silent about that.
	I can't be silent about that.
	Hate speech that involves stating a hatred or dislike is itself neither good nor bad.
	It depends on the context.
	It is simply stating a feeling or an emotion.
	I hate the way some men in the town grew up and bashed their wives.
	I hate the child marriage and abuse are acceptable.
	And I hate what is done to babies being ripped apart in our society.
	I mean, we can think of all these different things that we can and we should hate.
	These are actions. But as we hate abortion, we also...
	Try to hold out an opportunity for people to change, to be forgiven.
	The key part of that is to admit our faults.
	And you know, I have not yet seen a politician who has admitted their faults for what they did in any country, in any political party.
	None of them have said that they were wrong for what they did in 2020.
	Not a single one.
	None of the people who cheered them on, like Alex, have said that they were wrong about any of this stuff.
	None of them. None of them have repented.
	It's the same thing you're seeing right now with Mark Robinson.
	You know, somebody was saying, well, he's got really a powerful testimony of how he turned around and changed, but he won't use that because he's not going to say that, yeah, I did that.
	We all fall, but that's not me anymore.
	I've changed. He's not going to say that.
	That'd be a very important thing for him to air, you know, We don't stay sinless.
	But as Christians, we have to stay forgiven.
	We have to confess our sins.
	And if we're public figures and our sins are public, we have to make those confessions public.
	And we haven't seen anybody do that.
	We've seen Danielle Smith, as I played yesterday.
	She said, look at what happened.
	We're never going to let that happen.
	She's criticizing what happened.
	But she wasn't there. And so it's easy for her to criticize what her predecessor did.
	And the same thing with Javier Malay in Argentina.
	He's criticizing lockdown.
	It's easy for him to do because he wasn't in power when that happened.
	So I guess we're going to have to wait until Trump is out of power and forgotten before we can get anything done to stop this from happening again.
	Because right now, it's so important that we must not criticize Trump no matter what happens.
	Do not criticize him.
	Don't criticize what he did.
	And look, this is the thing.
	I don't really care about Trump's personality.
	His personality doesn't set me on fire like it does the liberals.
	I really don't care. What bothers me is his character that was already on display.
	His rapacious greed.
	You know, money was about everything.
	That's what is the whole thing, The Apprentice, you know, the beginning of it.
	Money, money, money, money, you know, that time.
	It was all about money.
	The love of money is the root of all evil, and guess what?
	So is the addiction to sex that was so evident within his life.
	All of those speak to a character issue, and that was my issue with Trump.
	But we already knew what the character of Hillary Clinton was.
	And, like Julian Assange, who leaked that information about Hillary Clinton, he says, We know that Hillary Clinton is a criminal and a warmonger.
	We don't know what Trump is.
	I guess we'll find out. Well, Trump was the guy who locked him up.
	It was his administration.
	When he put in CIA, Bill Barr immediately tried to kill Julian Assange.
	They even had a scenario where they would assassinate him and that type of thing.
	So... It's important for us to oppose these issues.
	And as I said, I despise the Trump presidency.
	I despise what he did.
	I think he should stand trial at a Nuremberg trial.
	You know, he just had this last week, Alex got a lot of attention because he confronted Francis Collins, said that Francis Collins killed 20 million people.
	Well, if Francis Collins killed 20 million people, Alex...
	Your boy, Trump, was the one he was working for.
	Why didn't your boy, Trump, do something about it?
	And, of course, Trump is responsible when it happens under his administration.
	And so Francis Collins doesn't say anything.
	He walks off and Alex says, Nuremberg 2.0!
	It's coming up! Nuremberg 2.0!
	It's like, okay, well, if that comes up, then your guy Trump and Biden and Fauci and Birx and Redfield and Francis Collins and all of them, all of them ought to be in the dock.
	And a Nuremberg 2.0.
	And maybe you should be there as their Goebbels.
	But, yeah, we're going to give a pass.
	This is why we can't, because we can't say anything negative about Trump or negative about anything that he did.
	We've got to pretend that everything that he did is fine.
	I'm not playing that game.
	The ability to speak freely, going back to Brownstone, the ability to speak freely enables us to call out others' flaws and to acknowledge those pointed out in ourselves.
	A king who has a court of yes-men is in grave danger of harming his people and himself, and that's the problem with Trump, and that's the problem with the MAGA media.
	It is a court of yes-men.
	These people have made themselves the court jesters.
	Of Trump. They're clowns.
	They're clowns. And not just Alex.
	People like Tucker Carlson, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, on and on and on.
	They're all court jesters.
	They understand that in this day and age, what you do is you sell information that fits the bias of your audience.
	You go out, you read the room, you figure out what the audience wants to hear, and you tell them what they want to hear.
	And they'll love you for it.
	And so, one of the things that you're seeing happening, over and over again, both sides are playing this game.
	Oh, look, Trump made threats.
	He said something mean and nasty against people.
	This is the legacy of this Sandy Hook thing, but it's also the trajectory of where they've been going.
	Sandy Hook is just one of the things along the way.
	This agenda existed before Sandy Hook, independent of Sandy Hook.
	Sandy Hook helped to reinforce it, though.
	And this idea that you can't say anything that would hurt somebody's feelings.
	Or you're responsible for the violence.
	If you hurt their feelings, it's the same as if you kill the kids.
	And Alex has said, I didn't kill the kids.
	Everybody's acting like I killed the kids.
	He didn't kill the kids. But that's what they're doing.
	And they're playing that game.
	The left plays that game with Trump.
	And Trump and the MAGA media court jesters.
	Play that game with the other side.
	Here's an example, okay?
	This is from Infowars site itself.
	They focused on this, and of course, a lot of different Trump MAGA media did.
	They said, look at this.
	Biden went on with the view.
	And as they're comparing him to a bug, Biden, yeah, would smash him like that.
	He's trying to kill Trump.
	Then he just wouldn't go.
	He was like a bug.
	He just kept being there.
	He was like a bug right there.
	So you felt...
	Yeah, okay.
	It's like a bug.
	And so he smacks the thing.
	And they are peeing in their pants at InfoWars.
	And by the way, it's the same writer...
	Somebody sent that sugar water clip to me.
	When I played that and I posted it, that same writer who did an article about how horrible this is.
	Look at this. Biden wants to kill Trump.
	That same writer, when I put up that sugar water stuff, mocks me as a whining, crying baby because it bothers me that Alex told people it was sugar water.
	That he told them to go ahead and take the adjuvants that have been causing autism for decades.
	And they told them about that.
	Go ahead and take the sugar water vaccine.
	It's harmless. You can do it for Trump.
	How pathetic these people have become.
	Sold out, prostituted themselves.
	For their job, for their political goals or whatever.
	It's mostly for their job.
	And then when you look at what Trump does on the other side.
	They were very brave, the Supreme Court.
	Very brave. And they take a lot of hits because of it.
	It should be illegal what happens.
	You know, you have these guys like playing the ref, like the great Bobby Knight.
	These people should be put in jail the way they talk about our judges and our justices.
	Yeah. Anybody that criticizes Trump, jail him.
	Okay. Lock him up or whatever.
	And we've heard, I've played the clips.
	I won't play them again for you. Lala Harris.
	I don't like what Musk did.
	He violated his privilege.
	He should have his privilege taken away.
	And Jake Tapper's like, uh, uh, uh, but he shouldn't have a privilege to speak.
	Free speech is not a privilege, it's a right.
	And then Trump said the same thing about ABC. He didn't like the way he was treated, and he wasn't treated fairly.
	I agree. But his response to that was to say that they've got a license, and their license should be taken away.
	No, we should never license free speech.
	We should never jail people because we don't like what they say.
	And yet, the MAGA media is out there saying, oh, look at this.
	They made this.
	Look, we've always had metaphors like that.
	We should go back and take a look at what people were saying about each other when Jefferson was running against John Adams.
	Or look at what they said about Abraham Lincoln.
	I mean, there's a great deal to criticize about Abraham Lincoln, but they went way over.
	They called his father a nutmeg addict or something like that.
	He's addicted to spices.
	It was hatchet-faced son of a nutmeg dealer.
	That's even better.
	Yeah, thank you. He always corrects me.
	He remembers that better than I do.
	Hatchet-faced son of a nutmeg dealer.
	He's a dealer. He's a drug dealer.
	Those drug dealers selling nutmeg, they ought to be executed, says Trump.
	Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, our drugs, because we had prohibition, our drugs have gotten a lot stronger than nutmeg now, haven't they?
	No, there is not going to be any criticism that's allowed of whoever they like.
	So the left is going to complain when Trump criticizes one of their people.
	That's out of bounds.
	This guy needs to be, he's dangerous.
	He needs to be locked up because we've got to lock up free speech.
	And the right, the MAGA people, Infowars, does the same thing.
	How dare them say they're all about free speech in the wake of the Sandy Hook thing and then say that Biden is guilty of trying to get Trump killed?
	What hypocrisy on their website.
	What hypocrisy to defend the lies about January the 6th and the vaccines.
	There's no excuse for that.
	So there's no criticism, no debate.
	You just got to follow the leader.
	I was never really very good at playing that game.
	I wasn't very good at playing the game, as Simon says, either, that Fauci tried to run on us.
	To finish up the Brownstone article, he said, It is the comfort of serving those who have adopted a right to control them, clucking at the misfits pulled out for slaughter.
	This is simply feudalism and oppression.
	And it's being sold by the MAGA people just as much as it's being sold by the others.
	And so when you look at Thomas Massey yesterday, I talked about January 6th.
	Thomas Massey in a hearing.
	It says, I personally think that this is a sleeper story of the day.
	So many lawmakers and pundits were decried as crazy for suggesting that there could be, quote, confidential human sources involved in January the 6th.
	And it looks like there might have been.
	I said from two days after the election, when Infowars and Steve Pachenik started selling the Stop the Sting thing, or Stop the Steal, said that, oh yeah, Trump's already got 20,000 soldiers, National Guard out there.
	They're arresting people. The whole thing was a sting.
	We marked the ballots.
	We got blockchain watermark ballots, and we got quantum computing, and we know exactly who rigged this election, and they're arresting them right now.
	Well, that didn't age too well.
	I knew it wouldn't. But Alex kept having him on, and he kept spinning these lies in different directions.
	And so I opposed it and was fired.
	I was fired for that.
	Of course, Alex said he fired me because he needed more money, of course.
	And Daily Beast picked that up and said, look, InfoWars is going out of business.
	They had to fire one of their guys and all the rest of the stuff.
	The only people that were fired were Travis and I, a week before Christmas.
	But, you know, that's fine.
	I mean, God immediately blessed us.
	We had people started sending donations and support.
	And so, you know, we started a program the following Monday.
	It was a really rough thing. We had no cameras.
