Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 26, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:23

The David Knight Show - 04/26/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	you
	using free speech to free minds You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 26th of April, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we've got big news.
	CO2 is not a problem.
	You knew that. I know that.
	But now we have multiple studies and multiple Nobel Prize winners who are finally pointing out that the emperor has no clothes.
	He's got a lot of gas, but no clothes.
	It could be very embarrassing here.
	And we're also going to take a look at the bird fear.
	It's not called the bird flu, it's the bird fear.
	We have an upcoming pandemic of bird fear.
	To kill the cows and to stop the dairy.
	That's the purpose of this one.
	It's being hyped on a daily basis.
	Not only by the New York Times and Washington Post and establishment media, but also by ex-Trump officials who brought us the first unnecessary lockdown and crisis.
	But we're going to begin with presidential crimes.
	Is it a crime for the president to assassinate his domestic enemies?
	Does he get immunity or is that only for the CIA and Big Pharma?
	We'll start with that. So, all of the Trump trials that are going on, for the most part, there are a lot of tabloid stuff.
	It's nonsense. These legal charges against Trump are, for the most part, trumped up.
	And I'm not going to get involved in the tit-for-tat, the back-and-forth.
	It is there, especially this Stormy Daniels thing and the National Enquirer.
	You can look at the headlines and the puns on the Drudge Report.
	It's there to highlight the character or lack of character of Donald Trump.
	And it seems to be working with the independent voters.
	So there's a political aspect of that for sure.
	In terms of, you know, trying to make a case that he has interfered with the election.
	He's stretching that further than you could stretch Gumby.
	It's ridiculous.
	Absolutely ridiculous.
	And so, we're not going to cover that.
	But I am interested in these arguments before the Supreme Court, which again has a political dimension to it, of course, about immunity and the back and forth in that.
	But before we go any further, I'd be remiss if I didn't talk into some shameless plugging here.
	We are at 51% for the month.
	Very, very low. Super Faye contacted us and she would like to do matching funds today.
	So we're going to do a lot of shameless self-promotion and begging.
	And she's going to match everything on every platform.
	I really do appreciate her generosity and her husband's generosity with us.
	And we've already got one tip on Rockfin.
	Greg Talent, thank you very much.
	He said, just getting back from the hospital.
	Oh, well, I'm glad you're back.
	A new aorta valve.
	A quadruple bypass.
	And I'm going to be among the living a little more.
	Well, good for you. It's truly a beautiful day in my neighborhood.
	God bless you, David, and thank you for your help making sense of this mess we found ourselves in.
	Well, thank you, Greg, and God bless you.
	My father died about the age I am right now, but he had had heart issues his entire life.
	He had a heart murmur that was not caused by a vaccine or anything like that.
	They could tell it was just there from the time he was a young man.
	And it would have kept him out of the military, except it was World War II. It's like, you're fine, go ahead.
	And so, but he had...
	He had a lot of issues with blood clots.
	They created blood clots for him.
	And he lost his sight in one eye when I was very, very young.
	I never remember him not being blind in one eye.
	And he had multiple open heart surgeries.
	But it was chemotherapy that killed him.
	They identified cancer and they gave him chemotherapy and that killed him immediately.
	So I'm glad you're doing well, Greg.
	One of the most dangerous activities anybody can do is go to the hospital today.
	So praise God that you're out of there safely.
	So let's talk about the presidency and the Supreme Court.
	Can a president stage a coup?
	Or is this only something that is delegated power to the CIA? Can the president assassinate his enemies?
	Or is that only a delegated power to the CIA that we just delegated even more power to on Saturday?
	Thanks to our wartime speaker, former conservative until he got power, Speaker Johnson.
	Who immediately became Boromir as soon as he got that ring of power.
	Maybe he turned into Boromir, which is why they gave him the ring of power.
	I don't know. But yeah, we give carte blanche to this agency.
	Nobody talks about that.
	Right? And I've said this for the longest time.
	You look at this vicious competition going back and forth between Biden and Trump and the persecution of Trump and these lawfare trials and everything.
	But I said it's a game of thrones.
	They don't really care about us.
	The justices are not asking if a president can kill as many of us as he wishes.
	You know, for personal gain.
	Or in an official capacity.
	Does it matter?
	If you do mass murder with a vaccine poison, is that part of the job?
	Or is that something that is for your private benefit?
	You know, because the pharmaceutical companies gave you money when you paraded RFK Jr.
	around and started talking about vaccine hesitancy.
	Oh, well, quickly they start showering you with millions of dollars in cash and you put one of their CEOs in charge of HHS and he began the fake emergency.
	So, I guess the question behind SCOTUS was just, just how far is this Game of Thrones going to go?
	Are y'all going to start assassinating each other?
	It's okay if you kill the American public.
	It's okay if you lock them down.
	It's okay if you steal their business.
	But everybody gets upset if Letitia James is going to steal Trump's business.
	I say what goes around comes around.
	It would be an interesting exercise in justice for that to happen.
	Asymmetric justice, but justice nevertheless.
	And so this was the question that was going back and forth.
	The hypothetical, could a commander-in-chief order SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival and not face prosecution?
	And, of course, the answer is no.
	That's what the CIA is for.
	We have to compartmentalize the government.
	The CIA is for assassinating politicians.
	The SEAL Team 6, we've got other uses for them.
	And then it was, you know, what if it's for personal gain versus for official use?
	And so, does the president get legal immunity?
	We've given legal immunity to the pharmaceutical companies for killing people for personal gain, haven't we?
	Look at the millions, the tens of millions that they've already killed.
	There's already, you just had an official bureaucracy say, I think it was the WHO, we'll get to it in a minute, WHO is suggesting that in a few years the number of cancer deaths are almost going to double.
	So, yeah, that's any cause except for the vaccine.
	Why would they say that now?
	And so, is it okay if he killed people officially?
	Is it okay if he kills them for personal gain?
	Immunity says, even if you did it for personal gain, we won't hold you responsible.
	Says Sotomayor, questioning the Trump lawyer, Sauer.
	And so, for this, a silly side issue here.
	And it is a silly side issue.
	We have the Supreme Court straining at gnats When they swallow the camel of mass democide through lockdowns, through ventilators, through medical hospital protocols that kill people, through medical martial law, all the rest of this stuff.
	This is like some bizarro world.
	They really are straining at gnats with Trump and all this other stuff.
	When they swallow camels whole.
	So... When he says, well, no, what the president does is basically he goes back and he takes the Nixon line.
	Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.
	By definition. Exactly.
	Well, there you go. They didn't need to have this whole discussion.
	We've already settled this once, didn't we?
	Richard Nixon, David Frost.
	Well, when the president does it, it's not illegal.
	Of course, he can do anything he wants, right?
	So that's where we are.
	So that also was brought up.
	Well, if he is in office, there's a procedure that has to take place.
	But, you know, after the guy's not in office, is he still above the law?
	What if he resigned like Nixon?
	Gerald Ford believed that he still needed a pardon.
	And he took a lot of flack for giving Nixon a pardon.
	Probably cost him re-election, giving Nixon a pardon.
	So why do that if it wasn't necessary?
	And so that brings up the whole point of what impeachment is for, doesn't it?
	You know, we never have any prosecutions of a sitting president, ever.
	And so Trump's people were right about that.
	But if they are impeached, and remember, the impeachment in the House is an indictment.
	It's an indictment.
	There's a trial that happens in the Senate.
	So the House will look at this, they'll vote, decide, well, we're going to impeach him.
	That's like a grand jury.
	And if you've got a lot of Democrats, you can impeach a ham sandwich, to paraphrase the old thing about grand juries.
	And so we've seen that.
	We've seen a couple of ham sandwiches impeached in the Trump administration.
	And then it has to go to the Senate.
	And there's a trial, and so they have somebody that is from the House side that will be the manager, in other words, the prosecutor of that trial in the Senate.
	And it works the same way in state legislatures.
	We had Ken Paxton in Texas who was impeached.
	He was the attorney journal in Texas.
	He was impeached and then they sent prosecutors from the House to the Senate and they had a trial there.
	He was found not guilty, just like Trump was found not guilty with his two impeachments.
	But if you are found guilty, what is the penalty?
	They take you to Gitmo?
	No, no. They kick you out of office.
	They kick you out of office.
	That's it. That's it.
	Because they don't want to have people...
	They want this determination to be in the House so that you don't have people all over the country like Letitia James and Alvin Bragg shutting down the office of presidency.
	That's what this is about.
	They're shutting down the election.
	You don't want to have politicized prosecutors all over the country shutting down the presidency.
	So if there really is something there, as determined by their peers, essentially, in the Congress, then you remove them from office and then those prosecutors can bring a crime And that's why Richard Nixon was pardoned.
	Because even though he did those things as president, it still was a crime.
	He was very happy to get that pardon from Gerald Ford, even though he said, it's not a crime.
	Well, they said, there seems to be some common ground between you, as they're doing the questioning there.
	There seems to be some common ground between you, your colleague on the other side, that no man is above the law that the president can be prosecuted after he leaves office for his private conduct.
	Is that right? Said Neil Gorsuch.
	Trump's lawyer said, we agree with that.
	And then the question becomes, says Gorsuch, as we've been exploring here today, a little bit about how to segregate private from official conduct that may or may not enjoy immunity.
	That underscored what could emerge as a key part of the court's ultimate decision.
	How to separate out Trump's conduct that is protected under the presidency, under a ruling of some executive immunity, And what he is doing outside the bounds of his presidential authority that can be prosecuted.
	And so Amy Coney Barrett said to Trump's lawyer, so you concede that private acts don't get immunity?
	And he said, we do.
	And so then she specifically cited various alleged acts from Trump's push to overturn the 2020 election.
	She said, well, I want to know if you agree or disagree about the characterizations of these acts as to whether or not they are private.
	Petitioner turned to a private attorney who was willing to spread knowingly false claims of election fraud to spearhead his challenges to the election results.
	Is that private? And he said, we dispute the allegation, but that sounds private to me.
	Then she continues. So Petitioner conspired with another private attorney who caused the filing in court of a verification signed by Petitioner that contained false allegations to support a challenge.
	Is that private? That also sounds private, said Trump's lawyer.
	Three private actors, two attorneys, including those mentioned above and a political consultant, helped to implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceeding.
	And a petitioner and a co-conspirator attorney directed that effort, she said.
	He said, I believe that's private as well.
	Well, then those are acts that you would not dispute.
	Those were private, and you wouldn't raise a claim that they were official.
	Sauer, the lawyer, said, as characterized.
	So, what's this about?
	It's about buying time.
	This is not about him being immune from these crimes.
	What they're trying to do...
	Just play legal games like Biden is doing for the purpose of election.
	Biden is running these trials to drag Trump's character out into the open.
	They are trying to delay these other trials until after the election.
	That's what this is all about.
	And that's why the Trump lawyers have said, well, we're going to lose this thing in the Supreme Court, but we think we're going to win anyway.
	Let me read some of the things that are on here.
	Travis tells me, Handy will be joining Jason Barker on Knights of the Storm tomorrow, live at 10 a.m.
	Oh, good. That should be very interesting.
	And by the way, Jason Barker and Serge the Purge, Serge released his documentary yesterday.
	It's on YouTube. You can find his channel at SergeThePurge.
	On Rumble, Macker7.
	Thank you for the tip. He says, bless you and your family, David.
	Thank you for your wisdom. Appreciate Suprafe matching today.
	Very generous. Yes, it is.
	Thank you. And she said she would match on any platform.
	So it doesn't have to just be here on Rumble and Rockfin.
	That's where we'll see the things for credit during the show.
	But we can do it on Zelle or Cash App.
	Several people donated on Cash App yesterday.
	I really do appreciate that. I can at least, on Cash App, there's no way to respond with a comment, but I can hit a heart to like it.
	On Zelle, the only thing I can do is read people's names there.
	And I want to thank all the people who on a regular basis support us on Subscribestar.
	You can't believe how important that is to us.
	And there's been a lot of discussion by one individual as to why I would have that.
	Well, I have that because I don't do one hour of commercials a day.
	Whenever I was on radio, and this is a standard thing.
	This is the radio and TV clock.
	When you're on, I would be on for like nine minutes, and then I would have like a five-minute clock break.
	And so the radio stations would run their commercials, and most of those breaks...
	And then in one or two of them, the show would run their sponsors to make money.
	So that was really kind of the way the revenue sharing was running.
	It didn't work out that way when I was at the radio station in Colorado.
	We had not set up any sponsors, so I did it for a month or so for free.
	Everybody thought I was making big money because it's back on radio.
	Radio doesn't make you big money.
	If you've got a lot of stations, it does.
	But it's difficult for these local stations to even stay in business.
	So, you know, no hard feelings about it.
	It's just it was, you know, I cut down one hour of this show and then it was kind of a condensed recap for that one hour with lots of commercials in it because that's the way it has to be done.
	People have to live, and so they do those commercials.
	I don't begrudge them of that, but, you know, what we do with this is just to try to do it commercial-free, and, you know, your support allows me to focus on the news without having the sidetrack of doing commercials all the time.
	So I really do appreciate that.
	And I appreciate the subscribe star people, even though we have not interacted with them as much.
	It's just difficult with all the different...
	Moving parts here to get there and interact with people.
	On Rumble, Jim Z7, thank you very much for the tip.
	David, I'm thankful for your dedication and understanding.
	Thank you very much of the truth in this wicked world, he said.
	Rumble, no truth in them.
	Thank you. Thank you so much.
	Here's $50 towards your new chicken coop.
	Make sure you stock it with plenty of cows.
	Yeah. I had to make sure we keep the little dog out of there as well.
	If they want to cull chickens, he's their means.
	This guy, silent killer.
	Rapid, swift killer.
	He got into one of our bins and killed half of our chickens when they were still pullets.
	We had not trained him to not do that.
	Scout's good. He's cool.
	He understands he's chilled out.
	But the little guy that Travis brought in as a stray, he's full of spunk.
	On Rock Fan, Bob Coleman, thank you very much.
	And Jason Barker, thank you, Jason.
	He says, thank you to Faye for the tip matching.
	Yes, thank you very much, Faye.
	On Rumble, Militin Milankovic.
	Thank you very much. He said, David, may God bless your show and health.
	Best wishes. Thank you very much.
	On Rockfin, Karen B. Thank you.
	Rockfin, Michelle Obaman.
	Thank you very much. David, play a Christmas song, and I will end the war in Ukraine.
	There we go. Yeah, silent night, I guess.
	We could do that going back to World War I. Rumble, M Sellers.
	Thank you. He says, praying for your health, David.
	God bless. Thank you very much.
	On Rockfin, Dougalug, thank you.
	He says, thank you, David and crew, and thank you to Faye for matching the tips today.
	Yes. Michelle Obama, again, another tip.
	Thank you. Pour out a little liquor for Joe Biggs.
	Yes. It's really horrible to see that happen and to know Joe.
	And I know I haven't talked to Joe, but I know how that eats at him.
	Because I know Joe.
	That's an unbelievably difficult thing, especially for him, especially for what he went through in Iraq and Afghanistan.
	That's the way they treat people who support the government's wars.
	They have no regard for that whatsoever.
	Let's see. Rock fan, James Carnival.
	Thank you very much. Appreciate that.
	And on Rumble, I'm Marty.
	Thank you very much. That is very generous.
	I appreciate that. God bless you, Faye and all.
	On Rumble, Rock Pogorelchnik.
	I'm sorry if I mispronounced your name wrong.
	Thank you so much for your great work, David.
	I've learned so much about politics, how it works, life in general, from your show.
