Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 13, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:03:12

The David Knight Show - 09/13/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds
	You're listening to the David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 13th.
	Year of our Lord, 10.
	We're going to take a look today at what is happening with the border.
	And as we discussed briefly yesterday, someone from Ohio said DeWine is actually a part of this, and it turns out he is.
	And we're going to explain to you how Governor DeWine, a Republican, how Governor Lee, a Republican here in Tennessee, and many others Signed on the dotted line in order to be able to get money from Trump in 2019.
	Yeah, we'll take all that you've got.
	Send them in.
	Folks, we have to understand who's on our team and who isn't.
	We have to understand who is fighting this agenda and who isn't.
	It's another example of the Uni Party.
	Don't get fooled again.
	We'll be right back.
	They just love to do their stuff right around Christmas when everybody's taking holidays and stuff.
	They love to do their deceptions.
	It's like when they brought in the Federal Reserve December 23rd.
	It got approved after a lot of people had gone for the holidays.
	Why did that report?
	It's a wonderful lie.
	In 2013.
	And that's what's really kind of behind this immigration stuff as well.
	That and the money.
	You know, it's going to be really difficult for us as the dollar loses its reserve status.
	It's going to make things financially very difficult for us.
	But it might be the price that we need to pay in order to get our freedom back to some degree.
	Because the way our freedom is lost is when the government in Washington bribes and then subsequently blackmails people using the money that they just conjure out of thin air and never have to worry about it.
	And those days would be over if the dollar loses its reserve status.
	But actually put them on a budget.
	See, the states are on a budget.
	That's why they're so easily controlled by this infinite amount of money that can be conjured out of nowhere in Washington.
	So, on December the 24th, Christmas Eve, 2019, Governor Mike DeWine, the Republican governor of Ohio, I guess as he was sitting there, he didn't really have anything to do on Christmas Eve, so he's like, well, what can I do as a gift to myself?
	I need this money.
	The Trump administration has said they're going to cut funding if I don't send a letter to them saying I will take refugees.
	So that's what he did.
	He sent a letter to the state department.
	Mike Pompeo was the one who was pulling all this stuff in based on an executive order from Donald Trump.
	So was Donald Trump fooled or is he a fool?
	Does it matter?
	On December 24th, 2019, Mike DeWine sent a letter to U.S.
	Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to authorize resettlement of refugees in Ohio.
	This followed Trump's executive order mandating state and local governments submit written consent to opt in to refugee resettlement in their communities.
	This is reported by impactohio.com.
	This is an immigration group.
	So, roughly 1,400 refugees were relocated to Ohio between September 2018 and September 2019.
	Ohio was tied with Kentucky for the fifth most refugees in the nation.
	Columbus had the second highest concentration of Somali refugees in the country.
	Somalians!
	That's what's going on in, say, in Minneapolis.
	In the area where Ilhan Omar is a representative, they call it Little Mogadishu, they brought in so many Somalis.
	That helps them to get a state attorney general like Keith Ellison.
	And of course a governor like Tim Walz.
	So Columbus has the second highest concentration of Somali refugees in the country.
	Uh, as of about five years ago, who knows what it is right now.
	So they'd had, um, in that previous year, 1400 refugees.
	Now they've had about 20,000.
	It's amazing how, what a difference five years can make, how we can be absolutely flooded and how, as everybody says, it's Biden is Biden is Biden.
	No, it's the uniparty Biden and Trump.
	Same type of thing.
	Trump laid the foundation for what Biden did with the vaccine mandate.
	He created the vaccine, laid all this stuff out there.
	Laid the foundation for it.
	Biden does it.
	Same thing with this.
	Trump says, uh, we'll keep giving you money or we'll cut it off.
	But send us a letter and we'll keep giving you money.
	Send us a letter saying you'll take all the refugees we send you.
	And they do.
	The governors did it.
	Isn't it amazing how, within just a couple of months, the governors would be doing everything that Trump told them.
	For money.
	How long have I said this?
	Everybody says, oh, that lockdown, that wasn't Donald Trump.
	That was the bad Democrat governors.
	Bad governors.
	Bad governors.
	Yeah.
	It was the bad Republican governors, too.
	Like DeWine.
	Like Little.
	Like many of them.
	And, um, so, you know, they, and they do it for money, do it for money, follow the money, Jerry.
	And you'll know what Trump was doing and you'll understand what his role was in 2020.
	And you'll understand his role in this immigration situation in 2019.
	in 2019. So the Refugee Act of 1980, signed into law by Jimmy Carter, began a lot of this ...began a lot of this stuff.
	In 1980, they had more than 200,000 refugees admitted into the U.S.
	By 2018, the number had fallen to approximately 22,500.
	And then the Trump administration set a cap of 50,000.
	In 2017, a cap of 45,000.
	Then the Trump administration set a cap of 50,000 in 2017, a cap of 45,000 in 2018, and the cap was way above people that were coming in.
	Remember in 2018, even though the Trump administration had a cap of 45,000, there were 22,500 who came in.
	So he wasn't restricting it in any way whatsoever.
	Uh, so, um, you do what he says, right?
	Even, and you get the money, even though he claims that he has no responsibility for migration or for the germ game.
	He was paying the governors to do it.
	He was paying the governors, Democrat and Republican, to do it.
	DeWine is among more than 30 governors across the country electing to open the state to refugees.
	Republicans and Democrats.
	Pritzker, for example, a hardcore Democrat in Illinois.
	Various Ohio mayors have also written to U.S.
	Secretary of State Mike Pompeo of the Trump administration.
	Including Dayton mayor and the Columbus mayor to express their willingness to accept refugees and other communities.
	Did the Springfield mayor do it?
	I don't know.
	But I do know that the Tennessee governor did it.
	Also in December of 2019.
	Also at the prodding, at the bribing, at the blackmail of the Trump administration.
	Tennessee will not stop resettling refugees, Republican Governor Bill Lee said.
	The issue forced Lee, who campaigned on his Christian beliefs, to consider his own experience in helping refugees, and he weighed it against the will of fellow Republicans in the legislature.
	Well, he has, um, when he, uh, and look, this is, so yes, we're, we're told to Help our fellow man.
	Love our neighbor as ourself.
	Does that mean, then, that Jesus wants a state welfare program?
	No, Governor Lee.
	That doesn't mean that you do that as governor.
	You have certain things that are laid out for you to do as governor, certain things that you swore to uphold.
	You took an oath to follow the law.
	You took an oath to the Constitution and other things, but yeah, just use your Christian beliefs as an excuse to implement communism, socialism, the welfare state, whatever it is that you want to do.
	Oh, well, I got to do it because I'm a Christian.
	Oh, well, okay.
	No, that's a different thing than your role as governor.
	And he had a lot of Republicans who were pushing back on him.
	I guess they weren't Christians at all, right?
	No, not at all.
	None of these conservative Republicans.
	But only Governor Lee, who wants to open it up as a welfare state.
	GOP lawmakers had sued the federal Trump government over its refugee resettlement program.
	But he said, I will consent to working with President Trump and the administration to resettle refugees.
	Okay, so, Republican governor, Republican president, Republican secretary of state, it's all about money, and they want to push this forward.
	But nobody recognizes that.
	As a matter of fact, as all this stuff was happening, they were running that germ game on us at that point in time.
	I didn't notice this either.
	I was looking at the harbinger of the germ game that was coming.
	An executive order says that if a state or locality is not consented to receive refugees under the State Department's Reception and Replacement Program, then refugees should not be settled within the state or the locality unless the Secretary of State decides otherwise.
	So that sounds like, you know, Trump is telling them, okay, we're going to prohibit the federal government from resettling them there unless you want them there.
	Well, obviously they don't want, uh, the Republican legislatures don't want more refugees resettled there.
	And, um, uh, and so, uh, but the, the, uh, the president comes in with funding.
	Even if a state opts out under Trump's order, refugees could still move there, but they wouldn't get the funding.
	See?
	So it's like saying, well, okay, the refugees can move here, but you won't get any funding whatsoever.
	Or you can sign this letter and say, I'll take all that you've got and we'll give you money when they come.
	Which would you like to do?
	Says Pompeo and Trump.
	Some resettlement groups have sued to block Trump's order, they said.
	Tennessee stopped participating in the program in 2008.
	And then they started accepting refugees because they wanted to accept the money, Governor Lee, in 2019.
	They hadn't had any in 11 years.
	And he signs on to take the money.
	And then he signed on to all the rest of the stuff.
	That Washington and the World Health Organization and Fauci and the CDC and the FDA demanded of them to do?
	In 2020, with a germ game, the Tennessee legislature's fight against the refugee program was sparked by fears of refugees following terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, California in 2015.
	At the time, former Republican Governor Bill Haslam urged the federal government to halt the settlement of Syrian refugees in Tennessee unless state agencies could get involved in the vetting process.
	In other words, we're not going to just let the feds vet them because we don't trust the feds are going to vet them.
	We will only accept refugees if we can look at them and see that they're legit.
	Attorney General Herbert Slattery at the time declined the Republican-led legislature's request to sue the federal government over refugee resettlement, but lawmakers forged ahead anyway in Tennessee with a third-party legal outfit.
	So I said, well, if the State Attorney General isn't going to do his job.
	We'll hire lawyers and do it ourselves, said the Republican legislature.
	So the governor is kind of sitting on the fence.
	The attorney general won't do it.
	So the Republican legislature picked up the ball and ran with it.
	The lawsuit was then rejected by the federal courts.
	When asked about the political consequences of the decision, Lee downplayed the concerns, the political, the decision of him writing the Trump administration and Mike Pompeo and saying, yeah, well, we'll agree to take all the refugees you got because we want to keep the money, right?
	Lee said, well, I know there certainly is disagreement on this subject, but there's disagreement around most subjects.
	You agree to disagree and you move forward, but I think it's the right decision and we're moving forward on it.
	And he went to great lengths to tout his Christian faith.
	Well, I'll tell you what he's got a lot of faith in.
	This guy is, in my opinion, when you see somebody, and I saw it in North Carolina with Tom Tillis, when you start pushing for toll roads, I know this sounds like a side issue, but folks, the toll roads are run by foreign countries.
	Foreign, not countries, companies.
	And those foreign companies, you are a sellout to the public-private partnership of stakeholders, these globalist multinational corporations, if you want to come in and start pushing toll roads in a state.
	I saw it with Tom Tillis in North Carolina.
	They'd never had toll roads.
	He did it.
	They were run by foreign companies.
	And now you got Bill Lee doing it.
	Only 14 states in the U.S.
	didn't have toll roads.
	Now Bill Lee calls them choice lanes.
	How about that?
	What a cynical globalist he is.
	I want to just open up borders because my heart goes out to these refugees.
	I've got to bring them in for my Christian convictions.
	They need some convictions, the kind you get in court, frankly.
	So, December 2019, Bill Lee issued a letter to the U.S.
	Secretary of State Mike Pompeo authorizing refugee resettlement in Tennessee, making Tennessee one of only a few Republican-led states that allow resettlement of this nature.
	Ohio is another one.
	See how that's working out for them?
	April 2021.
	An anonymous tip.
	sent to the Tennessee conservative, this is coming from this timeline from the Tennessee conservative, revealed that unaccompanied alien children were being housed in an old Tennessee temple dormitory in Chattanooga.
	Then in May of that year, in Chattanooga, they were spotted at the small airport there, Wilson Air Center in Chattanooga.
	They spotted incoming flights on the cloak of darkness, the plane loads of alleged immigrant children.
	Remember that?
	Remember when they were doing these nighttime flights?
	And people look at it and say, well, wait a minute, I'm, you know, looking at them coming into small airports and I follow them to where they're going and they go to a rest stop in New Jersey.
	Some of these, they go to a rest stop in the middle of the night, the wee hours of the morning.
	And they sit there and wait.
	Now an unmarked van comes up, offloads the kids, and goes somewhere else.
	Nothing to be concerned about.
	This isn't human trafficking of anything innocent of any sort.
	No, not at all.
	May of that year, same time frame, a conservative citizen journalist reported to the Tennessee Conservative that disembarking illegal aliens at Wilson Air Center in Chattanooga were being loaded onto buses.
	June 2021, Tennessee Department of Children's Services uncovers allegations of child abuse at the facility.
	July 2021, a 16-year-old boy who was held at a facility in Chattanooga but escaped was reported as a runaway June 14th.
	He was finally located in Guatemala with his family, prompting many Tennesseans to wonder if the youth was brought into the U.S.
	against his will in the first place.
	He's being held at this suspect facility in Chattanooga.
	He escapes, he's missing.
	Oh no, he's back in Chattanooga, not Chattanooga, in Guatemala with his family.
	July 2021, Tennessee Administrative Law Judge Philip Hilliard ruled in support of the state's decision to revoke the license of the Baptista group that was operating the facility there in Chattanooga.
	At least three female employees of the facility where the children, unaccompanied children, were being housed in Chattanooga were booked for sexual molestation.
	August 2022, four days straight, a local health department in Sevier County was standing room only due to a flood of non-English speaking children being pushed through in order to rush their immunizations and their enrollment in local schools.
	Also in August of 2022, Chattanooga is found to be a pit stop for buses of illegal aliens being transported from Texas to Washington, D.C.
	Many stayed in the area since reloading the buses was reportedly not enforced by the drivers.
	January of this year, According to the U.S.
	Department of Homeland Security, upwards of 600 immigrants from the southwest border have sighted Middle Tennessee as their intended destination when questioned during processing, and then this, March of this year.
	Tyson Foods looked to hire thousands of refugees and bring them to work in Tennessee, all while axing jobs for Americans across the United States.
	As we pointed out the other day, 1.4 million jobs lost By Americans, people who were born here, whose parents lived here.
	And 600,000 of those jobs went to foreign citizens who just came in.
	One and a half million jobs taken from Americans, 40% of those were not lost completely, but were transferred to foreign citizens.
	Also in March, A company in Morristown, Tennessee.
	Tough Torque Corporation.
	Fined for violating federal child labor laws.
	The company manufactures parts for John Deere.
	Good ol' John Deere.
	Good ol' politically correct John Deere.
	For Toro and for Yamaha.
	The investigation started in 2023 and it found that Tough Torque had employed 10 immigrant children illegally, some of them as young as 14 years old.
	Because they get them for cheap, right?
	So this is one of the reasons why it's, you know, maybe if they wait a little bit longer, Trump will give them a green card if they get some kind of a degree somewhere.
	At our expense.
	So Ohio is under siege and We're doing this because Governor Lee says he's doing it because he's a Christian.
	Well, it's the Christians who are getting the shaft.
	You know, I didn't see Governor Lee lift a finger or do anything when the Biden administration was coming out, coming after a Christian family, one family that were refugees from Germany.
	They weren't coming from a third world.
	They were not economic refugees.
	They came from Germany and they really were.
	Political refugees because their religion was being attacked.
	They wanted to homeschool and the, um, the German government was going to jail the parents and take the kids and raise them by the state.
	And so they escaped Germany.
	Uh, they'd been here for, I don't know, 10 or 15 years or something and not had any problem at all.
	And then the Biden administration just decided one day they were going to send them back to Germany.
	I don't remember governor Lee getting involved in that.
	Do any of you?
	His Christian values, of course, right?
	That really was the real deal.
	And here you have in Ohio, some of the people saying, well, I'm trying to get this Christian pastor, the Christians in Cuba are being heavily persecuted there.
