Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 3, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:03:11

The David Knight Show - 09/03/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday the 3rd of September.
	Year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, things to guard for a couple of days off.
	We're back and we're going to begin with a grave mistake.
	Afghanistan.
	Arlington Cemetery.
	What was the mistake?
	Was the mistake a photo op?
	Was the mistake making an issue out of that?
	Or by either side?
	Or were there other mistakes that are far more consequential that are being missed?
	We're going to begin with that.
	We're going to take a look at the drug wars.
	Now, back in the headlines, thanks to Donald Trump, he's now supporting marijuana and the recreational use of it.
	Just not where he can smell it.
	Not in his backyard.
	We'll talk about the constitutional legal issues as well as the spiritual issues because it's not a law enforcement issue.
	And there isn't any constitutional authority for any of this.
	It's just amazing all over the place on these issues.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Well as I said, I want to thank guard for a couple of days off really needed some time off and And, uh, as always does a great job, great guests, uh, very informative show.
	And, uh, thank you also to all of you who support the program, especially to the love of the road.
	Thank you for the matching donation.
	Uh, we've gotten up to 82%.
	Uh, so that was good for the month.
	Um, we didn't quite make it, but, um, you know, things have been.
	Things have been kind of difficult for us, and I went back tracking what happened with our podcasts, and I can trace it back to when I put in the title that the pharmaceutical companies were murderers.
	At that point, my podcast got cut in half.
	And they've not recovered and it's still, it's still popping around, but the podcast got cut in half because of that.
	What they did was, um, the host that we have, uh, said a complaint has been received.
	Now I had been on this for, um, well, coming up, we just had our seventh anniversary, seven years of podcasting, one complaint.
	Who would it be that can make one complaint and get you taken down?
	Well, of course, that complainer would be the federal government, right?
	Same thing I've seen before with YouTube.
	You know, just a complaint has been received.
	They sent that to me 8,000 times over a couple months without ever responding to me.
	They just kept sending it every few minutes for a couple of months.
	And I had it rerouted into a file so I could see what the total count was going to be.
	I didn't want to just block them.
	But, yeah, just kept sending that same message again.
	So, who is it that can make one complaint and get you taken down without any explanation, without any appeal?
	Now, the interesting thing about it was that they took us down on a Friday.
	I didn't realize it was down.
	I brought it back up on a Monday after Four Love of the Road contacted us and said, hey, you realize it's down?
	And so we got it back for Monday's broadcast.
	But then what they did, and I didn't realize it for another couple of weeks, They stopped after they restored the podcast.
	They didn't restart the podcast being sent out to other people.
	And so when I saw that it was down, I fixed that.
	And I thought that would take care of the problem.
	And quite frankly, so busy with other stuff, I didn't go back and look at the metrics.
	I don't try not to get caught up in metrics in terms of audience or dollars or cents or whatever, because I don't want that to control what I have to say.
	You know, you start looking at that, you start looking over your shoulder.
	Well, what are people going to think if I say this?
	Um, I knew, I knew this was going to be a tough year because of the election.
	And it's going to get a lot tougher these next couple of months because now people are making their final purchasing decision for the presidential American Idol reality TV show.
	That pageant, the presidential pageant.
	American Idol.
	Who are you going to vote for, for the finals?
	And at this point, you know, everything leading up to it, you know, people are saying, well, I'm going to go for this third party candidate, or I'm going to go for this independent, or I'm, you know, whatever.
	But then they jump into this lesser of two evils.
	And once they make that decision, then they start making all kinds of excuses for Trump.
	Since I'm talking to a conservative audience, that's what happens.
	They start making all kinds of excuses for Donald Trump.
	Well, you know, he's not Kamala Harris.
	That's true.
	He's not.
	They'll come after you in a different way.
	They're both your enemy, and neither of them has a solution.
	The solution is to be found locally.
	The solution is to be found individually.
	You, your family, your community, your state, that's where the solutions are.
	And the solutions for the most part are blocking out the federal government.
	That's not going to happen with either Lala or Trump.
	Both of them have a long list of activist programs that they want to hector you with.
	And I mean hector you with.
	It's going to be nuisance about this and about that.
	They want to micromanage everything in your life.
	They don't want to get government out of your life.
	They want to put more government into your life.
	And people are supporting that because they want more government against those people they don't like on the other side.
	That's how we got here.
	And they put their hope in Trump.
	And they think that if we don't have Trump, the conservatives, and I'm seeing this over and over again from outlets that I used to respect, that if we don't have Trump, it's going to be a civil war.
	The entire magazine cover of the new American.
	It's about, well, when is it right for us to attack government?
	And should we do this?
	And it's getting to be pretty intolerable.
	That's an inevitable conclusion if you think that this is the most important election of all time, which you hear every four years.
	And if you think that your future depends on Trump being in the White House and Lala being out of the White House, then you're going to, out of desperation, Desperation out of this narrative of fear that is being pushed by conservative media.
	You're going to be ripe for another January the 6th betrayal.
	And that's what it was.
	It was a betrayal.
	Don't fall for that again.
	That's why I talk about this.
	I talk about Trump so that you don't put your hope in Trump.
	If your hope is in Trump, you are hopeless.
	You're a hopeless case.
	You don't know how the game works.
	You don't know who's running the government.
	You don't have any understanding of what happened in the last four years.
	Nothing.
	Nothing.
	So, let's take a look.
	There was a grave mistake made.
	So what was the mistake?
	Who made it?
	Was it Trump or la la?
	Trump releases a statement from gold star families.
	Harris's disgracefully twisted Trump cemetery visit into a political ploy.
	Well, Trump was doing a political ploy as well, wasn't he?
	On the anniversary of the 13 deaths.
	And again, it was at the very beginning of the Biden administration, 2021.
	Uh, all of the casualties in the Biden administration, uh, happened on that one day.
	As they were retreating from Afghanistan.
	It was a disorderly, disorganized, incompetent bug out.
	And Biden owns that.
	And he owns the death of these 13 people.
	That is absolutely for sure.
	But what about the thousands of people that died before that?
	Under Obama and Biden?
	What about that?
	What about the people that died under Trump?
	How many people do you think died under Trump?
	Why did they die?
	What were they doing?
	Why were we still there?
	And so, both of them are using this as a political ploy.
	Trump released a statement from Gold Star Families of the 13 fallen U.S.
	service members who were killed in that retreat.
	And the families wrote in their joint statement that Lala's statement labeling Trump's visit to Arlington National Cemetery to take part in a wreath-laying ceremony to honor the family's lost loved ones and fallen service members a political stunt, that's what she called it.
	They said that's false, hypocritical, and disrespectful.
	And of course, the Biden administration and Lala have absolutely no respect.
	They don't even pretend.
	Trump at least pretends.
	But if he had any respect, he would have brought the servicemen home and ended the war in Afghanistan before Biden ever took office, wouldn't he?
	So it depends.
	Do you want the guy that pretends to have respect for the soldiers?
	Or do you want the people who just are out front saying we don't have respect for them at all?
	Who's more dangerous, by the way?
	Is it the enemy that you know or the enemy that you don't know?
	Somebody who will send you off to die in war and then tell you you're a great American and how much we love you even though there was no reason for it?
	Oh, there was a reason.
	But not a reason for those of us who live in America.
	There was a reason for the American Empire to do that.
	Not for you to go.
	So in the statement, the families added that Harris had disgracefully twisted this sacred moment into a political ploy.
	We, the families of the brave service members who were tragically killed at the Abbey Gate bombing, are appalled by Vice President Lala's recent attempts to politicize Trump's visit to Arlington National Cemetery.
	Trump was invited by us.
	Here's what one of them had to say.
	Vice President Harris, my name is Christy Shamblin.
	My daughter-in-law, Sergeant Nicole Leanne Gee, was killed in the Afghanistan exit at Abbey Gate on August 26, 2021.
	This year, for the third year anniversary of her murder, we welcome President Donald J. Trump to Arlington to lay a wreath on the tomb of the unknown soldier with our family and to visit Nicole Graveside.
	President Trump and his team were respectful.
	They listened to our stories and didn't talk much at all.
	We welcomed them that day and they were comfort to our family.
	Vice President Harris, I ask you, why won't you return a call and explain to us how you call my daughter-in-law's death a success?
	Vice President Harris, why will you not express your condolences yourself?
	Why have we never heard from you?
	And finally, why would you take a day where we celebrated the death of our loved one and use it to disparage not only them, but us?
	President Trump has called, President Trump shows up, and President Trump takes the time To hear our loved ones' stories.
	Why won't you do the same?
	So, Trump called.
	He heard their stories.
	He showed up.
	And we had George W. Bush visit soldiers who had survived in the hospital.
	For a war that was unnecessary.
	For a war that he put us into.
	Based on lies from the CIA.
	Based on torture that the CIA had conducted.
	Does that make it better?
	Is it okay to send somebody to a useless war, kill and maim them, and then come around and pretend that you're sympathetic about this?
	You don't have any sympathy for these people if you're creating wars for no reason at all.
	Stop the phony BS.
	Yes, Harris killed my son, said one gold star.
	Yes, she did.
	She did.
	Biden did.
	Trump did.
	They all had a hand in it.
	Let's get over this partisanship here.
	Let's understand that we want to have the peace and we want to be left alone.
	Oh, well, it was Biden who mandated the vaccines.
	I knew better than to take it.
	It's on you if you took it.
	Trump just pushed this poison out there and told everybody is the greatest solution.
	But if you believed him, that's on you, but he's going to save us, that type of thing.
	Well, I tell you, talk about, you know, Trump derangement of the left over Trump's personality.
	How about Trump delusion of the MAGA tards?
	And they are tards.
	It's unbelievable.
	There was no orderly withdrawal because we lost that war.
	And long after, you know, we went there because supposedly they were the ones who started 9-11.
	Who did 9-11?
	Our own government did 9-11!
	Why did we go to Afghanistan in the first place?
	Because it was necessary to cover up the lie.
	And because they had other designs on this and that's why they said we're not ever going to leave.
	I reported on this a decade ago.
	You had American military leadership, the CIA, the Pentagon, the real government that you don't get to vote for in this empire.
	They said we're never leaving Afghanistan.
	Why?
	Well, the Taliban had gotten the worldwide supply of opioid down to only about 10% of it coming from Afghanistan.
	Under the leadership of the CIA, we got that up to over 90% every year.
	Record crops every year.
	Because the CIA is the biggest pusher of drugs and wars and torture and the rest of this.
	And so they were staying for the opioid material.
	And of course we had an opioid epidemic here.
	I wonder if there's any connection.
	I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
	And then you have the lithium that's there.
	Massive stores of lithium.
	And there may be some geopolitical reasons for them to have troops positioned there in regards to other countries.
	But look, we didn't have a dog in that fight.
	Not you and I. Not the American people.
	Unless we had family members who are in the military who are being used and abused by Biden and by Obama and by Trump and by Harris because they don't have any respect for anything.
	No more respect for these people than Kissinger did.
	He treats them like animals.
	He referred to them as animals.
	Expendable animals.
	Because, you know, you're not essential.
	Not essential.
	Their plans, your business, your life, your plans are not essential to them.
	They're in the way.
	Got to shut you down, like they did in 2020, like Trump said in 2020.
	You're not essential.
	Hillary thinks you're deplorable.
	Trump thinks you're not essential.
	The real government, the government that you don't vote for, the empire, wanted a permanent presence there in Afghanistan.
	So Trump didn't shut the war down.
	And so then on Meet the Press yesterday, we had Tom Cotton.
	And he was criticizing Lala for not meeting with the people whose family members had been sacrificed for the geopolitics and the drug wars of our empire.
	And so he criticized Lala.
	And then you have the Meet the Press show, Kristen Welker, who runs NBC's Meet the Press now.
	Uh, she lied to cover up for Lala Harris.
	She said, no, she met with the gold star families of the troops in Afghanistan.
	No, she never did.
	Never did.
	But isn't it interesting that Tom Cotton would make such a big deal out of this because you know, there's probably no bigger warmonger anywhere except for Lindsey Graham.
	Then Tom Cotton, this guy's got blood on his hands.
	Tom Cotton.
	Yeah, never saw a war that he didn't want to get us involved in, just like Lindsey Graham.
	And then, when people get killed, he pretends to care.
	A little bit too late that time.
	Tell us why we're there first.
	That's what you're supposed to do in the Constitution.
	And so if we go back and look at the casualty figures, from Obama, which was the 2009 through 2016, that was the mass of people who were killed in Afghanistan.
	Far more than in previous years.
	In 2001, of course, they went there in the end of the year, 11 people, but in all of 2002, 49 people.
	That was, you know, the big war that was happening.
	But by the time we got to Obama, and we had McChrystal, and we had Petraeus, and they're going to do their surges, the surge, right?
	The surge, just like Fauci, right?
	Be careful when they start talking about surge, what they mean is mass murder of Americans, typically.
	So at that point in time, it started getting up in the just about almost 500 a couple of years there during the Obama administration.
	Then during the Trump administration, people continued to die in Afghanistan as he continued to stay there.
	Americans continued to die.
	And so during Trump's four years, we had 65 people die.
	people die. So that is a little bit more than the 13 that died in the first and that is it left on average per year right?
	And, um...
	But we don't pay any attention to that.
	Did Trump lay any wreaths on those 65 graves of people who died because he didn't end the war in Afghanistan?
	It's all about the photo op, folks.
	This entire presidential campaign is all about the photo op.
	And we're the ones who make a grave mistake when we forget the issues, when we forget and excuse what these people have done on both sides.
	They both got blood on their hands.
	One of them pretends to care.
	The other one doesn't even pretend to care.
	Oh, is that going to be the difference?
	You're fine if people get killed as long as Trump pretends to care.
	Is that okay?
	Well, that's some consolation, isn't it?
	It's amazing.
	So, um, yeah, big, uh, big surge under Obama.
	Uh, we could call it the old Biden administration.
	And, uh, 1,752 people died over those eight years.
	Most of them during the sage stuff.
	Uh, and then it dropped down.
	Um, last year, Obama was in office.
	10 people died.
	Um, it got up to 498 in 2010, but in 2016, 10 people died, continued to die.
	Uh, 15 people died under Trump in 2017, then 16, then 23, then 11 every year.
	15 people died under Trump in 2017, then 16, then 23, then 11.
	Every year, there were 15, 16 people that died under Trump.
	But the 13 who died under Biden, they want to make that a political issue.
	It is a political issue.
	Because this war was about geopolitics.
	It wasn't about defending America.
	America wasn't threatened.
	We didn't have Afghans fly planes into these buildings.
	They collapsed.
	We had two planes and three steel buildings just collapsed into their own footprint after a couple of hours.
	Seriously?
	You believe that?
	Then maybe you believe that Trump is the good guy in all this stuff as well.
	He and Rudy Giuliani, 9-11 Rudy, who was involved in the cover-up of 9-11.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Before we go, I just saw Travis put this up on Rockfan.
	Brian and Deb McCartney could use some prayers.
	Brian's sister passed away Sunday morning.
	Second sibling he has lost in less than two months.
	I am so sorry to hear that.
	I'm so sorry.
	I don't know, certainly don't understand, know what is behind it, but regardless, it's the loss of a sibling, and I'm so sorry to hear that.
	But you are both Christians, and so I hope you have that hope in Christ as Christians.
	And I just pray that God will give you peace and all of that.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let me go over some emails that I received over the last few days.
	This one is from Dave who says, well here's a U.S.
	progress in setting things up for people to be able to mark themselves when the time comes.
	Homeland Security is looking at biometric agenda.
	Of course they are.
	Every government on earth is doing the same thing at exactly the same time.
	They're all looking at biometric stuff.
	They're all looking at IDs.
	It's just the question is, what excuse are they going to use?
	Is it going to be an emergency?
	Or it's just, well, we've got to have it because of this chaos that we've caused.
	We've got open borders, so now we need to have IDs in order to get jobs or to vote.
	That'll be from the Republican side.
	From the other side, well, we've got to have IDs because we need to be able to track extremists like you.
	Of course, there's so many different excuses that they can make, but they want an ID for everything.