	Greetings from Slovenia to the beautiful USA. Well, thank you very much.
	Thank you very much. It is interesting to see.
	They do break down where the show gets downloaded on the podcast stuff.
	You're watching it live.
	So I don't look at that, but it gets downloaded in a lot of different places.
	It really is surprising sometimes to see how it goes around the world.
	Back to the news here.
	So, as I said, it looks like there's a lot of private things here.
	And it looks like what the purpose of the Trump people is, and as a matter of fact, they have privately said this to some of the establishment media who has repeated it.
	We're just trying to make sure that we're going to lose in the Supreme Court, but they're going to send it back to the lower courts to make these determinations before they have a trial.
	And so that's going to delay this.
	So it doesn't happen during the election.
	That's their point. A notable response came shortly after from Chief Justice Roberts when Sauer pushed the justices to remand the case back down to the lower courts to piece through which allegations in the indictment amount to a protected official act under the presidency and which ones were private.
	The official stuff has to be expunged completely from the indictment before the case can go forward, said Trump's lawyer.
	That's the purpose. The delay.
	And they want this to be after the election.
	And, you know, quite frankly, it's reasonable.
	I mean, Biden is doing everything he can to have these trials before the election because it is a massive negative ad.
	That's what it is. So, the fear of turning the Oval Office into a seat of criminal activity.
	And questioning Sauer about why the presidents shouldn't face criminal liability for unlawful actions if they take in office.
	Justice Brown-Jackson and Sotomayor were the ones who were really taking the lead in this.
	And I guess when I look at this, again...
	You know, the dog that didn't bark is the issue.
	What about the presidents?
	Should they face criminal liability for unlawful actions?
	Are we going to turn the Oval Office into a seat of criminality?
	The real question is, are we going to turn the District of Columbia into a seat of criminality?
	With the CIA, with the FBI, and the Department of Justice, and quite frankly, that question has been answered a long time ago.
	Yes, it is a seat of criminality.
	The District of Criminals and Criminality.
	She says, you give the President's absolute immunity, it could turn the White House into the seat of criminality, criminal activity in this country.
	That function's already been given to the CIA and the FBI. Sauer insisted that while a president shouldn't face criminal prosecution, they could face impeachment or other remedies for unlawful conduct.
	And so the question is, what is the remedy for unlawful conduct by the CIA? Or the FBI? Is there any remedy for that?
	Well, not if the president's going to stand by and let them do nothing.
	As a matter of fact, what if we had, here's a hypothetical for you.
	Purely hypothetical. What if a CIA official illegally tortured people and then used those lies to get us involved in, I don't know, say the Iraq War?
	What should happen under the Constitution?
	Well, evidently, the president who knows that should promote her to being head of the agency, which is what Trump did with Gina Haspel.
	Not a hypothetical.
	If someone with those kinds of powers, the most powerful person in the world, let's just change that.
	If an agency with those kinds of powers, the most powerful bureaucracy in the world, with a black budget, nobody's allowed to see anything, they can spy on anybody foreign or domestic, they can assassinate, they can overthrow governments, they can start wars, they can do anything they want, And they can lie, cheat, and steal, and they've got classes on it, as Pompeo said.
	What if we've got an agency like that, a bureaucracy like that?
	And we know that there would be no potential penalty for them to commit crimes.
	They could run drugs.
	They could do anything, right?
	No penalty for the CIA or the FBI. I'm trying to understand what the distinctive is from turning the Oval Office, let's say, from turning the CIA... Into the seat of criminal activity in this country, said Brown Jackson.
	And so Trump's lawyer says, well, I respectfully disagree with that because the regime that you described is a regime that we've operated under for 234 years.
	Well, the regime that I'm describing is a regime that we've operated under since World War II. All of my life.
	And it came out in the open that they could assassinate anybody that they wanted to.
	With a JFK assassination.
	But this regime has not been in operation for 234 years.
	This regime has been in operation for 79 years.
	Welcome to the fourth turning.
	Every 80 years, every four generations, there is a radical change.
	Now, they are also the ones who are going to be manipulating this fourth turning.
	And we're in the final stages of this.
	This next presidential administration...
	Where they will do nothing to rein in the CIA, regardless of which of these clowns is installed by the CIA. That's going to be from 2025 to 2029.
	So, during the questioning of Trump's lawyer, Gorsuch asked him to explain the Trump's team position on whether a president, hypothetically, has the power to pardon himself.
	Yeah, you just do the Steve Martin thing.
	Well, excuse me.
	And you're done, right? Well, excuse me.
	If the president does it, it's not illegal.
	And if it is, I'll excuse myself.
	And so, this is one of the funniest lines in it.
	Trump's lawyer said, well, I didn't even think about that until your honor asked it.
	People have been talking about this for, you know, the last year.
	Actually, longer than that, it was before Trump left.
	People were like, can he pardon himself?
	But Sauer, the lawyer for Trump, said, I hadn't even thought about that.
	Yeah, nice out.
	He's clever. Not honest, but he's clever.
	Everybody's been talking about that.
	We've never answered whether a president can do that.
	Happily, it's never been presented to us, says Gorsuch.
	So yeah, we're not sure whether a president can pardon himself.
	We'll have to decide that someday in the future, perhaps.
	So... Again, will the case be remanded?
	Will it be delayed until next year?
	Everybody believes so.
	Everybody believes that this is going to be what Trump wanted out of this appeal to the Supreme Court and what he's going to get.
	A majority of the justices seem inclined to rule that former presidents must have at least some protection from criminal charges, but not necessarily the absolute immunity that Trump's lawyers are seeking.
	Because absolute immunity...
	It's absolutely absurd.
	We do give that to the pharmaceutical companies for vaccines, and we do give that to the CIA, but do we want to extend the CIA's absolute immunity to presidents?
	I don't know. At least presidents, you can vote out of office.
	You don't even know who the CIA is most of the time.
	Most likely outcome might be for the high court to punt this, kicking the case back to the lower courts for more nuanced hearings, which would be a victory for Trump, delaying it.
	There may be five justices who are willing to kick the can down the road.
	And that would be enough for Trump, at least for now.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back of biased and false news has become all too common on social media More alarmingly, some media outlets publish fake news stories that we are true without checking facts first Unfortunately, some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control exactly what people think
	And this is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events.
	But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support.
	Sharing the show, subscribing, and even just hitting the like button all help.
	And if you found our show helpful, Looking for better information?
	APSRadioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world.
	radio news dot com
	the
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, on Roxanne, Brian and Deb McCartney, thank you very much for the tip.
	God bless you all, David, and thank you especially for sharing your faith in Christ and not backing down.
	Well, I can't give people the bad news without the good news, and I don't want to leave people hopeless.
	The key is that there is something that you can do that is going to make an eternal difference in your life.
	We need to do what we can to push back against a...
	Ruthless government whose feet are swift to shed blood.
	But, you know, that's the problem I had with what the guy had to say yesterday.
	We just don't go cloister ourselves off in a spot and not even say anything about it while this continues to go on.
	But we also have to understand that's not where our hope lies, regardless of what happens in this life.
	I don't want to leave people so desperate that they set themselves on fire.
	That's what we had in the Trump trial.
	A guy who had absolutely no hope except for trying to change things in this world.
	We realized that he wasn't going to be able to do that.
	He set himself on fire and ended his life.
	So I don't want people in that kind of a situation.
	On RockFanJames, thank you very much.
	And Rumble, DeltaMike8384, doing a great job, DK. Well, thank you so much for that.
	And thank you, Faye, if you're just joining us.
	SuperFaye has offered to help us with matching tips today on any of the platforms.
	Because we're down really, really low.
	This month, I think, is even worse than when PayPal and Venmo pulled the plug on us abruptly.
	And that was, at the time, that was where most people were supporting us.
	And I know the economy is difficult now.
	And I've not pushed it much.
	So today we're going to do like a little mini telethon and a lot of shameless begging.
	And we've got matching funds from Faye.
	So thank you very much, Superfaye.
	Let's talk a little bit about the pandemic.
	Because this is building, and it is very, very concerning what they are about to do.
	As a matter of fact, Jerome Adams, who, if you remember, we haven't heard anything from this guy for about four years, but he was all over the place during the Trump administration.
	He was Trump's Surgeon General.
	And he's now saying, well, it's looking very much like 2020.
	Well, that's not a good sign for one of the people who was pushing fear everywhere.
	Fear and lockdown and all these absurd measures.
	He was somebody, by the way, that had been tied in with Pence in Indiana.
	And so Pence got him that job as Surgeon General, and he certainly did a job on us and on the Constitution.
	I had this about PCR testing of animal slaughter.
	I mentioned this the other day.
	This is from Madra. He said, how do you cure an illness?
	Do you do it by slaughter or by killing the animal or the person?
	Or who has one or perceived to have had one of these diseases?
	It's all lies and hoax so far.
	He said, death is not a cure for anything.
	Mass murder, mass slaughter doesn't fix anything.
	It does, however, destroy a food supply or a group of people, as we saw with the COVID con.
	The only ones being killed now are the ones that are ordered to be killed.
	The birds. And soon to be, I guess, the cattle.
	Or they, you know, they torch them, they gas them.
	You can't fix an illness that way.
	You know, and so do I, says Madra, that no one else seems to understand this concept of immunity.
	Natural immunity.
	You allow the illness to take its course.
	You treat the worst symptoms.
	You let it run its course.
	The animal recovers or doesn't.
	In the case of this Bolshevik media hype and fear porn, the animals never recover because they kill them.
	You know, it's a hoax when the cure is death, don't you?
	And we know what the goal is.
	We saw it for the longest time.
	We've been talking about this.
	Oh, Bloomberg and Sadiq Khan, New York and London, started this C40s, you know, cities initiative.
	And their goals are things like you will have one, you have three items of clothing per year that you're allowed to buy.
	No cars, going to ban cars altogether.
	And of course, there's not going to be enough electricity on the grid to drive your electric car because we're going to shut down the power plants as well.
	You can take one plane flight every three years of about 900 miles.
	And on and on and on.
	But one of the key things that was there was no meat, no dairy.
	Well, how are they going to accomplish that?
	Here's the New York Times.
	With their daily fear report about bird flu.
	This is the one they published yesterday.
	One in five milk samples nationwide shows genetic traces of bird flu.
	Are you afraid? Well, you don't need to be if you read anything other than their headline.
	Even their subtitle says, well, there's no evidence that the milk is unsafe.
	So why are you reporting it?
	You're reporting it because you want people to be afraid.
	You're reporting it because you want the dairy herds to be culled.
	You're reporting it because you want the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the EPA to run their little scam and do even more centralized processing of meat and to make everything more expensive and more scarce until you eventually ban it.
	That's why you're reporting it, isn't it, New York Times?
	Not because there's any danger to even the cows.
	No danger to the cows, no danger to humans, no danger in the milk, but we've found something in the milk.
	Wow. Newsflash from New York Times, if I paraphrase it, one out of every five milk samples contains a harmless substance that could not be detected without an extraordinarily sophisticated and misused test.
	The PCR test.
	They say, this is the New York Times, no evidence the milk is unsafe to drink, but the survey result strongly hints that this may be widespread.
	Who cares? Who cares?
	I mean, they don't care if there's traces of microplastics in the soft drinks or anything like that, do they?
	Are we going to have to ban the soft drinks?
	No, no, we're not going to do that.
	They want to ban dairy and meat.
	And so, you know, what MacGuffin are they going to use to do that?
	Well, now it strongly looks like it's going to be the bird flu.
	What they're trying to do is they're trying to build a strong consensus of irrational fear that's going to then allow them to take incremental measures, right?
	How do you do this kind of stuff?
	How do you remove meat and dairy?
	If you were to ask Fauci, he'd say the same thing about how he gets to vaccinate the entire world with an untested experimental vaccine.
	You do it from the inside.
	You do it with disruption.
	And you do it iteratively.
	Well, this is the fear part of it, just like we've seen before.
	You get people scared to death.
	You still got people wearing the mask.
	He didn't scare the pants off of people.
	He scared the masks onto people.
	They're still so scared they won't take the masks off when they go anywhere.
	Up in the Northeast.
	And so you do that, you get people afraid, and then you start to incrementally offer measures to protect them from this imaginary fear.
	Federal regulators have discovered fragments of bird flu virus in roughly 20% of retail milk samples tested in a nationally representative study.
	No details on this study.
	You notice that? How many places did they do it?
	Where did they do it?
	All the rest of this stuff.
	What are the cycle threshold magnifications?
	Are they doing the kind of nonsense that they did with COVID? Magnifying it by 1.1 trillion times?
	And again, they find fragments of a bird flu virus?
	If it's fragments, are you sure that's what it is?
	They've got this thing hyped up so much, they're not even saying that they're finding the full genetic sequence that they're looking for.
	We're finding fragments of the genetic sequence that they're looking for.
	Do we know that that's even what that is?
	Nobody's harmed. Nobody's harmed with the milk.
	No cows are harmed.
	No people are harmed. Samples from, where did they find this?
	Parts of the country that are known to have dairy herds infected with the virus, they said.
	Well, those are more likely to test positive.
	Duh. But still, there's no harm.
	So why do we care? Why is the New York Times doing this long article about this?
	And of course, you know, you can subscribe to the very expensive, useless New York Times.
	As Joe always says, look at this front page.
	Look at what they're talking about. Well, I would be happy if they were just talking about Taylor Swift at this point.
	That would be a lot less dangerous than what they're pushing right now.
	Regulators said that there is no evidence that this milk poses a danger to consumers.
	That's the New York Times. So why did they even write this article?
	Why did they put this headline up there?
	Because they believe that their readers are not going to read past the headline.
	So they cover themselves in the body of the article.
	And this is quite a bit. This is at the very end of the article.
	Read the headline. Get scared to death.
	Don't read the article. Regulators say there is no evidence that this milk poses a danger to consumers or that live virus is present in the milk or the store shelves.
	Are viruses alive?
	I mean, I've heard that they're not.
	I've heard they're just a genetic sequence, that they're no more alive than the mRNA or DNA is alive.
	Does the virus even exist?
	It is a construct that they can't really see.
	It is perhaps a way of explaining certain things that they don't understand.
	In the same way, as I've said in the past, we have models of subatomic particles.
	We had the Niels Bohr model that I grew up with.
	It was like a little... Solar system, you got the nucleus with the neutrons and protons, and you got the orbiting electrons and everything, and that worked pretty well as a model.
	It helped to explain a lot of things.
	You know, you have the chemical, you have the chart of the elements, and they're organized by how they're going to bond with things, depending on the nature of the electrons and the various concentric shells and things like that.
	So, you know, that was a model that helped to explain things.
	And now they have quantum physics that is completely different from that.
	But that model helps to explain things, but they can't really observe that either because, you know, if you actually go in and try to look at this, you change it.
	And so you can't really observe it.
	I was one of the founders of quantum mechanics that if you say that you understand quantum mechanics, then we know you don't.
	Because it doesn't make any sense.
	It's so contradictory and strange.
	You've got particles that are not physically connected.
	They're at a distance from each other, and yet they seem to be operating in tandem and all kinds of weird stuff.
	The more you look at it, the weirder it gets.
	So I don't really worry about it.
	God's got it under control.
	The strongest signal yet that the bird flu outbreak in dairy cows is more extensive.
	But then they'll tell you that, nope, nobody's been harmed.
	And then they have a person, a virologist and flu expert at St.
	Jude's Children's Hospital.
	It suggests that there's a whole lot of this virus out there.
	Be afraid. There's a whole lot of something that is harmless and presents no danger to consumers or cows or anything.
