Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 6, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:02:17

The David Knight Show - 12/06/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Using free speech to free minds.
	soon.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's the 6th of December, year of our Lord, 2023.
	three.
	Well, today we're going to begin with enemies of the state, the same people that tell you that if you oppose war, you're a dangerous extremist.
	These same people are trying to ferret out all the dangerous extremists they can find everywhere.
	Throw us in jail, kick us out of financial systems as well as social media.
	Who are the enemies of the state?
	And more importantly, who are our enemies in the state?
	And as we look at what is happening financially coming up in the run-up to the election, there's a very important Supreme Court case that's going to affect everybody and everything.
	About the income tax.
	This is not just something about people who are stock investors.
	It's going to affect everyone.
	You want to get taxed on the increased value of your 401k that you haven't taken out or of your home or any other asset?
	That's what is at stake here in the Trump tax code.
	We'll be right back. Yeah, it's called unrealized gain.
	You know, they've played a lot of games with the income definition, haven't they?
	Originally, income was something that was only investment income.
	Stocks and things like that.
	During World War II, they redefined it to be wages, essentially.
	It wasn't a redefinition.
	They didn't really change anything. They just started doing it, and nobody called their bluff on it.
	Kind of like what we've seen in 2020 with a move by public health officials at every level, from local to state to federal.
	And nobody's calling them on it.
	And so when you don't call them on it, you let that stay there as a precedent.
	And you allow the bureaucracy to write rules.
	You allow the bureaucracy to enforce those rules without due process.
	Without a presumption of innocence, that's what you wind up with.
	That used to be simply the IRS that did that.
	Now they all do that in different ways.
	But what we're talking about here, and we'll get into that later, there's other things I want to talk about first.
	But in this particular case, you had a couple who were taxed On the value of an investment that they made.
	They were given a $15,000 tax bill, even though they had not sold it.
	So you got money in Bitcoin, or you got money in a stock portfolio, they can tax that.
	They can say that the value of your house has gone up, and they can make you pay taxes on that if this precedent stands.
	And where did this come from?
	This was something that was in the 2017 tax code that Trump put through.
	Isn't that great? Another Trump precedent.
	It's like gun control by executive order and all the rest of this stuff.
	Oh, that guy, he's really our savior, isn't he?
	Well, let's talk about the Pentagon investigating dozens of extremist cases within their ranks.
	Well, I think I do see some extremists in the ranks of the Pentagon.
	I think I see them at the top.
	I think they've got an extreme agenda.
	I think the Pentagon has been involved in...
	All of this warp speed stuff from the very beginning, they were the ones delivering it, but DARPA and the Defense Department and the intelligence community, all these people were involved in what happened to us in 2020, and of course, they've been working against the interests of America,
	and so I would say that it's surprising they said 78 cases of troops We're advocating or engaging in or supporting the overthrow of the U.S. government or seeking to alter the form of government by unconstitutional or other unlawful means.
	This is the same Pentagon that was using unconstitutional and unlawful means to try to force a jab on people.
	And they've already been called out for doing that in the past with the anthrax vaccine.
	But these are the people at the upper levels of government level Who think that they can alter the form of government without going through the Constitution.
	Who took an oath to the Constitution that they don't follow.
	The same people are telling you that war is peace.
	And if you oppose their interventionist empire building wars, then you are the problem.
	So I guess if they've got 78 cases of this, it's grown beyond the Joint Chiefs of Staff and people like Austin.
	And, of course, they're also targeting people for censorship as well.
	That is also something that we increasingly see coming out of the Pentagon.
	But it's not just the Pentagon.
	It's the Pentagon, Homeland Security, the FBI, all of government.
	And it's going to be an all-of-government effort to push us into CBDC as well.
	Biden already put the order out.
	And he put it out in the spring of last year.
	So anyway, thanks to a new report from the DOD Inspector General, says Weiss.
	They're very upset about this.
	You know, we've got to ferret out anybody in the lower ranks who actually takes an oath to the Constitution.
	Their annual report to Congress, pursuant to the NDAA, requires it to keep Congress informed on how well it's handling some of the Pentagon's problem areas, like, you know, diversity and inclusion is what they list here.
	That's their problems.
	Pentagon's got much bigger problems than that.
	If that's what their focus is, if their focus is on DEI, when we go to war, we're going to D-I-E. And that's what's happened to the military now.
	So, you know, you're looking at, of course, supremacists or extremists.
	Well, I would say these people are something of supremacists and extremists because when you look at the Lloyd Austin, as I just mentioned it briefly yesterday, He said, these people who are non-interventionists in America, they're weakening us.
	And he said this in the context of lecturing Congress on how they needed to give him money to go fight a war in Ukraine.
	Completely ignoring the border, of course.
	That's not their concern. America is not their concern, except when Americans rise up and say, we don't want to be a part of this.
	We don't want to be in this war.
	We don't want to send this money.
	Oh, well, now you're the problem.
	Now you're the problem.
	You know, people, by the way, people who demand war.
	Have you ever noticed that the people who demand that we fight wars for them?
	People who demand that we give them money for wars?
	People in America who want to go kill people like Lindsey Graham and Nikki Haley never saw war they didn't want to get involved in.
	Those kind of people, by the way, can be very hateful, can't they?
	And is that a surprise?
	I mean, we're talking about people who want to commit mass murder in a war.
	Should we be surprised that they hate us when we oppose them on that?
	Should we be surprised at anything that they do?
	Because these are people that demand that we kill.
	And if you stand in their way, they'll try to kill you.
	They certainly want to do it.
	Of course, you remember what Jesus said.
	If you really hate somebody, you really get angry with them, you've already committed murder in your heart.
	Well, these people have committed murder many times to me when I say I don't want to get involved in Ukraine or in Israel.
	It's not my fight. Either one of those.
	Not my fight. Let me just say this to Mr.
	Goldfold yesterday. I saw he put something up at the very end screaming in uppercase.
	It's not my fight. If Israel is your thing, go to Israel.
	You go fight, Mr. Goldfold.
	You say this is our war.
	He says he doesn't need God's help.
	That's a big part of your problem.
	That pride. Pushing God out.
	Doing it yourself. But don't expect me to fight your wars.
	Don't expect for me to pay for your wars.
	I'm not a part of this.
	I was a non-interventionist before I became a Christian.
	And I'm a real hardcore non-interventionist now.
	Because as Sergeant York said before he was gaslit by his commanding officer, he said, the book's again killing.
	And this is simply killing that we're talking about here.
	We haven't been attacked.
	Sergeant York would have known what to do if somebody had attacked him in Tennessee.
	He would have defended himself and his family.
	That's not what we're talking about here.
	This is simply murder, another form of it.
	We have the people who want to murder us with the shots, the people who want to murder us with the wars, because we're now figuring out that the shots were murder, and the people who want to kill us with all their depopulation schemes.
	No energy, no food, complete slavery, lockdown, all of that.
	This is all a satanic agenda to kill us.
	Don't count me in on any of it, okay?
	The Pentagon chief accused less interventionist Americans of trying to undermine the security architecture that has produced decades of prosperity without great power war, he said.
	That's his quote. So think about that.
	He's talking about So if I oppose Lloyd Austin, the Raytheon executive, we know what he's there for.
	He's not there for America.
	He's there for security architecture.
	He's there for money.
	He's just like Big Pharma.
	And it's a revolving door just like for Big Pharma.
	You know, this guy Lloyd Austin, he's no different from these FDA heads that have come and gone.
	And he says, we have produced decades of prosperity.
	For who? For who?
	Are you better off because of all the government spending and taxes that we have paid for these weapon systems like the F-35?
	So unbelievably expensive and also now completely hacked by the Chinese to the extent they can eject pilot.
	Take over the plane. Are we really better off?
	Are we more prosperous? Are we safer?
	No. And when he talks about without having a great power war, that's exactly what Ukraine is.
	I mean, they're pushing this as close as they can.
	They're using Ukraine as proxies, and we're fighting them to the last Ukrainian.
	But everybody sees this, the very beginning of this.
	I played for you. You know, we talked about what's been going on, the coup that was there and the rest of it.
	But even in India, you know, this independent party, they're not aligned with either side.
	An Indian general said, well, this is a proxy war.
	And they're going to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian.
	Chris Christie has said that.
	He said, look at how much money we're getting.
	We're decimating the Russian military.
	You want to talk about this not being a great power war?
	And not only that, but these fools, these greedy fools like Lloyd Austin, won a great power war with both Russia and China at the same time.
	Austin appeared to be targeting Republicans in Congress because, you know, if you stand in the way, you are an extremist.
	And you're against the security architecture that we've created.
	They didn't even call it national security.
	Because it's not about national security.
	He doesn't care a whit about the border.
	He lectures these people. They say, well, you know, we'll give you the money for Ukraine, but you've got to do something about the border first.
	Nope, nope, nothing about the border.
	We're going to go to Ukraine.
	That's what the Democrats respond.
	That's what Lloyd Austin is saying.
	Austin went on to urge Congress to pass a full-year appropriations bill and to approve Biden's behemoth $106 billion spending request.
	Military aid for Ukraine against Russia, for Taiwan against China, and for Israel with the Middle East war.
	We're talking about World War III. How about three wars for World War III? Three areas of conflict that were escalating here.
	He said, you know, our competitors don't have to operate under continuing resolutions.
	Here's the reality. You know, the fiat petrodollar that they've created, that Kissinger created, that fiat petrodollar fantasy money, your fantasy money is your only real superpower, Lloyd Austin.
	Lord Austin.
	That's the one he wants to become. You know, you have your ability to spend vast sums of money Allows you to create profits for yourself, for your companies.
	It allows you to be the arms manufacturer for the world.
	That's your superpower.
	And you've abused your superpower.
	And you're going to lose that superpower.
	Believe them when they tell you that funding these wars is mostly about enriching America's military industrial complex, said Thomas Massey.
	He said the plan to revitalize, quote-unquote, the defense industrial base.
	He says ending the war in Afghanistan was really tough on profits.
	That's right. As a matter of fact, he had, and I don't know if I put this in.
	Did I put this in the thing?
	Actually, no, I didn't.
	I forgot to put this in the deck.
	He was Jerry Nadler.
	Got up and pushed back against this Republican resolution that equated anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.
	And Jerry Nadler said, and Thomas Massey retweeted it and said, this guy is Jewish, he's one of the highest ranking members of the Democrat side, Jerry Nadler is.
	And listen to what he has to say about all the internal opposition to Netanyahu, to the Israeli government, to their policies and the rest of this stuff.
	And, you know, he says, so you're saying then that anybody who opposes Netanyahu or the Israeli government is anti-Semitic?
	And that's what they're saying. And that's what this resolution was about.
	This is what the speaker is putting out there.
	And Republicans. And every Republican except for Thomas Massey voted for that.
	There were some Democrats who voted against it.
	Some of them like Jerry Nadler.
	Surprising. I never thought I would agree with Jerry Nadler on anything.
	But as I've said before, I am anti-American federal government.
	Let me just put it that way. I'm anti-federal government.
	The federal government has nothing to do with America.
	The federal government is our enemy in the state.
	I don't hate America. I love America.
	And because I love America, I despise the federal government.
	I make no bones about it.
	I'm anti-vax.
	I'm anti-fed. Every aspect of it is unredeemable at this point.
	They have completely destroyed and rebelled against the Constitution.
	And so, you know, when you look at this, I'm not anti-American, but I'm anti-government.
	Don't ever tell me that a government, especially a foreign government, must be loved.
	And I must not speak evil of it.
	You know, you have people...
	Why are the Republicans doing this, by the way?
	For the same reason that DeSantis went to Israel to sign the anti-free speech bill.
	And this is a way to intimidate members of Congress who were intimidated, except for Thomas Massey.
	He's a good guy. He stood alone.
	Of course, they are...
	He doubled down on it.
	He said, we need to consider that AIPAC, the American-Israeli Political Action Committee, Very big.
	Very big. I covered their meeting when Trump was running for president in 2016.
	They had all of the presidential candidates at that point in time come to speak to AIPAC. And I was there.
	And it's amazing how big that is in Washington.
	And so Thomas Massey said they need to register as a foreign agent because they are a foreign agency.
	They should be subject to the FARA Act.
	The Foreign Agent Registration Act.
	But they're not. They're not.
	How is that? Trump says Israel owns the Congress, and rightfully so, is what he said.
	Rightfully so? And this is why this is being done by the Republicans, because they want money.
	That's why you had DeSantis signing hate speech bills and going to Israel to do it.
	This is shameless pandering and virtue signaling to a foreign government.
	To a foreign government.
	And let me just say for the people who, I've got a lot of Christians who are writing me, very angry that I don't give them carte blanche on all the rest of the stuff.
	And all I can say is that I have some very clear things that I follow in the Bible.
	I'm against war. And so, you know, if you think that your understanding of revelation trumps that, well, you know, do what you think is right.
	You're not going to change my mind on this, so stop writing me about this.
	I'm not going to support this.
	I don't care. You can turn the program off, you can stop sending money, whatever you do.
	You can't buy me.
	You understand? I opposed Alex when I worked for him.
	He was my only source of income.
	And I opposed him. I'm going to do what I think I have to do.
	I'm going to say what I believe.
	And if you don't agree with me, fine.
	You may want to have an honest opinion once in a while, but if you don't, that's fine.
	If you want me to alter the news to suit the demographics that I'm hoping are going to follow me, not going to happen.
	I really don't care.
	If I cared, I would start altering what I have to say about the vaccine and all the rest of the stuff so I could get on some of these social media platforms.
	I don't care. On Monday, Thomas Massey, who voted against both funding the Ukraine war and the new military aid for Israel, criticized the administration for citing the defense industrial base as a need to continue to fund wars.
	And so for that, he's now being called anti-Semitic, racist, hateful.
	He is, I guess, an enemy of the security architecture for World War III. I certainly am.
	I certainly am.
	So the U.S. border control bill collapsed.
	They put up a deal, and again, this is, I think, clever politics.
	I would not like to see the money go, you know, the deal is, we'll give you money for Ukraine, but you've got to give us what we want at the border.
	And all they want at the border...
	It's to change the asylum rules.
	And I don't really think it's just, you know, it's virtually significant.
	But it's not something that Democrats want to do.
	They won't do it even for that.
	And so, like I said before, I think that part of it is a smart move, a smart political move on the part of Speaker Johnson to show that the Democrats are at war with the U.S., with Americans.
	That's very clear. So, you know, we keep seeing this over and over again.
	They adamantly refuse, even though they have unlimited amounts of money, right?
	You know, Democrats can look at this and say, that's just fiat currency.
	We'll give, you know, tell the Federal Reserve to create some more phony credits on the computer, and we'll hand those credits out to this group and to that group.
	All it is is just money, right?
	But they don't want to do that.
	It's the same type of attitude we hear Bernie Sanders say with any tax cut.
	They're looting the treasury, right?
	They're taking money that belongs to us because everything belongs to them, right?
	They believe that we're just their serfs.
	And any tax cut, they said, is an expenditure.
	So, it's the same type of thing.
	Their architecture for tyranny.
	It's a threat to their architecture for tyranny.
	Mitch McConnell even came out.
	Again, this is political.
	He doesn't care about the border.
	Mitch McConnell has never cared about the border.
	He had plenty of time to do stuff about the border.
	He's not doing anything about it. So, this is, again, virtue signaling in politics.
	Mitch McConnell says we need to restore a functional asylum and parole system and ensure meaningful enforcement of U.S. immigration laws.
	He said that was a bridge too far for Senate Democrats.
	He's playing games.
	But isn't it interesting that the Democrats even refuse to play that game?
	They don't even care about the optics of this.
