Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 14, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:36

The David Knight Show - 06/15/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Music Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it is Thursday, 15th of June, year of our Lord, 2023.
	3.
	Today we're going to be talking to Marty Gottesfeld.
	I've been wanting to talk to Marty for a long time, but I couldn't because he was in jail.
	He has a lot of compassion.
	for other people and today he wanted to come on and talk about other people even more so than himself but it's an important story to understand as he was defending somebody who had been medically kidnapped and while he's been in jail the rest of us have experienced one degree or the other of medical kidnapping haven't we it's also important to understand where they put him in the communications management unit Yeah, an American Gitmo.
	We'll talk about that coming up in the third hour.
	We'll begin with news. Stay with us.
	We'll be right back. Yeah,
	very sad story about Marty Gottesville, but the good news is that he's out now.
	For years, I've talked to his wife, Dana, who has championed his cause.
	It's very sad to see him passed over for pardon.
	I guess he didn't have the $2 million.
	Trump administration.
	Rudy, the rest of them.
	Those people need to be in jail.
	And it looks like maybe it's going to happen with Trump.
	Not for the right reasons, though.
	Yeah. They need to lock up Biden as well.
	It looks like they've actually got some tapes about Biden's Ukrainian corruption.
	So we're going to talk about that as well coming up.
	But let's begin with the news.
	We had 22 U.S. troops injured in a helicopter accident over Syria.
	They think it was pilot or machine air or something like that.
	Not that they were attacked.
	We've been occupying that area, stealing their oil.
	Who secretly put our troops there?
	You know, we had this amazing gaslighting for Tucker Carlson.
	I just can't believe how it has just spread like wildfire everywhere.
	All the conservative alternative media people are saying, oh, well, this is just wonderful.
	Listen to this. Here's the way that we defend Trump.
	He threw them a lifeline.
	You know, in 2016, Trump ran as Mr.
	Anti-Globalism. Well, it was kind of hard to revive that, I guess, when he created the global vaccines and when he did everything the World Economic Forum and the UN and all of these globalists have wanted for the longest time.
	I guess it was kind of hard to recap that.
	So now they're going to portray him in 2024 as Mr.
	Anti-War. Well, who put these troops in Syria?
	I don't know, honestly.
	We didn't have, as Tucker Carlson said, well, you know, we have Congress decides to start a war, declare war, and then nobody's supposed to talk about it.
	No, Tucker? Who declared the war with Syria?
	How did we get into Syria?
	We knew that we had invaded them, we're fighting against them, but now we've taken the biggest oil-producing area of Syria and we're stealing the oil.
	And I remember there was somebody, this president, let's see, he said, uh, Yeah, just take the oil.
	Take the oil. We need to take the oil.
	Who was that? Tucker.
	Do you remember that, Tucker?
	I do. It's Trump.
	It's Trump. He didn't stop the war if it was started by Obama.
	And certainly looks like it's got his fingerprints on it.
	I've got the tape, by the way.
	Take the oil. Take the oil.
	We've all heard that. No, it's a real world reminder.
	That this whole thing about President Trump being anti-war peacenik is a bunch of bull.
	Sold to you by the CIA wannabe.
	Maybe he's not a wannabe. Maybe he already is.
	You know, his dad's worked for the CIA his whole life.
	Voices of America, the rest of that stuff.
	CIA propaganda. What a load of bunk.
	He sold everybody.
	Twenty-two U.S. service members injured in the incident.
	Ten of the wounded had injuries serious enough to be evacuated to hospitals outside the region, presumably in neighboring Iraq, where U.S. personnel have presence in Erbil in the north.
	We're in Iraq, too?
	Oh, wait a minute.
	That was the one that we got lied into.
	And now we've got people like Tucker lying about it as if Trump got us out.
	Trump pointed to the lies about weapons of mass destruction.
	And then he promoted the torture and the liar to the head of the CIA. And he left the troops there.
	We didn't pull out the massive numbers of combat troops until 2021.
	I think it was April.
	And we've still got several thousand there.
	Supposedly, supposedly not combat troops.
	How do we know? Would the Pentagon tell us?
	Does Congress care?
	No. It's just amazing to me how people are just gaslighted by the media.
	Left, right, alternative, Tucker, all these people.
	Just lying up one side and down the other.
	Amazing to me.
	Yeah, we should be angry about what's going on with these wars.
	Trump didn't fix anything.
	He didn't get us out of Afghanistan, Iraq, any of this stuff.
	Oh, he didn't start any new wars.
	He didn't stop any of them.
	He kept them going.
	Meanwhile, some are questioning why American troops.
	What are they doing in Syria in the first place?
	A lot of people ask that on social media.
	At least 900 U.S. troops, plus an unknown amount of State Department personnel.
	That would be, of course, CIA, most likely.
	Contractors and intelligence personnel have occupied northeast Syria for years at this point.
	They control all of Syria's main oil and gas fields, which were vital for meeting the population's energy needs.
	Yeah, just take the oil.
	Take the oil. It's big.
	It's bigly. Yeah.
	Yeah. Spoils of war that we started.
	Looting Syrian oil, driving it across the border into Iraq.
	That's what is being done there.
	The Pentagon is using the Kurdish Forces as proxies.
	You know, like we're using Ukraine as proxies.
	Sporadic drone and rocket attacks on U.S. bases in Syria have resulted in dead and wounded U.S. personnel over the past year.
	And that's the only reason that you're hearing about it.
	Because they're starting to up their ability to take the war to us.
	So we have, as that is going on, and we have unlimited amounts of money that we want to spend on the wars, what do we spend on infrastructure?
	I mean, take a look at this I-95 collapse.
	Now, that didn't collapse. Because of infrastructure, that was a horrific accident with an oil tanker that killed the trucker.
	Went off the road there at an overpass and burst into flames and actually burned down the road there.
	I saw this happen when Karen and I, shortly after we got married, moved to Houston when we were there.
	That is a similar thing that happened in Houston, Texas.
	They have really high flyovers as part of their traffic patterns.
	And there was a motorcycle cop who decided that he would give a speeding ticket to an 18-wheeler and that he would do it on a curve, on a tight curve, on one of these high flyovers.
	And so he pulls the truck over.
	And he's going to give them a ticket, and somebody comes along and hits them.
	Killed the truck driver.
	Killed the person who hit him.
	Killed the cop. All of them died.
	And it created this massive fire, because it was an oil tanker.
	Massive fire that burned down the concrete and steel.
	They couldn't get it put out easily, not because it was up really high.
	That was a horrific accident.
	They had another situation in Houston close to where the exit would be to go to our home.
	And we have to tell everybody, well, there used to be a sign there, but a truck hit it and they haven't replaced it for years.
	Twisted poles where the sign used to be.
	So we told them, look out for these twisted poles and that's where you get off.
	It would be such and such a road.
	And this was in the days before there was GPS.
	So people were using paper maps and our verbal directions to find the home when relatives came to visit us.
	Anyway, so what is happening with this I-95 collapse?
	And as we all know, I-95 is one of the major arteries going north and south on the east coast.
	Booty Gay showed up.
	He learned his lesson, I guess, finally.
	Well, you know, I guess I should pretend I care.
	And so he says, it's going to be expensive and we've approved some emergency funds.
	And then he reminded everybody, That this is a disruption.
	They're going to have to do detours around it.
	He said that's going to raise shipping costs and so forth.
	Maybe he should remember that when he starts putting on his green mandates.
	You know, you start messing with trucking and you start messing with cars and everything.
	There's a real price associated with that.
	Maybe he should think about that in the future.
	But he's talking about it here.
	Tanker hauling thousands of gasoline, gallons of gasoline, flipped over the off-ramp, caught fire underneath the bridge, so intense that it caused one of the sections of the bridge to collapse.
	The Pennsylvania governor said it would take months to fix the damaged bridge.
	And so they've come up with a novel solution, actually.
	It's a Pennsylvania company.
	That makes a kind of aerated glass.
	They call it nuggets, but about the size of it is...
	I've got it here.
	I'll get to it in a second. Anyway, it's going to save a significant amount of time and money and weight.
	And it was something that they...
	Use for filler on roads.
	And so this is a Pennsylvania company.
	It was approved by their Department of Transportation.
	Now you've got a lot of states that are using it.
	And it's going to get a lot of attention with this, I think.
	They said they're going to truck in 2,000 tons of these lightweight glass nuggets to quickly rebuild the collapsed section.
	They'll be working 24 hours a day until they can reopen it.
	Instead of rebuilding the overpass right away, they will use recycled glass to To fill in the collapsed areas to avoid supply chain delays in material.
	And it's got a big gap there that's about 30 meters long, about 100 feet long, and about 150 feet wide.
	So they're going to put this recycled foam glass aggregate into the underpass area, bringing it up to the surface level, then paving it over so they can have three lanes of traffic reopen each way.
	But first they're going to demolish what is currently there.
	The company, I thought this was interesting, Aero Aggregates.
	They have a production site just south of Philadelphia.
	They mill glass bottles and jars taken from landfills into a powder.
	Then they heat it into a foam to produce small lightweight nuggets that are gray and look like rocks, but they are as light as styrofoam.
	This reminds me of the aircrete, right?
	Wasn't that what it's called? Aircrete?
	Yeah. We had a friend of ours who's going to build a home, he's building his home himself, using aircrete.
	It's very, very lightweight.
	It's like concrete blocks.
	It's got the strength of the concrete blocks, but you can cut it very easily with a saw.
	Again, it's incredibly lightweight.
	You can just cut it with a handsaw and piece of stuff in.
	The total weight to fill in this was going to be about 2,000 tons, a fraction of what it would be if they filled it in with sand or with dirt.
	It'll take a lot fewer trucks.
	It'll be a lot faster.
	And it's now being used by 23 state transportation departments around the country.
	I bet you could probably fill some potholes with that if they really wanted to.
	Just bring that stuff in and fill it up and then pave it over after you get it there.
	So it is interesting to see this.
	We'll see how long it takes them to rebuild this.
	It took about... Six or seven months for Russia to rebuild that bridge, one of the longest bridges in the world, that was bombed.
	You have to rebuild that thing over the water, even.
	So, we'll see what happens with this.
	It'll be an interesting metric to see how much is left in our country.
	You know, can we really get things done anymore?
	It looks like they're on the job, though.
	We had a suspect in Brooklyn, I'm sure you saw this, the mom who was pushing her three-year-old daughter in a stroller and attacked by this woman who passed her.
	It was a black woman wearing a blonde wig and maybe she just looked over and said, what are you looking at?
	I'll stab your daughter, you know, and takes out a knife.
	To stab the daughter, the mom gets, 34-year-old mom, gets between this woman and the 3-year-old child and got stabbed in the chest and multiple times in both legs.
	She's in stable condition and they have now arrested the suspect.
	And this is...
	And you know, when I look at this, I thought it was the same thing, but I'm not sure now when I look at it.
	I thought it was the same thing as another situation where a woman had a child in a stroller and was attacked from behind and was beaten, I thought.
	But maybe, I'm not sure if those are the same things.
	We have had Starbucks now had to pay $25 million to a manager that they fired for being white.
	And that's really what happened.
	This is at the height of all the Black Lives Matter stuff.
	This is back in April 2018.
	Two black men entered a Starbucks shop in Rittenhouse Square, neighborhood of Philadelphia, for a business meeting with a white man who had not yet arrived.
	While they waited, and before ordering, one of the two asked to use the bathroom, and he was refused.
	I don't understand what happened with that.
	You know, you've got a public bathroom, I would think.
	Why would you have to ask?
	Number one. Number two, I guess they looked at them and said, we don't think that you're customers.
	Anyway, it's an old case.
	I don't remember what happened when it was five years ago.
	They were asked to leave.
	And when they didn't, an employee called the police.
	So was this the manager of the store that was fired?
	Was this the person who said you can't use the bathroom?
	No, not at all. It truly is amazing when you see the story of why this person was fired.
	They said subsequent arrests captured in video viewed millions of times online prompted accusations of racism.
	It prompted protests and boycott threats.
	I remember that. The company's chief executive apologized publicly, said this was reprehensible.
	Starbucks took the extraordinary step of temporarily closing 8,000 stores to teach workers about racial bias.
	The employees said they were forced to watch video after video of white cops beating blacks as part of their racial bias training.
	Well, we just had a verdict on Monday.
	A federal jury in New Jersey ordered Starbucks to pay $25.6 million to a former regional manager after determining that the company had fired her amidst the fallout from the Rittenhouse Square episode because she was white.
	And that truly is not an overstatement.
	She said in the suit that Starbucks had sought to punish her and other white employees in and around Philadelphia, even if they had not been involved in the events that led to the police being called.
	She said one of her superiors, a black woman, told her to suspend a white manager who oversaw stores in Philadelphia, but did not oversee the store where this incident happened in Rittenhouse Square, to fire them because of allegations that she had to fire them because of allegations that she had engaged in discriminatory conduct, allegations that Ms. Phillips said she knew to be untrue.
	In contrast, she said no action, listen to this, no action was taken against the manager who oversaw the Rittenhouse Square store.
	So were the two black men asked to use the bathroom and were refused?
	And then it escalated and they got angry, I guess.
	And there's a back and forth between the employee.
	The employee called the police and they were taken out.
	The place where that happened, the manager had nothing done to him because the manager was black in that store.
	And not only that, But the black manager promoted the employee who told these two black men that they couldn't use the bathroom and then ultimately called the police on them.
	Ms. Phillips said she was fired not long after for balking at the order to suspend the white manager who she said had not done anything wrong.
	And so now Starbucks is paying $25 million in damage.
	It's kind of interesting.
	Starbucks is now taking out a lot of rainbow stuff.
	Pride merchandise out of the windows and all the rest of this stuff.
	Florida has passed a digital bill of rights that is going to require Google to disclose if they prioritize search results based on political bias.
	Well, that's what search engines have become.
	They've been designed now to hide things.
	And Reed Hendricks said, we don't declare war anymore in order to gaslight uninformed or uninvolved people.
	That's right. That's right.
	Yeah. They tried to escalate the...
	The Syria thing, in a big way, while Trump was president.
	And he did fire a bunch of missiles, if you remember.
	Remember that? But fortunately, backed off before he went any further.
	The Feds are now buying massive amounts of information.
	And so part of this bill in Florida is to make sure that this deputized state doesn't get even more directly mercenary.
	And so this bill in Florida is the right to control personal data, to delete your personal data from a social platform, the right to know that your personal data will not be used against you when purchasing a home, obtaining health insurance, or being hired.
	No, it'll just be used against you by the FBI, as I heard yesterday, right?
	Stephen Friend. The FBI whistleblower.
	Yeah, they've got all that information.
	And even if you get this deleted by Google, most of it's already been sold, but it can be scraped off.
	And it's being scraped off and stored by the NSA, by the rest of these people.
	Even if it's encrypted, they're scraping it off and storing stuff.
	They're going everywhere. It's all an open book to them.
	And if they can't get through the encryption right now, They're storing it to decode it later when the computers get faster.
	And there's not really anything you can do about it.
	I think the most important thing out of this bill, Wine Press reported, said, well, this is really...
	Just DeSantis virtue signaling about doing this, but it's not going to make any real difference because your information is there, it's already been stored, and they're seeing everything that you do on the internet.
	However, there's one aspect of this that I think is important.
	At least at the state level, this will prohibit government employees from using their position to communicate with social media platforms To get them to remove content or to remove accounts from the platform.
	And I think this is a very important thing to do.
	We can at least stop this or criminalize it.
	You're not going to stop it, but you can criminalize.
	Government employees working in tandem with these social media people and then using them as a plausible deniability, using them as a beard.
	That's what we've seen for the longest time.
	And so I think that's important.
	A government entity may not initiate or maintain any agreements or working relationships with social media platforms for the purpose of content moderation.