	To tag and to track us like cattle.
	It says that Trump and Vance seem best equipped to delude and oversee the implementation of these technocratic projects, in my opinion.
	Yeah, because, you know, like I said, both sides have got all kinds of excuses.
	You know, we need to, on the left, they've got to control the amount of fuel that we use and the amount of carbon we consume in terms of food and energy and clothing and housing and all the rest.
	Every activity's got to be tracked and so forth.
	Oh, we've got to be tracked because of disease or this or that.
	And then on the right, they've got their own excuses.
	So, who's going to resist this?
	Well, the Christians would, unless it's Trump in Vance.
	And then, of course, we'll be told by the clergy that tell us that no good Christian is going to vote against Trump.
	And I'm not saying to vote against Trump.
	I'm not telling you who to vote for.
	I don't care.
	Frankly, I don't care.
	Between Trump and Lala, I could not care less.
	You need to pay attention to your local and state elections and pay attention to your life.
	Start making provisions for your life.
	Understand where the threats are coming from and they're going to be a little bit different threat depending on which one of these people is selected by the people who choose.
	You're not choosing the president, so wake up!
	You never choose the president.
	They're chosen by the real government as a puppet, spokesperson that is out there.
	You don't have any more choice over who the president is going to be than you do who the White House spokesperson is going to be, because that's what the president is.
	So the White House spokesperson for the empire.
	And then of course, that person has a spokesperson.
	Do you really think that Biden is running the country?
	You really think the president is running the country?
	You think that Biden has been running the country for the last three or four years?
	Come on, you know that he's not running the country.
	He spent 40% of his time in office on vacation, and then 60% of it trying to figure out where he is in the White House.
	I mean, he's absolutely out of it.
	That's the one good thing about the Biden administration.
	Well, two good things.
	People realize that Biden is coming after them, and so they push back, and they resist, and they refuse to comply.
	When Trump is there, oh, well, yeah, I know, he's a Republican, and he's a, you know, he's a Republican, he's a Democrat, but they think he's a Republican.
	And you got people like Alex Jones, and you got Mark Levin, and you got all of the talking heads, Glenn Beck, everybody on the right, Tucker Carlson telling you, oh, yeah, he's on your side.
	Okay, well, good, he's just playing 4D chess.
	It looks like he's betraying me, but that's just 4D chess.
	That's just to confuse the bad people.
	When he does this kind of stuff.
	He's actually still on my side.
	He's just a secret supporter of ours.
	Right?
	And so that's how these people run this thing through.
	So it just depends.
	Right?
	I think what they want is a civil war and unrest.
	They want open borders for that.
	They want contested elections.
	People who feel they've been disenfranchised.
	They want that kind of frustration.
	And so the question is, who better to give it to them?
	And I can't predict the election because I don't know the mind of these people and how they plan on using this stuff.
	I just know that, you know, if it's Trump and Vince, the Christians will lie down and they'll do what they're told, just like they were told by so many Christian leaders in 2020.
	Do what you're told.
	Stay away from church.
	Stay home.
	Don't come in.
	We don't want to meet together.
	You know, all things.
	Christians don't want to die, right?
	We don't want to do anything that could kill us, because who knows what would happen then, right?
	You have no confidence in your religion?
	So he says, I believe it will become the biblical mark of the beast once it's globally interoperable, globally mandated, that we have to obediently submit to the anti-Christian values of the global state, present our biometric right hand, or forehead, our face and eyes, our biometrics.
	In order to be approved for making financial transactions?
	Yeah, I think so.
	And isn't it interesting?
	Isn't it interesting?
	Why would anybody think 2,000 years ago, some guy's exiled on an island, where would he come up with this kind of a scheme?
	It's almost like it's a prophecy or something, you know?
	It's like, where did he come up with this?
	It truly is amazing and people can't see it.
	Truly is amazing.
	Handy.
	Handy says masks are back in Atlanta.
	He said, just a quick update from Atlanta.
	He said, I visited the second hospital system in my area to reinstate mask mandates.
	The Emory hospital system was the last to relinquish their mask mandate the last time.
	Now they're the first hospital system here to bring back the man's mask mandates because he works in EMS and.
	They mandate that he put a mask on to bring sick people in and put a mask on the sick people, too.
	Today, he said, I noticed that the Children's Health Care of Atlanta has followed suit.
	Both of their main campuses are practically neighbors with the CDC, which is headquartered in Atlanta.
	He said, you think it's a coincidence that those two hospital systems would be the first to mandate masks again?
	Probably not.
	And he says, I'm still seeing younger people.
	By the way, he sent some pictures of what it looks like here.
	There's the masking policy.
	We're seeing an increase in very sick kids and teens.
	Help limit the spread of illness.
	All visitors over the age of two required to wear a mask in our urgent cares and emergency departments.
	There you go.
	So he's got to wear, um, Any hospital or medical facility that tells you that a mask is going to help prevent the spread of illness has just disqualified themselves.
	They don't understand anything about medicine or science.
	They're about making money, and they're about complying with government orders.
	They're not about science.
	They're not about medicine.
	Then this, there's another one.
	Masks are required.
	Due to the rise in respiratory viruses, masks are required for patients and visitors over the age of two.
	And yet another one.
	Health alert for our visitors!
	Mask up!
	And they have the instructions in English and Spanish.
	Isn't that nice?
	It is nice not to see that here in Tennessee.
	It's almost, you get to the point, at first it was a shock to come to an area where all the signs were in English, in English only.
	And then you start to go back and see some of these, and that's just in Atlanta, English and Spanish.
	Now we need to have a language that is the official language.
	Nevertheless, he says, I'm seeing younger people with cancer, still seeing people with new and unexplained cardiac problems, and still have the occasional sudden death.
	Sudden adult death syndrome.
	As a matter of fact, you know, when we talk about the masks, there was an article, mainstream article, oh, we got a mask and it can measure all kinds of diseases and stuff, you know, it gets trapped in the mask.
	And it's like, yeah, that's what we've been telling you.
	It doesn't really, you're eliminating waste, right?
	That's why we call them a face diaper.
	It's why people get a diaper rash on their face when they wear this, because they're dirty.
	Your body eliminates waste through your breath and your speaking and that type of thing, just like it eliminates waste in the areas where you would normally use a diaper.
	Politicians and diapers need to be changed frequently and for the same reason.
	And so do masks.
	Change the politicians and wonder which one of them is going to put a mask on us.
	It's like musical chairs or Russian roulette.
	Which one of these guys is more likely to put a mask on me?
	Rock band.
	Actually, none of them.
	I never complied with any of this.
	And that's the point.
	You know, it is the hill to die on.
	The hill to die on is not in Washington, D.C.
	The hill to die on is not Capitol Hill on January the 6th.
	That's as Alex was telling everybody.
	He told me the hill to die on was not to argue with my dentist who was going to require me to wear a mask to come in so I could work on my open mouth, shooting air and water and everything flying all over the place, you know, out of my mouth.
	You're worried about what's in my mouth?
	Well, just wait.
	But, you know, that was the hill to die on.
	The individual little hills to die on, to fight that stuff.
	So he's telling me that.
	In a couple of months he's telling everybody, go die on Capitol Hill.
	I'll be there with you.
	I'll be coming soon, OK?
	Just you guys go ahead.
	I'll be there shortly, says Trump.
	And says, Alex, as they run to the other side of Washington.
	Rock fans, Psalm 144.
	Thank you for the tip.
	I got my biometric tracking implanted this morning and all I have to say about it is moo.
	Glad you're back and fired up, David.
	God bless you and your family.
	Thank you very much.
	On Rumble, Stealth Patriot, thank you as well.
	With every proposal, every piece of legislation, and every executive order, no matter how good it sounds at the time, I usually have to ask myself only one question.
	How can this be used against me?
	Yes, that's right.
	And unfortunately, because of this Hegelian fight that they have built up with us, We only typically look at the people who are caught up in this election, caught up in this political party stuff.
	There's a, well, how can this be used against my opponent?
	These are the same people who just celebrate and do happy dances.
	Whenever the other side gets owned as they put it over something, right?
	Oh, look at this.
	We really exposed them.
	We really called them out.
	We really tripped them or whatever.
	You know, they get so excited about that.
	And it's like, and how exactly does that help you?
	Does that make a difference in your life, does it really?
	Oh yeah, well it helps our side to win!
	Okay, your side wins, and then what happens?
	I'm sorry, I've been around this thing for far too long.
	I've seen Republicans win, I've seen Republicans lose.
	I've seen Democrats win, I've seen Democrats lose.
	And it always just means more government.
	In different ways, yes, but it always means more government.
	So, Burning Man.
	This was sent by Sam.
	He said, yeah, so what's happening at Burning Man?
	Well, you know, are they worried about their private jets?
	Of course not.
	Unfortunately, Burning Man, they're not even worried about their private parts, let alone their private jets.
	I couldn't believe it when I was at InfoWars and a couple of people went to that thing.
	It's like, you went to that?
	Are you kidding me?
	That's, I won't name any names there, but one of them was pretty high up.
	It was like, man, I actually talked to some people.
	I can't verify this stuff is true, but it certainly does ring true to me.
	I talked to somebody, a couple of Christians who were reporters and documentary filmmakers and stuff.
	They went to Burning Man to document what was going on there, and they said that they were told there was this tent over there.
	They said, yeah, you can't go over there.
	That's a bunch of billionaires, and they're coming in from Silicon Valley, and they're doing DMT, and they're getting tech tips.
	From the metal, what they call them, the metal elves, metallic elves, you know, the people see when they do DMT.
	It's like, yeah, man, I went to this alternate universe and I met these demons, or maybe they were helping me with technology.
	And it's pretty much the same experience that all these people are having.
	Which got a lot of these people to say, maybe this is something that's real.
	Maybe we should investigate this.
	And so they're actually trying to do some, I don't know, I'm followed up on this, that's It's not my thing, really, but they were going to start having people do this and document it and, you know, interact with the elves and all this other kind of stuff that they met.
	And they actually called themselves Psychonauts.
	Not nuts.
	Nuts.
	Psychonauts is what we would call them.
	They called themselves Psychonauts, as in an astronaut.
	N-A-U-T-S.
	And, you know, they're going to this other reality, this other plane, meeting these spiritual beings, they said.
	Yeah, well, you know, test the spirits to see what they're from.
	And I wouldn't be surprised at all if they were downloading tech from these people, the billionaires, of course.
	What about their carbon footprints?
	Yeah, what about it when they burn these things?
	Does that matter to anybody?
	Of course it doesn't.
	And then this from Will.
	He says, the media is working overtime to strike and paralyze the American public with fear.
	He said, just think about what we've seen over the last few weeks as a summary.
	We got mosquito transmitted disease, so they say.
	If the bugs don't kill you, the spraying will.
	We got a listeria outbreak at Boar's Head.
	And I got more information about that as well.
	What's really behind that?
	Bird flu and cows, monkey pox, weather events.
	Whatever the weather is, it's your fault.
	You're eating too much meat, you're eating dairy, and you got a car.
	Of course the weather's bad.
	I'm just thinking if you brought back somebody like Mark Twain and these people, he would just have a blast looking at this stuff, first of all.
	I couldn't even make this stuff up.
	Used to say, everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.
	Well, they do now.
	They talk about weather and then they punish us for it.
	You know, they think of, well, okay, look at this.
	I've got weather.
	That means that I can do this to you now.
	You know, that type of thing.
	Airline travel issues.
	Everything is failing.
	Yeah.
	That's another whole issue.
	Break down a society and that's intentional.
	The war in Ukraine and Gaza, all under false narratives and pretenses.
	We're actually in World War III.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	We, I would add to the list, the migrant anarchy.
	We're going to talk about that in a moment too.
	Uh, and then this, um, as we come back, we're going to talk a little bit about the drug war.
	Uh, this is from JT and, uh, so we're going to take a quick break.
	And when we come back, we're going to talk about the drug war.
	Stay with us, we'll be right back.
	This is a test.
	Thanks for watching....Please Subscribe and Thumbs Up
	Thanks for watching!
	the
	Making Sense. Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let me say just before we get back into the news, talking about the drug war, what's happening with that.
	This was from Don in Australia.
	And Victoria, Australia.
	He says, as a longtime contributor via Subscribestar, I've often heard you mention I can listen to your podcast without ads there.
	Given that I have had enough of the interruptions during your broadcast, I would like to take advantage of the ad-free service.
	Unfortunately, I have no idea how to do this.
	Could you please point me to the information that allows this to happen?
	Yeah, let me explain what's going on, especially, first of all, for the Subscribestar people.
	We really do appreciate your support.
	And even at the lowest level, $5 a month, that's a lot more than we would make out of ad revenue if you listened to every minute of every ad throughout the month.
	And so, what we do is we also have a link.
	Each day, we put on Subscribestar a description.
	We have the same description that's in the time codes and all the different topics and everything.
	It's in the description for the show.
	Because some places will attenuate that, depending on how many characters they allow.
	And so we put that there, the subjects as well as the time code.
	And then we have links to the different places it is on video.
	So we have links to Rumble.
	I think we got a link to the Rumble with a subtitle.
	We have a link to Odyssey, to BitChute.
	And then we have, for the people on Subscribestar, a link to the audio podcast that is ad-free.
	Because those other podcasts, except for Rumble, I don't think the other podcast put any ads on anything.
	Now, Rumble does put that on.
	We don't make any revenue from that.
	That's just Rumble covering their charges, their expenses, I guess.
	But the podcast, hopefully, we've got a lot of ads that get put in.
	That varies a great deal from month to month, depending on what advertisers are buying.
	You know, they buy it through iHeart, so we don't have any control over that, really, or what they put on.
	But we do make available a broadcast that does not have ads in it.
	And again, when we put the time codes in for the podcast, they're kind of approximate and we can't really tell because we don't know how many ads are going to be filling into the different slots.
	We don't know how long those ads are going to be.
	So what we do is we put the time codes in there for something that doesn't have any ads.
	And, uh, so it's, it's pretty close for those, but, um, once the ad you're listening to a podcast, it's got the ads in it.
	They're going to be all over the place and they get inserted automatically.
	We tried to put them in, uh, close to where I took breaks, but then things get shifted anyway.
	And so, um, now we just let them.
	Make their best guess effort.
	So that's what's happening.
	If it breaks in the middle of something that I'm saying it thanks because I pause for a moment that I'm stopping.
	But yeah, you can for the people who are on subscribe star and we really do appreciate that.
	We don't do enough.
	I think to acknowledge the people on subscribe star, but that really is a core base.
	of our funding, and we do appreciate that.
	We're trying to think of things that we could do.
	So if you've got some ideas of things that you would like to see that we could do, if it's possible for us to make something available, we'd like to do more for the people on Subscribestar.
	But all of them have access to the podcast without any ads in it, and you'd be able to, in a video format, get it without ads, I think, on BitChute and on Odyssey.
	Is that right, Travis?
	Um, he doesn't know I haven't, but I don't think they put ads on it, but we do have the audio podcast without ads.
	And we have a link and we put that there every day at the top of the entry there on subscribe star.
	And then at the end of the week, I upload the articles that we have gone through over the week.
	So you have access to all of those, the full list.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Do that at the end of the week.
	And so that's the, I send Travis every day, I send him articles.
	And so he puts them all up at the end of the week as kind of a recap.
	If you want to go back and find the sources, because we had a lot of people say, you know, this show, such and such show, you, you talked about this or that.
	And so he, he puts them up and they're kind of roughly organized by topic and by day, right?
	Cause you put up the same thing I send you.
	So, let's talk a little bit about this from JT Wright.
	He says, Trump wants to execute all drug dealers and go to war with Mexico.
	That's what he said in the Pennsylvania rally.
	He's going to arrest anyone who's ever touched narcotics, illegal narcotics, and create a new blitzkrieg economy using slave labor in prison camps.
	He's excited about that.
	As a matter of fact, it's...
	He's all over the place.
	Basically, you don't know what he's going to do, but I'll just tell you this.
	Whatever he does, good or bad, it's for DHS, it's for your benefit.
	So just trust him, right?
