As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 12th of March, Year of Our Lord, 2024.
Today we're going to begin by taking a look at the aftermath of the drugs, the pharmaceuticals.
And I know we've covered this a great deal, but there's new information coming out.
As well as the Swamp King.
We keep getting, almost on a daily basis, more indications that Trump is for sale.
The King of the Swamp.
Who would have thunk it, right?
We got the butler talking about it now.
The butler did not do it.
The butler talked about what was happening at the...
Trump's parties.
But even Steve Bannon says he got bought off on TikTok.
And Vivek has weighed in on TikTok as well.
Very interesting. He's flip-flopped on that along with Trump.
Because what we've got here, folks, the MAGA organization, the mob, is turning into a Jacobin mob.
Instead of Robosphere, we've got Donald Trump.
We'll be right back. Yeah, we have this wonderful vaccine that saves so many people's lives.
It's going to cure cancer as well.
Everything. It's a moonshot.
All of this nonsense that was pushed out of people in 2020.
And what we're seeing now here is in New Zealand, they've got people of all ages falling sick.
This is what Handy said yesterday.
He said, I'm just seeing a tremendous increase in people getting sick from all kinds of stuff.
Perhaps this is because of something attacking their immune system, making them vulnerable to all types of things.
And yet, in the New Zealand government, We're good to go.
We look at the lives destroyed.
We look at, you know, everything being set on the shelf, universal basic income being introduced to people, and they liked it.
They liked getting free money.
Who would have thought? The STEMI checks.
I can stay home and get a STEMI check or whatever.
All of this stuff happening, and then the jab coming along, you know, all of the control, the police state, the martial law, we don't need laws anymore, we got orders, the orders coming out of my mouth, Trump, the law, Trump, the Constitution, all the rest of this stuff.
All of that was very important, but it's really the tyranny is as important as this death shot going out there.
Because not everybody took these things.
Much, much higher with the Democrats than it was with the Republicans.
That's why they put Trump in.
So they could get a higher uptake with Republicans.
It would have been even smaller with Republicans.
But... On Friday, the New Zealand government, the health minister, failed to address why these numbers are increasing.
And if you dare to ask or look, that's a crime.
And that is something that has really escalated.
The censorship, this propaganda, and it's going to really escalate in the next couple of years.
They're using artificial intelligence.
It's going to be able to get them to focus on a wide array of people.
Artificial intelligence is going to be the key.
To censorship and propaganda.
Like we've never seen before.
You can't even imagine what this is going to be like very, very quickly.
Close to 20% of the people admitted to the hospital with heart attacks in New Zealand are now under the age of 40.
There you go. You're welcome, Joe.
You're welcome, Joe.
Thanks, Trump. Thank you very much.
So, again, a criminal offense to even ask a question about this.
But, you know, at the very beginning of this, Dr.
Ryan Cole, a pathologist, said, we're going to have a tremendous increase in cancer.
We're going to see cancer advancing much more rapidly, which we have seen.
And he said, and I'm saying this because the vaccine is killing the killer T cells, the killer T cells that are really responsible for keeping cancer under control, but not just cancer.
You know, you kill killer T cells, you're going to be susceptible to a lot of different things.
And, of course, you know, part of that is going to be what they call VAIDS and vaccine-induced AIDS. But when we look at this pro-vax doctor out of South Africa,
43 years old, She was one of the people who was bragging about the COVID vaccines that she got, shaming people who didn't get them.
I'm a doctor. I know better.
You know, like Ben Shapiro's wife.
Dropped dead of a heart attack at 43.
Dr. Vicki Jennings from South Africa.
Internationally recognized trauma surgeon.
The mother of two passed away unexpectedly last week after reportedly suffering a fatal heart attack.
Maybe she didn't get the sugar water that Alex Jones was telling everybody about.
Maybe she got the real Trump shot.
Oh, she must have gotten the Gates shot.
That's it. That's the Gates shot.
Like I said yesterday, you know, this wonderful shot that the MAGA people are talking about?
Did he not tell his MAGA fan club where they could find this shot?
Did we not see where it was manufactured?
The money that was spent for it?
While there's been no official explanation of why a young doctor would drop dead suddenly, many have been pointing to her past social media posts as indication of what led to her heart attack.
She often posted pro-vaccine propaganda, urged people to get the Trump injections.
According to Jennings, raising concerns about the safety of the shot is deadly and disinformation, and we must punish the people who talk about anything like that.
She also posted when she received her own injections, encouraging others to do so.
In one post, she even mocked so-called anti-vaxxers.
You notice they said when she received her own injections, plural.
Got multiple. She said after she got her injection, one of her injections, several.
She said, well, all you anti-vaxxers, I'm waiting to grow my unicorn horn now.
And maybe Bill Gates can start tracking my fascinating life.
Yeah, you just keep laughing about that, right?
No, she's not laughing now.
By the way, doctors can now edit the genes inside of your body.
Sounds like science fiction doesn't know.
Dozens of people have undergone gene editing for, guess what?
Cardiovascular disease.
Problem solution.
This has been the marketing goal of pharmaceuticals for quite some time.
You take a medication for X and it causes Y. It may not fix X, but it causes a new issue.
And so the question is, gene editing for cardiovascular disease, is that to produce the cardiovascular disease or is it to halt the cardiovascular disease?
Maybe it's to help you grow a unicorn horn.
Yeah, who knows? Well, we've got a lot of people compromised in the GOP. Rand Paul is just another one.
This was sent to me by listener Daniel.
And... He said that Del Bigtree, the high wire, just had Senator Rand Paul on their show, and somebody called in and said that their mother had been killed by remdesivir.
And Paul dismisses that person's concerns.
Rand Paul, who got his wife to buy into remdesivir, you know, Gilead Pharmaceutical, people who produce that, Rand Paul, who is pushing so hard for the gain of function, pushing so hard to convince people that the virus was real.
Rand Paul, who said, well, wait a minute, you know, people, I mean, I got exposed to it at CPAC, and you know, a lot of people were at CPAC, and as this was building up, and they were telling people, it was before Trump locked everybody down, but they were saying, oh, this is going around.
And somebody tested positive that was at CPAC, and the left rejoiced.
There was much rejoicing, and they said, well, all these conservatives are going to die now.
Nobody died. Nobody died.
You had several senators who took the PCR test and tested positive and isolated themselves.
And so then Rand Paul said, but I've had it.
I've had it. I don't need to get a vaccine.
And he would argue with Fauci about natural immunity, but of course he wouldn't argue with him about the safety and the efficacy of the vaccine.
He would only go so far.
And then he argued with him about gain-of-function.
But he wouldn't come after remdesivir.
Instead, he had his wife, his wife, buy the stock.
As if we wouldn't notice.
This has always been the goal of these people in Congress.
You know... Sign up for the feeding trough.
By the way, if you want to see, he did about a 16-minute video about this back and forth about Rand Paul defending Ron, death is near.
That's what the nurses called it, remdesivir.
And I talked about it when it came out.
I said this is one of the most shameful things I've seen.
Remdesivir has been pushed by Fauci.
He's got his friends at Gilead.
The government is not being a watchdog about any of this stuff about its safety or efficacy.
Instead, they're pushing it for their friends.
Their patent was about to expire.
Fauci had tried to push Remdesivir for AIDS. Everybody agreed it did nothing.
But it was very dangerous.
It had very bad side effects.
Liver, I think, was the organ that it attacked.
And many times killing people with that.
And so they said, no, it doesn't work for AIDS, but it kills people.
So they tried again with Ebola.
Same thing. Doesn't work, but it kills people.
Then he started pushing it for COVID. And there was a study that went up on the World Health Organization, a study that was done in China, and he said it doesn't work, but it kills people.
That same day, the World Health Organization took down that study.
Less than a week later, Fauci pushed his own study that was not peer-reviewed at all, just his assertion.
Saying, all right, it doesn't cure people.
It's a therapeutic. It's supposed to cure people, right?
All right, it doesn't cure people.
But of the people who survive, they got better 30% faster.
That's never been the measure.
And yet Fauci, by himself, was able to get that stuff purged, put up his study, and then pronounce it the standard of care.
And Rand Paul bought into it, profited from that fraud.
And now he's defending it, evidently, on the high wire.
I just, you know, I don't know.
If you want to see it, the title of the video is on Bitchute.
The channel is Daniel B. And the video is, Rand Paul is a snake in the grass on the scamdemic and is being facilitated by the high wire.
So you just look it up, Rand Paul is a snake in the grass.
You'll probably be able to find that on Bitchute at his channel.
A new bill would strip COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers of liability protection.
I talked about this last week.
This is coming from Chip Roy.
Good for Chip Roy. He's a hero on this.
And we need to applaud. Look, we need to out the people when they do the wrong thing.
Rand Paul has done some good things, but increasingly it shows that he's basically playing footsie with the deep state, with the military-industrial complex.
Who knows? Maybe if he plays his cards well enough, he might be able to take Mitch McConnell's place.
Elon Musk certainly wants him to.
So, you know, you look at what these people are doing, and you praise them when they do the right thing.
You oppose them when they do the wrong thing.
That's what I told Alex about Trump just before the 2016 election.
What are you going to do about, what are we going to do?
He meant, what are we going to do?
What are we going to do if Trump gets elected?
And so we support him when he does the right thing, we oppose him when he does the wrong thing.
He says, walks out.
So, that's what we should be doing.
You know, I have praised Ron Wyden whenever, and he's a, you know, he doesn't like, for some reason, it's a real pet peeve of his, to have this warrantless searches, warrantless searches that are going on by James Clapper, you know, by the Geospatial Intelligence and NSA and all the rest of these people.
He doesn't like that. And he keeps coming back after them on that one issue.
Now on everything else, Ron Wyden, I totally disagree with him.
Hard left. But whenever he does the right thing on that, I'll always congratulate him and praise him on that.
And look, Chip Roy has introduced something that we all ought to be grateful for.
This really does get to the heart of the issue.
Why should these pharmaceutical companies have legal immunity for vaccines?
When there's so many indications that it's doing harm, and yet there's no other product that has that kind of blanket immunity.
None whatsoever. It began in 1986 with the act that was signed by Reagan.
One of the first things that Fauci did was to shepherd that through.
And then in 2005...
Because all this stuff is tied to September 11th, 2001.
Dark winter two months before 9-11.
One week after 9-11, the anthrax attack.
Two months later, the model legislation sent out to the states.
And then in 2005, the PrEP Act, which gave legal immunity not for childhood vaccines...
They gave legal immunity for these pandemic vaccines.
They were laying the foundation for this, prepping it, practicing it for 20 years.
And that was W. W. Bush who did that.
Well, Chip Roy has introduced this bill.
Unfortunately, he's only got 19 co-sponsors.
Folks, that's not even, that's 5% of Congress.
He needs to have more people on board.
So if your legislator is not signed up for this, this is an election year.
Talk to them about it. This was introduced on March the 5th.
Chip Roy would retroactively remove protections from the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, the PREP Act, that George W. Bush put through.
And it says, no federal law may make the manufacture of a COVID-19 vaccine immune from suit or liability or limit the liability of such a manufacturer with respect to claims for loss caused by arising out of, relating to, or resulting from, The administration to or the use of an individual by a COVID-19 vaccine.
So it's very narrowly focused just on COVID-19.
Doesn't include the next, you know, disease X vaccine.
It doesn't go back and hit the childhood vaccine, but it's a start.
It's a start. And a lot of people have been hurt.
Nobody has been compensated for this.
Epoch Times says the PrEP Act currently protects manufacturers and people who administer the vaccines from liability under a 2020 declaration entered by then-Health Secretary Alex Azar during the Trump administration.
The guy from Eli Lilly, the CEO from Eli Lilly that Trump brought in after he got big donations from pharmaceutical companies because he brought in RFK Jr.
to Trump Tower to talk about vaccines.
And that was what came out of it.
You know, Pfizer gave him a million dollars and they got a place, they got to the front of the line when this thing hit.
Joe Biden's administration has since extended that declaration.
That was the declaration that was put in in January, the end of January, by Alex Azar, pharmaceutical CEO of Eli Lilly.
Somebody who had been their top lobbyist before he became their CEO. Very, very political.
And Eli Lilly has always been one of, if not the most political, historically, pharmaceutical companies.
Millions of Americans, said Chip Roy, were forced to take a COVID-19 shot out of fear of losing their livelihoods and under false pretenses.
Many have faced injury from the vaccine, but few have been afforded little recourse.
He said he was introducing the new bill to empower Americans to remove crony federal liability protections for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and to empower injured Americans.
He said the American people deserve justice for the infringement of their personal medical freedom and those medically harmed deserve restitution.
As of January, only 11 people have been compensated.
With the highest payout being $8,961.
Even by the incredibly conservative numbers of the vaccine adverse events reporting system.
As I pointed out yesterday.
Something like 37,000 people killed.
No compensation.
Many, many more than that injured.
And as we've seen...
With a study they said only about 1% of these are being reported.
That was before they started with this COVID-19 thing, really coming after people who reported any issues.
In the same way New Zealand is trying to criminalize anybody reporting any issues.
So he's got, since 5th of March, he's now got 19 co-sponsors.
Call your rep, tell them.
That we've got to do something about this.
And once we get something done about this, then we need to go for the 1986 Act.
And they're already coming back really strongly.
Trying to push fear about measles.
And, you know, when we look at what is happening with the pharmakia, I talk about that many times, you know, the word pharmakia, which is where we get pharmaceutical, it means drugs, translated in the Bible as sorcery.
Because it was so common for people to use hallucinogenic drugs as part of pagan religions.
And now, these big corporations, That have many of them tied in one way or the other to this pandemic, to the pharmaceutical industries.
The pharmakia people, as it says in Revelations, they repented.
The pharmakia did. The great men did not repent of their murders.
They're not repenting of their murders, are they?
They're bragging about it.
Trump is bragging about it.
So now they're focusing on magic mushrooms.
And it's not just Janet Yellen who's doing magic mushrooms.
She had big doses of them.
She went into China and she just could not stop bowing to President Xi there.
But now you've got people saying that CEOs are paying big bucks to get coached on how to use these things.
Helping business people try to optimize their performance by using hallucinogenic drugs.
Folks, we're descending into real darkness here in this country.
You know, we look at the people at the top, thoroughly into all of this Marxism, this DEI, this racism of critical race theory and all the rest of this stuff.
Waging war against the family in so many different ways.
And now, we're going to go directly into hallucinogenics.
Psychedelics can help with a kind of divergent creative thinking.
That's more required now, says Paul Austin, a 33-year-old micro-dosing coach and founder of The Third Wave, which offers courses costing as much as $14,000 to get you certified as a psychedelic guide, a spirit guide, if you will.
And so now we've got artificial intelligence that's out there hallucinating.
And we add to that our CEOs.
We want to get them hallucinating as well, just like artificial intelligence.
Society is absolutely imploding, isn't it?
We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
We're going to talk about how...
Is Benedict Donald, is he tapping into all these different sources of getting payola here?
Certainly looks like it.
But before we do, we're going to talk about the pushback that is still happening.
With his statement after the State of the Union.
You've got a lot of people out there sent me Alex Jones responding.
I don't know when he did it.
I don't know if he did it on Friday or if he did it yesterday or sometime over the weekend.