	We had an iPhone that Whistler held up.
	And I had lost a tooth over the weekend.
	You know, you talk about... It's like, I don't know.
	We've got to start this show, and I'm missing a tooth up front.
	And so it was crazy bad.
	But we're really blessed by you and by God.
	And so we did that.
	But I told people all the way up to January the 6th, I said, don't go.
	Because there's going to be, I didn't call it confidential human sources, as Thomas Massey did.
	I said, they're going to be agent provocateurs.
	And I said it all the way through and right up to the morning of January the 6th.
	Don't go. There's going to be agent provocateurs.
	They're going to entrap you.
	They're going to weaponize us.
	They're going to claim that you did things that you didn't do.
	And then they're going to use it to demonize the entire movement and the Constitution and all the rest of the stuff.
	But people went anyway.
	I told them, I said, the time to show up in mass and protest was when Trump locked us down.
	But Alex was telling you he was on your side.
	I said, don't follow him into this.
	I said, this is a trap.
	Well, it was four and a half years ago.
	Now Thomas Massey is saying the same thing.
	And it wasn't just that I was decried for it.
	I was fired for it. I'm fine.
	I'm fine. It's a badge of honor to be fired for that.
	Alex said it was because he needed the money.
	And people didn't buy that.
	So then when they started saying that, no, no, we're financially, we're saying all this stuff.
	Then he started coming up with all different kinds of excuses.
	And I said, when I got on air, I said, he's got more excuses and explanations for what he did than Hillary does for Benghazi.
	And he changes them about as frequently as she did.
	So, you know, when we look at this, I'm not going to, you know, Mitt Romney is saying, just like a lot of leftists, if Trump is elected, I'm leaving the country.
	Michael Cohen has said that.
	Mitt Romney has said that.
	A lot of people... Look, I'm opposed to Trump.
	I'm not leaving the country.
	Good or bad, I'm going to stick this thing out.
	I'm not going to be intimidated by him or by anybody else.
	And so this is actually from PJ Media.
	And they were actually sympathetic to Alex.
	But this is what they put up.
	I saw this and I thought, what in the world?
	They've got Alex doing his schticks.
	You know, he loves to do performances.
	And so they got him there as dressed up as a frog.
	And they say prediction InfoWars will go down in history as the next Drudge report.
	I don't think so.
	I don't think he's going to go away.
	And as a matter of fact, I don't even think that Matt Drudge went away.
	But that's the basis of his article.
	He thinks that Matt Drudge sold the site and somebody switched it.
	And he thinks that same thing is going to happen with InfoWars.
	He said, will somebody buy InfoWars, hire Alex Jones as his on-air talent, and then try to rebuild the platform?
	It's possible. Jones has some deep-pocketed fans.
	Like his dad. Like his bankers in the Cayman Islands.
	I mean, like the CIA people.
	Yeah, he could have any of those people could buy it and keep him going.
	And so he said, I suspect, however, that a number of Alex Jones critics greatly dwarfs the number of fans.
	The ultimate fate of Infowars will eerily be similar to the fate of the Drudge Report, he said.
	He says, at one point, Drudge was the biggest alternative platform in the world.
	He scooped the mainstream media on the most important monumental story of the entire 90s, the Clinton-Lewinsky sex scandal, and for decades that followed, all Drudge had to do was to post a link to an article, and traffic would shoot through the stratosphere.
	That's right. He was the preeminent kingmaker in independent journalism.
	Wherever Rush Limbaugh turned on his ditto cam, you almost always saw his monitor tuned to Drudge.
	Today, of course, the Drudge Report is like Southern California.
	A place we used to visit and enjoy, but it's gotten so bad that nobody goes there anymore.
	The Drudge Report has become a zombie aggregator, an undead, lumbering presence in the digital media, coasting on its past laurels, hemorrhaging readers' influence and credibility.
	So question, why would an investor purchase a brand like the Drudge Report, a site with an established, successful business model, and then toss that model out the window?
	He says, well, my answer is because they weren't primarily motivated by profits.
	Instead, they bought the site to silence and to control their opposition.
	I completely disagree with his assessment of the Drudge Report and what he thinks will happen with Alex Jones.
	Drudge Report became big reporting on the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal.
	Where did Drudge get that information?
	Does this guy know?
	He got the information from George Conway, who was a lawyer involved in it, from Monica Lewinsky.
	George Conway, Kellyanne Conway's husband.
	George Conway, who loathes Trump with a passion, in case you've not noticed.
	I mean, you talk about somebody with Trump derangement syndrome.
	Who was Matt Drudge seen with most often?
	and Coulter, who after she called him God Emperor blasphemously, then flipped another 180 degrees since when he didn't do anything about the border and started attacking him because again he didn't follow through he didn't do anything about the border in spite of what Maga thinks he did nothing about the border.
	So Matt Drudge's friends, as a matter of fact, you know, he's very close with George Conway going back to California when he was friends with Breitbart.
	What's his first name now?
	Can I remember? But, you know, the guy that Breitbart's named after, who died suddenly, mysteriously.
	Andrew Breitbart. Andrew, thank you.
	Andrew Breitbart, who died under, I think, suspicious circumstances.
	So, Matt was friends with Andrew Breibart.
	He was friends with Ann Coulter.
	He was close friends with George Conway, who made his career.
	I don't think that Matt Drudge sold the website.
	I think he's still doing it.
	And I think it's not just because...
	He just sold something else.
	Well, I don't think it's just because his friends don't like Trump.
	Drudge came to InfoWars in, was it 2015?
	Fall of 2015?
	Yeah, that sounds about right.
	He came to InfoWars.
	I was able to meet him and talk to him for a while, and he went on air.
	And said, I've been told by a Supreme Court justice that a hammer is really going to drop on free speech and it's going to get really, really bad.
	And that was in 2015.
	Within less than about three or four months, Antonin Scalia was found with a pillow over his head under strange circumstances.
	And I went out to that motel, actually stayed at that motel to look at it.
	What a...
	I mean, that place is just...
	It is the most...
	I've never been in a place that had that kind of satanic vibe to it.
	And of course, there was nobody at all there when I was staying there.
	I mean, there was a crew of us from Infowars that went out to take pictures and stuff.
	And it was unbelievably strange out in the middle of nowhere in West Texas.
	And all this occultic artwork and everything all over the place.
	I mean, it was like some kind of Agatha Christie novel where everybody goes to some weird haunted mansion and they start disappearing one at a time.
	I mean, it was creepy beyond belief.
	And the fact that Scalia would go there for a vacation was really strange.
	I mean, there's nothing else anywhere around there except the Mexican border where they can bring in prostitutes and stuff like that.
	I don't know what was going on with all of that stuff.
	But Matt Drudge was told, everybody believes it was Scalia, strongly hinted he wouldn't say it, strongly hinted it was Scalia.
	Scalia turns up dead.
	Breitbart is dead.
	And he knows that this crackdown of free speech is coming.
	So who's he going to ally with?
	Is he going to ally with Trump?
	For a little bit he did.
	But then he could kind of see the handwriting on the wall there.
	He's either going to lose his website by having it taken down and being the brunt of that attack, or he's going to switch sides and start cheering for the other side.
	And I think that's exactly what he did.
	I think it's about money.
	And when I talked to him, and I've said this before, I thanked him for showing the picture of Baby Samuel that got him kicked out of Fox News when he had his program there.
	He said, I just want to get out of my contract.
	But God can use that, whatever his motives were.
	He didn't really care about a pro-life issue.
	He doesn't care about these others.
	And then as far as Alex goes, I think that he is most likely going to somehow find some donor who just sends him mysteriously $9 million and buys a thing or something.
	Eventually in Fort Worth to share the same fate as Drudge Report, says PJ Media, a conservative site that anti-conservatives co-opted.
	No, I don't think so. I think it was co-opted a long, long time ago by the right wing of the intelligence community.
	And I'll just finish up with this one thing.
	Would-be a Trump assassin has ties to the CIA, says a former official.
	I said this the first day when I came back.
	It happened over the weekend.
	It happened on a...
	Well, no, that's the other shooting in Pennsylvania.
	But I also said it about that.
	But about this golf thing.
	I said that right away. I said, look at...
	This guy has been all over the world.
	And he's been interviewed by the New York Times, pushing the Ukraine war and everything.
	I said, how does a roofer get to do that?
	A roofer from North Carolina.
	How does a roofer from North Carolina get an actually pretty nice house in Hawaii?
	And he doesn't stay in Hawaii.
	Instead, he's going to Ukraine and holding court with the press and everything.
	So he's got CIA written all over it.
	And Ryan Wesley Ralph...
	A 58-year-old Democrat arrested last week after reportedly trying to assassinate Trump at the golf course has ties to the CIA, according to a former U.S. State Department official.
	Last week, former State Department official and Foundation for Freedom Online executive director Mike Benz shed some light on Ruth's mystique, saying he has links to the CIA. He said you can almost spin the globe and find a place where there was paramilitary activity, and somehow Ryan Ruth just waltzed his way through almost a dozen of them.
	And so, you know, when you look at the money, you look at the fact that he goes to Ukraine and he's trying to sell, hey, I know all these people from Afghanistan and everything coming in here.
	It's like, oh, wait a minute. Afghanistan, Ukraine, this North Carolina roofer?
	He said he's got CIA written all over him.
	We lived in North Carolina, and I knew guys that were in construction.
	None of them ever seemed to express any interest in the Ukraine.
	Yeah, or Afghanistan.
	They didn't know Afghanistan terrorists, right?
	They didn't know people on Afghan fighters and ISIS. Yeah.
	So, you know, if you're going to use CIA operatives and criminals like Steve Pachenik, who the Italian government said in Operation Gladio was sent by Kissinger, And executed, told the terrorist to execute Aldo Moran.
	Of course, the terrorist actually...
	Worked for NATO, right?
	So-called communist terrorists actually worked for NATO. So the whole thing was NATO operation.
	Kissinger, Steve Pachenik, NATO. They kidnapped and killed the Italian Prime Minister as part of their reign of terror.
	Anyway, ever since Crimea joined the Russian Federation in 2014, Benz explained the CIA began working to arm the Kiev government to take Western Ukraine back from Russia.
	Part of this capacity-building mission involved importing fighters, including ISIS and al-Qaeda soldiers, to bolster Ukraine's forces.
	Well, again, we can go back and talk about how the CIA engineered the coup that caused Crimea to say, we want to go to Russia.
	But he says he has an entire website, Dedicated, this supposed roofer, right?
	Has an entire website dedicated to military recruiting of Afghani, Pakistani, and Iranian militants to come to Ukraine.
	He explicitly tells him multiple times on his website, in big all caps, bold lettering, as well as in hundreds of Facebook posts, quote, Do not tell your local embassy that you're coming to Ukraine.
