Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 10, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:32

10Apr23 State Gold Backed Digital Currency; TN Insurrection: Ending Democracy? RFK on Climate;

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 10th of April, year of our Lord, 2023, day 1,124 days of the executive order emergency, which is still being piled upon.
	The new form of government we have, we must not allow it to be normalized.
	Never accept this.
	We've got Arnold Schwarzenegger saying, well, you know, maybe I just spoke a little bit too much when I said, F your freedom, you know, for these people.
	So, you know, just move on and forget it.
	Now, we're going to begin today with the Tennessee insurrection that happened after the show was over on Thursday.
	A lot of things have happened in the interim.
	Well, actually, the insurrection happened previously, but the fixing of the insurrection was what we're going to talk about.
	Leaked files all over social media from the Pentagon.
	What is that about?
	And also we have Texas introducing a bill to put in a gold-backed digital coin.
	We'll talk about that as well as an update on RFK Jr.
	and his green McMuffin.
	Stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, let's put this all in context.
	We've had a lot of people playing the race card over the weekend.
	Oh, this is the end of democracy, is it?
	Well, no, I think what happens is it's the end of the republic when democracy turns into mob rule, and that's what we saw in Tennessee.
	And so, as a response to what happened, a response to the fact that three Democrat legislators Lead protesters took over the house floor, refused to get out of the well, the area where they speak, had a bullhorn there and refused to be removed.
	And so now they got removed by the entire body, two of the three.
	Unfortunately, two young black men and one elderly white woman were involved in this.
	She did not use the bullhorn, and she mounted a successful pushback.
	They missed by one vote of kicking her out.
	And so then that opened up the ability for them to play the race card.
	Isn't that interesting? And that's what they were playing over the weekend.
	But let's put this into context.
	Let's remember that as this vote was being done, there was a second mob...
	Let us in. Let us in.
	There they are in the Capitol building, screaming.
	And their way was being blocked this time by the state police.
	No, you're not going to get in.
	But again, I think that the police handled it both of these times very well.
	They didn't go out and attack the crowd as the people, the Capitol Police in D.C. did, as we now see with the videos that were carefully kept from the public.
	We see that the physical force, people were yelling and screaming just like that on January the 6th.
	But it wasn't until the armored Capitol Police started bullying and pushing people, really, that things took off.
	Of course, you also had the provocateurs who were in the crowd that were pushing people forward.
	But in this particular case, the provocateurs were members of the House itself.
	And so when you look at, that was the scene as they were having the vote as to whether or not they were going to throw out the three legislators.
	Because you understand that they're trying to make this a pattern.
	And that's why these people had to be thrown out.
	This is about overthrowing the rule of law.
	And one of these legislators that got thrown out had gotten his seat because he was leading crowds to throw out Civil War statues and things like that.
	That's how he built his political career.
	And so now he's going to build his political career even higher.
	He's going to be held up as a martyr by CNN, by the Biden administration, and the rest of them.
	And so these people who thrive on chaos, who thrive on mob rule, as a matter of fact, one of the Tennessee legislators said, well, that's not how you do it.
	You don't take over the house with a screaming mob, and you don't encourage the people with your bullhorn, He said, what you do is you file a bill.
	Do you realize you're a legislator now?
	No, he's not.
	He's a demagogue. He's a Democrat demagogue.
	There's a lot of them.
	Now, this is what it originally looked like.
	This is the original event.
	And here is the massive number of people that showed up, again, to enact gun prohibition.
	Gun prohibition after A child was weaponized by the school system into a lunatic transgender with a chip on her shoulder who went to a Christian school and killed kids.
	Never forget. Shot three adults, but three nine-year-old children face-to-face, point blank.
	What kind of insanity is that?
	Oh, but that's the gun that we've got to worry about, right?
	Well, you know, this is where they got inside.
	Take a look at this scene here.
	And is this an insurrection?
	Is this worse than what happened on January 6th?
	I mean, people didn't get into the Capitol building.
	Nobody came close to the legislators on January 6th.
	And here you will see the state police trying to escort a state legislator into the House area.
	And look at this. They're attacking the police.
	They're attacking the legislator.
	They're pushing and shoving them.