But now Alex Jones even is trying to put some space between him and Trump.
Because this is a very, very damning admission.
We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles...
The Cars and Huey Lewis and the News.
You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
You can download the app from the link in the description.
Download the app from the link in the description.
you You're listening to The David Knight Show.
It'd be a good thing to have.
It's always a good thing, especially when you've got more than two candidates.
If you've got two candidates, they can just portray the other guy as Satan himself, the greater evil, and everybody will go with that, and they won't talk about any issues.
RFK Jr. would talk about some of these issues.
I'm not supporting him. I, you know, have not.
I've seen a lot of things that he's done that are very, very questionable.
And, of course, when you look at all three of them, All three of them have questionable financial dealings to the extreme.
They have questionable backgrounds in their sex lives and all the rest of this stuff.
People, when I was, you know, mid-20th century, when I was growing up, we certainly didn't have saints as president, but they would try to hide it.
And they did it pretty successfully.
You know, if you had FDR, you had Eisenhower, even Kennedy when it was happening, JFK, they were kind of hiding what they were doing.
These guys put it right out in front of your face.
And it's really a condemnation for our society, isn't it, that we don't care.
We don't care anymore. It was Bill Clinton who really helped to normalize it, but it's just the downward slide of society.
Brought about by Hollywood, by schools, and the rest of this stuff.
And it's a curse on America that we don't want people of good character.
But when it comes to some of these issues, at least he would force them to talk about some of these issues.
But there's not a chance. They will never let him in the debates, if they even have a debate.
Between Trump and Biden.
They won't let anybody else in.
And that will be true even if he is on the ballot in all 50 states.
We've seen that over and over again in the Libertarian Party.
They know how to get on the ballot in all 50 states.
And they're consistently kept out of debates, consistently kept out of debates at the state level.
When they jump through more hoops than the Republicans and Democrats.
They hold the places open.
Even, I've seen it, and I've talked about this in the past, even when You had a Republican candidate miss the deadline.
Republicans didn't file to run a candidate.
They were just going to let it go unopposed.
A Libertarian went through all the rigmarole, extra rigmarole that the Republicans, Democrats didn't have to do.
Got on the ballot. They did not want to have a two-way race between a Democrat and a Libertarian.
So they wanted to put a Republican on.
And it was well past the deadline.
And so they went to court over it.
And the judge said, well, it would not be in our best interest not to have a Republican on the ballot.
But they'll fight tooth and nail to keep anybody else off.
Third parties are independents.
But anyway, what did he say about this?
Again, when we look at what Trump posted on his State of the Union, this is what he put up.
The pandemic no longer controls our lives.
It was never the pandemic who was not controlling our lives.
It was Trump. It was Trump who controlled our life using the pandemic as an excuse.
The vaccines that saved us from COVID. They didn't save anybody from COVID. They have zero efficacy.
It was all a lie.
All a lie. Are now being used to help beat cancer.
No, to cause cancer. Everything that Trump says is a lie.
And it's the polar opposite of the truth.
Turning setback into comeback.
You know, you're turning your depopulation shut.
Your death by government democide, you're turning that into something that has saved us all.
So typical, Trump. And then all uppercase, you're welcome, Joe.
Nine-month approval time versus 12 years that it would have taken.
And so, RFK Jr.
replies to that. He said, Trump clearly hasn't learned from his COVID-era mistakes.
Should have put in there E-R-R-O-R. He fails to recognize how ineffective his warp speed vaccine is as the ninth shot is being recommended to seniors.
I talked about that last week as well.
Number nine, number nine, it's medication time and the asylum for the crazy people because crazy people are the ones who keep trying the same thing and expect different results.
Even more troubling is the documented harm being caused by the shot to so many innocent children and adults who are suffering myocarditis, pericarditis, brain inflammation, said RFK. Somebody should ask Trump.
Somebody should ask these MAGA apologists.
Why is it that we're testing kids, giving them heart tests and EKGs before we let them play sports now?
We never did that before, but bingo, just like autism.
Well, now, you know, we want to support these kids, and it's a really good thing that we're doing these heart tests.
It's like, why was it never needed before?
Why do we never have young kids suddenly dropping dead?
Why is that? So he goes on to say, RFK Jr., this has been confirmed by a CDC-funded study of 99 million people.
Instead of bragging about its speedy approval...
We should be honestly and transparently debating the abundant evidence that this vaccine has caused more harm than good.
I look forward to debating both Trump and Biden on September 16th in San Marcos, Texas.
Ain't gonna happen.
It will not happen.
It would be good if it did.
You know, I always like to see debate, but not gonna happen.
Trump's defense of Operation Warp Speed, the program he rolled out in May 2020 to spur the development and distribution of vaccines amid the pandemic, remains a sticking point for some of his supporters, writes the Epoch Times.
And so, they're right.
A lot of his supporters don't care.
They care about the vaccine, but they don't care about Trump bragging about it.
You got people like Tom Ritz who's like, ooh, I'm making a little career here out of criticizing the vaccine, but I'm doing it at the Reawakened Tour, and I've got to figure out how I'm going to thread this needle.
Operation Warp Speed featured a partnership between the government, military, and private sector, with the government paying for millions of vaccine doses to be produced, says Epoch Times.
Here's a question, folks, like I said yesterday.
Why didn't he pay for ivermectin and HCQ? They love to tell you.
Oh, he told us he mentioned those words out there.
He mentioned them so Fauci would slap him down.
He mentioned them in a way to make it look ridiculous.
And he did nothing. You know, what would it cost billions of dollars for him to mass-produce ivermectin and HCQ? And to give them away for free.
Instead, he let Fauci and the CDC and the FDA demonize the stuff that had been used for decades.
It was now past its patented time frame, so it was cheap to produce.
He could have produced it.
He didn't, but he didn't.
He got an entire factory and turned it over to Johnson& Johnson to get them into the vaccine business.
Bought an entire factory for them.
Billions of dollars to these companies.
Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson& Johnson.
Billions of dollars to them.
Then delivered it for free.
He wouldn't do that for ivermectin or HCQ, would he?
Trump said about the vaccines in an interview in March of 2021, it works incredibly well.
95%, maybe even more than that.
He's just making these numbers up.
Just like Pfizer and Moderna did.
And Russia, right?
All three of them. First week.
No, it's 90% effective.
We are 92, 3% effective.
Next week, Moderna, 94% effective, right?
No, it's 94.5%.
We're going to redo our numbers, said Pfizer.
And they just made it. Then they got it up to 100.
And then we watched this thing fall.
Somebody even put together a video.
Using, you know, the music in the Hall of the Mountain King by Pierre Gint.
And you just see the, you know, the numbers falling in the headlines.
It goes up to 100%, then drops down until it gets to 0%.
It doesn't work at all. And yet he's still saying that.
He said, but we have our freedoms, and we have to live by that, and I agree with that.
It's a great vaccine. It's a safe vaccine.
It's something that works. You should take it.
A lot of people who voted for me, frankly, don't like it, but he keeps talking.
On many occasions, President Trump has said he's not in favor of vaccine mandates, and he's lying about that as well.
And again, you can remember the date, December 7th, a day that will live in infamy, 1941, and then 2020.
The sneak attack at Pearl Harbor that FDR knew about.
And then the executive order to mandate vaccines in the military as soon as the FDA waved their hands and said this is approved.
And we know when that happened. That was in September under Biden.
But it would have been done under Trump as well.
He signed that executive order December 7th to do exactly what Biden did.
As soon as the FDA waved their hand and waved it in.
Kennedy told podcaster Joe Rogan that ivermectin was suppressed by the FDA. Well, that's putting it mildly.
So the vaccines could be granted emergency use authorization.
Well, that was a key thing from the very beginning.
The MacGuffin. You've got to have one approach.
One thing, right? We're all going to die from climate change.
There's only one thing that you can do.
You can have a car that gets charged off of the power grid.
And then they start shutting down the power plants as well.
Can't have an electric car that is going to run off of hydrogen, for example.
Can't have hybrids.
Can't have anything. No, you've got to have that battery electric vehicle that operates off the grid.
When they do that, when they get real authoritarian, they start banning stuff all over the place except for one thing.
Well, you know, you're in MacGuffin territory here.
You know, they're just using this...
To get what they've already decided.
Pretending to have a problem and they've got this one solution they're going to allow.
I would argue, Kennedy said, that the science is very clear right now that the vaccines cause a lot more problems than they averted.
And if you look at the countries that did not vaccinate, they have the lowest death rates, they have the lowest COVID and infection rates.
And we knew this all along.
And we knew this before Trump left office.
We knew the vaccines were killing people.
And by January, we already had data in various places showing that people were dying from this stuff right away.
He said Trump vowed to drain the swamp.
RFK Jr. said, well, I think he was earnest about that.
I don't. He was selling positions.
That's how he wound up with such a horrible cabinet.
He was selling positions from the very beginning.
He said he got John Bolton.
He said this guy is the very template of a swamp creature.
Scott Gottlieb, he said, who President Trump picked to run the FDA. He was Pfizer's business partner and he returned to Pfizer.
He returned from where he came.
He's a dog returning to his vomit.
Pfizer. A Pfizer dog.
Fetch. Here, go fetch Trump for us and come back, okay, with billions of dollars.
And that's what he did. But, you know, he also, the successor in the Trump administration to Scott Gottlieb was Stephen Hahn.
He went to work essentially for Moderna.
He went to work for the venture capital firm that created and financed Moderna for 10 years without a product until Warp Speed came around.
Kennedy said Trump had more lobbyists running federal agencies than any other president in U.S. history.
That's right. Including the guy that he's just now picked.
To be the co-chair of the RNC. We'll talk about that in a moment.
Trump knew that the lockdowns were wrong, he said, but he agreed to do them anyway.
He knew that hydroxychloroquine worked, but he was rolled over by these people.
No, he was bought. He was bought by Big Pharma, just like Fox and Tucker Carlson were bought by Big Pharma.
And then there's, in this epic times story, there's a couple of interviews, men on the street, or people who have organizations.
This is Mary Jo Perry, who's president of Mississippi Parents for Vaccine Rights, a longtime advocate for vaccine choice, and a Trump supporter.
She advocates for medical freedom.
And she said she thinks this is going to be an issue that could decide the presidency.
She believes that Kennedy is pulling votes from Trump because of that.
She said people care about medical freedom.
It's an important issue here in Mississippi and across the country.
Trump should admit that he was wrong about Operation Warp Speed and that COVID vaccines have been dangerous.
That would make a difference among people that he has offended.
But he won't. You've got all of these people.
Wayne Allen Root, Alex Jones, many, many of them saying, stop talking about it.
Don't you realize people hate that?
They understand what this vaccine's doing.
Stop taking credit for it.
But he does. He continues to do it.
And then you have, like, Luke Radowski on with Tim Pool.
He says, why can't he just say it was wrong?
And, you know, we're not going to do this again.
Because he was setting a precedent.
He was setting a precedent.
They were setting a precedent for universal basic income.
They were setting a precedent to lock us down anytime they wanted.
Just like they started doing lockdowns in schools after I got out.
I think it's probably in the 90s they started doing that.
I've been out of it a long time.
But yeah, we just call lockdown anytime we want.
It's normal now. Lockdown.
Okay, everybody knows the procedures.
Like we used to have fire drills.
They have lockdowns.
And that's what they wanted to normalize.
That's why he's not going to apologize.
He was the one preparing the way.
He's not John the Baptist.
He's the Antichrist.
He's preparing the way for the Antichrist.
That's what he's doing. From the very beginning of this stuff.
He's not going to apologize. Then you've got Tim Pool saying, just shut up.
I'm so tired of hearing about that.
Trump did a thing four years ago.
Tim Pool and people like him Trump sycophants, Trump suckers sucking on Trump.
They'll talk endlessly about the election.
They don't want to talk about anything else that Trump did in 2020.
Poor Trump. So he's not going to admit that he was wrong.
An Ohio Republican strategist, Wes Farnow, said, well, the positives of a Trump presidency far outweigh the negatives.
People are more concerned about their wallet and the economy.
Do they realize the connection between the lockdown and the economy?
Do they realize the connection between the lockdown and the massive explosion in debt?
No. Do they realize that Trump was saying that Main Street is not a central?
Where do you fit in this new economy of the globalists and Trump?
Where do you fit in that?
Well, you're not a stakeholder.
You're not essential. What are you supporting these people for?
You better get busy at the state level.
This is why I say this.
But what about Biden?
It's like, forget about both of them.
Forget about both of them.
Start working on things that are real.
They're an illusion to keep you from accomplishing anything.
And it might be that it just turns out that the economy is stupid.
People didn't care about Bill Clinton and his lack of moral character.
They didn't care about that. The economy is good.
Well, the economy is not good now.
And the economy was not good under Trump.
I mean, immediately, when he locked everything down, we had unemployment rates that jumped up above the highest point they ever got during the Great Depression.
And it took years for them to reach that.
It didn't happen right away. The stock market crashed in 1929.
It took a couple of years for the unemployment rates to get up to what he instantaneously did with his lockdown.
Absolutely insane. That anybody would do that and get away with it.
But it was a bipartisan thing.
All the Republicans were with him.
All the Democrats were with him.
That's why they're getting away with this.
Krista Cobb, 40-year-old mother in Western Ohio, voted for Trump in 2020, said she would cast her vote for him this November.
But she was stunned when she saw his response to Biden about the COVID vaccine.
I love President Trump and I support his policies.
But at this point, he has to know they, his advisors and health officials, lied about the shot.
They lied? They deceived him?
Does he not know? He's got to know by now, these people.
See, this is part of the QAnon stuff.
He didn't know. All those people that he hired.
He didn't know they were bad people.
He didn't know they were lying to him. He couldn't figure it out.
I figured it out. You know, Catherine Austin Fitz went after Greg Hunter that way.
He said, come on, Greg. We all knew.
How could he not know?
He knew. And if you think he didn't know, you want to get Forrest Trump for president?
Run, Forrest, run.
Oh, we love that guy.
He's boneheaded stupid, but we love him.
What's he going to get done?
If he was totally manhandled, The biggest failure of this country in my lifetime.
Why would you want him?
Like I said before, he's either a fool or a tool.
Take your pick. Either one disqualifies him.
She said if he continues to promote it, especially after all the hearings that they've had in Congress, the side effects, the cover-ups on Capitol Hill, at what point does he become the same as people who have lied?
Well, the question for Ms.
Cobb, the 40-year-old that they interviewed, the question for her is, at what point do you give up on this guy?
Well, you know, one more time, one more time, and we're done.
I think he should distance himself from talking about Operation Warfare, even admit that he was wrong.
So she's where all these pundits have been now.
Except that they're still backing him up.
And she will still back him up.
Especially when they get close to, well, I don't know, I really don't like what you do, but, you know, there's Biden.
So, she said, if he would do that, people would respect him.
And I guess the question is, you know, not even, do you respect Trump?
Why do you respect Trump for this, if he was used?
Why do you respect people like Bill Mitchell I talked about last week?
Clearly Trump rushed the vaccine through to save lives.
He took the advice of people like Fauci that he'd be safe and effective.
I mean, Fauci at the time was a respected leader in the medical community.
Not at the end of 2020, he had his people yelling at him, get him out of there.
