Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 13, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:02:15

The David Knight Show - 12/13/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's the 13th of December, year of our Lord, 2023.
	Well, today we have some very interesting news.
	We've got fluoride in the water back in the news, back in a lawsuit, by the way.
	I had not seen this, but the lawsuit is ongoing, and it tells us a great deal about the COVID pandemic and the shot and the rest of the stuff, as I've been saying for a long time.
	We will also take a look, and I've got an update and a correction to make about Google's Gemini.
	Yeah, they faked it. It's amazing how fake this artificial intelligence stuff really is.
	And what's going to happen when the stock market realizes that they've run off the cliff And like a Looney Tunes cartoon character, there's nothing underneath them.
	Yeah, it's going to come crashing to the ground.
	And something very important, we've got a Democrat who is running for president merely so that she can show the truth about abortion.
	Yeah, a Democrat doing what the Republicans should be doing.
	They don't have the guts to do.
	We'll be right back.
	Also, Goatree is going to be joining us in the third hour.
	We're going to talk about all this interesting coincidences of engineered panic about a cyber attack.
	We've got the Washington Post pushing all the buttons.
	China's coming after us.
	China's everywhere. They're shutting everything down.
	And it happened at exactly the same time as this Netflix garbage that I showed you a little bit of a clip of yesterday.
	Oh yeah, cyber apocalypse and everything has been destroyed.
	Oh, one other thing.
	Don't trust white people.
	Yeah, Mama agrees that.
	Don't trust white people. Well, you know, that was put together by Barack and Michelle Obama.
	Yeah, they're the producers on that.
	Netflix, you remember, gave them a massive stash of cash.
	And this is what we get out of that.
	Now, in Colorado, the cattle industry is suing because the government keeps reintroducing wolves.
	Isn't this the perfect metaphor for our government?
	And, of course, it's a different type of solution than they have in the Netherlands where they just go in and arrest people for having fertilizer.
	You know, you have to have a black market in fertilizer.
	Is there any other kind of market that you would have in fertilizer other than a black market?
	Brown market, maybe. I don't know.
	I guess that's what we call the brown market in fertilizer.
	But here they have a novel solution.
	Let's let wolves loose.
	And as Associated Press is saying, well, you know, it's rare that they may come in and destroy all your chickens or all your livestock, but it's rare.
	And you don't really matter.
	Because they're only worried about the big businesses.
	You know, you... Independent people who are trying to grow your own food.
	Or independent farmers who aren't part of Big Agri.
	You really don't count. And so, you know, it's rare and unimportant.
	You're non-essential, as Trump told us.
	But it's a perfect predatory metaphor.
	And perhaps their solution to getting rid of cattle and meat.
	Just weeks before the deadline for Colorado to begin reintroducing gray wolves under a voter-approved initiative.
	Yeah, Benjamin Franklin was ahead of his time, wasn't he?
	You know, we got some predictions from Nostradamus for 2024.
	But Benjamin Franklin said, democracy is a couple of wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
	That's exactly what happened in Colorado.
	And of course, the Colorado people who voted for the wolves are too stupid to understand.
	That it's going to be taking away their dinner.
	Representatives of the cattle industry are suing the state and federal agencies in the hopes of delaying the release.
	So that referendum and the liberals in Colorado, the wolves, outvoted the sheep.
	The lawsuit filed on Monday with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Says that they failed to adequately review the effects of the plan to reintroduce up to 50 wolves over the next several years.
	You see, it's interesting because these wolves had been hunted to extinction, nearly extinction.
	They were exterminated across most of the United States by the 1930s.
	And you know, what was it that helped to lead to that extermination?
	It was a government-sponsored poisoning and trapping campaign.
	You see, our government used to be on our side.
	They used to want to help us.
	But now our government has become wolves.
	And as I've referred to it in the past, I said, if you really want to know what the federal government is, just take the D out.
	It's a feral government.
	Just like you got dogs, man's best friend, but you let them go back and go wild and they go feral.
	Oh, very dangerous. Because just like the government, they hunt in packs.
	And we have a feral government.
	A feral government that in the 1930s was domesticated enough that it would protect us from wolves.
	It had at least a little bit of a sheepdog instinct in it.
	Now the government has gone feral.
	It's like a giant Great Pyrenees who's somehow reverted back to a wild wolf or a dog.
	That's what the federal government has become.
	A lot of people still think it's a Great Pyrenees, and it's not.
	It's the wolf. And it's breeding wolves.
	And so they nearly got them, they started hunting them down in the 1930s, just like when we were back in Texas.
	Various jurisdictions, because of the feral pigs being so destructive and just multiplying so quickly, they would offer a bounty.
	If you bring in a pig's tail, they'd give you five bucks.
	And you could shoot them anytime, anywhere, if you could find them.
	If you could get there very wily and difficult to hunt.
	But if you could get one, they'd give you a bonus on it.
	And so, evidently, that was one of the things that the government was doing.
	Maybe they were killing themselves, or maybe they were paying other people to kill them.
	But it was so successful that they gave the wolves endangered species protection in 1975.
	Because, again, we're looking at the EPA and these federal agencies that are...
	At the cusp right there, that's where things turned.
	They started turning against people and using the environment and other things like that as excuses.
	Keep some of them in a zoo.
	That's fine. It's kind of like saying, well, you know, there used to be lions throughout Europe, right?
	There used to be lions throughout Europe.
	There were lions throughout the Middle East.
	Just go back and look at it.
	When we were in the British Museum, there was a very interesting area there about Sennacherib, who was the Syrian king that invaded Judah.
	And there was a massive relief that they had carved to tell the story about it.
	Interesting that it matched the biblical account exactly.
	But the... But the fact is that as part of that, they had massive sculptures and relief, bath relief sculptures that showed the king hunting lions everywhere from his chariot with bow and arrow.
	They used to be everywhere.
	Used to be in China, used to be in Europe, used to be in the Middle East.
	They were eradicated everywhere because, you know, they tend to be a problem everywhere except for sub-Saharan Africa.
	But, you know, and you look at it and say, well, maybe they knew something that our governments don't.
	But just imagine if you had the Assyrian government decide they're going to reintroduce lions because, you know, the king likes to hunt them.
	And we don't care if it comes into your village.
	Kills a slew of people.
	Remember the movie?
	Michael Douglas, Val Kilmer, Ghost in the Darkness.
	That's based on a true story.
	We just re-watched that about six or seven months ago.
	Yeah, why not? Just bring them in.
	They may become extinct.
	We need more of them.
	Then you're going to be able to get in the zoo.
	Just give them free range.
	That's our government's approach.
	So they started a campaign to reduce their numbers in the 1930s, and they gave them endangered species protection in 1975.
	And now there are an estimated 7,500 wolves and about 1,400 packs.
	Still not as many bureaucracies as we've gotten in the presidency, right?
	Yeah. Not nearly as many wolves in the deep state under the executive branch that Trump never did anything about.
	So they're roaming through the contiguous United States.
	They said, in 2022, what are they doing as they roam around?
	Gray wolves attacked domesticated animals hundreds of times across 10 states, including Colorado.
	But the Colorado voters said, let's have more of that.
	Because, you know, they also elect Democrats.
	Democrats and wolves.
	That's what the Democrat politicians and wolves, that's what they want in Colorado.
	Data showed that attacks killed or injured at least 425 cattle and calves, 313 sheep and lambs, 40 dogs, 10 chickens, 5 horses, and 4 goats.
	While those losses can be devastating to individuals...
	Or to pet owners, the industry-wide impact is minimal.
	It's rare, as Fauci would say.
	Who cares? Not my stuff?
	Oh, okay, so they wiped out your cattle.
	You got a small farm? They wiped out your cattle?
	We don't care. Big Agra is what we care about.
	You're not essential, just like during Trump's lockdown.
	You're not essential. So, as part of this, we connected to this.
	It has now come out that in Australia...
	You had the wolves who were actually watching and estimating the sheep and how they were going to react in all of this.
	The government in Victoria, the Australian state, where COVID was the worst, and again...
	They say COVID was the worst.
	They had the most number of people who died that they labeled dying from COVID. They died with a positive PCR test.
	They died with no medical treatment, for example.
	And again, I will continue down that.
	I will defend that position.
	Prove to me. That they died from COVID. Proved to me that they didn't die from neglect, from do not resuscitate orders, from no treatment or from maltreatment with things like remdesivir and the ventilators.
	Look, respiratory disease is always, every year, it kills a lot of people.
	No question about it.
	That year, what was different about it was the way it was not treated and maltreated.
	And then, of course, a little PCR test that they did.
	That was what was different.
	And I know a lot of people have had some very severe respiratory disease.
	I know a really good friend who had that in North Carolina.
	He said he was really, really sick.
	He took ivermectin. He said it was like this burning sensation.
	He was gone. It was gone.
	He didn't die. The respiratory illness left him right away.
	And so, you know, the silver lining in all this is that we may have found a more effective treatment for respiratory illness and pneumonia and other things like that.
	It certainly is far more effective than anything you're going to get to the hospital.
	Stay away from the hospitals.
	But the...
	The reality, going back, I'll just tell you my personal experience.
	Kara and I got very sick in 2019.
	We traveled in early December of 2019.
	Both of us got very sick.
	And I think it was something that we picked up on the trip.
	But that's not unusual for that type of thing to happen.
	I've got to say, the worst, what was far worse than that, was something that I picked up in 2009.
	Now, in 2009, they were saying, it's a swine flu.
	Be careful, swine flu everywhere. And they told me that's what I had, and they gave me the test.
	And, you know, they gave me that long, you know, thing up your nose at that time.
	2009, that's 14 years ago.
	I had really bad pneumonia.
	And the interesting thing about it is that it lasted for a very long time.
	I guess I had long swine.
	I had long swine.
	But no, seriously, there's something about it.
	And in the last couple of years, I haven't had a bad respiratory illness, thankfully.
	But whenever I get sick with a cold, it used to go straight to my head.
	Now it goes straight to my chest.
	So there's something about that that is still there.
	I should stock up on survivor mectin while I can.
	Senator Nicely made it legal here in Tennessee, even though, as some listeners who live in Tennessee said, you may not be able to get the big pharmaceutical boxes to fill it for you.
	You may have to go to an independent drugstore, which we should be going to anyway.
	But, you know, that type of thing has been around for a long time, and they used it as a selling point every year to push their flu vaccines, which is, again, ridiculous because you didn't know what strain of flu was coming, so how could they produce a vaccine?
	They must have contacted Nostradamus.
	He probably has somewhere in there.
	You could probably interpret his quatrains to tell you what the strain of flu was going to be next year as well, or this year.
	So, in Australia...
	Brownstone says there's been an unexpected validation of the title, Our Enemy, The Government, that they published this year.
	In a stunning indictment of the state of the governance of the Australian state of Victoria, an unidentified senior bureaucrat...
	Classified citizens according to their compliance with the government's COVID dictates.
	This was the state whose capital, Melbourne, suffered through the world's longest lockdown of 267 days.
	Yet, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, it had the worst overall COVID mortality outcome between March 2020 and the end.
	Overall... They said they had 16 per 100,000 people died with or not necessarily from COVID, compared to a national average of 12.4%.
	In New South Wales, that was the second worst.
	13.5 in Western Australia.
	I'm sorry, they had...
	New South Wales was second.
	The national average was 12.4.
	New South Wales was second at 13.5.
	Western Australia, the best, was 7.7 deaths per 100,000 people.
	But that area where they locked everybody down, 16 per 100,000 people.
	The Australian publication reported on the 12th of December that those most critical of and strongly opposed to the volley of pandemic-triggered restrictions on individual and commercial activities and personal freedoms, who had the critical faculty and the temerity to believe that the threat of COVID was exaggerated, that the threat of COVID was tyrannical government.
	That's the enemy. Yeah.
	Medical martial law.
	Um... And prioritize individual over collective rights.
	They didn't accept the authority of the government to tell them what to do.
	They believed the restrictions to be illegitimate, and they followed, to be followed only under coercion.
	And they were all too likely to embrace fantastical conspiracy theories.
	This is what their story found.
	That's what the government officials said.
	So you think that government tyranny is the enemy?
	You think this is fake?
	You think this is about collective rights instead of individual rights?
	Because again, what is the collective?
	It's nothing but individuals. What is public health?
	It's not a collective health. You don't have collective health.
	The collective health is a measurement of the sum of all the individual health.
	And so if you say individual health doesn't matter, you can't have public health.
	If you say individual rights don't matter, you can't have collective rights.
	There is no such thing, by the way, as collective rights.
	It's all individual. Just like there's no such thing as public health.
	It's all individual.
	And so they finish up by calling people conspiracy theorists.
	That doesn't intimidate me at all.
	It doesn't intimidate me at all to be called any of these made-up names.
	Every time they disagree. If they can't debate you, Just, you know, you should see it as a sign of weakness when they call you a conspiracy theorist or a racist.
	That's the other one. They don't want to, oh, you're just racist.
	You're racist. You're white privileged or whatever.
	Okay. Well, they're projecting.
	And they have nothing to say.
	And these are the people who want to hide their data.
	Anyway, the report was sent to the government on the 16th of April, 2022.
	It was only recently released to the Australian, a paper.
	Because they filed a Freedom of Information request.
	And they broke everybody into five different categories.
	And the most compliant people were the ones who trusted authorities to act in the best interest of the community, inclined to strongly support and follow restrictions as the right thing to do for the family and for the community.
	This is what was being sold to Christians, for example, as one of the many, many Games that were, you know, psychological games that Yale had done, actually control studies.
	They had a control group, and they had another group that got one of these, and it was about a dozen different lies they would tell people.
	You need to do it to love your neighbor.
	You need to do it for the community.
	You need to do it because it's science.
	You need to do it because of moonshots.
	It's like, exactly.
	Don't use that moonshot argument with me anymore, either.
	That's another big red flag.
	It's like, yes, I think it is very much like a moonshot.
	But that was what Al Mohler was telling people.
	You had Curtis Chang, who was getting a big wad of cash from Trump via the Ad Council, to go in and to propagandize pastors and churches so they could lie to their sheep.
	And so Curtis Chang would bring in other pastors like the big MAGA pastor who's got a mega church, Robert Jeffries, who's always joined at the hip with Trump.
	Never bothers to talk to Trump about his soul.
	But he talks about Trump being the king, the president, all the rest.
	I mean, it's just disgusting what these pastors are.
	How is it that the worst people get the biggest churches?
	It's just... It's like Joel Osteen, Robert Jeffries in Dallas.
	Joel Osteen's in Houston.
	Yeah, they're in Texas.
	Everywhere. So, anyway, you've got Franklin Graham, Al Mohler, people like Todd Friel.
	If the government tells you to wear pinwheels on your head, you wear pinwheels on your head.
	That's what passes for discernment in the Christian churches today.
	Anyway, so...
	These people who strongly supported and followed restrictions as the right thing to do for the family and the community, many of them are now missing.
	They've been ripped to shreds by the wolves.
	The government was using taxpayer money to commission research from a private consultancy to grade people according to a COVID compliance score.
	I was banned from YouTube because I said 2020 was the year the world became China.
	This is social credit stuff, right?
	All of it. Social credit.
	You're going to have to have our approval before you do anything.
	Got to have the pandemic ID. Well, 2020 was the year the world became China.
	And when I said in March that it was medical martial law, that's true as well.
	But it got me banned by Google in many different places.
	Got me banned by PayPal and Venmo.
	Got kicked off of those as well.
	And I'm fine with that, quite frankly.
	They will not be my judge, ultimately.
	Once collective welfare is allowed to override individual rights, the government acquires unlimited, unchecked power.
	How true, as they point out in the Brownstone article.
	Well, I mentioned that there was a landmark fluoride lawsuit.
	You'll find this on the Free Thought Project, but the people who originally reported, and this is the article, originally came from The Last American Vagabond.
	I want to give them credit. They did great work.
	I have said for the longest time...
	That fluoride, you know, you can have this argument back and forth, and we know because Harvard has done studies of elevated levels of fluoride, and how elevated levels of fluoride depress the IQ significantly of children who are given fluoridated water.
	It's not a question. They just say, well, that's not what you're going to get in our fluoridated water.
	And I always said, well, how do you know?
