Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 6, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:00

The David Knight Show - 06/06/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 6th of June.
	Year of our Lord, 2024.
	Well, the chickens have come home to roost.
	Or maybe we should say the Burks has come back.
	We've got Burks flu being pushed again.
	Is anybody going to fall for this?
	But it's even worse this time.
	Because what we have is the other shoe to start dropping.
	All of this talk about gain of function.
	Oh yeah, now we even found...
	Oh, could be, could be, yeah, yeah.
	But if it was, it was China, that type of thing.
	And the Republicans pushing this very heavily.
	And now we have other people who are selling things to you besides the lies about pandemics.
	But now they're telling you to be afraid because this is engineered.
	No, folks, it's not.
	The propaganda is engineered.
	And we'll talk about that to begin with.
	We'll also talk about artificial intelligence and Palantir.
	Palantir has always been involved in one form of AI, anticipatory intelligence, to spy and surveil on you.
	And that's their role in Operation Warp Speed.
	And now they have been given a major Pentagon contract.
	We'll talk about that when we come back.
	Stay with us. Yeah, yeah.
	You do it from the inside, you do it with disruption, and you do it iteratively.
	And the iterative part is what you need to really pay attention to.
	This constant progression.
	Oh, look, we've got somebody with pink eye.
	Works on a farm. Oh, it's got to be bird flu.
	We've got another person. And now we've got somebody who has a cough.
	Doesn't have any fever or anything like that.
	And now we've got somebody in Mexico who supposedly died.
	And this is a new strain, says the World Health Organization.
	Why would anybody believe that?
	You know, I mean, when we had this Trump trial, one of the most amazing things to me about this was the fact that everybody understood that Michael Cohen was an obvious liar.
	And yet, when we catch the people that are on your side, right?
	You catch them in lies.
	When you catch these people in lies, Not a problem.
	Because if it's your guy who's lying, it's okay.
	We make excuses for them.
	Oh, that Cuomo, look at how he misled people when he was at CNN. Now the Ivermectin and other stuff like that.
	But, you know, Tucker? No, it's okay.
	You know, he did the same thing.
	Now both of them are out there on their own with a podcast.
	They've got to please the audience that is out there.
	And so, before they said anything that would please CNN or Fox, they were getting paid by big pharmaceutical companies.
	Now they tell you what you want to hear.
	It's not that hard to figure it out.
	I could figure out what you want to hear, too.
	Trump is great. He's going to save the world.
	Oh, I'll tell you what, the only hope we've got is Trump, okay?
	There you go. That's what you want to hear, right?
	Not my audience, but many people do.
	Well, why does the World Health Organization have any credibility at all?
	Why is anybody listening to them?
	And you see, this time they can't just run this game on us.
	We've seen this before. Not going to fool me again this time.
	Oh yeah, they will. Because I've seen this before.
	Most people see, because the partisan blinders that people have on, They don't realize how Trump and the alt-right press played people for fear in the spring of 2020.
	Leading up to and right after the declaration by President Trump, they don't understand that all of this push About gain of function.
	I mean, when I was at Infowars, we had a constant stream of people coming, oh, look, it's got this hook, and it's designed with a hook, and look at the furrage cleavage and all this other kind of stuff, and it's like, yeah, okay.
	Show me some sick people, okay?
	Show me some sick people, I'll believe it.
	I see pictures of people in China falling down, and they're not good at it, you know?
	That's why we pay the stuntmen so much.
	Pretty easy to spot a fake fall like that.
	But again, they pushed that.
	They pushed it for their own purposes.
	They pushed it for political purposes.
	And these people that had gained your trust pushed it for the CIA. The people running this stuff.
	Face the facts, folks.
	Stop the denial.
	It's right in front of your eyes, and they're doing it again.
	Look at these people like Rand Paul right out in front.
	Push, push, push on this lab thing.
	Why? Well, then we're exonerated.
	It wasn't us. We didn't do anything to you.
	It was the pandemic, and the Chinese created the pandemic.
	So get mad at them. We need to go to war with them, you know.
	Don't go to war with Trump.
	Don't go to war with the Republicans, who did nothing then, doing nothing now.
	They hold these hearings, and as I said, they're not going to do a blessed thing about it.
	Why? Because the purpose of the hearing is to have a gain of fear.
	That's what GOF stands for now, not gain of function.
	Gain of fear.
	That's what they hope to gain from these hearings.
	Fear. I need to do a t-shirt.
	Gain of fear. Ha!
	Just say no. K-N-O-W, right?
	You need to understand what they did to you before.
	So right now, the entire planet, pretty much, except for, you know, a small enclave of, you know, security blanket loving liberals, but pretty much everybody else realizes they were played, even if they won't admit it.
	And everybody's going to have a lot of resistance to them coming out with a vaccine program.
	So what do we do? Well, we do two things.
	Number one, we use this excuse to call the food supply and to vaccinate the food supply so they can vaccinate us that way.
	The number two thing is to get people to buy into this bird flu thing by telling everyone it's engineered.
	Even if you've got to blame the U.S. government, Tell everybody that it's engineered.
	And that's what you saw in spring of 2020.
	Oh, it's the U.S. government that's doing this.
	Along with the Chinese.
	And now this is coming out again.
	Dr. Peter McCullough is doing this.
	Yeah. So sad to see that.
	Why? He's got something to sell you.
	Look, ivermectin's great.
	Get ivermectin. Get it from Peter McCullough even.
	I don't care. You can get a lot of different places right now.
	You know, you needed to have food.
	At the beginning of this medical martial law as it was shaping up, I had no moral issues selling people storable food.
	They were going to need it. Not for a pandemic, but because Trump was going to lock us down and bust the supply chains, which is what he did.
	We had empty shelves of the grocery stores and people were destroying food on the farms because of Trump.
	Do you remember that? I do.
	Stop with the amnesia.
	Come on. It's just amazing.
	And so this is all happening again.
	I look at the comments, and like I said a couple of weeks ago, Zero Hedge, who has no problem pushing this fear, this baseless fear about bioweapons and bioengineering and everything, look, yeah, they're infecting animals with disease.
	They're infecting people with disease.
	Stop it. Stop the funding.
	They won't do that.
	Why not? No, they want it.
	Serves their purpose. Well, we got this bioweapons program and we can't do anything to stop it, you know, because national security.
	But boy, it's so dangerous.
	And if we have a mistake or deliberate thing, oh, well, you know, we're just going to have to lock you all down again.
	Oh, no, that's awful.
	I wish they could be more careful or something.
	It's ridiculous. Stop it.
	Just stop it. Stop the pearl clutching.
	Stop the funding.
	That's all that's happening in Washington.
	Just stop it. And they won't.
	Because it suits their purpose.
	And so now you've got people who have things to sell you.
	Conservatives. And they're now pushing the fear, just like we saw before.
	So Zero Hedge has these articles, like I said a couple of weeks ago.
	They had one, it was just a propaganda piece.
	It might have even been from Epoch Times again.
	Because like I pointed out yesterday and the day before, Epoch Times have been poking, pushing this stuff out.
	Hook, line, and sinker for their conservative audience, because it's the conservatives who will have objections to it, right?
	That's why they had to have Trump.
	They could have never gotten anybody to sign on to this thing if it had been some obvious shill of the big state like Hillary Clinton.
	Oh, but Trump is the anti-globalist, even though he's doing the globalist work for them, even though he is the epicenter of the globalist agenda, creating the vaccine, pushing it out to everybody.
	But he presents himself globally.
	And I talk to people in other countries, they still see Trump as the anti-globalist.
	Seriously? I can understand people in other countries who don't really pay any attention to what he did in this country, but of course there's a lot of people with a MAGA cult that don't pay any attention to what he did, and if he did something that was wrong, well, it wasn't his fault, it was Fauci's fault, or it was Pence's fault, or anybody other than Trump.
	So, when they ran these stories a couple of weeks ago, there was 500 people who commented.
	Everybody on Zero Hedge was like, what is the matter with Zero Hedge?
	Why are they pushing this kind of fear propaganda and all the rest of the stuff?
	So today, Daily Mail had it.
	Pretty much all of the media, mainstream media, and most of the So-called alternative right media had this story about the new strain of bird flu, according to the World Health Organization, that has killed a man in 59.
	In Mexico, who's 59?
	And it's nonsense.
	It's the usual lies that they put out there.
	And we can talk a little bit about that.
	But what I thought was most interesting, more interesting than the article, was to go look at the comments.
	I wanted to get kind of an informal poll of how people felt about it.
	Now, the problem is, and of course, Daily Mail has got an audience that is not as savvy as the audience on Zero Hedge.
	But I would say anywhere from a quarter to a third of the people believed it because they said, oh, it's gain-of-function, and we've got to stop this stuff.
	They're ready to go into lockdown, whatever measures the government tells them, because they've been told that this gain-of-function thing is creating pandemics.
	You see, that's how they keep the pandemic narrative going.
	That's why they're focused on the gain-of-function stuff.
	That's why Rand Paul and other people like him have been focused on Fauci.
	Rand Paul is a medical doctor.
	He knows better. He is betraying us.
	He's a traitor, every bit as much as Fauci is.
	He's playing this misdirection, red herring game, using Fauci as a smelly fish to throw you off the real trail.
	That's the way it works.
	So, like I said, about 300 comments, anywhere from a quarter to a third of them.
	Oh, it's the gain-of-function stuff.
	Oh, where'd you hear that?
	Where'd you hear that? You heard it from Republicans.
	You heard it from the mainstream media now, too, right?
	They mainstream media that said, oh, no, there's absolutely no way that it came from lab.
	Now they say, well, maybe. And these fear-mongering conservatives like Alex and Mike Adams and stuff from the very beginning of this stuff.
	That's where we had our fallout.
	And now, Peter McCullough.
	You know, I never had Peter McCullough on because he always had some things there that I felt like, not necessarily that he was dishonest, but that he really didn't get it.
	You know, he's not a psychologist.
	He's a cardiologist.
	He's not a historian.
	He doesn't look at that kind of stuff.
	Officials say a 59-year-old man in Mexico died after battling a seven-day illness.
	Now, do you believe that?
	The man who suffered multiple underlying conditions, he was on death's door for a long time.
	And then he dies, and then they do a test.
	The World Health Organization comes in there, finds a test.
	Oh, it's a new strain, and he died from it.
	No, he died with it.
	And again, your test, this is worse than the PCR test that they had before, as I point out.
	You know, the quantitative PCR tests, they magnified that by a factor of 1.1 trillion.
	Now they've got a digital PCR test that can go even more than 40 cycles.
	And if they want to look in the water, they use a centrifuge, and they spin it at 100,000 RPM to make sure they get all of the tiny DNA particles concentrated down at the bottom of the centrifuge vial, and then they test that to magnify.
	It's not enough to magnify this thing by trillions of times.
	Let's also concentrate it artificially, right?
	I mean, if you're going to be honest, you just take the water and you test it.
	No, no, no, let's concentrate it, right?
	Just take all the water out, maybe.
	It's ridiculous, isn't it?
	One person out of 8 billion?
	Do you find that to be credible?
	Dr. Peter McCullough does, and he's fundraising off of this.
	I mean, you go to Zero Hedge and you see his ads all the time.
	It's like, okay, fine, yeah, prepare for whatever they're going to do.
	I mean, you know, having ivermectin, having storable food, that's always a good thing to have that.
	But let's not sell fear in order to sell food.
	Let's not sell fear in order to sell preparation.
	That's vile.
	It's vile.
	It's evil to do that.
	So why do you think these people are pushing this so hard?
	I've seen this game before.
	It's PCR and PR campaign.
	You have PCR and the public relations campaign.
	And now what they're focusing on is fear.
	This is their story.
	And this is how they got the conservatives...
	Who would have never gone along with it?
	Two things. Trump, because we can trust him because he's an anti-globalist.
	And then the conservative media, like Alex Jones, taking the lead, scaring everybody about gain-of-function labs.
	I was the first one at InfoWars to report that the wet market, this bat soup thing that they were doing, this wet market was right outside the only biosafety level 4 lab in Wuhan.
	And then shortly after that, some information broke about a guy that was there.
	He actually was working on bats and coronavirus and stuff like this, and he actually put it on LinkedIn.
	And when Zero Hedge reported that, you remember, Twitter kicked him off, kicked Zero Hedge off.
	For reporting what the guy had publicly put out.
	He wasn't doxing this guy if the guy put it out there.
	But it was a miss. Why would the guy put this out there?
	I mean, he was leaving breadcrumbs and stuff like that out there to get people to pick up on this.
	And when I saw the measures that were being done...
	When I saw how they were ready to lock the world down, it's like I've seen this movie before, This Is Dark Winter, and I saw fake people falling down in the streets of China, how they were hyping the crowded hospitals in China and New York.
	And if you go back four or five years prior to that in New York, the same hospitals showing the same pictures, essentially.
	Oh, we need more beds.
	We need more money from, say, they just won't give it to us.
	Look at how crowded our hospitals are.
	And I've been in China. I know how crowded everything in China is.
	Don't tell me that you've got a crowded hospital that means that you've got a pandemic.
	PCR tests carried out on this person in Mexico, the 59-year-old man, on April 24th revealed that he had been infected with a flu.
	He was reported to have been bedridden for three weeks before contracting the infection.
	So how'd he get it? Pure BS. Did he have pink eye?
	That is the thing, right?
	We're going to lock everybody down.
	We're going to vaccinate all the food.
	We're going to kill the cattle, kill the chickens, because you've got two or three farm workers who've got pink eye.
	Come on! Don't stand for this stuff.
	Get angry about this.
	They're going to do this to us again.
	They're doing it bit by bit.
	I am so sick and tired of these lies and the gullible fools who can't get their head around this.
	How many times do they have to do this to you before you realize what's going on?
	Officials said 17 people at the Mexico City Hospital, where he was treated, and 12 neighbors, including 7 who had signs of illness, all tested negative for the virus, even with this digital PCR. Where's the pandemic?
	Come on. They want to slow walk the fear.
	Increasing cases are being detected due to a rise in the number of tests, said a doctor in Texas.
	I'm sorry, Tennessee.
	Bill Schaffner.
	An infectious disease expert at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee said the case was concerning, no it's not, but that it was likely that increasing cases are being detected due to a rise in the number of tests that we're putting out there.
	And then he says, we're also looking now in a much more sophisticated fashion.
	Yeah, you better believe the digital PCR. And the centrifuges and all the rest of this stuff.
	It's a very sophisticated lie.
	Lie! Liars!
	Much more sophisticated fashion than we were able to do even five years ago.
	Yep, that's right.
	Very sophisticated lie.
	And so...
	This was, thanks for the heads up, Harry Hound.
	This was, Stephen Miller is quoting the McCullough Fund.
	The McCullough Fund is Peter McCullough's fund.
	And they're saying, this outbreak is due to a lab leak at a USDA poultry lab in Athens, Georgia, and from one in Erasmus Medical Center, Netherlands, involving gain of function.
	So I had to get to Mexico. From the Netherlands and from Georgia.
	Had to get to one man in Mexico.
	There's his gain of function, right?
	Again, you know, buy his, buy ivermectin.
	Buy it even from McCullough. That's fine.
	But come on, Dr.
	McCullough, you don't need to sell fear and panic in order to sell your ivermectin.
	Have some integrity.
	Disgusting. This is nothing but hype.
	This is not real. This is not science.
	He's joined with the game.
	Expect him to be on Alex Jones very soon, selling this stuff.
	Alex wants to sell some storable food.
	Made record profits.
	It came out in his lawsuit. Record profits.
	In the spring of 2020.
	Selling the lie, the fear about gain of function.
	And, of course, he had, you know, Mike Adams there on a daily basis.
	He had Dr. Francis Boyle.
	With all due respect, Dr.
	Francis Boyle was way out of line.
	He was selling fear.
	Everybody's going to get this. He was one of the most pants-on-fire idiots out there, misleading people.
	Because they'd been involved in these treaties to stop the bioweapon stuff.
	Look, I appreciate that.
	But just because you studied this stuff doesn't mean that that's what this is now.
	That might color your perception of it.
	But that's not what it was.
	So I said yesterday, I said, one very sick person out of eight billion died with an enhanced PCR. This is not some GOP bioweapon, as they're telling everybody.
	It's a GOP propaganda weapon.