	I think that's a very important thing.
	And that is something that...
	something can be done about.
	So... Again, everything is online.
	To have transparency about how they're ranking things and stuff, that's not going to happen either.
	If anything, that'll be challenged in court because that's proprietary.
	They don't want you to know how they're ranking stuff.
	But I think the fact that there would be something there to keep the government employees from doing that, I think that is important.
	A key prohibition to prohibit the government employees from acting.
	As we look at artificial intelligence and chat GPT, you may not be aware of it, but you had a pro-free speech anti-censorship web browser called Tusk.
	And, you know, Tusk as in elephant, as in GOP. And the person who runs it created a chatbot called Gipper to honor Ronald Reagan.
	They did that back in May.
	The problem is that he built it on top of OpenAI, their chatbot, their chat GPT. And they're very angry about that, and they demanded that he skew it with a bias, their particular bias.
	Gipper is a modified version of chat GPT, provides users with answers from a conservative perspective.
	But they said that That does not, quote, conform to the requirements for what can or cannot be said, unquote.
	So OpenAI told them you're not in compliance with the policies.
	They're specifically related to deceptive activity and coordinated inauthentic behavior.
	Well, inauthentic behavior, deceptive answers, is exactly what you get from ChatGPT if you ask it anything about politics or the pandemic or the climate or any of that stuff.
	It's heavily biased with a heavy left-wing bias.
	And so they're saying the Gipper bot had been modified to not be highly biased in favor of a leftist agenda.
	And they said that is something that seems to be of critical importance to open AI. And of course it is.
	And that's why the CEO was invited in To Congress and allowed to pontificate about how important his product was so they could pump the stock up.
	And how this was such a critical thing that it had to be restricted and licensed by the government.
	Now, that tells you everything that you need to know, doesn't it?
	They want a little monopoly there and they'll do everything the government wants to do if they give them their monopoly.
	So it said Tusk had produced the only AI bot in operation.
	Which was actually fair and balanced and did not promote a radical leftist agenda.
	So, it doesn't say that it was promoting a positive agenda, but if we would just get rid of the heavy skewing of open AI, that'd be a big advantage.
	It's time for a truthful AI chatbot to take the market by storm.
	Remove the barriers that the radical left and big tech have put in place to allow all conservatives to enjoy the benefits of AI without fear of being canceled or shamed for your beliefs.
	Well, again, it remains to be seen whether any of these things are ever going to be trustworthy.
	They can swing the pendulum from one side to the other.
	But maybe what they should do, we're probably going to have a new medical standard chatbot.
	And I guess they could call it Fouch AI. And it'll tell you all the science that you need to know, right?
	Jason Barker. You can use just about anything as aggregate for Crete.
	I've seen rubber chips used before to make flexible Crete.
	They're pretty amazing. Yeah, that's right.
	They do that in a lot of recycled material in roads and different places.
	Starbucks CEO said, if you're not for marriage equality, don't drink our coffee, said Burt Stanton.
	Well, I guess that's why I don't drink their coffee, besides the fact that it's highly overpriced.
	CIA is still trying to keep spying going on U.S. citizens.
	The headline from Gizmodo says they want to keep spying on U.S. citizens legal.
	The problem is it's not legal.
	The problem is that they've taken the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which was created to stop them from spying on American citizens, to stop them from spying on foreign citizens in the U.S. without a search warrant.
	And so to try to say, well, but we got national security, and that's the thing that the government is all about is national security.
	So what are we going to do about this?
	They created the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, said we're going to have one judge, one court, you're going to go to him for your search warrant.
	So he does, and he gets a search warrant for Mr.
	and Mrs. Verizon. The thing that was supposed to stop the CIA and the NSA from spying on American citizens without a warrant, which is what they had been doing from the very beginning, which is why there was a church hearing in the Senate, And the pie carrying in the house, the very thing that was supposed to prohibit that and stop that has now been used as a tool, a weaponized tool.
	Everything that you do with the federal government, they invert it, they pervert it, they turn it inside out.
	If it's used as a prohibition, they use it as a weapon instead.
	And that's where we are with this.
	It's supposed to be a restriction of surveillance, but instead it gives them a green light to do this in secret.
	They're first introduced, they said, as a means to quickly target foreign espionage.
	This Section 702 has become something else entirely according to critics who argue the government routinely uses the provision to collect communication information of Americans who may have had communications with a surveillance target outside of the U.S. intelligence officials.
	And this is the other game they play with it.
	You're all familiar with the Six Degrees of Separation, the Kevin Bacon game, you know, where they say, well, you can take Kevin Bacon...
	And, you know, he was in a movie with so-and-so, and then look at who that person was in movies with, and by the time you do six skips, you pretty much got everybody in Hollywood.
	And it's not just Kevin Bacon.
	There's nothing that special about him.
	I mean, he did several movies.
	But, you know, he could do that about anybody who was working regularly in Hollywood.
	And that's what these people are doing.
	They can go several different skips from a person of interest and pretty much get anybody that they want.
	It's the six degrees of separation Kevin Bacon rule that the NSA uses to get people...
	You know, we look at our government, we look at how paranoid it is.
	How tyrannical it is.
	And it's to the extent they're so paranoid and tyrannical that they now want to regulate airsoft guns.
	I don't know, I guess they're not covered under the Second Amendment.
	You know, the founders didn't have airsoft guns.
	So yes, absolutely not included.
	They did have cannons, however.
	Local airsoft store says this is perhaps going to put them out of business and may stop the hobby.
	And this is an interesting story because of the way these regulations are being put out.
	Some people report, well, it's going to be a new law.
	And of course, it's not a new law.
	It's a regulation.
	It's a rule. It's a rule that's being produced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
	It has absolutely nothing to do with the safety of the airsoft guns.
	They're not dangerous. They shoot these lightweight little projectiles.
	They try to make them look like real guns because it's a toy.
	It's a fun thing.
	People get together and organize and have laser tag types of stuff or paintball type of guns or something like that.
	They do that with Airsoft as well.
	And so it has absolutely nothing to do with people getting hurt.
	This is just that they demand that they not look like guns.
	And now it has to be certified by a third party that they do not look like real guns.
	For years and years, they've had the requirement that you have a bright orange tip on it like they have for toy guns.
	But now they want something else.
	It's a bit vague. There is no third party certification that's going to be available out there.
	But they announced this rule back at the end of May, and they're going to be doing it in June.
	So, you know, no time to waste on this.
	And we've got to move right ahead.
	But it's typical of the arrogance of the regulatory state.
	And the Consumer Product Safety Commission, this is another monster that was birthed by Richard Nixon.
	And it is, as I like to say, an independent agency.
	So what does that mean?
	Well, it means that it is a federal bureaucracy that is independent of the executive branch.
	And that means that if it's underneath the executive branch, if it's something like the EPA, for example, which was also created by Nixon, They can replace the head of the EPA for no reason at all.
	I just don't like this guy.
	You know, you saw Trump doing stuff like that all the time.
	So you can get rid of those people if they're under the executive branch.
	You can get rid of them, of course, for cause because there's a problem with what they're doing or they committed crimes or something like that.
	But for an independent agency, the only way that you can get rid of the people that are running it is for cause if there is some kind of misconduct.
	That's how they're independent.
	They're actually more independent than that.
	Typical example of independent agencies, FDIC, the SEC, the Consumer Financial Protection Board that was created by Barney Frank and Elizabeth Warren.
	And that is...
	It does not protect consumers.
	What it did was it closed down small and medium-sized banks by burdening them with regulations and paperwork that they couldn't handle, that only the biggest banks could handle.
	It's done exactly the opposite.
	But that's one of the reasons why, after the first head of the CFPB stepped down, he appointed his successor.
	I said, you can't do that. Remember, that happened in the Trump administration.
	I said, well, I can do whatever I want.
	We're independent. It's like, oh, no, we appoint the head because, see, the Federal Reserve is portrayed, even though it's a private corporation, it is portrayed as an independent agency.
	Now, they're even more independent than these other ones are.
	But you can't get rid of the head of the Federal Reserve except for cause.
	I don't think anybody's ever been taken out for cause, although we have ample reason to remove these people.
	If you look at what they've done to the economy and the monetary supply and the interest rates and the rest of the stuff, if anybody's going to be taken out for cause, it'd be these heads of the Federal Reserve, but they don't do anything about it.
	Anyway, nothing has been done about these airsoft rules for 30 years.
	One person who has a company that sells the airsoft guns says there are going to be new regulations that are going to be imposed on us by this agency, and we don't even know what they are yet.
	So it's a blanket that is cast over us to incorporate us under their ruling.
	So if we miss the Christmas season or anything like that, it puts us in a huge financial position and probably will make us have to close.
	He said COVID was a huge hurdle, but this is something completely different.
	This is our inability to sell or operate with airsoft guns at all.
	It was even worse than the Trump lockdown.
	And so this is, yeah, I was right, this was put out in May, May 10th.
	They proposed a new rule.
	They give people a 30-day comment period.
	That ended on the 12th of June.
	And unless they change their mind, the new regulation begins June the 26th.
	They're dictators, you see?
	And I talk about this because the real issue is we've got to end this kind of dictatorial bureaucracy.
	They put it out there. You have a 30-day comment period.
	Well, yeah. Great.
	Comment all you want.
	We'll make the final decision.
	And we'll do whatever we wish.
	Unelected. Unaccountable.
	We have regulation without representation.
	We have taxation without representation.
	And I think there might be something else about this.
	I looked at this and thought, why are they focusing on airsoft guns?
	And why? Because the key, like I said, hasn't been changed for 30 years.
	And it was just a little orange tip.
	But now they're very, very, very concerned about its appearance.
	And so I looked at that and I thought, so are they getting ready to ramp up The use of biometric surveillance to look for guns?
	Is that what it is?
	And are they worried that they're going to be coming after people with toy guns and mistaking them and have egg on their face for doing that?
	I think that's very likely that it is something like this.
	I think that when they're so obsessed about the appearance of these airsoft guns looking like real guns, I think that's something of a tip-off They're going to do something that's going to be based on looking for real guns.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Making sense.
	Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Oh yeah, putting that thing together made me want to see the movie.
	Makes me want to see it when I watch that as well.
	I'm going to take off Monday for Father's Day.
	And I just need a break.
	And maybe we'll have some time to watch that.
	I don't know. We had some comments here about Starbucks removing the gay stuff.
	KWD68 says, yeah, the Bud Light effect.
	They don't want to become famous with their single tall latte that they have there, whatever.
	And my son says, if they start using AI to identify guns, will criminals start painting their guns like toy blasters?
	Probably will. It's going to be rainbow colors, probably.
	They'll get a pass.
	You have a rainbow colored gun, you're going to be just fine, even if it's real.
	They'll give you a pass.
	Obama's personal investment deals mirror tax strategies that he criticized.
	Absolute total hypocrisy with all these people.
	Barack Obama campaigned extensively during his presidency to eliminate the carried interest loophole.
	It's a tax strategy that allows billionaire investors to evade ordinary income taxes.
	And now that he's a He's a community organizer.
	He didn't have any job.
	He didn't create anything.
	He didn't build anything, provide any services.
	He's a community organizer.
	He's a communist organizer.
	He goes from communist organizer to billionaire.
	Just amazing, isn't it?
	But of course, that's the way communists work.
	That's the whole point of being a communist leader.
	If they steal your stuff, it's like kleptocracy system.
	Obama, while in office, said that this loophole, which he's now using, Leads to, quote, folks who are doing very well paying lower rates than their secretaries.
	But since leaving the presidency, he's been using it extensively.
	One example of this is his strategic partnership with MBA Africa.
	It was announced in July 2021 as part of the expansion of Africa's largest men's basketball league.
	According to private information, you know all this stuff about Michelle Obama being a transgender.
	She could run the league, I don't know.
	But, you know, I'm not going to go there.
	There's so much that's genuine that you should have a problem with Michelle Obama.
	Uh, this, as far as I'm concerned, this smacks of a clickbait disinformation campaign from, uh, the CIA type of people like Steve Buchenich.
	They would love for everybody to go all in, uh, on Michelle Obama being a transgender.
	And if you believe that, you know, whatever, don't tell me about it.
	Uh, I'm just saying that, uh, understand that's a pretty shaky thing right now.
	And if they can rope you in on that, they can thoroughly discredit you by pulling that rug out from underneath you.
	Anyway, one example of this is Obama's strategic partnership with the NBA thing.
	And with that, he gets a profit-interest share, which means he doesn't have to put anything down.
	And then later on, he can, as the thing goes up in value, he can get paid.
	And then he has this taxed at a capital gains rate of 20%.
	But of course, you know, he's also got his mansions on the ocean front, and he doesn't have to worry about them being underwater, even though, you know, you can go to these websites and you can say, based on climate change and the rising sea levels that you have predicted in your computer model, show us the areas that are going to be underwater while all these areas were...
	You know, he and Biden and all these other people buying oceanfront property that's very expensive.
	They're all supposed to be underwater according to these predictions.
	But they're not worried about that at all.
	As a matter of fact, it's kind of interesting.
	This is a story from CNN. A 1,000-year-old citadel rises out of the Atlantic Ocean.
	And that was the key. The way they did that headline got my attention.
	It's rising out of the ocean.
	But I thought the oceans were rising.
	Well, it turns out it's not rising, it's not falling.
	The oceans are not rising and not falling.
	The oceans are exactly where they were a thousand years ago.
	Yeah, show some of the pictures of this.
	It's kind of interesting.
	Exactly a thousand years ago, this month, construction started on a magnificent island building off of the coast of France that as it rose improbably from the choppy waters of the Atlantic Ocean would become a lasting symbol of national fortitude.
	And CNN forgot to put this in there, but I'll add it.
	And also is a lasting symbol of climate change denial because the sea level is still the same as it was a thousand years ago.
	The medieval abbey atop Mont Saint-Michel, a cascade of walls and buttresses, descending from a lofty central spire, was a spectacular creation which played a crucial role in French history over the centuries.
	Today, it marks a thousand years since work began, one of the country's most popular tourist attractions outside of Paris.
	In the span of a thousand years, its silhouette has become an emblem of French universalism, said Macron, this abbey, the symbol of what we are, a people of builders.
	And the static water level there, of course it changes with tides coming in and out, but it hasn't been flooded for over a thousand years.
	So it is also a symbol to deny the lies that he is involved in.
	So they said when the tide rolls in, it emerges out of the water like a French Atlantis, an architectural wonder set in beautiful landscape.
	And UNESCO made it a World Heritage Site in 1979.
	A marriage of human genius and nature, said Macron.
	And then CNN says this, in efforts to increase sustainability...
	Buses connecting the site will now be running on biofuels rather than diesel.
	You don't have to do that.
	It's been able to go through the Industrial Revolution and everything else, and it's just fine.
	Obama's seaside mansion is going to be just fine in terms of he doesn't have anything to worry about with rising water, and neither does this thing.
	As a matter of fact, the Industrial Revolution...
	It has had a minimal effect on atmospheric CO2. This is an article from American Thinker.
	I said there's a new study that was behind a firewall.
	It was done in February 2022, and they kept it behind a firewall, but it's just come out from behind the firewall, and it has created a big stir.
	The publication that had it was called Health Physics.
	And the writer says, it sounds like a new age magazine dedicated to the health-giving properties of vegan or bug diets, but it's not.
	Health physics was founded in 1956 to study radiation safety and radiation's role in health care.
	And so what they did was, because they're about radiation, they're looking at carbon-14, a radioactive isotope of carbon.
	And so they looked at...
	Carbon-14 and its CO2. And this is their paper.
	They said, From 1750 to 2018.
	And when they talk about anthropogenic, that means man-made climate warming.
	So the man-made fossil component they're looking at from 1750 to 2018.