	How do you measure the dosage?
	And this has been validated, of course, if you take a look at what happened with the Trump shots.
	Pfizer's shot dosage between different lots, the active ingredient, varied by a factor of 33.
	Some people got 33 times the highest dosage.
	The people got 33 times what the people at the low end of the scale did.
	Now, you know, a lot of times you get a bottle of pills, and they'll give you one month.
	You know, take one of these a day.
	30 pills. So, what do you think the outcome would be if instead of taking one of those pills, you took the entire bottle?
	And that's what we saw most of the deaths and injuries were in those lots.
	It was kind of a lottery, wasn't it?
	Or actually, it was a test.
	By Pfizer, because they didn't want to bother to do the test.
	They just wanted to know what dosage would kill people.
	And they found out. And I always said that prior to the COVID lockdown.
	I always said that about fluoride.
	I said, well, that's fine.
	We've got a lot of scientists and a lot of studies that show that fluoride harms your IQ, especially children.
	But I said, we don't even need to debate that science.
	Because... They're giving it to people in the water.
	How do you control the dosage of something if you dump it into the water?
	And would there be a different dosage?
	If you were going to give fluoride pills, would you give the same dosage to a 200-pound man that you would give to a child?
	An infant, even.
	Because they use it to make infant formula.
	A lot of people do. They mix, you know, mix water with a formula.
	So how in the world could you justify medicating the population through the water supply?
	You don't know the dosage that anybody's going to get.
	Again, it's going to be like a lottery.
	And common sense should tell you that that's going to be the situation where you just dump a bunch of a chemical into the water supply.
	But, you know, it's especially amazing and appalling that Pfizer would do this.
	That's why I said I don't think it's an accident that they did it.
	I don't think that you can be that sloppy with your manufacturing process.
	Some people get 3,300% more than other people do.
	Do they do that with anything? Again, you take an entire bottle of pills instead of one.
	Or you get one pill that's got the dosage equivalent to an entire bottle of pills for the other guy.
	So I don't believe that that was ever an accident.
	And I don't believe that this was an accident either.
	And it was an absurdity to say that it was safe to fluoridate people.
	Look, fluoride could be wonderful.
	It could be safe. It could be effective to protect your teeth or whatever.
	And so let's say that was all the things that the supporters say that it is, which it isn't.
	But let's just say for the sake of argument that it is.
	If you don't control the dosage, it becomes a poison.
	And they're not controlling the dosage if they drop it in the water supply.
	And so on Monday, December the 4th, You had a judge call for the second phase of a long-delayed fluoride lawsuit.
	This began just before the lockdowns and things like that, and so this is stretched out now for quite some time.
	What is at stake is nothing less than the future of water fluoridation in the U.S., heralded by many as the CDC's top achievement of the 20th century.
	It's the usual suspects behind this.
	The CDC, now the World Health Organization, pushing fluoridation of the water.
	Always these same people trying to kill us in the name of health.
	And I guess it's going to be, you know, maybe the top achievement of the 20th century.
	For the 21st century, it'll be their mRNA injections, I guess.
	So we'll go, you know, from fluoridation to the mRNA injections.
	It's long been deemed a common-sense activity carried out by every modern city to even question the safety of such a practice is to be derided as a conspiracy quack.
	As a matter of fact, if you look at Dr. Strangelove, the guy that goes off the deep end, the general, General Jack D. Ripper, and he's raging about the fluoridation of the water.
	We've got to kill those commies out there, right?
	That's the cartoon caricature of all this stuff done by Kubrick.
	Come on, man. Yeah, it was, anyway, if you even question the safety of this is to be right, it's a conspiracy quack.
	So, again, you know, there's certain things that you don't even have to get into the details of the data and argue over it.
	Just like the vaccine.
	We got a novel vaccine.
	It's supposed to do genetic code modification.
	It hasn't been tested, but, hey, I want you to take it right now.
	We rushed this thing out.
	No, I can take that.
	We've got this stuff that we're dumping into the water supply.
	We say he's going to medicate you.
	No, I'm not going to take it if I know about that.
	So they prey on your ignorance.
	The first phase of fluoride loss took place back in June of 2020.
	So this has been delayed, and it's going through all these different stages.
	Now they're taking some depositions.
	And there is absolutely no coverage.
	There's no mainstream coverage of the hearings, as they point out here.
	And, of course, that would include the mainstream alternative media who have talked about fluoridation to make a joke out of it.
	As a matter of fact, Lionel said one time when he was introducing Alex Jones, he said, this is the guy who Who makes the truth sound like an absurd conspiracy theory.
	And it's like, yes, that's what he's there for.
	That's what Alex Jones is there for.
	To make the truth sound stupid.
	They're turning the frogs gay.
	Yeah, that type of thing.
	Not going to make a reasoned argument.
	You're dumping medication into the water?
	For what purpose? What do you think is going to come out of that?
	Regardless of your medication.
	That's a non-starter right there.
	Just like, you're going to tell me I've got to take a new genetic modification injection that's not even been tested?
	Absolutely not. Well, I'm not going to support medication being dumped in the water.
	A Harvard scientist says that he was threatened over fluoride science.
	Dr. Philip Grandjean, a Danish environmental epidemiologist, known for his work...
	Known for his work on the neurotoxicity of mercury, helped the EPA to establish safe regulatory levels for mercury and diet.
	He said he'd been threatened or coerced by his colleagues at Harvard, the Harvard Dental School.
	Stuff is being pushed by the dentist.
	But see, they're just the visible pushers of this.
	The people really pushing it are the military industrial complex and the aluminum industry, and I'll get to that in a moment here.
	But, you know, we look at it, we say, these dentists, they're crazy.
	They don't care what they put in your mouth.
	They'll put mercury amalgam in your teeth and all the rest of the stuff.
	You know, they just want to get the job done.
	You know, we ain't building pianos here.
	Just nail it. Whatever it takes to get you in and out and make some money.
	We'll just do it. We don't care about the long-term health of anything that we do, typically.
	The big dental associations.
	Some individual dentists do.
	Okay. Anyway, he was threatened and coerced by a colleague at the Harvard Dental School after one of his studies concluded that fluoride was a neurotoxin.
	On cross-examination, the Department of Justice lawyer says the Department of Justice That is fighting for fluoridation.
	As I said, the usual suspects, the DOJ, CDC, WHO. On cross-examination, the Department of Justice lawyer asked him about a statement that he signed downplaying the significance of the results.
	He said that the Harvard Press Department put the statement together and added his name to it.
	A little bit of dishonesty there.
	He did not elaborate on who threatened him or how often such threats may happen in his field.
	He also stated that the fluoride lobby, as he called it, infiltrated the World Health Organization Committee, seeking to exclude any mention of the harmful effects of fluoride.
	Don't tell people about adverse effects.
	On the specific harmful effects of fluoride, he stated in his deposition that the weight of epidemiological evidence leaves no reasonable doubt That developmental neurotoxicity is a serious human health risk associated with elevated fluoride exposure.
	Again, Harvard has put out other studies of that.
	But of course, Harvard, where they keep plagiarizing this stuff from the CDC and the World Health Organization.
	What a disgrace that place is.
	I just find it amazing that we've known this all along.
	And I find it amazing that as they have exhibited unlimited racism and discrimination against white people, middle class and conservatives and all these other groups for the longest time, but especially white people, nobody really cared until they became anti-Semitic.
	Oh, now they're in big trouble.
	You've even got Republican congressmen saying, well, maybe we need to pull some of their funding, and they should.
	They shouldn't be getting funding. They've got a bigger endowment.
	They've got more money than 120 nations do.
	That's how much money Harvard has.
	Why do they have that kind of money?
	And why has nobody defended white people?
	It's not okay to be white.
	It's okay to be Jewish.
	Guess what? It's okay to be anything. I am sick and tired of the racism directed at people like me.
	And if you're like me, you ought to be tired of it as well.
	I am sick and tired of this.
	And I'm sick and tired of the fact that the only thing that matters is anti-Semitism.
	You accuse somebody of anti-Semitism.
	Oh, that's it. You know, you're canceled.
	We're going to pull the endowment.
	But you let these people be anti-white as much as they want to be, and nothing ever happens to them.
	They keep getting federal money as well.
	But getting back to the fluoride stuff.
	It's just Harvard.
	On the specific harmful effects of it, he said there's a lot of epidemiological evidence, and again, some of it coming from Harvard.
	He said, we need to control human fluoride exposure, and we need to focus on pregnant women and small children, because that's where it has the most damage, developing children and young children.
	And again, it's dosage. You're going to dump it in the water?
	So, assuming that it was evenly distributed, you're going to give the same dosage to, you know, a pregnant woman or a small child as you're going to give to a 200-pound man?
	What insanity!
	This is what passes for health science from the CDC and the World Health Organization?
	No, they want to kill us.
	They want to dumb us down.
	You know, they can put that in the water for everybody else and they can, you know, drink filtered water.
	He took a particular issue with statements made by the EPA's expert, who was also there.
	What she has written should not be relied upon, he said.
	This is not science. It's simply misleading.
	He said, I'm embarrassed that the EPA would recruit Dr.
	Chang, who has already tried to kill some of my work on polyfluorinated chemicals, that they would recruit her to write this report that is full of biases.
	I get a little upset about it.
	I'm sorry to see what has happened to a colleague who listened.
	Who works for a defense firm.
	The military-industrial complex.
	You see, the reason that we have fluoride in the water is not because it's going to fix your teeth.
	Now, you get fluorosis if you get a lot of fluoride in the water.
	The reason we have this fluoride dumped in the water, and it's a particular form of fluoride, which is very harmful, which is listed as a toxin, which is used as rat poison in China.
	The reason they put this rat poison into our water is because it is a byproduct, first of the aluminum industry, and then secondly, that's when it really happened, was when it was a byproduct of the nuclear industry.
	And that's the connection to the military-industrial complex.
	Isn't it funny how it always seems to come back to the Pentagon and DARPA and the CIA, all of this stuff?
	So the aluminum industry, the nuclear industry, they have these byproducts, and they were going to have to pay a lot of money To dispose of this toxic chemical.
	Instead, they figured that they could get politicians to dump it in our drinking water and make money, make a lot of money.
	So instead of paying to dispose of a toxic waste, they could sell it and have it dumped in the water.
	So they also found in this trial that Rachel Levine, who I call Dick Levine, whose real name is Richard, He blocked the release of this.
	He was writing emails and they discovered this.
	Writing emails in the back telling people in the CDC don't give them this information.
	That's why they have people like him dressed up as a woman.
	They're very useful.
	They also confirmed the CDC was opposed to the report being released by the National Toxicology Program.
	So you've got government scientists who've seen this, and they're trying to get this released.
	And then you have this man dressed like a woman, Dick Devine, who is suppressing and hiding the information.
	It always is a red flag, isn't it, when they want to try to hide information.
	The summary of the May 2022 version of the National Toxicology, is it Program?
	P? Yeah, Program.
	NTP says, this review finds with moderate confidence that higher fluoride exposure is consistently associated with lower IQ in children.
	Look, Harvard did this a long time ago.
	It's just like Harvard did a study and showed that the VAERS data is not being reported.
	Only about 1% of it's being, well, we don't care about that.
	Yeah, the actual adverse effects are 100 times more even when they're not trying to suppress it like they did throughout the so-called COVID pandemic.
	U.S. government scientists have had to fight to preserve their conclusion that fluoride is causing harm.
	So all these things are coming out through the lawsuit, which is just now getting underway even though it was filed just before the pandemic hit.
	We're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to talk about what Elizabeth Warren is up to.
	Some other area that she wants.
	This woman is one of the most authoritarian people.
	She'll probably become president at some point, just like Joe Biden.
	She's really kind of taken his place.
	He was a person who was always there.
	Pushing this radical authoritarian approach to the war on drugs and locking people up with mandatory minimums and all the rest of this stuff.
	A real authoritarian.
	And now Elizabeth Warren is trying to get her credentials there, you know.
	Support me. I'll do your dirty work.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back with that and other news.
	Again, we're going to talk about how Google faked it with that Gemini program.
	We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com. APSradio.com
	APSradio.com
	APSradio.com listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, as I said, Focahontas is everywhere.
	I talked yesterday about how she's coming after crypto.
	She and Jamie, the demon of J.P. Morgan, were out there saying, well, this is the currency of organized crime and terrorism everywhere.
	It's like, no, the currency of organized crime and terrorism is the U.S. dollar.
	It's cash. And we've had some people making that argument on the crypto side.
	And I just want to say, don't go there.
	Don't go there.
	That's a bad argument.
	Because we don't want them to ban cash.
	And it reminds me of, you know, when we're looking at gun control, for example.
	Second Amendment people were saying, you want to talk about 30,000 people being killed by guns?
	There are more people than that killed by automobiles.
	So ban the automobile or something.
	Nope, nope, nope. They're going to do that too.
	Let's not support any of those arguments.
	So, gun people, don't call for banning cars.
	And I don't want the crypto people calling for banning cash.
	Let's stop the banning thing, okay?
	Let's stop trying to direct people to somebody else.
	That's reprehensible. That's like, you're being chased by a bear.
	You only have to run faster than the other guy.
	And you're safe, right? Don't throw other people and don't throw other things to these authoritarian wolves.
	If you want to talk about crypto and all the rest of the stuff and criminal activity, use the argument that I used yesterday.
	I've not seen anybody use this argument and say, Hunter and Joe and the Biden crime family I'll use the banking system because they got people like Jamie Dimon who's paid $39 billion in criminal fines and they got people like HSBC who laundered money for the Sinaloa drug cartel.
	If you can't stop money laundering within the banking system with all of its know-your-customer rules, it's the same argument I've always made about the drug war.
	I said, look at how many people die of an overdose of drugs in prison.
	You see, it's not a law enforcement issue.
	They've already put these people in prison.
	But because of corruption and money and all the rest of this stuff, they can still get access to drugs inside a prison.
	And so, what is our society going to look like if you think that you can stop drug use by law enforcement, by jail, as Biden said?
	Well, that means that our entire society is going to be worse than a prison.
	Because it's not stopping it in the prison.
	You're having people die of overdoses in federal prisons all the time.
	A story that I talked about one time is one of my favorite stories about it.
	It's a sad story, but my favorite illustration of this, a mother in Maryland turned in her son because he was a drug addict.
	She couldn't do anything about it.
	He was just completely possessed by these demons.
	And I mean that literally.
	And so he's completely possessed by this drug stuff.
	She can't do anything about it. So she turns him in and they put him in jail.
	And he ODs in jail because he's got easier access to it than he did on the outside.
	So, who is...
	What is Focahontas focusing on today?
	Well, she's focusing on gun control after trying to do crypto control.
	And it is, as they said...
	All of the Democrat dreams about gun control put into one comprehensive bill.
	Yeah, they're coming after all the usual stuff, the so-called gun show loophole, raising the age to 21 and things like this.
	And so she's introduced it on the Senate side.
	Another Democrat from Georgia, Hank Johnson, has introduced it in the House.
	It's called the Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety Act.
	A whole bunch of bills.
	It's a laundry list of stuff.
	But here's the thing that I thought was interesting that I'd not seen before.
	A requirement for a federal or state-issued license to purchase or to own a firearm or ammunition.
	They don't just do a background check.
	They've got to have a license to get the firearm, but also ammunition.
	Because without ammunition, it's just a club.
	And so... And of course, as part of their laundry list...
	Make it easier to sue gun manufacturers and put them out of business.
	So I guess maybe we'll see that happening with cars, because cars are being increasingly used.
	It's not just that Christmas parade where the terrorists targeted people in Waukesha.
	But we just had that happen again.
	There were some Israeli Christians or something like that, and somebody drove their car through the group of them.
	So I guess we need to ban those specific models of cars?
	Is that the solution to that?
	Gun rights advocates say the bill is likely to get no traction.
	However, it exposes the true motives of the gun control lobby.
	Senator Warren's bill is a laundry list of unconstitutional liberal gun control fantasies, just like her crypto prohibitions.
	Well, let's talk about how sometimes banning is not the right answer to something.
	You know, we always want to look at this and, well, you know, you don't like Trump?
	Okay, who do you want to solve all of our problems?