	You know, the GOP is not on your side, folks.
	If they're on your side, they'd be doing a mea culpa.
	If they were on your side, they'd be exposing the pharmaceutical companies and this whole big scheme.
	Instead, they narrowly focus on Fauci and the biolab.
	And now we see, you can easily see what the purpose of this is.
	It's to get you to believe that the pandemic was real.
	Because they are all complicit people.
	And all of this stuff.
	They funded it. They let it go.
	They're not doing anything to punish anybody, including Fauci.
	They're all accessories in this crime.
	Trump and Biden and the Republicans and the Democrats and the Republican and Democrat governors and on and on and on.
	I said, just as conservatives were skeptical, And resistant to medical martial law and to rushed jabs in 2020, now the general population is skeptical of medical martial law and a rushed jab.
	So they've got to come up with the same thing that they pulled on a lot of conservatives to get them to take the jab, to get them to be quiet.
	Well, I'm not, I don't, it seems like it's wrong, but it's Trump and Alex is telling me this and I just, you know, I can't believe.
	I don't know what to do. I'll just wait and see.
	I won't resist any of this stuff, right?
	You better resist this this time.
	Better not stand there silently with your, sitting on your hands this time.
	You better not do that.
	You know they're going to do this again.
	And this gain-of-function lie is just to get you uncertain, to shut you up.
	So everybody's skeptical of this, so they're going to play this same game again.
	So don't get fooled again.
	Isn't that interesting? They call them the who.
	Right? Now, the propaganda on the left is now propaganda on the right.
	Don't get fooled again.
	Yeah, they're selling you these, people like McCullough, selling you their pandemic preparation products.
	Well, I could sell him some preparation H. Don't remove the lid.
	Deborah Birx is out there, of course, and this isn't a clue to a lot of people, is it?
	That Deborah Birx is back selling this stuff?
	We're not testing to really see how many people have been exposed and got asymptomatically infected.
	We should be testing every cow weekly.
	You can do pooled PCR. We have the technology.
	We love technology.
	Love money. And we have the ability to have these breakthroughs.
	We could be pool testing every dairy worker.
	I do believe in undetected cases in humans because we're once again only tracking people with symptoms.
	When we did that with COVID, the virus spread throughout the Northeast undetected because it took a long time.
	There was no pandemic. You were the pandemic.
	In the meantime, thousands, hundreds of thousands of people were infected with asymptomatic or mild disease.
	Asymptomatic. We have to switch from symptoms to actually definitive laboratory testing.
	We have the capacity.
	Yeah, it's not enough to...
	We have to lock down well people.
	I'm sorry, you got the cooties.
	You're going to have to go. Put you in prison, you got the cooties.
	Call in FEMA. Unbelievable.
	And I said, she wants to test every count.
	Every cow, every week, test dairy workers.
	Why if it's bird flu?
	Why of all the animals that are out there?
	You know, they found traces of bird flu in foxes that maybe ate birds and had the bird flu or something at the time.
	Not necessarily dead.
	Why are they focusing on cows?
	You know why they're focusing on cows.
	They've told you they want to get rid of meat and dairy.
	And then when they focus on cows with this, and they don't even take a look at the eggs or the chicken meat, they look at ground beef.
	They look at milk.
	They want to get rid of the cows.
	They've told you they want to get rid of the cows.
	Oh, they got methane and all the rest of the stuff.
	Come on. Can't people connect the dots with this stuff?
	I said, there's only one cow that needs to be tested.
	That's Burks.
	Deborah Burks. The only cow that needs to be tested.
	And the test that she needs is a lie detector test.
	Because she's nothing but a liar.
	She's paid off by Gates and his organizations.
	Just amazing.
	Just amazing. Yeah, you know, we got to find this because, you know, we can have a pandemic and nobody even have any symptoms.
	It just spread everywhere and nobody's got any symptoms.
	So roll out the digital PCR. Roll out the centrifuges.
	I'll roll out everything because, you know, we got a pandemic here.
	You don't even know that you've got it.
	That's the scary thing about it, isn't it?
	And you don't even know.
	Well, if it doesn't have any symptoms, why do we care?
	Well, because they want to get you in the hospitals and kill you with the Trump hospital protocol.
	So this was also sent to me by Harry Hound.
	Appreciate the tip on this.
	This is somebody called Canary's Blue.
	And so this is a Democrat who is critical of Trump.
	And this person put this out in April of 2020.
	Because remember, this whole thing started with Trump.
	He was the one. So, somebody who sees themselves as a Democrat put out all this stuff warning us about the connections between Burks and Gates and, of course, Trump. And so, canaries blew back in April of 2020.
	It was actually April the 10th, and less than a month after Trump locked everybody down.
	He said, by the way, the Global Vaccine Action Plan...
	Endorsed by the 194 member states of the World Health Assembly in May of 2012 is a framework to prevent millions of deaths by 2020 through more equitable access to existing vaccines for people in all communities.
	They copied that from their website back in 2012.
	How did they know it was going to happen in 2020?
	Well, you know, Gates had his ID 2020.
	He had a website, he had a plan, all this other kind of stuff.
	Going to get everybody an ID in 2020?
	Well, pretty close to it.
	I mean, they came up with a rationale for it in 2020, and they had a pretty good start.
	They opened the Overton window to it.
	You also had IA 2030, the immunization agenda for 2030.
	By 2030, every person, everywhere, every age vaccinated.
	Presumably with every vaccine they can imagine.
	And then this person goes on to talk about the Global Vaccine Action Plan, developed with collaborative leadership, Bill and Melinda Gates, the Gavi Alliance.
	And I played the clip for you of Trump talking about, Gavi, they're so great!
	We love Gavi! The U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, that's Fauci's thing, the NIAID, the World Health Organization, UNICEF. So you got Fauci, you got the WHO, you got GAVI, you got, which is Gates, and you got Gates again.
	Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was the largest private charitable foundation in the world with over $48 billion in assets alone.
	The collaboration followed the January 2010 call by Bill and Melinda Gates for the next 10 years to be the decade of the vaccine.
	Get everybody's awareness up of vaccines, and we're going to have everybody vaccinated by 2030.
	Now, here's where Birx comes in.
	Again, this is Blue Canaries, April of 2020, because, you know, our truth is so subjected to our partisanship that we have to get the truth about Trump from the Democrats, we get the truth about Biden from the Republicans, but they won't tell you the truth about their guy.
	Ambassador Deborah Birx, who is on the White House Coronavirus Task Force, but is also a board member of the Global Fund, which received $2.7 billion from the Gates Foundation.
	As U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator, Dr.
	Birx also oversees the implementation of PEPFAR, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.
	And has two large donors, the Gates Foundation and the Nike Foundation.
	So notice that she is involved with Gates.
	She's involved with an AIDS thing, which implies that she's involved with Fauci already at that point in time.
	That all these organizations that she's involved in are getting billions of dollars from Gates and his foundations.
	That's Deborah Birx.
	The GAVI Alliance, formerly the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, is a global health partnership of public and private sector organizations dedicated to immunization for all.
	Immunization Agenda 2030.
	That's their own description on their own website at GAVI. So do you understand who she is?
	Do you understand what this is? And why is the GOP carrying water for the GAVI? For the Gates vaccine initiative.
	Why are they doing that?
	Why is Trump promoting Gavi in 2020?
	Why are the Republicans pretending that this time it's real?
	Because last time it was real too.
	It was an engineered virus.
	It wasn't a fake PSYOP. It was an engineered virus and the Chinese did it.
	So don't get mad at me.
	It's not me. I didn't do it.
	The Chinese did it. Yeah, that's the ticket.
	Bunch of liars. Well, do prepare.
	Do prepare. You never know what your own government is going to do to you.
	And you never know what kind of chaos is going to happen either.
	This is from a listener in New Caledonia.
	I have to admit that as an American, I had to look this up to my know where it was.
	It's in the South Pacific.
	And so he says that we left New Caledonia late last year to retire in nearby Australia.
	And in May, mostly peaceful riots broke out in New Caledonia.
	Most of the big box stores, manufacturing businesses, and car dealers were torched and looted.
	The rioters set up roadblocks everywhere and wouldn't even let ambulances through.
	The airlines stopped flying, which is devastating for an island.
	President Macron, because they had connections in New Caledonia with French colonialism, Macron visited and pretended to be concerned, sending in troop reinforcements who just cleared the rubble and then looked the other way while the mostly peaceful protesters continue to rampage to this day.
	Yesterday, a friend rang us up to tell us she was down to her last bag of rice To feed her family of four.
	She's afraid to go out to look for food because the hooligans who rule the streets unhindered by all of the troop reinforcements from France.
	But even if she did risk it, there's nothing left on the shelves anyway.
	And those supermarkets that weren't burned to the ground.
	So many of them burned to the ground.
	The other ones emptied the shelves, looted them, and all the rest of the stuff, or panic buying.
	When we advised her earlier to stock up, she was quite dismissive and thought the nonsense would just blow over until it didn't.
	Stock up on food.
	Make sure you got water. Look, the plan, if you want to know what it is...
	Get these manuals from Jack Lawson, Civil Defense Manuals 1 and 2.
	Sells them as a pair.
	Talks about how you can prepare for, you know, an emergency with water.
	Make sure you got food.
	Make sure you got lead.
	Make sure you know how to use it.
	Most importantly, find other people.
	So that you can compliment each other, so that you can, with an eye, okay?
	Hey, looking really good in those fatigues there.
	No. So that you can work together to protect your neighborhood.
	It's got a lot of great advice there.
	Psychological advice, organizing device, as well as the things that you need to do to make sure that you got, you know, here are the important things.
	Make sure you got this and that type of thing.
	And it's easy to start accumulating that type of stuff.
	So again, go to CivilDefenseManual.com.
	Let me finish his letter here.
	With a possible electoral mayhem brewing in the States, and the ramping up of war in Europe, and the increasingly dying vaccinated population falling to unsustainable levels, the southern border swarmed by military-aged bad hombres fresh from prison, chaotic barrios, and CIA war zones around the world, he said, just fill in the blanks.
	I'm sure that the U.S. could turn into New Caledonia overnight.
	So prepare. Even here in relatively quiet Australia, we're gradually building up our storable food stocks as this company turned into Stasi Germany overnight during the scandemic and could easily become New Caledonia just as quickly.
	Mad Max was, after all, set in Australia.
	Yeah, Americans must prepare.
	Everybody should prepare.
	Wherever you are, you should prepare.
	And always understand that every one of these leaders, whether it was conservative, anti-globalist Trump leaders, Or whether it was the Davos spawn Trudeau.
	They all did the same thing at the same time.
	And it was Trump who was supplying that kind of stuff to people like Trudeau.
	There was no difference in any of this stuff.
	We're going to talk a little bit about Bilderberg and what's going on there.
	Because... You know, it is these people go to these meetings and they're the ones that get selected to win the elections.
	You better prepare for yourself.
	You better prepare in your community.
	You better try to prepare from the ground up.
	Your local community, state maybe, but don't count on anything in Washington.
	These Republicans are lying to you up one side and down the other.
	It's not just a reality TV show for them to get their face on television.
	They're part of the deception.
	And so are many of the people who are in the alternative conservative media, especially the ones who never have any criticism for Trump.
	You mean to tell me that Trump never did anything wrong?
	Oh, well, if you criticize Trump, you got Trump derangement syndrome.
	Pal, you got Trump delusion.
	You got a strong delusion if you think that he never did anything wrong.
	He thinks he never did anything wrong.
	He doesn't need any forgiveness from God or anybody else.
	Are you going to drink that Kool-Aid?
	On Rumble, Atomic Dog, how can we blame the Chinese when we supposedly paid them to experiment on a bat virus?
	Yeah. Shouldn't the U.S. government just hold up a mirror and point?
	Well, that's obviously, you know, that's the flaw in their narrative, isn't it?
	You know, we paid them for this stuff, but it was, you know, we were doing the right thing, and then it got out of hand with the Chinese, I guess, is the narrative that they're going to try to sell people.
	I don't know. On Rumble, S-Flow0818.
	Since it's all fiction anyway, they should get more credible writers.
	That's right. But, you know, hey, if it works, it's like, you know, the joke in Back to the Future.
	You know, he goes there and they got that big 3D at Jaws and it was like Jaws 28 or something like that.
	If the formula works, they just keep doing it over and over and over again until nobody buys a ticket.
	So don't buy a ticket.
	Don't buy into this stuff.
	Laugh at it.
	Resist it. Get angry about it.
	RockfanMJ, thank you, David, for not ever forgetting about what Trump did to us and trying to get people to remember.
	Yeah, it is amazing, isn't it, to see the memory hole?
	I mean, who needs Google?
	We forget on our own.
	We selectively purge the stuff on our own.
	We don't need to have Google. Google does it for the left.
	Google does it for the government.
	We do it for ourselves when it comes to conservative politicians like Trump.
	We memory hole it ourselves.
	We don't even need their assistance.
	You know, Google was a search engine.
	Now it is a search engine that is designed to hide things.
	On RockFan, Spencer DeLong.
	David, did you hear anything about Saudi Arabia ending the petrodollar agreement June 9th, 24?
	I see it on TikTok, but nowhere else.
	Would love to get your take if it's true.
	Well, the agreement, I don't know if there's some formal thing that happened on the 9th.
	We've got Tony Arterman coming up in the program.
	I'll ask him if he knows if there's some kind of a formal agreement.
	I didn't see anything when I was prepping for the show.
	However, Saudi Arabia stopped exclusively settling.
	See, the part of the petrodollar that was there, and I don't know how formal the agreement was.
	Was this a handshake and a Masonic signal or something?
	How did they ratify that?
	I don't know, but they had this agreement that we were going to sell them arms and help them stay in power.
	And they were going to only sell stuff in U.S. dollars.
	They were only going to take U.S. dollars for that.
	Now, it was about a year ago they started taking Chinese money and other things like that.
	And they've been talking about getting into BRICS. And there's a very, well, it's not a quiet exodus.
	I mean, some of these other, Russia is talking about it because they're happy to see it happen.
	But it's not really talked about much in the American press, but there is a steady exodus of a lot of countries away from the U.S. dollar, and it's not just the ones that we have been hostile to.
	It is a lot of others that are doing that as well.
	And so that's the reality, is that they did leave the U.S. dollar, and they did start taking the Chinese yuan, and they did that many months ago.
	Well, I mean, we're not at the 9th yet, so three days away.
	I don't know if there's some agreement that's going to be ratified three days away.
	On Rumble, J.P. Warren, David, I never hear you bring this up either.
	A Trump executive order, September 2019, modernizing flu vaccines.
	I talked about that a couple of times, but not that much.
	To me, I thought... Yeah, it is interesting to show that they've got prior knowledge, but you won't see the prior knowledge go back to two months before 9-11, to Dark Winter, because that's the game that was going through.
	And so there's been a lot of things that have happened.
	They practiced that for 20 years, but that was the blueprint, and then they practiced that exact same thing for 20 years.
	Now, there was also an executive, and he says that was six months before.
	I mention that once or twice, but I don't talk about it that much.
	But I think that's legitimate.
	I mean, certainly we've got a lot of stuff, and I've played for you.
	That was in September.
	In October, that was when that Milken thing that I played to death with Fauci.
	Hopefully you got that memorized by now, and I don't have to play it anymore for you.
	How do we get everybody in the world to take a vaccine that we haven't tested?
	Yeah, we do it with disruption.
	We do it from the inside, and we do it iteratively, right?
	That was October. October 2019 at the Milken Institute.
	They're openly saying it.
	I'm not trying to hide it at all.
	So yeah, Trump signed this order to modernize it, and it had some information in there.
	They're redefining what a vaccine was and all the rest of the stuff.
	And then in January, you had Alex Azar, the big pharmaceutical CEO from Eli Lilly, that Trump made HHS head after the pharmaceutical companies gave him millions.
	Pfizer alone gave him a million dollars in between the election and his installation, his inauguration.
	And so they were all paying him.
	And so as a result, you know, he used RFK Jr.
	to bid up his price.
	Yeah, you know, we might take a look at vaccines.
	I don't know, you know.
	The same type of thing. Nice business you got here.
	It'd be a shame if anything happened to it, you know.
	And so they all start paying the money.
	And he put in Alex's czar.
	And so, Alex Azar, at the end of January, really declared the pandemic at that point.