	But there's a lot of it out there.
	You can say that about everything.
	You can say that about the air.
	Oh, there's a lot of CO2 out there.
	It poses no danger to anyone or to the planet or to the climate, but there's a lot of it out there.
	Well, actually, not nearly as much as these other elements, but, you know, be afraid.
	Be very afraid. Maybe...
	So there's a whole lot of this stuff out there.
	So what if it's true, if it's harmless?
	But maybe, did it ever occur to this expert that maybe another explanation...
	It's maybe not that there's a whole lot of this virus out there, but maybe there's a whole lot of magnification going on in his PCR test.
	Could that be what's happening?
	Really? By the way, let's go back and refresh everybody's memory about what Kerry Mullis said.
	This is at the time when he was opposing Fauci.
	The PCR test was seized upon by Fauci to say that AIDS was caused by a virus, HIV. And he used Kerry Mullis' PCR test that Kerry Mullis got a Nobel Prize for to prove that.
	And Kerry Mullis said, you can't prove that by using my tests.
	And I've challenged him.
	I've said this over and over again.
	He went to forum after forum to say, I've challenged him to a scientific debate, but he won't debate me because he's nothing but a bureaucrat.
	He's not a scientist. And then there were a lot of scientists who would have Kerry Mullis on a panel because they believed that AIDS was something else other than the virus.
	Fauci made it a virus.
	He wanted to come up with some kind of a drug or vaccine, and so he made it about being a virus.
	But again, his first rodeo with a PCR, making a fake connection to AIDS, was what Kerry Mullis was, he was at a, this clip here is a forum where there's other scientists who are questioning Fauci's conclusions.
	And here's what Kerry Mullis had to say about his PCR test.
	If they could find this virus in you at all, and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.
	It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else, right?
	I mean, because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do...
	Then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least one single one of them in your body, okay?
	So that could be thought of as a misuse of it just to claim that it's meaningful.
	It allows you to take a very minuscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important.
	It doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you.
	Yeah, or it could be featured in the New York Times and all the mainstream media, on and on and on.
	Oh, look, we found not just a code for this stuff.
	We found a fragment of it.
	Absolute garbage. On Rumble, By His Love writes, No eggs or milk in the food bank I volunteer with for a month.
	Wow. Wow.
	See, this is becoming like an annual ritual for them.
	Kill bunches of chickens and create a shortage of eggs.
	Watch the price go sky high.
	But now they're extending it out to dairy.
	Rumble. Junk Silver.
	Does anyone doubt for a second that running PCR tests on the latest batch of COVID or flu jabs would also detect genetic traces of bird flu?
	That'd be great. We need to contact Robert Malone, Dr.
	Peter McCullough, see if they get some of the people who went through.
	They were able to, as Dr.
	Malone testified in some congressional hearings just within the last week, he said, yeah, we got some...
	Some of these mRNA shots from Pfizer and Moderna.
	And these were, you know, sealed and we have the chain of custody.
	So we know, you know, they're fresh and we know where they were not tampered with and all this other kind of stuff.
	We found these massive quantities of garbage in them.
	Fragments of DNA and all the rest of this stuff.
	And oh, by the way, these are the kind of fragments of DNA, especially the SV-40.
	He said it's only a fragment of...
	We'll talk about that coming up.
	He says only a fragment of the SV40, the Simeon Virus 40, notoriously found in the polio shots in the mid-century that they were given to kids.
	Everybody believes that that was responsible for an increase in cancer rates.
	And there's some hot mic recording of the people who were running that, the scientists behind all that, saying, we'll send that to Russia.
	And watch them get bunches of, you know, see their cancer rates going up.
	But he said, well, this is not the full SV40, but it's the part of SV40 that actually causes the cancer.
	You think that's a mistake?
	And so, it would be interesting to have these people get a hold of some Moderna.
	Same people that did these DNA tests.
	Have them get a hold of this stuff and test it for bird flu with a PCR test.
	I bet they would find that there, too.
	Unrumble, Awootz, thank you very much for the tip.
	And... Also, Angus Mustang, thank you very much for the tip.
	Thanks for all the night family does.
	On Rumble, YJ72, thank you for the tip.
	Many people have an attitude of don't want to know and don't want to see it.
	I realized knowledge of the truth will set you free.
	Thank you, David, and thank you, Super Faye.
	Yes, thank you very much, Super Faye.
	Again, Faye is matching the contributions today on all the different platforms.
	I really do appreciate it.
	We are at 51% on the gas gauge.
	I don't know if the gas gauge got updated.
	It's something we would delegate to Karen's brother, and his computer was down all day yesterday.
	I wonder if he had any milk either.
	I don't know. Milk, eggs, Wi-Fi, got some free Wi-Fi.
	I don't know. But on Rumble, emulated void, sending $20 on sale.
	Thank you very much. Rockfin, Jason Barker, comments.
	He said, you're more likely to die from undercooking the chicken and getting salmonella.
	That's right. That's right.
	Or at least a bad tummy ache.
	They don't say that anybody got a bad tummy ache from this milk or even from working with the cows.
	So, on Rumble, Speedtro626, thank you very much.
	May this money add with the rest to bless you and your family.
	It really does. Thank you so much.
	On Rockfin, Guard.
	Thank you, Guard. Appreciate the tip.
	From Mother Russia to you, because if you push back against the war, you are a Russian right now.
	That's where we are. Thank you for spreading the Russian propaganda, and watch out for the Larry Bird flu.
	Yeah, the Big Bird flu.
	How about that? I don't think Big Bird ever flew.
	I hear PCR tests can find it on virtually anything, and it can only be cured with a three-point shot.
	Like Larry Bird. Thanks to the Superfae for matching.
	Yes, thank you very much. And finally, on Rumble, Junk Silver.
	Thank you very much. Says, thank you Superfae for matching today.
	Such a blessing to have three hours of DK to listen to five days a week.
	Well, thank you very much. So let's talk about, you know, it's not just the New York Times.
	It's all the mainstream media pushing this bird flu stuff.
	Here's the way Business Insider, another hack publication, is doing it.
	Bird flu could jump to humans any day.
	They got a scoop.
	They decided they would go back and talk to Jerome Adams, Trump's Surgeon General, which nobody else had talked to him for the last four years.
	Well, three years after he gets out.
	He says that it feels like 2020 again.
	Well, I would say it stinks like 2020 again, I think.
	Jerome Adams, Trump's fear-monger extraordinaire.
	I think he did every bit as good a job as Fauci or Dr.
	Scarf Burks. Former Surgeon General Jerome Adams fears.
	He fears.
	And that fear is so contagious.
	He fears the U.S. is making the mistakes of 2020 all over again.
	Well, me too. I absolutely agree with him.
	He's one of the mistakes of 2020.
	Business Insider is talking to him.
	I do believe that we're going down this path.
	It looks very, he was not the Surgeon General, but he was the, he was General Fear, we'll call it.
	This is General Malaise, this General Fear that the Surgeon General was stoking heavily, and people of his ilk.
	It has, and here's what, this outbreak has killed tens of millions of birds, says Business Insider.
	An absolute lie.
	The government has killed birds after one of them tested positive.
	I mean, you know, that's what they do.
	Go in and call the entire thing.
	Even if, and I don't know that any of them have died, but, you know, if you've got one bird that dies of disease, do you kill all of them?
	Is that our new standard now?
	Because if it is, we won't have any chickens or cows, and I think that is the point.
	But, you know, just like COVID, People are not dying of COVID. They're dying from the ventilators.
	They were dying from remdesivir.
	They were dying from negligence and many other things that they were doing.
	And now the birds are dying from being gassed.
	We've gone from ventilators to gassing.
	I wonder when they're going to try that one on people.
	Yeah, it's been done before, hasn't it?
	So, genetic fragments of the virus discovered in grocery store milk on Tuesday suggest that the outbreak is more widespread.
	It's like they're reading a script.
	I wonder who it is that's giving them these press releases to write, you know, that the Business Insider and New York Times are doing.
	Is this coming from the CIA? Is it used to in the past?
	They have, you know, is this the mockingbird flu?
	Yeah. Operation Mockingbird Flu.
	Now one in five harmless things are found.
	And then they will always have the experts.
	These must be the people who gave them the lies.
	The experts say that drinking pasteurized milk is probably still safe.
	Probably still safe.
	So just don't have any of that raw milk.
	Oh, be afraid. Be very afraid.
	One human in Texas has tested positive, and that person's only symptom was eye redness.
	This is not even pink eye.
	Eye redness?
	I mean, I get that from smoke.
	I get that from staying up late and reading.
	I mean, should we kill all the cows because I get my eye gets a little bit red if I strain it too much?
	This is one human tested positive and had a little bit of eye redness.
	Can you just imagine what this scene looked like?
	Oh, we got a positive here!
	We're ready to believe you.
	Bird busters. And so they come in and it's like, can you see anything about this guy?
	Well, I think I see a little bit of redness there in his eye.
	Pull down the lower lid. Oh yeah, it's red.
	It's redder there when we pull down the lower lid.
	These people are just going everywhere with a microscope trying to create a problem.
	Folks, we got to stop this fear.
	We really do. And I think on a positive basis, the only person in Congress that actually seems to pay attention to anything is Thomas Massey.
	And he was talking a while back, looking at this persecution of Amos Miller, the Amish farmer up in Pennsylvania.
	And of course, that was being rolled out to a large degree.
	By the State Department of Health and Agriculture.
	They were persecuting him with that.
	But to stop him from being able to process meat that he has raised on his own farm.
	On his farm. And so he's got the Prime Act.
	And he is already there in terms of understanding how dangerous it is to tell people that they make it illegal for you to process your own food.
	And that has to stop.
	That has to stop. I mean, you know, they're going to treat people who raise a cow and process it.
	If they don't take it to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's meat processing place, you're going to be treated like somebody shot a bald eagle.
	You know how prickly they get about that kind of stuff.
	I haven't shot any bald eagles.
	But, you know, it's that type of thing.
	You killed it on your own.
	You didn't take it to us. Dr.
	Jerome Adams, a former Surgeon General and Director of Health Equity at Purdue University, is getting deja vu.
	Yeah, me too. Me too.
	He's the guy who helped to spread fear to lock down everybody without anybody being sick or dead in 2020.
	And so, to him, it's looking the same.
	And it is to me as well.
	You know, we got a pandemic without anybody being sick or dead.
	He says, if it keeps spreading in animals, Then it's eventually going to cause problems for humans.
	How? Well, he actually tells you.
	Either because we don't have food because they've got to start exterminating flocks.
	That's it. Or because it starts to make a jump into humans.
	Except we were ahead and make a jump into humans and he got a little bit of eye redness maybe.
	Even if that's related.
	Even if it's real. That's it.
	But the real problem is the thing that he mentioned first.
	If they go around with their little PCR test, they're going to start exterminating animals everywhere.
	It's the government always coming after us, trying to starve us, trying to impoverish us, trying to enslave us.
	Yeah, you know, so here's a choice that you're faced with.
	Either we're going to exterminate all the animals that we eat, our food supply, or you might get pink eye.
	Not even pink eye. I mean, they didn't even say it was conjunctivitis.
	He got a little bit of redness in the eye.
	I don't know. Which one would you choose?
	It's kind of like the MMR shot.
	Would you like to have autism the rest of your life and many other issues?
	Or would you rather have an itchy condition for a week or so as a child and then you've got lifetime immunity?
	Which one do you want? Well, we're not going to let you choose.
	It's really going around, says President Trump.
	They all got to get vaccinated.
	Oh, yeah, really? See, that's it.
	Not that there's anybody harmed by this.
	Not that anybody is dying from this.
	All of these so-called measles outbreaks that they've had with vaccinated people, they haven't claimed that anybody died.
	I never, ever heard of anybody dying from measles.
	Everybody I knew got measles.
	We all got colds. We all got flu.
	You know, people die from the flu.
	I never heard of anybody dying from measles.
	So Adams fears that the U.S. is repeating many of the mistakes that it made in the early days of COVID-19.
	Me too. Me too.
	And the fact that Dr.
	Jerome Adams, one of the big mistakes of 2020, is now back, I think that underscores it.
	Who is in charge of the animal pandemic, of an animal pandemic in the U.S., asked Business Insider.
	Is it the CDC? Is it the U.S. Department of Agriculture?
	Is it the FDA? Well, the answer is sort of all of them.
	So that means that any single one of these power crazy bureaucracies who want to, for their own sake of grabbing the limelight, of increasing their little fiefdom, any single one of them, Could do this.
	In the same way that we see the attacks on our food supply and on power, you know, you got the EPA as well as another agency talking about how they want to register and shut down cattle as well.
	I mean, this is not just, there's multiple prongs of government, multiple agencies for multiple MacGuffins, you know, the COVID MacGuffin or the Climate MacGuffin, targeting cattle.
	Gotta starve people.
	So the answer is all of them.
	All of them. For example, Adams says that he hasn't changed anything about his diet since pasteurization and proper cooking procedures should kill any of the live virus present.
	Again, are viruses alive?
	I thought it was a code.
	I thought it was a code. And again, it is an abstraction.
	Are there even viruses?
	Like I was saying before, we have models that help us to do things.
	We have models of the atom.
	We have models of quantum mechanics and things like that.
	Are either one of those correct?
	I don't know. Are there models of viruses?
	Is that correct? I don't know.
	But I've never seen that they're alive.
	But he's saying they're alive, and you can kill these, you know, you can kill bacteria is a lie, and you can kill bacteria by heating it up.
	You can kill the good bacteria and the bad bacteria, probiotics and all the rest of the stuff.
	You can kill all of that by heating it up, by pasteurizing it.
	But are the viruses alive?
	It's so confusing when they don't know, isn't it?
	I just get confused when we've got experts who don't know what they're talking about giving us contradictory information about all this stuff in so many different ways.
	He compared it to the development of the COVID vaccines.
	He said when people distrusted a process that they didn't understand.
	You think that we've got more trust in this now?
	Boy, this guy is dangerous and stupid, isn't he?
	He said the public needs good, consistent communication from the White House and from the USDA. No, what they need is good, consistent propaganda and fear-mongering from the White House and the USDA. Rather than consumers, the people most at risk, he said, are agricultural workers or anyone with a close or prolonged exposure to chickens or cows.
	Do you see how this is going to roll out?
	Can you imagine? Pretty soon, we're going to see farmhands out there dancing on TikTok with professionally choreographed stuff and, you know, drone and dolly shots, professional choreography.
	It's coming already.
	I just know it. And they're probably going to tell all these poor farmhands, you can't have your job unless you get vaccinated for bird flu.
	Or they just go out and kill all the cows.
	Maybe that's it. So he says, in those groups, because we don't want these people to get a little bit of redness in their eyes.
	You know, we'll have to kill the cattle or vaccinate them and the cattle.
	He said, we need a testing strategy that is proactive and allows true surveillance.
	I think they've got that already.
	Because, again, the PCR testing is going to be combined with an ear tag.
	And the ear tags, as I pointed out to you, they're just putting in the infrastructure for it.
	They have banned dairy cattle from being moved across state lines.
	And then if you want to take them to one of the processing plants, and I am guessing I haven't looked to see how many processing plants there are and where they are.
	But I'm guessing that not every state has a USDA-approved official, you know, processing plant.
	So you've got to take them across the lines.
	So they're going to put these RFID tags on all of these cattle, and they're going to track all of their movement and their vaccine history.
	And so if you don't have, if you violated the travel regulations, if you don't have the appropriate vaccine passport for your cattle, then they may just kill it and just throw it away and not allow you to have the meat back.