	Yeah.
	So here he is in Pennsylvania rally on Saturday talking about the death penalty for drugs.
	They kill 500 people during a lifetime?
	And I think it's much worse than that.
	I think that's only what we hear about.
	It would stop.
	If you didn't get it down 75, 80, 90 percent from day one, I'd be surprised.
	And these committees that they set up, it's laughable.
	It's a horrible thing.
	We would solve that problem so fast.
	And I'm calling on Republicans and Democrats I'm all for that.
	I would like to see Albert Borla of Pfizer given the death penalty because he kills a lot more than 500 people a year.
	A lot more.
	that. I would like to see Albert Borla of Pfizer given the death penalty because he kills a lot more than 500 people a year. A lot more. That big beautiful vaccine would have never happened without what I did. Look at this.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Take it, take my poison.
	It's like the wicked witch.
	Yeah, it's my pretty.
	It's just, that's Trump out there holding out the, the wonderful Apple, this miracle of science.
	It's a moon shot.
	I tell you.
	Yeah, it is very much like the moon shot, isn't it?
	So when I talk about drug dealers, don't want to talk about these drug dealers that he put in charge of HHS cartel leader, actually kind of CEO.
	Yeah, when you work for El Chapo, they confiscate your assets.
	When you work for Pfizer, they just stuff your bank account with money.
	Yeah, it's amazing.
	Trump repeats an urban legend by invoking fentanyl-laced marijuana as well.
	This is Reason Magazine, Jacob Sullum.
	And he says, okay, okay.
	So he does acknowledge the dangers created by prohibition, and he does use that as a starting point to say, I'm going to vote for legalization of marijuana in Florida.
	Recreational use of marijuana.
	He wants legalized.
	But don't smoke around him.
	Not in public places.
	We'll still be able to arrest you with the police if you smoke in public places.
	But then he repeats this tired urban legend of fentanyl-laced marijuana.
	It's always about fear, and yet the truth that he hits on is the fact that prohibition, besides corrupting the police, besides corrupting the courts, besides failing to do anything, prohibition whether you're talking about alcohol, drugs, guns, you name it, whatever you want to prohibit, You create a monopoly for organized crime.
	You create corruption for all the law enforcement and justice system because it's very easy for them to look at this and say, well, these people wanted it.
	A lot of people say a victimless crime, and I understand there's victims from addiction.
	Families are victims.
	People who were killed by somebody who's a drunk driver, for example.
	You know, drunkenness is not a victimless crime.
	But we had that experiment once, and we actually did it in a way that respected the Constitution, and it failed.
	And we learned a lot from that, except we haven't applied those lessons to the failed War on drugs has now been going for 53 years.
	A much bigger failure.
	And a failure that has created much more concentrated forms of recreational drugs than we ever had before.
	And created much bigger drug cartels.
	I mean, the cartels in Mexico that he wants to go to war with, they are actually getting military equipment and all the rest of this stuff.
	Because it just, it's like Al Capone on steroids.
	Because that's exactly what it is.
	Al Capone would have had armored cars and tanks and going up and down the streets of Chicago if they would have kept this going for 50, 60 years, whoever seceded him.
	Explaining his opposition to legal marijuana a couple of years ago, Marco Rubio warned that black market weed is laced with fentanyl.
	When Trump invoked fentanyl-laced marijuana on Saturday, his logic made a lot more sense.
	He cited that hazard as a reason to support Amendment 3, a Florida ballot initiative that would recognize recreational marijuana in that state.
	Both arguments suffered from the same flaw.
	Fentanyl-laced marijuana is an imaginary threat.
	And we know that's the case.
	How do we know?
	Well, in Reason, they talk about the economics of it, because, you know, they're all about economics.
	Illicit market weed sells for anywhere from $5 to $30 a gram in most states.
	Fentanyl is worth about $40 per 25-microgram patch, the low-end dosage for a cancer patient treating severe pain.
	A pure gram of fentanyl is worth up to $200.
	So in a best case economic scenario, the drug dealer would be losing $10 on every sale.
	Worst case, they'd be poisoning their loyal customers and wasting fentanyl that they could sell for much more at a much lower volume.
	See, it doesn't make any economic sense, but of course you think that Rubio and Trump Doing economic analysis?
	Frankly, I wouldn't have known what the economics of this stuff are either, but reason does.
	They've got connections with people.
	This is actually a figure that came from a writer for a publication called Leafly, which I imagine is about marijuana.
	So what Trump said is someone should not be a criminal in Florida for possessing marijuana when this is legal in so many other states.
	Is that the yardstick for this?
	Is that how we determine it?
	So if it's legal in a lot of other states, then it shouldn't be illegal in Florida.
	Okay, well fine.
	Is he going to apply that to abortion?
	When he talks about abortion, he doesn't want it as a federal issue, and I don't want it as a federal issue because it is...
	Constitutionally and pragmatically a big issue.
	It's a losing issue constitutionally and in terms of saving lives.
	That's a failing issue to make it a federal case.
	But when he talks about it, he doesn't talk about it that way.
	He's not, he doesn't care about saving lives and he certainly doesn't care about the Constitution saving it.
	And so Trump will always say, well, you know, well, I have every state should be able to do their own thing.
	Well, now what he's saying is, well, if it's legal for marijuana and other states and We need to make it legal here.
	And then he says, besides these arrests are, quote, ruining lives and wasting taxpayer dollars.
	You can say that about the entire war on drugs, can't you?
	He said, no one should grieve a loved one because they died from fentanyl-laced marijuana.
	And so that's, you know, that got Reason upset.
	So yeah, it doesn't make any economic sense.
	That is totally, total nonsense.
	But of course, the war on drugs doesn't make any sense if your purpose is to stop people from taking this stuff.
	See, the problem is, though, it's not a government issue.
	It's not a law enforcement issue.
	It is a spiritual issue.
	It is a medical issue.
	If you will, if you're a secularist, it's a psychological issue.
	But it's not a law enforcement issue.
	And we've got 53 years to prove it, don't we?
	Doesn't matter how much they ramp this up.
	As a matter of fact, the FBI said we just grabbed enough fentanyl to kill two and a half million Americans, and we seized it in South Carolina.
	See, it's not just drug prohibition, it's not just alcohol prohibition, it's all prohibition.
	Prohibition always creates more intense forms of what it is that you are trying to eliminate, as well as increasingly dangerous criminal cartels.
	And we need to start addressing this.
	This is one other area in our society that is there because of a spiritual issue.
	People are Addicted to so many different things, and of course these things are highly addictive, but the only real answer to any of this stuff is spiritual.
	You have to stop looking to these things to escape reality, to give meaning to your life.
	You've got to stop centering your life around the next high, and that's what your relationship with Christ is going to give you.
	But, you know, if you think that you're gonna get that, so you're gonna stop somebody from destroying themselves?
	I have to ask, what drug are you on?
	If you're looking at this stuff for 53 years, you know, you've got about as much upstairs as Joe Biden does, if that's what you think.
	Rumble, Tom McDogg, thank you for the tip.
	He says, You've helped make me a better man.
	Well, thank you.
	I'm sure that I don't get credit for that.
	The magnet helps tug my moral compass.
	Also, give Travis a firm handshake for a job well done.
	Well, thank you for the compliment.
	I appreciate that.
	It's going to be Christ that makes you a better man.
	Trump has signaled support for a proposal that will legalize recreational marijuana in Florida, so he says, I'm going to vote for it.
	I'm going to vote for it.
	And I thought it was kind of interesting that, as this is happening, we're talking about his flip-flopping back and forth.
	He's trying on policy things like a new suit of clothes.
	A new one every day.
	Still has the same red tie, but he's trying on different policy issues every day to see which ones are going to fit him.
	Not very becoming, is it?
	And so, some people on the left, you can find this all over Twitter, people putting up stuff.
	Somebody did a FOIA request about what was happening with the medical unit in the White House, the White House medical unit.
	As many of them said, it just turned into a pill mill.
	Here's an example of this.
	You see these two columns that are redacted here.
	Uh, they redacted the comments and then they have, um, who it was ordered by and who received it.
	That's all been redacted.
	Why is that?
	Well, when you go down the list, if you can see this, do you see Ambien, Ambien, Fentanyl, uh, all of this, the over and over again.
	Some people said, well, for a clinic that doesn't do any procedures with moderate medication, they are ordering prodigious amounts of morphine, fentanyl, ketamine, all the rest of this stuff.
	Uh, so yeah.
	Um, at the same time he wants to execute the drug dealers.
	Well, you know, if you want to execute the drug dealers, I suggest that you start with a CIA people like Gina Haspel.
	People who created the crack cocaine epidemic, the people who ran Afghanistan and the war in Afghanistan, the people who took Afghanistan's production and the poppy fields from 10% of the world's supply of opiates to 90 plus every year was a bumper crop.
	RT used to talk about that, you know, years and years ago, before he got the memo, Geraldo Rivero talked about it.
	Showed the American troops guarding the poppy fields there.
	And they admitted it, and then they stopped talking about it.
	But Russia would continue to talk about it.
	Russia will tell you what's wrong with America.
	They won't tell you what's wrong with Russia.
	Americans won't tell you what's wrong with America.
	They'll tell you what's wrong with Russia.
	But it's been going on a very long time.
	If you want to come after the drug dealers, President Trump, I suggest that you start with the CIA, then you go to HHS, and you arrest the FDA and the NIH and the NIAID, Fauci's organization.
	Those are the drug pushers.
	Those are the ones who are killing the most people.
	Those are the ones who killed more people than Fentanyl did.
	So start with them.
	Start with the international traffickers, the CIA, then go to your own drug pushers in your own administration.
	You put the CEO of Eli Lilly in after they gave you millions of dollars because you used RFK Jr.
	and he's doing the same thing again, folks.
	Same thing.
	He's using RFK Jr.
	Oh, good.
	He's going to finally, he's going to put RFK Jr.
	in and RFK is going to do something about vaccines.
	I don't think if you put RFK Jr.
	in, RFK Jr.
	would do it.
	I don't trust RFK Jr.
	I certainly don't trust Trump.
	More than likely, he's gonna put him in there just to bid his price up with the pharmaceutical people.
	So you start with them, and then when you finish arresting and executing the people in the CIA for drug abuse and the rest of this stuff, drug trafficking, child trafficking, wars, coups, assassinations, okay, then you can move on to HHS, shut down those agencies, arrest those people, put them in jail, vouchee, and give him the death sentence, that's for sure.
	And then go to the White House doctors that were prescribing all the fentanyl and all the rest of these things for you and your crew there.
	Shut that thing down.
	Then you can talk about us.
	How about that?
	Yeah, get it out of your own eye first.
	In your own veins.
	In your own stomach first.
	Trump proceeded to call on the Florida State Legislature.
	Republicans, 83 to 36 Democrats in the House and 28 to 12 in the Senate, Republican.
	He said, responsibly create laws that prohibit the use of marijuana in public spaces so we don't smell it everywhere we go like we do in many of the Democrat-run cities.
	Well, that's not the only thing you smell in the Democrat-run cities.
	You also smell the feces and everything else that is out there with the homeless everywhere.
	After pro-lifers decried Trump for stating that six weeks is too short, When he's talking about abortion, his campaign quickly issued a statement saying he's not yet said how he will vote on the ballot initiative in Florida.
	He simply reiterated that he believes six weeks is too short.
	No, he did.
	He did.
	And just in case you missed it, I remind you that when it looked like there was going to be a primary and he was ramping up for it, he criticized DeSantis.
	He said it's just too harsh.
	Too harsh to save babies' lives.
	This is why he will never Never when on the issue of abortion, he doesn't know how to handle it because he doesn't want to expose it because he doesn't care.
	And anybody who doesn't care about killing babies will produce a vaccine that'll kill you at any age and every age as well as babies with that.
	Uh, yeah, if we take a look at, uh, Trump's, uh, flip-flops, um, he has, um, let's see, where did I have that in here?
	Did I not put that in?
	I guess I don't have it.
	I forgot to put that in.
	So I had a clip where he flip-flopped back and forth with a, first he told somebody in an interview that he was going to vote against, he was going to vote for abortion in Florida.
	And then after he got a big pushback from people on that, then he said he was going to vote to support life.
	Except that he said it was already too harsh.
	Again, he doesn't know.
	You got Lala Harris, as it was in the clip that I don't have here, I was going to show you.
	She's going around the country in a van pushing abortion.
	That's her thing.
	Cult of death.
	Isn't it just amazing?
	And what is his response to it?
	He can't call it a call to death.
	He can't talk about their hypocrisy of saying it's my body, my choice.
	And you say my body, my choice, but you're like, Oh, well, he did the same thing too, right?
	You lock people down, you put a mask on them, not your choice.
	Biden just came in as part of a tag team thing to, to extend the same principles that Trump had established during lockdown and mask stuff that he had paid for.
	Uh, he just extended that to the jab.
	Logical extension.
	We knew that was going to be the case when they're telling everybody, your mask doesn't protect you.
	It protects the other person.
	Well, it doesn't protect anybody.
	Neither do their vaccines.
	Both of them are hazard to your health, but it's the jab that's the worst thing.
	But they were preparing people psychologically for this.
	You know, you got to take the jab.
	Doesn't help you, but it helps other people.
	So, um, she's accused him of flip-flopping on marijuana.
	And yet, if you remember, Tulsi Gabbard nailed her and the 2020 campaign and the debate.
	She accused Harris of putting over quote 1500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it.
	When she was asked, did she, if she'd ever smoked marijuana, none of that, but she made up a story about how she used to listen to such and such a group when she was in college and she would smoke pot.
	People said, well, um, that group wasn't even around when you were in college.
	So I don't know what she was smoking.
	As the saying goes, I don't know what she's smoking today.
	I don't know what Joe Biden is smoking today as well.
	But then with Trump in 2019, Trump helped pay for an ad campaign warning about marijuana's drug side effects, but now he's all for it.
	His surgeon general, Jerome Adams and his HHS secretary, Alex Azar, the CEO.
	of Eli Lilly, also advised against marijuana legalization.
	And they didn't even mention in this LifeSite News article here, Jeff Sessions, who was obsessive about it.
	And what did all of this show us?
	Especially Jeff Sessions.
	Folks, it showed us that the solution to our problems is not going to be found in the Oval Office.
	It's not going to be found in a Republican or a Democrat as president.
	The solution to our problems, most of our problems, are coming from the federal government.
	The drug war is coming from the federal government.
	And so the solution to that is to nullify it at the state level.
	And from just a purely constitutional legal standpoint, Again, I'm absolutely opposed to prohibition.
	I don't make a god out of government.
	And if you think that government is going to be somebody's solution to this stuff, then you are making a god out of government.
	You need to check yourself on that.
	What you're saying is, well, God can't save me, but the SWAT team can.
	Seriously?
	How stupid is that?
	You think SWAT team's going to save you, but God can't, right?
	OK.
	We know how that's worked out.
	The bottom line is nullification is the big story to come out of all this marijuana stuff.
	I don't recommend anybody use it, but I also know that even though that has been the number one charge against people in the war on drugs, more people locked up for medical marijuana possession, or not medical, but marijuana possession, marijuana use, distribution, more people for marijuana than anything else, than all the rest of them combined.
	And yet, they nullified it at the state level.
	Nullified it in a number of ways.
	As a matter of fact, you have medical marijuana.
	is legal in 38 states.
	38 states have nullified that.
	And they made medical marijuana legal while marijuana was scheduled, classified as a Schedule 1 drug, which means that it's highly addictive, highly dangerous, and has no medical use.
	And they said, no, we're going to make it legal and use it for medicine.
	38 states did that.
	And so you've also got 19 states that have made recreational marijuana use, plus the District of Columbia, allow recreational use of marijuana.
	So 19 states and D.C.
	said you can use it however you want, even though it's a Schedule I drug.
	And you've got 38 states, twice that many, have said we're going to allow it for medical use.
	And there are some medical uses for it.
	Uncontrolled convulsions, which in many cases is a reaction, an adverse reaction to vaccines.
	And David Simpson was an excellent Texas legislator, state legislator, when I was in Texas about a decade ago.
