Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 8, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:02:05

The David Knight Show - 06/09/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 9th of June.
	You're our Lord 2023. 23.
	Well, today we're going to have an interesting interview.
	In the third hour, we're going to be talking to Dr.
	Shiva Ayyadurai. He's running for president.
	And so we're going to talk to him about why he's doing that.
	He's running as an independent.
	But we're also going to talk about, of course, we'll begin with Trump and the trumped-up charges.
	I've got to say that of all the things they could charge him with, all this national security nonsense has become...
	They're being blown up by their own petard, their own bomb is what is happening with this.
	Overclassified everything. And of course, a different set of rules for Trump.
	Then you see for other people.
	Even as we see the Johnson& Johnson vaccine being taken off the market.
	Why? Because he rushed it to market.
	Come after him for that. Come after the bureaucrats who pushed that as well.
	There's a lot of people who need to answer in court for what they did in 2020.
	But this is not it.
	It's a misdirection. Pushing us to a civil war.
	We'll be right back. Well, as I said, even as these charges were being put out by Trump, and of course that's everything that everybody wants to talk about.
	What is far more important is the fact that 19 million people have been injected with the Johnson& Johnson COVID vaccine, Which has now been pulled by the FDA. Had its emergency use authorization removed because it's unsafe.
	Because Trump rushed it to market.
	Because Trump bragged about rushing it to market.
	19 million people.
	Just take a look at this.
	This is the Herald Sun out of Australia.
	A call to arms.
	Yeah. Bear your arms.
	We're going to inject this into you.
	This was back in July of 2021.
	Call to arms.
	It's at the heart of a simple objective, getting the nation vaccinated.
	Remember when that was the only thing that mattered for years?
	Remember when they unconstitutionally locked us down?
	Remember when they swept aside every law, every procedure, every regulation of theirs?
	They violated all the regulations about the masks, all the health regulations that have been in place, all of the science, all the medicine was thrown out the door for their political agenda.
	And they sold it to you through this guy who is the phony anti-globalist.
	That's what he ought to answer for.
	And let's talk about this first.
	As the FDA revoked the authorization of this, here we are, you know, three years later.
	Oh, never mind. It actually would have failed if we had done the tests, but, you know, who cares, right?
	Daily Mail says as of year three, Nearly 231 million Americans have received either one Johnson& Johnson shot or two doses of an MRA vaccine from Pfizer or Moderna.
	Let me tell you, the Johnson& Johnson is also an MRA. So is AstraZeneca.
	The delivery mechanism is different.
	You know, one of them piggybacks onto the adenovirus.
	The other one is encapsulated with polyethylene glycol, which in itself is an issue.
	But yeah, you should put Trump in jail for this.
	Why do I say that?
	Especially for the Johnson& Johnson.
	Because Johnson& Johnson wasn't even in the vaccine industry, right?
	They weren't even involved in that initially.
	And what Trump did was he got them their own factory.
	He subsidized all the stuff, just like he did for the other people.
	Here's billions of dollars. Rush this out.
	And do what you need to.
	But they did it for Johnson& Johnson more than anybody else.
	Johnson& Johnson had no history in this.
	And they had a lot of manufacturing issues.
	They had a lot of recalls.
	And the way that Daily Mail puts it, with a renewed wave of demand for Johnson& Johnson single-dose vaccine, highly unlikely.
	Yeah, yeah. Because now people understand what the scam is.
	They finally woke up to the scam as they started seeing their neighbors and celebrities dying.
	Getting paralyzed with blood clots.
	Jamie Foxx.
	I wonder which one he had.
	He had to get something.
	And remember how they sold this to everybody?
	Oh, it's only one shot.
	Oh, yeah, well, I don't like the needles in my arms, so I'll go with that one.
	19 million people took this one.
	They said, a renewed wave of demand is highly unlikely.
	Yeah. Coupled with a beleaguered history of production hiccups and health concerns.
	Isn't that a nice way to put it?
	Yeah, you had massive manufacturing problems.
	Gross negligence, incompetence.
	And then you had real health concerns that were dismissed and waved away by the FDA when it was happening.
	It severely eroded public trust.
	People have awakened to this vaccine scam.
	But they have not awakened to the scammer in chief, Trump.
	Trump produced it.
	Fauci directed it. It was a movie.
	It was a plan. It was a plandemic.
	We got no time for testing, no time for safety.
	Just dump the cash on them as fast as you can, right?
	This massive transfer of wealth.
	Disgusting to see it.
	Absolutely disgusting. Instead, they're going to charge Trump for a non-crime.
	Instead, they're going to charge him for something that they're giving each other a pass for.
	And when we look at Chris Christie, he goes on CNN, And he trots out Russia, Russia, Russia.
	Listen to this nonsense. And I don't know what President Trump is thinking about this, except that he's been a puppet of Putin from the time he was president.
	And it always was disturbing to me.
	We would argue regularly about Vladimir Putin during the time that he was president.
	And I think it's very clear what we need to do.
	We need to give Ukrainians every piece of military hardware they need to protect themselves against this aggression.
	Yeah. Yeah, let's escalate the war.
	Give them everything they need.
	And forget about the Americans, right?
	You know, RKJ is at the border.
	He said the hospitals are so full of pregnant women who came across illegally that American women can't get into the hospital.
	We've got, I think it was Wisconsin, if I remember, it might have been Minnesota.
	I can't remember whether it's Minnesota or Wisconsin.
	Where they are now going to give complete free tuition to any illegal aliens in college.
	For the longest time, I've talked about how they get preferential treatment.
	They come in illegally. You know, these DACA people, they can get in-state tuition pretty much any state.
	Virtually every state gives them in-state tuition.
	And now, they get a free ride in that state.
	Americans don't get that.
	Americans don't get free tuition.
	Americans don't get to go to any university that they want to and get in-state tuition.
	Why is that? Well, partly it's because they hate us.
	Secondly, it's because they want to inculcate their values in them.
	The universities are not universities.
	You don't get the tools of learning there.
	You get berated with propaganda.
	They're instilling their values into people and say, you're going to do this.
	You're going to listen to us as the authority figures.
	You're going to follow everything that we do.
	And then we're going to give you a nice paying job.
	That's what the universities are about.
	And so consider yourself fortunate if you don't go to one of them.
	But unfortunate in the sense that you're going to be taxed to pay for them.
	And of course, we put other people at the front.
	But with all this happening, and no expense spared for illegal aliens, no expense spared for foreign wars that we have absolutely no business being in.
	And you've got Chris Christie out there.
	He was spot on when he criticized Trump and the Trump family as grifters.
	Jared and Ivanka getting a $2 billion with a B contract from the Saudis over the protests of the Saudi businessmen who are running that fund.
	No, MBS knew what was happening there.
	And so, yeah, they are grifters.
	You've got to focus with that.
	But instead, he can't help but go on CNN and pull out this tired old charge of Russia, Russia, Russia.
	He's a Putin puppet and all the rest of this stuff.
	Christie has absolutely no credibility.
	He's... Just like Biden.
	Just like Hillary. It's just amazing to see these guys.
	And a warmonger, right?
	A warmonger.
	So anyway, back to the vaccines real quickly before we get into Trump.
	This is the way the media is spinning this stuff.
	They don't want you to wake up ever to what was done to you.
	Because if you understand what was done to you...
	Like George H.W. Bush said, these people knew what we were planning.
	They're going to be coming after us. Less than a month after the J&J vaccine was granted emergency use authorization from the FDA, it became mired in a controversy over a small but growing number of severe blood clotting disorders called thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, TTS. That's become almost as popular as myocarditis and pericarditis that have become household words now.
	That hasn't become a household word because it is so long.
	Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious, that type of thing, right?
	It hasn't become that kind of household word just because of its length.
	But everybody calls them the clot shots, and they should.
	They know that's the characteristic of all of these things because all of them program your body to make the spike.
	And it was not a small but growing number.
	Remember when they put it on hold?
	I remember it very well, and I've talked about this many, many times, but it's been a while since I talked about it.
	As they started rolling out the Johnson& Johnson, they had four dozen people.
	It's easy to remember, four, four, four.
	Four dozen people at four different sites and four different states pass out when they got the Johnson& Johnson at the very beginning.
	It wasn't even the blood clot stuff.
	They immediately passed out when they got it.
	And so they came back and they said, we're going to put it on hold.
	Not for that. They didn't want you to talk about that.
	Instead, they said, well, there's been some talk about how it's producing some blood clots, so we're going to put it on hold.
	And they put it on hold for a week as they did this in-depth investigation.
	It was so in-depth, they didn't even look at their vaccine adverse events reporting system, the VAERS report system at the CDC. That system showed that more than 800 people had already reported into the system, which they were threatening doctors and nurses and hospital staff do not report any of these things.
	Nevertheless, you had over 800 reports of these blood clots filed at that point in time.
	After a week, they came back and said, well, we've only seen six cases.
	Six women. No threat to men whatsoever, right?
	Six women out of six million.
	Yeah. It was a total lie.
	Everything about this has been a lie.
	It's been a cover-up. It's been a manipulation.
	They manipulate statistics.
	They manipulate the news.
	They manipulate public opinion with all of this.
	It's all been a cover-up. The FDA and the CDC issued a sweeping pause On administering the shots in April 2021, citing six cases of the rare, the rare clotting disorder.
	It wasn't rare. If it was going through a trial and we used the same types of standards that we always have for any drugs or vaccines in the past, if you had more than 800 of these things happening, they would have raised a flag, a safety flag, and it wouldn't have happened.
	You had three people who died from a previous shot, Nine states banned it.
	And so then they pulled it off the market.
	If you push back against this stuff, even at the state level, if any of the governors would have pushed back, including DeSantis, if any of them would have pushed back early on with this stuff as they saw this happening, I know because I reported it over and over again.
	They wouldn't do anything about it.
	If any of them would have done anything about it, had any concern for us, for we the people, had done any due diligence, They could have stopped it.
	Instead, it was, you know, left up to each individual person, try to weed through the massive propaganda network of lies that they were putting out for people.
	They do quote in this article a joke I'd not heard before from Dave Chappelle.
	He said, I'm going to have what the homeless people are having.
	They're not getting it, so I'm going to go with what they're doing.
	Well, the problem is that if you don't follow their orders in the future, they've got ways that they're plotting right now.
	They're weaving the web to make sure that you will be homeless if you don't follow through with their dictates or arbitrary orders.
	One person quipped online, Johnson& Johnson made the temporary tattoo of vaccines.
	Well, you know, the problem is there's nothing temporary about these adverse effects, right?
	There's nothing temporary about death.
	They kill people.
	Trump's got blood on his hands, and they're going to play with him with it.
	Does he have top secret documents that he was always able to keep as president?
	No, come after him for the blood on his hands.
	Come after him for all the people that he's crippled worldwide.
	He and Fauci and Francis Collins, the whole, take the whole list, Pence included.
	Come after him for that.
	Another person said that Johnson& Johnson was the godfather part three of vaccines.
	Yeah, that was a drug fodder.
	Yeah, hey, drug fodder.
	Drug fodder Fauci, what you gonna do about this stuff, huh?
	I'm gonna make you enough or you can't refuse.
	I'm gonna lock you down.
	I'm gonna take your job.
	I'm gonna take your everything, your business.
	Turns out that Trump owns stock in Pfizer.
	Uh-huh. Yeah.
	Did you know that? That's convenient.
	He also owns stock in Johnson& Johnson.
	Wow. And he also owns stock in the companies that are producing the gender sterilization, mutilization, the hormone blockers, and the rest of this stuff.
	This was an article by VaccineImpact.com.
	Trump has promised to ban child gender transitions, but he owns stock in the big pharma companies that he's promised to investigate for illegally marketing hormone therapies and puberty blockers.
	Oh, well, there you go.
	And it's actually a Daily Mail story.
	They took some excerpts from him.
	Even after he's promised to go after big pharma for pushing such drugs to minors...
	Trump has held stock in three companies that make puberty blockers that are essential for children undergoing a gender transition.
	Now, there'll never be a different gender.
	As recently as the end of last year, he held between $600,000 and $1.2 million in three companies that make these mutilation sterilization drugs, according to the Daily Mail's analysis.
	Yes, financial stakes in Pfizer and Johnson& Johnson.
	It's just coincidental that they also sell, you know, were pushed to the top of the list with the vaccines.
	Because, you know, Fauci and Monsef Slaoui had been working on this thing for a long time.
	And, you know, Bernardo was, you know, the front dog in all this.
	And then Pfizer and Johnson& Johnson muscled their way in.
	And I guess maybe it's because of that stock stuff.
	Who knows? Promised on day one to revoke Biden's cruel policies on gender-affirming care.
	It's going to be a busy day one.
	He's going to do everything in day one that he didn't get done in four years.
	Isn't that amazing? But, of course, people believe that Trump is God, so, of course, he can recreate the heavens and the earth and the federal government in one day.
	Because Trump is God, isn't he?
	That's what the MAGA people think.
	People who are going to swallow this stuff, just like they swallowed his lockdowns and they swallowed his masks and they injected his vaccines.
	They're going to swallow all that stuff.
	It's going to be ruled by executive order.
	You know what? We shouldn't be doing that.
	We should not be doing one executive order after another.
	What a real president would do...
	On day one, he'd say, here's my executive order.
	All these previous executive orders are done.
	I'm repealing them all.
	That's what he ought to do.
	But instead, we have Biden come in.
	He's got a slew of executive orders.
	Trump is going to do the same thing.
	They do gun control by executive order.
	They do everything by executive order.
	Because you understand that we are electing a dictator every four years.
	And they're going to rule as one.
	And so you're going to get this radical whipsaw back and forth because there's no longer the rule of law.
	They're dictators. The law comes out of their mouth in an executive order, an executive diktat.
	So, you know, when we look at this, it is sad to see what is being ignored and then what they're focusing on.
	As I said yesterday, I believe this is all there to make Trump a martyr.
	They want a civil war in the Republican Party during the primary season.
	They want to then thoroughly discredit him.
	And he is already, I don't believe that he's going to be able to win because he is so thoroughly hated by the Democrats and the independents for all the wrong things, frankly.
	And so they bring out the Espionage Act.
	Oh, the favorite tool of Obama, isn't it?
	The Espionage Act was part of, as I said yesterday, part of the Woodrow Wilson criminal regime in 1917, come after enemies.
	But in 100 years, from 1917 to 2017, Obama charged more people under the Espionage Act than all of the other presidents combined.
	And here we are with Biden, a continuation of the Obama administration, because Biden, he's not running the show.
	He can't find his way off the stage.
	So this is the third term of the Obama gang.
	And so they would come after their political enemy with the Espionage Act.
	This is a banana republic.
	It has become a banana republic.
	We look at the fact that Bill Clinton was charged with some papers that he kept.
	He beat that rap.
	And then they look at Biden.
	They look at Pence.
	They looked at Clinton.
	They all had papers. They gave them all a pass.
	They only came after Trump.
	This is a banana republic like Ukraine.
	It's that kind of corruption. Because, of course, Ukraine is a creation of the Obama administrations.
	And so they use the Espionage Act to try to lock up the guy that lost the election to them.
	Same thing that Zelensky did.
	After their election, he locks up his opponent.
	Because that's the way these guys operate.
	And Zelensky is just another part of the Obama-Biden administration.
	The other part of this, they've got seven charges.
	And here's where I think they're going to get Trump, for sure.
	I think a very good case could be made if he gets a fair trial.
	Again, this is always the issue, right?
	You look at these January the 6th trials being held in Washington, D.C. and stuff like that.
	This one, this indictment came out of Florida.
	So the Trump people are saying, well, that's good.
	At least it's not in Washington, D.C. The people, the January 6ers are not getting a free trial, a fair trial, I should say.
	And so even if you had a fair trial, And they looked at these precedents and they looked at the unequal application of the law with Trump and these other presidents all alive and vice presidents.
	If you had a fair trial, he still has real jeopardy because they said that he made false statements.
	And this has always been the big jeopardy for Trump.
	The big legal trap for him is that he can't keep his trap shut.
	He's always blathering about nonsense and he can't keep his stories straight.
	You know, this is what they sent Martha Stewart to jail for.
	It's the favorite tactic of the FBI. To come up with a whole bunch of nonsense charges, bring you in and question you, question you, question you, question you.
	Oh, we found a contradiction of what you had to say.
	So you lied to us.
	Now that's the crime we're going to put Martha Stewart in jail for.
	Not insider trading. She didn't do any insider trading.
	They convicted her of not being able to keep her story straight to the FBI. You think Trump can keep his story straight?
	This is the big issue.
	It's the big issue.
	So, it is a double standard.
	It is a Biden banana republic.
	It is the espionage act all over again.
	Robert Costa... Our mainstream media reporter says, what I'm hearing is that Trump is frustrated, not just with the indictment, but with people in his inner circle who reassured him for months that it was very unlikely to happen.