	The State Department's blocking it.
	But the Haitians who are coming in, no problem at all.
	No problem.
	Tim Boggs, a business owner, told WND there's so many migrants moving into the area, he's unable to hire people who can only speak English.
	So, you know, um, if you don't speak their language now, if you don't speak the language of the replacers of the squatters, if you don't, um, if you don't, if you only speak English, you're nothing, I can't give you a job.
	You only speak English.
	You don't speak Spanish.
	You don't speak Creole.
	Yeah.
	I'm not going to hire you.
	That's what this guy said.
	I can't hire English only speakers.
	Our customers, um, uh, would not be able to be served.
	Yeah, he doesn't want any Americans as customers, so I guess maybe Americans shouldn't go to his business, maybe.
	You think?
	So, he's also trying to get more migrants in.
	He says it's because they're Christians he's trying to get them in.
	I don't know.
	But, you know, that was the World Net Daily article.
	was that voodoo worshippers are coming in from Haiti but Christians can't come in from Cuba.
	There's other things that are happening here, quite frankly.
	In June, the Biden administration extended temporary legal status to more than 300,000 Haitians living in the U.S.
	illegally, allowing them to stay and work.
	I know they don't like Christians, and we saw that with this one family here.
	Send them back to Germany.
	But a lot of this stuff is not based on religious persecution.
	And if it is based on religious persecution, if they're Christians, they go to the back of the list.
	It doesn't matter whether it's Cuba or any country.
	It can be the African countries or whatever.
	You know, where they're coming after them.
	The Muslims are in Nigeria and other places.
	It's just horrific what they're doing.
	The murders that are happening there.
	And they won't open up for that at all.
	ABC and CNN fact-checked the claim that there'd been a surge in Haitian migrants, said it wasn't a problem.
	Well, Mike DeWine has earmarked two and a half million dollars to expand primary care access to everyone who lives in Springfield.
	There you go.
	We've got lots of money.
	I signed that letter five years ago to Trump saying we'll take all the refugees.
	So, hey, I've got, I've got fiat currency and more of it's being conjured up as we speak.
	He's also sending in state troopers to get on top of the car wrecks that are being caused by unlicensed Haitian migrants.
	Well, again, you know, the people who are new to politics, supporting Trump just don't understand how government operates and they don't understand how the uniparty operates and they don't understand how, uh, that they're getting behind a guy who has stabbed them in the back.
	Over and over again.
	It's always bribes and blackmail and it's always money.
	It's like, go ahead, you know, pass this, set up these laws that we just came up with in the germ game.
	Pass these laws.
	We're going to practice it for 20 years and we'll roll it out.
	We'll give you money on it.
	So you do what we say.
	We give you money.
	You don't do what we say.
	We take the money away from you.
	So, um, you know, now, um, now he poses as a savior.
	And I'm sure you've seen the clip, it's been everywhere, about this left-wing guy whose son was killed when you had an unlicensed Haitian man T-bone a school bus and the 11-year-old is killed.
	And he says, I wish my son had been killed by a 60-year-old white man instead.
	Because I am sick and tired of my son being used as an example.
	Yeah, I mean, it's... this is not an aberration, though.
	This is happening all the time.
	Taylor Hanson... Seems like you could have just wished that he hadn't been killed at all and it would have achieved the same thing, you know?
	Yeah, that's right.
	But he's a leftist.
	You know, the politics matter to him more than anything, I guess.
	Taylor Hanson went to Springfield And he said, every resident I've talked to is scared of driving.
	They're dealing with increased insurance rates due to unlicensed, uninsured Haitian drivers causing multiple accidents.
	Other reports say that Haitians are practicing voodoo, which includes animal sacrifice, including religious ceremonies, giving credence to rumors that Haitian migrants have been snatching up pets.
	Wall Street Ape said, this American is from the same island as the Ohio Haitian illegal immigrants, and she said the Haitian immigrants are indeed eating animals.
	Let me tell you something about these people.
	Not only are they harvesting cats for food, but also for witchcraft purposes, for voodoo purposes.
	There was a clip that was retweeted by Elon Musk.
	A young woman who said, my father came from Haiti, you know, decades ago.
	He was by himself.
	It wasn't a massive migration of Haitians.
	And she said, I know that this stuff is true.
	And she, you know, she's a Christian.
	She said, we can, we can pray for them.
	We can try to help them, but you have to understand what is happening here.
	And that's the issue.
	If governor Lee wants to help as many things that he can do, uh, besides stabbing his own citizens in the back.
	He has his first job as a governor is to take care of his citizens.
	He can do whatever he wants to as an individual.
	But as governor, he needs to look after the interests of his citizens first.
	And people who don't do that, like Governor Lee and Governor DeWine, are globalists.
	All the globalists despise their own citizens and do everything they can for people outside of the country.
	And they're working not on placement of refugees, but they're working on replacement of Americans with refugees.
	Sorry you Americans don't speak the language of the people that I'm bringing in by the tens of thousands.
	So you aren't much use to me as a job.
	I'm going to give your job to somebody who can speak the language of the people that we're replacing you with.
	So it's a guy who runs that store.
	People should look at that store.
	I would never buy anything from that store again, if I had been a customer.
	So, um, so how is this all working out for them?
	Well, unfortunately for the left, we now have some body camera footage of, uh, the police coming upon a woman who was in the process of, I don't know if it was ritual sacrifice or dinner that she was involved in, but she was trying to eat, she'd killed a cat and was trying to eat it, had blood all over her.
	When you spoke of the animals.
	Oh, sorry.
	Hang on a second.
	I want to play this other one first.
	This is the one I want to play.
	Put your hands behind your back.
	Someone got rubber gloves.
	She's covering blood.
	I bet you got gloves.
	You got rubber gloves?
	Smile for me.
	Thanks for watching!
	you He's taking her mug shot.
	Did you eat that cat?
	Did you eat it?
	No?
	Why'd you kill it?
	Get in there.
	It's ridiculous.
	Yeah, he has our smile because she's got fur on her lips.
	It's alright other kitty, you're safe.
	Did you guys see all this?
	No, we pulled up and she was just laying there with me.
	Did you see her eating it?
	She was eating it.
	She was eating it?
	Yeah.
	She said, in blood on her shoes, she said she stomped it out.
	Stomped the head out.
	Well, you don't kill a cat and go to the hospital.
	You go to jail.
	No, she was saying she killed two other kids.
	That's what she was saying.
	Copy, I'm at 10th and Hoover with CM410221.
	Please use your tires.
	Yeah, you know, nothing to see here.
	Just move on, says the mainstream media, because they are losing it about this cat eating going on.
	Spoke of the animals and the migrants.
	What they have done to our country by allowing these millions and millions of people to come into our country, in Springfield, they're eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats, they're eating, they're eating the pets of the people that live there.
	You talk about extreme.
	Just mentioning that the World Economic Forum has chosen the number one threat globally is mis- and dis-information.
	Yes!
	And the problem is... Yeah, you're the threat, lady.
	...social media and algorithms.
	When you have a presidential candidate standing up in front of a mic with millions of people in the audience and saying and peddling in conspiracy theories, although it's funny when you hear, because I found myself laughing, like, are you serious as I watched it?
	The severity of that moment is only numbed because of the candidate's saying.
	Yeah.
	I think we're numb to them, aren't we?
	Numb and number.
	There they are, right there.
	Look, I said from the very beginning that I thought it was likely that that was happening.
	There were a lot of reports.
	You had the mayor said it's not happening.
	But there were a lot of people that are living there that said, yes, it is happening.
	So who are you going to believe?
	Are you going to believe the mayor or the people who are there on the street?
	The mayor has got a vested interest in that.
	But I also said, I don't think that's what we need to really focus on, quite frankly.
	It is, shall we say, visceral, right?
	It gets attention.
	It gets people wound up on both sides.
	But it doesn't address the problem of the fact that that man there in the debate I talked about cat eating.
	It was the one who's trying to eat your lunch.
	He's paying governors to bring the refugees in.
	And then he gets everybody fighting amongst themselves as to whether or not the refugees are eating cats.
	Folks, these people are eating our lunch.
	These people are replacing us.
	This is the Uniparty and the way they do the Hegelian dialectic.
	While they do these orders and pay each other to betray us, Then they get us fighting over whether or not there's cats that are being eaten by the people they bring in.
	Hegelian dialectic.
	This is the way the Uniparty works.
	This is the way the choice that you've got between Trump and Lala.
	It's just ridiculous.
	It's ridiculous that this is what we are now fighting over.
	We should be fighting over the fact that he twisted the arms of governors and many mayors.
	Oh yeah, I want the money.
	You know, bring those people in because when those people come in and we put them on the welfare roll, that empowers me.
	This is what I said.
	Republicans have become the Democrats of my youth.
	The Democrats always wanted more people on the welfare rolls because it empowered them.
	Now the Republicans want it.
	Yeah, bring in people and put them on welfare.
	I don't care what it does to the city.
	I want that money coming into my community.
	That's Republicans now, just like the Democrats.
	So on information liberation, let's talk about the replacement aspect of it.
	Springfield factory owner revels in replacing American workers with Haitian immigrants.
	I wish I had 30 Haitian immigrants.
	said McGregor Metal CEO Jamie McGregor of Springfield.
	He tells us to PBS.
	I wish I had 30 more.
	Our Haitian associates come to work every day.
	They don't have a drug problem.
	They will stay at their machine.
	They will achieve their numbers.
	They are here to work.
	And so in general, that's a stark difference from what we're used to in our community.
	These lazy Americans who won't do anything.
	We've got these hardworking Haitians coming in.
	Is that really what's going on?
	Well, two things.
	First of all, a lot of people took to social media and complained about that company.
	They say they're a family-oriented company, but literally couldn't care less.
	They make their employees work six to seven days a week with no time for family, said one.
	And we don't know if these are true.
	These are people putting this out there.
	They don't care about their employees.
	They only care that you work six to seven days a week.
	They have no interest in your work or your personal life or any complaints fall on deaf ears.
	You're nothing but hired help after eight years.
	Management still didn't know my name.
	So some of these people, well, that's one aspect that may or may not be true.
	However, what we do know is that Reuters reported yesterday that out of the 15,000 migrants that have come in from Haiti, 15,000.
	8,000 of them, more than half, are on welfare.
	More than half on welfare.
	Yeah, hard workers, right?
	I'm sure some of them may be hard workers, but if he's generalizing and he and PBS are saying, well, these Haitians, they're so much better than Americans.
	That's a generalization, isn't it?
	So if they're going to make that kind of a generalization, then I think it's reasonable to actually look at what percentage of them are on welfare.
	Did they have these lousy, no-good-for-nothing, only English-speaking Americans?
	Were more than 40% of them, more than 50% of them I should say, that's 8,000 out of 15,000, were more than 50% of the Americans on welfare?
	Those good-for-nothing English-speaking Americans, were they on welfare?
	It's a good thing that DeWine sent that letter to Trump!
	So you get all that welfare money coming in there.
	Got 8,000, but don't worry.
	You know, we got welfare.
	It's going to pay for them.
	It's almost like they're working.
	Yeah.
	They got these government checks are coming.
	They can buy stuff.
	All the rest of the stuff, enrollment and Medicaid and federal food, food assistance and welfare programs surge.
	And so did rent.
	And so did vehicle accidents, including that collision.
	Where the Haitian T-boned the school bus and killed the 11-year-old.
	Boy, it's too bad that it wasn't one of these good-for-nothing white Americans that doesn't speak anything but English.
	Injured 26 other kids as well.
	The number of affordable housing vouchers fell as landlords moved to market-based rents that were rising in the face of higher demand, a blow to existing residents who were relying on them.
	And we're seeing this over and over again.
	In many different jurisdictions, they're kicking out the poorest among us.
	When I say us, I mean Americans.
	In the inner cities and other places, kicking them out to put in refugees.
	Why?
	Because refugees come with all kinds of federal money.
	Where'd that federal money come from?
	Well, that came when the governor signed your soul, the soul of your state, over to Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo in December 2019.
	30 of the 50 states.
	Reuters had nothing but praise for the Haitian invasion.
	The rest of their article, they shared claims that they were helping the economy.
	That's how they do it.
	Bringing in federal money.
	Well, how's that working out in Sweden?
	You know, Sweden took the lead out of the EU.
	They wanted more migrants than anybody else.
	And now, even though we got Trump paying states, who paid states, I should say, not doing it now, but when he was president, he paid states To take more immigrants or to lose money.
	What they're doing in Sweden is now they're paying the immigrants to leave.
	They're going to give them $34,000 each to leave and that's going to be a bargain for them.
	They have these people who are going to be on welfare the rest of their life.
	Yeah, they show up every day for work.
	They show up every day.
	Immigrants who voluntarily leave Sweden will be eligible to receive up to $34,000 and it'll be a An economic boom for Sweden now, after the mistake they made.
	Back in 2015, the then Foreign Minister Mike Pompeo, oh I'm sorry, it was Margaret Wallstrom, declared the country a humanitarian superpower and opened its borders to over 160,000 asylum seekers, more per capita than any other European country.
	Along with these arrivals came an increase in violent crime, with cases of murder and manslaughter almost doubling between 2012 and 2023.
	And sexual offenses increasing by 56% between 2013 and 2021.
	According to a 2017 investigation by a newspaper there, 90% of the perpetrators of shootings in Sweden are either first or second generation immigrants.
	It's actually the second generation is actually worse, generally.
	That's, you know, there'll be a terrorist attack.
	Second generation.
	Well, this person is a native.
	This person was born here.
	Yeah, second-generation migrant.
	That's what I've said all along and it's pretty understandable why that's happening.
	Yeah, they come in and it's like, well, I'm going to school with these other kids and my parents don't have anything.
	They're more likely to, you know, their parents know where they came from.
	These second-generation kids have never seen where they came from.
	They don't realize how much better things are even where they are struggling.
	To try to get up to the level of people who had been there as natives.
	But they just get very resentful.
	And they're taught by the schools.
	The government schools are teaching them oikophobia.
	Hatred of the home.
	Hatred of the homeland, as Roger Scruton called it.
	Swedish Prime Minister now has vowed to take action on the growing problem of migrant crime.
	Last year, three people were murdered in the span of 12 hours because there was a feud between rival Middle Eastern drug gangs.
	There, the invaders are coming from the Middle East.
	It doesn't matter where the people come from.
	This is not about these people, where they come from.
	This is about mixing the cultures in, about opening up the borders About crime and drug cartels coming in.
	Many people saw this coming, said the current Prime Minister.
	He said he would deploy the military to help the police in their work against the criminal gangs.
	He said they're threatening basic Swedish values.
	We're in the midst of a paradigm shift in our migration policy, said one of the ministers there in Sweden.
	In neighboring Denmark, they've undergone a similar tightening of migration policies.
	And we look at why this is happening in Germany.
	Oh, all of a sudden, after they lost big time in some local elections, they saw the handwriting on the wall.
	Somehow, they just got interested all of a sudden in Germany about doing something about the replacement, which they never cared about before.
	For the first time in EU history, Germany is at the forefront of immigration suspension.
	And so other EU countries may follow.
	And it's because of their election losses.
	And if the Germans take the pressure off of these globalist parties there, then they will revert back to what they've been doing.
	This is just to get the people who aren't paying any attention.
