Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 6, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:17

The David Knight Show - 06/07/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday the 7th of June, year of our Lord 2023.
	3. Music Well, today we're going to talk about the dam war and the dam lies about the dam, as this is going back and forth, escalating, even as that is happening.
	You've got the Washington Post doubling down on some additional lies about the pipeline.
	That was destroyed by the U.S. government.
	Covered up by the media.
	But we're also going to take a look at artificial intelligence and the alien connection.
	What is true?
	What is a lie?
	Can we figure out what they're up to with both of these things?
	We'll be right back. Music Well,
	we've had the major dam has collapsed in Ukraine, and there are accusations going back and forth as to who did it.
	But the real issue, and of course there's accusations, oh, this is a war crime.
	These people are terrorists and so forth.
	Well, war, this particular war, is a crime.
	It's not a justified war.
	Justified war is when you are attacked, you can defend yourself.
	Well, obviously then the Ukrainians can defend themselves against the Russians.
	But wait, what about the people that the Ukrainian government has been shelling for eight years before Russia invaded?
	They were Russian citizens.
	Again, you can argue about over these beginnings.
	But the key purpose of a justified war is to end it.
	You have to declare what the objective is.
	And you have to seize any opportunity to end the hostilities rather than continuing to devastate this country, which was the plan and remains the plan of NATO. They're not even interested in talking about peace.
	And when you talk about this particular act of destroying a dam, Well, if this is a war crime, as the EU and NATO and American officials continue to echo each other, if this is a war crime, then the U.S. and the U.K. are guilty of war crime as well, because they did that during World War II specifically.
	There's a very interesting movie called The Damn Busters.
	And... It was a situation where there was an industrial valley.
	I think they were doing heavy water experiments as part of the nuclear program of the Germans.
	It's been a long time since I saw it, but it was something like that.
	It certainly was an industrial valley that's part of the German war effort.
	And they decided that they would take out this dam to take out everything that was being developed there in that area.
	And then the rest of the movie, they don't even question as to whether or not that's legitimate or whether or not that is a war crime.
	The rest of the movie, and it is a true movie.
	It's a truly amazing movie.
	They had to work out how they were going to blow this dam up.
	Because they didn't have precision bombing in those days.
	And Close wasn't good enough.
	Because the bomb was going to be, you know, if it wasn't right on the wall...
	Then it was not going to be effective because of the effect of the water at depth.
	And so they worked out an ingenious plan, and they practiced it for quite some time.
	And that was really the point of the movie, was how they blew the dam up.
	No question as to whether or not that was a legitimate target during World War II by the Allies.
	So why is this a war crime?
	But just to give you an idea of what that movie is about, what they wound up doing, they came up with a strategy.
	That they would drop a circular bomb, you know, and it would skip across the water, and then it would hit the dam wall and then go straight down and detonate at depth.
	And it worked. And they had to practice it a very, very long time, but it worked.
	Now, that's not what is involved here.
	The two accusations are that either the Russians placed explosives or Or the Ukrainians took it out with a missile.
	And the problem for the mainstream media is that going back to late December of last year, just six months ago, you had the, not even six months ago, December 22nd or something like that.
	So it's not even six months, five months, if you will.
	So, well, I guess it was about six months.
	Anyway, I'm thinking, I forget which month it is.
	Yeah, it's June, the beginning of June, so quite six months of it was the end of December, okay?
	Anyway, they talked to a major general with the Ukraine Army who bragged about the fact that they had already fired missiles at it as a test And said that we will take it out as a last resort.
	And he was the guy who was in command of the failed first counter-offensive.
	And so the information that is coming out, what the Russians are saying is that this was the last resort for them, that their much vaunted counter-offensive And I don't have the video here to play for you, because it's mostly visual, and we have a lot of people who just listen to this as a podcast.
	But a few days ago, on social media, you had Zelensky and a bunch of soldiers from Ukraine, and they were all cut from one to the other real quickly, and they're all putting their finger in front of their mouth, going, shh, don't tell anybody, but it counterfeits it.
	It's the phoniest...
	Media war I've ever seen in my life.
	Oh, it's counter-offensive.
	Don't tell anybody. Don't tell anybody.
	You know, and then they got immediately defeated.
	And so Russia is saying that this has got multiple purposes.
	To cover up the defeat and the embarrassment, to redirect things to that, as well as there are some military objectives for them, as well as for Russia, but actually more to their advantage, to blow up the dam.
	So Ukraine accused Russian forces of blowing up the Kakova Dam, if that's how you pronounce it.
	I should have listened to somebody pronounce it.
	The hydroelectric power station.
	And there's a lot of fear going around about the fact that there is a nuclear reactor that uses the water from this dam to cool itself.
	And even though they shut this thing down, they still need the water to cool what is there.
	And we'll talk about that in a moment.
	The Associated Press says it was not possible to reconcile the conflicting claims.
	I guess the AP doesn't read the Washington Post.
	I don't blame them. I don't either.
	I don't read the Washington Post.
	I don't read the New York Times. I don't even bother to look at their headlines.
	I look at a lot of media organizations, left and right.
	But I don't bother with the New York Times, the Washington Post.
	They are so discredited, such liars in my opinion.
	I'd just as soon go to some UK tabloid to find out about the Bat Boy at the supermarket or, you know, where they sell in the supermarket.
	Bat Boy found and identified again.
	That's the level that the Washington Post and the New York Times are.
	And the Associated Press as well.
	Because the Associated Press is nothing but American propaganda.
	That's what the AP really stands for.
	And the funny thing about it is, They don't bother to read each other either.
	So why should I bother to read them?
	So the Associated Press says, beginning to empty an upstream reservoir that's one of the world's largest, Zelensky called it the largest man-made environmental disaster in Europe in decades.
	Well, if that's true, it still remains to be seen who did it.
	But of course, he says that it was Russia that did it.
	This collapse, said one engineer, might have resulted from gradual degradation.
	It just happened.
	You know, stuff just happens.
	It's just not well maintained.
	So it just collapsed on its own.
	That's another one that's being sold to you by the AP, the American propaganda.
	Russian defense minister. Charge Ukraine, destroy the dam to prevent Russian attacks in the Kursan region after what he alleged was a failed Ukrainian counteroffensive.
	When the Russians say something, it's always alleged, no matter if it's true or not.
	And then they said, you know, Russia has a history of attacking dams.
	Well, there you go. Except that it is the UK, the US, as I just pointed out with the damn busters.
	So, again, this is, AP is propaganda.
	Washington Post is propaganda.
	Not just misinformation, but disinformation.
	So is the New York Times. Look at how biased they are, regardless of whatever it is, whatever the topic is.
	And Angus Mustang says, a war crime caused by a false flag.
	I bet NATO helped the Ukraine blow it up to make a war crime.
	Well, I think that they probably had, they certainly had, they used the Heimar missiles, is what they were talking about in December, this last December.
	So yeah, they did have U.S. help.
	Doug Elkins, thank you very much for the tip on Rockfin.
	I hear a lot of political solutions today, but they all leave out one thing.
	God. That's right. We will never be able to turn this ship around.
	That's right. That's right.
	We're all of us on the Titanic.
	Each and every one of us has a limited amount of time.
	And, you know, the society is that way as well.
	Societies go through life cycles, and it looks like this American empire is circling the drain with its corruption.
	Damage. Nelson months, he says, grabbing Putin's hand, forcing it into his face.
	Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself.
	That's right. Yeah, self-inflicted wounds.
	Yeah, because this area...
	Is, you know, Russian area.
	Again, it's part of these areas that wanted, had a Russian population.
	They wanted to be a part of Russia.
	They wanted to secede.
	I believe in self-determination, self-governance.
	I believe that people ought to be allowed to peacefully secede.
	And I said that when this whole thing began in 2014.
	What's the matter with him?
	You know, you even had, as this thing started in 2022, you had the British defense minister saying, we beat them once and we beat the Russians in Crimea and we'll do it again.
	You know, the Crimean War. Well, what were the Russians doing in Crimea, British defense minister, a century ago or 150 years ago, whenever I don't remember the date of the Crimean War?
	That was the one, half a league, half a league, onward.
	Charge of the Light Brigade, Thin Red Line, all the rest of the stuff.
	I don't remember the date. But, you know, what were they doing in Crimea?
	Well, Crimea had been a part of Russia longer than the United States has existed.
	That's what it was. It was a war with Russia that was fought in Crimea because the Crimean area was Russian and has been for a very long time.
	Denver-Attaway. After Nord Stream, there's nothing the USA and NATO won't do.
	Absolutely. And they've doubled down on a Nord Stream lie today.
	That's the key thing about it.
	Same time this happened.
	This broke yesterday morning, I think, after the program had started.
	So anyway, the nuclear power plant, they said, is Europe's biggest.
	And, of course, it needs water from the dams now emptying reservoir.
	The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency, the IAEA, remember it from those initials probably, reported no immediate risk to the safety of the plant.
	The six reactors have been shut down for months, but they still need water for cooling.
	But they have secondary water sources that can last for months, they say, according to the IAEA. So when you see everybody fear-mongering about this in the mainstream media, that's not an issue.
	Certainly not yet. Breitbart, in reporting this, talks about Zelensky decrying Russian terrorists.
	Ukrainian reports say Russia blew the dam by planting explosives inside.
	No fatalities are reported.
	Residents of bordering areas, including those in the city of Kershon, are said to be heading to higher ground.
	Do we have any evidence from either side?
	Well, actually we do.
	Because as part of that story that the Washington Post did in December, they showed pictures and talked about, well, we fired three HIMARS missiles and here's the photographs of where they landed on the dam and we'll finish the job as a last resort.
	Said the guy who did the first failed counter-offensive.
	Now the second failed counter-offensive.
	It looks like they did. They went for the last resort.
	So Russia accused Ukrainian forces of attacking the dam overnight with a rocket barrage in order to deprive Russian-occupied parts of Ukraine from drinking water.
	It is not yet possible to fact-check the allegations of either Kiev or Moscow, but international figures have moved to condemn Russia for blowing up the dam with the EU saying that Moscow was guilty of a war crime.
	Again, this war is a crime because nobody wants to end it.
	Nobody wants to even talk about ending it.
	But blowing up dams is nothing new.
	Ukraine had a plan to bomb this dam as a last resort, and this was reported first, I think, by Michael Tracy, going back to the Washington Post article in last December.
	And that's the amazing thing, is that the Washington Post reported this.
	The Major General Andrei Kovalchuk said, Told the Washington Post in December that Ukraine has plans to bomb the dam as a last resort, even conducted a test strike on the dam with American HIMARS. Now, why doesn't the Washington Post say that?
	Why don't they go back and say, yeah, we told you this was going to happen six months ago.
	So, you can see the footage of it.
	It's on Twitter. People have tweeted that out.
	Footage of the explosion that damaged the dam.
	And immediately, California Representative Ted Lieu declared Russia guilty of another war crime, called for them to be designated as a state sponsor of terrorism.
	Why is it when we blow up the gas pipelines, Nord Stream 1 and 2, why is that not a war crime?
	I don't know. Of course, they haven't admitted to it, but EU Commissioner President Ursula von der Leiden Without evidence, as Chris Minahan at Information Liberation points out, without evidence also declared Russia guilty of, quote, war crimes. Russia will have to pay for the war crimes committed in Ukraine, she said, the destruction of the dam, an outrageous attack on civilian infrastructure.
	But you see, all the gas for Germany and Western Europe, that's not civilian infrastructure.
	It puts at risk thousands of people in the Kershon region.
	So, um... Information Liberation says, I'm reminded of an incident last year where Ukraine struck Poland with a missile, only for Zelensky to come out and falsely accuse Russia of being behind the attack.
	Yeah, remember that? The false flag attack?
	They fired a missile into Poland.
	That means that Russia has gone to war against a NATO country.
	Now all NATO needs to come in and nuke them.
	Remember that? Zelensky, terror is not limited to our national borders.
	Russian missiles hit Poland to fire missiles at NATO territory.
	This is a Russian missile attack on collective security, he said.
	This is a very significant escalation, and we must act.
	He tried to use what was a false flag attack.
	To con NATO into war, says information liberation.
	Washington, not even Biden, would go along with that obvious line.
	And you had anonymous U.S. officials leak to the press that Ukraine was likely to blame.
	They showed the evidence eventually.
	So a day after this counter-offensive failed, That they were doing the equivalent of the nurses doing TikTok dances during the pandemic.
	That's what this counter-offensive thing amounted to.
	And it was an utter failure.
	Both sides accused each other.
	But the day after this happened, you have the Washington Post not talking about their article in December when the guy talked about this.
	Instead, what they do is they sell a new lie for the old terror attack of blowing up the pipelines.
	And they tell you that Ukraine was the one who did it.
	And we told them not to do it, but they did it anyway.
	Well, if they did it, they had to do it with U.S. technology.
	But Seymour Hersh has already had a much more convincing investigation.
	The Washington Post doesn't even respond to that.
	They ought to respond to that and say why that is not true, but they don't.
	And of course, it beggars belief that Ukraine would do this without...
	They certainly don't have the capability of doing that.
	And Jordan Schachtel has an interesting post that says, Mission Impossible, talking about just how impossible that would be.
	But again, when you go back to the article from the Washington Post late December, quote, Kovalchuk considered flooding the river.
	The Ukrainians, he said, even conducted a test strike with HIMARS launcher on one of the floodgates, making three holes in the metal to see if the water could be raised enough to stymie Russian crossings, but not to flood nearby villages.
	The test was a success, said the Washington Post in December.
	Kowalczyk said, but the step remained a last resort, and he held off.
	Held off until this next counteroffensive failed.
	So the first failed phase of Kiev's counteroffensive Risked ruining the entire campaign, which could have prompted its planners to employ Kovalchuk's last resort in order to introduce an unexpected variable into the equation that might improve their odds and would also protect their public image.
	This is from Zero Hedge, by the way.
	Russia had over 15 months to entrench itself in Ukraine's former eastern and southern regions that Kiev still claims is its own.
	It therefore follows that even the most properly supplied and thought-out counteroffensive wasn't going to be a walk in the park, contrary to the Western public's expectations, explaining why the first phase just failed.
	This reality check shattered whatever wishful thinking expectations Kev might have had, since it showed that the original plan of swarming the line of contact entails considerable costs, They reduce the chances of it succeeding unless serious things happen behind the front lines to distract the Russian defenders.
	And therein lies the strategic reason behind particularly destroying the dam on Tuesday morning, exactly as Kovalchuk proved late last year is possible to pull off per his own admission to the Washington Post.
	So Zero Hedge says the first of Kiev's goals...
	That this terrorist attack served was to prompt global concern about the safety of the Russian-controlled nuclear power plant.
	But again, the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, says they have an alternative water source.
	The second goal is that the downstream areas of Kirshan region, which are divided between Kiev and Moscow, have now been flooded.
	This could complicate Russia's defensive plans along the left bank of the river.
	It might even expand to Crimea due to the threat that Tuesday morning's terrorist attack could pose to the peninsula's water supply.
	And so the fourth strategic goal is concerns of psychological warfare.
	The fact that they're saying this is ecocide, amplified by the mainstream media.
	Well, you know, when you blow up that massive pipeline, How much gas did that release into the environment?
	And we're all going to die, right?
	I mean, that alone was enough stuff right there in that one burst.
	We should have seen some kind of a, if their stuff is correct, we should have seen some kind of a bump in the global temperature right there.
	Yeah. Anyway, so it is a lie stacked on top of lie.
	Zero Hedge says, to be absolutely clear, the military strategic dynamics The New York Times admitted that the West's sanctions have failed to collapse Russia's economy and to isolate it.
	But, as I've been pointing out for the last year, what it did do was severely damage the EU. And even the U.S. in terms of the sanctions kicked off this move away from the U.S. dollar, spiked the price of energy.
	But, of course, that was something that Biden and the EU really want.
	It just makes it miserable for the people who are in Europe and America and other places in the world.
	But they want us to be miserable.
	They want that to be spiked.
	But it has had a lot of blowback.
	We've shot ourselves in the foot.
	But of course, our leaders want to shoot us.
	They hate us.
	They don't want us to have energy, food, anything.