	Don't say anything. Just send me your passport information and take a plane to Ukraine or take a plane to Poland and ride a bus into Ukraine.
	He says what Ryan Ruth was doing was that he was collecting thousands, literally thousands of passports of terrorists in foreign countries.
	In CIA war zones.
	And telling them not to tell their local embassy that they're traveling.
	But instead to go directly through him as a middleman because he can secure them visas.
	I mean, that part of all of this.
	How suspicious is that?
	And of course he could just be doing that as a front man for the CIA. Maybe they just wanted to get the passports for these terrorists.
	Right? You know, maybe it really wasn't about sending them to Ukraine.
	Who knows what the motivations of the CIA are at any given point?
	But you could look at this and you could tell right away.
	Can you tell right away when you got CIA known operatives spreading unbelievable lies that create a January the 6th movement and you get millions of dollars sent to you anonymously and you got family in the CIA? Can you tell...
	A controlled opposition CIA guy like Alex Jones?
	Or am I being too harsh?
	No. Another odd fact about Ruth is that although he had a criminal record, boasting at least 74 arrests and 100 charges, he didn't spend a day in jail prior to his alleged attempted assassination of Trump.
	Yeah, neither did Alex for January the 6th.
	I wonder if Ryan Roth has got some CIA family members like Alex.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to be right back with Tony Arterman.
	Stay with us. We'll be right back.
	And I'll get to your comments after we have Tony on.
	I've got a lot of people who have commented about this, and we'll get back to those comments when we come back.
	Stay with us. We'll be right back
	Music playing
	Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	The End.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Alright, welcome back and joining us now is Tony Arterman of Wise Wolf Gold.
	Tony has set up David Knight Not Gold and that'll take you to his site.
	You can get gold and silver, you know, it's starting to really ramp up.
	We're just talking during the break.
	It is really starting to ramp up.
	But you can get gold, silver, large or small amounts.
	And of course, if you want to gradually accumulate things on a regular basis, on a monthly basis, set up your budget.
	You can pick a level that you want to contribute each month.
	And if you're part of the Wolfpack, the buying club, you get the advantage of a group buy, as if you're buying a larger quantity, that type of thing.
	So take a look at that at WiseWolfGold.
	And thank you for joining us, Tony.
	Always great to have you on.
	One of the things that you always talked about, you said, what's going to be difficult is going to be, as this mania kicks off, it's going to be difficult to find product.
	And we're seeing that from Goldman Sachs.
	Their commodity desk is saying that the buying has been relentless and silver is starting to move too.
	Are you seeing that? Absolutely.
	And I appreciate you bringing that up because I've been talking about that for a long time.
	It's not something that made the headlines in the financial networks about the lack of actual physical supply of precious metals because of the ETFs.
	And as a matter of fact, I was reading an article from Reuters.
	Major banks are predicting this is the beginning of the bull run for ETFs.
	For gold. And it's not the end.
	It's not the bubble. They're looking for higher prices into $3,000 and so on for gold.
	And they were saying that one of the things that they're counting is not just central bank buying that we've talked about, but the inflows now of ETFs.
	Yes. So what they're doing, they're putting clients into ETFs.
	But again, that's not physical gold.
	That's an IOU. If you cash out an exchange-traded fund, they don't send you precious metals.
	They send you fiat currency.
	So it is driving the price.
	I mean, because there is a massive amount of inflows now after that rate cut.
	But... What I found, especially being a dealer in two different states, is that supply is not what it was when I started this business.
	Not anywhere near it.
	It's the selection, the timing.
	Now, we do have... I think the selection is decent right now.
	It has somewhat stabilized, but if anybody...
	started buying up physical silver for example, like the lady that was a billionaire here in East Texas a couple of years ago that placed a major trade for 90% silver and it took I think like 10 dealers across the country just to fill the order and it took six weeks for So it wasn't instantaneous, and they had to source it from several other brokers.
	So, again, I'm seeing the same thing here on the ground, just in supply.
	And, of course, silver's up 40% in terms of dollars this year.
	Wow. So there's a lot going on in the metals market, David.
	Wow. And gold as well, you know, really going up about that amount, I think, from last September.
	I think last September was around, like, 1900 or something like that.
	But, you know, you're talking about the ETFs and paper gold, and that was the thing that was the eye-opener for me.
	They had pretty much tracked, you know, along with each other.
	As gold would go up or down, so would the paper gold, until...
	2022, and I talked about this yesterday, and in 2022, what happened is gold starts going up and the ETFs start going down.
	I did not track. And so that's what they're looking at.
	They said, look at this, it kind of decouples.
	And when I saw that decoupling, I was like, why is that?
	And then I realized what the ETFs were.
	You know, it's just an IOU, as you pointed out, for what is supposedly, gold is supposedly being held on the Shanghai Gold Exchange.
	And it's like, oh, wait a minute.
	This is looking too much like the securitized mortgages of the mid-2000s.
	I want to get out of the paper gold and paper silver stuff.
	But now, you know, they could wind up being a buyer.
	Who knows? But they've used that to manipulate the price.
	And what he was saying was a couple of different articles.
	They were saying The central banks have been the ones that have been boosting this up, as you and I talk about every week.
	The central bank buying, all the central banks are buying gold except for the United States.
	And they're not buying any more gold because, again, it's an opposition to the dollar, as you've pointed out many times.
	But that has been driving it.
	Along with a little bit more retail trade in India and places like that.
	But this one guy said, hey, look, I'm not getting anybody, I'm not getting any taxi drivers or Uber drivers telling me, hey, you need to buy gold or silver.
	So it hasn't hit the retail area yet, right?
	And even though you get stock tips all the time and you should get this stock and you should get that, nobody's talking about gold or silver.
	He said, when that happens, it's going to explode.
	And he thought that would happen when it got to like $3,000.
	And we're getting there pretty quickly, aren't we?
	Well, yeah. And it's interesting because in my business, I've been tracking this just on a personal level.
	Like when I started out in San Antonio, I noticed when the price goes up, I get more customers.
	And when I move the shop to Branson into the 2020s, I saw the same thing.
	It's just been strange.
	You really can't even track these buying patterns now.
	I can't count on the same kind of volume that I used to for the reasons I used to get the volume.
	And you're absolutely right. When regular people, when your taxi drivers are just anybody running, have you thought about buying some gold?
	I was thinking about buying some silver.
	It's too late. If you're already plugged in or you're a member of Wolfpack and you've been following us for a while, you're like part of the 1%.
	There's not a lot of people.
	I mean, I have great customers, and I'm thankful for the people that do come in.
	But it's not, you know, your standard retail location with a line out the door.
	That's not how any of this really works.
	When that does happen, there won't be supply.
	I mean, the price will be price shock like we've never seen before.
	And we're on the edge of that.
	I really believe we're on the edge of a price shock when it comes to gold because the world's de-dollarizing.
	And like you and I were saying off air, we're just surprised it's happening as fast as it is.
	I mean, I'm usually very cautious to make predictions like, oh, it's going to be in six months.
	We're going to have such and such price or in two months or whatever is going to happen.
	And there's going to be a supply drain.
	But I really don't know anymore.
	Just the headlines continue to build up, especially with BRICS. And these cross-border payments and these countries dumping the dollar holdings, you know, the reserve asset of the U.S. dollar in central banks is the lowest it's ever been.
	It's continuing since 1944.
	It's declining.
	and we're just seeing the rapid de-dollarization, which is going to have a huge impact on the strength and purchasing power of the dollar and our own economy here at home.
	And so all of this stuff's going to add up when people start running toward the door to get some precious metals or to hedge against inflation.
	I don't know that this supply is going to be there.
	Yeah. Yeah, I don't know who said that.
	I think it was at the Great Depression.
	It was some guy who said, you know, when he was getting stock tips from the shoeshine boy.
	From his barber and from the guy driving the taxi and everything.
	He goes directly and sells and gets out of the market, you know?
	Maybe you remember who that was.
	I couldn't remember who that was yesterday and I forgot to look it up.
	But yeah, that is the key thing.
	It's going to hit some point at which everybody's going to go, whoa!
	And you're going to see... All the mainstream articles then talking about de-dollarization, talking about the deficit and the debt and all the rest of the stuff, and everybody's going to be running to Wolfpack.
	They're trying to get their gold and silver, or the Goldman Sachs or whatever, and they're not going to have it.
	So that's a key thing.
	You know, now is still time for people to be able to get in.
	And look, all the fundamentals are still there.
	It's just a question of when it's going to happen.
	Like Gerald Slinty says all the time, he says, well, I don't make predictions, I look at trends.
	And so it's a given that this is going to happen.
	When it's going to exactly happen, I don't know.
	A lot of people are saying 2,700...
	By, you know, the beginning of the year or whatever.
	I don't know.
	It could happen sooner, you know?
	And so, who knows?
	You've got these psychological barriers every time that it goes over, you know, another goes from 26 to 27 or whatever.
	That's our 25 to 26.
	That is a bit of a psychological barrier.
	People have to get used to that before people buy more.
	So there's that aspect of it.
	But if there's some kind of shock that goes to the system, it'll happen incredibly fast.
	And then I think once it gets to a certain point, and I really do think that when you start to turn over, it's like turning over the odometer on your car.
	You all sit there and watch when it goes from $99,999 to $100,000.
	And you tell all the kids, watch this.
	But when something like that happens and it All the digits flip and it goes to 3,000.
	I think that's going to be something that's going to wake everybody up.
	Well, if you look at the global markets, and I've said this before, gold has a $16 trillion market cap, $16 trillion or so, in the face of hundreds of trillions and supposed assets around the globe, whether that's currency, sovereign debt.
	Stock markets. And if you really drill down into what these markets around the world, what they traffic in, they traffic in fake.
	I mean, we're awash in fiat currency, fake currency with no backing, full faith and credit of whatever government.
	And when they inflate their way out of problems, it's what we're doing right now.
	Just right on the eve of an election, we cut the interest rate by 50 basis points, which is extremely aggressive given the fact that they've been raising interest rates faster than any time in history.
	So it's a... A 180 course correction at 50 basis points, and they're supposed to cut all the way down to a full point here by the end of the year.
	So the markets are responding to that, and not the way that you would think.
	A lot of times when the stock market was proclaimed healthy or the economy was healthy, gold just goes down.
	I know I've been in this business.
	It doesn't correlate this way.
	But now you're seeing the exact opposite.
	And the inflows in the ETFs are up.
	The central bank gold buying is up.
	I think just the general mood out there.
	You see with Bitcoin, the same thing with Bitcoin.
	People, it's a speculative asset, but it's finite.
	And I think that's another reason the inflows of the ETFs have been strong there and individual buying and adoption is up there and Bitcoin as well.
	It's because we're in the throes of a system change.