	And the police are not attacking them.
	They're outnumbered. They're not armored.
	But they're the ones who are being attacked by this mob.
	And I said when it happened, I said they did it the right way.
	Instead of making these people look like victims, they showed them for the violent, radical aggressors that they are, the useful idiots.
	And of course, most of them were useful idiots as well.
	Weaponized by the schools.
	This is all coming from the schools.
	And so before, just before they threw these three legislators out, they had a vote in the House as to whether or not they would approve funding For an armed officer to protect every school at the expense of the state.
	And those three legislators said no.
	We don't want children protected.
	We want guns prohibited.
	We don't want to stop the psychological and spiritual abuse of kids, sexual abuse of kids with this LGBT agenda.
	No, we don't want to stop that. We demand that that continue.
	We demand that you give up.
	Your means of self-defense.
	Let me just say that I think it's a bit ironic when you've got an angry mob demanding that you give up your God-given constitutionally protected rights of self-defense.
	I don't think that's going to go too far.
	And if you're going to take over the house from the inside, it was an inside job.
	You're going to do an insurrection?
	A Tennessee insurrection?
	No, you call it a tensurrection.
	You're going to do a 10-surrection?
	Well, we're going to kick you out.
	That's what's going to happen.
	So, again, as that happened, though, unfortunately, they missed by one vote, kicking out the elderly woman.
	The first guy was kicked out 75 to 26.
	She failed.
	They failed to kick her out.
	Vote was 65 to 30.
	Again, falling one vote short.
	They have 99 members in the House, so they have to have 66 votes.
	What they're showing you in these vote tunnels, they're not showing you the people who abstain.
	So I think that was nine people that abstained from voting one way or the other for her.
	And she stayed in by one vote.
	And so now, because two black men were kicked out, now this has become a cause celeb.
	They played the race card, as they always do.
	The Tennessee House Speaker Cameron Sexton explained the votes were not about peaceful protests.
	He said they broke several rules of decorum and procedure.
	They led protesters in the galleries in several chants calling for gun reform.
	It's not gun reform.
	It's gun prohibition. Let's call it what it is.
	The left chooses its words very carefully, and so should we.
	This is not about gun control.
	This is not about gun reform.
	This is about gun prohibition.
	Prohibition. Let's call it what it is.
	If you're going to call for the banning of certain accessories or the banning of certain types of guns, you're calling for gun prohibition.
	It's just that simple.
	And we can have these discussions.
	You know, you can even say, hey, you got a grief about this?
	You know, file a bill. Well, you know, again, you can file that bill.
	It's not going to go anywhere there. But look, here's a reality, Democrats.
	You got a problem with the Second Amendment?
	Well, amend the Constitution.
	And until you amend the Constitution, just shut up.
	Just shut up. You don't have any authority to say that.
	As a matter of fact, when you are out there with a bullhorn, Taking over the democratic process.
	The democratic process has rules.
	These people don't think there are any rules for them, right?
	You have to have an orderly procedure.
	Or you're just shutting down the body.
	Oh, that's the point, isn't it?
	The point is chaos.
	The point is to shut down our society.
	The point is that there are no rules for radicals.
	Except Zelensky's rules for radicals.
	The first rule for radicals, there are no rules that we will abide by.
	No, but I have certain rules, you know, like use ridicule.
	It's the most powerful weapon. There's no defense against it.
	That was one of Saul Alinsky's rules.
	My favorite one, as a matter of fact, I resort to that many times myself.
	So, you know, when we look at this, because we can use those weapons the same as they can, right?
	We can ridicule the radicals.
	They're very easy to ridicule, especially now they've aligned themselves behind the transgenders.
	It's kind of like, I guess we could call them low-hanging fruits and nuts.
	So it's pretty easy to ridicule those radicals.
	But again, prior to the expulsion, they're not interested about the gun issue.
	They want chaos.
	They want to shut down society.
	They want to be the monkey wrench and everything.
	Let's throw a wrench into this and break the machinery.
	That's what it's about. And as evidence of that, you've got a massive mob showing up, wanting to shut down the process to expel these people and expel them.
	But the reality is...
	Unfortunately, we don't do marketing too well on our side.