	A source close to Trump says, quote, too much happy talk for way too long, he said.
	And why is that?
	Because the people who've worked for Trump, like Ty Cobb, understand that if you want to keep your job around him, You tell him what he wants to hear.
	If you don't tell him what he wants to hear, he gets rid of you.
	It's just that simple. That's why I'm saying all of this stuff about, well, Trump wanted to do the right thing, he was a good guy, and he really is on our side.
	No. If people tell him something he doesn't want to do, if he disagrees with it, he gets rid of them.
	And just look at the people that he put in in the first place.
	Monday's meeting with the Department of Justice didn't go well.
	It was mostly the Trump team laying out their concerns and the Department of Justice officials just listening.
	This was not a negotiation or a friendly, let's-see-where-things-stand kind of meeting, according to multiple people that were briefed on it.
	He said another factor that has several longtime Trump people on edge is Mark Meadows.
	Why has he been so quiet?
	Fumed one Trump ally recently.
	Confusion about whether or not Meadows has cut a deal or not.
	There's a lot of guessing about what his attorney is telling him to do as he faces mounting pressure on the January the 6th case.
	Remember the texts that are there.
	And then he goes on to say, and we always hear this about all of these Trump situations.
	Right? You always hear this.
	This is a grave and serious case in the eyes of many law enforcement sources.
	And those who know Jack Smith say that he would never bring the charges of this nature unless he had tons of testimony and evidence convinced that he will win.
	We heard this all the way through all the Russiagate stuff.
	So you can discount all of that.
	You can discount that any crime here was committed.
	And, of course, you can understand that they're never going to come after him for the real crimes that he committed against we the people.
	But I think they may have him, if not now, eventually on this perjury charges, the perjury trap that they spring for people.
	They said proving obstruction is very difficult, and to bring this charge likely means that there is a lot of specific evidence in the hands of the special counsel.
	Don't believe it for a minute.
	They will always say this.
	Two campaigns to watch in the coming days, Christie and Pence.
	Christie is a former U.S. attorney who is willing and able to take on Trump, not just on the political front, but on the legal one.
	He has a grasp of the seriousness of Smith and the case that he can respond with authority on both.
	And yet, what does Christie do?
	He's a Putin puppet!
	He just lost any and all credibility that he would have.
	Between that, pushing the masks and all the rest of the stuff, not even going into his things that happened during his governorship there in New Jersey.
	Pence, meanwhile, has just jumped into the race and directly challenged his former running mate's respect for the Constitution.
	And for the rule of law, witness in the January 6th grand jury and a rival all at once, someone who had classified documents but can say that the feds dropped the probe.
	Why did they drop the probe?
	Why is there a different standard for him and for Biden and for Jimmy Carter and for Bill Clinton and all the rest of them than there is for Donald Trump?
	This is what they're going to say. I think Pence is done.
	First of all, he's a warmongering, quote-unquote, Christian.
	He's just like Chris Christie, except he tries to cover himself with Christ to push for war.
	Disgust me. You might as well call for abortion.
	And he went along with everything that Trump did in 2020 against the Constitution, the unconstitutional lockdowns.
	And the vaccines and all the rest of the stuff.
	He cheers all that, thinks that it was great stuff.
	And then you have the additional thing.
	Where he got away with what they're coming after Trump for.
	No, he's not going to be liked by the Democrats or the Independents.
	And MAGA is going to absolutely hate him.
	They already do. Have ever since January the 6th.
	So the charges are going to include willful retention of national defense secrets, obstruction of justice and conspiracy, which carry a potential of years in prison if Trump is found guilty.
	They're not interested in sending him to jail.
	They're interested in getting a conviction.
	They're interested in having a big show trial.
	Here's my prediction, just like the Manhattan situation, and everybody's saying, well, he's the first president to have been charged with crimes, and now it's happened to him twice.
	He's been indicted twice on crimes.
	This is what they're going to do, just like with the Manhattan thing, they're going to delay it until, you know, next year, what was it, late spring, early summer, so that it hits right in the middle of the primary season and as everybody is gearing up for the election, because that's what this is about.
	This is not about coming after him for real crimes that he committed, real corruption that he committed, because Biden is getting a pass on real corruption, the rest of the stuff.
	And Biden has just as much responsibility for these deaths with the vaccines as Trump does.
	Now, they're not going to do any of that stuff.
	But they will use this as a political show trial.
	And the timing will be such.
	The willful retention charge is a violation of the section of the Broad Espionage Act, though spying is not among the charges against the former president.
	It's the second time he's been criminally charged since March.
	When he was indicted in state court in New York, 34 counts of falsifying business records And again, Trump protests and says he's an innocent man.
	Well, you know, nobody is innocent.
	Nobody is innocent.
	You might be not guilty, but you're not innocent.
	You don't get declared innocent by the legal system.
	God doesn't declare us innocent.
	You know, Christ is our righteousness.
	He takes away those charges.
	But, you know, we could be declared not guilty, but...
	Nobody in a court of law or court of justice can always find something somebody's guilty of.
	That's for sure. Here's what he had to say on his social media platform.
	He said... The corrupt Biden administration has informed my attorneys that I've been indicted seemingly over the boxes hoax.
	Even though Joe Biden has 1850 boxes at the University of Delaware, additional boxes in Chinatown, D.C., with even more boxes at the University of Pennsylvania, documents strewn all over his garage floor where he parks his Corvette, and which is secured by only a garage door that is open, that's very thin and open much of the time.
	I have been summoned to appear at the Federal Courthouse of Miami on Tuesday.
	I never thought it possible that such a thing could happen to a former president who received far more votes than any sitting president in the history of our country and is currently leading by far all the candidates, both Democrat and Republican, in the polls.
	And then he finishes all uppercase screaming, I am an innocent man.
	He said, this is indeed a dark day for the U.S. We are a country in serious and rapid decline, but together we will make America great again.
	I agree. Not only has justice not been done with a trial for what he did during 2020 with the COVID and all the rest of this stuff, and the vaccine.
	So justice has not been done, and this is an injustice.
	This is an injustice that is being done by his political rivals.
	And understand what this means for everybody and for the political future.
	That's the key issue here.
	Let me read some of your comments.
	Angus Mustang. Follow the money.
	Imagine Trump making money off of other people's misery.
	Trumpsters need to wake up and see that this POS is not the savior they think he is.
	Stephen Caspar. The government wants us dead.
	That's it. Depopulation. At the end of all these MacGuffins.
	As similar as they are.
	That is it. Depopulation at the end.
	SoloCat, 1980.
	Trump is a willing instrument of the Democrat election stealing machine.
	Yes. All of that mail-in election stuff would not have happened, except that he persisted in his heinous violation of our individual liberties and the Constitution, financing and encouraging all these governors, Democrat and Republican, to lock us down.
	And to take away our individual liberty.
	And he financed that.
	That's why I call him the producer.
	He was a producer of the lockdown.
	He was the producer of the vaccine.
	And as a producer of the lockdown, he produced the election fraud.
	And I have absolutely no sympathy for him on that.
	And, of course, now he and Marjorie Taylor Greene and the other people like her who are the sucker fish on this giant parasite, They're all saying, well, we need to do all the ballot harvesting and all the rest of the stuff better than the Democrats do.
	Let me tell you something.
	Donald Trump is a guy who went bankrupt running a casino.
	You want to gamble on him?
	How stupid do you have to be to go out of business when you can rig the game at the casino table?
	And you still lose, right?
	I mean, come on.
	He's not a businessman.
	He's a mafia don who can't even operate a casino at a profit, let alone run a country or follow the Constitution, which he has absolutely no interest in doing.
	And then on Rumble, we have Damage.
	He says, executive orders, no matter who is president, are just partisan decrees and should be outlawed.
	I absolutely agree. We want to see a presidency that is nothing more than a dictatorship.
	That's what these people want with these executive orders.
	Last night, I had a very late night last night.
	I was on live with Clyde Lewis, and he's in California, and his show airs late at night in California.
	And so I was on last night in my time frame.
	From midnight to one o'clock.
	So if I have some problems today, you know why.
	As I said, I would do it last night because of the topic.
	I really didn't want to talk about the topic, which is what I'm going to talk about coming up next.
	But I saw this article.
	There was a 102-year-old doctor.
	A female. And she said, this is my prescription for everybody if you want to live a long and healthy life.
	Get nine hours of sleep.
	Karen got so mad at me when I told her that because I just accepted this thing.
	I was going to get like three or four hours of sleep.
	Yeah, we both of us, and she does it with me as well, both suffering from sleep deprivation.
	So if I get kind of punched drunk, you'll know why.
	But I wanted to get on and talk last night about the fact that these fires, which I talked about yesterday, have now been seized upon by the left to push climate change.
	And it is truly amazing how they're using it.
	So I'm going to debunk the fact that this is something that is, you know, it doesn't have anything to do with climate change, except for the green policies I talked about yesterday.
	But I want to talk about that.
	It's very important to talk about that because now they're combining these two MacGuffins with this big cloud of smoke into one combined MacGuffin of health and climate.
	It's pretty amazing.
	And then the problem is on the other side, The alternative media is stoking fear with all kinds of wild speculation about how the fires started.
	And so we're going to talk about why I don't think how the fire started is as big an issue as these other issues.
	That's way back in the pack.
	But that's all that the people who do clicks for money want to talk about.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Well, I just had a listener correct me.
	He said, Clyde Lewis is not in California.
	He's in Portland. He's in that west area, you know, the Pacific time zone.
	I just assumed it was California.
	So I stand corrected. I was on Ground Zero last night.
	I really appreciate the opportunity to speak.
	And it was something that I wanted to talk about a lot.
	Before I get to it, on Rockfin, Atomic Dog says, remember when Christie closed the beaches over COVID and gave himself a day on the closed beach for his family?
	Yeah, yeah. Just like these other guys, Newsom and all the rest of them.
	So, I don't know. Yeah, I didn't remember Christie doing that.
	But let's talk about how this is being used.
	Here's a headline from Politico.
	D.C. gets a lungful of climate change.
	This is not climate change.
	Not at all. But this is the way it's being spun by the media.
	And the danger in all of this is that they can point to something that somebody can see.
	You know, we couldn't see the COVID pandemic.
	We had to have tick-tocking nurses and stuff like that.
	We had to have big field hospitals set up by Trump and hospital ships go to New York and show us all the massive number of beds waiting for everybody.
	And then they just quietly moved them away after they had their effect.
	We had all these reports, some videos.
	Oh, look, they're burying people in Central Park.
	Really? Where's the monuments to this?
	I would have expected...
	That they would have put out monuments to the victims of COVID in Central Park.
	But we don't see that.
	But you can see this smoke that is there.
	And believe me, they're going to use that.
	Politico says, in a stunning manifestation of the dangers of a warming world, large swaths of the eastern U.S. are suffering from extreme air pollution driven by hundreds of wildfires ranging across Quebec.
	Well, again, it is, as I said yesterday, it's green mismanagement.
	These fires are uncontrollable, and that's the issue.
	You know, fires start all the time in vast areas of, you know, wilderness.
	But it's when you can't put these fires out that it becomes a problem.
	And they can't put these things out because of their policies that have been in effect, as I said, for at least 50 years.
	They've been allowing deadwood in the forest.
	As a matter of fact, one of the things I didn't talk about yesterday was the fact that in Texas, where we eventually moved to Austin, but the area where we moved, where Elon Musk is now buying everything up, they had a park there that had massive numbers of trees that had been planted back in the 1930s with FDR work programs.
	And from what I hear, it was a very nice park.
	Very heavily wooded.
	Had been there for like 80 years.
	You know, worth of trees and stuff like that.
	And the area was called the Lost Pines.
	They had Lost Pines this and Lost Pines that.
	Well, they lost all their pines because they didn't maintain the forest.
	And it burned down, this park burned down like 97 plus percent of the park.
	And then it spread out. To people's homes, to ranches.
	The people who lived there said it was amazing how it burned all these herds of cattle.
	They said it smelled like a massive barbecue.
	But it was horrific.
	You know, the damage that it did to the private property outside the park and nearly destroyed the park, nearly 100% destroyed.
	And then, of course, they never did anything the entire time we were there.
	We were there for almost a decade.
	And, yeah, they still had, they didn't take down any of the charred stumps of the trees.
	They didn't plant any more trees.
	They had soil erosion that happened when they would get the occasional torrential rain that you get there in Texas, and it would wash out roads.
	Eventually, they would repair the road.
	They wouldn't do anything else.
	Now, we're beyond the point at which we would plant a tree anymore in this country.
	Pretty much almost at the point where we don't repair the roads either.
	But they won't maintain this.
	And the reason I bring this up is because after we moved to that area, they sent out a thing to tell everybody, please remember that to control forest fires, it's necessary for you to remove dead underbrush and all this kind of stuff on your property.
	Oh, really? Well, why don't you do that?
	Oh, well, you know, we're the government.
	We got school buses.
	We don't have to worry about seatbelts for kids.
	You know, that type of thing. But we'll take the kids away from you if we want to, if you don't have your kids on a seatbelt.
	We'll certainly give you a ticket.
	It's that type of thing.
	The double standard.
	So Politico goes on to say, the smoke has spurred renewed calls for more aggressive efforts to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions, warming the planet.
	Yeah, these are not greenhouse gas emissions.
	This is not because of global warming.
	It's because of green policy to let this stuff get uncontrollable.
	Unlike most climate-linked disasters, people in Washington are feeling this one firsthand, and they can see it.
	And Paul Miller, who is an environmentalist, said, well, this air pollution could drive real action.
	We could really use this.
	People tend to act on things that they can see.
	We were able to create the 1970 Clearing the Air Act, and we were able to create the EPA and all the rest of the stuff because people could see smog.
	So now, we can do that with this.
	Perhaps that's their purpose.
	Certainly, regardless of what caused this, that's how they're going to use it.
	But, of course, this is being used now to tell people, wear a mask and stay in your home.
	Because that's the best that they can do until they get everybody and everything on the electric grid.
	And then they can tell everybody, stay home, you can't go anywhere, we don't have enough electricity.
	And you can't even cook your food because we don't have enough electricity.
	We put everything on the electric grid and then we started removing the power plants from the electric grid and now we've got a problem.
	And so we're going to have to ration this stuff.
	And of course that makes them more important, doesn't it?
	They become the people that you have to beg to eat, beg to go anywhere, beg to heat your house or to cool your house.
	You have to beg them.
	Everything that they do It's about empowering them and making us dependent upon them.
	And that's why the push to put everything on the electric grid.
	And it has a lot of parallels to what happened with this COVID pandemic, this COVID MacGuffin.
	The climate MacGuffin is the same way.
	We've got one solution that's going to be allowed.
	Oh, everything's got to be electrified.
	You can't have hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin or anything else.
	You've got to have the vaccine.
	And so we're going to lock you down until that happens.
	And we're going to lock you down until we can increase the power generation because we shut down all the power plants that work.
	So we're already paid to construct.
	And you can't have it. I wonder how the solar panels are working now with all of this heavy smoke.
	You think they're working pretty well?
	I don't think so. But that's going to be where they're going to head with this.
	Guard Goldsmith. Thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that. He said, I hear Mario Puzo's got a new book on Fauci and Trump.
	The Clot Fathers. Yeah, that would be...
	Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah, drugs is a dirty business here.
	But we're going to get into it.
	An orange haze filled with toxic particles has engulfed New York City, whose air quality is now one of the worst in the world.
	By the way, don't miss Guard's program, Liberty Conspiracy, on Rockfin.
	He does it on a nightly basis, Monday through Friday.
	So, now New York City has become one of the worst in the world, they said.
	Wait a minute. One of the worst in the world?
	You mean not the worst in the world?
	And so I looked at the list.
	They even had a link in their article from Politico to the worst air quality, updated with this, the worst air quality of all the cities, city by city.
	You know where New York City ranks?
	Not in the top 10.
	Not in the top 20.
	Barely made the top 30 at number 27.
	Coming in at number 27, New York City.
	Coming in at number 23, Shanghai.
	Number 22, Jerusalem.
	Number 19, Hangzhou in China.
	17, Guangzhou in China.
	Number 14, Mexico City.
	Number 11, Detroit.
	With all this stuff, New York City is 27.
	With all this stuff.
	And of course, there's two more in China that make the top 10.
	Number 5 and number 7.
	So who is number one, number one, number one, number one?
	Well, that would be Casey Kasem's countdown of dirty air.
	Tel Aviv in Israel.
	That was kind of surprising.
	But yeah, they're the dirtiest there.
	But you know, there was a lot of places there.
	Number 10, by the way, is Wuhan.
	You know, at the very beginning of this, John Rappaport was adamant.
	He said, people, they say they've got respiratory diseases.
	He goes, of course they've got respiratory diseases.
	They're in Wuhan. He cut the haze with a knife and he showed pictures that look like New York City does today.