	And we're 80 years on from Breton Woods.
	And this is a secularum, right?
	This is what the Romans called it.
	And this is the fourth turning. You mention it all the time.
	80 to 100 years.
	And we're right at 80 years since Breton Woods, New Hampshire, 1944, the new economic world order, IMF, the World Bank, gold at $35 an ounce.
	We're inside of an experiment, too.
	Since 1971, fiat currency is what we have.
	We used to have a dollar as good as gold, but now you can be your own bank.
	Thanks to Gerald Ford in 1974, executive order overturning FDR, you can be your own bank, and we're outside of that system.
	So they're going to continue to inflate.
	They're going to continue to pay for the welfare-warfare state.
	I kind of chuckle sometimes when people ask me about...
	Well, are we going to be on a gold standard again?
	I'm like, well, I don't know.
	I am. I'm on a gold.
	You should be on a gold standard.
	I'm on a gold. Everybody should be on a gold standard.
	Whatever the government does, let them do.
	So I really think that so many paradigms are going to change.
	And it looks like, David, and neither one of us are alarmists.
	But it's happening faster than either one of us thought.
	I mean, if you'd have told me at the beginning of the year, hey, gold's going to be up $570 an ounce, no problem, by September.
	I thought, I think that's a bit of a leap.
	I'm not going to go that far.
	I wouldn't have gone that far.
	Yeah. I'm usually not that way.
	I'm like, well, because it's been pretty steady.
	And we remember going back to 2020, it was, what, 2000 in August 6th, it broke like $2,010 or $2,050.
	And then it came back down and fell below $1,900.
	And when you and I were talking, not just a year and a half ago, gold at $1,600 an ounce.
	Now we're at $2,600 and climbing.
	Futures, by the way, are pegged at $2,700.
	So really unprecedented moves in the metals markets.
	Oh, yeah. As you point out, we're at a fourth turning.
	When you go back and you look at the characteristic of fourth turnings, as Strauss and Howe pointed out, is that there's always...
	Major economic unrest.
	And usually war, right?
	And so you go back and you look at the previous one, World War II and the Great Depression, and then we've been under the new worldwide financial system that was created in the wake of that now for about 80 years.
	And so that's what they're looking at.
	They all know that the financial system is going to be reset.
	They've got their ideas of what they would like to do.
	And, of course, there's a limited amount that we can do about that.
	We can protest it.
	And, of course, in Canada, you've got Mark Carney, one of the biggest banker insiders ever.
	I mean, he's connected to everything.
	But, as I pointed out yesterday, you know, World Economic Forum and, you know, the big bankers, Goldman Sachs and the Rockefellers, I think, or maybe the Rothschilds.
	Anyway, he was the head of the Bank of Canada and then goes to the Bank of England.
	He was the first... Person who was not British, who was head of the Bank of England.
	This guy is the ultimate insider.
	And he's saying, well, you know, we're not going to do the CBDC anymore.
	I don't think you can believe that.
	I think that's going to be a part of the new financial system.
	And that's even beyond all of the other stuff that would be pushing gold, all the financial issues.
	There's that control issue that's there.
	Because in this fourth turning, we not only have the concern about a world war, But we also have a kind of financial turning, like what was happening with the Civil War, both here and in Italy and in many other places.
	The Industrial Revolution was created.
	The nation states were created.
	Now we've got a technocracy revolution that is coming, as well as a global state that is coming.
	That's what they're trying to establish, and that's what this financial system is going to be a part of.
	So, yeah, you're right. We've got to have our own personal gold standard to be outside of that, as much as we can do.
	That's really the only thing that explains our current situation.
	If you look at the powers that be not trying to save the current system, they're certainly not trying to prop it up for any long-term usage.
	It looks like golden parachutes all around, David.
	I mean, they didn't save the petrodollar.
	They're printing into oblivion.
	There is no fiscal sanity or responsibility.
	There's no fiscal hawks anymore.
	Nobody talks about the deficit.
	It just seems to be the elephant in the room that everybody ignores.
	And that's the only thing I can think.
	The only thing that explains this is that they know, at least the top upper echelon knows that there will be a new system introduced and the backbone of that system will be a control grid, the central bank digital currency, which is what they want.
	I mean, if you look at whether, you know, Davos, World Economic Forum, they were crowing about 97% of countries on board with a CBDC or have some sort of plan for that.
	And then the Bank of International Settlements, Figuring out their, you know, system to distribute and a collection house and all that stuff.
	And I just I think that what's what we're watching happen is the rolling out of central bank digital currency and the plans for that.
	Luckily, I see so much decentralization and the attitude of adopting things like gold and silver or Bitcoin or crypto in general.
	I see a lot of that, the attitude.
	Maybe it's just my wheelhouse and what I study and all the people that I follow, but I've never before, and I've been in this game for a while, the energy, the intellect is all on the side of the people with the mindset of freedom and decentralization.
	The The overlords of finance, the fiat overlords, they really don't have a lot of heft.
	I was reading the other day, there's like 400 PhDs that work at the Federal Reserve.
	And I thought, something about, you know, there's got to be a joke in there about the collection of brainpower, kind of like JFK talked about with the Nobel laureates who came to the White House.
	And, you know, he said this is the most...
	Collection of brain power and intellect since Thomas Jefferson died alone.
	There's got to be some kind of joke there in that line of logic about all these supposed smart people, all the smart set.
	And look at the damage that they've done.
	It's absolutely unforgivable.
	It's criminal. Oh, yeah.
	Yeah. And, of course, you get back to the thing.
	Is it intentional? Is it malicious?
	Or is it incompetence?
	Yes. I think it's both.
	We know that they're malicious.
	Let's hope that they're incompetent as well.
	That's where our hope is. And I thought it was funny, you know, when you – I laughed when you said golden parachutes because I thought, you know, nobody ever grabs a Fiat parachute.
	No. I gotta use that.
	Nobody ever jumps out of a plane with a piece of paper.
	It's because they say so.
	It inflates because they say it will, and it doesn't.
	Exactly right. I got a question here from a listener, DG8. He says, can you ask Tony if cryptocurrency has played a role in strangely lowering gold and silver prices?
	Yes. If there was no such thing as Bitcoin, then gold would be way over $3,000.
	I think it has had a role in somewhat of the...
	It hasn't stalled gold.
	And they sometimes complement each other.
	There's room for both, folks.
	I mean, when you hear people say, there's an unlimited supply of gold or something...
	No, there's not. It's like the more steel is poured in one hour than all the gold has ever been mined in history.
	It's a finite, finite, even if you, you know, they say, well, there's gold could be on asteroids or whatever, you know, I mean, just these hypothetical things like there's a there's a limited supply of gold and silver.
	They're very hard to get. They're very hard.
	It takes a lot of resources to refine them and all the rest.
	But gold and I think crypto Especially since the adoption of Bitcoin, the good thing about Bitcoin is that it's taken a lot of people and the younger generation who might not have gotten into gold or silver or learned about fiat currency or the Federal Reserve They learned about it through Bitcoin, through what you call orange pilling, which I think is great because I have Bitcoin too and I deal in it.
	But I do think that's a good question.
	I do think that the rise of cryptocurrency has somewhat taken off a little bit of the Oh, yeah.
	Well, just the fact that Bitcoin talks about it in terms of mining, right?
	Using that paradigm. And so that helped to get people to understand the difference between something that has intrinsic value, that is real money or whatever, like gold, and that you've got to mine it.
	What they're saying is that the intrinsic value of the cryptocurrency is the process of, you know, doing the calculations for the transactions.
	They call that mining. But the bottom line is that it's based on work.
	And what the governments are trying to do with CBDC is to change it over from instead of proof of work, which would limit it, they're trying to change it over to proof of stake.
	Yeah, thank you. Basically proof of authority, right?
	It's worth this because I say so.
	And so what they were trying to do was establish that and say, you know, you're limited in these physical assets because you've got to mine it.
	We're going to limit this because you've got to work to get it.
	And so that's where they came with that paradigm.
	And that's very useful because it educated the younger generation, I think, that has gotten into crypto more than most.
	It helped educate them about fiat currency and why you don't like that.
	I think what's going to happen is, you know, most of the people, when I was talking to Aaron Day, he said the older generation values privacy, but they don't like the technology.
	The younger generation likes the technology, but they don't like privacy and they don't value privacy, right?
	And so perhaps Bitcoin has a role there for the younger generation, but also we need to understand that most of the assets are skewed towards the older generation.
	And they get scared and they aren't really paying that much attention for the most part, And so, like we said before, once everybody starts talking about it, once mainstream media starts talking about gold and de-dollarization, then the older generation is going to take the assets that they have more of, and they're going to start pouring it into gold.
	I think that's when we're going to start seeing it there.
	But of course, you know, the fact that people who don't trust Fiat have a choice of where they can put it.
	That has siphoned off a lot of wealth that would have gone into gold, I think.
	Yeah. Yeah, absolutely.
	I guess, you know, when we talk about the asteroids, instead of, you know, people used to say, I'm waiting until my ship comes in.
	I guess it could be your spaceship comes in from the asteroid and bringing back all of the loot.
	Maybe that's why Elon Musk wants to go to the stars so badly.
	There's gold out there.
	Gold in them, their stars.
	There's gold in them, their stars.
	Got to get out there. It's amazing.
	If you just take a look at the big picture here, we're going through a monetary reset.
	That's what the planet's doing right now.
	And the elites came out a long time ago and said, hey, this is what we're going to do.
	We call it a great reset.
	And that's a conspiracy theory.
	No, they're resetting the monetary system.
	There's going to be winners and losers here, too, by the way, folks.
	There's going to be those who gain.
	And there's going to be those who just really get caught flat-footed.
	As I say all the time, quoting Art Buckminster Fuller, people can't get out of the way of what they don't see coming.
	People just think tomorrow's going to be like yesterday.
	That's not how this works. History's unfolding before us.
	The prices are an indicator of that.
	I don't think... We're just getting started.
	We'll see some dips.
	There'll be some pullback in the precious metals markets, but that's only because of sell-offs and things like that and people getting liquidity.
	But we're on a general trend here with the dollar in decline, David.
	That's what we're watching.
	Yeah, that's it.
	That's the trend. We can't predict when it's going to happen, but we can see that it is accelerating as we're laughing about it.
	You know, it's like, this is happening a lot faster than I thought.
	I find myself saying that all the time as I get older.
	Everything in life is coming at you faster.
	But look, we are at the, you talk about a lifespan, right?
	You know, that's the fourth turning, 70 or 80 years, just like a human lifespan.
	And when you get to the end of the lifespan of the system that we're in, each time the, you know, things start to go pretty fast.
	They start to fall apart really fast, just like your body when you get to a certain age.
	It starts to fall apart really quickly and starts to accelerate as it's about to die.