In hindsight, it was a mistake.
But what is Trump supposed to do now?
Admit it was a mistake? Take personal blame for the vaccine deaths?
Trump has no choice but to defend his decision.
Yeah, because he's a narcissist.
Because he's a corrupt, bought-off politician, Bill.
And so are you, if you're pushing this stuff.
Or, you know, take a look at, like I said, Alex Jones talked about this.
Let's see, where is the thing here with Alex?
So vaccines didn't save us from COVID, didn't save lives, erasure immune systems, and he says are now being used to help beat cancer.
If I see any more of this from Trump, any more of this.
Oh yeah. Oh yeah.
Don't do it again. How many times has Alex said this?
I cannot put my head down on the pillow at night and say that I'm a true person to everybody.
You're a liar. You lied to people when it was happening, Alex.
You're still lying to them.
And you sleep perfectly well.
That's why Trump is taking control of the process saying he's going to have an early vaccine from a company that doesn't make one that is so dangerous or that doesn't change our DNA. And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing, but I understand what he's doing.
And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing.
And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing.
Gates goes, trust my vaccine, but don't trust the CDC's vaccine.
And then I went and looked up the ones that Trump's looking at.
They're very weak, attenuated, classic virus.
Liar. Liar. And so, yeah, Trump's looking at...
They're mRNA. They're not weak.
They're not attenuated. A little bit of an attenuated, you know, microwaved or radiated...
Nope. That's not what it is, and you knew it.
COVID deal? Absolutely. You knew it.
Full-blown liar.
Oh, yeah, he does it one more time.
You know, this is like parenting advice.
Kids, don't make me come down there.
You do that one more time, I'm going to come down there.
Guess what? They're going to keep doing it until you come down there.
Don't make empty threats like that.
It only makes children and presidents worse when you do stuff like that.
You have consequences when they do the wrong thing.
Survey shows declining concerns among Americans about COVID-19.
So I guess maybe it will be the economy, stupid.
We don't care anymore. It's all done.
I'm so happy that I don't have to wear a mask anymore.
I'm not to social distance like Trump made me do.
I'm so glad we're not locked down, that I have permission from the government to live my life.
Isn't life wonderful?
I hope they don't do it again.
But of course he will.
Because it was about setting that precedent.
Only 10% of Americans are concerned that they'll catch the disease and require hospitalization.
Kind of the opposite. I guess there's only about 10% that that's what they want us to believe.
But actually, it turns out that as many as two-thirds of Americans viewed COVID-19 as a major threat to public health in the summer and fall of 2020.
Guess what? A third of us did not.
30%. Not 10%, 30%.
That's enough to really change things, isn't it?
Got 100 million people say, I'm not going, I'm not going to do that.
They made us all feel like we were alone.
Because they used incredibly weaponized propaganda and banning techniques.
And it's only going to get worse with artificial intelligence.
But if you go back and you look, there's a chart here.
See if you can pull this up, Travis, in this article.
There is a chart.
Survey shows declining concerns showing Democrats, Republicans and the average between them I guess. A declining share of Americans have the most up-to-date level of protection against coronavirus. So if you go back to when the Trump shot was mandated you had 82% of Democrats got it.
55% of Republicans got it.
Overall, it was an average of 69%.
But now, today, with nine shots out there, there are 42% of Democrats.
Isn't that amazing? Up to date on their shots.
42% of Democrats.
Done this nine times.
28% of overall Republicans, even.
15%. They would not have gotten those 15% of Republicans without Donald Trump there.
Those people instinctively knew it was wrong.
They would have never followed it if it had been Hillary Clinton.
If it had been Obama, Biden, they would not have followed it.
So, they said in this article, 22% of Americans are unaware of long COVID. They're unaware that the Trump shot is what's being called long COVID. They're unaware of vaccine-induced AIDS. They don't really understand that either.
In the pandemic's first year, Democrats were routinely about 40 points more likely than Republicans to view the coronavirus as a major threat to the health of the U.S. population.
And that's the reason they put Trump in in 2016.
And so this is yet another reply of someone on Twitter saying, Trying to make excuses, this QAnon insanity, it shouldn't be very difficult at this point to consider the fifth-generation warfare strategy of Trump's approach to the vaccine rollout.
This is pure Steve Pachenik's CIA BS. Pure BS. Oh, fifth-generation warfare.
It's 4D chess.
It's the art of war from Sun Shoe, right?
Oh, yeah, listen to these guys.
They're so smart. Total BSers.
Con men. Liars.
Grifters. Bechenik.
Jones. These people using this kind of...
The QAnon people. They were at the center of QAnon, folks.
Jack Posobiec as well.
All of these people. Jerome Corsi.
Trump stopped the New World Order with warp speed.
That's right. Right now, they are thrashing around in their dying breaths of panic.
Now, those are the people he put on the ventilators, pal.
Just amazing. Many people have no idea how bad the scandemic was supposed to be.
The defiant ones were supposed to already be depopulated.
Their great reset into eating bugs and sleeping in pods in 15-minute cities, tracked with barcode tattoos, social credit scores, and CBDC was meant for the sheep who survived after the defiant had been disappeared.
Trump did not lead these people.
He was pushing against them.
30% of the people refused to do this in spite of a bipartisan push from Trump and Biden and Republicans and Democrats and the media and the schools and everything, the churches.
30% of the people said no.
They get the credit.
Not these institutions, not these politicians.
They were the Judas goats, the liars, the betrayers.
Why did he do the lockdown to start with, pal?
Oh yeah, yeah, 12 to 15 years?
He saved us from all that by rolling out the vaccine without testing it.
Well, he's telling people it was safe and effective.
And we all know it wasn't.
We all know it wasn't sugar water.
But why did he do the lockdown in the first place?
You mean he had to do the vaccine to stop the lockdown?
No, he didn't have to do the lockdown to start with.
Why didn't he give us HCQ and ivermectin?
Why didn't he just throw it out for free?
They were giving PCR tests away for free.
They just stopped giving away PCR tests.
So this is somebody, of course, that is anonymous.
And you better believe that this is somebody in the intelligence agency.
This is a CIA, and I use CIA as a generic sense for all these people, but he's a CIA bot.
It's the same kind of stuff that Pacinic does.
Those of us who've known about the New World Order for over a decade feel a great sense of relief at the way things have played out.
Not me! He talks about FEMA camps, yes?
And guess what? It was FEMA that was saying, well, this is essential, that's not essential, and all the rest of the stuff.
It was FEMA that was laying out the camp plans and all the rest of the stuff.
And the Trump administration, and continuing to be funded by the Trump administration.
Wayne Allen Root, I talked about this a couple of weeks ago, and I saw this on WND, and I thought, they still have that story up?
Talking about how Trump is a miracle?
Are you kidding me?
I talked about the pathetic idolatry and blasphemy of this Wayne Allen Root guy.
He says, Trump, now he's got another article.
He liked it so much, it was so popular.
That he wrote a second one, talking about how Trump is a miracle.
And then to this, he adds, Obama is the curse.
You see, Wayne Allen Root It's one of these very ambitious social climbing politicians and commentators.
He tried to climb his way up in the Libertarian Party and the Republican Party.
He was there at the very beginning saying, you know, I went to school where Obama said, well, he's never there.
He's a total fake. And he's still back to Obama.
So now he says Trump is a miracle.
Obama is the curse. Did you know that Trump's running against Obama?
I don't think so.
Does Wayne Allen root? No.
I don't know. But he's going to just keep recycling the same stuff.
He says, my column last week titled, Do You Believe in Miracles Went Viral?
It was everywhere. It was read by everyone.
Yes, I even read it. I read it to you, and I commented on it at the time.
But he says, I believe Trump is the, and he puts in quotes, the chosen one.
He says, Trump was sent by God.
Trump was blessed by God.
Trump is supernatural.
Trump is a miracle.
Wayne, you are blasphemer.
You attribute all of this stuff to him.
Just pure blasphemy.
Taking the name of Christ in vain.
That's what you're doing here.
In the really serious sense.
Even more serious than people always use Jesus Christ as a swear word, right?
Even in Japan.
Where you can count the number of Christians on one hand for the most part.
You know, I had a friend who later became a Christian.
Grew up in Japan.
She said, everybody there would swear by Jesus Christ.
I was like, who is this guy? You know, if they believe in Buddha, they believe in Allah or whatever, Shintoism or whatever it is.
You know, why don't they swear by that?
No, they would swear by this guy they don't know anything about.
Isn't that peculiar? But even more so are these grifting politicians who take the name of Jesus and wrap themselves in it.
You're taking the Lord's name in vain.
Just that simple. Trump is here not as a miracle.
He might, you know, yeah, he's put there by God.
Everybody, you know, God does what he wants.
He works out his plan.
But I think the plan is a curse to us, not a blessing.
Go back and look at 2020.
Was that a blessing or a curse?
And who was in charge at that point in time?
So, you know, Wayne Allen, his ilk, these grifting influencers, they are a curse themselves.
And the fact that so many people will follow them and hang on every word.
I talked about Clay Clark and the Reawaken tour.
And, you know, it's interesting.
They've got an event at Magalago, I like to call it.
They're going to have a thing there where you can go to pray.
Look at this. Catholic Prayer for Trump, March the 19th, at Mar-a-Lago.
I like to call it MAGA-Lago.
And it only costs $1,000 to go there to pray for Trump at Mar-a-Lago.
Well, I'll tell you what they need to do.
They need to, I think they need some exorcist at that place before they start any prayers.
But this person who put it up says, but it's not a cult for you guys, right?
It's not a cult. But you're going to pay $1,000 to go there and look at who's going to be running it.
It's all the reawakened American kind of guys.
You got Michael Flynn.
You got Jack Besobiet.
You got Jim Caviezel.
Oh, yeah, Jim Caviezel. Yeah, he's the Sound of Freedom thing.
You know, he's going around. Trump's going to save us from the pedophile networks and all the rest of this stuff.
He's totally absorbed into this QAnon stuff.
You've got, yeah, Roger Stone right there.
Yeah, all these good kids. You want to pray with Roger Stone?
You should pray for Roger Stone.
Pray for Michael Flynn.
The guy who was pushing transgenderism more than a decade ago at the Pentagon.
Yeah, these are the people that you can go there with.
And those are the same people that hang out with Clay Clark and his Reawaken America tour, along with people like Julie Green.
Don't they have Julie Green show up there?
I mean, the false prophetess of the MAGA cult.
Talking about how Trump is still president.
Uh, so this is, um, uh, this is from a listener, Darren.
He said, I heard you mention Clay Clark a handful of times on your show now.
I know you're aware of the cloth he has cut from due to the company that he keeps.
Having said that, if you're curious, I'd like to bring a few, delight a few things about his character.
He runs a Ponzi scheme in the Tulsa area called Thrive.
They pray. We should spell that P-R-E-Y. That's the whole question.
You know, is this a meeting to pray at Mar-a-Lago, or are they meeting the pray, P-R-E-Y, the people they're going to pray off of?
So they pray on local small business owners telling them they have all the answers on how to grow their businesses and become successful.
Essentially, it's a prosperity gospel without the pesky pretense of the gospel message needing to be mentioned.
There is a couple of semi-helpful nuggets they throw out to their clients initially, but the majority of it is nonsense or even harmful.
They fleecy small business owners who are struggling by having them come in once a week or every other week, footing them a stiff bill each month.
They'll be better spent on paying bills or saving for payroll.
I mentioned the prosperity gospel.
Well, Clay Clark is a fan of it.
He is a fan of T.D. Jakes.
And Clay claims that his son was blind and miraculously gained his sight when he was a toddler.
When Trump became president and the Stop Steal nonsense gained in popularity, he suddenly sprung up as a political activist.
He'd never been involved in that before.
He says, I remember the Dominion voting filed a lawsuit against him, but I never heard what came of it.
So yeah, it's kind of interesting that these people continue to pray, P-R-E-Y, on those who have followed them.
We have Trump advisor Peter Navarro ordered to prison next week.
He's appealing his sentence.
But they said, well, you've got to go to prison while you appeal it.
The judge did. And, you know, quite frankly, I'm glad to see it.
I'm glad to see Peter Navarro going to prison.
Not for the charges, but like I said before, Dennis Astert sent him to jail for something that was not a crime.
He took money out of his own account.
In a structured way. Money that he had already deposited, already been declared, already paid taxes on.
But he pulled it out because he didn't want the bank asking him questions, which they did when he started pulling it out.
Pulled it out to pay off a blackmailer.
Somebody that he had sexually molested when this person was a minor and he was a wrestling coach.
And then the Republicans picked him to run for Congress.
Then the Republicans realized what a find they had.
Dennis Astrid, he's so controllable.
We can make him Speaker of the House, and they did, and he stayed Speaker of the House more than any other Republican, longer than any other Republican.
And so they sent him to jail, not for that, because the statute of limitations is very, very short for pedophilia, and they won't change it.
Instead, they sent him to jail for a non-crime of withdrawing his money in a structured way, they said.
Well, you know, Peter Navarro presided over the ventilator manufacturing.
And many other things with the lockdown.
Peter Navarro is a serial killer.
Mass murderer.
He deserves to be in jail.
Not for this stuff.
But for being a serial killer.
For the ventilator stuff.
You know, I have talked many times about the American Hospital Association.
And I want to thank Mike, who found the letter.
That was sent by the American Hospital Association to the Trump administration saying, wait a minute, you told us you're going to pay us 20% bonus on anybody that we pointed a finger at and said they've got COVID. And now you're changing the rules?
You can't do that. That's not fair.
We want you to reconsider.
And of course they did. And so he sent me the letter.
I had the letter when I reported it.
I keep telling everybody it was August of 2020.
Mike fact-checked me.
Thank you, Mike. And he found it.
He said, yeah, here it is, exactly as you described it.
This letter needs to be shared widely.
And I will. I will share it widely.
And so when you look at this letter, this is from the American Hospital Association to the Administrator for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
They call it CMS. I don't call it CMMS, but anyway.
And so, what they say is, the American Hospital Association urges the Centers for Medicare, or let's just say CMS, to provide additional flexibility regarding the agency's new COVID-19 test documentation requirement for the diagnostic-related group add-on payments.
We urge CMS to allow provider documentation to suffice if the test result is unavailable.
And so, where did they get this authority?
They got it from the CARES Act that was rushed through, the Trillions of Dollars CARES Act.
And they refer to that, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, the CARES Act.
It provided for the duration of the public health emergency a 20% add-on to inpatient prospective payment system for patients diagnosed with COVID. CMS has been implemented the policy based on the presence of certain international classification diseases.
On August the 17th, however, CMS updated its guidance related to this add-on payment.
Adding the requirement to have a positive COVID-19 lab test documented and the patient's medical record in order for the claim to be eligible.
The new requirement, they said, would apply to inpatient admissions occurring on or after September the 1st, 2020.
So, they send out notification.
August 17th.
Beginning September 1st.
We're not going to give you the bonus unless you've got the test results.
And they started, they got very upset about that.
The AHA, the American Hospital Association, like I said, when I saw this, It was an aha moment for me.
I knew about the $13,000 bonus for identifying somebody as a COVID patient, and I knew about $39,000 for the ventilator.