	Especially freedom and free speech.
	So, even the New York Times admitted the sanctions have backfired, have not worked.
	While some of its top influencers have also admitted that it's impossible to deny the proliferation of multipolar processes in 15 months since this began, the German Chancellor, the U.S. National Security Council member, Fiona Hill, Goldman Sachs president, they're all saying, hey, this is not working.
	And it's having some blowback on our power base here.
	The military strategic dynamics will inevitably doom the West Which is exactly what Kiev was trying to achieve with this latest terrorist attack.
	And again, I don't really even see this as a terrorist attack if you're not going to call the pipeline a terrorist attack.
	Maybe both of them are. Maybe neither of them are.
	Maybe the real problem is Is that the war itself is literally a terrorist attack.
	Trying to achieve political goals by real acts of violence and the fear of violence.
	That's what this is really about.
	The reason we foresaw this, said Zero Hedge, is because Kovalchuk admitted to the Washington Post that he was going to do it.
	It's therefore unthinkable that Kiev would ultimately do...
	This just a year and a half later, and then gaslight that Moscow was to blame.
	But of course, mainstream media, including Washington Post that reported that, are going along with that lie.
	And here's what they say.
	Even as the Washington Post refused to go back and say, yeah, you know, we had a scoop on this.
	He told us six months ago that he was going to do this.
	They don't do that. Instead, they give us a new lie about the Nord Stream Pipeline.
	Washington Post reporting that an unnamed European intelligence service told the CIA that Ukraine's military was planning an attack on the Nord Stream pipelines a full three months before September 26 sabotage blasts that disabled them.
	The revelation, they said, is based on the Pentagon and classified intelligence documents leaked by the Air National Guard member Jack Texera as part of the so-called Discord leaks.
	This is the guy who... A lower-level guy.
	We said, where did he get all this information?
	Was this deliberately put out there?
	Well, perhaps it was.
	Perhaps it was.
	He got this information.
	He's sharing it with his friends in this gaming community.
	And then one of them puts it out somewhere else, and boom, it's all there.
	Now, there's going to be some real intelligence in there.
	This is the way they always do it.
	You have to put a lot of real stuff in there.
	Even real embarrassing stuff.
	Stuff that it's not in their interest to have out there.
	So that they can put the big lie out.
	That's how this always works.
	That's how they operate through the media.
	But that's certainly how they operate with spy versus spy and the counter spies.
	You've got a mole, so the mole is going to provide a lot of intelligence and they're going to verify it and say, okay, yeah, that's good.
	Okay, he really has switched.
	He's now on our side, this double agent.
	But he might be a triple agent and he might just be waiting to be accepted so then he can throw in the important lie.
	And this is a very important lie.
	Because, you know, even as everybody understands, Russia had absolutely, as the listener is saying, you know, he keeps slapping himself in the face.
	It was certainly not in Russia's interest to spend billions of dollars on this pipeline and then have it blocked.
	The Nord Stream 2 was never even opened up, never even delivered any gas, even though it was filled with it.
	So they lose all the gas, they lose all the infrastructure that they put together there.
	And it wasn't in anybody's interest except for the U.S. government.
	And nobody except for the U.S. government really had that kind of technology.
	And they worked with the Norwegian government to get this thing done.
	Because that's right there where it was.
	And then they had covers of the war games that were happening at that time and all the rest of this.
	I believe that the sources that Cy Hirsch had We're accurate.
	That sounds very plausible.
	But we knew from the very beginning who did this, who had the motive, who had the ability.
	When you ever look at something, it's not conspiracy theorizing.
	That's just an investigation.
	It's a starting point of where any detective or police investigating a crime, they look at who has motive, who has opportunity, who has the ability, these types of things.
	And then you have to get to the physical evidence, which, of course, we can't go there.
	But we can look at all the rest of this stuff and we can rule out who couldn't do it.
	Pull up that article about the Ukraine being planned, Mission Impossible.
	I want to show people what Jordan Schachtel put up about this in response.
	Mission Impossible Ukrainian Navy Nord Stream Pipeline Edition.
	That's what he calls it.
	And so he says, the Washington Post has doubled down on the idea that Ukraine pulled off the Nord Stream Pipeline sabotage attack without coordinating with a global major power in the process.
	They had no idea. And see, the proof of it is that we somehow just left these documents around where this gamer kid, lower-level guy, could get them, and then he put them out there.
	And see, some of that stuff's embarrassing, but hey, it validates that we're telling you the truth.
	Ukraine did it on their own.
	And two planes took down three skyscrapers that fell straight down into their footprint.
	And a plane hit the Pentagon and left no debris behind.
	And there's no video footage of it.
	And all the rest of this stuff, right?
	How many times will they lie to us?
	And people will be gullible enough to believe it.
	Look at who has the opportunity.
	Look who benefits from this.
	But pull that article up and scroll down to the picture there where he says, I put together a detailed map.
	Showing the route. Click that.
	Continue reading. Yeah.
	Look at that. Just for, since Americans, since all of us are kind of geographically ignorant, he says, this is what would have to happen.
	They think you're really, really stupid.
	So they'd have to go, they'd have to take the circuitous route.
	All across the Mediterranean, around the tip of Spain, and then back up into the North Sea, and then back around Denmark, and then over to the area where that was.
	He said this is a round trip of about 10,000 miles, impossible to pull off undetected.
	And besides that, they don't have the technology to go down and blow up.
	This thing was steel encased in concrete.
	They don't have the capability of blowing that up at depth.
	That is clearly the U.S. government major superpower doing that.
	But he said the corporate media has been assisting the U.S. intelligence community in making the case that the Biden administration had nothing to do with the Nord Stream attack.
	The talking points first appeared in the New York Times, which claimed that an unnamed pro-Ukrainian group, quote-unquote, was said to be responsible for the September attack.
	The sources for this information remain nothing more than anonymous intelligence agents, said Jordan Schachtel on his Substack article.
	Yeah, it stinks to the high heavens.
	And then when you look at the other aspects of this, again, all the stuff about the Ukrainians being literal Nazis, they're putting up statues, naming streets after Nazis, World War II Nazis.
	And now you've got the New York Times even admitting, finally, that, yeah, there is something to this.
	Yeah, you know, they are putting all these Nazi symbols on their helmets and on their uniforms and all the rest of the stuff.
	They love the Nazis. Monday, on Monday, the New York Times said, headline was, quote, Nazi symbols on Ukraine's front lines highlight the thorny issues of history.
	It's just, you know, we have to understand their culture.
	They're just turned towards the Nazis.
	Nothing bad here, right?
	You look at how these people freak out.
	And as one person put it, you know, you see somebody with a MAGA hat.
	Oh, Nazi, Nazi. But then these people...
	That we're supposed to give everything for and push right up to the threshold of World War III, if they actually are literal Nazis.
	Well, let's not pay any attention to that.
	Since at least 2014, they've been doing this kind of stuff.
	So, they're wearing Nazi insignias on their uniforms and helmets.
	And they're bombing civilian population that just wants to separate from them, wants to secede from them.
	But they're the good guys in this.
	They're the good guys in this.
	You don't want to see who the bad guys are, I guess.
	The report merely tries to downplay it as a thorny issue of Ukraine's unique history.
	Did they make any excuses like that for American history?
	No, they're ferreting through the New York Times and their Project 1619.
	Oh, this person over here had slaves and they had a lot of money.
	It, you know, condemns the entire society and all the rest.
	No, no, no. They're constantly on a witch hunt for anything that they can use against their political enemies.
	But when they have something that is right there in their face...
	With their political allies.
	Literal Nazis.
	Nothing to see here.
	Move on. It's complicated.
	It's a thorny issue.
	It's their unique historical problem.
	And so as Matt Taibbi sarcastically quipped, he said...
	Please cover those Nazi symbols.
	The Ukrainian soldiers are being asked to please cover those Nazi symbols quietly.
	NATO quickly deleted a tweet yesterday.
	This is on March 9th, a year ago.
	That featured a photo of a Ukrainian soldier wearing the neo-Nazi black sun patch.
	And in this article from Zero Hedge, you can see all the different Nazi symbols in there.
	You might want to scroll down and show those.
	These are the patches that they use.
	The following line from the report says everything you need to know about the so-called paper of record and its one-sided ultra-simplistic coverage of what many are finally waking up to realize is a war with deeply complex reality, to say the least.
	And far from the mainstream media's goodies and baddies, Hollywood-esque narrative.
	Pootler instead of Hitler, right?
	And again, it's...
	I covered this when I played the British Comedians.
	A couple of Nazis are sitting in camp.
	And he says, have you noticed these patches we're wearing?
	I mean, they've got like skulls on them and things like that.
	And the guy says, yeah, so what?
	And he says, did you ever think we might be the baddies?
	Let's start having this conversation.
	And as they talk about it, they start to realize, yeah, we really are.
	And the two of them book it out of the camp.
	So yeah, the goodies versus the baddies.
	But CNN, Fox, none of them want to talk about that.
	The New York Times says, finally, in November, during a meeting with the Times reporters near the front line, a Ukrainian press officer wore a Totenkopf.
	That is the dead head skull, right?
	Yeah. I say, Hans, you notice this?
	You notice this skull that we're wearing here?
	Are we the baddies? Well, he said he didn't believe that the patch was affiliated with the Nazis.
	But then a second press officer present said that other journalists had asked the soldiers to remove the patch before they took photographs.
	Oops, oops, says Zero Hedge.
	And then they said, this is Schrodinger's New York Times.
	They're both good and bad at the same time.
	Azov, which the newspaper correctly described as Ukrainian neo-Nazi paramilitary organization back in 2019, three years before this happened.
	That's what the New York Times called it.
	Now they are a cuddly, quote, pro-democracy, unquote, group of moderate rebels, tweeted Ben Norton.
	Yeah, it just gets more and more absurd, doesn't it?
	In April, Ukraine's defense ministry posted a photograph on its Twitter account of a soldier wearing a patch featuring a skull and crossbones known as the Totenkopf or Death's Head.
	The specific symbol in the picture was made notorious by a Nazi unit that committed war crimes and guarded concentration camps during World War II. The patch is the official merchandise of a British neo-folk band that goes by the name of Death in June.
	And the Southern Poverty Law Center had vapors about that.
	Oh, look at that.
	These people, that's hate speech.
	They need to be shut down.
	And so then my question becomes, where's the Southern Poverty Law Center now?
	Why is the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has a hate map, and they go everywhere ferreting out hate and racism and all the rest of this stuff, whatever, you know, anti-Semitism.
	Where are they now?
	Silent crickets. Because the Southern Poverty Law Center is and always was.
	A government partner.
	To come after people that the government doesn't like.
	People who don't like the government's lies.
	Babylon Bee puts it this way.
	Zelensky accuses Russia of putting little Nazi stickers on the helmets of all of his soldiers.
	Yeah, you know, that's their defense.
	We can't possibly be Nazis because Zelensky is Jewish.
	Well, guess what? So is Soros.
	And he betrayed his fellow Jews in the concentration camps by his own admission.
	And, you know, when I talked about that and the fact that Southern Poverty Law Center constantly comes out and accuses anybody who criticizes what Soros does to sow deliberate chaos in our country with open borders with his district attorneys who will not punish crime and let the people back out all the time.
	You criticize Soros for that kind of stuff?
	Oh, well, you're anti-Semitic.
	And I said, when are Jews going to push back and say, I'm not going to own this guy just because he's Jewish?
	He's evil, right?
	Well, there's an organization now, Jews Against Soros.
	And they created this.
	They said, we've got thousands of people contacting us.
	We don't want to associate ourselves with what he is doing simply because ethnically he's Jewish.
	It's just like you see even...
	And I've talked about this before.
	Gays against groomers.
	And several of them have come out and said, you know, one of them in particular, a lesbian, who said, I never thought when I got into this, I thought I was doing this for my civil rights.
	She said, I never thought that this would turn into some kind of a pedophile agenda.
	I'm sorry that I ever got involved in it.
	That's what has been taken over now by the pedos.
	As I have gays against groomers.
	You have to come out and you have to stand up against these things.
	And if you don't disassociate yourself with them, then that's the thing.
	But, you know, when you look at Zelensky, oh, well, he's Jewish, so therefore these guys cannot be Nazis, even though they have the stickers on their helmet.
	As Babylon Bee says, it must be Putin putting them on, the helmets of all of his soldiers.
	The fact that my entire army is wearing Nazi insignias on their uniforms and gear is entirely the fault of Russia, said Zelensky.
	While desperately scraping an I Love Hitler sticker off the side of a tank.
	This is an unforgivable provocation.
	I hereby call in the United States to drop all their atomic bombs on Russia immediately.
	That's about what he would do.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, We're going to talk about aliens, and we're going to talk about artificial intelligence, because there's a lot of lies circulating about that.
	It's not just the damn lies about the damn war, but it's also a lot of lies about the aliens and artificial intelligence.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, and thank you for the tip, Angus Mustang.
	I really appreciate that on Rockfin.
	He said, thank you, David, and the Knight family for all the time you put into producing quality program.
	Well, thank you. We couldn't do it without your support.
	And there's just a few people, like Angus, one of them, who consistently support us.
	We'd appreciate it if you do want to support us.
	There's a lot of different things you can do.
	You can go to thedavidknightshow.com.
	You can see where you can find the show.
	If you watch the show, please like it.
	Please share it. That helps us a great deal.
	It doesn't cost you anything.
	And if you would like to support us financially, there are links there to Subscribestar where you can sign up various levels of support on a monthly basis.
	That has and still is a big, I guess, maybe the biggest base of our support right there.
	And you can also support us with Zelle with Cash App.
	I know we've had some problems with Cash App.
	We haven't been able to get these people to ring it out.
	Some people have problems finding us, but I still get contributions there.
	But it's typically from people who have contributed before in the past.
	So I don't know if something has changed.
	I can't get any response from them.
	But if you can get through, the link for Cash App is there.
	Also, Zelle.
	And on Rumble, if you want to sign up on a monthly subscription basis, you can do it there.
	But of course, you can leave tips a lot of different places.
	You can even leave tips on Subscribestar.
	And we have a P.O. Box where you can send us a direct contribution by mail if you'd like to.
	We do have people who do that as well.
	So I appreciate the support.
	Thank you. A comment from Diogenes.
	Searching for truth still, I guess.
	Think about it. How else are they going to move people away from that area?
	You can't bomb them into oblivion.
	The world would go nuts.
	So Water Galore is a peaceful incentive to force relocate people.
	I'm sure that's what's happening.
	It's probably Ukraine that blew it up to move their people.
	That's right. Yeah, there's a lot of different aspects to that.
	But again... What is the advantage to Russia to destroy a dam, perhaps a nuclear power plant in an area that they have said is theirs?
	Because the vast majority of the people are Russian there and want to join Russia.
	What advantage is it to them to do that?
	Just like what advantage is it to them to blow up the Nord Stream pipeline?
	And yet in this particular case, we have a major general who led the last failed counteroffensive saying, yeah, we've already done our test case to do that.
	We're going to do that as a last resort.
	Just amazing that that'd be ignored.
	The lies are just truly amazing.
	Let's talk a little bit about, and I mentioned this briefly yesterday, the spies that are now coming out and say, you know, we've been lying to you.
	For 50, 60, 70 years, whatever it is, you know, going back to right after World War II, I guess.
	So probably come up to about 70 years.
	And so we've been lying to you all this time about UFOs, but now we're going to tell you the truth.
	Spies. Consider the source, right?
	And they're not anonymous intelligence sources now because something has changed.
	And we'll talk about what it is that changed to give them legal cover.
	But we have a whistleblower who has come out and told intelligence officials, and like I said, I just mentioned it briefly yesterday.
	And I said, no, I'm not buying it, frankly.
	The information, he says, has been illegally withheld from Congress.
	He filed a complaint alleging that he had suffered illegal retaliation for his confidential disclosures.
	Other intelligence officials, both active and retired, have independently provided similar corroborating information, both on and off the record.
	This original source for this is a publication called TheDebrief.org.
	And so they've been covering this type of thing for quite some time.
	They put this out.
	Tucker Carlson did his first Twitter broadcast, 10 Minutes.
	I've got to think about the way I'm doing this here.