	Three authors from the University of Massachusetts, Lowell.
	According to the study...
	They said it is true that CO2 began to increase a bit with the Industrial Revolution.
	However, the increase in CO2 because of human fossil fuel use has been negligible and could not have caused the climate to change.
	They said claims that all or most of the increase in CO2 since 1800 has been due to anthropogenic fossil component have continued since they began making these claims in 1960 with the Keeling curve.
	Increase in CO2 from burning fossil fuel, they said.
	But this is not true.
	They said concentration of the two components and their changes from 1750 was what they looked at.
	They said the specific activity of carbon-14 in the atmosphere gets reduced by a dilution effect when fossil CO2 is devoid of carbon-14 and enters the atmosphere.
	We have used results of this effect to quantify the two components.
	All results covering the period from 1750 to 2018 were in their table plotted out.
	Here's the summary. These results negate claims that the increase in carbon since 1800 has been dominated by the increase of the anthropogenic fossil component.
	Due to the use of fossil fuels from 1750 to 2018, increased from 0% in 1750 to 12% in 2018, much too low to be the cause of global warming.
	And of course, the amount of CO2 completely in the atmosphere is only 0.04%.
	And we have seen the carbon content go up, and we've seen the CO2 go up, but we've not seen the temperatures go up.
	And the two were supposed to drive an increase in temperature, according to them, according to what we were told decades ago.
	That's one of the reasons why you had ClimateGate.
	They said, how do we hide this decline?
	Because it's not going up. It's actually declining.
	Let me play for you. Now, that's the CO2. They're looking at the CO2, and they say, well, we're not seeing that kind of an increase in CO2 that could have any effect from the Industrial Revolution on.
	But there's also a way to look at the temperatures.
	This is being done with ice cores.
	And I'll just play for you a little bit of this clip.
	It's about four or five minutes, so I'm only going to play about half of it.
	This ice is from the Viking Age, around the year 1000, also called the medieval warm period.
	We believe that in Greenland the medieval warm period was about one and a half degrees warmer on average than today.
	Nordgrip, the Greenland ice core project, is being reopened to drill the last few meters through the ice sheet to the rock beneath the research station.
	The ice core, over three kilometers in length, has been hauled up to the surface piece by piece and contains important data on the history of the climate of the Earth.
	It bears the fingerprints of climatic conditions over more than 120,000 years.
	When we remove or drill the ice core, we leave a hole.
	And we insert a thermometer in the hole, we are able to map out the temperature through the three kilometer ice sheet.
	Now that temperature, if we do it precisely enough, a thousandth of a degree accuracy, then the ice has not forgotten how cold or warm it was on the surface at the time the snow fell.
	So, using those temperatures, we have been able to reconstruct the temperatures of the last 10,000 meters.
	Here we have our picture of the temperature reconstructions that we have from Greenland in the graphical form.
	And if we go back along this axis, it's going back in time.
	This is the last 8,000 years we have plotted here.
	On this axis we have the temperatures at the sites in Greenland and we can see that if we go back from now about 4,000 years ago, we would have temperatures up here for about 4,000 years That were two and a half degrees warmer on average than today.
	Hear that?
	Two and a half degrees warmer. In the period between 4,000 years ago and back to the period 2,000 years ago, which is actually the Roman age, the temperatures have been decreasing in Greenland by two and a half degrees.
	Then the temperatures increased gradually up to a maximum point around the medieval warm period, we call it a thousand years ago, and then temperatures declined and goes down to a minimum around 1650 A.D., comes back up a little in the 18th century, and then around 1875 we have the lowest point in the last 8,000 years, right here, and that matches exactly the time when meteorological observations started.
	Yeah, and that's what I wanted you to see with that chart.
	So they have this long plateau that lasted for thousands of years according to their ice core measurements that shows a couple of degrees warmer.
	And then it begins this decline that lasts for quite some time.
	Roman times, a couple thousand years ago.
	And then you have a medieval warming period.
	And then it drops back down again.
	And then it starts to go up again.
	And they very carefully ignore that medieval warming period.
	And of course you can see it in ice cores.
	You can see it in other things that they have seen.
	Some of the trees in terms of some of the medieval stuff.
	But... You can see that they're cherry-picking their starting point to have a warming trend.
	And you can see that the Earth was quite a bit warmer, quite a bit before we had the 250 years of the Industrial Revolution.
	Jason Barker says, It claims that the sea levels have risen 9 to 12 inches since the Industrial Revolution.
	So just forget about that medieval castle there that's become a symbol of France.
	It doesn't exist anymore.
	It's been flooded out.
	It's just amazing to me.
	We look at this and we laugh at this AI chatbot garbage, this hallucination.
	And I tell you, when I see that kind of stuff, it doesn't make me feel too good about people using it to design real-world stuff.
	At what point is it going to go off the rails?
	You know, it can look really, really good and then it just completely goes off the rails.
	And so, we look at that and we laugh.
	But the upcoming generations are going to bow down before that as if it is the gospel truth.
	And that's what's really scary about AI to me.
	The power to deceive.
	And, of course, the power to help go through this data and identify people.
	And, of course, it's going to be hallucinating about suspects as well.
	When they start using it as a police state, when they start using it to control weapons autonomously, it's going to be making big mistakes just like that.
	But they're just fine with that.
	Yeah, KWD68 says, if science doesn't prove climate insanity, then it's flawed.
	Yeah, the burden of proof is on them.
	The problem is, is that their models for the last 50 years have been proven wrong, just by experience.
	And they have always run this whole thing on the scam of...
	Arguing from authority. Look, I am a prestigious professor at a well-known university, and this is what I say.
	Here's a collection of scientists, and here's what they say.
	And that's why I said that's one of the things that they played on us throughout this pandemic.
	They've been doing that with climate stuff for the longest time.
	Oh, you're fake. You're disinformation.
	You're a denier.
	It's like, no, call me a climate infidel because what you're really talking about is I don't believe your stuff.
	Science isn't about believing.
	Science is about you proving what you say is true.
	And part of that is showing me your data.
	And when they fight like tooth and nail to keep their data hidden and we're successful in doing it, then I don't, you know, that's the key thing that we've got to fight against.
	And that is not get drawn into this trap of saying, okay, well, what do we do to stay within your imaginary climate change parameters that we don't increase the temperature by one to one and a half degrees centigrade?
	What do we have to do?
	Well, I think I can do it better this way.
	And why can't I do this? Because I think I can still stay within your parameters.
	Don't let them set these fake terms of debate.
	Don't let them set these terms of existential existence either.
	Walmart is building a new meat processing plant.
	Yeah, it turns out that, I'm going to say this first here, Atomic Dog says, I notice most climate alarmists start their warming trend after the mini ice age, which was between 1300 and 1800.
	Yeah, that's right. And yeah, they skipped the medieval warming period as well.
	So this article here on Zero Hedge says COVID sparked beef and pork shortages.
	Did it really? I mean, did this pandemic kill all of our cows and pigs and stuff like that?
	Well, no, actually. It wasn't COVID. It didn't do anything.
	It wasn't a real pandemic. It was Trump.
	Trump sparked beef and pork shortages because Trump locked us down before anybody had even died with this stuff.
	It wasn't... I've seen worse epidemics of stomach bugs going through the homeschool co-op than I have of COVID. It was their medical malpractice that he paid them to do.
	There was no pandemic when he locked us down.
	And there never was any pandemic.
	And even these people are going around saying, well, look at how many people have it according to my PCR test.
	Even by that metric, it's been disproven that the lockdowns did anything.
	So this is another one of my pet peeves.
	Just like these people say, well, I think I can comply with these emissions if I do this and that.
	No. And COVID didn't do anything to us.
	Trump and the other politicians did it.
	Forced dozens of meat packers across the U.S. to shut down.
	Walmart said, well, we don't want that to happen again.
	There's only four companies that control about 85% of U.S. beef processing capacity.
	So we don't want that to happen again.
	So they're going to set up their own beef processing plants, meat processing plants.
	And the next time this medical martial law is pulled on us, or the climate lockdown, or whatever they want to do, the next time that happens, Walmart is going to be even more essential than they were this last time.
	I said, that's one of the things that really made me angry.
	This lockdown. Trump telling people they were not essential.
	You know, we had video stores for about a dozen years.
	And one of our videos, we only had a situation, every time we would have a major snowstorm, I would get in a four-wheel drive Jeep and I'd just spend it ferrying employees back and forth.
	You know, they'd say, I can't get to work.
	I said, where do you live? I'll come pick you up.
	Because people would find a way to get the video store.
	They didn't want to go.
	They get the video store and they get to the grocery store to get milk and bread and they go get a movie.
	They may not be able to make it anywhere else, but they could go there.
	And that's the case with our employees.
	I said, I'll come get you. And so we always kept them open.
	There was only one time that we closed and that was after Hurricane Fran came through and it had a massive amount of rain.
	That it prepared the ground with.
	And then it had winds that were up to like 75 miles an hour.
	It wasn't even hurricane force by the time it got that far inland.
	But it knocked over a lot of trees.
	It knocked over trees that were more than 100 years old.
	And took out power lines everywhere.
	It took a very long time to get power back.
	One of our stores did get power back after a couple of days.
	And so those neighborhoods around there had power.
	We had power. So we went down and we opened up the store.
	And we ran it until that evening, and then traffic died down.
	And we had some police officers come in and say, you've got to shut your store.
	I said, why? Walmart across the street is open.
	Why do I have to shut down my store?
	Well, that's Walmart. They're essential.
	And I told you, Trump said that about you're not essential?
	Oh, that really struck a nerve with me.
	Don't tell me that I'm not essential.
	Son of a gun. Son of a gun.
	Just like that cop.
	So, yeah, Walmart wants to avoid this.
	They want to be even more central. They're going to be even biglier next time, aren't they?
	Next time this BS is pulled by Trump or some other stooge of the global world order.
	Yeah, Mr. Peacenic, give me a break.
	Give me a break.
	Trump is not about peace.
	He went to war with us, as all of you said yesterday.
	You're right about it. So Biden, meanwhile, is continuing to drain the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
	They said when they started doing it before the election, they said that they would refill it when the reserve prices were at or below $67 to $72 per barrel.
	But it's been way below that for quite some time, and they've done absolutely nothing about it.
	Since then, oil prices have fallen far below without as much as a squeak from Biden's energy guru, Hunter.
	This is not his son, Hunter.
	It's some other Hunter.
	And he can't hunt up any new petroleum to put in there.
	Maybe they could just steal it from Syria and put it in their petroleum reserves, but they're not doing that either.
	And so, nevertheless, even though Biden doesn't want us to have a petroleum reserve, the oil companies have found a new purpose in life.
	Exxon, Shell are saying, you know, we were told that we were going to be going out of business in a few years, but we kind of think that ain't going to happen now.
	And they said, what we have learned from Biden's sanctions...
	Or just how vital the existing power plants are.
	Fossil fuel, but they want to call it fossil fuel.
	It's not fossil fuel. But anyway, what they want to call fossil fuel.
	They said this is vital and it's not going to go anywhere.
	Exxon says, you know, if you want to go to net zero by 2050, that would mean a collapse in the global standard of living.
	Unfortunately, that's what these people want.
	Exxon doesn't think we're going to put up with it.
	But that's the plan. And if we know that that's the plan, and if we know that that's what they want to do to us, we can stop it.
	But only if people wake up to this.
	It's just like the CBDC thing, the poll that was put out by the Cato Institute, I think.
	And they asked people, you know, what do you think about it?
	More than half the people didn't know what they were talking about.
	But when they went down line by line and talked about what it would do, oh, I don't like that.
	Oh, I don't like that.
	If you know what this net zero is going to do, you're not going to like it.
	And if you know what CBDC is going to do, you're not going to accept that either.
	And so ExxonMobil became the first corporation to denounce The laughable claims that net zero is even a remote possibility by 2050.
	Exxon said the prospect of the world achieving that by 2050 is remote, and we're not even going to evaluate that any further in our financial statements.
	This came up because a shareholder proposal sought a report on the cost of having to abandon projects and said Exxon could face material financial risks from the net zero scenario.
	Exxon disagreed.
	And understand, they've got to be pretty confident about this because if they project some stuff out there that is not at all true and they can't back it up, the SEC will come after them, right?
	Oh, you gave people this rosy scenario that you don't have any way to defend that.
	You're deceiving people and pumping up the value of your stock.
	Exxon disagreed.
	They said the world is not on a path to achieve net zero emissions by 2050.
	As limiting energy production to levels below consumption demand would lead to a spike in energy prices, as we have seen in Europe following Biden's sanctions against Russia over Ukraine.
	Exxon is correct that it won't stop the green fanatics from beating the drum that somehow the world can transition to a green energy thing, but they're going to continue saying that we can do that, but they said here's the real world.
	That's not going to happen.
	And they're not the only ones. Shell is going to raise its dividend by 15% as it is doubling down on oil and gas.
	Back in 2021, Shell said that its oil production peaked in 2019 and said, we're looking at a continual decline over the next three decades as they look toward the 2050 net zero.
	They said, well, that's it. Our business is over.
	They were saying in 2021. However, When we see what Biden did, wouldn't this be amazing, this guy who is all about the Green New Deal, the unintended consequences of his warmongering sanctions are basically killing this whole idea of the Green mandates because they sped it up too fast.
	Right? They didn't boil the frogs slowly enough.
	And if we don't wake up to this, we're not going to have enough energy to boil a pot of water.
	That's what they want. They want to take us back to the Stone Age.
	And people are saying, I don't think I want that.
	It's not deterring Biden from trying to go through with his mandates and all the rest of this stuff.
	This is one of the reasons why I say don't freak out Based on who's in Washington.
	It's just the different ways that they're going to come after us.
	And sometimes what Biden does when he comes out with this authoritarian mandate to get vaccinated, or when he starts pushing really, really hard on this green agenda and on sanctions and things like that, it can actually have a blowback effect.
	It can wake people up.
	The Republicans go very slowly on these things.
	And what I said to people about, people said, well, you better hope that Trump gets elected because Biden's going to mandate these vaccines.
	I said, well, if he mandates the vaccines, it's going to wake people up to what's going on.
	There's going to be pushback against it.
	And, you know, and that's what happened.
	With Trump, I think Trump would have been more effective.
	I think Trump would have done it, for the most part, through corporations.
	Just as they ran the censorship through corporations and are still running the censorship through corporations.
	But take people a very long time to wake up to the fact that the corporations were a front for what the government wanted to do.
	And it was happening under Trump.
	And so they would have incentivized it.
	They would have used more incentives rather than coercion.
	You know, it was Mike DeWine, who was the governor of Ohio, who came up with a million-dollar lottery for people if you get the jab.
	You know, the Republicans were all about bribing you, incentivizing you.
	We got lotteries. We got this.
	We got that. Democrats are out there.
	Yeah, we can do whatever we want.
	And they're out there on their power trip.
	I order you to do this.
	I order you to do that.
	Calling up each other like you see this person that Biden wants to use to replace Rochelle Walensky at the CDC. Yeah, I called up these other state health officials.
	Are you going to let them do this?
	Well, then neither am I. Are you going to shut them down so they can't do it?
	Well, I am too.
	Right? That's the way this thing was running.
	They were just on this power trip.
	And that helped to wake people up.
	Anyway, the post-COVID rebound in oil and gas demand and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, with the subsequent major dislocation of energy trade, has shown, quote, the fragility of the energy system when we starve it of the supply that is required, said the Shell CEO. So they plan to have their oil production decline by up to 2% each decade, each year this decade.
	They said, well, we're rethinking that now.
	We may not have oil production decline.
	So I think that's a very positive development when we look at that.
	One last thing before we take a break.
	The World Economic Forum, of course, is very proud when we look at this 2050 thing.