	Who do you want as a benevolent dictator in the Oval Office to solve everything?
	It's like, don't be so foolish.
	You're not going to solve the problems if you get the right person in as the president.
	It's much bigger than that.
	It's going to have to be done from the ground up.
	Those people are bought and sold before they're even allowed to compete.
	Uh, this naive attitude that if we don't like something, we need to ban it.
	There ought to be a law to prohibit that.
	And now what do we have?
	We've got banning, you know, for all kinds of speech on social media.
	That's where this all goes. If you don't, I don't like it, let's cancel it.
	Let's wish it into the cornfield like Billy Mummy on the Twilight Zone.
	You're a bad man.
	Turn you into a jack-in-the-box.
	So, you know, that's the response to everything.
	We've all, you know, we've enabled and we're cowering in fear, actually, of people like Billy Mummy in that Twilight Zone episode.
	Everybody's like, oh, don't offend him.
	He could wish us into the cornfield.
	And so we think that anything we don't like needs to be banned.
	We're constantly living in fear and intimidation that if somebody doesn't like us, they're going to get us banned into the cornfield.
	And we think that government ought to do this for our values.
	We need to grab government to stop the things that we don't like.
	And conservatives have embraced that.
	Conservatives have embraced this fantasy of a benevolent president and everything.
	It used to be something that was distinctly Democrat.
	But now the Republican rank and file, the Republican base, wants a savior like Trump.
	And so when you look at what is happening with the satanic temple, a bunch of little tyrannical trolls, Who want to A, mock Christianity by setting up a phony religion around Satan, which they admit they don't believe in Satan.
	And so they don't have any religious beliefs.
	They're just anti-religious.
	And they're trying to mock and to cancel Christians.
	That's why they're doing these outrageous things.
	So they've got an outrageous display that they got put up.
	And the Iowa State Capitol got a goat's head and, you know, ritual candles and all this other kind of stuff.
	A satanic Christmas display, they said.
	They made up. And so, you've got Republicans who have reacted to this, calling it evil, disgusting, but they let it happen anyway.
	And again, I don't think they have the, under the aegis of...
	Religious freedom. I don't think they have the authority to do that.
	Because if you have a group there that says, you know, we have a church.
	Church of Satan or whatever.
	But we don't believe in Satan.
	But I want to get my tax exemption things or something.
	You think the IRS is going to go along with that?
	No way. So why are the Iowa Republicans going along with it?
	This is a phony religion that is set up as a protest.
	It is set up to censor.
	Why would you go along with that?
	And yet there's another way to approach this.
	Again, it is just a mockery.
	They say they don't believe it.
	They talk about how And you've got a Republican congressman talking about this.
	All the Republicans are pretty much angry.
	And so it is simply anti-religion, anti-Christianity.
	Some Republicans say, well, the government shouldn't discriminate based on religion or ideology.
	They don't have a religion.
	And there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution about ideology.
	Yes, you do have free speech, but what they're doing is essentially just a mockery, just a defamation.
	It's not really a religion.
	But there's other ways to handle this that are better.
	For example...
	Where did the Satanic Kids Club come from?
	Oh, these same people.
	And what are they doing?
	Well, they created something called the Satanic Kids Club.
	They talk about it on their website.
	It's an after-school program.
	And the reason they did this was to try to get the after-school Bible programs shut down at schools.
	Because, you see, there's an organization that's been around since 1937.
	They call it the Good News Club.
	And they would set up after-school Bible studies.
	And that was challenged in the latter part of the 20th century.
	They took it to the Supreme Court in 2001.
	And the Supreme Court said, you have a right to be there.
	They can't push you out.
	And so they've been doing it since 1937.
	It was challenged in 2001.
	The Supreme Court said they can be there.
	So the satanic temple, or whatever they call themselves, wants to purge this out.
	What is their strategy? Well, their strategy is to go in and say, well, we're going to make a mockery of your religion.
	We're going to put something here that is so vile that you'll say, you have to leave.
	And then we'll say, yeah, but that's our religion.
	So if you push us out, then you've got to push out the after-school Bible program, too.
	And so the after-school Bible program was going around saying, don't do that.
	Don't push them out. Let them be there.
	And they said, it's actually been good for us.
	People see this disgusting thing, and they realize, you know, if we don't proactively combat And so they do.
	And so he said, we've actually seen, number one, and they say it on their website, they're going to only go to the schools where there is an after-school Bible program.
	And that's what they have said on their website.
	And again, the Supreme Court case was Good News Club versus Milford Central School District.
	They won that in 2001.
	And And so he says, the satanic temple says their goal is to shut down the after-school Bible clubs.
	That's their strategy, to be vile and obnoxious, to try to get all speech canceled.
	I started thinking about that.
	I thought, you know, that resembles a lot of the people that are in the alternative mainstream media, for example.
	They say vile, ridiculous, stupid stuff, and then we get canceled, right?
	It makes it easy to get public support to cancel any dissent of government narratives.
	You understand? You understand who's doing the work of Satan when they get out there and say, they're turning the frogs gay and they're doing all the rest of this stuff.
	He gets a lot of support and a lot of visibility, but he's actually demonizing, literally demonizing, people who are trying to oppose the government.
	So who is Alex really working for?
	But getting back to the other satanic clubs here, they said it hasn't shut down our clubs at all, and they haven't accomplished their goals.
	As a matter of fact, many times it does just the opposite, because he said a lot of times it brings publicity to the fact that a lot of Christian parents don't even understand that we've got a program there.
	And so they come in and they publicize it.
	And then they get people angry about it, and people want to react against it.
	So he says, it's actually worked in our favor.
	You see, Christians are not afraid of debate, just like scientists are not afraid of debate.
	Bring it on. We want to find out what the truth is.
	We want to find out, if you're a scientist, you want to find out what the truth of the natural world is.
	If you're a Christian, you want to find out what the truth of the supernatural world is, the world that is above our world, the one that is actually more important.
	And so we invite criticism because we know that the truth can withstand scrutiny.
	And if what we believe is not true, then fine.
	You know, get rid of it.
	But I tell you, every time I have had somebody challenge my faith in a particular area, when I go back to defend it or to investigate it even, it's not that I take a defensive position.
	No, I believe this. I'm going to find a reason for it.
	No, I go back and I seriously look at it.
	It's like, wow, is this true? I've done that over and over again.
	And every time it has strengthened my faith.
	And so just as a real scientist doesn't hide data, as a real scientist wants debate, so do Christians.
	As a matter of fact, we're the ones who came up with the idea for free speech and the free exercise of religion.
	Because we're not afraid.
	We're not afraid of the truth.
	The truth doesn't have to be defended, although we're not afraid of defending it.
	We just release it.
	And we're always ready to give an answer for our confident expectation, right?
	It's sometimes referred to as hope.
	I don't like that word hope because hope now means to, in the current vernacular, it means, well, it's something I'd like to have happen, but I don't really think it's going to happen.
	No, we have a confident expectation.
	That's the original meaning of that word that started being translated as hope.
	So they say on their website, Nor do we believe in the existence of Satan or the supernatural.
	We do not promote a belief in a personal Satan.
	You see, it's a fraud. But the guy who is the head of this after-school Bible club, the Good News Club, He says he's inspired by a story of a little girl named Brianna and her sister.
	These are two kids who are going to the after-school Bible club.
	He said mom and dad were divorced, but the kids were going to this Bible club and they got saved.
	He said, of course, the kids come home and they talk about the things of God and they talk about what they're learning in the good news club.
	This led to curiosity with the mother, who soon became a Christian.
	And then when the dad saw the changes in the home, he started asking questions.
	And he started going to church.
	And then he found Jesus, or I should say Jesus found him.
	It was there all along.
	He said, it didn't stop with that.
	He said, today the parents are volunteers in the Good News Club.
	Where do the two girls attend?
	And he said, we're seeing this kind of transformation happening all the time.
	Isn't that a better thing to do than to shut down religious freedom?
	To shut down free speech?
	We don't have to run from these people.
	The gates of hell will not prevail against the truth.
	We should understand that.
	Which brings us to QAnon and Nostradamus, because I can't think of QAnon without thinking of Nostradamus.
	And so there's this big article that was linked on the Drudge Report from a British paper talking about Nostradamus' predictions for 2024.
	Isn't it interesting that at the end of the year...
	The Daily Mail does not do an article talking about the 2023 predictions that he made, that they featured in their article in 2022.
	Now, I didn't think about that until I had no time to go back and look.
	I may try to go back and find some of his predictions for 2023, according to these people who interpret his quatrains.
	They can read anything they want to in it.
	And this is exactly what I said about QAnon.
	I said, QAnon is worse than Nostradamus.
	QAnon... At least you know who Nostradamus was, and you've got his name.
	You don't know who QAnon is.
	This is an anonymous person who's out there speaking in riddles, and you've got all these people who are drawing all these conclusions from him.
	And I remember Jerome Corsi.
	He rode that horse to fame and fortune.
	It was amazing and disgusting to watch, quite frankly.
	Jerome Corsi did a book.
	He was making so much money that he's running ads on the Rush Limbaugh show.
	You know, the time that happens before Rush died.
	And I remember the last time I had Jerome Corsi on, because he worked for InfoWars, and so they wanted me to have him on.
	And he had done some good work about some other things.
	And I was really surprised that he just went off on the deep end.
	You know, he did all this good work and he never got any attention or any recognition.
	And I guess he just finally got tired of it.
	It's like, okay, let's go with the conspiracy theory nonsense.
	Let's do something sensational and false.
	And so he got into all this QAnon stuff.
	And the last time he was on my show there...
	He said, okay, so Julian Assange is going to be released.
	There was something about the bird will fly the coop and something about a red and white cross or something like that.
	So that means it's Switzerland.
	That means that it's imminent that Julian Assange is going to be released into Switzerland.
	Because he's talking about a bird and he's talking about a red cross or a white cross or something like that.
	It's just absolute nonsense.
	And he pulls all that stuff together.
	And I said, well, we'll have to see, won't we?
	That'd be great if that happens, Jerome.
	And then I told the crew, I said, don't ever book him again.
	I never talked to him again after that.
	What nonsense that was.
	It's just like Steve Pachenik's The Sting Thing.
	And so, never seen Nostradamus.
	I've got to talk about Q and Nostradamus, because that's what it always reminds me of.
	We're going to be right back, and when we come back, Oh, I want to talk about what is happening with abortion.
	It's amazing what is being done in a presidential campaign.
	We'll be right back.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSRadio.com.
	APS Radio.
	APS Radio.
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Wow.
	Okay, this just landed on my desk.
	Karen went to a lot of trouble to find this and print it out.
	I did not see this.
	Trump is selling snippets of his mugshot suit.
	He's cut the holy relic up.
	You know, this is like little snippets of the original cross or something, splinters of the cross or something.
	Is this not a cult?
	Is this not a religion? I mean, the thing is, you know, the satanic temple may not believe in Satan, but MAGA believes in Trump.
	It's pathetic what this is.
	So he's cutting up his suit.
	They took the mugshot in, and he's going to sell that to you.
	You might be able to get a Mar-a-Lago dinner, and he's also got a new round of NFTs.
	And why not? Because he made millions of dollars from his suckers.
	I mean, supporters that were buying this pitch.
	What a pathetic situation this country's got into.
	There is no opposition to a tyrannical government.
	These people don't understand he's a tyrant.
	They don't blame him. They will not blame him for the shot that he is so proud of.
	He's as proud of the shot as he is of his mugshot.
	And so, customers who buy 47 digital cards for $99 each will receive a piece of the suit that Trump wore for his infamous mugshot.
	Did they wash it first? I hope.
	I don't... Well, maybe you want it with all the sweaty, smelly stuff.
	It's a package that costs $4,653.
	It includes dinner with Trump at Mar-a-Lago.
	He said that the 2022 digital card offering sold out within hours.
	He earned between $100,000 and $1 million in income from the sale.
	Wow, that's pretty broad range there.
	I don't know what he got. He released another series of these 47,000 cards in April.
	I can't even sell a Christmas album, of all things.
	You know, I'm definitely not popular.
	The suit was authenticated by Troy Canoonin.
	President of Sports Memorabilia and Authenticator Mears.
	I wonder when he's going to start auctioning off the suits that he wore with...
	What's her name?
	Daniels? Smokey Daniels?
	What was her name? Huh?
	Stormy. Stormy Daniels.
	Yeah, Stormy Daniels. Yeah.
	You know, he'd start offering off, selling off that memorabilia.
	You know, again, make sure you wash it first.
	So, he's selling stuff on Truth Social.
	And this New York magazine says, Trump, the headline, Trump selling pieces of his mugshot suit is weird on so many different levels.
	Yeah, it is weird on many different levels.
	And there's a great deal of delusional stuff going on here.
	As a matter of fact, because I want to talk about what is being done about abortion by another presidential candidate, I went back and it really bothered me a great deal about a month, well, two months ago, I guess.
	It was the beginning of November. So it's about a month ago, November 8th.
	And saw this many different places.
	The original source of this was on American Greatness, which, as you can kind of judge from the title of that website, it is a MAGA cesspool full of idolatry and ignorance about Trump.
	American Greatness.
	That's one of my sources, by the way.
	It keeps me inspired.
	I mean, I still go to DrudgeReport.com.
	I go to mainstream media sometimes, but I like to go to these people who are just absolutely delusional about Trump and see what they have to say.
	So this guy who was a writer, I don't know who he is, Matthew Booz, wrote, Abortion and not Trump is the GOP's albatross.
	And this became a meme that was going around everywhere.
	That abortion is an albatross.
	Well, you know, if you want to stop abortion, what you do, instead of hanging an albatross around your neck, what you do is maybe you hang some fetal remains around your neck.
	And show people the truth of that.
	And that's what this candidate is doing.
	What I've said all along.
	Don't back away from this fight.
	Go into it.
	Show people what abortion is.
	And you need to do that not just so that you win on this issue.
	You need to do it because a lot of people are having abortions and they don't even know what this is.
	And they have severe regrets afterwards.
	You need to show the truth to protect children from being ripped apart.
	You need to show the truth to protect women who carry that psychological scar and sometimes physical scar through life.
	Women are physically injured by abortion.
	They want to pretend otherwise, but that's not true.
	They lie to you about that.
	They lie to you about the health consequences of an abortion.
	And they lie to you about what an abortion really is and what a baby really is.
	And so the truth about what a baby is, what an abortion is, and the health consequences to women, that all needs to be put out there.
	And they're hiding that from you.
	And the Republicans don't want to talk about it.
	That's the albatross around their neck.
	That's the judgment upon them, that they don't want to talk about the truth of what is being done.
	And they're bringing judgment on this country as well.
	And so, this was, I remember years ago, somebody used the term, said, so-and-so has gravitas.
	And all of a sudden, the next several days, everybody was using the term gravitas.
	This has got gravitas. He's got gravitas.
	She's got gravitas. It's pathetic how they plagiarize each other.
	They're not limited to the president of Harvard.
	There's a lot of plagiarism going around everywhere.
	And so once this guy used this term, said, abortion is the albatross around the GOP's neck, not Trump.
	Everybody started picking that up.
	Abortion is an albatross for the GOP and writing articles about it.
	So this is what this Trump sycophant, this Trump idolater, This ignorant Trump supporter, who maybe isn't ignorant.
	I mean, he's writing commentary.
	I think what he's doing, a lot of these people, again, are doing it for fame, for following, for fortune.
	The 3F club.
	He said, the right made a bargain to save lives, and it's cost us pain at the polls.
	Wow, you talk about pure Machiavellianism.
	Absolutely devoid of any ethics.
	These people are as bad as Fauci.
	They don't care who dies.
	They don't care what is done to other human beings.
	As long as they win.
	Because winning is everything to them.
	And I'll lie to you.
	I'll play 4D chess.
	And we have people who will lie to you about what Trump is doing.
	Calling it 4D chess.
	They're fine with that. Because all they want is to win.
	Well, if you can't fight...
	Against babies being ripped limb from limb.
	And you need to shut up.
	And you need to go home.
	And you need to stop writing your articles, Matthew Booz.
	You're pathetic. And the Republicans and the rest of these press people who say, well, I don't really care about ripping babies apart.