	He was there for a few terms and then he ran for Senate.
	He didn't win for Senate.
	He stopped.
	But he was a man of impeccable integrity and character.
	And he was conservative.
	He's a conservative Christian.
	And he said, I can't allow these parents who have kids who are damaged, they can't control their seizures, no medication helps them, the only thing that helps them is marijuana.
	They're getting it in Colorado, but they're running the risk, if they bring that back to Texas, of going to jail.
	And so he got an exception in Texas, and Texas doesn't recognize medical marijuana at all, but they made one exception for that one particular thing because of David Simpson.
	One individual can make a difference and we can stop this and we can nullify this.
	Even in a drug war, crazy state like Texas, especially when you look at Austin, like it's, it's amazing to me, the entire city of Austin isn't under arrest.
	Uh, but, uh, so even though it's a schedule one drug, 38 states.
	76% of the states have made it legal.
	We can do that with any issue.
	And states have done that with a second amendment as well.
	They have nullified federal things.
	Just in Tennessee, for example, Senator Nicely said, well, we got that covered when Biden wanted to do the pistol brace thing.
	We have passed two laws.
	One of them says pistol braces are legal.
	The other one says if the federal government tries to enforce some prohibition on something that we've declared legal in Tennessee, you can't do it.
	That type of thing.
	And we're going to block that.
	We're not going to allow Tennessee officers to participate in that.
	We're going to block them from acting in our state.
	You can nullify.
	And that's what we should take away from all this war on drugs stuff.
	And then finally, Schedule 1.
	The USDA, April of this year, Announced that it was easing restrictions on marijuana by reclassifying the drug from Schedule 1 to Schedule 3.
	Now we've had both Democrats and Republicans talking about this.
	So this makes no sense.
	Look at all the states that have, you know, authorized this for medical use and we're still saying it has no medical use?
	And so they move it from Schedule 1 to Schedule 3.
	There's four schedules that are there, right?
	So that's a big demotion And marijuana, but still, you still have...
	38% of the states say, we don't care.
	People can get it anyway.
	So they still have nullified this law.
	And they can do that.
	And Jeff Sessions couldn't do anything about it.
	Because they never passed a constitutional amendment like they did with alcohol.
	So the federal government has no authority.
	What do they do?
	They bribe.
	They blackmail.
	They encourage sheriff's offices and police departments to steal property from people.
	And then they split the loot with them.
	It's criminal what the federal government is doing.
	They ignore the law.
	They pay no attention to the Constitution.
	They entice local law enforcement to violate the Constitution.
	Say, we'll share the loot with you.
	Just steal from people.
	Don't even charge him with a crime.
	You don't have to find him guilty.
	You just confiscate whatever you want, call it a drug bust, and we'll split the loot with you.
	How about that?
	That was the Trump administration.
	That was Jeff Sessions' only thing that he could do.
	Because he knew that if he took it to court, just like when the IRS tries to intimidate churches and say, you can't talk about politics in your church.
	You had a lot of different, several different pastors.
	First it was just three of them one year.
	Challenge the IRS on that.
	That's a violation of our First Amendment.
	So they recorded their sermon.
	They talked directly about politics to make the point.
	Sent the tape to the IRS.
	The IRS never did anything.
	The next year, it was like a dozen.
	And then it was the next year after that, like three dozen.
	They never would do anything because just like Jeff Sessions, They know they don't have a leg to stand on legally.
	We need to nullify these unconstitutional things that the federal government is doing.
	And we need to not be bribed by their money.
	That's how you stop the federal government.
	It's not by electing Trump or Lala or whatever.
	That's not going to do anything.
	You have to stop them with nullification at the local level.
	And so finally, where did that schedule even come from?
	It didn't come from Richard Nixon.
	It came from the U.N.
	It was the U.N.
	that created the four-tier schedule for drugs.
	It was the U.N.
	that decided that marijuana was going to be in number one, and so forth, and put all the different drugs in these four different categories.
	That all came from the U.N.
	You know when I figured that out?
	I didn't know that for Forty-plus years, even though I was pushing back against the illegal war on drugs.
	I learned that when you had one of the first Democrat-run states nullified this unconstitutional, there was never an amendment for a drug war, so they nullified it for marijuana.
	And when they did that, the UN started squealing about it.
	They can't do that!
	They've only got a schedule here and all the rest of the stuff.
	So I started looking at this.
	I was like, what's their dog in this fight?
	And then I realized that they were the ones who had passed that schedule in the first place.
	That Richard Nixon was just a little globalist puppet.
	It wasn't even his idea.
	All these years I've been blaming Tricky Dicky for this thing, and yeah, he has to blame for it, and he is tricky, and he is despicable.
	But he didn't do that.
	I mean, he enacted that.
	It was not his idea.
	He didn't have a good idea for it.
	He just ran that thing through.
	So Trump is calling out the FDA employee to Big Pharma lobbyist pipeline.
	He says anybody who goes into the government should be banned from ever being a lobbyist.
	He said this in an interview here.
	What is the bigger problem in our country would you say?
	Opioids.
	Bigger than alcohol.
	Oh, for sure.
	I think that's one of the biggest problems.
	Can you compare that to fentanyl?
	Oh yeah, well that's the problem is people are making fake opioids because they can't afford real ones, so they're just getting them off the street and then they put fentanyl in them.
	Yeah, it's hard on how they shut down the Afghanistan pipeline.
	No, it's horrible.
	It's horrible.
	Yeah, they found some in a baby rattle somewhere, I think.
	I don't even know where that was.
	But one of the things I wanted to ask you about was like, so there's like the big pharma lobbyists, like there's 1800 big pharma lobbyists in Washington, D.C.
	Right.
	There's only 535 total representatives or senators total.
	So just the fact that there's this whole other almost drug government that's there kind of pushing the, you know, pushing agendas and influencing things, like, how do we stop them?
	And it just seems like it's obviously killing people, like people are dying, you know, it's like, What do we have to do that our own government won't help us?
	Well, you have to stop listening to lobbyists.
	You know, I was not a big person for lobbyists.
	And if they have even a little access to, like, a president or a senator or a congressman or woman, they get a lot of money.
	And in some cases, they just take the money.
	They don't do anything.
	But you have a lot of lobbyists in Washington pushing, and certainly a lot for all of the things that we're talking about, including alcohol.
	The lobbyists are winning it.
	Yeah, they're winning.
	They're making a lot of money.
	Absolutely.
	Can you stop that?
	Can a president stop that?
	Like, how do we stop that?
	Well, one way you can stop it is to say, if you're going to go into government, you can never be a lobbyist.
	In many cases, they have rules and regulations where you can't do it for four years, three years, five years, whatever.
	You mean be a lobbyist after you were an elected official?
	You could say that if you're an elected official or if you work in government, you can never be a lobbyist.
	You have people that work in government and they give out contracts to the military and then they leave and they work for the people that they're giving out contracts to.
	That's exactly what happened with the Sackler family, with the drug companies.
	They hired people that were on the FDA to work for them so they could loophole the laws.
	But can we outlaw lobbyists or we can't do that?
	Wow, that's amazing.
	There's a whole constitutional thing there.
	I mean, can you make somebody never, ever go into the business?
	If you're, if you work for government and especially if you're giving out contracts, in other words, you're a powerful person within some industry, the Navy, the Army, any, you know, anything, it could be military procurement, et cetera.
	There's a whole thing like, there's a whole question as to, you give out a contract and then all of a sudden you're working for the person you gave out the contract to or the company that you gave out the contract to.
	Right.
	It's like you're playing both sides in the net.
	Well, it's and it's obviously a problem and it's a big problem.
	And we were doing things about it.
	But then we had to get down to other business.
	We had to solve.
	Is this guy that's interviewing him?
	Is he really that stupid?
	Is he really that stupid?
	Do you not know anything about what happened with the vaccine industry, for example?
	Now you got both of Trump's FDA directors, the FDA directors, Scott Gottlieb and Han, both of them go to work for Pfizer and Moderna.
	You want to talk about a revolving door?
	Where did the guy that was head of HHS come from?
	He came, he was the CEO of Eli Lilly, one of the biggest drug companies out there.
	You want to talk about hypocrisy?
	Yeah, we don't need lobbyists.
	Let's get the CEO directly in.
	We'll put the CEO in charge of HHS.
	Just give Trump a few million dollars during the transition period and you're good.
	And you had Alex Azar, CEO of Eli Lilly, there for all four years.
	He ran all this stuff.
	He was the first one.
	At the end of January, to declare that there was a pandemic emergency and all the rest of this stuff, and then the people of the FDA who just looked the other way, green-lit and rubber-stamped all of this stuff with the vaccines, they go to work for Pfizer and Moderna.
	What hypocrisy.
	Unbelievably.
	You've got to stop listening to lobbyists.
	I was not a big person for lobbyists, said Trump.
	Yeah, lobbyists don't have near as much money as the CEOs.
	Go for them.
	That's where the real money is.
	He talks about the thousands of lobbyists, and that's just one industry, right?
	Take a look at the military-industrial complex.
	I briefly mentioned that.
	What about Israel?
	What about the lobbyists for foreign governments coming in?
	You see, that's why Lala Harris is able to get $500 million in one month.
	Why, she's now got over a billion dollars, because she also brought in money that had been at events to auction stolen goods.
	That's what an election is, right?
	She got that money that had been collected by Biden in, so she's flush.
	And so is Trump.
	Unbelievable hypocrisy.
	I guess, you know, we could even call Fauci a lobbyist.
	I mean, he was lobbying for Remdesivir.
	Ron, death is near.
	Yeah, isn't that amazing?
	Time for the never-Trump Republicans to put on their big-boy pants and to think of their country, says this article from some guy, Brian Jundeff, at American Thinker.
	Well, Brian, you may have your big-boy pants on, but maybe you need your diaper changed.
	You just peeing your pants thinking that Trump may not get elected?
	As I said before, you need to change your diapers Frequently, just like politicians, because they're both full of the same stuff.
	Unbelievably stupid arguments made by this person here.
	You don't know or care what these people are saying.
	You don't know or care what they did.
	Nothing says one's Republican like voting for a liberal Democrat, he said.
	I guess that's why he supports Trump, because that's what Trump is.
	Trump is a New York Democrat.
	He is no different from Hillary, except that he ran an opposition to her, so he's got to adopt the uniform and the purported policies of the other side.
	But he partied with them all the time.
	Look, the solution, folks, is not in the presidential election.
	The solution is to nullify D.C.
	We have to have AC, I think.
	We have to have an alternative Columbia, instead of a District of Columbia.
	I think we need to go from DC to AC, an alternate system.
	And that alternate system is a system of federalization, of non-centralization.
	It's about not looking to have an emperor fix everything in your life, or some billionaire who's going to be altruistic, or whatever.
	There is one good thing that came from Trump's tenure there, and that is distrust in vaccines.
	That's one thing that he's left behind, inadvertently.
	He doesn't understand why.
	I mean, he keeps telling everybody how wonderful they are.
	Nobody trusts the vaccines, but they all trust Trump, don't they?
	On the conservative side.
	On the liberal side, it's just the opposite.
	Washington Post had an article talking about how Trump is all over the place on vaccines.
	And they criticized him for the times that he would talk against vaccines, but then they gave him credit for all the misery that he created with the vaccines.
	But for the conservatives, it's just the opposite of the Washington Post.
	They see it flip-flopping all the time, but then they just excuse it and fall in line.
	If only distrust for politicians would grow like the distrust in vaccines.
	But of course, it doesn't.
	Because they have these two parties.
	They have this Hegelian dialectic.
	And it works perfectly.
	Every election, it works perfectly.
	Flawless in its execution.
	And these people never catch on.
	Study finds a 9.6% fatality rate among people who reported myocarditis or pericarditis after an mRNA COVID vaccine.
	So, you know, we want to talk about fentanyl though, right?
	Fentanyl.
	And we want to talk about opioids, right?
	That guy there, does he not know?
	He mentioned the Sackler family.
	Does he know who made the drugs for the Sackler family?
	I don't even know who that guy is.
	I've seen him, you know, this interview they had with Trump.
	So he scores an interview with Trump because he's low information sycophant.
	But he doesn't know anything about where the Sackler family got their opioids.
	You know where they got them from?
	Johnson and Johnson.
	Johnson and Johnson was selling them and themselves directly, the people.
	And the Sackler family was the one who did a bang-up job of marketing through hospitals and doctors to get people who come in not looking for a high.
	They come in in severe pain and they tell the doctors, give them this stuff and get them addicted and destroy their lives.
	I remember when Chris Christie was running for president in 2016.
	A hardcore drug warrior.
	And he told the sad story of a friend of his that he went through college with, legal school.
	And the guy got out.
	He became a very successful lawyer, very wealthy.
	He was jogging.
	You know, I guess Chris Christie has a lot of respect for that, maybe.
	I don't know.
	But he was athletic and he hurt his back severely.
	And they got him addicted to opioids.
	And that addiction caused him to lose his practice.
	It caused him eventually to lose his family.
	And then eventually he took, he took his own life and suicide.
	Chris Christie said, that's why we can't make marijuana legal.
	It's like, what?
	How is that a sequitur to that?
	That's a non sequitur to marijuana.
	This is somebody who was not looking even to get high.
	He had this imposed on him.
	By the criminal medical system in the hospitals.
	He didn't know what was happening, and they got him addicted to this painkiller.
	And so, it's a very different situation, but let me just ask you, you know, they like to talk about fentanyl all the time, and they don't like to talk about the real mass murder drug, the mRNA vaccine, which Trump and Biden and the Republicans and the Democrats all had a hand in.
	And so, let me ask you, did you ever have or hear of any employers requiring that you take fentanyl in order to get a job?
	That ever happen?
	Did they push fentanyl on, did the government push fentanyl on kids?
	Well, outside of the CIA and stuff.
	No.
	Why is it that we ignore all these people that are dying from pericarditis and myocarditis?
	It's rare.
	You're going to be fine.
	Forget about it.
	Okay?
	Just forget about it.
	Take, take another one.
	Take another booster, right?
	You know, they're telling people, kids now with myocarditis and Paragarditis, it's okay.
	We said from the very beginning, cardiologists said, you damage your heart, never comes back.
	I know that everybody knows that.
	It's funny.
	You think I don't know that?
	So smart and short.
	Uh, but, uh, Yeah, they just dismiss it.
	There's no problem.
	And yet, 10% of the people already are dying after they have been identified with myocarditis or pericarditis.
	It may be even higher than that.
	Maybe it hasn't been identified.
	We have a lot of people all the time.
	You're seeing people, public figures, who are dropping dead.
	Just saw this with a rapper.
	Up on stage and he's talking and, you know, and just boom, just like that.
	Uh, he drops over dead right in the middle of talking on stage.
	Wasn't dancing.
	It might've been dancing or whatever, but that's what typically happens.
	People who don't know.
	That they have a heart that's been damaged by the mRNA.
	Sudden adult death syndrome.
	Fatality rates were highest among men under 30.
	Isn't that interesting?
	That is the most hated demographic of the globalists and the Marxists, isn't it?
	Men under the age of 30.
	Trump's mixed record on vaccines is in the spotlight, says the Washington Post.
	After the RFK Jr.
	endorsement, And like I said before, Washington Post is just the mere opposite of MAGA.
	Both of them see Trump's all over the place.
	One of them, the MAGA people, want to excuse it.
	You know, they believe that the vaccine is bad and Trump is good.
	Washington Post thinks that Trump is bad and the vaccine is good.
	And so, Washington Post says, Trump vows to defund schools of vaccine mandates, but as president, he also embraced vaccines, championing the development of the coronavirus vaccine.
	Well, we didn't know that, did we?
	This is why I want to look at, I talked about, you know, the people that are influencers, that are pushing this stuff, and, you know, that are actually giving money to the Democrats, are actually taking money from them or whatever.
	Talked about that last week.
	One of the people I mentioned, there was an article from Milo about Nick Fuentes.
	Person said, you just read that article and it's from Milo.
	It's like, so what?
	He's there.
	He knows what's going on in the inner circle.