I did not know that they were also getting 20%, and that made perfectly good sense.
That's why, as Andy was saying, they would test somebody who's obviously having a heart attack.
They would take them in first and do a COVID test on them.
Because, you know, anything they do, then they get 20% bonus.
The AHA is concerned about the undue burden that this new requirement will put on hospitals, and we urge the agency to continue flexibility and eligibility for the add-on payment, as has been the policy since the beginning of the emergency.
Basing the COVID-19 diagnosis code on clinical judgment alone...
And they say that's in line with coding rules.
Continues to be an important approach, given that test accuracy may not be reliable.
Retesting is unnecessarily onerous.
And some communities face persistent testing shortages, as described below.
Like I said, they said, well, we didn't have these tests at the beginning.
And they don't work anyway.
You just heard that, right?
Reliability. And it goes on.
There's another couple of pages about that.
Trump paid the hospitals to kill people so they could boost the numbers of people who were dying.
And it was really strange at the beginning.
We saw people immediately dying of the vaccine shots in the first couple of weeks, right away.
Look at how many people died.
Compare this. This is like all the other vaccines in a year.
It's like all the other vaccines now in five years, now in 10 years, now in all 35 years and all the rest of the stuff.
And the thing that was strange about it, we knew the vaccine was killing people.
But what was strange about 2020 was the fact that we're seeing people die outside of hospitals.
Everybody going to hospitals is dying.
Then we found out about the ventilators.
We found out about some other things like that that other doctors did.
Quietly, a few of them said, I'm a pulmonologist.
What are they putting people on ventilators for with respiratory?
That doesn't make any sense. And now Fauci says, well, you know, this mRNA shot, it's a bad strategy.
I don't think that it's something that will ever work with respiratory diseases.
He said that a year ago, and still nobody's paying attention to it.
And, you know, I lost that document there, and I didn't go back and search for it.
At the time, I wasn't careful about keeping it.
And so thank you, Mike, for sending that to me.
At the time, I wasn't careful about keeping it because, you know, everybody's going to be talking about this.
This is such an outrageous thing that Trump would be paying them a 20% bonus to identify people, put them on ventilators and kill them and give them remdesivir and all the rest of this stuff.
Don't you find that outrageous?
That was all Trump, 100% Trump doing that.
You know, Biden started killing them using the Trump shot.
But in 2020, it was all Trump, and it was to boost this up, to boost up the idea that we had a pandemic when we didn't.
I put out a video of what I talked about yesterday, Answers for MAGA Influencers Hallucinating About Trump's Crimes.
And I laid it out in the description, some of the questions that these people are bringing up.
You know, and how Trump is playing fifth generation warfare or 4D chess or whatever QAnon people want to call it.
And Bacon Commander on Substack.
Give him a shout out. Thanks for putting this up.
His subtitle on the Substack is Bacon and Beans and Bullets and Silver.
And so he says, I got really tired of answering these questions for people.
So I'm posting up this video from David Knight.
I seem to keep having to explain why I don't like Trump.
So I'm going to post this here.
And so I don't have to keep repeating myself.
So why don't you guys share that around and repeat it to people so they can start maybe to get a glimpse of critical thinking.
Does any of this stuff make any sense?
Oh, he mentioned ivermectin and HCQ, but he didn't do anything to get it to anybody, right?
But now they're focusing on the measles.
The measles. And I've said for the longest time, for all the people who said, well, Trump would never have mandated the shot.
I said, oh, really? They have to get the shot, the vaccination.
This is about measles. This is really going around now.
They have to get their shot.
And I said at the time, I said, look, he's older than me.
They didn't have measles shots when we were kids.
We had the measles.
We got lifetime immunity. Not a problem.
I mentioned this is NBC. All the mainstream media is doing it.
I was surprised, though, to see that Breitbart did it.
And Breitbart actually beat NBC and some of these other places to the punch.
And Breitbart tried to insinuate that some kid in one of these migrant shelters or illegal alien shelters, that somebody there died from this.
Oh, look, they just found measles at a place where a child died.
A child died before they found the measles case.
A child did not die of measles at all.
Only Breitbart tried to make that.
That's a connection.
Isn't that telling about the big con media?
You know, you've got to pay attention to what these people are doing.
They've got their own agenda.
And sometimes, just like with Tucker Carlson, it's in perfect alignment with the pharmaceutical industry.
The CDC is sending a team of experts now to take a look at this Chicago measles quote-unquote outbreak as more cases are diagnosed in the migrant shelter.
But listen to the details of this.
The Chicago Department of Public Health reported on Monday two adults at the shelter had been diagnosed and are in stable condition.
A young child is diagnosed and is in good condition.
They're not dying. They're not even in really bad shape.
They send them to the hospital because this is the government.
The government's looking at, oh, you got measles, go send them to the hospital.
They're in good condition.
Once the students, and then they reply, the school's there, and school-aged shelter residents will not be able to attend school until they get their measles shot.
They gotta get the shots.
It's really going around.
It's like really something here.
They gotta get the shot. Can't go to school, right?
Don't tell me that Trump wouldn't mandate this stuff.
He was pushing it for measles before.
They're pushing it for measles now.
He's on the same page as the Democrats.
He was bought and owned by Pfizer.
Brought to you by Pfizer.
Once a student's vaccination status has been verified, says the Chicago schools, Students with confirmed vaccinations be notified to the date they can return to school.
See? Nothing has really changed.
It's all about Trump precedence.
And the precedence for keeping kids from going to school because they don't have a certain vaccine was set by Trump a year before.
A year before he started this fake pandemic.
Don't tell me that he wouldn't.
We've even got the signed order from December the 7th of 2020.
Or I was going to mandate it for the military.
On Rockfence, SoloCat1980.
Many vaxxed zombies are unwilling to admit that they got played.
Their pride prevents repentance.
Same as their idol.
The reality of their damage and their foolishness is something they don't want to face.
I agree. On Rumble, Rebel6.
Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that.
He says, you should interview Right to Repair advocate Louis Rossman, RossmanGroup.com.
He has a lot to say about doing business in New York.
Looking forward to Drago Dazarian returning as a guest as well.
Yes, I should get him back. And I should, because he had a lot to say.
We didn't get into what was going on with the vaccine stuff as much with Drago, a former Navy SEAL.
He's got an interesting story.
Grew up in a communist country, hated communism.
He volunteered and joined the military at a really late age.
I mean, he's in his late 30s or something when he joined and then became a SEAL and had a very long career because even after he got older, he became a SEAL instructor.
He's out now. He was very upset about what was happening with the military mandates.
But I have to look up Louis Rossman.
Save that for me, Travis.
And let's see if we can talk to him.
So now, measles.
Okay. The initial measles case detected at the shelter was a young child, not school-aged, who had recovered.
Nobody even knew the kid was sick.
And it's no longer infectious, according to the health department.
And yet Breitbart implied that somebody died there.
Implied that they died from...
Somebody did die there.
But they implied that the death was caused by measles.
In the same headline. They find a kid with measles where another kid died.
Measles has spiked globally.
This is NBC. In recent months, partly due to a decline in vaccine coverage.
The U.S. has recorded at least 45 cases this year.
Whoop-de-doo! What?
Pennsylvania tallied nine cases.
Florida had ten cases.
Guess what? Nobody died.
Sacramento, one child may have exposed about 300 people to measles.
At an emergency department on Tuesday.
Well, there you go. Nobody's died.
And again, in the Breitbart thing, they tried to make what everybody always dismissed as childhood diseases.
They tried to make it a very serious thing.
And I said, well, you know why they call them?
It's not the reason that Breitbart gave.
I said, the reason they called them childhood diseases was because you got them when you were a child.
People didn't die.
And then you had lifetime immunity.
So this is something kids get.
Once we get it as a kid, we don't have it again.
It's not the case with the vaccines.
NBC goes on to scare people We're good to go.
Well, you don't need that.
Stay away from that. It can also give you Guillain-Barre syndrome.
It can also give you autism and many a long, long, long list of this stuff.
And so in Illinois, they're making this now a state issue.
They'll try to make it a national issue.
As a matter of fact, you know what Trump was responding to there?
A couple of cases in California and New York where they say, oh, oh, oh, vaccines here.
And if you look at some of these, you typically find patient zero was vaccinated sometimes multiple times.
And so that's what they use to override religious and medical exemptions.
Finally, they end this story at NBC by saying roughly one to three out of every 1,000 children infected with measles die.
Well, let's talk about how many of them Get autism from MMR shots.
After they started all this childhood vaccination, 72 vaccines, all the rest of this stuff, we've seen autism that was completely unheard of before the mid-2000s, just explode.
Now it is everywhere.
Everywhere. And it's not a childhood disease, it's forever.
And if it is true, and I seriously doubt this based on the way society was when I was a kid, I seriously doubt that one to three out of every thousand children infected with measles die.
I don't believe that for a second.
But let's say that it was true.
What would that be?
Well, that would be 0.1%.
Which is about what the number of people who are dying from flu every year.
They want everybody to take a flu shot.
They want everybody to take a measles shot.
And it is not something that is a life-threatening disease.
This is all media propaganda put forward by censorship.
We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back.
And when we do, we're going to talk a little bit about Boeing.
And what is happening with them?
And what lesson does that teach us about our government, about the FDA and other agencies out there that are supposed to be checking for product safety?
Elvis.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
And the sweet sounds of Motown.
Find them on the oldies channel at APSradio.com.
Thank you.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, Boeing has had a lot of problems lately, haven't they?
But this is something that goes even beyond that.
We've had a Boeing whistleblower found dead in the United States.
Dead by gunshot.
And this happened right in the middle of his whistleblowing testimony.
Well, isn't that curious?
Almost like he was talking about the Clintons or something.
John Barnett had worked for Boeing for 32 years until his retirement in 2017.
In the days before his death, he'd been giving evidence in the whistleblower lawsuit against the company.
It is said that the 62-year-old had died from a self-inflicted wound on the 9th of March.
Very much like all these people who were blowing the whistle on the Clintons.
From 2010, he worked as a quality manager at the North Charleston plant, making 787 Dreamliners for Boeing.
In 2019, nine years later, he told the BBC that under pressure, workers had been deliberately fitting substandard parts to aircraft on the production line.
He also said that he had uncovered serious problems with oxygen systems, which could mean that one in four breathing masks would not work in an emergency.
He said soon after starting work in South Carolina, he had become concerned that the push to get new aircraft built meant the assembly process was rushed, safety was compromised.
The company denied it.
They had some kind of a warp speed program or something, I guess.
We've got to get production up. Go faster, go faster.
We don't really care about quality.
And we don't have any government oversight of this stuff either, do we?
But there is something different.
When planes crash, the FDA does something about it.
As I mentioned before, the 737, the 737 MAX, had two American plane crashes.
Out of 8,200 flights.
Now, if the FDA took the same approach that Fauci and the...
Sorry, the FAA. If they took the same approach as the FDA and the CDC and Fauci, they would just say, ah, it's rare.
It's rare. We don't care.
Yeah, just rare. Two people out of 8,200?
Yeah, no problem. We do that all the time, right?
Except that in each of those crashes, 250 people died.
They had 500 people die.
Still, very, very tiny number compared to the VAERS report.
Over 37,000 deaths from these vaccines reported.
More than all other vaccines for all 35 years combined.
And, you know, they were putting pressure on people not even to report it.
Just like this.
He later told the BBC the workers had failed to follow procedures intended to track components through the factory, allowing defective components to go missing.
He said in some cases, substandard parts had even been removed from scrap bins and fitted to planes that were being built in order to prevent delays on the production line.
Boeing denied his assertions, says the BBC. However, a 2017 review by a U.S. regulator, the FAA, did uphold some of his concerns.
It established that the location of at least 53 non-conforming parts in the factory was unknown, and that they were considered to be lost.
Kind of like when they do the Pentagon audits.
It's like, where did that money go?
I don't know. They've had six audits of the Pentagon, and they failed all six of them.
We don't know where the money went.
We don't know where the weapons went. Boeing was ordered to take remedial action.
On the oxygen cylinders issue, the company said in 2017 that it had identified some oxygen bottles received from a supplier that were not deploying properly, but it denied that any of them were actually fitted onto aircraft.
After retiring, he embarked on a long-running legal action against the company.
He accused it of denigrating his character and hampering his career because of issues that he pointed out.
These charges were rejected by Boeing.
Now, at the time of his death, Mr.
Mr. Barnett had been in Charleston for legal interviews linked to that case.
He had been due to undergo further questioning on Saturday when he did not appear.
Enquiries were made at his hotel.
He was subsequently found dead in his truck in the hotel parking lot.
Speaking to the BBC, his lawyer described his death as tragic.
And it comes at a time...
When production standards at both Boeing and its key supplier, Spirit Aerosystems, are under intense scrutiny.
This follows an incident in early January where an unused emergency exit door blew off a brand new Boeing 737 MAX shortly after takeoff.
But that's just the tip of the iceberg, folks.
Isn't that interesting? Very combative.
He's fighting them, and then all of a sudden, he commits suicide.
Very much like the DC Madam or Gary Webb or people over and over again.
Aaron Schwartz, who had fought the government over CISPA two times.
CISPA two times. SOPA, ACTA, PIPA. All these different ways to give legal immunity to big corporations who are going to snoop on you and sell your information or give it away to the government.
They wanted to give them protection from lawsuits.
And he kept fighting that. And then Harvard got involved and accused him of hacking in.
The state authorities said, that's nothing.
We're not even going to prosecute. But then a federal judge, her name was Ortiz, Carmine Ortiz, they were grooming her to run for governor.
And so she brought this case against him.
And then he supposedly committed suicide and people got very upset with her.
Said, you drove him to suicide.
He was a fighter. This is a guy who took them on.
He started all of this stuff.
And then her husband put out and said, he was not facing 30 years in jail.
She offered him a plea bargain where he would have done a couple of months in jail, and that was it.
And she didn't drive him to commit suicide.
And then he removed that tweet after he put it up.
Yeah, this is what happens with whistleblowers too many times.
And it's always a coincidence that they get suicided like that, isn't it?
And so as all this stuff is happening, the issues of Boeing are much bigger than what the BBC mentioned.
And we just had another one happen on Sunday or yesterday.
Yeah, yesterday, Monday.
Passengers smash into the ceiling after a Boeing 787, and this is the same one this guy has a whistleblower on, right?
You know, the 787 and the 737 MAX. This is a 787.
Both of them have had problems.
The plane nosedives mid-flight due to a quote-unquote technical problem.
Fifty people got injured.
Twelve of them in the hospital.
So, it suddenly nosedived in the middle of a flight.
This is going between New Zealand and Australia.
It marks the latest disaster for Boeing after a wheel fell off of one of their planes mid-flight last week.
Another one skidded off the runway last week as well.
Now, you know, going off the runway, that could be pilot error.
That could be equipment error.
But it also, you know, when it dives really bad like this, that could be turbulence and everything.
But all these things, certainly a wheel falling off.
That's a wheel falling off or the door blowing off.
These are equipment failures for sure.
The others may be equipment failures as well.
A spokesperson for the Chilean airline, LATAM, told news outlets that a technical problem on the flight had harmed passengers and crew.
A technical problem.
It doesn't say turbulence. And the passengers on this plane said, I've been on a lot of planes.