	At least they did the right thing.
	And I give them kudos, except that one person who set that vote out and didn't get her thrown out.
	That was maybe by design, huh?
	Congressional Black Caucus held an emergency meeting on Zoom.
	They Zoomed in an emergency.
	A hundred state and federal black lawmakers.
	Quick, we can play the race card.
	How can we play this the best way?
	You had the Congressional Black Caucus, the Tennessee Black Caucus, the National Black Caucus.
	They said they threw their black caucuses right out of the chamber.
	What are we going to do about this?
	Yeah, always playing the victim card, right?
	No. They didn't get, they didn't become victims.
	They didn't get the January the 6th treatment.
	Those people are victims. Those people have been rotting in jail now for two years, tortured in jail.
	Many of them looking at lifetime sentences.
	But this, oh, you know, we have two different standards, of course.
	You know, boys will be boys, they used to say.
	Well, they don't say that anymore. But now, essentially, it's like, well, the left will be the left.
	You know, we can't say anything about that.
	The trans will be the trans.
	We can't say anything about that.
	So anyway, the Tennessee Three, they're calling them.
	It's just two. It's Chumlee and And Tennessee Tuxedo, right?
	Daji, Tennessee. What do we do now?
	Well, we play the race card, Chumlee.
	That's what we play. So they joined, last week, the Tennessee Three.
	And this is coming from, let's see, I think this is CNN here.
	MSN, Microsoft News.
	I'm not sure where the original one is here.
	Anyway, the way they portray this, they said last week, the Tennessee Three joined the hordes of protesters.
	No, they were mobbed.
	Hoards of protesters. Mostly protesters.
	No, they were a mob. They were a mob, pushing and shoving the police.
	Pushing, who were trying to protect the legislator.
	Pushing and shoving the legislator.
	Can you imagine if January the 6th, they had gotten into a situation where they were pushing and shoving Nancy Pelosi?
	Oh, wow. You know, that'd be completely different, right?
	The guy who put his feet up on her chair.
	Going to jail for years is old enough.
	It'll probably be a life sentence.
	They said these three members, quote, knowingly and intentionally brought disorder and dishonor to the House of Representatives.
	Yeah, they brought chaos.
	This is just not about one specific instance or one specific rule that may have been broken.
	The rules are here for order.
	Said Representative Johnny Garrett, who led the arguments against Jones.
	We owe that to the constituents that we represent across the state.
	Now, see, they're saying, you can't throw us out.
	We represent a bunch of radical people in our district who want to, you know, throw out statues and statutes, right?
	We have to overthrow society.
	And, of course, they begin with the visible things as statues.
	And then they go to the less visible thing, the statutes.
	Well, these people say, well, we represent people as well.
	And I'm going to say that every one of these people who voted to throw them out represented me.
	I would have done the same thing.
	I would have thought, is there anything else we can do?
	Let's put them in jail.
	I'm fed up with this stuff, quite frankly.
	It is a microcosm of what these radical leftists are doing everywhere.
	It's a microcosm of what Soros is doing everywhere.
	Creating chaos by letting criminals out on the street that are violent.
	And then locking up and going after political opponents.
	That's what they always do.
	And so it's not about democracy.
	It's about mobocracy.
	And when I say it's a mob, it's because these people don't care about rules.
	They don't care about a republic.
	They don't care about a constitution.
	They don't care about God-given rights.
	They don't believe there is a God. And they don't believe that you have rights.
	They have power. And power, they know, comes out of the barrel of a gun.
	And so they want all the guns.
	That's what this is about.
	It's about nothing other than that.
	So one of the Black Caucus people said, it's a tarnish on the Tennessee legislature.
	It's a tarnish on the community.
	Yes, what the Tennessee Three did is a tarnish.
	Not for them being thrown out.
	We have to establish, we have to defend our society or these people will rip it apart.
	And they're very anxious to do so.
	Eventually, a democracy turns into a mob.
	Showing up at your door, demanding that you turn over the rights, that you get rid of the rule of law.
	Right? That's what we saw in a microcosm.
	We saw the degeneration of democracy into a mob, led by demagogues.