	Because... Defense of the United States is not their concern.
	Chuck Schumer blasted Republican senators for holding up their negotiations on sending more weapons to Ukraine.
	But as they are adamant that they're going to leave the border open, Johnson tweeted out, he said, any national security supplemental package must begin with our own border.
	He's taking a very smart situation.
	The Democrats are not.
	And so they passed this stabilization bill.
	And then in the Senate, it was backed by 30 GOP senators.
	That's only about two-thirds of the GOP senators even backed it.
	So, again, there's very little that they want to do.
	Interestingly enough, and I did think that this was interesting, even Lindsey Graham, And I think this isn't because he's had a change of heart about open borders and immigration.
	He was a part of the original Gang of Eight back in 2013 who wanted open immigration.
	But now he's saying, we've got to have border policy changes before we fund any more of the Ukraine war.
	This is a guy who has been all war all the time, just like Nuki Haley.
	They want to put it in that front burner, do any blank check, just give this to anybody who wants to have a war.
	We want to be a part of that because we know that we can sell weapons to at least one side, if not both sides, in any conflict around the world.
	And so Lindsey Graham has always been for war.
	And even Lindsey Graham is pulling back for this particular ploy.
	Again, Mitch McConnell has never cared about the border, never done anything when he had the majority to protect the border.
	Lindsey Graham has been actually an advocate for open borders for a decade.
	And yet now they've wised up.
	This was election year.
	This is posturing.
	They're not going to do anything to protect the border.
	I can guarantee you.
	But he's saying, I'm not going to help Ukraine until we help ourselves.
	That's Lindsey Graham talking.
	That is pretty amazing.
	And yet, the reality is, is that when you look at people like Graham, and you look at people like Nikki Haley, It's not just illegal immigration, but it's also legal immigration.
	As Nikki Haley says, we want to flood this country for whatever the corporations...
	Corporations, you tell us what you need, and we'll just grant that to you.
	We're not going to have any restrictions.
	You want some cheap labor?
	Fine. You want this or that?
	That's fine. We'll bring the people in.
	You just tell us what you want, said Nikki Haley.
	And so Mark Kikorian, who's director of the Center for Immigration Studies, he said, the thing I'd like to hear asked of these people...
	There's questions about legal immigration.
	He said, that's where people like Graham and Nuki Haley are not going to be good.
	As long as the discussion is confined to controlling the border, Republicans pretty much are presenting a united front because they don't have to really do anything about it.
	The Democrats, on the other hand, one of the leaders in terms of Saying we're adamantly, you know, no matter how important it is to continue this proxy war with Russia, we are not going to do anything about protecting the border.
	And that is Pramila Jayapal.
	Let's just call her Pramila PayPal.
	Because Pramila PayPal is all about pleasing the big companies, just like Nuki Haley.
	And so PayPal is an Indian-born advocate for massive migration of the American workplaces, the communities, and societies.
	She's a Democrat, but she's exactly the same as Nuki Haley.
	Maybe the thing is, Nuki Haley is exactly like the Democrats.
	She talked about how she was inspired to begin in politics because she saw Hillary Clinton.
	So maybe we should call her Nuki Hillary.
	Of course, you know, Hillary also never saw a war she didn't want to get involved in, never was ashamed of the people that she killed.
	We need to put our foot down, said PayPal, and say no, they want to try to trade destruction of the asylum system for aid in Ukraine.
	By that she means the open border situation.
	And no, we're not going to do that.
	We're going to have an invasion of economic migrants.
	This is not about asylum.
	Asylum is what you do with people who are political refugees.
	They're not interested in that.
	You just had the Biden administration after this Christian German family was here, Christian homeschoolers who were under persecution in Germany.
	They had been here for a decade.
	And the Biden administration just tried to throw them out.
	They're real refugees.
	These other people who are coming in here are not refugees.
	This is mass migration.
	And we understand what this is about.
	It was interesting because LifeSite News, it's a Catholic site, they had an exclusive interview with a German cardinal.
	His name is Mueller, I guess.
	It's got an umlaut over the U, I think is how you pronounce it.
	Cardinal Mueller. He says, mass migration is being used to destroy national identities.
	He told the truth about this.
	He laid it out. He said, we have these self-appointed globalists, that was his term, self-appointed, who are using mass migration to destroy the national identity of countries.
	You know, exactly what Pramila PayPal and Nuki Haley want.
	But he said, mass immigration is not about helping our people.
	It's about destroying national identity.
	They say that national identity is nationalism, which has caused all wars.
	So they say they're against nationalism, but they're really against the nation.
	He said if nationalism is the reason for wars, we must ask who is financing the wars?
	And what is the interest behind it?
	It's the military-industrial complex.
	It's people like Lloyd Austin.
	They want everyone to be completely isolated, not connected to language, not connected to culture, not connected to family, and not having a native land where you feel at home.
	That's what this is all about.
	So I said, you know, when you look at the lockdown, when you look at what they want to do with the different MacGuffins, whether it's the pandemic MacGuffin or it's the climate MacGuffin, it's always about isolating us.
	You'll go nowhere. You'll do nothing.
	Be it because you're going to be using quote-unquote carbon or because you're going to be spreading germs.
	But either way, the solution is the same.
	You've got to stay home.
	Isolate yourself. And only communicate to people through the systems that we control.
	Through the internet that we control.
	Through the electrical grid that we control.
	But you're not going to go anywhere.
	We've got a 15-minute city and understand it's going to be smaller than that.
	They don't want you to get out. And it's amazing to me to see how we have really fallen into this trap.
	Even as a society, culturally, we bought into this.
	I was driving with Karen the other day, and we went past the house, and there were all these kids playing.
	And it struck me as odd.
	And then I thought, why is that striking me as odd?
	We used to play outside all the time.
	We were always outside playing in her neighborhood in New York and in my neighborhood in Florida.
	We were always in the front yard.
	We were playing, you know, touch football or flag football or something.
	You know, we were always outside doing stuff.
	We were bicycling. We were riding, you know, whatever.
	And, you know, playing war, for example.
	You know, hoping that we could grow up to be Lloyd Austin.
	And I thought, how did we get to this situation where it's really strange to see kids out playing?
	Well, they've scared everybody, right?
	Oh, your kid's going to get abducted.
	You've got nosy neighbors who will call social services on you, all the rest of this stuff.
	You don't go down to the store.
	I mean, I used to ride my bike for hours.
	I go to stores by myself and I just ride it anywhere I wanted to go.
	I don't know. Don't do that now.
	And so they have found a way to isolate us.
	But this is really weaponized.
	You know, culturally we bought into this.
	And we bought into it based on fear.
	And now they have weaponized that fear and they've escalated it.
	Fear of the germs especially.
	But he said this is what it's really about.
	It's to make sure that you're not connected by language, by culture, by family, or even to the land that you grew up in.
	They want to destroy all that.
	They want everyone to be atomized, to have no culture, to have no religious roots, to have no identity.
	Mueller also believes that the elites are committing genocide by promoting abortion and euthanasia.
	He is very discerning about the political stuff here.
	Really is. He said anybody who criticizes this is called a Nazi by those who themselves promote the murderous Nazi ideology.
	And that is the ideology that might makes right.
	He said now the genocide is being carried out and they protect it by propaganda.
	They equate the critics of their genocide with They equate us with the people who committed genocide in the past, the Nazis.
	You see, it's a projection. That's what they always do.
	They say, well, we've got to stop hate speech.
	That means that they hate you, and they hate your speech, and they're going to stop it.
	And these are the people who, every time anything happens, we're going to oppose you, we're going to call you racist.
	That's what they just did in the Congress.
	You oppose our aid to Israel?
	You are racist.
	So shut up and sit down.
	You have been canceled. I have labeled you as a racist.
	You know, in that resolution, the Republicans actually referenced the heinous ADL. These racist pimps.
	Who have made so much money pushing the accusation of racism on everybody else.
	The Republican Party embraced the ADL's definitions of this stuff.
	That is where they are.
	The Nazi accusation, he said, is often used as an instrument of power to suppress dissent and to suppress debate.
	Because, again, you don't debate anybody if they're racist.
	You just dismiss them.
	So just call them racist and you're done.
	Just, you know, hate them.
	And you're done. You don't have to have a debate over war or anything else.
	The globalist said, Cardinal Mueller, don't care that suicide rates among young people are growing worldwide.
	That's fine for them.
	He said the globalists don't feel anything about the suicide.
	For them, people are just a number.
	10,000 people less is a good statistic.
	And so then he kind of defined, he kind of condensed this.
	He said, understand that the globalist system is a blend of capitalism, communism.
	He said, Western globalists are capitalists with a socialist mindset.
	And of course, we have seen this, haven't we, in the Chinese Communist Party.
	They call themselves Chinese, communists, but they are really fascist economically, by the economic definition, and really even by some of the political and war definitions, right?
	Take a look at what they have done to different ethnic groups, like the Uyghurs, for example.
	We're going to purge them out.
	They're highly nationalistic.
	Highly ethnic in terms of what they promote.
	They are looking to project military and political power everywhere.
	So in that regard, they look very much like Nazi Germany, don't they?
	Except, of course, the Nazis also describe themselves as socialists.
	And when you go to, quote-unquote, communist China, and again, they use the communist tactics to Things like struggle sessions and what we see being applied here in the United States in terms of you must be anti-racist, you know, so you must criticize yourself and all the rest of the stuff.
	So they use those communist tactics and they use the communist labels.
	But then when you actually look at what they're doing, it's a bunch of corrupt politicians who have to have a share in every business that happens there.
	And then enslaving their people.
	And so, you know, you're not going to do business in China unless you've got some Chinese political functionary on your board of directors so they can steal what is happening, you know, steal the designs, the intellectual property theft is part of that.
	But it really is a fascist system.
	Fascism, economically defined, is a merger of the state and the economy.
	And so, where the state is really controlling it.
	And that's really what they are.
	And so, when you look at the people here in America...
	You could call Silicon Valley, you could call them fascists, you could call them Marxists, you'd be right in both cases.
	They're neo-Marxists, is what George Gilder calls them.
	But again, the Chinese communists are highly nationalistic, not internationalistic, right?
	And fascistic.
	So whoever has the most money is in power.
	And they control and pay the media, says the cardinal.
	And he's right. Just take a look at Tucker.
	Yeah, Tucker, who for decades pushed back on 9-11 until he went independent.
	And then he says, well, I don't know. You can't say anything about Building 7.
	You get fired. And, of course, you can't say anything about the lockdowns and the jabs.
	You can't oppose that when you're at Fox News or the fire for that, too, because that's the people who pay them.
	As the Cardinal said, this is totalitarianism that is merged with materialism.
	He said, climate change and the Green Movement are being used as a substitute religion.
	I agree with him 100%.
	I've said all this myself, as a matter of fact.
	The respect for the creature, he says, is derived from the belief in the good creator.
	And we don't need to have a catastrophic worldview.
	Matter of fact, there's a meme that somebody put up of John Kerry, and they put a sandwich board on him.
	And it says the end is near.
	Come and it's got a date.
	And that date scratched off. And then another date.
	And it scratched off. And another date.
	It just keeps going down.
	Catastrophe. He says they use sexuality like a drug.
	Well, this is the brave new world.
	And they use drugs as well.
	Right? They use drugs and sex.
	And they use it especially on the kids.
	That was the brave new world.
	He said, globalism is materialism, totalitarianism, contempt for humanity, the uprooting and the destruction of people's identity.
	Well, that is a very good definition of what globalism is.
	But of course, you know that the ADL and many other people have said, well, if you talk about globalism, that's just code word for anti-Semitism, right?
	You see that trick?
	The idea on these people. You want to define what these people are doing?
	You say that these are a bunch of elitists who are materialist, totalitarian, who have nothing but contempt for humanity.
	They want to uproot and destroy people's identity.
	Oh, well, then you're anti-Semitic, obviously.
	I'm sick of these labels out there.
	And I'm sick of these tactics that they use.
	And I'm sick of the Republicans joining in with this.
	Just more indication that there's very little difference between the Republicans and the Democrats and that the federal government is beyond reform.
	It really is.
	You've got to fight it at the local level.
	If you can do that. Zelensky is now being labeled as an autocrat.
	What a surprise by the mayor of Kiev.
	He says, at some point we will no longer be any different from Russia, where everything depends on the whim of one man.
	They reached that point a long time ago in Ukraine.
	This guy's creating his own churches.
	He's arresting the monks that have been there for centuries in Ukraine.
	He's arresting his, you know, the first things he did was arrest his political opponents after the election.
	He's been trained very well by the Democrats, hasn't he?
	And a Zelensky Party MP is now telling women to go to the front lines.
	Hey, you go. Why don't you go?
	Why don't you go, Zelensky?
	You go to the front lines. No, we need to have, more women need to sign up because we're running out of men.
	And we are going to fight them.
	That's always been the plan. We're going to fight them to the last Ukrainian.
	And they said that, you know, in 2019, Arrestovich says, oh, we're going to be destroyed here.
	Oh, that's horrible. No, the good news is that we get into NATO. We get into NATO? Who does that benefit?
	Well, that means that Arrestovich and his pals, Zelensky and the rest of them, they get to join the globalist club.
	You know, NATO's their ticket in.
	And they don't care if they destroy their country.
	They don't care if they destroy how many Ukrainians they kill.
	And this is what we've seen from Trump with the vaccine stuff.
	This is what we've seen from each and every one of these people in 2020.
	What they did to their own country.
	And so she says, the people are the state.
	As the people, so the state.
	So you're nothing without the village.
	You're nothing without the state.
	Your identity is collectivist.
	You have no individual identity.
	We say that with the idea of public health.
	Forget about individual health.
	No, you don't get any exemptions from any of this stuff.
	No, the collective health is what we must serve.
	How do you serve the collective health if you ignore the individual health?
	There's absolutely no way to do that.
	Well, before we go to break, I've got some things I want to read.
	Some comments.
	On Rumble, Maluton Milankovic, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. He said, good morning, Dave.
	Just wanted to say, thank you for your prayers for your channel.
	And he's now a monthly supporter.
	Well, thank you very much. I really do appreciate that.
	And from Nick, thank you.
	Nick Ellenbecker, thank you very much.
	I appreciate that. On Rockfan, Gard, Goldsmith, thank you, Gard.
	He says, Thank you, David. Seeing and hearing your principled stance against warmongers and their evil is wonderful and profound.
	Gets me very emotional.
	God bless you and your family, and thank you for extending the family wisdom and strength.
	Well, thank you. That is very kind.
	On Rumble, Nathan Bedford Forrest.
	By the way, they're trying to purge Nathan Bedford Forrest, and I saw it on something, you know, yet another monument.
	They want to get rid of him at some university, I think, or something here in Tennessee.
	In the 1980s, I was under the impression the Vietnam War was just a war.
	The older officers in my squadron clued me in that it was a war for profit and for revenue streams for the military-industrial complex.
	I've got to say, I watch that very closely because my sisters were about a decade older than me.
	And so the boys that they knew were all looking at going to Vietnam.
	And so I got focused on that very early on.
	And by the time it was ready for me to go, you know, they ended the war right as I graduated high school.
	And so I didn't go.
	But I've been watching this very closely.
	And it was, you know, you were probably possibly there early on.
	But I thought it was very clear.
	They had no objective.
	At that point in time, we had people in the military.
	And this is, you know, a lot of people have pointed this out.
	They didn't lose any battles.
	But they would fight these pitched battles, and many people die on both sides.
	And then they would tell them to clear out.
	You know, it's like, what do we fight that for?
	There was no strategy to win.
	And later on, when I started interviewing with various companies to work as an engineer, that was in the late 70s, about five years or so after it ended.