	Except it's worse than New York City.
	It's number 10. New York City is 27.
	You know, perhaps that was what was happening.
	Yeah, New York is down to 31 today.
	Oh, they changed it? Okay.
	Well, okay. I looked this morning, and they just updated it this morning.
	I looked just before the show began.
	So it's now down to 31.
	All right. It's broken out of the top 30.
	The top 40 hits of climate change, of course.
	Yes, climate change. That's it.
	It's funny, when they pushed that Clean Air Act in 1970, they say it was due to climate change.
	As a matter of fact, it was always, we've got to get rid of the cars.
	Got to stop the cars.
	And from the very beginning, you know, for the first eight years of Earth Day, they were telling everybody that, you know, Paul Ehrlich and his population bomb, they were saying, well, we're all going to die.
	We're going to starve to death.
	Why? Because we're going to go into a new ice age.
	They said that for eight years, and all of a sudden they flipped the script because it's nothing but a script.
	So now we're going to all die because of global warming, and it's going to melt the polar ice caps.
	It's going to go so far in the other direction.
	And yet, everything that they wanted to do remained the same because their ultimate objective is to kill people.
	Their ultimate objective is depopulation.
	And along the way, they do all the same things to get to depopulation.
	But last night, as we were talking about it, I said, you know, if we were going to be heading into a new ice age, and if SUVs and cars...
	Are going to warm the planet.
	Wouldn't you think that the appropriate response would be to tell everybody, turn on your engines, let them run?
	Instead of having all these people shouting on Earth Day, ban the cars, ban the cars, they should have said, gentlemen, start your engines.
	Let's get these things, let's heat this place up.
	We're going to go into a new ice age.
	Let's start heating everything up.
	No? No?
	Not consistent whatsoever.
	And so Politico goes on to say, meanwhile, Republicans are still opposing multiple federal and state-led efforts to tackle climate change.
	Pramila Jayapal, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, derided Republican climate deniers.
	Yes, that's right. We don't believe your doomsday cult religion with all of your false prophecies.
	50 years of false prophecies from this doomsday cult religion, and we're not buying any of it.
	The problem is, is that they don't spend enough time doing that.
	Instead, you know, the conservative press and the politicians will say, well, you know, let's figure out how we can try to dance between the lines that they have drawn for us.
	So she said, you show up to work at the Capitol today, you see the skies filled with smoke, and you still don't get that we need bold and immediate action to save our planet?
	This is ridiculous! It's like these people do.
	Every time that there is hot weather, oh, see, that's evidence of climate change.
	And then whenever there's cold weather, Republicans say, see, that's evidence that there is no climate change.
	Well, I don't believe that there's any climate change happening.
	Certainly not any global warming.
	And the data shows that.
	But that's not the argument for it.
	This is weather. This is forest fires, and hot and cold weather doesn't make the case one way or the other for climate change.
	As a matter of fact, and I've said this before, it was...
	Back in 2014, nine years ago, the American Meteorological Association had their convention in Austin.
	I went to it. I looked at the thousands of people that were there.
	Several hundred exhibits put on by people who were trying to predict the weather.
	They all had different models.
	They were all talking about what worked and what did not work with their model.
	They're giving presentations and exchanging information.
	That's how science works.
	But there was a Soros organization that was there.
	That had a booth set up to hector the meteorologists.
	And I said, you know, people trust you.
	And you need to be using this trust to sell climate change.
	And yet most of you don't believe in climate change.
	They knew that. And of course they don't.
	Because they can't predict the weather two days in advance.
	They know you can't predict it, you know, for decades.
	And now that we've had decades of their failed predictions, why do we bother?
	Trying to dance to their tune.
	I just don't understand it.
	Narrowgate Narrow Ways Ministry says the only hot air warming the planet is the hot air from the flatulence coming out of these miscreants on both ends.
	I agree. KWD68 says one of the first stories on the fire I saw had the typical doctor.
	Stay in! Mask up! We need a stimulus for it now.
	Is there a vaccine?
	Yeah, lock us down, all the rest of it, yeah.
	Damage says the winds must have shifted.
	The air quality in Pennsylvania has dramatically improved beginning yesterday.
	Yeah, before they can get their legislation done, smoke clears, right?
	Used to be smoke-filled rooms that got things done.
	Now it's smoke-filled big cities like New York that get things done.
	KWD 68 says, You can't discount the failure to clean up the forest for decades.
	That is literal fuel to the fire.
	Yeah, exactly. As I said yesterday, my uncle, who's head of the forestry department, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, told me when they were changing the way that they were doing it.
	They're getting rid of stewardship. They're going into this kind of precious environmentalism, and it's going to It's going to burn the forest down.
	They're not going to maintain them anymore.
	And then we saw it happen when we went to Oregon.
	I think that was 2014-2015.
	Travis and I talked to, as I mentioned yesterday, a lumberjack who lost everything because the fire started and publicly owned lands spilled out to these other areas.
	And we've seen that happen over and over again in various places.
	It's the mismanagement of the government.
	The government, as George Washington said, is like a fire.
	It is a fearful servant and a dreadful master.
	And it's the government that is burning everything down.
	And they use every failure of their own creation to argue to burn down more of what we have.
	Politico says, as the smoke was settling on Wednesday, Virginia regulators voted to exit a region-wide initiative aimed at cutting power plants' planet-warming emissions.
	Planet-warming emissions.
	Just disgusting. What a bunch of fake news these people are.
	A major goal of Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin despite a 2020 state law that mandated Virginia's participation.
	So, they're very upset about that, and they're very upset about the fact that Republicans are trying to stop the banning of gas stoves.
	They said Republicans in Washington are also trying to pass two bills that would stop the Biden administration from regulating gas-burning appliances, which BS studies show increase the risk of asthma and other respiratory conditions.
	They don't show anything of the sort.
	And we all know, just from common experience, that that's not the case.
	And it wasn't about asthma either.
	They were honest about it in the UK. They said, well, we just don't want anybody having any gas appliances.
	But they're still lying about it here in the U.S. As a matter of fact, I'll play for you a little bit of what, as they're going back and forth on these two bills, this is Thomas Massey giving them some straight, hard truth.
	Gentlewoman yields back.
	Gentleman from Kentucky is recognized.
	Make no mistake, this administration wants to ban gas stoves.
	They've said it out loud.
	38 to 40 percent of Americans use gas stoves.
	I asked the ranking member of the Committee of Jurisdiction for these bills to save our gas stoves.
	Did he have a gas stove?
	In fact, he does. I asked him, does it meet the new standards?
	Would he be able to buy one in the market?
	He has no idea.
	He was offended that I would ask such a question.
	But we have two bills here to protect your gas stoves.
	The Gas Stove Protection and Freedom Act and the Save Our Gas Stoves Act.
	The Federal Interagency Committee on Indoor Air Quality has never identified gas cooking stoves as contributing to asthma or respiratory illness, nor has the Consumer Product Safety Commission or the Nor the EPA ever identified gas stoves as a significant contributor to adverse air quality or as a health hazard.
	But the other side of the aisle, they just don't like gas stoves.
	They're reaching for any reason to ban these things.
	But they shouldn't.
	It's short-sighted. Number one, what if everybody had an electric stove?
	How would they get the energy?
	Well, you would burn natural gas, as many states do, most states do, in a turbine.
	You would generate electricity in a process that's hardly 50% efficient.
	Then you would transmit it over power lines to the household, which could be hundreds of miles, at an efficiency of maybe 70% by the time it goes through all the transformers, get to the house and then heat up the pot.
	Why not take the natural gas to the house and burn it there directly?
	Well, many consumers have identified this is a lot more efficient, and that's what they do, and that's why they have gas stoves.
	They're 3.4 times more affordable than electric stoves.
	Those who use gas for heating, cooking, and clothes drying on average save over $1,000 a year in their household.
	And when electricity goes out and you have natural disasters, natural gas is there and usually available to offer life-saving heat and to boil water.
	Yeah, yeah.
	You also should have included the efficiency of the actual electric range versus the gas range as well.
	That's another efficiency that you stack on there.
	No, they're kind of like this.
	As he talks about, well, you're going to burn it at the power plant, right?
	And then you're going to put it on electric transmission lines, and then you're going power lines, and then you're going to lose more stuff transmitting it.
	Why don't you just take it right there? And that's kind of what they're doing with this electric bus.
	They just take the diesel generator right there next to the bus.
	And charge it with a diesel generator.
	The bane of all these environmentalists, a diesel generator.
	And look at the smoke coming out.
	You can actually see the smoke. You know, it's just kind of like you can see the smoke just like you can in New York City.
	And of course, when Elon Musk went to the Nürburgring in Germany to show how fast his car was.
	What did he do to charge it?
	He pulled over a diesel generator.
	And the people in Germany were complaining about the smoke and about the noise and all the rest of the stuff.
	He was using a dirty diesel generator to charge his Tesla there at the Nürburgring.
	Well, the problem is they've got two bills to try to save gas-burning appliances.
	Republicans have come up with it.
	Because the Democrats are hell-bent on taking that away from us.
	For the Republicans... Can't get this passed.
	And they're pushing it. You've got the House Freedom Caucus.
	Supposedly the conservative, freedom-loving, libertarian caucus that's there.
	The House Freedom Caucus is not happy about the way this bill was presented.
	It needed to go through them, according to these new rules that they had gotten Kevin McCarthy to agree to.
	They don't like the way the bill was introduced, so they're going to stop it.
	People like Matt Gaetz are going to stop it.
	They don't care about you.
	They care about their political power.
	So Republican infighting over Republican power and procedures is going to allow the Democrats to go ahead with this agenda.
	Senators from both parties are pushing out something as well that would have a carbon footprint of industrial materials produced in the U.S. to be calculated.
	Oh, wow. There you go.
	More theft. More grifting.
	Avoid the people. Climate advocates are praising Washington State's new cap and invest system, says Politico, as a rousing success.
	It has robbed hundreds of millions of dollars from people and businesses in that area to put it into climate action.
	Oh, they didn't say robbed.
	They said raised.
	That's right. But it is robbed, you see.
	This is redistribution of wealth.
	From people they don't like to people that they do like.
	And it is a rousing success by the standards of any socialist or Marxist, because that's what they're all about.
	Redistribution of income. And so they've taken hundreds of millions of dollars and channeled it from some people and put it into climate action programs.
	The grifting green boondoggles.
	And of course, Brian Deese, as I pointed out, Earlier this week, when he was interviewed, somebody said, how much is all this stuff going to cost?
	He said, that's the wrong question.
	We don't care. If it cost a tremendous amount of money, you know, Goldman Sachs is saying, well, we think it's going to cost over a trillion dollars.
	He said, who cares? If it costs more, that's even better.
	If anybody who qualifies for this, it's an entitlement program for billionaires, the green billionaires.
	That's what it is. It's an entitlement program.
	You qualify for this, you get the money.
	Even if the government doesn't have the money, you get the money.
	They'll print some more of it. Don't worry about it.
	It was in the Inflation Reduction Act.
	There's no limits, said Brian Deese, the former economic advisor of the Biden administration.
	Now let's talk a little bit about the fires when we come back.
	I want to take a quick break, and we're going to talk about the number of fires.
	We're going to talk about some of the theories as to why they started.
	And how this all fits into the big plan.
	We'll be right back. Decoding
	the mainstream propaganda.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Alright, let's talk about the fires.
	Hundreds of fires are out of control in Canada's worst ever season.
	And so we could ask, you know, why are there so many fires?
	But the bigger issue, they said more than 400 forest fires.
	Most of them are out of control.
	And that is the issue. Why are they out of control?
	It's because of their forestry mismanagement.
	It's not the SUVs that have caused the fire.
	It's not any human activity that they need to monitor, regulate, and tax.
	But it is their green rules that have made these fires uncontrollable.
	And regardless of how they started, whether they are natural or whether it is arson or whether it is some directed energy weapon or whatever, The reality is, is that if you got all of this dead wood in there, this like giant 50-gallon drums of gasoline, that any kind of arson becomes uncontrollable.
	That's the issue. They're forced to policies.
	We need to turn this back on them.
	And the forced to policies are something that the Greens put in.
	You know, I think there's a lot of misdirection that is coming out of The alternative media, focusing so much on how did these things start?
	We need to look at how do we control this or how are we being controlled?
	It's the same thing that they did and are continuing to do with Wuhan and with the biosafety lab that's there.
	They want to focus on, well, how did this thing start?
	No, focus on how they use this to control us.
	Focus on what they did after this, not just the input into it.
	And focus on how do we stop this from happening in the future?
	You know, they have, in the same way that the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act that was enacted along with 9-11.
	This is the other shoe to drop that happened to us, part of the 9-11 hoax and mass murder.
	Two months before, they had their first germ game simulation.
	9-11, a week later, they had their anthrax false flag attack that they blamed on Iraq, which was not possible.
	Then they blamed it on a scientist.
	It was not possible because Iraq didn't have the technology to produce the anthrax like that anthrax that had a particular way of being carried.
	Then they blamed a scientist who worked at a lab.
	Who also did not have the ability to produce that any more than Iraq did.
	But they blamed him. And there were two labs only that could have produced this.
	But they didn't look at those two labs because they were both run by the CIA. Which kind of tells us something about the anthrax attack, doesn't it?
	But anyway, two months after the anthrax attack, they put out the model legislation, the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act.
	So they laid that foundation there.
	Just like they've let deadwood accumulate and these new policies accumulate for decades.
	And then we have this massive catastrophe that they use for the problem that they create, the problem that they ignite.
	Then, just like the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act or the deadwood in the forest, nobody wants to talk about that because it is so fun to To talk about whether or not this could be done by directed energy weapons or by flame throwing drones or this or that.
	And you get a lot of clicks and a lot of money when people click.
	That's what it's about. So they said poised to burn more land than ever in Canada, about double the size of New Jersey.
	And the real issue is...
	The land rules, just like the real issue is and remains the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act.
	See, the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act are just sitting there with all these powers that these people have given themselves over decades, and then the additional powers that they demonstrated and took to themselves during these three years of lockdown.
	Those things are sitting there like gasoline cans in the forest for the next time they spark off some kind of pandemic.
	And we can't see what the underlying problem is.
	Why? Because a lot of people who should be focused on this are focused on, as Rolling Stones points out, UFOs, lasers, antifa, arsonists, directed energy weapons, flamethrowing drones, and all the rest of this stuff.
	They went through and looked at these speculations about how it started.
	Stu Peters mentioned several times in here.
	They highlight his stuff.
	And he hasn't got a clue as to what's...
	It's just wild speculation.
	He hasn't got any evidence of anything.
	And he doesn't understand the real problems that are underlying all this stuff.
	Just as with the pandemic, these people are pushing fear on their own readers as well.
	Rolling Stone says, creating some of the worst air quality in the world, the official explanations of lightning striking these unusually dry forests...
	Whether they're dry or not, it is, yeah, they are, when they get dry, and of course, you know, we had that situation here in Tennessee, around the Smoky Mountain National Park.
	It's typically very wet, but the real issue was lack of forest management to get out of control.
	And so, instead of talking about that, you have, as I pointed out, Stu Peters, It focuses on directed energy weapons.
	Why directed energy weapons?
	Why does it have to be that way?
	He puts this up and he says, well, look at this map.
	And we've got all these things happening all at once.
	Most of the fires are out west.
	They're not there where it's going down into New York.
	You've got a cluster of them up there in Quebec.
	But still, he says, so all these are happening all at once?
	Well, I don't know if that's true, but even if it were true, why do you have to jump to something like directed energy weapons?
	Isn't that a flag right there that he's trying to sensationalize this without any evidence?
	I mean, clearly, if you've got people who want to commit arson, it could be Antifa.
	It could be people who come into the U.S. and into Canada illegally, terrorists.
	It could be from Russia. Why don't they call Russia?
	I mean, it could be deliberately set...
	But it is deliberate mismanagement that is there, that is the basis of all this stuff.
	And so, if this stuff is all catching fire at the same time, is it an accident?
	You know, certainly these fires will, you know, pick up in the wind and they will get adjacent fires.
	So it's not unusual to see a cluster of these things.
	Then he jumps into the flamethrower drones.
	Again, look, Stu, if you want to get clickbait, just go for the real stuff, you know?
	Go for genetically modified fire-breathing dragons.
	Now, that's a story that I would read from you, actually.
	I would find that to be entertaining.
	So, you know, do that instead of coming up with the silly stuff.
	Flame-throwing drones.
	So, you know, the question is, why is this air quality worse than before?
	There could be some geoengineering that is happening.
	It certainly has been cooler.
	As I pointed out, it's been cooler here.
	It's been cooler in Texas.
	I remember a year ago in May, before this stuff started, I talked about it, how it was over 100 degrees every day when we were packing up the truck to try to move to Tennessee.
	And we couldn't get out of there fast enough.