We've had a lot of turbulence. I've never seen anything like this.
The airplane was traveling from Sydney, Australia to Auckland, New Zealand.
When the turbulence hit, Reuters reported a contingent of emergency vehicles was called to the Auckland airport after the passengers and crew were injured.
Twelve passengers in total were rushed to the hospital.
One is in serious condition.
One horrified passenger revealed that several passengers were thrown to the roof of the plane.
When it lost altitude suddenly.
I went into fight mode and I just started jumping in and helping where I could because the crew was injured and so couldn't help.
I've been on plenty of flights before, but that was completely out of the gate, said the passenger.
Another passenger revealed that a man two seats away from him was not wearing a seatbelt and flew up into the ceiling.
He said the event resembled the famous horror story, The Exorcist.
He said his back is on the ceiling and he's up in the air, and then he drops down and he hits his head on the armrest.
And the whole plane is screaming, he said.
The plane then started taking a nosedive, and I was just thinking, okay, this is it, we're done.
And I thought I was dreaming. And then I opened up my eyes and he was on the roof of the plane on his back looking down at me.
It was like the exorcist, he said.
So the plane, unannounced, just dropped, said another person.
I mean, it dropped unlike anything I've ever experienced on any kind of turbulence.
And people were thrown out of their seats, hit the top of the roof of the plane, throwing them down the aisles, said a passenger.
Some of the roof panels were broken.
From people being thrown up and knocking through the plastic roof panels and the aisleways.
There was blood coming from several people's head, said one person who was not injured.
He said passengers who were doctors on the plane provided bandages and neck braces for people who were severely injured.
We've got doctors traveling.
You know, I can understand there being doctors on the plane, giving them help.
If you're a doctor, do you travel with bandages and neck braces?
Maybe a stethoscope, too?
What's that about? I would think the TSA would have a problem with that.
They confiscate all of our daughter's toys when we're coming back from China.
I don't know, but maybe they're lax when you go between Australia and New Zealand.
Boeing shares dropped suddenly as well.
They dropped 4% in morning trades based on this incident.
And so, Babylon Beast, commentary on this.
Boeing blames gravity for the recent mishaps.
As aircraft malfunctions and incidents continue to make headlines, Aerospace Corporation Boeing blamed gravity for its record string of mishaps.
Gravity is a real problem, and it deserves the blame here.
No one would be talking about any of this stuff if gravity wasn't maliciously pulling all of these detached aircraft parts down to the ground with such force.
Even if a wheel from one of our planes falls off, We're not the ones sending it hurtling down toward unsuspecting victims.
It's gravity. This person could get a job writing for QAnon.
It's not Trump's fault.
Yeah, it's gravity's fault.
They fail to appreciate the gravity of the situation.
Boeing shares continue to drop lower as the Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation.
Into the Alaska Airlines blowout of the door.
Now, this is not the 787.
This is the 737 where the door just blew off.
And so that happened, what was that, a month or so ago?
Two months ago, January. And it was a brand new 737 MAX, and the door just blew off.
Fortunately, nobody was hurt.
Boeing officials admitted they can't find records for the door plug that blew off of Alaska Airlines 737 MAX in January.
Despite extensive searches, no documentation on the plug's maintenance reportedly exists.
Now, if it was the Department of Justice cares about this, they don't care about the vaccines.
Isn't that interesting? They don't care.
And it's not the difference between two different agencies either.
One industry is highly regulated and they've got to keep track of, well, where did that defective part go?
I need to know. You got paperwork about that defective part?
Except when you talk about vaccines, like I said yesterday, Children's Health Defense Fund saw they were going to be using polyethylene glycol to encapsulate these nanoparticles and They said a lot of people are going to go into anaphylactic shock.
The FDA said, well, we don't care.
Call Pfizer. We're brought to you by Pfizer as well.
And, of course, Pfizer doesn't care.
And, of course, you did get people who got anaphylactic shock to that.
But the Department of Justice doesn't care either.
It's not just a corrupt, bought-off agency like the FDA and the CDC and HHS and all that.
The Department of Justice doesn't care about this either.
The Department of Justice's probe on the aircraft, however, aims to determine if any factors leading up to the door plug incident might impact Boeing's 2021 Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the federal agency.
That was established in the aftermath of the two deadly 737 MAX crashes in 2018 and 2019.
So again, these crashes happened during the Trump administration with that Department of Justice.
Things drag on.
They don't really do anything about it.
And then they reach, in 2021 under Biden, they reach an agreement with the Biden Department of Justice that we're not going to prosecute you for that.
No problem. We'll give you a mulligan on that.
How about that? You see how it's bipartisan, this stuff?
It truly is. You think one of these guys is going to make your life better?
They don't care about inspecting plants, inspecting food that comes in, the applesauce stuff that I talked about the other day.
They don't care about any of that.
They don't care about the drugs. They don't care about the airplanes.
These people are just there to collect a paycheck.
And if it gets really bad, they will say, as they have said, well, you know, we just need more personnel and more money.
The answer is we need to have a bigger footprint so we can do a better job of checking all this stuff.
We just don't have enough people.
And so that's where these guys are.
They said, well, we're going to take a look at this deferred prosecution thing.
And then you have the U.S. Transportation Secretary, Pete Buttigieg.
The boy Wonder is going to look into this now.
I'm sure that will take care of everything, don't you?
He knows so much about planes.
And procedures and management and all the rest of the stuff.
I'm sure you'll get this all sorted out, don't you think?
Passengers, by the way, though, are now starting to boycott Boeing.
Calling it online, their planes calling them death traps.
And what they're doing is there's an online booking website called Kayak.
And Kayak has, scroll down there, Travis, and show.
There you go. So, you know, when you sign up, it's got different things.
Aircraft, I would like to have a narrow, I'll accept a narrow-body jet or a regional jet or something like that.
And then you can go down and you can include or you can exclude particular planes.
And they have a way for you to exclude some of these Boeing planes.
I said people are doing that extensively.
It's become a selling feature for this online booking website.
Consumers quickly realize that Boeing planes are flying death traps.
You see, they can do a better job of regulating this stuff than a bought and sold regulatory captured agency like the FAA or the FDA or even the Department of Justice.
If these people won't stop it, There'll be a way for the marketplace for people to opt out of this thing, if they let us.
You know, they were coercing people for the shots, the Trump shots and everything.
But yeah, word got out.
You know that if they hadn't used the coercion, they wouldn't have had nearly as many people, and still, a third of the people.
So I'm not getting those shots.
A lot of those people lost their careers, lost their jobs or whatever, but they would not be coerced into doing that.
And of course, you know, Bill Mitchell just dismisses it as saying, well, you know, hey, I didn't get the shot.
You didn't have to get it either. So there you go.
I don't know if anybody was trying to take away his work or not.
I don't know why anybody listens to somebody like that.
The spike in mishaps appears to be concentrated on Boeing jets.
There was a mid-air engine fire, a tire that separated from the landing gear.
We were joking about that yesterday.
Straight out of Back to the Future.
Where we're going, Marty?
We don't need no wheels.
We're going up right now.
We don't really need... We don't have to worry about that.
That's something that will happen in the future.
So don't worry about that wheel coming off.
But they've had a lot of issues, and people are starting to push back.
We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the king of the swamp.
Who would that be?
Hear news now at APSradionews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
APS Radio is a production of NASA.
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
you you
Thank you. Making
sense. Common again.
You're listening to The David Knight Show!
You know, it's kind of interesting to watch the evolution of Vivek the Snake.
He, as one person put up a clip of him talking, and he said, Vivek first says, TikTok is like fentanyl.
And it's killing young people.
I'm open to a total ban.
Like I said yesterday when Steve Bannon said Trump has been bought off.
He's taking Yass coin, Jeffrey Yass.
I think it's Y-A-S-S or it's Y-E-S-S. I don't know.
Maybe he's a yes man or maybe he's a yes man.
But he's got, he's very wealthy.
He's got, just in TikTok, a $33 billion stake.
Now, you know, Trump's got $3 or $4 billion total.
This guy, just in TikTok, has got $33 billion.
He doesn't want to see that in a distress sale like Trump's properties may go into if he can't.
Find somebody to give him a lot of money to buy his way to an appeal.
He may wind up having these things go to a distress sale.
So, again, you know, Trump is somebody who desperately needs money.
That's a very dangerous combination.
You know, somebody who's a politician and has access to all of this unlimited money that's in Washington and can write checks to anybody and everybody who really needs some money desperately.
That's a very dangerous combination.
But, you know, Vivek and other people like him, it became a tenant of the right that TikTok should be banned.
Because those pesky Chinese have got it.
You know, it's just, they're watching everything our kids are doing, and it's a disgusting social media platform, and it is.
It is. Libs of TikTok, you know, they go through that stuff.
But there's other things that are there.
And all the social media platforms, Facebook, are like that.
You know, Twitter is like that as well.
So, it's not different in that regard.
And if you start giving the government power to ban one website, who knows?
You know, next they may ban Trump's Truth Social.
Or more importantly, something like Rumble or Substack could get banned.
The government should not be in the business of banning websites.
The fact that this would be entertained, even especially the fact that it would be entertained as an idea by conservatives, should really concern you.
This is the type of thing that we always saw as a hallmark of totalitarian governments like China.
And now we're going to beat China by becoming like China, right?
Which is what they want to say. No, I don't think that that is a solution.
I've never agreed with it. But now, Trump, even though Trump was against it, now he is, well, he was against TikTok.
He wanted the ban. Now, he does not want the ban.
And that sudden change is why Bannon said, well, he's been bought off.
Now, Vivek wanted to be a little Trump clone.
Whatever the big guy says, that's what I'm about.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And so he's now done a reversal.
He was for a total ban, but now that Trump is not for a total ban, Vivek has reversed himself.
Here's the back and forth.
President Trump just came out against a legislative measure that would require the owner of TikTok to divest it.
It's currently a Chinese owner, a company called ByteDance, or else that it would be banned in the United States.
President Trump just came out opposing that.
I think that's the right decision, actually, of President Trump.
Yeah, because if President Trump does it, it's right.
Because it doesn't make any sense.
And I've long said this, even late in the campaign, took a lot of heat from fellow Republicans.
But I think we have to ask ourselves the why.
And this is the problem with professional politicians.
President Trump isn't a professional politician, and neither am I. But many people in professional politics, they look at what they're supposed to say, and they act like billiard balls on a pool table.
They go in whatever direction they're hit without thinking about the actual why.
It's a problem even in the Republican Party.
Let's take a step back and ask about the why of what's going on here.
What's the real concern that people have with TikTok?
Well, one is it's an addictive problem in kids.
It's not just TikTok. That applies to a bunch of other social media platforms as well.
And that is an issue we need to tackle, but it's not specific to one platform.
I do think there should be age-based restrictions on using addictive social media.
But that's not a TikTok-specific point.
This point about the divestment relates to a different concern.
The use and provision of data, US user data, potentially to the Chinese Communist Party.
And I think that is a major concern.
But here's the rub. It isn't limited to just TikTok or even Chinese-owned companies in the U.S. It expands to include even so-called U.S. companies that are still beholden to the CCP because they do business in China.
Here's an example. A couple of years ago, there was Good Wall Street Journal reporting on the fact that Airbnb, a U.S. company, supposedly U.S. company at least, Was providing U.S. user data to the CCP as a condition for doing business.
In China, according to the Wall Street Journal reporting, Sean Joyce, the chief privacy officer of Airbnb, resigned over that because it wasn't properly disclosed to the public.
And one of Airbnb's co-founders reportedly told him that we're not here to promote American values behind closed doors.
I'm sure he wouldn't say that in public when they put a little black square on their Instagram account to stand with Black Lives Matter.
That virtue signaling aside, this is what they say behind closed doors.
It's not just Airbnb though.
It applies to countless other US companies as well.
So we have to ask ourselves the why.
And if the real concern we have, and I think it is a real concern we ought to have, is the provision of US consumer and user data to the Chinese Communist Party, that's what we should be legislating against.
Ban U.S. companies from providing U.S. user data to China.
I think it's a sensible measure regardless of the company.
But it is beyond silly to just pick one random company and go after them because that is temporarily a politically popular thing to do while actually failing to solve the actual problem that applies to Chinese companies and U.S. companies alike, including the U.S. companies that do business in China.
Now, here's the real problem with the Republican Party is when it has its head stuck in the stand this deep without even thinking about the why, then they start to behave in self-defeating ways.
Democrats are all over TikTok, reaching the next generation of Americans, while Republicans are virtue signaling amongst themselves, failing to actually bring those new voters along by meeting them at least on the platform that is operating in the United States today.
I became one of the rare Republicans when I was running for president, one of the rare Republican candidates who did open a TikTok account late in my presidential campaign.
And I'm glad I did it because I hope it sets an example for other Republicans to say that for whatever's wrong with these platforms, we make them that much worse if the only message that they're getting is a progressive far-left message from a bunch of Democrats that are using that to reach the next generation in a way that we're not.
That's a formula for, you know what?
Losing elections, the thing that we've exactly been doing.
So I guess it's all about winning.
Did you hear anything in there about the Constitution, First Amendment, or any of that kind of stuff?
Now, you've had people who have come out in defense of social media censorship of us, saying, well, you know, the corporation's got First Amendment rights.
No, they don't. They're creatures of the government, and they have privileges granted by the government.
And they want to claim that to keep them, this is the inverted logic that we see from mainstream media about social media censorship, that we are denying them free speech if we deny them the ability to censor.
Well, they've got legal immunity for a lot of things because they do not present themselves as publishers.
So they want to have it both ways.
But he's talking about this.
He says, well, you know, China's getting the user data.
We don't want them to have the user data.
First of all, you can scrape user data off of the Internet, off of any of these sites.
It does make it easier for them to get the user data if it is their site.
But if we go back and we look at what Trump was doing with 5G, for example, when he was president, remember the fact that they were leaning on all Western nations not to do business with Huawei?
Because they didn't want the Chinese to be setting up the 5G networks because they would be spying on us.
And nobody mentioned the fact that, well, wait a minute, should we be concerned about our own governments spying on us?
Yeah, I don't want the Chinese spying on me, but I'm even more concerned if the American government is spying on me, or if I'm in England, if I'm a British citizen, I don't want the British government spying on me.
That's an even greater threat to me than a foreign government spying on me.
Nobody ever asked that question.
Why is it okay then, since these 5G things are going to be used as the infrastructure for smart cities and the rest of this stuff, why is it okay for the U.S. government to do that and not okay for China to do that?
And when you talk about track and trace and grabbing data, what they're really concerned about, folks, is about artificial intelligence.
At the bottom of this is big data, and everybody is fighting over massive amounts of big data.
That's one of the functions of the social media stuff now, is the big data to feed into artificial intelligence.
These things were designed, as I said, from the very beginning, the Internet was designed as a psychological manipulation tool.
And then once it became practical, the intelligence agencies, CIA, created NCATEL and all the rest of these things, venture capital funds.
And if you look at the venture capital funds that created and funded Google and Facebook and other things, they've got people from the intelligence community, high-ranking officials from the intelligence community all over these venture capital firms.
And so they picked people that they thought would work with them, and then let them compete in this as it became viable.
Let everybody use the services for free, and then they started paying them to inform on us and turn our data over to the government.