	And these guys were talking about how they started this and started that during the Vietnam War.
	And I started to realize, you know, this was just kind of a weapons program for the military-industrial complex.
	They were practicing on the battlefield.
	And your lives don't mean anything at all to them.
	Let's see if we can get that bomb to be a little bit more accurate.
	You know, here's a picture where we couldn't quite get onto that bridge, but now we've got it now.
	We can, you know, pinpoint target that bridge.
	So that's what they were practicing.
	They were practicing to do that.
	Training soldiers with live fire drills.
	That's a way to think of Vietnam War.
	You may be killed, but the people who survive are going to be trained for the next war that we're in.
	And so that's the way it goes.
	On Rockfin, Dougalug, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. See you there frequently.
	Thank you. On Rumble, KWD68 says, Zelensky will end up a U.S. citizen with a home in Martha's Vineyard if he isn't offed.
	Yeah, I agree. I agree.
	Just take a look at Fatala Gulen, for example, right?
	This is the guy who was...
	He and Erdogan in Turkey, both of them started...
	Taking Turkey away from a secular state into an Islamic state and embrace that.
	And Fatala Gulen was this mystic cleric who had a very big following.
	A lot of people throughout the government, you know, the police, the military, the judiciary, all these different places, he had a big following.
	But he got to be a threat.
	And so the two of them, you know, Erdogan, he had a falling out.
	But this guy who was trying to turn...
	Turkey, Fatala Gulen, the guy who's trying to turn Turkey into an Islamic state when he got into trouble with Erdogan, the CIA got him into America.
	They'll probably do the same thing with Zelensky.
	They got him into America, and he's living in this compound up in Pennsylvania.
	And from that compound, he's running over a thousand madrasas worldwide.
	But in the United States, and this is an excellent documentary that Mark Hall did, you can find it's called Killing Ed.
	In the United States, Fatala Gulen, It's probably the worst case example of charter schools.
	And last time I looked at it, which was about five years ago, he was making nearly a billion dollars in government subsidy for these charter schools that he runs.
	And they cannot be explicitly religious, but he has people taking junkets to Turkey all the time.
	The best students go to Turkey.
	They learn Turkish culture and all the rest of the stuff.
	They present these schools as schools of science and math.
	And Texas is where they've had the biggest influence there.
	And so you've got conservative politicians.
	Like the lieutenant governor in Texas, who are real advocates for this Islamic cleric.
	And so, yeah, he will wind up in the United States and probably give him his own compound somewhere.
	And on Rock Van Angus Mustaine.
	Zelensky will go the way of Gaddafi.
	Well, we'll see. I don't know.
	I kind of think they're going to bring him in, unless somebody may off him internally.
	They're going to make him the scapegoat one way or the other, I think, for this.
	It's definitely looking like this.
	This is a big failure, and they're going to need to have somebody to blame.
	You know, success has many fathers, but failure is an orphan.
	And Solinsky's going to be the orphan.
	We'll be right back. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
	Check out the Chaz Channel at APSRadio.com and the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind.
	APS Radio
	APS Radio
	APS Radio APS Radio APS Radio APS Radio APS Radio APS Radio APS Radio APS Radio Well yesterday I was talking about it and it kind of surprised me.
	me, I went back and I looked at the percentage of people who would, even when they knew it was the wrong answer, they would give the wrong answer in the Ash experiment where they had a group of people all in on the gag, one test subject, and they're giving obvious, you know, which line is longer, which line is shorter. which line is longer, which line is shorter.
	And they start giving the wrong answer.
	And after a while, the test subject starts going along with the crowd.
	And of course, you know about the Milgram experiment where they use the position of Tell the person, you know, give that guy a shock and he's pretending to get shocked.
	They get it up to where he's in a great deal of pain.
	Then about two-thirds of the people would take it up to a fatal level.
	You know, just following orders.
	The Nuremberg defense, for example.
	And so I think it is interesting that we've had...
	About 70% of the people, just like in the ASH experiment and just like in the Milgram experiment, about 70% of the people got the vaccine.
	And you look at the number of people in the United States who got the first shot.
	That was about 80%.
	And then the number of people who got this, and they may not have known.
	I mean, it was a full-court press.
	It was both social pressure as well as pressure from authorities like Fauci and the president, and do this and do that.
	And so they may not have known, but by the time they did know, people did not participate.
	But about 70% still did.
	And again, even though, like the Ash experiment, even though they know this is the wrong answer, they'll still do it.
	And there was a lot of coercion of people who knew that it was the wrong answer.
	Direct coercion. You're going to lose your job, like the firefighter I talked about yesterday.
	Well, the fire department says, even after you had that really bad reaction...
	Went into anaphylactic shock with the first one.
	You're still going to have to get that second one.
	He did. He got a heart disease, myocarditis, and he can't be a firefighter anymore.
	And so the expose out of the UK headline says, Death Sentence.
	One million COVID vaccinated have died in England compared to only 61,000 who were unvaccinated over the last two years.
	Despite 30% of the population refusing a single dose of the COVID injection.
	So again, just like here, 70% go along with it.
	Many of them coerced by their job or other things.
	Many of them coerced just because everybody else is doing it.
	Many of them are hearing people on the news media telling them they had to do it.
	Remember this? Back in 2021, April 2021.
	Just like we've been saying, please take COVID seriously.
	I can't say it enough. Enough people have died.
	We don't need any more death.
	Research like crazy.
	Talk to your doctor, your doctors, medical professionals you trust based on your unique medical history, your current medical condition.
	Yeah, yeah. Bottom line is you're going to find out you've got to get the jab.
	Trust me. I'm Sean Hannity.
	Public service. A public disservice announcement.
	Yeah, what you need to do is you need to research Fox.
	You need to find out who pays for them.
	You need to find out who pays for his multi-million dollar salary every year.
	You need to take a look at how pharmaceutical companies began to own the news media back in the 1990s where they ask your doctor commercials that they run constantly.
	So, you know, both here and in the UK, 30% of the population says no, but 70% of them go along with all of that.
	And we had a lot of people that were putting out that information and telling us there was absolutely nothing to worry about.
	You had Democrats initially, as this was being developed, said, well, I'm not taking anything that Trump's developing.
	Shame on anyone who casts doubt on the potential effectiveness of a vaccine just because it would come under my husband's leadership.
	The success of a vaccine will save millions of lives.
	Yeah, yeah. Yeah, no, that wasn't why we didn't want to have it, Melania.
	It was because it was not going to be tested.
	That was the whole point of warp speed.
	We're going to skip the testing. How about that?
	Now we skip the testing for all this stuff, and I'm not having any of it.
	I hope you won't either.
	But anyway, yeah, it was because it was untested.
	But the Democrats were saying, oh, I've taken this because it's Trump.
	And then as soon as Biden gets in, Oh, now you must take it.
	We're going to mandate it. And you had people like Mark Levin kicking and screaming, saying, you know, don't let Biden take credit for this.
	It's your vaccine. You've got to take credit for it.
	He's like, give him the credit.
	And he's still taking credit for it.
	He saved millions of lives, remember?
	Well, over the last two years, you've had 61,000 people in the UK who have died that were not vaccinated.
	But you've had 1 million people Who were vaccinated die.
	Now, let's talk about saving lives.
	By the way, I can't resist when I saw Melania talking about that.
	I said, she reminds me of somebody.
	Remember Green Acres?
	Remember his wife?
	Mr. Haney's got an injunction.
	Well, if it is contagious, you shouldn't be standing close to him either.
	Yeah. Got an injunction, so don't stand close.
	That's the entire pandemic in a nutshell right there.
	They got an injunction against us, so don't stand too close.
	Well, the military...
	It's still memory-holing information from their DMEDS database.
	Again, they keep the most accurate database, and so it's necessary for them to constantly alter it and delete things, which they're at it again now.
	The U.S. military has revised their post-vax myocarditis stats lower.
	Lower. They keep this database.
	This is not like VAERS where you have to report it, and it was only 1% Harvard study said that doctors would report vaccine injuries over the years.
	There was a lot of pressure with the Trump shot to not report it, and yet even with that, They had more injuries and deaths than they did all the last 30 plus years combined.
	But for the military, what they do is part of military readiness.
	They want to know if they're under attack biologically or chemically.
	So they keep very careful records as part of what they do.
	And those records exposed that they had things going up by several hundred percent, many different conditions going up by hundreds of percent or thousands of percent.
	So they went back and they modified five years worth of data.
	Now, the myocarditis stuff, they're going back and changing that as well, specifically that, because that is such a clear signal of what these vaccines are about.
	By the way, as you've got a lot of people...
	And we've reported this over the last couple weeks, you know, finding DNA fragments.
	Now the person who has done that has had his access to databases removed.
	He's had his people who served that to him.
	And I forget one of them. The other one was wasabi.
	And... You know, they pulled that down for Steve Kirsch as well, that and another one.
	But McKernan, who was a part of discovering these DNA fragments, had that removed.
	And so Steve Kirsch put a thing out and said, you know, don't use these two.
	And the one that I remembered was wasabi.
	I thought, yeah, it leaves a bad taste in your mouth, doesn't it?
	But... They're now being shut down.
	Instead of the FDA shutting down the vaccine, after they found that it's got all kinds of contamination in it, especially DNA contamination, instead of shutting down the vaccine, they're shutting down the critics.
	It tells you everything you need to know, doesn't it?
	When you've got a whistleblower in New Zealand, and again, I've not gone through that data yet, the person who pushed back somewhat on it, but as I pointed out, looking at his three things that he said, Disagreed with it on.
	The only one that I haven't really looked at is, well, he says that he was doing the financial stuff, but I don't see all the data there.
	Well, he may not have released that information.
	Nevertheless, if it is not true, it should be easily debunked.
	What we need is more transparency.
	Show us your records. Disprove what he had to say.
	He's got some records he says are from you.
	And the records are talking about how many people died.
	And we've got other whistleblowers who talk about the fact that New Zealand exempted politicians and doctors from these shots, certain ones, important ones.
	So tell us about that.
	Instead, by keeping stuff concealed and by arresting whistleblowers, I think it confirms what is being said.
	And so the FDA, rather than doing anything about the contamination, they are, well, if we were to find out years from now after we do a FOIA request and then they deny the FOIA request, then you do a FOIA lawsuit, you'll probably find that the FDA has leaned on these internet storage companies to shut down this stuff.
	The recent findings of DNA fragments...
	And Pfizer and Moderna vaccines has led many to question why the FDA, which is responsible for monitoring the quality and the safety of the vaccines, has failed to sound the alarm.
	This is from the Brownstone Institute.
	And look, folks, as I pointed out before, we've already seen in these different batches that the active ingredients vary by a factor of 33.
	So some of them have 3,300% more ingredient than the other ones do.
	And guess who is, which batches are killing people?
	I think, in and of themselves, the genetic code injections are dangerous, but any medication It's dangerous if you give it in a strong enough dose.
	One of the key things that any pharmaceutical company is going to do is to control for dosage.
	And don't tell me that this is not deliberate.
	You don't wind up with something that is 3,300% more in one particular batch than in another one because you're just sloppy.
	It's got to be deliberate.
	And it was an experiment.
	That's why they kept track of the batches.
	They wanted to see what happened.
	You know, that would be normally part of the testing that would take a decade that Trump wanted to shut down.
	And that would be to determine what is a safe and effective dosage of any medication.
	For years, the FDA has known about the risk posed by residual DNA and vaccines in its own guidance to the industry.
	This is what the FDA says to the pharmaceutical companies about DNA contamination.
	Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and or infectivity potential.
	In other words, cancer causing.
	Cancer and infections.
	There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be cancerous oncogenic including the integration and the expression of encoded oncogenes And or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.
	Put simply, the FDA acknowledges the possibility that fragments of DNA left over from the manufacturing process can be incorporated into a patient's own DNA to potentially cause cancer.
	So the FDA and the WHO guidelines consider the amount of residual DNA in a single dose of a traditional vaccine should not exceed 10 nanograms, one billionth of a gram.
	And yet when these people did these experiments...
	They found the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines.
	Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by the FDA and by the WHO. And so when you're talking about, again, that's why I say it's absolutely unbelievable that when these people are working these kinds of Microscopic amounts, you know, 10 nanograms.
	You're supposed to keep it down below that.
	When they're working with these kinds of things, how in the world do they get so sloppy that they have vaccines that go out that are 3,300% more than another batch?
	And so their response is to just shut up and take it.
	Because, you know, for the longest time, that has been their response.
	We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin.
	And your refusal has cost all of us.
	People who are incubators for every variant to come, walking around lawfully unvaccinated?
	That's psychotic.
	For the unvaccinated, you're looking at a winter of severe illness and death.
	For yourselves, your families, and the hospitals you may soon overwhelm.
	In a world of threats and tyrants and terror, you know what our biggest enemy is in America?
	Our fellow Americans.
	They are the ones that are propagating this outbreak.
	Being frustrated that there is still a percentage of the population who are not vaccinated.
	I wish that he would go further to restrict the activities of the unvaccinated.
	Vaccinated person having a heart attack?
	Yes, come right on in. We'll take care of you.
	Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo?
	Rest in peace, Wheezy.
	Yeah, well, again, that's a little super clip there.
	Just to remind you what we've been doing the last couple of years that everybody wants to forget now.
	Let's just move on. You know, they locked us up.
	They injected us with poison.
	Handy wrote on Rockfin, he said, myocarditis used to be so rare, they didn't even include it in my textbooks in paramedic and EMT school.
	But now it's everywhere.
	So yeah, a vaccinated guy having a heart attack, come on in.
	Yeah, we know all about that.
	We know what that's from.
	As a matter of fact, let's just go back into one more clip that I wanted to do, which was, and I've said this before, I said, look at how our own governments turned against their own people.
	And a good example of this is Israel.
	A good example of it is Netanyahu.
	And here's an example of this Israeli teen...
	14 years old. She died from her shot.
	She made a video five days before her death.
	She died in her sleep suddenly.
	We're seeing that a lot. She had suffered a heart attack five months after she received a Pfizer shot.
	She had had previously some leg surgery to fix her leg, but she was able to walk a day after the surgery.
	But things got really bad after she got the jab.
	According to her doctors, it was a neurological phenomenon related to the jab a week before her death.
	She said, though, that her heartbeats are really strong.
	So if you want to hear me talk about kind of tea of some stuff that happens after you get the COVID vaccine, then keep on watching.
	Yeah, keep on watching.
	But, you know, the guy who used children like her as lab rats...
	That's the guy that we're not supposed to say anything bad about.
	Netanyahu. Look, quite frankly, I don't care.
	Goldfold, whoever you are, anonymous name there.
	You know, he loves BB. He's going to do anything to keep BB in.
	BB had nothing to do with October 7th.
	Look, let's say he didn't see any of this stuff.
	He still killed more people, his own people, than the Hamas people did.
	He killed them with a jab.
	He killed them with poison.
	And he bragged about it to the World Economic Forum.
	I have to make sure that the future of the Jewish state is safe and sound.
	That's my one goal.
	And I would like to be remembered as the protector of Israel.
	The injector. That's enough for me.
	Protector of Israel. Mr.
	Prime Minister, pleasure to have you on.
	Thank you. Yeah, World Economic Forum.
	Same thing that we see, you know, from Trump.
	He's the protector of America.
	These backstabbing politicians.
	In short, I gave Pfizer the argument that they could benefit from the data that we could produce, and they were convinced, and then we went along and did this.
	And in fact, Our health system did exactly that.
	We have a digitized system for distributing health.
	1,400 sites in a very small country of 9 million.
	And they just work it out.
	And again, on the distribution, you know, I take...