	They want to reduce private car ownership by 76%.
	And let me say, it's going to be less than that.
	For them to get to net zero, it's going to be net zero cars.
	Nobody's going to have... A car unless you are somebody that's part of the elite.
	And in that particular case, because, and you won't even have an electric car.
	Because they'll tell you, they don't have enough energy for the grid if we let them go through this system.
	There'll be a few elite people who'll have electric cars, who'll have private jets, they can go anywhere they want and have their conferences and their parties, and they can drive around on these empty roads because you'll all be off of them.
	They want everything to be owned and operated by them.
	As the world economic forfeiture class says, they want communal travel.
	They want everything owned publicly.
	Communist travel.
	Like I said, I had that one person, the Raleigh City Council, came back from Moscow before the Soviet Union fell.
	She said, we need to have a rail system here in this little town of Raleigh, North Carolina.
	We need to have a light rail system.
	I just got back from Moscow.
	And you can go anywhere in Moscow for a nickel.
	And I said, it cost them everything.
	everything.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Geesebusters, thank you very much for the tip on...
	That's Rumble, isn't it?
	Yeah, thank you. Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that. He said, David, thanks for reminding us every day what this baby-killing traitor did to our country, this con artist.
	Yeah. And we're not just talking about abortion, right?
	Which he thinks that we need to federalize that again.
	After we finally got control of it with the Tenth Amendment, we got people like Trump and Lindsey Graham on the Republican side, and of course all the Democrats, saying we've got to federalize this thing again.
	And then they're going to be using that.
	Vote for me and I'll set the threshold where we can kill babies at this level or that level, right?
	They wanted a federal issue again because it empowers them.
	Just like they want to run all your transportation.
	But he killed a lot of babies, a lot of babies with his vaccines.
	Killed a lot of toddlers with his vaccine.
	Peter Singer must be so happy with Trump.
	I think it's one of the reasons why they're giving him all these charges.
	It's because they want to see him get re-elected.
	Have you ever thought about whether this lifelong Democrat, Donald Trump, who's always a friend of Epstein and Hillary Clinton and all the rest of it, have you ever thought that maybe he's like a double agent?
	Because it's been Civil War...
	Inside the Republican Party since he was there.
	And it's going to be civil war throughout the primary.
	I had an interview yesterday with Sean of UNN in the UK. And that was one of the questions, you know, he wanted to say, you know, who do you think is going to win?
	I said, well, I said, I'm voting for sheriff.
	That's where I'm putting my efforts here locally on my ballot thing.
	I said, if there's somebody running for sheriff that I like, I'll show up and vote.
	Or local elections.
	But I said, when I was in Texas, I didn't vote because there wasn't anybody in the sheriff who had locked us down.
	But I said, it's going to be a complete civil war on the Republican side.
	And the Democrats know that.
	And Trump is just going to create absolute chaos.
	He's going to trash anybody that's not Trump.
	He absolutely cannot win re-election.
	He's not going to get the independents.
	He may be unbelievably popular with the Republican base.
	Run away with the Republican base, but he can't win the general.
	I really don't think so. Chris Christie is talking about that.
	And it says he hasn't won anything since 2016.
	Well, I promise Chris Christie hasn't won anything since 2013 either.
	So, you know, we don't have a really strong field on the Republican side.
	And I said, and I'm not endorsing anybody, but I said, I think with all this bickering that is going on with the Republicans all around Trump and the way that the Democrats are charging him with his stuff and elevating him, I said, while this is happening, you've got RFK Jr., which is hanging out quietly, not being vetted, because there's a lot of issues with RFK Jr.
	as well. But he's talking about, you know, Free speech and not having vaccine mandates and peace and all this other kind of stuff.
	And he can talk about that a lot more credibly for most people.
	Again, I have problems with the fact that it was just a few years ago that he wanted to lock up people who were climate deniers.
	And he hasn't talked about that.
	You know, he vaccinates his own kids.
	He had a party where, you know, it was his wife's idea, he said, where you had to show your vaccine certificate to go to the Christmas party, you know, when all this stuff was happening.
	So, I mean, there's a lot of issues like that.
	But the way that he comes across is as a rational individual.
	And he's got actually more support in the Republicans than he does in the Democrats.
	So his big issue is trying to get there.
	But, you know, you've got Biden, who is elderly.
	He's just one trip and a fall from being out of office.
	It may not even take a fall.
	You know, he seems to be in such poor health.
	Lala Harris, can you imagine her running for president?
	She never got more than 1%.
	There's no way that she would be able to defeat RFK Jr., I don't think.
	So, I said, you know, at this point, I would have to handicap it for him.
	Because he's coming up really strong and all this stuff.
	But I, you know, it just, I don't see any of these people that I would vote for.
	None of them that I would support.
	I see major, major problems with all of them.
	I'm just saying this is, I think, the public perception that I see out there.
	And so, again, you know, we better start preparing things at the local level.
	And that also means politicians who are going to stand in the gap as lesser magistrates to protect us from bad federal policies, from bad state policies as well.
	So thank you, Geese Busters.
	Appreciate that. And Liberty Mama, thank you.
	That's very generous. I appreciate that very much.
	KWD says they want us in freedom cities.
	That's what Trump calls it.
	See? 15-minute cities.
	Oh, I don't want that. Smart cities.
	I don't want that. So Trump comes out.
	Freedom cities. And you hear crickets from the MAGA people.
	Remember that before we had all this vaccine stuff, one of the things that I was criticizing Trump about was his...
	Insane obsession with pushing 5G. I said, you realize there's a lot of health considerations to think about with that, but even more so, that is the infrastructure for smart cities, and it is the infrastructure for complete surveillance.
	It's nothing at all freedom about that.
	But see, they can get Trump to sell it to people.
	Sell it as a freedom city, right?
	They sell you the surveillance and call it smart.
	They sell you the freedom city and it's total surveillance that is there.
	Narrow way, narrow gates ministry.
	When they ban the cars...
	They'll then ban the horses for flatulence and manure.
	Yeah, that was one of the things. Back with the Malthusian stuff, they kept saying, you know, we can't keep going this direction.
	Look at how crowded the cities are, and look at how much manure there is in the streets, and we're going to be, you know, up to our carriage bottoms and manure if this keeps going on.
	And so you had the cars that were developed, and it wasn't something that the government had to force people to get.
	People were more than happy to move to the cars.
	KWD68 says, if anything is having an environmental impact on this point, it's a failure to manage our land.
	Yep. In name of letting forests take care of themselves in Canada and California.
	You're right. Jason Barker says, once Walmart runs the world, we can all wear yoga pants and flip-flops forever.
	Yeah. We can dress like the Chinese peasants did, you know, in Hillary Clinton pantsuits and stuff.
	We're getting there really quickly.
	You notice how it's become a big style thing to have pants that are all ripped up with holes in them and everything.
	You pay a lot of money to dress trashy, as Billy Joel said way back in the 80s or 90s, whenever you did that.
	And he also says China is about 1 million barrels up from their reserves.
	They're getting it from Venezuela, who now has a dark fleet of tankers.
	Yeah. China can do whatever they want.
	Rex Tillerson that Trump brought in.
	Oh, we've got to keep that Paris Climate Accord.
	Why do we have to do that? I mean, the people who were true believers in all this climate change stuff looked at that and said, well, if this is about global warming, why are we letting the two countries that have the most number of people, China and India, continue to build power plants without any restrictions on them even being clean, or the number of them? This doesn't make any sense.
	And the real environmentalists said, this Paris Climate Accord is nothing but a massive transfer of wealth.
	It's not changing anything.
	And they were absolutely right.
	It's the only time I ever agreed with them.
	Draining the strategic oil reserves and giving all weaponry to Ukraine is all part of the plan.
	That the U.S. will not be able to defend itself when the invasion comes and the destruction of this nation, says Narrowgate's ministry.
	I agree. I agree.
	So again, you know, Tucker Carlson, everybody is talking about...
	Trump as Mr.
	Peacenake. I loved this satire that was sent to me by Raybo.
	I don't know who did this. But I will be making arrests great again.
	This will be the most biggest, bigly, fantastic arrest.
	Better than any arrest in history.
	Better than Pablo Escobar, Ted Bundy, Zodiac Killer, Al Capone, Charles Manson, and even Renona Ryder.
	I'll put them to shame, right?
	The corrupt democratic justice system will send me then to woke jail.
	That's what it is, woke jail.
	I'll be forced to list my pronouns on my rainbow jumpsuit.
	It used to be nice orange, like my skin, and now it's rainbow.
	Oh, woke down. They'll shave the side of my head to look like some kind of lesbian Hitler, right?
	Hair Hitler, they call it.
	It's a hair Hitler. They'll ditch my gender to be fluid, right?
	Everybody's wet, everybody's fluid, whatever the hell that means.
	And lastly, they'll put me on an all-vegan diet, ultimately starving me to a forced confession.
	But justice will prevail, and I'll escape the jail.
	Then I'll get out and send all these freaks to jail.
	Yeah, there you go.
	At least people understand that's a satire.
	They don't understand that Tucker Carlson's pulling their leg when he tells them That Trump's going to save us all from war, right?
	Yeah, I've already talked about that.
	But, you know, it's just amazing to me.
	Everybody is repeating this.
	It's even going to Hungary.
	Because I guess they watch Tucker Carlson as well.
	Tucker Carlson went to Hungary and hung out with the Prime Minister there, Viktor Orban.
	So I guess he watches all the Tucker programs.
	And they said, Trump's election victory can bring peace, says Hungary.
	Come back, Mr.
	President. Make America great again and bring us peace.
	It reminds me of Mars attacks where you got Annette Bidding, you know, she releases the dove and they fry it with a ray gun.
	You know, we come in peace.
	Yes, there we go. Going to use Trump.
	He's going to be the...
	The guy who comes in peace, but he's kind of like these angry Martians.
	As soon as he gets into the White House, he starts shooting everybody with a ray gun.
	So where is this stuff going?
	And we keep seeing these...
	I find these interesting legal theories bouncing back and forth.
	Like I said, I didn't see anybody who thought that...
	That Trump only had a chance with this stuff, except for Dershowitz, and even he said, but there's those tapes that they've got.
	Where he says, he's showing this to people who don't have any classified, and it's an audio tape.
	They don't have any security clearance, and he admits that they're secret documents.
	Yeah, he should have declassified them, I guess.
	So all this stuff about, well, if I take them and they're mine, and I can just declassify them about thinking about it, well, of course, they got them on tape saying they're not declassified.
	And even Alan Dershowitz says, I don't know how we handle that one.
	And so you've got a guy who came after Bill Clinton, and it's the Clinton Sox Challenge.
	Of course, that was the name of the cap, but that's not what this is about.
	He said that Judicial Watch's Michael Bakisha said in the Wall Street Journal that a president can choose what records to keep and which ones to return to the National Archives.
	He said, I understood this well because, as I put it, I know because I'm the lawyer who lost the Clinton sock drawer case.
	Bill Clinton put a bunch of documents in his sock drawer and took it with him.
	He had actually 79 audio tape recordings.
	Okay, well that's all very interesting, but none of this applies. This Trump case.
	Why do I say that? Because Trump has been caught on tape Saying that these were not declassified, number one.
	But number two, it's really now the case is not even about the security clearance.
	And it's not about anything other than obstruction and perjury.
	Now, I don't like the way that this rolls out.
	We talked to Stephen Friend yesterday, and I said, well, you know, they came in and they deposed him as an FBI whistleblower, saying the FBI is politicizing this.
	They're going after January 6th people.
	They're going after parents who are speaking up at school board meetings, and I'm not going to be a part of this.
	And he and some others went public with it.
	So what did they do? They brought him in for a very intense interrogation, trying to get him to say something That's the real danger.
	The entrapment, the perjury trap, the obstruction traps and things like that are far more dangerous in many instances than what they initially say they're coming after you for with a crime.
	And so I said, you know, he knew what their game was.
	And so this is kind of a chess match.
	What's going on between these guys?
	Can they trick him into saying this and that?
	And can he keep from being tricked into saying that?
	Evidently, they didn't come after him with charges as badly as they really wanted to get him because they were doing all kinds of other things outside of that, but they couldn't get him on this perjury or obstruction trap.
	But they've got Trump on the perjury and on the obstruction trap.
	It isn't about the classified documents anymore.
	And this is what the people who are supporting Trump don't understand.
	Biden had classified documents.
	Pence had classified documents.
	But there wasn't any obstruction with that.
	Now, there was with Hillary Clinton.
	There was obstruction.
	You know, they came up and said, we'd like to have your servers.
	Go away. Oh, okay.
	Sorry, ma'am. I'm sorry to disturb you.
	Have a nice day. She was just as obstructionist as Donald Trump.
	There is a politicized, unequal system of justice.
	And that's what everybody sees.
	And because they see that, That essentially poisons this whole thing for them, and to a degree, I agree with the public, you know, if you have something that is the fruit of a poison tree, the legal doctrine is, then that disqualifies it all.
	And, you know, this is predicated on an unequal application of the law.
	But Trump still broke the law with his obstruction and with his perjury and other things like that.
	So are they going to come after him for that?
	This is why I find it very interesting that the single thing that Dershowitz said, I don't know what they're going to do about that.
	That is the most damning thing.
	Well, you know, that audio tape that they had of Trump, where he's showing those documents and admitting that he never declassified them and that they're top secret and all the rest of the stuff.
	That was not part of the indictment.
	In Florida. He's going before a friendly judge in Florida.
	Eileen Cannon was criticized because she had made some very friendly determinations in terms of Trump that were overturned in appeal.
	And so people were saying, well, you know, she could do a lot of different things.
	She could slow walk this and she could say, well, we just don't have enough time to go through all this before the election.
	And if it happens after the election, then maybe the Democrats don't have as much motivation to pursue this.
	And if they convict him, Jonathan Turley thinks that the president could pardon himself.
	I think that's a really dangerous idea.
	Especially, oh yeah, the president could pardon things in advance and pardon himself and all the rest of the stuff.
	Yeah, pardon yourself in advance for anything.
	What a crazy idea that is.
	That's full banana republic.
	Anyway, so she could shield this until after the election.
	But these two key charges, and this is an op-ed piece that appeared yesterday on The Atlantic.
	Two lawyers, Ryan Goodman and Andrew Weissman, They said, you know, that most damning charge, you know, those two tapes and stuff, that most damning thing is not part of what's happening in Florida.
	And that conversation took place in New Jersey, Bedminster.
	And so that may be, if she's going to delay this thing until after the election, then, you know, this special prosecutor, Might bring that indictment up in New Jersey.
	And that's the most damaging charges.
	As they put it, when you look at the retention of the documents, why is that a crime?
	That is a crime to prevent possible leakage.
	But when you actually give the documents and show the documents, and that's what the tape recorded, if you actually give and show the documents to somebody else, deliberate dissemination, Is the leakage itself.
	And so, retaining the documents means that you're exposing this to the possibility of leakage, but he actually leaked it to these people.
	And there's actually a recording of that.
	That's why that's the most serious charges.
	And it's not part of the indictment in Florida.
	And so, you know, this is something that if he chooses to do that in New Jersey, it's going to be very damaging to him.
	But then on the other side...
	This has now surfaced, as one person pointed out.
	People forget that the special prosecutor, Jack Smith, is one of the only lawyers in history to have his prosecution reversed by the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision.
	In a unanimous decision.
	Eight to zero.
	Even Darth Vader Ginsburg voted to reduce it.
	And it was a case of coming after the governor of Virginia.
	This was back in 2016 that it was reversed.
	He was convicted in 2014 of corruption.
	There were issues of Ferraris and Rolexes and ball gowns and all this kind of stuff.
	And the Supreme Court said this is distasteful.
	This is tawdry. But we believe that the application by Jack Smith in getting this conviction is based on a, quote, boundless interpretation of federal bribery statutes.