	He was part of that inner circle.
	And even if you don't pay attention to that, the personal stuff that's there, you know, was Fuentes going to sell the list of all that?
	He was trying to get money from the people that he said he was opposed to, people that were Zionists.
	He said, oh, I'm all against Zionism, okay?
	Well, now Fuentes' two issues, according to him, are the border and war.
	Well, that's fine.
	Those are two big issues.
	But why only two?
	You don't care about what... You're going to oppose Trump because of the border and because of the war, because you want to get him moving in that direction.
	But you're not going to oppose him on the lockdown, on the poisonous jab, and on the rest of the stuff, which he won't acknowledge is even an issue.
	And of course, he doesn't acknowledge that he didn't do anything about the border.
	According to him, he fixed the border, and then on day one, You had Biden break the border?
	No, he never closed the border.
	He did show that if there was a will to enforce the law, they could reduce the traffic, because they did that with the excuse that they had to do it for the so-called pandemic.
	Had to keep up appearances there.
	But then, you know, once the people came in, you could ship them around however you wish.
	You know, Trump has championed the development of the coronavirus vaccine that allows public life to resume amid a pandemic, says the Washington Post.
	And meanwhile, you got people in the mainstream alternative media tying their tongues in knots, trying to excuse what Trump said and what Trump did in 2020.
	It's just sugar water, right?
	Come on, you can take this for Trump.
	It's just sugar.
	It's not the bad vaccine.
	It's just got adjuvants that I've been telling you are going to give you autism for 20 years.
	You can take that.
	Do it for Trump.
	Well, you know, they always fall back.
	When Trump vows to defund schools who have vaccine mandates and the conservatives are going to say, well, that's it.
	It's because Biden tried to mandate it.
	Well, okay.
	I'm against force and fraud.
	You see, the fraud came with Trump.
	The force came with Biden.
	You should be opposed to using force or fraud to achieve social or political goals.
	That was the core thing that somebody joined the Libertarian Party that used to be part of the thing.
	It's like, I sign on down here.
	I agree that I'm not going to use force or fraud to achieve social or political goals.
	Well, they used force and fraud to achieve their political goals of depopulation 2030 and all the rest of the stuff.
	Laying the foundation for universal basic income.
	That was all at the feet of Trump.
	He was the fraud who prepared the way for the force of Biden.
	Tell me that it makes a difference between these two.
	Okay?
	You put your big boy pants on there, American thinker, and tell me what I need to do about this stuff.
	Come on.
	Big boy pants.
	They talk like children.
	Trump has also been a longtime vaccine skeptic, says Washington Post, who once falsely linked childhood vaccines to autism.
	And as he campaigns for another presidency, he's threatening to withhold money from schools of vaccine mandates.
	Of course, that was empty talk.
	That was a bidding war.
	He was bidding for people's votes, and he was bidding for money from the vaccine people.
	That's why he brought RFK Jr.
	to Trump Tower.
	His appointment this week of RFK Jr., founder of a prominent anti-vaccine group, an honorary co-chair of his transition team for a possible second term.
	Oh, now he's going to make him co-chair.
	He used him such advantage in his first transition team.
	Got millions and millions of dollars, and then he, you know, filled up his HHS with Executives from big pharmaceutical companies.
	I wonder what will happen the next time.
	They go on to say, then they talk to a vaccine proponent, Washington Post.
	Any role of an anti-vaccine seller.
	Hear that?
	An anti-vaccine seller.
	That's an odd way to put it.
	These people are all mongers.
	They're war mongers selling war.
	They're poison mongers selling their poisonous pharmakia garbage.
	You know, it's just, it's amazing.
	It's not just the mark of the beast that is so amazing.
	When you look at 2000 years ago, it's also identifying the pharmakia, uh, the great and powerful men of the world who would not repent of their murders.
	I can't say it any more succinctly than John said it 2000 years ago.
	Um, the role of an anti-vaccine seller.
	And a presidential administration would be a very bad thing for American society, said this guy.
	And he looks at the rising rate of measles.
	Hmm.
	Yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	Fearful thing, isn't it?
	Again, they take one of their strategies, as we talked about.
	You have a situation where you've got Measles or chickenpox or polio or you name it.
	You always got that bell-shaped curve, right?
	The couille.
	The couille that we had to flatten, you know.
	Well, what happens is they come in after the, you know, you've done your little bell-shaped thing and you're on the tail end where it's tapering down, approaching zero.
	And they come in with their shots and say, look, we got rid of it with our shots.
	And time and time again, they repeat that same playbook.
	In a July phone call with Kennedy, whom Trump has considered to lead as vaccine safety commissioner, they go all about this, you know, how you could hear on the phone, Trump is pumping him up about how many shots they give.
	He says, you know, something like 38 different vaccines.
	No, no.
	It's 90.
	I think it's 92.
	There's actually a very good graphic.
	It shows a baby laying there in diapers.
	And it's got all of the hypodermic needles that baby gets its first year of life.
	And compares it to what they had in 1984.
	In 1984, I think it was five in their first year of life.
	1984 I think it was five in their first year of life and now it's something like 92 or 98 in their first year of life and they have them grouped because they're giving them like four or five shots of one thing over that first year And they wonder why we got an explosion of autism, but not the Washington post.
	Washington post doesn't care.
	Doesn't care to ask any questions about what's happening with autism.
	Um, why would people be skeptical of this stuff?
	So we've got to say that, see, there was something that good that came out of the Trump administration.
	Some vaccine hesitancy.
	People don't trust the vaccines even if they still trust Trump.
	And then we look at what is happening in Gaza.
	Mass polio vaccination to begin in Gaza after the deadly disease re-emerges, says the Washington Post.
	Again, the Washington Post.
	There's a couple of things that are happening here.
	Number one, polio has been their big success story.
	And it is a story.
	It's not true.
	But it's been their big PR campaign.
	Just like the 1918 flu, that's the thing they want to scare everybody about all the time with the flu shots.
	Well, polio is their big success story, they think.
	They tell you about the vaccine.
	And it's not.
	And so part of this is the re-emergence, trying to build back the vaccine.
	They've completely destroyed the credibility of vaccines.
	They've destroyed the credibility of the existence of viruses.
	You can't isolate it.
	You can't identify it.
	Talk to me about science.
	If you've got a computer program that's generating randomly these genetic sequences and then you've got to send this out and say, this is what we're looking for.
	Then you use a PCR test to find that genetic sequence and magnify it by a trillion times.
	What a joke.
	What a joke.
	Junk science, just like the climate alarmism.
	That's why I call them both MacGuffins.
	But yeah, they want to reemerge.
	Not a disease re-emerging, but it's a concern they have that has re-emerged, and that is hesitancy to get shots.
	And so that's a big part of it.
	The other part of it is that it is a sophisticated attack on the people in Gaza.
	Another one.
	Yet another one.
	And always go after the children first.
	Remember, when you want to attack a population, you go after the children.
	The WHO has been warning about a spread of polio after polio was detected in July in six sewage samples in Gaza's southern and central regions by the WHO.
	So, they use PCR to look for it in the sewer.
	Now, what have they been doing?
	They've been injecting people with the very stuff that they're looking for in the sewer.
	And then they claim that now it is somehow an epidemic.
	And again, you're back to the same game of this PCR magnification.
	Health authorities have warned for months that we're going to have worsening conditions, and here they are.
	So, it's a way for them to try to carve back some respect for these totally discredited vaccines, and it's a way for them to come after the people of Gaza as well, the children of Gaza.
	So we'll be right back.
	...with the Great Replacement.
	Going along, progressing extremely quickly all across the West.
	Before we get into it, though, I just want to say real quickly thank you to those who sent checks the last week of August.
	Mary N., Brent and Ingrid S., Martin T., Scott and Samantha T., Jack H., William G., Lois L., Aaron F., Will R., Eric M. Thank you, all of you.
	And again, Zal, The checks, the cash app, and Subscribestar, all of those, that's how the program is funded.
	And so we do appreciate your support.
	You are our producers.
	We could not do it without you.
	You're the ones who actually produce the show.
	Let's talk a little bit about what is going on with the borders, with the replacement.
	And along those lines, because, you know, I see this as a massive welfare program.
	The issue is not that we don't have a wall.
	The problem is that we've got a big magnet that's pulling people across, and that magnet's going to pull them under the wall, through the wall, over the wall, around the wall, you name it.
	If you put a big enough magnet out there, you're going to get people from all over the world coming here to get free stuff, and they just can't stop thinking about what the next free program is they're going to offer to people who are not citizens.
	Come to America, get whatever you want.
	Well, this is sent by Mary Ellen Moore.
	She called it Brides of the State.
	She said, this was sent to me by a friend, David Samuels, put this in a publication, UnHerd, and he says, the key to a Harris win in November Won't be the support of black Americans or Indian Americans or even brown Americans, though she has identified at various points in her political life all three of these.
	Rather, Harris is a flesh-and-blood avatar of a much more numerous, powerful, and radically dissatisfied demographic.
	Never married and childless American women between the ages of 20 and 45.
	Why is he writing this?
	Well, because J.D.
	Vance has pointed this out, but he gets a lot of criticism for it.
	I don't support J.D.
	Vance.
	I know he's part of the technocracy, so don't write me about all that.
	I don't support any of these people.
	But they can identify some of the problems.
	R.F.K.
	Jr.
	has done a good job of identifying some of the problems.
	Do I believe that he would fix them even if he was president?
	No.
	But he's done a good job in terms of identifying a lot of the different problems out there.
	With food, with drugs, with free speech and censorship and all the rest of this stuff.
	He's done a great job of some of those things, but that doesn't mean... You know, it's one thing to run as a candidate and to identify problems and to point out problems that everybody else wants to pretend don't exist.
	And then it's something altogether different to do something about them when you become president.
	That was the difference between Trump in 2016 and Trump in 2020.
	Anyway, back to this.
	Aside from mass immigration, the most striking demographic development of the past decade is a large cohort of American women who have embraced the helping hand of the state in place of the increasingly suspect protections of fathers, brothers, boyfriends, husbands.
	In doing so, they've become the Democrat Party's most enthusiastic and decisive constituency.
	According to a recent Pew survey, these brides of the state, they call it bots, support Democrats or Republicans by a whopping 72 to 24 percent, providing the party with its entire advantage in both national and most state elections.
	Married American women, by contrast, support Republicans 50 to 45, which more or less matches the pro-Republican margin in every other age and gender demographic.
	Without the overwhelming support of bots for the Democrats, in other words, America would be a solid majority Republican country.
	I think that's interesting.
	Hence the focus on abortion.
	Hence the focus on women without children.
	Even James Carville said it.
	Hectoring James Carville for pointing out what hectoring, how these dictatorial childless women are bossing everybody around.
	He pointed that out, and yet nobody says anything about that.
	It is obviously an issue.
	But it is the elephant in the room, if you will, but they're not really doing anything about it.
	So let's take a look at The Great Replacement, where we are now with the last week.
	We talked about what was happening in Aurora, Colorado.
	And kind of a related story here.
	You know, we talk about DEI.
	Well, DEI can also mean bringing in people and putting them on the job, even if they're not trained, right?
	You got the immigrant program and you can get people in and put them on the assembly line.
	And there are accusations that this is what happened with Boar's Head.
	I mentioned earlier, you got a lot of people who have died.
	Over 50 people are in the hospital.
	And Boar's Head, when the inspectors went there, they found mold, bugs, listeria, all kinds of stuff, because it was not being properly maintained.
	According to the Associated Press, at least nine people have died.
	Two deaths in South Carolina, one each in Florida and Mexico, Tennessee.
	Three deaths previously confirmed by people who lived in Illinois, New Jersey, Virginia.
	Fifty-seven people sickened and hospitalized in the outbreak.
	Listeria infections are caused by a hearty type of bacteria that can survive and even thrive during refrigeration.
	An estimated 1,600 people get Listeria food poisoning each year.
	About 260 die, according to the CDC.
	Infections can be hard to pinpoint because the symptoms may occur quickly or it could take 10 weeks.
	after eating contaminated food.
	It's almost as difficult to find as a vaccine injury, right?
	That delayed response.
	The disturbing news comes right on the heels of Borehead's DEI refugee program, where they hire, train, and mentor migrants.
	Is there a connection?
	I've been saying that since this first came out.
	I knew this was going to come out.
	This is so obvious.
	So, so obvious.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, we had the, this isn't our first rodeo on this thing either.
	Remember that Chobani?
	I got sued because I pointed this out about Chobani.
	You know, Chobani comes in and, um, uh, this is a guy who comes from Kurdistan.
	And he was given a golden ticket to come in and you even had Democrat senators in New York.
	You had Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand who replaced Hillary Clinton in New York.
	They set this guy up with a factory.
	to do Greek yogurt up in New York.
	And during the Obama administration, you had Michelle Obama move all of the lunchroom programs.
	Oh, you need to get yogurt and you need to get Greek yogurt, you know.
	And by the way, he makes this great stuff, Giovanni.
	And so he was he was obviously brought in and set up for success.
	And then he sets up another second factory because he's now got so much business with all the school lunches and everything.
	He sets up another one in Idaho.
	I think it's Sioux Falls, Idaho, something like that.
	And there was some crime issue that had happened there.
	There was a cloud over it.
	Some crimes were committed from some migrants.
	But as soon as they cleared Chobani of any involvement in it, they had 60 Minutes ran this puff piece about what a great entrepreneur he was.
	Hey, look, you know, you give me a yogurt factory, Give me a chocolate factory, I'll be the next Willy Wonka, okay?
	It's not rocket science to do some of this stuff, right?
	And over and above that, we realized that he was playing footsies with the regime, because he was bringing in all these different people from other countries.
	And some of the people had pointed out that in his factories, He said, I love these people so much.
	I've hired interpreters so they don't have to learn English.
	And so we have all these interpreters on the floor to help people communicate with each other.
	And it's like, that seems like an awful waste of money.
	And, but it works out because you see, if they don't speak English, they can't go work anywhere else.
	So he'd bring people in from, you know, some places where they speak these, uh, these rare languages, but he'd bring along an interpreter to hire somebody to be an interpreter.
	And, um, they don't learn English.
	And so they're trapped in that job forever.
	And so once this court case was over, that was a cloud over their immigrant practices that were there, then, um, You know, 60 Minutes ran this puff piece, and I talked about it.
	And I showed how they were rewarding these people, foreign business people, who will come in and do what they want.
	You don't think that's happening at Google, other places like that as well?
	And so I talked about it from that perspective.
	Then it got wrapped into the nightly news.
	And then pulled out, the comments were made by someone else at the beginning of it, and then it was published up as, I put it up as, I was talking about crony capitalism, about their immigration agenda and all the rest of the stuff, and I called it Chobani's own private Idaho.
	Alex hated puns like that.
	And so did The other people are there.
	So they took that down and then they put it up as something about child rapist or something like that.
	It's like, no!
	And I changed, I had Travis change it.
	Yeah, I had to change it twice and they kept changing it back.
	He changed it, he changed it, they changed it back.
	He changed it again, they changed it back.
	And then with that child rapist thing, which had just been found false in the court, we all got sued.
	Yeah, individually and collectively.
	But, you know, Alex paid it off or whatever.
	It cost him a bunch of money for that.
	But look, that's what's happening with these different companies that come in.
	And it's all tied in with the immigrant stuff.
	And so that's, you know, that's why Travis was not surprised that this is what was happening with Boar's Head.
	They want to bring in cheap immigrant labor.
	Maybe they're not training them very well.
	Somebody's not doing their job.
	It's filthy.
	And now the whole company looks like it's possibly going to go down the tubes.
	Boar's Head proudly displayed their DEI initiatives on their website where they bragged about their programs, including focusing on refugees.
	Boar's Head is part of the Tent Coalition for Refugees in the U.S.
	Exploring, hiring, training, and mentoring opportunities for refugees.
	Inspectors, however, turned up dozens of violations at their plant in Virginia, now linked to the nationwide recall of deli meat.
	And when you look at what the Department of Agriculture found, they said, according to records that have been released, mold, mildew, insects repeatedly found throughout the site.