	And that's what this system is going to do as it's about to die.
	It's going to start accelerating its deconstruction, its decomposition or whatever.
	So it's a dying system.
	And we can all see that it's a dying system.
	The question is, you know, how are you going?
	This is a storm that's coming.
	What are you going to do to protect for the storm?
	That's the key thing.
	Well, tell us a little bit about what's going on at Weiswolf, other than trying to cover things.
	Trying to get supply.
	That's the daily mission.
	I wake up every day. It's funny.
	We talked off air. I don't know what day it is.
	I know it's Thursday. I'm going to talk to David on Thursday.
	I do my shows. I have to remember that, at least.
	You're right. Just getting supply.
	And we've been real fortunate.
	The two locations always help.
	I'm here in North Texas.
	I'll be back in the Ozarks next week in Branson.
	But just really just supplying Wolfpack.
	I mean, we just continue to grow that.
	And thanks to your listeners.
	DavidKnight.Gold, folks, go check that out.
	And you can hit the tab, join Wolfpack.
	Start as little as $50 a month.
	We're about to add, I can't really announce it yet or what it's going to be, but we're coming up with something called Wolf Picks, and it's going to be on the wolfpack.gold site.
	What we're doing is every day, we're going to set the price for an ounce of silver or an ounce of gold.
	Now, you don't know what it's going to be.
	It could be a coin, could be a round, could be a bar, and I'm going to set that as the most competitive price I can.
	It's going to be from noon to 6, every day, and then we're going to stop it.
	Every day at the end of the close of business, I'll stop it when I can't lock a Great.
	So you could check that out.
	We'll have no fees on that as well.
	No credit card fees.
	We're just going to take bank ACH. And then we're going to have blocks of $500 and $1,000 for just gold or silver.
	And it's like first come, first serve, best deal.
	You can lock that in.
	All silver or all gold.
	We'll fix at the beginning of the day and then we'll give you a detailed invoice and let us shop.
	And it could be anything that comes in.
	So it's just going to be from what we're buying and putting over the counter and we build your invoice.
	So we're looking forward to that.
	That's great. So look out for the blue light there and the blue light special.
	Limited time each day.
	You're going to have a special that's going to be there so people can take a look at it.
	And again, it is Wise Wolf Gold, and you can get there through davidknight.gold.
	Let Tony know that you're coming through us.
	And you've got a program that's following immediately after this one, noon Eastern Time, 11 Central Time.
	Tell everybody where they can find your program and what's coming up.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah, please come over.
	We'll be over on Rockfin on the America Unplugged channel.
	My ex at Tony Arterburn, I'll be broadcasting there.
	And Rumble, America Unplugged channel, Arterburn Radio Transmission.
	We'll have some fun.
	Go join the stream. That's great.
	And I've got another comment here.
	Actually, this is a thank you on Rumble from Atomic Dog.
	He said, David, thanks to Tony for insisting silver was going to be a solid investment.
	I increased my position last month, and it has paid off.
	Very good. Yeah, I know.
	Glad to hear that. Yeah, you saw that coming and you called it.
	And so good. I'm glad that worked out for you, Atomic.
	When the market's up, you look like a genius.
	And then when you have a sell-off and a correction, I don't look so great.
	But thank you so much for that.
	Well, we know what the long-term trend is going to be.
	That's the key thing. And there's going to be a lot of noise up and down.
	It's not going to be, I don't think, as much of a rollercoaster ride as Bitcoin has been.
	But it's going to vary, you know.
	It's going to go around.
	So it's not going to be just always straight up and to the right, you know.
	All of this stuff jumps around, and there's many things that affect it.
	But we know what the fundamentals are.
	We know what's going on with the deficit.
	We know that the financial system is at its natural end of life, and these people have got grand designs of what they want to build, and what they want to build is going to be very tyrannical.
	We don't want to have that dominating us.
	We want to have something that is going to be outside of that.
	So for all those reasons, Have some wealth insurance and have some tyranny insurance as well.
	I don't think that these people, like I said yesterday, I don't believe them for a moment, that Canada is going to pull back from the CBDC. I think that's just a head fake before an election.
	That's all that's happening with that.
	That's the long-term plan.
	They're in lockstep with the World Economic Forum and all the rest of these things.
	I mean, look at this picture of Chrystia Freeland.
	I'm looking at it while I got the article pulled up.
	She looks just like Herman Munster's wife.
	I mean, she looks like Lily Munster in black and white.
	I mean, it truly is amazing.
	Except that Lily Munster was nice, you know.
	Right. She had life in her life.
	Christy of Freeland is not nice.
	So we're going to take a quick break.
	Thank you so much, Tony, for supporting the program and for all that you do.
	And it is...
	It's great to have somebody that we can trust.
	I would hate to have to be buying my gold and silver from Goldman Sachs.
	So it's great to have you there.
	Thank you so much. We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back folks
	music playing...
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	David Knight Show.
	Well, before we get back to the news here, and we've got a lot of very light news about Lala Harris.
	We'll have a few lols about Lala because it's really crazy what she's saying.
	And she got called out on it.
	She made a mistake.
	She finally did a one-on-one interview.
	With an honest journalist, it is pretty amazing.
	But before we get to that and have some laughs, I just want to remind you, I mentioned at the very beginning of the program, Jason Barker, a prayer request for his grandson.
	And I want to thank all you for the prayers for my son.
	I got this last night, and I told him that I would mention it today.
	He said, please do. He said, I know Whistler needs all the prayers he can get right now, but we also desperately need some tonight.
	My younger stepdaughter had her third child today, my fifth grandbaby.
	She was overdue, and they ended up inducing labor.
	She had the baby just fine, but he soon started having trouble breathing.
	He was flown to Mercy Hospital in St.
	Louis where he's struggling. They're about to put in a tracheotomy, and he is in really bad shape.
	His name is Baby Liam.
	Can you please pray for God to place His healing hand on him and to comfort his mother?
	And so we have been praying for Tony.
	I would like to please pray for him yourself.
	And he says, I'll continue to keep Whistler, Travis, all night filming my prayers.
	It's times like this that we need each other more than ever.
	This is why I think, you know, God, these things happen in our life so that we see God working in our life and so that we can pray for each other and lift each other up to Him.
	And, you know, if you need to, you look at this and you wonder about this.
	It was an excellent book.
	You have... Lee Strobel did a book called The Case for Christ, and I thought an even better book that he did, because I'd seen the arguments that he made.
	He addressed issues and things that skeptics would have, and I also have had on the show a couple of times a guy who wrote Cold Case Christianity, an excellent book as well for skeptics, a guy who was a cold case detective.
	And he was not a believer.
	And he read the Bible because his wife became a Christian.
	Same type of thing, I believe, that happened to Lee Strobel.
	And he applied the same types of things.
	In a cold case, you've got some written testimony that was taken, some written evidence that was taken at the time.
	But now pretty much everybody is dead in a cold case.
	You might have some people that you could go back and re-interrogate, but, you know, the evidence is cold.
	Most of the people, witnesses and things like that are dead.
	So you go back and you look at the evidence.
	He said, applying those same standards to what he found in the New Testament, it convinced him, absolutely convinced him.
	But, of course, we know that it is, and he understands as well, that it is God who ultimately convinces us and opens our mind to this.
	But we see this type of thing happening so that we can see God working in our lives.
	And I was starting to say that Lee Strobel did a book, The Case for Miracles.
	And so he went out and he talked to people who were skeptics.
	He talked to people who had done scientific studies about it.
	Let's have this group over here pray about something.
	Another group will have a control group do it like a scientific experiment and things like that.
	And what he found was that more than any other segment of the population, doctors and medical staff believed in miracles more than anybody else because they had seen this answered so many times.
	Now, it is always a situation where sometimes God's answer is no to what we want.
	And there will come a time where all of us will die.
	In the interim, it is great for us to pray for each other so that we can see God's work.
	And I've seen that so many times in my life.
	That's why I kept telling people, look at the biography, the autobiography of George Mueller and his diary.
	Truly an amazing life of faith that he lived.
	And Jason says, well, I'm already thanking God for the miracle that he will provide.
	And if the worst happens, then I will take comfort in the fact that baby Liam will be in paradise with our Lord.
	Absolutely true. And that in and of itself is a miracle, isn't it?
	A miracle that God would save sinners like us.
	This was sent to me by a listener.
	I won't get into a lot of details, but basically he was just asking me, he said, I'm not a religious man, but I hear you weaving Christianity into what you're talking about.
	It made me want to buy a Bible and investigate it.
	And so I told him, I said, well, I didn't tell him that, but I'll just say to people out there, I've always believed that the best translation is going to be the one that you read.
	And so if there's something that really clicks with you, and you can look at different Bible translations at BibleGateway.com, I think in terms of clarity and clearness and modern language, I think New Living Translation is good if you want to get more detailed in your understanding of things.
	You can look at the Bible Gateway and you can see why does one translation use this word or that phrase and the other one uses something different.
	But it really, you know, you can get more clarity, but you can still see the picture.
	An analogy that I've heard somebody use is that the Bible is like a hologram, you know.
	You can break off pieces of the hologram.
	You'll still get the image.
	It may not be as clear, but you're still going to get that image.
	And I think that's true.
	I think that's true of any of these translations.
	We had my mother-in-law is Catholic, and we had a neighborhood Bible study that we did.
	We got her to come. And she was really reluctant.
	She said, I don't know, I have a completely different Bible.
	I said, well, just bring along and read along with us as we're reading.
	And, you know, she had the Catholic Douay Reims Bible, which is an English translation of a Latin translation of the Greek and Hebrew.
	So it's two levels direct.
	But she said, well, it's basically the same thing.
	You know, she's looking at it.
	And I think you'll find that if you look at the Bible Gateway, that even though this is a copy of a copy, essentially a translation of a translation, it was still there.
	the difference in the Catholic Bible and the Protestant Bibles are what is called the Apocrypha, the books in between Malachi and Matthew, between what we call the Old Testament and the New Testament, that inner period. They've got some books there that they put in. But you're going to understand, if you read the Bible, you're going to understand who Christ is and you're going to understand his importance to us,
	what he did for us. You're going to see that in any Bible that you look. And if you want to look to, you know, same resources that I mentioned before, if you've got concerns about particular things, skeptics have brought up or you've got concerns about the Bible passage that's there, you can find that.
	Just make the Bible your key source.
	Let it speak for itself.
	You can always, not wrong to find out other things, but always don't treat them at the same level that you would.
	This was put up on Subscribestar.com.
	This is from DocuGarden, who says, there's a great interview with Scott Schera the other day, who's our amazing grace.
	He mentioned that hospitals refusing to discharge patients and holding them hostage.
	When I heard that, I thought of Ammon Bundy.