	And so they said, we think that you really went over the limit with this.
	And they unanimously in the Supreme Court shut this thing down.
	Now, that's another issue. That's why I don't think that Trump will ever go to jail, even if he gets a conviction.
	I think this is all...
	You know, theater to create a civil war in the GOP. And, you know, most likely Trump would emerge victorious out of that because of his strong base, but would not be able to win the election.
	I think that's what this is ultimately about.
	Again, I don't see that he's going to go to jail.
	I think the Supreme Court would pull that back and say there's nothing to be...
	Gained by actually sending him to jail.
	He's been punished enough and all the rest of this stuff, right?
	I think that's what's going to happen.
	But as one Virginia state senator said after the Supreme Court decision there where Jack Smith had overstepped and abused his power and they called him on it, said it was a boundless interpretation of a bribery statute.
	One Virginia state senator said, sometimes a luncheon is just a luncheon.
	So Marjorie Taylor Greene wants to defund Jack Smith, the special prosecutor.
	That is far too narrow, frankly.
	You need to impeach Merrick Garland.
	You need to defund the FBI. The FBI whistleblower yesterday.
	Stephen Friend said, yeah, it's unconstitutional, it's politicized, it's weaponized, we don't need it.
	You know, these law enforcement functions really ought to be done as the Constitution intended at the local level, for the most part.
	But they want to have a GOP civil war, and I just wonder if Trump is a Democrat mole.
	All of this stuff.
	As Todd Young, a Republican from Indiana, senator, said, this is a self-indulgent, self-flagellating exercise to even consider nominating Trump for the presidency once again.
	And so this is a very long article put together by Vox.
	They interviewed a lot of different senators.
	Very strong opinions on both sides.
	I'm not going to go into it except to say that, you know, they went to people to make the case that he's done nothing wrong.
	And, you know, it's pretty hard to make a case for that.
	They don't do that. Instead, they fall back on the unequal treatment of the law.
	And they make the Department of Justice the issue.
	But see, that issue is far, far bigger than Trump.
	Look at, again, the January 6th people and the parents who show up at school board meetings.
	This is the problem, and the politicians don't get interested in this until they come after them.
	But they ought to understand that just as we saw, Trump was absolutely not interested in And the weaponization of censorship by social media.
	As a matter of fact, his administration was pushing that.
	He wasn't concerned about that at all.
	But it happened to him before he even left as president.
	They kicked him off of Twitter as well.
	And so if you don't do anything about this stuff, if you don't care about the January 6th people, then guess what?
	They're going to come after you because if it's a politicized police state, what do you think the politicized police state is going to be most interested in?
	Politicians. So these politicians who sit on their hands, these Republicans who do nothing, and they don't want to shut down the FBI. They don't want to even reduce its funding or do anything punitive to it whatsoever.
	No consequences at all for what the FBI and the Department of Justice are doing.
	Well, guess what? They're going to come after all of them.
	And it doesn't even have to be anything real.
	They will come after them.
	And they will trump up these charges for them as well.
	So, they said, key differences between the cases, says Vox, between the cases of Trump, Clinton, Pence, and Biden that put Trump's allegations in a league of their own is that none of the other officials ignored a federal subpoena for documents or tried to conceal them as is alleged of Trump.
	Well, that's Fox saying that, but it's not true.
	Hillary did that. Hillary did that, and everybody understands that that's the situation that is there.
	So you have those people who are on Trump's side, like Mike Braun of Indiana.
	He endorsed Trump for president.
	He said his policies have worked well, and we'll just have to see what's happening.
	No, his policies did not work well.
	That's what I'm saying. These people don't care at all.
	About what they did to you, your jobs, your businesses.
	They don't care about that stuff at all.
	They don't care about the people that were killed with these injections.
	They don't care about how they trashed the Constitution.
	None of it. None of it.
	The best you get is somebody like Chris Christie.
	And he really didn't land a criticism of this, as I said.
	You know, he says, well, Trump hasn't won a damn thing since 2016.
	Well, Christie hasn't won anything since 2013.
	And he got slaughtered when he ran for president the last time.
	But he's got even bigger problems than that.
	Mike Pence is saying there's serious allegations in these classified documents.
	Mike Pence wants to hang out as Mr.
	Warmonger, so of course he's going to go about national security issues.
	Pence wants, you know, pedal to the metal for war supplies to Ukraine.
	He's a very dangerous person.
	Tell me that you're a Christian and you push for war like that.
	As Trump, after all this indictment, what he had to say in reality was almost as bad as that satire video I played for you.
	They're not coming after me.
	They're coming after you.
	How many times have you heard him say that?
	He says that to the people that he labeled as non-essential.
	Just a couple years ago.
	I just happen to be standing in their way and I'm not going to be moving.
	Yeah, right. I'm sick and tired of hearing that.
	Yeah, he throws people under the bus when they come after him.
	He threw the January 6th people under the bus.
	He ripped them off, picked their pocket, threw them under the bus, did nothing to help them, kept quiet about all of it, wouldn't say a thing to protect himself.
	Well, that tells you everything, doesn't it?
	He said nothing in defense of those people, did nothing in defense of those people while he was president.
	So Chris Christie said, do you need Donald Trump whining, moaning, and making everything about him?
	He doesn't care about the American people.
	He's putting himself first.
	That's exactly what it is.
	You had Kim Buck saying in an interview with, I think it was CNN. And, yeah, CNN's Dana Bash.
	He's always been pro-Trump.
	He's part of the House Freedom Caucus and the rest of this stuff.
	He said he was very concerned about the unequal treatment, what Hillary Clinton was able to get away with, but he also said that doesn't excuse Trump's conduct, right?
	It just shows that we know that Hillary's a criminal, we know that Trump is a criminal, and we know the Department of Justice and the FBI's are criminals as well, because they have unequal application in terms of coming after these people who are criminals.
	So I say, forget about lock her up, lock him up.
	We need to lock them all up in the District of Criminals.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Decoding the mainstream propaganda.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Alright, welcome back.
	And we're going to cross up here with our connection, miscommunication on our side, trying to get Tony Arterman.
	So Tony, if you're there, sorry that we're late.
	We're going to try to get you on here.
	So hang on.
	And we have at the top of the hour, we have Marty Gottesfeld as well.
	But we're going to try to get Tony Arterman on.
	While we're waiting for Tony, let's talk a little bit about the corruption of Joe Biden.
	I thought this was very interesting because one congressman says, we want to know if he paid taxes on his bribery income.
	They know he was bribed.
	It's an open issue, right?
	But did you pay taxes on it?
	Even if it's something illegal, that's how they got Al Capone, right?
	He got all of his money from violating prohibition, selling alcohol, running it.
	Drug dealers have to pay income taxes.
	One of the things when they catch these guys, they can get them for income tax violation as well.
	So, you know, Joe has got issues with, did he pay his taxes on his bribe money?
	And he also has a recording, which is kind of interesting.
	Because not only do we have the audio recording of Trump essentially leaking information that is...
	Highly classified. But it turns out that the guy who owned Burisma kept recordings of his dealings in this Biden bribe.
	This is being said by Senator Grassley.
	It says Chuck Grassley from Iowa said, yeah, we've got this memorialized.
	The Burisma owner, Mikola Zlochevsky, has made a couple recordings of They said that he was making this for his own protection.
	These recordings were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national in case that he got into a tight spot.
	Yeah, we've got a tight spot here.
	More than that, the FBI made Congress review a redacted, unclassified document and a classified facility.
	That goes to show you the disrespect the FBI has for Congress, he said.
	But in terms of this actual document, Apparently, you know, this is all part of the reason this guy was, you know, Burisma was there.
	They had an investigation that was going on, a special prosecutor, and Biden bragged about it publicly.
	We got it on video.
	I told them to shut down that investigation, and they did.
	And this guy made other recordings of them in private that apparently are going to be significant in this.
	And, of course, the corruption is not just limited to Trump and Biden and the Department of Justice and the FBI. You've got Senator Hawley asking Energy Secretary Granholm, why did you lie to Congress about holding stocks?
	All these people are doing insider trading, right?
	The people in Congress, Pelosi and the rest of them.
	And of course, in April, the Energy Secretary, Jennifer Granholm, told Senator Hawley, under oath, that she did not own any individual stock.
	She said everything she had was in mutual funds, so it wouldn't influence what she was doing.
	But she was lying. Today, she admitted that she did, in fact, own stock in multiple companies, including companies like Ford, that fell directly under her jurisdiction.
	Three times you told me and this committee that you did not own individual stocks, said Josh Hawley.
	But we now know that that was false.
	Last Friday, you informed the committee that you did own stocks at the time of your testimony in April.
	And so, do you think anything's going to happen with that?
	Of course not. Take a look at what happened to James Clapper.
	Absolutely nothing. Statue of limitations expired.
	I remember talking about that the day that it expired.
	And, um, so, um, it's, um, so we're going to cancel with Tony.
	It's like, it's not going to be so late.
	Okay. All right.
	Um, well, I'm really sorry about that, but, uh, the, um, I wanted to talk to Tony today.
	Uh, maybe, uh, we can work out something to get him on.
	Um, if not today soon.
	Uh, but anyway, by the way, uh, Appreciate Tony's support.
	Always do appreciate his support.
	And I apologize for this mess up here.
	But anyway, we've got...
	Travis is going to be back on Monday.
	He is not here at the moment.
	And miscommunication.
	We had different people in here.
	But please do go to davidknight.gold.
	I'll take you to Tony Arterman's wisewolf.gold.
	He's been a great supporter.
	It is something that you really need to...
	Take preparation on the outside of this system that we don't really have any control over.
	These elections are not real.
	The Federal Reserve is not real.
	The dollar is not real. You better start doing real things to provide for yourself.
	Again, davidknight.gold.
	We have a women's group that is set to spend tens of millions of dollars to boost Lala's image.
	Because they understand as well how tenuous Biden's tenure is.
	And that she may very well be the presidential candidate.
	And it's going to be made in this re-election campaign for Biden.
	She is going to be a big part of it, even if he is still at the top of the ticket.
	We're going to tell a story about who she is.
	That's going to cost millions of dollars to show her credentials there to everybody, to push back against the massive misinformation and disinformation that has been directed toward her.
	They said 70% of the people don't think that Biden should run for re-election, and they're very concerned about the fact that Harris is there as well.
	So they're going to have to try to boost that, and it's going to take them a lot of money to do that.
	Lala Harris calls Joe Biden a racist during the debates, and Stephen Colbert asked her about that.
	She said, well, you know, it was a debate.
	It was just a debate.
	We just say things that we don't mean in debates.
	She says that all the time.
	We'll be right back. Let me tell you, The David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	That's a website.
	Welcome back.
	Let's talk a little bit about what is going on in Uganda.
	And I think it's important. It's a very important mirror to our country, I think, what is happening here.
	Because we have...
	I haven't kept up with what's going on in Uganda.
	When I hear Uganda, I immediately think of Idi Amin.
	You know, the crazy nut, that crazy dictator that was there.
	That's 50 years ago.
	I really have no idea what is going on in that country.
	Yesterday, I played for you a group of African nations...
	Saying we have set up our own export-import bank so that we can trade between ourselves and our own currencies and we don't have to go to the U.S. dollar and be under their control.
	They're waking up to what this situation is.
	And when we look back and forth at all this, a lot is being said by politicians and by religious leaders in the West.
	About this anti-gay law that is in Uganda, we just had the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, express his concerns about the Ugandan Anglican Church's support for the country's widely criticized Anti-Homosexuality Act.
	Except the thing is, these people, even though they call themselves Anglican, they don't have anything at all in common with the Archbishop of Canterbury.
	They're actually maybe Christians.
	I don't know. He certainly isn't.
	He's so-called Christian, but he pushes back against all of it.
	And so he was criticizing it, especially the idea that there'd be a death penalty for, quote, aggravated homosexuality.
	Well, that sounds pretty crazy, doesn't it?
	But do you understand how they defined aggravated homosexuality?
	They defined it as rape, as pedophilia, as coming after an elderly person or somebody who is drugged, all these different things.
	That's what they mean by aggravated.
	Do you have a problem with a death penalty for a pedophile?
	I don't. I mean, my problem with a death penalty...
	Is that it would be, is our justice system really being able to accurately determine somebody's guilt or innocence.
	But somebody who does something like that, I think they're deserving of the death penalty, frankly.
	And so the, you know, why is this the hill that all these people, especially Ted Cruz, really surprised people?
	You expect this kind of thing coming from the Archbishop of Canterbury, who hangs out on the far left.
	Why did Ted Cruz go out of his way to call out this law?
	And to do it this month?
	Because this law has been going through and reported on for several months.
	It was signed at the end of May.
	About May 25th, May 26th, something like that.
	But it has been in the works for several months.
	You can find documents going back to February talking about this.
	So why is Ted Cruz doing it And Pride Month, right?
	That's the first thing about this.
	I think it's a lot of virtue signaling.
	And he called this grotesque and abomination.
	Who cares?
	Do you not have enough logs in our eyes here in the United States that you can do something about without worrying about what Uganda is doing, Ted?
	Is that really what this is about?
	No, of course not. It's about him sucking up to people.
	After some amendments were added to protect individuals seeking help in dealing with homosexual inclinations, it was signed May 26th by the President.
	The law is, quote, an act to prohibit any form of sexual relations between persons of the same sex to prohibit the promotion or recognition of sexual relations between persons of the same sex and for related matters.
	You see, the thing is, They see where this is all headed in the U.S. They understand how it began in the U.S. And it began with same-sex mirage, and it began with the feminists and things like that.
	And they understand this progression.
	They've seen it happen in our countries.
	And we're trying to push this on them.
	And they're saying, this is a kind of colonialism that you're trying to enforce with us.
	Ted Cruz said this Uganda law is horrific and wrong.
	Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for, quote, aggravated homosexuality.
	Again, he never bothered to look that that included rape of a child and rape of a person who's mentally ill or advanced in age or drugged or who otherwise has contracts a terminal disease from the sexual act.
	Those are the types of things that they were talking about.
	And of course, they were excoriated by Rick Grinnell, the homosexual director of national intelligence for President Trump.
	And I played that clip for you, how he was bragging about the fact that President Trump was far more embracing of LGBT than Joe Biden.
	He played clips of Joe Biden saying, you know, we're not going to have recognition even of homosexual marriage and things.
	And that's where the Democrats were just a couple of decades ago.
	It was Bill Clinton. They had the Defense of Marriage Act and all the rest of this stuff.
	But many people got on and talked about it.
	But Rick Grinnell says, another example of what is happening around the world without Donald Trump as President of the United States, they're outlawing homosexuality in Uganda.
	And they're criminalizing the rape of children.
	Now, if only we had President Trump in, that wouldn't happen.
	He said, Ugandan leaders understood the message from us.
	We made it clear to Uganda and the Trump administration that criminalizing homosexuality is wrong.
	And they don't want them punishing anybody who rapes a child homosexually in Uganda.
	That was a clear message from Trump's homosexual advisor.
	He said they got the message from us.
	He said the message hasn't been as clear from the Biden administration.
	Well, the Biden administration made it very clear.
	Biden administration, the State Department, And so, Uganda has had something to say about this, and of course, this is not really anything that's new.
	They had laws against homosexuality going back to the time that they were a British protectorate, because that's the way things were in Western civilization.
	Even the Democrats would push back against that, as I said.
	And so there was, and I talked about this last week, I'm not going to go over it again, there was a back and forth between a pastor and Ted Cruz.
	Ted Cruz was saying, well, you know, the penalty, you know, he quoted Leviticus, which was saying that homosexuality was a crime to Ted Cruz, and a sin, I should say, and also a crime, because they had a theocracy.