	But this year, it's been kind of moderate.
	It's been in the 80s. I mean, it's a huge difference.
	You're talking about 20 degree difference.
	It's cooler than I remember a year ago here, a bit.
	And so temperatures have been down.
	Is there some kind of geoengineering with clouds or something like that?
	And would that geoengineering possibly make the smoke much worse?
	Now, that could be a factor.
	I don't know. That is just simply speculation.
	But again, there are things that we can do and we need to take their climate change lies on directly and debunk these things.
	Stop coming up with sensational things to talk about and talk about their sensational false prophecies.
	And we got 50 years of failed doomsday predictions that you could talk about.
	And so, again, Wuhan is far, far worse on a regular basis than anything that New York City has seen.
	That's why John Rappaport was saying, look, you're talking about a respiratory illness in a place like Wuhan?
	Do you realize you can cut the air with a knife there?
	New York is now 31, ranked 31.
	Yesterday it was 27th.
	But Wuhan is there at number 10 and hanging in at number 10 on the charts right there.
	Here's an example of what is happening with the fires.
	Another historic church burns down in Alberta.
	Police have yet to confirm the cause.
	Oh, was it arson?
	Well, likely, as a matter of fact.
	It wasn't a forest fire. The area around it didn't burn.
	It was just this particular church building, and it was an historic building.
	A 118-year-old Romanian Orthodox church reduced to a pile of rubble and ashes after it was consumed by fire earlier this week.
	The church building was declared a provincial historic resource in 1976.
	Local firefighters had responded to the scene and then asked for help.
	From the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, they asked them for assistance.
	But altogether, they couldn't stop it.
	And see, this is another aspect of what's going on with this.
	I suspect that one of the reasons why these fires are getting out of control, besides the bad forestry management, is that, if you remember, when was it?
	Was it about 2013, when Obama was putting MRAPs in all of the police departments?
	Remember that? How he was arming all of them.
	We were like, what is going on with this program?
	And it was even more suspicious because the federal government had been giving military surplus equipment to rural fire departments ever since World War II. You know, when they would have trucks and things like that start to get old, rather than junking them, they would give them to the rural fire departments because they had very few people, very little money.
	They were typically operating on a volunteer basis.
	And so they said, you know, here's this because our first line of, you know, the place where we are most likely to have a big forest fire is going to be out in these wilderness areas.
	You're our first line of defense.
	We don't want that to get out of control, they said at the time.
	Well, Obama stopped that program and then started giving all of this surplus military equipment to police departments.
	Including these mine-resistant armored personnel carriers.
	And everybody's like, what's going on with that?
	Now, when that happened, the Royal Fire Departments, these people are active, and they contacted their senators and congressmen and a lot of letter writing, and that was turned around pretty quickly, and they resumed that program of getting surplus equipment to them.
	But, you know, that's one aspect of it.
	You can see it in this particular church that's in a rural area, small town, that type of thing.
	So we need to do better land management.
	We need to have better firefighting tactics, more equipment for that.
	But I'm sure that probably what they're going to say is, well, we don't want anybody having any firefighting trucks unless they're electric, you know.
	Yeah, get one of those things out there and let it get caught in the forest fire and see what happens.
	Anyway, it burned completely down.
	We don't need to ban gas stoves.
	We need to have better firefighting management, better forestry management.
	We need things like that. Since the spring of 2021, well over 100 churches, most of them Catholic, have been burned or vandalized across Canada.
	Did they use directed energy weapons?
	Did they use flamethrowing drones or GMO, fire-breathing dragons?
	Did they use any of that stuff? Sometimes it's what we don't report, isn't it?
	What we're not concerned about.
	And that is the directed hate, not the directed energy weapons.
	In January, another historic Canadian church, St.
	Joseph's Lutheran Church, Alberta, was...
	Taken, was burned to ashes, and what police said was an intentional act of arson on New Year's Eve.
	Despite the massive number of church fires in Canada, Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez made the brazen suggestion recently that recent slew of anti-Christian church buildings in Canada could be remedied further by further online internet regulation.
	I say this is what we're talking about with the fire.
	The solution to any problem that they identify is always what they wanted to do anyway.
	Whether or not it's going to help that.
	Whether or not it has even anything to do with it.
	Oh, well, you know, we wanted to have more internet regulation and censorship.
	So I think rather than really investigating this thing, what we can do is we can just have more of that.
	That'll solve this.
	No matter how unrelated...
	They always find something, even as a non-sequitur, to justify what they always wanted to do.
	Why would a flame-throwing drone or a directed energy weapon be better tools for arson than a lighter, says my son.
	Absolutely right. Yeah, if you've got gasoline cans all throughout the forest, you don't need something real high-tech like that.
	Only you can prevent forest fires.
	And you've got to do it by telling your government to start managing the forest in the way that they're not doing it right now.
	Narrow gate ministries.
	The cost to turn a house to an electric stove from gas is huge.
	You have to run a 240-volt line, and that's not easy to do in a house that's already built.
	It's very expensive to do. Well, they don't care, right?
	They don't care. You will pay for that yourself.
	You're not going to get a government grant to do that, but who knows?
	Maybe they'll do government grants to do that because it doesn't matter if it's green.
	We can spend any kind of money, but no, they really don't care about you.
	They're going to use these government grants to channel money to the billionaires to build their Solyndras and their other boondoggles that are out there.
	Spencer Long says if Trump was in office, he would have all the big pharma companies coming out wildfire smoke vaccines.
	Warp speed round two.
	Well, you know what we need to do? We just need to redirect those windmills and blow the smoke away.
	That's what we need to do.
	Just run the windmills.
	We start using them. Instead of using them as generators, we put a motor on them.
	And then we just blow the smoke back up into Canada because these politicians are always blowing smoke at us anyway.
	Brian and Deb McCartney, it's the way these fires are burning that make them suspect.
	Yes, there's a ton of mismanagement and neglect.
	Jason, maybe they all started by burning windmills.
	Could be. Or electric cars.
	Did somebody leave their electric car parked in the forest?
	Yeah, who needs directed energy weapons or flamethrowing drones when you've got electric vehicles?
	Just take a bunch of them and park them out.
	Leave them parked and just wait for the inevitable to happen.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Well, welcome back. Let's talk a little bit more about some of the insanity that is coming out of what I think is now the, well, it's hard to say.
	I mean, they're using the IDs are being pushed forward with the COVID MacGuffin and the, you know, the big pharma MacGuffin, but of course the climate MacGuffin.
	Has been the way they've been manipulating us for a long time, and they're still doing that.
	Take a look at what is happening in California.
	They have an electric truck mandate.
	And I'm talking about the big trucks, the 18-wheelers.
	And this is going to take effect January of 2024.
	We're less than six months away from this mandate, where they're going to mandate that you can't have diesel trucks in California that would go to distribution centers.
	This is Newsom's big monkey wrench into our supply chain.
	The question is, what is he smoking?
	He's high on power.
	That's what he's high on. So it's going to mandate that all new trucks purchased for servicing, ports and rail yards and distribution centers in the state, have to be zero-emission vehicles.
	But, of course, they don't exist.
	They can't buy these things.
	There's a few of them that are being made, but they have absolutely no idea.
	Say the trucking companies, we have no idea.
	We have no experience with them because they're just now starting to build them.
	We don't know how we're going to charge them.
	We don't know what the cost of operation is for these things.
	How are we going to price our services?
	We have no idea. We're totally blind.
	And they said it's going to be extremely expensive, but they can't even buy them yet.
	Availability of the electric semi-trucks is a concern, as is the price of the vehicles, the number of miles that they can go on a charge, the cost of maintenance and replacement costs, which are all currently unknown.
	And, of course, it's where you're going to charge them as well, right?
	Not just the range, but where are you going to charge them?
	A trucking company based in Wilmington, California, said we need to know all these things in order to plan.
	If we don't know the actual range, it makes it impossible to schedule.
	And they can't give me a straight answer on how long these trucks will take to charge.
	Does Newsom care?
	No, he doesn't care.
	Newsom has never done anything other than issue people orders as a politician.
	He's never had to make anything work.
	He's never had to run a business.
	He's had no accountability for profit and loss.
	Nothing. He has no real-world experience.
	He sits there as an emperor with no clothes.
	And quite literally, possibly, as a mayor of San Francisco.
	What did he do? Yeah, when Schwarzenegger was governor, and when homosexual mirage was not legal, Gavin Newsom was marrying people on the courthouse steps there in San Francisco.
	And even Schwarzenegger called him out on it.
	And of course, when we look at how same-sex mirage became legal, it never passed.
	Law had never passed a referendum.
	The referendum lost, even with all the millions of dollars from Tim Cookett, CEO of Apple, and all the millions of dollars that he did in matching funds and all the other money that was poured in by the left.
	Same-sex mirage was rejected even in California.
	It was mandated and forced by the Supreme Court.
	Unelected, unaccountable politicians.
	That's what they are. Anyway, getting back to this.
	Charging is problematic on several fronts as trucks require special charging stations with limited infrastructure at or near the ports.
	Experts say the frequent need to recharge and the wait times experienced with more trucks than charging ports will add to the time and to the cost of operation.
	Again, the trucking company guy says nobody has real numbers when we ask them for details about maintenance or replacement costs.
	With diesel, we know our cost per day to maintain the vehicle.
	They know their cost per mile of fuel usage and all the rest of the stuff.
	They know their cost per day of maintenance.
	They're operating blind.
	So what are they going to do? Well, what would you do?
	I don't know how much this is going to cost.
	We know it's going to be more expensive.
	How much do we raise costs?
	Well, it's raised a lot because we don't want to be surprised on the downside and have to go out of business, right?
	So this is going to be very inflationary.
	It's going to cause a super high price surge with this.
	But more than anything, it's going to mean that it's going to block Stuff from being supplied.
	Do you remember when California, with its nonsense and the Longshoremen games that were being played there in California, and what the government was doing with lockdowns and all the rest of this stuff, you had a bottleneck there for products that were coming into the country.
	And because we've become so dependent on foreign imports, we create all kinds of supply chain havoc that took a very long time to get those disruptive oscillations out of the supply chain.
	But this is just more chaos, more havoc for the supply chain, for the food chain as well.
	A lot of food comes out of California.
	Now, you notice that they're talking about rails and ports, but they talked about also distribution centers.
	And I believe that's going to affect the food.
	Food is going to come in and it's going to then go out from a distribution center.
	Oh, it's going to have to be an electric semi-truck.
	One person said, even if I had a half a million dollars to buy a new electric truck, there aren't any for sale.
	No problem. We're talking Democrats here.
	We don't care about that. With 10,000 drayage trucks, The ones that access ports and rail yards, reportedly replaced on average each year, the newly imposed mandate will create demand that manufacturers will be unable to supply.
	And of course, they will then not be able to supply the things that they transport to the marketplace.
	Based on current production standards, according to trucking company owners, distributors additionally say that only a handful of trucks are available at a time, with supply substantially trailing demand.
	And then, of course, there's the weight and the range limitations.
	I said, well, you know, we have to put this on the highway.
	They have weight limitations.
	And these battery packs are going to weigh 10,000 pounds.
	So that's going to mean less cargo is being carried due to the weight limits.
	And they said, we've had absolutely no success when we've requested details about anything from the manufacturers regarding specifics.
	And of course, they can't get their hands on these magical, mystical trucks that don't exist yet.
	I guess, you know, living in San Francisco, he's so used to seeing these big Silicon Valley silicons, is what they are.
	These silicons in that area coming out with vaporware.
	You know, they have all these hyped announcements of something that they're going to sell, and yet it doesn't exist.
	Well, I guess the trucks are like that, and Newsom doesn't think anything about that.
	He's seen that with software so much.
	We're only one election away from having AOC, occasional cortex, being the one who controls the committee that handles oil drilling on public lands.
	Do you realize that? Look at how close we are to these Democrats just shutting everything down.
	She led the charge for the once...
	Fringe Green Deal, but of course now as she bragged that put the Green Deal into the Inflation Reduction Act, and as I pointed out, Brian Deese said, it's an entitlement program.
	We don't know how much it's going to cost.
	There's no upper limit on that whatsoever.
	There's no debt ceiling, and there's no ceiling on the amount of money that they're going to give people in terms of this crony capitalism.
	So that's another area where I strongly disagree with RFK Jr.
	He says, well...
	We wouldn't have to worry about...
	All we have to worry about is the crony capitalism of all these fossil fuel companies and that type of thing.
	We get rid of that and kind of let the market take its place.
	Well, there isn't anywhere that you've got more crony capitalism than in the green market.
	And this is something that's put out, by the way, by...
	E&E News, Energy and Environment, that's the relabeled name of the guys that I worked with when I was doing environmental stuff.
	And when we talk about all this, and I mentioned it last night, you talk about all these people, I can't breathe, and we've got all this smoke and all the rest of this stuff.
	As I was leaving North Carolina, I got to go to Texas to work for Infowars.
	There was a case that was happening right there in Research Triangle Park at the EPA. I've talked about this several times.
	But you had Steve Malloy, who has a site called Junk Science.
	I highly recommend him. He's a great researcher.
	He was going through the paperwork, and he found that they had to transport people from this EPA facility on an emergency basis.
	And he goes, so what's this about? They had screened for people who had respiratory issues and heart issues, and they wanted those people to participate in their study.
	Then they hooked them up to the tailpipe of a diesel truck.
	They actually had pictures of it.
	They filtered out the carbon monoxide stuff so they wouldn't kill them, right?
	But then they wanted the particles that were still there, the diesel particles to be there.
	And then they exposed them to levels that were 72 times higher than what the EPA said was healthy for people.
	At the very same time this was happening, you had Obama's EPA director, Lisa Jackson, and a show trial that was done by then-Congressman Markey from Massachusetts.
	He's now a senator. And they were talking about how they had this little dialogue that was worked out between them, and he actually walked over some of her lines.
	So you knew that they had worked out this dialogue back and forth with each other.
	And what they were telling everybody there was, you know, we got more people dying of fine particulate matter.
	You know, the smoke that you see in New York City now.
	Fine particulate matter is killing more people than heart disease and cancer.
	And Marky says, really?
	Oh, really? And she says, yes, I'm not talking about making people sick.
	I'm talking about killing them.
	At the same time, they're doing it.
	And notice how they did that again with the COVID stuff.
	We got more people dying of COVID than we do from heart attacks and from cancer.
	And I'll never forget the day that I was walking out of InfoWars after doing my show, and Mike Adams was pushing the fear stuff, and he put that up.
	That lie from the CDC, and hyping that as fear.
	It's like, come on, Mike.
	We've seen them do this with everything.
	We saw them do this at the same time that they were hooking people up.
	If they really believed that they were killing people, send them to jail then.
	But we even tried to get a stay on them doing that, and they said, no, we're not going to give you a stay on it.
	And so they were exposing people 72 times limit.
	Now, that was fine particulate matter.
	That was what we're talking about with diesel, talking about with fireplaces, as you see in the UK. They're not playing around in the UK trying to say that gas ranges are giving kids asthma.
	That's a bunch of nonsense.
	Nobody's believing that. They just said, no, we just don't want you to be able to burn anything.
	And so we're banning fireplaces and we're banning any kind of furnaces and all the rest of this stuff.
	So that's where these people are coming from.
	By the way, Senator Markey in Massachusetts has now introduced a health care package that he calls the Green New Deal for Health.
	There you go. Markey's been able to combine both the MacGuffins into one package.
	That's pretty amazing, isn't it?
	So Occasional Cortex is now the ranking member of the Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee.
	And of course, if the Democrats get the majority, she's going to run it.
	And what she can do then is to aggressively shut down power plants.
	She can aggressively make sure that nobody gets any fuel.
	That's how close we are with this.
	In this article, they say Goldman Sachs is now estimating that this Inflation Reduction Act will cost $1.2 trillion in subsidies for the green energy projects.
	Well, they got that wrong because Brian Deese went on the talk shows and said, no, it was last week, last Wednesday, I think.
	He said, no, it's unlimited.
	He said, cost is the wrong question.
	Don't ask that question.
	You know, ask not how much it will cost.
	But ask how much of this we can transfer to our friends.
	That's the real issue.
	How much money can we give to our friends?
	So if she chaired the Energy Mineral Resources Subcommittee, Occasional Cortex would have oversight powers over energy production, mining, and drilling on federal lands.
	Yeah, part of the issue is if we listened to Cliven Bundy, and you should still listen to him, he's still right.
	He was right then, he's right now.
	There shouldn't be any federal lands.
	Under the Constitution, the federal government should have the District of Columbia.
	That's why they created the District of Columbia, because they didn't want them owning any land.
	So they would have the District of Columbia and then have a few forts and ports that they would own.
	But the vast amounts of land that they own out west, that is something that should never have been allowed.
	But it is, as Reason points out, is simply a temper tantrum that is keeping the Republicans from protecting us from these appliance bans.