	I think that's the way they're going to do this.
	It's all about central control, the centralized processing, inventory, and tracking of everything.
	They want to add every single cow and chicken to their inventory of things, just like they want to add each and every one of us and every one of our appliances and our cars are all part of their inventory of things.
	So, the dairy cows must be tested for this before they're moved across state lines.
	That's just the beginning of it. And I would imagine that these state departments of health, in the areas where, even if you're in a state where you don't have to go across state lines to do, you know, with the dairy cattle, or if you want to take them to market for meat,
	still, within the state, in those places where they do have A USDA facility in the state, they will probably say to the State Department that they have to be the Department of Health in that state, that they have to be the ones to track all of this stuff.
	And if you don't do it, we'll probably just shut down that USDA plant because we don't need that many of them, right?
	It'll be the kind of arm-twisting that's going on.
	I mean, Biden is back now, twisting the arms of states over parental rights and the tranny stuff in schools with more money, fiat money, from the Department of Education.
	It never ends, and that's the way they always do it.
	Just like the lockdowns of COVID-19 were devastating for the restaurant and the hospitality industries, a crackdown on bird flu can be devastating to the chicken industry.
	And to the restaurant industry, and to the grocery store industry, and to our ability to eat.
	So, who knows?
	If they get their way, we might have, in the 2030s, we might have a politician running on the campaign like they did, was it in the 1930s, I think, that they ran a chicken in every pot?
	Was that FDR? Maybe that'll be something that we go back to and an aspiration again.
	You know, we don't even think about chicken.
	It's all over the place now, but you know, a chicken in every pot?
	Wow. We would be so wealthy if we had that.
	Well, they're going to take that away from us.
	The government giveth.
	The government taketh away, I guess.
	We're seeing the same tension between business interests and public health interests, said Adams.
	And, of course, we know that he doesn't care about business interests, and he doesn't care about the needs of consumers or individuals either.
	When they locked down everything, it wasn't just devastating for restaurants and hospitality industry.
	We couldn't get food. Remember, the grocery store shelves were empty because of boneheaded people like Trump and Jerome Adams' Surgeon General who said, you're going to shut down the restaurants.
	And so they couldn't deliver the food.
	We had food being destroyed on the farms while the grocery store shelves were empty.
	Why? Because it wasn't in a format that they could sell it in the grocery stores.
	They couldn't accept it.
	It was a format that was set up for restaurants only.
	Same thing with toilet paper.
	You know, plenty of toilet paper, but in the wrong format.
	And so, yeah, there's a conflict between, he says, business interests.
	No, this is our personal interests.
	This is our individual rights, Jerome Adams, that you don't care anything about.
	And so his attitude is just, so screw your food.
	I don't really care. My concern is we keep making the same mistakes over and over again.
	Because we focus on the wrong things instead of focusing on the root causes.
	That's right. That's right.
	Making the same mistakes again.
	People like Jerome Adams, going to people like Jerome Adams and asking him for advice.
	We keep making the same mistakes over and over again.
	You know, mistakes like Jerome Adams, mistakes like Donald Trump, mistakes like Joe Biden.
	We keep making those same mistakes over and over again.
	They don't appear to learn anything From what we have been through Well, the Biden White House has just signed on to a new Gates funded pandemic surveillance plan Right, so the Children's Health Defense the pandemic fund It is a he announced this on Tuesday a 50 country partnership to combat future pandemic and a new pandemic fund and it's got money coming in from big corporations because that's how
	the global governance is funded is by these big multinational corporations and the People like the Gates Foundation the Bill Gates Foundation So they released a 64-page document detailing this program.
	This partnership said it aims to strengthen global health security to prevent, detect, and effectively respond to biological threats wherever they emerge.
	We've got to be prepared for disease X because disease X is going to get us all.
	That's the fear that they push out there.
	And of course, we see that kind of fear being pushed by Alex Jones as well.
	Be afraid of disease X. How many times has he done, and many people in the conservative media, how many reports have we seen about disease X? Disease X. They're going to get us this time.
	Boy, we nearly escaped that gain of function the last time from the Wuhan lab.
	The disease X is the way they're going to get us.
	The WHO is not backing down on its pandemic plans, as we knew.
	There is no major victory for freedom because we've now had the International Health Regulations, the IHR, released this last week.
	Although some changes, reports expose news, although some changes have been made and some wording has been moved around the World Health Organization's plans are the same as they were before. This week from the 22nd to the 26th of April the eighth meeting of the WHO's working group on the IHR is convening and all of these Doctor Who's are metastasizing there
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	False news has become all too common on social media.
	More alarming than some media outlets, all of which say that they can't say that we are true without checking facts first.
	Unfortunately, some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control exactly what people think.
	This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events.
	But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support.
	Sharing the show, subscribing, and even just hitting the like button all help.
	And if you found our show helpful, Please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth.
	Because independent, listener-funded news, untouched by corporate, globalist agendas, is extremely important to our liberties.
	Interested in a curated list of the finest classical music?
	Find it now at APSradio.com.
	Now, we are having kind of a little mini-telephone today, and Suprafe has agreed to match contributions, And so I really do appreciate that.
	I really do appreciate the contributions.
	Let me read some of the names of people who have contributed while we've been talking.
	Let's see. We've got on Rock Fan, Michelle Obama.
	Thank you again for the tip.
	That's the third one I've seen from you today.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate it.
	On Rock Fan, Diana Phillips.
	Thank you. And she writes, shamefully being a new mother in UK, I didn't eat beef for two years during the mad cow debacle.
	The scaremongering does work on the distracted and the naive.
	Yeah. Yeah, they can.
	I mean, I've... When I was a college student, you know, I used to buy into some of that stuff as well.
	I never bought into the climate change thing, but I would, you know, it's just the persistence.
	And until, I think the key thing, though, is that once you realize that they lied to you and took advantage of you, that's it, you're done, right?
	I think most people, after the first rodeo, they don't listen to that anymore.
	So, yeah, hopefully the mad cow syndrome may come back to save us from artificial intelligence.
	I've talked about that before. Once the AI starts consuming other AI, then it starts to get into a cannibal type of thing as well.
	But yeah, they over-fear manga with all of that stuff.
	On Rockfin, PapaCT2G, thank you very much.
	And writes, thank you, your family, and your wonderful supporters for everything.
	Yes, thank you, all of you.
	Thanks be to God. I've been reading C.S. Lewis's Weight of Glory, and I'd like to paraphrase something that really struck me.
	He says, we're all immortal beings and we should treat each other as such and take each other more seriously.
	Think about how our eternity will be spent in everlasting splendor or immortal horror.
	Love, Charles. Thank you.
	Yeah, that's right.
	He said and may have been in that same context there.
	He said, every person that you see on the street It's really sobering to think that one of them, that each and every one of them will either become transformed in some being that is so amazing that you'd be tempted to fall down and worship it, or something so horrible that you couldn't even look at it.
	And that's where we stand in this juncture.
	All of this other stuff is very important.
	How we live our life is very important.
	How we make money is very important.
	We need to support ourselves and our families, but we don't want to love it.
	We don't want to make it the principal thing in our life.
	And so that's when we talked yesterday about the Christian nationalism and all the rest of the stuff.
	That pastor was absolutely right to criticize so many people for putting politics at the same level of these eternal questions or even above it or to even turn political partisanship or the following of a celebrity politician into idolatry.
	You know, we're always looking for things that we're always tempted to make too much out of everything.
	You know, as has been said, the heart is an idol factory, human heart.
	And we have to be careful that we don't manufacture idols in our life.
	So there's all these things that are good and necessary.
	We just don't want to make it everything.
	And it's good and necessary to understand that people are going to try to steal our food.
	That they're going to try to impoverish and enslave us.
	Because we need to be able to prepare for ourselves and for other people and help to defend them from that fraud.
	There are a lot of people out there that are trying to harm us and everybody in this society, and we ought to understand that they're just like some kind of a sniper that is on top of a building.
	And so we need to not just turn away because it's difficult to look at or because we think that there's not much that we can do.
	Even if we don't have the ability to take out that sniper, we don't have a gun or whatever, but we can at least warn people.
	Don't go down that street.
	Trump is up there shooting people.
	Or Biden or Jerome Adams.
	They're trying to kill you up there.
	Go get those people.
	Watch out for them. Let's see.
	Where did we leave off? Yeah, there we are.
	On Roxanne, a Syrian girl.
	Thank you very much. She writes, the fact that none of the people responsible for the COVID murders has been punished means that they will all be back.
	Not just Jerome Adams. You're right.
	Not just Trump. Not just Joe Biden.
	All of them will be back over and over again.
	And the agencies that got away with it, they are all more powerful than You know, what does not kill them makes them stronger, doesn't it?
	So, on Rockfin, Random Guy, thank you very much.
	That is very kind.
	I appreciate that. Thank you very much, Random.
	I appreciate that.
	We're on a first-name basis there.
	On Rumble, Stealth Patriot, thank you.
	Here's a little extra to add to what I give each week.
	Yes, I see your name there frequently.
	I know the gas gauge needs a little filling.
	Thank you for your hard work, David.
	Well, thank you. Appreciate it.
	On Rockfan, Spencer DeLong.
	Thank you. He says, Hello, David.
	While this isn't much, I hope it helps the gas gauge.
	Everything does. I appreciate that.
	I wish I was able to give more, as you deserve it, for the hard work you're in the Knight family put into the show.
	Thank you for all you do.
	God bless. Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that. On Rockfan, MJ, thank you.
	Thank you for all your hard work.
	Thank you, MJ. And on Rumble, BTurner170, thank you for the tip.
	He said, I always get a good laugh when you talk over the video clips that you play.
	Well, I hope I don't do it too often so you can't hear the video clips.
	On Rumble, Owen 61, thank you for the tip, and he thanks us.
	And thanks Superfay, who is matching the tips today.
	And thank you very much, Superfay.
	I really do appreciate that. It's very kind of you.
	So, let's talk a little bit about the pharmaceutical fraud here.
	And as I mentioned this yesterday, this idea of a universal vaccine...
	That the headline says, a new vaccine could protect against any strain of a virus with just one shot.
	Do you really believe that?
	I mean, it sounds very, very, very absurd to me.
	Before I get into this, we've got another couple.
	There were so many comments on here, I didn't see all of them.
	On Rumble, Michael DeSilvio says, MacGuffin after MacGuffin after MacGuffin after MacGuffin.
	That's right. They're everywhere.
	And now we're back to Hitchcock's The Birds, right?
	On Rumble, River Gambler, are the Amish taking applications?
	I'm ready. Yeah. You know, they got that right.
	I always wondered, you know, why did they stop where they stopped?
	As I said before, we've had dealings.
	We've met some people who were Mennonite.
	Literally ran into them, or they ran to us in a car accident.
	And then we got to know them and hired them for some stuff.
	Said, yeah, you don't have to pay us.
	We'll just, you know, that's what you...
	He was out there doing some work and saying, well, you know, we need some work that's not much damage.
	Let's just, if you want to come out, we'll apply that to some work that we need to have done when we were in Texas.
	And so we got great workers, honest guys, is amazing.
	And then there was the guy that was, there was a car accident.
	And then he knew an older guy who had a bobcat.
	And that was his thing.
	He cleared land with a bobcat.
	And he had a situation where it got tangled up into some trees and some shrubs and stuff, and it took off a hydraulic hose.
	And he's there. He's capable of fixing it all.
	And that was really the whole thing about the Amish.
	I went back and looked to see why did they stop it where they stopped it.
	Well, they stopped it at that point because they wanted self-sufficiency.
	There wasn't anything special about, you know, they just didn't want to get with, you know, go to cars because that was going to make them dependent on outside sources for parts and things like that.
	Which, you know, as you look at it now with 3D printing and some things like that.
	That might actually be something that we're going to need to have in the future if we have Amish communities who might be able to have 3D printed parts so we could keep the cars going.
	But that was the wisdom of what they did.
	I always wondered about that.
	But they wanted to have self-sufficiency and not be dependent on people from the outside, which means that they don't have to get the shots and other things like that.
	On Rumble, Shevkin321, I'll never forget how Fauci went from saying, That masks weren't necessary to recommend that you wear two or three at the same time with a smirk on his face.
	Yeah, and that picture of him sitting there in the baseball stadium with his mask down in his chin.
	What a fraud. Anthony Fraudci.
	Rock fan. Angus Mustang.
	Thank you again for the tip.
	I appreciate that. And on Rock fan, Mr.
	Chanel. Thank you. He writes, I'll start trusting the politicians again when they complete the simple task of cutting down the mightiest tree in the forest with a red herring.
	He didn't say a red herring, but...
	They've got plenty of red herrings out there to distract people, don't they?
	With a herring, yeah.
	That would be interesting. But we do have red herrings all over the place.
	And so let's talk about this vaccine that proposes to be the universal panacea for every disease.
	This is the University of California.
	I began talking about this yesterday, but I didn't get to an important part of this, so I wanted to revisit it.
	University of California, Riverside.
	A new RNA vaccine.
	The colleagues and this guy and his colleagues are so excited about the experimental and allegedly universal shock.
	And it's got a very broad strategy, they said.
	It's been put forward in a new paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
	Broadly applicable to a number of viruses.
	Broadly effective against any variant of a virus.
	Safe for a broad spectrum of people.
	Well, there you go. It does everything.
	It is effective as a panacea for everything.
	And it's totally safe.
	Well, at least for a broad spectrum of people.
	You might wind up on the autism spectrum if you take it, but he said this could be the universal vaccine that we've been looking for.
	In traditional amoculation-based vaccines, there's a dead version of something Or a modified live version, they say.
	Well, again, that brings up the question I have.
	Are viruses alive or dead?
	Is there such a thing as a virus either?
	But here's the thing.
	The new candidate, however, does not rely on your body responding to it.
	And see, this is one of the logical fallacies of the lies that Fauci was telling everybody.
	You know, if you've had...
	This COVID thing that he was selling.
	If you had a cold, and we'll call it COVID, and you've recovered, then you still don't have immunity unless you get the vaccine.
	Remember the arguments between him and Rand Paul?
	And it's like, wait a minute, if you recovered, that means that your immune system defeated whatever it was that you were exposed to and is now trained for life.
	That's one of the miracles of what God's created in us.
	That is an immune system.
	Somehow these, you know, single cell things, or maybe they're not single cell, but, you know, somehow these killer T-cells and the rest of the immune system can remember a disease that And can take it out.
	And that's the whole theory that the vaccinations were based on in the first place.
	And so, if your body has already been trained with the actual thing, you don't need to go back to basic training.
	You've got a marine group out here, and they've been fighting in the jungles of Vietnam for the last year.
	You're going to send them back to basic training?
	It'd probably shoot you if you tried to do that.
	But that was the nonsense that Fauci was trying to sell everybody.
	Oh, no, that doesn't work.
	You know, your immune system doesn't do anything.
	It's the vaccine. Now these people are selling, guess what?
	The same lie.
	This new vaccine does not rely on the body and its traditional immune response.
	Instead, it uses small silencing RNA molecules.
	What is that? Which our bodies create naturally through a process known as RNA interference or RNAi.
	Oh. So we're going from mRNA to RNAi.
	So they said that while viruses typically block out the RNAi process, additional molecules could cause viruses to mutate.
	So they can't do that.
	All right, so this is not about training your immune system.
	What this is about is mutating the viruses or the pathogens at the DNA and the RNA level.
	What could possibly go wrong with that?
	Yeah, we're not going to train your immune system.