	And, um... Uh, so the, um, uh, so we're still waiting for somebody else to come on.
	Is that what you're trying to tell me? Okay.
	Uh, okay.
	All right. Well, just tell me when we're ready to go.
	Okay. Uh, so anyway, the, um, uh, sorry, it's a very confusing situation today with the guests.
	So anyway, the, um, there was, um, The penalty in the Mosaic Law that you would stone people for a lot of different things, right?
	But there was also more mercy than you typically see in other legal codes at the time.
	The whole idea of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth was to say we're going to have proportionate punishment for some of these things.
	And so Ted Cruz comes back and says, oh, so you're going to stone people for disobeying their parents.
	Is that what you're going to do? And that was not in view at all.
	But of course, Ted Cruz didn't notice that this aggravated assault stuff, when we want to talk about the death penalty, again, we're talking about the rape, homosexual rape of a child.
	And he came back and said, well, render to Caesar what is due to Caesar.
	Well, Caesar doesn't define what marriage is, right?
	And the lesson that we ought to learn from what Uganda is doing is that we ought to all tell them at the state level to take a hike on all of this stuff.
	So this is what I want to read you before we go to our guests.
	I want to read you what was being said in Uganda about this.
	Addressing threats from the U.S. and international bodies that aid to the country would be cut off if they persisted with this law.
	They said we're not going to be coerced by money.
	Why can't we say that at the state level and the local level?
	He said, if they cut aid, we'll sit down and discipline our expenditure and rearrange our budgets.
	If they interfere with our trade, we shall trade with other people.
	If there is a deviation from the normal, if there is abnormality, how would you seek to universalize an abnormality?
	How would you seek to establish an abnormality as an alternative way of life?
	Why don't you seek to treat this abnormality?
	To isolate it, not spread it.
	There's something wrong with these groups in the West.
	There's something wrong with the leadership in the West.
	There must be some serious issue there.
	Yeah, and that includes people like Trump and Ted Cruz.
	There's a serious issue with them, that they seek to normalize this.
	And they understand, as I said, where this is headed.
	They compared the attempts, and this is a LifeSite News article where they had the comments of the people in Uganda.
	They said this is the Western countries trying to impose an LGBT agenda on Africa.
	They said this is worse than slavery and colonialism.
	We are faced with what could be a bigger problem than slavery or colonialism.
	A person proposing that there should be same-sex marriages, same-sex relationships, is a person who is not just attacking the family.
	But a person who is seeking to wipe out the entire human race off the face of the earth.
	So that's what we need to understand.
	We need to understand this abortion agenda, this LGBT agenda, this transgender agenda, sterilizing kids when they can't make that determination.
	We need to understand that that is a depopulation agenda.
	Why doesn't Ted Cruz, if he wants to get involved in this, why doesn't he get involved with his energy defending children from this agenda?
	But he doesn't do anything.
	Instead, he pushes this agenda on other people.
	One woman said the human rights approach that UNAIDS, the agency that's supposed to be protecting the world from this pandemic, has a document called the International Guidelines on HIV, AIDS, and Human Rights that says that to stop AIDS, you have to legalize abortion, same-sex marriage, prostitution, and provide children with a radical form of sexuality education.
	That's in order to prevent AIDS, you see.
	Except it does exactly the opposite.
	They said they're pushing an insidious form of sexuality education, said the Ugandans, called comprehensive sexuality education.
	They push a form of sexual social colonization.
	By getting to your children, seeking to change their worldviews on issues of sexual orientation, gender identity, and abortion.
	And they teach them about sexual pleasure and sexual acts.
	Why is that something that our government schools think they should be teaching?
	And we have their manuals used throughout all of Africa.
	The first school in society is the family, she said.
	What you put in your child's mind as values is what they go to do out there.
	So we should concentrate more on helping the families build values, working with church leaders, working with traditional leaders to facilitate them to rehabilitate the family.
	These are the conversations that are being held in their Congress.
	We don't see that kind of stuff in ours.
	We see people like Ted Cruz criticizing them for saying this.
	We do not want your pro-gay money.
	We want and love our country more than we love your money.
	You see, I said this for the longest time when we were talking about abortion.
	I said this is a Tenth Amendment issue.
	The Supreme Court does not have the authority to ram this thing down our throats and define when life begins or when it is sustainable and all the rest of this stuff.
	That's not theirs to determine.
	And eventually, that's what the Dobbs decision said.
	I kept saying it for the longest time.
	I said the appropriate response to Roe v.
	Wade was, In 1973, for the state of Texas to say the Supreme Court's made its decision, let's see them enforce it because we're not going to do it.
	And they didn't have any way that they could enforce it.
	What they would do is they would pull money away from Texas.
	And so all the different states said, oh no, we love the money more than we love our children.
	We love the money more than anything.
	And we'll do whatever you say as long as you print up money and hand it to us.
	And then they did the same thing when the Supreme Court exceeded its authority and defined what marriage is.
	Well, we love the money, so we're not going to do anything about it.
	You know, that redefinition of marriage had lost everywhere.
	It was prohibited in state constitutions, under state laws.
	It lost every referendum that they had, even in California.
	With all the Silicon Valley money, they still lost that referendum.
	But everybody bowed down to the Supreme Court.
	And everybody forgot about the Tenth Amendment.
	Because the 10th Amendment doesn't get anybody any money.
	And they're willing to abdicate their duty as well as their power to Washington in order to get a paycheck.
	Yeah, that's the key thing about it.
	Well, we're going to break here and we're going to establish with our guests...
	So stay with us. We're going to be right back.
	We're going to be talking to Marty Gottesfeld, a whistleblower who was talking about medical kidnapping.
	That's how he wound up in jail.
	That's what happens to whistleblowers.
	And we're also going to talk to him about the prisons that people are suffering under.
	But, you know, Marty has got a big heart.
	and he is, even in prison, was more concerned about other people in prison than he was about himself.
	He wanted to tell people the stories of what was happening to other people who were there also unjustly.
	And so he's got a couple of people that he wants to tell the stories about today as well as talking about these communication management units.
	So we'll be right back.
	THE END
	THE END
	THE END ANALYSING THE GLOBALIST'S NEXT MOVE THE END And now, The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back. Joining us now is Marty Gottesfeld.
	And I've talked to Marty's wife, Dana, who has been a champion for his cause for the longest time.
	And I'm sure that both of them are delighted that Marty is finally out of jail.
	It's been a very difficult time.
	And I always told her, I said, I'm going to talk to your husband one day.
	We're going to... See him get out of jail.
	So don't give up hope. And I know it was very dark days when we had high hopes that there might be a pardon from Trump and that did not happen.
	We're going to talk about why he was in jail.
	We're going to talk about the jail that he was in.
	And also we have on the line Ennis Bosnick.
	Welcome to my show!
	Thank you for joining us. Let's talk a little bit about, tell everybody your history about why you were put in prison, what you were fighting for, the medical kidnapping case.
	Give them kind of a brief overview.
	We've talked about this with Dana, but it's been a while since we've talked to Dana, so if you could kind of fill people in on that detail.
	So sure. In late 2013, I became aware of some very serious human rights violations against children in a network of mostly for-profit juvenile detention centers, boot camps, so-called residential treatment centers, wilderness programs. This story affected us personally.
	It affected a member of Dana's family.
	We had to fight to get him out.
	We did get him out.
	We trended the hashtag to shut down the place where he was at to number two globally on Twitter.
	Put a lot of pressure and achieved a good outcome.
	But once we achieved that outcome, it was very clear that the fight was not over.
	There were still so many of these kids going through these abuses.
	And it was at that point in a group online that I first saw the Justina Pelletier case.
	And this was happening right in my backyard.
	It was right here at Boston Children's Hospital.
	It was a very strange and odd case.
	The family had been put under a gag order.
	They were not allowed to talk to the press about it.
	That was kind of the first smoke signal to me that something might be going really wrong here because, you know, you should be able to speak about pretty much anything.
	You know what I mean? So what is it exactly they did not want the public to know?
	Then I found out that they had been denied the right to get a second opinion on Justina's medical condition.
	And that also struck me as just very suspicious, because why should someone be told they can't get a second opinion?
	To me, you know, in my family, when there's a diagnosis, you know, the more serious the diagnosis, the more serious the need for a second and even third opinion.
	And so just the whole way this case had been operated, to me, you know, was un-American, I think is perhaps the best word for it.
	So then I started looking more into the details of the Pelletier case.
	So Justina has mitochondrial disease, which is kind of an umbrella term for a group of conditions, mostly genetic, but there can be environmental causes too, that affect how the mitochondria, which are the Organelles, the parts inside your cells that actually produce the chemical energy that runs your body and all your systems.
	So Justina has an issue between the mitochondria and the rest of her cells.
	Not every case of Mito is a little different.
	No two are really exactly the same.
	So you have symptoms that run a gamut.
	Some cases, fortunately, are very mild.
	Some cases are fatal.
	Baby Charlie Gard, who was in the London, I think, Orchard Street Hospital, Orcon Street Hospital, a few years ago, and the Pope got involved in that case where the hospital, you know, refused to allow any further medical interventions to try to save Charlie's life, and he ultimately died.
	Yeah, meanwhile, the parents were desperately trying to get him to other care elsewhere, and doctors eventually came forward to say, hey, we want to treat this kid, but it was too late.
	So he also had mitochondrial disease.
	It's the exact same condition, but Charlie's case was a much more severe form that affected him neonatally and directly upon delivery, and he unfortunately did not live very long.
	But that's the condition that we're talking about.
	Justina's case is a little more mild than Charlie Gard's, but still very serious.
	So she had a team of doctors at Tufts, which is, you know, a renowned medical institution.
	Here in Boston, we're very fortunate.
	You know, we have some of the best medical institutions in the world.
	Justina was at Tufts because they had a mito specialist there who was really good, who had actually treated Justina's older sister, who also had had mito.
	Justina caught the flu.
	She was nauseous.
	She could not put food, keep food down.
	And that is a very serious issue for mitopatients because if you imagine, right, you have an issue in the cell turning food into chemical energy.
	Now you stop the food intake.
	It kind of compounds that.
	What was, you know, a problem further down the line is now compounded gravely.
	So she went to go see her GI doc.
	And her GI doc had just moved from Tufts to Boston Children's Hospital.
	So she arrived in an ambulance at 4 o'clock in the morning on a Sunday, the same day as a blizzard, with this referral to see her GI doc.
	She never got to see her GI doc.
	A different doctor there, a neurologist, like seven months out of medical training.
	I'm not sure his exact But he was not, you know, a mito expert.
	He was not a team that had treated Justina for years and treated her older sister and knew her and knew her family well.
	He started to suspect a different diagnosis, a psychological diagnosis called somatoform disorder, which is basically psychosomatic, that these issues were presenting with no physiological cause whatsoever, and that therefore it was kind of all in Justina's head.
	He called in a different practitioner, a non-MD psychologist, who we later learned had an NIH grant to study somatoform disorder.
	And, you know, lo and behold, she agrees with the neurologist that, you know, Justina has somatoform.
	They go to the parents.
	They say, we want to stop all of Justina's mitochondrial disease treatments and treat her for somatoform.
	The parents, of course, say no.
	Mitochondrial disease is an often fatal degenerative progressive condition.
	When it's left untreated, you know, it gets radically worse oftentimes, and you can't always reverse that damage from the progression of this condition.
	But the hospital then went to the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families, the state's child welfare agency.
	Being from Massachusetts, living here most of my entire life, I can tell you DCF has a horrible reputation.
	They've earned it. You know, hundreds of children have died on DCF's watch.
	It's kind of a four-letter word, you know, around the area when you talk to parents.
	I'm not going to sugarcoat it.
	I mean, the agency has just had a horrible past.
	DCF agreed with the hospital, filed an emergency petition for custody of Justina.
	That petition was granted.
	The parents were frozen out.
	Hospital security came, escorted them off the premises.
	The parents tried to call the police.
	They tried to call the FBI. They contacted every authority that they could.
	No one would help them.
	And then that's when the gag order came down, and then the hospital moved Justina to its psych ward, which is a fairly notorious place.
	Whistleblowers had come forward to report this psych ward, including a former nurse from inside that very same psych ward.
	And she put it very bluntly in an open letter to the Massachusetts governor saying that the more proper term for The things being done to Justina was torture.
	And that was actually the word that she used, torture.
	So one of the things that Justina went through that has been under-publicized, in my opinion, but the parents did get this on the air on a local PBS broadcast.
	Justina, like many Mito patients, suffers from nerve pain.
	Because of the issues with the chemical energy in the cell, the nerves don't fire directly.
	And those nerve signals can be misinterpreted as pain in the brain.
	And that's something that Justina suffered from.
	And that was throughout her whole body.
	And she had been on a medication called Lyrica, which helps with nerve issues, right?
	And Boston Children's Hospital took her off of that Lyrica, and that left her in agony pretty much 24-7.
	And then the whole time she was in the psych ward, They're telling her that it's all in her head, that she can move her arms, she can wheel her own wheelchair.
	And she's like, I can't do this.
	I just can't do this.
	But they're pushing her to do that.
	And I know that one weekend, when she was unable to move her own wheelchair, they kind of just left her in a corner sitting at a blank wall all weekend.
	And when other kids in the psych ward would try to help her, they'd say, no, no, no, she's got to do it herself.
	And this is stuff, Justina, you know, now she's free.
	She's spoken about this stuff.
	She gave an interview to an award-winning journalist named Bo Berman, who actually won the Edward R. Murrow Award two years in a row for covering Justina's case.
	Yeah, I suppose that's, you know, so that's where we were kind of when I first heard about this case.
	So I got involved.
	I found out, you know, All this stuff, all these other cases before Justina's, and you can kind of read about those online.
	This was not a new thing.
	The hospital actually has a word for this.
	They call it a parentectomy, like an appendectomy or removal of the parents.
	I remember going back and seeing that there was a family even from some Scandinavian country.
	I mean, there's a lot of different cases that were there.
	Yeah, that was the Sindhre Halan case, and he ended up passing away, unfortunately.
	So, you know, what do you do when the political process has entirely failed?
	You know, that becomes, you know, or became a very, very urgent question.
	The government alleges that I, as part of Anonymous, Orchestrated one of the largest distributed denial of service attacks ever seen, and that I knocked Boston Children's Hospital off the internet on their big fundraising day, and that this cost the hospital hundreds of thousands of dollars.
	They accused me of potentially impacting patient care, but they failed to prove that to my jury.
	We have the jury form.
	The jury would not go along with it.
	You know, medical devices don't require internet access.
	If they did, you'd have fatalities all the time.
	Hospitals are required under federal law to have backup plans to work without internet access.
	And again, if internet outages cause deaths at hospitals, you would have deaths at hospitals from internet outages all the time.
	And so there are numerous safeguards that To stop all that, I was aware of all that.
	I worked in biotech myself.
	I was a data security coordinator for a biotech company.
	I know the HIPAA law very well.
	I know the accreditation standards for these hospitals very well.
	So they ultimately failed to prove kind of the moral core of their case against me when the jury refused to convict me for even potentially impacting the diagnosis, care, or treatment of one or more individuals.
	I went to trial.
	My trial judge, Nathaniel Matheson Gorton, of the Gortons Seafood family.
	So that family's for-profit business, Slade Gorton& Co.
	Inc., donated to Boston Children's Hospital.
	And Boston Children's Hospital actually kind of advertised that family business on the very same website the government was alleging that I brought down, you know, where they thanked their philanthropic donors.
	Mm-hmm.
	I told my jury straight up that they could not acquit me or should not acquit me because of my good motive.
	So kind of the opposite of what you'd expect in a self-defense or defense of others case.
	My jury was told, no, you could not.
	They could not acquit me for that.
	One juror actually came forward in tears saying she didn't want to convict me.