	They said politics is a petty business, isn't it?
	Yeah. The fact that lawmakers would kill one bill simply because they didn't get their way, and then why this one?
	Why this one?
	Well, again, you've got people like Matt Gaetz who says, today we took down the rule because we're frustrated at the way that this place is operating.
	Oh, there you go. Reason says, just like that, a chance to protect kitchen appliances from the federal government's regulatory onslaught against, quote, things that work, died.
	And Reason says, for all of his faults, Trump was a sterling defender of appliance freedom.
	How did that thing like appliance freedom become something that needed to be defended?
	Well, because we won't go on offense.
	And we won't take on their lies.
	Because we're trying to live by lies.
	Because Republicans are spineless.
	They don't want to defend or attack this phony agenda and defend our liberties any more than they will go on the offense against abortion.
	If they can't convince anybody of what's happening with abortion, all you have to do is show some pictures.
	You show some pictures of living babies.
	You show some pictures of the babies that they have torn to pieces.
	That should do it. That should do it.
	Yeah, there's always going to be people who want to kill other people who are filled with hate or filled with this demonic rage.
	But look, the vast majority of people are going to be able to see what's happening.
	And it's just as easy...
	To pull the curtain back and expose all these climate lies as well.
	Damage says on Rumble, half of the petroleum consumption of a vehicle happens in the manufacturing process.
	There's literally a barrel of oil in every tire.
	It doesn't matter if it's battery-powered.
	And as a matter of fact, these EV things, and they admit it, Stellantis said they arrive on the showroom floor, With much more energy intensive than the process for an internal combustion engine.
	And it takes many, many years of operation before they even get equal.
	KWD68 says, our roads will be trashed because EVs don't pay gasoline taxes for roads, and they're also a lot heavier.
	Better build four-wheel drives and 16-wheel drives.
	Build back better. Yeah, we'll need to get these.
	They took some of these Porsche 911s out of California.
	One guy retrofits them because the roads are so bad in California.
	Put a heavy-duty suspension.
	He elevated the Porsche, kept some of the steering dimensions in there so that, you know, it handled great.
	But it became like a road warrior, you know, Mad Max type of vehicles because that's where we're headed.
	Headed to Mad Max Future.
	Syrian Girl says, I see a new business opportunity with the California trucking fiasco.
	Trucking companies with real trucks can contract to wait at the state borders, reload supplies, and carry them to their destinations.
	Yeah. Question is, are they even going to be able to get the stuff to the border?
	E-trucks can't work without swappable batteries, says Aaron Moss.
	Yeah, that's absolutely...
	It's going to be amazing to see what happens with this.
	And we stop and think about the charging trucks.
	They've got super, super fast chargers for these trucks.
	But what does that do?
	Well, you know, when you put it on super fast charging, that takes down the battery life.
	It also increases the risk of fire.
	And so, you know, we've got to get to the heart of this thing.
	We've got to get to the heart of the climate lies.
	You know, this thing is like hydro, where you're cutting off the head and it grows back, right?
	You've got to go to the heart of the issue.
	The heart of the issue is the lie.
	But we've got a lot of people...
	Who are secretly saying, hail Hydra.
	You know, they've had diesel particulate filters for a long time.
	That's right. Yeah, all this stuff.
	See, that's the thing. That's the ivermectin HCQ argument there.
	Oh, no, no. Can't have that.
	No, no, no. It's got to be banned.
	We're not going to allow that.
	You know, we've got some old technology that works.
	We've got other ways to, you say that this is the problem, and again, I don't want to get in an argument about hydrogen vehicles and all this other kind of stuff.
	The point is that there's other technologies out there that, even though they may have problems, these lithium battery things have problems as well.
	And they don't have the infrastructure for that either.
	Certainly don't have any infrastructure for the hydrogen stuff.
	But if you did have an infrastructure for hydrogen, and if they did, you did get the technical issues ironed out on them, you would be able to fill them up just like you fill up with gasoline or diesel.
	And that's what they don't want.
	They want to control everything with one solution, one centrally controlled solution.
	That was what the vaccine was about.
	That's what the battery EVs are about.
	And regardless of what they say the problem is, no, it's all about them controlling everything.
	One last thing before we take a break.
	Patrick Moore says, and Patrick Moore was one of the co-founders of Greenpeace.
	He said, carbon dioxide is the building block of all life on Earth.
	You know, we talk about life on Earth being carbon-based, right?
	You ever watch Star Trek? We are carbon-based.
	And this little thing over here, it's silicon-based, you know.
	Life form. Anyway, it's a building block of life.
	It is a thing that plants need.
	Why would we spend so much money and destroy people's farms to build a pipeline to store CO2 in the ground?
	You need to release it so the plants can grow.
	It's just that simple. He said there is no definitive scientific proof through real-world observation.
	That's called science. That carbon dioxide is responsible for any of the slight warming of the global climate.
	But there is certainty beyond doubt that there is a building block for all life on Earth, that without its presence in the global atmosphere at a sufficient concentration, this would become a dead planet.
	And so he was co-founder of Greenpeace.
	And after being in the leadership for 15 years, he left and he said, well, the problem was we were looking at it and...
	The real purpose was to try to save civilization from destruction with an all-out nuclear war.
	But these people gradually took the green part and left the peace part behind.
	Yeah, they really don't care about, do they care about the carbon footprint or the emissions of the jets or the tanks or the explosions that are happening, the bombs?
	No, they don't care about any of that stuff.
	They don't care about peace. And that's just another glaring piece of evidence about their hypocrisy.
	He said it drifted into a belief that humans are the enemies of the earth.
	It has been that from the very beginning.
	Depopulation. British scientist, Lovelock, who came up with the Gaia theory.
	Gaia was the Greek goddess Mother Earth, right?
	And it was anthropomorphism, saying that Mother Earth is like a living, sentient being, and humans are a virus.
	And of course, Lovelock walked away from that as well.
	Just as you had Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, walked away from Greenpeace.
	The guy who came up with the Gaia theory walked away from that as well, as well as walking away from man-made climate change.
	And so he had said back in October of 2015, and this is what we need to hear.
	This is what the politicians need to be saying.
	Today our children and our public are taught that CO2 is a toxic pollutant that will destroy life and bring civilization to its knees.
	Tonight I hope to turn this dangerous human-caused propaganda on its head.
	Tonight I'll demonstrate that human emissions of CO2 have already saved our planet from a very untimely end.
	In the absence of our emitting some of the carbon back into the atmosphere from whence it came in the first place, most or perhaps all life on Earth would begin to die less than two million years from today, he said.
	Hydrocarbons, the energy components of fossil fuels, are 100% organic as in organic chemistry.
	Produced by solar energy and ancient seas and forests when they're burned for energy, the main products are water and CO2, the two most essential foods for life.
	So again, I don't agree with the fossil fuel stuff.
	This, you know, biomass stuff that is there, but it's the burning of it that is absolute nonsense.
	I'd quibble with his age of the earth as well.
	But carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, he said, is the stuff of life, the staff of life, the currency of life, the backbone of life on earth.
	Well, it is definitely...
	The means that God has created for us to propagate life on Earth.
	And it's not something that we should take out of the atmosphere and bury in the ground.
	And you don't talk about geoengineering.
	All the CO2 sequestration is not just a money grift.
	It's really going to seriously...
	Whether you're talking about the geoengineering, putting up clouds, or trying to hide the sun.
	They're talking about they're going to do it.
	They're not admitting that they're already doing it.
	We've caught them already doing it in many cases.
	So when you look at that, removing sunlight, removing CO2, to the degree that they do that, to that degree, we're going to have reduced production of food.
	And they're going to say, well, see...
	The food supply is going down.
	That means we've got to do more to control climate change.
	That's the way they're going to do this.
	Always going to use it as an excuse to go in the direction that they want.
	Just like they'll take the arson of a church building and say, well, that means that we've got to control the internet.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Let's talk about money.
	Let's talk about some freedom here. We've got a street preacher who claims that Cash App has closed its account for protesting drag shows and LGBT events.
	Well, this is the first time I've heard this, but it certainly looks plausible.
	I don't know if I'm being shadow banned on Cash App.
	I've had some people say that they can't find me.
	I just got a contribution yesterday.
	I appreciate that. This is a prominent street preacher, online Christian activist.
	Says he was locked out of his Cash App account.
	And he thinks it's because they don't approve of his protesting at LGBT events.
	His name is Rich Pankowski.
	A prominent street preacher who founded the online organization Warriors for Christ.
	He travels the country to protest drag queens and LGBT pride events.
	He said he had two different cash app accounts, one for him, another for his wife.
	Mine got closed first, then yesterday we found out that my wife's got closed.
	He said the way that he uses this is when he's traveling, he said people can send him donations so they can get gas and food and things like that.
	He said he also uses it to give money to other people who need it for things.
	So he donates to individuals.
	He said when he called them, and he said, when this happened, he said, I've had these accounts for well over five or six years.
	I've never had any issue. He called them.
	He said the woman insisted that his account closure was because of, quote, a violation of the terms of service.
	He said he went through the terms of service pretty meticulously, and he couldn't figure out where there was a violation.
	So there wasn't any fraud.
	So he got with them after the customer service representatives examined his account.
	He said they got back and said it was shut down because, quote, they didn't like what I was using my cash app for.
	He said, what do you mean?
	He says it's because people donate money.
	He said it wasn't huge sums of money.
	But when we would go travel, we'd go preach.
	We would use this for gas and money.
	And we would also, as he said, do this for other people.
	He said, so based on that call, He said, I concluded that they didn't like what we were using the funds for to preach against LGBT things.
	So he said, I told him, so now you're going to cancel Christians' accounts because of what we're using the money that people send us for?
	He said, the cash app representative got really nasty with me and said, well, I'm canceling and closing out your appeal now, and then hung up the phone on me.
	So he said...
	The account was in good standing.
	The company, even at one point, offered him a line of credit.
	I've never had a problem ever.
	See, this is what they're going to do with CBDC. You know, they want to map out your political, your religious beliefs.
	Maybe not anything political or religious.
	Maybe you just don't agree with whatever the current MacGuffin narrative is that the government is putting out there.
	Just shut you down. He said, I wonder how exactly they knew what we were doing.
	He said he speculated that an LGBT person or some supporter flagged my account.
	Or maybe Cash App was watching him.
	Well, you look at Pulaski, Artur Pulaski in Canada.
	He was a street preacher. Everybody loved him because, like, this guy was helping people with Cash App.
	He gave him money for food if they needed it, things like that.
	And people could give the money to him back and forth.
	Well, Artur Pulaski was, you know, talked very kindly of in the press until one day...
	He was preaching about what the Bible says about sexual sin, and of course the only sexual sin is not homosexual sin.
	The Bible condemns a lot of heterosexual practices as well, outside of marriage, pretty much everything.
	And so this person comes up and said, I heard what you're saying, and I'm going to get you.
	And he said, after that? He never had any positive press.
	They were always attacking him. The police were constantly harassing him with minor violations, and I imagine it's that type of thing with this as well.
	He said he doesn't think it's coincidental that his lockout comes as Americans are celebrating Pride Month in June.
	He said, we went to a Target store, we filmed their Pride event, and then we rebuked Target as we walked out and filmed it, so I don't know if that made a difference or not.
	But again, that's what we're seeing with the financial systems.
	Meanwhile, this headline was interesting.
	For gold investors, a temporary solution to U.S. debt ceiling is the gift that they would wish would stop giving.
	I don't know what the timing is going to be on this.
	Every time I talk to Tony, we always say, look, you can't time these things.
	We just know what happens over years, over decades.
	Even you can show over centuries with this stuff.
	And we know that gold retains its value.
	The interesting thing is, is that they're saying, well, there's going to be gold on sale.
	Because gold is going to go down slightly, perhaps, because of the massive bond sales that are coming up.
	But of course, for the long term, that doesn't help the dollar.
	You know, if they put out new bonds at higher interest rates, oh, that'll be great.
	Everybody say, well, so we're going to...
	But the foreign central banks are not buying into the dollar.
	They know what's happening.
	And these higher interest rates, higher costs, we know it's going to be inflation, other things like that.
	So it's actually probably going to be a good time to stock up.
	The way I would look at it is it's a sale.
	And so if you want to go to davidknight.gold, that'll take you to Tony Hardeman's Wise Wolf.
	And long term, we know which way this is going to go.
	China isn't slowing down any on their gold accumulation.
	They've been accumulating gold over a seven-month period, rapidly accumulating it, and not stopping in this most recent month.
	As this article from Zero Hedge says, the collective purchases by big central banks accounted for nearly one quarter of global gold demand last year.
	So what do they know that we don't know?
	They're not out there saying, oh, well, they're going to raise the interest rates on the bonds that they're paying, so let's go buy some treasury bills and things like that.
	No, no, China, Russia, many other countries are going for gold.
	And the real reason that I look at the gold stuff It's not because I'm trying to, you know, do some kind of arbitrage between dollar value and gold, but it's simply because of digital IDs, of CBDCs, of the type of thing that you just saw with this preacher.
	We're going to take him out of the system.
	Again, I've been through that with PayPal.
	I know that you can't get any answers from these people.
	I've got a hat to tip out to Mark for sending this article to me from Gateway Pundit.
	Appreciate it. It said, Georgia's governor, Kemp, Brian Kemp, went to the World Economic Forum just this last January.
	And now when he comes back, he is setting up so that Georgia people can have a new digital ID driver's license.
	Isn't that nice? Just like the World Economic Forum said you need to have.
	Just like these videos that you see being produced by Ukraine say, well, you know, we're destroying the country right now, but when we build it back, we're going to have a completely digital country.
	Everything, your driver's license, all the things that you interact with, banks and with the government, it's all going to be digital.
	Isn't that going to be great? Yeah, as long as they don't disagree with you, as long as you don't disagree with them.
	But it's not about convenience.
	Georgia joined the ranks of Arizona, Maryland, Colorado, where digital IDs have already been implemented.
	Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Utah are also in various stages of implementing a digital ID program as well.
	And again, he goes to Davos in January of this year, along with Gretchen Whitmer from Michigan, and with Jared Kushner.
	I guess he's looking for another sugar daddy after he got $2 billion from the Saudis.
	And he said, I went there to sell Georgia.
	Well, it looks like he was successful in selling out Georgia, doesn't it?
	Selling them out, now they can all get their slave ID. That he's going to make available for them.
	As a matter of fact, take a look at this video here.
	This is in the UK. This is at an Aldi.
	And the person is showing that they've got gates at the front of the store.
	He can't even get into the store unless he gets his QR code on his smartphone scan.
	So look at this. You're in London.
	You're on a business trip.
	You're staying in Greenwich.
	And you want to buy some food.
	So you're going to the local oldies, like this one, and you think, I'm going to go in here and buy some food so I can feed myself.
	And then you approach the barrier, and look!
	You can't even get in the shop without having a QR code to scan here, or to scan here, And then you can go and buy things.
	Now this looks to me like the beginning stages of the digital prison that we keep talking about.
	What do you think? Yeah, I think exactly it.
	They're going to make everything digital.
	Everything is going to be by permission only.
	And just as we saw with that individual, they may not give you permission to do the things that you want to do, the things that you need to do as well.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	And at the top of the hour, shortly after that, we're going to be joined by Dr.
	Shiva Ayyadurai. So we're going to talk to him.
	He's now running for president as an independent.
	So that raises a lot of questions.
	I'm going to ask him why he's running, what his position is on various topics.
	Using free speech to free minds.
	Music.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Welcome back. You know, we've had absolutely nothing happening with the ATF pistol brace ban that was done by executive order.
	Again, Trump set the precedent for the bump stock, and actually Trump in 2019 began his own pistol brace ban also by executive order.
	He pulled it out at the last minute in December of 2020 during the lame duck session there, and then Biden put it back in.
	They enacted it unconstitutionally, and many people sued them, and they have now been able to get a preliminary injunction on this.
	I said, you know, it's kind of interesting that we haven't seen any Reports of people being harassed by the ATF. Well, this is the reason.
	We've had a federal judge who has now blocked the rule being enforced for a major gun control group.
	Again, this is for gun owners of America.
	And it is not all the way across the country that they're doing this.
	Tennessee has already taken care of it, as I pointed out before.
	It is interesting when you look in Tennessee, you now have this fight over the manifesto of the shooting in Nashville, which is going to be the basis for a special session by Republican governor trying to pressure and browbeat the Republican legislature to do gun control.
	But this manifesto, which should be at the heart of all this, it's pretty amazing that there have been so many violations of the law, you know, under the Open Records Act.
	They should have turned this over.
	But you've got the police department there in Nashville violating the records law in Tennessee.
	You also have the FBI violating Request for Freedom of Information Act.
	You've got multiple lawsuits trying to get this information, and now they've got a new wrinkle.