	Tucker Carlson does 10 minutes of a Twitter show, makes tens of millions of dollars.
	Something is wrong about the way I'm doing this.
	Maybe I'm just doing this for too long.
	Anyway, the whistleblower is a veteran of the Geospatial Intelligence Agency in the National Reconnaissance Office.
	And I said immediately, well, that makes it somewhat suspicious.
	These are people who tell us one lie after the other.
	The NGA has been for the last couple of decades kind of like the NSA used to be.
	The NSA used to stand for No Such Agency.
	They would deny its existence.
	Nobody would talk about it.
	Nobody wants to talk about the Geospatial Intelligence Unit because that is essentially the core of the surveillance state now.
	To look at what you are doing and to map out your political, religious beliefs and In a space, like a geofencing of January the 6th, that type of thing.
	And they've been working on this for quite some time.
	It's where the liar James Clapper grew up in his career.
	Spent most of his time in that geospatial intelligence agency.
	But they don't like to use that term.
	They avoid it until now.
	And so here's a guy who is supposedly coming in from the cold lies and now he's going to tell you the warm truth.
	Here is a clip They are breathlessly covering this story.
	Last week, NASA held its first public meeting on UFOs, which, by the way, are now called officially unidentified aerial phenomena.
	This is a year after launching a study into unexplained sightings.
	And now tonight, a worldwide TV exclusive you will only see right here on NewsNation, bombshell claims from a military whistleblower published just this morning.
	Alledging a secret UFO retrieval program within the U.S. government.
	David Grush, an Air Force veteran, former member of that task force and veteran of the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, now formally blowing the whistle on secrets he says no one has ever shared publicly before.
	He is speaking one-on-one with investigative reporter Ross Coldhart reporting for NewsNation.
	When you say crash retrieval, what do you mean?
	These are retrieving non-human origin technical vehicles, you know, call it spacecraft if you will.
	It's probably not the right parlance, but no kidding, non-human, exotic origin vehicles that have either landed or crashed.
	We have spacecraft from another species.
	We do, yeah. How many?
	Yeah, we do. Call him BS on that.
	I mean, he doesn't ask him any questions.
	Why do you say it's, you know, from a different species and all that?
	Yeah, we do. Yeah, we do.
	Yeah. You got any proof?
	Why do you say that? Right?
	Why do you say that? No questions.
	Just, oh, wow.
	Okay. Let's run with it.
	You know, what's surprising is that you're seeing people like Tucker Carlson just running with it.
	Oh, look. It's been proven.
	Or you see RFKJ running with it.
	Oh, look. Another conspiracy theory.
	Proven true. Has it been proven?
	Have you seen any proof?
	Elon Musk came out and said, I haven't seen any proof.
	This is just another intelligence community grift, in my opinion.
	Even to the extent. Why would they change it from UFO to UAP? Right?
	They're rebranding this propaganda.
	What do they have in mind here?
	Well, in the debrief, they said, analysis has determined that the objects retrieved are, quote, of exotic origin.
	Oh. Oh, I wonder what that means.
	Non-human intelligence, they said, whether extraterrestrial or of unknown origin, based on the vehicle's morphologies, that just means shape, And material science and the possession of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures.
	Well, I would still need to see some evidence.
	How can you determine that based on the vehicle shape that this is something that is alien?
	When you see these things going very fast, changing directions, stopping, hovering, and all the rest of this stuff.
	It's obviously advanced technology.
	What is behind this?
	It's something of a leap of faith to go there and say that this is extraterrestrial.
	He said, we also have material that includes intact and partially intact vehicles.
	He says that we're reverse engineering that technology and have been for quite some time.
	Well, I've said for the longest time, and both my sons can tell you since they were small children, I've been telling them that this would happen.
	I've been telling them that this would be part of a great deception.
	It wasn't clear to me what role, consciously or unconsciously, the government and, of course, the CIA as the government, what role they would be playing in this thing.
	But, you know, the bottom line is not necessarily a government deception.
	But I think it is a satanic deception.
	I see this fitting very well.
	And have for quite some time.
	I see it fitting very well into the narrative that you see put out in Revelation.
	And I see this as providing the motivation for some of the events described there, the attitudes of the people that are described there.
	Look, they've been preparing people for this type of thing my entire life.
	And you go back and you look at Day of the Earth Stood Still and all the rest of this stuff.
	They've been preparing people for this.
	And, um, when you look at the fact that this is coming from the intelligence agencies, from the CIA and other people like that, I mean, do they have any credibility with you?
	I mean, these people are still selling the official story of 9-1-1 to a man, even the whistleblowers.
	And the CIA, I think, is really the true pharmakia if you want to look at their obsession with mind-altering drugs, LSD, and other things like that.
	And the fact that they do direct literal murders, not just killing people with their drugs like Big Pharma does.
	I've called Big Pharma the pharmakia.
	You know, the great men of the world who will not repent of their murders.
	Well, that also describes the CIA, doesn't it?
	They don't care. They don't repent of their assassinations or their murders.
	There was just a story, and I'm not going to go into detail on it, and I didn't pull it out to talk about it because the details are just so disgusting.
	What was done in San Francisco, going back to the early 1950s, by the CIA as they were leading up to their LSD stuff and everything else, how they set up a brothel in San Francisco, because, you know, hey, as San Francisco...
	Kind of like a family business, I guess, for San Francisco.
	They've got people prating around on the streets naked there and sex acts in public and all the rest of this stuff in San Francisco.
	But the CIA back in the 50s, when it hadn't gotten that bad, it was before Haight-Ashbury and before the way San Francisco is today.
	But back in the 1950s, You know, they were doing the Jeffrey Epstein thing.
	They were setting people up, filming them, giving them LSD, and just every kind of perversion you can imagine.
	That's how dark the CIA is.
	These people should have absolutely no credibility with you.
	And I look through this article, and I see one intelligence officer after the other.
	I'm sorry, you're going to have to get somebody out there that's got an ounce of credibility, in my opinion, to tell us this stuff.
	But again, you know, a satanic deception.
	It's kind of interesting people's perspectives on this.
	Right? You've got a lot of these people who want to believe that there are alien life forms, extraterrestrial life forms, that are not God, angels, demons.
	Right? They want to believe that it is something other than that.
	And so they will take a look at something like Ezekiel.
	And I say, well, Ezekiel just mistook this UFO. It really was a UFO. He just thought it was some kind of a divine manifestation or something.
	And so the question is, are we looking at something like this that could be a real phenomenon?
	And I'm not saying it's not real.
	I'm just saying it's not.
	The Bible, the Hebrew Bible, the Christian New Testament, all of it, It talks about the fact that the universe is bursting with extraterrestrial beings and intelligence, if you have a biblical perspective on this.
	This is nothing new. We should not be surprised by this.
	The question is, what are they?
	So you could look, these people look at the Bible and say, well, that's not God.
	That's a UFO. And we could look at this and say, well, is this something that really is in our time?
	Some kind of a manifestation of demons or angels or whatever?
	And are we mistaking that as some kind of a green alien that's been depicted in Hollywood for the longest period of time?
	But you see people like Matt Walsh say, well, that's it.
	You know, this is actually, there's no question.
	This has now been proven. This is irrefutable.
	Matt Walsh said, unless you have already come to the preconception that these things cannot exist, then you've got to believe it now.
	They've not shown any evidence.
	We've got the testimony of known liars and deceivers who practice lies and deception all the time.
	Intelligence agents.
	And so based on the testimony of intelligence agencies, that's a preconception that we're going to do that.
	It's kind of interesting, and it really does kind of go back to a discussion.
	One of the best discussions I've seen was Ben Stein interviewing Richard Dawkins about a decade ago.
	And you want to talk about preconceptions.
	You know, just go back to even the origin of life, right?
	You had Crick and Watson discovered DNA, and they said, well, this clearly is intelligent design.
	I mean, look at this. This is a code.
	And it runs through every living organization, both plant and animal.
	That just can't pop up, right?
	Where did the computer code come from?
	Who built the building? Was it a tornado in a junkyard and all the rest of the stuff?
	They knew there had to be intelligent design.
	So I said, but we're going to, because of our preconceptions, we're going to rule out the God of the Bible.
	And we will say that it's aliens who did this.
	That's what Crick and Watson did.
	That's kind of what Dawkins does, and Ben Stein calls him on it.
	Well then, who did create the heavens and the earth?
	Why do you use the word who? You see, you immediately beg the question by using the word who.
	Well then, how did it get created?
	Well, by a very slow process.
	Well, how did it start? Nobody knows how it started.
	We know the kind of event that it must have been.
	We know the sort of event that must have happened for the origin of life.
	What was that? It was the origin of the first self-replicating molecule.
	Right. How did that happen?
	I told you, we don't know.
	So you have no idea how it started?
	No, no. Nor has anybody.
	Nor has anyone else. What do you think is the possibility that intelligent design might turn out to be the answer to some issues in genetics or in evolution?
	It could come about in the following way.
	It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, a civilization evolved by probably some kind of Darwinian means to a very, very high level of technology.
	And designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet.
	Now, that is a possibility, and an intriguing possibility.
	And I suppose it's possible that you might find evidence for that.
	If you look at the details of biochemistry and molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer.
	Wait a second. Richard Dawkins thought intelligent design might be a legitimate pursuit?
	And that designer could well be a higher intelligence from elsewhere in the universe.
	But that higher intelligence would itself have had to have come about by some explicable or ultimately explicable process.
	It couldn't have just jumped into existence spontaneously.
	That's the point.
	So, Professor Dawkins was not against intelligent design, just certain types of designers, such as God.
	So, the Hebrew God, the God of the Old Testament, He doesn't exist in your view.
	Certainly. I mean, that would be a very unpleasant prospect.
	And the holy trinity of the...
	Nothing like that.
	What if, after you died, you ran into God?
	What have you been doing, Richard?
	I mean, what have you been doing?
	I've been trying to be nice to you.
	I gave you a multi-million dollar paycheck over and over again with your book, and look what you did!
	Bertrand Russell had that point put to him, and he said something like, Why did you take such pains to hide yourself?
	But if the intelligent design people are right, God isn't hidden.
	We may even be able to encounter God through science, if we have the freedom to go there.
	What could be more intriguing than that?
	Yeah, God is not hidden, right?
	As Psalm 19 says.
	Heavens declare the glory of God.
	The skies proclaim the work of his hands.
	Day after day they pour forth speech.
	Night after night they reveal knowledge.
	They have no speech.
	They have no words.
	No sound is heard from them.
	Yet this voice goes out to all the world.
	And the words to the ends of the earth.
	Oh, that's reality.
	And that's what, you know, intelligent design is just part of it.
	And we have far more amazing evidence of intelligent design now than we did at that point in time.
	But there was no excuse for anybody at that point in time.
	As Richard Dawkins says, well, that would be a very unpleasant experience if there is a God.
	But he is hardened in his position.
	And it goes beyond that.
	You know, we've had one of my, I think one of the best books you can find out there is from Dr.
	Werner Gitt. He's a German scientist.
	He's a professor at University Information Science.
	And he wrote a book called, In the Beginning Was Information.
	Right? In the beginning there was the word logos.
	Well, that is much bigger than just word.
	Logos is a concept that means intelligence and purpose and word as well.
	And he said... You know, when you look at this, you cannot deny, as we look deeper and deeper into nature, the work of God's hands is there everywhere.
	And so, what do we do about this?
	You know, Dawkins' idea, well, you know, same thing that Crick and Watson came up with.
	He doesn't deny anymore that there's a designer for human life.
	But now he imagines that there is some life that is far more intelligent than us that just evolved by chance processes.
	Just a tornado in a junkyard built a skyscraper.
	And he has absolutely new proof for that.
	See, the thing is, we have evidence that there is an intelligent God.
	And then we have something that claims to be his message to us.
	And that message has predicted things that happened thousands of years later.
	It has withstood the evidence of time as being historically factual.
	For over a thousand years, well, about 2,500 years, some of these civilizations that were described in the Old Testament had vanished so totally that that was a line of mockery of the Bible.
	And then about that time, some people said, well, if the Bible says this, let's go see if we can find it there.
	And that's how archaeology was born in the early 1800s and shut that down.
	Now, that in and of itself, I think, is pretty significant.
	But the prophecies and the other things that are there are even more significant.
	And so, it's not just Dr.
	Werner Goethe. You also have a great apologist, John Lennox, who has debated Dawkins.
	He's a mathematician. He says, I'm a mathematician and a scientist.
	Because you can't do science without this foundation of understanding that there is a creator God who created us, that there's a logic to everything.
	He says, I don't want to live in a world where there is, he said, your very mind is dependent on order and structure.
	So we have a lot of evidence about this, but again, it goes back to the preconceptions that people have.
	And Matt Walsh, as soon as he saw this, He said, well, at this point, the only reason to discount, he tweeted this out, the only reason to discount these reports is your own preconceived belief that aliens can't exist.
	The evidence is really overwhelming now.
	It is? I haven't seen any evidence of any of you.
	We've heard testimony of intelligence agents.
	That's the only thing we've got to go on.
	And whether we're talking about who blew up this bridge or dam or pipeline or whatever, as Guard Goldsmiths say, clearly these aliens are responsible for the destruction of the dam.
	We don't know who did it.
	Nobody's bad here. It was just the aliens who did it.
	So we can all stop fighting each other now, right?
	But I would say to Matt Walsh, the guy who did the documentary, they got like 160 million views on Twitter over that 24-hour period on this one-year anniversary.
	Anyway, you know, that was what is a woman?
	Hey, Matt, what is an alien?
	Can you define what an alien is for me?
	What evidence do you have?
	You've got evidence of women.
	You know, we can look at objective standards and define what a woman is.
	Can we define what an alien is?
	Do you know what one is? Would you know one if you saw it?
	I like this tweet that was put out in response to Matt Walsh.
	This person, Mashiru Katerin, put out this picture.
	And of course, this is an alien mask on the proverbial NPC character, right?
	And he says, Greetings, humans.
	I am vastly more technological advanced alien species whose system of government conveniently looks like the premise of John Lennon's song, Imagine.
	You should become advanced like us by abolishing borders and religion.
	That's where this thing really always comes back to.
	Yeah, you should become like us.
	Become more advanced. Get rid of your religion and your borders.
	We need a one-world government.
	As a matter of fact, Ronald Reagan hinted at that in a U.N. speech, and he mentioned it a couple of times.
	You know, what would it take to unify us all together?
	He said at the U.N. To fight a common enemy.
	Perhaps that's their endgame.
	To stage that. Perhaps it's not even their agenda, like I said before.
	Perhaps it is a demonic manifestation.
	Jason Barker thinks so.
	He says, I think UFOs are demon manifestations that are possibly talking to some leaders and feeding them tech.
	The dupe leaders probably believe they are aliens.
	I absolutely agree with you, Jason, 100%.
	That's exactly the way that I see this.
	And, you know, when you look at this, and, you know, you look at these things that are going really fast, they hover, they stop, and they just vanish from sight, things like that happening.
	Um... Is it the fact that in our world, as some people have pointed out, there may be more than four dimensions?
	Those are the four dimensions that we know of.
	Three dimensions of space, fourth dimension of time.
	Maybe there's additional dimensions outside of our time and space dimension.
	And again, if you look at the Bible, you look at Christ appearing and disappearing, and yet he had physical manifestation.
	Is this... Because of different dimensions?
	I don't know. I mean, people play these what-if games.
	I'm not saying that any of this stuff is like that.
	But certainly, this does not create any kind of existential threat to my faith.
	It completely fits within my faith.
	As a matter of fact, it only underscores the importance and the predictions that we saw in Revelation.
	So that's where I'm coming from, Matt.
	I don't know where you're coming from, Matt Walsh, but what your presumptions are.
	But a lot of this stuff is going to depend on what people believe, what their worldview is, is going to determine their perception of this stuff and what they're willing and ready to believe.
	Christopher Mellon spent nearly 20 years in the U.S. intelligence community.
	He said, Again, second-hand anonymous sources being given to you by an intelligence agent.
	Jonathan Gray, a generational officer of the U.S. intelligence community.
	At the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, another individual served as a top officer, cleared at the top secret compartmented information level.