	Instead, our new theory is we're just going to start genetically modifying what we're looking for, that particular disease.
	It's going to go around, it's going to start genetically modifying it.
	Don't worry, it won't genetically modify anything else it finds in your body.
	Just that particular disease.
	You trust that? Unbelievable what these people are coming up with.
	It's to the point where we're just going to have to say, you know, don't want any of your bioengineered food or your bioengineered medicine or any of this other stuff.
	By the way, you know, after we aired that clip yesterday about Aldi's, a woman goes in and says, look at this, bioengineered that put down that package, but it's not.
	Karen started going through the pantry and was like, I never saw this before.
	Look, it's on this one, it's on that one.
	Several things there that we found and threw away, you know, prepared food, processed food.
	And it's become a new category.
	When I looked up this new category, anything that uses...
	Corn or soy or soybean oil or anything like that, you know, and pretty much all of those are now genetically modified.
	But it's just a catch-all phrase.
	They don't want to have you on the label.
	They don't want to put out their GMO corn, GMO soy, GMO this, GMO that.
	They just put it all in one category thing, bioengineered food products.
	So, we'll be looking at our labels much more carefully.
	Now, you may want to do that as well.
	So, he said, if we make a mutant virus that cannot produce the protein to suppress our RNAi, we can weaken the virus.
	Okay, so, here's a strategy.
	We're going to genetically modify the virus, or whatever it is that we're trying to stop, and sterilize it.
	But don't worry, there'll be no side effects for you or anything else in your body.
	People are crazy. While viruses obviously mutate rampantly, the researchers say they don't believe the pathogens will be able to circumvent this new, still unnamed vaccine.
	Viruses may mutate in regions that are not targeted by traditional vaccines, he said.
	However, we're targeting their whole genome with thousands of small RNAs, and they can't escape this.
	Well, can you? What makes you think they're not going to be targeting your genome?
	Researchers believe that they'll be able to cut and paste their vaccine creation strategy and use it for everything from influenza to COVID-19, even dengue fever.
	But what about bird flu?
	They have yet to test the shots in humans or birds, I guess.
	But tests, who needs tests, right?
	Where we're going, we don't need no tests.
	On Rumble, J.J. Taylor, thank you very much for the tip.
	Truth breeds liberty.
	Our Lord bless you and keep you.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	This was sent to me by Mike, a listener, and it was a good reminder.
	I remember when this happened. Herman Cain, when he died in the hospital, I said, yeah, well, we couldn't get any information much from them, but we eventually found out, and thank you for reminding me of this, he died while on a ventilator.
	Or did he die from the ventilator?
	Right? From what we now know.
	Herman Cain. Herman Cain.
	And this is a CNBC article that was done a couple weeks after Herman Cain died.
	And CNBC says, Herman Cain had been put on a ventilator and was at times unconscious during his final weeks hospitalized with the coronavirus.
	A top aide and friend of his told CNBC. Said, we were trying to use the ventilator to strengthen his lungs.
	Said the hospital. Right?
	Is that what it does?
	No. Actually blows the lungs out, according to pulmonologists and other people who were talking about it.
	Kills like 90% of the people that they put it on.
	The 74-year-old Kane wasn't conscious the whole time because he was on a ventilator, which was something we weren't telling you at the time, because we didn't think there was any reason you needed to know.
	The family just didn't want to discuss it in that much detail.
	So, he died with a positive PCR. So, he died from COVID, right?
	No, he died with a positive PCR and from a ventilator.
	I think we can safely say now.
	And it's sad because, you know, it was, again, people didn't want to talk about what had happened.
	Nobody was comparing notes at the time, for the most part.
	And so, these murders got away with it.
	Murder on the Warp Speed Express.
	Every, you know. Every one of these doctors and people get a shot in there.
	Moderna confirms that COVID mRNA vaccines cause dangerous cancer cases.
	This is Dr.
	Robert Malone, who was at a hearing that was being led by Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	And as he spoke, and yesterday I had about a four-minute clip, and I think it's better to just kind of summarize what he had to say here, because I can slow down on some of the technical spots that he just kind of goes right through, because that's his area of expertise.
	But as I pointed out yesterday, you know, we had the Surgeon General in Florida, Joseph Latipo, that DeSantis put in there, and said several months ago, stop all of the vaccines, For any age, because of the contamination.
	And the contamination that they have found is something that if the FDA followed its own rules, would be an automatic pull it from the market.
	And yet, they don't care.
	And what Dr.
	Malone was saying was the reason they don't care is because this is the way they make it.
	They're not going to clean it up.
	That's the way they make it.
	And now, Moderna has admitted that it causes cancer after billions of DNA fragments were found in the vials of the dangerous injection.
	The revelation was made after Dr.
	Robert Malone recently appeared in this hearing that was led by Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	He said, That its quote-unquote vaccine contains billions of DNA fragments and other contaminants linked to birth defects and cancer.
	But the amazing thing about it all is that the FDA doesn't care.
	The government doesn't care at all.
	Just like they didn't care about the fact that scientists with the Children's Health Defense Organization saw that they were going to be putting these particles in polyethylene glycol, PEG, pegylated, wrapped in that.
	And they said, well, that's going to cause people to go into anaphylactic shock.
	They called the FDA. The FDA said, well, I don't care.
	Call Moderna and tell them that.
	Or call Pfizer and tell them that.
	And they called him up and they didn't care either because they knew they weren't going to be penalized for anything like that.
	They weren't going to change the way they make this stuff.
	So he said the problems including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis, mutational genetics, that could lead to the activation of oncogenes, that's cancer, Or the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes.
	So it can lead to the activation of cancer.
	It can lead to the suppression of your immune system.
	And it can genetically mutate you.
	And that's the mechanism.
	He said, the FDA says that they're not aware of any concerns, but Moderna in its own patent lays out exactly the same concerns that exist about DNA in terms of insertional mutagenesis and genotoxicity.
	Genetic toxicness and inserting things into the gene that are going to cause people to have cancer and other issues.
	So he says, so Moderna knows it.
	That the DNA is a contaminant, and it's left in because of the way that they make it.
	So it's inherent in the process of manufacturing.
	They use the DNA to make RNA, and then they degrade the DNA, and then they have to purify the degraded DNA away from the RNA, and the process that they're using is not that good.
	And of course now, this is starting to make more sense about the arm-twisting, blackmail if you will, that Pfizer was doing to Argentina, to Brazil, and to a third unnamed South American country, which remained unnamed because they reached an agreement with Pfizer.
	It was reported in Stat News, which is a pharmaceutical trade publication.
	And this was back in 2020 actually, or early 2021 before they started putting it out.
	But what they did was they said, we want you to hold us harmless against any manufacturing defects.
	Against any shipping errors and all this kind of stuff.
	Oh, wait a minute. You know, it's one thing to say we're going to hold you harmless for the formulation, which is being rushed out because we've got an emergency, supposedly, that we've got to respond to.
	But if you're saying that you want to be held harmless for any kind of negligent manufacturing or handling of this stuff, no, we're not going to go there.
	And to make it even more interesting...
	They said, and we want you to indemnify us against this and guarantee it.
	And if somebody sues us or something, we want you to put assets outside of your sovereign country that you have earmarked for us in case there is some kind of a lawsuit or something.
	And so two of those countries said, we're not going to do it.
	And they were blackmailing them because at the time they were saying to everybody, if you don't get this and your people don't get it in your country, you're not going to be able to travel.
	People aren't going to be able to travel in or out of your country.
	This is the, I tell you, we've got global governance is in place.
	And it works with the corporations.
	And we're going to blackmail you.
	You're not going to travel in or out of your country if you don't do this.
	And so that's why These, Argentina and Brazil, this other company, complained about it.
	The Stat News is, look, we're being blackmailed with this stuff.
	That's the same reason why Netanyahu used Israelis as lab rats.
	He wanted to get to the front of the list.
	And so he promised that he would use his own people as lab rats.
	And he called on multiple occasions, and we got the tapes about it.
	They even did it publicly. Calls the World Economic Forum and brags about how he is taking the lead and using his people as an experiment.
	And we're going to get the information, and it's going to be a great public service because we're going to use Jews as lab rats.
	Yeah, let's talk about how we should support him.
	Scientists from the U.S. and Canada were able to get their hands on an unopened vials of Moderna's COVID jab, a clear chain of custody, and they sampled them.
	And this is their expertise.
	Just to be clear, they do deep sequencing on samples and they relay their findings for the public good.
	This is from Exposé News, their commentary.
	What they discovered were large numbers of DNA fragments in the RNA preparation to which they applied standard reconstruction tools to see what the circular plasmid DNAs looked like.
	None of this was disclosed to the public, by the way.
	Now, we began this program by talking about the New York Times and said, look at this, we've sampled milk and we've found fragments of bird flu DNA. Oh, be afraid, be very afraid.
	And it's front page headline news and all this kind of stuff.
	Have they done the same thing with these shots that are being injected into people that have all kinds of DNA fragments in it?
	They don't care.
	It just shows you how ruthlessly biased the New York Times and the media are that they would freak out over fragments of DNA in milk and then in the body of things say, well, it's not harmful or anything.
	And then they would not do anything to talk about Expert testimony about the fact that the DNA fragments are in the vials.
	I think we need to start spelling that V-I-A-L-S. This is V-I-L-E-S, rather.
	Yeah, it's disgusting how vile this stuff is.
	And they don't care.
	They don't care about DNA fragments there.
	But, oh, they really care about DNA fragments in milk.
	The documentation suggests that there are certain DNA sequences present in the vials that are normally not allowed in anything that is going into humans, not the least of which is an antibiotic-resistant gene, said Dr. Malone.
	They include these sequences from Simeon Virus 40, SV40, and Not the whole virus, he said, but highly active promoter sequences, which is exactly the thing that the FDA and their older regulations said must be avoided.
	So they don't put all of the SV40 in there, just the most dangerous part of it.
	It must be avoided, said the FDA and older regulations, because it confers even more risk for insertional mutagenesis.
	Cancer causing.
	It turns out that Pfizer's mRNA injection for COVID contains the same contaminants.
	Documentation was provided by the company to regulators in the U.S., Europe, and Canada.
	And then these regulators deleted that information.
	You see? Partners in crime.
	And think about how this works.
	Look, if the company was doing this kind of stuff and failed to report it, And people found out.
	If they deleted the information, if they suppressed the information, they could get hit with big fines, jail sentences, a lot of other things like that, right?
	But if they ship it over to the FDA and their partners at a government agency delete it, then what happens?
	Well, the company says, we gave them all that information.
	We're harmless. What do you do about the FDA regulators?
	Nothing. Nothing.
	They're working in an official capacity.
	And just like Trump, when he kills people, they've got legal immunity.
	So they don't get a fine.
	They don't get a jail sentence.
	As a matter of fact, if it gets really big, you'll have the head of the bureaucracy go to Congress and say, you know, this happened because we just don't have enough people for the job.
	You need to make us bigger.
	That's the way they respond. So this is the way the partnership works.
	It's not just having plausible deniability, like what happens when the Biden White House or the Trump White House partners with social media to censor people.
	That's when I got censored, is under the Trump White House.
	But it's not just when they partner with people to give themselves plausible and liability.
	This is actually done so that nobody goes to jail or pays any fines.
	They cover up for these corporations in the same way that when children's health defense contact about the pegylated viruses, they say, well, we don't care.
	Talk to them. And they don't do anything about it because they've figured out how to escape any punishment.
	Dr. Malone said, high-level people at both Moderna and Pfizer had to have known about this, the potential consequences for jab recipients being, quote, anything that is associated with DNA damage.
	So what happens when you damage DNA? Birth defects and cancer being the most notable ones.
	But, of course, it's not limited to that as well.
	I played a little bit of a clip yesterday about the woman who was the hospital medical coder.
	She would be the one to basically summarize this stuff and put it all there so they could get paid for it.
	So she's got like a bird's eye seat of all this stuff.
	And she sees more than any individual nurse would because she's seeing everything that's coming into the hospital.
	It's coming through her, the hospital medical coder.
	And some of the things that she said, I'll just repeat.
	She said, I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically, so quickly, before they rolled out the mRNA injections.
	For days, patients would be seizing and no medication would stop it.
	And eventually they just had to kind of be put down.
	She said they would call it encephalitis or encephalopathy, and then later on, even the coding organization called it COVID-19-associated encephalitis, she said.
	But the clots were insane.
	Never seen clots like that before.
	Even the interventional radiologists that were going in with scopes where they can do heart interventions and do stents.
	A stent is a tube usually constructed metal alloy or polymer put into an artery.
	If you have a stroke going to your brain, normally it's rare to have more than one stent going in.
	They were documenting multiple locations at once.
	There were people that were hiking in their 20s that were totally healthy, that had been running marathons, that suddenly needed a leg amputated because they had a massive blood clot going from their hip all the way down to their leg, and it couldn't be saved.
	She said, Doctors would never tell patients that.
	They would just say, it's a stroke.
	It's a heart attack.
	It's a blood clot. And they would never connect the two.
	They would never connect the dots.
	On Rumble, Colton Kimberly.
	Thank you very much. That's very generous.
	I appreciate that. Mr.
	Knight, many thanks and a few bucks for the show.
	Also, thanks for the Roku app.
	Ah, thank you for reminding me.
	We're on Roku. And so if you have the app or if you want to find us on Roku, we have a Roku channel.
	And so you can search it on your search engine to find that or you can go to Roku to find it.
	And so I'm glad that we've got somebody watching us.
	If you're watching, make sure you like us on Roku so we can get the visibility up.
	Thank you very much. Appreciate that, Colton.
	And on Zell, I got these.
	I guess Karen gave these to you.
	Yeah, he's not. I said yes. On Zell, contributions from Jeffrey C., David R., Armando M., Jacqueline.
	Thank you very much. On Subscribestar, we got new subscriber Rick D. And JustMe83 gave us a tip on Subscribestar.
	Thank you very much. On Rockfin, Andromeda, one.
	Very generous. Thank you very much.
	That is really kind.
	David, last month I lost my 37-year-old son to addiction.
	Oh, I'm so sorry. He was a brilliant man who understood how evil and corrupt our government is.
	As you correctly say, this is a spiritual problem.
	Please pray for him. Yes.
	I'm so sorry. And for you.
	I'm so sorry for your loss.
	God bless you and your family and Super Fae who's matching today.
	Your show has given me strength through this most difficult time.
	I am so sorry.
	I am so sorry.
	Well, we are not without hope.
	And that absolutely is true.
	And so I just pray for you and your family.
	I'm so sorry that that happened to you.
	As we are talking about medication and its effect on people, there is an article out of Harvard University, Harvard Medical School.
	It's published in Stat News that I was talking about earlier.
	And this is a guy at Harvard who wants antidepressants for everybody, SSRIs.
	We call them murder-suicide pills because so often...
	And, you know, when we...
	I played the clip earlier this week from the survivor of the Columbine shooting.
	And he said, you know, these guys, it's not the bullying that they went through.
	He said they were just playing really dark, evil stuff.
	And they planned this and all that.
	So he said, it's not the bullying, it's not drugs, it's not any of that kind of stuff.
	And I think in their case, probably it was not...
	SSRIs. They had been planning it for quite some time, and that's not the way that works.
	And yet, when we look at this, and I can't remember, maybe you can remember her name, Travis, the lady that we interviewed who got the black box label on SSRIs because of what happened to her husband.
	And I have interviewed people who set up a website called ssristories.org.
	They've got, I forget if it's 7,000 or 9,000 different stories that are there, and it's amazing how common these stories are.