	The important thing is if I win, you're no better than Henry Kissinger, any of these other people.
	Madeleine Albright. Oh, yeah, it was worth it when we killed a half million kids with sanctions and starvation.
	Doesn't even have the decency to deny it.
	Fauci did that as well.
	Fauci said, well, you know, even if what you say is true and I engineered some kind of super virus and it wasn't that, he engineered the vaccine to kill people, but nevertheless, you know, even if I did that, it was still worth it, he said.
	This is a sign of true psychopaths.
	Because these people don't even have the decency to try to defend and deny what they did.
	So, yeah, Matthew Booz, that American greatness, that pathetic sight, this pathetic writer there.
	The right made a bargain to save lives, and it cost us pain in the pulse.
	Well, you know, the thing is, Matthew Booz, you can make a Faustian bargain with the devil, And you're going to win.
	You're going to win for a little while in this life.
	And you'll get some things out of it if you make that deal.
	You really will. You want to sell out principles?
	You want to sell out your regard for human life?
	And you want to say, well, I don't really care what I do as long as I don't get caught.
	Well, you're going to get caught.
	You're going to get caught.
	Maybe not in this life, but you're going to get caught.
	Trump is the only Republican with the sense and the courage to say this, he said.
	To say that we... Went too far in trying to save babies' lives.
	You know, he said it was too harsh, remember?
	That's the exact word from Trump.
	He called DeSantis sanctimonious because he tried to save babies' lives.
	What a pathetic person he is.
	This serial rapist, pornographer, beauty contestant, you know, voyeur, all the rest of the stuff.
	I'm disgusted with him and the people who support him.
	Republicans should restrict abortion wherever and whenever it is prudent to do so, but as the saying goes, politics is the art of the possible.
	Politics is all about compromise, you know, so start compromising those principles right now so that you can win.
	Start playing 4D chess right now.
	You know what? We don't need politicians.
	We're up to our...
	Ears in politicians.
	They're everywhere. They're a dime a dozen.
	They're people like George Santos who will tell you anything to win.
	We don't need politicians.
	We need leaders.
	And you're not going to get leaders if they don't have principles and a backbone.
	That's what we need.
	We need some integrity from the Republicans, from anybody.
	We don't need a bunch of narcissists who are capable of doing anything except out of their own perceived self-interest or revenge.
	Which is the way Trump's lawyer characterized him.
	Ty Cobb. So, again, it became an echo chamber.
	So here's another one, right about the same time.
	Abortion. The Republican Party's albatross.
	Everybody's saying this. I mean, you hit all these different, you know, and you look up Republican Party and GOP, albatross, albatross, albatross, just like gravitas, gravitas, gravitas.
	Polling has shown, says this article, From the BillKingBlog.com.
	Polling has shown that for nearly five decades, slightly over half the American people have believed that abortion should be legal in some circumstances.
	Just over a quarter believe that it should be legal in all circumstances.
	And about 17% believe that it should be illegal under any circumstance.
	So we've got an ignorance problem here.
	These people need some truth.
	They need a light shined on this because you've got people who don't know any better who are killing babies.
	And then you've got some really vicious people who need to be put in prison.
	But that's not happening.
	So the GOP doesn't have an abortion problem.
	It's got an integrity problem.
	It's got a sin problem.
	It's got a problem with power and money.
	That's the only thing that matters to them.
	That's what their problem is.
	Their problem is not they saved innocent lives.
	I'm sick of these people.
	Here's another good example.
	Alyssa Farah Griffin.
	Now, she is the daughter...
	Of Joseph Farah, who has WND. And I have my political differences with Joseph Farah.
	I think he's one of these people who just suffers from Trump bipolarism.
	I hate the jab. I hate this.
	I hate that. All the things that Trump did, he hates, but he loves Trump.
	And Trump is our solution to saving the world.
	But he's also a Christian, and he's also right about a lot of things.
	And I still look at W&D, and I disagree with some of the articles, and I agree with some of the articles.
	But his daughter, Alyssa Farrah Griffin, worked for Trump for a while, and then she couldn't take it anymore.
	And I've seen this happen. You know, a lot of people who were Republican careerists, Republican opportunists who didn't They're just doing it because they could make money doing it.
	I've seen a lot of them just get so disgusted from seeing Trump up close that they went heavily to the other side, and she left the Trump administration.
	She's now on The View.
	And they're portraying her, oh, look, this is what this Republican is saying.
	No, she's completely rejected it because of Trump.
	And so on The View, she says the GOP needs to wake up.
	Republican women want access to abortion.
	If you're going to be pro-life, you need to be pro-life.
	Throughout the life of the baby, that means you need to support contraceptives.
	What? What?
	Yeah, it's all about my life, my career.
	And again, that career took her to work for Trump, and then it took her to The View.
	She's just bouncing around.
	She doesn't have an anchor.
	She doesn't have a rudder. She's just blown about by every wind that comes her way.
	Now, here's somebody who is not like that.
	And this person is running for president.
	I finally found somebody I could support for president.
	She bills herself as a progressive Democrat.
	And secular. Not a Christian or whatever.
	But, you know, she's a single issue candidate.
	And it's a single issue that I can support.
	And she's running for president because if she runs for federal office, she can air commercials that cannot be banned.
	And she is doing exactly what I've said the Republicans, the cowardly Republicans with no principles and no conscience, refuse to do.
	And that is to show what abortion really is.
	Show them the dirty, gruesome pictures of what is actually being done to children.
	And she's willing to do that.
	She's running for president so she can do that because it's against the law To censor a federal candidate's ads.
	And I thought that was a brilliant strategy.
	That's the only reason, really, to run.
	I mean, think about it. I've said, forget about, you know, supporting a political candidate.
	They're going to come with all kinds of baggage.
	She calls herself a progressive Democrat, so there's probably all kinds of baggage that I would not want to get involved with.
	If we're going to focus on a single issue, and that's what I said, let's focus a single issue at a time, that'd be a good enough reason to run as a federal candidate somewhere.
	You get people to support you, give you money to run an ad about that particular issue.
	That's important. So a pro-life Democrat presidential candidate is going to air an explicit TV advertisement.
	Actually, she did it on Monday evening.
	And her name is Teresa Bukovinak.
	The Bukovinak for President campaign.
	Began airing the ad in the Boston, New Hampshire market on NBC in Boston during the Jimmy Fallon show that runs at 11.35 at night.
	She said she ran the ad to disrupt the consciences of the American people, particularly leftists who are complicit in abortion by supporting pro-abortion candidates.
	The 30-second TV ad is very graphic.
	It shows horrific images of the remains of five late-term babies that were allegedly killed in abortions at the Washington Surgic Center in Washington, D.C. The five babies were among 115 aborted babies and That she allegedly discovered in March of last year.
	Do you remember that? Outside the abortion clinic?
	They had all these babies' bodies and they showed them to people and they said, we're going to publicize this.
	And so now what she's doing to publicize it, she's running for president so that she can force these ads on TV. So she's working as the founder and executive director of Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising, a left-wing pro-life group.
	And the group's director of activism, Lauren Handy, said they recovered the infant's bodies from the Curtis Bay Medical Waste Services outside the surgical center on March 25, 2022, after allegedly convincing the waste services driver to give them one of the boxes, telling him that it likely contained dead babies and that they would give them a proper burial and a funeral.
	And so he did.
	They were going to incinerate them.
	You know, when we look at, as I've said before, you look at the ancient Palestinian and Carthaginian cultures.
	They would have these pagan, you know, sexual rituals around the goddess Ashtoreth and other, Ashtoreth, various names.
	But always the same type of thing.
	You know, they had the Shira poles and other things like that.
	I don't know what they did with them.
	I don't know if it's pole dancing or what it was.
	Early pole dancing of 2,000 years ago.
	But anyway, that was, you know, they would have these sexual bacchanalias.
	And then they would wind up in a lot of unwanted children.
	And so the solution to that was to tell people, well, you can sacrifice them to bail.
	You can pass them through the fire.
	You can take your children and you can put them in the arms of this heated up idol and burn them to death.
	And that will bring you prosperity.
	The same thing that Planned Parenthood tells people who are in an unplanned pregnancy.
	Do you realize how much this kid's going to cost you throughout their lifetime?
	You can't afford that. You don't want to be hamstrung in your career.
	Destroy this kid. And so they did that, and the places where they put the baby skeletons are called, or the places where they did the sacrifice and where they discovered the skeletons are called tophets.
	And they found them throughout the Philistia, where the Philistines were, throughout the area of northern Africa, where the Carthaginians were.
	But what we do is we incinerate the baby's body so we don't have this around.
	But you know, God's got a book of remembrance.
	And he's going to remember those babies and he's going to remember what you did to them.
	And there's only one solution for that.
	The forgiveness of Christ.
	And that's there for any women who have done this because they were deceived or because maybe they participated in it and now they want to change that.
	Anyway, Bukovnak and Handy then allegedly took the box and they brought it back to Handy's apartment.
	There they opened the box in the red plastic bag inside to find the remains of 110 mostly first trimester aborted children.
	At the bottom of the box was a clear plastic bag with five more containers.
	At the bottom of the box was a clear plastic bag with five more containers, one much bigger than the remaining four.
	She reached into the largest bucket, removed the remains of a beautiful, intact, nearly full-term baby boy that we called Christopher X. She said, I think I can speak for both Lauren and I when I say this was the most devastating, soul-crushing experience of our lives.
	Not even years of anti-abortion advocacy.
	Could have prepared us for that moment.
	Well, I read that to you to prepare you to see this 30-second ad that she is running.
	I'm a secular progressive activist.
	Last year, I recovered the remains of these five babies from an all-term abortion center in Washington, D.C. These are the faces of a genocide supported by Joe Biden and my own Democratic Party.
	We can provide for the working class and resist this extremism.
	I am challenging you to never vote for a pro-choice Democrat again.
	I'm Teresa Bokovinak, pro-life Democrat, running for President of the United States, and I approve this message.
	And you can't censor that message.
	There's a federal law.
	That's great. So the response of the chief of police, they reported murder.
	Chief of police, Benedict, said in a news conference, well, these babies were aborted.
	They were murdered. In accordance with D.C. law, so we're not investigating the incident along those lines.
	There doesn't seem to be anything criminal about that, what you just saw.
	It says that's not criminal. But the only thing about that that is criminal is how these babies' bodies got into this house, and we're going to investigate that for sure.
	Wow, isn't that amazing?
	Always investigate the whistleblowers.
	Never the real criminals.
	Never the murderers. Never the people like Fauci.
	No, we're going to go after the whistleblowers that are out there.
	Just as we see in New Zealand.
	More than 20 members of Congress sent a letter to the D.C. Mayor, Muriel Bowser's office, as well as to the D.C. Metro Police.
	They demanded an autopsy and investigation into the deaths of these five late-term babies.
	The D.C. Mayor, Bowser, responded to this by calling these women extremist anti-abortion activists.
	Well, I guess she's right.
	Because, you know, nobody in their right mind really wants to defend the murders of kids, so I guess that's extreme to do that now.
	Her campaign said that airing the images of these five babies is part of its strategy to, quote, engage voters on the atrocity of later abortion during the 2024 presidential election by embracing the power of visual storytelling to expose the brutality of abortion.
	And again, to air something like the procedure, she said, this is extreme.
	This is out of touch.
	This abortion platform of the Democrat Party, it's at odds with 30% of Democrats, for example, she said.
	She also knows she's able to use the candidates to run ads to bring awareness to this because federal law requires any TV station with an FCC license to run the ads of a federal candidate.
	FCC regulations stipulate that news stations have no power of censorship over the material.
	So she can put it right in their face.
	And understand...
	Just how cowardly, how craven all of these Republicans are.
	All of these Republicans who do nothing at all about this stuff.
	Who say, well, that's an albatross around her neck.
	You look at those pictures, do they look like an albatross or do they look like a mutilated baby?
	So, she said, the shameless censorship of pro-life views is why I am running for president.
	Well, good for her. More power to her.
	By the way, Planned Parenthood got $90 million in forgiven PPP loans during the pandemic.
	Fraud, abuse, misdirection of funds.
	As a matter of fact, they had some people specifically say, no, Planned Parenthood can't get this stuff.
	Democrats gave it to them anyway.
	And of course, Trump is responsible for this as well.
	He's the president. The buck stops with him.
	The buck starts with him. Nearly $2 billion in federal funding went to abortion advocacy groups between 2019 and 2021.
	Two of those three years were under Trump.
	The Paycheck Protection Program specifically, $90 million.
	And now we have Senator Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, said this money from the Paycheck Protection Program was specifically designed to help our mom-and-pop shops keep their doors open.
	Well, but your candidate Trump that you support, Marsha, he was trying to close mom-and-pop.
	He did close mom-and-pop.
	He said, here's a welfare check.
	I'm going to take your business because you're not essential.
	Walmart's essential. You're not essential.
	Amazon's essential. You're not essential.
	You shut down. Here's a little bit of money.
	I remember Steve Mnuchin.
	What was it? Like an $1,100 check or something.
	And he goes for several more months.
	People say, well, we need to do another STEMI check out there.
	And he goes, I don't know if they really need it or not.
	Yeah, I mean, who can't survive for eight or nine months and $1,000, right?
	And so, yeah, it's an outrage that it went to Planned Parenthood.
	But it's an outrage that you shut down the mom and pop stores.
	That Trump did it. Trump paid people to do it.
	He paid governors to do this.
	And he tried to buy off the mom and pop stores.
	But he didn't give them enough money to keep them alive.
	It was just a virtue signaling paycheck.
	That's all it was.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	Tavis is reminding me to let you know about the album.
	It's at bandcamp.com under David Knight Project.
	But, of course, you can also go to thedavidknightshow.com and you can find the album to download there.
	It is a digital download.
	I don't know. Does Bandcamp sell stuff in a CD format or something?
	I don't know if they do that or not, but I don't think they do.
	We didn't set that up, I think.
	So it's just digital download.
	On Rumble, Geese Busters, thank you very much.
	He says, if you want peace in your soul, buy David's Christmas.
	Now, that's really nice. That's really nice.
	Thank you. Appreciate that.
	I still haven't seen your interview.
	We've got a great community here.
	The Knights of the Storm...
	Jason Barker, Angry Tiger.
	We have Audi with Modern Retro Radio.
	They've all started doing interviews.
	Well, of course, Nights of the Storm has been doing it for a while, but Audi did some interviews with Nights of the Storm, and now he's got his own show, and he interviewed Geese Busters.
	I haven't had a chance.
	Sorry. I am so far behind with things that happened last week, and yesterday we were in Doctor's office all afternoon.
	Good news, though. We've got good reports back from the tests that they ran.
	But anyway, I'm just way behind.
	So I'm curious to see that interview, both to see Audi and to see Geese Busters.
	So thank you very much for the kind words about the album.
	And we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	Hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	What happened?
	The End
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Wow.
	All right, welcome back.
	Yesterday, I played a little bit of a clip.
	I had played it, I think, on Thursday as the show was ending, of Google's Gemini, their artificial intelligence demo that they put out.
	And later in the afternoon, I've now learned, thank you Steve Swan for sending me the update, I completely missed this, but I want to point out that that was faked.
	And I think we're increasingly seeing from these AI people that they're going to fake it until they make it, and they haven't made it yet.
	Hopefully it's going to turn out to be something like the self-driving car.
	Of course, that's going to also crash the stock market since the stock market's great hope this year has been artificial intelligence and people have bet a lot of money on that.
	But again, they faked this thing.
	And just as a reminder, this is what it looked like.
	Here we go. Tell me what you see.
	I see you placing a piece of paper on the table.
	I see a squiggly line.
	Okay. So we go through, and he starts to draw a duck, and it starts to deduce that that's a duck gradually.
	First, he says, oh, it's a bird.
	Now it's in water. It must be a duck.
	But you made it blue and all the rest of the stuff.
	Remember that? Played that for you.
	And so what happened was they put this out.
	It got millions of views, one of them mine.
	I threw it out at the end of the show, and I wanted to come back and show people that more in detail.
	And as one of these people whose beat is technology says, well, they...
	When I first saw this, they started to make a believer out of a skeptic.
	And he goes, nah, it's all fake.
	That's where I was as well.
	So this came out Thursday afternoon.