	No, this is not a, as one of these Black Caucus people said, oh, this harkens back to the darkest days of our nation in the South.
	No, this goes back further than that.
	It goes back to the French Revolution.
	That's what this is really about.
	Just because you don't get your way, you can't come to the well, bring your friends, and throw a temper tantrum with an adolescent bullhorn.
	Said Andrew Farmer during the debate.
	He told this to one of the Dependents, you call the guy, I guess?
	If you want to conduct business in this house, file a bill.
	And he was very angry about that.
	He said, how dare him speak to me like that?
	This is a guy who occupied the well, and he's with a bullhorn.
	How dare you speak to me like that?
	You think I'm a child with a bullhorn?
	Why, yes, we do.
	If the shoe fits, pal, wear it.
	Now, you all heard that.
	How many of you would want to be spoken to that way?
	Well, how many of you would do something as childish as he did?
	When you get elected, you're supposed to act like a grown-up.
	What we saw happen this evening in the Tennessee House was appalling in a return to a dark era in the House of this country, in the history of this country, and the South, he said.
	And as I said, no. It's really about the French Revolution.
	A mob takeover.
	And then, of course, the woman who wasn't thrown out.
	Rather than...
	She's trying to play the race card, too.
	Even though she's white and elderly.
	I'm a 60-year-old white woman.
	And they're two young black men.
	So they threw them out and they didn't throw me out.
	Again, I would like to accommodate her.
	Let's give you some credentials.
	She's just upset. It's like, oh no, I'm white privileged here.
	And so one of the guys goes on, Justin Jones, one of the guys, goes on MSNBC, and he said one of these guys called him a, quote, uppity negro.
	I seriously doubt that.
	If you're going to go that far, you're going to go all the way.
	Boy, you uppity n-word.
	He says, basically, I had a member call me an uppity negro.
	You notice he used the term basically?
	Basically. In other words, what he means is, nobody else heard this.
	There's no witnesses. There's no videotape of this.
	But basically, he said that.
	Can you imagine that? They call me a teenager?
	And they dressed us down for being stupid and immature, staying there with a bullhorn and disrupting the proceedings?
	Yeah. Yeah. So basically, that's what he called me.
	Called me uppity. Yeah.
	Basically. Basically.
	Not literally. Again, playing the race card.
	That's what it's about. He says it's about the 78,000 people I represent.
	This is a diverse district.
	No, it's not a diverse district.
	It's a majority Democrat district.
	And most of the other districts are majority Republican.
	I guess they're just as diverse, right?
	You know, every one of these districts is going to have diversity of opinion in it.
	Oh, no, no, that's code word.
	Code word. He says, I mean, this is a very hostile environment.
	It's hostile to democracy.
	Did he think that it was a hostile environment when he had thousands of people show up and they're doing this?
	Is that a hostile...
	Is it hostile to democracy when you push and shove people who are trying to go into the house?
	Is that a hostile to democracy you think?
	It's mobocracy.
	How dare him play that?
	Well, you know, we are the wronged people here.
	Just ridiculous to see this.
	Again, he says, I was arrested in this building over 14 times trying to remove a KKK statue, a Civil War statue, of General Nathan Bedford Forrest.
	And so this is the anti-history mob, the anti-American mob, the Sodom and Go Marxist mob.
	Again, removing statues, then he gets elected to remove statues.
	And to remove the very things that he swore to uphold.
	See, when you go against the Constitution, Jones, I think is his name.
	Let's see. There's Justin Jones, I think, and Justin Pearson.
	I don't know which one of the Justins it is, but I think they threw them out just in time.
	But, you know, when you go against the Constitution that you swore to uphold as a condition of your office, you don't have any authority anymore.
	You don't have any right to talk about people trying to overthrow democracy when you bring a mob in to shut down the process.
	Not once, but twice.
	The other time, to protect yourself.
	They pretend to care about the shootings, but they just voted against protecting kids.
	And again, I don't think that's the best approach.
	But I don't think schools are the best approach to education either.
	So, anyway, I think if they try to violate the Constitution by doing gun prohibition, they ought to be put in the same boat as Donald Trump.
	You know, Donald Trump did that.
	And I think we ought to have some t-shirts that say, dump Trump for the bump.
