All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 24, 2024 - The David Knight Show
03:06:30
The David Knight Show - 09/24/2024
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
you
using free speech to free minds minds.
you You're listening to The David Night Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 24th of September.
Year of our Lord 2024.
Well, we're going to take a look today at the UN Pact of the Beast.
Yeah.
It's where they're accelerating global governance.
That's what they call it.
And that's an accurate term.
They're accelerating it.
They're looking at debt swapped out for land.
As they're telling us, we're going to have to accelerate the financing of this green new steel, and they get us trillions of dollars in a debt.
Well, I guess then what they'll just have to do is swap it out for land.
We're also going to take a look at free speech and how the billionaires have caved.
From Elon Musk to Pavel Durov, they're all caving.
They are not going to defend your free speech.
They're going to defend their addiction to money and power.
And we're also going to take a look at... I mentioned it briefly yesterday at the very end of the show.
We didn't have time to get to it.
We're going to get to it earlier today.
Thousands of dollars in fines assessed against homeowners because of misconduct of teachers.
Yeah.
That's the next one.
We've got to defund these schools.
We'll be right back.
Well, Representative Bob Good said this is the most important issue, and it's getting the least amount of attention.
And he's absolutely right.
What is he talking about?
He's talking about the UN Pact for the Future.
It is a satanic pact, a pact of lies.
It is a must set about artificial intelligence for summoning the demons.
Yeah, we're doing it with this as well.
Who is Bob Good?
Well, you may, if his name sounds familiar to you, he is the House Freedom Caucus chair.
It's somebody who is focused on the right issues.
Somebody who actually talks about issues and he's just been pushed out of his position.
He just lost, got primaried out because of Trump's vengeance.
Trump decided that because Bob Good had endorsed DeSantis, and then later on when DeSantis dropped out, Bob Good said, well, I endorse Trump now.
That wasn't good enough.
You got to kiss the ring.
And of course, we don't really want to have people who are going to oppose the UN around if Trump gets elected either, right?
Because he didn't oppose the UN.
He did not oppose it.
He trimmed the budgets a little bit of a couple of their agendas.
You should have shut this thing down.
And nothing less than that is going to be acceptable.
Because anything less than that, folks, this is where the heart of global governance is coming from.
We pay $18 billion a year for the UN.
One-third of their budget.
That continued through Trump.
We continue to be the elephant in the room, and yet we exert absolutely no influence over them.
Or do we?
Or do we?
Is this agenda really coming from Washington?
You know, when you look at it, if we're funding it, don't we control it?
If we're the major funder of the UN, we can't control what they're doing?
Come on, let's get real about this stuff.
This is a pet peeve of mine that people can't understand how political control works, especially how Washington exerts political control.
Washington exerts political control with their fiat money that they just conjure out of thin air.
They bribe governors, they bribe and blackmail people all over the place on every issue.
And Trump is aware of this.
He said, by the way, if you do these things in these schools that I don't like, I'm going to cut your funding.
Well, that's exactly what Obama said.
And that was what I was saying all through 2020.
It's what I've said for the last four years.
Trump knew exactly what he was doing when he funded all this stuff.
So when we look at that and we see who's doing the funding, the United States is doing the funding of the UN.
The United States controls the UN.
And so what you see happening here, It's what the US wants to happen.
One of the reasons that they're putting together this pact for the future, why they're concentrating so much power, they said that they have to do it for the Paris Climate Accord and for the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Both of those came out in 2015.
They picked 2030 as the target date and now the UN is saying We're not on schedule, right?
We've got to speed this up.
We're getting close to the Senate.
We've got to accelerate this.
We've got to accelerate the transfer of money.
We've got to accelerate the imposition of dictates from us to make all this stuff happen.
And so that's what this is really about.
It's also about consolidating power away from things like the National Security Council.
And they said it's outdated.
All power must be concentrated.
Excuse me, had to sneeze there.
All power must be concentrated into the office of the UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres.
And of course, that was Antonio Guterres' idea.
These people are so incredibly transparent.
The little petty fogging bureaucrats who want to be king of the world.
I'm going to be king of the world!
All power to me!
Give me the ring of power, says Boromir.
Except this guy was never a Boromir.
He never had any good intentions to be corrupted.
So, um, that's what this is really about.
And it's also about the, uh, debt for, uh, the, the, um, swapping out debt for land and countries.
That is extremely disturbing, but I find it disturbing that the people who pushed back against this, all of them from the house freedom caucus, essentially, nobody else cares in Congress.
And of course Trump doesn't care.
The only thing that matters to Trump is your personal loyalty to him.
Because he's the only thing that matters.
Folks, it's not America first.
It's Trump first.
Trump first, second, third, fourth, fifth, Trump only.
Okay?
That's what this is about.
So the UN is planning to become an international governing body and Congressman Bob Good at a press conference that he organized along with Congressman Ralph Norman Said this, he said, the most important issue that's getting the least amount of attention relative to its importance to our country.
And like many other issues, we're going to be deciding on November the 5th, what kind of country we're going to be.
And it applies to this issue as well.
Later this week, the UN is going to hold a, quote, Summit for the Future, unquote, and they're going to produce, this is right from their website, an intergovernmental, negotiated, action-oriented pact for the future with a chapter on transforming global governance.
Ascending beyond the powers being sought by a subordinate agency, the WHO, the UN, is seeking even broader and more powerful authority.
The Biden-Harris administration apparently intends to fully support the surrender and the compliance of the U.S.
to the U.N., and these endeavors are aligned with the international globalists that hate America, that hate the Constitution, that hate our founders, that hate our founding Judeo-Christian principles.
They want America to become like the rest of the world.
They don't want us to be subordinate to or governed by our Constitution.
No, they want America to be subordinate to and governed by the U.N., the World Health Assembly, the WHO, And in fact, they intend to join with others at the U.N.
Summit this week to vote to award additional powers to the U.N.
Secretary General.
They seek to facilitate the evolution of the U.N.
from an international cooperative body, that was never that, come on, to an international governing body.
That was always the purpose.
But look, you know, you got to get people like good and nicely out because you got to put in bad and evil, you know?
That's what's going on everywhere.
Yeah, it's good and nicely out, bad and evil.
Congressman Newman, very clear about this as well.
He said the agency is, quote, owned by the Chinese.
Well, that's not the real issue here.
He says the summit of the future will happen on September the 22nd, 23rd.
And folks, what they will likely do is cede America's authority, America's sovereignty, basically to China.
China is defined as a developing country.
It is the number two economy behind America.
It's not developing.
It will cede our decision-making ability to China, and that's what you need to know.
Look, what you need to know is China has been picked to supersede the United States, and that's been in the works for a very long time, going back to Henry Kissinger, going back to the treaties to bring China into the world trade thing, but all of these treaties, and you can see it in 2015, When they created the UN Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development, they also created the Paris Climate Accord.
China can do whatever they want.
They're free to do whatever they want.
They can build as many power plants, and they're building a tremendous number of power plants.
They can use coal.
They can do it cheap, dirty.
Don't have to clean anything.
It doesn't matter if the pollution comes from China.
They're not concerned about global man-made warming if it's coming from China.
Anybody else, well, you've got to reduce it right now.
China can do whatever they wish.
And this has been the case for quite some time.
And that's one of the other things that concerns me.
When you look at the Paris Climate Accord, as I've said for the longest time, it is a treaty.
It is a treaty.
Treaties must be ratified by the Senate.
That never happened.
You had John Kerry say, I've ratified it and Obama's ratified it.
You know, we self-ratified this treaty.
You can't do that.
That's not in the Constitution.
Why didn't anyone call BS on that?
Why doesn't the mainstream media call BS on that?
Why doesn't the MAGA media call BS on that?
Well, because they're in bed with the two parties.
And both of the two parties are in bed with this globalist agenda for the most part.
With just a few people speaking out against it.
That are in the Freedom Caucus.
But you don't have any of the so-called conservative senators.
People like Ted Cruz is up for re-election this year.
If you live in Texas, you need to send a letter to Ted Cruz and say, hey Ted, why don't you talk about the Paris Climate Accord?
Why don't you talk about the fact that it was never ratified?
Why don't you talk about the fact that we're not bound to it?
And of course when you look at the Paris Climate Accord, The confusion that people had was they said, well, Trump got us out of it.
No, he didn't.
No, he didn't.
He dithered around because people in his administration, like Rex Tillerson and his daughter-in-law, Ivanka, that he takes advice from, like his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, said, you don't need to get out of it.
Besides, it's such a good thing.
We don't want to get out of it.
But there were wiser people, at least in the beginning.
Scott Pruitt at the EPA, they drove him out of town.
Trump didn't defend him, protect him.
He was actually getting some things reversed, so they drove him out of town.
Trump allowed that to happen.
The, uh, when you look at what was happening in the Paris Climate Accord for the first few months, well, I don't know.
People tell me that we're not really in it, but then other people say we really are in it and we got to get out of it and so forth.
I'll tell you what I'll do.
We'll get out of it.
Oh, but wait, it says in this agreement, which we're not in, this agreement that we're not ratified.
This agreement says that we can't get out of it for four years after we decide to get out of it.
If we say we're going to get out of it, we've got to give them four years before we actually exit the thing.
Now why do you think they came up with that number?
That just so happens to be the interval that we have our presidents in, right?
That's to make sure that nobody gets out of it.
That's to make sure that no president exits it.
That clause was put in there specifically to supposedly hamstring the president.
But the president didn't need to be hamstrung by that.
He had advisors who told him, we're not officially in it, but you've got to shut it down.
You've got to make that declaration that we're not in it.
And so what he did was he made a declaration that we're in it, but we're going to get out of it.
And so he said, well, we'll get out of it because we're going to wait for the four years.
We'll get out of it right after the election.
And he did that.
We were out of it for maybe about six weeks, maybe as much as eight weeks before Biden took office.
And then we're back into it again, again, following this idea.
That this accord, this treaty, can be done without Congress.
And that's what they're doing with this pact of the future, you understand?
The pact of the future.
is being done without Congress being involved, without the Constitution being involved.
And at some point, we're gonna have to call BS on this and say, we're not in this, we're not playing this game, you never followed the Constitution, oh by the way, you don't have any authority either, because you violated your oath to the Constitution, you don't care what the Constitution says, and yet, you took office under the assumption that you were under the oath.
That you're going to follow the Constitution.
You've lost your authority.
These people should lose their office.
And so, when we look at how this is going to move forward, it's going to move forward in the same way.
They're all going to pretend that it's the law of the land.
And it's not the law of the land.
But they will pretend that it is.
And they will continue down this path.
So what is in it?
Well, some very concerning things, actually.
We have... It's going to bring global governance, they said, back from the brink.
More accurately, what they're going to do is double down on global governance and accelerate it.
And they have to do that because they're in the homestretch of the fourth turning.
And they have to do that because people are starting to awaken to what this stuff is.
In their own words, they said, we're deeply concerned by the growing sustainable development goal financing gap.
Financing gap.
And we've got to close this gap because we have widening inequality within and between countries.
Now, the people who are concerned about equality of results, we have a word for that.
It's called communists.
Jefferson, his people had a word for it.
It was called levelers.
They wanted everybody at the same level.
You had to have the same results.
Everyone had to have the same results.
And what we want is equality of opportunity, not equality of results.
If you have equality of results, you have the French Revolution, you have communism, you have those types of things.
And so they say, though, that there is a financing gap for what they want to do.
In other words, they've got to grift us more.
They need tens of trillions of dollars to be transferred from the many to the few.
That's what this Green Grift is about.
So the rich can get everything, so that you will own nothing.
That's what this is about.
A financing gap.
It's about turbocharging the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement.
That's their words.
That's their words.
Actually, it was Antonio Guterres, the UN Secretary General, who said that on Sunday morning.
Now, they have passed this agreement.
Very interesting the way this thing operated.
They went through four drafts of this, and the way the process operates is that they will put the draft agreement out there, send it to all the different countries, and there'll be up to a 72-hour period of silence.
You silently assent to this.
You assent to it by not saying anything.
And if somebody says something, they go back to the drawing board and they come up with the next draft.
So if in that 72-hour period anybody had objected to this, they would have gone back to the drawing board and they would have created a new one and come back again.
Isn't that a picture of how this whole thing operates?
They give us the Paris Climate Accord, they give us a pact for the future, whatever.
And what we get is silence from Trump, silence from Biden, silence from La La, silence from the media, silence from Congress largely, the governors, the people, everyone, the media, whether it's the MAGA media or the mainstream media, silence.
Silence is consent in their world.
Now, if you oppose it, and if you push back on this, what are they going to do?
Well, they'll start all over again and come back again.
It's relentless.
And of course, the defense of liberty is relentless as well.
The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.
Eternal vigilance against these people who keep coming and coming and coming.
They'll reformulate it.
They'll come back.
They'll name it something else.
They'll give it a different spin, but they'll keep coming back.
And so, it is by silence that we assent to this.
And that was the approval mechanism for this thing.
That's why they ran it through so quickly.
They had already agreed to all this stuff by silent consent.
And then they agreed with the consensus.
There was only a handful of countries that pushed back against it.
Pretty much all of them opposed to the U.S.
and its hegemony.
People like Russia leading it, right?
Why?
Well, because the U.N.
is controlled by the U.S.
We control it with the money.
In the same way that our politicians are controlled by the people who give them hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars.
In each election cycle now.
Billions of dollars given to each of these, you know, over a billion dollars probably for both of these presidential candidates this cycle.
Think about it in 20 years.
You know, we've gone from Al Gore accusing George W. Bush of trying to buy the election because he spent $100 million collectively between his campaign and the Republican National Committee and the PACs.
Al Gore had $70 million.
The two of them combined, $170 million.
Lala, on her second month, just picked up twice that.
$350 million.
In her first month, she got $500 million.
And then look at Trump getting $100 million from the widow of Sheldon Adelson to support Israel and all the rest of the stuff.
They're buying influence.
An election is an advanced auction of stolen goods.
And these people get it for pennies on the dollar.
Less than pennies on the dollar.
They get thousands of percent return on their investment if they're corporations.
If they're foreign governments, they get exactly what they want, and it's probably even worse if you look at the dollar and cents amount of it, because not only do they get treasure, they get blood, they get our blood, as we get tangled in these wars.
So, in the words of the UN Secretary General, they're turbocharging the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement.
And they are going to be turbo charging it and dumping massive amounts of money into it.
And then also concentrating political power into the office of the UN secretary general.
Um, he says the UN security council is outdated.
It's authority is eroding.
And so we need to concentrate all this stuff into an executive order because he has a plan.
He wants to impose public health emergencies.
Does that sound familiar?
Granting the Secretary General increased decision-making abilities during public health emergencies and also to be able to impose these.
World Health Organization or the UN.
Halfway through the 2030 agenda they say the world is not on track.
But it's not too late to change course.
It's not too late to rethink, to refocus, to recharge.
Well, it's not too late for us to shut this down either.
That's the key thing.
Uh, so, um, when you look at the articles from the MAGA press, then the next that you'll see a headline like this within our subsection, Trump threatens the UN's future.
Not at all.
Not at all.
This is professional wrestling.
He fully funded them.
He reduced a little bit of money to a couple of different departments.
He gave them Nikki Haley to cheer them on.
And again, still pay 18 billion dollars, a third of their funding.
They talk about it, you know, what Trump did, just like Jim Jordan.
He holds hearings, he holds court, he talks about it, Jim Jordan does.
He does nothing.
And Jim Jordan doesn't cut the funding to any of these who are... Sorry, he doesn't cut the funding to any of these organizations.
Same thing about Trump.
He holds court, he does press conferences, he talks about it, and he keeps funding these horrific organizations that he's just said are horrific.
Almost six years ago, in 2018, Trump addressed the UN Assembly, said America will always choose independence and cooperation over global governance, control, and domination.
Talk, talk, talk.
Empty talk.
So, the public still has not seen the final draft of this, but we have seen some previous drafts of this.
And as I said before, one of the things that's very concerning is the debt-for-land swap that is out there.
And that is as they pile up all this debt for all these green projects, and it's not just the green projects, they want us to send money to all the third world so they can buy green projects from the multinational corporations that back all this stuff.