	We're going to get to that here in a moment.
	But, you know, what Trump did with his executive order on Friday the 13th was to release the money.
	It's the dollar. It's the petrodollar that runs all this stuff.
	So, yeah, Trump executive order, September 2019, modernizing flu vaccine six months before COVID created a Department of Defense and DARPA task force to develop the new tech.
	We'll be talking about some of that type of stuff as well.
	Rumble, overcoming the world is now a monthly supporter.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	Of course, you can do that on Rumble.
	and we have Subscribestar and other places where you can do it on a regular basis.
	And if you would like to make a donation to support the program to keep us on the air, please also if your bank lets you use Zelle, that's one of the best ways to contribute to us because there's no fees whatsoever. Some of these, and we're fighting this, some of them have put sales tax on because they look at the state that you're coming from. A lot of them look at it as as we're selling a service.
	I don't know. Some states put a sales tax on services.
	Others don't. It's not a service.
	It's a donation. And so there shouldn't be any sales tax on it.
	But there is no sales tax or fees at Zelle for now.
	And so the only two places where there's not a charge like that is if you send it via mail or if you send it with Zelle.
	But it really does help us if you make a commitment and subscribe and just do it on a regular basis.
	That is a big, big help to us.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	The Common Man The Common Man They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing. TheDavidKnightShow.com All right,
	and thank you, Michelle Obama, and thank you for the tip on Rockfin.
	Let's take a quick look at some of the tech issues.
	Artificial intelligence, for example.
	And Bilderberg is happening, you know, actually did happen.
	It was 30th May to the 2nd of June.
	But the topics that they had there, supposedly, we don't know.
	We have to take their word for it.
	But what they said their topics were...
	We're basically AI. AI, climate, and war.
	That's a pretty good summary of what they're looking at.
	Here are the topics, key topics they said they discussed.
	The state of AI, AI safety, changing faces of biology.
	Yeah, that sounds like the Daniel Suarez change agent book where they were able to change their faces.
	I don't think that's what they're looking at, but yeah.
	Climate, of course.
	The future of warfare.
	Ukraine and the world.
	Yeah, that's going to be, yeah, the future of warfare is in Ukraine.
	And then they talk about, you know, since they're talking about climate, they also talk about Europe's economic challenges.
	Economic challenges because you're burning the economy down, you're shutting down your industry, you're banning manufacturing in the name of saving the climate.
	Geopolitical landscape, U.S. economic challenges, U.S. political landscape, Ukraine and the world, as I mentioned before, the Middle East, China and Russia.
	And so... This article from What's Up With That says, you know, there was a study that was done by a university in 2023 last year, and they looked at the list of people who had gone to Bilderberg, and they said at least 133 politicians were elevated to positions of power after attending a Bilderberg meeting.
	And occasionally it went the other way.
	They went after Margaret Thatcher because she called him out, and so she was immediately removed the next election.
	But other than Margaret Thatcher, the highest-ranking politician in the UK to lose in the next election after we covered in, what was it, 2014, when they were carrying, I've told the story before, Ed Balls.
	He was with the opposition group.
	So they have all these different positions where they have them as shadow this and shadow that.
	You know, they say that this is the person who's the Chancellor of the Exchequer in his particular case, which is like the Secretary of the Treasury.
	And he's the shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer.
	That sounds pretty dramatic, doesn't it?
	The shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer.
	Yeah. You do a 1940s radio drama all about that.
	Great, great title that he had.
	His name was Ed Balls.
	And he shows up on the side entrance and Karen got it.
	And we put it out.
	And he shows up and he doesn't have his badge and he's fumbling around for it.
	And he's like, oh, I'm looking at my luggage.
	And when he does, his luggage is filled with nothing but papers.
	Nothing but papers.
	It'll all spill out from this little airport carry-on bag that he's got he's pulling.
	And of course, this is all just for people to get around.
	There was no business being conducted.
	That was always the narrative, right?
	And people saw that this guy, Ed Balls, was doing that.
	He lost. He's no longer even a politician.
	Now they put him on TV to lie.
	Instead of lying in Parliament, he now lies on TV. As a presenter, they call it.
	Somebody reading a teleprompter.
	But the people, you know, that attended Bilderberg and then got elevated, you know, people like Bill Clinton, People like Angela Merkel in Germany.
	People like Emmanuel Macron.
	Yeah, you want to talk about young Davos leaders?
	Well, look at the people at Bilderberg.
	133 of them that got put up, and one guy who got demoted.
	Karen did great work there.
	And so then we see today, Pentagon's AI office awards Palantir a contract to create a data-sharing ecosystem.
	It's kind of funny. Most people don't like to talk about Palantir.
	I do. I do because they don't want you to talk about it.
	Oh, I shouldn't talk about it.
	Oh, let's talk about that then.
	I reported on this back in November of 2020.
	November the 10th, actually. I talked about the fact that Palantir, at that point in time, had been given by Trump Operation Warp Speed contracts to attract people.
	And of course, that's what Vivek the Snake, Rama Smarmy, was getting into with DeWine, the Republican governor of Ohio.
	Rama Smarmy went in there because he wanted to get the, you know, track and trace contract for his business.
	And so those foundations were laid.
	It didn't turn out to be as big of an issue as some of these other things, perhaps.
	But perhaps they were also watching us.
	Palantir has a very long history.
	And one of the things that Palantir was always involved in was a different kind of AI. Anticipatory intelligence.
	Pre-crime, if you will.
	And so, I talked about this and the fact that they'd already been given contracts to do this domestically.
	Palantir had already made a lot of money from the Pentagon and the Department of Defense to identify enemies abroad and that type of thing, to do geospatial intelligence.
	Geospatial intelligence, again, is not just about finding people in foreign countries.
	If you think that's what it's about...
	If you think that's what Palantir is about, then you must believe all the lies about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the FISA Act.
	Oh, we're not spying on Americans?
	No, they've been spying on Americans from their inception.
	The CIA and the NSA, that's why they had the FISA Act, and then they used the FISA Act to give them a legal beard and plausible deniability to say that, well, we're not breaking the law.
	Hey, even if they had been given authorization to spy on people, as you know Machiavelli and Mike Johnson has been doing to expand this, even with that it's still unconstitutional. Fourth Amendment's pretty clear. I don't care how many laws they pass.
	I don't care how many FISA acts they do.
	I don't care if they set up FISA courts and the rest of the stuff.
	If you don't have a search warrant, then it doesn't have any legal authority.
	That's why the Constitution is still important.
	Because it puts a big, glaring red X on these laws and these politicians who violate their oath to the Constitution.
	So, anticipatory intelligence is something that they were always working with, domestically and abroad.
	Domestically, they want to identify people, and they were very explicit about it.
	They want to identify people by their politics and their religion.
	Oh, well, we've got to do that because we've got these radical Islamicists out there.
	We've got to identify politics and religion.
	Is that who they're really focused on?
	They're opening up the southern border to radical Islamicists, right?
	They're really looking for your religion.
	And your politics, and you know which religion they're after, don't you?
	It's not Islam. And it's not the liberal politics, it's not the Marxist politics that they're after either, is it?
	So, now, this new news, I'm going to give you a background on, well, let me do the background first.
	So, this is a report, most of a report, not all of it, But it was a report that I did back in 2014, 10 years ago.
	And five years ago, in 2019...
	I was reminding people of this even before, and I do it periodically, try to remind people what Palantir is about.
	This is Alex Garp. This is Palantir.
	These are the people who have just been given a contract by the Pentagon to run all artificial intelligence.
	Much has been said about the big tech companies that were implicated in this slide from Edward Snowden's documents.
	It's eroded confidence in their integrity and damaged their business.
	But what about the Prism program itself, where people are profiled by data mining the intercepted digital communications?
	Some have suspected that the company behind Prism is Palantir.
	I've often thought that the Palantir from Tolkien's Lord of the Rings were the perfect metaphor for the Internet.
	In the book, the Palantir were crystal balls that allowed the possessors to communicate and to see things.
	Eventually, they fell into the hands of the evil forces, and using a palantir not only revealed you to the villain, Sauron, represented by the all-seeing eye, but also allowed him to learn where you were and look into your mind and your soul.
	A great metaphor for people who are trying to use the internet for legitimate purposes, and the government spooks who create profiles of people as they're using it.
	Although Palantir has a program called Prism, and although its function is exactly like that shown in the slide, they have denied the allegations.
	The company, Palantir, was created with funding from In-Q-Tel, a venture capital company created by the CIA, and with funding from PayPal billionaire Peter Thiel.
	Now you know why PayPal was after me.
	Both Thiel and Karp were attendees at Bilderberg this year as they focused on big data.
	Palantir Company profiles from the Wall Street Journal in 2009 and Business Week in 2011 emphasized Palantir's connection to the military-industrial complex and to data mining for terrorist profiling.
	Palantir self-consciously emphasizes to its employees its connection to Middle-earth mythology.
	Whether or not Palantir's PRISM program is THE PRISM program, Palantir was created by the CIA and globalist banksters, serves as a tool for the banksters and the CIA, and was named after Sauron's surveillance tool.
	But questions are now being asked about PayPal's involvement with the CIA and the NSA that go beyond Palantir and the PRISM program, and call into question the integrity of PayPal's Pierre Amityar's newly announced journalism venture with Glenn Greenwald.
	Whistleblower Sabelle Edmonds is asking why we've seen nothing in the leaked Snowden documents about PayPal's involvement with the NSA. A retired NSA official contacted Sabelle Edmonds and told her that the Snowden document cache contains extensive information about the NSA working not just with major Internet companies, but with financial institutions, especially PayPal.
	Banks have long been a surveillance arm of the government, if for no other reason than to collect taxes.
	But it appears that PayPal's relationship goes much deeper than just financial reporting.
	The Snowden documents are slowly being doled out by Glenn Greenwald, who has announced that he'll be partnering with PayPal owner Pierre Amityar.
	About two months ago, Amityar announced that he was going to become a philanthropist patron Anybody who publishes stolen information should help catch the thief.
	Shouldn't publish it in the first place.
	And less than a year later, Amityar's PayPal was conspiring with none other than Palantir to strangle WikiLeaks financially and to attack Glenn Greenwald.
	PayPal subsequently froze WikiLeaks funds and funds to Bradley Manning's defense.
	In protest, some hacktivists that identified with Anonymous, now known as the PayPal 14, began a denial-of-service attack against the PayPal website, not the PayPal service.
	Supporters characterize the protest as a digital sit-in.
	PayPal pushed for felony charges, 15 years, and half a million dollar fines each.
	Amityar's PayPal partner doubled down on this interview with Charlie Rose even after the Snowden leaks.
	I am probably uncharacteristically pro national security agencies writ large and NSA in particular.
	Despite the fact that they would not hire me at some point, I actually wanted to work for the NSA, and I was not a U.S. citizen.
	I just fundamentally trust the national security establishment to care about the citizens.
	It's a trade I would be willing to make.
	Security and liberty? Security and privacy.
	There you go. That's all the time we've got for that report, but I've got, when we come back, I'll tell you how Palantir, CIA-backed, CIA-created Palantir, you heard the guy, well, I'd be more than willing to trade liberty for security.
	I love national security.
	He doesn't love liberty. He's not, by nature, an American.
	Not by birth, and not by the values that he holds.
	Now they're being used in the streets of L.A., Yes.
	Palantir is now being used here domestically.
	Not just by banks, not just by the military and the CIA, but here on the streets.
	And we'll tell you how it's being used when we come back.
	Stay with us. Alright, getting back to Palantir.
	What are they doing now?
	I played you that report back in 2014.
	Oh, that was just a radical conspiracy theory, right?
	You know, they have a prison program.
	And guess who the first corporation was that got on to the prison program, according to the NSA slides, back in 2000, what was it, 2012, I think, maybe?
	Or was it earlier than that?
	Anyway, it was Microsoft.
	I know it was the very first one to get on there.
	Now, who is it that DARPA is turning to to push NewsGuard and ElectionGuard Who is it that they've given $10 million to to push election guard?
	None other than Microsoft.
	Isn't that interesting? And of course the CIA very publicly creating a venture capital firm.
	One of their biggest success stories was Palantir.
	And now it's being used as Zero Hedge reports on the streets of Los Angeles to root out criminals.
	They said it's something like straight out of the movie Minority Report.
	Yes, it is. And quite frankly, this isn't anything new.
	Going back to the late 1990s as they were creating these...
	And, of course, you've heard me say that many times, haven't you?
	I was talking about what had happened.
	Played a report from 2014.
	That's my report from 2019.
	Not much has changed. They put Palantir on the streets of LA to root out the criminals.
	Why? Because when you arrest them, the Soros district attorney lets them out.
	Why do you need to root them out if you're going to release them out without doing anything at all?
	That's what's going on there with the DAs.
	But again, going back and looking at that, is it any wonder that PayPal came after me after I had been using them only for about four months, four or five months, actually five months.
	It was May of 2021.
	They had come after Assange.
	They had come after WikiLeaks.
	PayPal is very aggressive.
	That guy, Max, there, you know, he says, oh, you trade off Liberty for security and goes, well, no, he doesn't even think about Liberty.
	Liberty's dead. Dead.
	Dead to Americans.
	They don't even think about it. He says, no, no.
	Liberty or security versus privacy.
	You're not going to have any security.
	You're not going to have privacy, brother, because we've got to have security.
	And understand, the security is not for you.
	It's job security for them, and it's keeping them secure from being discovered for the crimes that they commit.
	It's their security.
	National security is their security, not your security.
	They will take you to war.
	They will get you shot and killed.
	They'll have your country bombed.
	It's not about national security.
	It's not about protecting the border.
	They don't want to use all of these surveillance tools to protect the border.
	You look at how sophisticated their surveillance tools are.
	You look at how sophisticated their international databases are.
	Don't tell me there's nothing they could do at the border.
	They don't want to do anything at the border.
	You understand, right?
	And of course, Peter Thiel.
	You know, I first did that report in 2014.
	Within two years, Peter Thiel was making his speech to support Trump, right?
	Part of the PayPal Mafia.
	As a matter of fact, Teal was considered to be the godfather of the PayPal Mafia.
	Most of these guys, after they left PayPal, they became venture capitalists.
	That's why they call them the PayPal Mafia.
	So now what are they doing?
	Well, now they have something called Open Data and Applications Government-Owned Interoperable Repositories.
	Okay? And so they came up, they dropped the open, so they could take these letters, and that doesn't really say much of anything, does it?
	But when you apply the Pentagon rules for creating acronyms to it, what they get is DAGIR. D-A-G-I-R. Oh, okay.
	It's a DAGIR. It's a DAGIR. You know what this DAGIR is?
	The Pentagon with its artificial intelligence and Palantir.
	You know what that dagger is?
	It's a sword of Damocles hanging over our heads.
	This is not about national security.
	This is your government weaponized against you.
	This is Big Brother government.
	And this is their dagger.
	Yeah, I'm leaning over to the side of...
	You know, security, always security.
	Job security, financial security for these people.
	No security for you.
	If you have no privacy, folks, you have no security.
	If you have no liberty, you have no security.
	If you have no liberty, you're a slave.
	Well, they may lock me down.
	They may lock me up.
	I'm safe, right? No, you're not safe even under those conditions.
	To the extent that you give up your liberty, to that extent you become a slave.
	Slaves are never safe.
	So, if they kept the open there, they could have called it O-D-A-G-I-R. Maybe they could kind of arrange it a little bit.
	Odd, a grift.
	It wouldn't be odd.
	Grifts are always coming out of the Pentagon.
	So, Palantir will provide this dagger over our heads, held to our throats.
	Noting that they are going to allow industry and government to ingest data together.
	Think of it as this giant sucking sound in Washington.
	Sucking all the information they can about you.
	Sucking all of your money.
	Sucking all of your liberty.
	All of your privacy. And to bring in third party vendors to do this as well.
	The Dagger contract announcement came a day after the DOD awarded Palantir a $480 million contract for its MAVEN smart system prototype.
	Palantir said the award will allow it to make licenses of their AI-enabled operating system available through the Department of Defense.
	It's always been part of the war machine, but it's part of the war machine that is focused on us.
	Our government is at war with us.
	And when we look at the kinds of things that our government is pushing, not just the foreign wars everywhere, but we look at the debauchery that they're pushing everywhere.