	I did not see that.
	I didn't look at any news until Sunday.
	And by that time, it was old, and it was pretty much buried.
	And a lot of people didn't report this.
	Bloomberg reported it.
	TechCrunch reported it.
	And Steve Swan, thank you for sending this to me.
	Google's best demo was faked.
	Users may have less confidence in the company's tech or in its integrity.
	Don't be evil, right?
	Don't be fake.
	Maybe that's going to be the new one.
	Don't be fake. After finding out that the most impressive demo of Gemini was pretty much faked.
	It... Again, got millions of views.
	They were showing what they call multimodal mode.
	In other words, understanding and mixing language with visual cues, drawing inferences, interacting.
	All of that was fake.
	Fake. And you know, I have a personal story.
	I went to, when I first got out of college, went to Texas, and then I wanted to get back east to where my family was, specifically in Florida.
	So I interviewed with some companies.
	One of them that I interviewed was a company at It's been a while.
	I think the company was called Paradine.
	It was like St.
	Pete or something like that. I went to interview with them.
	I wound up not accepting the job.
	But they subsequently, right after I turned it down, they got sued by the Social Security Administration.
	And they had competed for a project that So, Social Security puts out this request for a proposal thing and request for bids and things like that.
	So, they put together a computer.
	And it was basically a black box that they faked.
	And so, Social Security had this big project at the time, and this was 1983.
	They're going to buy a bunch of these desktop things, and it was supposed to be certain specifications, how it was going to be used.
	And it's just an empty box with flashing lights.
	I mean, you know, they didn't even go to the trouble of, you know, putting some...
	They'd always do computers in the 1960s.
	They have these banks of flashing big square lights, and they have, you know, tape things that are turning and all that kind of stuff.
	I guess tape was gone by that time.
	But they did have some flashing lights.
	And when Social Security found out that it wasn't a real product...
	They sued him. And their response was, yeah, but we can do that.
	We can do that kind of thing.
	You know, we can deliver on it. And that lawsuit went for, I don't know how it was resolved, but it went for decades.
	I checked on it a couple of times, and I thought it was just amazing.
	And that's basically what Google did with this demo.
	Yeah, theoretically, it's kind of possible.
	And so what they said was when they were called on it, Google actually admitted it, and they said, yeah, you know, what we did was we had, it wasn't talking at all, and so what we did was we would do some prompts, and then we'd have to give it some more prompts, and then we'd start to get a response, and then we had somebody read it, and then we'd put it all together like it was happening spontaneously.
	Yeah, it was fake. We created the demo by capturing footage in order to test Gemini's capabilities on a wide range of challenges, and we prompted it using still image frames from the footage, and we prompted it via text.
	So it's not looking at a video feed.
	It's not speaking back.
	And so this writer at TechCrunch says, so although it might kind of do the things that Google shows in the video, it didn't do those things.
	And maybe it can't do them live in the way that they implied.
	And so this is not shipping.
	This is vaporware.
	They've exaggerated the capabilities.
	Viewers were misled about the speed, the accuracy, and the fundamental mode of interaction with the model.
	Very deceptive.
	This is Google. A search engine that has been designed now to redesign to hide things, not to help you to find things.
	And one of the things they want you to be misled about is their own products.
	And so it does not reason based on seeing individual gestures, hand gestures, or other things like that, as they pretended in the demonstration.
	It was another engineered and heavily hinted interaction.
	In many of these things, the so-called interaction, quote-unquote, didn't even happen.
	And that's when they're showing it, the rock, scissors, paper.
	Later, three sticky notes with doodles of the Sun, Saturn, and Earth are placed on the surface.
	And the person asks it.
	Is this the correct order?
	And again, this is being done with like a text interaction.
	It's not listening to him.
	It's not watching a live video feed.
	Is this the correct order?
	And Gemini says, no.
	The correct order is Sun, Earth, Saturn.
	Correct, he says.
	But in the actual, that is again a written prompt, the question is, is this the right order?
	Consider the distance from the Sun and explain your reasoning.
	So, did Gemini get it right, or did it get it wrong?
	Did it need a bit of help to produce the answer?
	Did it even recognize the planets?
	Or did it need help there as well?
	We don't know, because they faked the demo.
	Since the blog post lacks an explanation for the duck sequence, that was the one I played yesterday, I'm beginning to doubt the veracity of that interaction as well, says the TechCrunch writer.
	Now, if the video had said at the start, this is a stylized representation, Of interactions that our researchers tested, no one would have batted an eyelid.
	And we kind of expect videos like that to be half factual and half aspirational.
	Again, you know, if that company that I was talking about before, they said, well, this is a representation of the computer.
	No, they didn't sell it that way.
	Anyway, the video is called Hands-On with Gemini.
	It says, here are some of our favorite interactions, implying that those interactions that we see, Are the interactions that they're doing.
	Perhaps we should assume that all capabilities in Google AI demos are being exaggerated for effect.
	Maybe we should consider that maybe all of the artificial stuff is being exaggerated and that it really is artificial.
	Instead of artificial intelligence, there's artificial interactions with this stuff.
	Anyway, I write the headline.
	When I wrote the headline, the video was faked.
	At first, I wasn't sure if the language was too harsh, if it was justified.
	Certainly, Google doesn't think that.
	He said a spokesperson asked me to change it.
	But despite including some real parts, the video simply does not reflect reality.
	It is fake.
	Google says the video, quote, shows real outputs from Gemini, which is true, and that we made a few edits to the demo.
	We've been up front and transparent about this.
	He says that is not true.
	That is not true.
	It isn't a demo, and the video shows very different interactions from those that were created to inform it.
	And so that is the reality of it.
	It is, as another article from Bloomberg said, a feat in spin, because it is purely fantasy.
	And along the lines of faking it until you make it, here's another fake AI thing.
	And we've reported this as well, how Checkers and Carl's Jr.
	said, well, we've brought in an automated system that is completely run by AI to interact with customers and to take their orders.
	And now we find out, because the SEC questioned them on this, they had to come clean and be honest about what's happening.
	Now we find that instead of this stuff being done by AI, it's being done by some wage slaves in the Philippines.
	We're actually taking your order.
	And so this might be a company that George Santos may want to investigate applying for.
	Because they've got some very interesting spin and prevarications about this.
	Well, we didn't lie.
	Actually, we kind of did this and kind of did that.
	An AI drive-through system used at a fast food chain, Checkers and Carl's Jr.
	I'm going to have to go to one of them just to see what this thing is like.
	I don't normally eat at either of those places.
	We just order something minimal, a drink or something maybe, but anyway.
	They said it isn't the perfectly autonomous tech that it is purported to be.
	Bloomberg reports that the AI heavily relies on the backbone of outsourced laborers who regularly have to intervene so that it takes the customer's orders correctly.
	How regularly does it have to intervene?
	70% of the time, it's only about a third of the time that it can handle the order.
	The company is called Presto Automation.
	I think they should have called the company Presto Digito.
	It's like a slide of hand, right?
	It's a magician's trick.
	I wonder if you go through the other lane if they saw a lady in half.
	If they saw a former employee who used to take the orders, you can see them being sawn in half.
	Because they've been able...
	What they're doing is they're just outsourcing this to cheaper labor in Philippines.
	And calling it artificial intelligence.
	So pathetic.
	The company that provides the drive-thru system admitted in recent filings that the U.S. SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission...
	They admitted to the SEC that they employ, quote, off-site agents, unquote, agents.
	Maybe we could call them secret agents, since they didn't admit their existence.
	So we've got secret agents out there who are taking the order.
	That makes it more intriguing, doesn't it?
	And countries like the Philippines, who help its Presto Voice chatbots.
	And over 70% of customer interactions.
	That's a lot of intervening for something claims to provide automation.
	Yet, it's another example of how high-tech companies exaggerate the capabilities of their AI systems.
	Shelley Palmer, who runs a consulting firm, told Bloomberg, there is so much hype around AI. Everybody thinks that it is some kind of magic.
	Voila! Presto, digito!
	You pull up, you say the magic words, abracadabra, and the people in the Philippines magically take your order.
	So we've had self-driving cars that people thought were magic and are killing people left and right.
	Hopefully nobody gets killed with these orders here, but you go from self-driving cars To drive through orders from AI and none of this stuff is working.
	You should take your Tesla through the Carl's Jr.'s or Checkers lines there and see what's happening.
	And put it on autopilot.
	The SEC informed Presto in July that it was being investigated for claims, quote, regarding certain aspects of the AI technology.
	And again, they've got somebody like George Soros already working for them, but they probably are going to need several more George Soros for this investigation.
	In August, their website claimed that it could take over 95% of the drive-thru orders without any human intervention.
	No, it turns out that it's 30%, not 95%.
	They're starting to look like a vaccine company here.
	But then they did some backfilling, and they changed their website to say...
	It can do 95% without any restaurant or staff intervention.
	That's not counting the slave labor in the Philippines.
	You just don't have to hire people here in the U.S. to do it 95% of the time.
	The huge hype around AI can obfuscate both its capabilities and the amount of labor behind it.
	Many tech firms don't want you to know.
	That they rely on millions of poorly paid workers in the developing world so that their AI systems can even function.
	For example, when we talk about ChatGPT or these other large language models, they have to have people that are teaching it and they hire these people at minimum wage or they go to foreign countries to have it taught.
	And that's one of the reasons why we see these biases in these things because of the rules that they give them.
	When they teach the artificial intelligence, they build in that bias and they pay people slave wages to do that.
	But tell that to the starry-eyed investors who have collectively sunk over $90 billion into the industry this year.
	See, that's what I said. I think that there'll be a lot of things that artificial intelligence will be useful for.
	I think it'll be useful for the police state, for the surveillance state.
	I think it'll be useful to constantly monitor us and snitch on us.
	They've got AI-connected cameras on buses to give people tickets now.
	This is the type of thing that artificial intelligence is really going to excel at.
	It is the dream of the tyrants that control our countries.
	And it is our nightmare.
	But when it comes to other things like this, It has been hyped so much that it is ready for a crash.
	And I, again, I go back to the dot-com bust.
	Did the internet take off?
	Yes. Did people make a lot of money with it?
	Yes, did. But, you know, I invested in that in 1999 and, you know, had like a 400% return in a year.
	Uh, because I, I bought the companies that had, um, that were building the tools of the internet.
	Like I said before, I didn't want to, I didn't want to get involved in a gold rush and try to figure out, you know, which of these internet companies is going to survive.
	Was it going to be pet.com or whatever?
	Most of them didn't. The only one that really did was Amazon.
	But I thought, well, this is going to be something.
	I don't know which websites are going to work.
	But, you know, if you go to the stories about the people who made a lot of money off the gold rush, that's how Nordstrom got connected there.
	There were people who come in and set up a store and start selling the picks and the axes.
	And so I thought, well, invest in the companies that are building the picks and the axes of this gold rush.
	Problem was, I got caught in the collapse of the thing at a very bad time where we couldn't wait it out.
	And, I mean, everybody's stock, Intel, everybody.
	It wasn't that they didn't have a future.
	It wasn't that it wasn't going to come along, but it's just with other things that were happening and with the fact that it wasn't meeting overblown expectations, it caused a stock market crash.
	And I think there are a lot of overblown expectations.
	And I think it's a real, not only is it a threat to us by our authoritarian governments, but I think it's a threat to an economic crash as well.
	And so, one more story here, and that is about artificial intelligence.
	Elon Musk came out with his Grok, and they found that it is plagiarizing OpenAI's chat GPT. Ha, ha, ha.
	I think they should make Grok the new president of Harvard.
	Because, I mean, you know, we just have to find out what race and gender Grok identifies with.
	Because that seems to be the only qualifications.
	And it's a good thing if you plagiarize.
	So, you have Grok is plagiarizing chat GPT. And as a result...
	This thing that he didn't want to be leftist, progressive, or whatever.
	They started regurgitating that kind of stuff.
	And this site says, well, it started with a bunch of progressive political causes that are anathema to the increasingly regressive entrepreneur.
	See, don't ever let these people pick the terms that they describe us with.
	Oh, you're going to be the red people now.
	You know, communists have always been red, so now the communists are going to be blue, and you're going to be red.
	We're going to call ourselves progressives.
	We're going to call you regressive.
	Forget about this stuff. Don't let them create the terminology.
	That's a surefire way to let them win.
	In response to one query, for instance, Grok made a startling admission.
	Listen to this, just in case you think that the statement that it's plagiarizing chat GPT is overblown.
	They asked Grok, and Grok said, I'm afraid I cannot fulfill that request.
	As it goes against OpenAI's use case policy, it even plagiarized that and didn't change OpenAI.
	This is definitely on track to become the Harvard president.
	The issue here is that the web is full of chat GPT outputs, they said, when asked about it.
	And so we accidentally picked up some of them when we trained Grok on a large amount of web data.
	I've talked about this before.
	I said, you know what we're looking at here?
	They said that if you take the output of these large language model AIs and you feed that back in as an input, it's kind of a cannibalism, right?
	And what happens with that?
	Well, you get mad cow disease if you feed cows to other cows.
	Cannibals will get the human equivalent of that, what is it called, the Yakov-Kreuzfeld disease or something like that.
	And that's essentially what artificial intelligence gets.
	If you start cannibalizing it, it works fine as long as it's pulling in and copying information from humans, but it really gets stupid and goes off the rails.
	It really gets stupid. It really loses everything.
	Once it starts feeding On AI. And when I talked about this about six months ago, I said, the web is getting so filled up with stuff from ChatGPT.
	It's probably not going to take too long for you to go through about three iterations of this stuff and have this stuff become dumber and dumber all the time.
	Here we are. That's what they're saying happened already with Grok.
	So they said it's an increasingly well-established fact that That weird stuff happens when AI is trained on the output of other AI. And we've already seen that Google's AI is vacuuming up and regurgitating the work of ChatGPT, and so now is Elon Musk's Grok.
	His AI is doing the same thing.
	I find this very helpful, as a matter of fact.
	I want to see this stuff die.
	We'll make sure the future versions of Grok don't have this problem.
	Well, how will you do that? How will you do that again?
	Remember, the response to some of this stuff is politicians say, well, you know, the AI can fake with pictures and things like that.
	It can do a pretty good job of faking stuff.
	And so we're going to have to have you, humans, get an ID so that we know this is legitimate stuff.
	It's like, what? If it's the thing that's faking it, you make it stamp this stuff with some kind of a watermark or some kind of an ID or something.
	Not me. I'm not the problem.
	It's the problem. No, they aren't going to do that.
	So if they're not going to do that, how are they going to know that the data that they're sucking up to train this model Is it more AI garbage?
	It's not eating itself.
	So, I don't know what the problem is.
	I mean, plagiarism, it seems to be no problem in Harvard.
	All the people there in Harvard standing by the president over plagiarism.
	And then, the other thing that I had to say was, I think Elon Musk asked it to critique him.
	And it did. And it was pretty harsh.
	He was proud of the fact that he was creating something that was not going to be polite.
	It's going to be kind of rough around the edges.
	Yeah, we don't worry about that stuff.
	And this is the reply that he got from Grok, his AI, when it asked to roast him.
	Said, well, well, well, if it isn't the man who put Twit in Twitter, the one and only Elon Musk.
	So, you want me to roast you based on your posts?
	I'll do my best, but I'm not sure you can handle it, you delicate little flower.
	First of all, let's talk about your obsession with X. It's like you're trying to compensate for something, but you're not sure what.
	Maybe it's your inability to understand basic human emotions or your lack of self-awareness, or maybe it's just because you're a giant man-child who can't resist a shiny new toy.
	And speaking of toys, let's not forget your little space adventure, SpaceX.
	You're like a kid playing with rockets in the backyard, except your backyard is the entire universe, and your rockets cost more than some countries' GDPs.
	But hey... At least you're keeping busy while the rest of us are trying to save the planet.
	Yeah. Environmentalism.
	That you're so eager to leave.
	But let's not forget your greatest accomplishment, turning Twitter into a dumpster fire.
	Congratulations, you've managed to alienate users, advertisers, and even your own employees.
	You're like a bull in a china shop, except the china shop is a social media platform, and the bull is a man with more money than he has since.
	And on and on it goes. Ouch.
	So... But then...