And so as a part of that, they want to remake the international financial architecture.
They want to be able to directly tax us because you can't have a government without taxation, right?
They have to be able to raise money.
You know, the army will come later.
First they work on the finances.
That's when they got smart about all this stuff.
You know, you've had situations where people, you know, Napoleon tried to rule the world, Hitler tried to rule the world, they tried to do it militarily.
No, they should have done it like the Rothschilds did.
They should have done it through financial stuff.
And they got smart.
That's why they call it the World Economic Forum.
And that's why Bilderberg has always been focused on economic issues.
Rather than going out and raising an army and conquering the other people, you do it subversively through economics.
And so they want to remake the international financial architecture.
The stated goal is to restructure this for sustainable development goals, for Agenda 2030, for the Green Grift.
And as I reported recently, Antonio Guterres, the UN Secretary General, this megalomaniac communist, ...has called for a new Bretton Woods moment.
And that was a moment right after World War II where we established the dollar as the international reserve currency.
And so, in other words, he wants to re-establish the global economic structure.
And also financing and pouring money into quote-unquote developing countries, piling on the debt.
And then comes the debt for nature swap.
So they get us in debt by trillions of dollars with this stuff.
Then they do a debt for nature swap.
Well, you know, you got a lot of debt there.
So let's see, what kind of assets do you have there?
Okay, well, you know, we can take all that farmland over there.
We can shut it down for Bill Gates so that you have to eat out of his Frankenstein lab and all the rest of this stuff.
Action 42 of the pact says that we need to promote greater use of debt swaps, including debt swaps for climate or nature.
To developing countries as appropriate.
So they can come in and purchase a country.
This is, by the way, the last American Vagabond talking about this.
And they've been really good about focusing on this.
The swaps are going to be financial agreements in which a conservation organization or a government reduces, restructures, or purchases a country's debt at a discount.
In exchange for investments in conservation of land.
Promoted by the World Economic Forum as recently as April 2024, but before that, if you remember, Senator Nicely, when he came in, he was talking about the fact, he said, be careful.
All you farmers out there who are getting conservation easements, and he's like, okay, yeah, that's fine.
I'll just, you know, put this kind of over here, not use it and get a reduction on my taxes or whatever, or you've got other land, you put it in a conservation easement for tax abatement.
He said, this is where the endgame is coming in.
When you have it in these situations, the government can then come in and say, well, you know, this is a conservation easement, so we're going to give it over to Wall Street, and they're going to do these derivative financial instruments.
That's what this is all about.
This is a big scheme with the banks and with Wall Street to reset everything, right?
Just like the documentary that's out there, The Great Taking.
It's these debt for land swaps.
is a big part of that.
So, they said they view the natural world as financial commodity.
Foreign intervention and national sovereignty will return to the colonial system, they said.
As some critics have said.
Well, of course.
They are colonizing our countries and they are also bringing in settlers to colonize us as well from the third world.
And then we have to send our money to the third world in order to get into debt to these people so they can take our land as well as colonizing us with settlers.
The great replacement meets the great taking.
Participating in a debt swat agreement immediately results in a loss of autonomy and sovereignty.
Of course it does.
And that's the whole point.
So what comes next?
Well, perhaps with an election year, maybe you ought to ask before you vote for any of these clowns, what do they think about the Paris Agreement?
What do they think about the Pact for the Future?
Do they think they're binding on us?
If they do, don't vote for them.
Overall, the Pact for the Future is yet another globalist document being negotiated behind closed doors with no public input, very little awareness.
Who granted the UN authority over our lives in the first place?
Why does the UN negotiate documents on our behalf while never consulting the people?
What happens if we choose to reject the UN's edicts and to carve out our own path?
Why don't we shut down a third of their funding?
Why don't we evict them out of New York?
Is that beyond the realm of possibility?
Of course not.
Of course it isn't.
It is something that must be done, frankly.
And so I want to begin with that.
We're also going to talk about war today, as we've got a lot of serious issues on the plate.
But we'll also, when we come back, we're going to talk about censorship.
And how these billionaires cannot be trusted to hold the line on free speech.
What a vain idea it was.
Well, Elon Musk, he spent $40 billion to help us to defend free speech, and he just caved.
What about this brave guy with Telegram?
He just caved as well.
And so we're going to talk about what the state of free speech is, and we're going to talk about how stupid it is To put our trust in billionaires, and billionaire politicians, and any politicians as a matter of fact.
We're gonna take a break and we'll be right back.
So, I'm gonna go ahead and get my laptop. And I'm gonna go ahead and get my laptop.
So, I'm gonna go ahead and get my laptop.
Making sense.
Common again.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, I was up pretty late last night.
I did Clyde Lewis's program and it airs at like nine o'clock in the West Coast.
And so that's like midnight to one o'clock our time.
So I got like three hours of sleep last night.
So if I fall asleep in the program, somebody wake me up.
I hope I don't put you to sleep today.
If he falls asleep, I'll take over and we'll talk about Lord of the Rings.
Yeah, Lord of the Rings, video games, all fun stuff that none of you care about.
It'll be utterly pointless.
Yeah, that's right.
Finding games while the world is spiraled down.
I was thinking we could rearrange some deck chairs.
Yeah, there you go.
That's right.
Well, speaking of deck chairs, Telegram is now going to provide the governments with all the stuff that they wanted.
Gonna surrender all the user's data, going to sensor people and all the rest of this stuff.
And Elon Musk is also okay.
You had all these people in Brazil, you had Bolsonaro, others.
By the way, every time I talk about Bolsonaro, the transcription program.
Changes it into bows and arrows.
So yeah, bows and arrows.
Grab our bows and arrows.
We're going to be down to that.
But Bolsonaro and a bunch of Brazilian politicians rallied behind Musk.
That's right.
He's going to lead us out of this thing.
There's a lesson in that, isn't there, for conservatives in this country?
Stop putting your trust in these billionaires.
They are a cane that, when you lean on it, will break and pierce your hand, as Musk has done, and as this guy Durov has done.
And why would we be surprised about that?
Why would we be surprised these guys will sell out?
Is he going to go to prison to defend your free speech?
No, he's not.
Are they going to have their companies fined or shut down to defend your free speech?
Of course not.
These people love money, that's how come they got so rich.
Love of money is the root of all evil.
A wise man said that, right?
I think Jesus knew what he was talking about.
He knew the nature of mankind.
He knew what an important and seductive and addictive thing money is.
Money, sex, power, right?
These things are going to control them, along with the rest of their self-interest, and they're going to sell the public out for their monetary interest.
No surprise there.
So we're seeing it happening now.
And so, Durov has changed while he's been on bail.
As Zero Hedge said, it's been one month since he was arrested.
The billionaire, co-founder, CEO of Telegram, on charges of allegedly failing to act against criminals who were using his platform.
He's still in France after being released on a five million euro bail and must check in with police twice a week.
They've got him on a leash.
He very quickly began cooperating with the French government, it appears.
Those lawyers said the charges were absurd, and telegram supporters and free speech advocates blasted the efforts at state censorship.
I criticize it.
I mean, it's absolutely wrong what France did.
And it was surprising to see them do that, but it's not surprising to see him cave.
And as Zero Hedge says, he very quickly began cooperating.
On Monday, he made a significant announcement, which is clearly the result of his ongoing legal ordeal in France.
He said Telegram has removed problematic content.
Problematic content.
Folks, there is no problematic content if you have free speech.
There's stuff that people say that is wrong, false, hateful.
And the best way to counteract that is not with government censorship and control.
Not with government deciding what is true and nice, but with other free speech.
The way that you come after bad free speech is with more free speech.
It's the same as it is with the Second Amendment.
The way you stop bad people with guns is good people with guns.
The way you stop bad people with speech is good people with speech.
It's just that simple.
It's that simple.
And if you're going to say, well, because there's bad people in the world, you can't have any freedom.
Just get rid of the Bill of Rights, as our two political parties wish to do.
Over the past few weeks, his staff has been carefully searching through the platform using artificial intelligence to ensure all of the problematic content we identified in the search is no longer accessible, he explained.
Person to spokesperson.
Now, there's a couple of very troubling things in there.
Staff has been carefully searching it using artificial intelligence.
Because that's the way the censorship is going to operate.
They'll use artificial intelligence to find each and every person who... See, artificial intelligence can do this diligently.
It can do it... The scope of the surveillance is something that we've never seen before.
But it's going to be brought by artificial intelligence.
And, of course, they will do it through these corporations.
Using them as a beard, using them so they can have plausible deniability.
We all knew that the censorship was coming from the U.S.
government during Trump and during Biden.
And then we got the documents that showed, yeah, it was.
It was organizations within those that were demanding censorship.
But even with the evidence, even with what we knew was true, and even with the documents, no one's going to stop it.
They're not going to stop it.
It just continues on.
And as we, the people, are silent about it and put up with it, that is seen as consent, just like the consensus confirmation of the UN pact for the future.
So he's now making it clear that suspected criminals and policy violators can now have their personal details handed over to authorities, including Internet IP addresses, phone numbers, so forth, in response to valid legal requests.
We won't let bad actors jeopardize the integrity of our platform for almost a billion users.
Well, I think you might include the bad actor.
Would be this CEO, Durov.
He refuses to support free speech.
Look folks, extremism in defense of free speech is no vice.
Nothing to be ashamed of.
And moderation of content is not any virtue.
The United Arabs Emirate-based platform boasts nearly a billion monthly active users that could change, of course, with this new policy update.
Darav is essentially still a hostage of the French state.
And then, as Brian Shalhavi of vaccineimpact, healthimpact.com also says, he said, you know, he said, think about the difference between free speech and forbidden or banned speech.
So we talk about free speech, we're talking about free speech is cheap, he said.
And by that, what he means is allowed speech.
In other words, allowed speech.
Oh yeah, it's free, right?
If you want to be free and allowed, that's cheap.
But forbidden speech, speech that is banned, is expensive.
It may cost you your life.
It might cost you your livelihood or your job, right?
Might get you in prison now, as we see.
People have made jokes in the UK.
People who've talked about their religious beliefs going to jail.
But free speech is cheap in the sense that he's talking about allowed speech is cheap.
That's why I'm not interested in playing the game of being on YouTube.
I'm not interested at all in being on YouTube.
The only thing I could say on YouTube would be cheap speech.
Stuff of no value.
Anything that you can say on YouTube is not really worth saying when you're talking about politics.
We're talking about what this agenda is.
Remember, I got kicked off in January 2021 when I said that 2020 was the year the world became China.
They agreed with that.
And they acted like they were Chinese dictators, in terms of kicking me off for saying that.
But that's the reality.
If you tell people the harsh truth about our masters, our masters will kick you off.
And I'm not interested in censoring myself.
I'm not interested in living by their lies at all, or any lies.
A quote attributed to Thomas Jefferson, says Brian, is this.
Listen to what he said.
This is from 1829.
It's taken from his memoirs, correspondence, and miscellaneous from the papers of Thomas Jefferson.
You know, I've been to Monticello years and years ago.
And we go around, look at his office.
He had a way to make copies of all the letters that he wrote to people.
He was constantly corresponding people.
They would write him letters.
He'd return that.
And when he would write it down, he had it hooked up to a thing that was mechanical and it made a copy of his letter.
You know, as he's writing it down.
And this is what he had to say.
The most effectual engines for pacifying a nation are the public papers.
The newspapers, in other words, the press.
A despotic government always keeps a kind of standing army of news writers.
This was true in the 1700s.
It keeps a standing army of news writers who, without any regard to truth or to what should be like truth, invent and put into the papers whatever might serve the ministers.
This suffices with a mass of people who have no means of distinguishing the faults from the true paragraphs of a newspaper.
Now that was, again, from that book 1829.
They put together his memoirs.
That was published four years after he died.
He knew exactly what was happening.
You know, the nature of man doesn't change.
The tools change.
You know, he had this elaborate gearing thing to make copies as he's writing.
Yeah, now we have other ways to make pictures and photocopies and facsimiles and stuff like that.
That's very, very cheap, very free, pretty much.
The technology changes, but the nature of man, even as the technology changes, does not change.
The nature of government does not change.
You know, one of the things that UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, the communist commissar, said, he said, we can't be governed by things that our grandfathers wrote.
Oh, really?
Human nature doesn't change.
I wish we were governed by the kinds of things that our great, great, great, great, great, great, great grandfathers wrote, like Thomas Jefferson, or whoever it was, how many generations back you go.
They were wise, and they understood human nature.
And nothing has changed except the technology, and the technology has been wedded to people of an evil nature, who don't have the character to govern.
Except that they've been put in place to govern us as a judgment from God.
Brian says, I've observed the same thing through my own publishing career, especially in regards to government published facts on the injuries and dangers caused by vaccines that I frequently wrote about before COVID, were the only narrative allowed by the government on both sides of the political divide.
Folks, that's the GOP, that's the Democrats, that's CNN, that's Fox News.
The only thing that was allowed Was quote, the science on vaccines is settled.
Vaccines are safe and effective.
End of story.
And you can't sue them.
They need to have, they need to have special liability protection because the vaccines are so safe and effective.
That's why they got to have special liability protection.
That in and of itself, just, you know, once I learned of the 1986 agreement to protect the vaccine companies, it's like, okay, we're done.
Yeah, it's, it's nuts.
If you got to have that, it's not safe and effective, but yeah, Brian was there long before this.
So as I, I was anti-vax before anti-vax was cool.
I guess you could say.
Um, so he says using the corporate media, silenced people, then later using social media to silence dissenters.
He says they banned me and all the major social media platforms.
Yeah, me too.
In 2013, for example, popular daytime talk show host, Katie Couric.
Dare to interview a mother who lost her daughter to the Gardasil HPV vaccine.
You know, that was the first one they tried to mandate as a condition of attending school.
Guess where that was done?
Texas.
Guess who did it?
Rick Perry.
Guess what the connections were?
Well, Rick Perry had somebody who used to work for him, who went to work for the pharmaceutical company, lobbied Rick Perry.
Rick Perry said, yeah, let's have everybody get the HPV vaccine.
Gardasil.
That's how it works.
The revolving doors, the corruption, the stupid and corrupt politicians like Rick Perry, Donald Trump.
Just because they got an R after their name doesn't mean that they aren't as evil and as stupid and as compromised as the Democrats.
And so Katie Couric has a mother on who lost her daughter.
Her daughter died from the Gardasil vaccine.
Everything that Couric published was true.
It was all protected by the First Amendment.
She even stated publicly that she was pro-vaccine and that she and her daughters were both vaccinated by Gardasil.
And she interviewed pro-vaccine doctors who stated that Gardasil was perfectly safe and effective.
Those were lies.
But because she had one dissenting opinion, because she interviewed a mother who was put forth as a tragic case of a very rare vaccine side effect, I'll tell you what's very rare, these people never telling the truth.
The reality is, is that when they tell you that something is safe and effective, what's the basis of that?
Well, they went out and they did a, maybe they did a double blind test or something, maybe, maybe they just proclaimed it as Fauci has been doing, as the FDA has been doing lately.
But let's say they did a test.
When they get the test back, what do they get?
Well, we had 20% fewer people who died after getting this from that condition that it's supposed to treat or whatever.
It sounds to me like its success and its efficacy is rare.
If it only works like 20% of the time, that's garbage.
And then, how much of the time does it harm people?
And then what you need to do is you need to look at not only the number of times that people are harmed, but the extent of the harm.
Does it kill people?
Does it disable them?
Those things should be multiplied out by the number of occurrences, but they don't care about anything.
So when Katie Couric has a mother on whose daughter died from the Gardasil vaccine, she was viciously attacked as promoting conspiracy theories.
She was forced to bring on her show the next week, the Surgeon General of the United States, who is dressed in her military uniform, because that's the way they all dress up in military uniform.
That seems strange to you.
Doesn't it seem strange to these people who are supposedly out there to protect our health?
Operating like some kind of a military organization?
Does it seem strange to you that the DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Administration, is supposed to be about defense?
Does it surprise you they got involved in vaccines and all this kind of stuff?
That they're delivering these bioweapons that they inject into their own people?
Yeah, it's a military operation.
From its inception to its delivery, it was a military operation.