	The judge kind of reiterated his thing and said, no, his good motive is no excuse.
	And that's really kind of a problem with our legal system in general.
	You know, the jurors are supposed to be the ones to determine this, and if they don't like what the law is, they can nullify the law.
	But the judges will say, you can't do this and you can't do that.
	They're the ones that are...
	Yeah, and I'm not allowed to tell them about jury nullification.
	If I tell them about jury nullification, it's an immediate mistrial, and they're going to come down on me hard.
	The judge had already threatened me to remove me from the courtroom and basically try me in absentia.
	Wow. Wow.
	So I could not tell her this.
	So they find you guilty, and then what was the sentence that you were there for?
	The sentence was 121 months in federal prison.
	Ultimately, the First Step Act of 2018, which ran Paul...
	And the Trump administration passed the big federal prison reform bill, ended up freeing me a bit earlier.
	And then there's also a controversy about other, like, credit for time that I am owed.
	And we're still litigating that, actually.
	And if I win that, then I get to go have my probation cut.
	So my three years of supervised release could potentially be reduced, you know, if I win that.
	And I'm still litigating that in the Southern District of Indiana.
	Yeah. Yeah, I suppose that's it.
	Now, how did this become a...
	You were in a federal facility.
	How did this become a federal case?
	Because the law they charged me under, which is called the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, is a federal law.
	It's at 18 United States Code Section 1030.
	And so the feds picked it up.
	I don't know that they could have convicted me in state court.
	You know, I really don't.
	In state court, I'm not sure they would have been able to...
	Bar the defense of another defense, right?
	So I'm not sure that the local authorities had any interest or any desire to try to try the case.
	The feds knew that, you know, they had this law and that they could freeze out this defense.
	And so they felt, I guess, more comfortable going forward with it.
	But in the end, they still didn't, like they failed to prove the moral core of their case.
	I'm convicted only We're good to go.
	But, you know, she was able to walk.
	And had she recovered from the flu, I think everyone had the reasonable expectation she would figure skate again.
	But after 14 months away from her family and away from her mitochondrial treatments, you know, she's still not walking today.
	Did she sue them for damage?
	Yes, the family did sue, but Boston Children's Hospital is Harvard's primary pediatric research teaching facility.
	They get hundreds of millions of dollars every year in federal grants.
	The last I knew, they had a $2 billion endowment.
	They are the home team favorite.
	Suing them in Suffolk Superior in the local court here in Massachusetts was always, always going to be an uphill battle.
	The jury found for Boston Children's Hospital.
	I'm unsure if they're taking an appeal from that.
	I'm unsure if If they can take an appeal from that, if they have any good issues or not.
	But yeah, they sued and they lost.
	And to me, that kind of just underscores that, you know, had nothing been done, Justina very well may have died.
	Yes. You know, because the system failed Justina at every level.
	State executive, state judicial, federal judicial, right?
	Because the feds could have taken up a civil rights case for Justina, and they did not.
	The feds could have looked at some kind of Medicaid fraud case, because as soon as Justina became a ward of the state, Medicaid was picking up the bill for all the stuff they were doing to her, right?
	And so if a medical practitioner bills Medicaid...
	To treat a patient for a condition that that practitioner knows or should know the patient does not have, or bills Medicaid excessively to treat a condition that they do have, that becomes a federal issue.
	And so there were a bunch of places where the feds could have stepped in.
	I mean, if they had just made a phone call to Boston Children's Hospital to say, hey, what are you guys doing?
	Like, this looks kind of fishy.
	We might have to investigate this.
	I bet the hospital would have done an about-face pretty quickly.
	My understanding is the feds didn't even investigate.
	We put the FBI agent on the witness stand in my bail hearing, and we asked him, are you aware of allegations Justina Pelletier was tortured at Boston Children's Hospital?
	He said, yes. Are you aware of any investigation into those allegations?
	No! We don't care.
	Since you were, while you've been in prison, of course, we've seen a widespread medical kidnapping of a lot of people.
	We've seen people, you know, the government, in terms of talking about the money they get from government, they've financially incentivized medical malpractice and killed a lot of people with ventilators, remdesivir, and other things while denying effective treatment to them.
	You know, when we don't address these issues, These key issues for a child or anybody, then it has a tendency to spread.
	And if we don't get to this rotten moral core that we have in this country, that's basically what we saw happening to a lot of people while you were in jail.
	How long were you in jail for?
	Well, I was imprisoned for seven years and a little under four months.
	Wow. Wow.
	And you did some hard time, too.
	Let's talk about the CMU, but before we do, let's bring in, because we've got Ennis waiting there, Ennis Bosnick, and he was a big help to you while this was all happening.
	You talked about how he gave you free hosting for freemartyg.com, which is where people could...
	Support your efforts and help Dana while this is all happening.
	Tell us a little bit about, or Mr.
	Bosnick could tell us about his story.
	What is happening in his country?
	Hello, sir. First of all, thank you for giving us this opportunity to talk about this case of my friend Marty here that I didn't know before this case, you know.
	Well, thank you for what you did.
	I'll just tell everybody the reason you got a mask on there is because, you know, we have, this is where we are now, around the world.
	We got governments that are so tyrannical, you know, they're looking to identify people.
	And so that's why you have that there.
	You don't want to have your face shown.
	So tell us a little bit about your story and what has happened to you in Bosnia.
	Well, there is a lot of stories, but let's stick to the Martis one.
	Mm-hmm. In this case, and maybe later we can discuss some other stories that I think are really important for today's life on this earth.
	When you say these kids got mistreated, even some of them got dead and stuff like that.
	I'm a highly religious man.
	I believe in God.
	And he sees everything that they do.
	Yes. And one day there will be a judge, you know, not the judge that put the mark in prison for seven plus years, but one judge, you know.
	And what I'm seeing here is transgender, gender this and number that, it's just the work of Iblis.
	You know, Iblis, He directly rejected the God's order and he said, then please allow me to be with them until the judgment day and I will show you how they follow me, not you. And this is what we see, my friend, all around you if you go on the street and look across.
	Here, let me show you.
	Since you asked for Bosnia, across my balcony there is the street.
	the guys who killed like thousands of people you know they just slaughtered them like this and now they have like little state Republic of Srpska they call it you know my Republic of Bosnia got the Status of the Republic and this aggressor got half of the state because my fake president signed this contract with them.
	But let's get back to the Marty.
	Since the war in Bosnia, even before the war, I was the guy who I had a brother who was genius regarding the electronics and stuff like that.
	So he teach me about this.
	But I lost him in the war.
	And after the war, I was starting my own stuff.
	During the war, I had to produce electricity because we didn't have electricity.
	The enemy cut off the polar lines.
	So my grandpa showed me there is Tesla induction motor.
	If you reverse this engine to spin it in reverse, it will produce energy.
	And I had a little waterfall next to my house, so we had this spinning wheel, and that is how it all started.
	And one day after war, when the Marty case, one mutual friend now, the Kevin, He told me like, hey man, there is some issues with a friend of mine, Marty.
	He's stuck in jail and can you talk to Dana, his wife?
	They're having issues with this website they need to set up.
	And I was familiar with the case of Justina Pelletier previously because, you know, it's all over the place.
	So immediately I was like, yeah, let's go some dude.
	Let's do some good deeds, you know.
	I'm doing good deeds.
	As you say, all they're taking care about is the money.
	Money. Why?
	Do you know how money got invented on this planet when the people were living in the caves and they were...
	Iblis come to you and talk to you like, hey, you're a bigger guy than this one, you should kill him, you know, and all of these wives then become your wives and stuff like that.
	So since then, they invented the kings, you know, king, oh, you should be the king.
	And here is the money, here is the money.
	And when first time got invented, Iblis put it on his forehead and You know, it's still melting here.
	And he'd say, whoever is looking for you, you know, whoever wish you is mine.
	Yeah. And long story short, I was looking to do some good deeds.
	So yeah, I will help whoever got in prison for telling the truth.
	And then I set up the site, and what is an interesting story and why I'm here to discuss this is that, you know, I do this professionally for living all my life, and this was just another website on my infrastructure.
	And I had set up some monitoring devices in order to be professional, you know, and keep my uptime, and something is bad or under some attacks, so I received the alerts.
	And there is usual...
	Operations from China and there is a lot of Chinese guys having nothing to do, just scanning the networks all day long.
	But there is some particular issues with the Marty G's host.
	When I set up this site, immediately I got taped by some IT addresses that I later on discovered belong to your dear government and some of these agencies.
	And then when they're trying to sniff the traffic on my machines and the traffic of my network, I will leave them the logs, you know, the messages for them.
	They're expecting to see, for example, the PHP version on the machine.
	And there is a message for them, like AFPI, maybe you need to eat more of Pura.
	Later on, in some of these modified queries that are talking about this endpoint, I see the question, like, he's asking to this database that he's trying to, you know, hack in.
	He's trying those passwords and Pura is in it like the word, you know?
	That is how I know that they got the messages.
	And that is interesting.
	I found it interesting what kind of government wish to suppress the information that contain only the facts.
	You know? That's right.
	Just facts. That's right.
	So what kind of government is that?
	It's our government. It's our government.
	Yeah. And let me tell you this here.
	My country here is experimental field.
	Done by your government.
	By your government also is just puppetry, you know?
	There is no president, my friend.
	That's right. There is just a puppet.
	Yeah, it's amazing that they would go to that extent.
	You know, when you look at this...
	Oh, national security.
	Everything we have to do is a secret, and it's all about national security.
	And yet, everybody's heard the situation with Marty's case.
	You know, this revolved around medical kidnapping of a young girl who was severely damaged by the hospital.
	And as he is being held in jail...
	Our government has decided they're so political, they're so pervasive in everything they do, they decide that they are going to attack this website that's being hosted in Bosnia.
	That's amazing. I don't wish to say anything that they can put Marty back in jail.
	I don't wish to say anything that can put you in danger.
	But what I wish to say is this.
	I was fighting for seven years the cult of pedophiles.
	You know, that is what I was doing to keep up this website.
	Because they was, at the end of the day, the persons who was giving instructions to these technicians.
	The technicians was just doing the shit.
	But the mastermind who was like, da-da-da, it was some pedophile.
	And I will tell him, fuck you, man.
	And he can come anytime in Bosnia to visit me, you know?
	And in order to keep it offline, he need to unplug the servers.
	He's back behind this wall.
	Welcome. Yeah.
	Wow. That's amazing. And of course, you never charged Marty a penny for that, all the years that you had.
	To be honest, his wife sent me maybe once or twice.
	Because my government blocked my company and all my bank accounts.
	I was not able to feed my kids and a lot of other issues.
	So our government got your government to freeze your bank account.
	As a slave. Yeah, wow, that's amazing.
	And this, of course, is happening before the big...
	A publicized event where Trudeau froze the accounts of anybody who helped or supported the Freedom Convoy.
	No, no, no, sir. My bank account was blocked for other reasons, not Marty.
	Oh, okay. My bank account got blocked because I reported my government paying taxes every month, 44,000 euros per month, for the Security and apartment where he stayed, Ms. Bilena Plavšić.
	Bilena Plavšić is a war criminal, which is prosecuted by the judge in Dean Haag, International Court for Ex-Yugoslavia.
	So this lady got 22 years, but she was released after 8 years, and she's living in the Belgrade in the private villa.
	And this villa, you know, it's owned by the guy who is president of this state across my balcony.
	Wow. You know, and that guy giving the bill every month, 44k euro, to my government to pay For the living costs of the war criminal who killed my brother and half of my family.
	Wow. You know. Wow.
	I'm sorry to see what you've gone through here.
	This is going to be quite a few tales, I think, are going to come out of Ukraine eventually.
	Because this has taken decades for...
	And not that much information has come out of your country to ours as to what was happening.
	Because of suppression, my friend.
	That's right. That's right.
	Because you don't meet often people like me.
	Well, thank you for doing that.
	Thank you, sir, for giving us this opportunity.
	I know how difficult it is to put your life on the line for principles and to defend other people.
	And when we talk about what you experienced, Marty, tell people, this is the other reason I wanted to get you on.
	So that people could see how, both in Bosnia, how our government is still influencing things there, but to see how totalitarian they are in all these different aspects.
	But, of course, it really is about speech.
	And long before they started cracking down on free speech, They were cracking down on speech in their prisons with a communication management unit.
	And that's one of the other things that I wanted you to educate people about.
	The CMU. We have one in Indiana where you were, and I think there's, what, one or two more?
	Is there another one? And maybe a third one is being built or something like that.
	But tell people about the CMU, what it is for, and how they treat the prisoners there.
	I'm sorry guys, because I have to leave.
	I appreciate it, yes. Thank you very much.
	I'll let you go. I'll review this later, Marty.
	Okay. Thank you very much.
	And hopefully we'll take some time later.
	Thank you very much for what you've done, yes.
	I appreciate that. Thank you for the rest of this.
	Thank you. Okay, bye-bye.
	That's Ennis Bosnick and his company that helped Marty with, and you've heard the story there.
	Marty, tell us a little bit about these communication management units.
	So, when I arrived at the Terre Haute Communications Management Unit on April 1st, 2019, it was basically, there are two types of prisoners there.
	The first was political prisoners, and the second were radical Islamic terrorists.
	It's an interesting mix, but they use the terrorism cases as the excuse to suppress the political cases.
	So they built this unit during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars to house some of the guys that they arrested back then.
	And they put them under this kind of total communications management under the theory that they had to police entirely their outbound communications to prevent them from engaging, orchestrating, encouraging further terrorist acts against the United States.
	Once they had the unit kind of established for that, they realized it would also be really useful for cases like mine where people are speaking to the press and there is press involvement and they want to control that message and kind of limit it.
	After I started kind of writing about it, they tried to shift the population a little bit.
	But it's still largely a political prisoner unit.
	I was punished there for trying to litigate.
	I was punished for writing to journalists.
	I was denied contact with my attorneys.
	I was denied the ability to exchange legal documents on multiple occasions.
	Just now when I was released, they would not allow my attorney to come the day before I was released to take my legal documents.
	I actually had to cart, you know, three 70-pound boxes of legal documents to the Greyhound stop when I left prison and arranged for them to be UPS'd from there.
	You know, it's very Orwellian, and There are basically no rules.
	So they'll say that there are these communications rules and they'll kind of point to them, but they're very vague and they even go outside the vagueness of the rules.
	So for example, when I would try to talk to the press or if I had tried to call into your show, they would try to write me up for circumvention of monitoring.
	Even though they're monitoring the call live in real time, they should Yeah, it just doesn't fit, doesn't square with the rule as it's written.
	And then, you know, they have the, you know, bogus officers who hear these quote-unquote incident reports, right?
	And they always find you guilty.
	Like, they don't care what the facts are.
	You know what I mean? You can't get anything in edgewise.
	And they falsify the record, all right?
	And that happened with me and also with another fellow I'm going to speak about.
	Yeah. So, you know, you had my case there.
	You also have a guy named Donnie Reynolds Jr.
	And Donnie, we believe, was the original intended straw man weapons purchaser for Operation Fast and Furious.
	Donnie was an NRA member.
	He's black. He was active in the hip-hop community.
	He was an antique firearms collector.
	The feds raided his house.
	They kind of, I think, assumed that they would find something they could use for leverage over Donnie, but Donnie was a legitimate businessman, and they really didn't find anything.
	So then began this kind of like suppression operation where, you know, they went and they intimidated witnesses.
	They made it very difficult for Donnie kind of to defend himself.
	I wrote about Donnie's case, and then the American Conservative Union actually followed up on my writing about Donnie's case.
	They did this months-long investigation, published a 5,000-word piece, and it ultimately recommended clemency for Donnie because of prosecutorial misconduct.
	That clemency, unfortunately, was not granted before January 20th, 2021.