	I mean, we are a septic tank.
	We really are. This country is a sewer.
	Not a swamp. It's a sewer in Washington.
	They're spending lots of money pushing atheism everywhere.
	Spending lots of money pushing transgenderism everywhere in other countries.
	We have become, in this country, the American government is missionaries for Satan.
	That's what they are.
	And so now let's take a look at the AI stuff.
	This is an interesting article from Forbes, and of course, the New York Times is talking about the same thing at the same time.
	This is the competition between different billionaires for who's going to rule the world.
	Everybody wants to rule the world, right?
	Especially these billionaires.
	And they have two different approaches to artificial intelligence.
	One of them, you have these people who are going to Capitol Hill, one of the most notable ones, of course, being Sam Altman, They want to scare everybody.
	Oh, it's going to be, if we don't keep this thing under control, it's going to be Terminator all over the place.
	The AI will come for us.
	It'll kill us and all the rest of this stuff, right?
	And then, so, in order to make sure that doesn't happen, you need to give a monopoly to people like me, says Sam Altman, and people like another venture capitalist, or I call him vulture capitalist, Vinod Kozla.
	Then on the other team, you've got venture capitalists like Marc Andreessen.
	And what they're saying is, these people are trying to scare you.
	This is just a computer program.
	Let's roll this thing out.
	Let's go as fast as we can with it.
	They're of the philosophy that you typically see in Silicon Valley, go fast, break things, right?
	So you have the go fast, break things, and then you have the people say, oh, it's going to be bad.
	We've got to keep this under wraps.
	The Chinese will see what we're doing.
	They're going to see the big board, you know, as they said in Dr.
	Strangelove. You showed them the big board.
	And so we got to keep this under wraps, or the Chinese will steal.
	Of course, the Chinese are going to steal it anyway.
	You can't keep anything secure in Washington.
	And so we have to have regulation.
	To outlaw just anybody.
	You can't just have anybody out there doing this AI computer program stuff, right?
	It's got to be limited to the responsible people like Sam Altman.
	You know, the guy who wants to have a...
	He wants to rule the global coin.
	He created WorldCoin.
	He's got this creepy orb thing that you look into and it does a retinal scan and gives you a pittance of money in his WorldCoin.
	Yeah, that megalomaniac, Sam Altman.
	Oh, trust him. That's right.
	Give him the monopoly.
	And so, as Forbes is looking at this, it said, Vinod Khosla, if I'm pronouncing his name correctly, I don't know, don't really care.
	He comes up in a black turtleneck, even though it's very warm, they said, you know, for dramatic effect, I guess.
	He surveys the packed auditorium in the bowels of the U.S. Capitol complex before setting the stakes of the debate at hand.
	He says, winning the race for AI means economic power, which then lets you influence social policy or ideology.
	Oh, that's exactly what the people in Washington want, isn't it?
	They want to scare you to death about gain-of-function stuff.
	They want to gaslight you about gender, gaslight children about that.
	They want to push the satanic stuff.
	They want to influence us.
	Dominate us. And that's what AI is about.
	AI is about weaponized lies.
	And about surveillance and tracking.
	That's all it is, folks. That's all it is.
	It's 100% that.
	That's why they're pulling this thing in with Palantir.
	That's why the Defense Department is getting in on it.
	And he's right up front about it.
	His next point was that China is developing AI powers that could be a threat to U.S. elections.
	Who cares? Should the CIA pick our rulers or should China?
	I don't care, frankly.
	Fight them from the trenches here at home.
	That's what you do locally.
	And so that resonated with the congressional staffers because they're all concerned about elections.
	They want to be the ones who are going to win the election if they can influence social policy and ideology.
	Maybe even the voting machines.
	Who knows with artificial intelligence?
	That could be their key to perpetual power.
	Yeah, that's what it's about.
	It's about power. It's about economic power.
	It's about political power, military power, all the rest of this stuff.
	And so this is an article from Forbes.
	They put this guy, Vinod Nosla, they put him on the cover of Forbes.
	An epic battle for AI's future.
	And they call him a Silicon Valley statesman.
	That's how they identify him.
	They don't call him a vulture capitalist like I do.
	Or a venture capitalist even.
	They call him a Silicon Valley statesman.
	Did you know there were statesmen in Silicon Valley?
	Who knew, right? He used to be the CEO of Sun Microsystems.
	Then he became a vulture capitalist with Gosella's Ventures is the name of it.
	AI has heralded a technological revolution on par with that of the mainframe or the PC or even to hear fellow billionaire and partner Reid Hoffman to tell it, as important as the automobile or the steam engine.
	This is the way they're hyping it.
	This is Forbes. We can free people from the drudgery, the servitude of jobs, like working on an assembly line for eight hours a day for 40 years, he said.
	That's right. We'll free you from your job.
	You'll have no job. Which means that you're going to own nothing.
	You'll be dependent on them for universal basic income, as I've said many times.
	UBI and AI go hand-in-hand because both of them are to create dependency.
	With AI, you'll be dependent on them.
	Without a job, you'll be dependent on them for food and for housing and stuff like that, just like you lived in Stalinist Russia.
	Right? That was the big dagger that was hanging over everybody's head as Solzhenitsyn talked about it.
	You go against the government, guess what?
	You're on the streets now. And then they will be able to, you'll be dependent on government for the food and for your job and that type of thing.
	And you will also be dependent upon their artificial intelligence for information.
	It will have all the information.
	It'll tell you what is true and what isn't.
	And it'll watch what you're looking for.
	This is their plot.
	So to him and to Hoffman and to a powerful set of tech leaders, there is a clear way to mitigate regrettable, unintended consequences.
	That's right. The way that you avoid all the bad things that could happen, that they scare you about, is to give them monopolistic control.
	Or, you know, Terminator's going to come and get you.
	Give me control over all this stuff or Terminator's going to come and get you.
	My view, said Andreessen, I'm sorry, this is Hoffman, who is kind of on the same side as Andreessen in this.
	He said, my view is to find the fastest way that we can accelerate while taking intelligent risk.
	Again, this is the let's go fast and break things approach.
	I don't like either one of these approaches, by the way.
	I like the Amish approach.
	Let's cut off the things in our life that make us dependent upon these satanic, demonic people.
	But an increasingly vocal faction is doing all they can to thwart these two people and everything they stand for.
	Andresen, co-founder of Netscape, and as Forbes says, a band of open source absolutists, counts among its members the CEOs of Open Source AI.
	Sometimes that includes Elon Musk, but he goes back and forth between these two different Sometimes he's talking about disasters and fear-mongering, and other times he wants to have it all open source and don't worry about it, you know.
	One of them, Lacoon, Meta's chief AI scientist, Lacoon, says there is no safety issue.
	The existential risks don't exist with the current technology.
	If you're in the lead, you say that you need to regulate it because it's dangerous, so keep it closed.
	That's a classic strategy for regulatory capture, and everybody saw it when Sam Altman took the stand.
	And that's exactly what these guys are talking about.
	Forbes, on the other hand, seems to side with the people who want to lock everything down in regulatory capture.
	Who knew, right? Andreessen and his allies envision a best-case scenario for the future in which AI prevents disease, early mortality.
	All artists and business people work with AI assistants to enhance their jobs.
	We have warfare, but without bloody human blunders.
	Oh, so you're talking about giving the kill decision to the artificial intelligence, are you?
	Because we don't want to have any human mistakes.
	Let's have the artificial intelligence mistakes.
	Really? Yeah.
	Let's let them drive. We've heard this movie before, right, as well?
	Oh, yeah. AI is going to be so much superior to humans.
	You know, it's constantly learning and remembering everything.
	And whatever one of these driverless cars experiences, it goes into the database, and all of the cars learn about that.
	Well, then why are they still crashing into trains and ambulances and, you know, decapitating their drivers, driving under trucks from the side and all the rest of this?
	Why does that happen? Why do you have all of them going to an intersection in California and just freezing?
	Why is that happening?
	Are they getting smarter?
	Or are they getting dumber?
	Are we getting any smarter about any of these Silicon Valley statesmen and their lies?
	Safe, innovative, or anti-competitive cabal.
	Which is it? Techno-utopia or chaotic Wild West?
	I don't like any of those options.
	I think I would go with the Amish option.
	For accelerationists like Andreessen, anyone who wants to slow down when approaching corners is a decelerationist, a decel they call.
	The academics and leaders who called AI an existential threat to humanity are doomers, he said.
	Well, in May of 2023, we all saw Sam Altman go to Capitol Hill and scare everybody to death.
	You know, and I'm the one, I'm the only one who can keep this under control, so give me the monopoly on this.
	And we saw how he monetized it and made tremendous amounts of money.
	The substance of his message, says Forbes, was regulate us.
	Yeah. For his opponents, this was the mask-off moment that they'd been waiting for.
	Three months earlier, Musk, who had co-founded and bankrolled OpenAI when it was still open source and a non-profit, had taken to X to decry OpenAI's recent multi-billion dollar capital infusion from Microsoft.
	Again, Microsoft always at the center of this stuff.
	Microsoft at the center of the prism stuff.
	Microsoft working with Palantir.
	And the Pentagon to do News Guard and Election Guard.
	Always Microsoft.
	And Bill Gates, isn't it?
	From its non-profit roots, OpenAI had evolved into a closed-source, maximum-profit company, effectively controlled by Microsoft, said Elon Musk.
	He'll tell you the truth about his competitors, won't he?
	He tells you the truth about Soros, too.
	Soros says... And Musk says, look what he's doing with the district attorneys.
	Soros knows that the presidential race doesn't matter, not even to a billionaire like him.
	He's not going to have that much influence over a presidential race, but he can totally dominate locally if he pours his money in there.
	But we can totally dominate locally locally.
	He explained to people what is happening.
	That's what's happened in a lot of these district attorney races, where, in an unprecedented way, Soros puts millions of dollars into a local district attorney race.
	If the district attorney goes public with it, and he's got some people behind him, and you get the message out, Soros is trying to buy this district attorney office.
	Why? Oh, let's take a look at what he's done in other places when he gets his district attorney in.
	You do that, you beat him.
	All politics is local.
	Elon Musk knows it.
	Soros knows it. The Democrats have always known it.
	It's time that you catch on to the secret.
	Your secret, don't tell anybody.
	Politics is local. Big Tech.
	Think Google and Microsoft.
	And the new incumbents like OpenAI and Anthropic, heavily backed by Big Tech, have a common goal, Andreessen has claimed.
	And that is to form a government-protected cartel.
	That locks in their shared agenda.
	And what are they willing to do for that government cartel?
	They will spy on you.
	They will work with the government to arrest you, to kill you.
	They will do anything for that cartel and the money and the power that comes with it.
	Either AI is a big scary existential threat, and the big AI labs need to be nationalized and militarized right now, said Andreessen in March, or AI is just software and math and the fear-mongering and the lobbying for regulatory capture needs to stop.
	It's one or the other. He has said that he assumes that Chinese agents are already downloading updates from America's leading AI companies nightly.
	Sure they are. Restricting model access therefore is like bolting the front door when the thieves are already inside the house. Instead he argues the US should be using its full power to push American AI dominance, including exporting into China itself. I wouldn't go either one of these extremes.
	I wouldn't go either one of them.
	I think it ought to be shut down.
	Anyway, I'm a Luddite.
	I'm getting more and more of the Amish approach, as I said before.
	And so, when you look at this competition, New York Times is talking about it.
	Forbes is talking about it.
	And inside OpenAI, there is a back and forth Over these non-disclosure agreements.
	Whether or not people can talk about what is happening there.
	And so there are whistleblowers there.
	I don't know. All these people telling me, you know, well, if somebody hires you, you should just shut up and do what they say.
	I said, well, that's not the job definition of an engineer or of one of these companies here, or a software engineer.
	That's not the job description of a journalist.
	What you're telling me is the job description of a prostitute.
	Is that what you do? You do anything if somebody pays you enough?
	Hey, trolls, you know, I mean, come on.
	There are some things that need to be exposed when our employers go off the rails.
	A common theme of the complaints is that OpenAI safety isn't first.
	Growth and profits are.
	In 2019, OpenAI went from a non-profit dedicated to safe technology to a profit organization worth $86 billion.
	And now Altman is considering making it a regular old for-profit vehicle of capitalism.
	Let's just drop the pretense that it is anything other than that.
	And so, again, the civil war within OpenAI, this civil war between billionaires who want to dominate and control and own everything everywhere, still in the news, as Technocracy News says, this reckless race for dominance, both within OpenAI and between these two different groups.
	He says, on top of raw technocratic urge, We're good to go.
	Unplugged technocrats, 800-pound gorillas in the room, and the Trilateral Commission, who started the modern technocracy in the first place.
	It all seems like a real disaster in the making for us, says Technocracy News, but not for them.
	In fact, I can see the Trilateral Commission is now playing the 1972 hit song, I Can See Clearly Now, as they get near their goal of world domination.
	Well, what is the solution to all this stuff?
	Again, they have said all my life, I've heard, think globally, act locally.
	All politics is local.
	We have to monitor these globalists, and we have to block them locally.
	We'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, welcome back. Do we have Tony yet?
	Okay, we're going to be bringing Tony in shortly.
	Let me read a couple of comments here.
	We have on Rumble, we have DGA. Thank you for the tip.
	He says, no way the lockdowns and COVID tyranny happens under Hillary.
	That's right. That's why they had to have Trump in there.
	No way they go along with it.
	With Trump, they were trusting the plan.
	These fools were begging for martial law at inauguration.
	They lost cult.
	Yeah, you know, as I look at these trolls, you know, when you show them what Trump says, or you show them what Alex said about the sugar water vaccines and think, oh, don't worry about that.
	It's nothing but, you know, injecting aluminum and mercury into your veins.
	That's no problem. It's basically sugar water.
	Like, what have you been telling people about injecting these adjuvants, these dangerous adjuvants like mercury and aluminum into your arms?
	That was always the issue.
	But now that's really nothing compared to the fact that you're injecting something that's going to modify you genetically.
	It's going to take over your body and start manufacturing something.
	What is it that is manufacturing?
	Oh, you know, that spike thing.
	That spike thing that's causing all kinds of circulatory damage.
	It's accumulating in your reproductive organs.
	It's crossing the blood vein barrier.
	You know, that spike thing.
	Well, that's what it takes your body over and starts manufacturing that.
	It doesn't seem to be going away for these people.
	Yeah, but don't worry about it. You know, I told you not to take the adjuvants, but don't worry.
	So you put stuff up like that, and boy, do people get angry.
	And I said, when I was looking at some of these trolls from, you know, these various things, I said, you know, Trump's a problem.
	But the biggest problem are the people who follow him, the people who give him the power.
	That's the real issue.
	So we've now got Tony, and we're going to take a quick break and establish contact with him.
	Let's remember that we're the ones who decide when the mask is going to be worn, and we're the ones who can take the mask off at any time.
	We'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	All right, and we've got Tony Arteman on after that brief break from Wise Wolf Gold, but he has set up davidknight.gold to take you to Wise Wolf.
	And, of course, you can buy gold or silver, small amounts or large amounts.
	You can also set up a savings program there with Wolfpack.
	You can determine how much you want to save each month in gold or silver and get a group discount as part of that.
	And so you can gradually accumulate that.
	And he can also help you if you want to do a metals IRA. He can help you to set that up.
	Great to have you on, Tony. Thank you for joining us today.
	Thank you for supporting this program.
	Well, it's an absolute honor, sir.
	Thank you for having me back.
	I always enjoy our Thursday chats.
	Well, thank you. Yeah, it's great to have you on.
	And in the brief time that we were talking during that break, you said you heard the question from somebody about Saudi Arabia.
	In three days, is there some kind of magic agreement?
	Were you able to find anything about that?
	Well, yes. And I'm going to be very careful not to break anything here that is unsubstantiated because there's a whole host of blogs out there and speculation on what's going to happen on the 9th.
	We do know this, that on June 6, 1974, the House of Saud and the United States formed a petrodollar agreement In exchange for military protection that the brokering and all sales of the crude oil in Saudi Arabia would flow through dollars.
	And that's where you get the term petrodollar.
	And so that was 50 years ago today?
	That's interesting. D-Day, too.
	June 6th. Also, anniversary of Operation Overlord, 1944.
	And so, yeah, it's expiring on the 9th.