	They call it the Shenzhen area.
	29 European countries that have officially abolished border control at their mutual borders.
	So you can pass back and forth without having to show your passport.
	Germany's government announced plans to impose tighter controls at all of the country's land borders in what it called an attempt to tackle irregular migration and to protect the public from threats such as Islamic extremism, recent deadly knife attacks, and so forth.
	But that's not what did it.
	It's not the concern.
	They were never concerned, and I don't think they're still.
	They're only concerned about their election losses.
	And again, if that pressure goes, their concern will disappear.
	As reported just last week, this is Newsweek's characterization of it.
	Germany's far-right Thuringia victory is an ominous sign for Ukraine.
	Well, it's kind of interesting.
	You know, those horrible far-right people that our mainstream media and the globalist media hates.
	What is it that characterizes far-right people?
	Well, they look after the welfare of their country first.
	Which means that they want peace.
	Which means that they want borders.
	Which means that they don't like these people whose loyalty are to these globalist institutions who are at war with them and seek to undermine them from the inside.
	We better wake up as to who these people are.
	By their fruit, you will know them.
	By their bribes and their blackmail, with their money out of Washington, you will know them.
	You have to pay attention to what they do, not what they say.
	And you don't need to get caught up in some stupid fake cat fight, which is what that debate was.
	It turned into a cat fight, just to distract you.
	From what Trump had done in 2019, what Governor Lee did in Tennessee, what Governor DeWine did in Ohio.
	No, pay attention to the catfight.
	That's the important thing.
	That's unbelievable.
	When are people going to wake up and have some discernment and question What they're being told by the mainstream media.
	And question what you're being told by the Trump cheerleaders and the mainstream alternative right.
	Those people don't have your best interests at heart.
	I've been telling people this since before January the 6th.
	I was telling people this during 2020.
	When Trump was doing, when Trump was betraying us with the germ game, I was telling people, no, it's not 4D chess.
	And this January the 6th thing is a betrayal.
	And look at how he betrayed the people.
	He fleeced them, he put them in harm's way, he turned his back on them, and he turned his back on them literally that day, and then he turned his back on them and refused to pardon them.
	Why?
	Because his best interests were not served by that.
	Yeah, yeah.
	We'll be right back.
	You might want to hear it in your pod.
	You'll owe nothing.
	And be happy.
	Ain't got no cash.
	Ain't got no car.
	But 24 booster shots in your arm.
	Oh nothing.
	Be happy.
	You can't even buy sh** in the store.
	Because of your low social credit score.
	Owe nothing.
	Be happy.
	You'll owe nothing.
	And be happy.
	Be happy and eat some bugs.
	They're doing what?
	In the place they named after me?
	Good thing I have The David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	This is The David Knight Show.
	All right, and on Rumble, North American House Hippo.
	It's good to see that.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says, my wife Melissa is home resting from her heart surgery.
	She'll be off her feet for a while until she recovers, but she's here and alive.
	Thank you so much for your prayers and kind words.
	Thank you, all of you, for praying for them.
	I know we have a lot of people who do pray for that.
	She had the surgery a couple of days ago, and I remember we talked about that.
	And I would like to ask for your continued prayers for my son, both of my sons actually, who have been damaged by the pharma killers.
	So, various things that have happened.
	I won't go into the details of it again.
	On Rumble, Awoot says, uh, welcome to the party, Springfield.
	Southeast Florida has over 300,000 Haitians and the traffic is reflective of it.
	Yeah, yeah.
	On Rumble, StealthPatriot, thank you for the tip.
	He says, they see the most important election in the history of the universe.
	That's right.
	That's such a tired... We should have a drinking game.
	Every time they say that, have a drink of coffee.
	Maybe it'll wake you up.
	I see a bunch of slaves arguing about which master is going to give them the best scraps and innards.
	At the Christmas slaughter.
	That's right.
	The cat fight.
	On Rumble, 16th King.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	And writes, I lost track of you when you left the other place.
	So glad I found you on Rumble about a year ago.
	Well, I am too.
	Thank you.
	And by the way, you know, that's why it's so important.
	To like the stream and to pass the videos along.
	Your social media may not be banned like ours is, so that'd be one way that you could help us.
	But wherever you watch the show, if you're watching it live, or if you're watching it on Roku, or Rumble, or Rockfan, or any of these other places that start with R, Or the places even that don't start with R. If you're watching it live or watching it as a rebroadcast, if you're watching video or audio, and of course you can find the links to all those places at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	That would help us a great deal.
	I don't know what happened.
	Well, I don't know exactly what they have done, but we got a complaint.
	This is always the way it starts.
	A complaint.
	Back the first week of December.
	And took us off for a weekend.
	We didn't realize it for a couple of days over the weekend, and then we realized it on Monday.
	We talked to them, and they put us back on.
	Said, so what's the deal?
	I knew what the deal was.
	It was the headline that I put up accusing the pharmaceutical companies of murder.
	I stand by that headline, but they restored it.
	Again, this is a place that I had been since 2017.
	And so after six years there, they decided after a complaint, I wonder who would have the kind of clout to get your entire podcast taken down with one complaint?
	Who could that be?
	Pharmaceutical companies?
	Government?
	Who would it be?
	Is there a difference between those?
	But anyway, they did not restore the thing.
	We didn't realize that they didn't publish out the thing to all the different locations at that point for a few more days.
	And so then I saw that, but I didn't.
	And the reason I looked was because all of a sudden when they brought us back, it cut our podcasts in half.
	And so, um, I started looking at it and I thought, oh, well, they didn't start it up, you know, sending it to iTunes and all these other places.
	And, um, and we're carried pretty much everywhere.
	They say, uh, the podcast is except for, um, except for Spotify.
	Spotify has always banned me.
	Well, always since the show started, I should say.
	Uh, so, um, Spotify will not accept the podcast, but, uh, everybody else does.
	And so we thought we had it taken care of, but it never did come back.
	And I don't know what it is that they've blocked there, but they've found some way to shadow ban us somehow.
	Well, on 9-11, I thought this was interesting, the U.S.
	scrambled fighter jets, 9-11 this year, to intercept Russian aircraft near Alaska.
	Why didn't they scramble the fighter jets 23 years ago on 9-11?
	That's what Gore Vidal said.
	It's either his father, his uncle, and the one who had set up NORAD.
	He said, how in the world did all this happen without the jets being scrambled?
	He said, that would never happen.
	He says, I don't believe the official story.
	This is an inside job if they didn't scramble the jets.
	And of course, at the time it was happening, they had told people that they were doing an exercise.
	They just have what what are the chances that you would have a coincidence that you would do an exercise that is exactly like the supposedly real thing that's happening right now at exactly the same time.
	So people don't know what's going on.
	I don't know.
	But you know, it was when they had the 77 attacks in the UK and the subway, they did the same thing in there.
	They were telling everybody, we've got a simulation of such and such a thing.
	And so then when the real thing happened, They were doing a game simulation of it, exactly the same thing, at that time, and it confused the people who would be responding to it.
	They didn't know if it was real or a game, and so it delayed everything quite a bit.
	They just keep doing the same things because they keep getting away with it, because the media won't report it.
	So whether you're talking about the London underground attacks on 7-7, or you're talking about 9-11, they have those things happening at the same time.
	Now, this particular one, These are some Russian jets that flew close to American airspace.
	They were still in international airspace, but it was close enough.
	You know, they'd not even gotten into American airspace, and NORAD scrambled the jets.
	Huh.
	Paying attention now.
	The North American Aerospace Defense Command.
	These are the people who track Santa Claus's sleigh every Christmas.
	And they were tracking those men from caves who were flying all the jets on 9-11.
	The same people who track Santa Claus on Christmas Eve.
	They said they detected, tracked, and intercepted two Russian military aircraft operating in the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone.
	The Russian aircraft remained in international airspace and did not enter American or Canadian sovereign airspace, they said.
	The Russian activity in the Alaska ADIZ is not seen as a threat, and NORAD will continue to monitor competitor activity near North America and meet presence with presence.
	Well, I think they're responding as Putin did.
	They're responding to Putin.
	Putin responded to the threat.
	of American long-range missiles being operated by U.S.
	personnel, and we're going to have his statement about that coming up in just a moment here in the news.
	But in July, the Pentagon said Russian and Chinese bombers, two Russian Tu-95 and two Chinese H-6 military aircraft, were detected flying near Alaska, marking the first time, first time, the two nations had been observed operating together.
	In that manner, to threaten America, after America has been threatening them together for a while, I guess.
	So, what is happening in America?
	Now, are we going to turn this thing around?
	The Constitution Day is coming up next Tuesday, and on the 17th, And so the Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey was put out.
	Now, these people, if I remember correctly from days back when I would hear PBS when I was in college, the Annenberg Foundation was a big sponsor of public radio.
	So they did a survey to see if Americans know anything about the Constitution.
	Perhaps they should give this survey to Trump and Lala, you think?
	I wonder if Trump and Lala could pass this.
	Because Trump's appointment for Supreme Court, Amy Coney Barrett, couldn't.
	Remember that, when she was asked in the confirmation hearing?
	Describe the areas of the First Amendment she couldn't.
	And of course, she has nothing but contempt for the Constitution, as we've seen with her decisions that she has issued here.
	Recent survey shows that even in an election year, many Americans are still fuzzy on some basic civics concepts.
	Yeah, especially during the election year, because we're fighting over cats.
	Cat fight.
	Not election, it's a cat fight.
	First, the positive.
	Nearly two-thirds of Americans can correctly name all three branches of government, executive, legislative, and judicial.
	Wow.
	That says that one-third can't.
	I'm kind of a glasses-half-empty kind of guy.
	One-third of Americans can't name the three categories of the government.
	No wonder they don't catch on the fact that the bureaucracy is ruling us.
	That we have taxation without representation and regulation without representation.
	No wonder they don't know who's supposed to do what.
	And of course even the 65% don't realize that We're actually being ruled by unelected bureaucrats, not by the executive legislative judicial branch.
	When it comes to the First Amendment, though, things get a bit murkier.
	While almost everyone knows about freedom of speech, 74% of respondents name that.
	I guess it's because they're working in so many different ways to take it away.
	The other four rights protected by this crucial amendment are far more problematic for Americans to name, including Amy Coney Barrett, when she was asked, can you name the five freedoms that are recognized in the First Amendment?
	She could only name four of them.
	Only 39% mentioned freedom of religion, 29% noted freedom of the press, 27% recalled the right to assembly, and only 11% identified the right to petition the government.
	Those 11% are more qualified for the Supreme Court than Donald Trump's pick, Amy Coney Barrett.
	Surprisingly, more people incorrectly said the right to bear arms was in the First Amendment.
	22% of the people said that.
	And so there were more people who knew that than knew that the right to petition the government was there.
	And I guess we would be confused about the right to peacefully assemble and the right to petition the government because of what's happened with January the 6th.
	I wonder what part of the Constitution the story about Romulus and Remus is in.
	What do you think?
	Article Z. That's when they surveyed the Christians.
	Not most of the Christians, but a large percentage.
	I forget what the percentage was, but it was a minority.
	But there were still a lot of people who identified, self-identified as Christians, who thought that Romulus and Remus, the mythological story about the founding of Rome, was in the Bible.
	Civics knowledge matters.
	Well, just knowledge matters in general.
	It would be a good thing to know something.
	If these people didn't know the wrong things, they wouldn't know anything at all.
	That's the fruit of government school.
	Government education.
	I don't like the term public education.
	I don't like the term public health, as I said yesterday.
	I think, well, if they start talking about public health, why don't you just talk about communist education and communist health?
	That's what we're talking about.
	And they put the word public in.
	It's a code word.
	Those who do not understand the rights protected by the Constitution can neither cherish nor invoke them.
	Those who do not know which party controls the House and Senate may misattribute credit or blame for action or inaction.
	And if you just listen to the politicians, you may think that some guy is on your side who isn't, because of the catfights that they create.
	So yeah, it's nowhere in here do they mention the fact that our rights come from God and not from the Constitution, but nevertheless, they do say the rights protected by the Constitution, but they need to spell that out, I think.
	The survey also dug into what Americans know about the Supreme Court and their opinions on potential reforms.
	And here's where it gets interesting.
	They say in the article.
	And it's even more interesting than the article writer understands.
	Because when he talks about the fact of what people's understanding of the Supreme Court is, whoever wrote this article doesn't know it either.
	Is that 86%?
	No, the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected.
	85% know justices serve life terms.
	Moreover, 56% understand the Supreme Court, not the president, has the final say on whether presidential actions are constitutional or not.
	Well, you need to get those 56% of the people to take a look at Andrew Johnson.
	Because Andrew Johnson defied the Supreme Court.
	He said, the Supreme Court's issued their opinion, let's see them enforce it.
	I've said that over and over again.
	The Supreme Court is not supreme.
	We don't have, we have, just as I talked about, we've got three branches of government.
	Why do we have three branches of government?
	As checks and balances.
	And not only that, but the founders were so concerned about consolidation that they not only split the federal government into three parts, but they said, if the federal government has not been expressly given certain powers, It doesn't have them.
	Those powers, not rights, powers, are reserved to the states and to the people.
	And so, Andrew Jackson, when the Supreme Court was weighing in on what he did to the Cherokee, and I completely disagree with what he did with the Cherokee, But he understood what the Constitution was, and so did the Supreme Court.
	They understood they didn't have any way to enforce it.
	And that's why the founders said, well, we think the least dangerous part of the government is going to be the judicial system, because they don't have any enforcement mechanism.
	And that's exactly what Andrew Jackson said.
	They had issued a statement saying, yeah, you can remove the Cherokee.
	They saw how horrific it was, and then they reversed themselves in a year with another case.
	Within a year.
	And Andrew Jackson said, well, I'm going to just continue with it.
	He says, they've issued their opinion.
	Let's see them enforce it.
	See, if you follow the Constitution, if you understand history, the 46% of the people who write, they were not misinformed.
	This writer is misinformed.
	And the Annenberg Foundation is misinformed.
	And we need to recoup these checks and balances.
	If everything is, if the Supreme Court is supreme, If the judiciary is supreme, we don't have any checks and balances, and we've completely destroyed the Constitution.
	And that's what Jefferson said about Marbury versus Madison.
	When they gave themselves a right of judicial review, he said, well, we've just lost the Constitution.
	And of course, we've seen that play out in spades in the 20th century, and now in the 21st century.
	82% support prohibiting justices from cases where they have conflicts of interest.
	I wonder, you know, as the left and the Annenberg Foundation talk about this type of thing, did they ever pay attention to the fact that Lena Kagan, who was put in by Obama, had been in the Obama administration.
	She had been the lead person pushing Obamacare.
	She then became a Supreme Court Justice, and shortly after she became a Supreme Court Justice, Obamacare came up for review in the Supreme Court.
	She refused to recuse herself.
	They completely ignored that.
	But now they're trying to claim, well, we got to get Scalia and Thomas out because they have conflicts of interest or this or that.
	So it's all partisan.
	It's all partisan what they pay attention to, what they talk about.
	So while all of this is happening, we have, again, I'll remind you today of the summit of the future coming up September the 22nd.
	World leaders will sign the pact for the future at the summit for the future.
	And the member states will pledge allegiance to the UN as a central unifying government.
	And that is the right way to do it.
	So they'll say something along the lines of, I pledge allegiance to the pact of the United Nations.