	But there's huge evidentiary problems with Donnie's case.
	The whole case hinges on this one wrapper that they claim to have found in Donnie's garbage.
	And the chain of custody on that is suspicious at best.
	But meanwhile, Donnie's been trying to exonerate himself.
	He has business records. The money they say that he was laundering, he has records that show this was income from concerts and events that he was putting on and promoting.
	But they try to obtain those records.
	They stop Donnie from getting to anyone on the outside who can try to help him.
	They threaten lawyers who consider taking Donnie's case.
	They threaten witnesses.
	They've locked up his son.
	They've come to the house and pointed guns at Donnie's family.
	This is all to try to keep Operation Fast and Furious under wraps.
	For those who don't know...
	Operation Fast and Furious was started under the George W. Bush administration as Operation Wide Receiver.
	The idea, I think, under the Bush administration was basically a sting operation.
	They were going to lure the cartels with these fully automatic armor-piercing weapons and then trace the weapons to the cartels and arrest the cartel members.
	Under the Obama administration, Wide Receiver changed and became Fast and Furious.
	It's not quite clear what the Obama administration's Motive or intent was.
	I have a theory about that.
	Yeah, I think a lot of people do.
	You know, that it was to scare people against domestic gun purchases and to be used as an excuse to curtail the Second Amendment.
	Yeah, the UN Arms Trade Treaty, I think, was a big part of that.
	And, you know, the idea would be that we got this leak and say, here's our program.
	We just show you how this happened.
	And we've got this leak of weapons across the border.
	We've got to stop that. And in order to stop it, we've got to trace every gun inside the United States to make sure that doesn't happen.
	It was, I think, creating a motivation to push through the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, in my opinion.
	I believe that. I think it definitely was geared towards gun control, towards an excuse of we have to curb or radically control domestic sales because of what's happening south of the border.
	Department gave the cartels an obscene amount of weaponry that the cartels then used as cartels do.
	And, you know, and there's a lot of bloodshed, you know, south of the border.
	And, you know, we never really got answers as to, like, who in the Justice Department approved this.
	Like, you know, when the Obama administration received a congressional subpoena, I believe from the House, but someone can correct me if I'm incorrect, they asserted executive privilege.
	So they basically pled the fifth.
	That's the governmental equivalent of pleading the fifth, when there's an assertion of executive privilege.
	You know, they don't get to assert executive privilege against Donnie.
	Like, Donnie has a right to this information.
	You know, that's under decision...
	In our Supreme Court called Brady, where if the government's going to prosecute you, you're entitled to all the evidence the government has that speaks towards your innocence, right?
	And so Donnie's case is a very interesting case to me because I think it's potentially a vehicle to get some of these answers if we can only get him back into court and have his rights actually honored.
	They would have to answer some of these things as to the origin of this operation, right?
	And that's, I think, really why they're so hard on Donnie and why he's in a communications management unit And it would just be very interesting to see the truth come out in that case.
	But I know Donnie very well.
	I know him personally. He looked out for me.
	I don't believe that he was guilty.
	And his is not the only such case, you know, in those CMUs.
	I could go on for rather a long time with these cases.
	How many of them would you like to hear?
	Yeah. Well, I want to hear also about how they manage your communication.
	They keep you essentially cut off completely from the outside world, as you pointed out.
	This is really convenient for political prisoners.
	You do a lot of time and solitary confinement as well, don't you, there?
	I spent several months in solitary confinement in the communications management unit.
	You know, they put me there the first time when I was trying to litigate.
	They said that my attempted litigation was extortion.
	They wrote me up for that.
	I'm in court on that now, too, in that we're going to hopefully get to some kind of meaningful answer on that as well.
	And then they operate kind of like a snitch network inside the CMUs.
	And so when I first arrived there and made it clear that I was intending to report on some of these cases, various people came up to me and told me the various ways the government would retaliate against me if I did that.
	In the end, one of those snitches ended up writing something.
	I'm not exactly sure what he said, but they put me in solitary again from September of 2021 to January of 2022 and ultimately transferred me to the other CMU. You asked how many of them there are.
	There are two for men.
	I believe there's a CMU-like unit for women, but they don't call it a CMU, but it's fundamentally the same thing.
	The other one is in Marion, Illinois.
	So I spent about 10 months in Marion, Illinois before they ultimately transferred me back Welcome to Terre Haute.
	That's a rule violation.
	They'll rent you up for that and take your phone and take your good time.
	They'll actually hold you in prison longer for saying, tell mom I said hi.
	Why is that a violation?
	They say it's third-party communication, that you're relaying a message to somebody else, you know, on the outside.
	And this stuff, we really can't stand constitutional scrutiny, you know what I mean?
	Like, when I tried to write to a Forbes journalist, they said it was, you know, attempted circumvention of mail monitoring, and then they're quoting from the very message they're claiming they couldn't monitor.
	Like, it's like, it just proves that it's not mail monitoring.
	The ultimate goal is to suppress protected conduct and to prevent litigation.
	Like, they make it very, very hard to get a lawyer.
	And that's something that Donnie and a lot of these other guys are struggling with.
	So there's another case there, a guy named Kurt Johnson.
	Kurt's an absolute hero.
	He stopped a murder in the CMU. There was a guy there.
	He killed one. He was going to kill another.
	Kurt interceded, saved the other man's life.
	He's now trying to get back up to the Supreme Court on a really important issue.
	I referred him to my Supreme Court lawyer, and they will not now allow Kurt to send privileged mail to my Supreme Court lawyer.
	They've blocked that. And they've said that because the Supreme Court lawyer, his office is in one state and his bar membership is in another, they won't allow him to send this mail.
	And it's like, well, he practices before the Supreme Court.
	What state he's licensed in is really irrelevant.
	It's unsurprising to me that he would be licensed in one state and have an office in another when he practices before a court that has jurisdiction across the entire country.
	Kurt's not trying to go in on a local Indiana issue.
	He's trying to go up to the Supreme Court on an issue that affects a lot of white-collar cases, and they won't allow Kurt to send this lawyer legal mail.
	And then my legal mail has been read.
	It's not supposed to be read, but they read it.
	It arrives already open sometimes.
	Other times, you know, they're sitting there literally reading it before they hand it to you.
	They read your outbound mail.
	I was not allowed to send certain things out to my attorneys.
	It's legal mail. They're not supposed to read it, but they give it back and say, you know, you can't send that.
	Wow. Yeah, that's the thing.
	And we're seeing this in a lot of different ways, and this is happening on the outside in a lot of ways that people don't see it.
	But this type of situation, when you're in the prison, it's done out in the open.
	It's done in your face, but it reveals the character of this government.
	And it is pervasive throughout this government, what we're seeing here with this attitude towards free speech, freedom, any rule of law.
	And they throw out the Constitution and they come up with their minute details to lock us down on every single thing in every different aspect of it.
	It's truly amazing to see that.
	And that's what people need to understand.
	And I think there's a third CMU that's being built, if I'm not mistaken.
	I guess this is going to be the way that they're going to be increasingly putting people in there.
	You talked about how they conflated political prisoners with actual terrorists.
	Well, of course, they are, since you've been in prison, calling parents who show up and speak out at the school board against the grooming of their kids.
	They call them domestic terrorists.
	So I guess, you know, if you're convicted by them, they can get the CMU treatment as well.
	We've seen this type of targeted persecution of people with Ross Ulbrich.
	Actually, I think, you know, when you're talking about Boston and the things that were going on up there with the local prosecutors, it made me think of Aaron Schwartz's case where the local prosecutors didn't see anything wrong.
	You know, he got some information from the Harvard computer.
	It wasn't any big deal, but the feds came in and were coming after him for a lot of charges.
	But he kept fighting them on with that.
	And then they said, well, in despair, he took his own life.
	This is a guy who was a fighter.
	He was constantly fighting the system just as you have.
	I never believed that he committed suicide.
	But that's where we saw the federal government coming in and overriding local prosecutors who didn't see a crime.
	They invented one in the case of Aaron Schwartz.
	We've seen this over and over again, and it truly is amazing.
	I am so glad that you are out now.
	Thank you. Thank you very much.
	Aaron's case was MIT, not Harvard, but it was a JSTOR archive, and they were coming after him for 35 years in federal prison for trying to allow Americans whose taxes had paid for academic research to actually be able to read that research.
	It was paywalled behind a third party that had not produced the research.
	And that was ultimately what Aaron died for one way or the other.
	And I was charged under the exact same law by the exact same U.S. attorney as Aaron Swartz.
	And I think that was part of the reason they were concerned with the optics and the politics of my case.
	Tell me that attorney.
	What was that attorney's name, the federal attorney?
	So that was Carmen M. Ortiz.
	She was the U.S. attorney under Obama.
	She ended up leaving office in disgrace, largely.
	She lost one of her big, big cases, and then she was not able to go run for mayor or run for Senate or get a partnership in a big firm.
	I remember they were grooming her for higher office, and that case with Aaron Schwartz blew up in her face.
	And her husband tweeted out when people were saying that she drove him to suicide.
	He came back and said, no, she was offering a plea bargain of like 30 months.
	And he refused that because he wanted to fight this thing.
	And then he pulled that down.
	But people got a clip of that.
	And so that made me even more suspicious about the claims of suicide.
	She also got into a lot of trouble because she went after, with the war on drugs and civil asset forfeiture, she confiscated a hotel that had, over 15 years, they'd had, I think, three drug busts at this hotel.
	None of them had anything to do with hotel owners, but because those drug busts happened on that hotel grounds, she came after them to confiscate that, and that really blew up in her face.
	So And she was the one who was part of yours as well.
	Boy, she was a piece of work, wasn't she?
	Yeah. People on both sides of the political spectrum denounce her.
	Wow. Pretty roundly.
	Wow, that's amazing. Well, we have a couple of comments.
	Very poor use of prosecutorial discretion.
	Yeah. Please go ahead. That's right.
	We had a couple of comments here.
	Aaron Moss writes, Marty traded his life for a little girl's life.
	That's a man. And that absolutely is true.
	I second that.
	I appreciate it.
	They're still retaliating against you.
	Yeah, they go out to your website. You can't even have a website that tries to put out the truth.
	And the funny thing is, they were trying to do to my website the same federal crime that they alleged that I was doing.
	So it's alright when they do it.
	But it's not alright, you know, when it's a little girl's life on the line, oh, you better not.
	But if you're saying something on the internet that we disagree with, we're going to do exactly what we accused you of doing to try to bring your website down.
	That's right. That's right. Well, what are your plans now?
	I'm so happy to see that you and Dana reunited.
	What are your plans now? I know you've done a lot of writing while you were in prison.
	And is that what you're looking at doing now?
	So I'm going to create a substack.
	I'm going to update all the websites like the FreeMartyG site to link to that substack.
	I'm definitely going to keep writing because there are all these CMU cases that I still care a lot about.
	You know, I did Four years with these guys.
	I was in prison for a little while before I got to the CMU. So I'm going to continue fighting for justice for them.
	But, you know, these fights are time and very capital intensive.
	And so I'm going to find the most prominent role that I can in business cyber counter warfare.
	And I'm going to use that role and use that platform for the advocacy that I want to do elsewhere as well.
	Good, good. Well, it's so good to see that you're out of jail.
	I saw it on social media and there was a statement, well, we're hoping that Marty's going to get out.
	We hope it doesn't happen like it did last time.
	I guess it was one time you were hoping that you're going to be released and they shut it down at the last minute.
	They tried to hold on to me, you know, with...
	With everything in their power.
	Well, be careful because I know they're going to try to get you back in there.
	It's just amazing how vindictive and relentless they are.
	And it really does show the character of our government.
	And it's a frightening thing for all of us if we understand this.
	Because Marty is not exceptional.
	This could happen to anybody, as we've been saying.
	You know, these politicians who don't do anything for our freedom, they let this politicized police state exist, and they need to understand it.
	And so we're starting to see now, we're getting very high-profile politicians charged with stuff.
	We see the unequal application of the law.
	That's what happens when they don't have the guts to stand up.
	But you had the guts to stand up.
	And I'm sorry that that happened to you, but certainly you can hold your head high.
	And I'm sorry that that happened to Dana, but I'm so glad that you're out.
	Keep in touch.
	Let us know what is happening, okay?
	I will.
	One last thing, there was The staff had told us in the CMUs, and they've later rescinded this, that they were going to move the CMU program to a much larger location in Cumberland, Maryland.
	And when I heard that, I couldn't help but think of the January Sixers.
	And I think that was very much the intention.
	I don't know if it's still... Kind of the intention, but if, you know, they've been looking for an excuse to grow the program instead of close the program, with the end of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, I think the program was facing an existential issue as to how to justify its continued operation, and I think they have their eyes on the January Sixers.
	Well, it's James Madison who said the weapons of fighting wars abroad become instruments of tyranny at home.
	And if they wanted to begin this thing by saying they were going to push back against Islamic terrorism, it's now they're the ones who are terrorizing American citizens.
	And we see that with January 6th.
	I can imagine that is probably exactly what they're going to do.
	They certainly don't want...
	People who have had these charges ramped up and escalated beyond all reason, excessive punishments beyond people's imagination, they certainly don't want them talking to the press.
	And they want to make it difficult for them to do appeals.
	I can certainly imagine that that's part of it.
	Looking at Stuart Rhodes and a guy who's a lawyer, they're going to want to keep him in some kind of a CMU where he's incommunicado.
	That's how they act as terrorists.
	Thank you so much, Marty. Again, you're going to start a sub stack, and people will be able to find that on freemartyg.com.
	Facebook, Twitter, all that.
	Good, good. Thank you very much, and I'm so happy for you.
	Say hi to Dana. She has been on your side relentlessly.
	I know.
	And it really, very lucky.
	It really broke my heart.
	Uh, you know, there was some hope, not much hope that, uh, there'd be some pardons, you know, for people like you and for people like Ross Ulbricht.
	And I know Lynn Ulbricht, uh, for years has fought for Ross and to see the, see you guys passed over and to know Dana and to know Lynn and to see, uh, you know, Trump, uh, giving pardons to these big white collar criminals that obviously gave him money under the table, if not giving pardons to these big white collar criminals that obviously gave him money It's just amazing to me to see that.
	So one of the other things that I cannot stomach about that man, but I'm sorry to put that on your interview here, is just another indication.
	And I guess, you know, the problem with Mr.
	Reynolds is that he doesn't have $2 million to give to Rudy Giuliani.
	Thank you. And again, congratulations.
	So happy that you're out of prison.
	We're going to take a break, folks, and we'll be right back.
	Stay with us. Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Yeah, it is. We don't have too much time left.
	Let me just say this.
	You know, I was going to talk about this with Tony.
	It was pretty amazing to see.
	And the fraud that we see out of all this PPP and the so-called COVID relief funds and everything just continues to grow.
	They've now admitted that 10% of the $4.2 trillion that was given by Trump and Biden, and of course $3.1 trillion from Trump and $1.9 trillion from Biden, they now say that 10% of that was lost to fraud and to waste.
	And of course we saw this from the very beginning, as I pointed out many times, that PPP program is supposed to help small businesses, Well, the first fraud that was involved was the definition of a small business.
	They changed that just like they changed the definitions of what a vaccine is and all the rest of the stuff.
	They changed the definition of a small business to be any location that had fewer than 500 employees.
	And that was so that Trump and other people like him could feed it the trough.
	And you had more than 50% of that money Go to less than 5% of the applicants.
	And those were the big applicants.
	They weren't the small businesses.
	And so when we see this happening, think about this in terms of its magnitude.
	10% of $4.2 trillion.
	That's $420 billion.
	That's half the annual budget of the Defense Department.
	Just fraudulently thrown away.
	And of course, we all pay for that in terms of inflation, if not taxes, or both of those.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day. They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.

▲