	A couple of weeks ago, they said that parents of the victims, people who are associated with the church and the school there, Said that they'd filed a motion saying, we don't want this information out because it's going to be private information about us or something.
	And this is the manifesto, right, of the killer.
	And clearly there isn't anything as the Tennessee Star, and there's multiple media organizations that are filing to get this information.
	There's nothing that they need to have in terms of The layout of the school or anything like that that would put anybody at danger.
	Nothing specific. They wanted to know the motivations of the killer.
	And I think we also need to know whether the killer was taking these SSRI drugs.
	When I talked to the lady whose husband committed suicide because of the SSRI drugs, She had a very good point.
	She said, when somebody has committed mass murder and has been killed in the process, why are we trying to protect their privacy in any way, shape, or form?
	Their medical records should be available because we need to understand what's going on here.
	If we really want to stop school shootings, you better understand what is at least a contributing factor, if not the factor, in many of these school shootings.
	And so that should be open to everybody.
	So why are they keeping all this stuff closed?
	And now we've got a new interesting angle.
	Because now the parents, not of the kids who are victims or the school that says, well, we want to keep a lot of this stuff private.
	The parents of the killer are now saying that they don't want this stuff put out and they want to turn over these records to somebody else.
	But why do they get to decide all this stuff?
	None of this makes any sense, except if it's viewed as part of a cover-up.
	The ATF is saying that pot users cannot legally own firearms, regardless of state laws.
	Oh, wow. That's kind of interesting.
	And I think it is interesting because when you look at the application of the Tenth Amendment to nullify unconstitutional laws and overreach, and that's what we're talking about here, right?
	You don't have to, if the federal government does something that is unconstitutional, something they don't have the authority to do, states can stop that.
	They don't have to always file a lawsuit and go through this long, lengthy process and hope that the Supreme Court will even hear it or hope that the Supreme Court will decide on their side.
	No. You have the power...
	Under the Constitution, anything that is not specifically given to the federal government remains the power of the states, and they have the power to stop this stuff.
	And this has been evidenced by many states.
	More than half of the states now have either legalized medical marijuana or even recreational marijuana.
	The federal government, even under Jeff Sessions, has been reluctant to do anything about it.
	Why? It would expose that this whole thing is a fraud.
	That they don't have the authority to do drug prohibition in any way, shape, or form.
	And that it can easily be nullified.
	And of course, their overreach on guns needs to be nullified as well.
	But notice what they're doing. They're actually saying, well, we're going to combine these two things to try to claw this back.
	So, the ATF warned an advisory that Minnesota residents who use marijuana cannot legally own firearms.
	So why are they doing this in Minnesota?
	Well, because Minnesota is going to play along with this, of course.
	That's where they're trying to establish a precedent, that they can block gun owners from getting this.
	People who smoke weed or take marijuana edibles are, quote, still federally defined as an unlawful user of a controlled substance.
	Prohibited from shipping, transporting, receiving, or possessing firearms or ammunition.
	And until marijuana is legalized federally, firearm owners and possessors have to be mindful that it remains federally illegal to mix marijuana with firearms and ammunition.
	But is it okay to mix the drugs that Hunter was using?
	I know that's what you're all thinking, right?
	Yeah. He committed perjury on this form as a known drug user before, during, and after buying this pistol that he got.
	And then when he was shacking up with his deceased brother's wife, she realized what he'd done, and she took the gun and threw it in the trash, she said.
	So... But by the way, this is why they want to end the gun show quote-unquote loophole and end the quote-unquote loophole of private sales.
	The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, so they've been aware of this state and federal cannabis contradiction, whether it's for medical or recreational use.
	And so this is going to be interesting because, again, they go to a Democrat state and they try to set this up as a new precedent.
	But we've got our guest, Dr.
	Shiva Ayyadurai, ready to come on.
	And we're going to take a quick break and establish contact with him.
	And we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Let me tell you,
	The David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	That's a website. All right, and we're back.
	We had Dr.
	Shiva on for a second.
	He had to step away.
	He's going to be coming back.
	Let me just go ahead and give you his bio here because he's done a lot of things.
	Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai of MIT, PhD, inventor of email, a scientist, inventor, entrepreneur, Fulbright scholar who has four degrees from MIT, including his PhD in biological engineering.
	He has started seven successful high-tech companies, providing thousands of jobs in Massachusetts.
	And so when we get him back, my first question is going to be, so why are you running for president when you've had so many other things that you've been able to do?
	But also where you can find him.
	We're going to be talking about the presidential race that he's doing as an independent.
	That is also going to be an interesting question.
	But anyway, Shiva4President.com.
	TruthFreedomHealth.com is another one of his websites.
	And Vashiva.com is also another one of his websites.
	We have Reverend Bill1960 says that Aldi may have been one of their checkout-free grab-and-go stores.
	Yeah, it might have been. The thing is, though, that everybody's trying to go cashless, and they're trying to go with ID. And that's going to be one of the key things that we have to try to build awareness for.
	Certainly, people over 40, as I pointed out the other day, understand the issues involved in that.
	But when you look at the Millennials, when you look at Generation X, Y, Z, they don't have any problem with the government even putting in cameras in their home and watching them around the clock.
	And of course, many people have done this with the Amazon door cameras and things like that.
	It's one of the reasons why you get so many interesting and funny videos on YouTube.
	Because people have these cameras going on all the time.
	And a lot of people have been pressured by local law enforcement to turn over their feed of their Ring camera or these other cameras to turn it over to law enforcement because they're viewable from, you know, if you've got them hooked up to the internet, you can see what's going on in your home when you're not there.
	But then, of course, they can turn this over to the government.
	The government can just invite itself in.
	You know, that's the other issue that they don't think about.
	All right, Dr. Shiva is back now.
	Thank you, Dr.
	Shiva, for coming on. It's been quite a while since we've talked.
	I've already introduced you and given your bio.
	Welcome. Welcome.
	How are you doing, David? It's been a while.
	When was the last time we spoke?
	I forget now. Oh, it's been.
	I've had this show now for a couple of years, and I think it was a couple of years before I left Infowars since we talked.
	So a lot of things have happened.
	And I talked about your long resume.
	Tell us a little bit about why you're running.
	You've got all these other things in the fire.
	Why are you running for president? Well, David, the number one reason I'm running for president is because the problems that America faces are very fundamental systems issues.
	We need a systems overhaul.
	And the only kind of people that are going to be able to solve that are people who actually come from people and actually care about the suffering of the American people and who have a systems approach to solving these problems.
	The Democrats and Republicans, I would argue since the last 70 years, have been colluding together against the American people.
	When I first launched our campaign, David, the main thing that I shared was this very interesting graph.
	And the graph basically plots over the last 40, 50 year period, the life expectancy of all the industrialized nations.
	And then it averages it into one solid gray line, starting from 1980 to the present.
	America's life expectancy rate is going this way.
	All the other nations are going straight.
	And this is not something that's because of COVID or the vaccine.
	It has to do with a history of policies that go back, starting in the Kennedy administration, which got consolidated in 1970s with all sorts of fundamental issues.
	And we'll talk more about that.
	But the end result is that the policies of both Republicans and Democrats have resulted in the fact that if you're an American, your child will live younger than you.
	And this is quite devastating.
	And it is a very fundamental graph that no one else wants to talk about, David, because it exposes all of these politicians.
	It exposes all of the academics.
	It exposes all the university presidents, all the, quote, unquote, talking heads, all the celebrities, all of these people who have been part of this institutional framework that has resulted in this very important result.
	I mean, if you're running an organization, you see a graph like that, You need to have a systems overhaul.
	And it's not any one issue.
	It's a systemic issue of a number of interconnected issues that go back to the corruption of science, go back to the fact that doctors have essentially been made to be data entry operators.
	You can go down the list of things that's involved, but it fundamentally exposes the fact that those in power don't give a damn about the American people.
	And the reason, David, is all of them running come from one of them.
	They come from the elites.
	So to overnight say, and this is why you see people like, I call them boobie effing Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, talk a good game, or Elon Musk, and all of these people talk from five sides of their mouth because they have trained people that they can say whatever they want, that they never have to walk the walk.
	They can say one thing and people will just believe them because they come from above.
	And that's the fundamental thing that needs to be shattered, David.
	And I think the American people deserve one of them.
	They need people who actually worked hard, came bottoms up and weren't given, you know, things by their parents and never really had to work for anything, never had to be accountable for mistakes that they made in their lives.
	So that's where I'm running because people really need someone like me.
	As you know, David, I've always called things two to three years ahead because I put in the effort to understand things from a scientific perspective, from a political perspective, from what I call a systems perspective.
	That's right. Yeah, and of course, that's the important part, I think, about the campaign for presidency.
	We have such a massive bureaucracy in Washington, but when you have the campaign for presidency, if you've got some people who are going to talk about things that are outside the normal, approved topics, that's what people need to be able to hear.
	We need to be able to open up the lines of discussion, and of course, that includes things like being able to get in debates.
	We can talk about that later as well.
	But it's the fact that they will always talk about the same safe subjects and take the same safe positions.
	You know, Dr. Shiva, when we look at what is happening on the Internet now, you know, I go back often and talk about how you had the Geospatial Intelligence Agency started being created in the 1990s as bandwidth went up.
	They seemed to go in and pick the people who were going to be allowed to compete just as we see in politics.
	They would give venture capital funding.
	The CIA even came out in the open and gave venture capital funding to certain companies and then let them compete.
	They had an honest competition to see, you know, may the best person win here.
	But they had already picked the people who were going to help them, you know, put the stuff out and run it for free for a few years, get everybody into that system and then close the doors on this walled system.
	And that's really where we are.
	We've had closed doors on this walled system of politics for a long time, haven't we?
	Yeah, David, it's a very important point you make, and this is where Musk comes in.
	Musk has presented himself as a fighter for free speech when he's directly the opposite, and I want to sort of walk that through with you, because I was at the center of of that fight for free speech, David.
	If you may remember in September of 2020, I forget the last time we spoke, but you remember in September of, you know, I ran for a Senate first against Elizabeth Warren in 2018.
	We were the ones who forced her to take that DNA test.
	It wasn't Trump. It was our efforts that did that.
	We put up, you know, tens of thousands of signs with that great slogan which said only the real Indian can defeat the fake Indian.
	And it was really exposing her integrity.
	It took off.
	And we hammered her at this fact that she has no integrity.
	She's actually a racist because she uses race for her political advancement.
	Anyway, and at that time, you would have thought the Republicans would have embraced us.
	They didn't.
	So we ran as independents.
	And then in 2020, I gave the Republicans an opportunity.
	I ran for primary as the Republican candidate.
	And we had three thousand lawn signs.
	Sorry, three thousand volunteers, David, all over Massachusetts.
	We raised $2 million in a primary, all $5-10 donations, and we had close to 3,000 volunteers on the ground.
	You couldn't get out of Massachusetts without seeing our billboards, 25,000 lawn signs, 10,000 bumper stickers everywhere.
	The Republican GOP finds a fool to run against me who maybe had one lawn sign, literally, David.
	Now, on September primary day, 2020, the word on the street was, Dr.
	Sheehan is going to win by a landslide.
	And lo and behold, as the results come in, I win in Franklin County, Massachusetts, where all the ballots are primarily hand-counted, and I win there by 10 points.
	And in every other county, I lose 60-40, 60-40, 60-40, 60-40.
	All those other counties have these machines.
	Now, I had never, ever thought there was fraud in U.S. elections.
	I thought that only occurs in third-world countries.
	And so... What was interesting was, you know, here I have four degrees from MIT, you know, I've studied electrical engineering, I built these systems, and I really started understanding these election machines.
	And what I found out within a very few days, and I stayed up day and night studying the manuals of these systems, that when a paper ballot goes through these machines, an image is taken, an image of that ballot, and it is the AI on the machines which looks for the dots.
	So the AI calculates your votes based on the image.
	According to federal law 52 USC 20701, which was passed by a Democrat majority 50 years ago, all records in connection with the federal election are supposed to be preserved for 22 months.
	So I naively go to the secretary of state's office with one of our volunteers who was filming it.
	And he says, you know, we would like the ballot images.
	All right.
	And we file a formal FOIA.
	And they have 10 days to respond to that FOIA.
	And they arrogantly say, oh, we don't have to save those images.
	We deleted them. But the reality is that's a violation of federal law.
	Anyway, 10 days later, I never get my response.
	So I say, hey, you're supposed to respond to me.
	And the Secretary of State's legal counsel says, oh, we don't need to save ballot images.
	And I go, can you show me the law?
	And they send me a manual for the...
	The machines, which has nothing to do with it.
	I said, look, you have violated federal law.
	Now, those four emails, David, that I have, they're admitting they deleted valid images.
	And we had moved this very powerful ground campaign on September 20th to a write-in campaign.
	And we put out two million flyers all over Massachusetts.
	That's a level of ground force we had, David, saying stop election fraud.
	So our campaign moved from these very fundamental policies to that.
	Now, what's interesting is when I put up that tweet, sharing, and you have to add close to 300,000 followers on Twitter, I would do a tweet, David, it would get 30,000 retweets.
	My engagement was quite profound, which I came to find later was a very powerful technique.
	I would do a tweet and then lead people to these long-form, very educational videos.
	And you have to remember, in March of 2020, I was the first guy to call out Fauci as a systems biologist.
	I said the guy should be fired, the guy should be indicted, while Robert Kennedy was promoting lockdowns.
	Robert Kennedy was promoting strict lockdowns and lock, step, and barrel with Fauci because it would save the climate.
	Robert Kennedy, at that time, had endorsed Hillary Clinton three times.
	Missed vaccine mandate queen.
	And Ms. Monsanto, Queenie, had also endorsed his own nephew, who was a Democrat, also was for strict vaccine mandates.
	So Robert Kennedy's full of crap, okay?
	And people need to understand that Kennedy's, and we'll come back to this, historically have been mafia.
	They have their own internal fights with the elites, but they've done very good PR, good camera angles, to make them look like they are Camelot, right?
	But when they are completely part...
	I was exposing all of this in 2020, using my knowledge as a scientist, as an engineer.
	I could see Fauci was a fraud back then.
	I wrote to Trump in March 23rd of 2020, said, please fire this guy.
	And I gave Trump a letter, an immune protocol that he should do that did not deserve lockdowns.
	You support the American public through proper support like vitamin D3, quercetin, zinc.
	By the way, I didn't make a penny off that.
	A number of people took those protocols and they made a lot of money.
	But we helped millions of people.
	So all that had already happened, David, in March of 2020, right?
	And we had already helped people.
	But now, not only had I exposed Fauci by then, not only had I exposed the issues of the pandemic, not only had we called out these things when it mattered, but now here in September 2020, I get thrown off Twitter.
	Why? Because I shared, I said the government of Massachusetts violated federal law, they deleted ballot images.
	One of those fact-checking organizations very cleverly removes the word images, and they said, oh, Dr.
	Shiva's saying one million ballots were deleted.
	I never said that. I said ballot images.
	Yeah. Anyway, in that article, when I was thrown off Twitter on September 25th, 2020, this fact-checking organization in a sort of a blessing in disguise, they said, oh, we called up the Secretary of State's office of Massachusetts.
	Remember, I'm running as a U.S. Senate federal candidate.
	And they said the Secretary of State's office said that they had contacted Twitter to throw off Dr.
	Shiva. Now think about what I'm saying.
	The government of Massachusetts had called Twitter to throw off a Senate candidate.
	And I knew I had a First Amendment case.
	I didn't know enough about election law.
	So no lawyer in Massachusetts wanted to take on Secretary of State Bill Galvin, who's known as the Prince of Darkness.
	The guy's been in that role for 40 years.
	Controls everyone. Well, because I actually care about the First Amendment, I came from a country that doesn't have that.
	The Commonwealth countries don't have that.
	So I had to file my own lawsuit, David.
	I had to learn pace law.
	And I had to file a lawsuit.
	And I had to file a preliminary injunction.
	And the judge gave us our hearing, which is very hard.
	Judges typically don't like to give PI hearings, right?
	Preliminary injunction hearings.
	So that was set for October 15th.
	I wrote a letter to Tucker Carlson.
	I said, Tucker, as a U.S. Senate candidate, I was thrown off.
	You should cover this. It's a large lawsuit.
	It's an important one.
	Nothing. Silence. Anyway, I go into court.
	It's me against three judges.
	Three Harvard trained lawyers, and myself and the judge, federal judge, it's in federal court.
	We are cross-examining the social media director, and we're asking her, how did you decide to throw me off Twitter?
	What was the procedure you followed?
	Oh, we saw him, we saw Dr.
	Shiva putting up this tweet.
	The judge said, well, what did you think about that?
	Oh, we didn't like what he was saying.
	What did you do next?
	Oh, we have a special portal into Twitter, the partner support portal.
	He goes, what's that? He goes, oh, when we report, we get VIP treatment, essentially.