	And so, again, there's some disinformation, and I don't want to lean too heavily on this.
	There's some blogs out there and some substacks saying that...
	The Crown Prince in Saudi Arabia has said that they no longer accept dollars.
	That's not something I can confirm.
	What I think is going to happen is if you look at the digital currency headlines out there, Saudi Arabia and China are creating a cross-border digitized payment system.
	I think that will start off what's going to happen.
	The future is going to be a host of currencies.
	I don't see any evidence that Saudi Arabia is going to stop I think we would know that.
	I think that would be, even though it's on a couple of blogs out there, I don't think that that is the true crux of the matter.
	I think what we're looking at is that Saudi Arabia is going to not renew that agreement, the petrodollar.
	So officially, really, the petrodollar is not necessarily dead, but it's on its deathbed.
	It's in hospice care because these other...
	And I think it'll probably be more dominated in Chinese yuan and then the BRICS system itself.
	Let's not forget that Saudi Arabia recently joined BRICS. And I think that made it, I think really that really is going to accelerate de-dollarization, David.
	I mean, it's not that it's going to go to zero, that Saudi Arabia is not going to accept it, but they're going to have a completely new payment system set up.
	So what we've known and what we talked about as the petrodollar, I think is officially coming to end here on the 9th.
	Well, now, am I mistaken?
	Because I thought that Saudi Arabia had said they're going to start settling contracts with China, for example, and the Chinese Yuan.
	Was I imagining that, or did that really happen?
	Do you remember?
	I thought they'd started doing that, but maybe they didn't.
	I believe that they have started doing that.
	And I think even during this agreement, I think they've been setting that system up.
	I think that will accelerate now more than anything.
	But it's not that they won't use dollars.
	At least that's what I'm able to find.
	And we've been talking about this for a while.
	Part of the overall...
	The dollarization, uh, globally that we're seeing.
	And it really just, I mean, it accelerating faster than I think, as you look at the financial, the mainline financial networks aren't even talking about this.
	This is huge. You know, this, this departure away from the petrodollar system.
	So no, I, um, again, I don't, it's not going to go to zero.
	Like they're not going to use dollars or Iraq has done that by the way, the Iraqi, the Iraqi parliament, uh, We're good to go.
	Another stellar victory for the American empire.
	The people we rescued have made it illegal to even take our money anymore.
	Maybe we should offer a bill like that in Tennessee.
	Made it illegal to accept any federal bribery out of Washington, D.C. That would start things going in the right direction immediately, wouldn't it?
	They don't even want our money.
	And of course, Turkey, which is a NATO ally, they have declared that they're going to join BRICS as well.
	So was there a, you mentioned, you know, 50 years ago today, there's some kind of an agreement.
	Now, what kind of, you know, is this kind of a handshake between, I guess we could call it a handshake between a clown prince and Kissinger?
	Or was this some kind of a formal agreement that They spell out there that they can just start to, you know, find some wiggle room or just ignore it.
	I guess maybe. I don't know. Was it some kind of a formal treaty or something?
	I believe so. Was it?
	Okay. I just thought it was kind of an agreement.
	You know, if you look it up, the petrodollar agreement of 1973 was a deal between the United States and Saudi Arabia.
	In exchange for military protection and advanced equipment, Saudi Arabia agreed to sell oil exclusively in U.S. dollars.
	And they call it an arrangement, established for a dollar.
	We're doing a couple of mafia families there.
	It's like the Tataglias and the Corleones made an arrangement there.
	And of course, the reason that we talked about this many times, the reason they had to do that was because everybody saw the fraud that the dollar was not backing up, not being backed up by gold as they had promised.
	And so they had to back it up essentially, you know, with guns.
	With the military equipment for the Saudis and keep them in power because, you know, it's an organized crime cartel that's running that country.
	Absolutely right. It was a bit of a delayed reaction.
	You know, August 15th, 1971, Richard Nixon takes us off the gold standard, closes the gold window.
	Mm-hmm. And it doesn't, again, not until June 6, 1974, do we have this official agreement.
	I think that was probably the plan all along because it would be more of a floating currency based off a real-time commodity in some ways, at least.
	So it's not just, because that was a huge departure from the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1944.
	And again, the 1970s, that's where you get stagflation.
	You get high unemployment, inflation, and low economic output.
	And so that's what you get also to get the gold going up 2,000% during the 1970s.
	Of course, gold didn't really go up.
	It's the dollar loss purchasing power.
	But all through that, that's the military-backed U.S. currency argument I've heard that before.
	What backs us now? It's been a host of things.
	It's really about money velocity.
	This is my opinion. You look at places like Iraq that we invaded, and I tell this story often.
	One of the first places I was called to at the tail end of the invasion going into Mosul, they sent me to the bank.
	They put my team to the bank and said, figure out what's going on.
	Because people were just taking boxes of the Iraqi dinar out of the bank, and the people were staying there, and they were just barely looting.
	But they would go out in the street.
	Nobody wanted any of the currency.
	I literally got to see a currency die in real time, a paper currency.
	And you think about the departure.
	That was 20 years ago, David.
	So if you think of the departure 21 years ago, And I look at that and how far we are away from that, the apex of American power and hegemony post 9-11, going into Iraq, doing that, setting up that intern government, all that with Paul Bremer and all this.
	You look back now and they don't even accept dollars.
	Yeah, yeah, that's right.
	And this is a swift fall.
	We talked about this last week.
	This is on purpose, that we lose these deals.
	This was one of the reasons that, if you look at the history of the Cold War in the 1980s, Ronald Reagan was able to bankrupt the Soviet Union, and there's a lot of moving parts that go into that, but that was one of the things...
	He was able to work closely with the House of Saud.
	They were able to have a massive amount of output of crude oil onto the market.
	The main export of the Soviet Union was energy, Russia, and their natural resources.
	So coupled with some other things, that was deal-making.
	That was a strategy.
	What is happening now?
	I know it's an inside job, but it's pretty incredible.
	I mean, they're not even trying anymore.
	that you have Biden's economic advisor Bernstein, he can't explain what currency is, like he was on 60 Minutes, he can't explain how debt is denominated, all this stuff, and he's also arguing he wants to lose this. The head economic advisor for Biden wants to lose the world's reserve currency status of the US dollar, which I don't know how does the dollar survive, David, if it's not being used globally.
	And again, I don't think these elites understand, or maybe they do, the consequences.
	I think the people running the government understand.
	I think they put in these idiot subordinates who don't.
	And those are the ones that we look at when they go, our leaders, they don't understand what's going on.
	Maybe, I don't know, maybe they're such traitors that they would do it anyway.
	Maybe they're so stupid, they don't understand what's going on.
	But the people who are setting this whole thing up do understand.
	And they are deliberately, it's kind of like the failing schools, right?
	For the longest time, people say, what is the matter with the schools?
	And I'd say, I think they're doing exactly what they intended to do.
	I think they're deliberately dumbing down the kids.
	And our government, we look at it, and it's like, what's the matter with it?
	Can't they see this?
	Does it make any sense? No, I think they're deliberately pulling the economies apart in America and in Europe and other places in the West.
	I think it's a deliberate focus on us to rip everything apart.
	I agree. I think it's a plan.
	America will be the first nation, I think, ever that will be brought down artificially.
	Again, every nation, every great empire has a rise, a fall, has an apex, and a collapse eventually.
	But this has been accelerated.
	You go back and just look at the timeline.
	I get stuck on this, but if you watch the departure of American greatness and American power and accountability, it really just starts, again, the acceleration point, at least, is 1971.
	And then that's when we go off the gold standard.
	And I'm thankful for a lot of things that happened post Nixon taking us off the gold standard.
	For one thing, it's legal for you to own gold now.
	You couldn't know it from 1933 to 1974, which is interesting.
	This is 74 is the year we signed the agreement for the petrol.
	It was also the year Gerald Ford made it legal for you to own gold.
	So again, you go to prison, you couldn't physically hold it.
	So now you can. So you can be your own bank, but you've got to understand everything that's happening with the government and the idea of sound money and liberty and accountability in regards to the monetary system, That's what props up the deep state.
	It's when we have the problems that we have.
	There's absolutely no accountability.
	And now that they're doing this controlled demolition, this is the time when you really, folks, you've got to pay attention to what this is going to happen.
	Like David says, it's gradually then suddenly, right?
	With Hemingway's quote about the rich going broke, I mean, it's gradually and suddenly.
	I think we're I'm going to see the suddenly part, and I try not to be an alarmist and say, well, tomorrow you're going to wake up, and the dollar's not going to zero, but it is going to digital.
	That's something that we need to really focus on.
	All these things that are happening, I think, you know, David and I talk about, it's like, how could you even...
	How would you let this agreement lapse when we need it so badly to strengthen the dollar?
	Well, it's because they're going to put in the environment for you to need or ask for a central bank digital currency.
	There will be a run on the dollar.
	There will be loss of purchasing power.
	Foreign adversaries dumping it.
	And so they're going to say, well, this is what you need.
	Just sign up. Here's your biometrics and all the rest of that stuff.
	At least that's the signpost that I'm reading from all this, because they have to know that they're going to lose this status.
	So there might be, and again, this Jerome Powell has been raising rates faster than any Fed chair in history.
	And we've noticed that.
	And they're also very much on the fence about lowering rates now because they have stagflation.
	They have inflation now, but they also have an economy that's failing.
	But I think you and I have also talked about the Fed.
	The Fed will choose the strong dollar.
	So there's a mixed bag, and there's probably a lot of civil war going on in the realm of finance and our dollar.
	Which will work its way out into the general society eventually, you know, the civil war stuff.
	I agree. Well, you know, I think it's kind of interesting when they put in commodities of oil, but also the other commodity that was implicit in the petrodollar was military power.
	So those are the two commodities that we control, right?
	And so we control the oil, we control the military power.
	Once they put the petrodollar there that was based on that, then they could let people have the gold.
	Because prior to that, it was implicitly tied to gold at the very least.
	And so they move these things along and, as you point out, they're gradually taking everything down.
	Just like Fauci said, you know, how do we accomplish radical change is basically what that guy was asking him at Milken.
	And whether you're talking about getting people to take an untested vaccine or whether you're talking about radical change in terms of our infrastructure and our economic organization, our radical wealth redistribution from the Western governments to a handful of oligarchs.
	When you're talking about radical change, you do it from the inside.
	You do it with disruption.
	And you do it iteratively. And that's what we're seeing with all this radical change.
	Right. And the question is, Kubona, who benefits?
	Yeah. And certainly not the American people.
	That's right. And because this system's been in place so long, you're going to develop normalcy bias.
	And I think that's so dangerous right now because the elites are planning.
	They've been talking about this.
	They even have a term for it.
	It's called the Great Reset. They throw it in your face.
	I was talking about this, and I know you were too, in 2019.
	I was talking about this. Talking about the language of the Great Reset and the World Economic Forum.
	By the way, the World Economic Forum started in 1971, same year we went off the gold standard.
	Who knew? You know, you see, a lot of that stuff has followed us into our present time.
	In 1972, we opened China.
	And in China was, if you read Pat Buchanan's work on him following Nixon to open China, it was like this backwater.
	He called it like a moonscape.
	It was very quiet.
	They had nuclear weapons in 1964, but they were very isolated.
	The Maoist regime, even though they were set up by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds in 1949, it was a...
	It was very insulated, and they had cross-border fights, skirmishes with the Soviet Union.
	A lot of that was covered up, but they still had border disputes between some of the lands the Russian Tsars had conquered 200 years prior.
	But there was a lot of tension, so when that opened up, this is where we are now.
	China, we have this most favored trading status given to it by George W. Bush on December 11, 2001.
	And after that, we lost 55,000 factories here in the United States.
	All this wealth transferring to China.
	But I read a report this morning, Dave, it was really interesting.
	The amount of dollars that China now holds is a mystery.
	There was a, going up to the peak was 2014.
	And then there was this decline since that time.
	And now they just basically papered over it and covered it up.
	You really don't know how much of the dollars they actually hold.
	So this is coupled with the fact that China has been stealthily under radar, which is very bizarre, buying gold since the beginning of the century.
	I think that's also a tell.
	They're setting themselves up with their economic nationalism, their manufacturing, which production, if you listen to the former Fed chair, Paul Volcker, when he talked to Congress back in the late eighties, he was saying, well, what's wrong with the economy?
	You know, why is the American economy...
	What's wrong with the economy?
	I am. That's me.
	He does a G.K. Chesterton thing on it, right?
	You know, what's wrong with the world?
	I am. But he definitely was what was wrong with the economy, these Fed chairmen.
	That's exactly right.
	He pointed to the fact that the United States had departed from a production nation to a consumption nation.
	A consumption economy is not going to be near as strong and productive with overall wealth as a production economy.
	So we went away from manufacturing.
	So there's something happening here.
	The history here is really breathtaking if you follow finance and you're a gold bug like me and follow precious metals.
	It's all happening now.
	Even the news feeds, it's hard for me to catch up because so much happening in the realm of digital currency But just this here, you know, we're on the cusp of losing the petrodollar.
	I didn't think it would be this fast.
	But there's really no resistance.
	Even the archived stories, David, if you go back, the United States government isn't putting much pressure on Saudi Arabia to renew it or to create some sort of deal.
	They don't care. It's truly amazing.
	I mean, you would think that Biden would go over and at least, you know, do a sword dance with him or something like Trump did.
	Yeah. They could pull out the glowing orb and he could put his hands on it.
	It's like, yeah, all right, we're all together in on this one.
	But they're doing nothing.
	Not even a sword dance.
	Well, and have you heard anything?
	I haven't heard anything on the campaign trail from any of these candidates.
	No, no, no.
	All the truly foundational existential issues, they don't care about it at all.
	As a matter of fact, you know, when you look at this, right, it was energy oil.
	It's military power, things like that, that they were focusing this thing on.
	Well, as you were talking about, as you made the transition from a manufacturing economy to a consumer economy, that is a path to poverty and to slavery.
	And yet, when you look at the green agenda, and you look at the Paris Climate Accord of 2015, what is that about?
	That's about making sure that China and India...
	Have an insurmountable advantage in terms of manufacturing.
	Because if they've got cheap, available energy, nobody can compete with them.
	And that's why we're seeing a lot of these.
	We're seeing factory after factory close.
	They're the last steel plant in the UK closing and on and on.
	You see all this stuff. Why?
	Because manufacturing is energy intensive.
	And if it's energy intensive, it's going to be done in the places where energy is cheap.
	And so this whole green agenda...
	Has been about making China the manufacturing king and making it so that we can't manufacture anything.
	Not competitively, at least.
	Well, it's a way to consolidate power, too.
	And you called it a watermelon that's green on the outside and red communism on the inside.
	That's exactly right. I mean, this is what the plan of the elites in the World Economic Forum, whatever you want to call it, there's probably a massive amount of influence, too.
	And I probably need to do a whole show on this, where the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, how much of their hand...
	BRICS and the foundation of BRICS. We know that they founded the Trilateral Commission in 1973.
	All these years are very pivotal. Beginning of the 1970s, going off the gold standard, opening China, Trilateral Commission. 1974 is also a very important year, not only for this agreement, but it's the last year that the United States ever ran a trade surplus.
	And you've got to remember, folks, a trade surplus, again, this is what we had for most of our history.
	There was a reason we were called the arsenal of democracy and the manufacturing marvel of mankind.
	I mean, it's what we... The founding father, especially Alexander Hamilton, set up a tariff system so we would protect our markets and we built things.
	And so there was always a trade.
	That's how we even paid. David's mentioned this many times.
	That was our taxing system.
	About 70% of the government, the federal government, was funded through tariffs.
	So foreign imports. You had to pay a tax to enter our home markets.
	And now you look at that timeline, David, going on the petrodollar, but it was the last year we ever ran a trade surplus.
	Now, where does that money go?
	So if you're running trade deficits, that's funds and wealth away from you.
	And I remember when I was running for Congress, I said, well, we're going to reach a trillion-dollar trade deficit, and I was laughed at.
	I think it was the Dallas Morning News, and I thought, that's just crazy.
	Well, we hit that, and it wasn't that much longer after that.
	It's because we continue to consume and consume, and we're based off of debt, and the elites push that.
	We went from a production economy to a consumption economy, and so that's where we are.