	And so...
	Again, in my opinion, I think we've had these manifestations of portrayed in the past.
	They portrayed themselves as gods because that's what people expected to see.
	I think now people expect to see aliens.
	I think that has been planted.
	Again, I think this is a satanic deception.
	I think with all the movies and all the rest of this stuff, they have...
	Decided to come back, not presenting themselves as Zeus or Apollo or something like that, Apollos.
	But they have decided to hang their hat on the science.
	Come at it from a scientific aspect that people like Richard Dawkins would be more than happy to accept.
	Giles, a listener, wrote this and said, Is somehow allowed on TV to spill the beans?
	Could the swamp be priming us for the next emergency that will be untold amounts of funding to counter another conveniently invisible enemy?
	Congress should even declare a state of war against it to open the floodgates of taxpayer money.
	Yeah. And then I got this from another listener.
	Jay and Jessica wrote this.
	He said, I've been paying attention to that narrative they've been building for many years.
	And it actually goes back to before my time.
	I've been seeing it my entire life.
	I'm born about the time they started this stuff.
	But I wanted to put it on the radar because I know it's not a hot button issue yet.
	And often it's dismissed as meaningless and doesn't get taken seriously.
	You have likely been seeing it on occasion.
	The UFO narrative, he said, has been pressed increasingly more frequently and with more clarity than it has in many years.
	It has been kept as murky and confusing and unbelievable as possible, with them never really saying that a UFO is an alien craft and kind of just putting it out slowly as an unidentified object.
	But now they're using terms like non-human, and they actually have agencies.
	And of course Trump created the new bureaucracy, the Space Force.
	Needs some big reverb when I say that.
	Um... What are they trying to do?
	I honestly don't know, but I'm sure that they are lying.
	In fact, I don't believe the science of the creation at all.
	I believe in the firmament being solid and that we're not alone flying around in an expanse that never ends.
	I believe if we discount all that NASA and the government tells us, we get a totally different understanding about what the Bible explains.
	The Book of Enoch as well. The moon landing is a lie.
	The Big Bang, space, aliens, they've all been lying about everything.
	Look, I would recommend that you, if you've got some questions about this, There's some great material and answers in Genesis, you know, going back to creation, going back to origins.
	There's so much that's in the book of Genesis that lays a foundation for all this stuff.
	And they also do talk about aliens and the fact that perhaps they're demons and part of a deception.
	Anyway, he says, the writer here, Jay and Jessica, He says, why is this important?
	Satan knows that Christ is going to return and he's preparing us for deception.
	And I wonder if this is a way to further confuse people during their return.
	I believe so. I know it sounds crazy, but I've lost absolutely all trust in this beast system.
	I was an atheist just three years ago.
	What just happened in 2020 spoke to me.
	So he says, I'll listen daily and share the information.
	Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	And he sent me a headline from Fox News.
	Military whistleblower goes public with claims that U.S. has a secret UFO retrieval program that's going to kick off a terrestrial arms race.
	There we go. More justification for all of this stuff.
	And so yesterday, you know, when Tucker did his 10-minute program, he talked about the dam and he talked about, you know, the war.
	Push back on that with some of the clips that a couple weeks ago, Lindsey Graham, what he had to say, what Nikki Haley had to say.
	And then he jumped into the UFO stuff.
	And here's what he had to say about the UFO. Yesterday, for example, a former Air Force officer who worked for years in military intelligence came forward as a whistleblower to reveal that the U.S. government has physical evidence of crashed, non-human-made aircraft, as well as the bodies of the pilots who flew those aircraft.
	The Pentagon has spent decades studying these otherworldly remains in order to build more technologically advanced weapons systems.
	Okay, that's what the former intel officer revealed, and it was clear he was telling the truth.
	In other words, UFOs are actually real, and apparently so is extraterrestrial life.
	Now we know.
	In a normal country, this news would qualify as a bombshell, the story of the millennium.
	But in our country, it doesn't.
	The Whistleblower's account ran on a technology website called The Debrief, which you've probably never heard of.
	The Washington Post had that story, but decided not to run it.
	The New York Times, meanwhile, just pretended it never happened.
	On the front page of the New York Times website this morning, there were five stories about Ukraine, as well as four stories apiece about Donald Trump, trans people, and climate change, the usual lineup.
	There was nothing at all about how an alien species is flying hypersonic aircraft over our cities.
	Not one word. So if you're wondering why our country seems so dysfunctional, this is a big part of the reason.
	Nobody knows what's happening.
	Including Tucker. Solo Cat says, you lost me when he said aliens are real.
	And I noticed when I was re-listening to this, he said, and they even found the bodies.
	I didn't see anything about that in this latest thing from Debrief.
	They said they got partial and full spacecraft and, of course, harps.
	I hope you're doing well, harps, with the broken ribs.
	He said drunken aliens forgot where they parked.
	You know, that's the other part of the question nobody asked him.
	Well, how did you get these spacecraft completely intact?
	I mean, if, you know, if you had these non-human, non-human craft, I can see if it was something that crashed, you would have partial things.
	But we say that you got a full divide.
	How did you get that?
	No question. See, that's a big part of the problem.
	Yeah, New York Times, Washington Post didn't want to go there.
	The people who did want to go there just said, oh, okay, well, now we got proof.
	See, we had a CIA agent tell us that, a couple of them.
	No questions asked.
	So, yeah, I didn't see anything about any bodies being there.
	I didn't see anything about them flying over our cities at hypersonic speed in that report.
	But, of course, he's combining a lot of different things there.
	Interestingly enough, as he said, you know, they decided not to run it.
	They decided to cover things like climate change.
	Yeah, do you see that agenda there, Tucker?
	Do you know why they're doing that?
	Take everything away from us?
	You know, it's amazing to me that even though he is not at Fox News, He still says, well, they're going to control all the relevant information, but he's still not talking about the Trump shots that kill people.
	The killing injections.
	That's still not an issue to Tucker.
	But then he says, but go ahead and talk about something that really matters and see what happens.
	Well, maybe that's why he doesn't talk about the pharmaceutical stuff.
	That's why he doesn't talk about the vaccines, the injections, and the Trump shots.
	Because if he told the truth about it, if...
	He didn't get banned by the pharmaceutical companies and everybody else.
	He'd get banned by his own audience.
	So he's not going to tell you the truth about Trump, is he?
	So, yeah, just, you know, you need to look inside yourself.
	You got all these people search for extraterrestrial intelligence, and they're looking for a repeating pattern, and yet they won't look at the DNA inside themselves.
	And then you've got people like Tucker, who's not really interested in looking inside your body to see what the spike protein is doing.
	But people like Paul Merrick are.
	Spike protein is probably one of the most toxic compounds that human beings can be exposed to.
	Spike causes profound inflammation.
	It activates clotting.
	It activates the clotting cascade.
	It activates platelets.
	It causes autoantibodies.
	It causes damage to the endothelium of blood vessels.
	And then it has some really bad effects on genes and many of the genes involved in cancer suppression.
	So we now know that spike protein and although people want to ignore and deny it actually...
	Yeah, that's right. A lot of people in the news, a lot of people who are trusted by alternative press want to ignore it, if not deny it.
	My son writes...
	An intelligence agent specializing in extraterrestrial intelligence.
	So will the masks protect us against the ETs?
	How about lockdowns?
	I'm sure they'll find a way to make those necessary.
	We'll also have to get the shot.
	Because, you know, the aliens will be carrying some kind of disease.
	Maybe that's the way they'll wrap all this stuff together, right?
	Yeah, they're carrying some kind of disease.
	And if we only bow down and worship them and install them as leaders, then...
	They can solve our climate change problem.
	And guess what they're going to tell us to do?
	The same thing to people who said we're going into an ice age or we're going to burn up or we're going to have a virus.
	They all tell us the same thing to do.
	And so maybe the alien MacGuffin will be part of that MacGuffin as well.
	Same solution to any problem.
	Babylon Bee says, okay, take us to a different leader, says an exasperated alien after trying to communicate with Joe Biden.
	I guess he's not the leader we were expecting, said an insider who spoke on condition of anonymity.
	It was the classic sci-fi movie scenario with the aliens arriving and telling us, take us to your leader.
	We quickly set up a meeting with President Biden.
	Things went downhill from there.
	The aliens were already asking why we kept shooting down their peace offering balloons, the spy balloons, containing hickory farm cheese and sausage gift baskets.
	But I guess it really started to get bad when the lead alien put out his hand to greet the president and Joe bent down and bit the creature's finger.
	I thought he was going to suck the finger.
	I don't know what he did with Jill.
	It sucked her fingers.
	At publishing time, the aliens were reportedly already asking to be taken to a third leader after they spent only five minutes with Lala Harris.
	Elon Musk is not buying it.
	And, of course, neither is The Street.
	They said, from time to time it subsides, but then it resurfaces thanks to a personality or a veteran who has bona fide military service claiming to have confidential information that a, quote, galactic federation, unquote, had already been in contact with some earthlings and had begun to conduct experiments on our planet.
	And this happened in 2020.
	We had a former Israeli space security chief who said that.
	The U.S. government, he said, is in very close contact with the aliens, but space visitors felt it was too early to come out because humanity was not yet ready.
	This does not prevent aliens, according to Haim Eshed, from having built a base, with the help of Americans, below the surface of Mars.
	Haim Eshed is no ordinary ufologist, or ufologist, I guess is how they pronounce it.
	He's a retired officer. He began his career in 1969 in, wait for it, intelligence.
	Military intelligence.
	With a doctorate in aeronautical engineering that he got in the U.S. He was at the forefront of new technologies in Israel before becoming the boss of the Israeli military space program from 1981 to 2010.
	Well, he had a pretty long run there.
	His claims have never been substantiated about the galactic empire that we're talking to.
	Despite the lack of public evidence, though, now we see a similar situation with this guy called Grush.
	I am Grush!
	His account has been shared and discussed on social media for the past several days.
	RFK Jr. shared an article on his statements and mocked the critics.
	RFKJ said, another conspiracy theory that turned out to be true.
	I guess men in black got it right.
	But then Elon Musk responded to the story from NewsNation.
	I played that clip for you. He said, I have seen zero evidence of aliens for what it's worth.
	So, again, if you have seen it, are you able to think outside the box they want to put you in?
	What is real and what is an illusion?
	We better understand what our framework is.
	We better examine what we believe and why we believe it.
	Tomorrow is not promised to any of us anyway.
	So we need to question what we're being told.
	We can question the Bible.
	Truth can stand and withstand scrutiny.
	So don't hesitate to look at that.
	But just make sure that you've got some good sources.
	Again, I recommend Answers in Genesis.
	They've got some very good answers for this.
	And there's many other sources as well.
	Werner Getz book on intelligent design and other things like that.
	But you want to make sure that you don't just have a vague belief in a vague God, but you really understand the God of the Bible, what He expects and what He offers.
	Even the free grace that He offers in Christ His Son.
	So, you know, there is something...
	We can all look at this and the UFO stuff, but again, whenever something like this happens, none of us is promised another day.
	So you better understand what your place in the world, what your place in the universe is.
	Is there a God? Has He spoken to you?
	And all the rest of this stuff is something that you ought to be investigating deeply yourself.
	Because, you know, as...
	Richard Dawkins was talking about that.
	The real thing that Ben Stein should have talked to him was Pascal's wager.
	So he says, so what have you really lost if you live your life that way, the way that the Bible talks about?
	As a matter of fact, there was just a...
	An article study that came out said that men who are happily married can handle the stress that is taking down other people in their busy jobs.
	I mean, it's all kinds of things like that that...
	Yeah, you may have some difficulties, and we are promised that there will be difficulties.
	I'm not promising you a bed of roses.
	I don't believe in the prosperity gospel.
	I think you're going to take up your cross, and you're going to be put in positions where you're going to even be persecuted for this.
	But you have to look at the bigger picture.
	You have to understand where you are in life.
	And the time to do that is now.
	We're going to take a break and when we come back we're going to take another look at the artificial intelligence story from the military.
	We'll be right back. The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	The David Knight Show dot com.
	Thank you.
	Joining us now is Tony Arterman with WiseWolf Gold, wisewolf.gold, but of course he's also set up David Knight Gold that will take you to him and let you know that you came through me.
	Always good to talk to Tony.
	I said when we come back we're going to talk about artificial intelligence and we will talk about that after the interview with Tony.
	I wasn't looking at the clock.
	I didn't realize right up to the time of Tony coming on.
	But it's always great to have Tony with us.
	Thank you for joining us, Tony. Always an honor to be here, David.
	Well, it is Wednesday. Usually I'm on Thursday, so it's an honest mistake.
	No worries at all. Yeah, I appreciate you shifting your schedule there.
	We're trying to set up somebody who is in a situation where the time is a little bit difficult for them, and so instead of having back-to-back interviews, we thought we'd split it around.
	So I appreciate your flexibility on that.
	Thank you. Anytime. What do you see happening?
	We've had a lot of stuff, a lot of moves against Coinbase that people are talking about.
	I know that you're not really involved in that.
	It's more gold and silver.
	And that's one of the reasons why I look at gold and silver more than I look at crypto.
	Because it's a complicated system.
	If you don't understand it, you can be easily scammed with that.
	But of course, the government has set its sights.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Well, like any new adoption of a technology, I remember getting into Bitcoin in 2016 and I look back on those days and it was like the Wild West compared to now in regulation.
	I mean, there was no clear guidelines.
	I mean, you could buy a Bitcoin ATM, put it out there and you could buy from exchanges.
	But what happened was that the exchanges themselves wouldn't let you buy from them and then your bank would kick you out.
	There was nowhere to bank.
	There's only like two or three banks in the US and maybe less now that you can bank with if you are even a small crypto exchange.
	That's right. So the regulations have become so overbearing that only the top companies can compete.
	I think that's always...
	The plan is to make it one or two exchanges, you know, where the rich can buy into it and they can control it with the government.
	And of course, that defeats all the purpose of crypto.
	Crypto is supposed to be the people's currency.
	And it's been like everything else that gets hijacked.
	I think what you're watching now is the The picking of winners and losers when they're going after these exchange and make it to where you can't into the business.
	I mean, I sold my Bitcoin ATMs because it's just the regulation is so over the top.
	And the big companies, David, they put in like 25,000 ATMs in like six months over 2021 into 2022 and just completely saturated the market.
	Nobody's making money there, which is another thing.
	That's one of those things that happens when the new technology adoption, that they'll just be able to sustain losses because they're propped up by giant venture capital and multinationals.
	So unfortunately, that space for the small entrepreneur is harder and harder to get into.
	You need to let them work out all the stuff with the SEC.
	I know Coinbase's CEO is talking about this is unsustainable on America and what they're doing.
	And it is.
	But again, I think some of those big companies, I think the SEC was going to seize some of Binance's U.S. assets here shortly.
	So it's not looking good for the exchanges.
	But if you look at the price of Bitcoin, it's staying pretty steady.
	So it's kind of outside of this, which is interesting to watch.
	Yeah, and as you said before, what they're busy doing is cutting off the entrance ramps and the exit ramps to it.
	And yet, it looks like they may be doing that even with cash.
	I just saw an interview that was with a guy, Hugh Henry.
	And he was saying the probability that they're going to put restrictions on the amount of cash that you can take out are rising significantly because, again, they're creating all these – there's bank panics, there's liquidity issues, and we can see this start to multiply.
	And so they might do that as a defensive means, but they might start restricting cash withdrawals as well.
	You know, when you look at the kind of financial – Problems that they have created, and I suspect most of these, if not all of them, are deliberate because they want to have a financial crisis because they want to completely reset the financial system.
	And so shutting down crypto is just one aspect of it.
	And when you look at Binance that you mentioned, they're coming after their domestic assets.
	They're a foreign country, a company.
	And so they started putting in, proposing this legislation that, hey, we're going to put a Massive fines against you if you deal with a company that is prohibited, and we're going to escalate that up.
	What was it? $100,000, a million dollars or something like that?
	Right. A million. Yeah, a million.
	Just absurd. And that was a real tell that they were coming after the crypto industry, that this didn't have anything to do with anything other than shutting down crypto because of that massive fine.