	I don't call them that much, five times a day.
	I heard that you had been on the phone 70 times with the Pfizer CEO. 21 times, not 70, but 21 times.
	But also I speak with Stefan Bansel of Moderna.
	I've spoken to the heads of the other companies.
	I think you need personal leadership here.
	You know, it's like checking on munitions in a war.
	Yeah, it was a war. And the vaccines were his munitions.
	And he killed more Israelis than Hamas did in the October 7th raid.
	And they're still dying. But the thing about poisoners is they can do this and not be caught many times in a surreptitious way.
	Yeah, it's about totalitarianism.
	You will take that. That's the other thing that Netanyahu did.
	Rolled out a system of vaccine passports and intimidation and authoritarianism.
	It wasn't just the propaganda.
	He went the same path that all these people did in 2021.
	And that is forcing people to get it.
	If Trump had been in, I'm absolutely convinced that he would have done the same thing.
	Exactly the same thing. He was walking in lockstep with the rest of these people, the father of the vaccine, of course.
	It's great. It's going to save your life.
	You've got to take it. But yeah, he's all about protecting Israeli lives, like that 14-year-old girl I just showed you there.
	Meanwhile, in Germany, get COVID shots for Christmas, they say.
	The problem of long COVID has not yet been resolved.
	No, it's actually a problem of long tyranny, and we've not resolved that because we won't hold these people responsible.
	LifeSite News article actually comes from COVID Chronicles.
	You won't believe the irony of this doctor's punishment for using ivermectin to treat COVID. A physician who had his license restricted, because many of them, because they used ivermectin, saved lives, did it cheaply, didn't push the vaccine, didn't make money for Pfizer, and it's because he kept abreast of the information.
	You know, like anybody would do if they thought there was something going on, they'd look at it and say, well, you know, this is very effective.
	This respiratory disease, give people ivermectin, give people HCQ and zinc and things like that.
	But the licensing body is going to make him go to re-education camp, essentially.
	Just like the communist tyrants that they are.
	Retraining. To become educated about what they say about COVID-19.
	You will. You know, do what we say.
	You will follow our narrative.
	We're not going to have any dissent here.
	Retraining because they dared to follow real science because they promoted ivermectin.
	And by the way, I want to say thank you to the listener, Fred, who sent this to me.
	I did not know that, actually, he sent me, I don't know if it was this article, but he did send an email where he said, here in Tennessee, it's legal to get ivermectin.
	And the guy who wrote the bill on the Senate side was Senator Nicely.
	Man, I tell you, just keep seeing people like Thomas Massey and Senator Nicely, they always seem to be on the right side of every issue.
	It truly is amazing. We're truly blessed to have somebody like Senator Nicely here in Tennessee.
	So he wrote the bill in Tennessee, somebody who's a sponsor on the House side, and they got it signed into law.
	But as he pointed out, he said, good luck.
	Getting these big box retailers to fill that, they won't do it.
	He said you have to go to a small independent pharmacy, they call them compounding pharmacies, where they will make custom things for you.
	But again, the big multinational, the people, the big box people that Trump said were essential, right?
	They're essential to enforce their globalist narrative.
	Trump knew that. They all knew that.
	So even if you have at the state level things saying that it's okay, To have ivermectin, you've still got to find some pharmacy somewhere.
	So make sure you support the independent pharmacies, because if they go away, then even if you've got permission from the government to take things for your own health, you won't be able to find anybody that will sell it to you.
	That's the bottom line, and that's why they do this, running it through the essential big-box retailers.
	Finally, this science journal...
	British Medical Journal's Archives of Disease and Childhood this weekend released a systematic review of studies about mask mandates for children, and they came to the conclusion that masks, at best, do not reduce COVID infection.
	We're at the point right now, we're at the stage where people are saying everywhere...
	This stuff doesn't work. We got a lawsuit in Texas that's being done by Ken Paxton that's suing Pfizer because they told people that the vaccine didn't work.
	We got major medical journals saying the masks don't work.
	And we knew that.
	I went back for the longest time and talked about the 2002 study that was done by a scientist in, I can't remember if it was Australia or New Zealand, Where she went through, she had discovered the parvo virus and was there for that, for animals.
	But, you know, she did a study of it and she said, there's not a lot of, not everybody in the operating theater wears a mask.
	And she did a study and she said anything that it does in terms of stopping anything that's aerosol is not effective after a certain amount of time.
	These people who are saying that these masks work...
	They're not granular enough.
	Certainly, we're talking even about the N95 mask, certainly not the cloth mask, to stop any airborne particles.
	So they say, well, it stops the spittle.
	She's pointed out that after 20 minutes of wearing this, It becomes so saturated with spittle that the air pressure as you're breathing out and talking is going to push out that spittle anyway.
	But it's going to push it out in smaller particles.
	It will stay airborne longer and travel farther.
	So it's actually counterproductive.
	And then there was a German scientist in the middle of this insanity saying, Who started looking at the inhalation part of it.
	So both from an exhalation point, it makes things worse for other people.
	From an inhalation standpoint, same thing happens.
	You breathe in these smaller particles and they go further down into your lungs and they're more likely to create infection.
	And so we're at the stage now where people will say, well, the mask is not effective.
	We need to get to the stage where we say the mask was actually a problem.
	And you could see it on people's faces.
	You had the acne on people's faces at war all the time.
	Their faces would break out.
	That's the way your body eliminates waste.
	It's through your mouth.
	One of the ways. And so it was a filthy thing.
	It made things worse for everybody.
	And so we need to understand that, you know, Ken Paxton wants to talk about the fact, oh, your vaccine didn't work.
	It was fraudulent. He needs to start talking about the fact that it did harm.
	You know, it's two things, right?
	Safety and efficacy. But the first thing in medical ethics has always been, first, do no harm.
	That's attributed to the Greek physician Galen.
	First, do no harm.
	That had to be the first thing they look at.
	Not that your vaccine didn't work.
	Not that your mask didn't work.
	Did you harm people with your mask and your vaccine?
	And why don't they want to do that?
	Well, because they have CulpaBuild in it as well.
	We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered.
	Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSRadio.com.
	Music.
	��
	�� You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you And, of course, that was somewhere in my memory from Home Alone.
	I had another listener say, in that video, you've got all these pictures of Christmas and everything in the house.
	And then you see a car driving in the snow.
	The next thing you see a guy, and he's got a crowbar in his hand, you know, kind of wielding it like a weapon.
	He said, that was kind of strange.
	It's a reference to the Home Alone thing.
	And, of course... Nothing to be afraid of, as we see in the movie.
	Colkey Colgan is more than able to handle these guys, so nothing to be afraid about there.
	But staying on that theme of Home Alone, fans are shocked by the fact there's a 248% increase in grocery prices since that movie debuted.
	At one point, there's a scene where he goes to the grocery store on his own, and he starts putting stuff in the cart.
	And he goes to check out, he buys milk, bread, toilet paper, laundry detergent, fabric softener, cling wrap, macaroni and cheese, a turkey TV dinner, orange juice, and a bag of plastic army men.
	Now the total was $19.83.
	So last year, you had a TikTok user, actually, well, no, it isn't.
	It isn't the libs of TikTok.
	Anyway, went to Kroger and purchased those same items, and it came up to $44.40.
	But this year, you had Nick Smith with News Nation, went to a Chicago grocery store, because he was in Chicago, a grocery store called Happy Foods.
	And when he bought the items that were in Culkin's shopping list in Chicago, it came out not to $19.83, but to $72.28.
	Including tax, which of course he would have been.
	So it's inflation, right?
	Inflation by inflation has made it so that the average U.S. household needs to spend an extra $11,434 per year just to maintain the same standard of living When Biden took office.
	Isn't that amazing?
	How rapidly it's going up.
	You need another $11,500 to maintain your same standard of living.
	And yet, when they ask people about whether or not they've been impacted by inflation, 8 in 10 say they have.
	But 20%, as usual, don't know anything that's going on.
	The undecided, the uninformed, 20% of the people don't know that things have gone up that much.
	When you're looking at them just a year ago, of course, it could be a difference in where they were, grocery stores and that type of thing.
	I think the more accurate one would be compared back to the 1990s, buying groceries in Chicago in both of those cases.
	Record U.S. oil production, though.
	It's starting to push prices down.
	You see, we're coming up to an election.
	This is the reason why the Federal Reserve is talking about easing up on interest rates.
	And so Biden, as we also predicted, was going to do what he could to ease up the supply of oil.
	Because just like interest rates, just like quantitative easing, it's all rigged.
	He began his administration, and this is what really kicked off the inflation.
	The thing that is the core base of inflation, anybody who lived through the OPEC oil embargo of the 1970s understands that you can put a tremendous inflationary shock throughout the system by restricting energy.
	And so he lived that in the 1970s, and now we're living it again.
	And he began, his very first act was to shut down pipelines and drilling and stuff like that.
	And then he began with sanctions against Russian oil, which had absolutely no impact on Russia.
	They were able to make more money.
	They could actually sell their stuff.
	With a massive discount if you paid in their currency or in gold and still sell it for more than they were selling it before he created the sanctions because he put such a spike.
	So the people who paid for it, not Vladimir Putin.
	But it's Europeans and it's Americans.
	And so he has the key way that he has affected inflation.
	It's been by design. He said, yeah, it's going to be very painful, but we're going to have to go through this in order to get to net zero, in order to get rid of fossil fuels.
	We're going to make them too expensive.
	But now he wants to get reelected.
	And so now he's going to ease up on the thing that he used to artificially create inflation.
	Just like the Federal Reserve uses interest rates, just like the Federal Reserve uses quantitative easing.
	And so now the U.S. benchmark oil prices are down nearly 20% because they're easing up on things.
	And when you look at what is happening with quantitative easing, it's not just interest rates, it's not just oil, but it's also quantitative easing.
	And so, Zero Hedge headline, the canary just died.
	You know, the canary in the coal mine.
	Indicate that, you know, it's foul play going on here.
	A sudden spike in the secured overnight financing rate from the Fed.
	Hints at mounting reserve shortage and an early restart.
	Of quantitative easing.
	So they're going to lower interest rates.
	They're going to restart quantitative easing.
	They're going to ease up on the artificial restrictions of oil and energy and that type of thing.
	So I saw this headline yesterday from Gerald Salenti.
	He said, as the dollar dies, the future is paved with gold.
	That's a good way to put it.
	Again, if you want to subscribe to Trends Journal, use the code KNIGHT and you can save 10%.
	And it helps us as well.
	And this is another headline from someone else that you see on Zero Hedge.
	Hope dies and gold flies.
	That's another way to understand it.
	Both gold and silver.
	Perhaps silver is even more undervalued than gold is right now.
	Again, go to davidknight.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony Arterman's wisewolf.gold.
	He's going to be joining us tomorrow, and we'll talk about this in more detail.
	But you can start to set it aside.
	And again, I don't give investment advice.
	I'm more interested in the aspect of the shenanigans that they're playing with CBDC. You know, we go through these cycles.
	They manipulate the quantitative easing, the interest rates, the oil.
	They manipulate gold and silver prices as well.
	And so it's difficult to know what's going to happen economically with this stuff.
	But I look at it for the anonymity and the stored value because even crypto is not anonymous.
	And so even Monero and things like that, they can trace it when you get into it, that type of thing.
	And so unless you're going to be very sophisticated about it and make a lot of different hops and jumps, they may still come back.
	And we'll talk about what's going on with the IRS here in just a second here.
	But this is how currencies die.
	Says the article, again, this endgame is nothing new.
	In fact, it's always the same choice.
	Save the bonds or kill the currency.
	Right now, they're trying to save the presidency, and that's why they're pulling all the stops out, and that's going to create an inflationary spurt.
	But then we start to get a glimpse as to where this is all going.
	And when you look at the difference between Biden and Trump, again, I believe it is a tag team match.
	You have the Trump tax code that happened in 2017, and one aspect of it right now It's being litigated.
	It takes a while for it to go through the courts and get to the Supreme Court.
	So this is now just reaching there.
	But it's part of the 2017 tax overhaul.
	The Wall Street Journal says the Supreme Court appears to be wary of remaking the income tax.
	That's the way they look at this. Arguments were held in the Supreme Court yesterday over this definition of what is taxable.
	The idea that unrealized gains could be taxable.
	That is a very dangerous thing.
	And yet, Wall Street Journal doesn't really take that kind of approach.
	This is what they said.
	The Supreme Court looked unlikely to impose strict new limits on Congress's power to tax income, with some conservative and liberal justices alike signaling wariness about upending long-settled principles of the federal tax code.
	Well, these are two contradictory things.
	This is not a principle of the tax code, the idea that you're going to tax unrealized gains.
	That was something that just came in in 2017.
	That's only six years old.
	As a matter of fact, if you look at the long-term principles of their federal tax code, it's just the opposite.
	Challengers are seeking a rule that limits income that can be taxed to money that has actually been realized by taxpayers.
	That is, cash that they've actually received in some fashion.
	And what we're talking about here is taxing stuff that you have not received.
	What we're talking about here is something that's very subjective, a wealth tax.
	For example, you know, when you hold any assets, Let's say it's a stock.
	Let's say there's Bitcoin. Let's say it's gold.
	Let's say it's a house. What is happening?
	Well, the market value of that is constantly going up and down when you look at the paper value of it.
	And other than a stock market, all these paper values, you know, when you look and say, well, the house in my area, do they go up or go down?
	That's all very subjective.
	You don't really know what that value is until you put it on the market and try to sell it.
	In the stock market, people are constantly buying and selling stuff, so you can kind of pinpoint a market value for it, but you can't easily do that with a lot of different assets.
	And yet, this is going to be a subjective determination of money that you've actually made.
	And so, while the Wall Street Journal may not be, may think, well, you know, this is, we're going to, the conservative position is that Congress can take anything that they want.
	Well, the Spectator, Reason, a lot of other places are very concerned about this.
	As a matter of fact, the headline from Spectator says, the scariest Supreme Court case this term.
	And they point out that this is not some kind of inside baseball case that only people who like to watch the Supreme Court care about.
	This is something that is going to affect each and every person because it's a precedent, a principle that is being set here.
	It's not just going to be investors with large stock portfolios.
	At issue is the mandatory repatriation tax and a 13% stake that was owned by this couple, the Moors, who were bringing the case.
	They had a 13% stake in a company that supplies low-cost equipment To small farmers in India.
	The couple has never received income from this stock because the company reinvests all of its profits in the business.
	So it's essentially philanthropy that they're doing.
	They're trying to help small farmers in India.
	So when they make a profit, they put it back in the company, they buy more product, and they sell more farm equipment at low cost to small farmers in India.
	So they reinvest all their profits back into the business.
	Historically, the IRS has not taxed shareholder earnings, quote-unquote, and you should put that in quote, until they actually receive dividends or they sell their stock for capital gain.
	Yet, after the Trump tax program and this mandatory repatriation tax was put in, they got a bill of $14,729, nearly a $15,000 bill.
	On their share of the company profits.
	They sued the government on the grounds that the IRS violated the 16th Amendment.
	They lost in federal district court.
	They lost in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
	And now they're at the Supreme Court.
	And this is what Stephen Calabrese says.
	He says, That realization is not a precondition for income.
	In other words, actually receiving the cash.
	So, the mores could be taxed on unrealized gains and wealth.
	This is a wealth tax.
	It is subjective. Because, again, in most cases, there's going to be assets that are not easily determined in market value.
	Again, the...
	Best example, this is your house.
	You go to these real estate websites, and they'll try to give you some kind of an estimate.
	I think that's total nonsense.
	You had one of these real estate companies was buying real estate based on their estimated values and everything, and obviously they got it wrong.