	All those dollars, though, as I've mentioned, have to go somewhere.
	They don't just float off in the ether.
	Wealth transfers, so this large transfer of wealth has been happening under your feet, For the past 50 years.
	That's right. And now we're just, I think they're consolidating, that's rearranging the grand chessboard, all of that.
	And the danger here is all of us just thinking, well, you know, tomorrow will be a lot like today.
	Yeah, that's right. It's not going to be.
	And you go back and you look at it, and I remember you had a lot of people who were all about free trade, you know, carrying the water for the multinational corporations, and they said, oh, this is going to be great.
	You're going to be able to, look, you'll get everything so much cheaper.
	You know, these people in China, they've got nothing, they'll work for nothing.
	And so you're going to get really cheap goods from these people and all this kind of stuff.
	And it's like, well, you know, is that a good thing that we're going to use these people as slaves to make cheap stuff for us?
	And then what is the long-term picture of this?
	You know, we're going to get wealthier as a community.
	Think about that. As a community, if we are just doing each other's laundry, Or cooking for each other with restaurants?
	And that's really all that's left to us now.
	Are these service businesses as individuals?
	You know, if you're not a big multinational corporation on the New York Stock Exchange, what have you got left?
	Basically, service businesses.
	Now, if you do a good service business, you can still get rich.
	But at the same time, your community or the country is getting poorer and poorer.
	So you're going to be a big fish in a shrinking pond that's there, and eventually you're going to run out of water in that pond.
	And so that's the direction that we've been taking as a community.
	And a lot of these people who sold us this open trade stuff, again, when you go back and you look at how these things got put in, at the same time we went from having...
	Having taxes at the border to having taxes internally, we also set up the Federal Reserve.
	We set up the income tax and all the rest of that stuff.
	That's when we made, you know, essentially the guns turned in on us in the same way that the guns are turning in on us now with the surveillance state and the police state and the rest of this.
	They turned that gun on us economically a long time ago.
	And you're right, talking about the 70s when you had...
	There's a big new Brzezinski when he's starting the trilateral thing, and they loved him.
	They loved his thesis that he wrote a little bit before that and sets up the trilateral commission.
	And then when they switch out Nixon with Jimmy Carter, they put him in charge.
	Take over from Henry Kissinger, who's running the show.
	Then you get the big new Brzezinski running the show for the trilateral commission.
	It truly is amazing to watch this thing unfold over all these different years and how these people are painting us into a corner.
	And boy, we're in one now. And we're in a tight spot now, as I said in that Brother Where Art Thou?
	The barn's on fire and they're shooting inside.
	It truly is an endgame.
	And as much as I don't like that, the fact that this plan, that it's been a long-term plan to transfer the wealth and power and the ability to project power away from the United States of America, and it's going to wake up.
	You know, that quote that's often attributed to Thomas Jefferson, you wake up homeless on the continent your forefathers conquered because this was a plan that was implemented.
	You mentioned, you know, the income tax and the Federal Reserve.
	I mean, 1913 is the four horsemen of the political apocalypse.
	You know, you have the 17th Amendment, the direct election of senators by bankers instead of your state legislator.
	You get the 16th Amendment, which was the income tax.
	You get the Federal Reserve.
	But you also get in there, in the incubation stage, where we start moving away from being economic nationalists to a free trade system in 1913 with Woodrow Wilson.
	Folks, all that was set up by the elites.
	This was their plan.
	The Cecil Rhodes Roundtable internationalist merging of the British Empire, the City of London, and the United States and its power to form a one-world government.
	Years later, after the end of World War I, the League of Nations was rejected because we still had some people that loved this country that were In the United States Senate, and it was rejected, but that's where you get the Council on Foreign Relations.
	They've been working. It's an inside job.
	They've been working on this, and it's beyond just human intervention.
	This is a spiritual thing, but they've been working on this since the beginning of the country, but especially accelerated after World War I. I'll end with this, David.
	But, you know, the debt of the U.S. going into World War I, the war to end all wars, uh, was a, was a billion dollars.
	And, uh, when we, when we were done with the war, it was five, you know, because now we had the federal reserve too, and they had hijacked the money supply and then they've expanded the, you know, it was 5 billion.
	That's pretty quaint compared to where we are now with a trillion dollars every 90 days, uh, you know, so totally unsustainable, but.
	This is monumental, David.
	Watching these agreements expire, and this is the passing of an age of the American empire, and it's swiftly eroding.
	Right. Yeah, and of course, when you look at China, they loved China because the communist leaders were nothing but thieves.
	Marxism is essentially a kleptocracy from one regard, a kleptocracy combined with totalitarianism.
	So they knew these people were bribable, and what they did was they set up a...
	A kind of fascist system where you had public-private partnerships.
	You didn't have a business there unless you had a Communist Party partner there.
	And so that kind of model that they used, they liked China because they could have their way with it.
	And you hear the politicians and everybody else saying that all the time.
	Oh, I love China. I can do whatever I want to there because it's a dictatorship.
	And they want a fascist dictatorship here.
	That's what the public-private partnerships are all about.
	And they're the ones who are going to, you know, you asked before, where does the money go?
	Well, we know. It goes to these guys.
	They're the ones who get it. I've got a question for you, Tony.
	This is from Michelle Obama.
	And thank you for the tip on Rockfin said, Tony, does the gold you send me that is larger in size, Have less value because it's not as easy to break down and trade for day-to-day items.
	No. Well, I think what you're referring to is when you get gold that is broken into things like half-ounce, quarter-ounce, tenth of an ounce, or even gram bars, like I put a lot of the gram bars in the Wolfpack packages, There's a premium placed on those.
	My cost is going to be higher.
	It's not a cost I'm passing necessarily on to you from the mint.
	I have to absorb the cost first and then sell it.
	So there's always a higher premium on fractionalized gold as there is on fractionalized silver.
	It's just the way that metals work.
	The minting process and all of that.
	There's always going to be a little bit more and sometimes a lot more premium.
	It's one of the things that's great about Wolfpack.
	We buy the gram bar sheets and sheets of 100.
	So 100 grams of gold per sheet.
	And what I do is we take those little white gloves and we break off the grams and then repackage them into a coin flip.
	So instead of you going online and finding one that's an assay that's through one of the major We'll save you $10, $15 a piece on those.
	So it's not that your gold's worth less if it's in an ounce form.
	And it's not necessarily that your gold's worth more when it's in a fractionalized form.
	But you end up paying a little bit more.
	And I think there's probably a psychological value placed on that.
	It's like, if you can just trade grams at a time, I think people will like that, by the way.
	And I think that's a way that you could...
	Handle business. And it gives you the ability to...
	You've made that coin divisible.
	So that's the whole point of why you're paying a little bit of it.
	I agree. Yeah, yeah. When you get something, the bigger it is, you're going to get a bulk discount type of thing on it, right?
	And then if it's smaller, you've got some more utility for it in terms of maybe in the future if you're trying to...
	So those two things are just kind of...
	there are different types of things that you might accumulate.
	You're looking to get a massive amount that you then can't break down, but you can get a quantity discount on it, or you're going to get something that is more involved in manufacturing it and more stuff that has to go into it, more processing, but it might have a little bit more utility for you in the future.
	I guess it's just that, maybe it's that kind of trade-off.
	What else is gold?
	And that's, by the way, that's the way I buy a lot of my gold from myself personally.
	I buy it from people that come here to my shop or to my place in Denison, Texas.
	But I try to buy the 10-ounce pieces.
	The same things, if you call me and you want to buy something, just know that it's like I'm buying for myself.
	I'd think, what would I do with this particular situation?
	So it's you know, that's just me projecting my own strategy with my customers and so I That's a great question because I have the same I have the same thoughts like a 10th ounce gold Krugerrand. I love Krugerrands South African, it's part of the BRICS nations, it's probably a good hedge.
	You can usually get a good deal on them.
	The premiums on them aren't like American Eagles.
	I like to save those Krugerrands.
	I like the 10-ounce pieces.
	As a matter of fact, I carry one on my neck.
	It's my necklace. It's a good way to travel, too.
	If you want to take a little gold with you, just in case, like a backup, you can always do that with jewelry.
	Don't go on a plane. The TSA will steal it from me, right?
	Yeah. Wait a minute, I had this basket.
	Where'd that go? Yeah, wear it.
	Don't put it in your bag.
	The Touch It and Steal It Authority.
	That's what the TSA stands for, I guess.
	So, what's going on?
	Other things that are happening?
	Any specials or anything like that that's going on at Wise Wolf you want to let us know about?
	Well, so we're working on payment systems.
	I've had a lot of people reach out and said, I heard you on David Knight talking about the new payment systems.
	Working on that where you can do ACH. It's for some of the larger tiers or one-time purchases.
	And I'm working on being able to accept major crypto on Wolfpack.
	So you can go on and get in the shopping cart.
	Use Bitcoin or Ethereum.
	We should be announcing, probably this time next week when I'm on with you again, hopefully, we'll be announcing that.
	So that'll be really exciting.
	Oh, yeah. And we've got a lot of great products going out on Wolfpack.
	If you haven't checked out Wolfpack, go to davidknight.gold and look at all the things that you can set up.
	In the automatic, you can do one-time purchases, and we buy your metals for you.
	So we've got close to, we're getting close to like 1,200 people So we've expanded our reach there a bit.
	I got like 700 five-star reviews.
	So if you haven't joined Wolfpack or you've been on the fence about it, especially with this going off with the petrodollar, save some silver, get some gold.
	And with us, you're going to get quality products delivered directly to your door and all of that certified.
	I buy for you like I buy for me, just so you know.
	Yeah, what would Tony do?
	That's what you're thinking when you're making the purchases.
	Well, you know, as Gerald Salenti will always say, he says, I don't predict the future.
	I predict trends.
	And we know what the trend is for gold.
	We don't know when it's going to happen, when the price is going to go up exactly or go down, but we know what the trend is for the dollar, and we know what the trend is for gold.
	And so that's all you need to know to know that you need to start accumulating gold and silver.
	Thank you so much, Tony.
	It's always great talking to you.
	And your show is going to be following.
	I've got another question here, I think.
	This is from Atomic Dog.
	He said, David, gold has gone up about 32% over the last two years.
	What does your gut say about the future price increases?
	Is $3,000 likely within the next two years?
	I saw something the other day, and I don't remember what the time period was, talking about gold.
	Maybe it was longer than two years, but it had gone up quite a bit.
	What is my gut feeling about it?
	Well, let me ask you, Tony, what's your gut feeling about it?
	We're not making predictions here, but we're talking about the trend.
	I know that there's a lot of banks that have picked $2,700 by the end of this year, beginning of next year.
	Several of them have picked $3,000.
	And of course, you've got some wild outliers that go really high, just like you see with Bitcoin predictions and things like that.
	What do you think? Well, I think just conservatively, you go back to 2020, and Citibank was expecting $3,000 gold during that time.
	I think the second quarter, they were talking about 2021, $3,000.
	There's been a lot of disruptions in the natural progression of what gold's value is.
	And you've got to understand, this is warfare, folks.
	This is a very, you know, this is fourth-dimensional warfare.
	You've got the United States Central Bank is at war with gold.
	That's why they don't buy it. That's right.
	It's not simply market forces.
	You've also got active manipulation.
	Active manipulation.
	Again, there's a revaluation of commodities, even things being denominated in dollars.
	And I think one day we'll look back and wonder, what does that even mean, that we were denominated all this stuff in dollars?
	It is crazy.
	Gold is really...
	If you step back from it, gold is the world's reserve currency.
	It's supplanted the dollar already.
	I think the final nail in the coffin was 2022 with the invasion of Ukraine by Russia and the sanctions that were placed.
	The blowback from that.
	I think that gold really is the world's reserve currency now.
	So what happens with it being denominated in dollars?
	That's a great question.
	And I think if I'm betting on something, I think easy $3,000 gold in the next 24 months.
	I don't think that's really a problem.
	It could be much higher.
	I mean, honestly, would anybody blink at $5,000 an ounce gold?
	Probably not. But if I'm understanding what happens when the price goes up, It really slows down all the things that I do.
	You would think it would speed it up and there would be some windfall, but it really doesn't.
	It's a really crazy time.
	It takes me about two weeks now to get paid on a certain type of items, especially the larger gold items.
	Even though the price is up, I usually have to sell them to the trading house.
	It's taking a long time for that To be evaluated, to be paid for.
	So everything is slowed down, and I think it's like choking out some of the, because, you know, you're dealing with more dollars, there's more risk that happens if you're holding that much more.
	So you've got to understand all the factors that will happen.
	So I don't pray for higher prices, by the way.
	I don't think that's a good thing right now.
	I mean, right where we are is crazy.
	Gold hit its all-time high five times or something like the last four months.
	So we are on a trajectory of a bull market for gold, but I don't think it's just a bull market.
	I really think it's a generational shift for the world's reserve currency of the dollar status moving away, de-dollarization, and re-evaluation.
	Well, you know, we've talked about Zimbabwe, for example, you know, the basket case in modern times, the trillion dollar Zimbabwe note and all the rest of the stuff, trillion Zimbabwe dollars.
	They did the Ziggy, the Zimbabwe gold thing, and it's actually gaining against the U.S. dollar.
	How bad is that when the U.S. dollar is falling against Zimbabwe's currency?
	Yeah. It's up 2% over the U.S. dollar.
	So I said it's having some problems in the country because there's a big black market there competing in a lot of different ways with the government's currency.
	But internationally, people are liking it.
	Again, because they supposedly tied it to gold, I guess maybe internally people don't believe that it's tied to gold.
	This is the big lie.
	How do we know that they're telling us the truth?
	It's like, well, they always tell us a lie.
	But yeah, I think it's going to be there.
	It's a safe play.
	When you've reached a certain point in time and you've been on roller coasters of investments, I'm not interested in any roller coasters at this point in time.
	I'm too old to ride them, you know.
	So I'm looking for something that's going to be kind of slow and steady and stable and physical and all the rest of these things that gold and silver are.
	That's just my personal opinion.
	You know, the stock market is doing really well, but it's...
	Like, you know, just a couple of stocks that are doing it.
	You know, first it was seven.
	Now it's only about four stocks, and it's focused on AI, and it's focused on NVIDIA and things like that.
	These are things that are kind of fads, and I've seen a lot of fads come and go.
	You know, as these people are setting up their global conquest, what were we doing back in the 70s?
	You know, people were dancing to disco and wearing bell bottoms.
	You know, it's like, what do we know?
	It's kind of crazy.
	And how uninformed we are about what these movers and shakers are doing in the background.
	So you've got a program that is coming up following this one.
	Is that correct? Oh, yes, sir.
	Just at 11 a.m.
	Central Time, Arterburn Radio Transmission.
	I'll be live on Rockfin on the America Unplugged channel and my Twitter at Tony Arterburn and a couple other places.
	Freeworld.fm as well.
	Yes, yes, good. Yes, and I think we still need to get there.
	Someday we'll get our tech changes done.
	It's so much stuff on a regular basis.
	It's hard to get something new. I understand.
	All right. Well, always great talking to you, Tony.
	Thank you so much for joining us.
	Thank you so much for your support of the show.
	And everybody, check out his program immediately following this.
	And you can find him on Twitter, on, let's see.
	Yeah, at Tony Arterburnon.
	Yeah, at Rockfin, and also at, give me the address again, the FM. FreeWorld.fm.
	You can listen to a lot of great hosts there live, and shout out to Jason Barker, who's doing an amazing job.
	He's streaming your show right now on FreeWorld.fm.
	Well, that's great. Yeah, do we have a link to that on our website?
	We need to make sure we've got at least a link to that.
	So that's great. I'm glad that he's streaming that there.
	Well, again, thank you, Tony, and we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back.
	Transcribed by https://otter.ai 1 2
	3 4 5
	6 7 8
	9 Common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right. So the State Department.
	What are they spending this money that they manufacture on?
	Well, a half a million dollars for grants to promote atheism and many other things.
	You know, we have become, in this country, and it's kind of fitting.
	I saw an article that some church somewhere did a worship service where they worship LGBT. Not God, but LGBT. And they actually changed the lyrics to the old hymn, Come Thou Font of Every Blessing, to praise LGBT, not God. And so what the federal government has become is a font not of every blessing, but of every curse.
	That's filth coming out of our government as they push all this stuff.