And so, you know, in order to keep her job, she's got to have the Surgeon General come on, dressed in military uniform, to tell the public that Gardasil is perfectly safe.
Cork was even forced to issue an apology, even though she had published the truth.
And of course, this was to keep her job.
This is the kind of coercion, kind of capitulation that people will engage in.
And so, when you look at what these people are doing, and as a matter of fact, we go back and we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to look at what is happening in some of the, whoa, I've got it right here.
Look at what has happened in Ireland.
Yeah, we have supposedly a victory in Ireland.
But I don't see a victory in anything that's happening in these places when it comes to free speech.
And we'll talk about that when we return.
Stay with us.
We'll be right back.
♪♪
And now, The David Nutt Show.
And so, the...
I That's exactly it.
That's from The Prisoner.
As a matter of fact, I ran... I was making fun of the elections.
I love to talk about, you know, the mock elections that they had in The Prisoner series in The Village, where six ran for two.
Six for two.
Six for two.
It's running for number two.
Of course, they don't tell you who number one is, you know, and we kind of know that.
But anyway, the...
And one of the other things from that besides being declared a mutual when you did something that the government there in the little town didn't like.
Uh, it was also the way that people would say, see you later, whatever they would say, be seeing you.
And they would make it like an okay sign up by the eye and put it out there like that.
So I finished the report like that.
Be seeing you because what they're talking about that, that was a play on the fact that everybody was being watched, right?
I'll be seeing you, you know, that ties a very cynical, uh, instead of see you later, I'll be seeing you.
I'll be seeing you all the time.
I'm always watching you, that type of thing.
Which is a society that we now live in.
And when I did that, whether it be seeing you or the eye, I got all these letters.
Yeah, he's Illuminati.
Look at this.
Look what he did with this.
I didn't get the reference whatsoever.
I don't know those people would have gotten the reference, even if they'd watched the series.
I don't know.
But the question is Ireland.
Ireland drops hate speech.
Is it a victory for free speech?
Well, I don't know.
What would Patrick McGowan say about his beloved Ireland, right?
And a partial victory for free speech.
The Irish government is going to drop controversial provisions contained within its new hate speech bill.
This is from the Daily Skeptic in the UK.
Those provisions would have made communication of material deemed capable of inciting hatred punishable by up to five years in prison.
And then if you had material that they thought could be interpreted by somebody, if you had any material on your computers or anything like that, your phone, if that was something that somebody somewhere, some snowflake or some government censor could say was hateful, well, let's just say unmutual, right?
Well, then you could get two years in jail just for possessing that stuff, even if you didn't do anything with it publicly.
You see, they're going to be looking on our devices and our devices looking all the time.
That's what the CCPA, the Chinese Communist Party of America.
No, it is the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authentication.
This is a coalition being put together by Microsoft on behalf of the intelligence community to bring together the hardware CPU people, people like Intel, the ARM processor families and things like that, as well as software providers like Intel.
A coalition for them to look at who created that meme.
What is that meme?
And of course, part of the coalition is going to be the big government aligned media companies.
Like the New York Times, Washington Post, BBC, things like that.
They will determine what is true and false.
They will give the veneer of legitimacy to these censorship things.
And then the big tech people will stop you from even being able to publish it.
Maybe even from being able to create it.
Or maybe if they see that you're trying to create it, or you have created this, they'll stop you from uploading it and send the police to your house.
This is what these monsters of the technocracy have in mind for the future.
Now, they control this type of stuff.
There's going to be ways for people to come up with technology that's going to be outside of their grasp.
And so it's going to be a war back and forth, just like last week.
I was talking to Aaron Day.
He was trying to find some way that he could work in the crypto space, constantly changing as they keep changing the rules, regulations, and surveillance and everything.
So you can try to, you know, dodge and weave within that, or you can just opt out and do a different parallel system.
But going back to Ireland, even the small improvement that they had in there is not enough.
And, you know, it is a victory for the people there who didn't depend on billionaire saviors.
They didn't look to Elon Musk or to Pavel Durov or to Donald Trump to save them.
They took it upon themselves and pushed back against it and they got some of the stuff pulled back.
But I don't think that it's a real victory.
I think what they're doing is they're just going to boil the frogs a little bit more gradually.
Because all these things roll out iteratively.
You do it from the inside.
You do it with disruption and you do it iteratively, as Fauci said, right?
That's the way it works.
And so what they were doing in this bill, they'd already put stuff in there to say, well, if you do hateful speech, you're going to go to jail.
And so what they're trying to do was to extend that.
And they decided that they're not going to do the extension.
And I think the real, what is buried in this, the real reason is that there's going to be an election in six months.
No later than March of next year they're going to have to stand for election.
And this was going to be a, you know, this is quite a bit of an extension of this stuff.
The amendments will remove sections 7 through 10.
With a bill then proceeding only with elements that mandate tougher sentences for existing crimes.
They're going to, you know, you got a crime, well it's not going to be a fine.
You're going to go to jail if we don't like your speech.
And so they're going to toughen that up, but they're not going to add these new extensions.
The perpetrator of an offense is motivated by hatred of the victim's protected characteristics.
You know, like being a tranny.
Or a settler, or a squatter, or something like that.
Some protected class.
You know, a person of color, or whatever.
You know, a person who doesn't know what gender they are.
You know, a protected class like that.
Under the Prohibition of Incitement of Hatred Act.
Is that one?
1989.
Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred.
It targets speech intended likely to cause physical violence You know, quite frankly, we've already had both presidential candidates jump in on that.
Trump was just out there saying, you know, they're criticizing me and they're going to get me shot.
They shouldn't be able to say things to criticize me.
Lock them up.
Take away their license.
I don't like, I thought that ABC was unfair in the debate.
Take away their license.
And Lala is saying the same thing about Twitter.
Yeah, he's got a privilege.
That's a privilege that we gave him.
We're going to take away that privilege.
Trump says, take away their license.
And they're both saying, well, you know, you said this and you said that, and you incited this.
And we're going to treat that as if you were actually doing violence to people.
There is no difference between Trump and Lala, the Republicans and Democrats on this issue.
Democrats are, have been doing this to people with January the 6th.
Peaceful people who are protesters over there.
And Trump is doing it saying, you know, these supposed assassination attempts on me.
That's caused by your speech and your criticism of me.
So you people need to be locked up.
So you get up to five years in jail if you say anything, online or offline, which anybody with a protected characteristic drawn from a long list of such characteristics of race, religion, national or ethnic origin, gender, including transgenderism, etc.
If any of those people perceive something to be hateful, in other words, you know, Bruce Jinder could bring a claim against me and this type of thing.
If he thinks that that's hateful, whatever.
But to the point, the bill is an open invitation to every woke activist in Ireland to say that they perceived such-and-such a comment to be both subjectively offensive, quote-unquote, He says every Christian street preacher will be accused of homophobia and gender-critical feminists will be accused of transphobia.
You know, people like J.K.
Rowling.
She's a TERF!
So we're going to lock her up.
Street preachers are going to be locked up.
They're locking up street preachers and people praying silently in front of abortion clinics and so forth.
This is kind of interesting.
Going back to 1926.
History in Ireland, in a sinister echo of Ireland's Committee on Evil Literature.
That's cartoonish, isn't it?
The Committee on Evil Literature, established 1926, and the Censorship of Publications Act which followed, and prohibited the sale and distribution of unwholesome literature.
The bill also contains provisions that make it a crime, punishable by up to two years in jail, to prepare or to possess material likely to incite hatred.
You see, if you create a government that trashes free speech in the name of decency and wholesomeness, you'll eventually wind up a hundred years later with what we have now.
A government that trashes wholesomeness and decency.
That's what they're doing.
Now that's what's being censored.
The problem is the principle of censorship.
We have to be able to work these things out.
What is true and false?
Again, just like a gun, the defense of free speech, the defense of one's person, is done by applying those First and Second Amendments.
Possession in this context could simply mean having a dodgy meme or cartoon that is saved on your phone or a copy of Mein Kampf on your laptop.
Or let's say the Bill of Rights or the Declaration of Independence on your laptop.
Those are hateful, right?
They hate them.
Or how about the Bible?
You know, Bible.
Sodom and Gomorrah story in there, Leviticus, Romans, you know.
Wow, that says that homosexuality is a sin.
Wow, yeah.
So we've got to get rid of the Bible.
Can't have that Bible.
You possess that Bible, you're going to jail.
Because it's hateful, we've been told many times.
Legislation includes a provision that makes it a crime punishable by up to a fine of up to 5,000 euros or a year in jail if you refuse to give the police a password to any electronic device that you own.
Wow.
Wow.
That's even worse than the, um, well, not just a year, the fine is actually higher than if they actually found something.
So if you refuse to give them the password to unlock your device, A year in jail, 5,000 euros.
Meanwhile in Australia, the government there is rebooting the misinformation bill.
This week, Australia's Labour Party reintroduced its misinformation disinformation bill.
And this is from Brownstone, Andrew Lowenthal.
And he said, you know, it's kind of troubling where this came from.
This bill in Australia came from the Aspen Institute.
Where did we just see the Aspen Institute?
Right here, involved in a local Tennessee election.
Person heavily involved with the Aspen Institute.
Person from the Walton family.
Giving massive amounts of money to Jesse Seals to defeat Senator Nicely.
Yeah, that Aspen Institute.
That globalist organization.
And they're also now setting a pattern for Australia.
And the interesting thing is that when you go back, the bill that they're putting in Australia was actually co-written by participants in the Aspen Institute's first draft.
And that was a coordinated effort to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before it happened.
Before it happened.
They got together in August of 2020 because, you know, the one thing I would differ with Andrew Lowenthal on with this is the fact that it wasn't known.
He said, look at this, you know, they did this.
This wasn't released until October.
I know.
And I criticized the Republicans for doing that.
I said, we had known about what was going on, of course, with Joe Biden's crimes in Ukraine and that type of thing.
We'd known about all that stuff.
And we knew about Hunter Biden as well.
I said, why are they not doing anything about this?
Why are they not saying anything about this?
Well, of course, the issue, what the reason for that was, was that the Republican Party decided that they would use that as an October surprise.
They'd release it with the New York Post and they released it late and they got lots of opposition from the rest of the mainstream media.
And there wasn't enough time for people to process the information, and so it was basically shut down.
But everybody knew about it, months and months ahead of time.
And so, yeah, when they got together in August 2020, they knew about it.
I knew about it.
But the Aspen Institute organized what they called a tabletop exercise with Twitter, Facebook, and First Draft, and a host of other media organizations, including the New York Times and Washington Post, and they conspired On how, with a day-by-day playbook, they would respond to the Hunter Biden laptop story when it was released.
And again, it was released then in October as an October surprise by the New York Post.
These people had already war-gamed this out.
They had a plan for how they're going to deal with it.
And on a day-by-day basis, They got rid of it.
We all knew that this was coming.
We all knew about the crimes of Hunter Biden.
So, so bad, as he points out, Zuckerberg, you know, Facebook was a part of this.
Zuckerberg thought the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story was so egregious that he recently issued a sort of apology.
But be even more explicit.
The Australian bill extends the code, which is written in part by an organization that worked to suppress a true story of major historical significance.
This bill should be dead on arrival, and it tells you all you need to know about the real aims of the bill.
But the Labour Party is adamant, the Labour Party of Australia is adamant that they want it passed, and they could likely count on the Greens, because the Greens were also teamed up with Labour, to pass a new digital ID bill.
Exactly right.
Well, we're going to take a break, and when we come back, yesterday, I told you about the liability that people in two different cities have now discovered as they had misconduct from teachers and there was a multi-million dollar assessment.
These are small communities and now these property owners are getting hit with thousands of dollars.
The average property owner, which they can't afford, and property taxes because of the misconduct of the schools.
And of course, as we said for the longest time, schools are there as the major part of your property taxes.
And because of property taxes, you will never own your property in this country.
But let's just cut to the chase.
You'll never own your property in this country.
Because of government schools.
You'll never own your home because of the communist public education.
You'll never own it.
But what you might wind up with is a massive assessment of legal fees.
And of course this type of assessment It's something that could be imposed if we're going to play along with the green globalist games that the UN is putting out there with the Paris Climate Accord or whatever.
They're going to assess penalties for climate violations or whatever.
Well, you might wind up having that type of thing, but it's many, any number of ways that they can all of a sudden hit you with a bogus fine.
So we're gonna talk about that when we come back.
We'll be right back.
Welcome to the World of Music.
You decided it was all about money.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, we're going to talk about what's going on public education, but before we do, I thought it was absolutely amazing to see Carl Lentz, and if you don't know who this guy is, he was the senior pastor, lead pastor, whatever title you want to give this guy, but he was the head honcho at a very large, very financially successful organization called Hillsong Church.
I hesitate to call it a church.
And while he was there as senior pastor, lead pastor, whatever, He was the spiritual advisor to a lot of celebrities like Justin Bieber and others.
And he was kicked out of leadership there because of leadership issues, they said.
Because of breaches of trust and because of adultery.
Adultery.
But now he has re-emerged in a podcast alongside his wife.
who is there, his wife Laura.
And he had an interesting thing to say that was picked up by Dissenter.
He took aim at street preachers.
He called them lazy.
Now, we just talked about what was happening in the UK.
Talked about, you know, the massive suppression.
Anybody that has anything that they deem hateful, they're going to arrest you, or worse, right?
But he said, street preachers are lazy.
He said, so you hop on TikTok and you see a guy who, you know, might preach from the street corner and he gets persecuted.
And in his mind, he's being bold.
Okay.
He says, I have respect for some people that do that.
I'm not going to judge what they do, but to me, it always seems easy and even lazy.
Wow.
I'm not going to judge you, but you know, you seem to me like you're evil and lazy.
Easy, easy.
Easy and lazy.
Right?
Easy and lazy.
But I'm not judging you.
I'm not judging.
And I have respect for some of the people who did this.
Not for many of them.
Gee, thanks rich celebrity adulterer.
Very cool.
I know.
Yeah, I don't know if I have any respect for people that run these megachurches at all.
I mean, if you look closely at any of them, you'll see people like this there.
And they're getting kicked out left and right of all kinds of moral failures, all kinds of corruption, ego trips where they abuse people, they abuse their staff, they sexually abuse people and everything.
This is rampant in these megachurches.
He goes on to say, because what takes work and boldness is to show up in an industry like you're in every day for years and years and years and years and to love people, to meet them where they're at, to show them what you believe through your life and to do it again and again and again.
That's bold.
Bold to me is not standing up in the middle of a mall where you haven't earned a single relationship.
Now, notice that he calls his business an industry.
It is an industry.
It's an entertainment industry.
It's a money-raising industry.
These megachurches.
It's an industry.
You show up day after day.
And you develop relationships with people.
Well, I mean, you could say the same thing about politics, right?
And of course, I had the story not too long ago about the guy who was shot in the head as a street preacher.
Shot in the head.
Didn't really... It's a horrific story.
The bullet didn't go all the way through his brain.
It lodged in the side.
He's just... He didn't even realize he'd been shot.
And he starts to walk, and he falls to the ground, and he's able to drive in his car to where his wife and his brother-in-law are.
Then he starts seizing, and they take him to the emergency room.
After a while, you know, the x-ray says, oh, he's been shot.
And told his wife, well, we'll know more about it when we do the autopsy.
Nobody expected him to live.
She started praying.
She had everybody praying, giving updates and everything for months and months and months.
And he's walking around fine now.
Something of a miracle.
But that kind of hatred and persecution still exists for Christians, it still exists in the West, and it's ramping up in the West.
People get killed all the time in foreign countries for this type of thing, third world developing countries.
So, yeah, here's this guy who is a celebrity pastor, commits adultery, and he's saying these people are just Lazy.
And what they're doing is easy.
And so he says, they haven't spent a day with anybody.
How does he know that?
Yeah, preaching on the street just might be the beginning of something.
But you think standing up and just speaking over people, trying to eat their peaceful lunch, speak over them, who is Jesus and nobody listens and you go away?
You know, when I saw that, I thought, yeah, he could say the same thing about Jeremiah.
You know, that Jeremiah.
He was just so lazy.
He's so lazy.
This all smacks of jealousy to me.