	I just talked a week or so ago about Phil Hartman and his wife who was on SSRIs, the lady who got the black box thing put on.
	Her husband was very fit, and he wasn't depressed or anything.
	He was just having some trouble sleeping, and the doctor prescribed an SSRI for him.
	And he had really bad reactions to it.
	It felt like his body was on fire.
	And I think she had a business trip and she was gone.
	He just started this stuff. Doesn't know if, you know, he continued taking it.
	Or if he stopped taking it, that's frequently what causes the issue.
	The way... One of the people I talked to at SSRI Stories described it.
	You know, if you're just changing the level of medication and doing too much too soon, you've got to get off of it very, very gradually, or it will create these very same problems.
	And so I said, well, it sounds to me, it's kind of like, you know, I did scuba diving when I was younger.
	I said, it sounds to me like the Benz.
	You know, you go down and you're operating at a depth and the nitrogen dissolves into your bloodstream.
	And so you have to come up very, very slowly if you've been down for a while.
	And so you have to come up very slowly.
	If you don't do it slowly enough, The nitrogen bubbles out of your bloodstream and creates all kinds of pain and damage.
	It can kill you in your body.
	And incredibly painful, that type of thing.
	So you have to be very, very careful about that.
	My instructors had been...
	Industrial divers, they did welding underwater.
	You're talking about something dangerous.
	I mean, that's crazy.
	And both of them had severe injuries.
	They were still diving, but they both had had severe injuries.
	And one of them had been bent, but, you know, they had had things fall on them or whatever, and basically barely survived.
	The face of one of the guys was all messed up and everything, and I took it with a friend.
	We were partners. And not too long after we took it, I said, you know, it's kind of like that moment in that comedy thing where the two Nazis are sitting around the thing.
	It's like, have you ever thought, are we the bad guys?
	Why do we got these skulls on our head?
	And I'm thinking, I said to him, I said, you ever think about how dangerous this is?
	Look at our instructors.
	I mean, these guys are just barely survived whatever it was that they did.
	Maybe we shouldn't be doing this.
	And I had a friend of my dad's who's sold insurance and sold him his insurance.
	My dad mentioned something about me going diving and he said, I didn't hear that.
	He says, if it's found out that your son's scuba diving, we're going to have to cancel his insurance.
	We treat that like skydiving.
	So there's various things like that, little hints that I got that God put in my life that got me out of it before I got hurt.
	But the reason I mention all that is because the SSRI stuff is...
	Like getting bent.
	You know, you have to be very, very careful.
	Gradually, very, very gradually come off of this stuff.
	And a lot of times, it has its own horrible side effects, like in her husband's case.
	She was... His body was on fire.
	And so, you know, if he just stops taking it, it hits him that way.
	But this guy, Roy Perliss, a professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, argued that antidepressants, known as SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, should be made available at U.S. pharmacies without a prescription, just right over the counter, you know, like the abortion pill.
	Which again, you know, if you don't have a physician looking at how far along are you in your pregnancy?
	Are you in a condition where this is going to threaten your health if you do a chemical abortion?
	So this guy, Perlis, called on drug manufacturers to, quote, engage with the FDA and invest the necessary resources.
	In other words, pay off some politicians and bureaucrats so that you can sell your stuff across the counter.
	Why not? Everybody else does it, right?
	To make it possible because SSRIs have, quote, repeatedly been shown to be safe and effective for treating major depression and anxiety disorders.
	Well, take a look at SSRIstories.org if you are thinking about doing this.
	It may not happen to you.
	It doesn't happen to everybody, of course.
	If it happened to everybody, then they would easily recognize it.
	But if you've got somebody over here that didn't happen to...
	See, it didn't happen to this person.
	Well, I'm glad that it didn't.
	But look at how many other people it did happen to.
	It comes off the back of a recent FDA ruling that allows the purchase of oral contraceptives over the counter without a doctor being involved.
	Perlis treats patients at Massachusetts General Hospital.
	He failed to declare his ties to the pharmaceutical industry in the article.
	Isn't that a surprise?
	Sparking anger among academics online.
	In other words, this guy is hawking drugs.
	In the same way that Rick Perry had a former staffer who left him, went to work for a pharmaceutical company, and then goes back to work for Rick Perry.
	And the next thing you know, Rick Perry is saying, well, everybody needs to take this HPV vaccine.
	All students need to take this.
	And he was the first one to do something like that.
	And then everybody pointed out the connections that he had to, I think it was Merck.
	Antidepressants are among the most prescribed treatments in the world.
	SSRI-induced suicide is not limited to young people.
	In 2007, the FDA updated the black box label on SSRI packaging.
	Again, I interviewed the widow who spent so much of her life getting that black box warning on there.
	Warning doctors to monitor suicidality in patients of all ages after they start the medication.
	And yet, you know, when you look at this, Harvard Medical has long pushed these SSRIs.
	So they got the black box label in 2007.
	Seven years later, Harvard was contacting the mainstream media and saying, suicides have gone up since we got this black box warning.
	Really? What is that?
	Does that prove anything?
	I mean, and there was a big back and forth.
	A lot of people pushed back on that conclusion that was being pushed out there.
	The bottom line is Harvard has been pushing SSRIs for a very, very long time.
	In some instances, when researchers have gained access to regulatory documents, they've found that vital data on suicides were excluded from journal publications.
	Perlis at Harvard also says that there is low potential for misuse and abuse of antidepressants, but he overlooks the fact that SSRIs can lead to dependency.
	People often experience discontinuation syndrome, that's what I was talking about with the Benz, upon ceasing SSRIs because they are habit-forming and can cause abstinence symptoms.
	People who forget to take their medication or deliberately, well, I'm having this or that problem, I'm going to cut it down.
	And that's when some of these things happen.
	One kid who was on it, he cut down his medication because he was having secondary and tertiary problems.
	And he went to school with a rifle, and he got in front of the classroom, and he pointed the rifle at the people in the classroom, and he pointed it at himself, and he pointed it back, and this went on for a while until they got the rifle away from him, put him in the hospital.
	He didn't know what he was doing, and he didn't have any recollection of that event at all.
	About half the people on SSRIs have difficulty stopping them.
	Their withdrawal symptoms can lead to suicide, violence, and homicide.
	Some patients report the withdrawal is worse than their original depression.
	If SSRIs become available without prescription, who will counsel patients about tapering off their medications?
	Another significant problem is that few patients and doctors, for that matter, are aware that SSRIs have potential to cause severe, sometimes irreversible sexual dysfunction that persists even after discontinuing the medication.
	Well, that's depressing.
	I guess. The condition called post-SSRI sexual dysfunction.
	They call it PSSD. Actually, I think it should be PSSRISD. If we can remember all the LGBT initials and put a plus back there, just in case we forgot one.
	They could do it with this. It could be PSSRISD+. No, they call it PSSD. Instead of PSD, it's PSSD. It has been described as sufferers as chemical castration.
	The problem is under-recognized, largely under-reported, but drug regulators are starting to pay attention.
	In June 2019, the European Medicines Agency, that's their FDA, updated the special warnings and precautions section on their package insert label to warn that sexual dysfunction can persist even after the treatment stops.
	And Canada, 2021, Health Canada updated their product label for the same thing.
	But not FDA. Not Harvard.
	Yeah, just sell it over the counter.
	This is something that earned the black label more than the black label.
	It should have been banned, frankly.
	Perlis at Harvard says people should be able to access antidepressants without prescription because they're capable of self-diagnosing in the same way that many over-the-counter products are used to treat symptoms.
	He said, you know, think about it as yeast infections or acid reflux or respiratory infections, he said.
	These people will do anything for money, won't they?
	Truly is amazing. Yeah, the time for over-the-counter antidepressants has come, is the article that he wrote in Stat News.
	And I tell you, stay away from SSRI, stay away from Harvard Medical.
	These are the same people who came after Marty Gottesville.
	I mean, they are politically very powerful.
	Got him put into a communication management unit because he embarrassed them over medical kidnapping.
	And that wasn't the only case of medical kidnapping, the allegations that they had had either.
	WHO expects a 77% increase in cancer cases, as I pointed out before.
	But anything other than mRNA injections are what they're going to look at.
	As a matter of fact, almost doubling.
	They estimate they're going to go up to 35 million new cancer cases by 2050, which is a 77% increase over the estimated 20 million that they were expecting.
	The WHO ignored the emergence of rapid-growing turbo cancers in people who have received one or more of the Trump shots.
	Many of these cancers are showing up in young people, many of them under the age of 30, who have no family history of cancer at all.
	So how might they trigger the cancer?
	Well, we've already talked about Robert Malone and other people there.
	Dr. Makis, who I've talked to, had focused in the past on some of the synthetic ingredients that were in it.
	But I think it's the DNA contamination.
	That is going to be the key thing.
	For the Human Genome Project at MIT and his colleagues were the ones who got those vials and had a chain of custody.
	They said DNA contamination that exceeds the European Medicines Agency's requirement and the FDA's requirements are found.
	And we've known this for many, many months.
	Will the FDA follow their own rules?
	No. What they do is they attack and criticize Dr.
	Joseph Latipo, because he says, no, you shouldn't have this, because according to the FDA rules, this is contaminated, and they admit it, but they won't take it off the market.
	It's just amazing to me how corrupt our government has become in all these different areas.
	Even when you look at the Emergency Use Authorization, there's a good article on Brownstone about what it truly is.
	It is... The Emergency Use Authorization is not something that is just for an experimental product that is undergoing clinical trial.
	It doesn't have anything to do with that.
	The article by Debbie Lerman on Brownstone says, During the COVID pandemic, the U.S. government spent billions of dollars on nearly 400 products intended to protect, diagnose, treat hundreds of millions of people.
	All of them were given the label of EUA. Well, let's correct that.
	During the COVID pandemic, the Trump administration, you've got to say his name.
	He wants the credit for this.
	Give him the credit that he so desperately desires.
	So I said it's helpful to look at what an EUA is not.
	It is not a designation for an experimental product that is undergoing evaluation.
	The FDA tells us that the process of getting an EUA is not likely to generate any information about the product's effectiveness.
	It is not designed to provide evidence of safety or effectiveness.
	It is unlikely that any useful information will be obtained to benefit future patients, they said.
	There is no systematic data collection.
	No data is published in medical journals.
	Oh, we've noticed that, haven't we?
	No informed consent is required.
	But patients who volunteer, you know, you volunteer because if you don't volunteer, they're gonna fire you they have to be told that they can refuse and that the product is unapproved and Under although it's available under EU a this is why they waited until they gave their Quasi approval to it in September 2021 and then they required it from people in the military No institutional review board is required and all the rest of this stuff
	So the bottom line is you have to understand it's not part of a development pathway.
	It is something that is entirely separate.
	They're not evaluating it for safety, for efficacy.
	Process of granting a product EUA is unlikely to generate any evidence of safety or effectiveness.
	Once a product is granted EUA and administered to patients, it's unlikely that any useful information will be obtained to benefit future patients.
	I think we've noticed that, haven't we?
	It's meant only for weapons of mass destruction emergencies.
	Which is what they practiced in dark winter in 2001 and continued on.
	Three steps for emergency use authorization.
	You've got to have, the first thing is, you've got to have somebody that's either the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
	That's the person. Big Pharma's Alex Azar, the former CEO of Eli Lilly, he was the one that did that in January 2020.
	That's the first step.
	Then the FDA looks at some of these other statutory things and then they have to impose certain required conditions on it.
	But that was the key thing. This is meant only for weapons of mass destruction and that's why it was so vital.
	That Alex Azar declared that emergency at the end of January in 2020.
	Now, Trump did it on that Friday the 13th in March.
	The purpose of that was to unleash money.
	And the purpose of the money is to get everybody to do what you want them to do, which is what the Department of Education is starting to come back now.
	You know, it was under the Obama administration where they said if you don't put...
	The boys in the girls' locker rooms and showers were going to take away all that money you become addicted to.
	And so, you know, that is coming back now.
	What a surprise. And so...
	Again, once one of these secretaries has declared, and in this case it was HHS, that there was an emergency, then the FDA looks at some requirements.
	It has to be used for a serious or life-threatening disease or condition.
	They hyped everybody to believe that that was what was happening, even though there was no pandemic.
	You need to have evidence of effectiveness.
	What did we have with that?
	We had statements. Oh yeah, it's 90%.
	No, it's 94. It's 94.5.
	It's 100% now.
	And then it starts falling and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's just letting these people put it out there.
	And the risk-benefit analysis, all that kind of stuff.
	They just get to put...
	And then the key thing. No alternatives.
	And that fourth thing there is why they fought tooth and nail.
	To shut down ivermectin, HCQ, and zinc, any of these things.
	Gotta have no alternatives.
	And of course, it was always, from dark winter on, it was always, lock everybody down until we're ready to vaccinate them.
	That was what they practiced for 20 years.
	On Rumble, AlanJ78, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. And on Rumble, SuperFay, who is matching all the tips today.
	Thank you so much for doing that, Fay.
	She says, raw milk has cured many of my health issues.
	And I'm absolutely not going to stop kissing my chickens.
	I've heard that before about raw milk as well, and about buttermilk as well.
	I'm really concerned because our dairy here, we have a local dairy.
	They are required in order to sell.
	They sell in some of the grocery stores, but we go to the dairy on Saturdays.
	They're opened up. And they pasteurize it so they don't get into the raw milk hassle stuff.
	So you lose some of the good probiotics that are in it.
	But the key thing is that they don't homogenize it.
	And I think that the homogenization...
	It's a very dangerous, very negative thing.
	The way it suspends those particles, the way your body is not meant to handle that.
	Plus, it tastes a lot different, a lot better than the regular milk that is in the store.
	And it's cream colored as opposed to white, like the stuff you get in the store.
	So, I know they're struggling.
	And I hope that this isn't going to be used to put them out of business.
	But yeah, I've heard that about raw milk before from a lot of people.
	On Rumble, Allie's dad says, hug a chicken today.
	On Rockfin, Torinator, thank you very much for the tip.
	Happy Friday, David. God bless you and your family and the person matching donations.
	That's Faye. With regard to Columbine, please try to get Jennifer Small on your show.
	She's a survivor of the Columbine shooting, and according to her, we haven't been told the whole story.
	Don Jeffries had her on his show, and her story was interesting to say the least.
	He gave me a link to it.
	Well, I'll have to do that. Yeah, it was interesting to hear what he had to say.
	I didn't hear his entire interview.
	I was really more interested in how he was dealing with the forgiveness because his sister was killed and several of his friends, and he really struggled with that for a while, and so I wanted people to hear that aspect of it.
	But yeah, Columbine was really the one that kind of kicked it off, and I'm sure that there is a lot there, so I'll take a look at that.
	Thank you very much. Make sure you save that, Travis.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	♪♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you Let's talk a little bit about what's going on with the climate, MacGuffin.
	We've talked about the attacks on our food, and of course that is really key.
	I mean, we don't want to lose our ability to move.
	We don't want to lose our power, the power.
	The power grid that the EPA is attacking as well.
	Used to be they just attacked our cars.
	Now they want to take down the power grid as well.
	We have four new types of power plant regulations and rules that have just been released by the EPA under Biden.
	The bureaucratic deep state is going to kill electricity as well as cars, as well as food.
	You know, the EPA's got a hand in the attack on our food supply as well.
	Before we get back into the news, just real quickly, Karen handed this to me on SubscribeStar.
	We've got a couple of tips I want to thank people for.
	Matthew D., And I'm not sure if that's an S or a J. So it's either Jolanta or Solanta W. Thank you very much.
	On Zell, Louis A. Thank you very much.