	I remember you interviewed him, and he had some kind of a group or posse around his area to fight back against stuff like the medical kidnapping.
	If I remember right, his group was successful a couple of times, standing up to hospitals and demands that they release the persons being medically kidnapped.
	At the time of the interview, he was starting this group.
	The group was called People's Rights.
	It was back in 2020 as all the lockdown stuff was happening.
	I signed up in our area, but I never heard anything back from anybody.
	It was not really active.
	I thought it was a great idea.
	It's just that you have to have a certain critical mass.
	In Idaho, where he did have a critical mass, they were able to help someone who was, again, I think it was around the birth of a baby and they were giving him a hard time because of the vaccines and the mask or something like that.
	And so they stood up to that, but then they actually, the officials came back and charged him and charged others, and they trumped up the charges on all this stuff.
	So I've not heard from him for quite some time.
	He did put in a candidacy to run for governor, and last time I talked to him, he was flirting with that idea, and I said, well, if you decide to run, let me know.
	I never heard back from him, but I did see that he was running, but...
	I figured, well, he doesn't necessarily want to come on the program, so that's fine.
	But I don't really know what's going on with Ammon.
	And I thought it was a great idea.
	The issue with the people's rights was it's supposed to be a network of people.
	And if somebody had an issue where they were being attacked or there's medical kidnapping or something like that, you would send a call out and this network of people would show up to film stuff.
	The film stuff, because it's the light of truth about what is happening that is one of our best disinfectants of these tyrants that is out there.
	And this is from Love of the Road, and thank you.
	Love of the Road is a really key supporter of this program.
	He said he was just an Amish country and made a distribution there.
	It made him wonder what the update is about Amos Miller.
	And he said, I didn't realize, and so I haven't done an update on that.
	I need to look into that and find out what's going on.
	I interviewed a guy who was right in that area, and he was one of the key reporters about that.
	He was independent media who was right on the spot.
	I need to contact him and find out what's going on with Amos Miller.
	Thomas Massey has talked about that.
	Frank Nicely, along with Thomas Massey, talking about the Prime Act that Massey has sponsored in Congress.
	Frank Nicely was trying to get that in the state legislature here.
	To say that if you own the U.S. Department of Agriculture, can't stop this.
	And of course, the big problem that Amos Miller had was the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture.
	That was really where this was coming down.
	And so, you know, again, being supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
	And Ryan also says...
	I didn't realize that it was so bad that Whistler has been bedridden.
	Yes, it is. It is that bad.
	He can only walk a short distance and he starts to get into pain in his hips and other things.
	And we're very concerned because the phloxan poisoning from the antibiotic, the fluoride antibiotic, It is something that attacks your tendons.
	And a lot of people have ruptured tendons.
	But he's in a lot of pain even if he's just lying down from that.
	So we're trying. We've had a lot of people send us a lot of suggestions.
	We appreciate that. We're trying the detox things that have been suggestions that have been there.
	And charcoal and other things.
	And castor oil. We're getting infusions.
	We're trying to do what we can.
	But the key thing, again, is prayer.
	And so we really do appreciate that.
	Well, we're going to...
	Oh, one more thing here.
	This is sent as an email from Handy this morning, and let me get to this before we move on.
	He said, I'm working tonight.
	I just had an encounter that I want to share before the details get foggy in my mind.
	Earlier, we were dispatched to a sick person call.
	When we arrived, we went through the open garage, and on the way into her house, I noticed two surgical masks swept into the corner of her garage.
	I pointed that out to my partner and told him, I bet this one took the vaccine.
	What we found was an adult female complaining about extreme weakness.
	She said she'd been too weak to even sit up in bed or to care for herself in any way for the last seven days.
	But her condition has been progressing since late fall of 2022, she said.
	She says her husband has been caring for her.
	Upon further questioning, I found that her weakness was due to rapid progression of Parkinson's disease that did not respond to medications according to her doctor.
	She told me that her doctor hasn't really given her any hope for recovery or even slowing the progression of her neurologic disease.
	On the way to the hospital, I asked if she had any prior medical history, which she denied.
	She told me her doctor says she's been, quote, disgustingly healthy, unquote, and she's never had to take any prescription medications before now.
	That's when I asked her if she took any of the COVID vaccines.
	She told me she'd taken several.
	I took a look at her vaccine card, and he sent this to me, actually.
	And this is her vaccine card.
	And you can see it, Pfizer, Pfizer, Pfizer, Pfizer.
	Four of them. Notice the last entry.
	Pfizer bivalent flu COVID jab on 10-31-2022, just prior to the onset of her debilitating neurologic disease.
	He says, she's not the first that I have seen like this.
	Absolutely. It's such a shame, too.
	And look, you know, we don't ever want to...
	Blame people who've had this done.
	Anybody can be deceived. We've been deceived in our family over the antibiotic thing.
	And, you know, we don't want to be the smug that say, well, I knew better.
	It's your own fault because you take it, you know, like Laura Loomer, right?
	It's not your fault if you're poisoned.
	It's not your fault if you're lied to.
	It's not your fault if you're gaslit.
	I mean, would we say that to a child?
	Well, it's your fault that you had bottom surgery and you had puberty blockers and all this other kind of stuff.
	No, it's not their fault. You know, they were lied to.
	And of course, you can say, well, we should have known better.
	Look, you can always...
	Go back on all that. You can always say, you know, well, I was in a car accident.
	If only I had taken off a little bit sooner or later or whatever.
	You can always, but no, no.
	It's not that.
	These people who are doing this know what they're doing.
	And they're poisoning people.
	We know it. They know it.
	They need to know that we know it.
	We need to say to, not just to Francis Collins, But to Trump and to Biden, to the Republican congressmen and senators, as well as the Democrats, you need to have a Nuremberg 2.0.
	But we know that's not coming.
	We know that's not coming.
	We need to put the fear of God in them.
	Because something much worse than Nuremberg 2.0 is coming up.
	And again, there's forgiveness if they think they need forgiveness.
	But of course, people like Trump doesn't think he needs forgiveness for anything.
	What a dangerous position to be in.
	Before we take a break, I've got some comments here.
	On Rumble, DG8, thank you for the tip, says, Alex and Trump, lure you in with the real truth and false promises and then betray you.
	Controlled opposition at its finest.
	Praying for your family's health and recovery.
	Thank you. On Rumble, don't frag me, bro.
	David, could you ask Goatree...
	About how much the internet he thinks is dead.
	Also, about the new debunk bot.
	Well, that's one I haven't heard of.
	I'll look up that as well.
	On Rumble.
	Anon a moose.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says, I've been young and now I'm old and yet I have not seen the righteous forsaken or his children begging for bread.
	Psalm 37. Psalm 37 has been a very important psalm for me.
	Not about what happened at Infowars, but about what happened when I said we were creditors in a bankruptcy case.
	That was a real trial.
	And I don't mean a judicial trial.
	I mean a trial for us personally.
	And the thing I remember about Psalm 37...
	I actually did lyrics in a song about it because we talk about different words that you see in different translations.
	The word fret was used three times in that.
	I remember looking at that and I thought, what?
	And that's the only place that it's used.
	And so that Hebrew word for fret, when you look it up, It actually comes from a situation where you actually kindle a fire.
	You start a fire and you keep pouring stuff on it, right?
	I thought, what a great visual image that is of fretting, what fretting is.
	It's like, do not fret.
	Do not fret when the wicked succeed.
	That's the message of it, and it finishes with that.
	I've been young and old, but I've never seen the righteous forsaken or the children begging for bread.
	So don't fret. God is in control.
	And that's what we need to understand through all this stuff.
	We need to be clear and not look away.
	The things that are bad.
	We don't want to say, well, I don't even want to read the possible effects of these drugs that I'm dispensing because it just gets me too scared and depressed.
	Well, you should be scared. You should be depressed.
	And you should know about this.
	And you should, because forewarned is forearmed.
	But we don't want to get so afraid that we are paralyzed with fear.
	And we don't have to be paralyzed with fear.
	By the way, you know, that's why I recommend the Blue Letter Bible for people.
	You take a look at the Bible verses like that, and it explains to you where these words like that particular word that's only used in that psalm, it's the only time that Hebrew word is used in the Bible.
	That's a wonderful picture.
	You wouldn't know that if you didn't look it up in the Blue Letter Bible.
	So we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	They're doing what in the place they named after me?
	Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
	Making sense common again.
	This is the David Knight Show.
	From Guard Goldsmith.
	Thank you, Guard. He says, God bless Whistler, Jasons, Liam, and family.
	Travis and all such fine people.
	Thank you, Guard, for our kinship.
	Yes, thank you. Thank you, Guard, for your friendship.
	It truly is wonderful knowing Guard.
	He's a great guy. And you should tune into his show, Liberty Conspiracy.
	Yes, yes. And we met Guard and Occupy Peace rally in 2021.
	And... Yeah, a great place to go.
	If you can go this weekend, that's when Gerald Slenty is going to be having the Occupy Peace Rally.
	He's got a great lineup of speakers that are there.
	And so, if you're anywhere in the area, you can go.
	And, of course, the guard was not in the area, but he went from New Hampshire all the way over to New York, and it was great seeing him there.
	Let's talk a little bit about Lala.
	We need some laughs here.
	We need to lighten this up here.
	And... If we go back and we look at people who are, you know, freaked out about the fact that Biden goes on with the view and said, you know, Trump is just like a bug and he'll smash him and everything.
	Well, you know, they're kind of freaked out about that.
	But, you know, the worst thing that Biden said was not that.
	That speech really doesn't harm Trump at all.
	But he really stuck the knife in Lala.
	Biden also said that he delegated everything to Lala.
	He said from foreign policy to domestic policy.
	Whoa. And so...
	That was also in The View.
	Instead, I see so many of these people that picked up on this thing.
	Oh, look, he insulted Trump.
	They called Trump a bug and he said, I'm going to swat the bug.
	No, he stuck a knife in her back.
	The acknowledgement, says Breitbart, they did pick this up at Breitbart, the acknowledgement is significant because it contradicts Harris' talking points.
	She's tried multiple times to distance herself from the Biden-Harris record.
	You know, she's going to be unburdened by what has been.
	Or I guess you could kind of rephrase that and say, we're going to be unburdened by what has been.
	Oh, that has been.
	Joe Biden, that has been.
	We're going to be unburdened by the has-been Joe.
	But now the has-been Joe is trying to burden her with legacy.
	He said, my approach is about new ideas, new policies that are directed at the current moment.
	And also, to be very honest with you, you know, when anybody says that, well, I'm going to be honest with you.
	Why would you say that unless you're usually not honest with people?
	It always concerns me when someone says, well, to be honest with you.
	Oh, what you just said or other things that you're not being honest with me?