	House Republicans, who have led a nearly two-year investigation into a half-million-dollar State Department grant to an organization that promotes humanism and secularism, Come thou font of every evil.
	The wars, the police state, the surveillance state, all the rest of this stuff, the occult, the debauchery, the sex promotions, anything coming out of this government, your own government.
	That's what these people are pushing everywhere.
	So yeah, it's only a half a million dollars.
	I mean, that's like a round-off error on most of the stuff that they do.
	They're also funding a film festival in San Francisco, of course.
	With queer X-rated cinema about steamy gay bathhouse and many others.
	The entire film festival is about, it's an LGBT film festival, and of course it is in San Francisco.
	I have movies, this is Daily Caller, has movies about prostitution, pornography, drag queens, transgenderism, abortion.
	Abortion. Why is abortion?
	Well, because, you know, it's all about sex as recreation.
	We don't want to have any kids.
	So, yeah, got to throw that in there as well.
	This is the federal government's superpower for evil, the fiat currency that is there.
	And again, it's the National Endowment for the Arts, the people that were paying artists to stick a crucifix in a thing of urine years and years ago.
	But then it made an impact.
	Today, it doesn't matter if they push a pornography film festival in San Francisco.
	One of the films, I'm not going to go into all these because some of them are pretty explicit.
	Daily Caller has them.
	Alley of the Tranny Boys.
	A movie in the X-rated compilation describes itself as groundbreaking film that reimagines sexual liberation for today's outlaws.
	Yes, they promise liberty, but they themselves are slaves of sin, aren't they?
	Transit. Recorded at a pornography festival.
	So here we are. It's kind of, you know, pornography about a pornography festival.
	Trans superstar non-binary porn icon.
	The two stars in it.
	And they celebrate, well, again, hedonism everywhere.
	And then, as one person said, how do you know that a nation is under the judgment of God?
	This is coming from a website, Dissenter.com.
	How do you know the nation is under the judgment of God?
	Well, Romans 1 tells us that God gives them over to a depraved mind, to sexual immorality, to injustice, to do things that they ought not to do.
	In other words, the surest sign of God's judgment is rampant sexual immorality, especially when it is funded and promoted by the wicked government that should be upholding justice and defending what is right.
	And so you've got the FBI. FBI marching in a West Hollywood pride parade.
	That's how you know this country is under God's judgment, isn't it?
	Forget about Trump.
	Just take a look at the things that the FBI does to every other person in this country.
	Take a look at what they promote.
	And then this piece from Campus Reform.
	Why young women are leaving religion in record numbers.
	54% of Gen Z women have disaffiliated from religion.
	This trend coincides with young women reportedly becoming more liberal and progressive and LGBT. And so...
	I said 54% of young women are pro-choice, according to the 2022 survey.
	31% identify as LGBT, compared to 15% of Gen Z men.
	So twice as likely, a woman, to follow this debauched definition.
	The thing that's being pushed to us in this month based upon pride.
	Pride, the original sin of Satan.
	Another factor is the rise of feminism.
	A whopping 61% of young women identify as feminists, surpassing the percentage of women from previous generations.
	The modern feminist movement Emphasizes career-oriented independence over domestic life, suggesting a woman's career will lead to greater fulfillment than being a mother or a wife.
	And as these people leave the church, what do most of these churches do?
	Well, they chase them down.
	And as they throw away their complementarianism, right?
	What do I mean by that? Like I said earlier in the show, it's not about...
	It's complimentary with an I, not with an E. It's not like, darling, you look really nice today.
	No, it's not that kind of complimentary.
	It is the fact that we compliment each other, right?
	If you want a pagan example, since we have a pagan society, yin and yang or something, right?
	This whole idea of opposites...
	Complimenting each other, supplementing each other, that kind of thing.
	So let's just throw that out. Men and women must be exactly alike.
	You know, we must do the same work.
	We must wear the same clothes, all the rest of this stuff.
	And that's where these people are going.
	And then, of course, you know, these churches who, they are all about, how are they going to stop this trend?
	Well, they're going to stop this trend by conforming to what people want, right?
	Except we're also told, don't conform to this world, but be transformed.
	How do you do that?
	Well, I mean, you'd have to, like, renew your mind by reading the Bible or something, right?
	To quote the Bible.
	Don't be conformed to this world, but transform by the renewing of your mind.
	No, we don't want to do that.
	We've got a better plan.
	And let me show you what the better plan looks like.
	Saddleback Church. Now, Saddleback Church...
	I had a lot of controversies last year or the year before.
	It's where Rick Warren was, the guy who wrote the best-selling book, Purpose Driven Life.
	It's one of the biggest churches in the country.
	And he was kind of loosely affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention.
	And he wanted to use the size of his church to tell the Southern Baptists that they needed to ordain women pastors because that's what he did in his church.
	And, of course, Rick Warren was a guy that frequently went to Davos.
	Did you know that? Yeah, Davos.
	Young spiritual leader, I guess, except he wasn't all that young when he went.
	He should have had better discernment if he's going to go to Davos.
	Maybe he was just there like, you know, we hear from Youngkin and we hear from Kemp, the Republican governors, I'm there just getting jobs for people, you know?
	Heard the same thing from Trump.
	You believed it about the Virginia governor, the Georgia governor, but, you know, oh, they're doing deals with the globalists and they're getting instructions on the globe.
	But you didn't believe it when it was Trump.
	No, Trump really is getting jobs.
	Well, maybe that's what...
	Rick Warren was doing.
	Maybe he wasn't getting marching orders from these satanic globalist occultic people.
	Maybe he was just there trying to, I don't know, get jobs or something.
	I don't know what Rick Warren was doing at Davos.
	But now that he's gone and he's got a husband and wife team as the primary leaders of this massive church, Saddleback, they're doing a VR church.
	And let me show you what this looks like Cartoon characters there and you're moving around a virtual reality space Some of them are you know, there's a person who's dancing up and down. He's got a headset on there's some creature there that's all black with a halo and it's got wings coming out of the back like some kind of a Angel or demon I don't know what's going on people who are in the worship service as little dogs or something like that Truly amazing, you know when you look at this
	Yeah, that's what they're doing And then you've got people like Julie Green.
	Somebody said this to me.
	I thought it was really funny. This is Julie Green.
	She's got a prophecy now, not just for Trump, but she's got a prophecy for Alex Jones.
	And the person sent this to me and said, Alex is really screwed now.
	She's reassuring Alex Jones.
	Hey, Alex Jones, the Lord is with you.
	He is a prophetic word today.
	Praying for you all, Alex Jones.
	Here's her prophetic word and quotes.
	She's quoting what God supposedly told her.
	Alex Jones, my son, I have not abandoned you.
	I have not left you to be destroyed by the Marxists in your nation, the deep state, and all who blah, blah, blah.
	Okay? Well, as the person said, considering her track record, this is really bad.
	This is like getting a stock recommendation from Jim Cramer, except she is a perfect example of the politicization of the church and the fact that these people who are mixing the politics with religion, the fact that they are...
	More than willing to look the other way when they're lied to.
	And James, thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	And then as we're talking about, you know, the person who is usually the target of her fawning false prophecies.
	Trump. Trump is asked yet again, and really, you know, we've seen this several times.
	We saw it back in 2016, where people asked him, you know, so, have you asked God for forgiveness?
	Well, no, no, I don't feel like I have to.
	That is the heart of the Christian religion.
	The understanding that all of us have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
	That God's standard is perfection, and none of us can achieve that.
	And so we know that God is merciful, that as long as we're alive, there is still an opportunity for us to turn to him.
	And that offer is there for free.
	But it's only there for people who think that they're sick.
	Only the sick need a physician.
	The people who are doing just fine are really sad.
	And as I said, when I watched him...
	Talking about this, it just, he got smaller and smaller and smaller until he was like a little child who didn't know anything about this world or the world to come.
	Absolutely does not know God.
	Whenever you talk to him about this, he immediately starts talking about, hey, you know, I know some religious people and they really like me.
	Is that what you're going to say when you stand before God?
	Are you going to say, well, I did some bad things, but look at all the money that I gave to good causes.
	That's what Bloomberg says. He says, if there's a heaven, there's no doubt.
	I'm going to just straight in.
	Look at all the money that I've given for gun control and all the rest of this stuff.
	Yeah, you think so? You think this is going to be measured on what you do to your fellow man only?
	Or is there something about your rebellion to God that needs to be addressed there?
	So he got this, he just got this, I think this is a new question.
	I had not seen this one before.
	And I believe this is recent.
	This is Sharon from Alabama, and I think her question actually ties into what we were just talking about, which is how do you do this?
	And I know that you've said before that you've been sustained by the prayers of lots of Americans.
	I've seen pictures of people praying over you.
	It's incredible, actually.
	Her question is, she says, you've been faced with so much adversity and persecution for years.
	What's your relationship with God like, and how do you pray?
	That's Sharon from Alabama.
	Okay, so I think it's good.
	I do very well with the evangelicals.
	I love the evangelicals.
	He starts talking about his polls.
	I have more people saying they pray for me.
	I can't even believe it.
	You ever ask who they pray to?
	They're committed and they're so believing.
	They say, sir, you're going to be okay.
	I pray for you every night.
	I mean, everybody.
	Almost, I can't say everybody, but almost everybody that sees me, they say it.
	The question was, does he pray?
	It's a beautiful thing, too. When you look at all of this bad stuff going on, they have nothing to look up to.
	They have no God. They have no anything.
	They kill people.
	They beat people. They push people into subways.
	There's just nothing there.
	Religion is such a great thing.
	It keeps you...
	He's like Richard Dawkins....something to be good about.
	You want to be good.
	You want to... It's so important, and I don't know if it's explained right.
	I don't know if I'm explaining it right now.
	But when you have something like that, you want to be good.
	You want to go to heaven, okay?
	You want to go to heaven.
	If you don't have heaven, you almost say...
	What's the reason?
	Why do I have to be good? What difference is it?
	Or they try to create heaven here.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Isn't that interesting? Isn't that interesting?
	He's kind of in the same position that Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins was.
	I don't believe in God.
	I just like the apples.
	I don't like the orchard.
	And I don't like who planted the orchard.
	I don't like any of that stuff. I just want the apples somehow.
	I like the fact that people aren't killing each other and stuff.
	Religion kind of keeps people in line.
	So it's a good thing for that.
	Richard Dawkins likes the architecture of the ancient churches, which we don't build anymore.
	He likes some of the even songs around Christmas there in the UK. But other than that, he doesn't want any of it.
	So he asked Donald Trump, and it's like, yeah, I know some Christians, and they say they're praying.
	I don't know who they're praying to.
	Don't really care to know who they're praying to.
	It's really sad. And I mention this, not to condemn Trump, but is there anybody that you know that's like that?
	Are you like that? Right?
	Well, yeah, I do some good stuff, and I know that God's going to...
	The good's going to outweigh the bad.
	I just know it. No.
	Never will. Never will.
	The penalty for rebellion against God is death, eternal death.
	And so, since God has to be just, but is also merciful, that's why He sent His Son.
	To satisfy justice and to give us mercy at the same time.
	But some people don't want justice or mercy.
	One day, you'll find out.
	Your children will love us.
	Your children will join us, says an LGBT activist.
	You know, we were told, I played that clip a few years ago.
	You know, you're telling about children.
	We're going to take your children from you and all this kind of stuff.
	Well, you know, this time you're right.
	We are. And it's exactly the same thing that they said in that song.
	Your children will love us, your children will join us.
	They said at the time, well, it was just a joke.
	It was a joke, right? No, it wasn't a joke.
	And so, in Philadelphia over the weekend, there was a lot of chaos during a Pride parade.
	Pro-Palestinian queers in a parade.
	We're talking about cognitive dissonance.
	Do they realize that the Palestinian Muslims will throw the queers off of the roof?
	Do these people know anything?
	They really don't.
	You know, I guess that I had on yesterday who was talking about the lack of civics information and stuff like that.
	They don't even know what current events are.
	He had written an article about some of these protesters and You remember the clip.
	They asked one of these protesters, what are you protesting for?
	I'm not sure. What are we protesting for?
	They have no idea.
	They have no idea who the players are.
	And look, it's one of the reasons why I don't talk about many of these things except to say we want to have peace.
	And we know that our government does not want to have peace for whatever reason.
	Because once the shooting starts, once the wars start, the fog of war, the fog of lies and propaganda are so thick you can't see through it.
	I'm not going to be somebody who tries to push propaganda for one side or the other.
	I'm just going to stay out of it from a distance.
	We don't want to be a part of a war that doesn't involve us.
	End of story. In Memphis, Tennessee, there's a controversy after the police department took part in a Pride Fest parade.
	So, you got the police in Memphis.
	You got the FBI doing it.
	Police officers riding in two specially designed gay police cruisers.
	I wonder what that looks like.
	Gay police cruiser.
	In Idaho.
	Real controversy there.
	Because you had one saloon, a restaurant or a bar, called it the Old State Saloon, announced a month-long celebration of straight people.
	They're calling it Heterosexual Awesomeness Month.
	Heterosexual Awesomeness Month.
	I guess that spells ham.
	And so he got the wrath of the Idaho Statesman.
	Special discounts for ladies and couples and men who dress straight.
	And so a journalist there at the Idaho Statesman took a lot of umbrage of that and demanded to know how someone can dress like a heterosexual man.
	Well, Todd Starnes had the answer.
	He said, well, at first blush, I would recommend steering clear of crop tops, askets, and buttless leather chaps.
	So, you know, eliminate those things from your wardrobe, or at least don't wear them outside.
	That's a good start.
	Get your discount there at the saloon.
	This is an op-ed piece from Brownstone.
	Thomas Harrington. And the headline really caught my eye, and then as I read it, I thought, well, he gets some of it, but he doesn't really get it, I think.
	Because he's not looking at this from a Christian perspective.
	The title is, Children are Gifts, Not Projects.
	He says he had attended a Brownstone Supper Club presentation by Sheila Matthews Gallo, founder of Able Child, an organization that fights against the widespread practice of applying our children, mostly boys, with psychotropic drugs in the name of helping them to overcome supposed behavioral problems.
	Well, what is this? Let me decode that for you.
	It simply means you're giving the kids Ritalin.
	Most of Ritalin is given to boys, right?
	You created an institution, a situation where they got to sit in chairs all day.
	They don't like that. Boys don't like that.
	I've talked about this many times, you know, when we're schooling our kids.
	And little girls like that, little boys like to move around.
	Like, don't want you moving around.
	We can't have you all moving around. Here, have some drugs, you know, that type of thing.
	That was one of the key reasons why we did not homeschool our kids.
	You know, spiritual reasons and everything, but also the Ritalin stuff.
	Boy, the epidemic still is.
	There's many, many, many other new reasons that are out there, but that was one of the key reasons that they were doing at that point in time.
	Anyway, in her talk, she explained how teachers working with counselors who've bought into the pharma-generated campaign to medicalize student behaviors that are seen loosely as non-compliant or simply challenging for teachers to handle, how they effectively coerce parents into turning their children into long-term users of personality-changing drugs at very tender ages, and with all that implies in terms of distorting
	or losing access to the unique sensorial abilities with which each child is born, and that are in many ways the forge of their unique way of perceiving and hence acting in the world.
	Well, a simple fact of the matter is that you have to learn to discipline yourself.
	Somehow, someway. And you can't try to fix everything with a pill.
	It's just that simple.
	And when you start to, when you do that from a very young age, you're teaching kids that they can't control themselves.
	You're teaching them that the pill bottle has all the solutions to life.
	That is what pharmaceutical companies and Goldman Sachs bankers want them to understand, but that is not the truth.
	So she spoke of the many apparent links between these drugs and seriously violent behavior.
	Do you think it might have something to do with why we've got shootings now?
	Absolutely it does. And so she said, they go on to say it's a causal relationship between the consumption of these lucrative pharmaceuticals and the violent actions of the children that take them.
	But he said, I couldn't help but ask myself, as I always have, We insisted on doing when fellow citizens try to turn the problem of illicit narcotics in our culture mostly into a discussion of foreign drug producers and smugglers rather than our own enthusiasm for what they're selling.
	In other words, you know, the problem of fentanyl is China.
	Well, China can make all the fentanyl in the world that it wanted to.
	If we didn't want it, they wouldn't be able to sell it, right?