	And thank you to Suprafe who agreed to match tips today.
	Because we were down so low this month that just 51% before the program started on the gas gauge for the month.
	And we're getting pretty close to the end.
	But let's talk about what's going on with EPA. The Biden administration yesterday announced a series of new rules against coal and natural gas.
	There you go. Isn't it amazing how much you can get done with a bureaucracy when you don't have to depend on a democratic process?
	Isn't it amazing that they can do taxation without representation?
	Isn't it amazing that they can do regulation without representation?
	Actually, I think it's revolting, don't you?
	As in the American Revolution.
	The electricity industry is central to America's economic growth and independence, said the administrator of the EPA. Therefore, we're going to kill it.
	No, he said that these are folks who keep the lights on and the power for our country to move forward.
	So he really loves it.
	It's just like these people say, I really love babies, but let's abort them.
	Let's kill them, right? At the same time, he said the power sector is also a major contributor to the pollution that drives climate change and threatens public health.
	Isn't it? At the EPA, it is our responsibility to act within the bounds of our legal authority.
	Well then, turn the lights out and go home, because you don't have any authority to exist.
	There's no constitutional authority for the federal government to do anything about pollution.
	That is a state power, a state function.
	There's nothing in the Constitution about that.
	And any of the powers that have not been delegated by the states and by the people, says the Tenth Amendment, don't belong to the federal government.
	You're an illegal, unconstitutional agency created by Richard Nixon.
	But of course, when the president does it, it's constitutional, right?
	By definition. No?
	No, it isn't. But this is what it looks like.
	New rules pronounced by the bureaucratic state, the deep state.
	And as they point out on ABC News, even though this is being done by the EPA, this is the Biden administration.
	Because Biden could stop this.
	Biden is in agreement with it, but he is tacitly in agreement with it if he's going to let it stand.
	The deep state, the bureaucratic state, whatever you want to call it, is underneath the presidency.
	And that's why... For all you MAGA people out there, that's why we talk about the lockdowns and the hospital death protocols and the masking and all the rest of the stuff.
	That was the Trump administration.
	Everybody else uses that title except we have people who go out of their way And the conservative media, especially the alternative conservative media, go out of their way to never say his name.
	It isn't Donald Trump. It's not the Trump administration.
	No, it was COVID that did it.
	It was the pandemic that did it.
	It was Fauci who did it.
	It's never Trump who did it.
	And yet he is responsible for all that stuff.
	The buck stops with him.
	It starts with him as well because he paid for it.
	Power plants account for more than one quarter of all greenhouse gases, they said.
	So kill it. Even if that were true, I'm going to get to this very important study that says that CO2 gas is not an issue.
	It cannot cause global warming.
	The age of unbridled climate pollution from power plants is over, pronounces this president and chief executive officer for the Natural Resources Defense Council.
	So we have an NGO, non-governmental organization.
	Plus, an unconstitutional bureaucracy.
	We should call them UCBs.
	Unconstitutional bureaucracy.
	So we have the unconstitutional bureaucracy of the EPA and a non-governmental organization, the Natural Resources Defense Council, pronouncing this stuff, making these little dictatorial fiats out there, backing it up with their fiat cash from the Federal Reserve.
	The age of power plants is over.
	It's really what she's saying. Because these things threaten our health.
	And again, it was Lisa Jackson, Obama's EPA administrator, who was lying within Congressman, now Senator Markey from Massachusetts, saying fine particulate matter 2.5 is killing more people than heart attacks and cancer, which was an absolute lie.
	And at the same time, she was doing this prepared dialogue.
	They had written it out.
	They even stepped on each other's lines in a couple of spots.
	But while they're reading this prepared dialogue in Congress, the EPA and Research Triangle Park, where I was, was putting people on a pipe and feeding them.
	They'd removed the carbon dioxide, but they were giving them levels of PM 2.5.
	That's a fine particulate matter of 2.5 microns.
	Giving them that at 72 times the level that the EPA had said was safe.
	And just to make sure they were going to get a reaction, they advertised for people who had heart or respiratory illness and then put them on that.
	They know it's not harmful.
	And so, again, you know, the group I was with sued them because, like, all right, either confess, you know, either you are breaking the Nuremberg Code and trying to kill people, Or, you know, there's nothing wrong with this stuff.
	Which is it? Well, of course, just do the thing out.
	That way, you don't care. More than 70% of the nation's coal and natural gas plants are located in communities of color or low-income communities.
	So, according to the black EPA administrator, Regan, Pollution is racist.
	CO2 is racist.
	It's not pollution. It's just CO2. CO2 is racist.
	There you go. Well, we know.
	Edison Electric Institute, which is an organization representing U.S. investor-owned electric companies, told ABC News, it supports the EPA. We really love the EPA, and we want to do everything that we can to help them.
	They're very afraid to oppose it.
	Because, you know, you get these bureaucrats angry?
	Yeah, their little fiefdom there, they shut you down real fast.
	So they're afraid to directly oppose him, just like the conservatives are afraid to oppose Trump.
	They have to dance around this.
	While we appreciate and support the EPA's work to develop a clear, continued path for a transition to cleaner resources, we are disappointed that the agency did not address the concerns that we raised about carbon capture and storage.
	Carbon capture and storage is not ready yet for full-scale, economy-wide deployment, nor is there sufficient time to permit, to finance, and to build the carbon capture and storage infrastructure needed for compliance by 2032.
	So what they're saying is, I thought we had a deal.
	You know, you told us that we could play this little game where we're going to, you know, grab the CO2 and we're going to stick it in the ground or something.
	And now we don't have enough time to do that.
	You're just going to shut us down?
	It's like, yep, yep, that's what we're going to do.
	Kind of like Jabs into Arden, you know.
	It sounds to me like you're just going to start, you know, you're going into full-on dictatorship.
	Yep, yep, that's what we're doing. Yep, yep.
	They're not interested in any of these so-called solutions to this imaginary MacGuffin.
	And it truly is imaginary.
	The... Biden administration is declaring another national emergency over climate change.
	See, we're ruled by one emergency declaration after the other.
	And Trump began that, and now Biden is continuing that with everything.
	Everything is an emergency.
	So if you declare it's an emergency, you can rule without any law being applied to you about anything.
	You know, again, think about this.
	After this next election, Trump or Biden will be there.
	Both these guys have ruled by emergency executive orders.
	They've ruled by fiat.
	And it's going to be one of the two of them.
	It's going to take us through the end of this fourth turning.
	Top advisors to Biden have recently resumed talks about the merits of such a move, an emergency declaration, which could be used to curtail crude exports, to suspend offshore drilling, to curb emissions, and all the rest of it. In other words, to turn off our power and to ban cars.
	Officials have not made a decision on the matter, nor is any declaration imminent.
	They're going to wait until after the election.
	You do this kind of stuff before the election, people are not going to be happy with this.
	We used that same Defense Production Act that Trump used to start, essentially overnight, a heat pump manufacturing industry.
	So, you know, Trump used that Defense Production Act To tell the car company, stop making cars, start making ventilators.
	And then he hammered GM for not making these things fast enough.
	And what did they do?
	Well, they killed people.
	They were useless, dangerous.
	And so what is Biden going to do?
	Well, he's going to tell people, well, we can't have ranges and we can't have heating and air conditioning that are anything other than electric.
	He wants to do to our homes what Trump tried to do to our bodies.
	And he's going to use it with this emergency declaration that is out there as well.
	So, here's the study.
	And it's...
	It's peer-reviewed, by the way.
	This is not a pre-print study.
	This is peer-reviewed.
	It is endorsed by a lot of scientists, including a couple of newly minted Nobel Prize winners.
	The study says that carbon emissions cannot cause global warming.
	Cannot cause it. A bombshell new peer-reviewed study has provided conclusive scientific evidence proving that carbon dioxide emissions cannot cause global warming.
	Dr. Jan Kubicki, or maybe it's Jan, he's from Poland, J-A-N, led a group of world-renowned Polish scientists to study the impact of increases in CO2 emissions on the Earth's global temperatures.
	However, not only did they find that higher levels of CO2 made no difference, but they also proved that it simply is impossible for increases in carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise.
	The emperor has no clothes.
	Or I guess we could say the emperor has no cause.
	The emperor has no cause for this stuff.
	And so you don't have any justification for any of this stuff.
	The emperor has no cause.
	And by the way, I've pointed this out before, along with their failed predictions, along dire things about there's not going to be any more snow, and the glaciers are going to disappear, and all the stuff that you've been hearing from Al Gore and from RFK Jr.
	all these years, and from people like Michael Mann, with all these lies that are out there, One of the key things was when you look at things like Michael Mann's fake and false projection with the hockey stick and everything, they had a correlation where as CO2 was increasing, temperature would increase.
	And yet, you know, now that these models and things like that are several decades old, what we've seen is that CO2 has increased, but there was no increase in temperature.
	They were not correlated to each other.
	That's what these people are saying.
	But they're saying a lot more than that.
	They're giving you an explanation as to why temperature is not tied to CO2. Kubicki and his team recently published three papers which all conclude that the Earth's atmosphere is already saturated with carbon dioxide.
	He said the saturation means that even at greatly increased levels of CO2, the greenhouse gas will not cause temperatures to rise.
	Current levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are around 418 parts per million, but the scientists state that past 400 parts per million, and we're past that, the CO2 concentration can no longer cause any increase in temperature.
	So it's saturated from the standpoint of having an effect on temperature.
	The saturation of CO2 is the hypothesis that dare not speak its name in mainstream media politics.
	All we hear from these people is carbon, carbon, carbon, carbon, carbon.
	They don't even finish the rest of it.
	And I've seen so many times reporters who refer to carbon monoxide.
	Yeah, we don't want to fill the atmosphere with carbon monoxide.
	That happens when you have the car running and you shut the garage door.
	And that's fatal.
	But there's a big difference between carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, but they don't even make the distinction.
	And since it's so confusing to these reporters and politicians, they just say carbon.
	Especially because, you know, we get carbon on our hands, it's black, it's soot or something like that.
	Oh, we've got to get rid of all that stuff.
	The World Economic Forum's net-zero collectivism agenda is doomed without the constant fear-mongering of a so-called climate crisis.
	So this is key, folks.
	The saturation hypothesis is complex, but in simple terms, it can be described of the example of insulation in the loft of a house, for example.
	After a certain point, doubling the insulation that you put up in the roof...
	It's going to have little effect since most of the heat trying to escape through the roof has already been trapped.
	That's what they're saying. They're saying, we've got so much insulation in the roof, we don't need to add more stuff.
	And, well, if we do add more stuff, it isn't going to make any difference to our heating bill, right?
	That's what they're saying. It's just that simple.
	And that's one of the reasons why, perhaps, if they're right, sounds like they are.
	Because we have not seen a correlation between additional CO2 and any warming.
	Just like you would not see any benefit in terms of insulation if you add it past a certain point.
	Carbon dioxide traps heat only within narrow bands of the infrared spectrum.
	Levels of the gas have been up to 20 times higher in the past without any sign of runaway global warming.
	And they know this because they have gone through and taken ice core samples and looked at geological records and things like that.
	They know that we've had 20 times the amount of CO2 that we do right now.
	And the planet did not boil.
	And so these people don't want you to know that.
	And they cherry-picked... Their temperature, and that's the other part of it.
	You know, you look at all of the ghost weather stations that they got places where they've just shut them down.
	You know, they're not worried about this stuff, or they'd be putting more of these stations up.
	But they don't have a historical record.
	They don't have an accurate current record for this stuff.
	They've changed where and how they're taking the temperature measurements, and they don't have that much anyway.
	People were not keeping temperature records all over the planet for more than about a century or so.
	Many other scientists are attracted to this saturation hypothesis because it provides a more plausible explanation to fit what we see in the climate.
	Last year, three scientists led by atmospheric professor Yi Huang of McGill University stated, quote, Transmission in the CO2 band center is unchanged by increased CO2 as the absorption is already saturated.
	Despite over 50 years of trying, climate modelers and scientists in the anthropogenic camp, that means man-made climate change camp, are no near putting a temperature rise on doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere.
	Estimates from a half a degree centigrade up to about six degrees centigrade.
	Well, that would tell you that they really don't know, right?
	If it varies by a factor of 12, they have absolutely no idea.
	These models are all over the place.
	With some outliers as high as 10 degrees C. So, again, varies by a factor of 20, not 12.
	As little more than guesses.
	And yet they form the scientific bedrock.
	You know, keep hearing there's a scientific consensus.
	Is there? You've got models that say that it's going to cause the temperature to go up by half a degree centigrade, and you've got some models that say 10 degrees centigrade.
	Do you have a scientific consensus?
	No, you don't. It's not even close.
	And by the way, science is not decided by consensus.
	Science always advances when somebody questions the consensus.
	The figures are too wild, too imprecise to make any reasonable scientific predictions.
	But that's not what they're trying to do.
	They're trying to push fear, just like with the bird flu.
	So the Polish authors of this thing are concerned, they said, about the recent push to rely on modeling, computer modeling, and to rely on assumptions about CO2's capacity to drive changes in global temperatures rather than observational evidence.
	That's real science.
	You know, we're getting rid of doing real science.
	And this is happening in the drugs as well.
	You know, they talk about in vitro.
	That means in the glass Petri dish, right?
	And so they can do experiments in vitro.
	You know, so you can have in vitro fertilization or you can have, you can take some bacteria or something and you can put silver in.
	In the glass vial.
	And you can see it dies. And people say, yeah, but does that work when the bacteria is in your body and you ingest silver?
	Something like that. So, to test that, you do a different test in the person.
	And now they've got...
	They just go to models.
	It's like, well, I don't really care about, you know, testing my hypothesis in glass or in the body.
	I will just do it...
	You know, instead of doing it in the glass, instead of doing it in the living thing, I will do it in a computer model, and they call that in silica.
	And so I'll test it in silicon.
	And they're doing that with drugs now.
	And that's what they're doing with their climate modeling.
	They're just doing it in silicon.
	So they have certain assumptions about how things work.
	And we go back to that simulation that Fauci and Birx apparently gave Trump.
	And he said, well, two very smart people gave this to me and this is what's going to happen.
	Well, they didn't have, as part of their assumption, they didn't have the, they didn't have Farr's curve, the curve that we're going to flatten.
	There wasn't a curve. So they had a false assumption, and then they had a bad implementation of it.
	And that's what you wind up with.
	So they rely on modeling and they rely on assumptions.
	And sometimes the assumptions are false, like it was with that Imperial College of London assumption about COVID, which was not a pandemic even at that time.
	So they do that instead of observational evidence.
	And that's what real science is.
	That's why I've said for a long time, we look at the American Meteorological Society, they will have people come in and do their weather prediction.
	Here's the factors that we're looking at.
	Here's how we think they're going to interplay with each other.
	So this is our model. And then we went out and we did observations.
	Were we able to predict what was going to happen with the weather?
	And so everybody was doing that, trying to get better and better, but they were able to do observational evidence.
	These people know.
	But now we can do observational evidence of their stuff.
	We can now see that they were lying to us because we're 50 years out, 54 years out from this stuff.
	And we know these people are lying about everything.
	Everything failed.
	So, this unequivocally suggests the officially presented impact of anthropogenic CO2 increase on the Earth's climate is merely a hypothesis rather than a substantiated fact.
	It's a hypothesis that's been proven false.
	Just like the COVID MacGuffin.
	Emeritus Professor William Happer of Princeton is another leading proponent of the saturation hypothesis.
	Remember I played the clip for you the other day of a movie, Climate the Movie?