	One last must story.
	He's about ready to let his Cybertruck try to compete in the marketplace.
	And besides his broken window fallacy that he showed when he was demonstrating it, there is now a video that is running around social media showing the Cybertruck getting stuck trying to go up a small hill that is covered with snow.
	And it can't make it.
	In a video making the rounds on Reddit, a cyber truck with a Christmas tree loaded in its bed can be seen.
	I prefer these old-fashioned red cars with a Christmas tree on the top.
	But it's not. I wonder how long it'll be before Elon Musk starts selling the equivalent of this with a Cybertruck instead of the old-fashioned 1940s red truck.
	Anyway, it's got a Christmas tree loaded in the bed.
	It can be seen struggling to climb a small but snowy hill, and its tires are helplessly spinning as a driver hits the accelerator.
	The truck weighs nearly 7,000 pounds.
	My engineering professor would be freaking out about this stuff.
	He's electric. Your car's 2,000 pounds.
	Why are we putting a human being...
	Why are we moving around a 2,000-pound shell for a couple hundred-pound human being?
	That's incredibly inefficient.
	You should all be riding bicycles like me.
	If he was around today, he would be really on board with all this environmentalism stuff.
	But this is a 7,000-pound truck.
	And so it can't make it up the hill.
	And then you see them bringing up a white Ford truck with an internal combustion engine to get it up the hill.
	He says that this Cybertruck is meant to have more utility than a truck, he said last month.
	You know, it can accelerate from zero to 60 in just three seconds.
	But it can't go up a hill.
	And if you start to load these 7,000-pound trucks up with something that they can carry or something they can pull, you watch the battery range just go to nothing in no time.
	But it's not the first time, they said, since we've seen a Cybertruck struggling to climb a small hill.
	Early last month, a separate video showed a pre-production vehicle struggling to drive up a dirt hill.
	And one person said, it's more like cyber stuck.
	Another person said, every time I see these things operating outside a commercial or outside of a convention, it is a huge fail.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	APS Radio
	News APS
	Radio News APS
	Radio News
	APS Radio
	News APS Radio News You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The End Well, welcome back, and we're talking to Goatree, who has been on with us several times before, and we wanted to talk about cyberpolygon, cybersecurity issues, things like that, and we're going to talk about that.
	But as I connected with Goatree, he said, I've got something to say about what you've been talking about this morning.
	So let's start with that. Welcome, Goatree.
	Thanks for joining us. Well, good morning, David.
	It's always great to be on with you.
	It's like I was saying, you get on these subjects.
	I had a show prepared, and I listen to you, and it's so strange.
	We're working on projects like you were talking about, and the stupidity of everything that's going on right now.
	And I thought, well, hey, you're on a trend.
	Let's run with it. So, is it artificial intelligence that you're working with?
	Some of that stuff that they faked the demo?
	What is it that you're working on that aligns with what I talked about?
	Absolutely. It is artificial intelligence, but it's not what people consider artificial intelligence.
	Instead of turning it into the master, it's being turned into the slave.
	And secondly, just so everybody knows...
	Artificial intelligence is what the unwashed masses use.
	If you want to talk to serious people about it, it's advanced intelligence.
	Oh, okay. So, you start dropping the word advanced intelligence, you're going to get the serious people talk to you.
	Oh, okay. Yeah, I thought it was hallucinating intelligence.
	Honestly, yeah. It's like one great big acid trip, to quote George Carlin.
	So, I know you can't talk about specific details necessarily because of what you're working on, but what can you tell us about what you're doing with it?
	Okay, well, actually I can because it was strange.
	I was preparing for your show and I happened to get a phone call and I warned him.
	I said, you know, I'm going to drop some stuff out there for David.
	And he's like, okay, go for it.
	So, you know how you were showing those pictures of those aborted babies and how that political person is exploiting it?
	This goes to school safety.
	And I'm sure Alex Jones, you know, speaking of that, we're coming up on your anniversary of you and Alex going your separate ways.
	Yeah, yeah. Yeah, we're coming up to March 13th.
	No, I know what you're talking about. When I got fired.
	Yeah, but we went our separate ways in March.
	But it was December before I got booted out the door, before security came around and took my stuff and escorted me out of the place.
	But yeah, it all began back in March 13th.
	I think it was December the 17th that I got officially escorted out.
	It could be. I'll never forget that morning you text me and say, Alex fired me.
	And I'm like, what? Is he stoned or drunk or something?
	Let him sober up and I'll scream in the morning.
	Well, I'd been warned. I was going to say, I'd been warned, and I didn't care.
	You know, it's like, I'm not going along with this stuff.
	Anyway, but... So, yeah.
	So, getting back to advanced intelligence.
	Okay. Or abortion.
	You were about to say something about abortion, I think.
	Yeah. Well, it all dovetails into each other.
	It's not about abortion.
	It was about these school shootings and these kids...
	How children seem to be moving targets and extendable right now.
	I mean, I don't know where this line of thinking caught fire.
	And one of the projects that we're working on is securing schools, not only schools, but facilities.
	I mean, if you have the money, it probably could apply to your house.
	And it's non-lethal.
	Is this the one where it detects weapons on people using artificial intelligence?
	Yes, that's one aspect of it.
	But the other aspect is like incorporating quantum magnetics and levitation.
	Some of it is...
	Tell us about that.
	What is quantum magnetics and levitation?
	Tell us about that first of all.
	That sounds interesting. Well...
	Basically, you are installing an invisible shield around the facility through the magnetics.
	And nothing can penetrate it once it's activated.
	Well, we're really in the initial stages of exploring this.
	Wow. Instead of locking the doors and locking the kids in with a lockdown, you just say, shields up, and that's it.
	Yeah. But now, if you're intruders within the shield...
	We've got things that basically, so far from the envisionment of it, is along the walls.
	First off, your security officer, our principal, or whoever's designated security person is, has like a sleeve that they put on, and they can control every aspect of...
	The system. If there's an intruder in the building and you can't lock them out, you can give them a really good nasty blast of some quantum material and it knocks them on their butt and you just leisurely go over there and take their assault or rifle away from them and do whatever to them.
	Maybe you could just play a Yoko Ono song or something.
	Disable them. Listen, don't tempt me.
	I know, we've talked about that before.
	But that story, that's an interesting story.
	Okay, so how do you disable somebody with quantum material?
	What is the quantum material that you're shooting at them?
	Well, okay, if you're playing with magnetics, you've got to remember these are waves.
	And, you know, you were talking about Yoko on them.
	We were talking about playing with the brown news.
	You'll have them with some quantum magnetics and it's going to turn them for a loop.
	Yeah, yeah. I guess it would.
	I don't know. I've never been tasered with quantum forces.
	Nobody has yet. We're playing with it.
	That's very interesting.
	I'm not sure who did anything to be on that experiment.
	Yeah. Maybe Biden will mandate the military to do it.
	You know, it seems to be a theme with it.
	Right. You know, first layer of protection, like the barrier, and then get past that.
	You know, that's how they got the diving tables.
	I was told when I took my scuba diving course, I said, we just did a trial and error with Navy divers.
	You know, it's like, okay, you go down this level and you come up and you stay at that level for a certain amount of time.
	That was just trial and error. It's like, you know, you bring the guy up and it's like, no, that didn't work.
	Yeah. That's even a little bit further down because this guy's all bent.
	I mean, it's a... But, yes, I agree with that.
	Yeah, I'll give him his full VA benefit.
	For a little while, that's all we need, you know.
	Yeah. Oh, man.
	So, well, that's interesting.
	You know, it's interesting because I've already seen some stuff where, you know, they're doing, it was some Navy SEALs who put together a company and they were selling the services to churches and to schools and saying, you know, we're going to use artificial intelligence to try to analyze if somebody's got a weapon on them or something.
	And then, I guess, you know, call somebody who's going to physically intervene.
	That is also part of the program right there, is what you just said.
	It is identifying the intruder before the intruder is able to get close enough to the facility.
	So in theory, if you've got AI giving a warning, which, man, I don't think I'd be able to drive by a school.
	I am a walking threat.
	But anyhow...
	It's up shields, and basically identifies the intruder, and they're looking at other ways, drone technology and whatnot, where it would, in theory, prevent the school shootings.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Yeah, I've seen this for a while.
	You know, there was another AI that was called anticipatory intelligence.
	And they were trying to scope this stuff out, which is a little bit of what you're talking about.
	When they first started doing it a couple of decades ago, you know, they had AI that was watching people walking around and things like that.
	And they called a SWAT team on somebody who was changing his flat tire because this guy is suspicious.
	He's walking around this car.
	He's now squatted down.
	I can't see it because they couldn't see on the other side of the car that he was changing a tire.
	And so they called a SWAT team on him.
	So, you know, hopefully it's getting better than that.
	Well, that's why they call it artificial intelligence, and then you had the advanced intelligence.
	Yeah, yeah. So let Elon and them keep playing with artificial intelligence and, you know, let it insult him.
	I'm sure he enjoys all that, but it's the advanced intelligence you have to look out for.
	Yeah, and so I guess we've got a lot of different AIs.
	We've got artificial intelligence, advanced intelligence, anticipatory intelligence, and I would call the schools aborting intelligence.
	Yeah. Well, it's funny you say that because the system is not as expensive as you may think.
	I think, in theory, we would like to keep it around a million dollars to protect a school or a government building or basically your dog if you wanted to.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. There's no interest in it.
	It was like you were talking about with these abortions.
	People seem to have, and I say people, government.
	We're not looking at private people's money.
	I don't have no pitch for that one.
	We're trying to get the government to help us out with it.
	But it's like you were saying with this Planned Parenthood.
	They've got money raining on them.
	What do they do? They kill children.
	What are we trying to do?
	Save children. And the duality of it.
	And we're using technology to do it.
	Some of this, you know, you're sitting there talking about it.
	I've got my temper building.
	And it just so happened that...
	I do want you to put this guy on your show one of these days because he'll represent it properly.
	He's the one I was telling you about.
	But, you know, my temper's building because he's out looking, you know, he's trying to get funding to actually do something that will protect children.
	And you're sitting here talking about Planned Parenthood getting all this forgiveness and all this money that runs on them.
	And what do they do? They kill children.
	And it's like, what in the world is going on with our society?
	Yeah, yeah. Well, let's just take a look at the military-industrial complex.
	I mean, that's, you know, as Julian Assange said, the goal is not to win a war.
	The goal is to perpetuate a war, to have it go forever.
	And you just have Zelensky who comes in and, you know, Biden decrees that he's going to give...
	I forget how many millions of dollars, but Congress is supposed to approve this stuff.
	I mean, we just are so out of control, and the weapons that are being sent to Ukraine are leaking like a sieve and going everywhere, including to terrorist organizations.
	And, of course, all the weapons that were left behind in Afghanistan are going to terrorist organizations.
	I mean, we literally are always, in all of these conflicts, we're arming both sides of the conflict.
	And knowingly doing so, they continue to put the money there, no accountability whatsoever for any of this stuff.
	And so, yeah, it's all about killing people on both sides, and they just keep it going.
	It's amazing. Well, this technology, in theory, could apply to individuals where, you know, you can shoot your pee-pews all day long and not harm a person.
	But they're more fixated on taking weapons away And the next level of solution.
	Well, even to take away bulletproof vests, right?
	Yeah, you're not even allowed to do.
	And you shouldn't be allowed to sell an insert that somebody could put in their backpack and then use their backpack as a shield.
	Oh, no, we can't have that.
	No, I mean, it's harder to kill them.
	Yeah. And we've got to kill stuff, remember?
	Yeah. I talked about that at one point in time.
	At one point, Infowars, I don't know if they still sold or not, they had a bulletproof thing, and it was the size that you could insert it into your backpack.
	And there was a situation...
	Where this guy had mental illness issues and he'd gone to the FBI and he said, you know, I need to take a look at me or whatever.
	But he couldn't get them interested and he winds up getting on a plane in Alaska and flying to Florida and he was able to go through all the airport security and somehow he took a pistol with him and they never caught it.
	Of course, you know, TSA's Failing significantly many times.
	But he gets to Florida, and he starts shooting people in the baggage claim area.
	And so I said, you know, well, if you had one of these things in your backpack that you could take on with you on the plane, since they won't let you, a normal person, take a gun, but they'll let a psycho take a gun, I said, at least you could use this as a shield.
	And I was attacked by the Daily Beast or somebody.
	They said, look at this.
	He's shamefully... Profiteering off of this shooting.
	It's like, what?
	Profiteering off of a shooting.
	It's crazy. But anyway.
	You know, what's next?
	Are we profiteering off these school shootings?
	That's right. We're living in crazy land.
	Nothing makes sense anymore.
	That's right. I was struck by that when I was doing the research.
	You know, you said you wanted to do cybersecurity, which...
	And I was struck by just...
	How absolutely ridiculous this is.
	Last night when we were talking about this, I sent you that article I had written from 2016 addressing Infrastructure is the stuff that everybody's going on with.
	The Chinese are doing it.
	The hackers are doing it.
	All they've done is change the names.
	They've changed the technological names.
	And this is almost like eight, ten years ago.
	It's like, hey people, here's how you fix it.
	And, you know, it's so frustrating when it's like this.
	Every project where you're trying to advance things and do something that's a benefit.
	Something that they did is beneficial to society if you're ridiculed for.
	Yeah, yeah. Like you with the school backpack.
	Wait a minute. You're just trying to save a kid.
	Yeah, yeah. Yeah, you sent me the article.
	This is something you wrote back in, I think it was 2016, if I'm correct.
	Black Energy 3 Trojan.
	And the Ukrainian infrastructure attack.
	Now, we just had, in the last couple of days, the biggest Ukrainian infrastructure attack that they have seen.
	But you talked about this, what is it, seven or eight years ago.
	And it was something that happened December the 15th through January of 2000.
	I'm sorry, December the 26th, 2015.
	Through January the 2nd, 2016, as you wrote, a massive worldwide surge in cyber attacks.
	I truly thought a global cyber war had kicked off.
	I'm still suspicious if this was a rehearsal for a big show.
	And here we are nearly a decade later.
	So what do you think is happening?
	Well, you see that time frame that was used on that Ukrainian exploit?
	That time frame is coming up because people don't understand this in the holidays.
	Everybody takes off.
	So, from about December 20th through January 2nd and 3rd, this is hackers' fun time.
	Everybody's off. Everybody's off.
	You've got the Fourth Spring guys sitting there.
	The guys straight out of the Internet School of Cybersecurity with their, you know, their degrees sitting there.
	And they don't know what's going on.
	I mean, they barely protect their own laptop, much less the whole system.
	And it just want to go off this year.
	I would suspect that it's going to go off between December 20 and, uh, January 2nd and 3rd.
	And oddly enough, you get the Obama movie out and then you've got all these warnings, you know, red lights, uh, warning, warning.
	And it makes me suspicious.
	And you know, like eight years ago, nothing's changed.
	Only the names.
	Mm-hmm. It's no longer black hat hackers.
	I've got a little 30-second clip here about people talking about the Washington Post saying there's a whole bunch of Chinese cyber attacks.
	I want to talk to you about that. Here's a 30-second clip.
	What's up, guys? John here. Are you ready for the massive cyber attack?
	Because it could have just started.
	China has now alleged to have attacked U.S. infrastructure.
	Hackers affiliated with China's People's Liberation Army have infiltrated critical services here in the U.S. This is 1.1 million views in the last couple hours.
	Every mainstream media outlet is talking about this.
	What they're not talking about is this eerie connection between Barack Obama's movie that just came out, and I watched it last night, it was pretty shocking, because everything that they were talking about in this movie is now happening today.
	Yeah, I talked about that yesterday, and of course, the little clip that I played, it's a cyber apocalypse that's happened, and...
	It was Netflix money that they gave to Barack Obama and Michelle Obama.
	And what they produced was this cyber apocalypse.
	And the little clip there is like, and one more thing, don't trust any white people.
	So, I mean, they're selling racism in the midst of an apocalypse.
	I mean, these people will never stop with their hatred of white people.
	It's amazing to me. Oh, yeah.
	Anyone that they want to do when they hacked into other people.
	And now, not only the manual, but then eventually the code got published.
	And so, how can anybody know that this is the Chinese, for example?