	But what is this Tent Coalition?
	Well, it goes back to 2021.
	That was when we got out of Afghanistan.
	And we had a big tent to bring all the Afghan refugees in.
	People fleeing Afghanistan.
	They had 33 major companies because again, these companies are going to do what the federal government wants them to do because it's a pay to play type of thing, right?
	They, you do what we want you to do.
	You help us with the optics on this or these, this other social issue.
	We'll clear the way for you to have an oligarchy, if not a monopoly.
	So you had companies like Amazon, Facebook, Pfizer, Tyson foods.
	Announced that they would join the Tent Coalition for Afghan Refugees back in 2021.
	The new coalitions of the announcement is spearheaded by the Tent Partnership for Refugees, a network of over 180 globalist businesses.
	They say global business, but that's globalist business.
	It's these multinational corporations that are part, they're stakeholders.
	And they're either going to drive a stake through our heart, or we're going to drive a stake through their heart.
	180 global globalist businesses integrating refugees to help Afghans to better integrate into the American economy.
	How about the veterans?
	Do you do anything about the veterans from Afghanistan or just the Afghan refugees?
	You want to put them in your factories, have them cleaning machinery at Boar's Head.
	Albert Bourla, by the way, CEO of Pfizer, he was bragging about his participation in the Tent Coalition for Afghan Refugees.
	We're proud to join.
	We'll be undertaking a number of projects in support of Afghan refugees and special migrants.
	You know, as all this stuff is happening, Boeing over the weekend.
	What do they call that thing, the Starliner?
	What was it, Jupiter 1 or something?
	That's their lost in space.
	That's what they call the spaceship in lost in space.
	But on the Jupiter 1, where they're marooned in space, they started hearing these strange noises.
	He's got his, uh, his phone or whatever.
	I guess they got phone service up there.
	I don't know.
	Some of some sort.
	He played it for the people of NASA and they said, okay, we got it.
	We're on it now.
	Now it stops.
	So everything is fine.
	But it was this creepy, weird noise.
	It was coming from the, uh, Jupiter one warning.
	Well, well, Robinson, uh, 1.6 million migrants in the UK are costing taxpayers.
	They're 8.5 billion pounds.
	And that doesn't even include the cost of asylum seekers who are routinely placed into four-star hotels, as well as foreign students.
	Because, you know, these foreign students, that's really the bread and butter of these universities, especially in the United States.
	I mean, the actual cost to British taxpayer is probably much, much higher.
	Well, in the United States, it's far worse than that, as a matter of fact.
	In the United States, it's not 8.5 billion pounds.
	It's 150 billion dollars.
	Now, you know, the 8.5 billion pounds, that might be like 10 billion or something like that.
	But here it's 150 billion.
	In one year.
	In one year.
	U.S.
	taxpayers paid 150 billion dollars to care for illegal aliens just last year.
	And Wokeness put that up on Twitter and said, but a five billion dollar wall is too expensive.
	Well, the problem is a five billion dollar wall ain't gonna cut it.
	Because if you're paying these people and giving them free jobs and you're doing everything for them, they're gonna find a way to get in.
	They're not stupid.
	Colorado mayor has asked for the eviction of the Venezuelan migrant gang.
	They're asking, again, the squatter stuff.
	It's just so absurd, the laws that are in so many of these different states.
	Somebody comes in and they occupy your home and you can't get them out, you can't evict them.
	Everybody knows what's going on.
	News reports all over the place, how you've got Venezuelan gangs have gone in and taken over several apartment complexes.
	They've had shootouts in parking lots of stores, like a Walmart parking lot.
	They got trash all over the place, fights and shootouts and everything.
	And they've completely taken over several apartment complexes.
	And so officials are asking the courts to let them evict the Venezuelan migrant gangs.
	They don't want to.
	And the governor there, Governor Palos, He is a comrade of Lala.
	He's on the Marxist team there for sure.
	He doesn't want to do anything about it either.
	He just dismisses it.
	Not interesting at all to him.
	Yet, this is a woman who was a former resident of one of these apartment complexes, talking to Fox News.
	Councilwoman Durinsky, who has been amazing.
	My first conversation with her, she said, she said, do you still live there?
	And I said, yes.
	And she said, I'm going to get you out of there.
	Wow.
	She's like, I'm going to make it my work.
	So you're singing her praises.
	In the meantime, the office of Governor Jared Polis is saying she's making all of this up.
	Listen to what his spokesman said.
	According to police intelligence, this purported invasion, I guess, of these apartment buildings is largely a feature of Danielle Jurinsky's imagination.
	What do you say to that?
	You can't fake video and polis wouldn't last five minutes on that property.
	Wow.
	Here's what Danielle said about it.
	Listen to this.
	I absolutely did not make any of this up.
	I love how our governor has quickly rushed in to say that that's the actual problem here.
	But the actual problem here are his weak policies that have turned this state into a breeding ground for this gang activity.
	Cindy, why do you think the governor's office has got its head stuck firmly in the sand over this issue?
	They don't want to admit that they're part of the problem.
	It's the administration who we count on to make the rules for us.
	they are coming in with guns.
	I make the guidelines.
	The farm accomplished.
	I call nine one one.
	No help comes for me.
	No help.
	There's no mass amounts of police that show up to make sure that we're defended.
	Nobody showed up to help me.
	I didn't have a bulletproof vest.
	I didn't have five officers showing up with me whenever there was a problem.
	We were on our own and we were left to die.
	No registration in this country.
	Yeah, and the guns, shootouts, all the rest of the stuff, the government says, just making this up.
	He's the guy who makes up genders for children.
	Okay.
	But everybody else is, I played for you last week.
	People, all different demographics, people who live in the area.
	Y'all can't believe this.
	Look at what's going on.
	And it is absolutely insane.
	One person, as he was filming it, nearly got run over.
	But of course, it's just their imagination.
	California Assembly, meanwhile, has passed a bill banning local voter ID requirements.
	No voter ID.
	Seen this rodeo before as well.
	I've mentioned before, I'll say it real quickly once again, a friend of my brother-in-law's who went to vote in North Carolina, where they had no voter ID laws.
	I don't know what the law is right now or not.
	And they had the longest voting period of any state in North Carolina.
	And so he goes on election day to vote, and they said, you've already voted.
	What?
	I haven't voted.
	Oh, yeah, you have.
	And this other person at your address, and I mentioned the name, he says, that's my mother.
	She's been dead for years.
	No ID.
	No ID.
	That's what the Democrats want.
	And so, you know, it should be the only thing that we need an ID for.
	That and, you know, for the mark of the beast that both the Republicans and the Democrats want to impose on us, but they're not going to do it for that.
	On Rumble, Marky Mark, thank you for the tip.
	He says, it's a shame about Boar's Head.
	They used to be good and trusted brand.
	If you wanted deli meats, there was none better.
	Yeah.
	Proverbs 22 says, a good name is rather to be chosen than great riches.
	That's right.
	When you lose that, many times you lose everything.
	But it doesn't always work that way.
	Sometimes you can lie to people straight to their face and get away with it.
	Look at Fauci.
	Look at the politicians.
	Or look at Alex.
	When I confronted him about the stop the steal stuff, I said, Alex, you know that everybody's going to know this is a lie in just a couple of days because they haven't sent 20,000 people out to arrest frauds after the election.
	But he got away with it.
	He emerged from it bigger than ever.
	It just is absolutely amazing.
	But anyway, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	And we'll be right back.
	Oh, my God.
	And now, The David Nutt Show!
	I thought this was a very interesting article.
	A look at income and taxation relative to gold.
	And of course, when you look at the creation of the Federal Reserve and the creation of the income tax, they were right there together, hand in glove, because it was part of a complete restructuring of our taxation system, of our financial system.
	Prior to that, the government, much smaller than it is now, Operated primarily off of tariffs at the border, and within the border, it was a free trade zone.
	Then they decided that they wanted to have no tariffs at the border, essentially, but to come after each and every one of us individually.
	Hence, the internal revenue service, as opposed to external.
	And that was their hand in glove with the creation of the Federal Reserve.
	As Clint Signor points out, gold and silver prices moved higher for a second week.
	The odds of a September rate cut by the Federal Reserve were bolstered by comments from Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve.
	The odds of a rate cut also got a boost from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, announced their massive restructuring of the lie that they told us about jobs.
	So, you know, all those jobs we told you were created by Biden?
	Well, almost a million of them were not.
	And they're doing that to make the trend look better in the run-up to the election.
	That's why they always do that.
	Turns out the unbelievable jobs report was just what skeptics thought it was.
	Nonsense.
	So stimulus addicted markets, like the stock market, The S&P 500 closing back to near all-time highs.
	It would be hard to overstate just how profound a couple of changes made to U.S.
	law in 1913 have been for American society.
	You look at how our entire economy is being manipulated by the Federal Reserve and how Many people warned that that was going to be the case.
	Charles Lindbergh's father was a senator at the time.
	I mentioned him in the report that I did about the creation of the Federal Reserve.
	It's interesting that that report was censored five years before there was any censorship of Alex or Infowars or anything like that.
	I mean, years later.
	Facebook was coming to him to be one of the first people on Facebook to do video, that type of thing.
	But they didn't want anything out there about the Federal Reserve creation.
	So, if you go back, this is what I thought was interesting about the story.
	Gold was valued in 1913 at $20 an ounce, 1916.
	1913 at $20 an ounce 1916 the average annual income at that point in time was $600 a year and so it's kind of hard to get your head around stuff like that But start thinking about not the price of gold, but the price of things in gold.
	And that's what he did.
	He said, in other words, a typical husband earned about 30 ounces of gold per year.
	So think of it that way, right?
	1916, a husband would earn, one wage earner, a husband, could earn 30 ounces of gold.
	Well, what happens today when you look at the average income and you look at the price of gold?
	The average salary today is roughly $60,000.
	Or 24 ounces.
	In other words, it's 20% below what it was all those decades ago.
	So you get a real feel for what inflation is or the value of the dollar, the fiat dollar, the made up dollar is always changing in value.
	And so single wage earner would make about 30 ounces in 1916.
	Here we are a century later, make 24 ounces a year.
	Now it takes two wage earners in most households to produce the gold equivalent income that a single earner achieved in 1913.
	But the picture gets dramatically worse when you bring in income taxes.
	Because in 1916 there wasn't any income tax.
	They had I started to push this through, but at that point in time, and I've said this many times, you know when they talk about, well, we got this wealth tax or this unrealized gains tax, they call it, but it's only going to be for the really, really rich people.
	Well, that's why they always start these taxes.
	In 1916, the original income tax, if you adjust it for earnings today, for the value of the dollar today, that means that your first $360,000 a year would, those earning above $360,000 a year would be paying income tax.
	And those earning above $360,000 a year would be paying income tax.
	I'm sorry, that's not even adjusted.
	So when the average person was making $600 a year, the income tax didn't even kick in until you started making $300,000.
	When the average person is making $600 a year.
	year. When the average person is making 600 a year. So and and then the top rate was 35%. It would get progressively more if you were a millionaire or whatever, but the most that you would pay in 1913 was going to be 35%.
	Now, Lala Harris wants to make it 45%, and she wants to tax unrealized gains as well.
	But don't worry, it's just for the really wealthy people.
	How'd that work out for us with the income tax?
	And don't forget, they said that 43 U.S.
	states have their own income taxes also.
	to compound the burden.
	I've pointed out many times that when you go back, you don't even have to go back to 1913, go back to the 1950s when we had Pretty much two-parent homes.
	Certainly, yeah, there'd be a death of a spouse.
	Divorce would happen, but it was rare, you know.
	A lot more rare than mRNA adverse effects.
	But, you know, when you had one person saying they're raising the kids, another one who's making the money, you had If you look at what has happened from that point in time, the 1950s to the 1980s, I went over that statistic many times when I was running for office.
	And I said, if you look at what has happened, the government has grown to the extent that now we have to have two wage earners and most of the typical second wage earner, the mom who has her job split between family obligations and job obligations, most of her money is going to pay for the increase in income taxes.
	Which were only 2% for the typical family of four in the 1950s.
	A lot more than that at that point in time.
	And so, if you look at what was happening, the government had grown to the burden, forcing, even in a two-parent home, forcing both parents to work.
	And of course, they need childcare, so let's ship the kids off to school.
	This is the basis of all this stuff.
	The taxes really do shape our lives.
	Kamala is going to drive gold to $10,000, says James Hickman.
	He said, the reality is there's a very good case we made that gold is still quite cheap compared to the trajectory.
	It's possible that in a few years, $2,500 gold could look remarkably inexpensive.
	It wasn't that long ago that we're looking at about $1,200 gold.
	Not to be overly dramatic, but Harris is a big reason why, he says.
	He says, it's funny because I seem to remember AOC saying that no one ever makes a billion dollars.
	You can take a billion dollars, she said.
	Well, he says, in this particular case, I'm inclined to agree with AOC.
	Lala took a billion dollars from Biden, the legitimate nominee.
	She raised another half billion by making the most outrageous claims and lying without ever bothering to sit for a basic interview or take legitimate questions.
	Her plans will undoubtedly cause higher deficits and more inflation.
	And by the way, so will Trump's.
	As a matter of fact, it was Trump's three and a half trillion dollars.
	Remember the only person who opposed him, the only person who opposed him.
	Republican or Democrat was Thomas Massey.
	He said, this is outrageous, and I'm going to demand that everybody come back and have a vote.
	We can't come back.
	We'll all die.
	Nobody did.
	They're pretty old.
	They're not very healthy.
	Nobody died.
	But he did get that vote, and Trump was outraged and wanted to primary him out.
	Unfortunately, he was unable to.
	But three and a half trillion dollars, and then that precedent was continued by Biden and increased a bit.
	So holding gold yields better returns than even mining for it.
	With spot gold prices at record highs, investors might expect the shares of precious metal mining companies would also be trading at record highs.
	By and large, though, that's not the case.
	The mining company's stock is not going up.
	Mining stocks, as represented by the HUI Gold Bugs Index, are still underwater by more than 40% compared to their highs back in 2011.
	And that's despite being pulled up significantly this year by soaring gold and silver prices.
	Even when the value of a mine's end product, silver or gold, goes up, the costs of getting it out of the ground can go up even faster.
	During periods when the market prices for metals fall below a mining company's all-in sustaining costs, some of them choose to sell at a loss rather than shut down everything, fire their employees, and if they want to start back up, I don't know who we're going to hire.
	They've found jobs somewhere else.
	So sometimes they would sell it at a loss, he said.
	But there would be another option.
	He says, it's kind of strange that the CEOs haven't taken this.
	He says, why don't they hold some of the gold on their books as a reserve asset instead of immediately exchanging it for dollars regardless of the prevailing price?
	Gold is considered by the Bank for International Settlements to be a tier one asset within the banking system.
	That means it's globally recognized as a high-quality capital reserve asset.
	That's why the central banks are buying so much of it and hoarding it.
	Central bankers around the world agree, but with few exceptions, the large corporations that are mining it, including major gold and silver producers, have failed to bolster their own finances with sound money backing.
	The question is, are you missing that opportunity?
	Even the gold mining companies are missing the opportunity in some cases to bolster their wealth protection, if you will, by accumulating their own product.
	Sometimes you have to Sometimes you have to think out of the box, and they're just in the habit of not doing that, I guess.
	But if you want to not make that mistake, you can start to set up wealth protection.
	Go to DavidNye.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony Aardman.
	His Wise Wolf Gold.
	You can buy gold, silver, large or small amounts.
	You can set up an IRA or transfer your money from an IRA into metals there.
	And he's also set up something that most gold dealers don't do, and that is the Wolf Pack, where you can sign up for a certain amount each month, starting at $50.
	Actually, there's a kids version that starts at $35.
	But he's got different levels there that you can buy into it.
	And that way you can just set up on a regular basis, you can start to set some money aside as a hedge against inflation, a hedge against economic collapse, a hedge against central bank digital currencies, against a lot of things.
	And that central bank digital currency, to me, that's the big issue.
	And that's the new threat.