You open up TikTok and you see these guys, he doesn't say it, but you can tell, you see them getting millions of views, and I'm not getting, what's real is me going in and having a relationship with these people, because he's not as big as he was anymore, I bet.
I bet the adultery hurt him.
Oh yeah, I bet, yeah.
It's having a relationship with people like Justin Bieber and P. Diddy and stuff like that.
That's where the really hard work is, folks.
Yeah, what an impact you've made on these people, on this industry.
Good job, dude.
We can really tell.
You've done so much work.
He's reformed it, hasn't he?
Well, you know, it's interesting, you know, we go back and look at the people in the Bible.
Jeremiah, you know, I mean, he was arrested, thrown in the pit, and all the rest of the stuff.
People didn't want to hear what he had to say.
Why did he keep saying it?
Why didn't he just, you know, go to the King and, you know, develop a relationship with him and, you know, we'll party and I'm not going to be judgmental about what you're doing.
You know, he's not going to be judgmental about, uh, Justin Bieber or P Diddy, but he'll be judgmental about the street preachers.
Why does that tell you about what team he's playing on?
You know, seriously.
Uh, and so he says, but that's not bold.
Bold to me is invading dark spaces every single day, regardless of how you feel.
Because people forget that.
Well, that's exactly what these street preachers are doing.
You see, the whole idea, people call themselves evangelicals.
They don't even know what the word means.
It just means a good message, right?
You're proclaiming a message.
You're not out there to debate somebody.
Oh, you're ready to give an answer if somebody wants to ask you why you have hope in this.
You're ready to give that answer.
But whether or not they ask you, you're there just to proclaim the truth.
And if they're curious, if God is working in their life, they'll ask you, perhaps.
Or they'll investigate further.
You never know what's going to happen.
Your job is to broadcast the seed, right?
That's what they used to call it when the farmers would go out and throw the seed on the ground.
They're broadcasting it.
That's what these street pictures are doing.
They're broadcasting it.
They're broadcasting the news, the good news, right?
He doesn't like that.
He doesn't think there's any power in the Word of God.
I've seen a lot of people like that.
I had a pastor once who was very good in terms of apologetics for creation and Genesis and things like that, but he would always say, when I talk to people, I like to keep it on scientific terms, when I'm talking to unbelievers and everything.
And then you've got people on the other side of things, like Ken Ham, with answers in Genesis, and he says, I always bring the Bible in, because the Word of God is the power.
to believe for people to believe.
So I have to throw that in there.
It's not going to be my logic and my wisdom.
that's going to bring people to Christ.
Christ is going to bring people in.
God will bring them in.
He'll open their heart, or it'll be perhaps He's ordained this as an act of judgment on them if they harden their heart and they refuse to listen.
We don't know how it's going to be used.
Just as Christians, we're just allowed, we are required to live our life and to talk about what we see as we go through our life.
We talk about it with our children.
We talk about it with our friends.
That's what it's about.
And in that sense, it is relational.
You're relating everything, really, to God's Word.
And so this guy, DeCentury, says, should anybody be shocked that a man who cheated on his wife dodged the abortion question on The View?
I didn't know that.
He actually got on The View, and they asked him about abortion.
He doesn't want to talk about it.
And he rarely quotes Scripture.
Should anybody be surprised that he dislikes the open proclamation of the good news?
first let's not claim that we won't judge others only to call them lazy.
In the next sentence or the same sentence, there's nothing more disingenuous than declaring that you won't do something and then doing just that. This reminds me of all the people who say, I love the second amendment, the Democrats, right?
But we've got to ban those assault rifles.
Or people say, I love the First Amendment, but you know, these people have violated their privileges.
Their licenses should be taken away because of what they said that I don't like.
What they said about me that I don't like.
We should take that away.
But I love the First Amendment.
I love the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
No, you don't.
What truly requires more boldness, he says?
Does it require more boldness to mingle with celebrities?
To dress like them?
To behave like them?
To receive all the worldly acclaim while offering the gentlest Christian platitudes?
Or is it more bold to stand outside an abortion clinic and plead with men and women to embrace Christ and to choose life?
Yeah, what do you think?
What does it look like?
I'm just so sick of these people.
When you look at these megachurches, folks, what did Jesus say?
He said, Beware when all men speak well of you.
If you look at the parable of the mustard seed, it's going to grow into this giant tree, and all the birds of the air are going to fly and flock into this thing, which, you know, if you look at the parables, usually the, you know, the birds, like in the parable of the seed, the birds come in, it's like Satan, you know, taking the word away.
He even gives you the commentary to tell you, that's what I mean by the birds.
Then he goes on to say, and the birds of the air are going to come and nest in these megachurches.
They grew out of a small mustard seed.
I think it's also interesting that they refer to Satan as the prince of the power of the air.
Yeah, that's right.
Birds of the air, power of the air.
Yeah, the power of the air, that's right.
Yeah, it goes on to say, boldness is standing up for the unborn when millions are watching, instead of dodging it like he did on The View by saying, well, I'm not the judge.
I don't judge people who have abortions.
I judge street preachers.
Those street preachers are lazy, and it's easy to do that.
Yeah, you tried doing that.
You tried doing that.
Anyway, boldness is fidelity to your wife, he says this guy, when you're tempted to stray.
Boldness is found in those without a platform who faithfully proclaim the gospel, not just hoping that others will somehow grasp it through osmosis.
Yeah, that's right.
I'll just hang with these celebrities and they're just gonna, it's just gonna somehow rub off on them.
Because Carl Lentz is so godly.
So, he says, meanwhile, don't let men like Carl Lentz deter you from your calling if you're preaching God's word with love on the street, or if you're protecting innocent life.
You're bold.
More importantly, God delights in it, he says.
And so, along those lines, the UK is threatening unlimited fines now for people who are trying to influence others near abortion centers.
What do you think they'd do with some guy who's boldly standing on the corner proclaiming the truth, right?
Look at that picture there, too, by the way.
Zoom that in, scroll it up.
Look at that.
Now, I find that to be incredibly disgusting.
There's a young man there, he's got his cell phone, and there's a cop.
Excuse me, sir, can I see your... Oh, ever so polite as they are in the UK, the police, right?
Uh, excuse me, sir.
I need to see your device here.
Could you unlock that device so I can scroll through it with my finger here and see if there's anything in here that I object to or that anybody else might object to?
And you know, that very act that you see right there in Ireland, if the man with a phone didn't open up his phone and let this Stasi cop scroll through it, they get a $5,000 Euro fine just for denying to open up his device for it.
The British government last week threatened unlimited fines for anyone who quote, influences someone's decision to use abortion services.
Well good, that ought to shut down Planned Parenthood.
Oh no, you can only influence in one way.
Right?
You can influence minors to mutilate their bodies.
That's okay.
But if you try to convince them that they don't want to do that, that's not okay.
That's conversion therapy.
Can't do that.
If you're trying to influence somebody to use abortion services, that's fine.
If you're trying to influence them not to use abortion services, that's unlimited fines.
Safe access buffer zones will make it illegal for anyone to do anything that intentionally or recklessly influences someone's decision to use abortion services, obstructs them, or causes harassment or distress to someone using or working at these premises, says the government.
They announced that.
The law will apply within a 150 meter radius of the abortion service provider because we do not want to have anybody deterring anybody from child sacrifice.
Child sacrifice must be unimpeded.
The Home Office did not explain what constitutes influencing, but we have Jess Phillips who has the title of Safeguarding Minister.
Safeguarding Minister.
It's not enough that we have to throw away all of our liberty and our freedom for the promise of safety.
No, now we have a Minister of Safeguarding.
Does this have an Orwellian ring to you as well?
Claim that the new rule is necessary to protect abortion clinics because we're interested in protecting abortionists, the murderers, the high priests of this child sacrifice religion.
We're not interested in protecting the children.
For too long, says the safeguarding minister, for too long abortion clinics have been without these vital protections and this government is determined to do all we can to make this country a safer place for baby sacrifice.
Now, if they haven't had these vital protections, but they're still doing abortions, right?
Last week, trial proceedings began for Adam Smith-Connor, a British veteran who was arrested in December 2022 for silently praying.
You know, it wasn't just that lady who got arrested three different times.
This is a man who is a veteran.
I've also shown his video.
He was silently praying in his mind near an abortion center.
Smith-Connor was quietly standing with his back to an abortion center in Bournemouth in January when he was approached by law enforcement officers who asked him what he was doing.
Well, I'm praying, he said.
An officer notified him that he was in an area that was governed by a public space protection order.
You know, I've never seen such faith from statist police officers.
Have you?
I mean, imagine the faith that they have in this man's prayer.
They believe that he can stop these abortions with his prayers.
They're people of faith, aren't they?
It's called a safe zone, a censorship zone.
It prohibits protesting, namely engaging in any act of approval or disapproval or attempted act of approval or disapproval.
With respect to issues related to abortion services by any means.
Well, wait a minute.
If it prohibits acts of approval, doesn't it prohibit what these police are doing?
Aren't they approving of the abortion service by their actions?
Of course they are.
Hypocritical.
This includes, but is not limited to, graphic, verbal, or written means, prayer, or counseling.
And so he says, can I ask what the nature of your prayer is today?
Said the officer.
49-year-old responded that he was praying for his dead son who had been killed by an abortion that he had arranged 20 years prior.
The officer said, well, sorry, but I've just got to follow orders.
Got to follow orders.
See?
This is why, you know, that was the excuse at Nuremberg.
And that is the bad understanding of Romans 13, that you just gotta follow orders.
No.
No.
Not when the orders are evil.
Romans 13 says government is God's minister of good.
A legitimate government is, right?
In other words, that is descriptive of what a legitimate government is.
Illegitimate governments, like tyrants, must be opposed.
I think there's a moral imperative to oppose that kind of a government, not to bow down and to follow its orders.
And so he issued him a hundred pound fine for the, quote, prayer that you have admitted to.
He was also criminally charged with breaching a public spaces protection order.
Well, there you go.
That guy, he's so lazy, isn't he?
Doing such easy work.
Well, this is an abortion survivor who wrote an op-ed piece, and he said, we've now got 24 states with laws that protect unborn children at 15 weeks or sooner.
Should we throw all those out?
Well, Lindsey Graham would like to do it.
The people who want to nationalize this would like to do that.
And I think it matters to save one child.
You know, we look at the people who are at the abortion clinics.
Do they feel like they've done something good if they've discouraged one person from sacrificing their child?
So why don't we celebrate the fact that we've got 24 states that are doing this, instead of saying we're going to go all or nothing, because that's what it's going to be.
If you nationalize this, it's going to be all or nothing.
All the states will protect babies' lives, or none of the states will protect babies' lives.
This new era has unfortunately bred abortion extremism, says this person who survived as a 31-week-old baby.
Many Democrats have gone from pro-choice to pro-abortion, he says, and the abortion lobby has ramped up aggressive campaigns to promote the procedure.
I'm not sure, actually, whether this is a male or female person.
They don't have their name here.
But they say, I was born alive after a failed abortion attempt.
I lived when I was supposed to die as a 31-week-old baby.
I grew up in Iowa, in a loving home, knowing that I had been adopted by parents who loved me.
I had a happy, normal childhood.
At the age of 14, I found out that I had survived an abortion.
What did that mean to survive something like this?
Who was my birth mother?
How could my birth mother give me up?
These are only a few of the questions I wrestled with for decades.
When my birth mother was 31 weeks pregnant, her mother, a prominent nurse at a local hospital in Sioux City, Iowa, forced her to have a saline-induced abortion to end my life.
For days, they injected a toxic solution into the amniotic fluid, a solution that was designed to poison and scald me until I was delivered dead.
On the fifth day, I was born alive, but my birth mother was led to believe that the abortion was successful.
I was rushed to the neonatal intensive care unit where, without my birth mother's knowledge, I survived and was later placed for adoption.
See, what they didn't do was what the Democrats love to do.
What Ralph Northam, governor of Virginia and a medical doctor, said, comfort care, comfort care.
We're going to stick them all there on the side table and let them die of comfort, right?
Yeah, just abandon these children to die of comfort.
And here we can also see that nurses are every bit as bad as doctors.
Yeah.
Her mother is a prominent nurse.
Some of them are.
Yeah.
Some of them are.
As a general rule, they're just as egotistical and they probably know even less.
I don't know.
Maybe something else.
I have zero respect for nurses or doctors.
If you're a nurse or a doctor, go get a real job.
I have zero respect for the whole medical industry at this point.
We all do at this point, my family.
No respect whatsoever.
They either should know better or they do know better.
There's no excuse for either one of those.
Anyway, it says, in 2016, I reunited with my birth mother, Ruth.
I will never forget the pain in her eyes when we first met, pain that my survival helped to dull, but could never erase.
Ruth was led to believe that her abortion had been a success for over 30 years and that I didn't exist.
She was shocked to learn that I had survived the abortion.
Ruth questioned how I could ever love her or forgive her.
I'm grateful that I've been able to offer her unconditional love.
Yeah, God works in mysterious ways.
This man or woman was raised in a Christian family.
But we do get, one of the reasons, it's not just the megachurches, it can also be the little churches like this particular one.
This is a Presbyterian pastor, Reginald Avant, the queer senior pastor.
of Madrona Grace Presbyterian Church in Seattle, Washington, a recent sermon, he claimed that the parable of the prodigal son, Luke 15, never set right with him.
And while the prodigal should not have wasted his inheritance on prostitutes and wine, he said there's nothing wrong in asking for a share of the estate in the first place.
The father, he says, shares some blame in how and why the prodigal son squandered his wealth.
And for this reason, the father needs to repent as well.
I read that and I thought, you know, that's kind of interesting.
I see so many people try to stand in judgment of God, because that's really what this parable is about.
You know, the Father is representing God, God the Father.
And of course, sometimes we hear this so often, you know, the prodigal son and so forth.
We don't really think about the meaning of it.
You know, that was a way that was referred to in ancient English.
Means, you know, like the same as prodigious, right?
It really means the wasteful son.
I'd like to see the headline is start calling it the parable of the wasteful son.
He wasted money.
He wasted years of his life.
The father gave him the stuff.
Yes, that's true.
And there's a lesson there about God as well.
God does let us make choices, doesn't he?
See, the point is that God lets us make these choices.
That's what this guy's missing.
God lets us, gives us the ability to make these choices.
When we make the wrong choices, you know, just like this mother who had had the abortion, when we make the wrong choices, He also stands there willing to forgive us when we return to Him.
That's the point.
But this guy, the queer senior pastor at this Presbyterian church, doesn't seem to understand.
I think he's got some father issues, you know?
That is, male or female, whatever your sexual orientation is, there's a lot of people who have a real difficult time understanding what the Bible says about God our Father, because they had fathers that they were not at all acting like God does toward us.
That's one of the reasons why you have this parable.
But anyway, he goes on to say, why was the father not more reluctant with his son?
Why did he give in so easy and not hesitate about what he felt or thought in this situation?
You know, it is kind of interesting.
In the parable of the talents, one of the three people gets a sum of money and then the master goes away for a time, sees how they manage it.
The one who doesn't do anything with it, the one that is called out for doing the wrong thing.
He blames the master.
He says, I knew you were a harsh master.
I knew you were going to require things.
That's basically what this guy is doing with the parable of the prodigal son or the wasteful son, right?
I knew you were a bad guy.
You're asking for stuff that you're not reasonable to have this.
So it can be difficult for some people to see God because of the fathers that they've had.
But you need to try.
You need to try.
One more thing before we leave.
This I thought was also an interesting biblical twist.
I saw this on a conservative website, which I gotta say, I just don't agree with anything that I ever see on this website.
I go there because same reasons I go to CNN or to some of these other places that I totally disagree with what they have.
I want to see what people are saying.
And this headline popped out to me.
Did the Bible inspire Israel's attack against Hezbollah?
It's like, okay, let's see what this is about.
This person says, using technical wizardry, Israel simultaneously detonated thousands of Hezbollah pagers in Lebanon and Syria, effectively castrating a bunch of fighters who subscribe to an ideology that views sadistic rape as a weapon of war.
A short time later, After weathering 11 months of non-stop rocket fire from Hezbollah, Israel finally launched serious military strikes against Hezbollah outposts.