But now they've got yet another use.
And of course, once they did that, it also allowed them the censorship, and then they also allowed them to do propaganda, And social media allows them to close that feedback loop so they can tell how well their propaganda is working very precisely, which they could never do that.
With print media, with radio, with television, but now they can do it with social media.
They can come out with a narrative and they can look to see how well that is being accepted.
But now you've got artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence needs to get massive amounts of data and it's going to be more efficient and easier for it to operate if it is a site that they have rather than trying to scrape it off of the internet.
And that is really what is at the basis of this.
Nobody wants to talk about that.
Nobody wants to talk about the spying, the artificial intelligence, the constitution and free speech or censorship.
We just accept the fact that censorship is going to be okay as long as we're told that it's to fight our enemy, whoever that is at the time.
Pure Orwellian stuff.
Now, Ramaswamy himself, when he talks about big data, he got on to the COVID team at the very beginning in Ohio with Governor DeWine, and he wanted to get in there, and he put forward a solution to do track and trace.
He wanted to grab our data.
He understands how important that is, and he wanted to profit off of it as well.
I absolutely do not trust this guy.
But isn't it amazing that now we have the corruption crisis The intimidation and even the idolatry, all of this stuff, along with revenge.
This has always been there in politics.
But it's never been more public and unashamed.
And they should be ashamed of all these things.
They don't even have the decency to try to hide the corruption, the intimidation, the desire for revenge now.
This is politics at its worst.
This is worse even than partisanship.
This is about one man.
And so everybody, he's going to, you know, do videos to support Trump.
We've got to do anything we can to support this guy.
Except, you know, he's not going to give Trump any money.
As desperately as Trump needs it, And Vivek is really wealthy.
He was asked about that, and he said this.
You know, people realize you're a very successful businessman, a biotech entrepreneur, and you've made hundreds of millions of dollars.
We're told that Donald Trump has asked Elon Musk for some support.
I don't know if that's true or not. Elon Musk made a clear that he's not giving to either Joe Biden or Donald Trump.
I'm just wondering, if he were to go to you and say, can you loan my campaign some money, what would you say?
So, look, Donald Trump is not in need of anybody else's help or anything else.
He's in the poll position to do this well.
Every one of us has to look ourselves in the mirror and ask how we play on fire.
And in my case, and look, I think...
He doesn't need my money. And the beauty of this is you have grassroots supporters.
That's actually been the character of the America First movement.
Let's fleece them. We're good to go.
I was actually honored, even in my campaign to see Neil, I would travel this country, ask people, if you ask for $10 to farmers in Iowa, they might give you $100.
If you ask people for $1 to get you on the debate stage, they'll give you $10 if they believe in your message.
And that's what this country is really about.
It's about we the people selecting our leaders, not a small group of oligarchs or corporatocratic autocrats deciding who runs the country.
And in my case, I've been about as vocal of a supporter of our America First principles...
As I could be over the campaign over the last year, and I don't plan to stop this year until we actually secure victory.
So you would think about the money thing, but you're not doing it now.
I'm going to be a vocal supporter, Neil.
A lot of businessmen on the sidelines, I'm focused on the front lines, and some of us have chosen to get in the arena, and that's where I'm playing.
Got it. Yeah, he's not going to be a sucker.
But you know, there were a lot of people who did get suckered by Trump, especially in 2020, especially after the election.
As I pointed out, he raised a lot more money after the election.
He scammed supporters out of $250 million for a non-existent fund with his Save America stuff.
Now, I've reported in the past the fact that if you read the fine print, the first $8,000 that an individual gave to Trump was Save America.
The first $8,000. Went to Trump with a share with a kickback to the RNC. If you gave $8,001, $1 would go to the defense fund.
But there actually wasn't even a defense fund to get that $1.
The money would go to the so-called official election defense fund after he got past the $8,000.
That appears, as they looked at this during the January 6th committee, Not widely reported was the fact that they said the election defense fund never actually existed, according to testimony.
He raised $250 million from his supporters, most of which didn't go to election litigation.
Even Rudy didn't get paid.
But to Trump's newly created Save America Political Action Committee, the PAC. The PAC then made the contributions to Mark Meadows Charity, to a conservative organization employing former Trump staffers, and to the Trump Hotels.
They call it the Trump Hotel Collection.
It's like a Monopoly game, you know, you have the hotel collection here.
And to a company that organized a rally for January the 6th.
I don't know. That's where the money they gave to Trump's Save America went.
I don't know what happened to Alex Jones' stop to steal cash.
It's a record year for him.
He didn't promise to spend any of it on legal defense for Trump.
But anyway, Trump got this into his political action committee.
The committee said that some of the money of the Trump campaign raised in the weeks after the election went to paying down campaign debt.
Because he hadn't raised that much before.
And into the coffers of the Republican National Committee, just as I said, the first $8,000 would go to those two.
But then, you know, when you look at the Mark Meadows thing, that was a million-dollar contribution to the Conservative Partnership Institute run by Mark Meadows, a charitable foundation.
You know, just the same way that Pfizer gave a million dollars to the Trump inauguration party.
Yeah, because that must have been an amazing party, wasn't it?
Because they're just one of many donors that were doing that.
Then there was a million dollars from the Save America thing.
Went to the America First Policy Institute.
An organization that employed several former Trump administration officials, put them in a holding pattern.
You know, people were telling me four years ago, leave him alone.
He lost the election.
He's going away. He's done.
I say he's not done. None of these people are done.
$204,000 to the Trump Hotel Collection and more than $5 million to Event Strategies, an organization that managed Trump's rally on January the 6th.
Campaign finance experts say that Trump's solicitation of funds for a non-existent election defense fund...
And his subsequent direction of that money to his leadership PAC was unethical, but probably not illegal.
That's one of the reasons why they set up these political action committees.
You have limits as to how much you can give to an individual candidate, and that's what got Dinesh D'Souza in trouble.
You know, I think the limit is something like $2,500.
I think he gave somebody he knew from college was running for office, he gave her $25,000.
No, you can give her $25,000, but you've got to give it to her PAC, to her political action.
You make a direct donation, you're in trouble.
In reality, the money raised went toward paying down the Trump campaign debt, funding the Republican Party, and financing Trump's newly created PAC Save America, which is now paying off a lot of his legal fees.
The president of Common Cause said in a statement, it was grift.
Grift, pure and simple, but on a massive scale.
And then in addition to that, later...
In 2021, the Trump re-election campaign had to give back $122.7 million to supporters.
It was nearly 11% of the money that they had raised.
They had raised fraudulently.
And how did they do that?
Well, they had an online contribution thing, and what they did was they pre-checked A box that says recurring payments.
So that was the default thing was to make recurring payments.
A lot of people didn't realize that.
Unless they really looked at the fine print of the online disclaimer, unless they manually unchecked the opt-out box, the donor's credit card would be charged weekly until Election Day arrived.
In the lead-up to the election, the campaign made the disclaimer increasingly opaque and eventually added a second pre-checked box that automatically doubled a donor's contribution.
So you had a lot of people contacting their credit card company and reporting fraud.
So much so that several banks and one of the nation's largest credit card companies confirmed that at one point in late 2020, The Trump donation cases accounted for up to 3% of all fraud complaints that they had received.
Now, Jason Miller is probably one of the employees in this organization.
This other organization is getting money.
So that's not true.
We had 0.87% of these transactions.
The website was win red.
Win red. Yeah, put your money on the red.
Let's go back to Taj Mahal.
The fact that we had a dispute rate of less than 1% of total donations, despite raising more grassroots money than any campaign in history, is remarkable, he said.
However, other people said things differently.
One person said it felt like it was a scam.
His family realized that $3,000 had been withdrawn from the account of his brother, Stacy, who was battling cancer and living on less than $1,000 a month.
But the average daily amount that the Trump operation refunded to donors in December...
Was $720,000 per day.
They were refunding money.
So I think I would not agree with Jason Miller that this was nothing at all.
I thought this summed up perfectly.
What Trump is doing to his supporters is a cartoon.
And it says, I think I sat on a porch in a rocking chair with a beer can in his hand and a red cap on his hat.
And a woman is yelling at him through an open window.
Cletus, did you give our last five dollars to Donald Trump?
He says, I had to.
He's been persecuted by the FBI, and he needs his billions to keep them from coming after us next.
That's the way it is sold to these people.
It truly is amazing.
King of the swamp. By the way, we've got some people who've left some comments here.
Let me get to these. On Rumble, Radice Bro, thank you very much for the tip.
He says, instead of banning TikTok, Somebody told Trump to invest in it.
While the MAGA bird was telling everybody that the Chinese are spying on us.
Ron Rumble, Chevkin 321.
We should be more worried about data going to the American government.
I agree, and I think he wrote that before I said it.
On Rockfin, Jason Parker. Good to see you, Jason.
Knights of the Storm. When we would donate to charities in the military, they would have to disclose what percent was used for operating costs.
And many charities suck up 95% or more of your donation.
Yeah, I know. I had that at Texas Instruments as well.
And I said, I'm not going to donate to them.
And it was something universal that was like United Way or something like that.
And they really prided themselves on 100% support of them.
And I said, no, I'm not going to do that.
And they came back to me several times.
My supervisor did. And finally, his supervisor contacted me.
And I told him, I'm not going to donate this money to them.
I don't like the causes that they support, and they keep most of the money themselves anyway.
And so then my boss's supervisor's supervisor called me, and he says, come on, just put in $1 or something.
I was like, okay, this is getting to be a big deal.
So I gave them $1 so they could say that they had 100% participation in their Texas Instruments.
But I wouldn't give Trump $1.
Not even a dollar. On Rumble, Chevkin 321.
The American population had years of getting dumbed down, fat, and lazy.
And that's why we have what we have running for office.
Yes, absolutely true.
And then, of course, this is the way, you know, people like Cletus on the cartoon, this is the way they see Trump.
You know, all there in his gold armor.
And he is, you know, our gladiator.
Standing between them and us.
We've got to protect his billions so they don't come after us.
Let's give him our last five dollars there.
And of course, a lot of Christian symbolism in there as well.
A cross on his shield, a cross on his staff, and the bottom of his staff turns into a sword.
A lot of artificial intelligence going along with all of that.
But his butler, his butler finally did it.
His butler talked about what Trump has been up to and talked about how he was, seemed like he was for sale.
Were there ever any instances when you were still working there that you witnessed where Trump was, in your view...
Now this is CNN, they would never do this with Biden.
But it doesn't mean that you shouldn't do it with Trump either.
It really stood out to me, but in, I believe it was April of 2021, there was a member, Anthony Pratt, who, he was coming, he flew in the night before.
He's an Australian billionaire.
He finishes his meeting with the former president, gets in the car, and his chief of staff says, how did the meeting go?
Pratt, without saying, just says, he told me, and it would be U.S. military classified information of what he told him about Russian submarines and U.S. submarines.
And that's really all I remember hearing.
And I went, what?
You know, I'm thinking this. I'm in the car.
I'm like, did I just hear that?
So it wasn't like, oh, the meeting went well.
We talked about it. He went straight to the point.
He told me that the U.S. subs and with the Russian subs and, you know, something that would more than likely, in my mind, be classified.
So it was clear to you that he was basically seeking access, didn't you?
Oh, absolutely. Absolutely.
I mean, red flags went up in my mind.
Years before that. So Anthony Pratt, this Australian billionaire that you're talking about, he would pay a lot of money to come and have these New Year's Eve parties.
So it might cost $1,000, $1,500 per person.
He was giving a million dollars.
And I think at the height he had 30 or 40 people there.
So, something that would be 50,000.
Let's just say max 50.
Here's a guy that's just buying access.
It's very easy to see.
Yeah, yeah, that's an Australian billionaire buying access.
And then, of course, Biden. He's had people buying access with him.
All of the foreign governments buying it as well.
On both sides.
We don't really care anymore, right?
There'll be no consequences for any of these people.
It's all out in the open, and yet you've got half of the country adamantly supporting one crook or the other.
I am not a crook, says Richard Nixon.
I'm not as bad a crook, Richard Nixon says, as these other guys.
I mean, you know, we had Richard Agnew, who had a briefcase full of cash that he got caught with, but yeah, these guys are doing it all the time.
That was Brian Butler, the butler who did it, who went there and told them what was happening.
And again, CNN will, and this is the partisanship there, right?
CNN doesn't care about Biden's corruption.
And Breitbart and big con media doesn't care about Trump's corruption.
This is how they get away with it.
Everybody says, yeah, yeah, but what about this?
You know, so-and-so's doing this kind of stuff.
He doesn't get punished. Well, punish them all.
Send them all to jail.
The swamp petition.
This is from Daily Haymaker.
The swamp petition. North Carolina GOP chairman and the guy who's going to be the co-chair for the RNC now with Laura Trump is, guess what?
A lobbyist. And a lobbyist for solar.
Oh, yeah. Yeah.
Yeah, there he is right there.
As a matter of fact, let me show you a tweet here.
One person says, no, Whatley is heavily invested in green energy.
He's a bowtie-wearing liberal who supported Rona's re-election.
He needs Democrat policies to make his company money.
Somebody needs to warn Trump.
Oh, you think he doesn't now?
You really think he doesn't now?
There he is. The person says, yeah, Emerald is right.
I'm from North Carolina.
Whatley is poison.
Well, maybe he comes with some investors, you know, some money that is badly needed for these people.
As a matter of fact, you know, we saw the same thing with Rex Tillerson.
I was telling everybody, one of the first picks that Trump made in, you know, in late 2016 was Rex Tillerson.
I said, this guy's a green energy nightmare.
Everybody said, you're an idiot.
You don't know anything.
He was the head of Exxon.
It's like, you don't understand that these energy companies, all companies, they're the first ones jumping into the screen stuff.
They're going to make money in both directions.
It's just like the big investors on Wall Street.
They make money when it goes up.
They make money when it goes down.
They buy it longer.
They buy shorts or whatever.
They can make money going both ways.
And these people and these big energy companies, they got themselves set up to make massive amounts of money on all this green energy, things like solar, things like wind.
So... This article from Daily Haymaker says supporters of Whatley like to pass their guy off as just another proponent of offshore drilling.
And there's an organization there, CEA, Consumers, Business, Agriculture, Industry, End Users.
They say that they're advocating the Consumer Energy Alliance.
They say on their website that it is the voice of the energy consumer.
And we want to provide consumers with sound, unbiased information on U.S. and global energy issues.
But their 2016 Form 990 shows that it received almost $2.6 million that year and paid more than $1.1 million to HBW Resources, a public relations and lobbying firm.
That has Michael Whatley as the vice president, and it has four or five guys that split that money between them.
According to his biography on their website, Whatley, who was based in D.C., and again, it's another similar situation to Alex Azar, who was the top lobbyist for Eli Lilly, then eventually became their CEO, and He's based in DC. He's a lobbyist for energy, including green energy projects.
Served as a senior advisor to the Trump-Pence campaign and the transition team.
There again. There at the very beginning.
All these lobbyists paying off Trump and the transition team.
He represents companies and the energy and the transportation sectors before the U.S. Congress, before the federal government, and before the swamp, the agencies, then the federal government.
HBW reported $850,000 spent in lobbying revenue to the U.S. Senate in 2017.