	Yeah, we see what is happening with financial system and inflation, but CBDC is a new thing.
	So you can start to accumulate on a gradual basis.
	As part of that club, you can always get a group buying discount.
	And again, you can get there at davidknight.gold.
	I'll take you to Tony Aardman's wise wolf and let him know that you came through us, davidknight.gold.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	They're doing what?
	In the place they named after me?
	Good thing I have The David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	This is The David Knight Show.
	Talk a little bit about the battery electric vehicles.
	A lot of back and forth, and even to the extent that the big cheerleaders and a lot of these leftist organizations are saying, yeah, I know it looks really bad, but you know, this is a difficult time.
	We're in the middle of this transition and don't abandon these things yet.
	We're going to get there.
	But the reality is, is that if we look at this, it shares a couple of common features with the pandemic MacGuffin.
	First of all, both of them were about a phony problem, a non-existent crisis.
	And then the other thing they share in common is that both of them, we only had one solution that would be possible for the phony crisis.
	That in and of itself should be a tip-off.
	A lot of people, that was the tip-off for them.
	They would at the beginning you had some doctors and some people in the medical profession they said well we got an idea this is what you say is happening here's a way that we could something we could do about no shut up we're gonna lock everybody down and wait for the vaccine that's it period because that's what they'd practiced for 20 years starting two months before 9-11 with dark winter so it's one solution and one solution only anything else had to be demonized but that one solution
	No matter how bad that solution was, no matter how expensive that solution was, it was going to be subsidized.
	It was going to be forced down people's throats or into their arms or whatever.
	And that's what we're seeing here with the climate MacGuffin.
	Same thing that we saw with the pandemic MacGuffin.
	Two months into his presidency, Biden announced a $2 trillion infrastructure plan.
	They called it the Inflation Reduction Act.
	Just, just ridiculous.
	These people just mind dead, even with their labels and nobody catches on.
	A $2 trillion infrastructure plan that included $174 billion in grants, subsidies, other payouts to encourage Americans to switch to battery electric vehicles.
	Since that initial investment, quote unquote, It's not an investment.
	It's corruption.
	Crony capitalism.
	Since that time, billions and billions more have been poured into what is increasingly a failing effort to convince or to cajole American buyers to switch.
	These huge expenditures together with COVID and war money.
	See?
	Even they understand.
	There's a connection with that.
	This is from whatsupwiththat.com.
	Yeah.
	It's, um, they, they share all the COVID McGuffin, the climate McGuffin, war, All that is set up to crash us.
	They ballooned the national debt to the point 76% of income taxes are needed just to pay the interest on that debt.
	No, they're not.
	They're not needed.
	The income taxes are not needed because they don't care about the deficit.
	They only care about the deficit if you want to cut taxes.
	That's the only time these people ever care about any deficit or about the accumulated debt.
	The fault lies the very concept that the government knows best.
	But isn't that what we bought into, left and right?
	The government knows best.
	We can fix this if we just get Trump in.
	Or, you know, we want Lala in because she knows she's gonna subsidize everything that we want.
	Well, there are a plethora of alternatives to battery electric vehicles, of course, and they list some of them here, including a wide variety of hydrogen-powered engines and a new self-rotating engine.
	None of these, however, have been blessed with massive subsidies.
	None of them would require a heavily subsidized nationwide charging station network, either.
	So we had other things.
	If we had hydrogen-powered engines, we wouldn't have to have the big charging stations.
	Remember, $8 billion and they got, what, seven charging stations built?
	Well, you don't even need those charging stations if you go to some of these other alternatives.
	And so even if we accept their lying premise that there is a problem, That there is global warming.
	And then the next premise that you've got to accept is that it's man-made.
	And then the next premise that you've got to accept is that their solutions are going to be a net savings of global warming.
	None of those are true!
	It is a house of cards.
	And I think that we need to pull it down from the very first assumption.
	about global warming.
	Certainly about man-made global warming.
	We ought to respond to all this stuff the same way that we should be responding to all this pharmaceutical garbage.
	Prove it!
	Prove it!
	The New York Times back in 2021 questioned the wisdom of Biden's big battery electric vehicle plunge.
	Someone by the name of Chotzy wrote both that the $174 billion might not be enough to push most Americans towards EVs. Chotzy was doubtful that federal largesse, which merely shifts part of the cost of a battery electric vehicle from the buyer to the public, would convince consumers of the benefits of electric vehicles.
	And he was right.
	We know what the real agenda is, though.
	At the time, it was deemed as the only pathway toward a cleaner energy future.
	There's that MacGuffin tip, right?
	We've got a phony problem, and we've got only one solution.
	Well, beware.
	If they're going to restrict everything to one solution, they're not serious about the problem.
	And that's what woke a lot of people up about the pandemic.
	They said, if this really was a global pandemic, and if it was really killing people, or had the potential to, that you say it does, then it would be all hands on deck.
	Everybody bring your own solution.
	Let's find us something that's going to stop it.
	Let's try everything.
	No, when you pull back and you roll this out iteratively in stages, when you say, we're going to wait for the final solution, then we know what this is all about.
	And this climate MacGuffin was designed for dependency.
	It was designed for control.
	It was designed for the elimination of private cars, including the battery electric vehicles.
	It's just like the schools.
	We look at the schools and say, well, these schools are not working.
	No, they are.
	They're doing exactly what they were designed to do.
	So a recent article noted that Stellantis is investing $6 billion to build a generation of motors capable of running on gasoline or on Brazilian ethanol.
	And combined with plug-in hybrid technology, Kohler engines last year unveiled a KDH hydrogen internal combustion engine.
	BMW, Toyota, Triton, EV, Hyundai, all and many other automakers are also building hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines.
	The tech isn't the issue though.
	Government is.
	And the fact that people are coming up with these alternatives, even without government subsidization, and the fact that they're being rejected and disallowed.
	Should be the big signal of what's going on here.
	Just last week a new report touted a liquid nitrogen engine, based on 1990s research at the University of Washington, that even with a 100-gallon nitrogen tank is cheaper and lighter than a battery electric vehicle.
	And again, weight matters.
	If you're going to look at this as an overall picture, that kind of efficiency should matter.
	You're going to be using more energy to haul something around this heavy.
	The operation is akin to that of a steam-driven engine.
	Hey, we could all have a steampunk future, maybe.
	Generates zero pollutants.
	It refuels at existing gas and diesel stations, and it only takes a few minutes.
	But Washington wants nothing other than an all-electric motor vehicle that is completely tied to the electric grid.
	Why?
	Because they want control, they want dependency, and they want to eliminate Independent cars.
	Hydrogen fuel cells are ideal for the trucking industry because the refueling time and the driving range are comparable to diesel or gas.
	Trucks and travel routes are predictable, which lowers the barrier for developing a fueling infrastructure.
	In other words, every truck stop in America could easily put in hydrogen tanks.
	Hydrogen will likely be an equally better choice for other heavy-duty vehicles, including school buses, But the Biden administration has provided huge subsidies for the electric school bus.
	Lala loves these things.
	I guess she thinks they run on pure joy.
	Here's one example.
	One county that went into it in Maryland, probably it's Montgomery County, I don't know, but I'm assuming that it's a suburb of Washington, D.C.
	Nobody else could be this cavalier with the amount of money that they throw away.
	The Montgomery County, Maryland Public School District is the nation's largest purchaser of electric school buses.
	They bought 326 at a cost of $168 million.
	They're about a half a million dollars each.
	So how much does a diesel school bus cost?
	New, it costs between $100,000 and $200,000, not $500,000.
	And if you can get amused anywhere from $20,000 to $60,000.
	So, they wasted a tremendous amount of money, and waste is understating it.
	From February 2022 to March 2024, these electric buses failed to complete their routes 280 times, and the repairs took an average of 13 days.
	Last October, the school board felt the need to buy 90 diesel buses to make up for the failures of the electric buses.
	Nationwide, over 90% of the 21 million plus bused students ride in diesel buses, with most of the rest relying on propane.
	See, and that in and of itself is an unnecessary cost.
	I went all the way through high school Going to schools that I could walk or ride my bike to.
	We had neighborhood schools.
	The busing began in my junior and senior year of high school.
	And now everybody rides a bus everywhere all the time.
	It absolutely is crazy.
	And a tremendous waste of time and money.
	So, of course, the fires.
	This was sent to me.
	This is yet another example of fires.
	This one at the Rivian Automotive Manufacturing Facility.
	Uh, investigators, this is fine.
	Investigators are still trying to determine the cause of the blaze.
	Couldn't be the battery that blew up and exploded, right?
	Uh, and this is not the first time we've seen this happen at a factory.
	Uh, we also had this happen at a factory that was manufacturing, uh, large semi trailers and, um, big fire with that because those batteries are even bigger.
	Uh, but now it's, it's kind of interesting because the insurance premiums are coming into play.
	The very fact that these things are difficult to put out, if not impossible, that 13% of them reignite after the initial blaze, like one of these birthday candles that you try to blow out, keeps coming back.
	And they can explode with thermal runaway while they're being charged, if there's damage to the batteries, if there's extreme weather, anything like that.
	So now the insurance companies are paying attention.
	Would it be ironic if the insurance companies were actually there and actually preserved private vehicles by getting rid of this battery electric vehicle agenda?
	These explosions and higher repair costs for EV batteries are causing insurance companies to take a closer look, so they've gone up.
	If they haven't dropped Insurance coverage for electric vehicles, as some of them have.
	They have risen, the premiums have risen significantly.
	A 72% jump in average EV insurance costs, compared with a 29% jump for gas vehicles.
	So they're soaking us both ways.
	But more than twice as much of an increase for the electric vehicles.
	Some EV owners are receiving insurance quotes of over $120 per week.
	While others are receiving quotes double or even triple the year before.
	And again, insurance companies just insane.
	I remember a guy that I used to work with bought an expensive fast motorcycle and they were going to charge him for insurance more than the price of the brand new vehicle every year.
	So how in the world can they justify that?
	I mean, first of all, um, you know, all you're talking about is a worst case scenario.
	Well, in the worst case scenario, the motorcycle rider is going to get killed.
	But in the second worst case scenario, the motorcycle is completely totaled, but they're going to charge you more than the price or replacement price of a brand new one each year.
	And how much damage is it going to do to some other vehicle?
	Not like any of the others.
	Anyway, the EV revolution says the verge, don't lose the faith, never give up, says the leftist environmentalist.
	It's just going to take longer than we thought.
	So don't give up on it yet.
	Contrary to what you've heard, electric vehicle sales are up.
	Yes, I know, says the writer.
	I know.
	Tesla sales are down.
	Ford is scaling back its EV rollout.
	GM is delaying electric trucks and holding back on investing in EV battery construction.
	Hertz is offloading EVs as its stock price is struggling.
	Automakers across the board are losing millions.
	Some of them are losing billions.
	But hey, this is America.
	Who cares about cost, right?
	Especially this person.
	They're not fully on board with the climate thing, so they don't care about costs.
	As they said, the vibe, they say, as they say, is grim.
	And yet, sales are still growing.
	We've had 1.2 million EVs will be sold in the U.S.
	by the end of 2024, an increase over 1 million sold last year.
	Well, you know what?
	Some people still want masks.
	These propaganda narratives die hard.
	Not the batteries.
	The batteries are not diehard.
	The agenda is diehard.
	EVs are fine as long as they're not subsidized.
	You know, just as long as you want to pay for your own costs.
	As long as this is not used to ban all private cars, including EVs.
	But this person says, well, no, it's not a problem.
	We're just in the middle of a, the messy middle of an EV revolution.
	Well, Here's the fundamental thing.
	Going back to emissions, a big study has been done.
	1,500 different practices that were mandated or implemented that were supposed to eliminate emissions.
	And they looked at this over 1,500 different practices over a 24-year period in 41 different countries.
	And out of the 1,500 policies, only 63 of them did anything with emissions.
	Now, that's only 4%.
	And even though you're reducing the emissions, that doesn't mean that, you know, that doesn't have anything to do with warming.
	If there is global warming, it doesn't have anything to do with it.
	Because again, CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere.
	Only 3% of it, they even claim, and they've probably inflated that, only 3% of that CO2 is produced by humans.
	And of all of these procedures to reduce that CO2 emission, Only 4% of them do anything to reduce any of it.
	So what does that tell you?
	Years ago, when we had a lawsuit against the TSA, when they were bringing in the naked body scanners and the rest of this stuff, and the pat-downs were escalating, there was a lawsuit and they found out that, at the time,
	There was opposition in Texas and in response to the opposition they threatened to close down every single flight in and out of Texas if they stopped the TSA from doing what they were the new procedure their new iterative thing right well now we got something else yeah yeah now you got to do this you know well if they stop that they threatened to stop all flights in and out but at the same time in their internal documents those in 2011 they said there is currently no threat
	To airports or to airplanes.
	So why were they doing that?
	Well, we all know why they were doing it.
	And so even though you've only got 4% of these measures do even reduce anything, they're still going to have you do all 96% of them that don't have any effect whatsoever.
	And just like with the TSA, If there's no threat, and if they are incompetent, and we've had studies, they won't give you the real percentage number.
	You know, how many times, what percentage of the time do they fail to identify weapons or something like that?
	But it's been hinted by congressmen who have seen that it is in the upper 80s to lower 90s percentile failure.
	So if they're only getting 10% of the things that are coming through, or even if it was 20%, if there really was a threat, we would have had a lot of terrorist events like that.
	We haven't had them.
	If only 4% of these measures are doing anything, if the CO2 is a problem, We would have a big problem, and we don't.
	That's across four sectors, 41 countries, two decades, two and a half actually.
	They only found 63 successful policy interventions out of over 1,500.
	So that tells you why, when you look at this, Daily Caller put out an article, Democrats' massive green energy agenda is walking America right into China's hand.
	China has always been the beta test site, the preferred model, for the way they want the global system of slavery and the new global governance to work.
	It's one of the reasons why in January of 2021, as this program began, I was on YouTube, and when I put up the video that said 2020, it was right at the beginning of the year, talking about what had happened in 2020, I said, 2020 was the year the world became China.
	That was it.
	Boom.
	Google got on my case and they shut me down within a couple, first they suspended me and then they found another one, they start doing a review, they found another one, and I didn't even get back on air.
	They found three strikes to keep me off the air.
	After I put out that one thing that said 2020 was the year the world became China.
	Because that's what they want.
	They want the world to become China.
	They don't want you to know that that's what they want.
	Other critics of the West's climate policies have pointed out the continued use of fuel, especially coal, by populous countries like China and India will blunt global emission reductions, while Western countries saddle themselves with high costs of an energy transition.
	Who cares?
	96% of their stuff doesn't work.
	And then the two countries that use the most energy don't have any restrictions on them.
	That's the Paris Climate Accord.
	And so you've had these people who are true believers were very upset about that.
	They said, you're not doing anything to stop global emissions.
	All you're doing is transferring industry to China.
	Bingo.
	China is by far the world's leading emitter, more than doubling America's emissions.
	While India is the third largest source, and it emits more than all the 27 countries of the EU combined, India.
	And there's no restrictions on them.
	No restrictions on the quantity or the how clean or dirty these are.
	Meanwhile, AI is showing that these corporations don't really care about this stuff.
	They told you that it was an existential issue.
	The planet's gonna melt.
	We gotta do everything.
	We got no amount of money.
	You know, we're gonna have ESG, all the rest of the stuff.
	Now...
	Because they need a lot of power for AI.
	Forbes says, well, they're just saying, forget about the climate stuff for now.
	They always know that if they've got AI, they can pull back, they can create a new MacGuffin or they can revive any of these old MacGuffins because AI is their control tactic.
	That's how they're going to gaslight and, and control you is with artificial intelligence.
	That's how they're going to monitor what you do, surveil what you do and censor what you hear.
	And propaganda issue as well.
	Google, Microsoft once positioned themselves as leaders in sustainability, setting ambitious net zero goals to align with global environmental efforts.
	But now the rapid rise of A.I.
	that is so energy intensive is forcing these companies to reconsider and even abandon these commitments so they can make money.
	Imagine that.