	One world government against God and is anointed with rage and tyranny toward all.
	No, it's not that concise.
	They take like a ream of paper to do what I just summarized there in a paraphrase of the Pledge of Allegiance.
	We, the heads of state and government, representing the peoples of the world, have gathered at the United Nations Headquarters to protect the needs and the interests of present and future generations through the actions of this Pact for the Future.
	That's the way it begins.
	It's a preamble to the new UN.
	Member states then repeatedly reaffirmed their unwavering commitment, that's the term used over and over again, unwavering commitment, to the UN, to its charter, to its purposes, its principles, and to, especially, Agenda 2030.
	They vowed to comply with the UN's International Court of Justice.
	They promised to, quote, reform the international financial architecture Like I was saying before, the way that Trump and Biden control people, the way all the presidents have controlled people, Obama as well, if you don't put men in the women's bathroom, then I'm going to take away money from your schools, that type of thing.
	They all do that.
	They all do that.
	And so the financial system is the means of control, and so they want a global financial system that they redesign.
	That'll be used to control and to inform and surveil us.
	Reform of the international financial architecture, quote-unquote, is an important step toward building greater trust in the multilateral system, they say.
	Another quote, we commend ongoing reform efforts and we call for even more urgent and ambitious action to ensure that the international financial architecture becomes more efficient, more equitable, fit for the world of today.
	And closing the SDG gap, that is the Sustainable Development Goals, the 2030 goals, the Green New Steel.
	The reform of the international financial architecture should place the 2030 agenda at its center, with an unwavering commitment to investing, an unwavering commitment to crony capital corruption, and the fleecing of the people, and the wealth transfer From the many to the few.
	That's what this is about.
	And they're, you know, accelerating.
	They're going to be really accelerating things in these next five years.
	So again, it depends on which puppet they think is going to be most useful for this.
	Which puppet is going to be serving their interests.
	Because their interests are chaos.
	You know, on the one hand, with Trump, he's going to be an agent Of chaos in a different way than Lala Harris will be an agent of chaos.
	She will do chaos by her agenda and the things that she creates.
	Trump will be doing chaos with his comments and other things, getting people to fight each other.
	And they will fight each other if he doesn't become president.
	So, you know, there's a lot of different ways that they can slice this thing.
	On the other hand, you know, some of the people who would push back the hardest Against this 2030 agenda.
	We'll just go along with it if it's Trump, because you know that even though it looks like he's betraying us, he's just playing 4D chess.
	Who knows which one of the two the people who do the selection will pick.
	It's not going to be your choice.
	Altogether, the document lists 60 actions that member states should take, and a clause buried toward the end of the document requires member states to embed, quote, U.N.
	agreements and resolutions in their own national laws.
	This is the type of thing that they did after 9-11 and the anthrax attack and the first germ game, Dark Winter, in 2001.
	They put out model state legislation.
	That's what they're going to do with this government and with the U.N.
	as well.
	It works so well.
	Here's what we'd like you to do.
	Just encode this into your laws.
	Member states will deepen the UN's engagement with national parliaments and United Nations intergovernmental bodies and processes in accordance with national legislation, including through building on the efforts of the UN and blah, blah, blah.
	So they're going to give them model legislation to put out there, and they're going to lay the foundation for it.
	Just as the states did for the federal government for the germ game.
	And there's going to be three packs.
	There's a pack for the future and there's a couple more of them that are going to be approved at the UN summit.
	Leaders of 193 member states expected to reaffirm their commitments to the Sustainable Development Goals.
	Which really define the agenda 2030.
	The Sustainable Development Goals include poverty eradication, industrial development, environmental protection, education, gender equality, peace, and partnerships, I say.
	Well, let me translate that for you.
	These Sustainable Development Goals are going to include poverty escalation, Industrial deconstruction.
	Environmental prohibitions.
	Miseducation.
	Gender gaslighting.
	Not peace, but war against their own people.
	And not partnerships, but crony corruption.
	Which they call public-private partnerships.
	In a PPP down your back.
	Tell you that it's raining.
	Tell you that it's warming.
	Probably would be.
	The summit was initiated by UN Secretary General Guterres in 2021.
	He called it at that time our common agenda, our communist agenda.
	The UN claims that this summit is necessary because, quote, we are confronted by rising catastrophic existential risks, many caused by the choices that we make, and we risk tipping into a future of persistent crisis and breakdown.
	If we don't change course.
	And all these problems that we are facing can't be solved by individual governments.
	They far exceed the capacity of any single state alone.
	Except that this government, the American government, is basically paying for the UN, I guess.
	We're kind of the source of all this stuff.
	And we're kind of the single state that's doing this, aren't we?
	So since 2020, says this article from Brownstone, the confidence that people have in the UN has been seriously undermined because of the World Health Organization, because of all the garbage that they pulled on us with the germ games.
	Although the COVID response was ordered by national leaders, the UN actively pushed the disastrous one-size-fits-all measures, including Border closures?
	That's the only time that Trump closed the border was when the UN told him to do so.
	That's true, folks.
	He didn't close the border until the UN told him.
	Then he reduced it significantly.
	Societal shutdown, mass vaccination, removal of access to formal education.
	Dogs and cats living together.
	I should say being eaten by Haitians.
	It's a war against their own people.
	And so the other two things they've got, besides the pack for the future, like I said, there's going to be three of these packs that are there.
	So in addition to the pack for the future, they also have a declaration on future generations.
	They have set themselves up as advocates for future generations.
	As Brownstone says, well, how do they know what future generations want or need?
	Right?
	That's the way the left always works.
	I'm an advocate for such-and-such, okay?
	It can be something that... an animal.
	It can be for Mother Earth.
	I'm an advocate for Mother Earth.
	Well, what do you know about what Mother Earth wants?
	You know, they're the ones who think Mother Earth is a cognizant creature or something.
	So...
	They're gonna take care of this intergenerational dialogue, and when I see that and I see future generations and stuff, I'm reminded about the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and I've played for you several times the clip that I created about 15 years ago about that.
	And although the United States did not sign on to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, what we're seeing with the gender gaslighting of children by schools, by judges who are stepping into families to allow children to be mutilated and things like that, or the state or the legislatures, that is all.
	What the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child was about.
	It was about removing parental rights.
	Either the parents are in charge of the child or not.
	And it's not going to be the children who are in charge of themselves.
	They are not responsible.
	This is a battle for the state to take away the rights of parents.
	It's a battle for the state to be the parent.
	It's a battle for the village to raise children.
	And so the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child were always about that.
	Removing parental rights in the name of giving rights to children.
	And so when you look at them starting to talk about intergenerational dialogue, or when you look at this, this Brownstone article has, it lays out, they were able to get some of these drafts and go through them.
	So they got some great quotes from the draft, but at the bottom, the bottom line is as they finish up the article, they say, well, we don't really have to worry about this because we don't have to worry about it being enforced.
	So they talk about the future generations, the global digital compact, where they want to jump in with censorship and with surveillance and all the rest of this stuff.
	But I think they've got it wrong when they think that this is not a threat to us.
	It is very much a threat to us.
	The UNCRC has been enacted by courts and by state governments and by school boards and all the rest of the stuff.
	That notion has been put into place.
	And in the same way, the Paris Climate Accord, even though that was never ratified by the Senate, and you never had any Republican senators point that out to people, even though we have pointed out many times, they still pretended that it was ratified.
	When Trump became president in 2017, there was a fight within the Trump administration.
	Some of them saying, well, you don't have to do anything because it's not real.
	You can just ignore it.
	Others said, no, you've got to get rid of it because it is setting the tone and people are using it, states are using it, and others are using it as a reference for what they need to do.
	It's model legislation, essentially.
	And so he kind of split the baby in the two.
	He said, all right, well, I'll get out of it.
	And we'll formally get out of it.
	But he also acknowledged that we were in it, and we were never in it in the first place.
	In other words, he said, I'm going to follow the formal procedures of getting out, which means that I have to wait for four years until right after the election, then I can get out of it.
	No, you don't.
	We were never in it.
	He should have just said, we've never been in this.
	He should have said it.
	Mitch McConnell should have said it.
	Rand Paul should have said it.
	Cruz, Lee, anybody that says that, hey, I'm for the Constitutional limited government should have said that.
	Nobody did.
	Instead, they pretended that it was in effect.
	And then, of course, right after the election, OK, well, I'm not in it anymore.
	And then a month later, Biden says, I'm in it now.
	It doesn't work that way.
	But they treat it as if we are in that thing.
	So when they say here that PACs, declarations, compacts do not have binding force, that simply is naive.
	I'm really surprised that Brownstone would say that.
	How do you look at the Paris Climate Accord?
	How do you look even at the UNCRC, Convention on the Rights of the Child?
	How do you look at that and say that's not binding?
	It doesn't have an effect.
	It does have a tremendous effect.
	And it is treated as a binding force.
	They should be seen, they said, as soft laws.
	No.
	No.
	We should scoff at these presumed laws.
	That's what we should do.
	And we should refute them.
	As a matter of fact, when you look at the Paris Agreement, why do you think they said, well, if you want to get out of this, there's a four-year delay?
	Why do you think they put that in there?
	They know that the presidential terms are four years.
	That was all set up just for us.
	Just for us.
	So these texts, if approved, says Brownstone, should be seen as pure distraction from the serious commitment to implement the SDGs by 2030.
	I couldn't disagree more.
	I think they're very important.
	I think all this stuff is very important.
	It is all used as propaganda, as lies, as misinformation, disinformation.
	People don't even know what's in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution.
	And so when they don't know what's in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution, and when your own Republican senators don't know or care about the fact that it's their job in the Constitution to ratify a treaty, and their job alone, When they don't stand for that, when they abdicate their authority to the bureaucracies, they abdicate their authority to the UN.
	They abdicate their authority to the Secretary of State.
	When they do that, this should be taken very seriously.
	No one will hold world leaders accountable to these promises.
	Well then, why did all of the world leaders, including Trump, obey the germ game?
	To the letter.
	And why did they do it synchronized in time?
	Well, that's the question that they need to answer for themselves, and they need to think about that.
	Finally, before we take a break, an Australian doctor could lose his medical license for sharing Babylon Bee articles and other conservative content.
	The Daily Beast, really kicking off the shadow banning of our program and of me, was when they came after me because of a Babylon Bee article I put out there.
	Look at this, he thinks that Hillary Clinton is a lizard person.
	Oh, wow.
	This guy is obviously deranged or something, right?
	A doctor in Australia may lose his medical license for posting conservative content, including articles from the Babylon Bee to anonymous complaints.
	Well, he had to have two complaints.
	I only get one anonymous complaint.
	And I lose everything.
	Anyway, he learned of the investigation nine months later, after the board had scoured 10 years worth of his internet and social media content, enlisting help from forensic specialists.
	Social media is like LifeLog.
	LifeLog that was created by the intelligence community, and then everybody says, well, that's creepy.
	We don't want that.
	OK, we'll shut it down.
	The next day, Facebook began.
	Because these are all funded by DARPA.
	They highlighted 80 Facebook posts they found problematic, including five shared Babylon Bee articles.
	In 2019, Koch was told that he would be immediately suspended from practicing medicine in order to protect Public Interests.
	He has been on trial for professional misconduct since July 2024, a five year period passed when he was suspended.
	The trial is set to end on October the 14th this year when the fate of his career will be decided.
	Some of the articles that he shared from the Babylon Bee are this one, LGT and Q publicly execute B for implying that there's only two genders.
	The B is bisexual, right?
	Well, that means that there's two genders.
	So the rest of them teamed up on the B's.
	Of course, the L's and the T's are fighting amongst themselves as well.
	However, whether gender is biological, you know, there's a gay gene.
	I guess you could say the L's and the G's are against the T's as well.
	Because, you know, they tell us that it's biological.
	Now the T's say nothing is biological.
	The T's say that nothing is... you don't have two genders.
	Anyway, Australian citizens asked the Taliban to liberate their country.
	He's in Australia.
	That was in response to Dictator Dan and all these other tyrannical measures that were enacted there.
	Congressional prayer lasts for two days as Democrats include all 5,787 genders.
	Another one.
	Instead of traditional warfare, the Chinese military will now be trained to shout the wrong pronouns at American troops.
	And this is my favorite one.
	A nation that kills 3,000 babies a day feels morally superior to slave owners from 200 years ago.
	Hmm.
	Yeah.
	A majority of the content he shared talked about there being only two genders.
	For example, a post from Matt Walsh he shared read, Our sex is one of the most biologically concrete things about us.
	They could dig up your bones a hundred years from now and tell what sex you were.
	If that is now fluid, then literally everything else is.
	Well, certainly this guy's license is fluid, isn't it?
	Everything that's a privilege from these governments can and will be taken away from you.
	Well, before we go to a break, I want to cover this from the, this is a local story, and many times I talk about how it's important for us to have good people at the state level.
	And this is an interesting story about what is going on with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation and a small town, well, not a sheriff, but he's actually a police chief in a very small town in the county.
	Agents with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation searched the Millersville Police Department on Wednesday.
	Susan Nyland, spokesperson for the TBI, said they're conducting a search warrant execution at the police department.
	There was a second search warrant that was carried out by the Millersville Police Assistant Police Chief.
	Sean Taylor's home in the same town, and I've got a statement from him.
	Now he is the assistant police chief.
	Because the police chief, these are, these are small towns.
	Um, Brian Morris was formerly the chief of the now defunct Ridge top police department in Robertson County.
	And then they named him the police chief in this town, Millersville in February.
	And then in April, uh, the same guy was appointed to be the city manager.
	So he's got a couple of hats, right?
	Um, he's puts on the hat of city manager.
	He puts on the hat of police chief.
	And so he essentially relinquished the day-to-day police operations then to Taylor, whose guy, the guy whose house was just searching the guy that I'm going to play the clip of.
	And so for all practical purposes, the Taylor guy is, uh, Sheriff Taylor.
	No, he's not Andy Griffith, but, uh, he's a police chief for all practical purposes.
	And, uh, but the two of them are not in opposition to each other.
	The two of them are in agreement.
	Morris, who is the official police chief, and he's also the city manager, said that the investigators took some laptops and some case files, but he said, these are case files that we've tried to get them to help us with in the past.
	They said, we add, we, he added that we welcome the investigation.
	He said, the authorities now have everything that Millersville police have been trying to give them.
	He said, we wanted to get them involved in this investigation.
	We wanted their help.
	And they refused to do it.
	But then they do a raid and show the media.
	What do you think is going on?
	Well, I think maybe they were getting enough attention, and they did get some attention, that maybe the TBI decided that they would step in and shut it down, shut down their investigation.
	Not only are they not interested in investigating it themselves, but they're not interested in these guys doing the investigation.
	He called the raid unnecessary.
	He says, I think it's retaliatory in nature, says Morris, who is the police chief and the city manager.
	And it was not his house that they raided and took stuff from.
	It was the guy who's the effective police chief, the guy who's officially the deputy police chief, that they raided his house, took documents there.
	He said, we would have given them access to anything they asked for without a show of force.
	And they were trying to give them access to this stuff.
	He said, I believe this was done to try to make us look bad and to undermine our credibility.
	He said the city requested months ago for the TBI to investigate alleged criminal activity that occurred in Millersville before these guys came into office in January 2024.