	They went into a lot of red ink over that.
	Anyway, so the rationale is not limited to the Moore's.
	And the rationale is not limited to any particular tax.
	Investors might be taxed on their unrealized capital gains in their Vanguard fund or in their stock portfolio.
	Or homeowners might be taxed on the unrealized capital gains in their houses or their land.
	And so they're calling on the Supreme Court to reverse this part of the Trump 2017 tax code to grasp the significance of this case.
	It's necessary to remember that the original Constitution did not permit an income tax.
	Then they, you know, again, we can talk about the...
	According to Article 1, Section 9, it was prohibited to have direct taxes on individuals.
	That was ignored by Abraham Lincoln, just like he ignored so much other aspects of the constitutional law.
	And they passed the first income tax in 1862, but it was phased out after the war.
	They passed another income tax law in 1894, but the Supreme Court struck it down that year.
	No, you can't do that, according to the Constitution.
	So then they played shenanigans and presumed that they had the 16th Amendment passed in 1909.
	They ratified it in 1913.
	And as part of that 16th Amendment, it says the power to lay and collect taxes on income.
	But then the question was, what is income?
	And it was not wages.
	But in 1920, the Supreme Court ruled that an increase in the value of a stockholding in the absence of monetary dividend is not income.
	In other words, the Supreme Court has already ruled on this back in 1920.
	So where is the real conservative position with this, with the Constitution?
	In that particular case, this is what the Supreme Court said when they're, again, talking about, okay, we've got an income tax, so what is income?
	They said, mere growth or increment of value in an investment is not income.
	Income is a gain or profit in itself of exchangeable value, proceeding from capital, severed from it, derived or received by the taxpayer.
	In other words, it's something that you get from an investment somehow, and it's something that you've actually received, because they already tried to do this once before.
	So something that you've actually received, and it's something you receive from an income, from an investment.
	Notice that it didn't say anything about wages there.
	And we didn't have a wage tax until World War II. And just like they did in the Civil War, they put it in and said it's going to be a temporary tax, except afterwards they didn't remove it.
	And after the middle of the 20th century, we no longer had a government or a Supreme Court that cared what the Constitution said.
	And so the IRS has continued to send out their forms and say, thank you for participating in the voluntary tax system.
	And so it's been that since we've been there.
	Again, wages were not part of the 16th Amendment.
	I've seen tax protesters who push against the legitimate passage of, have questions about the legitimate passage of the 16th Amendment.
	But regardless of that, wages were not included in that.
	And so any taxation of wages is really unconstitutional.
	Personally, it's not a hill I'm going to die on because when I first got involved in politics and the liberty movement, I saw a lot of people who got railroaded.
	They made a legitimate constitutional argument, and the judge says, I don't care.
	You're going to jail. Just like we see right now, the January 6th stuff.
	It doesn't matter. I don't really care what your arguments are.
	I'm not going to listen to this.
	I'm not going to debate you.
	You're going to go to jail. And that's what the situation is with the tax system.
	It's completely illegitimate, but you're going to go to jail if you find it.
	And so now they're extending this.
	They took an income tax, and they usurped the authority to tax wages.
	Now they're going to usurp the authority to tax you on money that you've not even received.
	And it really doesn't matter.
	The Wall Street Journal says, well, is the Supreme Court going to step in there and tell Congress what they can and cannot tax?
	Well, the Constitution says what Congress can and cannot tax.
	That's superior to any act or law that is passed by Congress.
	Congress can't do something that they don't have congressional authority to do.
	And they don't have the congressional authority to tax unrealized gain.
	And the Supreme Court has already said that.
	But I think that they will probably pass it.
	I think it's one of the reasons why they're passing this army of IRS agents on to us as well.
	Because we're looking at the weaponization of finance.
	This is a very long article.
	I'm not going to go into any detail about it.
	It's on LifeSite if you want to read about it.
	It was written by Mercola.
	And he talks about the fact that in mid-July 2023, Chase Bank closed my business accounts, Mercola, Along the personal accounts of my CEO and my CFO and the accounts of their spouses and their children.
	That's what PayPal did to me two years earlier.
	A little bit more than two years earlier.
	So, yeah, we're going to see this.
	That's what Bank of America, you know, the politicization, the weaponization of the banking system, the finance system, because, again, it is bigger than the banking system.
	It can be things like PayPal.
	And it is a weaponization.
	You know, when we look at what's going on with January the 6th, they have the House weaponization of government, or I forget what the exact time, but looking at the January the 6th thing, that's what the Republicans are calling it, weaponization.
	And it's true, it is a weaponization.
	But part of the January the 6th is weaponization by Bank of America.
	You know, anybody that had a transaction anywhere in that area, we're going to report you to the government.
	Or if you flew into that area, we're going to report you to the government.
	And if you've got conservative leanings, well, now you're in trouble.
	You're a suspect. And they just sentenced another person who, I don't think he even steps up.
	I mean, he didn't do anything. There's another one of these deals.
	He's a conservative actor.
	They're going to give him some, you know, jail sentence or house arrest or something like that.
	I didn't read the details of it.
	I'm just tired of seeing this over and over again.
	Because I was warning people for months about this.
	So don't put yourself in this position.
	They're going to have agent provocateurs.
	They're going to use this against all conservatives.
	But they're going to throw you in jail.
	Because that's the way these people are.
	It was absolutely beyond belief how naive people were.
	Naively following Trump.
	Naively following Alex with his Stop the Steal.
	All the rest of this stuff.
	We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles...
	The Cars and Huey Lewis and the News.
	You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	Music You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	On Rockfin, Bethany Ann.
	Thanks, David. I was wondering about the Crowbar Man.
	Home Alone is what that came from.
	It was an excellent piece of music by John Williams.
	That's why I threw that in there. On Rockfan Harps, imagine if there was an NIH website that showed the results from a whole heap of studies showing the opposite of what they say.
	Oh, wait, there is. Yeah, that's right.
	There sure is.
	But, you know, just ignore that.
	It doesn't mean anything. And ignore the fact that the military has been doing this as part of their battle readiness.
	On Rock Fan Handy said, our masks are mainly for splash protection.
	Honestly, we frequently don't have the time in EMS to either bother donning a mask if the call is that severe.
	Yeah. Yeah, it is.
	Again, this is yet another.
	The fact that, you know, make you wear a cloth mask and even beyond that, you know, you got to wear a mask to get into the restaurant.
	And everybody is already sitting there eating and they don't wear any mask.
	And, you know. I've got to wear a mask to walk by.
	Oh, yes, you've got to wear a mask, said the restaurant owner.
	It's like, oh, bye-bye. You'll never see me again.
	You know, and it's the same thing with my dentist.
	The dentist's office, you know.
	I've got to wear a mask to walk into the dentist's office.
	I said, I'm not going to do it. I've already paid for this.
	You're going to do this. We'll see you in court.
	Rumble. Stealth Patriot is now a monthly subscriber.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	And on Rockfin, Leszek Gaska, thank you very much for the tip.
	Thank you. As a matter of fact, before I get into this, because I'm going to wind up forgetting it yet again, let me read off some of the names of people who sent us checks in November and thank them.
	These are people who sent checks in November, and thank you, all of you, for helping us to meet the goal last month.
	Ty S., Susan L., David and Deborah, Kelly M., David M., Lloyd P., MP and MJ, William M., Christopher S., Martin T., Stacy P., Jackie and Fred, John R., Stacy P., Jackie and Fred, John R., Ronald C., and Daniel and Melissa S.
	Thank you very much, all of you.
	I really do appreciate that, all of us.
	And I've got a few more here that are from November that are checks, and I'll save that for just a little bit here.
	This is from the Daily Skeptic, and I was always surprised by this headline.
	They said, can't our politicians see the damage that they're doing to our country with their headlong pursuit of net zero?
	You don't think they know?
	You really don't think that they know what they're doing?
	I think they know exactly what they're doing.
	There's no question in my mind that they know what's happening with this.
	Just take a look, you know, when you look at the private jet stuff, right?
	You know, what climate crisis?
	The private jet demand is surging.
	This is from Zero Hedge.
	And as they're pointing out, you know, you look at the fact that, and many people on social media scroll down, and you can see some of the pictures there in the post that are embedded in this article.
	There's Taylor Swift. So he said, Taylor Swift took her private jet to see her football player boyfriend play in Green Bay.
	She jetted out after a few hours.
	The next time you see this hypocrite, Taylor Swift will complain about climate change.
	Hit her over the head with this post.
	That's from Ron Milner. Scroll down a little bit.
	John Kerry at every global warming conference.
	He takes the jet, too.
	And here he is with his sandwich board.
	The world will end in 1984, 1990, 2000, 2008, 2014.
	Now it's 2030. We're getting kind of tired of that.
	That's from Citizen Free Press.
	Put out that tweet. And then Political B. Put out the alarmist World Economic Forum, King Charles, claimed at COP28 there is 30% more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere now while he is flying around in his private jet.
	And here's the story about the private jets.
	Four hours of use of a typical private jet It's going to equal the entire year of an average person in terms of their own measurement.
	Oh, well, carbon dioxide or carbon this or carbon that, right?
	Again, I don't have a problem with that.
	I don't think it is a problem.
	I don't believe any of that stuff.
	But by their own metric, the astounding hypocrisy, if they use their private jet for four years, that's an entire year of the average person driving their car, The average person heating and cooling and cooking and eating food, all of those things combined for an entire year in just four hours.
	And these people are constantly using their jets.
	But do you see anything at all about anybody talking about bans on private jets?
	Are they going to limit the use of private jets?
	Nope, can't fly into this area.
	This is an ultra-low emission zone.
	No, not going to be anything about that.
	There's not going to be any regulations to reduce emissions.
	You're going to have to completely redesign these private jets.
	As a matter of fact, I want them to run on electricity and batteries.
	I would like to see that.
	Start seeing a lot of them coming down, I think, if that were to happen.
	But no, there's not anything at all.
	They completely ignore that.
	They completely ignore the yachts.
	The giant superyachts like Jeff Bezos.
	The FAA, as a matter of fact, in terms of talking about private jet activity, again, four hours of use of one of these typical private jets is the equivalent to an entire year of one person driving their car, heating their house, cooling their house, cooking their food, all the rest of these things that they want to prohibit.
	The FAA says that private jet activity in October jumped to the highest level in more than a year, reaching 459,000.
	The accelerating private jet demand is happening at a time when climate alarmist elites have a weird obsession with lecturing everybody else about doomsday climate propaganda, about cow farts and fossil fuel cars being banned.
	Hypocrite Bill Gates provided the latest warning about climate change at the annual UN meeting in Dubai on Sunday.
	He said climate progress is moving ahead, even though we won't meet our highest aspirations.
	Well, maybe if he wasn't flying private jets.
	Yes.
	It is significant.
	And it is their super yachts, their mega yachts.
	And what we see here is that this is obviously a two-tier society.
	Well, they'll be able to do anything they want.
	Nothing is going to limit the kind of engines that they use for the mega yachts or the private jets.
	And yet Hillary Clinton, as she's speaking at COP28, It says that extreme heat has killed half a million people.
	By the way, she's just making all this stuff up.
	Making it all up.
	She says that according to Europe, she said we had 61,000 people killed by extreme heat.
	Well, we're back to their definition of being killed by.
	Were these people who died while it was hot?
	Or they die from it being hot.
	You know, did you die with COVID positive test?
	Or did you die from COVID? Well, did you die while it was hot?
	Well, then you died from climate change.
	Maybe if you died while it was cold, you died from that as well.
	We have seen this, as a matter of fact.
	You know, they want to eliminate air conditioning.
	And when the hurricanes come through, we had a bad hurricane came through a couple years ago and took out power for quite some time in Florida, and you had a lot of people in one nursing home who died because they couldn't get air conditioning.
	You have pensioners in Germany who have died because they can no longer afford the electricity to heat their house.
	And they keep it too cold, and they get sick from that.
	So you can kill people with your climate MacGuffin.
	But she says, oh, we got 61,000 people in Europe who died last summer.
	No basis for that whatsoever.
	And then she gets even crazier.
	She goes, and then when we don't have any numbers from Africa, Asia, and Latin America, she said the people in Africa don't have the ability to count.
	Ha, ha, ha.
	I don't know how she meant that as an insult, but she said, in other words, their governments are not keeping track of this stuff.
	Well, your government's not keeping track of it either.
	You're just making it up. But she said, even though we know that 61,000 people in Europe died, we're going to estimate that about 500,000 deaths happened throughout Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
	And then here's the kicker, as always.
	This goes back to the...
	It used to be a joke at Harvard National Lampoon in the 1970s.
	They had a joke about it.
	And they had a newspaper said, Newsflash, the world is going to end tomorrow.
	Women and minorities hardest hit.
	Well, this is exactly where she goes.
	This could measure about 500,000 deaths.
	The majority of those are women and girls.
	Women and minorities, hardest hit, as always.
	Oh, and pregnant women. Notice that she used, not politically correct, she didn't say pregnant people.
	Jackson said pregnant women.
	So, hilarious Clinton is saying, we're seeing and beginning to pay attention and to count the record and record the deaths that are related to climate.
	Yeah. Death with weather.
	Not from it, necessarily.
	So, where is this coming from?
	Where did the 61,000 figure come from?
	Came from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health.
	Who funds that? The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
	This is circular logic propaganda lies for their agenda.
	And as Rise Melbourne tweeted out, he put her actually saying that, she said, wow, this is next-level gaslighting.
	Hillary Clinton dropping a climate change scam misinformation.
	In Europe last year, they recorded 61,000 deaths from extreme heat.
	Africa could see 500,000.
	I'm 100% sure that these deaths had nothing to do with the experimental vaccine, right?
	Notice how they're combining the MacGuffins.
	You go out and you poison people, and you've got an increase in deaths.
	How can you explain that away?
	I know we'll say that it's due to climate change, not to the vaccine.
	You look at the increase in deaths in 2020.
	Oh, well, that's the vaccine.
	It's not the death protocol in the hospitals.
	It's not the remdesivir.
	It's not the ventilators that we put people on that we know kill them.
	No, it's this deadly pandemic, so you've got to get the vaccine.
	People got the vaccine the next year, and as soon as the vaccine rolled out in the third quarter of 2021, when they'd already had a year and a half of the worst pandemic we've ever seen in the history of humans, We then started seeing the number of people scale up to an unbelievable number.
	More than three standard deviations from the mean, said one American insurance company.
	Something that you wouldn't expect to see over two centuries.
	I wonder what happened right then.
	Was it a sudden warming that happened in the third and fourth quarter when it got cold?
	As a matter of fact, I bet if you go back and you look at these numbers, I bet it wasn't tied to hot weather at all.
	Because when we saw that big spike, it happened from September on, not when it was hot.
	Bill Gates has shifted from green grifting the COP28 climate fraud conference.
	He's now pushing for carbon taxes.
	And even admits that it's about promoting industries like electric cars and hydrogen planes.
	And so this was sent to me by Jackie.
	He said, you've got to read this and cover it on your show.
	The IMF is now pushing for carbon taxes.
	Well, everybody is, right?
	Hillary's pushing for it.
	Gates is pushing for it.
	Kerry is pushing for it.
	The IMF is pushing for it.
	So you can't have a global government unless you've got global taxes.
	You can't have a global government unless you've got a global problem.
	So you've got to have a global pandemic.
	You've got to have global climate change and all the rest of this stuff.
	But you should ask yourself, to whom do these taxes go?
	Who's going to get the taxes?
	Who's going to get the carbon taxes that you pay?
	What global government is going to get these taxes?
	You do need to have, for a government, what is essential?