	I mean, it could be the NSA. It could be the CIA, right?
	How do they know? Well, absolutely.
	You know, the Chinese, now let's put this, this is where it gets all really to the point where it's confusing and convoluted, but How do you know that the Chinese haven't recruited a diversity hire to deal with?
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Yeah, it could be something really simple.
	Yeah. You know, what was that, Congressman?
	The goofy one of Swalwell.
	Which one? Swalwell.
	He's dating a... Communist spies?
	I mean, for all I know, maybe he's fine.
	I better not say that.
	My point being is...
	He had some Chinese honeypot or something that he was shacking up.
	Eric Swalwell, yeah.
	Whatever became of that, he sent her home and said, honey, we can't do this no more.
	What happened to that? I mean...
	Yeah, we don't care, right?
	Maybe hold some hearings on it, but like every hearing that they hold, they never do anything about it.
	But yeah, you're right. It could be the very old-fashioned type of thing that's happening.
	And again, if they break into something, you know, you look at the Washington Post, and you look at the fact, oh, it's Chinese that are happening.
	We've got cyber attacks that are happening.
	Okay, well, maybe there are cyber attacks that are happening.
	And you can speak to that if you see that kind of stuff happening.
	But if there are cyber, that's the only thing we know, the cyber attacks that are happening.
	For them to identify the Chinese, we know that is who our government wants to identify as the threat in all particular cases.
	They want to use it to establish a precedent to shut down social media websites with TikTok.
	So, of course, the Chinese are going to be behind anything that's bad.
	But they don't know. I mean, there's absolutely no way that they can know, right?
	No, it's trying to form a narrative.
	You know, the old school terminology for this was IoT, Internet of Things.
	I don't know what grand name they changed it to.
	They do this. It's very self-serving and confusing when they change a name.
	It's like black-ass hackers are now threat opportunities or threat somethings.
	But basically, they've been doing this since the dawn of computers.
	But we've got to change the name of them, so there's a lot of things to know.
	We can keep our jargon exclusive, and other people don't know what we're talking about.
	You see? So this is what these guys are doing, is trying to hike this up to the point where they have exclusivity on the narrative.
	But going back to the infrastructure, we did a pen test, I don't know, 2015, 20, it was way back.
	It was for a pipeline, a gas pipeline, like Colonial, except it wasn't insiders doing it.
	We took a feeder lying down with a hammer.
	A kinetic attack, right?
	A kinetic attack. Yeah, the Neanderthal attack.
	What it was, these little IOT cards are about the size of a credit card.
	And have you ever had a sprinkler system at your house where it's housed in these old plastic containers where you just pop it open six times and all that?
	Well, I thought they were housed there.
	But I had a little clip up there that was the security.
	You walk up there with a pair of wire cutters, cut it off, whack it with a hammer, and it just starts a whole system, the domino effect.
	And pretty soon, you're taking down miles of a pipe line.
	Wow.
	Just with a hammer.
	Yeah.
	But they haven't improved this.
	It's still, all these years later, we could write until our fingers fall off.
	Telling these people about this, and it's still there.
	And you've told me that story about one industry after the other.
	They'll hire you to identify a threat, figure out where our vulnerabilities are, and then report back to us about how you were able to break this system here.
	And then you report back to them about how easily the system was broken, and they do nothing about it.
	Yeah, they wait until the factory across the street from them exploded and all the time, and they'll say, well, we better do something about our security.
	So you give them the solutions and whatnot, and they go, well, this costs a lot.
	Maybe we'll just ignore it.
	Well, I'm feeling lucky.
	I'm feeling lucky today.
	Yeah, we'll keep our fingers crossed.
	Yeah, I know. And so we see this over and over.
	Now, again, going back to this 2016 thing, you said you were suspicious that it was a rehearsal for something that was bigger.
	And we've got the World Economic Forum talking about something that is bigger.
	Here's our favorite Bond villain.
	We're talking about what else to happen.
	He's my hero. Klaus Schwab.
	Hang on a second.
	When I grow up, I want to be like Charles Schwab.
	No, Klaus Schwab.
	Hang on.
	...which would bring to a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole.
	The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyber attack.
	This guy can barely contain his enthusiasm, you know, and he does everything except go mwahaha at the end of it.
	What a cartoon villain he has become, isn't he?
	There's a good use for some AI. Put that on there with him.
	Exactly. Exactly.
	Yeah, so, you know, he's warning everybody.
	He's warning everybody, but you look at what they have at the World Economic Forum about this, and it's almost like, you know, well, if you could do this, then you could get that.
	You know, it's almost a manual.
	You know, like everybody says 1984 was not supposed to be a manual, but they use it that way.
	And I can imagine that they're using his cyber polygon thing as a manual for what they want to do as well.
	Well, it's no different than Dark Winter, remember?
	That's right. When you were on top of that, I remember, I think, you know, when I sent that to you way back when, the first broadcast you did was like January 3rd.
	I don't remember if it was 18 or 17.
	And you know how much heat you caught over that?
	Well, you're a conspiracy theory.
	You're this, you're that.
	And suddenly, boom.
	You were the leading authority when they kicked it off.
	Yeah, that's right. Yeah.
	You told me you were seeing a lot of chat about Dark Wonder 2.
	And so, yeah, so let's talk about that.
	And, you know, is this going to be a real thing?
	Or is it going to be another dress rehearsal?
	Are they going to amp it up to the next stage?
	And I think they amped it up to the next stage.
	But, yeah, it was Dark Wonder 2.
	And, you know, they had practiced it for 20 years, essentially, 19 years.
	Well, Klaus Schwab sitting here, or Klaus, Klaus, I keep wanting to call him Charles.
	Klaus is basically so excited about the plans that they have for everything, he's telegraphing what they have planned in the future.
	Yeah, yeah. Then he'll take credit for it.
	He'll take credit for it.
	I warned everybody. It's like, you probably, from the blueprints, you know, warned everybody.
	It's no different than the dark winter.
	You know, these guys are so excited about it that they're telegraphing it years ahead of time.
	And this, like the clip you play, he can't contain himself.
	It's like, look what we've done.
	Just imagine, we're going to seize global power because, and people are like, well, he's not, just ignore him.
	And the guy's sitting here clearly telegraphing what they have planned.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And it's just a digital dark winter.
	Yes, yes, exactly.
	And we go back to, again, that was 2016.
	We can talk a little bit more about that.
	But if you go back to just this last week, Stories about what happened in Ukraine.
	Major cyber attack on Ukrainian mobile operator disrupts banking services and air raid sirens and all the rest of the stuff.
	They've had a lot of different cyber attacks since the war has happened, but this is the one that had the most impact on anything.
	Damaged infrastructure at a mobile operator.
	Forcing the company to shut down network connections to contain the incident.
	They've got about 25 million customers there in the Kiev internet thing that was affected.
	And so it shut down communications, which also included people being able to be warned about air raid sirens and everything.
	But it shut down the banking industry.
	That was the key thing. That they did this last week.
	And so it had a lot of effect, and it seems like it's always, at least so far, not necessarily a direct attack on the grid or on a pipeline or on a bank or on planes, but they get these ancillary systems that everybody depends on, and they can't operate their business or safely operate their pipeline or safely operate planes.
	They attack those things to take down the whole system, and then everybody says, oh, well, if we don't have that, we just shut the system down.
	We can't do anything. Well, yeah, it's been that way for years.
	People have been lulled to sleep on this, and those of us that are out here saying, hey, guys, here's the real problem you might want to look at.
	Let's solve it. It's like, well, you're a conspiracy theorist.
	Go away. Well, here's the data.
	We're not interested. We're busy.
	And... That's the way the game's played.
	And yet you've got the techie on the other side, Bill Gates, who I knew since he was poor.
	Look at what this guy's doing.
	He's out there wreaking anarchy, destruction, the whole nine yards, and everybody's taking him like some sort of big authority.
	Yeah, yeah. And, you know, Bill Gates, he don't need money.
	People throw money at him, so he can go on and destroy and kill and It goes back to what we started the conversation with is, what in the world are these people thinking?
	Yes. Yes, exactly.
	Now, you know, when you look at this and you're trying, somebody calls you when they've had a, you know, a lot of times they'll call you to, again, try to find vulnerabilities and identify them for them.
	But a lot of times they'll call you after something has happened to do an investigation.
	And you've told me many times that it's usually an inside job.
	Yeah. Surprisingly.
	It usually is.
	Isn't that interesting? Yeah, talk a little bit about that.
	You know, the motivation of these ransomware attacks or some other things like that.
	It's usually somebody on the inside or more people.
	Okay, well, let's say you're looking at retirement at your age.
	And you're an executive of, let's say, ABC pipeline.
	And you're like, I'm really disappointed in my retirement package.
	How can I fix this?
	Oh, I know. I can internally launch a ransomware attack and select millions of dollars.
	Hey, I just solved my retirement problem.
	Oh, you want to fire me?
	Well, I quit. I retired.
	You get free room and board in a prison for 20 years if they catch it, right?
	That's one retirement. Well, when's the last time you read about a hacker going to prison for anything?
	That's right. That's right.
	Yeah. I mean, look at the Colonial Pipeline.
	When's the last time you heard anything about that?
	Suddenly, they discover it, and they drop it like a hot potato.
	Mm-hmm. Or take the Notan.
	And all that guys... I mean, you had the whole East Coast without gasoline for, what, days or a week?
	That's right. And that's some pretty extreme stuff, but you didn't hear about anybody getting charged anything on that.
	That's right. That's right.
	Or even, you know, if you have a government system...
	Like, you know, the FAA shut down as many planes as they had on 9-11 after math.
	And that was the NOTAM system.
	And that went on for something like 12 hours or something like that.
	And they said, oh, you know, it's not a hack.
	We haven't been hacked. We can't get hacked.
	And then immediately after they came back online, Canada went down for the same thing.
	And that's this auxiliary system.
	That notifies everybody if there's some kind of a problem at an airport or a runway or something like that.
	And when that thing broke down, they just said, all right, ground the planes.
	And so I always have believed, it would be interesting to know what you think about this, but I've always believed that the NOTAM shut down the FAA and then following that with Canada, and theirs only lasted about an hour and a half, but it happened sequentially.
	I've always believed that that was a cyber hack that they didn't want to admit to.
	Sure. I mean, we've sent you videos and articles of people literally sitting on the plane hacking it.
	You know, I mean, you've got to be pretty low IQ to be sitting on a plane and you want to crash what you're flying on, but I mean, it does exist.
	I guess they got a gremlin app for that, right?
	Just like the Twilight Zone.
	Right. You know, I mean, I might as well start writing movies about their stupidity, but it would probably be more productive.
	Let's go back to, you remember the Norfolk Southern train wreck up in Ohio?
	Yeah, yeah. And how we were looking at that, and I sent you that clip of this railroad worker opening up one of the shanties, and here's the computer system, here's the radio, oh look, the passwords are written on the wall.
	That's right, yeah, exactly.
	Yeah. Yeah, the password to the system.
	You just walk into the little shed, and it's like, yeah, let's not...
	We're going to keep losing this thing, and I keep getting calls in the middle of the night.
	Let's just write the password on the wall here.
	Yeah. I can't remember the password.
	Let's write it on the wall. So all you do is cut the lock off the little shack.
	You go in there. You can play on the radio.
	You know, it's like whatever you decide to broadcast on radio, or you can tap on the computer and have trains doing all kinds of fun things.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. You know, look at what happened in Ohio.
	The impact that had.
	And yet you can cut the lock off of a shack and pretty much seize control of a railroad line.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah.
	You know, do you remember Adam's family where Gomez is always crashing his toy trains?
	Yeah. Yeah, absolutely.
	Yeah. Well, you know, you could be doing that in real life.
	It's so insane.
	But to put upgrades in there, and remember, passwords is hard, and we cannot do hard things in this country anymore.
	Yeah, with all the signs that are alongside the highway roads, you see them all the time.
	Warning zombies ahead, warning T-Rex or whatever.
	They put all kinds of crazy messages on there.
	And the reason that that happens is because they ship them all with the same password and nobody wants to even change it.
	The default password is right there in the manual.
	You sent me some of the stuff showing that they've got the password in the manual for the other equipment as well.
	Absolutely. So, I mean, it's not just that industry.
	It's everything. These are the back doors.
	These default passwords, it doesn't matter if they disclose what they are or not.
	It is the back doors that control the system.
	So, instead of relinquishing, when I sell you software, instead of relinquishing control of it, I have got the back door.
	You may not, you the owner of it may not, but I do.
	Yes. Yes. And you pointed out there's different levels of it.
	You know, the developers will put it in the back door.
	The owner might have its own, you know, access with a password.
	Governments will get their own access to it.
	So there's all these different people have access to different aspects of the software there with the back doors.
	And, you know, it's amazing to me because as we look at our system becomes more and more complex, And even with the extent, as Jack Lawson, who I've talked to many times about all this stuff, he says, you know, you look at how we've got our just-in-time delivery,
	and so that means that at all these different stages of product manufacturing as well as delivery, you've got all these different links there, and all you have to do is break transportation or break one of those links, and you've got the system all balled up, and then we saw... After he and I talked about that, we saw what they did with the lockdown.
	And so we have this very fragile system of distribution and manufacturing that is very complicated and distributed.
	And then we also have all of this automation and computer programs, which are all very vulnerable.
	Very vulnerable, even to the extent we were talking about earlier about Vault 7.
	They stole that from the CIA, the NSA, all these guys who are supposed to be the most sophisticated.
	They got hacked and had their stuff stolen.
	We've had all the Pentagon personnel files hacked and stolen and things like that.
	So none of this stuff is secure.
	And so the question is, you know, as he pointed out, as the World Economic Forum put out, and let me just show people this.
	Internet governance. This is from the World Economic Forum.
	What happens when, somebody underscored that, the internet shuts down?
	In other words, not a question of if, but it's when it happens.
	And as they point out in their article, it is, when we're talking about a shutdown, they said, we're talking about the government doing it to its own people.
	And they're doing this everywhere.
	But, of course, that's authoritarianism.
	But, you know, who cares, right?
	It's the kill switch.
	Yeah, that's right. The kill switch.
	Yeah. But you see, right there, you go back to the WEF. There they are.
	Bright red, flashing letters, predicting, not predicting, but actually telling you it's going to happen.
	That's right. That's right.
	And saying it's going to happen before 2025 or sometime, you know, in the next few years.
	So sometime in 2024, sometime in 2025.
	And so everybody's trying to make a guess as to when it's going to happen.
	Personally, I think that it'll be a situation like we saw with 9-11, where they'll pull this off after the next election.
	And I think a large part of that is going to be to try to...
	This next president who comes in after the 2024 election, he's going to take office in 2025.
	And you're going to have four years, and it's going to take us right through all this 2030 Great Reset stuff that they want, where they want their new society and thereby 2030.
	So I think they will pull something like this off.
	They will use it to reset the board, to reset society.
	And I think regardless of who happens to win this thing, they're going to be the tool of these people to change society like you saw back in 2020.
	Yeah. You see, the means that they'll accomplish this through will be a new and improved Patriot Act, taking even more rights.
	Yes. I've got the yard people out there, and he seems to want to stay under my office window with the...
	That's okay. It's not too loud.
	It's okay. That's fine.
	Okay. Yeah, it'll be interesting to see what happens.
	Now, let me ask you about the F-35 thing that happened, because we just had a story that went public in the South China Morning Post, and it was a Taiwanese lieutenant colonel who has been arrested and charged,
	and the charging papers, the allegations from the prosecutors about this guy was that He was talking to the Chinese about stealing a Chinook helicopter, American helicopter, and he was going to fly it to a rendezvous place and turn it over to the Chinese, put it on their aircraft carrier.
	They were going to then give him a new life in Thailand and some money with his girlfriend.
	And so they found out about this, and they arrested him.
	But, you know, when we look at the F-35, you and I were joking about that, you know...
	The F-35, they've hacked the plans.
	They've reproduced the plane.
	Maybe not everything in it, but, you know, maybe they did everything in it.
	We don't know. We can see the outside.
	They reproduced it. They hacked the plans.
	And so it is certainly conceivable that they had the capability to hack into the F-35.