Bribing senators.
That's what that is.
Including oil and gas producer Noble Energy and Sonova Energy, a residential solar and battery storage technology service provider.
So, again, just like T-Rex and Exxon, playing both sides of this thing, but playing Trump for money.
So when you look at where this is headed and you look at the politics being played last week, one prosecutor says that Trump has put forward a motion in this hush money payment case.
Now, you know, George Stephanopoulos on Sunday had Nancy Mason said, do you really support this guy who's been convicted by a jury of rape and then convicted again of taunting her in defamation?
Oh yes, and how dare you try to shame me?
What? How dare you try to shame me for rape?
I'm a rape victim, and I came forward so that I could put an exception in there that we can abort children who are the product of rape.
And she's absolutely unashamed of that.
Absolutely unashamed. He should have waited a little bit and asked her if she was ashamed of Trump and his hush money that he paid to multiple women to be quiet.
That case is the next one that's going to be coming out.
A new motion filed by Trump cites his claim to presidential immunity.
And yet, you know, when you look at commentary from a lawyer, he said, well, it's difficult to imagine that these allegations would be protected as a presidential duty or action, right? Difficult to label this as presidential.
He said hiring and making payments to your personal attorney to handle your personal affairs is He said that's not a presidential duty.
To reimburse Cohen for advancing hush money?
That's not a presidential duty.
Yeah, you know, he's petty, he's greedy, he's boasting, he's openly debauched just like Bill Clinton, and just like the Democrats didn't care about Bill Clinton.
Violently raping multiple women.
Credible accusations of that.
And neither did Ken Starr.
Well, you know, this is where this all began.
And like I said earlier, we used to have a country where somebody who did something like that would be a political suicide pill for that stuff to come out.
But at least people openly boast about it.
An evangelical group, Faith and Freedom, that is led by Ralph Reed, one of these people that was always the Christian Coalition.
He was the little fresh face for the Christian Coalition.
Now the Faith and Freedom Coalition is going to give Trump $62 million.
They don't call themselves a moral majority anymore.
I guess the morality is off of there.
And I don't know about the faith.
They've got their faith in Trump, who didn't give us any freedom.
I don't know where this is coming in.
You know, I wonder if the churches that shut down in 2020, are they going to support him?
Are they going to support the Faith and Freedom Foundation coalition that supports them?
In terms of home visits and voters reached at the door, to my knowledge, this is the largest effort on the right outside of the Republican National Committee ever, said Ralph Reed.
The initiative also reportedly includes handing out 30 million pieces of literature, And 125,000 churches, and I bet you most of these churches were probably shut down by Trump during the pandemic.
It's $10 million more than they gave him four years ago.
They gave him $52 million four years ago.
And now they're going to give him $62 million.
And as all of this is happening, we see the open debauchery and...
And the grifting by both of these candidates.
What we see now is that MAGA itself has turned into something of a Jacobin mob.
It really has. There's all these threats out there by all these different people about how we're going to take revenge.
And we're going to take revenge on all these Republican officials that are out there.
If you didn't support Trump, we're going to come after you.
We're seeing this from them all over the place, even at the state level.
Anybody who does not kiss Trump's ring, they're going to come after them for revenge.
Here's Wisconsin.
One guy there, Voss, infuriated Trump and his supporters by refusing to decertify Joe Biden's election win.
And he said, it truly is sad that a group of people who didn't get their way in the 2020 election are wasting resources and efforts working with Democrats to settle a political score rather than better using their time to defeat our ineffective Democrat president, he said in a statement.
And, of course, that was what I was saying when all the Stop the Steal, Save America stuff was happening and build up to January the 6th.
First of all, they've missed the deadline.
I said that December the 14th, I was fired three or four days later.
That was on a Monday. I was fired on a Thursday after I said it was nothing other than a grift.
Because they had already reported the results.
They had not had any effective actions whatsoever with disputing any of these cases.
They didn't take it to the Republican legislatures and have them send a different slate of electors officially.
There wasn't anything to be contested on January the 6th.
I said, at this point, it's nothing but a grift.
And then you saw them do nothing at all in terms of changing this vote-by-mail stuff.
They've left that in. And now you hear Laura Trump saying, we're going to outdo the Democrats in terms of vote harvesting.
And so nothing was done.
And so they had the runoff of two Senate seats in Georgia.
Both of them went Democrat.
And it turned over control of the Senate to the Democrats.
And I said, this is what happens when people care about nothing other than Trump.
But there's been 11,000 signatures.
Well, above the 6,800 signatures to force a recall election of this guy, Voss.
But he says he's going to, they're going to take a look at the validity of these things, which is another game that everybody plays with that.
But the people who are coming after him, leading this recall movement, because he did not support Trump sufficiently in their view, issued this threat.
Fail to serve the people, and you could be next.
Which people? You mean the Jacobin mob that has become MAGA? This was put out by Doggy Stylist.
I was right again.
It's more like the movie She-Devil with Roseanne Barr.
You've got Laura Looney and...
She's out for revenge.
Look at what she put out on social media.
Laura Looney.
It's true. The GOP spent millions against me to make sure that, to make me the first deplatformed candidate in U.S. history.
And guess what the GOP did to help me when I won my primary?
And was denied access to social media.
They laughed at me. They mocked me on late night TV shows.
And they didn't lift a finger to help me as I ran to reclaim Trump's home district.
I'll get you, my pretty, and your little dog, too!
Yeah, Laura Looney.
That's it. The evil Wicked Witch of the East.
We'll be right back. Looking for better information?
APSRadioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world.
at SRAdioNews.com.
♪♪♪
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Let's talk a little bit about money and finance.
We talked earlier about Boeing.
Losing a wheel, having a mid-air engine fire, dropping suddenly.
Well, it looks like the economy is not going to come in for an easy landing either.
After eight consecutive months of 3% inflation, the Fed's goal of 2% remains elusive.
It's a zero hedge.
I'm sorry, this is NBC News, actually.
The 12-month inflation rate has been stuck between 3% and 4% since June.
The official target rate is 2%.
NBC says, yet it is now clear that a third chapter has emerged, a stall.
Oh, yeah, the economy is stalling, which is what happens just before the plane drops out of the sky.
For the past eight months, stuck between 3% and 4%.
That's even after the Federal Reserve raised interest rates to their highest level since the 1980s, as it sought to bring the pace of price increases back towards its official goal of 2%.
Central bankers believe that by using high interest rates to slow the pace of borrowing and demand for money, price growth and thus inflation falls, they said.
Well, do you believe that it is 3-4% inflation?
Do you really believe that? Anybody at the grocery store believe that?
It's absolute nonsense.
But of course, many other things, like for example, the groomers at Disney World, they've gone up a lot more than that.
This article from a fan website of Disney called All Ears.
Yeah, All Ears.
They talked about the fact that over the last 10 years, Disney World prices have gone up by 91%.
Now, of course, this is just one thing, but we're seeing way more than 3% to 4% inflation on food, on cars, on many other things.
And you see that picture right there, that statue that's there in the end of Main Street and just before Cinderella's Castle.
That's Walt Disney's And he's holding the hand of a Mickey Mouse that comes up to his waist.
I remember when they put that statue up.
Karen and I used to go there pretty frequently.
We lived in Florida in the early years.
It was a nice place to just go hang out, like a nice park.
And that's the way he had originally designed it.
You could go to Disney World and you just pay for parking.
Entry was free. You could go in there.
Go to the restaurants and all that kind of stuff.
You know, you pay to park. You go in for free.
You can go to restaurants. You can just hang around the place.
They had extended hours.
You could, if you wanted to ride something, you bought a book of tickets, but you could use the tickets whenever you wanted to.
If you didn't use the tickets today, you could come back on another day, walk in for free after you paid to park, and you could take the rides.
That was the model that Walt Disney did.
Then Michael Eisner came in and made all the rides for free, reduced the number of hours, Jack the price up really big, and when they had that statue put in to honor Walt Disney as they were taking away his vision for the place, I said to Karen, I said, the one thing that's missing there is they need to have that statue of Walt and Mickey.
Pull that up again, Travis. That statue of Walt and Mickey, they need to have Michael Eisner in the back.
Bent over, stealing the wallet out of Walt Disney's back pocket.
That's what's really missing out of all that.
So, the big threat, the two big threats right now for all of us economically, really, inflation and digital money to track what we're doing and to prevent us from doing what we want to do.
There's a lot of things.
Disney World is not essential.
It truly is amazing to see people spending thousands of dollars to go there now.
It's crazy.
But there's other issues out there that are just as crazy and just as inflated, like the $7.3 trillion budget that Biden has put out.
Of course, it's dead on arrival.
But he's going to, just like the House and their impeachment things or stuff like that, they know that's not going to happen, but they're doing it simply for theater.
And that's what politics is, is theater.
So he's got these things and, you know, he's $7.3 trillion budget.
Yeah, we are just spending ourselves into bankruptcy faster and faster.
And every one of these presidents ramps it up.
You know, Trump was going up to $3 or $4 trillion a year, the deficit.
And now we're going to go even deeper with Biden if he gets his take on all this.
Raise taxes by a net of $4.9 trillion.
And to do that without any policy changes, I guess they can just squeeze the blood out of people with the army of IRS agents.
Defense spending.
Of course, it would go up, but that doesn't include the border.
Nothing for the border. Not going to defend our border.
It's going to be for Ukraine.
For Ukraine, they'll spend $60 billion in emergency aid, but for the Department of Homeland Security, in terms of immigration, they're not going to do anything to protect the border, but they will spend $8.7 billion to give free stuff to people who come across the open border.
Under his plan, Families making less than $200,000 a year will be guaranteed subsidized child care.
The government wants to raise your kids.
And they will pay you for that privilege.
They'll do it for free.
They want you to go to work so that, you know, both of you go to work so that you can pay more taxes.
And, of course, the taxes aren't going to pay for the For the child care.
We don't care about the deficit or anything.
We just want to make sure that we're the ones who are raising the kids, not you.
Very important that they get to do that.
And that's the real sucker play.
It's always the money.
It's always the cash incentives that they're putting out there.
Now, Jerome Powell, chair of the Fed.
Says that, yeah, there's going to be banks that are going to collapse, but it's going to be manageable.
He doesn't say which ones or when or why or whatever.
He does mention, some people said, you know, commercial real estate exposure.
Well, we know the banks that are too big to fail are not going to collapse.
They will let the medium and small banks collapse.
And, of course, they're the ones who are the most exposed to commercial real estate at the time.
Small and mid-sized banks.
Powell did not disclose which institutions are at risk and how many.
But, of course, we know the ones that are not going to be allowed to fail.
Ones like J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, others like that.
Visa, meanwhile.
Has put out, they're very proud of their new high-tech system that's all about biometric payment.
This is the path that we're going down.
Palm scanning payment terminals.
You can pay by using your hand.
I guess a chip implant is never.
Next, they're going to have artificial intelligence analyze anonymized biometric and payment data.
And that'll also allow the businesses to gain valuable insights as to how they can sell stuff to you and track you and all the rest of this.
This is why Ramaswamy wanted to do it for the pandemic.
These businesses can make a lot of money off of you.
But the key thing is that they are anticipating what you're going to do next.
It's been talked about since the middle of the 20th century.
It's a big new Brzezinski. Before he set up the Trilateral Commission, before he went to work for Carter and actually ran the Carter administration, he was somebody who was saying that we live between two ages.
The coming age, the technocratic age, he called it.
He said, we're going to know what you're going to do before you do it.
We're going to track and trace everything.
He laid out the plan exactly, what the globalists have been doing since then.
But if you're going to have AI follow everything that you do, if it is all going to be palm scanning and biometric data, guess what?
You need to have some real money outside of this virtual world.
And that they've created for everybody.
They want to trap everybody in.
Like I said before, CBDC and this, in addition to inflation.
It's one of the reasons why you need to get out of the dollar.
I know that Bitcoin is exploding in price.
I've been on roller coasters before.
I want something that's going to be stable.
You can pick whatever you want, but if you want to get gold and silver, Tony Arterburn, big supporter of this show, big friend of this show.
And Tony has set up davidknight.gold, which will take you to Tony's website, and he can help you with...
Small or large purchases.
He can help you with Wolfpack where you can set money aside on a regular basis.
And he uses that group to get priced like a buyer's club.
He can get a price advantage to more people that he gets in there.
So you can gradually accumulate it.
You can buy it small. You can buy it big.
It can help you with your retirement plans and other things like that.
But see, we look at this and what Visa is saying.
The future of biometric payments is promising and it is set to revolutionize the retail experience.
All of these stores are going to want this.
Because it's going to mean fewer people at checkout.
It's going to mean that they get insights into your purchasing behavior.
Visa said they're also going to offer things like virtual try-on experience, where you could go in and get your body scanned, and then they can show what you're going to look like wearing these various clothes and all the rest of this stuff.
Augmented reality combined with artificial intelligence, the evolution of e-commerce, says Visa, and a growing comfort of consumers with online shopping as well as with contactless payments.
It's a world in which you will have no contact with human beings either.
That's the key.
Everything will be through your digital virtual world.
Augmented reality powered virtual shopping.
Even for the brick and mortar stores.
Even virtual fitting rooms.
And they said they've already got this operating in the Singapore Innovation Center.
Very similar to some of these cases, what Amazon is doing with their just walkout stores.
We just pick stuff up and you walk out with it, but they know who you are.
They scan you. They scan the other stuff.
Do you find that to be creepy?
And every time they talk about this, they say, well, we've got privacy-preserving authentication in our biometric templates.
Do you really believe that?
If you do, you're a real sucker.
They're going to be giving all of this information to the government.
They may anonymize it when they give it to a corporation, or they may not.
Who knows? But they will not anonymize it when they give it to the government.
And again, this goes back to one of the reasons why they put through CISA. They finally took out the P because they didn't want people asking questions, I guess, about who is being protected because it certainly isn't us.
It's the corporations that are being protected from giving your personal information to other people, protected from being sued.
Visa said in their filing, if our personal devices could participate in An external-facing authentication, too, where biometric measurement is captured by a nearby external sensor, then we can also enjoy a frictionless authentication experience in a variety of physical spaces.
Well, it sounds like a real dystopian nightmare, doesn't it?
Because it is. And when we look at the Big Tech Corporation, this is Reclaim the Net, the Big Tech Coalition is pushing online age verification and digital ID. This is the way it will come at us from the GOP. The GOP wants to save the children from porn.
So we've got to have a digital ID to get onto the Internet.
We have to save our jobs from illegals that they let in.
So we have to get a digital ID. We're going to have to protect people from computer-generated artwork, AI, you know, AI fakes and things like that.
So you and I will have to get an ID and validate everything that we do.
You see a pattern here?
We're not worried about the online pornographers.
We're not worried about the people coming across the border.
We're not worried about the artificial intelligence either.
It all means that we've got to get the ID. Not the people coming across the border, not the people running these porn sites, and not the people who are doing the fake artwork.
They don't have to rubber stamp this stuff.
We have to get the ID. And this is the way it's being sold to us by the GOP. They've got conservatives now in these various areas begging for online ID. They know how to work both groups because these people are so easy to read, so easy to manipulate, these partisan supporters.