	Well, you've got to have taxes, you've got to have an army.
	At the very least, you've got to have an army of tax collectors, like Biden and the Republicans are creating now.
	And so the IMF managing director said, we are very keen to give the highest possible incentive for decarbonization, which is putting a price on carbon.
	Now, by this, they mean energy usage.
	When we see carbon, just say energy usage.
	That price needs to go up, up, up if we are to speed up decarbonization, she said at the COP28 meeting.
	She said, we believe both the carbon price has potential of raising revenues in a way that is both equitable...
	And is also an incentive to equalize decarbonization.
	In other words, you would need less money because of consumption and production adapting to it.
	So there you go.
	There's your diversity, equity, and incentivization instead of inclusivity.
	And I guess this is where they say, well, this is the way we're going to address the private jets and the mega yachts.
	Except that, of course, we know that people who have the private jets and the mega yachts don't care.
	They'll find some way to tap into this income stream.
	So Bill Gates is going to pay a tax on his private jets.
	How much income is he going to get from this scheme?
	And he's not even going to feel it.
	Why? Because we've got a two-tier system.
	These people have so much money, they don't care, even if they had to pay the tax.
	But they're going to make it somewhere else.
	In September, African countries signed the Nairobi Declaration, which demanded that wealthy nations impose a global carbon tax.
	And then send the money to them.
	You're going to send it to some third world dictators.
	What will they do with it?
	Well, they're going to scam a great deal of it off.
	And then to show that they're really doing something about it and to keep the scam going, they will create some make-work projects, infrastructure projects, where they will buy things from these multinational corporations and billionaires who run them and own them.
	They'll buy some stuff from them.
	So it's ultimately going to be going to them.
	Just like, you know, when we ship weapons to Ukraine, who makes the money?
	The military industrial complex does, right?
	And so we ship the money for climate reparations to African dictators who then take a big cut on it.
	And then they turn around and give that money to these globalist billionaires who are telling us that we've got to have a carbon tax.
	And they're all part of this.
	The World Economic Forum, U.N. Guterres, Emmanuel Macron, Trudeau, all the usual suspects, they're all pushing this global tax thing.
	Hillary, you know, every one of them, pushing this global tax thing.
	Green billionaires are not only going to be the ones who benefit from this, but of course they're the ones who are funding news stories to get people to ramp up the climate reparations.
	So they're playing propaganda.
	They've got a narrative out there. Oh, by the way, if you oppose this narrative, you are hateful and evil, and you must be purged out of society and out of the public sphere.
	John Kerry is calling himself a militant.
	I agree. I think he's a militant extremist.
	I think he's a very dangerous person.
	As I began the show, talking about enemies in the state.
	He's a good example of it.
	He wants to end coal plants.
	Anywhere in the world, he said.
	Cold plants should not be permitted anywhere in the world.
	But see, the fact that when he self-ratified the Paris Climate Accord, why did he sign that?
	If he really believes this.
	That was in 2015.
	And so what he did when he signed that Paris Climate Accord, it said that China and India can produce as many coal power plants or anything they want without any pollution controls on them whatsoever.
	Nothing at all. You know, it's like saying, well, you know, you want to You want to ride the streets with a lawnmower type of engine that doesn't have any emission controls on it?
	That's fine. We don't care.
	You want to roll coal? That's fine, too.
	No, they're coming after eBay for thousands of dollars per device that was sold over eBay for rolling coal.
	Why is that? If we don't care that China is rolling coal on everybody and India is doing that because this is supposed to be global, isn't it?
	No, it's just a transfer of wealth, as I said, a transfer of energy and production to China and India.
	And this next stage of reparations is a transfer of money and wealth to these people, to people like John Kerry.
	Somebody who was never elected president, who pretends to ratify treaties, and yet he knows very well that it's required, I'm assuming that he knows, you know, he was a senator.
	Did he ever read the job description?
	You know, one of the things that he would do would be to ratify treaties, but not by himself, but in conjunction with, you know, 59% of the other senators there, or 60%, I should say.
	He's not just one of them.
	But here's the solution of this stuff.
	We need to have people who will stand up to this.
	And I don't think it's going to happen in the federal government.
	Not with the Republicans that we've got there now.
	Not with the Speaker. Not with people like Jim Jordan.
	Not the people who just want to have hearings about things and they never do anything.
	They're not going to stand up against a...
	As a matter of fact, these guys voted for that Trump Act that would tax unrealized gain.
	In Canada, Danielle Smith, who is...
	She's Premier in Alberta.
	And she says, we have the Sovereignty Act, and that means that we don't have to essentially commit economic suicide because Trudeau says so.
	I can shield Alberta from Trudeau's clean energy regulations using the Sovereignty Act, is what she's saying.
	And I've always said, you know, the globalists have said, Think globally, act locally.
	We need to understand where the globalist agenda is and we need to stop them locally, whether you do it at your local area or even preferably at the state level.
	And that's exactly what she's doing.
	She invoked the Sovereignty Act.
	And to safeguard Albertans from future power blackouts due to government overreach.
	She did this right about Thanksgiving.
	Did not cover this yet.
	And here in the United States, we have something even more powerful than the Sovereignty Act.
	We have something that is in our Constitution that says that you don't have the authority to do this.
	And so if we had governors who would exercise the power that they have under the Tenth Amendment, we could easily stop this.
	We also have the non-commandeering aspect, which has been upheld by courts repeatedly.
	They may be willing to expose Albertans to high costs, to blackouts, to brownouts, and I would even call it lockouts.
	They want to lock us out of the grid.
	I think they'll do it deliberately.
	But we're not going to do that.
	She said, we will continue to ensure that Albertans are protected from these destructive and unconstitutional federal policies.
	Well, good. I'm glad that she's willing to take the fight on.
	She indicated that she would be soon using all the tools at her disposal to take on Trudeau.
	She said he was running a lawless federal government.
	It's pushing ahead with its 2035 net zero energy law despite the fact that Canada's constitution allows provinces full jurisdiction over their natural resources.
	We need to have people in the United States to do that.
	You push back against it at the provincial level in Canada, at the state level in America, and even at the local level.
	And we need to understand that even when you get to the local level, it's usually the federal government incentivizing people to do all this stuff, just like Trump incentivized everybody to do everything in 2020.
	And they're more than happy to take the money and to do whatever is necessary.
	On Rockfin, Audi, good to see you there.
	Modern Retro Radio, thank you for the tip.
	That's very kind. He says, they can tax us all they want.
	God meets the needs of his followers regardless.
	Absolutely right. Absolutely right.
	We look to a God.
	As a matter of fact, I'm not going to have time to get to it because we've got our guest coming on.
	But it's interesting to see Tucker Carlson cut a video talking about, well, if you want to be happy, do this one thing.
	And I didn't watch the video, but somebody kindly gave a summary there in one sentence.
	And it says, don't care about what anybody says about you.
	Except the people that you love.
	And I thought, well, that's really not it.
	First of all, as Christians, we talk about joy, not about happiness.
	And we make that distinction.
	It may sound like semantics to you, but the distinction is that happiness is really what happens.
	It's really based on what happens to you.
	It's based on circumstances.
	Whereas joy is something that is deeper, something that is more lasting, something that is not based just on the particular circumstances that I'm in.
	You know, I might be very unhappy because I get stuck at the airport and the planes are all glued to the runway by ice, you know?
	But you can still have an inner joy if you have a connection with God.
	And when you look at what is it that is our ultimate goal, it changes everything about the way we live our lives.
	You know, money can make you very happy.
	I think Tucker is very happy with the money that he's made.
	Money can make you very happy under certain circumstances, but then there's something else that comes along.
	Maybe you've got all this money and you find out you've got cancer or something.
	Now, that's a bad circumstance.
	So what do you do to make it through that bad circumstance?
	Well, you can make it through if you've got an inner joy, if you have a hope in this life that is beyond this life.
	And I'm not talking about something, well, gee, I hope that is going to happen.
	No. A confident expectation.
	What is your confidence based in?
	Do you believe what the Bible has to say?
	Well, then, instead of just, like these politicians, holding it up for an event or putting their hand on it, swearing on it, but never looking inside of it, actually look inside of it, that will give you hope.
	And when it comes to your family, yes, they're important.
	But understand, as Christ warned us, That following him might divide you from family.
	Not that you're going to push them away, but they may push you away.
	We see that over and over again.
	I don't like you. I think your religion is hateful because it condemns what I want to do.
	And you see that over and over again.
	It's just the strangest thing.
	I saw it when I was in bands.
	You know, if I didn't get drunk with everybody else, they got angry at me for not getting drunk.
	I wasn't saying, hey, you guys shouldn't be drinking.
	I wasn't saying anything to them about that.
	You know, do whatever you want.
	But they'll get upset if I didn't join them.
	And that's the kind of thing that you're going to find, is that people will get angry with you if you don't join them in what they do.
	So again, this is not even based on your family and caring what your family says, necessarily.
	You know, hopefully you're not in that kind of a system, a situation where you're going to have a conflict with family members.
	But as we become a non-Christian nation, that's going to be increasingly the case.
	So again, your happiness is, as Audi says, God meets the needs of his followers.
	He doesn't necessarily give us what we want, but he gives us what we need.
	And sometimes the hardship that we go through, if it's a health thing, if it's a financial thing, frequently, you know, we get on the other side and we look back at it and say, that's one of the best times of my life.
	I learned so much during that.
	And I grew as a person.
	And you got through it because you have an inner joy and you have a hope, a confident expectation in the future that money isn't going to buy.
	Friendships aren't going to buy. Even family is not going to buy that.
	On Rumble, Jeff Ingram, 3355.
	Thank you for the comment.
	He says, when I took environmental engineering in 1998, My instructor skipped the global warming chapter.
	I asked him why, and he smirked and shrugged his shoulders.
	You had a good professor, then, with environmental engineering, or an instructor, I should say.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to be joined by Jack Lawson, who has the Civil Defense Manual.
	You can find it at civildefensemanual.com.
	And we're going to talk to him about preparedness.
	Because there's a lot of things on the horizon right there that are concerning, that are worrying, and there are certain things that we can do.
	We can't control all of our circumstances, but we can make some preparation, and we should do that.
	And we understand that there's a possibility.
	We should be wise enough to do something to minimize the effects of things that we see coming.
	That's why I say understand what they're trying to do globally.
	And counter it locally, especially with your own personal preparedness.
	We'll be right back.
	Hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	APS Radio
	News APS
	Radio
	News APS Radio
	News APS Radio
	News APS Radio News You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The Common Man.
	The Common Man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	Okay, we're having some connection issues, but we should have Jack back in just a moment.
	Again, the two-volume book, and here's what it looks like.
	You've seen this before, and different colors, but it is sold as a collected set.
	And you can find this at CivilDefenseManual.com.
	Excellent set of books.
	It covers everything in terms of power, food, medical preparedness, as well as defending your area and what you can do in working as a community with other people.
	Very important to have this.
	He's got a lot of experience doing this.
	He's retired military, and he has seen action in...
	Welcome to my show!
	Some of these aspects of it.
	You can go to the website, civildefensemanual.com, and you can see the chapter that he has on water, for example, which is very important.
	That is the most important thing.
	But he also has a couple of others there.
	We've talked about nuclear preparedness and the risk that people have.
	He's got experience with that in the military.
	And so you can see that chapter as well for free.
	I think if you see those chapters, you're going to realize how in-depth this is.
	And he only puts it out as he doesn't have an electronic version of it.
	He only has it in print because what happens when the power goes down?
	And you're really going to need this because when the power goes down, we're going to very rapidly descend into anarchy.
	As I said the other day, if you have some kind of a cyber attack or EMP, it is going to only take a couple of days before everybody starts trying to cannibalize What other people have.
	And it's going to descend into chaos very rapidly.
	So joining us now is Jack Lawson.
	Always great to have you on, Jack.
	Thanks for joining us. Yes, David, can you hear me?
	Yeah, gotcha. Okay, good.
	Good and clear. Good. I never trust my technical capability when it comes to this type of thing, but it's always good to be in your show, David, and good to hear your voice.
	Well, it's good to hear your voice, and of course, you're doing this a little bit differently than you have in the past, because in the past, we've always done it by phone, and so it's a little bit better connection, but we had a little bit of, you know, since it's the first time doing this.
	You know, I've been talking the last couple of days, I mentioned When they were talking about cybersecurity and the grid and the vulnerability of the grid, I said, you know, I've talked in the past to Jack Lawson.
	We talked about how easy that would be, but I think it's even easier if you've got somebody that is going to take down the grid with a cyber attack.
	We've seen that done over and over again, usually by just taking down, they shut down the Colonial Pipeline by putting a ransomware attack on their accounting system, and they got them to shut everything down.
	I believe that all the traffic was grounded.
	Earlier this year, when the NOTAM system went out, I think that that was a hack.
	They won't admit that it was a hack, but it was out for about 12 hours, and they shut all traffic down to the extent they hadn't done since 9-11.
	And then as soon as that was finished in the United States, the NOTAM system went down in Canada.
	So it's obviously not some kind of a localized failure.
	And that one came back faster, only about an hour and a half.
	But again, when you look at that type of thing, it's very easy For somebody to do it for ransomware, it's easy for a hostile foreign nation to do it, and it's even easy for our own government to do it as a false flag attack.
	So if we lose the power grid over something like that, how does this play out in terms of how long does it take for everything to really descend into anarchy, and what do you do about it?
	I really believe it would not take very long.
	Number one, you said a word that always strikes me earlier.
	You said the word cannibalize other people's possessions.
	I think that we are so...
	That borderline with our supply system, that actual word of people eating other people, as grotesque as that may sound, is very probable.
	I have, through writing this book, I've met a lot of very important people, very knowledgeable people, more than important, and along with this, almost every one of them.
	That's a concept that's hard for people to understand.
	It's repulsive to me.
	That's where I draw a line in the sand.
	When you step over that, you're no longer a member of the human race as far as I'm concerned.
	But let's go back to one thing.
	You talk about EMP. Electromagnetic pulse event is usually generated by a nuclear weapon that's set way up in the atmosphere.
	It's set off an area of the planet, and through that pulse that's sent out from that, it destroys electronics.
	Any semiconductor, any type of transistor or semiconductor would be ruined.
	I don't see that as probable as I do see what Dr.
	Eric Waddell, a friend of mine, who owns a company called Amorous, and he deals specifically...
	His entire life, he's written a book about it.
	He deals specifically with grid-down situations and redundancy and backup.
	And his belief is this, that there's a very, very strong probability, along with all of we don't know who is in this country.
	It just astounds me to see 40, 50 people standing in a line that are Chinese, and they're all military-aged people.
	No women, no children.
	No protection at all. And that's the amazing thing about it.
	You know, we look at this debate that I was talking about earlier in the Congress, and it's like, well, we're not going to give you any money for Ukraine unless you fix the border.
	You know, we really literally have an invasion, as you pointed out, a lot of military-aged people coming from China and everywhere on Earth.
	And, of course, they don't have to do something like this very provocative, like exploding an EMP, which they could easily trace that back to whichever country that had fired that and annihilate it.
	But they could easily go in and sabotage.
	And we see that as a real possibility.
	And of course, the other part of this is that we have this slow system of sabotage that's being put out by our own government in the name of climate, where they are putting everybody on getting rid of anything that is not electric.
	All the cars, all the appliances, everything must be electric, and then they're shutting the grid down at the same time.
	So they're gradually killing it.
	That's why I say at some point in time, I wouldn't be surprised if they just pulled an event and pulled the whole thing down.
	So, the people who are coming in, as you point out.
	David, I believe this.
	I believe that there has been...
	There's...