I firmly believe that the Israeli Defense Force looked to the Bible for its inspiration.
Do you think that they did?
Do you think Mossad looks to the Bible for inspiration?
Or the CIA?
You think any of those people?
They're probably burning them.
Israel and the Jews, known for their love of Christianity and the Bible.
Yeah, well, this is actually an Old Testament passage that he goes into, right?
From the Hebrew text.
But I don't think any of them look to the Bible.
They look to it as, well, you know, we're going to call these people Amalekites, and we're going to do whatever we want to do it.
They like about – what they like about it is they can use it to manipulate a lot of Christians into supporting whatever they do.
That's what they like about the Bible.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, it's like Ben Shapiro who said, yeah, well, you know, I don't – you know, was it Joe Rogan, I think, asked him, so did Moses part of the Red Sea?
No, Moses didn't part of the Red Sea.
But, you know, that land that was on the other side of the – now that God gave – that's true.
God gave that to us.
I'm going to take the land, but I'm not going to take the miracles.
I don't – I'll take the land, but I don't want Jehovah.
Forget about that.
So I thought, this is pretty amazing.
And so here's the story, you know, it goes back to Genesis 34.
This is a situation, you know, Jacob has a patriarch who later becomes, is renamed Israel.
Jacob has 12 sons, become the 12 tribes of Israel.
He has one daughter, Dinah.
Dinah is raped by some of the people in the area, the Hivites, right?
And then after the rape, this guy comes back and says, I love her.
I want to marry her.
And so the brothers, rather than punishing this guy for the rape, what the brothers decide to do is they say, well, if we're going to merge our families and everything, then all of the people in your family need to get circumcised.
They said, okay, we'll do that.
I can marry her.
And so while they are incapacitated after the circumcision, the brothers come in and kill everybody.
Now this guy thought that was the inspiration for what happened with Hezbollah.
And he was getting high fives from everybody in the comment section.
Yeah, it's like Hezbollah's underwear is fruit of the kaboom, you know, that type of thing.
And, but that, not even joking like that.
I mean, it was vicious, warmongering garbage.
And you know, yeah, 11, 11 months of rockets.
Well, what happened?
To start off this 11 months of rockets, October, what was happening in Gaza after the October 7th attack and so forth.
And so you can play this game of Hatfields and McCoy, you know, who did this?
And then who's reprising, you know, we're reprising, we're, we're taking reprisals against what they did.
And then they say, well, we're taking reprisals against what you did before that.
And we just keep going back and forth.
What are we going to talk about having peace?
Never going to talk about that.
But I thought, you know, he said, so he thought about this, he thought that this is brilliant, all these people, yeah, kill them all and everything, but you know, he didn't read to the end of the story.
And as Paul Harvey said, and now for the rest of the story, right?
Well, what happened at the end of the story?
Jacob says afterward, Jacob said to Simeon and Levi, the two guys, two brothers who organized this thing, listen to this, you have ruined me.
You've made me stink among all the people of this land, among all the Canaanites and the Perizzites.
We are so few that they will join forces and crush us.
I'll be ruined and my entire household will be wiped out.
And then the brothers say, no, we've got an alliance with America, we'll be fine.
I mean, to me, that is the lesson here.
Look, the brothers would have been within their rights to come in and punish or kill the rapist, right?
Most of the punishments at that point in time were capital punishment.
So if they focused on the guy who had done the rape, that would have been legit.
Instead, they decided that they were going to, by deception, kill everybody around him, right?
And that's what Jacob, who was always, I mean, his name was Usurper, Trickster, and all the rest of the stuff.
This guy, he himself thought that his sons had gone too far.
See, the brothers then reply, but why should we let him treat our sister like a prostitute?
They retorted angrily to their father.
But see, that problem is that that's not the only option.
And it's not the only option that we have just to continue to escalate these wars, is it?
You know, Israel is now in a situation where they've got war on five fronts.
It's kind of like, you know, what happened where they're attacked by three different countries all simultaneously.
But now they're the ones initiating this on five different fronts.
I do not and will never support preemptive strikes.
I do not and will never support escalation of this stuff, and people who have no interest in even talking about having peace or coming to a resolution, and at some point saying that's enough, let's stop.
Meanwhile, a North Carolina teen says that her class read about cousins having sex and she went publicly in to rebuke the school board and said, and I'm out of here.
I'm leaving.
This happened.
Uh, we're used to live in Raleigh.
Uh, this is, um, the Karen is there.
Karen, this is at Athens drive high school in Wake County, a 15 year old sophomore, uh, went to speak at a school board meeting.
And said that students in her English class were asked to read a story independently and then come together and discuss it in groups.
She said, the problem is that there was a part of the story that made me feel very uncomfortable.
I looked around and I saw the same expression on other students' faces.
It was graphic, it was pornographic, and it was incestuous.
And they were supposed to discuss this.
It's very detailed.
She said, this incident got me thinking.
In my Helpful Living Honors class, I am being taught about brain function and development.
I was taught that teenage brains like mine are not fully developed yet.
That's right.
That's why they shouldn't be doing this gender gaslighting.
And yet, and we must be careful about what we engage in during these years.
Based on this logic, I am a teenager, my brain is not fully developed, and I should not have graphic, incestual, sexual content taught to me in my classes.
I'm deeply bothered and deeply disappointed, she said.
Well, it's not just in our classes.
The transgender ideology is We've gotten to the point that, now I don't know if this is true, we see this in so many different areas.
Everybody is talking about, you know, everything is going our way, right?
If you look at the MAGA media, oh Trump is kicking butt, you know, he's ahead in this state over here, and then you go to Drudge and the anti-Trump left-wing media, they say just the opposite.
Oh look it, Lala is undefeatable, look at how she's doing in this state and that state.
So this is coming from World, and it says transgender ideology is driving longtime Democrats away from the party.
They're changing sides or they're refusing to vote.
Well, I don't know if that is true or not.
But I do know, and this is the story that I wanted to get to, this school district where everybody's getting these massive fines because of the actions of a schoolteacher.
This is in Oklahoma, Ninicah, Oklahoma.
The school district had a seven and a half million dollar settlement because of misconduct by a teacher.
And that's being passed on to the homeowners.
Here's the local news report about that.
Paying the price for a former coach's criminal behavior.
That should not be our responsibility of what happened.
By no means.
Why some may be forced to foot the bill for a multi-million dollar settlement.
A 7.5 million dollar settlement.
That's right, one that could end up costing homeowners out in Ninicah the money going to the victims of former longtime basketball coach Ronald Atkins, who's in prison for grooming and sexually assaulting players.
The district accused of turning him blind eye.
I'm pissed.
Those who live in Ninicah are devastated.
A settlement was reached in the case of former Ninicah coach Ronald Atkins.
The settlement?
$7.5 million paid to victims.
$1.5 in the next 90 days.
$6 million over the next three years.
For now, insurance covering $1 million.
The school will absorb a half million.
The rest, more than likely, will land on school district property owners.
In Ninicah, just about everyone, including the mayor, said reality hasn't sunk in yet.
To compare, Kingfisher School, seeing the effects of a suit this year, property owners in that district hit with a 12.5% increase in property taxes to pay off the $5 million lawsuit after a case involving former coach Jeff Myers.
The district wasn't insured, so...
With 5,000 property owners in that district split equally, it meant over $250 a year per owner for three years on average.
This will be a precedent for more lawsuits.
We are not liable for your mistakes.
In Ninicaw, the county assessor tells News 4 there are just over 2,000 property owners, so that $7.5 million could mean an average of $1,000 per owner each year for three years.
I am pissed.
Why?
That should not be our responsibility of what happened.
By no means.
What's your reaction to that, I guess?
I don't understand why Ninicaw has to pay for something that somebody else has done.
For those still new to Ninicaw, they wonder, who would move in now?
It kind of shocked us.
Because like I said, we were moving out here because it was quiet.
And could anyone here already sell?
Knowing what happened in Kingfisher, and now hearing the settlement last night here, I know that we're not flush with millions of dollars of cash.
The district does deny any liability, but the board released a statement saying this right here was the best option that would allow the district to still operate.
Pretty amazing.
And of course, in that particular case, the $7.5 million settlement, that was about sexual abuse.
The $5 million settlement they referred to in the other community, Kingfisher School District, that was because of a hazing lawsuit that happened with a football team.
And so that was not sexual misconduct.
But the other one, sexual misconduct, they did a settlement of $7.5 million, as you heard.
If they average that out over the small community, you know, the insurance is going to only pay so much.
They were underinsured.
And so it went over a million, and they've got to take the excess out of the property owners.
As I said, when we look at what is happening with the schools, it is destroying our society.
Public schools, like public health, are Marxist institutions.
They don't care.
Public health doesn't care about individual health.
They will sacrifice the individual for the public health, and it is about concentrating power into the government.
That's the purpose of the schools.
The purpose of the schools is to get people to accept that, and to sexually groom the kids.
I mean, when you look at these multi-million dollar settlements there, and you think about the kind of stuff that is being done in our schools, And the harm that is being done to people with the gender grooming, not just with sexual rape and things like that, which happens all the time in government schools.
But, you know, when you look at that and you look at the rest of the stuff, the people who have been gaslit, who take puberty blockers, who have surgery, whatever, as minors, can you imagine the liability that's going to be coming back in years on that?
Why are we going through with this?
It is so out of control.
And the school board and the principals, they have absolutely no accountability.
Just like any of these other government actors that are out there.
They bear no responsibility for it.
Nobody is going to say, let's end the school.
And, you know, they need to have... Here's what I would do if I was an elected official there.
I'd say, we're going to defund the schools.
We don't have anything to do with the schools anymore.
Bye.
And then, who are they going to sue after you dissolve the school board?
And the school board deserves to be dissolved for this type of stuff.
The small people in that town should come together, they should denounce the school system, shut it down, and then say, okay, well, if you want to sue each and every one of us personally for this stuff, have at it.
We'll see you in court.
But we're not going to just quietly go by and be assessed for this.
Folks, we gotta defund the schools.
We must defund the schools.
There's no accountability for any of this with these people, and with having the schools, Means that, first of all, we will never own our property.
Secondly, look at the damage that they're doing to our children, to our society.
It is a synagogue seminary of Satan, isn't it?
And the stuff that they teach people is just unbelievable.
And what they do to people.
The civil lawsuit is one of a handful in the last year that relatively small rural communities in Oklahoma are having to pay.
Everything that they do Should we say prodigal?
Wasteful?
Right?
Everything that they do.
We're going to take a quick break.
Eric, thank you very much for the tip on ROKFIN.
And folks, I want to ask you if you please will like the stream wherever you're watching it.
If you're watching it live or if you're watching it recorded, please like the stream there.
We have, when I come back, we're going to talk a listener who is watching on ROKFIN said he had a little bit of a problem.
So I'm going to tell you what that was and ask you that if you have That type of experience.
Give us some feedback.
Let us know how that is working.
We do want to know if it works or if it doesn't work for you.
So we appreciate the people who have supported us.
I just want to give you an update.
I don't think we've updated the gas gauge.
It's been a crazy couple of weeks here.
We're spread very, very thin, but we are at about 65%.
And so we got a little bit less than a week left.
We really do appreciate your support, really do need your support.
And so we'll get that gas gauge updated.
We're going to come right back and we're going to take a look at some of the comments.
If we don't get enough support, I'm going to have to start up a new segment called, I Have No Shame and I Must Grift.
I'll let Travis do the ads there with that.
Yeah, he's going to make you listen to his pleas for money.
But we're going to take a quick break.
It'll be 30 minutes of me begging.
We'll take a quick break and we're going to be right back.
Stay with us.
They're doing what in the place they named after me?
Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
We had a couple of people who wrote us detailed letters about what is happening with the elites and their bespoke nuclear power plant, their own personal power grid.
Their own personal power trip, I guess we'd say.
Well, they're not going to share anything with anybody, but they're going to go back.
Microsoft's going to open up Three Mile Island.
And I said, isn't that great?
Don't you want to have the people who brought you the blue screen of death operating Three Mile Island?
I got this letter from John.
He said, The Three Mile Island accident was a partial nuclear meltdown of Unit 2 reactor in Pennsylvania in 1979 during the presidency of Jimmy Carter.
Prior to the accident in Pennsylvania, I did a study on nuclear power safety in 1974.
I was selected from my peers to intern under then Governor Jimmy Carter in an intern program in 1974.
My assignment was to do a study on nuclear power safety.
The study was to address safety concerns and to look at current safety standards.
My focus of the study was to look at the Hatch nuclear power plant located in the Alta Maha River near Baxley, Georgia.
I found during my studies that earthquake fault lines are primarily located on riverbeds.
Interesting.
And when we stop and think about it, California, they have absolutely no problem putting a nuclear power plant right on a large earthquake fault line, the El Diablo nuclear power plant.
You know, what could possibly go wrong with that?
Let's build a large power plant on an earthquake fault line.
With the new small reactors coming online, he says there's a question about where is the waste going to go?
He said, I investigated the nuclear industry for three months and met with many officials as well as nuclear power lobbyists.
He said, the biggest unanswered question was the disposal of the waste.
And again, as I said, what we're doing is we're kicking the nuclear waste can down the road.
And where is it going to go?
Nobody wants to take it.
Uh, different, uh, areas out west, vast areas and, you know, underground caves and stuff.
Nobody wants it on their, in their state.
And so what do we do with it?
Right.
For the most part, it's being kept on site, which is what happened with Fukushima as well.
He said, if you go to the governor, Jimmy Carter library index, you'll see my nuclear power safety study has disappeared.
Based on my last look at the index.
He said, do you know that the Savannah River has been closed down to the supply of drinking water many times?
Upstream in Augusta, Georgia from Savannah was the nuclear bomb plant that was run by DuPont.
As one looked at a circle surrounding the bomb plant, leukemia was found at a higher proportion in the population, closer to the plant, and it decreased as the circle got farther from the nuclear bomb plant.
No wonder DuPont sold the plant to another company.
My brother, a Vietnam combat veteran, was a pilot in the Army and flew around the bomb plant and saw many strange things, he said.
He said, P.S.
Carter had Georgia oversprayed by airplanes with poisonous fire ant spray.
During the spraying by air, I thought it was in Vietnam again being sprayed by Agent Orange.
Yeah, when we look at this, as a matter of fact, Tully Blackwell I did an investigation out in California at an Air Force base, and they had a massive amount of radium that they had dumped there.
Radium from things that they would use for instrument dials and things, so they would glow in the dark, and they had a tremendous amount of radium, and they just put it on the military base And let it seep into the water there.
This is your government.
You know, that's the thing.
Governments pretend they care about the environment so they can shut you down or whatever you're doing, but they really don't.
And then this also was sent by listener Adam.
He said, I've been telling people for over a decade that a major goal of the Viridian Green Movement is nuclear power.
Barack Obama was called Mr. Nuclear before Fukushima.
Three Mile Island isn't the major U.S.
nuclear disaster.
He said Hanford, Washington State, and SL-1 in Idaho were worse.
I don't remember SL-1.
People in the San Fernando Valley are still dying from the Santa Susana Field Lab meltdown in 1959.
We're within a few miles of where I worked for an aerospace contractor.
Many more people have died from radioactive tailing disasters, like the Four Corners National Sacrifice Area overflow into the Colorado River.
There are many more.
For example, the Las Vegas overflow, but I'll spare you the details.
By the way, nuclear waste, he says, can be used over and over again.
Physicist Galen Windsor exposed the nuclear waste burial scam in 1986, and there's YouTube documentaries confirming his charges.
Well, you know, look, these people are all about environmentalism, right?
Didn't even bother to try to do recycle, reuse, reduce anymore.
They don't care about any of that stuff.
They don't care about efficiencies.
They don't care about reusing waste, nuclear waste, or any other waste.
That's really where we are.
It's just all of this stuff is just their way of gaining power.
And then this was sent to me from Australia, an Australian listener.
And I thought this was interesting because the link was to SMH, which Stands for Sydney Morning Herald, but when I saw smh.com, I thought, shake my head?
Shake my head in disgust?
Well, if you see this, you will shake your head in disgust.
This is coming from the Sydney Morning Herald.