	These acts included police misconduct involving the employment of uncertified police officers, the printing of police commission cards, the theft of city documents and of city property.
	And here's the zinger, folks.
	Election fraud and voter fraud.
	Oh, oh, we're not going to look at any of that stuff, are we?
	So, uh, here's what the, the guy who is the effective police chief, uh, who is, you know, there's two of these guys, they're both asking the TBI, Hey, take a look at this stuff.
	We think we found some, uh, election fraud in this small town.
	The TBI is not interested until the story starts to get picked up other places.
	Then they rate them to make them look like they're the problem.
	Hello, everyone.
	I'm Assistant Chief Sean Taylor with the Millersville Police Department in Middle Tennessee.
	Many of you may have seen my video last week regarding the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation raiding our police department and my personal residence.
	They came and they seized evidence regarding corruption that we had locally that tied into corruption nationally, and they took all of our files so that we are unable to complete these cases.
	The cases that we've been working on affect every American.
	They affect us in the mortgages, fraudulent mortgages, human trafficking, narcotics trafficking, and many other crimes.
	We have crisscrossed the United States talking to state attorney generals, senators, congresspeople, and numerous law enforcement officials throughout the United States.
	We've identified a major corruption That's transnational.
	It involves the BRICS nations in China and investment companies and fraudulent mortgages on homes here in the United States in very key counties and key states.
	It goes into the election integrity and fraud, and it's creating a geopolitical shift within our political system.
	This is a multifaceted attack.
	from a foreign adversary who is paying off our local municipal, county, state, and federal politicians to keep from coming to light.
	We are moving forward with this case in other states and other arenas, even though they have taken our files and our information.
	This is very important to us.
	When I say us, I mean we the people.
	It's time That we the people come together.
	It's time that we stop allowing ourselves to be segregated by our own government.
	No matter what race you are, what creed or what religion you are, you are Americans.
	We need to stand together as Americans and demand accountability of our elected officials.
	It's time for this corruption to stop and for us to have our country back.
	So that we know we leave it in the good hands to our children, our grandchildren, because if we don't stand up and do this, we will no longer have a country to hand over to them.
	I'd like to send a special thanks out to Mark Fincham.
	He wrote a very good article that all of you can go and read at yournews.com regarding the information that I'm talking about tonight.
	One of the things that happened that really upsets me that The TBI did at my residence was they urinated in my bathtub and tracked urine throughout my home.
	To me, that was the government saying, piss on you, America.
	And that's not okay.
	It's time to stand up, unify, come together peacefully and demand accountability.
	Thank you very much.
	Well, that's pretty amazing, isn't it?
	That is pretty amazing.
	The allegations that he made there, that they're essentially marking their territory, and what they did after both of them said, look, we've been trying to get attention for this, and evidently they did get the attention of the TBI, not interested in doing an investigation.
	But in terms of shutting down the investigation, what I found interesting about what he had to say, and again, I haven't, I don't know the details of this.
	I'll try to get some more information.
	I'll let you know, but they're going around to a lot of different states and their message is the same as my message.
	It is those of us at the local level.
	Who have to stand together against what is being done to us from those who are above us.
	It is about organizing at the local level.
	That's a very dangerous message for them.
	It's also about banks.
	It's also about mortgage fraud, voter fraud, foreign involvement of different things.
	So, very interesting what is happening there.
	I'll see if I can get some more information about that.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	I want to thank Anurag Vin.
	Dustin Helm, thank you very much.
	And let me thank some of the people whose checks we just received.
	Austin M. Ryan for Love of the Road, thank you very much.
	Walter and both of those are, you know, it's just a few people.
	Who do a lot of heavy lifting for this show.
	And they deserve a lot of thanks.
	A lot of people watch the show.
	And if, as I said before, if people would just support the show with $5 a month, that would do it.
	I don't want to put the show behind a firewall.
	I wanted to get the information out there to people if they can't afford it.
	And we're coming into some situations here where the economy might get very difficult.
	But the $5 a month, if people could do that, we would have more money than we really need.
	But very few people do support us.
	But those who support us have been very kind and generous, so I appreciate that.
	Austin, Ryan, and others who I mentioned earlier this week.
	Walter and Joe A., also William and Tina P., Aaron W., Jay Moore, John R., Sue from Burke and Michael M. Thank you, all of you.
	And those of you who are listening, thank you for those of you who support and for those of you who don't support.
	These are the people who make the show possible.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
	It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes.
	The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
	Hey!
	Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
	Tomorrow it will be something else.
	Hey! Hey! Hey!
	The End.
	Liberty.
	It's your move.
	of a You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Watching that, I'm thinking, no wonder the left hates these people.
	They're dressed as Indians.
	I mean, cultural misappropriation.
	They should have, if they were good guys, they would have worn an N95 mask.
	Those horrible colonists.
	On Rockfan, Carolus Rex, thank you very much.
	That's very generous.
	I appreciate that.
	And on Rockfan, Dougalug, one of our frequent supporters.
	Thank you so much.
	I appreciate that.
	So happy Friday, David and crew.
	Thank you.
	And even though it's Friday the 13th, that doesn't bother us.
	13 has been an interesting number for Karen and I.
	We got married on the 13th.
	We were married for 13 years before we had a child.
	We had our business for 13 years.
	And many, many other things I could go into.
	It seems to be an interesting interval for us.
	At one point in time, we kind of look back on it.
	So, interesting how that's coming out.
	So, we don't fear numbers.
	We fear God, who is in charge of everything.
	Bill Gates, though, has a lot of things he wants you to fear.
	Gates says the world is facing two options.
	It's always that, right?
	We have two choices.
	Always going to be two choices.
	We got two options for presidency.
	We got two options for the future, according to Bill Gates.
	And your two options are a major war or another pandemic in less than 30 years.
	Which would you like to have?
	About neither.
	How about that?
	What does he think?
	He's God or something?
	That was what God offered King David when he got proud.
	He said, I'm going to give you a multiple choice here.
	How do you want to get spanked?
	You could have a plague, or you could have people attacking you and everything.
	And David's like, oh no, I'll take the plague.
	I don't want to have a war.
	So I guess we could go with that.
	He says, don't put me at the mercy of men, because men are merciless.
	And it was God who had mercy on him with the plague.
	Well, um, major war, you know, we can either have war games or we can have germ games.
	Which do you want to have?
	There are some questions that keep even billionaire philanthropists and entrepreneur Bill Gates up at night.
	And this is this fawning article.
	Out of mainstream media.
	Uh, pretty disgusting.
	Uh, Gates, a father of three.
	He's just a family man, you know, give the guy a break.
	It's just a family man who is, who loves Planned Parenthood.
	He doesn't want you to have a kids, right?
	He's determinedly optimistic about AI and about eradicating deadly diseases like polio.
	Oh, wait a minute.
	I think I started to get it now.
	Okay.
	So the major war.
	Or a pandemic germ game.
	Let's see.
	This is the guy who likes AI and vaccines.
	So just like the last germ game we had, the vaccines are what's going to kill you, not the disease.
	And when we talk about a major war, is that going to be something that he's going to use AI to either initiate or to facilitate or both?
	Yeah, that's probably what he wants to use to kill us.
	The Microsoft co-founder was unimpressed with the global response to the pandemic, and he said crucial lessons have been ignored.
	As a matter of fact, the World Economic Forum says this was a test.
	This is a test and they just didn't do well enough.
	You know, we only had about two thirds of the people submit and get the vaccine and things like that.
	So we got to do better next time.
	Yes, it all was a test.
	It was a test of compliance.
	It was a test of intelligence.
	It was a test of all these different things.
	Whether they could browbeat you into submission.
	Whether they could get you to jettison common sense and your principles, your devotion to God.
	Whether they could use the wolves in the churches to mislead the sheep.
	You know, the people like Curtis Chang and Robert Jeffries that I talked about the other day.
	And they're never going to stop doing it.
	It was all a test.
	Will they take universal basic income?
	When they get really upset and they're desperate and we lock them down and we take their jobs and we say they can't move, can we use a stimulus check to placate them?
	To keep them from, in the words of Michael Bloomberg, to keep them from getting guillotines and coming after us?
	Yes, it worked.
	It worked for them.
	It worked surprisingly well, distressingly well.
	So Gates was critical of America's response to the crisis.
	He said, the country that the world expected to lead and to be the model fell short of those expectations.
	They wanted even more compliance, even more submission, even more groveling before the tyranny of Trump and Biden.
	They should be happy that people are going to fight as to which one of these two people that did that to us is going to become president.
	No, that's where it was.
	They were fine.
	And okay, Biden or Trump, two people did that to us.
	And of course, Lala is part of that regime.
	Although some of the lessons from the germ game have been learned, it's way less than I would expect.
	Sadly said Gates.
	Yes, we were only able to kill tens of millions of people.
	We wanted to get billions of people.
	Professor Paul Hunter, uh, an expert epidemiologist.
	At the University of East Anglia in England.
	This is the same place where they had the climate gate centered.
	The University of East Anglia in the UK.
	They ought to rename that the MacGuffin University.
	That's a far more catchy title.
	You know, the MacGuffin University, the University of East Anglia.
	We are the people who can get you with the climate change lies or now the pandemic lies.
	I've got a professor of epidemiology.
	Maybe they could, if they don't like MacGuffin University, maybe they just call it Watsamata U. That's what the epidemiology department is.
	They know that there's something.
	And whatever the germ game of the week is, that's what's amount of you.
	And they're going to be able to find that with a PCR test.
	In the West, we only really get interested in a disease when it starts directly threatening us.
	And then he says, boo!
	Boo!
	It'll scare the people.
	Are you feeling threatened yet?
	Well, let me get out my scientific PCR test.
	Yes, and then we'll get the Ouija board and we'll do that as well.
	Figure out exactly what it is that's ailing you.
	What contagion did you pick up this week?
	The West only gets concerned about controlling epidemics when we start seeing cases.
	Yeah, I got cases right here on the TV set.
	Cases of cases.
	Yeah, define what the case is.
	Well, yeah, God on isolation here, but I do have a PCR test.
	So, um, as all this stuff is happening on the war side, they're moving forward on that as well.
	I mean, you know, they've identified, uh, mosquito viruses and they, you know, they want everybody to lock down, even though there is absolutely no evidence of anything that's happening there.
	Uh, trying to scare everybody to death, you know, one state after the other in the Northeast.
	And, you know, isn't that interesting?
	It's not in the southern states where they've really got lots of mosquitoes.
	And I know they do get a lot of mosquitoes in the northerly climate there.
	I know in Alaska in the summer, it's famous for a massive mosquito attack.
	So maybe they do up in the northeast, but you don't see people in the south doing that.
	I guess it's because they have mosquitoes year round.
	But on the war front, we have Putin issuing a new warning to NATO.
	So who's the aggressor at this point?
	We don't want to have any peace talks.
	Those are shut down by the US government.
	They told even the Ukrainians, no, no, no, no peace talks.
	So, removing restrictions on Ukraine's use of Western weapons would directly involve the U.S.
	and its allies in the conflict with Russia and would be met with appropriate response, said Putin.
	The West has sent Ukraine long-range missiles, which Kiev so far has used against Crimea and Donbass, but in the past several days, both the U.S.
	and the U.K.
	have openly suggested publicly suggested that they might allow those long-range missiles to be fired deep into Russia, which they have prohibited.
	We just had Lloyd Austin, as I reported earlier this week, said, well, that's not a red line.
	We can now fire long-range missiles into Russia.
	They keep, you know, keep doing that with the F-16 jets and now with the missiles to say they're going to fire it into Russia.
	Putin said we're not talking about allowing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory.
	It's doing so already with unmanned aerial vehicles and other means.
	This is what Putin had to say.
	In recent days, we've seen and heard very high-level discussions in the UK and the US about the Kiev regime being able to strike deep into Russian territory with long-range Western weapons.
	And it appears that this decision is either about to be taken or apparently has been taken.
	And this thing, of course, is extraordinary.
	I wanted to ask you to comment on why this is.
	Here's Putin.
	There's an attempt to substitute concepts, because we're not talking about authorizing or banning the Kiev regime from striking across the entire territory.
	That is already happening with the help of drones and other means.
	But when it comes to using high-precision, long-range, Western-made weapons, it is a completely different story.
	Fact is, I've already mentioned this, and any experts will confirm, that both in our country and in the West, the Ukrainian army is not able to strike with modern long-range precision systems of Western manufacture.
	It cannot do this.
	It can only do so using intelligence from satellites, Which Ukraine does not have.
	This is data only from EU satellites, or from the United States.
	In general, from NATO satellites.
	This is the first thing.
	The second, and very important, maybe the key, is that only NATO servicemen can enter flight assignment information into these missiles.
	Missile systems.
	Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this.
	And so this is not about allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not.
	It is about deciding whether NATO countries are directly involved in a military conflict or not.
	If this decision is made, it will mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the United States, European countries, and the war in Ukraine.
	This is their direct participation.
	And this already, of course, significantly changes the very essence, the very nature of the conflict.
	This would mean that NATO countries, the United States, European countries are at war with Russia.
	And if that is the case, then bear in mind the change, this change is the very essence of the conflict and we will take appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be posed to us.
	They just keep escalating.
	They want World War III.
	There's no other rational explanation for this.
	As he points out, first of all, they can't target without the satellites that they don't have.
	And secondly, they can't do the firing.
	They have to have NATO and U.S.
	personnel to do the firing.
	And so he says that means that it'll actually be the U.S.
	that is at war with us and that changes it fundamentally.
	That would mean that NATO countries, US, European countries are fighting against Russia.
	And he says that significantly changes the very essence, the very nature of the conflict.
	So that may be one of the reasons why on 9-11 you had Russian jets getting close to Alaskan territory.
	The limitations were originally put in place to allow the US and its allies to claim that they were not directly involved in the conflict in Russia, writes RT.
	Russia Today writes that, while arming Ukraine to the tune of 200 billion dollars.
	Plausible deniability.
	Yeah, we're not the ones who are censoring you on social media.
	That's just a decision that's being made by Facebook and by Twitter and so forth.
	No, actually they were.
	And we all knew it.
	And everybody knows that they're behind all of this.
	Kiev has been clamoring for the restrictions to be lifted since May.
	Secretary of State in the U.S.
	Blinken and British Foreign Secretary David Lammy have hinted that the restrictions might be lifted this week, citing the alleged delivery of Iranian ballistic missiles to Russia as the pretext.
	Iran has denied sending any mission missiles to Russia calling the accusations psychological warfare and so at the same time we've had Lloyd Austin say that oh yeah we're gonna it's not a problem if we shoot long-range missiles and publicly putting this out Secretary of Defense going back to about two weeks ago
	anti-war said if World War three breaks out it would not be contained in Europe says Russia at the time Russian deputy foreign minister said that the US would face much harsher consequences the impression is that our colleagues in Washington have discarded the remnants of common sense and believe that they can do anything the US claims it was not involved in the planning of the Kursk offensive but it has allowed Ukraine to use US provided armored vehicles
	missiles and bombs in the attack on the Russian territory the New York Times reported that the US and the UK have also provided Ukraine with satellite imagery and other information about the Kursk region Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov strongly warned against this potential escalation said the US should understand that if World War III breaks out, it wouldn't be contained in Europe.
	Americans unequivocally associate conversations about the Third World War as something that, God forbid if it happens, will affect Europe exclusively, said Lavrov.