	I also love how we're getting new ideas and new policies from a woman who's been in politics, what, how many years?
	Decades at this point? Why haven't you implemented any of these before?
	Come on. Yeah, or said anything about them.
	Yeah, because she just looked on Trump's paper and she kind of pulled him off of there.
	So to be very honest with you, she said, my focus is very much in what we need to do over the next 10, 20 years to catch up on the 21st century.
	She isn't going to be there for 10 years, even if she won this election in the next.
	And she says, I'm obviously not Joe Biden, and you know, I offer a new generation of leadership.
	I'm burdened by that has-been Joe.
	But when she went on the view, when Biden went on the view, he appeared to blame Harris for the administration's failure to reduce inflation, for the failure to secure the border, And for responsibility to withdraw from Afghanistan, he says, as Vice President, there wasn't a single thing that I did that she couldn't do, and so I was able to de-delegate her responsibility on everything, from foreign policy to domestic policy.
	You see, many people said when she was declared to be the border czar, many people talked about how much Jill Biden, Jill, Hated Lala.
	And a lot of people said they have just tied this thing around her neck like a dead albatross.
	And I think they just did that again.
	They just reminded everybody of the albatross they put around her neck.
	The one thing that she is detailed about, she doesn't really have very detailed policies as we're going to see here in a moment, but the one thing that she has a lot of detail about Not so much the economy, but her economy and her campaign is based around a single issue.
	She's talking about a $100 billion manufacturing plan and other things like that, but it's really about abortion.
	That's where you'll find the details.
	And that's really where her economy is.
	But... She had an interview.
	She said, well, $100 billion in new investments in manufacturing.
	She said this plan will cost approximately $100 billion and will be paid for by a portion of the proceeds of international tax reform, which seeks to prevent a global race to the bottom and discourage inversions.
	Outsourcing or international tax strategies designed by corporations to avoid paying their fair share to the United States.
	And so everything about it, global, international, international, everything is globalist, right?
	And everything's about taxes.
	She's right on, but she's really making her pitch to the World Economic Forum.
	And of course, she's got a plan, she says.
	Well, you shouldn't have a plan.
	We shouldn't have a centrally planned economy.
	She goes on to say, I'm a capitalist.
	I believe in free and fair markets.
	No, you don't. You're just talking about how you got a plan about investments in manufacturing.
	Government shouldn't be investing in manufacturing.
	As a matter of fact, if you say that you're about free markets, then that means that you don't have government investing in manufacturing or in businesses.
	They're not there to pick the winners and losers.
	They're not there to create some grand strategy.
	You know, the communists have their five-year plans.
	Well, she's got a 10-year or 20-year plan, she says.
	That's the way these people always work.
	She's just a communist.
	Commie Lala. I don't understand how you can trust someone who repeatedly lies, says a person that was interviewed by NBC News in the suburbs of Pittsburgh.
	And I looked at that and thought, well, are they talking about Trump or Lala?
	They both continually lie.
	I don't know who they're talking about.
	I think in this context, because it was NBC, I think this person was supposed to be talking about Trump, but that applies to anyone.
	And so we see the interview that she had with MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle.
	Stephanie Ruhle calls her out for dodging the questions on how she's going to raise taxes.
	Well, it's just going to be this global international thing, and we're going to prevent a global race to the bottom by taxing everybody.
	Well, that takes us to the bottom, I think.
	Stephanie Ruhle says she doesn't answer the question.
	Yeah. And so I think she thought that she was going to have a very, very friendly interview because Stephanie Ruhle had been so critical of Trump and giving her excuses.
	And then she gets there and all of a sudden she gets straight up questions.
	The liberal host had previously defended Lala Harris for avoiding questions.
	And so Lala is giving these answers about, she's got this whole thing figured out.
	It's all just a bunch of, I don't even like to use the term word salad.
	That's what other people do. This is the kind of speech that you see bureaucrats do when they get up and give each other, you know, they get up on a podium and start talking to other bureaucrats.
	Or at a college or something.
	It's just meaningless, multi-syllable words or whatever.
	But in this particular case, she's talking about how she wants to make the economy, I don't know, holistic or something?
	And assistance to state and local governments around transit dollars.
	And looking holistically at the connection between that and housing.
	And looking holistically at the incentives we and the federal government can create for local and state governments to actually engage in planning in a holistic manner that includes prioritizing affordable housing.
	Today's word, folks, class, is holistic.
	You must use this at least three times in a 30-second clip.
	And you don't have to know what it means.
	You don't have to define that.
	I mean, this is just petty-fogging nonsense.
	Holistic, holistic, holistic.
	And so, with that kind of nonsense...
	Stephanie Ruhle calls her out.
	She doesn't answer the question around if the GOP is controlling the Senate, if she can't raise corporate taxes, where is she going to get the money from, you know, to expand the child's tax credit and do all the things she wants to do?
	And she says, we just have to do it.
	And that's great, and that's a campaign promise, but the issue is, if it means we're just going to borrow again, then what we're doing is we're just never addressing the deficit.
	And back in the days when you were a proud Republican, debts and deficits mattered.
	Yeah, they're going to matter again because they're exploding.
	Another trillion dollars every hundred days or whatever.
	We don't have to worry about any of that stuff.
	Look, Lala is one of the big advocates of MMT, modern monetary theory.
	I call it the magic money tree.
	Deficits don't matter.
	And if inflation goes up, all we do is we raise the taxes of people we don't like.
	That's their economic plan.
	It's utter nonsense.
	It's even dumber than Keynesian economics.
	I mean, at least in Keynesian economics, even though it was false, they tried to come up with mathematical formulas.
	The people that are doing MMT don't even do math.
	So, Rule said, so do you still go forward with those plans and do you borrow?
	She says, Lala says, well, but we're going to raise corporate taxes.
	See, those are the people she doesn't like.
	I'm going to raise their taxes.
	We're going to have to make sure that the biggest corporations and the billionaires pay their fair share.
	That's just it. It's about paying their fair share.
	It's always tax policy based on envy, right?
	And to tell you that you're not going to have to pay the taxes, that other person, that person that you don't like, they're the ones who are going to pay the taxes.
	Don't worry. We're not going to tax you.
	And yet you are going to be the one they tax.
	So she said, as she pointed out, she said if the GOP is controlling the Senate, if she can't raise corporate taxes, where's she going to get the money from?
	Well, she said we just have to do it.
	And so she said, that's not an answer.
	But this is what Lala was also selling her.
	She kept referring to, you know, not just holistic, holistic, holistic, but we got the opportunity economy.
	Yeah, the opportunity economy.
	Here's what she talks about.
	She doesn't define it, but here's what she says about it.
	The third pillar of our opportunity economy is Is leading the world in the industries of the future.
	And making sure America, not China, wins the competition for the 21st century.
	Yeah, we don't like the Chinese.
	Just copying that from Trump as well.
	One of the recurring themes in American history is that when we make an intentional effort to invest in our industrial strength, it leads to extraordinary prosperity and security.
	Not only for years, but for generations.
	Think of Alexander Hamilton having the foresight to build the manufacturing capabilities of our new nation.
	Think of Lincoln and the transcontinental railroad.
	Think of Eisenhower and the interstate highway system.
	Kennedy committing America to win the space race and spurring innovation across our society.
	Yeah. Okay.
	So, yeah, we should do this because Lincoln and Hamilton did it.
	Can you find any more despicable characters?
	And then, of course, you know, we had the interstate system.
	Well, that was done for military purposes, you realize.
	And then we had the moon launch.
	The moon launch. Let's never forget the moon system.
	You believe that?
	Anyway, just days ago, Stephanie Rule had argued that Harris didn't have to answer tough policy questions because she wasn't running for perfect.
	She's running against Trump.
	Uh-oh. But then it was so vague and vacuous that That she talked about price control.
	Prices are still hot.
	Yeah, I agree with you. You said you want to take this on by going after those who engage in price gouging.
	Yeah. But as somebody who supports free markets, who's a capitalist, how do you go after price gouging without implementing price controls?
	Because once we get in this zone, people start to get worried and they say, I don't know what she stands for.
	So... Just to be very frank, I am going to apologize for going after companies and corporations that take advantage of the desperation of the American people.
	And as Attorney General, I saw this happen.
	In the midst of an emergency, whether it be an extreme weather event or even the pandemic, we saw it.
	Where those few companies, not the majority, not most, But those few companies that would take advantage of the desperation of people and jack up prices.
	Yeah, I'm going to go after them.
	Yes, I'm going to go after them.
	And that is part of a much more comprehensive plan on what we can do to bring down the cost of living, including housing, including the everyday needs of the American people.
	She has absolutely no idea what the free market is about.
	Anybody that is going to do price controls, anybody that's going to say, well, you're gouging people on this stuff.
	Look, if you're able to raise the price, guess what that's going to do?
	It's going to suck in more supplies in that area instead of rationing them because Lala is going to throw me in jail.
	I just won't sell it at all.
	And you exacerbate the problems by saying, I'm going to invest.
	I'm going to control. I'm going to centrally plant.
	She's just a full-on communist.
	And, of course, she always prefaces these things by saying, well, to be honest with you, well, to be frank with you, to be frank with you, let me dodge and weave here, and to be honest with you, I'm going to next lie to you.
	No, what she is all about is she's got a $100 billion plan for the economy, but the abortion industry's got a $100 million plan for her.
	See, that's the way this stuff works.
	They invest millions into a candidate, and that candidate gives back these different industries billions.
	So the abortion industry is pumping money into her campaign like mad.
	$100 million. Essentially, Planned Parenthood.
	Think of it this way. Planned Parenthood is to Lala as Miriam Adelson is to Trump.
	$100 million? Both of them are good for $100 million.
	She's got one policy, and she is very specific about that policy.
	And she's passionate only about that policy.
	And she's so passionate and specific about it.
	That dictator that she is, whenever she's passionate about something, whether it is abortion or gun control or whatever, she's going to do it by executive order.
	I'm going to dictate this.
	If she cares about it, she's going to dictate it.
	So that's what she said. I'm going to eliminate the filibuster in the Senate so that we can pass a law to ban any restrictions on abortion anywhere, up to or past birth, right?
	And she's going to get rid of the filibuster.
	Well, wait a minute, says Manchin and Sinema, who are both running for re-election.
	You can't come after the filibuster.
	You can come after those kids.
	You can rip the kids to shreds, but don't you dare rip the filibuster to shreds.
	Which, by the way, is not even something that's in the Constitution.
	It's a good thing, I think, in general.
	I think we always have to have something that's going to be a check.
	We should make it difficult for government to do things, just as a rule of thumb.
	Otherwise, if it's easy, if it's quick, if it's warp speed, we know what's going to come.
	So it should be difficult for these people to get things done.