	They've never sold any fentanyl to me.
	You stop it when there's no demand for it.
	But that's so typical, isn't it?
	And so those rascally Chinese, we've got to stop making this fentanyl, or people in Mexico, or whatever.
	And we've got to have a war on drugs.
	And we've got to use law enforcement to stop people from taking the drugs that they want to take.
	Well, it hasn't worked for over 50 years.
	It'll never work.
	It's a failed strategy.
	And so he's right about that.
	He said, we take the problem of narcotics in our culture, We make it one about foreign drug dealers instead of our own enthusiasm.
	So he said, we can also look at the educational and medical authorities.
	Who seem to have skin deep and essentially authoritarian understanding of the marvelous and at times difficult process of helping our children merge into something approximating a happy and productive adulthood.
	Just as I was talking yesterday and we were talking about, well, we need to, people need to ask, what is the goal of education?
	I remember a pastor once saying, I took his kids to, it was like preschool, kindergarten thing or something like that, and they were talking, the parents were there, and they were showing them their projects and what they did.
	And I said, look at this, and they had this elaborate project and they had all the kids doing it, you know, and he raises his hand and he says, what's the purpose of this?
	What's the purpose of it? I mean, this is what they're doing.
	No, no, no. What is the purpose of this?
	What are you trying to train them to do?
	She had no idea.
	If you don't aim at something, you will never hit it.
	If you don't have a purpose in education, Your children are going to grow up without a purpose.
	They're going to grow up without any direction.
	It's going to be like shooting arrows at random directions and hoping that it's going to hit a target somewhere.
	It'll probably hit somebody else and hurt somebody else if you're just shooting in random directions like that.
	There has to be a purpose in education.
	And folks, there is a purpose.
	It's just that you may not see what their purpose is yet.
	They have a purpose. Even the people who are putting out the curriculum may not understand what the purpose of this thing is.
	But there is a purpose from the person who designed it.
	And you better discern that.
	I had my first child, he said, in graduate school.
	When the news came that I'd be a father, I was 30 years old.
	I was in a relatively new relationship, living on $700 a month stipend.
	I had no money, I mean zero, in the bank, he said.
	To say that I was anxious was an understatement.
	And so he had two people that were older than him that gave him words of encouragement.
	The first one said, Tom, do you know what they say in Spain?
	All babies are born with a loaf of bread under their arms.
	Huh. Okay.
	Well, I don't know.
	When I had our kids, you know, we looked at things, if we had financial difficulties or something like that, I didn't think, well, the baby's going to provide.
	No, God provides.
	God is our provider.
	He honors those who honor Him.
	And we pray to Him for our daily bread.
	We see Him as our provider.
	And when we honor him, we know that he has the ability to back that up.
	He owns the cattle on a thousand hills, and so we don't worry about that thing, right?
	Which of you, by taking thought, can add an inch to your stature?
	God knows that you need this stuff.
	He takes care of the birds of the field, the flowers that are there.
	He'll take care of you, even if you have just a little faith.
	But anyway, so the children are going to be born with a loaf of bread under their arms.
	Well, they may say that in Spain, but we never said that.
	I believe that. And he says, as the time for birth came closer, and he's still worrying about it, he said, my brother said to me, he said, your first job as a parent is to enjoy your children.
	Well, that's good.
	That's good advice.
	But again, is that really what it's about?
	He said, telling me that my children were only partially my children.
	My job was not necessarily to mold them, but rather to try and understand and acknowledge their inherent gifts and their inclinations.
	And so, you know, when I saw this thing, I thought when he said, well, children are gifts, not projects.
	A gift has to have a giver.
	So who's giving the children to you?
	Is it God? Who gave it to you?
	Did nature do this?
	Did the universe do this?
	Did God do it? And if God gave them to us, does he have some idea about how we should mold them?
	I think children do need to be molded.
	They need to be protected.
	They need to be trained in the way that they should go.
	I believe that because the Bible says it.
	And then I saw it for real in my life and in other lives.
	You know, when we look at this, these things are not mutually exclusive.
	You know, you train the child and you try to understand their gifts and their inclinations.
	It's not like you either train them or you just go with their gifts and their inclinations.
	No, you put both of those together.
	It's not one or the other.
	Bottom line is, hey, Christian men by name.
	Train your children.
	Teach and train them. If not, the world is going to claim what they hear.
	It's just that simple.
	He says, but when, as a mindset, it comes to the point of effectively ruling out the possibility that there might be a set of supernatural forces.
	A set of supernatural forces.
	What does he mean by that? Is this Mother Nature or something out there?
	Does it have a name?
	Certainly everybody understands that The universe is created.
	Even the people who deny that it was created understand that.
	But the question is, you want to put a name on it, right?
	Has the Creator spoken to us?
	Well, I think that He has.
	I think it's in the Bible. I think there's a lot of internal and external proofs about the Bible being exactly that and could only come from that.
	But he says supernatural forces behind or beyond the immediate physical and perceptual realities of our day-to-day lives.
	If we lose that, then we lose something very important.
	We lose a belief in the inherent dignity of every person.
	Now we're back to where Christopher Hitchens was before he died and a couple of years before he died.
	I'm not saying that he was converted as a Christian.
	It definitely seems to have not been.
	Or Richard Dawkins, where he is as well.
	Or where Nishi was, right?
	God is dead, we killed him, and this is going to be really bad because there's nobody just like Trump was saying, oh, they're going to push you into a train if they don't believe that you're going to answer to God.
	And yet they don't want there to be a God.
	They can't have their apples without the orchard.
	They can't have their cake and still eat it at the same time.
	But they think so.
	And then he finishes finally here with this.
	He says, Within Western culture, the idea of human dignity is inextricably linked to the concept of imago dei, or the image of God.
	He says, God is not a force.
	God is an intelligence, but he's not even just merely that.
	God is love.
	He provides us mercy, and he provides for us.
	And that's a big mistake, you know, that we have lost this.
	Conservatives have absolutely come unmoored from the foundation that they must have in order to even support conservatism.
	You wonder why everything is coming apart?
	Well, because too many people think God is dead, or they can't acknowledge him.
	We'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	On Rock Fan, James, thank you very much.
	And on Rumble, Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	He says, David, you really touched my heart yesterday.
	Sometimes truth-seeking is a lonely journey.
	You're not alone. I'd love to buy you lunch next time I'm in the mountains.
	Well, that's really kind. Thank you.
	And I think you just bought me lunch today, as a matter of fact.
	Thank you. On Rumble, Raddus Bro, thank you for the tip.
	He says, no one gets to the Father without going through his Son, Jesus, no matter how much Christ consciousness they think they have.
	That's right. No one comes to the Father but my me.
	It's kind of exclusive, and that's very offensive to a lot of people.
	And he knew that.
	Knew that when he said it.
	And we need to not run from that.
	Well, the Guardian...
	When you talk about false claims, they had to remove a false claim that they had that renewables were cheap.
	But in Edinburgh, the city council has decided to ban all ads that have to do with taking a cruise, flying on an airplane, going to an airport, or anything that has to do with an internal combustion engine, a car. So the Edinburgh City Council in Scotland has banned any of those types of ads.
	And yet there's nothing intrinsically wrong with those because these people go to these, they take trains, planes, and automobiles all the time to their conventions, don't they?
	Tom Nelson, producer of the social media blockbuster Climate the Movie.
	Excellent movie if you haven't seen it.
	Often tweets in response to net zero nonsense and he says, when he talks about that ban, he says, it's not about the climate, is it?
	No, it's not.
	It's really not about the climate.
	It's about something completely different.
	Large amounts of advertising revenue could go to the Edinburgh government there and it could save taxpayers some money, perhaps.
	Of course, they don't think about that.
	Because these people don't care.
	They've got a different supporter.
	They're signed up for the UK 100.
	This is something that's billionaire funded.
	It's a green operation targeting local authorities.
	See, they know that everything is local.
	All politics is local. Their agenda is going to be enacted locally.
	So you've got billionaires.
	It's not just Soros, but you've got billionaires who want to rob people blind.
	And what they do is they pull it together into a pool.
	They call it the UK 100 because it is focusing on cities, and it's very much like the C40.
	The C40 was originally 40 cities when Bloomberg and Sadiq Khan were doing it.
	But now it has expanded to 100 cities.
	So now they've got a new organization called the UK 100, or newer, I should say, where the billionaires will give them money and tell them to start shutting everything down so that they can then own everything.
	This green operation targeting local authorities, local folks, local, this is how they make the change.
	Stop paying attention to Washington politicians.
	Forget about Congress.
	Forget about the presidency.
	You need to focus locally.
	That's where it's going to happen. You're not going to be able to change anything in Washington.
	It'd be great if we could change things from top down, but that hasn't worked forever.
	And it is insanity to keep doing the same thing over and over again and thinking that you're going to get different results.
	You're not. You're not going to be able to fix this from Washington.
	You've got to cut Washington off.
	You've got to block Washington, not fix Washington.
	Make that your mindset.
	So, a former BBC reporter is one of the founding members, but it's also being funded by the European Climate Foundation and Bloomberg Philanthropies and Sir Christopher Hahn.
	Former paymaster of eco-vandals that call themselves the Extinction Rebellion.
	These are the people going around...
	You know, defacing classic art, you know, graffiti on, you know, classic architecture, gluing themselves to the ground, all the rest of this stuff.
	But some of the billionaire funders, just so you know, besides the Rockefeller Foundation, the usual suspects like that, you have some like IKEA. IKEA. One of the five board members of UK 100 is Madeline Carroll, described as a communication campaigning specialist for the European Climate Foundation.
	So, local governments around the UK have signed up for this pledge that they will act sooner than the central government's goals, right?
	What have we always said?
	Local government can make things better or they can make things worse for you.
	The UK 100 is about getting the local governments to make things worse for you than even the central government.
	And so, again, Michael Bloomberg is all over this.
	Sadiq Khan is all over it.
	They tell everybody, we are closer.
	We want to do it at the local area because we are closer to the people who live and work in our communities.
	So we have a better understanding of their needs.
	No, it's just because they know that all politics is local.
	This person says, try telling that to the less affluent car owners who are forced off the roads in London by Mayor Sadiq Khan's punched-down ultra-low-emission zone policy, backed by the notorious statistical construct of saving 4,000 lives a year.
	Khan is the current chair of C40, a group of 100 city mayors striving for similar goals as the UK 100, backed by substantial grassroots donations from concerned citizens.
	He says, oh, no, I'm just joking.
	It's backed by Michael Bloomberg.
	Yeah, it's not a grassroots movement at all.
	It's these billionaires operating now at the local level.
	That's where you're going to have to fight them.
	And if you don't fight them, they're going to take over the local government, and then things are going to get really, really bad.
	It's bad enough when they take over the centralized government that is hundreds or thousands of miles away from you.
	They take over your local government with a Soros district attorney or with some of these green dictators.
	That's when it's going to get really bad.
	It's clear that all this green advocacy is being heavily funded by global billionaires carefully curating the agenda in mainstream media to remove all hydrocarbons in just a few years from a human society.
	This is insanity on steroids and support is starting to wane across the world as the full implications of this policy become clear.
	But it remains popular with the controlling elite, who are clearly committed to a process of world deindustrialization under the guise of scientifically unproven climate emergency.
	But what they want to tell you is that the problem...
	With the climate ads, is that they're false?
	Well, here's the Guardian that has got an article that was false.
	They said renewables are cheap.
	And an advertising watchdog, so there was a pushback from the Daily Skeptic, David Turver, filed a complaint.
	And, you know, there's a watchdog in the UK that looks at false advertising.
	He says, this is...
	Demonstrably false. Look at how expensive renewables are.
	And he got them to contact The Guardian and they removed the article because it was a lie.
	And yet, they don't want to have any advertisements about cruises or airplane travel or cars or anything on the buses in Edinburgh.
	He said, I complain both to The Guardian and to the Advertising Standards Authority.
	He got this thing pulled.
	But here's how...
	They've gotten away with these false claims forever.
	These are the Julie Greens of the global government.
	A senior UN official claimed that entire nations would be wiped off submerged by the year 2000.
	In 1989, a senior UN environmental official warned that entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend was not reversed by the year 2000.
	According to the article, governments had a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it went beyond human control.
	Well, then I guess we can just be left alone now because we've already passed that deadline.
	Nothing could do about it now.
	The UN official also predicted that as warming melts the polar ice caps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet.
	You know, we know that these people don't believe it.
	People like Barack Obama buying oceanfront property, they have websites that say, well look, all this area here is going to be underwater in a short period of time. And that's where Barack Obama and these other people are buying their very, very expensive oceanfront property.
	They clearly don't believe the lies that they're selling you, do they?
	In 2019, Snopes fact-checked this.
	They said, well, this idea that a senior UN environmental official says entire nations can be wiped off the face of the earth.
	Well, this is just clickbait.
	They say, well, no, the article was available for everybody to read.
	Arnold Snopes needed to do was to demonstrate that his article was not supported by scientific papers or whatever.
	In other words, the senior UN official had lied.
	Scroll down and take a look, Travis.
	Scroll down on that article there.
	And they actually show, there's the thing.
	UN predicts disaster.
	If global warming is not checked, this is the original article, and that's from, guess what, the AP, Associated Propaganda.
	They even said it.
	At the UN, entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea oils, just as I read to you.
	So that was what they were selling everybody, and there's no question about it.
	As the warming melts polar ice caps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations.
	Brown told the Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday.
	So Snopes is saying the Associated Press is lying.
	No, they're just trying to distract people.
	Dogs and cats living together.
	It's the end of the world, right?
	Well, here's the reality.
	A new study in the journal Nature shows that we've had 85 years of glacier growth and stability in East Antarctica.
	They said, our results demonstrate that stability and growth in ice elevations observed in terrestrial basins over the past few decades are part of a trend spanning at least a century.
	This is from the journal Nature.
	How did they come about this?
	Well, they found some old photographs.
	Some of the first aerial photographs that were taken of Antarctica.
	Here we explore the earliest large-scale aerial image archive of Antarctica to provide a unique record of 21 outlet glaciers along the coastline of East Antarctica since the 1930s.
	So they show that it's been growing, that it's stable.
	Now, see, this is why when we say when you look at satellite data, rather than these temperature maps, Then these thermometers that are put on airport tarmacs or added and they extrapolate them or deleted and they extrapolate them.
	This temperature data that they're doing with thermometers on the surface are not very accurate compared to the satellite stuff.
	The satellite stuff does not show that anything is changing.
	And you go back and look at these photographs that were taken in the 1930s, the first aerial photographs that they had, show that nothing is changing because now aerial photographs from satellites are not an issue at all.
	Steve Malloy says the Supreme Court has a chance, and this is going to be today, so we'll be talking about what they decide maybe tomorrow.
	They have a chance to rein in blue state climate madness.
	You see, in the same way that Mexico is attacking U.S. gun manufacturers and trying to shut them down with a lawsuit, Hawaii is doing the same thing.
	Hawaii is trying with a lawsuit and doing it at the state level.
	They're trying to shut down anything that is, as they say, fossil fuels, but of course it is any fuel at all.
	Can a single state or locality dictate energy policy for the entire U.S.?
	Some of them are trying, and the Supreme Court has an opportunity to stop these unconstitutional coups.
	The city and the county of Honolulu are suing oil and gas companies for creating a public nuisance.
	They say greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climate change and harm all Hawaiians.
	Well, back in 2011, the Supreme Court already ruled on something like this.
	And guess what? The decision was written by Darth Vader Ginsburg.
	And what did she say?
	She said... It is primarily the office of Congress, not of the federal courts, to prescribe national policy in areas of special federal interest.
	So they'd already tried this once and they shut them down.
	It was none other than their beloved Ginsburg who did it.
	So what did they do? Well, they said, if it doesn't work in the federal level, we will go to the states.
	And so that's what Steve Malloy is saying.
	He says, but now states and localities are trying to in-run the high court's ruling by bringing lawsuits in each and every state court.
	They want oil and gas companies to pay billions of dollars for alleged and speculative future damage.
	You see, when we talk about lawfare, there's a lot more important lawfare going on than what's happening with Trump.
	They're trying to shut down all gun manufacturers.
	They're trying to shut down all fuel.
	They use this against anyone and everyone.
	Against people small and large.
	It's not just Trump. We'll be right back.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