	Ukrainian President Zelensky has said, and his Western backers are naive, for worrying about escalation.
	And he called Russia's red lines a bluff.
	So is it?
	It's a pretty high-stakes gamble.
	But the people in Washington are more than willing to gamble with your life.
	They're more than willing to gamble with World War III.
	They really don't care.
	At all.
	I mean, they might be right.
	Maybe they can go in and take Russia.
	Why would they risk it?
	Why is it important for them to take down Russia?
	Again, part of it that has been suggested is that they want to have a monopoly on selling natural gas to Europe and other things like that, and yet, in spite of the sanctions, in spite of blowing up the undersea gas pipelines from Russia to Europe, the Nord Stream pipelines, both of them, in spite of doing that, Russia is still selling more natural gas to Europe than the United States is.
	So that part of it hasn't worked out too well.
	In spite of the sanctions, in spite of the sanctions, the European countries that are supposed to be our partners in this war are trading with the enemy, and trading with the enemy more than they're trading with us.
	And it may be that they understand this is simply about American geopolitical hegemony, trying to monopolize and control everything militarily, economically, and the rest.
	It truly is disturbing to see that our government is the center of wars and coups and economic unrest and the global agenda that appears to be running through the UN but is really coming from us.
	And it's coming from the Republicans and from Trump as much as it comes from the other people.
	They just have their own ways to try to deny it and to make you think that it's coming from a different source when it's really coming from them.
	Before we take a break, our guest is going to be joining us, not until the bottom of the hour.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Before we take a break, on Rumble, Sam Miller, 1, 2, 3, thank you very much.
	That is very generous.
	Thank you.
	David, you always keep it real and not afraid to speak the truth.
	Well, thank you.
	That in and of itself is more than money can buy, but a little money helps now.
	Thank you very much, Sam.
	I appreciate that.
	And on Rumble, do not obey.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says, common people looking for truth in a world full of lies.
	M sellers, David, we need a new, we need some new merchandise.
	We're all in McGuffin, you McGuffin university.
	Uh, you are the professor where the students all wear them, uh, on game day.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	Uh, Mulan Lave.
	Uh, thank you.
	Appreciate the tip.
	It says a little more for the tank prayers for Travis.
	I know what he's going through.
	Yeah.
	And, uh, and my other son as well, who was, uh, injured with a antibiotic.
	Um, it was a bad weekend a couple of weekends ago.
	I was having a fib and he was suffering a lot of pain, went to the emergency room and, you know, antibiotic.
	And the only thing it mentions on there is dizziness.
	And it turns out that the, um, chloroquine stuff has a long history of incredible neuro, uh, neuropathy.
	And attacking of tendons and things like that, he's really struggling with it.
	On Rockfin, Dusty Milton, thank you very much.
	He says, okay, okay, David, I got the message.
	Thank you, I appreciate that.
	Answering the plea for financial help, thank you.
	On Rockfin, IRS Machine Gun, thank you very much.
	And may God bless you with what you're working on as well.
	They told us a few weeks ago that he had Reordered things in his life so that he could do more with his family.
	We'll be right back.
	So, let's get started.
	You know, there are a couple of articles that got my attention that were really interesting and from a nostalgic point of view, but also told us something About what people are yearning for as human beings.
	That is counter to what we're being sold by the technocratic elite.
	This was on the Wall Street Journal.
	It said, dumb phones and fax machines are the new boss flex.
	Now, why do they say that it's the new boss flex?
	Well, because only the boss can go offline and not be bothered.
	Everybody else has to be on call 24-7.
	And if you're not on call 24-7, you've also got your devices are constantly hitting you with distractions, with other things, watching what you're doing, trying to monetize your activity, trying to grab your data, what you're doing, what you're saying, feed it to the artificial intelligence.
	To make it smarter and everything.
	So these are people who are trying to just get away from all of this predatory surveillance and this constant 24 7, 365 being on call.
	We've even seen in some European countries, they've passed some laws saying you can't contact your employees outside of business hours or, you know, in different parameters that they put there.
	But it really is the distraction and the surveillance.
	And then from a nostalgic point of view, but there's more to it than just nostalgia.
	I saw this article in terms of old tech.
	And it was nostalgia for video stores.
	And that was something that we did, and we really enjoyed it, because this whole article is really talking about the magic of video rentals.
	They call it Blockbuster Dreams.
	Well, Blockbuster was not our dream.
	Blockbuster was our competitor.
	They were kind of our nightmare.
	They were a predatory competitor, actually.
	They would go through and they would target individual retailers.
	By the time they got into our market, there were a lot of small mom and pop chain stores there, a lot of different ones besides us.
	And they'd have two, three, four, five, six stores or something like that.
	And Blockbuster would take one of them at a time and they would open up a store as close as they could, uh, to that particular mom and pop chain.
	And they would do it everywhere.
	They had a store all at once because they didn't have to make money.
	Blockbuster after it was taken over by Viacom.
	The parent company of Paramount and CBS and many other big media things like that was Sumner Redstone.
	And so Viacom, Sumner Redstone, bought Blockbuster from Wayne Huizenga, who had made a lot of money waste management incorporated, you know, doing dumpsters and stuff like that.
	So he was very, very wealthy.
	He bought the concept of blockbusters from some people who had done it in their local area, some entrepreneurs.
	Kind of, you know, think back to McDonald's, that type of thing, right?
	So, he bought it, this concept, and then he put his money behind it, and he grew it into this big thing.
	And then Viacom, which is really, think of it as one of the major movie studios of the time, Paramount.
	They bought it, and I'm absolutely convinced that they did it in order to regain control of video rentals and things like that.
	To put it out, they wanted to go to a streaming model from the very beginning or something like that.
	They had tried to shut down video stores at the very beginning.
	They were unable to do it because the video stores, that's one of the reasons why they would have the clubs.
	You know, you'd join a club and you'd pay a certain amount of money.
	It's the same type of stuff that people have to do in order to have raw milk, for example.
	Because they were trying to play games to shut things down.
	And it wound up, as they were coming out to different video stores, the video stores got together and they created this thing called the Video Software Dealers Association.
	And the VSDA fought that all the way to the Supreme Court.
	And one, what they call the doctrine of first sale, saying that after you sold these tapes to the video store, they can do whatever they want to.
	They bought it.
	They own it.
	They can do whatever they want.
	You can't dictate what they can do.
	The movie studios never liked that, but after that decision, they decided that they would Work with that.
	And that was kind of the golden age for Hollywood.
	At that point, once they started working with the rental business, they never had a situation where they lost any money on any of the films.
	You could have something like The Terminator, for example, which did nothing in the movie theaters.
	Made absolutely no money.
	It was discovered in video, and it was a good movie, and we would recommend it, and everybody else was recommending it.
	And that made, it was the video chains that made that a success.
	And they did the sequels to it.
	Same type of thing happened with Disney.
	Disney had really not made animated films.
	And as you all remember, you know, back in the late eighties and early nineties, they were doing a big animated film at least once a year, sometimes two times a year.
	And so it was really working out well for them, but they had to control everything.
	And so they wanted to have a situation where it was you paid per view or where you had a streaming service.
	And that was what they were really working for.
	But this article talks about what it was like to go back and physically go to the store.
	And they said, Telegram is just filled with people who took movies of themselves in the stores, shopping, and they put it up and everybody's just, oh, that was a lot of fun when we did that.
	Back in the day, a Friday night wasn't complete without a visit to the local video rental store.
	It was like walking into a library.
	As a matter of fact, it was a library.
	That's exactly what it was.
	Even when we first opened up, our first store was an experiment, and we got into it.
	Karen had some relatives in New York that had done a video rental business, and we wanted to do our own business.
	We were both working for other people.
	We wanted to do a business together.
	And I looked at it as more of a testbed for a point-of-sale system that I wanted to sell based on the Apple Macintosh.
	I was a certified developer, so that's what I was interested in.
	But as we got into it, several things happened.
	First of all, there was a local distributor who went out of business, and we got a great deal on a lot of movies, catalog titles that were there. And then this court case with the Doctrine of First Sale happened and so when they decided they were going to work with video stores they just opened up the catalog titles and that was what we got involved with. But when we first opened up the first small store was only about a thousand square feet and
	And, uh, we got a lot of novels and because it really was like a library and we put the novels up next to some of the movies that were made about those novels.
	Uh, that didn't last too long because nobody's interested in reading even at that time.
	So we got the message pretty quickly, but, uh, it really was like a library.
	And this article says, but instead of dusty novels, you're surrounded by endless aisles of cinematic treasures.
	The magic wasn't just about the movies, though.
	It was about the experience.
	And there's some of the telegram things.
	It was a ritual, the gentle panic of pacing through the aisles, desperately hoping nobody else had snagged the last copy of a film before you could get your hands on it.
	You were the hunter, a movie-obsessed lion prowling for VHS prey.
	And the best part?
	You would probably leave with something completely different.
	Exactly.
	Well, you might have been looking for the Matrix or something.
	You wind up with something you never heard of before, like the Terminator.
	And that was a thing that made so much money for Hollywood.
	Fast forward to today, where streaming is king and movie watching feels a bit clinical.
	There's no anticipation.
	There's no will they or won't they about that coveted VHS title on the shelf.
	The spontaneity is gone and quite frankly, it's all a bit too convenient.
	Where's the charm in scrolling endlessly through Netflix menus?
	Yeah, by the way, you know, when I had Netflix for a short period of time, they were constantly pushing things that I would never watch alongside things that I'd already seen.
	I never could get it to stop showing me the same stuff over and over again that I didn't want to see.
	Anyway, there was something magical about the hunt, about the tactile nature of picking up a VHS case, flipping it over, reading the synopsis, maybe just maybe falling in love with something you'd never expected.
	And again, in our stores, what we did, it was the catalog titles, and it was the fact that we hired people who knew a lot about movies.
	We quizzed them before we hired them.
	And so they knew a lot about movies, and they could make recommendations, but it was about getting to know these people.
	We didn't have a lot of turnover of staff.
	These are people who were there because they liked movies, and they stayed because they liked movies.
	And liked working there.
	And so people would come in and they knew these employees.
	And that was what we really liked about it.
	You know, it was a community thing.
	And she doesn't mention this.
	She's looking at it from the perspective of a consumer.
	But that was really the key part of it.
	And when she's talking about this, there was recently something by Rick Beto, who is on YouTube.
	He talks about music and things like that.
	He's a musician himself.
	And he said, you know, the problem with music, same type of thing.
	He said, it's just too easy to get it.
	He said, now you can get into a streaming system and you can just listen to all the music that you want.
	You never, you know, there's, there's nothing special about it.
	You know, when you are going there, it's like, well, I hope I can find that movie, but if he couldn't find it, there was something else.
	I'm like, Oh, I really liked that.
	And you had somebody recommend that to you.
	Maybe that person's got another recommendation that something that you've never heard of that you would enjoy that type of thing.
	And he said, it was that way with music.
	So when he was a kid, he had a job, and he said it would cost him, when he would buy an LP, it would cost him a couple of hours of work to get an LP.
	So he couldn't buy everything, right?
	But what they would do is they'd get together with his other friends, and they would, hey, I just got this new record, let's all get together and we'll listen to it, you know, and this other guy, maybe he got a record, you know, so you guys listen to what everybody's, that's what we used to do.
	And especially as musicians, you'd sit there and you'd look at the back of the cover and it's like, oh, this guy played bass on this other record, you know, and that type of thing.
	You look at the personnel, you got to know who these people were.
	Big album, it was a big artwork cover and all that kind of stuff.
	It was an experience and it was difficult to get.
	And you didn't have access to everything.
	Now you got access to everything, nothing special, right?
	And that's true whether you're talking about movies or music.
	And it's also true that it's all been dumbed down.
	That's especially true of the music.
	That's the other thing he said.
	It's too easy to create.
	It's too easy to create because most people don't learn to play an instrument and they don't have much appreciation, if any, about the fundamentals of music.
	And so as a result, They're just getting whatever the, um, you know, the, the commercial garbage is, is out there from Taylor Swift or, you know, whatever gyrating chick they pulled up from MTV.
	It was MTV, in my opinion, that really killed music more so than AI.
	AI is just kind of coming in and, and doing the coup de gras.
	They've already been trained to not care about the music.
	Because they don't know anything about music in general, right?
	And so it's all about the visuals.
	It's all about the people.
	It's not about the music.
	It's about the performer and how she dresses, typically.
	It's about that kind of stuff.
	So they're very ripe to just get something that is formulaic and commercial.
	And AI can do that great.
	As a matter of fact, they just had a guy who made $10 million creating AI music and streaming it out on garbage platforms like Spotify that won't carry my program.
	Uh, so, so there's Spotify, uh, the, uh, uh, but you know, they're now coming after him for fraud.
	They're trying to make an example out of him.
	Why?
	Because they're so worried.
	You know, if you're going to put out commercialized, synthetic, you know, junk music, computers are going to be as good or better than you're going to be at doing that kind of stuff.
	So that's got him worried.
	So they're coming after him, I don't know exactly what, some kind of, I think they're trying to say it was fraudulent or something, that he was doing that, trying to represent himself as a A human being, when it was really AI.
	I don't know exactly what the charge is.
	But why do I mention all this stuff?
	It's not just about nostalgia.
	She goes on to say, it's wild how stepping through all those unassuming blockbuster doors can stir up all the feelings, take you back to your childhood, or for some parents, those golden days when Friday nights meant a trip to the video store.
	Picking out a few tapes for a cozy weekend.
	Simpler times, no doubt.
	And that's it.
	Physical, right?
	You go somewhere, you get something, you have experiences, you're picking up tactile things, you're walking through three-dimensional space.
	It's not a virtual experience, it's a real experience.
	You're meeting real people, you're picking up real boxes.
	That's what I think is really missing.
	You know, we have been created to live in a real world and they are trying to force-fit us into a virtual society where, going back to the dumb phones and the fax machines and stuff, the society that they want us in with a smartphone is one where they're constantly watching us.
	They want us to live in this virtual world where they control everything that we have access to and where they see everything that we do.
	It is a totalitarian mindset.
	And part of the way that they do that is to remove us from a physical reality, regardless of what we're really talking about here.
	Which says people are nostalgic for that.
	They actually have a blockbuster themed motel that a couple of guys are going to set up.
	Well, I don't really understand how that works.
	The only time I slept in a video store was when we got stuck in a snowstorm.
	And then we had somebody break through the wall in the middle of the night.
	They're trying to rob the store.
	It was quite an experience, but, uh, I don't know about sleeping in a video store.
	Uh, so, but what they're doing is they're taking away what we really want, which is the real world, the real life, physical places, real people.
	And there's, they're replacing it with this virtual, sterile, boring experience.
	You know, those people who go back to the dumb phones and the fax machine realize that tech is always coming after us.
	That we are, after all, we're really just the product.
	And so, what's the direction that we're going to take in our life?
	You know, we can be intentional about these things.
	We don't necessarily have to follow the plans that they want to push us into.
	As a matter of fact, they just did an opinion survey.
	Americans absolutely detest artificial intelligence that makes decisions for them.
	Who would possibly want to have AI making banking and rental decisions for them?
	And they're not talking about movies.
	But that's what I hated about Netflix.
	Netflix was already trying to make some rental decisions for me, but, um, um, so-called automated decision-making is being heralded as the next big thing.