	So I support it, but it's not in the Constitution, and the filibuster is not more important than the baby's.
	Except to Joe Manchin and the cinema.
	And so because she's pushing that, both of these people who support abortion, but they don't like getting rid, they don't like aborting the filibuster.
	Wow. Abort the baby, but don't abort my Senate process.
	Two pro-abortion senators...
	Turned on Lala over her call to end the filibuster to codify unrestricted abortion.
	Shame on her, says Manchin.
	Not for wanting to abort kids, which she supports, but for wanting to abort the filibuster.
	She knows the filibuster is the holy grail of democracy.
	Where was this guy when...
	The Paris Climate Accord was self-ratified by Al Gore and by Obama.
	And then when it was put back in by Biden, where was Manchin about that?
	Don't we have, I mean, yeah, sure, filibuster, fine.
	Don't you have a process for approving treaties that's actually in the Constitution?
	Shouldn't you care about that?
	No. He said filibuster is the only thing that keeps us talking and working together.
	She gets rid of that. Then this would be the house on steroids.
	And then Sinema says, to state the supremely obvious, eliminating the filibuster to codify Roe v.
	Wade also enables a future Congress to ban all abortion nationwide.
	What an absolutely terrible, short-sighted idea.
	I absolutely agree with her.
	She's a thousand percent right on this.
	Because I've said this about the pro-life people who want to do just the opposite.
	See, the pro-life people want to set a limit for abortions in Washington.
	They want to make it a federal issue.
	And Sinema is saying, if you make this a federal issue, then you understand when the other side gets in, then they're going to ban all abortions.
	I don't want to ban all abortions.
	I do want to ban all abortions.
	But I think we have to do that at the state level, because if we do it in Washington, first of all, anything that's important needs to be done at the state level.
	Let's not abdicate anything that's important to the federal government.
	It's too corrupt. It's just too corrupt.
	And first of all, secondly, it doesn't have the constitutional authority.
	What both of them should be saying, as senators, is that, well, if you want to codify Roe v.
	Wade... Then you need to amend the Constitution to say that the federal government has the power to define when life begins.
	Because you don't have that.
	According to the 9th and 10th Amendment, anything that is not expressly delegated to the federal government remains the power of the states and of the people.
	And they have overruled that.
	In the same way that when the Supreme Court decided they were going to define what marriage was, they overruled state constitutions and they overruled referenda that had been done across the country.
	Every state had rejected homosexual marriage.
	Even California had rejected it.
	So the Supreme Court overruled the power of the states and the powers of the people And usurped that in order to define what marriage is.
	They have no right, regardless of what you think about abortion and about marriage.
	The Tenth Amendment is the Tenth Amendment.
	And so whether you want to support or abandon or deny either one of these things, you've got to change the Constitution first.
	Or just throw the Constitution out.
	And that's a really dangerous thing.
	And that's been done over and over again for a very long time by all these people.
	And so change the Constitution or shut up.
	We don't even have this discussion until you change the Constitution and give yourself the constitutional power to make these determinations.
	But from a practical standpoint, Sinema is exactly right.
	And I agree with her 100%.
	She is pro-abortion, I'm pro-life.
	But we need to understand that if you give that power to Congress, a future Congress is going to do exactly the opposite of what you want.
	And it is an absolutely terrible, short-sighted idea to put these things into the federal government.
	So I absolutely agree with her on the issue, on the constitutional aspects of that, but not on these other issues.
	Let's take a look at another issue, and that is, what does all this talk about nuclear power tell us about where these people are headed?
	You know, we talk all the time.
	We say a double standard is two-faced or this or that.
	They talk about it in the UK. They say, we have a two-tier justice system.
	You have one set of rules for these people over here, a different set of rules for those, right?
	And certainly, that is the case over and over again.
	Now we're seeing that there is a two-tier system or a hypocritical system here in terms of power.
	And they really do want to have a two-tier system when it comes to electrical power.
	Because the electrical power is going to give them political power over us.
	That's what this climate MacGuffin thing is truly about.
	And yet we see everywhere that you have individuals like Raimondo, I'm sorry, not Raimondo, Granholm, who's the energy secretary.
	She appeared on CNBC Tuesday, and Jennifer Granholm says that we need to have small modular nuclear reactors so we can power the AI data centers.
	They don't want you to have an SUV, but they want the AI data centers to have their own nuclear reactor, their own Mr.
	Fusion. Ha! Back to the future.
	Where's Doc when we need him with a professor or whatever?
	You know, no, there is no Mr.
	Fusion. It's going to be quite a bit bigger than that, but they don't want us to have cars, but they do want us to have artificial intelligence, big brother, watching everything that we do, telling us lies, and stopping us from speaking the truth.
	That's what artificial intelligence is designed to do.
	And that's why you've got to clear the decks.
	We've got to fast-track this.
	We've got to warp speed it in.
	You've got the Pennsylvania governor saying, let's do that for three months.
	We're going to run this thing really through fast.
	All the electricity, folks, is going to go to the AI data center for Microsoft.
	Enough electricity to power 700,000 homes.
	I wonder how many electric cars you could power that kind of electricity.
	But that's not going to be on the grid.
	That's not going to be available to you.
	Because they don't want you to have cars.
	They don't want you to have even electric cars.
	That's the whole point. The electric car is a lie.
	It's a lie. The cake is a lie.
	The electric vehicle is a lie.
	It's all a lie. It's just an illusion.
	It's just to tag you along on this, the electric car battery operated off of the grid that they have every intention of killing, that they're in the process right now of killing.
	You got the EPA out there now treating these power stations as if they were, you know, a dirty car that needs to be regulated.
	They have absolutely no intention of us having any power.
	But they're going to clear the decks to get these nuclear reactors to all these data centers.
	So Jennifer Granholm says, seems to acknowledge that small modular reactors, we should just start calling them Mr.
	Fusions. One technology that we've claimed will be the future of powering AI. They're all but a full-on go for the future.
	She was asked about how data centers would be powered in the future.
	They asked her, they said, well, at the same time, we've been trying to obviously replace typical energy sources with renewables.
	Why? Let's call out that lie.
	Anyway, but we now have this incredible potential uptick and the need for power because of data centers and the growth of generative AI. We were talking about Three Mile Island.
	I said, how do you see this coming out?
	We're talking about that coming back online.
	How do you see this playing out?
	How is it going to mix out, given that our power needs could be 20% higher than right now in just a handful of years?
	Oh, it's going to be much more.
	Much, much more than that.
	As a matter of fact, Goldman or Bloomberg saying, we're going to have 50% increase in power just for the AI. And so she comes back with an astounding lie.
	He says, it's going to be 20%.
	No, all the people who are actually looking at this thing, it's going to be at least 50% just for the AI. She says, well, the estimates are 15% higher.
	Not 20% higher, but 15% higher.
	This Harvard-educated lawyer who obviously doesn't have anybody on her staff that can even do math or cares to look at the power requirements of this stuff, Which is the other day I was talking about the fact that both Elon Musk and the CEO of Toyota were saying there's not enough electricity on the grid for electric cars.
	There just isn't. Both Toyota and Tesla, both the guy whose name is Toyoda and Elon Musk, they're both saying there's not enough electricity for this.
	They don't plan on you having an electric vehicle that you can give electricity to.
	So then it's not going to be a vehicle, is it?
	But she says, oh no, it's only going to be 15% higher as a result of both AI and electrifying the transportation sector.
	What a bold-faced lie.
	I mean, when she talks about electrifying the transportation sector, she's talking about cars and trains.
	I don't know if she's talking about planes.
	Some idiots have been talking about that as well.
	Would you get on a plane that runs on a battery?
	It's worse than Boeing.
	They're talking about planes.
	They're talking about trains. They're talking about semis.
	They're not just talking about passenger vehicles.
	This is your captain speaking.
	Just know there's going to be a slight delay as we charge for the next 12 hours on the tarmac.
	Please remain in your seats. More like the next 12 days.
	Oh, and by the way, no air conditioning.
	We're charging this thing, so you're just going to have to sweat it out on the tarmac.
	So anyway, she says, no, no, it's only going to be 15% higher, and that's for the AI data centers as well as the transportation.
	What a lie.
	She says they're committed, they're telling us, to bringing that power with them, which is why the need for nuclear small modular reactors co-locating data centers with small reactors or partnerships.
	Yeah. She said, we got a ton of nuclear sites in this country that have been permitted for additional reactors that could be powering data centers as well.
	We're working with those. Look, these are the people who are banning any kind of appliance or heating or air conditioning or stove or anything that isn't electric.
	We're not even going to have electricity to cook our food, but they're going to grease the skids for the AI data centers.
	Because we know how they're going to use them.
	Yeah, it was BlackRock. I couldn't remember if it was Bloomberg or...
	It was BlackRock that says that AI is going to drive a 50% jump in Asian energy demand just by itself.
	You know, forget about the entire transportation sector.
	Forget about all your home appliances and everything else.
	No, just AI alone.
	A 50% jump in demand for energy.
	And so they're looking at this and how they can make money off of this.
	Every client we speak to is interested in investing in infrastructure, specifically energy transition and digital-related infrastructure.
	This is the big grift.
	This is the big wealth transfer for, you know, the energy transition.
	This is what the UN is talking about.
	Well, we've got to accelerate these sustainable development goals, and so that means that everybody's going to have to spend trillions, tens of trillions of dollars, In order to pay for this stuff, and then they're going to jack up your energy rates 10 to 20 times or more.
	I'm not exaggerating with this stuff.
	We've gone through the numbers with this.
	10 to 20 times more for your electricity, if you can get it.
	Scarcity, rationing.
	This is not only a product of Marxist centrally planned controlled economies, but it's also how they rule.
	They rule through austerity and through dictates.
	People like Jennifer Granholm, people like Lala Harris, these people are as vain as they are insane, and they are as vain and insane as the gender transition people when they talk about our energy transition stuff.
	They identify with wind and solar, but it's just part of their imagination.
	Don't believe it. They're just trying to gaslight us while they take away the gas that we light our stoves with.
	Meanwhile, in the UK, we have the Labor Party Conference.
	Ed Miliband is doubling down on his de-industrialization strategy, says Daily Skeptic.
	That's exactly right. The techno-feudalism.
	It's about making sure that the poor are immobilized, that we are poor, that we're immobilized, that we're surveilled, that we're lied to.
	You know, I guess we could say...
	Surveilled, propagandized, and censored.
	The SPC agenda.
	You know, it's not the SDG, Sustainable Development Goals.
	It's the SPC that they're really after.
	Well, we'll have more to talk about with us tomorrow.
	As a matter of fact, there's an interesting story about what happened with crypto.
	When they banned it, everybody's rates went up.
	Thanks for listening, have a good day.
	Goodbye.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.

▲