It says, the next pandemic is inevitable and Australia isn't ready.
Yeah, we got to give more power to government people.
But yeah, I guess if you live in Australia, you should start referring to the Sydney Morning Herald as Shake My Head.
We used to do that with the papers around us in Raleigh.
They had the Raleigh News and Observer.
We called it the Noise and Disturber.
In Atlanta, they had the Journal and Constitution.
We used to call it the Urinal and Constipation.
These papers deserve to be mocked.
I had a friend of mine who, the Raleigh paper, The Noise and Disturber, called him.
They wanted to sell him a newspaper subscription.
And he told the person on the phone, he says, no thanks, I'm not training any pets right now.
The person didn't understand what he was talking about.
But it just went right over her head.
And then this about Roku.
This is from Ron.
He says, I'm watching your program on the Roku channel.
About 51 minutes in, there's some kind of distortion on the screen.
I hear the audio, but there's a screen distortion.
Half of it's pink and the other half is green.
It could be, like you say, the environmentalists are green, but red and pinkos in the center.
But I think it's my television, though.
I'd let you know about, thought I'd let you know about it, in case you and your family, and I hope you and your family are doing well.
Praying for Whistler and his full recovery, along with Travis' ailments.
Well, thank you very much.
And I just want to say, if any of you are having any problems with any of these platforms, Roku or any of them, please let us know.
Yeah, I'll check in on that and see what's going on.
It's most likely some kind of error in the way it's sending you the video.
Okay, yeah, could be, could be.
Maybe some kind of, does it get encoded again on Roku?
No, I use the same file, so that would be an issue on every single file if it was something like that.
Okay, so yeah, we'd like to know if it's some kind of an issue with Roku, but again, if you go to Roku, you can find, what is it, the David Knight Channel?
Is that how it is set up?
Yeah, just search the David Knight Show.
And you can find it there.
We're going to take a quick break.
Do we have our guests ready?
Yeah, good.
Okay.
We're going to take a quick break and we'll come back.
Let's see.
Oh, before we do, on Rumble, StealthPatriot, thank you for the tip.
I don't know how many billions of dollars of taxpayer money was spent on updating coal-fired plants with scrubbers.
It's now all just a grift to separate us from our money and just to shut them down.
That's right.
We cleaned up all these plants and now we've got to just shut them down.
Can't have anything.
This is the zero COVID, zero emissions, zero CO2, zero everything.
What they really want is zero freedom, zero money for you.
That's what this is all really about.
But we're going to come back in just a moment and we're going to talk about the father whose daughter was killed as part of this medical mass murder that we keep seeing whistleblowers coming out to talk about.
He's going to join us and talk, Scott Sharer is going to talk about His daughter, Grace, he's got a website set up called My Amazing Grace.
He's got a podcast and he's got a lawsuit and we wanted to catch up with a lawsuit.
We also want to go back and touch base with him and see what is happening with that lawsuit.
And for some of you who haven't heard the story, so we're going to go back and talk a little bit about, cover what happened to his daughter.
We're now seeing this story repeated over and over again.
They kept the lid on everything with all the censorship.
and banning that they did, but the truth will eventually come out, especially when they kill our family members.
So we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Stay with us.
♪♪
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, joining us now is somebody who is trying to defend Americans' lives.
It is too late for him and for his daughter who was murdered as part of this financially incentivized medical mass murder and martial law.
But he is trying to make a difference here with a lawsuit to explain to people what is happening.
He's now set up a podcast.
He's got a website about his daughter and how they murdered her.
And we're starting to see the whistleblowers coming out.
You know, when you come after our families, We're going to do something about it, you know.
And so joining us is Scott Shara.
The website is OurAmazingGrace.com.
Thank you for joining us, Scott.
Well, thanks for having me, David.
The website, by the way, is .net, but that's okay.
If you go to .com, it'll end up going to .net because we also have that URL.
But thanks for having me on again.
Oh, no, not at all.
You know, since I last talked to you, my son has been injured.
My other son, Travis here, my other son has been injured with an antibiotic.
He hasn't been able to walk for nearly a month now.
And so, you know, this type of thing is happening.
It is rampant throughout the so-called medical community.
It's not medical at all.
It is just maniacal.
But tell people what happened to your daughter, Grace.
Because some people have heard the story.
It's been a while.
So I think they would be well informed to hear it again.
But some people have not heard the story.
So tell us what happened to Grace.
What's interesting about what happened to Grace is God used the specific circumstance to open my eyes to show that this has nothing to do with COVID.
This has been going on for a long time.
And before I do that, I just want to tell you, two days ago we celebrated Grace's golden birthday.
She was 22 on September 22nd, which was pretty awesome.
um you know you start remembering all those years she gave us and she was she was a gift from the lord david and we just are we're blessed to have her so as you know we get into grace's story um grace just had a cold and unfortunately i was not awake then yeah i was somewhat awake you know grace was never vaccinated but i was not awake that covid was a psyop and this whole agenda to reduce the population and the government control i just thought the government was
Not something that you submit to, but it certainly wasn't against us.
Of course, I've gone completely opposite of that now, now that I'm woken up.
But anyway, so I took Grace to the hospital with a cold.
We had gotten into the fear of porn relative to COVID, so we had done a home COVID test.
Ultimately, the hospital emergency room physician suggested checking in Grace into the hospital for three to four days as a preventative, put her on oxygen and a steroid.
And if they would have only done that, if I would have never taken Grace to the hospital as another option, Grace would be alive today.
But they didn't do that.
And seven days later, she was dead.
They euthanized her with a combination of Presidex, lorazepam and morphine, which that combination helped me to open my eyes to see, oh, this is much bigger.
And ultimately, when it came time to revive her, my daughter, our daughter, Jessica, was in the room with Grace.
I had been taken out by an armed guard three days earlier.
She called us panicking because Grace, we didn't know they gave her this combination of meds.
And her numbers started to crash.
We started screaming through the FaceTime call to save our daughter, and the nurses from outside the room with a guard hollered back, she's DNR, do not resuscitate.
And of course we screamed, she's not DNR, save our daughter, but they refused.
The doctor had put an illegal do not resuscitate order on Grace's chart, and we watched her die on that FaceTime call the evening of October 13th of 2021.
It took a bit for me to start realizing what was going on. But two months after that was my first opportunity. I was on national TV with Newsmax and that started the whole process of jumping in and now you know this is our full-time responsibility to you know attempt to wake people up. Yes, yes. Well you know you talked about the beginning of it and you said well you weren't awake and you were concerned
because you're getting fed misinformation and lies.
That's not your responsibility.
These people know what they're doing.
They did this deliberately.
They poison people.
They kill people with their drugs, with their ventilators, with their midazolam.
That was the drug of choice.
for mass murder in the UK and they're now finding that out and you've got whistleblowers, doctors and others saying we were told to euthanize people and we were told, especially people who had Down syndrome or elderly or whatever, we were told to euthanize them and they claimed that it was a COVID death so we could get the statistics up while all the while we had an empty hospital.
This was just pure evil.
And you know, it is not not your responsibility for this at all.
It's the people who committed this murder, the people who financed it, who incentivized it, who demanded it, eventually.
And so, you are now involved in a lawsuit, and that is, and you had a major, your lawsuit is very important because it's not just about medical malpractice.
Tell people about the lawsuit.
Yeah, the lawsuit, you know, first of all, I'll just frame the lawsuit, and you referenced, I forgot to say, Grey's Head Down Syndrome, and I have become convinced that is why she was taken out as part of this collectivism idea that we have too many people on Medicare and Medicaid, it's too expensive, and...
You know, so Grace was on Medicaid, the elderly are generally on Medicare, and that's the excuse they're using.
Of course, it's much deeper than that, but people buy into that concept.
You know, we have too many, you know, we gotta ration care, we don't have enough care.
My uncle, we just went to his funeral on Sunday, he was 84 years old, he was doing fine, short of breath, and they killed him.
The doctors literally told the family, We don't have enough resources.
We have to ration care.
It's a complete lie.
Anyway, so you jump into the lawsuit.
The lawsuit, as I have really studied now and become kind of the fifth attorney on the team, I guess you would call it.
We have four attorneys on the legal team.
The legal industrial complex is in bed with the medical industrial complex.
So what we're using the lawsuit for is a platform.
It gives me an opportunity to share the truth, to shed light on the evil, both in the legal system and the medical system.
So while we have a lawsuit, I'm not expecting justice through the lawsuit.
That is not how you get justice.
Not using an anti-price legal system.
Our claims are wrongful death.
You asked about the details.
Wrongful death, medical malpractice, of course, and then lack of informed consent.
That's a biggie.
Interestingly, in Wisconsin, which is where I'm from, Lack of informed consent has been put underneath medical malpractice by precedent.
So I mean, you can't make this up.
So what we ended up doing is getting a fourth claim, which is medical battery.
So to get around this idea that lack of informed consent, which is a battery, is underneath medical malpractice, we have a separate claim for medical battery because we weren't told anything.
And then our fifth claim is a declaratory judgment Relative to the illegal do not resuscitate order.
And all of those claims have survived.
We've had multiple motions to dismiss last July, last October.
We are in discovery right now.
We finished the first round of depositions in May.
Interestingly, we had two of the attorneys on the ground from Ohio.
We had our family depositions, my wife and my daughter's depositions done and the defense Had a discussion with us, me and the legal team, and said, we're not going to proceed with the doctor and nurse's depositions unless Scott signs a gag order.
And so we said, okay, we'll go under a gag order as long as you file a motion with the court so the court makes a decision on the gag order.
And that decision just happened July 29th, two months ago, and the judge released the gag order relative to the transcript and the audio.
I'm still under a gag order relative to the video component of the depositions.
You know, the idea, it's so crazy, David, but the idea is that, well, if I show these videos, so then a person has a picture of the person who did this to Grace, you know, that could put their life in jeopardy.
So anyway, that was the message the judge gave us, but at least I can now release the details.
I have, we're only a third done with the depositions, but I would say I have roughly 50 lies reported under oath in the depositions.
I mean, you can't, this stuff, you know, people would think that once somebody's under oath, they're telling the truth.
Yeah, we had a doctor, a doctor who I never met.
I never met this doctor and he's talking about how he met me and I told him how Grace is a golfer.
Well, Grace has never picked up a club other than in mini golf.
It's just, it's ridiculous.
But that's what's going on and you know that's why you know the legal system people are are thinking oh Scott this is great you know it's great because we have an opportunity to have a platform to share the truth but you know I wouldn't wish going through a lawsuit on people because it's it's a time-consuming process and your mindset has to get into standards of care which and and that's the main thing I want to talk about today is standards of care because
Well, you know, just to give you just a blunt reference, David, you know, during COVID, they were pushing ventilators.
We turned down the ventilator five different times.
Grace was never on a ventilator.
And I believe because we rejected the ventilator, which was about a $300,000 payday, that's why they euthanized Grace to turn the bed.
So, ultimately, if Grace would have been put on a ventilator and died on the ventilator, which would have been, statistically, what would have happened, because 9 out of 10 people, when they were put on a ventilator, died on the ventilator, we'd have no lawsuit, because that was the standard of care.
Doctors are immune from liability if they follow the standard of care to kill you.
That's just amazing.
And I've talked about the economics of this.
And of course, that number that you get, typically I say, well, you know, they were told if they point at somebody and say, you got COVID, $13,000.
You put them on a ventilator, $39,000.
The ventilators cost them 50,000.
They're already in the black with it.
And then they get to charge you for your daily use.
And then because it's a COVID patient, they get a 20% bonus for everything.
So what was that number that you came up with?
The reason I say 300,000 is because the government incentives weren't 300,000, but when you look at statistically what was going on, the average hospital stay with somebody on a ventilator was 22 days.
That's right, yeah, the daily use, and then they get 20% over what they would have normally charged from the government.
So they're financially incentivized to kill these people on the ventilators.
That truly is amazing, and the standard of care, and of course Remdesivir, Fauci made that the standard of care when they had never done any, people who are pulmonologists, people who are respiratory technicians said, What is this about putting people who are having difficulty breathing, putting them on ventilators?
Or people who are having difficulty breathing, giving them respiratory suppressant drugs like midazolam and things like that.
You know, this absolutely makes no sense unless it is the purpose of the government to kill people.
Now, a couple of things that stand out in your lawsuit.
First of all, the idea that in Wisconsin And informed consent is just ignoring that as just malpractice.
It's not a crime.
That's kind of interesting because that flies in the face of the Nuremberg codes, where you have to get an informed consent.
But then also when you talk about the fact that you, the key thing in your lawsuit was that you were able to get this medical battery charge, which is outside of malpractice, because always in malpractice, they like to just have the insurance companies paper this over with a lot of cash and then it goes away.
But this is a medical battery charge and you know that that is very important because that that is a that does come down to the malicious murder of people.
I had just this last week when I was talking about the information coming out of the UK had a listener He called and talked about how they had killed his wife, put her on a ventilator and then said, well, she can't handle the ventilator anymore.
She's not going to survive.
So they take her off the ventilator, give her this cocktail of midazolam and a couple of other things to suppress her respiratory system as well.
He said she still survived 40 minutes, even though they wouldn't help her.
You know, it's just amazing how criminal these people were.
And they did it for money.
That's the other thing.
They did it for money, didn't they?
What's, you know, as I've studied this, and you referenced my podcast, my podcast is called deprogramming with Grace's dad.
Well, the programming is so, it's by design.
These, you know, not just the population has been programmed, but the medical profession has been programmed.
And, you know, they follow these standards of care like a religion.
And they actually think, a lot of them think they're doing society a favor by following standards of care.
They believe in rationing because they've been sold a lie over and over and over and it's become the truth to them.
That does not get them out of their choice, by the way, but it is part of what I've seen with the banality of evil.
I mean, you I'm sure know of Hannah Arendt.
She coined that phrase when she studied the Adolf Eichmann trial, and that is what's going on.
The very few people who are truly awake see it, but otherwise, they have everybody participating in this.
Right now, my wife went to a Girl Scout camp a couple of weeks ago, and in the documentation for her to sign up for this, she was a former Girl Scout leader.
And I mean, the Girl Scouts is another bot organization.
I'm not going on that rabbit hole right now.
But you get into the minutiae, and they would not let her go to the camp unless she was vaccinated.
And there's no religious exemption.
So, of course, she just said, I'm not getting it.
If you don't want me to come, I'm not coming.
But I mean, this is how they get everybody to participate.
This vaccination agenda, I mean, the number of pediatricians and the people who believe that that is our way to save ourselves, it's hard.
But they've been working on that vaccination PSYOP since the 1880s.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, it's very ingrained in everybody's thinking and ingrained at a very early age and now Pfizer is going around with a mobile school classroom propagandizing kids about the next lockdown and the next germ game and all the rest of the stuff and how you're going to have to wait and we're going to be the ones who are going to come to the rescue With a rapidly created vaccine that's going to be required of everybody to get out of their homes.
I mean, it's just, they used to be propagandizing the people in the medical community, the government, and that type of thing, for 20 years, running these germ games.
Now, they're taking the germ games out to the young kids, so they're going to have allies and true believers that grow up believing this stuff.
It truly is amazing.
You wanted to talk about standard of care.
Tell us a little bit about what you wanted to...
Yeah, I do because, you know, you start with just think through what we all believe relative to the Hippocratic Oath.
And we believe, if you want to bring up the first slide, Travis, you know, you'll see the title of this.
I say standards of care are standards of death.
And what we've been told regarding the Hippocratic Oath, if I just did a man on the street interview, People would say, assuming they know what the Hippocratic Oath is, they would say, first, do no harm.
That's what we've been programmed to believe.
Well, the reality is that if you actually read the Hippocratic Oath, and this is why I try to take, every time I have a chance to talk, I want to take it outside of COVID, to show people how long Satan has been playing this game and using the law of entropy to his advantage, because the Hippocratic Oath, the first paragraph of the Hippocratic Oath, if you read it, it's an oath to four satanic gods.
So, you wonder, why are we in the trouble we're in?
In 400 BC, the Hippocratic Oath was already written to four satanic gods, and that's been the acceptable standard for over 2,000 years already.
That's what's going on.
So, I want to get into You know what, I do want to show a couple pictures of my beautiful daughter, if I can.