	But it turns out that many consumers are disgusted by the idea of AI making choices for them.
	You know, they are.
	They're just cutting us off of the real world.
	They're cutting us out of the decisions.
	It is a scheme to pacify, to control, to monitor, to destroy us.
	And so this was something that was done by Consumer Reports.
	They did a survey this summer.
	They found a broad majority of American respondents are not comfortable with AI making decisions about job hiring or banking or renting or medical diagnoses or surveillance.
	They surveyed more than 2,000 people.
	Consumer Reports said 72% said they're uncomfortable with having AI scan their faces.
	Well, see, that's happening all the time.
	They just don't know it.
	Do it looking at their answers in a job interview, you know, kind of like Blade Runner.
	So you come across this, this turtle in the desert, he's upside down.
	45% said they're very uncomfortable with the concept.
	When it comes to banking, roughly two thirds of respondents said they weren't comfortable with financial institutions using AI to determine if they were eligible for loans.
	The same percentage said they were uncomfortable with landlords using AI to decide whether they were eligible as renters.
	Cause we're, you know, we're getting to the social credit score type of thing here.
	40% said they were very uncomfortable with that potential application.
	More than half of the 2000 Americans also said they were uncomfortable with AI facial recognition surveillance.
	A third of those respondents said they were very uncomfortable with it.
	83% said they'd like to know what data the algorithms making the decisions about them were trained on.
	Yeah.
	What's this bias?
	What's this assumption?
	Does it have good information about me?
	Can I see that?
	Can I contest that?
	91% said they'd want to have a way to correct the data when it was wrong.
	Given that AI frequently screws up, often in a discriminatory way, they're probably not wrong to be concerned.
	As a matter of fact, if you look at the Gemini pictures, It's showing some Scottish people and they were all black or Asian, anything other than Scottish people.
	Uh, but we know that there was a bias and an agenda in that as well.
	Some governments are now pushing full speed ahead to implement this nascent, but error riddled technology and save on human labor while they're at it.
	And in California, you have grabbing nuisance governor.
	Announced that California will be partnering with five AI firms to test AI within government agencies.
	Transportation.
	Public health.
	Well, public health, we should just end it.
	Housing and taxes.
	A similar project undertaken by New York City's housing department was met with a successful tenant protest.
	They shut it down.
	Absolutely shut it down.
	Well, it's not being shut down everywhere though.
	Um, and, um, in Nevada, they're racing ahead with it there in spite of, uh, some setbacks.
	But I liked this particular one.
	This is AI parenting tips.
	These are the, you know, this is the AI that's going to make decisions about whether or not you should be able to get a home loan or move into a rental place, all these types of things.
	And, um.
	The question is about Google's AI telling parents, giving parents a tip on how to potty train their young children, telling them that they need to smear poop on a balloon.
	I think smearing poop on a balloon is why you potty train them.
	How to teach wiping poo during potty training.
	The AI says, make it fun.
	You can try a balloon bathroom activity where you put a little poo on a balloon and then tape it to a chair.
	Have your child practice reaching around to wipe the balloon.
	Well, this may be a excrement hits the fan scenario.
	That thing pops, right?
	Um, the idea and where did it get this idea?
	It looked at a video that's out there that is one of the high ranking videos.
	And what the person was doing was they were showing shaving cream or they were showing peanut butter or something like that being put this on the balloon and teach your kid about wiping, you know, using this poo, you know, quote unquote poo.
	Well, AI didn't get the fact that that was not actually poo.
	First of all.
	Secondly, I don't know who came up with this kind of crazy idea anyway.
	I mean, do you really need to model wiping by putting... I don't think you're going to need to do this, Travis.
	I'm not giving you any parenting tips here.
	Except I would say this is absolutely not the way it's been taught for many, many generations.
	If you do this and it worked out for you, that's fine.
	Don't write me any letters.
	I don't want to know.
	But they emphasize shaving cream or peanut butter.
	But Google AI did not get that memo.
	So when we asked Google point-blank whether it was a good idea to wipe poop on a balloon, it said yes.
	And then it broke down the balloon method in detail, telling us that we should use a little bit of poop.
	Start with a small amount of poop.
	Yeah.
	And then you can build up to big amounts of poop until it pops.
	And, um, so again, it came from, it's misunderstanding, but those are the, um, that that's what we should have.
	Making decisions and in Nevada, they've already, California grab and nuisance wants to do it for a lot of different departments.
	But in Nevada, they've already started putting AI in charge of deciding whether or not somebody should be able to get unemployment benefits and paid Google.
	The same people are telling you to put poop on a balloon.
	They got these wonderful experts.
	With their science, you know, the science like PCR stuff and everything.
	And here's the problem.
	These kind of decisions, as they bring in artificial intelligence into government, into banking, into, you know, rental property, AI is going to rapidly be seen as unchallengeable.
	Because, hey, it's an expert.
	It's the computer.
	It's science, right?
	Fifty years ago, they were telling people, don't trust this simply because you got a computer printout.
	Garbage in, garbage out.
	Just because somebody did a computer model or a program, that doesn't make it right.
	This does not have some special anointing from God because it's a computer printout.
	It was a human who put that in there.
	And humans are putting all kinds of bias and nonsense into the AI stuff as well.
	But nevertheless, that memo, just like they like to use real poop on the balloon, the fact that you don't give real credibility to these computer printouts, that's somehow been lost on people.
	That's harder to understand than the fact that the AI would think that it was real poop on the balloon.
	People think that this is real truth because it came out of a computer.
	So the director of Nevada's Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation, they said, yes, the acronym really is DETER.
	We can get decisions out more quickly.
	So it actually helps the claimant, they said.
	But they have referees who look at it.
	And so some of the people said, well, if you're going to have people looking at it, except in the simplest scenarios, Uh, this could actually slow things down.
	Uh, because, um, if you are going, if it has to be revised by a human, uh, and then it's going to be fed back to the algorithm and everything, it's actually, uh, a lot slower.
	Well, when we look at the self-driving cars, that was going to be one of the big killer apps of AI and robotics, right?
	Waymo is now giving 100,000 robo-taxi rides per week.
	Now, they're not doing this in just one city.
	This is the cumulative of a lot of different cities.
	But they're still not making any money.
	They're still losing massive amounts of money.
	Why?
	Because Google can do that.
	You know, for years and years and years after these social media companies and search engines were created by venture capital firms, the CIA's venture capital firm, In-Q-Tel, many others that had a lot of intelligence community people on the boards of directors, they were able to operate without making any money for years and years.
	And that's really what's going on with Waymo right now.
	Nobody else has got the deep pocket, so they've got this market pretty much all to themselves.
	All of its competitors are gone, but Ogle, the spy company we call Google, is still there.
	And the 100,000 paid rides to customers each week are happening in San Francisco, Phoenix, and L.A.
	Uh, double the number of weekly rides it was giving in May, a sign that it is growing in the market that it doesn't have any competition in.
	But there is a major caveat.
	Despite its healthy stream of customers, it's still not profitable.
	Their experimental division, which includes Waymo, had an operating loss of about $2 billion first half of this year.
	And the RoboTaxi company is most likely a significant portion of that loss.
	So how many companies do you know that can afford to lose $4 billion a year and not even think twice about it?
	That's one of the reasons why they created Google.
	Unlike the rideshare companies that it will be competing against, Uber and Lyft, Waymo needs to provide its own vehicles.
	Now that's very important because I remember when this whole thing began, Uber was one of the first ones, of course, you had Uber, you had Lyft.
	Travis Kalanick was the CEO at the time of Uber.
	And he made it very clear that, you know, they were full on about going to self-driving cars, even to the extent that he said, what makes our rides expensive is that other dude in the car.
	So we got to get rid of him.
	Now I've talked about that many, many times as to, you know, the contempt that he had.
	How are they going to use people, use people and use their cars until they got this in place and then just cut people off.
	But when I read that, uh, this, uh, I realized something else because I say, you know, when Google has to actually buy the cars and Uber and Lyft don't, And these self-driving Jaguars that they're using are not cheap.
	They cost as much as $100,000 a pop.
	And according to the New York Times, and they cited remarks that were made by a Waymo executive in a podcast.
	So the thing that was making them really expensive.
	Or rather, you know, when Travis Kalanick said, the thing that's making our rides really expensive is that other dude in the car.
	It's like, no, actually that other dude in the car is taking away a lot of your cost.
	Taking away your capitalization costs at the very least, because you don't have to buy the car like Google does.
	They're providing their car.
	They're providing, not only are they doing the driving, but they're providing their car.
	And he didn't even talk about that.
	That's the kind of contempt these people have.
	The other dude in the car was providing the car.
	Providing the car.
	But we don't really care about that.
	We don't care to talk about it.
	Before we were joined by our guest, I just wanted to real quickly talk about the fact that a lot of people now We're talking about the lies that came up in the debate when they were not doing a catfight.
	They were mocking, they were all three of them, coming after Trump about the abortion thing.
	And many pro-life groups are very angry about it.
	It was 100% inaccurate, they said.
	And I said this right away.
	I said, no, there are kids that are full-term that are being aborted.
	That's how I came around to being pro-life.
	When I was running for Congress, partial birth abortion was happening.
	Roe v. Wade did not stop partial birth abortion.
	It actually enabled it.
	And Lala Harris, and this I thought was the most interesting thing, I haven't seen people really talk to this, they talk about the fact that yes, you know, there is comfort care, which they cynically call it comfort care, where you set the baby that survived the abortion, set the baby over there, give it no help, no medical help at all, and just let it die.
	That's called comfort care.
	It's not abandonment, it's comfort care.
	And so that's a cynical lie.
	And we also know that Tim Walz in Minnesota and many other places allow abortion for the full term.
	As a matter of fact, it got even worse.
	I talked about this before when Tim Walz was brought on.
	I said, they've had just in the last couple of years, last one, they stopped in 2022.
	They stopped collecting information about it because they had, you know, eight to 10 kids a year.
	That it survived abortions and then they let him die.
	And that had to be reported.
	So when Tim Walz got in, he worked with other Democrats and they stopped the reporting.
	They didn't want you to know that.
	And they also removed any restrictions that would have required somebody to help a baby.
	So don't help the baby and don't tell anybody.
	So this is a very cynical lie, but the most cynical lie of all.
	Was the fact that Lala Harris was saying, no, I just want to get back to Roe v. Wade.
	Roe v. Wade would prohibit that.
	No, Roe v. Wade prohibited protecting the baby's life in the first few weeks, whatever the cutoff that they arbitrarily decided.
	I don't remember how many weeks it was.
	But the Supreme Court came in and said at this number of weeks, anything earlier than that, you're not going to be able to prohibit an abortion earlier than X number of weeks.
	But you can do whatever you want after that.
	And you could have abortions right up to full term, as they did with partial birth abortion.
	So what Roe v. Wade did was it prohibited protecting a baby's life.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	I just want to say, too, that when we talk about what we can do to make things physical, to get outside of the grasp of this virtual world that they're trying to do, right?
	But think about gold, right?
	You want to get into a real physical world.
	You want to have a real community.
	You want to have things that you actually control, things that are private, things that are not a part of surveillance and control by the big tech stuff.
	Uh, I want to get physical.
	I know we're not going to bring back a VHS tapes or video stores.
	There's not much use of doing it anyway, since they're not making any new movies that anybody wants to see.
	But, uh, uh, get physical, get outside of this trap.
	That they're laying for everybody.
	And you can do that at davidknight.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony Aardman's Wise Wolf Gold.
	And he has some excellent program that he's put together there.
	Wolfpack allows you to get group discounts.
	You can sign in.
	It's how much you want to save each month, and you can start to prepare.
	A great way to do that, especially with what we see coming on the horizon.
	I mean, I've been talking about what's going on with Berkshire Hathaway you know we had they dumped like seven billion dollars worth of Bank of America stock and then the Uh, the partner, uh, like the number two guy, he's cashing in his Berkshire Hathaway stock.
	I mean, these people are think something as big as coming.
	So prepare for that.
	Uh, get out of the, the net, the net is a trap.
	Uh, get physical, do things to protect yourself.
	And when we take a, we're going to take a break.
	And when we come back, we're going to talk to, um, uh, the man Jack Lawson, the man who behind, uh, civil defense manuals.
	And of course he makes a civil defense manuals physical.
	Because we're talking about protecting yourself in the real world.
	We're not talking about theoretical things.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back with Jack Lawson and CivilDefenseManual.com for some constructive tips about the real world.
	♪♪♪
	Defending the American Dream.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, welcome back, and joining us now is Jack Lawson, and he's been a frequent guest of ours.
	He has an excellent publication.
	I love this, this two-volume civil defense manual book.
	He only does it as a book because when everything, when the excrement hits the balloon and it pops, then you're not gonna be able to get this stuff online.
	But it is excellent information.
	And you can see online right now, you can see some samples of some of the stuff.
	He's got for free a chapter about how to make sure that you get water and preparation that you can make.
	That's one of the most important things.
	If not the most important thing, you can't survive very long without water.
	So he focuses on that.
	He's got a free chapter there.
	He's got some other free chapters.
	You can get an idea about how thorough and comprehensive the information is.
	But the books are worth their weight in gold.
	We've got them, and I've had other people who have contacted me after they got them.
	It's great to have you on, Jack.
	Thank you for joining us.
	It's always been a pleasure, David.
	Thank you.
	David, I wanted to comment about your earlier conversation, your presentation of the AI, how to wipe a baby's tail end and put him poop on a balloon.
	I know who did that.
	That was my college child psychology professor.
	I just about got kicked out of the class because right there in the middle of this class, about a month in, I said to her, I said, do you have any children?
	She said, no.
	I said, well, how can you be teaching a child psychology class?
	And she went ballistic on me.
	And she tried to contain herself, but she lost her cool.
	And of course, I didn't get a very good grade out of the class.
	Yeah, that's right.
	If you don't have kids, they're going to take you to school and teach you a lot of things that you didn't know one way or the other.
	This technology is getting, it's, I don't know if you ever recall, about 20 years ago when tech was starting to get big, there was a group of IT people, psychologists, psychiatrists, that formed an organization advocating stopping this spread of this stuff amongst the common person and going back to hiring people by the hour
	with a pencil, with a steno pad, calculator, and moving away from it.
	I don't know what happened to that group, but Google probably bought them.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	That's true.
	But, uh, it's just, uh, just, it's getting out of control.
	I was just in a big city yesterday, a day before yesterday.
	And I was astounded at, I watched a woman walk right off the curb and about fall over.
	She's on her phone.
	This is, it's just getting out of control.
	I went into an office and everything was on a tablet questions that didn't fully encompass.
	I didn't even understand some of the words on it, you know, the medical thing, but my God, it's just, it's gotten past the point of practicality for the average person.
	Yeah, it has become very controlling, obsessive, and intrusive.
	You know, that's a lot of people that I just don't want to be intruded upon, and it gives, you know, this whole idea of having a dumb phone and a fax machine, well that's a new flex for somebody showing their authority as a boss, because the bosses are demanding that everybody else be at their beck and call all the time, and this is giving them the tools.
	And the bigger point that the Wall Street Journal doesn't talk about Is that just as this gives power to the bosses, the technology gives power to the bosses to constantly hector you or keep you working and that type of thing.
	It also gives all of these tech organizations the capability to constantly keep us at its beck and call and to constantly dominate us and to constantly surveil and control us.