	Been a couple of events where transformers at power generation stations had a whole shot in the bottom of them.
	It doesn't take much, but the AKM round, the 7.62x39, most of the military production has a steel core in it.
	And that will go through the steel of a transformer that is filled with oil that is used to jump the electric power voltage up to where it allows it to be transmitted for a number of miles before it's done again.
	I think that we've had derailments.
	I think that the federal government is hiding this.
	This from us.
	They're definitely afraid that somebody's going to get in, shut the border down, gather these people up, and send them back to where they came.
	It astounds me.
	I lived in a country where there was infrastructure damage like this, formerly called Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe.
	During the time I was there, there were attacks on the fuel tank farms That were devastating.
	It took every fire truck in Rhodesia and the South Africans send hundreds of trucks up just to contain this fire.
	That entire incident was a result of two terrorists with an RPG rocket launcher hijacking a taxi, standing on top of it and firing a rocket into the Fuel tank, 500,000 gallons of aviation fuel.
	It took 10 days to put out.
	Wow. It was in danger of setting the entire rest of the tank from up.
	There is so much infrastructure that could be damaged with simple methods.
	You don't need a rocket launcher.
	You can design.
	There's all kinds of things that can be done.
	And I think that this has been going on for some time.
	Well, and when you look at, okay, so that's a fuel depot.
	You hit that, it blows up. You point out it takes 10 days to put that one out and could have set everything off.
	But we also look at, you know, as they're going to renewables, you know, around here in this area, we got the TVA, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and they are mandating and incentivizing and paying for people to put in what they call battery energy storage sites, And that is a massive lithium battery site, and that is a gigantic fire waiting to happen.
	It could even happen on its own.
	We've already had one of them that was set up in Australia that Tesla put in there, their mega battery thing that caught on fire.
	But if you were to sabotage that, that'd be pretty easy to sabotage as well, because we know that we've had electric cars that have...
	You know, run over something on the road and it penetrated the battery and it caused the whole thing to combust very quickly.
	And so if you were starting to shoot those things, you know, deliberately trying to destroy them, they'd be pretty easy to destroy too, just like a big fuel depot.
	Absolutely. The guy that wrote the underground shelter portion of the Civil Defense Manual, he is probably one of the best experts on underground shelters.
	He refuses to put a lithium battery in.
	He said there are a fire waiting to happen.
	Yes. Now, there's all kinds of dangers, but...
	There's no point in paying to increase your danger level.
	And I'm not putting Musk down and saying I think the lithium battery at this point is probably one of the most efficient.
	It is kind of like a hand grenade, though.
	It's one of the best batteries to give you a slow power charge as you need it.
	But if you short those terminals together, it's like pulling a pin and a hand grenade.
	Yeah. It doesn't like that surge of power.
	I remember a few years ago when Samsung came out with a phone that had a lot of these issues, and they were catching fire and injuring people.
	Flammable phones. Yeah, exactly.
	And so what have we done? We've gone from the phone to the electric scooters in New York, and they've had a massive number of fires up there, a lot of people that have died from that as well.
	I think it was Munich.
	We're burned down an entire station of these things.
	And in France, they had them spontaneously combusting and took them off the market.
	In Canada, they went back and changed them back to diesel.
	But that's a bus.
	And so then from there, they want to go to a semi-trailer.
	And then from a semi-trailer, they want to go to a backup energy system for the grid.
	It just keeps getting bigger and bigger.
	And yet they still have that flammability issue.
	So that is something that people...
	Well, let me ask you this.
	When he says he's not going to use underground storage and things like that, he said, I'm not going to use a lithium battery.
	What does he use for storage?
	He uses a simple lead-acid forklift battery.
	They're one-third the price of a Tesla firewall, and...
	There's some issues with them because batteries, when they regenerate, cause hydrogen emissions.
	So you have a flammability issue, but that is way overrated.
	If you have some venting, you don't really have a problem with it.
	But he just refuses to deal with the lithium batteries.
	He's built $17 million shelters, and he's had arguments with some of these tech people that the one that he built was a...
	He won't tell me who, and I can't ask him, but it was somebody fairly well known, and they ended up going around him and putting in what he told them not to put in.
	I don't know if they've had any problems or not from that, but...
	Their capability to generate power, they had a, I don't know how many horsepower, Caterpillar tractor, diesel generator, but they had enough fuel to last them for 48 hours.
	So he said when this was done, where's your fuel truck going to come from?
	And, you know, they don't think this stuff through.
	And, you know, he was pretty disgusted.
	You know, they paid him. He built a big complex for him.
	But he just gets very disgusted with some of these people.
	Some of these people's egos, they're a legend in their own mind.
	You know, they think they're God themselves.
	You know, it's pretty hard to talk to those people.
	But they did... I think we're kind of in a state of limbo.
	Everybody thought World War III was going to start.
	I personally believe that most of the Arab states would like to see Hamas.
	I don't want to get into politics, but I think they want to see them eradicated.
	They're kind of...
	They're kind of the orphan child.
	Nobody wants them.
	I find it amazing that there's $3.5 billion in oil and natural gas that was discovered in 1999 by British Petroleum in the Gaza Strip.
	And I think that's one coincidental issue for them going in there and taking over.
	So Hamas just didn't dig their tunnels deep enough, right?
	Yeah. Yeah, really.
	Strike oil. We're going to have them flooded with seawater now.
	So with the Hooties, they're the ones who are shooting drones at shipping lanes and that type of thing, and possibly at some of the American ships there.
	But so far, the American, I think it's an Aegis-class destroyer, has taken out a bunch of those.
	But other than that, as you point out, there's not really any coordinated movement by any other groups outside of Hamas, except for the Houthis who are shooting stuff at people.
	Yeah, I think I think they're keeping this somewhat under control as far as the expansion of it.
	I don't think the Saudi Arabians or the Turks want to go to war over this.
	But this death toll...
	I mean, they talk about 1500 Israelis that were killed by Hamas on October 7th or thereabouts.
	Quite a number of them were killed by their own Apache attack helicopters.
	They were shooting anything that was moving on the ground.
	Mm-hmm.
	So I don't think it takes much to set things up, but it seems like we're kind of in a limbo.
	Everybody was looking at, oh, we're going to have World War III. Well, at the beginning, you had some rockets that were shot by Hezbollah, and people were saying, well, you know, maybe Hezbollah, maybe Lebanon, maybe Iran is going to do something.
	But so far, that has been, except for right at the very beginning, it's been kind of quiet.
	Well, I laugh at that.
	I've seen a lot of explosions, and I've seen the aftermath of a lot of explosions.
	And 500 people being killed by one rocket, that was not a Hezbollah rocket.
	To take a building down...
	And most of them are probably masonry or concrete.
	They're heavy. They're not a wooden structure that the sides will blow out of easily.
	That absorbs a lot of the blast and directs it upward.
	To have 500 people killed makes me question where that explosive device came from.
	And the long and short of the thing is, I think this is controlled, but If we get into a situation, which it could escalate into a World War III situation, you will see an EMP. But before that, I think what we will see in the next couple years, we're going to start seeing grid outages.
	And whether we're told the truth of where they're coming from or not, what was it?
	The one in California, they...
	Proved that there were two trained marksmen and one spotter.
	That's usually the makeup of a tactical SWAT team's sniper unit or a military sniper unit.
	You've either got one spotter and one rifleman or you can have a couple of riflemen.
	But they systematically shot holes in the bottom.
	I think it was a test run.
	Matt Bracken... He comes out and says that.
	He says it was a test run.
	And there's a funny Department of Homeland Defense investigated this, but they don't say much.
	So, you know, it's like everything else.
	They don't say it must be classified.
	Yeah, we're not allowed to know that.
	And, of course, you know, they would look bad if they were not protecting our border.
	But, of course, everybody understands that they're not doing that.
	I think you're right, and I think, you know, even if we don't have, so, you know, you look at Ukraine, that is failing miserably.
	Things have not, even though they're escalating somewhat in China, even if we don't have a full-out war with China or something like that, as you point out, these groups that are coming in could be engaging in constant harassment, sabotage, or something like that, just to To push back against the United States, you don't necessarily have to have a full-on war for them to start messing with the grid.
	No, it doesn't take much of anything.
	And I think that's what we're going to see.
	The explanation will probably be infrastructure failure, but I think what it's going to be is sabotage.
	I think there are...
	It's impossible that there are not military intelligence in this country along with all of these able-bodied people.
	I think they're military.
	I think they're... The Chinese form of their CIA and FBI. I'm sure they've got people in here, and they know where things are.
	And they know how to damage it, and it wouldn't take much.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah, I agree.
	So, you know, we talk about that you've got two different volumes here, and you've got...
	All together between the two, you've got 44 different chapters, and so it's an extensive amount of information.
	As I said before, if somebody wants to see what is typical of it, they can go to your site, CivilDefenseManual.com, and they can see a free chapter there on both water as well as nuclear threats and how to prepare for those two types of things.
	But in each one of these volumes, you have an extensive checklist that As well on the back in terms of talking about food requirements for people, different ways that you can use, different things that you can use to protect from gunshots and that type of thing in terms of body armor, but also the types of penetration that we're just talking about and what you can do to shield against that.
	But it's just a wealth of information that you've got there.
	Talk to us a little bit about medical things like dental care.
	You know, what do you do with dental care when everything has been shut down?
	Pick a topic and give us some idea of something that we can prepare for today.
	I go back to my prime directive.
	My prime directive is to store food and water.
	I know you always advocated that, David.
	I cannot emphasize enough.
	I guess I feel like an insurance salesman.
	I'm trying to get people to ensure their survival and that of their children.
	I pound on my family about this all the time.
	I'm after them all the time on it.
	I spent a lot of money preparing them.
	And generally, I think they're probably pretty much in the preparation stage to where they could last for a while.
	But I think people have got to have at least 10 days of water and three weeks of food, more water if you can, but also life-sustaining medicines.
	I mean, I'm going back to what I feel like.
	I sometimes feel like I'm a farmer that's been plowing, killed the horse, and I beat him to get up to pull the plow some more.
	You know, I feel like this is something that people cannot really fathom.
	We live in such an abundant society here.
	I've been through not eating.
	I've been through on top of not having water or doing a forced march for two days in deep, dark Africa.
	And I know what it's like to become just about going out of your mind from thirst.
	And people have to look at One of the most critical things, you turn a tap on and water comes out.
	And it's potable water. It's drinkable.
	It's safe to drink, generally speaking.
	But people need to do this.
	I have all kinds of things in this book.
	And I put some of this on the website.
	It's free because I want the water treatment.
	I want people to be able to get that now.
	If they don't have my book, go to my website, CivilDefenseManual.com.
	Read the blogs and read the sample chapters I have there.
	I mean, here's your Navy SEAL officer, Matt Bracken, who's one of the most fantastic authors.
	He actually got me started.
	He's my mentor. He put a whole chapter in there on night fighting.
	Now, who's going to go night fight?
	You may at some point, if things get bad enough, have to be protective of your property when there's no moonlight, no streetlights.
	And to do that, he tells you how to do it without all this expensive night vision and imparatic.
	And this to me is one of the critical aspects of being able to protect your neighborhood.
	There's, you know, back in Texas, they had such an invasion of feral pigs that it was open season at any given time.
	As a matter of fact, if you bring a pigtail...
	I know, my sister lived there.
	I heard all about that.
	Yeah. And if you could bring in a pigtail in the county that we lived in, they would give you cash for any pigs that you could prove that you'd killed.
	But it was really difficult to kill them.
	And it would come out at night, and you would have to have these really expensive night...
	Well, not so much hunting feral pigs, but protecting your property.
	That's a different thing. I mean, Matt's led SEAL teams in the Middle East.
	He knows this stuff inside out and backward.
	He wrote the whole chapter for me.
	I got a way to store chicken eggs without refrigeration for up to two years.
	This is the way it was done.
	If you wondered how these guys in New York wearing a six-gun still out there got their eggs for breakfast, it was really true.
	Their refrigeration method in hydrogenated lime and it says, I've got how to do this in there.
	One thing I was taught, I was in a commando unit and I was taught by Israeli and British Commonwealth SAS instructors is I was taught things like Skipping rounds.
	Guys, everybody's...
	Obviously, everybody thinks 95% of the equation of survival is firearms and ammunition.
	That is not true.
	It's 95% of it is food and water.
	But you may need to protect what you have.
	You can make a single round, a jacketed round, turn into a shotgun, basically, by skipping rounds.
	This is something that we're taught to do.
	I've got in there where to get Mother Nate.
	Define that term for skipping rounds.
	You're talking about shooting at the ground at something that's hard that's going to fracture the bullet, I'm assuming, right?
	Right. Yeah, it fragments.
	And I've got pictures in the book of AK rounds I've fired and 7.62x51, which is a.308 and 8 a round, and the.556 millimeter M16 AR round.
	And it's absolutely amazing, along with the debris.
	That this bullet will kick up.
	These will call, not all of these holes in the sample silhouette target I have would be lethal, but they certainly would make a bad day for the guy that's laying in wait trying to kill you.
	But like salt, where to get salt?
	How to keep from freezing in cold weather without burning fuel.
	Mm-hmm. We may all need that, even if there's some kind of a catastrophe, because they're trying to shut up our boat and wear ourselves.
	Yeah, we're so close from grid shutdown.
	We're so close to this type of thing.
	I don't think people realize how Critical and how susceptible this is to shutdown.
	I mean, don't you think about this often?
	I mean, you've got a lot of lights and electronic stuff in your show there.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. We lost power, I think it was last week or the week before that.
	And, you know, we could have a backup here, but we don't have really the kind of Internet access that's going to allow us to do the bandwidth that we need.
	And so, you know, we had to start the show like three hours, almost three hours late that day because it just shut everything down in the entire area around here.
	Everything shut down.
	School shut down.
	All the stores are shut down.
	And so you look at that and you get a little bit of a taste of it.
	But then you also realize these politicians are trying to gradually.
	They're like gremlins destroying the grid system themselves in slow motion.
	And we've seen the results of that when we were in Texas, you know, where they can the entire time I was in Texas for a decade.
	They were shutting down coal and oil power plants and putting in windmills and solar panels.
	And the windmills froze and everything froze.
	And we were out of power for a while with that.
	So, you know, they're making the whole system very, very vulnerable.
	Everybody, every summer, people can see how the capacity and the vulnerability is...
	The capacity is going down.
	The vulnerability is going up because every summer or winter, whenever you have extremely cold or hot weather, everybody is being warned, oh, don't use any electricity because we're right on the edge of going down.
	We never had anything like that in decades past.
	This is something that's brand new.
	It's their new normal when it comes to energy starvation, and it's only going to get worse.
	It's only going to get worse rapidly.
	We've had such an explosion of the use of electronics.
	I mean, our computers don't draw that much, but you put everybody's computer together and you put this foolishness of these mandated electric Vehicles, together with cutting back on the mainstay, the muscle of power production, which is coal-fired plants and nuclear, I don't think are faring much better.
	And depending on Mother Nature for windmills, solar, it's a recipe for disaster.
	Yeah. What degree of that disaster is is another thing.
	Whether it comes to not being able to drive your car, not being able to get groceries at a grocery store, those are two different degrees of danger.
	Yeah, or not being able to get emergency medical help to you or to get to where there's emergency medical help.
	That type of thing doesn't necessarily have to rely on some kind of a war or something breaking out or sabotage.
	It's just it's gradually being sabotaged by these people.
	And they're increasing it.
	You know, as you talked about nuclear, the whole idea that we got to stop all this stuff because of emissions.
	I see a lot of problems with nuclear because I understand what the long term issues are with storage.