That's the second slide.
Travis, if you want to bring up the second slide, you can see some pictures of Grayson.
I always tease with the second slide that the picture on the left is my hair color before I hired four attorneys.
You're lucky that you're able to find four attorneys that are going to go after the doctors and the medical system.
Most of them are afraid to do that, so that's good that you found somebody like that.
Yeah, well, I agree with that.
I mean, there's not enough attorneys for this, but also what they have done is make it near impossible to win because the attorneys can only, assuming that they're doing it on contingency, we're not doing ours on contingency, but if they're on contingency, our state statutes say they only can get a third.
The maximum malpractice claim is by claim, not by individual you're suing, is $750,000.
You know, our lawsuit is estimated to cost $800,000 in legal fees.
So, you know, think it through.
Attorneys aren't going to take these cases on, because there's no money in them.
There are other people talking about these types of, you know, antibiotics and other things.
Somebody, I read an article yesterday, they said, we talked to attorneys, and I think it was, actually a listener said, we talked to attorneys, and they said, we can't take that, it'd bankrupt us.
Because they've made sure, they so control the system, and they have so much money.
It's one of the reasons why they started with RICO statute to come after organized crime.
And I don't agree with that, you know, just take the money first and then we can come after them.
I don't agree with that principle, but that's why they were doing that, because they couldn't get convictions against organized crime, and they can't get convictions against pharmaceutical companies for the same reason.
They're organized crime.
I mean, people think that the PrEP Act is what we're fighting, that that gave immunity for COVID.
system in most cases, I agree. Yeah, I mean these laws, I mean people think that the PrEP Act is what we're fighting, that that gave immunity for COVID. The PrEP Act is child's play compared to the statutes that have been around since the 70s. Yes, yes. Even just another quick one is because Grace was a legal adult, Grace was 19 years old, there is by statute no loss of companionship claim.
By statute.
I mean, this is why, you know, you wrap your head around this and it's so evil, and it's so many angles.
And that's why, like I said, when I get a chance to talk, I like to zoom out and show, okay, this has been happening for 6,000 years.
I've come to the conclusion, we'll bring up slide three.
By the way, David, I don't see them on your screen, but I have them on mine.
You got it?
Okay.
On the third slide, what I'm first exposing, I've studied this quite a bit, the law of entropy.
So the law of entropy says we go from freedom to control, from order to chaos.
Well, God is a God of order, God is a God of freedom.
So we don't—these things that are happening are not from God's system or God's way.
So I've come to the conclusion that the law of entropy did not exist before the Garden, until the first sin entered the world.
And so then, now Satan uses the law of entropy and the Hippocratic Oath, I already explained.
Okay, well, the Hippocratic Oath, you know, That is put in place in 400 BC, and that gets repeated over and over and over, and all of a sudden propagandize it to first do no harm, and that's what people believe.
It's no wonder we trust the white cult.
And then, what I have also seen is that in Genesis 18, 17, this is when, right before God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, he said to Abraham, shall I withhold from Abraham what I'm about to do?
That is a principle.
That's a biblical principle.
And Satan is under God.
Even though Satan is the prince of this world, he is under God.
and he has a responsibility.
Satan's also a legalist, so he legally, not lawfully, but legally exposes what he is going to do.
The Hippocratic Oath becomes a big one.
The virology vaccine agenda in the 1880s that we already referenced.
Already in the early 1900s, doctors were using reason We can't fight Satan with reason, but they were using reason to speak out and say, listen, 100% of my patients who have cancer are vaccinated.
I don't see cancer in any unvaccinated patients.
This was already in the early 1900s.
But nobody would listen, because the propaganda was already starting way back then.
Jacobson versus Massachusetts.
This is huge.
I'm going to read out of that decision because it's that big.
This is how they pulled COVID off.
Jacobson was a pastor.
He didn't want to take the smallpox vaccine.
His case went all the way to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court decided 7-2 in favor of the state of Massachusetts.
And what they did was put a stake in the ground that said electivism is now And here's what they said, in every well-ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members, the rights of the individual in respect to his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint to be enforced by reasonable regulations as the safety of the general public may demand.
So this is what they did with COVID.
In 2012, it became legal to use propaganda against our own citizens.
So then they can do a fake pandemic and use this spirit of collectivism, staking the ground from Jacobson versus Massachusetts to do lockdowns, masks, forced vaccinations, all those things became legal.
They're not lawful.
And of course, let me point out to people, you know, he fought this.
They never vaccinated him, but they did make him pay the fine.
And as you point out, it was the beginning of this whole idea of public health being more important than the individual's health.
More important than the individual's consent.
And that's why I say, you know, when you look at public health, you look at public education, they're not about health.
They're not about education.
They're collectivist organizations.
They're about subordinating the individual to the collective.
And that's why they're fundamentally Marxist in their orientation.
And you briefly mentioned 2012, when it became legal to propagandize the population.
The Smith-Month Act was repealed by the Obama administration.
Saying we're going to now directly propagandize people in the United States.
They'd had that prohibition there when they created Voice of America and Radio Free Europe and other things like that.
Said, oh, we'll only do that over there.
You know, same type of thing we're seeing with the CIA, the NSA spying on Americans from their inception.
Now removing any legal penalties for them to lie and to propagandize us.
So, yeah, I just wanted to fill that in as well.
Yeah.
It's just fantastic.
This is why when you asked me to come on, I would jump on it because you and I, it's just, you have such a, you've been doing this a lot longer than me.
I'm a newbie on the block.
And you know, when I'm seeing this, it's like, oh my gosh, you know, and you fill in those gaps.
It's just, it's fantastic.
The Flexner Report in 1910, the Carnegie family hired Abraham Flexner.
This is where conventional medicine got started in 1910, allopathic conventional medicine.
And this report through all other modes under the bus, chiropractic, naturopathic, osteopathic, everything else was labeled quackery.
And what I want to dive into a bit With the time we have left is Medicare, Medicaid was passed into law July 30th 1965 by President Johnson and I believe by design these laws that the government claims are to help the citizens, so this was to take care of the elderly and the disabled, I believe that was put in place by design.
They were able then to pull it off through standards of care which started in the early 1980s And now the standards of care are literally designed to hasten our death.
And I'm going to go through an example of that in just a little bit.
Oh yeah, you're absolutely right.
When you look at Medicare, Medicaid, CMS, that was how they pushed all this stuff out.
They were the ones who were giving the standard of care as you point out.
They were also the ones who were giving the bonuses of 20% and that type of thing.
And after getting these people hooked on that money, Then, the following year, when Biden comes around and says, now you're going to vaccinate all of the people in the hospital, all the doctors and nurses who had been partnering with them to do this to the rest of us, now you're going to vaccinate them.
And if you don't, we're going to cut off all of your Medicare and Medicaid, and you're going to go out of business, because they've gotten so reliant upon that.
That's what they do.
They always throw the money out there.
They get you addicted.
It's like a drug dealer, right?
Because that's the way these guys operate.
They get you hooked on the money.
And then you're theirs, and they can do to you whatever they wish.
You're absolutely right.
Medicare was a big part of it.
I just mentioned this last week how everybody was so afraid of Hillary Clinton's health care, and rightfully so, that they're going to have death panels, and they're going to decide what we can and cannot have in terms of health, and they're going to ration care, and all these other things.
Well, guess what?
That all happened with the lockdowns in 2020.
You know, we got we got all of that stuff that we were so worried about.
They're able to run it through and they will run it through with a Republican.
It's just just amazing.
It's well, it's insane.
And now that you mentioned CMS, Travis, if you can bring up the fourth slide, I referenced CMS here.
So, you know, we we get this idea.
I think about the programming here.
We're programmed.
Hey, when you retire, you can be You know, you've got social security, you get free health care, blah, blah, blah.
Well, you know, then a couple times a year they throw this out that, you know, Medicare is going to go bankrupt, social security is going to go bankrupt.
That's all a lie to get us to fight for our own demise.
So then we fight back.
No, you can't take my social security away.
You can't take my Medicare away.
and those are designed to kill us.
So we end up participating in our own demise by them throwing out those lies.
So it's the ultimate bait and switch for our life.
CMS is, CMS controlling standards of care is illegal because that's the federal government.
But they have been able to pull it off through the Chevron doctrine from 1984.
You know, the Chevron Doctrine was now repealed three months ago, but we'll see how that shakes out.
I mean, that also could be another bone that they get us to chase, because we're still in that system.
All right, so then we'll go to slide five, Travis.
I want to just show Satan's legalism in two very specific things relative to standards of care.
So the first one is in Obamacare.
Obamacare passed March 23rd of 2010.
And Obamacare, we're the greatest country in the world, David, at projecting our sins.
So we look at the Canadian-made medical assistance and dying program, all those naughty Canadians.
Well, we invented it!
Here you see right in section 1555 that we're authorizing assisted suicide, euthanasia, and mercy killing right through Obamacare.
Then before that, President Reagan authorized vaccines to kill us with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, November 14th of 1986.
So now we have the two major ways they kill us.
Vaccines, euthanizing, and they both were codified into law.
So this is Satan's legal agenda.
And let me tell people who are listening, because we do have some people listening on audio only, this Obamacare thing that you're referencing here, which you've got underscored, that these organizations may not, they're required to, it says, if the entity does not provide any health care item or service furnished for the purpose of causing or for the purpose of assisting in causing the death of an individual, such as by assisted suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing,
And so, you know, the issue is that they're laying the groundwork there for that, as you pointed out.
Exactly.
I mean, this is why I say Satan is the ultimate legalist.
All these things are legal.
They're not lawful, but they're all legal.
And that's why, you know, the odds of holding anybody to account for COVID and all the atrocities before COVID is very low.
Because they're operating with the legal authority.
If we go to slide six, This is statistically what they're trying to do.
And slide six, I call it the death funnel.
And they want us all on Medicare.
So you think, well, they want, they're trying to get us off Medicare.
It's just the opposite.
Because once you bought into Medicare, your supposed free healthcare, which isn't free, of course, then You are subscribing to the standards of care and the standards of care are designed to kill you.
I'm going to give you a very specific example with the next slide.
And so the question becomes, can you avoid signing up?
There's 135 million Americans on Medicare and Medicaid today.
That's over a third of our population.
The cost is approaching five trillion a year for those people when you include their social security.
That's That's over 50% of the annual federal budget.
You can see why this spirit of collectivism was so important to implement because their goal was to get people on the programs.
Why?
So they can kill them.
So can you avoid signing up?
And the answer is the only way you can avoid signing up is to not take your social security.
That's how they married those two things together, because once you take your Social Security, you are signed up.
That was by design.
All right, so then, we'll go to slide seven.
I want to just cover this.
And what that CMS does is it financially incentivizes the doctors to do even more to you, right?
You know, for the longest time, we were cash patients, and we had one of these Christian ministries, and when you tell them that, hey, I'm a cash patient, well, we would normally do this, this, and this, but we don't have to do that, so we won't do that.
It's like, well, great, because those types of tests and procedures could wind up killing you.
So, you know, besides costing a lot of money.
But once you've got that label there, now you're a cash cow.
And now they're going to do everything they can think of to get the money out of you.
That's the real danger of that.
Yeah, and the services they provide to get the money out of you are designed to kill you.
That's right.
One that just about everybody would be familiar with, and that's why I like to use this one, is cancer.
So the standards of care for cancer have been around since the early 80s.
Already in 1984, there were doctors speaking out, and that's the cover of this book, Dissent in Medicine, was written in 1984 by nine doctors.
They're speaking out against the cancer standards of care, which are the same then as they are now.
Chemo, radiation, and cutting.
Those were the standards of care in the early 80s.
They're the standards of care now.
They don't tell you that chemo has a 97.9% kill rate.
They will not tell you most cancer has been cured.
Why?
Because they'll lose their licenses if they do.
They'll lose their million dollar mortgages if they do.
They have to follow the standard of care to kill you.
This is what these guys wrote in the book.
Already in the 84, trying to warn people again by reason.
This is a satanic agenda, that's why reason didn't work.
They wrote, the entire field of orthodox oncology will disappear as chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation for cancer are revealed as fundamentally irrational and scientifically insupportable.
So these MDs already knew this was a lie and they just thought, well, we can just, we want to warn our profession so we stop killing people.
You know, ultimately they concluded a patient stands a better chance of recovering if he's never diagnosed.
So this is what's going on.
This is why I say the standards of care are really standards of death.
Then relative to the vaccine agenda.
So that's the, that's to euthanize somebody.
What about vaccines?
Slide eight, Travis, if you bring that up, This is from a nurse, David.
She's a labor and delivery nurse.
My daughter, Jessica, found this on Facebook about two months ago, and she's proud of herself.
She put her picture and her name on this Facebook post.
She wrote, as a labor and delivery nurse, it was up to me to inject the newborn.
Even back then, over 30 years ago, we had patients that would refuse.
I know that it is their right as parents to refuse, but as not only a nurse, but also a mother, I just could not send a baby home defenseless.
I know what I did was not right, but I would inform the parents I was taking the baby to weigh him or her on a more precise scale, and then take them to the nursery and inject them.
Just had to do it.
No baby was going to bleed out on my watch in spite of the parents' stupidness.
Wow.
Wow.
Travis, my son, they're just a couple months away from having their baby.
Travis, you better stay with that baby.
They gotta take him somewhere?
You're going with them as well?
Absolutely.
You cannot leave the baby at all.
You cannot.
You cannot fall trap to their foolishness.
They're, they're ratcheted it up.
So, you know, Travis, I know you're listening.
I would encourage you to not even go to the hospital to have the baby.
And the reason is, is if you start rejecting the hospital protocols, they can call CMS on you or not CMS, CPS on you, Child Protective Services.
And they do it with legal authority because we are under medical Military control right now.
Yeah.
Because we are still under a public health emergency.
It's not a joke.
So you literally cannot leave the baby.
And better yet is to have the baby outside of the hospital.
Oh, I've covered so many stories about hospitals kidnapping kids.
It's just just amazing.
But yeah, that's another story.
Continue with yours.
I'm sorry.
I didn't mean.
Yeah.
All right.
On slide nine, what I have documented, why do doctors follow this?
If they know these standards of care are killing, why do they follow?
Well, part of it is, of course, their program, but also, as I mentioned earlier, the state licensing boards, the state statutes, and it's so deep.
That we believe that we have informed consent, and yet informed consent is kind of a cursory thing.
And the Cures Act, C-U-R-E-S, in 2016 effectively removed informed consent.
So you've got to have an advocate With you, always never leaving your side if you're in a hospital state.
The clip that I have underneath the training AI, this is, we had an attorney involved to approach the district attorney in our county with a criminal case against the doctor who euthanized Grace and put the illegal DNR.
And this is what she wrote back in response to the attorney.
She wrote, a doctor is not required to administer treatment she or he believes is not medically effective.
This includes authorizing a DNR.
The parties clearly had a dispute about how Dr. Shokar should treat Grace.
Dr. Shokar did not abide by the wishes of the family.
However, there's no law in Wisconsin that requires him to do so.
Wow.
Wow.
And this stuff is, you know, your brain should explode when you hear this and you think, oh gosh, this is really what is going on.
And the answer is yes, this is really what's going on.
We are involved with a hospital rescue right now.
My wife is in a hospital with a lady in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin, trying to get her out.
She didn't have any paperwork or anything available ahead of time.
She didn't plan.
She has special needs, so the state assigned a guardian.
She has become a ward of a state under a guardian, and they're trying to kill her because she's on the system.
All right, big picture, and I always want to close out with a couple big picture things.
Let's go to slide 10.
And this is, when I keep saying this is a satanic agenda, the idea of public health is a complete lie.
It's public death.
Why?
Because the globalists have been submitted To Satan, and they believe they're going to live forever with transhumanism.
We don't have enough resources.
People are too expensive.
And so they have all the money.
We have a fiat currency, so they can buy off everybody who isn't one of God's.
And ultimately, big pharma, big corporations control our government.
The government just becomes a puppet implementing Satan's agenda.
If you read Ephesians 6.12 in the Geneva Bible, because they've eliminated it in the translations most people read, you'll see that the government is a function of how Satan operates.