	I had several people comment and say it's an excellent film.
	I haven't seen the whole movie yet.
	It's an excellent trailer.
	Martin Durkin did climate the movie and Happer, Professor William Happer of Princeton, was featured in it.
	In the film, he responds to current quote-unquote science that enforces the World Economic Forum's net zero agenda.
	In the film, he said he could live with the descriptive suggestion of hoax.
	Although he preferred the word scam.
	Well, I could live with hoax, but I think it's more of a scam.
	In the 2022 Nobel Physics Laureate, Dr.
	John Clouser, blasted the climate narrative in no uncertain terms.
	He said, I assert there is no connection whatsoever between climate change and CO2. It's all a crock of crap, in my opinion.
	Okay, so hoax, scam, crock of crap.
	It's pure Bolshevik, because they're using it for Marx's reasons, isn't it?
	So, Clouser...
	He's highly respected.
	I mean, he just won the Nobel Prize in Physics, a modern science giant.
	He has also signed a declaration asserting what he just said about these climate predictions.
	He joined over 1,600 scientists from around the world, including another Nobel Prize winner, by signing a declaration stating that claims of a, quote, climate emergency, unquote, are a hoax.
	The massive group of scientists signed the World Climate Declaration, which declares there is no climate emergency.
	It says climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific.
	I like that. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming.
	It says, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of the policy measures.
	Wouldn't that have been nice during COVID, for example?
	What are the real costs of your lockdowns and business closures and face masks and your remdesivir and your ventilators and all the rest of this stuff?
	Versus your imagined benefits.
	They stress there is no statistical evidence to support these claims.
	There is no climate emergency.
	Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm, say the scientists.
	We strongly oppose a harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.
	During a separate speech, Clauser warned the public that the climate crisis narrative being pushed by the global elite and their allies in the corporate media is a hoax.
	He was also awarded the 2010 Wolf Prize in Physics, the second most prestigious physics award after the Nobel Prize, and he's won both of them.
	And he warns that fear-mongering climate science is nothing more than, listen to this, quote, massive shock journalistic pseudoscience, unquote.
	He said, the popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world's economy and the well-being of billions of people.
	This is why people like Bill Gates wants to push the essentials of 2 plus 2 equals 5.
	That's why he wants to say that math is racist and he's got all these other things to dumb people down.
	They deliberately want to dumb people down.
	They want to say that math is racist, that science is racist, and so forth.
	They don't want any critical thinking whatsoever.
	And that is going to be even more destructive than what they're doing to destroy our society, our energy infrastructure, our transportation, our food, everything.
	We won't be able to rebuild it, quite frankly, if they're successful.
	And of course, it threatens to rob each and every one of us for the benefit of the few.
	In turn, he says, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills.
	It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business, marketing agencies, politicians, journalists, government agencies and environmentalists.
	In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis.
	Could they be any more adamant about this and specific about it?
	I don't think so. Well, I've got a lot of people left comments here, so let me get to some of these here.
	Unrumble, B. Slice, thank you very much, and writes, I still don't trust Malone or McCullough for that matter.
	He still prescribes drugs made by Pfizer.
	I didn't know that. Also, check out Shannon Joy.
	She detests Trump for all the right reasons.
	And thanks, Faye. Well, thank you.
	And I was on Shannon Joy's program once.
	I need to talk to her more.
	Get her on my program, I think.
	But yeah, you know...
	Malone and McCullough were late to it, and the way I look at that, I think they've both done some good work, but we have to look at the totality of it.
	I don't know if they're still prescribing some of this stuff, but they were slow to get to that point because that was not their area of expertise, and there was so much interference with the information that was put out there.
	Again, since this was political and not medical, Somebody who's watching politics is going to see it sooner.
	I was able to see it sooner because I've been watching things like Dark Winter and stuff like that.
	I've been watching the shenanigans of the CIA for a long time, and so it was pretty obvious where this thing was going.
	But for somebody who hadn't been looking at the germ games, it'd take them a while to really catch on to what's going on because they hide all that stuff.
	On Rumble, for love of the road, good to see you there.
	Thanks for the support, and thank you for that tip.
	I appreciate that. He puts up the show on Telegram.
	I've never been able to get everything together to kind of scope out Telegram, but he's been putting up our program on Telegram, so I really do appreciate that.
	Thank you. And he says, Thanks, Superfae.
	The new commercial sounds great.
	You need Trump and Biden ads to go with Fauci and Lala.
	If you know how to rate the Roku app, please let us know.
	He says he's tried it on TV and on the phone.
	I don't see how. Well, thank you.
	I'll have to take a look. I don't have Roku.
	So I'll have to take a look at that.
	It's like... There's so many different platforms out there.
	We'll try to find out what's going on with it, and I'll let you know.
	But thank you for the support.
	NeuroDivergent on Rumble, thank you for the tip.
	Says, thanks Superfae for consistently stepping up to support the Knights.
	Yes. And the broadcast, prayers for you and the family, David, and for your health.
	Thank you very much. Steve Swan, thank you on Rockfin.
	Wayne Wonder, thank you.
	Rockfin, Jessica Morrow, thank you.
	And she says, thank you, David, for your continued effort in the spiritual battle.
	May God continue to bless tonight, family.
	Well, thank you. Sean E. on Rockfin.
	Thank you. And Jason Barker writes, David should have a panel of people in the background answering phones like the old telephones.
	We can make those typewriter noises in the background, so they're very, very busy.
	And get some walla walla, as they call the crowd murmuring.
	There we go. Travis has got it right there.
	Operators are standing by, folks.
	I was going to say, that's my great aunt, Froze99.
	Oh, we got Kramer.
	That's even better. Except he'll probably make everybody angry and then hang up on him, right?
	Rockfin, Liberty Mama, thank you for the tip.
	I'm sending 500 via Zelle so Rockfin doesn't take a cut.
	We need to fill up the tank.
	Thank you so much for doing that.
	Wow, that is amazing.
	And, you know, that is a thing, you know, Zelle doesn't have any fees.
	And so that is a big advantage.
	I don't mention it too much because I just, you know, whatever is most convenient for people.
	I know a lot of people, their bank doesn't operate with Zelle.
	But if it does, that is the one place between that and checks where there's no fees involved.
	So, I really do thank you for that.
	We're gonna take a quick break and we will be right back
	Music playing...
	You're listening to the David Knight Show Elvis Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles!
	And the sweet sounds of Motown And Karen just handed this to me.
	She got off the phone with Zelle.
	She's not doing that. But she did see it on Zelle.
	Scott L. and Baby Bear, thank you very much for the tips on Zelle.
	Before we run out of time, I want to talk a little bit about what is going on with the obsession of the Democrats to sterilize, to groom, to mutilate our children.
	It just truly is amazing.
	And a lot of pushback, angry pushback from mainstream media about the fact that Tennessee lawmakers have just okayed a bill to criminalize adults who help minors.
	This is the way AP puts it, to help minors receive gender affirming care.
	No, what they did is they criminalized the grooming, sterilization, and mutilization of children against their parents' wishes without their knowledge as well.
	But the bill mirrors almost the same language they said from a so-called anti-abortion trafficking proposal.
	So they hate that.
	That's AP. AP violated its own speech rules.
	They're not supposed to say...
	Well, they do.
	Anti-abortion rights, right?
	They won't call it pro-life proposal.
	And to say that it's so-called...
	Anti-abortion, they're fine with that.
	They don't like to use the word trafficking because, you know, it's got a negative connotation, rightfully so, but it is true.
	Tennessee Republican lawmakers approved that just a day prior.
	In that version, supporters are hoping to stop adults from helping young children obtain abortions without permission from their parents or guardians.
	Isn't that evil? Why would the evil Tennessee legislature, why would they...
	Why would they prohibit strangers who don't know or love the kids as well to do something that's going to be very harmful for them?
	And of course, trafficking and things like that are appropriate because Planned Parenthood and these other organizations, even when it's a minor, if a minor is pregnant, that is statutory rape.
	We've always understood in our law that under a certain age, minors really cannot consent because they don't have fully developed judgment.
	That's why children don't have rights.
	Parents have rights.
	Minors can't consent to certain things.
	They can't drive cars.
	They can't have guns and all this stuff because they're not mature enough.
	How do we get away from that?
	Unbelievable how insane this is.
	And so, speaking about it, Republican Representative Brian Ritchie, the sponsor of the bill, co-sponsor of the bill, said, this is a parents' rights bill.
	Parents' rights bill.
	Nothing more, nothing less.
	And of course, the idea of children's rights is another one of these UN things.
	To destroy the family. And this goes back...
	Well, I was doing commercials about it 15 years ago for the parental rights amendment group.
	But the UN wanted to emphasize children's rights because they want to be able to directly work with kids.
	Without parents around.
	That's the type of thing that abusers do.
	Don't tell your parents, right?
	That type of thing. But that's where this is coming from.
	It's coming from the U.N. The U.S. never signed on to the U.N. Convention for the Rights of the Child.
	And yet, you have all of these different institutions have been acting as if we had.
	The same way they do with the Paris Climate Accord.
	Nobody ever pretended that there was a de facto...
	Signing of that treaty, but they have always acted that way, judges and courts and others.
	And so who's on the opposite side of parental rights?
	This group called Human Rights Campaign.
	Always pushing the LGBT stuff.
	Always opposed to parents.
	Why? Because they're pedophiles who want to mutilate children.
	If they can't kill them, Planned Parenthood wants to take part and profit from their mutilization.
	And so these people, to try to cut the parents out of the equation, classic pedophilia.
	DeSantis is vowing to defy these new Title IX rules coming from the Biden administration.
	The Democrat pedos is what really characterizes them.
	Bribery with federal funds that are there.
	New language from the Biden administration reconfiguring the Title IX to protect students on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity.
	They've removed sex and they've put in gender.
	And so what is going to happen with this?
	It's all about the money.
	This is why I said to everybody, what is so important about what Trump did with that emergency order on Friday the 13th was to release the funds.
	This is the way they entice people to do what they want to do, and it's the way they punish people.
	They bribe and they blackmail.
	The carrot and the stick.
	And anybody that understands anything about government knows that's how they all operate.
	And so governors do it.
	To local jurisdictions, well, we'll give you some state funds if you do this, or we'll take the state funds away if you don't do that.
	And the people who don't know anything about politics, who are into this cult of celebrity worship, like the Trump MAGA cult, they don't understand how this works, and they still don't see it.
	And they will argue with you endlessly about it.
	But there is no argument.
	And I even used this very example.
	I said, do you understand how this works? When Obama wanted boys in the girls' bathroom and the girls' shower, he used the power of the purse.
	All these different jurisdictions had already gotten addicted to the money, and so he decided, well, I'm going to pull it back.
	So what's going to happen, I think, is that DeSantis and other people are going to have to understand that we're not going to be blackmailed with our own money.
	And they're going to have to find another way to fund their schools without relying on federal funds.
	Or they'll have to do what these people tell them to do if they want the money.
	That's what they're going to do to them.
	So locker rooms, bathrooms at schools that accept public funding are about to become dangerous places for women.
	This is one of the reasons why I don't support charter schools.
	They're going to tie all of this stuff.
	It's always tied to the money.
	The money and the strings that come with it.
	And by the way, who would have ever thought That the sniffer would do something like this.
	This is what Democrats always do.
	It defines them.
	So beginning in August is when they're going to run this thing out.
	Takes effect August 1st for the next school year.
	Teachers can be accused of discrimination for misgendering students.
	Not using their pronouns.
	And that schools will have to allow biological men who identify as females to use women's bathrooms and locker rooms.
	This is an obsession.
	With these degenerates that we call Democrats.
	Even in states that have passed legislation protecting women's private spaces.
	This is the very purpose of the Department of Education.
	The money. The social engineering.
	Via fiat currency.
	By the way, as we look at this, I probably won't have time to get into the economic issues I was talking about.
	Just real briefly...
	The key thing that I'm seeing in a lot of different places, all these people saying the Federal Reserve is losing its ability to manipulate things because of inflation and massive debt.
	It's like, of course, we've seen this before.
	Anybody that remembers the 70s, they lost their ability to do it.
	The way I refer to it is the Wizard of Oz up in the balloon.
	Wait, wait, come back for me. I don't, I can't, I don't know how it works.
	Inflation got the better of the Wizard of Oz as well.
	And so these wizards who are the wizards of D.C., once they inflate this balloon enough, they can't bring it back.
	They never know where it's going to go either.
	And so central banks all around the world are raising the flag about that.
	But central banks, one thing they can do and they are doing is accumulating gold.
	So maybe you ought to... Learn something about that.
	But if you want to do that, davidknight.gold.
	Tony, who was on yesterday, always a great supporter of the show.
	We really do appreciate his support.
	And if you go davidknight.gold, if you want to accumulate gold or silver, you can do it gradually with a wolf pack there.
	That lets him know that you're coming through us.
	Let me say real quickly here on Rumble, Miss Keoru, thank you very much.
	That's very kind. Marky Mark, New Jersey, thank you.
	Writes, here's something for the tank.
	Thank you. Scrumford, thank you for the tip.
	Have a good weekend, David.
	God bless you and your family.
	On Rumble, it's Plissken, and we thought he was dead.
	Have a great weekend. Thank you so much for all of that.
	Just a little bit more of this.
	Just in case you ever thought that the Democrats like the rule of law and due process, another part of this social engineering thing that's going to kick in, if you're going to take the money, we're going to tell you what you're going to do.
	Beginning in August, also, when the students are accused of sexual assault, they will not have a right to cross-examine their accuser or witness, which is a violation, of course, of the due process rights, but we don't care about that in America anymore, do we?
	And of course, Speaker Johnson doesn't care about that either.
	Warrantless searches. No due process.
	Trump didn't. We'll take the gun and do the due process later.
	Well, then it's not due process.
	Schools are directed to use the much lower standard of a, quote, preponderance of evidence to convict the kids.
	And these are regulations.
	Again, it's not a law.
	It wasn't produced by Congress.
	This was produced by By the Department of Education under Biden, part of the deep state, the bureaucratic state, part of the executive branch.
	It is the Biden administration, just like it was the Trump administration all of that time.
	1,577 pages.
	Again, bigger than a typical Bible.
	It's unbelievable the amount of regulations that are being cranked out by these people who are unaccountable to everyone.
	I remember one of the events that we covered.
	There was a Senate candidate, and there were several of them there.
	It was a party event, and they did have some people there from the Democrat side.
	But there's one guy who was organizing it, and he was going to shred the tax code.
	And so he rented a big paper shredder, and he wanted to feed the tax code through it, but he called the IRS, and they couldn't tell him how many pages the tax code was.
	He kept calling. Nobody knew.
	It's gotten so big they don't know.
	So he just took a guess and did, you know, a couple of dozen or whatever telephone books, and it was pretty impressive.
	One last look. Got here on Flower Sower on Rumble.
	Thank you very much. It says, Thanks Knight, family, and Superfae.
	Thank you so much, all of you, for your support.
	It's very kind. And thank you especially to Superfae, who got this ball going.
	Thank you, all of you. Have a great weekend.
	Thank you again. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
	Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events.
	But if the show is going to stay on the air, we'll need your continued support.
	Sharing the show, subscribing, and even just hitting the like button all help.
	And if you found our show helpful, Please consider donating and becoming a part of a community that values the truth.
	Because independent, listener-funded news, untouched by corporate, globalist agendas, is extremely important to our liberties.
	And I wanted to just jump in here and thank Edward B. Anzell, who sent a big donation.
	Thank you so much. I appreciate that.

▲