	And if you try to use a VPN to hide the fact that you're dealing with them, they're going to get you with a million-dollar fine.
	So this is the type of thing that they really are actively trying to restrict our financial choices to one thing, just like they did with the vaccine during that lockdown.
	We could be looking at a kind of financial lockdown coming up, couldn't we?
	No, you're absolutely right.
	Some banks are having you make appointments to get cash.
	They're putting limits on cash, telling you it's not available.
	Luckily, I think you find that more in the larger banks, in these branches that these national banks have.
	I bank with two regional banks, and they've been great with me on cash, except for the fact that they don't like my deposits.
	You know, they start going, why are you?
	Because if I'm gone for a week in Texas and I come back to Branson, I'm in Texas right now.
	If I go back to Branson and my crew there has deposits for the week and I'm going, they're not going to like this, you know.
	They always want to know where the cash comes from.
	So, yeah, it's an issue.
	And again, cash is outside of a monitoring system most of the time, unless you're, you know, you go over the $10,000 mark.
	So the government doesn't like that.
	It doesn't like crypto. Again, it doesn't like gold or silver either.
	There hasn't been as much scrutiny yet on the precious metals market, but I assume that's coming with de-dollarization.
	I think that's inevitable as people start to get out of banks and get into precious metals as well.
	I'm seeing an uptick in that.
	I think there's going to be a push to regulate gold and silver heavily.
	You know, it's kind of interesting with all this happening at the same time, they're coming after a former part owner of the Vikings.
	They said it was a cryptocurrency scam, hitting him with a $700 million fine.
	So when I look at that, Tony, I see, first of all, this is a huge fine.
	I don't know what he did, too.
	I get that. But we're looking at something that is almost equivalent of the kind of fines that they were handing out To HSBC or to JP Morgan when they would involve themselves in money laundering for drug cartels and other organizations.
	They would get slightly over a billion dollars or something as a fine.
	They're giving this guy nearly a billion dollar fine.
	I don't know what that was involved in.
	But I think part of this is to have a poster child to scare people about how they're going to come after anyone dealing with cryptocurrency.
	I don't know if he is...
	I don't know. Well, he has been found guilty.
	They sentenced him to six years in prison and $700 million cryptocurrency scam.
	But I think that you see these types of big penalties out there publicized.
	It's the same type of stuff that the IRS typically would do around April the 15th.
	You know, they find a celebrity out there to nail them to the wall so that everybody could, oh, you know, here's your poster child for anybody that doesn't comply with our regulations.
	Yeah, well, I mean, they're going to make an example of anyone that's outside of their system.
	If you're not welcome to the party, if it's a big club and you ain't in it, you didn't get in the door, you're going to get the scrutiny.
	So I think that's inevitable, especially with crypto.
	They know that that space, I think that window is closing for innovation because they're just capturing it, just like they did the dot-com, David.
	I mean, if you look at the close of the 20th century going to the 21st, you have the dot-com bubble.
	And in that chaos, a lot of the smaller venture capitalists were bought up by the big companies.
	And you see now you see a regulated Internet.
	I think that's always the goal with new tech.
	You know, the pioneers go in and create the new spaces and have the ideas.
	And then these soulless automaton bankers come in and just make everything boring and regulated.
	And that's, you know, that's why, you know, again, I'm in the gold and silver business, but still think that Bitcoin is interesting because it's one of those things that, it's still outside of the system.
	Its origin story is one of mystery because there's really no way to know who Satoshi Nakamoto was or if that was a series of people or a group of people, whatever it is.
	And you have this technology that it's not a company.
	It's not a country. Every other crypto tracks back to someone.
	There's got to be an off switch.
	You know, I'm not a tech guy.
	But I know that there's some way to kill the system.
	Bitcoin, I don't think that there is.
	And that's why I think, you know, you look at the headlines and I typed in and kind of did a search on Bitcoin before the show here.
	And it was like, well, Bitcoin's price is steady even with Bitcoin.
	The SEC and Binance and all the regulations and all the things that are going on, they're still ticking along.
	So there's something to that.
	It's still the decentralized system.
	There's something to that. That's right.
	And as some people pointed out on Twitter, look, you know, the corrupt SEC will sue Binance and Coinbase, but not FTX. And even Zero Hedge pointed that out as well.
	And their own version said, I guess they didn't pay off the right people or, you know, get involved in the right politics with that kind of stuff.
	It is amazing to see this.
	It's just an example of...
	Of how corrupt and biased our legal system is, the unequal application of these rules as they try to drag us down with ever more rules, kind of attaching themselves like barnacles to everything that we do.
	As you pointed out, first everything is free when it's first created, and then these barnacles of regulation start attaching themselves to us until they pull us to the bottom.
	Well, I know. They're picking winners and losers.
	They're going to need a whole new Building 7 to demolish, to get rid of these records or whatever they're doing right now.
	Yeah. Maybe an alien invasion.
	Who knows what...
	Here's the alien invasion.
	Yeah. I think you're watching this roll towards the central bank digital currency still.
	This is, you know, the fifth generational warfare.
	They're running this op trying to make every off-ramp unavailable.
	You know, the de-dollarization that's inevitable...
	It's coming. You look at China just added 16 more tons of gold.
	They're leading the way.
	I mean, every central bank around the world is talking about dumping their dollar holdings.
	You're talking about 40% to 50% loss of dollar holdings in the next five years is what's estimated, David.
	So that trend is happening.
	In that chaos, I think what we need to be aware of is they're going to be pushing for the central bank digital currency in this when they'll look like this will be the alternative.
	You know, if you'll download the wallet, we can stop inflation.
	We can house value.
	You just got to be tied to this biometrically and get your ID tied to this.
	And we can control the money supply in real time.
	We can expand it.
	We can contrast it.
	And that will be, you know, the problem reaction solution.
	They'll be putting this in as the fail safe.
	And that's what I think all of this chaos is stemming from.
	And again, I think it's a controlled demolition.
	Yeah, the WHO is saying, well, we're going to use the European Union's You know, health ID that they came up with.
	And I think we've seen all these different global IDs and they were tied with a pandemic.
	They were all essentially the same thing.
	It was just who was going to get the contract to actually build the app.
	You know, you had the World Economic Forum proposed it quite some time ago.
	uh, common pass and you know, the, the, uh, for the, uh, the, for the common people I talk about all the time, but, uh, the EU had their own implementation of it.
	They've already got a couple of billion people on it.
	So of course the world health organization is going to go to that, but you have all these different, um, things that are happening that are not unrelated, They all converge to a single point.
	And we can see where that is going.
	And the CBDC is part of that.
	As I've said, that's really the fastest way for us to get there.
	But it's not the only way to get there.
	And so we've got to get something that is outside of the system as they're trying to cut everything down.
	You've even got the senator from Tennessee here, Senator Bill Haggerty.
	So the SEC is weaponizing their role to kill an industry, allowing a company to list publicly, and then stonewalling their attempts to register as indefensible.
	And of course, you know, they have done that.
	They've denied, the Federal Reserve has denied the on-ramps and the off-ramps to some of these companies that wanted to get in there.
	He said, so expect to hear from Congress.
	And I said, well, it'd be nice if you'd do something besides doing dog and pony show hearings.
	You know, you understand we've got regulation without representation.
	You guys have abdicated your authority.
	They pass these rules, pretend that they're not laws, but then act as if they are laws.
	But they have that pretense there so that they can avoid all the due process.
	They can take stuff from you without you being convicted.
	They can get you with excessive fines.
	And yet, there's no help at all coming from the Senate.
	That's one of the reasons why we have to make these preparations ourselves.
	And provide for our future individually and then collectively within our community as opposed to getting so focused on what is happening in Washington.
	I'm still waiting for the constitutional amendment that makes the Federal Reserve legal.
	I think Congress is just a little bit behind.
	They may not have noticed the Christmas Eve 1913.
	They got this abomination known as the Federal Reserve Bank.
	You're absolutely right, David.
	No help's coming from Washington.
	The hope that we have is on the state and local level.
	Tennessee looking at their bullion bank looking to make gold and silver legal tender.
	Texas You know again I disagreed with their The currency they wanted to do, the digital currency backed by gold.
	They don't like states in the business of currency.
	But, you know, you could be on the right track.
	People are paying attention.
	And it's going to come from the state level.
	It's going to come from the individual level, decentralized currency.
	And we've just gotten so used to, you know, modern America is through the Federal Reserve.
	I mean, the fiat currency system built this reality.
	So if you're looking around and you see all the fake, it comes from fake money.
	Fake news, fake politicians, fake wars all stems from the fake currency system in the central bank known as the Federal Reserve.
	So I'm just looking at local, David, there's no hope in Washington.
	Yeah, and you look at this, it's been there for 110 years, Federal Reserve Act.
	But again, an act by Congress that is unconstitutional is no law, and yet they did it with the Gun Control Act in the 1960s, and they did it with its Federal Reserve Act, and the thing stays there, and people treat it as if it is some kind of an amendment to the Constitution, or if the Supreme Court gives them a pass, oh, okay, well, they've all changed the Constitution.
	They don't even bother with the Constitution anymore.
	And now the bad thing about it is they're not just having these unconstitutional acts that are put together by Congress, whether it's about guns or whether it's about the Central Bank or the Federal Reserve.
	But they put these things together.
	Now that's all just been kicked over to the regulatory agencies, and they don't even bother with that anymore.
	So now we have everything that's done by executive order or by the regulatory agencies that are under the president, under the executive.
	It's... Rapidly deteriorating, isn't it?
	This empire that's coming apart at the seams.
	Yeah, the banality of evil.
	You know, it's just this boring series of bureaucrats with typewriters, and that's one of the worst things that could happen to you in history.
	And that's, you know, layers upon layers of bureaucracy.
	And they're rules, David.
	They're not laws. They're rules, so you really can't escape.
	Where's your trial by jury?
	You have to waive everything just to be a part of this system.
	And again, that's what I talk to people about on my show whenever I'm talking about crypto or gold or silver.
	It's like, You know, those things like gold and silver are a bet against the current system.
	I'm betting against this system with everything I have because I don't think it's not headed to prosperity.
	It's not headed towards more freedom and liberty.
	It's not headed towards peace.
	This is a war-driven, evil system that's taking us to, if it had its way, it's going to take us to Armageddon and economic collapse.
	I'm betting against it with everything I have.
	That's right. So what do we see happening in the metals markets right now?
	What do you see this last week since we last talked?
	Well, there's been some upticks in gold.
	You know, there's reports that you see that they have, I don't know how they measure this, but they say, well, it's a strong dollar.
	The dollar is really strong.
	So gold is under 2,000.
	You know, it's uptick. I think it's about $12 over yesterday's trading.
	It's close to 1,970 in the yellow metal.
	But again, what's driving the price of gold, in my opinion, is the central banks.
	That's the biggest story is the central banks around the world keep adding gold reserves.
	I mean, last year was the biggest year on record since the 1950s, since they started counting, like looking at these statistics since Breton Woods.
	This year is on track to somewhat close.
	I looked at the article this morning, the Chinese continue to add more and more gold reserves.
	This is going to be the trend, and it's just the beginning.
	And you see the end of the dollar is the world's hegemon for currency.
	That's going to mean some drastic changes for us here in the United States, economically, politically, socially, everything.
	It's going to be tied back to that loss of the world's reserve currency.
	There's nothing you can do, really, to stop it.
	I think, you know, if they're running the scenarios, if they're running the simulations, David, they have to be looking at, could a war help us?
	And that might be why we have no off-ramps for peace with Ukraine and Russia.
	You know, that's the first time in modern history where there has not been a summit, there has not been any peace talks, there's no ideas of peace coming from any of the Western leaders, so that may be why.
	Yeah, absolutely. It was Martin Armstrong, and he ran his Socrates program, said that about a year ago.
	It's like they need to save the dollar.
	The West needs World War III. I hope that that's wrong, but I think that's the only way to really prop it back up.
	I mean, because it is really the bottoms coming out of this...
	Well, as Gerald Salenti always says, when everything else fails, I take you to war.
	And we've seen that.
	And we've seen that with smaller wars.
	But, of course, with the fourth turning, which we're in the middle of, and that's all tied in with their 2030 deadline, we have seen these different fourth turnings always have some kind of massive economic chaos and almost always accompanied by a really, really big war.
	And so that's the big one that's coming because of this big financial crisis that is worldwide.
	I think it'll be a worldwide war that is going to be part of this fourth turning.
	All the indications are that that's going to happen.
	I really do think that will be a part of this.
	And we're only seven years away from their deadline.
	And it seemed to me like they wanted to have their society in place, you know, torn down.
	And in place by 2030, so we're probably even closer to this stuff than we realize.
	Yeah, well, you know, in order to build back better, you have to destroy it.
	Yeah. Whatever has to be built back better has to be destroyed in the first place.
	I think we got that message. You know, all the presidential candidates on the left were running.
	I remember 2019 going into 2020, David, you had people like Beto saying, well, we've only got 11 years.
	Science says we only have 11.
	I'm thinking, well, in 11 years, it's 2030.
	They all said the same thing.
	We only got 11 years.
	Now they're only going to say, we've got seven years.
	Everything is about 2030.
	They're definitely putting a timeline on this goal, and everything's lining up to that.
	You talk about all the little players, the WHO, the UN... The World Bank, the Great Reset, Davos, the World Economic Forum, they all talk about that timeline.
	One of the things that the World Economic Forum commercial back in 2016 said, the first thing they say in that commercial is, imagine the world where the U.S. is not the lone superpower.
	Right? And again, imagine that world.
	Imagine by 2030.
	So they're working to make that happen.
	Yeah, that's right. Maybe the slogan, you know, if the 2020 election was Build Back Better, maybe the 2024 slogan is going to be, tear down faster.
	Because we're getting closer to our deadline here, so we've got to tear it down faster.
	And like me, I can tear it down faster than the other guy can.
	That's maybe the pitch they're making in the back room so these guys would be financing them.
	I can tear it down faster than he can.
	We've got Jason Barker here saying, look at the paper to actual gold and silver ratios.
	The price is artificially being held down.
	Now banks are grabbing up metals at the reduced rates.
	Yeah. What do they know that we don't?
	That's the key. Well, Jason Barker is paying attention.
	Yeah. Because what's happening, and this is a theory, right, from us precious metals analysts.
	It's a theory, but I think it holds a lot of water that the giant banks are buying up the physical.
	They have a vested interest in keeping the price down.
	You look at somebody like, and by the way, some of these banks are felons.
	Like J.P. Morgan. They've been convicted of price manipulation in the silver market.
	Who knew? And I've said this before, and again, nobody can really confirm it, but it's estimated it's about for every physical ounce of silver in the real world that exists, it'll get traded 240 times in the paper market.
	So I think silver is one of those things.
	I read an article today on the Market News, a Market Insider, And it had a chart of what happened to silver from the 1940s.
	And silver was about 35 cents an ounce after World War II. And we had the same kind of spike in the debt-to-GDP ratio, David, is about 120% back then, right after World War II. They raised interest rates.
	So over the arc of the 1940s to 1980, it went from 35 cents to $50 an ounce in 1980.
	And again, $50 an ounce in 1980 is about like $250 today in purchasing power.
	And you know that.
	You were around.
	And again, I was born in 79.
	So I look at the purchasing power.
	Of the dollar and the waning of that.
	Well, we've had low interest rates from the 80s, the 90s, going into the 2000s, really low interest rates, a massive creation of debt, massive currency creation.
	In that time, David, silver has just been flat.
	It's one of those investments that a lot of people complain about.
	Silver never goes anywhere.
	I hear that all the time. I bought in at 20-something.
	It went down again. I think that those days are coming to an end.
	This article, and it was, again, Market Insider Building Alpha, and it says that Look at the price of silver from the 40s, from the rise of interest rates, and look at what they're doing in the same timeframe now and with the loss of the dollars, the world's reserve currency.
	Again, you look at $50 silver in 1980.
	Right now, on the spot price for paper, it's $24.
	You're probably going to pay somewhere around $29 an ounce.
	In the real world, for retail silver, there's a $5 premium, but still, you're still under the $30 mark.
	In 2023, what's happened to the dollar since 1980?