And then I do want to explain, God always warns us ahead of time, slide 11, Revelation 18-23, for your merchants were the most important people of the earth, because with their sorceries or pharmacheia, they deceived all nations.
So that's what's going on.
We see this big picture, you know, the medical-industrial complex is the biggest one in the world on purpose because God said this is, God prophesied this is how it's all going to come to a close.
Alright, so then I want to just close with one more big picture slide and then people obviously, what are we going to do?
So I want to, I do want to close with what we're going to do, but one more big picture slide, slide 12.
What I see happening, David, is we have this desire for security and comfort.
Everybody wants to get things back to normal.
Gas, two weeks ago in Wisconsin, dropped to $2.79 a gallon.
Oh, thank God everything's back to normal.
Well, it's not back to normal.
And God warns us against delusions.
In 2 Thessalonians 2, verses 10-12, He says, "...they perish, because they refuse to love the truth, and so be saved.
For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion, so they will believe the lie, and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth, but delighted in wickedness." So, we see this over and over and over.
We've got this politics right now.
Everybody's engulfed in politics.
It's a delusion.
It's a delusion to get us to participate in our own demise.
I've done a lot of studying on this.
You can see in the bottom right-hand corner, I did a about a 500-hour research project called The Matrix Revealed, where I exposed this in a lot of detail.
So then now what?
Slide 13, Travis.
Before we leave, I like the cartoon down there at the bottom, the illusion of free choice.
You got the cow licking.
And there's a left and a right there, and there's two different paths, but both those paths converge again after that wall, going back into the slaughterhouse.
And that really is what these elections are.
And I agree with you.
You know, we need to understand that we're never going to break through with any of this stuff as long as we fight this simply as a, you know, try to rationalize this with people who have absolutely no reason to think that they need to do the right thing because they have rejected God and they've rejected morality.
You're not going to get anywhere with those people.
They're going to look at what is ultimately, when push comes to shove, they're going to do what's in their best interest, which is going to be money and power.
Sometimes it also involves sex, but when we're talking about the medical stuff, it's money and power.
They're going to make those choices in what somebody would call enlightened self-interest, but they're not going to make these choices as someone who is responsible and accountable to God.
And if we don't have that as a society, that's why our society is coming apart.
That's why we're seeing the corruption that we see everywhere.
That's correct.
Yeah.
And what your bright light test, you know, when you start hearing the politicians that are solving everything, if they do not call for repentance, they're lying.
So both sides lie.
You might as well get it through your head.
We're not going to elect our way out of this.
Yeah, they don't think that they need to apologize for anything they've done.
They absolutely have no conscience on it.
Talking about the Bible, we were just talking about this this weekend with my family, how negative the Bible is about physicians.
Yes!
Going back to the Old Testament, right?
King Asa, and it says, well, he got an illness in his foot, and he went to see a doctor, so he died.
Just kind of leave it there, you know?
It's like, well, you know, we've got to think about that.
And then coming forward, you know, at the time of Jesus, this woman comes up to him, and she's had this illness, this bleeding, whatever.
She's had it for a very long time, and the doctors haven't been able to heal her, it says, but they have taken all of her money.
It's like, yeah, okay.
Over and over again, you see the same thing.
And that quote that you got there about the merchants, the great merchants of the world, the pharmakia, the sorcerers, as it's usually translated, but the pharmakia, I call them the pharmakia all the time.
That's exactly, that is so spot on as a description of these people.
And it's just as appropriate today as it was 2,000 years ago, and of course, you know, they saw this coming to the extent that we've never seen it before.
We've never seen the pharmacheo, this much power.
We've never seen these merchants with this much money and with this much ruthlessness and this much just unrepentance about the murders that they do to people.
They really don't care.
I've never seen this type of thing ever before in humanity.
Humanity doesn't change in terms of it, but the extent of it, we have not seen to this extent.
Partially we see it because they have, through the banality of evil, dumbed down the population through the public fool system.
Yeah, that's right.
And that really helps them implement this agenda.
You know, the event that you referenced in Jesus' time, it comes out of Mark chapter 5, and that's a great segue into slide 13.
Because the only, what the end of that story is, so the doctors took all that lady's money and they didn't cure her, but the end of the story is she came to Jesus And he said, it's your faith that has healed you.
So once she had a repentant heart and realized, I blew it, she came to him and he did not hold that against her.
And that's the Jesus of the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Jesus today never changes.
And so this slide 13, I put, now what, legislation.
I've had several people come up to me, we should have Grace's Law, so that we don't have DNR orders.
Believe me, we cannot, we've never been able to legislate morality, so I'm not biting on that.
The new administration, I mean, God warned us in 1 Samuel chapter 8, You know, Trump is not a savior.
The desire for a king in 1 Samuel 8, God warned him, I'm the king.
And so then, once he said to Samuel, give them their king.
But when they find out the king is going to enslave them, and when he does enslave them, when they come crying to me, I'm already done with them.
I warned them.
So, you know, a new king is not going to fix this.
And you think, well, we don't have a king here yet.
We do.
I mean, we live under that saying, because it's not a literal king with a crown on his head, but it's the idea that we want a king to fix everything for us, instead of a king.
Yes.
Both conservatives and liberals want that.
Let's send somebody to Washington that's going to fix everything for us, right?
Yeah.
So the courts, you know, we covered that enough.
So the pharmaceutical, the picture that I have on the left, or on the right, is not meant to be a pharmaceutical.
When I did the Matrix Revealed series, I ended up doing an explainer video, and I called it, you know, the solution to both the blue pill and the red pill.
Those traps, the Matrix, is the white pill, and the white pill is our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
So he's always been the solution.
That's good, I like that, as opposed to the black pill.
We will not get all of this without I agree.
I don't really like that.
We have the red and the blue pill.
Well, we got the black pill.
People are just, I'm so negative about everything.
Well, we got the white pill that we're offering.
I like that a lot.
I've not heard it before.
I want to show on, you've already showed my website, so I want to just go to our latest billboard, slide 15, and we put this up the week after the gig order was lifted.
Will you survive the hospital stay?
We have two of these up, both about 25 minutes away from the hospital that murdered Grace.
Last time I was on, we talked about my Medical Burner series, and this URL, medicalburner.net, links to my medical murder series, which is medical murder is the number one cause of death in the United States by design.
And that's where that goes if people want to study more.
And the last slide I have is outside the courthouse, slide 16, outside the courthouse after our first victory, July 14th of 2023, the attorneys made me wear a suit.
I don't normally wear a suit, but they said, you got to do it for the hearing, so I did.
Our daughter Jessica is on my right, my beautiful wife Cindy on my left, and I am here because they messed with the wrong girl.
Yes, good for you.
Good for you.
Well, we need to do what we can to pursue justice, and that always needs to be the case.
And as you pointed out, you know, politics, having a grace's law or whatever.
We have a good constitutional system, but we don't have people that will follow the Constitution.
I've said this so many times when you have people saying, let's have a Constitutional Commission fix all this stuff.
Mark Levin, you know, talking about doing it.
It's like, no, no.
Who's going to be writing the new Constitution?
The people who won't follow the one that we've got right now.
And the problem is moral.
It is not legal.
We have a good legal system.
The problem is we've got immoral people who won't follow that legal system.
As John Adams said, this form of government is not going to work for people if it's not a moral people.
If you don't have any self-governance, if it's just going to be dog-eat-dog, whatever anybody can get away with, they don't think they're ever going to be held accountable, not in this world and not in the next world.
Well, then you're not going to have a society where anybody's going to be interested in following the law.
So you can pass all these laws and all these prohibitions and they will just swipe them away.
I mean, when we were talking earlier about what happened with the FISA Act, that was supposed to stop them from doing mass surveillance.
Instead, what they did was they turned it around and used that as a legal excuse, legal permission for them to spy on everybody.
You know, and actually ramped it up and did it in our face after they had the law to prohibit it.
And so that's when you have immoral people who are ruling your country, no law is going to stop them.
It's just a piece of paper, and they will tell you it's just a piece of paper.
I don't care what it is.
You're going to have to have that white pill, and that's where our hope is.
You know, our hope is not in enforcing these people, but our hope to be good.
We can't do that.
But it is showing them the God that can make them good and that can change their life.
And that's really the key thing.
Right on, David.
Very well said.
Nice closing.
Well, again, tell us a little bit more about your website and, of course, people want to support you.
You've got merchandise there and a lot of other things.
I've got some printouts of your website here.
Tell us a little bit about your website there and what is there.
Yeah, so the website is OurAmazingGrace.net.
In the upper right-hand corner, you can subscribe to our sub-stack.
That's the main tool I'm using to get the research out that I'm doing.
If people want to contribute, you'll see we have a Give, Send, Go.
We do have merchandise now.
We started some shirts.
My daughter Jessica got this going.
She did a great job.
The goal with these shirts is to get the message out.
We receive $5 a shirt.
You hire a vendor to do all this stuff, but what's cool about the shirts, I'm just actually going to grab a couple and show you so people can get a grip on what we're doing.
And that's the key.
They are trying to do this on their own, and it is very important what he's doing in terms of educating people.
You know, we don't know what it is.
They can really blindside us, and they can blindside us with fear, with ignorance.
They can get us redirected to the condition itself, so we don't look at what it is that they're giving us.
It's very important, very important what you're doing.
And so when you wear these, you just, so I like to wear them in airports because you would, you're going to strike up conversations.
That's great.
I like that.
Then we have one for the people who can't see this unvaccinated lives matter in the form of black lives matter.
And this one, will you survive a hospital state medical murder.net?
That's certainly good.
Yeah.
I like that.
So those are the type of shirts you're going to see on the website.
We have some ones that are emphasizing our beautiful daughter, Grace, too.
But yeah, I want people to wear these things because, you know, everybody, you know, nobody is necessarily going to do what I'm doing.
I get that.
You know, I was at retirement, so I mean, I have the time and the resources to be able to do this.
And also, God built me a certain way.
He made me for a time such as this.
But everybody can wear a shirt and then engage with the person in the grocery store.
You know, it becomes our responsibility.
We all have to do our part.
That's what the parable of the talents is about.
And they may not, people may not even say anything to you about it.
They just may look at that website there and go that website and look at it themselves.
That's absolutely right.
Well, that's very important, and again, I'm so sorry for your loss, but thank you so much for what you're doing.
It is very important in terms of educating people so that they're not taken advantage of by this system, this horrible predatory system that's been put in place.
It truly is evil, and it is satanic.
Thank you so much, Scott Scherer.
And sorry about your daughter.
Ouramazinggrace.net, or you can go to .com.
Either one of them will take you to the same place.
Thank you so much, Scott.
I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Thank you.
God bless you, David.
Thank you.
Folks, we've only got a couple of minutes left, and so I want to play this clip for you.
I was going to do a little bit more of an introduction to it, but I got busy on some other things.
This is, I think, very interesting because we had the Russian government do a simulation to show people in the UK what a nuclear bomb was going to look like.
And when I was on with Clyde Lewis last night, we talked briefly about this.
We talked about the idea of mutual assured destruction that was always around during the Cold War.
I remember growing up as a child and seeing all of these horrific pictures of the houses being blown apart and the mannequins that were there.
And it really did put that concern and fear about nuclear war.
And there should be a concern and fear about it.
And so a lot of people are just gonna, in the West, are just gonna look at this and say, well, that's the Russians and they're just trying to scare us.
Yeah, they're trying to scare you back into reality.
Take a look at this.
Imagine for a moment that the unimaginable happens.
A nuclear weapon explodes over London.
In this documentary, we explore the devastating consequences of this catastrophe.
They could have got a better narrator, but... We will use a warhead with a yield of 750 kilotons.
That's a pretty powerful charge.
Some US and Russian ballistic missiles are capable of carrying up to 10 charges in a single missile.
Upon detonation, a fireball as hot as the sun rapidly expands, reaching a radius of 950 meters.
Anything trapped inside this fireball is instantly vaporized.
In our simulation, the epicenter of the explosion is at Westminster.
People within that radius won't even feel anything, because the nerve impulse transmission speed is slower.
Within five kilometers of the epicenter, the blast radius.
City of London, Camden Town, Kensington, Brixton.
These areas will receive the most destruction.
Buildings will be destroyed and debris will fill the streets, creating extremely dangerous conditions for everyone in the vicinity.
Given the population density in central London, the initial death toll could exceed 250,000 people and around 600,000 injured.
Within a radius of 10 kilometers, the radiation will cause third-degree burns.
Within that radius, anything that can burn will catch fire.
Gas stations, autobiles, power substations, gas infrastructure.
Explosive facilities will explode and amplify the effect of the devastation over a huge area, including areas from Camden to Greenwich and Islington to Wandsworth.
According to various estimates, further 450,000 people will die from burns, debris injuries or radiation sickness, and over a million will be traumatized.
Many of these injuries could prove fatal over the next days and weeks.
Radiation sickness, in particular, will take lives days and weeks later.
In time, about 100,000 more will be added to the death toll.
Within an 18 kilometer radius of the blast, So you get the idea.
This is about a four minute video, but it is time for us to think about the reality again of nuclear war.
And not just of nuclear war, but about all war.
You know, it isn't horrific if you're just blown up with a nuclear bomb.
It is also horrific if you're blown up with other bombs.
And why are we so cavalier and careless about this.
Why are governments involved in this kind of brinksmanship?
And again, I'll remind you that this weekend, Occupy Peace, you can find out about it.
Gerald Cilenti has the Occupy Peace rally there in Kingston.
Is it Kingston, I think?
Anyway, you can find it at OccupyPeace.com.
All the information about where it is and when it is.
The people will be speaking.
You know, it'll be entertaining.
It was a great time when we were there.
I mean, a lot of things, kind of a street festival that's going on there, and great speakers, but you'll be able to meet like-minded people.
We met Gard Goldsmith for the first time when we were there a few years ago, three, four years ago.
Again, people are so cavalier about this war, and it's important for us to understand what this would be like if we continue to go down this reckless path that our leaders are pursuing.
And I also didn't get into it earlier today, but you have the Canadian government has said that they're not going to, Central Bank has said, we're not going to pursue Central Bank digital currencies.
I don't believe that for a second, folks.
Because if you look at the guy that they're putting in, touting as perhaps the next Prime Minister, this is a guy who's Canadian, but he was head of the Bank of England.
This is the ultimate insider.
This is the ultimate lay down your arms, we come in peace type of thing.
I think CBDC is on the way.
I think we've got a lot of things headed towards.
Again, if you want to protect your financial wealth with some wealth insurance, Go to davidknight.gold.
That'll take you to Tony Aardman and his wise wolf gold.
And you can buy gold or silver from him.
And Tony saw this coming.
It is, Zero Hedge has got several articles about it.
Metal mania.
They said gold and even silver now are taking off because as all of these things are coming in line.
All these things are lined up.
The UN is coming with all of these measures to try to increase our debt, rapidly increase it, and then come in and steal from us the debt for land exchanges and things like that.
People see this, see the war, see the loss of the dollar status and all the rest of these things.
You need to do something to proactively, for yourself, don't depend on the government to protect you.
Don't believe their lies that, yeah, we're not going to do that anymore.
You know that thing we said we're going to do for 20 years?
Well, we decided we're not going to do that anymore.
I wouldn't buy that for a moment.
Anyway, go to davideyegold.com.
That'll take you to Tony Ardaban.
And before we terminate the program, I just want to thank people who've left tips and comments on Rockfin, Andromeda1.
Thank you very much for the tip.
Said your explanation of the UN today was absolutely brilliant.
Well, thank you.
I appreciate that.
And on Rockfin, Jason Barker.
Good to see you, Jason.
And thank you for the tip.
It says, once you realize that health care is a for-profit business, Then you can see why we're all being made sick by our medical industry.
That's right.
A for-profit industry for which they have absolutely no liability.
For which the FDA exists to say that you are free to do anything.
As long as, you know, you pay these people and give them jobs and give them royalties on the poisons that they inject into people, you're free to do anything, says the FDA.
If you understand that, then you're ahead of the game to some extent.
You can try to take preventative measures.
Thank you for joining us.
us. Have a good day.
The common man.
you They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
They created Common Past to track and control us.
Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
▲
Export Selection