Now we're hearing that a big tech group called Digital Trust and Safety Partnership has come out in support of age verification and its response to the UN's wide-ranging global digital compact.
The members of this coalition, Google, Apple, Meta, TikTok, Microsoft, LinkedIn, Amazon, Twitch, Reddit, Pinterest, Zoom, and Match Group, Bitly, and Discord have rebranded age verification as age assurance.
And they reveal that they're willing to combat harmful online content, but that this could, to actually work, highly likely mean a collection of new personal data such as facial imagery or government-issued ID.
It'll begin with some of this content that people want regulated.
But that's not going to stop with that.
It'll move towards everything.
Well, now that we've got an ID worked out for people to get on a porn site or something, or you've got to have government permission and government ID in order to get hired on a job or something, prove who you are.
Well, now we can extend that to everything.
It'll immediately be applied to everything.
That's the carrot that big tech wants for itself in return for playing ball with the UN and with its initiatives.
And it's a dangerous kind of thing.
Linking individuals' digital ID to their bank accounts.
You see how all these things are converging?
The CBDC and all the rest of the stuff.
And this is why, you know, like Catherine Austin Fitz, I want to get out of the digital world.
You know, I want physical things.
You look at cash.
You look at also gold or silver, whatever.
That is outside of the digital world.
It is completely anonymous.
There's no way that they're going to track those transactions with other people.
Suing the National Park Service for not accepting cash.
This is a new lawsuit. Some people pushing back against a cashless society being imposed now through government parks.
They charged to get into all the national parks.
They stole the land from various people.
The Apaches have got a lawsuit going out in Arizona over Tonto National Forest.
That's a national park.
That was there. It was a historical, religious site for them.
It's a recreational site for Americans.
But now the Park Service has decided...
That they're going to sell this for a massive mining operation.
Copper is there.
And they're going to make such a big crater, they'll be visible from space.
And so the Indians, the Apache Indians, are suing for that.
But when you look at how the government has gone in and owns these massive tracts of land, calling them parks, we've just had, you know, Obama did massive land grabs in terms of new parks.
Biden is doing one right now.
Then the next thing they do is to make sure that people can actually have access to it.
You know, they make it smaller and smaller, the amount of the park that is available to the people.
They charge people to come into the park.
Yeah, because the government believes in user fees, they say, for that type of thing.
Here in Smoky Mountain National Park, they never charged for it because we've got roads that run right through it.
And it was an agreement that they would not charge to get into the park.
It was the last park that they'd not charge to get in.
Now they've come up with a way to do it.
The guy that Biden put in.
Well, we can't stop you from coming here and using these public roads, cutting through, but if you stop, you've got to pay.
Well, the National Monument in Georgia, Fort Pulaski, these people went in, and they decided that they wanted to pay by cash.
But the National Park Service would not allow them to do that.
And so the question here in this lawsuit is whether or not the US government itself can refuse to accept the paper money that they have claimed is legal tender.
Judging by the filing, the Fort Pulaski employees were equally indoctrinated against accepting cash as they were trying to be helpful.
The visitors were first told in no uncertain terms that only cards would be accepted.
And then if, say they had no cards, that they might not want to use them, doesn't seem to have been a consideration, if they were instructed to go to a grocery store chain like Walmart and then buy a gift card.
Bye.
Bye.
However, bizarrely and unnecessarily complicated, this might sound all the more ironic because it appears that the explanation for this policy is that cards are more convenient.
And that's what Fort Pulaski wanted.
Cards of any sort.
You know, even if they go to Walmart to buy a loaded card, we'll take that.
We're just not going to handle that...
Dirty cash.
Can't do that. By forcing people to use credit cards or digital wallets under the guise of convenience, the National Park Service becomes a player in the surveillance state.
And in undermining park visitors' privacy rights, says the Children's Health Defense General Counsel Mack Rosenberg, commenting on the case.
So it's good. You know, these people are making a point about this.
And they're willing to go to the mat to pursue this and to make a statement about the government trying to remove cash.
At the same time, you see the Department of Commerce, which is supposed to facilitate commerce, right?
Picking winners and losers, shutting things down.
Of course, as I've said before, many people appeal to the Department of Commerce and For the war on drugs, well, the Department of Commerce can shut down anything at once.
The purpose of the Commerce Clause, there was no Department of Commerce, but the purpose of the Commerce Clause was to stop the restriction of commerce, and so that's what they're being used for.
Again, you needed a constitutional amendment to prohibit alcohol.
You need a constitutional amendment to prohibit anything.
But now the Commerce Department is proposing all new know-your-customer rules for the internet infrastructure.
So, an ID to get onto the internet?
Know-your-customer rules.
It's not just having an ID where they can validate your age or something, but they need to know all about you.
Just like you're dealing with a bank or like you're dealing with a cryptocurrency exchange or something like that.
That's why, you know, it was really a powerful position for Wilbur Ross, the Rothschild banker that saved Trump with his casino bankruptcies.
He rescued Trump.
Yeah, it can take a long time to get paid off, but eventually it happens, doesn't it?
Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
Get details at APSradio.com.
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪ 這些畫面,對於非� certa画面,對於非派系型的視頻即境畫作廢片生物, 也 custom pay , most of you, are not used to pay for Androoney Call's installation or Creases Herld.
dwa belinkу стать Fun, but it is quite overwhelming for the people of androoney Call's sponsor specific customer and owner of the photos.
...
yes,
...
Show. Gordon Shumway says, I'm afraid before long it's not going to be safe to camp with all the illegals that are roaming the National Forest.
Trust me, you're not going to go far before you have an encounter.
That's true. We don't know who these people are, right?
They're undocumented. Well, not in the country that they come from.
They're just undocumented here.
They may have a long, long rap sheet where they come from, but we're not allowed to know or ask.
Thank you, by the way. Brandon Beckett, thank you very much for the tip.
I appreciate that. Denver is asking landlords to rent to illegals now.
Well, maybe they'll do something like that CDC order that was put out by the Trump administration.
Saying, landlords, if somebody's not paying you, you can't evict them.
You're still on the hook to the bank, but the bank can't foreclose on your mortgage right now.
But there wasn't anything that kept those payments from building and accruing interest and ruining your credit.
Maybe they couldn't foreclose, but all the rest of that stuff could happen.
And so the CDC just said, no, you can't do that.
And that was done under Trump, and Trump extended that once, and then Biden extended it a couple of times.
The Supreme Court really didn't want to stop it, but eventually they did.
You had Kavanaugh, who was the deciding vote, said, well, they promised me that they're going to stop in 30 days.
And he let it go. Guess what?
30 days, the CDC continued it.
Then that kind of made him mad, and they stopped it.
That's how bad things have gotten.
So is it going to be something like that where maybe the feds step in?
Maybe Border Patrol will demand that landlords rent to illegals.
Maybe they just let them squat.
Maybe they don't even have to pay anything.
Or maybe it'll be the Department of Justice that'll come in.
Maybe it'll be the CDC. Who knows?
It could be anything. We have left...
The rule of law completely.
On Tuesday, Denver launched a program gathering information from landlords.
So you better tell us about your property.
And property vacancies that rent for less than $2,000 a month.
But of course, they will be paying the rent for the people coming across the border because it's a big welfare magnet.
The program was launched as the city continues to close temporary hotel shelters in an effort to scale back costs, which the mayor announced at the end of February.
A move, he said, could save the city some $60 million out of an anticipated $180 million in expenses related to the migrants.
I guess that's per year.
They don't specify. But, hey, the only problem, say these mayors like the one in Denver...
We've got to get the federal government to pay for it.
They can just print more money.
That's a problem for us.
But in the meantime, the cities and the states have to start to make things meet if Biden isn't just going to get the federal government to cut him a check.
So they've got to pay for this somehow.
They've cut $5 million from programs in order to give free housing to the illegals.
And that's the way that it's going to go.
And all this is happening while they are, this is from Real Clear Wire, this is all happening while 5,000 officials in the city of Denver are making more than $100,000 apiece.
How many people do you think they have working for the government in the city of Denver?
I don't know. But at least 5,000 of them are making six-figure salaries.
Oh, roughly one-third.
So they got about 15,000 city employees in Denver.
You think they need that many? Do they need to pay them that much?
Open the books. Auditors found police officers making $281,000.
Nearly 5,000 Denver employees took home more than $100,000 last year.
Then the city paid $225 million into its employees' retirement plans, their second largest expenditure in 2023.
Denver spent $42 million to house 38,830 migrants in the last year, and there are currently 3,800 people currently in their shelters.
Well, when you look at the Super Tuesday exit polls from last week, said that in North Carolina and Virginia, Republicans said that immigration was their top issue.
Their top issue.
It is an important issue, but I think what happened in the pandemic should be the top issue.
But these are exit polls.
Isn't it interesting how we always get this exit poll information?
Well, this is what Republicans say.
This is what Democrats say.
This is what white male Republicans who are left-handed say.
I mean, we get it broken down by detailed demographics about what is happening.
But you know what they never tell us?
They never tell us.
Our exit polls showed that X percentage of people supported candidate A and Y percentage of people supported candidate B. They never tell us that.
Why? Why? Well, the State Department looks at exit polls and looks at those total numbers, which they have, right?
But are never reported.
There's one organization that does the exit polling for all of the press organizations.
And I don't even know if they show them the total.
They certainly know the total.
Because they know how many people of every demographic cross-tabulation voted for Biden, how many voted for Trump or whatever the candidates are running.
They know total what everybody voted for.
But they break it down in the demographics and they won't give you the total.
And the reason for that is because that would be the easiest way for people to see how rigged the election is.
When the State Department looks at a foreign country, they look at the exit polling and they compare it to the reported vote.
If it varies by more than 5%, they consider it to be a stolen election.
That's why they don't tell you in America because every election has always been stolen.
It doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter. They're all rigged, and they're all corrupt.
But getting back to this in terms of immigration, 43% of North Carolina Republican primary voters, 37% of those in Virginia said it was the most important issue, and that was the number one issue for both of them.
And yet, as I said before, you know, this E-Verify thing, the problem solution thing.
This is, in Arizona, they're looking at new mandatory E-Verify measures, even more so than they have already put in.
And so, you know, again, voters are begging for this stuff.
Nationwide, the surge of E-Verify queries has not coincided with a significant reduction in the number of illegal workers.
It's just a scam. It's another phony solution to a manufactured problem.
And I think it's another reason why the Republicans aren't doing anything about it.
We've always had a situation where the numbers have been rigged, and we have seen the Democrats always want more voters.
The Republicans are being run by interests who want to have cheaper labor.
But now I think both of them want to have an excuse to tag and track us.
I think both of them do.
If we look at Frankfurt, it's become the first German city to hang Ramadan lights.
Frankfurt has become the first German city to put up lights at a cost of 50,000 euros to honor the fact that 15% of its population is now Muslim.
Kind of interesting, too, because, you know, it was a Frankfurt School where they sold Marxism to Hollywood, right?
Now this is coming full tilt back to them.
And, of course, it's being run by the Greens and the SPD, the Marxists.
The Green Department for Diversity and Anti-Discrimination passed a motion in Parliament last year to honor Ramadan and to spend money to put up Ramadan lights.
On Rumble, Swamp Lover says, NRA, if they were legit with all the money that they had, could easily fight and win against every gun law restriction in existence.
But once they do that, they would not be needed.
And that's the situation that we have with a lot of the pro-life organizations as well.
And that's one of the reasons why I think they are now trying to refederalize this issue that the Supreme Court said does not belong in the federal government.
We don't have the authority under the Constitution to make a decision about when life begins.
That should be done in the states.
And then you've got all the Republicans and a lot of Democrats saying we want it back.
We're going to pass a law about that.
And you know what's going to happen with that.
They're going to bring it back and they're going to make it more easy to kill babies.
Speaking of even having babies, this is a study from the Heritage Foundation, the biggest conservative think tank, says that higher education is fueling a decline in marriage and in birth rate.
And of course we've known that for a long time.
The declining birth rates in the West have multiple factors involved in them.
There's food and chemicals and the drugs that people are given.
There's a physiological component to it, but there's also a big sociological component.
That sociological component is highly skewed towards education, but it is also entertainment and everything that is in the culture.
Their report was called the birth dearth.
Why the decline in marriage and total fertility is a genuine crisis?
Well, those are not honored or anticipated or wanted anymore in all the stuff that we are shown, right?
Hollywood denigrates that and has for most of my life.
Now, as a young child, these were things that people aspired to, especially women aspired to having children and a family, but now they have been denigrated.
A career is what you want.
You want to turn your kids over to have Joe Biden raise them.
Isn't that what you all want?
When you do that, you're going to wind up in a nightmare scenario in a couple of years when they get older.
The demographic crisis in the US is real and a threat to society as we know it, said the report.
In the US, the birth rate in 2022 was 1.65.
You need to have 2.1 births per woman in order to maintain your population, so it's declining.
The policy expert noted that a majority of undergraduate students now take six years to complete a four-year degree, thus delaying marriage and family life.
Yeah, that was my mistake.
We did that.
Took me six years to get a degree because I changed majors five times and schools three times.
I couldn't decide what I wanted to do when I grew up.
Still trying to decide.
And so...
Got started late. And once we started, it's like, hey, this is not working.
What do we do about that?
It's a long story.
Anyway, court has rejected the challenge to a Maine law that promoted religious discrimination.
And so this is a law that Maine put in a poison pill regulation for religious and private schools.
A cross-point churches Bangor Christian School in Bangor, Maine participated in the program from its founding in 1970 until 1981 when the state amended the law to require that participating schools be non-sectarian.
they ran it just long enough to get the money strings hooked into people.
right? And so after a decade, they're now dependent on this government funding, and then what do they do?
They pull it away. The injunction stems from a series of back-and-forth legal exchanges on Maine's tuition program.
The program enables school districts that do not have their own high schools to pay tuition for local students to attend either a private high school or a public high school in another district.
But see, it's always about the money, and that's something that People who are going to be homeschooling, people who are going to be doing private schools, all the rest, stay away from government money.
That's what they use to control you.
That's what they use to destroy you.
Whether you're talking about the policies of the Obama administration tied to the funding from the Department of Education, or, you know, if people understood how the government really works, they would have clearly seen what Trump was doing with the pandemic and the lockdown, funding it.
You put that money out there, you give the money to the hospitals, you give it to these other organizations, they will pull it back.
And I still see, as I talked about yesterday, homeschool organizations, and we need to have money for this and we need to have money for that for homeschool parents.
Do not take their money.
It's a trap. Maine Democrats are quietly reintroducing pro-transgender bill to eliminate parental rights.
You see? It's always about attacking parental rights.
About getting the parents away from the children so they can do what they wish.
That's why we call them groomers.
That's what child molesters do.
Quietly reintroduced a bill.
It was the same transgender bill that was unanimously defeated.
In January...
But they have now, they're bringing it back.
It was killed in the Judiciary Committee in January.
Republican critics of the bill are blasting the provisions as anti-family, anti-child.
The bill prohibits any interference from children, from parents.
If the children have been indoctrinated by the schools we pay taxes for.
Sarah B. says, everything is a problem reaction.
It's more than obvious that we are on the destruction list, doing everything they can to do it.
And of course, that is especially to our children.
Thank you for joining us today.
Have a good day. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.