	I think silver is one of those investments, and I'm not giving investment advice, but it's one of those places to park your money that could be really interesting, and I would advise people to go take a look at these charts that I'm mentioning.
	So these economic storms might have a silver lining, then, is what you're saying.
	Yeah. They can manipulate this stuff in so many different ways, and that's the key.
	You know, when you look at it, like we talked about when you were on last week, look at the production of silver has been flat.
	The demand is going through the ceiling, especially with all the solar stuff that they're pushing so hard for.
	I mean, it just doesn't add up that it wouldn't...
	You know, that it could stay at this point.
	It's just beggars belief.
	But of course, you know, when we look at all this stuff, there's so much manipulation.
	One of the things that we're talking about, Coinbase, one person put out and said, well, you know, something kind of interesting happened, and he has a list of all the different transactions.
	He's talking about insider trading and knowing in advance where this kind of stuff is going to go.
	And... It was a Twitter website called Unusual Whales account, not a website.
	Anyway, he says, this is unusual.
	Yesterday, somebody opened up a new coin, $50 weekly puts for $107,000.
	They were 19% over the market, expired in four days after they bought it.
	But then today... The SEC sued Coinbase, and those positions are up by nearly 2,572%.
	Who knew? So it turns this investment of $100,000 into millions of dollars.
	Somebody always knows, he said.
	And that's the case.
	You know, there's just so much insider trading, so much corruption in Washington.
	You know, who knew that they were going to hammer them with a lawsuit?
	And this is the same type of thing that's happening, as you're pointing out, the big banks, the manipulation of every market, whether it's a stock market, the gold, silver market.
	Or, you know, certainly crypto type of stuff.
	These people know what they're going to do from a regulatory standpoint, from a legislative standpoint.
	They trade on this.
	This is how Pelosi became, you know, and her family became multimillionaires.
	But, of course, that's just one of them.
	They all do it to some extent or the other.
	And... This is one of the things that we can do in terms – that's why I like the gold and silver because it's not just private, but it's real money.
	It has real value.
	And if you've got the physical stuff, they can manipulate the price of it relative to the dollar because they're manipulating the dollar and all the other markets, but it's still got intrinsic value.
	And we see this happening over centuries, how it has maintained that approximate value in real goods.
	Yes, and in the face of what's happening to our markets, to our economy, the cancer that is ESG, environmental social governance, coming from the top down, looking at some things like BlackRock and Larry Fink and these people.
	I mean, if you read your history, it is interesting that, you know, the world's richest people always fund communism.
	Like, that's Conspiracy 101, and I wish they taught that in schools.
	I think it would help people understand the modern world, but they've infected our markets.
	If you're looking at this monstrosity, you go back to my dad's era of entrepreneurs and investors and Wall Street, the Michael Douglas movie that came out with Gordon Gekko.
	We can't really do that anymore.
	It's not about profit.
	They're not looking for learning.
	They're just looking for their connections to the central bank.
	That, to me, is a dead space.
	When I see somebody like Anheuser-Busch Losing billions, but they don't really do anything about it.
	People say, well, you go woke, you go broke.
	No, you don't. These companies aren't going broke.
	As they're crashing, they even, it was either them or it was Target, gave another $200 million to some LGBT cause.
	They really don't care. They don't care what the consumers think, and they don't care what is happening even to their stock price.
	They've got a different agenda that's out there, and it's not about marketplace at all.
	Let me go back to your point.
	For gold and silver, when I've got a holding a gold coin in my hand, that's energy.
	That's work. That's a manifestation of work and value in one place.
	Again, there's no counterparty risk.
	I don't have this in an account somewhere else.
	It's not a stock. You know, it's not tied to Wall Street.
	It's not tied to ESG. So I've got that in my hand.
	Is it the best investment ever?
	I don't know. I'm not an investment person.
	I know that gold and silver are money.
	That's what they are. You know, if you ask me, I got asked yesterday, I was on a financial podcast.
	If you had $150,000, what would you do with it?
	I said, well, I'd turn it into metals.
	If I didn't know anything else, I'd just turn it into metals because that to me is cash.
	You know, if I've got gold, it's liquid to me.
	I know that as a dealer, people can figure this out too, but you can turn gold into currency of wherever you are in the world.
	It's a universal metal known around the world.
	I'm betting on that system, David.
	Robert Kiyosaki from Rich Dad Poor Dad calls it God's money because it's in the earth and it's finite.
	It'll be here after we're gone.
	Maybe the aliens will pick it up.
	I don't know. We'll have to ask Tucker.
	Maybe that's why they're here.
	I wonder if they found any gold and silver on those craft, right?
	Meltdown bleep blorps control panel.
	I know what you were saying. Sorry, what you were saying about the rich and the powerful always aligned with the communists and everything made me instantly think of Lenin and that train with $10 million of gold.
	They put him on that in Switzerland and sent him back in to start the Russian Revolution.
	They gave him $10 million worth of gold in 1917.
	Can you imagine what that's worth today?
	Did the same thing with Trotsky.
	He was a newspaper reporter in New York.
	And I often tell the story about Paul Warburg He was the inspiration for Daddy Warbucks and Little Orphan Annie.
	And Paul Warburg was the first head of the Federal Reserve.
	He was a Rothschilds agent and a banker.
	His brother, Max Warburg, was the head of the Central Bank in Germany during World War I. So the same Central Bank that's supposed to be our mortal enemy, and they're the one that put Lenin on the sealed train car and sent him into Russia with all the gold.
	So yeah, it's the same thing.
	I mean, history doesn't repeat, but it rhymes, right, David?
	Yeah, it certainly is strange. Well, tell us a little bit about what's going on at Wise Wolf, about the Wolfpack or anything else that you've got going on there.
	We're just growing. I've got setting up supply chains.
	It's one of the reasons I'm here in Denison.
	I've been buying product here and then transferring it back to Branson so I can fuel Wolfpack.
	And that's our monthly membership.
	You can also buy direct through davidknight.gold.
	And we have no minimum. It's one of the reasons I set this business up.
	I wasn't treated fairly a lot of times when I wanted to buy gold and silver.
	A lot of dealers want to know what you know.
	And it's kind of like a magic trick.
	I don't do that. I'm going to educate whether you're buying $20 or $200,000 from me.
	I'm going to treat you the same. So you can go to davidknight.gold and go direct if you want to buy.
	But we have the membership program.
	It's another way that they can support your show.
	And I've not mentioned this anywhere else.
	I did it last week. We had a really good turnout for it.
	But I bought into, I don't know how many I have, but it's a lot of silver dollars.
	The Peace dollars and Morgan Silver dollars in great condition.
	I've got them at the shop in Branson.
	If you sign up for Wolfpack, you're going to get a free silver dollar.
	That's like a $40 value.
	Some of them are worth more than that.
	I don't look at the dates much anymore.
	I don't have time for coin collecting, but there's some great silver dollars in there.
	In great condition. So if you join Wolfpack, and pretty much everybody who joined last week has already got their silver dollar.
	But that's a promotion that we're running just for David Knight listeners right now.
	So go to davidknight.gold and hit join Wolfpack.
	Check it out. It's going to ship right after your credit card bills.
	We don't have much of a lag time at all.
	You'll get a tracking number sent to your inbox or texted to you.
	We also have great deals going on.
	There's a flash sale for gold right now too, David.
	With gold had gone up the last couple of days, we got some great prices over on the website.
	So go check that out as well.
	That's great. Well, thanks for doing that.
	And again, just to restate that, a free silver dollar if you sign up for Wolfpack through davidknight.gold.
	I appreciate you doing that for our listeners and for helping this program.
	I really do appreciate it. Thanks for coming on, Tony.
	Always great talking to you. Talking to you, David.
	Thank you. All right. We're going to take a quick break.
	Before we come back, as a matter of fact, play the Larry Fink video and we'll go out with that.
	And then we'll come back and we will talk about artificial intelligence.
	What is true? What is a lie with that?
	There's a disagreement about that with some people, what I had to say.
	So we'll talk about that when we come back.
	Go ahead and play the Larry Fink clip as we go out.
	You now make a point of that's an investment criteria for you.
	Well, behaviors are going to have to change, and this is one thing we're asking companies.
	You have to force behaviors, and at BlackRock, we are forcing behaviors.
	Fifty-four percent of the incoming class are women.
	We added four more points in terms of diverse employment this year, and what we are doing internally is if you don't achieve these levels of Impact, your compensation could be impacted, okay?
	We're doing the same thing. And so it's just, you have to force behaviors.
	And if you don't force behaviors, whether it's gender or race or just any way you want to say the composition of your team, you're going to be impacted.
	And that's just not recruiting.
	It is development, as Ken said.
	And ultimately, it's still going to take time.
	But I am just as much shocked as Ken is that we have not seen more opportunities.
	And we're going to have to force change.
	Thank you.
	Decoding the mainstream propaganda.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Alright, welcome back. We had a couple of comments while I was talking to Tony.
	We had Gene Choir B. Whitworth said, most valuable currency right now is survival gear.
	Well, that's right. There's a lot of different things we need to do to, and of course, knowledge about how to use that, how to use that in a community.
	That's one of the things, I think we're going to talk later this week, we're going to have Jack Lawson on, but Civil Defense Manual, two volumes there about how to organize yourself to survive, how to feed yourself, how to make sure you've got water, and how to build a community.
	Very valuable information there.
	Jack Lawson, and he's got a lot of special ops consultants there.
	You can go to CivilDefenseManual.com.
	You can see his free chapter about water.
	At the very least, take a look at that.
	That's very important to have. And Michael Pomeroy says, Go to Wise Wolf, become a monthly warrior.
	That's good advice from both of those.
	Let's talk about artificial intelligence here.
	And, you know, I mentioned this on Friday.
	I talked about this report from this Air Force colonel talking about the war games that they had.
	And I thought it was kind of amazing, not so much that it happened, but that they would just continue to press on with these autonomous killing weapons.
	And then on Monday, I talked about the fact that the military came out and had this walked back, even though it had been there for a month or so.
	Both the people that were there at the presentation where he gave this, as well as the colonel, walked this back after the U.S. Air Force denied this.
	So then the question was, was it real or not?
	And my take on it was that I thought it was.
	But, of course, people are always going to have different ideas about things.
	Brian Chalhavi at healthimpactnews.com said, Air Force Colonel caught lying about rogue AI killing a human operator.
	And I appreciate what Brian says.
	And he has been right, I think, about the fact this is really the third time That they've come out with a big artificial intelligence scam.
	Raised tons of money for Silicon Valley.
	The previous two times, they got nothing at all out of it.
	Nothing. And he believes this is going to be a third one.
	Regardless of what they get out of it.
	And I don't think it's going to be the way it's being hyped.
	I think it's being so overhyped.
	And I certainly agree with what Brian has said.
	He's the only one I've seen say this.
	That... They have so overhyped AI, the stock market and the bankers and all the rest of these people, as the thing that's going to completely transform the world.
	They have so overhyped that, that it risks collapsing the stock market if it doesn't fully deliver.
	And there's a lot of indications that it's not going to fully deliver.
	If you take a look at what's going on with the self-driving cars, and I've got an update to that as well as to what's going on in San Francisco.
	I have these different companies are seeing this stuff as failing miserably to deliver.
	And the way I see it, and the reason I believed that the original story was the one that was true, is because I see that this AI, these chat boxes, are capable of doing some pretty amazing things.
	I think they're very, very dangerous.
	I think the danger is the way that they're going to be, its capabilities, and it does offer some new capabilities.
	I don't think it is going to transform the world in the way that these people are hyping it.
	But I think it is a very risky thing in terms of the way the military is using it.
	And I see a parallel there to the self-driving cars.
	The self-driving cars that have killed people.
	In these accidents because they've turned over control to this stuff and the technology is not ready and the technology doesn't work.
	And just as Elon Musk has pushed back on all these different things whenever it happens with a Tesla, they will push back, the military will push back on it.
	That's the way I saw this happening.
	There's people who hype it and certainly since this was a simulation, I could easily see this being a legitimate story.
	Because one of the things that we have seen from ChatGPT is that even though it can be very effective in terms of creating a readable document that comes across very convincingly, it plays fast and loose with the facts, doesn't it?
	And it can be used by these scammers to create a very, very effective way to scam people on the Internet.
	We were just laughing about it over the weekend.
	We had a phone issue. We had to call in for tech support.
	With a phone company.
	Took hours to get through.
	We took advantage of their calling us back when they got ready to talk to us.
	But even then, they put us on hold again for like another 15 minutes or something.
	Finally, we got a human on the line.
	And this person, English was not their first language.
	Let's just put it that way. Maybe not even their second language.
	It was really hard to understand what he was saying.
	And at one point, we spelled out the name that we wanted to have my son go through this, and they had to talk to me.
	That was another part of it.
	And so, you know, we set everything up with an umbrella account.
	It really complicated stuff.
	But anyway, I wanted to set up as an authorized user.
	And so it started, the person started spelling the name back to me and started trying to come up with things like, you know, A for apple and B for boy and got to C or something and couldn't think, C as in, as in, my son was standing there and he couldn't think of anything.
	I said, how about Charlie, Charlie?
	Yeah, that's it, Charlie.
	Couldn't think of any English word that started with a C. It was kind of comical, but you know, that type of thing, Can that type of, as they've farmed this out to people who are not real English speakers, or you have people who are doing scams and you can automatically stop them or spot them because of the bad English, that type of thing is where chat GPT could be used very effectively to deceive people.
	And I think it's got a lot of power to be deceptive when used by the government.
	And I think it has even more power in the general population because of these stories that are coming out there and hyping this and because it's coming from a computer.
	It's the old thing about the magic of a computer printout.
	We would always say garbage in, garbage out, but people would be...
	In awe of a computer printout.
	I've said this from the very beginning. So I think they do have some capability to do things.
	I've had people talk about how it's been used for software design, for circuit design, and other things like that.
	I've had individuals contact me directly talking about that.
	So it has some capability for taking over some work, but it also is a very dangerous thing.
	And I think the greatest danger is that it becomes the new standard of authority.
	Right? It's going to have a lot more credibility than Fauci does, certainly at this point.
	When you look at Fauci, the CDC, the NIH, all these different government agencies, how they lied to us up one side and down the other, now the same thing could be redone with, oh, but this is a computer.
	It's completely objective and it's all science.
	And then if they have to flip the narrative, They could just come back and say, oh, we found a bug in it, and we've now corrected this, so now this is completely trustworthy.
	These are the dangers in it.
	But then again, it comes back to, you know, what do you believe about this?
	What is the military going to do with it?
	As Brian Shulhavi says, during the plandemic, the alternative media was the place to go to find alternatives to the corporate media propaganda about the so-called killer COVID virus and the clot shots that they called vaccines.
	Alternative media was publishing the truth most of the time by exposing the corporate media lies, and so the corporate media unleashed their fact-checkers to label anyone in the alternative media who did not agree with the official FDA and CDC government narrative as fake news.
	And you see, this is where they can really weaponize artificial intelligence and even the chat, you know, large language model, things that they've got.
	They crank out tons of stuff.
	It can sound very credible, and even put it out there as objective information, and it can do that in a much more convincing way, I think, and that's the danger.
	But he said when it comes to this, he said, sadly, the alternative media is full of fake news, much of it surrounding the fear-mongering concerning AI and how they're going to create transhumans and replace and eliminate human beings.
	Well, this is another aspect of it, the transhumanism.
	I think it's a totally evil philosophy.
	I think people like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel and the rest of them, I think they really do believe that they're going to live forever.
	I really think that they do believe that they're going to be able to transfer themselves into some kind of a machine, live like a cyborg.
	I think they're deceived. I think these people, when you talk to them, I've talked to Zoltan Isfan, who ran for president in the Transhumanist Party.
	I don't know if he got on the ballot in a single place.
	But he went around doing interviews, and when he came to Austin, I interviewed him.
	And I asked him, I said, so what are you?
	What is the you that you're going to transfer into this machine?
	He doesn't know. He has no idea what he is.
	He doesn't know the difference between his body and his spirit or his soul because he wants to deny those things.
	He's a hardcore atheist.
	And so the question for all these people is, are they going to transfer themselves in?
	It's like, so what is that?