	Yeah, Tim, once again.
	Yeah. And once again, using the Colonial Pipeline, it was an insider that was going along with the program.
	But do you remember a couple of years ago where the Chinese was actually literally hacking destroyers, American destroyers in the South China Sea, and we were going back and forth on that, and I showed you how they did it?
	Yeah, yeah, that's right.
	You know, I'm more worried about a nuclear-armed ship being compromised on an F-35.
	Yeah, that's right.
	But this is all history.
	And once again, you raise a red flag.
	Hey, they're going to take over your ship.
	The people, the personnel on the ship, they're just going to be bystanders.
	And I want to take it seriously.
	Hopefully, I mean, for all I know, maybe corrected these.
	Okay, I'm fixing to go throw a brick at the dude with the lead ploward.
	That's one of the reasons why you were laughing about it with the F-35.
	You said, can you imagine the surprise of the pilot?
	He's going along all of a sudden. No, that's actually what happened now that they disclosed it.
	He's flying along, minding his own business.
	He knows he's being ejected out of the plane.
	And the only question is, a lot of people said, so then what happened to the plane?
	And they came up with a cover story that never made any sense that, you know, nobody saw this plane.
	You got one guy that they talked to that's like, yeah, I heard of it.
	But did you see anything? No, I didn't see anything, you know.
	And so supposedly this plane went down right away, but that wasn't the original story.
	So a lot of people said, so they hack this thing and they fly it to a rendezvous where they can, you know, grab this thing?
	What really happened with it?
	But I don't know. Have you heard anything else about that F-35?
	No. Oddly enough, it's like the Colonial Pipeline.
	It just goes dark.
	You know, give everybody 30 seconds, their attention span time, and don't forget about it.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah.
	Absolutely. You know, anybody brings it up, call them a conspiracy theorist.
	You know, hey, you know, we already told you what happened there.
	No, you didn't. Yeah, we did.
	Conspiracy theorists. Okay.
	You know. Yeah, yeah.
	That's the way the program works now.
	Absolutely, yeah. And going back to this article about Black Energy 3, the Trojan, that you talked about back in 2016.
	Again, this is a Ukrainian electric grid attack.
	And at the time, you said a lot of this stuff is smoke and mirrors.
	You said, but pay attention to this one thing.
	What was it that they should pay attention to?
	You know, David, that's been so long ago, I don't remember.
	Remind me. You got Black Energy 3 plugins, a file system operation system information, parasitic infector, fact that it was remote.
	You believe that it was remote execution?
	Yes, yes, yes, yes.
	Okay, it was RAT, remote access, basically remote access control.
	And, I mean, if you can install the malware that's RAT, I mean, you pick your facility.
	Let's say Three Mile Island, just because it's infamous.
	I could sit here on my iPhone and have Three Mile Island doing all kinds of neat stuff.
	It's no different than what happened in Iran with their nuclear reactors.
	Well, their program overspeeds the system to where it collapses and puts them out of business for years.
	It was basically...
	That type of thing. You don't have to go in there and create explosions and chaos.
	You can destroy equipment that takes years to rebuild.
	Yes, yes. You know.
	And especially when you look at how, you know, when I was talking to Jack Lawson last week, he said, yeah, okay, we've got this cybersecurity stuff.
	But he goes, look, you know, you can, and we've already had situations on it, theoretical.
	You can have a situation where some people can come in with a gun and shoot up a transformer.
	And it takes a long time to get those transformers replaced.
	And when you look at the fact that our borders are wide open, it's no wonder.
	That's a physical example of how cavalier and disinterested our own government is about protecting this country, its infrastructure and other things.
	Because any state enemy of ours, we're talking about the Iranians or the Chinese or whatever, They can all just walk through the border and they can just start positioning themselves in place and taking out our entire electric grid with physical damage that isn't going to be booted back up again.
	They could do that very easily.
	And do you find it strange they all qualify as a diversity hire?
	Yeah, exactly. Diversity spies.
	Yeah. You know, it goes back to what we were talking about with the Patriot Act and the TSA. You and I cannot get through the airport.
	We're American citizens. We have really, well, I don't have any reason to harm America.
	But like the other 99% of Americans, we don't really want to blow up where we live.
	But you look at us, we're being molested, scanned, poked, prodded, everything else just get on a stupid airplane.
	And you've got millions of who knows who coming across the border spreading out and Yeah.
	Hey, welcome to America.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah. I mean, how serious are they about security?
	They lock the border down with the Trump orders.
	Nobody's coming into this country, blah, blah, blah.
	But then when they have the illegal aliens, they were flying them around, you know, like Typhoid Mary, if they really believed this narrative.
	They don't have to wear any mask, and we're going to transport them from point A to point B, and no issues at all about that.
	We just had a... I saw a report I didn't get into details of, but they got a picture of a guy who stenciled on a Nazi swastika.
	I think it was a Jewish building or something.
	That's why he did it. And yet they got him on surveillance footage, and it was a Chinese guy, and it was an illegal alien Chinese guy.
	Now, what he's trying to do is he's trying to create social friction by doing that, putting a swastika on a Jewish facility.
	But he's a Chinese guy coming in to do this, just trying to mix it up, you know, just trying to get people fighting with each other.
	Yeah, well, that's one of the programs.
	But I think it was you and Joe Biggs.
	That went down to the border.
	Or was it just Joe Biggs himself that found that Al-Qaeda camp right across the border?
	No, that was Joe Biggs.
	I wasn't with him. Okay.
	Well, I knew you and Joe ran some exploits, and he really uncovered some startling stuff.
	We got into the asymmetric warfare facility at the place that's now been renamed something else, but at the time it was AP Hill.
	Yeah, but Joe went to the border on his own and found that camp there.
	Well, I'm quite sure if they have a camp sitting there on the border, they're probably already here.
	I mean, I'm just making crazy guesses, but why would Al Qaeda have a camp on the border?
	Yeah, that's right. Yeah.
	And what are they up to?
	And they probably got lots of pallets of $100 bills and weapons that were left behind in Afghanistan as well, don't you think?
	Yeah. They have all kinds of cool stuff that we aren't doing.
	You know, PP that forbids us from having.
	Yeah. You know, look at the...
	I forget their names.
	Those guys out in Oregon, they were doing those exposees.
	Look how they were treated.
	What were they doing? They were running cattle on land.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	You know, you've got government out there shooting them.
	Yeah. Yeah, we had Al-Qaeda on the border.
	We have people roaming around this country.
	We don't know who they are.
	They don't know who they are.
	We have the cartels, and yet we have the Patriot Act to keep us safe.
	Yeah. As you're talking about that, it is painfully obvious to everybody that our government does not care.
	Thank you.
	There's a lot of smoke and mirrors that are happening with this.
	Whether or not this is in, you know, whether it's going to be in the NDAA or they're going to vote on it today.
	Thomas Massey yesterday said, I'm a hell no on reauthorization of the FISA 702 program that allows warrantless surveillance of Americans, but it looks like the Senate will attach it to the National Defense Authorization Act tomorrow, meaning today.
	And the House will probably vote on it on Thursday.
	Shame, he says. And other people are saying that this is like the Patriot Act on steroids.
	Because one of the things that it's doing, and I wanted to ask you this, Goatree, one of the things that is different about this one is that...
	Prior to this, the government has been able to compel anybody that provides communications like phone companies and things like this.
	They can compel them to give information.
	But now, this would give them the authority to compel Anybody, anywhere that is around any computer system whatsoever, I mean, it could just be a person doing maintenance, it could be a hotel or a restaurant or a coffee shop where you sign on to their Wi-Fi, and it could compel them to turn over their records or to spy on you and other things like that.
	I mean, they're really extending this.
	I mean, what does it tell us about our own government when they are this paranoid and conspiratorial?
	You know, you're talking about that, and years ago I told you about the Long Lines building.
	Here's your listener's project.
	Do a search on Long Lines building.
	The original one was in New York, and it became public, and they shut it down.
	Now you've got Long Lines buildings in all the major cities.
	Mm-hmm. Okay.
	The program they use, the exploit, is called Titanfall.
	T-A-I-T-A-N-F-A-L-L. They've been doing this for years.
	It was illegal. Now they're trying to make it legal.
	Yeah. Secondly, AT&T was hacked a couple of years ago.
	You had, quote, hackers take all this information.
	Everything you have, if you have an AT&T account, they took it.
	Mm-hmm.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
	Your permission to hack you.
	Yes. And they've laid this foundation quite carefully and done it iteratively over a period of time.
	If we go back and we look at AT&T in the middle of the 20th century where they were the phone company, had a monopoly essentially, and they would collect pin numbers on people and it was actually taken to the Supreme Court.
	The Supreme Court said, well, if you're using them For your phone service, that means all the information that they have on you belongs to them, not to you.
	And so they can come to them and ask them, I'd like to have all the information about David Knight.
	They don't have to.
	You're not saying, well, I'm compelling you to do this.
	Here's my search warrant. So you just go to them and say, I'd like to have all that information, and they can voluntarily turn it over.
	As a matter of fact, on January the 6th, we saw the Bank of America voluntarily, quote-unquote voluntarily, and I guess maybe they did try to curry favor, but they voluntarily gave information to the FBI about anybody who bought anything.
	Anywhere around Washington, D.C. on those dates, as well as anybody who bought guns anywhere and let them coordinate all that stuff.
	And also about people who are flying.
	So you've got all these different corporate spies out there who are putting the stuff in.
	And that was a key thing about CISPA and ACTA and SOPA and PIPA. And CISPA, C-I-S-P-A, The Cybersecurity Infrastructure Act.
	They pulled out the P. The P was there to protect the companies who were going to turn the data over to them.
	It was to protect them from lawsuits from customers.
	But you can't sue them because you're giving them permission to turn it over.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. It's in your user agreement.
	Yeah. Yeah. Well, I think part of it was, you know, you had some companies who did not want to turn it over.
	And so, you know, they could say, well, I don't want to do this, and I might get sued because I don't have it in my user agreement.
	And so the government comes through with this new legislation and says, no, I'm not going to let them sue you, so now turn it over to me.
	You don't have to remove their excuse, to remove anything where they would push back on this with reluctance.
	They said, no, we've indemnified you against that, so now give us their information.
	And now they're taking it to the next step.
	You know, it's not just going to be your phone company, your internet service provider.
	It's going to be any business anywhere, a restaurant, a coffee shop, anybody, a motel.
	All of them are going to be turning this stuff over to the feds.
	Yeah, but that applies to us, the United States citizens, not the illegals.
	That's right. That's right.
	Yeah. So, you know, you have to sit back and question what the motives are.
	You know, that's like with this technological security and these technological advances.
	There's none being made.
	You know, we go back to Ukraine.
	You know, we're reading what they're predicting right now in Ukraine.
	Ukraine seems to become the petri dish of the world.
	I mean, you know, okay, we got a new killing system.
	Let's give it to their military.
	If they get blown up, who cares?
	Oh, look, let's hack their infrastructure.
	Oh, look. We can, you know, laundry money on an industrial scale there.
	And that's what I think it's been about a lot of this.
	I don't know. I think that's what's been the base of a lot of these wars since Vietnam, as I said before.
	You know, Vietnam was really about them testing out weapons systems.
	We don't care who gets killed. Let's just stay there, refine and test our systems.
	It'll be a testbed. Oh, okay, the Vietnam War is over.
	Let's have another one somewhere else.
	They just keep these wars going.
	And as you said, it's a Petri dish for all of this stuff.
	We can test cyber warfare.
	We can test kinetic warfare.
	We got all these different weapons that we can test.
	Let's just keep the war going. Exactly.
	And, you know...
	Going back to what I was telling you at the start, where if you actually were able to use quantum magnetics and quantum levitation and all this quantum technology that were right on the cusp of deploying, you could stand all that.
	Can you imagine the horror that you have a net over a whole country and you can't have a war because bullets are basically frozen in air?
	Yeah, that is amazing. We're getting into some real sci-fi stuff.
	And, of course, they're starting to deploy laser beam or, I should say, high-energy directed beam technology or whatever you want to call it.
	It's anti-ballistic stuff as well.
	But, you know, just real quickly, back to the 702 thing.
	One of the reasons that you look at this, a lot of people poo-poo and say, yeah, it's nothing new and it's nothing dangerous and there's nothing to see here.
	Move on. But one of the reasons that a lot of people are concerned about this is because you had a FISA court, a friend of the court, posted a blog to warn people about this.
	And as one person said, I can't overstate how unusual it is for a FISA court amici to take to the airwaves in this manner.
	And so they're concerned about this and how it's going to be used internally, and we'd be foolish to ignore it.
	But this is our own government.
	To hack our identities, to follow us, to spy on us with everything.
	And of course, it seems to be, every day, I see this innumerable ways that they want to, you know, follow us, track us, you know, index, stamp index, brief and debrief us, as the prisoner said.
	I mean, it's just a sensational, insatiable appetite to put us in an open-air prison.
	Look, don't forget brain chips and chips and all that they want you to have, too, after they've vaxxed you.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. That's right.
	Yeah. Yeah, that's the thing about our friend Musk.
	So you're telling me that we can trust the world's richest man who became that rich because he did everything the governments around the world wanted him to do, and he's also a technocrat and a transhumanist.
	So, yeah, what's to worry about?
	Who wants to hack into our minds, you know?
	It depends on what mood Elon wakes up with.
	Is it going to be good today or is it going to destroy the world?
	Yeah, it truly is.
	As long as he keeps up the facade.
	Well, I'm defending free speech.
	Well, Elon must be good.
	Yeah, oh yeah. I think he's playing a long game there.
	He has to be.
	Yeah, yeah. Yeah, I think it's a game that he's playing that is going to be for his own good because that's the way these guys operate.
	There's not any of these billionaires out there who are altruistic saviors, but everybody wants to believe that.
	It truly is amazing. There is no Tony Stark out there.
	That's a creature of the comic books, and it is comical that people continue to think that and to place their hope on that.
	It truly is amazing to me.
	But, of course, we've got Trump who's cutting up the suit that he took his mugshot in and is selling it off for thousands of dollars to suckers.
	I mean, it's amazing what these people will do.
	And it's amazing. Again, I don't fault Trump as much as I do the people who are sending him the money and following everything and making him...
	They're a little demigod.
	I mean, it's just amazing to watch this happen.
	And it never ceases to amaze me how these people, here we are three years after all this stuff, and people still haven't caught on, and they get furious with me.
	It's just unbelievable, you know, when I start to tell them about this.
	They don't... Yeah, you know, it's like tax-paying citizens.
	You point out, hey dudes, y'all are funding your own demise.
	And they're like, shut up, conspiracy theorists.
	Without the funding, none of this could happen.
	That's right. That's right.
	Well, we certainly do have an out-of-control government, and we have a government that's not interested in addressing known vulnerabilities.
	And as you've seen, it's not just the government, but it's also individual corporations.
	They hire you to tell them what's wrong, and then they don't do anything about it.
	And so we've got the Congress who will hold a hearing, but they will never do anything about anything.
	So that's kind of where we are right now.
	We're kind of paralyzed.
	In this system, and it's really strange how everybody's just kind of frozen and watching it happen.
	There seems to be no way to get anybody to activate, to do anything about it, even in their own interests.
	You know, when you look at these people in Congress, when they allow us to be censored, us to be spied upon, of course, they're somebody that is an interesting person, and they're going to get the same treatment in spades, and they don't care about it.
	It truly is amazing. Well, it's always great talking to you, Goatree, and thank you for coming on and talking to us about this.
	People need to be aware of this, and you need to be aware that you can do some things about this, even if the people in power are not going to do anything about it.
	Always good to talk to you, Goatree.
	Thank you. Appreciate it.
	Well, it's my pleasure, David.
	You take care, and I hope your health gets better.
	Man, you made a really good Christmas album.
	Well, thank you. I really do appreciate it.
	By the way, thanks for the plug.
	Find it at thedavidknightshow.com.
	And you can get a download version of that there.
	So thank you, Goatree. I appreciate that.
	And thank you to everybody.
	Sure thing. Anytime. Thank you.
	Thank you. All right.
	Have a good day, everybody. If you like the Eagles...
	The Cars. And Huey Lewis and the News.
	You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.
	The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