	Ha ha ha! With a picture of a gun underneath it.
	As he did for the first time.
	Gun control by executive order.
	Who are you to do that?
	You and your unconstitutional bureaucracy.
	The BATF. There's no authority for the BATF to exist in the Constitution.
	And you have no authority to use them to do gun control of anything.
	No matter how small and minor it is.
	By executive order.
	Trump. Dump Trump.
	For the bump. If not for anything else.
	So, the White House Press Secretary, when asked about whether or not, asked in a press conference, whether or not this is a hate crime, targeting a Christian school, specifically, by a tranny, And she has no idea.
	Says, well, that's not for us to decide.
	Former Vice President Pence said that if the shooter who killed six people in that Christian school in Tennessee was motivated by a hatred towards Christians, that the crime should be categorized as a hate crime.
	I'm wondering what the president thinks of that kind of designation.
	It's not for us to decide.
	Oh, not for us? I would dare not...
	Not dare venture into this.
	Except how many times have you seen them immediately jump in when they can polarize it to the advantage of their base, right?
	You got a shooting and, you know, they jumped into that Pulse nightclub shooting and everything.
	Turns out the guy was not, he was one of them doing the shooting.
	They always do that.
	And there are a lot of people who believe that this was tied to efforts to protect children.
	From pedophile predators. Because, you know, it's okay to be a pedophile if you're a trainee at the same time.
	You just better shut up about that.
	Better not even criticize these people for their grooming, for their pedophilia.
	I wonder if the parents of the victims of the Nashville shooting today would still have their children if these trans bills in Tennessee were never a thing.
	I'm not a parent, but if I were, I'd be real, real mad at the government.
	I'd be real, real mad at the government.
	Yeah, yeah. It's their fault.
	It's not the lunatic trans who shot the people up.
	And of course, perhaps one of the reasons why these three people did not vote to have any protection at the schools was because they would like for the trans to have all the guns.
	This was a stink Uyghur.
	Of the young turds, the old turd that's leading the young turds.
	I'll be a little bit of a hypocrite here, but it's not.
	I'll explain why I'm saying it.
	I don't like guns.
	I would ban assault weapons in a second.
	We can go on and on about the gun control that we need in this country.
	And I always tell people, don't get guns.
	It'll make you less safe. I'm going to make an exception here for trans people.
	They are actually in danger.
	They have had hundreds of laws passed against them.
	They have right-wing media ginning up fear against them 24-7.
	They are targeted more than any other group in America.
	And if anyone should get guns, it should be trans-Americans.
	Okay? And get them before the day of vengeance.
	I'm worried for them. I'm worried that the right-wing lunatics are going to attack them as they have over and over again.
	And by the way, it's not just right-wing lunatics.
	Other people attack trans folks as well.
	We're the lunatics, not the trans people.
	They're not the lunatics.
	We're the lunatics, you see.
	And they need to be able to protect themselves from violence, even though they're the ones going around shooting nine-year-old kids in the face, right?
	They're the ones that need to be protected, not us.
	My son says he wants you to have a medical note proving that you have a mental illness before you can get a gun.
	There we go. I get to call that the young turds or the old turds green flag law.
	If you come in with some pastel colored flag, you immediately get approved for a gun.
	Anybody else? No, no.
	Especially if you come in. Yeah, red flags only law.
	Yeah, red heels. Red heels.
	Yeah. If you come in with red high heels, you're in if you're a man.
	So we'll give it to you.
	You've got to prove that you're mentally unstable before you can get a gun.
	That's the way Stink Uyghur wants to run the world.
	And of course, hate crimes depend on who the victims are.
	If the Democrats hate you, then it's not a crime to kill you, you see.
	That's the issue, even if you're a nine-year-old child.
	Not a hate crime. Last week, the White House press secretary that you just heard there said the trans community is under attack right now.
	You see, they are the core of our nation's values, according to the Biden administration.
	And according to Biden's proclamation, they are shaping the soul of America.
	First time I know of that he's told the truth.
	They are shaping the soul of America, not for the better, however.
	And of course, they are a protected class.
	They know that they can do anything, including murder, and get away with it.