	An Exhibit A of all of this climate hypocrisy and energy-hungry big tech sector is Elon Musk.
	He's building the world's largest supercomputer in Memphis, Tennessee.
	750,000 square foot vacant manufacturing plant in Memphis.
	And it's going to use more power than 100,000 homes.
	Again, each of these AI facilities is using more power than a pretty good-sized city.
	And it's kind of interesting that they're looking to make this the fastest supercomputer and the other supercomputer that is currently the reigning champion is at Oak Ridge Labs in Eastern Tennessee.
	And where's all this electricity going to come from?
	It's going to come from the TVA, which is a real big issue for those of us who live in Tennessee, because that means that the feds, when the feds are running TVA, that means that there's no reality to any of this stuff.
	They've got an agenda, and their agenda is going to be to serve these supercomputers, and they don't really care what it's going to do to electricity rates for the rest of us here.
	So, Oak Ridge, Tennessee has the current big supercomputer, and now Elon Musk is looking to transcend that.
	When we look at what this is all about, I liked what What's Up With That said.
	Energy transition is simply a federal bribe.
	Bribes and bans.
	As I've said for the most part, this is how the federal government works.
	And you need to tell your MAGA friends.
	Explain it to them.
	They don't care what the Constitution says.
	They don't care what the Tenth Amendment says.
	They can bribe and they can ban strategically to get people to do whatever they want.
	And that's what's happening right now.
	They are picking the winners and losers by the subsidies that they do.
	Subsidies are the only reason that they have these big facilities like wind and solar at commercial scale.
	Again, if you want to use it to get independence away from the energy grid, that's a good thing.
	And the economics are so distorted by subsidies, by subsidies from China, by subsidies from the U.S., that even though, as Jason Barker has pointed out, There's more energy, according to a lot of studies, more energy goes into creating a solar panel than you're going to get out in its lifetime.
	Even if that's true, if the government is heavily subsidizing these things, and it may make economic sense for you, and it might make sense for you to get off the grid, but these things don't make any sense when you put them on the grid.
	All it does is drive the cost of electricity sky-high, take the reliability to zero.
	And that is what's happening across the country, Texas and everywhere else.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	And when we come back, I want to talk a little bit about what is happening on the societal level.
	We talked about drugs before.
	We talked about how that is really a spiritual issue.
	Well, it really is.
	And we're going to talk about what this looks like in other dimensions as well.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, I want to talk about false flags, and when we have, what are the conditions for us to take up arms and fight our government?
	That's being talked about a lot now.
	Not just a civil war, but actual organized violent resistance to the government.
	And so I want to talk about that and tell you what the conservatives are saying here as they line up behind Trump for perhaps a civil war.
	Before we leave this energy issue here on Rumble, Marky Mark, New Jersey, says, Hydrogen yields less energy than needed to make it.
	It's normally made by splitting H2O or CH4 water and methane, respectively.
	This takes more energy than it yields.
	It's also hard to store and to transport.
	I'm not advocating for any of these things.
	What I'm pointing out, however, is the fact that, you know, we can point out the flaws with all of these things.
	The fundamental flaw, however, that ought to be apparent to everybody, is that there is one heavily subsidized alternative.
	That's the point I was trying to make.
	Point I'm trying to make is I don't, I don't care what anybody drives.
	You want to drive electric vehicle?
	If you want to drive a steampunk car, I don't care.
	You know, you want to light up some coal and burn some water and get this thing moving and go mad max.
	It's up to you.
	I'm not here to tell people what cars to drive.
	I'm here to tell people that they don't want you to have a car of any kind.
	That's the point.
	And you can see this is happening when they come up with number one, a phony problem.
	the emissions.
	Number two, only one solution is going to be allowed.
	Nobody's allowed to try anything else out, right?
	We're going to have one heavily subsidized solution to our phony problem.
	Folks, if that's not a telltale for a MacGuffin, that's how these things always work.
	And that's the point I was trying to make.
	Now let's talk about the election and about an armed resistance.
	False flags and agents provocateurs.
	This is from the New American.
	They have their entire magazine this month.
	It's about when a civil war is justified.
	Human history will dispose the prudent man to protect himself, his family, his community, his nation.
	Not only against robbers, murderers and thieves and thugs, but also against potential invading armies and their spies and fifth columns.
	Notice what they didn't mention.
	Your own government.
	That's not what they mean by fifth column, because they immediately pivot to say this, as well as arming ourselves.
	We also establish sheriffs and police departments, militias and military forces, and to provide guidance and early threat warning to these protectors, we establish intelligence agencies.
	Well, we used to not have that, except at time of war.
	And we used to not have standing armies, except at times of war.
	And what this paragraph misses completely is when the government itself is your biggest opponent, even as we're talking about false flags and agents provocateurs.
	And then to support this, They go back to the Bible and said, well, you know, in Bible, in Numbers, Moses sent out the 12 spies to look at the land of Canaan, you know.
	Go back and scout it out.
	Tell us what you see, right?
	And most of you know the story.
	Ten of them come back and say, it's too difficult.
	There's giants in the land and this and that.
	It's a land filled with abundance, but we can't handle it, right?
	Two of them said, we can do it.
	Let's go.
	And so the people didn't want to do it at Kadesh Barnea.
	And so because of that, God punished them 40 years in the wilderness and said, nobody in this generation is going to see the promised land except for Joshua and Caleb.
	They were the two spies who came back and said, we can do it.
	Moses was punished by not being allowed into the promised land as well.
	What was the problem?
	Was it bad intelligence?
	No.
	The problem was that they didn't trust God.
	That's the issue here.
	That's the issue with this issue, is that they don't trust God.
	You see, what they were saying was, we need, first of all, to even have intelligence scouts there.
	We have to do that because we can't trust God to do what he's promised to do.
	So let's check on him.
	Let's do a sanity check on this promise from God, okay?
	No, it doesn't look like he can do that.
	I don't think we need to even try.
	And so they get a 40-year penalty.
	They get banned from entering because of their faithlessness.
	Now, it's not exactly the same thing, but when you look at what our government is doing, our government, which is its mission, right, is to protect us.
	And yet it now sees us as its greatest threat.
	And that's not just in America, that's in every single country.
	These people have gotten together for so long in their globalist confabs, whether it's Bilderberg or Davos or the Club of Rome or whatever, they all get together and they conspire about this global government that they want.
	And what's the thing that's in their way?
	It's people who are in their own country.
	So we become the enemy and they turn the surveillance systems on us.
	Well, so, again, continuing with this, the New American, one of the other articles that they have in this month's magazine, when is armed resistance justified?
	When is it justifiable for a Christian to take up arms against a tyrannical government?
	Well, we should have had this discussion, if we're going to have this discussion, we should have had this in 2020.
	I said that in 2020.
	I said, why would you have, you know, send everybody to Washington To try to put Trump back in when he did nothing to defend us.
	He turned us over to the unelected bureaucrats and the pharmaceutical industries and special interests.
	He locked us down.
	Well, the lesser magistrate and nullification are the first thing that you should try.
	So when is armed resistance justified?
	Well, I'll tell you, first of all, you better try those other things.
	If you haven't tried nullification, if you haven't tried the lesser magistrate, then you don't have what it takes to overthrow a government by force.
	It's just that simple.
	If you're going to look at that and say, that's too difficult.
	Let's just grab some weapons and, you know, I'm sure there's somebody out there that knows what they're doing.
	We'll figure this thing out.
	If you don't have the kind of leadership that wants to achieve this with a minimum of bloodshed, if you don't have the kind of leadership that wants to try to do hard things, if you don't have the kind of leadership that wants to follow the law and do the right thing, the law is on our side when we talk about nullification.
	I mentioned that earlier with the war on drugs.
	I won't belabor it anymore, but if you don't have the guts to do that, if you don't have the organizational skills to fight for nullification, guess what?
	You don't have the organizational skills to fight a war either.
	You need to shut up about that.
	It disgusts me to see all these conservatives out there beating the drums for war when they won't lift a finger.
	They won't even pay attention to what's going on locally or at the state level.
	They won't nullify what's happening in Washington.
	They think that they can all get together by force somehow and impose some billionaire dictator who's going to fix everything for them from Washington.
	That is a disastrous idea.
	And if we don't learn anything about this election, You need to understand that.
	It's a selection.
	First of all, you're not going to make any difference in your vote.
	Number two, get over this idolatry.
	It's just, and number three, you're not going to, if you haven't done anything at all, you're not going to, it's going to be much tougher with a war.
	If you can't do nullification, if you can't organize people when you've got legitimate arguments to make with this stuff, all of this, It's because of presidential idolatry.
	It's an American Idol contest.
	It's a pageant.
	It's a fake revolution.
	As Caitlin Johnstone said on Thursday, the reason that you have these elections in the American empire is not so that you can actually change anything.
	It's basically a cathartic experience.
	So you can feel like you're participating in a revolution, except now this time around, what has changed?
	And she doesn't address this, but here's the danger this time around.
	You got everybody in the mainstream alternative media that is out there saying, well, this time, if we don't get what we want, this is the last election we're going to have.
	And we're going to have to do this by force.
	That's stupid.
	You need to look at Matt Trujillo's book.
	The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate.
	You can find that at defytyrants.com.
	D-E-F-Y tyrants dot com.
	Go there and take a look at what he says can and should be done.
	And if you're not willing to do that, then don't go to Washington for another January the 6th nonsense.
	And if you're not willing to do something to protect your family, Again, all these people want to talk about, oh, you know, let's have another American Revolution.
	Just grab your musket and let's go.
	Take a look at this.
	The Vermont Department of Health.
	Department of Health.
	It's not the Department of Education.
	It's the Department of Health telling schools not to use words like son or daughter.
	So what are you going to do about that?
	All these brave conservative MAGA-tards who want to have a shootout.
	Would you even take your kids out of school?
	Oh, that's too hard.
	I can't do that.
	Right?
	Would you fight against the property taxes that keep you from ever owning property your entire life?
	Would you fight to defund the schools that are doing this to all the kids in your community?
	No, that's too hard.
	Well, let's talk about a revolution.
	Yeah, right.
	These gaslighting pedophiles who are paid by the taxes on your home so that you never own anything.
	And you won't stop that?
	But you want to talk about revolution at the federal level?
	What?
	You know, it's amazing to me to see what's happened to the John Birch Society and so many conservatives.
	They've completely lost sight of what the issues really are.
	This is your issue.
	Take care of your kids, take care of your family, take care of your community, your state first.
	And the threat is coming from Washington.
	They're not the solution.
	But if you're not going to fight them at the local level on these types of issues, Or the right is on your side.
	What is right is on your side.
	You're not going to fight them on the other stuff.
	The language we use matters, says the state agency, and it has to be inclusive language.
	These people, schools taking your home, now they want to take your kids, right?
	They urged school employees, this is the health department in Vermont, they urged school employees to use terms like child and kid instead of daughter and son.
	Explaining, child and kid are gender neutral.
	They can describe a child who may not be someone's legal son or daughter.
	That's not what they're after.
	It's this gender gaslighting stuff.
	They've never done anything like that before.
	For context, it's important to note this is not the first time the Green Mountain State has sought to police the language used in public school system.
	And it's coming from the Health Department.
	It's not even coming from the Educational Department.
	But the time they did this before, it did come from the school district.
	This is the Essex-Westford School District in Vermont.
	Made headlines in April of last year.
	When according to the Parental Advocacy Group, parents defending education.
	Parents defending education.
	What are they defending?
	I mean, if you want to defend education, shut the schools down.
	These are nothing but indoctrination camps.
	And they're bankrupting us with their school buses and their free education for everybody, including people who are not even American citizens.
	We cannot continue to have a society while we're being financially bankrupted by these schools and intellectually bankrupted by them, while our children are being pedophile groomed by them.
	Why don't we shut them down?
	We can't shut down the schools.
	How do you think you're gonna shut down Washington?
	Officials sent a letter home to parents informing the teachers we'll be using gender-inclusive language throughout a course on puberty and the human reproductive systems.
	Not about that.
	It's about debauchery, not puberty.
	Teachers would say, quote, person who produces sperm, instead of boy, male, or even a person assigned male at birth.
	Even that is not crazy enough for them.
	You can't even say, well, there's no such thing as male or female.
	There's things that we are assigned at birth.
	You're assigned that by God.
	It is a physical reality.
	Or you would have a person who produces sperm, or a person who produces eggs, rather than girl, female, or assigned female at birth.
	They said, we're working on editing worksheets and handouts to reflect these changes, but you may see some worksheets that have not yet changed, so I apologize if we're still using the terms boys and girls, or sons and daughters.
	Meanwhile, a former teacher gets five years in prison after threatening a judge over a ruling that supported parental rights.
	You see, it's okay if you threaten children.
	If you threaten parents, you're okay.
	Just don't threaten the judge, or you'll go to jail.
	U.S.
	District Judge William Jung sentenced Stephen J. Thorne, 66 years old, retired teacher, to five years in federal prison for transmitting a threat to harm a federal judge and members of the judge's immediate family.
	Thorne entered a guilty plea and was given five years.
	He had left the hateful messages for another judge, a woman, Judge Wendy Berger, who had ruled against a challenge to Florida's Parental Rights and Education Bill that was signed by DeSantis in 2022.
	This is the one they said, don't say gay.
	And this person says, I'm gay and I don't like that.
	And so because this judge ruled that the law was okay and could move forward, This person blew up in an email to the judge and said, let's see how you would like it if somebody endangered your children in school or your grandchildren in school.
	That's what he was doing, actually.
	You're an embarrassment to the judicial system.
	He said he looked up the judge and her husband and two children lived and said the judge was, quote, very easy to track.
	The irony is this person was extremely easy to track.
	He now has a number and a permit location for the next five years.
	He's very easy to locate.
	I'm a retired teacher.
	I've taught in Florida.
	I've taught in California.
	I have seen the sheer hell those kids are put through, and you have the gall to say that's part of middle school or high school to be picked on, he said?
	This is for the stupid, redneck, blankety-blank judge.
	He said, one message, you are a cruel person.
	You think it's okay for LGBT kids to be bullied.
	And that's what this law is allowing.
	And that's what it's saying that they're second class citizens.
	Listen, dummy, you're easy to track down.
	Five years.
	Uh, as a matter of fact, the, uh, uh, the, uh, prosecutors sought 30 months in prison, but the judge doubled the sentence.
	However, however, This teacher is retired.
	And in California and Florida, this teacher had been grooming and abusing kids, obviously on a regular basis.
	You know, talking inside, I've spent a large portion of my teaching career advocating for LGBT public school students.
	I'm also the parent of two adult sons, one of whom is gay, said the homosexual teacher.
	So he's been doing this to a lot of kids.
	Not a problem.
	Just don't, you know, do whatever you want.
	Just, um, uh, uh, and you still get a pension.
	Just don't criticize a judge for any of this stuff or you're going to go to jail.
	So are conservatives getting played by Trump on abortion?
	Look, folks, getting played by Trump on everything.
	Why?
	Because they've set themselves up to look for a billionaire savior.
	And so he's flipped on one side of the issue to the other.
	Lila Rose has just been, you know, savaged on Twitter by people like Cat Turd and, you know, other MAGA turds that are out there.
	But, you know, this person is writing this essay on a Christian site that's called AmericanReformer.org.
	And as I talk about this, I said, you know, look at all the different, Trump's all over the place.
	We can't trust him on anything.
	Yeah.
	He's, he's got a personality that we don't want to hold that up as an example yet, despite the enormity of the abortion issue.
	Other things matter as well.
	In fact, they matter more so to be blunt.
	Well, I just have to say that if you don't care about the abortion of children, And you don't care about the mass abortion of adults, of young people, of elderly people, with the shots?
	With all the remdesivir, with the ventilators?
	If you don't care about that, look, being pro-life is not just being anti-abortion.
	It's being anti-vaccine and anti-war.
	It's about being actually for life.
	And if you don't care about that, quite frankly, I don't care about your view of ethics or Christ or anything else.
	You need to go back to the drawing board and think a little bit more.
	Thanks for joining us.
	us have a good day.
	I'm dying.
	you They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