	And that's the problem with it.
	When the technology is no longer serving people, but making servants out of us.
	I saw that when I first got involved in engineering, when we had mainframe computers.
	And, you know, we were all lined up waiting on this, you know, the god of the machine type of thing.
	Everybody's there.
	I'd go in at all hours of the night so that I could, the lines wouldn't be as long.
	And, you know, they have one mainframe computer and everybody is waiting on this gigantic mainframe computer.
	It's that kind of centralization.
	And we got away from that for a brief period of time with personal computers, but then they actually use those as a way to control us.
	So we have to be wise about how we're using it.
	And I think that's the key thing.
	I also advocate people get rid of their Get rid of technology that is interfering with their life.
	When I say that, if they don't realize they've got kids and they're ignoring their children and their children are ignoring them, if they don't realize that, then they're past the point of helping.
	The point being this, I told you before, I threw my iPhone out the window of my car one day driving down the road, and I thought, well, that was stupid.
	I had to go back and find it.
	And it was just the thing had a mind of its own.
	Yeah.
	And I just got a lemon or whatever.
	But the bottom line is I found out one back and got a flip phone.
	And I noticed a lot of college kids.
	There was an article I read a couple of months ago about college kids that are getting into college are getting rid of their iPhone And they're getting a flip phone because they're finding it's intruding too much in their studies, in their ability to relate to people.
	That's a step forward.
	But this technology is totally out of control.
	I suggest to everybody that they analyze what they're using and move away from some of it.
	My son limits his kids in the video games.
	My son has got all kinds of things for the kids to do.
	And I see children in homes that are absolutely, the parents don't even know they're there except they follow the cord from the game controller to the child on the couch, you know?
	Anyway, it's out of control.
	That's smart advice.
	Yeah, I've gotten to the point now where the device that I use, I was just overwhelmed with paper.
	Yeah, I would do like, you know, three, four hundred pages of paper when I print the articles out, and then, you know, go through and read them and keep the ones that I wanted to say.
	That's different, David.
	Yeah, it started building up, and so what I wound up doing, though, I didn't want to use a computer.
	I didn't want to use a laptop or even an iPad.
	So there's these things out there.
	What I use is actually, it only, it doesn't have any internet.
	It doesn't have any applications.
	You just write on it.
	And so what I do is I just transfer over the articles as PDFs, and then I mark them up, and there's no distraction.
	I don't have all this other stuff that's coming in, bells and whistles and all the rest of these things, and it lets you focus.
	That's a different facet.
	That's a good application.
	I see applications like that.
	And in a sense, you know, that's like going back to a flip phone, right?
	You still got the technology to let you communicate with people at a distance and all this other kind of stuff, but it's not intruding on you, it's not controlling you, it's not shoving you around, and that's the key thing.
	But let's talk a little bit about, you know, earlier, one of the reasons I wanted to get you on was I was talking about what is happening in Ohio and other places earlier today.
	I pointed out that going back to December 2019, you had 30 states, many of them Republican states, Tennessee is one of them, where the governor said to President Trump, they signed a paper and said, we'll take all the refugees you got, just don't cut off our money.
	Because that was the thing, you don't have to sign this, but if you don't sign it, And the refugees come, you won't get any money.
	And so, accept the refugees directly from us, because otherwise they might come into another state and just come living in your house, and then you won't have access to any of this money.
	And so, a lot of states, like DeWine in Ohio, the governor there, as well as mayors in Ohio, said, yeah, give us all the refugees you want, because they're going to come with a lot of federal welfare money.
	And Medicare payments and all the rest of this stuff, and we want that money.
	And so this is now blowing up in our face.
	And so what do we do?
	What would you tell people?
	Advice from Civil Defense Manual.
	OK, let me first give a brief introduction of myself.
	I was in the American Air Force.
	I've been on a extremely large police board, second largest one in the nation.
	I judged officers when they used deadly force.
	I was a real estate broker for a number of years in a big city.
	I've got a background that's varied.
	I was a welder.
	Long and short of the thing, in the Air Force, I armed and disarmed nuclear weapons as a part of my Air Force specialty code of work.
	Then I went from that to, I've had a construction company.
	I was raised in a construction company in a farm family in the Midwest.
	It sickens me to... I had no idea.
	I've got some lunatics in my family back in Minnesota, my birth state.
	I don't go so much by birth date, I go by conception date.
	That's estimated.
	But I really believe that God puts a spirit into the formation of I am a child at conception.
	That's my belief.
	I am against abortion with the exception of extreme situations.
	I went from all of that up to I was in the Foreign Legion in Africa for two and a half years.
	I was in an anti-terrorist unit.
	I've experienced a lot of Africa.
	Living in Africa, not just visiting it.
	So, the bottom line of the whole thing is, when you go back to ask me what people should do in places like Springfield, good God!
	Get to know your neighbors!
	Organize yourselves!
	You know, and I'll just tell people that I'm still miffed by the fact that we have twenty Some governors.
	They're Tinos.
	T-I-N-O's.
	Traditionalist in name only.
	They are politicians.
	I guess politicians.
	That's a dirty word to me, but... It just astounds me, living in Africa.
	The Africans were wonderful people.
	I loved going in the bush.
	I've eaten meals in their crawls, which are mud huts.
	Quite extensive ones, too.
	They're very caring people.
	I'm talking in generalities about tribes.
	They're very caring people.
	There's a few things we get to learn from them.
	They have their legal system.
	The country I was in, they controlled 80% of it in tribal trust funds.
	Their legal system has been passed down by voice and by action for thousands of years.
	Their legal system has No other precedent that overrides it.
	When you're dealing with the African situation of somebody possibly stealing someone's cow, they've got prescribed rules that they go by.
	They don't have, well so-and-so did this previously, and that has a precedent like we do in our court system.
	All that aside, and as good a people as they are, put them in the city, And bring them into your house, and they will literally stand up and straddle a sink, have watched it, and urinate in a sink.
	They don't have a concept of the civilization that we live in.
	Very, very much different.
	Good people, but when you bring these people, the diaspora of these people as slaves all over the world, Particularly in Brazil and Haiti, these tribal instincts from Africa have not left them.
	They're different.
	They have a different thought process.
	They have a different concept of time.
	Down in Mexico, you say, mañana, mañana, we'll do it tomorrow.
	In Africa, they don't even have that.
	They just can't think past the end of the day.
	And I'm not belittling them as people.
	I'm telling you, this is the way they are.
	I've had somebody said, Oh, you're a racist.
	No, I'm not a racist.
	I'm a realist.
	I said, you haven't been 500 miles from home.
	So don't start telling me about the rest of the world.
	I've lived in it.
	And of course, this person's educated, and they had books on this, and whatever.
	They had books on it, but they're not experiencing it.
	Well, anyway, that's the key thing.
	These people are different.
	It just shocks me.
	That they've moved, from what I understand, somewhere around 20,000 people into this sanctuary city of Springfield, Ohio, of 60,000 people.
	The majority of which, I guess, are black people there.
	And the black people are terribly upset with what's going on there.
	Well, you know, and that's the thing.
	When we look at it in the Bible, it doesn't make distinctions based on people's skin color.
	What it talks about is nations, tongues, and tribes.
	Languages, political borders, and culture.
	And the people, the black people who are Americans in Ohio, have a totally different culture than the people who are coming in from Haiti.
	And different religions, different norms, everything.
	But what they want to do, and the reason, it's another reason why I think it's so many people all at once, is because the government, our government, all of the Western governments want conflict and chaos.
	They want this clash of societies.
	They don't want to bring in one or two people.
	As a matter of fact, the young black woman who said something on Twitter, and it got retweeted by Elon Musk, and now pretty much everybody has seen it.
	But she said, my father came from Haiti in the 1950s.
	He's by himself, and basically, he was either a Christian or he became a Christian, but he was part of the culture, the religion in America.
	These people are being brought in and just dumped cold turkey, and there's no assimilation, there's no training.
	As a matter of fact, it's going the other way, as I pointed out.
	You got a guy with a story, he says, I don't want anybody that can only speak American.
	I want people who are going to speak English.
	I want people who are going to speak Creole or speak Spanish or whatever.
	If you only speak English, I can't hire you.
	You know, it's that type of thing.
	That's what they want to do.
	They want to create that kind of conflict and having people from different countries erasing the borders and then having a conflict over language, over culture and things like that.
	That's what they want because they want chaos.
	I think, uh, yes, I think in addition to that, I think they want to lower, uh, America down and mostly because we've been a very, very progressive nation.
	I think we've been used in wars.
	I'm totally against all of these wars we're getting in and I've been in wars and I've seen the bodies and the parts of bodies, uh, until people see that.
	They can wave the flag all they want, but they're not looking at the realism of what happens.
	These people born... I have a black nephew in my family.
	I love this kid.
	I won't go into his background, but he has a different sexuality, but he's one of my favorites.
	He's a good person.
	As much as it's a conflict, he's a Christian with his lifestyle.
	But the long and short of the thing is, is my sister got him out of a ghetto and raised him.
	Now, if you bring somebody over here, and I'm, Orientals, my family, brought over here, raised, they're totally different.
	You bring somebody that's in an adult age from a foreign country into this country, and that thought process that I talked about earlier, that's in them from their culture and their concept of time and their thought process, that comes with them, and it does not mesh.
	With what we think about in this country.
	They're on a totally different plane of thought than we are.
	Why do I know this?
	I lived with them.
	I talked to them.
	They're wonderful.
	I drank a lot of beer with the Africans.
	They had 7 day Chabuco beer.
	When I was a drinking man, I would sit around and drink with these guys.
	There might be a mouse floating in a 55 gallon drum of beer.
	You know, you just drank the stuff and it would kill anything anyway.
	But they're different, raised here, and different.
	And I welcome anybody into this country.
	I don't care what their color is.
	And I've learned that from my family.
	I do care about their ideology, and I do care about how they are to me and other people.
	Well, that's the culture, you know.
	Back in the late 90s, I was very concerned about the direction that America was going, especially when I looked at what happened with Waco and Ruby Ridge and things like that.
	It's like, you know, we need to have some kind of a backup plan and maybe even move.
	Yeah, maybe move out of the country.
	We went to New Zealand and even though, you know, English speaking and everything, we went down, we took a trip there.
	Everybody was very nice, but just realized I would never really fit into that culture.
	And so, you know, that's the type of thing that you should talk about when you immigrate as an adult.
	There's certain things that are just kind of ingrained, and they want to exploit that with these open borders.
	They want to bring people in in large groups so that we have a kind of anarchy.
	Anarchy is not that you don't have any orders, that you've got multiple power centers and multiple cultures that are fighting each other and all the rest of the stuff.
	That's what they do want.
	That's the way that they're going to control with a divide and a conquer.
	So, as you point out, the real issue Is knowing your neighbor, getting to, and you've got a lot of tips in your book about the pitfalls about that, you know, how to organize without making it look like you're some kind of a threat to the FBI, so they're going to try to set people up, or the other, just the, just general advice about when you start trying to put together people and organize people in a neighborhood.
	Right?
	Yeah, so one of the first things I say in the book is you are not a militia in organizing your neighborhood for self-defense.
	And I do it under what I call an Area Tactical Proactive Defense.
	I've got this all spelled out.
	It's in layman's terms.
	You read this and if you've got an understanding of what that is, you can implement it.
	People need to get to know their neighbors.
	Walk out of your house Tomorrow, Saturday, go over and bang on your neighbor's door and introduce yourself.
	That's a first start.
	And just tell them, look, you know, we've been living next to each other for five or 50 years or whatever.
	And most people just don't even know their neighbor.
	Get to know your neighbors and encourage them to get to know the neighbors.
	I can guarantee you the people in Springfield are probably doing something like this right now.
	I had a guy in Minneapolis wrote me a letter and told me that after they burned the commercial centers down next to him, They came into their neighborhood.
	One of them had a Molotov cocktail.
	Wow.
	Now that'll burn your house right down.
	It's very hard to put out.
	It's literally an aerosol bomb.
	Wow.
	And Molotov cocktails thrown into somebody's house.
	Get out of your house because it's going to burn down.
	You're not going to stop it without a fire department there.
	Get to know your neighbors.
	It's critically important.
	The second thing is, Get the family shotgun out of the closet.
	You're a neighborhood guardian to be out in the street, not just in front of your house, to keep people from coming down the street.
	You're not obstructing traffic in a situation like that.
	You're protecting your neighborhood.
	I know a lot of the legalities of this.
	I'm not an attorney, but in the book it'll give you the basic information for literally all 50 states.
	This is critical.
	People no longer do what cities were set up for.
	They walled in cities to not just because they're going to designate inside the wall is the commercial area.
	People formed by clans and tribes and race Whatever, but they walled the city in to protect against outsiders.
	And literally, that's what's going to have to happen in America again.
	I don't want to see walls, but you can have an individual with other people form an invisible defensive perimeter.
	You got to keep people out of your neighborhood.
	If they get into your neighborhood, you're done for.
	You cannot defend your house by yourself.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah, that's very true.
	And when you talk about the cities and everything, go back and look at the term outlaw, right?
	That was somebody that because of something that they had done, perhaps they were kind of ostracized by the protective community that you're talking about.
	They were outside the protection of the law.
	We don't think of it that way anymore.
	We think of it as somebody who violated, trespassed, committed some kind of a crime or something.
	But that was somebody who, for whatever reason, and it could be other reasons, was now outside the protection of that local community.
	And so that's the thing that we need to understand.
	We can't ship everything off to distant people who don't know our situation and don't care about our situation.
	And if we look at it carefully... They don't know how to ask.
	They can't run their own organizations if you're referring to the federal government.
	Yeah, and the federal government is what is the real problem.
	They're the ones who created the problem.
	Correct.
	We don't look to them for protection.
	Yeah, I read Michael Yan, you know who he is.
	Oh yeah.
	He had an interesting article he put out the other day about cannibalism.
	I know cannibalism went on in Africa.
	It was not widespread anymore amongst most of the tribes, because in the process of the colonials taking over, they brought a lot of missionaries in.
	Converted a lot of people to Christianity.
	It fell by the wayside.
	It still goes on though.
	In Africa, an albino, if you're black, born white or with blue eyes, you're a dead person because somebody will kidnap you and sell you.
	They recently had a guy in South Africa, a very, very wealthy guy that was caught buying a albino and also the pygmies.
	Which is a stunted growth Africa.
	And this goes on.
	Well, Michael Yan writes an article about it.
	He said these people in Springfield are going to see kids disappearing.
	There's just such a strong undercurrent in these illegals that are there that it's a danger to the entire society.
	It is.
	It is not us.
	Yeah, it's just a different culture, and yet, A lot of those things, like cannibalism and everything, they're really working pretty hard on trying to sell that to us in Hollywood.
	Again, the book is Civil Defense Manual.
	You can find it at CivilDefenseManual.com.
	Take a look at the examples.
	This is an excellent resource, and it is something that you need to think about.
	to prepare for your family for food for defense and many other things thank you so much for joining us Jack and I want to thank you David thank you and I want to thank Stella 39 thank you so much it is so important so we take on our children's pain as parents and I will pray for your family thank you so much for doing that folks have a great weekend hopefully we'll see you on Monday
	Let me tell you, the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears!
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now.
	Yeah!
	Good job!
	And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at TheDavidNightShow.com.

▲