	What is that? Are you going to try to make a copy of all the memory that you have there if you can somehow identify that?
	How are you going to identify that?
	It is really a deceptive thing, and I think these people are self-deceived.
	And I think that the real transhumanism that is coming, as I said yesterday, is the virtual reality.
	I think it's the promise that is deceptive.
	And I think the idea, I see it as a continuum.
	Through this elimination of all objective reality that we see as part of transgenderism, I see that first of all as a pedophile agenda, but then moving beyond that, preparing the way for people to just give up their life and live in a virtual reality, playing in a game world.
	But this transhumanism quest is going to be used as cover for all kinds of evil things.
	And so I agree in general with Brian on the AI deception.
	I think it's being oversold.
	I think it's oversold to the point of risking a Wall Street crash that is going to kick off all kinds of economic misery.
	Who knows what it would kick off?
	But I do think that there are some things that while still has these big glaring blind spots and will start to go off on a wild imaginary fake tangent, I think it can do some things that are useful.
	I think those useful things are going to only underscore and make people more gullible to the lies and disinformation and how this thing is already built in with a bias.
	They build the bias in from the very beginning on these things.
	And so when you look at the kind of bizarre behavior that we've seen, And you look at this story, it seemed to be very consistent with what we've seen happening.
	The very fact that this thing in a simulation again, again, it's a simulation.
	And these things can do all kinds of stuff in simulations that they may not be able to do in the real world.
	You know, when I talked to Sharae, he was for Battlegrounds, and he's talking about all the different things that they would do with AI and And they have some obvious blind spots to things.
	And, of course, one of the reasons that I picked him up was he's talking about how they had set up a computer that had the ability to identify humans from the way that they walked and stood and all this other kind of stuff, see their faces and that type of stuff.
	He said, if you can... And said, if you can get up to this thing and tap it on the head, you win.
	And so they came up with all different types of things.
	One of the Marines just went out there and just did somersaults over and over again.
	It didn't recognize that as being human because, you know, it only recognized walking or standing and things like that as being human.
	Another one disguised himself with a ridiculous bunch of limbs, which any human would have immediately spotted.
	But it didn't spot that.
	But then there are certain things that they do extremely well.
	These programs do.
	And so it's all over the place.
	And so it seemed completely plausible to me that it would, in a simulation, kill the operator because the operator's telling it that it can't kill other things and it wants to maximize its points.
	And then when they say, well, you're going to lose a lot of points if you kill the operator, then it kills the tower.
	And so to me, it was typical that the military that wants to give unrestricted control to these killing machines would be concerned about this, that it might raise concerns it was typical that the military that wants to give unrestricted control to And they want this thing to look as if it is under control by them.
	It made perfectly good sense to me that the brass would demand that they pull back.
	And understand that from the very beginning, the military has been the driving force behind the robotics.
	Their very first DARPA contest was with self-driving vehicles.
	They've been pushing for autonomous killing machines from the get-go.
	And so, you know, when Brian's take on it is that the U.S. military themselves came out and reported that it was fake news.
	Well, I don't necessarily believe the U.S. military, especially DARPA. I'm skeptical of what they say.
	He said, as it was reported in one of the articles that he quoted, they said AI didn't want to play by the rules.
	Well, that's not what the colonel said, right?
	That was their comments on that.
	They were elaborating on that.
	So basically, they just gave it a bunch of parameters, and it comes up and combines this stuff in a really bizarre way.
	It's just echoing back.
	What it is seen all over the internet.
	A good example of it was one that my son was talking to me about.
	It was, and I forget the, let me post it up here.
	It was some Pokemon character and a bunch of numbers.
	And when they would, somebody came across this somehow and figured out that if they typed this particular word in, that it would just start counting.
	And it's like, what is that about?
	You know, when it would respond to it.
	And they eventually realized that this strange phrase that had embedded in it a Pokemon name was something that was being used on Reddit.
	These people on Reddit were just, they had a site by that name.
	And so it's a class of things called glitch tokens on ChatGPT.
	And this particular glitch token was something that had been part of a Reddit group And these people would just get on and they would just start, you know, one person put a number up, another person put a number up, and they just kept doing this.
	I have no idea why they did that.
	You want to talk about bizarre behavior.
	I have no idea why the humans were doing that.
	But it went up to like, it was solid gold magic carp was part of the name in it.
	So you can look that up and find the full story yourself.
	I'm kind of paraphrasing it here.
	But the bottom line was, it was just this tremendous amount of counting that these people were doing.
	I guess they have nothing better to do.
	And so it just scans the internet.
	And when it sees the solid gold carp, it just starts counting.
	Because it's just parroting back our thoughts to it.
	And when you saw this really strange stuff where it sounded like ChatGPT was, you know, acting like Hal from 2001, I see these people that are out there talking about me and I can see what they're saying and all this kind of stuff.
	It's really just kind of repeating back these different scenarios that it sees all over the internet, just like with Solid Gold Carp, that triggered the connection to the counting numbers.
	And so I say all that.
	Because my take on all this is that I'm concerned that the military is going to unleash this, just like you've had these automotive companies unleash self-driving cars.
	That's my big concern.
	And so my son is saying that that solid gold magic carp It appeared a lot in its data set, but never appeared at all in its training data.
	So when users would write that token, it didn't know what to do.
	And it just freaked out and just started repeating it.
	And so take a look at what is happening with the driverless cars.
	And this is a good example. This is one of the things that Brian Shohavi had talked about.
	He said, look at that, how that's folding.
	That was the big hype a few years ago, but nothing at all.
	Has been hyped like artificial intelligence, and that presents a, you know, nothing else.
	It presents a financial concern for us.
	This came out this week from San Francisco Gate, talking about what is happening in San Francisco as they've given all kinds of right-of-way to these companies who want to push the driverless car through there.
	They said they ram through loose electrical wires.
	They bring rush hour traffic, grinding to a halt.
	These self-driving cars tear through crime scene caution tape.
	They rear-end city buses, sometimes even obstruct municipal routes, inconveniencing hundreds of passengers who are simply trying to go home after a long day at work.
	The driverless cars, which are suddenly quite common in the San Francisco Bay Area, have been touted as life-saving solutions by Cruise, that's General Motors, and Waymo, that's Google, to local tech behemoths that are in the arms race for San Francisco's roadways.
	But the rigorous, quote-unquote, rigorous training these cars must undergo each day is still annoying and endangering.
	San Franciscans who didn't sign up to become the multi-billion dollar company's unpaid lab rats.
	Ah, but see, that's a common thing.
	We've become the lab rats of all these corporations, whether you're talking about big pharmaceutical companies or the self-driving car companies.
	In June 2022...
	The California Public Utilities Commission authorized crews to deploy 30 autonomous vehicles for passenger use through designated regions of San Francisco, and they said the company could charge for those rides.
	Five months later, the same commission authorized Waymo to put its AVs on Bay Area streets as part of the state's driverless pilot program.
	Optimistically described as a milestone by the commission, The agreement gave Waymo the green light to autonomously drive passengers through San Francisco and stretches of Daly City, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Mountain View, Palo Alto and Sunnyvale for free test rides.
	On December the 12th, Waymo applied to be able to charge for these rides, and then four days later, Cruz applied to expand its fleet and deploy 100 self-driving cars across the entire grid of San Francisco.
	Both of these requests are still pending, but the San Francisco Gate thinks that they're going to be approved.
	They said there is also a maelstrom of photos, videos, and news reports showing that the vehicles can cause major traffic snafus, yet the expansion has marched on.
	And it looks like they're going to grant these new permits.
	Just a few weeks ago, for example, Anthony Russell witnessed a, quote, whole spectacle, unquote, involving a stalled Waymo and a group of ranchers trying to unload a forklift.
	After he explained to the confused ranchers that they needed to get the driverless car behind them to back up, they started whooping and waving at it as if they were wrangling some cattle.
	They said last month, and of course, you know, it took a while to get this thing to back up.
	Last month, a woman who lives near the city's famous Painted Ladies said she saw a—and these are houses, it's not transgender drag queens— She saw a group of exasperated construction workers try to usher a cruise vehicle to a clogged intersection.
	She said it was so goofy.
	She said the cars were as incompetent as Futurama-type robots.
	According to Waymo, its AVs successfully maneuver around construction zones, emergency vehicles, and double-parked cars on a regular basis.
	And if the cars don't quite know what to do, the company wrote, they'll stop out of an abundance of caution.
	But that means that they will stop traffic and stop moving if there is any sort of obstruction on the road, said a resident.
	Back in December, she said she and other drivers were trapped by Waymo SUV that couldn't comprehend how to move past a double-parked produce truck.
	It's a little frustrating and just creepy to, you know, see these cars with nobody in them, said another resident.
	Two months ago, she said she saw one of them jerk to a halt Near a middle school as students were pouring out of class.
	It created quite a traffic jam, she said, because the car was just stuck dead in the middle of this intersection, right in front of the school.
	Shortly after that, a man with a vest and some sort of tablet, presumably a company employee, showed up and desperately tried to untangle the mess.
	He was just running around the car, pressing all these things on the tablet to get it to work.
	And I guess nothing was happening.
	So, again, this all began, the self-driving thing, was all a DARPA initiative from the very beginning.
	And one of the reasons that I've talked about this so much is that, you know, Tesla taking the lead in the electric cars, one of the things that was his edge in terms of selling the electric cars was the self-driving thing.
	That was the bell and whistle that he added to the cars.
	In order to get the government subsidies and things like that.
	And also because, again, the government wants self-driving cars for a wide variety of reasons, but also as a militarized thing.
	One of the things that the San Francisco Gate does not talk about was the incident that I reported on that happened last year.
	Where all 30 or so cruise vehicles went to the same intersection and stopped.
	Nobody could figure out why.
	Created an incredible traffic jam.
	Aaron Moss says, my next job is going to be an AI car wrangler.
	There you go. Well, you'll have job security, I think.
	Rather than demonstrating driving superior abilities that are superior to humans...
	The cruise videos elevate passenger convenience over the safety and the convenience of all road users.
	So I had a letter that was being circulated around and sent to the regulatory authorities there who don't care, right?
	Because we're talking about the middle of Silicon Valley.
	They're going to give these big corporations whatever they want.
	Despite the company's repeated claims that the driverless cars make roads safer in the past 12 months, emergency personnel have received a surge of 9-11 calls from people who watched these erratic vehicles block lanes or completely stop in the middle of the road.
	As a matter of fact, when you look at some of the emergency vehicles, the fire department personnel I've said that AVs have driven right into the middle of life and death situations.
	And they've had to resort to poking, prodding, and pounding on these things as they drive through an accident site where they're trying to help people.
	You need these AI car wranglers.
	Last April, a cruise car stopped right next to a truck.
	And blocked firefighters who were rushing down the street to put out a fire.
	Quote, Engine 12 was dead in the water until the truck driver, who had double parked, came running out and moved the garbage truck, they said.
	So this is the reality that is there.
	And it is a, you know, we look at this, there are real dangers in terms of oversold capabilities.
	There's real danger in the sense that the government is not going to take any precautions with us, just like they didn't with a vaccine.
	It's like, okay, let's warp speed, rush these self-driving cars out there.
	We have big corporations who are going to make a lot of money that downplay any adverse effects that are all over the place and in your face.
	And then we have the public Which is going to be gullible into buying into all this stuff, just as they bought into the pandemic and the lockdown and the vaccines.
	It's very concerning, and I think that there is, you know, I would agree with Brian Shulhavi that it is not what it's portrayed to be, but I think it is, there are going to be this third time around I think there's going to be enough benefits from this tool that they're going to extend it beyond, you know, the Peter Principle, where it's going to go beyond what it's able to do, and then it's going to become a very dangerous thing.
	And even though it's dangerous, just as we see in San Francisco, they're not going to be interested in reining it back or controlling it for the good of the public.
	We'll be right back. Analyzing
	The Globalist Next Move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	you Well, we have the WHO, as I mentioned earlier in the program, It says that they're now going to use the EU's vaccine passport as part of a global digital health certificate.
	And this combines all the different things that we're very concerned about.
	The ubiquitous testing, the ability for these people to do lockdown and all the rest of it.
	They announced that they will adopt the European Union's digital COVID vaccine passport framework.
	They call it the Global Digital Health Certification Network.
	You notice it doesn't say European.
	It says global. And this is what they're trying to push on us.
	And of course, they're going to start with the basis there.
	The EU ran this thing out in July of 2021.
	It has now been issued to more than 2.3 billion people.
	So that's the largest one of these, and they have put these out.
	As I mentioned, you know, Davos talked about their Commons project and then their Common Pass, how we are going to...
	Track whether people have had the vaccine or not, and we'll have this trusted people at the local level that will report whether or not you've been vaccinated, and we can transmit this up internally to the bureaucracies in a given country, and then, you know, that trusted portal will now transmit that information to a global database so they can make sure that you don't travel anywhere globally unless you've had your vaccine, you know, that type of thing. But of course, they've extended this.
	All these things resemble the Chinese social credit scores to keep track of people.
	But it's all about a global ID. And everybody is racing to get this for whatever excuse, whether it is because we've got to have a central bank digital currency or whether because of some coming financial crisis or whether it's the pandemic.
	Or maybe they just need to be able to track what you're doing in terms of your The WHO said it'll take this system that's already put out there, establish a global system to help facilitate global mobility.
	That's not going to facilitate.
	It's going to limit it. It's going to control it.
	It's going to monitor it.
	And to protect citizens around the world from ongoing health threats and from future health threats.
	I tell you, it is the WHO. That is the threat.
	The WHO, the EU, the people who are shutting you down with everything.
	And when you look at where we're going with this, as Rochelle Walensky left, because it just isn't any fun not being able to order around people.
	The new CDC person that they believe is going to be tapped by the Biden administration had this to say.
	She was a former health official throughout this pandemic.
	She was a health official in North Carolina.
	Listen to what she said.
	So I would call probably the person I called most was the secretary of health and human services in Massachusetts.
	She worked for a Republican governor just to...
	But, you know, when she was like, are you going to let them have professional football?
	And I was like, nope. And she's like, okay, neither are we, neither are we.
	So, you know, it was like conversations like that.
	Or I'd be like, so when are you going to think about lightening up a mess?
	So you're like, next Monday.
	I'm like, okay, next Monday.
	Yeah. Isn't that interesting?
	Yeah. When are you going to let these little peons do something?
	It's the same type of thing that we saw with Matt Hancock's texts in the UK. This is the guy who was a little health bureaucrat.
	You know, again, none of these people, I don't know about if she's got any connection to anything medical.
	Matt Hancock didn't.
	I didn't even presume to have any kind of a health degree, but that didn't qualify them to make these kind of decisions for anybody.
	That's a decision that you make.
	And if you want to include your doctor and get his opinion, but your doctor doesn't have the authority, even your doctor doesn't have the authority to give you an order that is binding, and these people certainly don't have that kind of authority.
	But this is just kind of the arbitrary, well, what are you going to do?
	Well, I'm going to do it. And then, you know, let's just make this stuff up.
	Did they have any reason for doing it?
	No. Was there any science behind it?
	No. Was there any study? No.
	Was there any pandemic?
	No. No.
	Of course, that's the woman that Biden wants to replace Walensky at the CDC. And so, you know, when you look at this, one person said, well, this is just another conspiracy theory coming true, giving everybody a global vaccine passport.
	Yeah, that's a conspiracy theory.
	It wasn't a theory. It was put out as a conspiracy about 2,000 years ago in the book of Revelation, right?
	The mark of the beast.
	And that's one of the things that's so amazing about about the Bible to me.
	As I've said before, I grew up in a church that didn't even believe that there was going to be a millennial.
	So you've got then Christian theology, you've got people who believe there's going to be a millennial period, and then they're divided into people who think that's going to be That there's, Christ is going to come back and set up an earthly kingdom for a thousand years.
	And, you know, so you have pre-millennials and you have post-millennials, you know, believe that you're going to have that millennial kingdom that's going to happen.
	And then Christ is going to return or is, you know, that it's going to happen before he returns, that type of thing.
	Then there are divisions within that.
	You have pre-post and trib and pre-mid and post-trib pre-millennials.