	But nevertheless, you know, they are not looking to replace anything that they're taking down with something that is known that works, that is reliable.
	You know, nuclear is reliable.
	It's got some back-end costs that are huge on it.
	It's got some other risks that are involved there.
	But they don't care about any of this stuff.
	And they're not talking about the nuclear, even though it has, by their admission, zero emissions.
	So according to their story, that ought to be something that they would turn to.
	So you know there's something else here, and we know exactly what that is.
	It's a deliberate destruction of the grid.
	Yes, and along with the grid, you may as well replace that word grid with America, because if the grid goes on, we've got some serious problems.
	I cannot believe the level of corruption that It's even gotten into the area I'm in.
	There's developers that are trying to increase the water allotment.
	I'm in the southwest.
	It's a desert.
	Cities like Las Vegas and Salt Lake City even, Phoenix and Albuquerque, they're all cities that are in the desert, the high desert.
	And there seems to be an endless drive to build properties here because everybody's leaving California.
	But that's the corruption and the people that are involved with this on a federal level.
	It just astounds me.
	It astounds me. I see very few...
	People that are Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Greene and Rand Paul, they're all people that I deeply respect because I think that they've had...
	Well, Gates himself was literally, they tried to lynch him.
	And they picked on the wrong guy because the billionaire family of his got behind him and traced back this fraudulent scheme all the way into the Justice Department.
	Nothing was ever done, but it seemed to drop off there.
	They could never find out who it was connected to.
	But the level of corruption has gotten to the point...
	I don't know. The older I get, the more I believe in the Bible.
	I have one son that was a Muslim.
	He's no longer. He asked too many questions, and I think they asked him to leave.
	And the other one was, I guess you might say he's a Christian.
	He was the sergeant of his...
	Scout sniper unit and weapons platoon unit in Iraq.
	Kind of an absolute of contradictions.
	They both love each other.
	They're great guys.
	Great guys. I'm very proud of them.
	But the point being this is I am more and more am seeing the wisdom of reading the Bible and the wonderful story it has.
	And I look back at my life, David, and I tell you, I told my wife the other day, that must have been a period of insanity.
	I was in one of doing this or that.
	And I said, only God and Jesus, some entity kept me alive.
	For what reason, I don't know.
	But the odds are I shouldn't have survived what I did.
	But the point being this, I more and more look at the Bible, and I'm a Christian, and I'd like to accept anybody's religion that...
	As long as they aren't going around trying to kill me.
	We support religious freedom because we want to have it for ourselves.
	I've said that about everything.
	Even when you talk about free speech.
	You can't have any freedom in any form if you don't support that freedom for somebody else.
	So I can't have my freedom of religion if I don't support your freedom of religion.
	But you're right. You know, you ask questions, and you should be asking questions.
	And you're right to talk about the Bible.
	You know, you don't have a chapter in here on the Bible.
	That is the ultimate prepping, isn't it?
	That is.
	But I do have a section on religion, and I have six points that I go over that I'll accept anybody's religion.
	And, you know, obviously, people that are advocating...
	Killing the infidels or killing the Muslims or whatever, either way that they're going, need to step back and look at the fact that the majority of people We're good to
	go. It's something that's a competition to what they want to instill in humanity, which, by the way, is illusionary.
	It's based on communism.
	Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Absolutely is.
	By the way, Merry Christmas to you before I forget it.
	Well, thank you. Same to you as well.
	Yeah, that's another example that they want to try to shut things down.
	I mean, they're very, very intolerant, very totalitarian.
	And so that's one thing that we want to be able to push back on and to stand firm against it.
	And I think the key thing is, you know, one of the things to prepare for is to understand your relationship with God.
	And one of the reasons that we see everybody fighting each other in this country is because we've thrown God out.
	We don't have peace with God.
	We're going to have war with each other.
	Absolutely. 100% correct.
	I've come to this conclusion not because I'm getting older and I'm afraid of dying.
	I've faced death many times.
	Bottom line is this.
	I think about things a lot and I think about some entity kept me alive and some entity has given me the blessings of wonderful children, a wonderful wife, and I'm just appreciative, and I love Christianity because it's the one religion of all of them that professes forgiveness and sacrifice.
	And when you read about it, whatever you want to think about, Jesus or God is up to the individual.
	But I've got six points in my book that I go over that pretty much encapsulate what I think It should allow a person to look at another religion and accept its existence instead of trying to exterminate.
	I mean, look at these jokers over in the Middle East.
	They've been trying to kill each other off for 4,000 or 5,000 years, you know, and it doesn't seem so.
	Yeah, I know.
	I've heard people say, well, you know, we've had a situation in the past where the Catholics are trying to kill the Protestants, the Protestants are trying to kill the Catholics, and so forth, this kind of war.
	And as one person said, you know, well, you know, at that point in time, they took their religious differences seriously enough that...
	They would go to war over it.
	But that was when it was tied in with government.
	And so we looked at this and it's like, well, we still want to take this seriously, but we want to have the toleration that we're not going to establish anything.
	That's really what the basis of America was.
	And yet, you know, as you get older and you're talking about it, when you're younger, you look at it, and when I was younger, I should say, I would look at it and it's like a fear of death.
	I don't have the fear of death anymore.
	It's not something that I look forward to experiencing, certainly.
	It would be an unpleasant experience.
	But when I look at it now, I look at it with an anticipation of what comes next.
	Right.
	It's not that you're going to be leaving behind things and people, especially people that you really love, but there's an expectation you're going to be reunited with them.
	And that's what we work for.
	We work to try to take as many with us as we can and to try to get there ourselves.
	And so that anticipation and what it is about, I find it very – when we're talking about books, I love Randy Alcorn's Heaven because he begins with the Bible, and he tries to keep it as based in the Bible.
	He gives a reason why this would fit with the Bible.
	But it's a very positive understanding of what life would be like afterwards.
	It's not just hanging around on clouds and doing nothing.
	Not that at all.
	And he makes a biblical case that we would be very active, and we'd be active in a sense that we don't have the kind of frustration and futility that we have here on this earth.
	But it is also, even in that book, and as you talked about your friend who left Islam because – not your friend, but your son – who left Islam because he asked too many questions.
	We invite questions.
	And we invite that inspection.
	And as I do that, and as I look at it more carefully, it actually bolsters my confident expectations.
	And the more deeply I look at it, the more closely I look at it, rather than pushing me away.
	And so I always invite that.
	You know, somebody's skeptical about something, let me hear it.
	You know, let me look at it. Because every time I look at it, it gets validated and my faith gets stronger for doing that investigation.
	Yes, it does. It has a way of drawing you further into it, and I think that your belief grows as you expose yourself to this.
	I mean, I had a friend of mine saw a Bible sitting in the front seat of my car, and he says, Lawson, you?
	The Bible? You know, what are you doing, you know?
	And I told him, I said, you know something?
	I said, there's some fantastic stories in there.
	I said, I read these things, and this is like a roadmap for life.
	Old Testament, New Testament is a roadmap.
	It tells you all the mistakes.
	They're telling you what the mistakes they were that they made.
	And they're telling you not to do it.
	And unfortunately, most of experience of life for people is making mistakes by which you learn wisdom.
	And I just also encourage every adult out in your listing area, every one of them...
	Well, there was a song by the Judds, Grandpa Tell Me About the Good Old Days.
	I've said this before, but...
	You know, the thing is, now you start to realize your grandpa, and younger people need guidance, and I think a person...
	It needs to give them the guidance that the wisdom of their age provides.
	And have some faith in these young people.
	There are good young people out there.
	Concentrate in their preparation on individual liberties.
	That's the way I measure everything.
	Not the Second Amendment.
	I measure individual liberties, which the Second Amendment is part of.
	They're now attacking free speech.
	If you don't believe, if you have somebody that doesn't believe in individual liberties, that's somebody I don't want anything to do with.
	Yeah, man, that's Congress.
	I don't want anything to do with most of them.
	So, yeah, it is true.
	You know, we were talking about nuclear, but the nuclear family, that term, I just recently realized that term was just kind of referring to, you know, mother and father and immediate kids.
	Because we have a mobile society and people would leave the area that they grew up in for the most part and leave their extended family and go to another part of the country.
	And so you just had that real core there, mother, father, and kids.
	You didn't have the extended family of grandparents and cousins and things like that.
	And so in a sense, that was one of the things that really kind of undercut us.
	And as you point out, as grandpa, we've got to tell those stories.
	And we've got to keep that culture going.
	And that's one thing that really is we've lost that.
	And everybody is attached not even to their nuclear family, but they're attached to the kids, get attached to the school.
	You know, they get more attached to their schoolmates than they get to their siblings, and they get more attached perhaps to their teachers in many cases than they do to their parents.
	Put the iPhone down.
	Put the iPhone down every once in a while.
	I've seen families in restaurants.
	I don't know what they're doing sitting together other than they're reading their text messages.
	I don't even call it a phone anymore.
	It's an entertainment center.
	Put the phone down.
	Put your entertainment center down and look your kids in the eyes and talk to them.
	I do this all the time.
	We've kind of got an off-limits phone thing here.
	I have a son-in-law who's an attorney that doesn't always work with me.
	He's always on the phone.
	But anyway, it's something that's important.
	These young people...
	Don't try to cram a religion down their throat.
	They'll come to it.
	Giving the guidance to a child and wisdom and being an example, I think, is very, very important.
	Yeah, that's right. And it's the time that you spend with them.
	You go back and you look at Deuteronomy 6.
	As you're walking with your kids in the way, you do this.
	Well, you've got to be with them in order to be able to have a teachable moment as you're walking with them.
	So that's a key part of it, I think.
	But getting back to the survival stuff that's more immediate, when you were talking about the open border and the unrest that is going to come with that is as we see the anarchy that's being pushed in both directions, both with an open border and with the policies of a lot of these Soros both with an open border and with the policies of a lot of these Soros district attorneys just turning Now we're seeing one of the district attorneys and I think is in New Orleans.
	He gets carjacked by somebody he let out.
	And we have an FBI agent who just got carjacked.
	And we have a congressman who got carjacked in Washington, D.C. And so they're creating a great deal of anarchy and things like that.
	Do you address just that kind of ordinary personal safety on a regular basis in your book?
	Yes, I do. Yes, I do.
	I have a whole section.
	I sat on a police board in a major.
	It was one of the largest police boards in the United States, and I was a judge of officer-involved shootings and use of deadly force.
	And I was on that seven years.
	So I had a lot of exposure to law enforcement having to deal with the public.
	And along with that, I put a lot of information in there on how to common sense watch where you are, what you're doing, and be aware of I'm a believer in this.
	I believe a person walking from the grocery store door out to their car in a semi-lit parking lot can sense a danger around them, but the problem is they're thinking about everything other than that.
	We're almost like the old sitcom, The Jetsons, where this guy had the antennas come out of his forehead.
	You know, only we don't let ours out anymore.
	We're always thinking about something else.
	And on that police board, I talked to hundreds of people, and it was always the same statement.
	Oh, they came out of nowhere.
	They didn't come out of nowhere.
	They were waiting for you, but You weren't thinking about them and you weren't tuned in.
	I swear there's almost a sense of adrenaline in the air that you could pick up on or some type of telepathic thought when there's evil about you.
	You can be aware of this, but I've got quite a bit in there about how to...
	Survive a knife fight, which is basically turn and run.
	If you talk to any special operations guys, they give you all kinds of different movements and blocking movements and that type of thing.
	But wrapping a coat around your arm to protect yourself, doing whatever you have to.
	But the number one rule I had an instructor tell me, turn and run.
	There's quite a bit on common sense protection.
	Also, I get heavily into the neighborhood protection, and I am revising some of what I've written.
	I am astounded at what has happened.
	I was exposed to the Mormons, the very first one of these I set up with.
	And they were people that...
	Ate this stuff up and asked for seconds.
	Because their religion pushes this type of thing.
	It's self-preservation and group protection of your area.
	But I've noticed where I live, I'm getting people coming from areas of the country.
	They've lived in an anti-state where they're told everything they can do and what they can't do.
	Mostly what they can't do.
	And it amazes me that I see these people The males have gotten so feminized and everybody is, oh, you can't do that, or that's against the law.
	Well, I'm not a lawyer, but I know enough about how police look at you in your own area to be able to state, as I do in the book, what to do.
	And it's frightening to me that this attitude of This lackadaisical attitude, this I don't really care about this, is so overwhelming, people.
	Again, my latest post in my book, my blog, is an article called Fear that was written by a preacher, a friend of a friend of mine, a guy called Gen X Can, and he It basically tells you how to deal with it.
	I believe this.
	Get some food. Get some water.
	Get yourself a protection device, whether it's a firearm or whether it's non-lethal, like bear spray.
	You'd have bear spray. And be prepared.
	Then enjoy your family.
	Enjoy life. But get something to tide you over when the grocery stores are being raided by everybody.
	That's right. That's right. And, you know, when you look at the advice that you've got here, Being situationally aware of what is happening, you know, it's amazing to me when we look at how everybody is freaking out over things that are absolutely nothing and yet they completely ignore the real dangers around them.
	Interesting. Yeah, isn't that an interesting contradiction that's there?
	It kind of gets you passive in a lot of different ways and I think about it in terms of driving, you know.
	I've been in countries where there's not really any lanes and people just say it's freeform and...
	But people are more aware of what's going on.
	They're constantly thinking about all this stuff, whereas Americans get lulled into this.
	It's like, OK, I got my lane.
	I got my traffic light.
	That light's green.
	I'm going.
	I'm not even going to look to see if somebody is running it in the other direction.
	Right.
	That's a very interesting perspective.
	Yeah, that is very true.
	And I think that has happened to us in all aspects of our life.
	And so I think that's one of the big advantages of reading your book, because it opens people up to, OK, this type of thing can happen and that kind of thing can happen.
	But even to the extent you're talking about keeping warm, easy ways to keep warm, not just if you lose power, but just if you want to try to save some money because or whatever, you know, in terms of food and other things like that.
	And this time of rapid inflation and things like that that might happen or with job insecurity, you know, making some preparation of things that are going to tide you over.
	That is very, very important.
	And so it has immediate usage in terms of preparation, I think, for the things we're going to face on a regular basis, but also for catastrophic things.
	But even if the catastrophic things don't happen, you're going to be better off with these types of preparations and understanding what is there and ready for a lot of different things that are going to come at you.
	So it's a great book.
	I highly recommend this to people.
	And people will need this knowledge.
	Within the next two years, especially since the next year is an election year, I anticipate not total anarchy in a country, but I anticipate towards the...
	I anticipate there's going to be a lot of rioting.
	The rule of law is basically going out the window already.
	To me, I would not want to be a policeman, which I wanted to be for a long time.
	I would not want to be a policeman now because there's a total lack of respect for the police.
	That's right. And it's a tough job to go to work.
	A lot of handcuffs put on them, isn't it, while they release the criminals.
	That's the way the rules have been set up.
	I'm not saying some of that shouldn't be.
	Yeah, that's right. Because there are situations, but basically...
	In my book, Where to Hunker Down in the City.
	I don't advocate a person stays in the city.
	But if you do, there are certain ways that you can survive.
	If you're in the summertime, there's enough food around to eat in alleys with weeds.
	Edible. Well, we'll have to talk about that the next time.
	There's so much in the book and two volumes of this.
	Again, the website is civildefensemanual.com.
	Go there and take a look at least at what he has to say about water.
	That is vital. And we need to start thinking about preparedness because things are going to get very volatile very soon, I think.
	Thank you for joining us, Jack Lawson.
	Thank you, David. Looking for better information?
	APSRadioNews.com features articles and commentary along with audio from all the top news from around the world.
	APSRadioNews.com The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