	Hmm. And so the judge said, you know, I'm sitting under a picture of Louis Brandeis, one of the biggest proponents of the First Amendment.
	Had you ever thought of responding to his tweet with your own speech?
	Why did you call the government on him?
	You do understand he's a U.S. Senate candidate.
	And they said, oh, we hadn't thought about that.
	Anyway, the judge was appalled.
	He gave me all the terms of my PI. He orders the Secretary of State no longer to call Twitter.
	And he says, you will refrain from interfering.
	If you have anything you don't like, you will go on Twitter.
	And debate him.
	Anyway, I don't get put back on until November 4th, right after the election.
	For 39 days, where I had used Twitter to raise 2 million bucks, I was off the most important political platform.
	When I get back on November 4th, By the way, you also may remember during that time, I had done the Michigan analysis.
	I'd done Arizona analysis.
	I became sort of the election mathematics guy showing all these problems.
	Didn't make a penny off of it, David, right?
	Trump started using election fraud and raised a half a billion using all of my material.
	We didn't make a penny off of that, all right?
	But the bottom line is that I keep between November 4th to February 1st, I talked about all sorts of issues against vaccine mandates, the election systems.
	And on November, sorry, February 1st, I put up a tweet once again showing those four emails, exposing the Secretary of State.
	Boom, I'm deplatformed within 17 minutes of showing those images permanently.
	Wow. Wow. I go into federal court again, and I say, Your Honor, they didn't hold up your order.
	And he says, in order for me to give you restitution, you must bring Twitter into my courtroom.
	Now, this is a historic case, so it's now me against the Secretary of State, three lawyers, and I also discovered an organization called the National Association of State Election Directors, who had also contacted Twitter.
	They represent the force of all the Secretaries of State, David, okay?
	Okay.
	And they had used Twitter.
	So they were also a defendant and now Twitter is a defendant.
	Anyway, May, end of May was that hearing.
	So now it's me against seven lawyers.
	Wow.
	Yeah.
	What happens at that hearing was the night before that hearing, I find three very important documents, initially on a server in England, and then on the Harvard Belfer School server.
	And these documents are playbooks, David.
	They are actual playbooks, which lay out step-by-step methods how the U.S. government will censor U.S. citizens.
	Developed at the Harvard Kennedy Belfer School.
	The Kennedy Belfer School, right?
	And the head of the Defending Democracy Project was a guy called Robbie Mook, who was Hillary Clinton's former campaign manager.
	But not only the Democrats, Republicans and Democrats.
	And these documents laid out how you will identify an influence operator domestically.
	People who are critiquing the government.
	How you will blacklist them.
	And so when I go into court the next morning, I hold up this document.
	I had to do my opening statements.
	There must have been about a thousand people because that was when Zoom hearings were taking place during the lockdowns.
	And I said, Your Honor, all of these defendants have lied to you because the front page of this document was written by Twitter Legal, by Harvard and all the defendants in this case.
	Three years ago, they had put together a document how they will silence speech of Americans silently by laundering censorship.
	The government would launder censorship through these backdoor portals.
	The judge is appalled.
	He says, I've got to read this.
	It was only supposed to be a two-hour hearing.
	He goes on for the next day.
	He comes into the next hearing, and he goes, I went through Dr.
	Shiva's documents. He goes, this case will go down in history and will be taught in every constitutional law class.
	This guy's a Harvard-Yale trained judge.
	And again, mind you, I had told Tucker Carlson and Glenn Greenwald and ACLU, they did nothing.
	That's right. Because they're arrogant, and I believe they're all part of the intelligence establishment.
	They do limited hangouts, only putting out news either drives them popularity, but they surely did not want to drive me views and hits, because I'm independent of the left and the right.
	And the judge says, I have the right to appoint you a constitutional lawyer, because you've done amazingly well on your own.
	The head of Wilmer and Hale, Twitter uses Wilmer and Hale, one of the leading firms in the world.
	And the vice chairman of Wilmer and Hale said, we don't believe he wrote his lawsuit briefs.
	They're too good. Okay?
	And I haven't gone to law school, but I had figured out how to write pretty good briefs.
	And this was before ChatGPT even.
	This was before ChatGPT.
	I had to actually do the work. Now remember, David, I am doing stuff, exposing election stuff.
	I did the signature verification analysis for Arizona.
	Cary Lake Should have followed it then.
	All these grifters stayed silent.
	They don't do what needs to be done at the right time.
	Because they watch which way the wind blows and they see if they can make money off of it.
	That's the key. The money.
	Yeah, the money. So, 2020, March of 2020, where was Booby effing Kennedy?
	Nowhere to be found. He waited a year and a half to plagiarize all my material and then write stuff against Fauci.
	But he was lockstep and barrel with Fauci's lockdowns in 2020.
	And everyone should look this up.
	Kennedy's speak from left and right sides of the mouth.
	They are the epitome of the not-so-obvious establishment.
	And they use this Kennedy name to manipulate the masses.
	It's got to end. And here, you saw Trump didn't do really anything against election systems integrity.
	You know, two years later, he said, oh, I want to thank Dr.
	Shiva. I met with Trump, and I said, why did you endorse a guy in Massachusetts who Yeah.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	This is what people need to wake up to.
	But anyway.
	And even the extent that, you know, we had a lockdown election, right?
	Why did we have a lockdown?
	Why did he persist in that?
	And that's why we had that additional new form of corruption with the paper ballots and all the rest of this stuff.
	Yeah, it truly is a deputized state.
	You know, when you're talking about the ballots being disappeared, the same thing happened in Texas with local elections.
	And we had somebody who ran for local office and they said, well, according to the Texas Constitution, you're supposed to keep an image of all these ballots.
	And we had the guy who, the Republican, who ran the state board of elections there.
	If somebody used to work at the Rose Law Firm with Hillary Clinton, the Republican governors brought him in to run the elections.
	And he would send out a message every election to all of the boards of elections in every county saying, destroy the records.
	Why would you do that when it's in the Constitution that you've got to have it in there?
	Making sure that they don't do it.
	Yeah, it's a 22-month principle.
	Well, the bottom line, David, is you find out that there are fundamental systems issues and there's the swarm of elites, which includes a collusion of the top 100 university professors.
	So the conspiracy, there is a conspiracy.
	But the problem is the conspiracy theorists don't understand that they think it's one person, right?
	Oh, the Rothschilds here or this religious group here, et cetera.
	It is a swarm, no different than a bird swarm flying, swarm intelligence.
	So they have the top 100 academic university professors.
	They have the top 100 leaders of the biggest NGOs, right?
	They have the top 100 investment bank and advisors from, you know, Jamie Dimon, etc., right?
	They have the Hollywood agents.
	They have the influencers now, the Joe Rogans, the Tucker Carlson's, right?
	All of these people are chosen and they all collude together in one framework.
	And the front end of this collusion is the obvious establishment like the McConnell's and the Clinton's, which they just hammer people.
	And when they can't do that, they have the not so obvious establishment, which are the Kennedy's, which are the Trump's.
	And you go down the list.
	They all say the right things.
	But when you actually look at materially at their actions, they have learned to say one thing and do another.
	I'm going to drain the swamp.
	Well, you brought the swamp in.
	OK, I'm going to lock her up.
	Well, you didn't do that.
	Right.
	Your own followers got locked up.
	That's right. He took money from Pfizer.
	So the bottom line is, and same with Kennedy.
	Kennedy, in fact, speaks from 10 sides of his mouth.
	And that's what he does all day long.
	And our campaign is exposing this because we were in the trenches doing the work while these guys were bullshitting people, David.
	I agree. So when you follow that entire process through, and I want to get to Musk, is that so here in May, we've exposed that the government has a backdoor portal.
	We've told all the major...
	Tucker Carlson and Glenn Greenwald, they did nothing.
	Either they were jealous because we broke the story, they didn't want to give us abuse, or they're part of the intelligence network, where they release stories when it doesn't matter.
	In 2020, it mattered that you covered the story.
	Just like it mattered, you talked about indicting Fauci in 2020.
	Not like Rand Paul, who waited a year and then used our fire Fauci...
	I collected 120,000 signatures, David.
	We drove them down to Trump in our rickety old school bus.
	When the lockdown, we delivered it to him.
	Marla Maples took my letter and said, do not fire this guy.
	Follow this immune protocol.
	We don't need to shut down the entire country.
	Vitamin D3, quercetin, zinc boost people's immune system.
	Trump didn't do anything. He had all the information in front of him.
	Oh, he played a clown to Fauci's straight man.
	You know, he'd say stuff like, well, maybe we can inject sunlight in.
	And Fauci's like, oh, I'm the expert here.
	You don't know anything about it.
	It was like a stand-up routine with Abbott and Costello.
	It's crazy. David, it's theater.
	And these people know they're playing theater.
	But let me just finish the lawsuit thing because it gets quite profound.
	So the judge then appoints me a constitutional lawyer.
	And that's when I should have realized it was a honeypot.
	The constitutional lawyer was supposed to brief up my cases, and all the signals from the court were they were going to put me back on Twitter.
	And remember, in my lawsuit, it wasn't just getting back on Twitter.
	It was also that I wanted the government, in their personal capacity, the Secretary of State, to be sued for damages.
	And I had figured out the case law to overcome qualified immunity.
	Well, anyway, in June, July is when I'm supposed to present my case to the judge, okay, with this new constitutional lawyer, a guy called Howard Cooper.
	Well, what ends up happening is three days before the briefs are due, Cooper tells me, oh, Shiva, you're going to become one of the biggest heroes, the first guy back on Twitter, drop all your claims against the government.
	I go, what are you talking about? I said, you haven't briefed this?
	No. He goes, well, it's my way or the highway.
	So I fire Cooper. And in three days, David, he had seven weeks.
	I had to put together nearly 2,000 pages of memorandum of law myself.
	Wow. So I go into court and it was a setup.
	The judge flipped.
	He just wanted to put me back on Twitter, toast their martinis in Martha's Vineyard and say, you know, we got this rabble rouser.
	Isn't it great? We all defended the First Amendment.
	But they wanted me not to go after the government.
	I refused. He wanted to censor me, throw me in jail.
	And he forced me to file the case just with one claim, which I did.
	But I got a very, very important diagram in there, David.
	If people go to winbackfreedom.com, and that diagram essentially exposed the entire censorship network.
	The Omidyars, the Zuckerbergs, all the people who funded it, all the players.
	And Matt Taibbi and all the Twitter files guys stole my stuff.
	Two years later, never cited my work.
	And they rebranded it the censorship industrial complex.
	It was my work. So this was a limited hangout that they did two years later.
	So anyway, in October of 2022, when Musk buys Twitter, I'm still on Facebook.
	And I say, hey, Elon, are you going to remove the backdoor portal that government has to Twitter?
	Yeah. The next day, David, The Intercept drops a story saying, oh my god, DHS is involved with social media companies.
	Well, it was a complete...
	Limited version of what I had put.
	DHS was one of the players.
	Tucker Carlson then has Fang, who's a writer at The Intercept, on and goes, oh my god, isn't this amazing?
	How did we miss this?
	Well, I have the emails that I've sent to Tucker.
	He missed it. Not only did he miss it, but he concealed the actual story, and then he promotes The Intercept, which gives a limited version of it.
	This is a CIA technique called the limited hangout.
	Yes. And then, so I expose that.
	The next day, I'm put back on, eventually I'm put back on Twitter, on December 20th.
	And I think they were trying to buy me, David.
	So I get back on Twitter, and everyone can watch the tweet feed.
	And I said, hey, Elon, if you want truly free speech, you look like you're looking for a CEO, I'm willing to be your CEO. That tweet goes viral, David.
	It gets 20 million views.
	Wow. All right.
	Major newspapers picked it up.
	You can just go look at it.
	Aya Dure, CEO, Twitter.
	You'll see all these hits. And then after that, I started hitting Musk.
	I said, are you going to remove that backdoor portal?
	Are you going to remove that backdoor portal?
	Clayton Morris, who is at Redacted, in a big Twitter Spaces event, where Musk is there with about a couple hundred thousand people, he says, hey, Dr.
	Shiva's lawsuit, Elon, exposed that there's a backdoor portal into Twitter.
	How do you reconcile with that of your position wanting to be a free speech absolutist?
	Are you aware of this?
	What are you going to do? So Musk acts stupid.
	He goes, oh, that sounds like Big Brother.
	I'll get back to you on that.
	That was in December 20th of 2022.
	The scumbag doesn't do anything.
	And all of these conservatives suddenly are promoting Musk as though he's some free speech fighter.
	And what is really going on, David, and I wrote a blog page on this, is Musk is a government front man for United States and China, any government.
	That's what he is. And you have to look at the facts.
	They're right in front of us. SpaceX, $5.7 billion from government.
	All those Starlink satellites, all those permits, don't just happen overnight.
	Okay? You are cahoots with government.
	Tesla. During the pandemic, the guy made...
	600 billionaires made $2.3 trillion.
	He became the biggest billionaire, the most wealthiest man during the pandemic.
	How did Tesla get profitable?
	They were not worth $600 billion.
	They weren't worth anything until they got carbon tax credits from government carbon tax credits.
	So he's lockstep and bow with the climate change scam.
	He thinks Greta Thornburg is great.
	And using carbon tax credits...
	They move from negative profitability to about a billion dollars in profitability.
	They get a 600x on valuation.
	Suddenly, he's worth 600 billion.
	Again, government linkage.
	Now, finish up with Twitter.
	And this is something very few people understand.
	I've had to explain this in the most succinct way I can tell you is you have a publishing company like the New York Times and you have social media platforms.
	A newspaper reporter, the New York Times, writes something, say David kicks his dog all day, you can sue the New York Times.
	They don't have indemnity, right?
	And because of that liability, if the New York Times makes a billion dollars in revenue, they're only worth about...
	$2 billion in value.
	On a good day, two times a revenue.
	A social media company, if they make a billion dollars in revenue, they get 10 times valuation.
	They're worth $10 billion. So when Twitter made $5 billion in revenue, they get a $50 billion valuation on Wall Street.
	Why? Why does a social media company value it at 10x and a New York Times is valued at 1x?
	Simple reason. Congress and Silicon Valley colluded to create what was called Section 230 immunity, which allows social media companies never to be sued.
	So if I post on Twitter, David kicks his dog, you can't sue Twitter.
	Okay? So that indemnity allows them to have this higher valuation.
	Now in return for that...
	Congress and SISA struck a deal with all these social media companies.
	You will give us backdoor access so we can censor people.
	And that censorship architecture is what I discovered in my lawsuit.
	The way they censor it, they have a backdoor clearinghouse.
	The clearinghouse was created by Pierre Omidyar.
	It's all documented. This is who was the former head of eBay, who bought PayPal from Musk and Peter Thiel.
	That backdoor portal allows government to let this non-profit, Center for Internet Security, know, oh, Dr.
	Shiva's saying something, take him out.
	They then report to Twitter.
	Government can say, oh, we didn't do it.
	It's laundering censorship.
	It's a term I came up with in my...
	So fundamentally, I had exposed this backdoor portal, and I didn't let up, David.
	I kept hitting Musk over and over and over again.
	And if you look at my tweet...
	Visibility. In December, I used to get 500,000 views per day.
	And as I increased my tweets attacking Musk, my visibility goes down like this.
	From 500,000 views to 300,000 views to 100,000 views.
	Now it's 5,000 views, David.
	For a guy who's got 330,000 followers...
	And dropping, they eat away my followers on an algorithmic way.
	So what Musk has done is he's doing censorship 10.0.
	Jack Dorsey just took you out for certain issues.
	Musk gives the illusion that he put guys like me back on, but he has us in a digital cage where your voice doesn't go out anywhere.
	He has said free speech does not equal free reach.
	This is a complete rewriting of what the founders actually wanted free speech to be.
	I agree. So this guy's dangerous.
	And the most disgusting people are the conservative grifters.
	And you can see it.
	People like Dinesh D'Souza, people like James Woods.
	All these people are ass-kissing to Musk because they want views.
	I saw it in front of him.
	I have it all videotaped, in fact, documented.
	Musk, when the WEF CEO got brought in, then people said, oh, my God, Dr. Shiva's right.
	Look, he just screwed us.
	He brought in a woman who's with a WEF executive who's pro-vaccine mandate, pro-mask mandates.
	And when he brought that person in, James Woods, you know, tries to be very snarky.
	He says, oh, I guess the party's over, you know?
	And I said, James, the party never began.
	That's right. A couple of months ago, I put up a tweet, and I was surprised because I'm so shadowbanned.
	You know, I've got, like, what is that?
	I don't even... $133,000 or something like that.
	But they keep it flat. You know, it'll go up over the weekend and then when they come back on Monday or whatever, it drops off.
	You know, everything happens always like that.
	And they've kept me at this plateau and, of course, limiting my visibility.