	And they'll be covered.
	That's the point, you see.
	And so they are weaponizing these shock troops.
	How shocking are they?
	Well, as soon as you get accustomed to the Dylan Mulvaney and all the rest of these people, as soon as that becomes passe, they'll have something even more shocking to throw at you.
	I don't know what...
	I can't guess what that's going to be, quite frankly.
	Because I would have never guessed that the trans stuff would be defined as sane.
	And the rest of us who find that Section 8 behavior a lunatic, we would be the ones who are accused of being insane by the old turd Stink Uyghur.
	We've been very clear about these anti-LGBT bills, said the White House spokesperson.
	Jean-Pierre, that we're seeing in state legislatures, these anti-trans bills, they're not attacking trans kids.
	They're trying to protect the kids from the trans predators.
	You understand how they turn everything around.
	It's just amazing to me.
	She says it's shameful. It is unacceptable.
	You know, we don't want, these are anti-pedophile laws, frankly, that she says are shameful and unacceptable.
	It's okay for pedophiles to attack kids in school, to shoot them, to sexually groom them, to psychologically gaslight them.
	But the left, it is the left, by the way, let the record show, it is the left that now associates the LGBT movement with pedophilia.
	They've made it clear. They want to support that.
	So Biden had some more things to say.
	He said it was shocking.
	It was an undemocratic expulsion of the Tennessee gun protesters from the assembly.
	No, they expelled them because they were undemocratic.
	They wouldn't allow the democratic process to take place.
	And they were trying a second time to stop that.
	Throwing a tantrum with a bullhorn in a legislative building is not an acceptable way to proceed.
	You might want to ask one of my former colleagues about that as well.
	Sometimes when you engage in showmanship to get an audience, sometimes it does backfire on you.
	But he invited the expelled Democrats to visit the White House.
	They're moving on up.
	They're going to just leapfrog this whole state legislator thing.
	And they'll go right to becoming radical Congress people or something else.
	Or maybe he'll appoint them.
	He's got an empty spot over there in the Nuclear Waste Regulatory Agency.
	They had to get rid of Sam Brinton.
	Kept stealing women's luggage at the airport.
	Ha! So now maybe they could put Justin Jones and Justin Pearson, give one of them his response, or just create another position.
	It's not like there's not enough jobs in Washington.
	We could make some more jobs in Washington, print up some more money to pay these people, no problem.
	I'm sure they've got a big future there with the Biden administration.
	And Lala Harris immediately came down to, you know, get her face on the news.
	They get somebody with less baggage, my son says, yeah.
	Everybody's got less baggage than Sam Britton.
	Not hard to find.
	So, of the three, the Tennessee Three, the IG Tennessee Three, Thank the president for his leadership and seeking to ban assault weapons and standing up for our democratic values.
	You see? Your democratic values fly in the face of our republic and our constitution.
	Oh, thank you for trying to ban things that you were told you don't have any authority to ban.
	Those are God-given rights and you're specifically prohibited from doing it.
	So thank you for trying to overthrow the constitution.
	Thank you for sending Lala down here to preen and to pose.
	The two expelled Democrats can be reappointed to their seats by the officials in their respective counties.
	Both of them represent Democrat strongholds in Nashville and Memphis.
	You see, even here in Tennessee, we have a big city problem.
	Wherever you have big cities, you got problems.
	Oh yeah, we got trouble.
	With a capital T and that rhymes with a C and that stands for cities.
	And you pool all the voters together.
	All the crazy people move to the cities and then try to impose their will on the rest of us.
	And by the way, so they could be reappointed by the radicals in their district and they cannot be expelled a second time for the same thing.
	But we know that they've had a taste of fame.
	That's what got them elected in the first place.
	And I know they'll do it again.
	And I just hope that the Tennessee legislators have the spine to throw them out again when they do it again.
	They just keep doing this over and over again.
	Politico is very upset about this.
	Oh, this is just a glimpse of the future, they said.
	Do you realize, said Politico, That state legislatures can do what they want?
	How outrageous is that?
	How do we get them under the control of Washington?
	Tennessee Republicans really went there, said Politico.