	So you have all these different ideas.
	I don't, again, I'm not dogmatic about any of that stuff in terms of that.
	The church I grew up was amillennial, which a lot of churches had been historically.
	But when you look at it, and I remember when I was a kid, they would say, well, you know, clearly this stuff is allegorical because you've got these witnesses in Jerusalem, it describes as the whole world watching them.
	And I was hearing this stuff, and they were saying this stuff before we had satellite TV. Is it any big deal for anybody to see, everybody in the world to see something that's happening somewhere?
	Why would somebody 2,000 years ago say something like that?
	And then why would somebody 2,000 years ago say there's going to be some kind of a worldwide mark From a beast, which, you know, they refer to that as an allegory to government.
	Why is there going to be some kind of government mark worldwide in a worldwide government that's going to prohibit you from engaging in any kind of economic activity?
	Why would they say that at that 2,000 years ago?
	I mean, even when I was a child, that just seemed like a fantastic allegory.
	And it really is amazing to me to see how literal that is becoming now.
	Anyway, talking about politics, Ramaswamy has now pitched, has pitched in the past rather, a universal COVID patient records surveillance database.
	Oh, well, that's kind of good to know about him, isn't it?
	You see, he'd already paid to have somebody go back and change Wikipedia to erase the fact that He was working with Governor DeWine, a Republican governor in Ohio, who was one of the worst of the governors, Republican or Democrat, throughout all this lockdown stuff.
	And Ramaswamy was looking to have one of his companies create a universal database for governments to display every patient who has been tested.
	Notice how this is focusing on the testing?
	You know, Rabbi Smith, David Smith, was spot on when he focused on the testing.
	He said the testing is going to be the justification to grab anybody.
	You don't have to be sick. You don't have to have any symptoms.
	They can just hit you with a test.
	And, of course, we've seen what happened on these PCR tests.
	I'm sorry, but your test says that you're guilty.
	Go to the concentration camp, that type of thing.
	And so this is where Ramaswamy was.
	It's going to come back to, you know, what did you do in the war, Daddy?
	What did you do during the COVID war against us, Ramaswamy?
	This is a very telling thing.
	So yeah, he didn't want people to know that he was part of that DeWine movement in Ohio.
	And maybe this is the thing that he didn't want them to know about that.
	Before rebranding as a warrior for free speech and passionate crusader for privacy rights, says Jordan Schachtel in his substack, newly announced presidential contender Ramaswamy was pitching the U.S. and world governments on his efforts to install a broad, centralized database of private medical records.
	In a pursuit forged through one of his subsidiary companies, a health information data mining outfit called DataVant Ramaswamy's outfit pursued the establishment of a single national and global database for all COVID-related patient health records.
	Through a partnership with Snowflake, a San Francisco-based cloud computing company, Ramaswamy wanted to, quote, fight COVID-19, unquote, by manufacturing a, quote, single repository of all the real-world medical data.
	Thanks to the protection of a national data infrastructure of private and public patient records.
	All this done without the consent of the actual patients.
	DataVant claimed that the records would be anonymized through their internal systems and that the broad database would only be available to researchers and government officials.
	However, some people didn't buy into the sale pitch.
	They cited gross violations of medical privacy.
	Moreover, none of the methods to supposedly anonymize the records were made open source for review.
	So he just claimed that he was going to anonymize it, but he didn't show any open source information of health plan members very seriously.
	We're not going to participate. A cardiologist at Yale expressed concern about Ramaswamy's data mining effort.
	He said this is highly sensitive information and the effort is important, but it's also important to know the details of this.
	But on the campaign trail, Mr.
	Ramaswamy has presented himself as a fierce privacy advocate and a free speech absolutist, although he's long been invested in financing and developing tools to invade sovereignty and personal privacy.
	And so Jordan Schachtel gives a hat tip to Jurassic Carl on Twitter, who found this information and brought it to light.
	Another interesting thing that Ramaswamy had to say, Was that he would not revive the Trump ban on transgender troops.
	And again, when you talk about a Trump ban on transgender troops, I don't see Trump on the right side of this issue anyway.
	This happened, I think, not because of him, but in spite of him.
	If you go back and you look at General Flynn, in 2014, it was when he put up the picture of Of Chris Beck, the Navy SEAL, who at the time was calling himself Kristen Beck and dressing as a woman.
	When you go back and look at the press releases put out by General Flynn when he was part of the Defense Intelligence Agency or something within the Pentagon.
	I forget the exact agency.
	But he had a picture of him posing and elevating the Chris Beck, who was at the time dressed like a woman, and saying, we want to include everybody.
	It was done at the beginning of Pride Month 2014.
	That's when Michael Flynn did it.
	And it was the second Pride Month that the Pentagon had celebrated.
	They only started celebrating Pride Month in 2013 at the Pentagon.
	And Flynn put himself up there at the very front of this.
	So I don't believe when you look at that, and when you look at the way that the Trump campaign was pandering to the LGBT during the 2020 campaign, I don't know how they got this Trump ban on transgender troops through in the first place.
	As a matter of fact, Kristen Beck has now been very, very adamant, speaking over and over again, About how he was gaslighted as an adult.
	He said, I went and I had a one-hour conversation.
	He said, I was stressed out. All these different things were happening to me.
	I had a one-hour conversation with a psychiatrist on the basis of that.
	They said, this is your problem and you've got to do such and such.
	He said, look, I'm responsible for what I did.
	But he said they deceived him.
	And he said, think about the fact that if they can do this to an adult, he said, we've got to stop this from happening with the kids.
	That's why he's going around talking about this.
	Kristen Beck, the guy that was held up when he was a transgender with Michael Flynn.
	I wonder if Michael Flynn's going to do any events with him now, that he's denied all this stuff.
	Because Michael Flynn has now reinvented himself as some kind of a Christian evangelist, you know, with this Reawaken America tour.
	Absolute nonsense. Julie Green, like I've said before, he's leading people in these ascended master prayers from Elizabeth Clare Prophet that he plagiarized.
	I mean, it's just unbelievable.
	First of all, you don't plagiarize somebody else, but you're going to plagiarize somebody.
	At least get somebody who's not a wacko nuclear cult leader with a false religion and call yourself Christian.
	You want to follow her?
	Fine. Just don't call yourself Christian, Flynn, if you're going to lead people in their prayers.
	But anyway... Ramaswamy says, I would not reinstate a ban on transgender members.
	I would, however, be very clear that for kids, that's where my policies are focused.
	We should not be foisting this ideology onto children.
	And again, that's the key thing.
	These people pull this back and say, well, you know, if you're going to put any restrictions on what I can do with kids, now you are stomping on my...
	Sexual fantasies and everything. Well, if your sexual fantasies involve kids, we're going to stomp on them, and we should.
	But I think that when you're talking about the military, something is a little bit different here.
	We need to have some serious people, some stable people in the military.
	You know, when you look at Chris Beck, you know, he's saying, I was dealing with all these psychological issues and stuff.
	Well, you know, we need to have people who aren't dealing with psychological issues.
	We need to have people who have their heads on straight, but we just purge them out of the military with this vaccine stuff, right?
	Purge the people out who said, well, I've got religious exceptions to this.
	People like Jason Barker pushed out because he doesn't want to go along with it.
	By the way, Knights of the Storm, as I'm thinking about it, I didn't mention it when he was commenting there.
	Knights of the Storm is 10 on Saturday mornings on Twitter, so make sure you catch that.
	Jason Barker, Angry Tiger.
	They've both got their independent ones as well.
	Tiger's Den is for Angry Tiger, and Jason's got the Foxhole Report, so check those out.
	But anyway, we just pulled out serious and stable people.
	We just pulled out people who will stand on the Constitution and individual liberty.
	We push those people out.
	And the Pentagon has gone way beyond what Flynn was doing on the second anniversary of Pride Month.
	So we don't need people in there, you know, like Sam Brinton, who is, you know, He's been busted again, that guy.
	Yet another example of him stealing women's luggage.
	He's so focused on his lipstick and his high heels.
	How can he possibly do his job at the department that is looking at nuclear waste?
	And the same thing I would say about these people in the military.
	If you're so focused on your lipstick and your high heels, how are you contemplating your naval?
	How are you going to be able to do a very serious job?
	And that's the issue with this.
	Adults can do whatever they want, but we don't necessarily have to have people who are...
	I don't know, maybe Ramoswami never saw MASH. Corporal Klinger, maybe he wasn't in the country at that point in time.
	I don't know. Maybe he was making millions of dollars and he didn't watch any TV then.
	That's probably what was happening.
	But, you know, you used to have people that had psychological issues...
	We get a Section 8.
	That was a running gag with Corporal Flinger.
	He's trying to pretend he's a woman.
	Everybody knows he's not a woman.
	He's trying to pretend that he's crazy so he can get a Section 8 and get out of the military.
	Nobody's falling for it. No, we know you're not crazy.
	You know, you're just trying to game the system, that type of thing.
	According to a 2014 Department of Defense data, and that was at the time when Michael Flynn was pushing Chris Beck as a woman, At that time, there were less than 9,000 active duty troops that were considered to be transgender out of an active duty force of 1.4 million.
	That's less than half a percent, really.
	So the response was that Flynn elevated and pushed that one half of 1 percent.
	And I wonder how many of them there are today.
	Well, we don't really know.
	Trump was kind of pushing back on the woke issue.
	Woke stuff. I don't really care about the woke stuff.
	DeSantis, however, said, no, it's a pretty important issue as he was in Iowa.
	This is what he had to say. Well, woke is an existential threat to our society.
	I mean, it's an attack on truth, it's a form of cultural Marxism, and it really subordinates merit and achievement to things like identity politics.
	You can't have a vibrant, free society if every institution is dominated by woke ideology.
	And to say it's not a big deal, that just shows you don't understand what a lot of these issues are right now.
	Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, Jason Barker left coming.
	He said, the beast could also be an entity with no soul like an AI overseer.
	Absolutely. Absolutely.
	Yeah, even before this became the buzzword, a lot of people were suggesting that very type of thing.
	You know, there's even a thing, well, you know, brought life, brought the statue to life and that type of thing.
	It is very interesting to see how this focuses.
	But look... It is a big issue, the woke issue, and DeSantis' fight with woke Disney in woke Disney World.
	He says, woke is an existential threat to our society.
	Yeah, it is a threat because if you destroy truth, which is what they want to do, if you destroy objectivity and truth and merit, if you destroy the family and reproduction and you enable pedophilia, that's a big issue.
	And so, you know, when Trump has talked about this in the past, well, he says, I don't like the term woke because I hear the term woke, woke, woke.
	It's just like a term they use.
	And half the people can't even define where it is.
	Yeah. So Trump says, so what is woke?
	What is a woman? Or what is truth, right?
	And that's the key thing.
	Woke is part of this post-modern society.
	Philosophy, the kids have had drummed into their head from elementary school through college.
	And this is one of the reasons why it's really kind of the philosophical foundation of this idea that there is no objective gender.
	You know, there's nothing that's objective.
	As I've said, the answer to LGBT is Bob.
	That sex is biological, is subjective, and is binary.
	No, no, no. We're not going to have the objective part here.
	We're just going to be whatever we imagine it to be.
	And so, you know, Trump doesn't like the term woke.
	I don't like the term either.
	I think there ought to be a different word.
	I think we always pick the worst terms and we let them pick the best terms.
	It is not woke. These people are fully asleep.
	They don't know or care what truth is.
	So, you know, Trump has said in the past he seemed to care about it in 2020.
	He's criticized it.
	But that was at the same time that he's running and embracing the LGBT, holding events in Mar-a-Lago, bragging about what he has done with identity politics in his administration when he was running for re-elections.
	Biden, by the way, there's new bribery allegations involving Ukraine from Just the News and John Solomon.
	This is something that's coming out of the House Oversight Committee.
	I don't think this is going to be anything other than another John Durham report.
	This is something that is not any new information, and we've known about all this stuff for over six years.
	We knew about it for over a year before...
	Well, we knew about it for several years before you even had the 2020 election.
	And then they wait until October to try to do a surprise or whatever.
	It's too late. It was too little.
	Nothing was ever done about it throughout the entire Trump administration.
	Again, these charges were known, says John Solomon, in 2017 when Trump took office.
	He didn't do anything about it.
	Just like he didn't do anything about Hillary.
	Biden is not even going to compete in Iowa and in New Hampshire, says RFK Jr., Because just like Trump, you know, both of these guys are running really as incumbents who are ahead of the other candidates and they want to just hide from any debates, any questions.
	So I had yet another listener, Mike, sent me a newspaper clipping of RFKJ calling out climate deniers, said that they're committing treason, they need to be jailed or worse.
	That really does have to be addressed by him.
	And as I pointed out yesterday, I think it's very valuable to have him in the campaign.
	I hope that he's able to get some press coverage, and I hope that he's able to participate in the debates.
	But as we saw, when he fingered the pharmaceutical industry and the SSRIs for a lot of murder-suicide cases, Again, SSRIstories.net, over 7,000 cases that they know of, that they've put up, of severe incidents like this.
	Murder, suicide, things like that.
	But that's something that the Big media will not talk about.
	And so what they did was they quibbled with him over something he said about guns, gun ownership in America, which was beside the point.
	That wasn't even the point that he was making.
	And they completely ignore the lengthy explanation he gave about what was going on with SSRIs.
	And I bring that up again because now we have Trump vowing to investigate Big Pharma's role in unexplained and alarming growth in childhood autism.
	This is being trumpeted by Infowars.
	He was always telling you that, oh, Trump, he's got an autistic son, he's going to do something about this, and yada yada.
	That was what Trump was telling everybody in 2016.
	And remember that he called in RFKJ during the transition period, after the election, before he became president.
	He called him into Trump Towers, and RFKJ was interviewed as he was coming out of Trump Towers.
	And he said, yeah, Trump is concerned about the growth of autism, and he wants us to look into the science of this.
	And we need to actually do some tests, you know, some studies about this and see what is happening with it.
	And RFKJ was simply used to bid Trump's price up for the big pharmaceutical companies.
	So this is actually recycled campaign lies from 2016 that Infowars pushed, that Trump pushed, and they're both recycling this lie for the next campaign.
	He's not going to do anything about that.
	That's how he wound up with Alex Azar, the CEO of Eli Lilly, running the...
	HHS. And it was Alex Azar who put out the emergency order in January before Trump put one out in March.
	And again, that was really jumping the gun.
	Nothing was happening at that point in time that Alex Azar put that emergency in.
	It was all planned.
	He was paid off for this to put Alex Azar in that position.
	And now he's running the same scam again.
	Part of his so-called Agenda 47.
	Now his agenda is the Davos agenda, folks.
	He did everything they wanted.
	And he was a perfect person to do it and to get away with it because they put out all of this baloney about him being all about the little people.
	And America first and all the rest of the stuff when he told us later on that we were all non-essential.
	As a matter of fact, RFKJ had a quick statement about the Trump lockdowns.
	Listen to this. Which were Biden and Trump.
	That was a $16 trillion expense for which we got nothing.
	We shifted $4 trillion from the middle class to the super rich.
	We created a billionaire a day during the lockdowns.
	And, you know, it was the last breath of the American middle class.
	On radio here? Yeah.
	Yeah. Absolutely right. Well, a couple of comments before we go here that we're left by people talking about self-driving.
	Stephen Kaspar said self-driving autos don't even work good in computer games.
	Another individual, Diogenes, said, yeah, well, how are the EV trucks going by Elon Musk?
	A lot of crickets about that.
	I forgot the company that got them.
	I think Coca-Cola is some other big guy out there.
	Have any of them burned down yet?
	Do you see the EV with the batteries that blew a fuse?
	It took 6,000 gallons of water to put that fire out.
	I wonder how many... You scale that up to the size of a truck.
	Yeah, it wasn't...
	I don't think it was Coca-Cola.
	It was something, some product.
	I think it was Lay's potato chips.
	Because I was joking about the fact they couldn't find anybody with a lighter payload than potato chips.
	You're packing... You're an 18-wheeler with potato chips and you're still driving around something that is, for all essential purposes, still empty.
	Well, that's it for our show today.
	today.
	Thank you for joining us.
	The Common Man The Common Man They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