	But I was surprised Matt Drudge put a link to my tweet up.
	I was like, what is going on?
	Left it up there for a couple of days, so I'm pretty much burned.
	But what I said... I said, you know, this is all just...
	Musk hasn't done anything.
	It hasn't changed except maybe to get worse.
	And he's brought back a few high-profile people as a beard.
	And that's all that's really going on here.
	And I agree with you.
	You know, you call it... I like your term.
	I like laundering censorship.
	I call them the deputized state.
	Everybody talks about the deep state.
	Well, these are their deputies. They work on their behalf.
	I mean, that's... Yes. And they get paid handsomely to do that.
	Now, what's interesting, David, is they...
	In order to cover up the true findings of my lawsuit, they did the Twitter files, which is a complete bullshit, okay?
	Because it never, if you notice, The Intercept and Twitter never exposed the people who are actually the funders, people like Pierre Omidyar.
	They cleverly leave them out.
	And then what I've noticed is this is the way these guys work.
	It's a very interesting intelligence formula.
	First, when guys like me, independent journalists, expose the truth, they conceal it.
	And they hope it goes away. Then, when it doesn't get concealed, they do a limited hangout, which is a CIA technique.
	They release a manicured version of that story, and they try to take ownership for it, like The Intercept, which is a total intelligence operation.
	The Intercept was started by Pierre Omidyar, and Pierre Omidyar is the one who created the Center for Internet Security.
	Think about this. And FAANG never exposes that.
	That their boss is the one who created the censorship infrastructure.
	So they do a limited hangout.
	And then when the story is going to come out too much, then they try to own the story.
	Oh, we're the guys who released the truth.
	Not this guy, Dr. Shivaya Dure.
	We did it. Give us the honors.
	And that's called total plagiarism.
	So they have it down to a science, David.
	The problem they had, David, is a guy like me is alive.
	We're exposing it.
	And now we have close to 400 million people all over the world who know about All the videos I did, they did get out.
	And we've also created a movement now, David, called Truth Freedom Health.
	The Truth Freedom Health movement says all these movements for fighting for our health, fighting for good science, fighting for freedoms, all have to come together.
	You can't have the yoga people here saying, oh, I'm going to take care of my body, and the nerves talking about innovation, and the freedom people saying, I want my guns.
	All these movements have got to come together.
	Why? Because without freedom...
	The fundamental force of movement of information, matter, and energy, freely, you cannot do great science.
	Science demands the ability to have open discourse.
	And only with great science, truth, and freedom can you figure out what's right for your health.
	And when you have health, you have the wherewithal to fight for freedom and truth.
	So the Truth, Freedom, and Health movement now, we have close to about 400,000 people in over 100 countries.
	And what I'm doing, David, I'm teaching people system science, system thinking.
	Not this reductionist way of looking at the world beyond left and right.
	And it is the only force that's going to change the world because the elites...
	Take very complex situations and they reduce it to one-line, you know, Edward Bernays-type advertising models.
	And then they have their Bobby Kennedys, Booby Kennedy, that's what he really should be called, or Trump.
	Or, you know, they found a brown guy like this guy, Vivek, right?
	They have to find out. If you notice, there's been a lot of brown people that they found to take away this guy, Jay Bhattacharya.
	Suddenly, this doctor. Look at him.
	He was promoting lockdowns.
	And then suddenly, he's going the other way.
	So all of these MDs...
	They want to try to get credit now.
	They're saying stuff against Fauci.
	Well, you profited from being silent in 2020, and now you're profiting from lecture tours in 2022 and 2023.
	So what I urge people to do is, it's not the obvious establishment, David, that's the enemies of the people.
	It's the not-so-obvious establishment.
	It's the Tucker Carlson's.
	It is the Booby Kennedy's.
	It is the Trumps because they keep people.
	They say just enough.
	Yes.
	And they and they have their marketing people figuring out all the buzzwords.
	But you look at Kennedy.
	We have a video that I exposed him in 2020.
	I had to do the dirty work in exposing Kennedy.
	I lost 20 percent of my followers.
	All these wealthy, bougie women who keep giving him money.
	What was Kennedy who endorsed Hillary Clinton three times?
	Not once, not twice, but three times.
	He endorses nephew, as I said, was pro vaccine mandate.
	We have a video where he says, I am pro-vaccine mandate.
	I am for full vaccination of all Americans.
	I vaccinated all my kids.
	And then he goes on with his other mouth to say, oh, the CDC is so corrupt, but I'm going to get them to make safe vaccines.
	You see, this is all bullshit.
	On Ukraine, the guy says, yeah, we are in Ukraine for the right reasons.
	We shouldn't be there for regime change.
	This is classic liberal imperialism.
	The Republicans like Goldwater in Vietnam said, yeah, we need to bomb the hell out of the Vietnamese.
	The LBJs and the liberal elites said, well, we need to do it this way.
	They basically tell people how to screw other people so they can swallow the bitter pill.
	And this is the evil of people like Kennedy.
	This is the evil of these liberal imperialists because they take advantage of people.
	So our campaign, David, is fundamentally systems changing because what we're saying is when you look at that simple graph, And you put it together, that one graph that, since 1980, Americans' life expectancy is going like this.
	It makes it so clear.
	It doesn't matter what any of these guys say.
	They're eating organic food.
	They get the best insurance.
	They get the best health care.
	But everyday people, if you're an American, your son or daughter is going to live less than you.
	And that is the most important thing to recognize, that all of these people are professional bullshitters.
	They're professional theater.
	And the only people you can trust ultimately is one of you.
	Did this guy, does he walk the walk?
	I definitely do. I've been 100% right without any arrogance.
	You look at the predictions I made, they've been on target.
	Why? Because I take a scientific systems approach.
	And I'm telling you right now that the biggest thing that people need to recognize right now is that these people who are running for office right now, they're all one, you know, group of people.
	They all work together. Elon Musk is part of that.
	And one of the most dangerous things that's taking place right now is the fact that the life expectancy of Americans is going downward.
	And the only way forward is a systems overhaul.
	This is not any one thing.
	And so what we've been doing on our campaign, David, is we have a six-part platform.
	And guess what? Our platform doesn't say, oh, elect me and then I'm going to do this.
	So every Thursday, David, we take an issue and we're rotating it.
	So healthcare. What's our position on healthcare?
	I can talk about GPOs, PBMs, but even simpler, you've got to boost your immune system.
	And Government ain't going to do it.
	They're going to keep destroying your immune system.
	Ultimately, every policy, as a systems biologist, I know, will affect your biology.
	Policy to biology.
	So, cytosol, the technology that I created, allows us to understand what happens at the molecular systems level.
	So, you take a policy, you can see it affects your biology.
	So, those in...
	And all of these people know that the health of American people is going downward because people's immune systems are shot.
	When the immune system is shot, it is the operating system of even the aging systems.
	Anti-aging and immune system science are like this.
	So what's the health care policy?
	Forget the government. Forget the presidency.
	Forget the judiciary. You have to boost your immune system.
	So, my being president, David, I have a very different definition of what the presidency is.
	I think the presidency is a bully pulpit to educate people.
	That's what a president should be doing.
	Because we know it's corrupt.
	We know the judiciary is corrupt.
	But if I get in as president, David, imagine you can go see my videos.
	I would be educating people every day.
	On how this policy affects them and telling them, you have to now take action at the local level.
	Government ain't going to do anything for you.
	Let's be honest. It ain't going to do anything.
	So healthcare boosts your immune system.
	And we actually teach people this, David.
	We teach people what the immune system is.
	We give them the ability to do it so they don't have to wait until I'm president.
	And we did that in 2020.
	When it comes to the environment, we just did a talk yesterday, and this is our second time we've done it.
	We teach people the foundations of the environment are, again, government has passed policies which support big ag, big agrobiotech companies.
	And I did some of the fundamental research showing what happens with genetic engineering, what it does at the molecular systems level for plants.
	But then we say, look, they're not going to do anything.
	Start supporting your local farmers.
	Learn how to eat on a local budget, organic food.
	Government ain't going to do that.
	When it comes to education, David, one of my mentors, Jay Forrester, said every child at the kindergarten level should learn system science, system thinking.
	It's way beyond reading, writing, and arithmetic.
	You should learn that first. So we just offer that program, David, every other Thursdays.
	And then when it comes to innovation, you know, I wrote a book many, many years ago, David, a very simple book called The Seven Secrets of Innovation.
	It teaches people what are the seven fundamental principles, and I give that away.
	Because there are seven principles people can teach.
	When it comes to the economy, we're teaching people as a part of our campaign, what is a balance sheet?
	What is a profit and loss statement?
	What is cash flow? Government ain't going to do anything.
	A president should be educating people how they can take care of themselves.
	And if they get conscious, then they're going to get good, militant, strong activists in their local levels.
	And that's the only way the world is going to change.
	It's not going to come from someone coming in and doing all these negotiations.
	Look at what's happened since Trump got in.
	What did he actually do? Lockdowns, lockdowns.
	Pfizer went from $45 billion in revenue, losing $25 billion over 10 years, shooting up to $85 billion in revenue, now $100 billion.
	So these guys aren't going to do anything for you.
	We have to do it ourselves, and you need one of you, which is a guy like me.
	So that's why I'm running, David. Well, you know, that's a great thing, because I've said for the longest time, I said, look, we need to understand what these people are doing.
	We see that there's going to be a slight difference in the way that they come after us first.
	They all have ultimately the same goal.
	But I said it's important to understand where these guys are coming from.
	But the most important thing Just have a discussion about what is going on.
	And I think that's the value of the campaign, is to have, and it's very limited whenever that happens, that you do have a discussion about what is going to be done out there.
	So I think that's a good approach for your campaign, to get that out there, to have people look at, because a bully pulpit doesn't just happen if you get elected president.
	The bully pulpit is really happening during the campaign.
	Exactly. And so that's a very important thing that you're doing there.
	So tell us a little bit about, I guess, since you've got truthhealthandfreedom.com, why is it then?
	Truthfreedomhealth.com, yep.
	Truthfreedomhealth. Okay, I got the other order.
	Truthfreedomandhealth. Since you've got that, why, though, with the president thing, is that, you know, while you're running for president, you've got the bully pulpit that you've been able to establish contact with people.
	You know, when you're running for president, I've said with people, way before you get to the ballot counting aspect of it, it is already corrupt in terms of who gets on the ballot in different places, who gets into the debates, as we're seeing already.
	That's really where it begins, right there with ballot access.
	And I'm sure as an independent, it's got to be a real uphill climb.
	But what does running for president do for you?
	Yes, so David, it's a great question.
	You're asking one of the most fundamental questions.
	Everyone at a certain point in their lives, and it may happen when they're five years old.
	In my case, it happened when I was four, right?
	Because I grew up in an Indian caste system.
	I grew up in working class neighborhoods in New Jersey, right?
	You come to a point in life where you observe the world, and at some point, whether you do it consciously or unconsciously, you decide, I don't like the way the world is, the way it is, right?
	Or I'm fine with it.
	I'm willing to put up with all these inequities, right?
	And when you come to that point in life where you choose a former, we say, hey, this is really screwed up.
	I want to be an agent of change.
	But it's a very important decision people make.
	And some people actually make the decision, but they never acknowledge they made that decision.
	So I made that decision when I was 12 years old.
	And when I decided that, I said, I'm going to use whatever my existence to figure out how all of this works.
	Now, in the current world, they give people only two options.
	They say, oh, you want to change the world?
	Oh, write to your congressman, right?
	That's what they taught us when we were in civics class, right?
	Write to your congressman or run for office, right?
	What I call the electoral opportunistic process.
	And in that process, you're told to compromise.
	Oh, don't say that. Don't say this.
	Get into office. That's the goal, right?
	So you end up in this opportune model.
	The other option they give you is a legalism approach.
	Be a lawyer. File lawsuits, right?
	Et cetera. Now, we know both of those are corrupt.
	The legalism approach takes you to courts, which are completely bought and paid for.
	And the electoral process goes into a process where I learn hands-on.
	It's elections or selections. Mm-hmm.
	However, both of those processes can be a front end to have what you just said, discourse and teach people stuff.
	It's really an experimental lab.
	If you have a movement, if you have a movement and you're interested in advancing movement, movement is raising people's consciousness.
	To me, that's what movement is, movement of consciousness.
	And history shows that the only time anything has ever changed has always been through mass movements.
	People rising up, bottoms up.
	It occurred in the 1920s, in the late 1800s in the United States with the great upheaval.
	It was these truly bottoms up workers movements long before they were taken over by the left and the right that galvanized people that were independent grassroots movements that scared the hell out of the elites.
	And you can look at it in the United States, right?
	By the 1920s and 30s, these bottoms up movements, truly independent trade union movements, is the ones that eliminated child labor.
	It's a thing that made sure that we had infrastructure.
	It's a thing that we had proper plumbing.
	It's a thing that forced us to get proper hygiene.
	So long before 1963, before the measles vaccine came, most of measles was gone.
	But no one wants to give the credit to those workers' movements that did that.
	And when that happened in the 1950s, The Republicans and Democrats got together.
	McCarthy branded all these movements.
	He said they're communist. And then the left wing took over all these movements top down.
	So by 1970, the unions were destroyed.
	They weren't truly organic bottoms up movements.
	The right wing attacked any time working people organized.
	Oh, they're communists. They're communists.
	And the left wing actually took over these movements.
	So between 1940 and 1970, American economy expanded.
	Everyone's wages grew because of these mass movements.
	But after 1970 till today, the wage of American workers has gone down.
	And there's maybe been, you know, 900 strikes in the United States.
	In the 1940s, there were close to 11,000 strikes.
	It was truly a bottoms-up movement.
	So in my view, those in power do not want people mobilizing bottoms up, independent of left and right.
	They want people to always give away their power to some fool called a Kennedy or some other guy called a Trump.
	You see? And they've engineered that.
	So... Having understood this, David, and I, it took me, I mean, I studied left-wing books, right-wing books, everything I can get a hold of, and I realized it was bottoms-up movements.
	In system science, I would call it a self-organizing system, where enough people start consciousness raises.
	So, our movement for Truth For The Health teaches people this.
	We educate people.
	It's knowledge. It's a community.
	Running for office is When I ran in 2020, think about all the accomplishments we did because they attacked us.
	We were the ones who exposed the election fraud.
	We were the ones who exposed Fauci.
	We were the ones who exposed the backdoor portal.
	Had a guy like me not run, David, and just be a cloistered academic or a scientist, none of this would have come out because we wanted the truth.
	So now me running for president and doing it in every 50 state, David, think about what experience that's going to give to all these new people coming.
	Because they realize left and right is screwing them.
	Now they're going to try to get on the ballot or shoot for president on the ballot.
	They say, wow, what the hell is really going on?
	Think about the learnings people are going to learn.
	Think about in their bones, they're going to learn the corruption.
	It's not just going to be something they watch on Fox or CNN. They're going to learn it.
	And how valuable is that, David, to educating people on why they need to be active citizens?
	I think that's a great plan.
	I agree with you. And I've been telling everybody, look, you're not going to get anything solved in Washington, but everybody wants to look for a solution in a president.
	So if you're running for president, it gives you an opportunity to tell them, hey, start with yourself, start with your community, start from the bottom up.
	I think that's a brilliant plan.
	Yeah. And what we've done, David, we've created sort of a revolution university.
	You know, you go to school for civil engineering, you go to school for aeronautical engineering, right?
	If you want to build an airplane, you have to understand Bernoulli's principle.
	You have to understand design.
	Where do people go to figure out how to change the world, the dynamics of change?
	You know, this book I have, System and Revolution, took me 20 years to write that book.
	In that book, I explain to people in very simple terms, what is a system?
	The nine principles, you know, you learn in an MIT PhD class, I've made it easy.
	And you find out the same principles show up everywhere in nature.
	Now, understanding those principles, people understand what is a revolution, that it is a phase transition, you know, like water going from ice to, you know, liquid.
	And when people understand these concepts, and then they understand what is a disturbance, you So, we're teaching people this fundamental theory.
	Then we get people on the ground, David.
	We have people going out, handing out leaflets, going door to door.
	But the idea is to make people be conscious activists that it's up to them.
	That's great. We've got to get you back on to talk about this.
	We're out of time, but it was fascinating.
	Again, truthfreedomhealth.com.
	Yes, and then people can go to 4, numeral4president.com.
	So, shiva4president.com.
	ThePresident.com. Yeah, donate and volunteer and get involved.
	Thanks, David. Look forward to seeing you.
	I'm glad we reconnected. Thank you for all the work you do, David.
	I'm very, very thankful for your intelligence, by the way.
	Oh, well, thank you. Thank you for what you're doing.
	I really do appreciate it. I think it's a great idea.
	That's it for the broadcast today, folks.
	Folks, thanks for listening.
	Thanks, Dave.
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core and dumbed down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

▲