	Despite the outcry, the GOP-controlled state legislature expelled two Democrats for engaging in a boisterous protest against gun violence.
	No, they were. They took over the Democratic process and ran and led a mob so they could overthrow the Constitution.
	That's what they did. They said the key lesson out of Nashville is not what did or did not happen in the chamber.
	It's another reminder of what it means for a legislature to gain a supermajority, enabling it not only to dominate legislative matters, but to deploy overwhelming power more broadly, even over the other branches of government.
	But if they're an elected legislature, isn't that democracy?
	You see, we have what's really happening in Washington, in spite of what Politico says, The Congress and the Senate have abdicated their authority to the unelected, undemocrat, democratically unaccountable, unelected bureaucracy that's there.
	That's the reality.
	And they don't have a problem with supermajorities when it's their supermajority.
	Now this is just obvious partisanship here.
	They said in virtually every state, The legislature, each house of the legislature, is the judge of its members.
	Imagine that. They also judge the winner of the election as well, which Trump didn't bother to do with all of his money.
	All of us save America money.
	He didn't bother doing anything about that.
	So again, they have funded an armed guard at every school.
	They introduced the bill.
	And in the House, these three people voted against that before they got kicked out.
	Now, I don't think this is the best solution.
	I think a better solution is armed teachers who are not wearing a uniform.
	They say, take me out and you can have everybody else, right?
	And also the very fact that, as we've seen in Florida, as we saw in Texas, many times these people who are armed don't put themselves at risk.
	That's why we call people heroes who do that.
	The police officers there in Nashville went in as they were being shot at.
	They put their lives at risk to save other lives.
	That's a heroic act.
	And we honor people like that.
	But it's not to be expected.
	And it's too easy for somebody to do what the school officer in Parkland did.
	You know, the Marjory Stone Douglas or whatever the name of that school is.
	And that is just to hide.
	But if you were in the classroom and you have a weapon and you know how to use it, you would be defending your life.
	That's just self-defense.
	Or you would be defending the life of children that you know.
	It's a very different situation than having a person.
	First of all, it creates something of a security problem because you've got the person who's got the only gun in school marked with a uniform.
	And if you've got a lot of people and you don't know who's carrying and who's not carrying, That's a much better situation.
	And then they are there under attack and they're now defending themselves instead of putting their life at risk to defend other people.
	So armed teachers are always better.
	But the best solution is to close these government schools.
	We can have education without schools.
	America was at its most highly educated level when we had no schools.
	No government schools.
	We didn't have to go to school for 12 years in order to learn to read and write.
	Now you go to school for 12 years plus 4 years in college and you can't read or write.
	And you can't think critically.
	And you're nothing but a weaponized tool of the state for revolution.
	You're nothing but a graduate of a seminary for Satan.
	Shut those things down.
	Stop taxing us.
	To run these places that are a threat to the lives, the liberty, the minds, the bodies, the spirits of our kids.
	So anyway, they went with, did something.
	Certainly not the best thing.
	They're going to be spending more money to protect these schools and it'll be shut down in the first place.
	There will be education, one way or the other.
	The question is, who does the educating?
	Do you really want the government to run the education?
	Because what they've done in doing that, as R.L. Dabney said, at the end of the Civil War, he was a chaplain.
	He was Stonewall Jackson's chaplain, as a matter of fact.
	He said, the reason we had this war was because you had people who were radicalized in the Northeast, especially Massachusetts, by the government schools.
	And he said, you're not ever going to, when you have the government running the schools, you will never have freedom of religion.
	You will always have an established religion.
	It could be Christianity.
	Or, as we've seen, it could be secular humanism.
	It could be a lot of different things.
	But it's going to be the values that are taught are going to be antithetical to a large number of people.
	The government should not be running schools for the same reason government should not be running churches.
	It's just that simple.
	So anyway, second provision of this was to make significant physical security upgrades at both public and non-public schools all across the state.
	Third provision was for mental health resources.
	A mental health liaison in every county But that we have multiple ones in many counties.
	He said, not just one, but many of them.
	Well, I think we do already. We've got a lot of guidance counselors who are doing LGBT gaslighting of kids.
	It's the mental health issues in the first place that is the problem right now.
	He said, we cannot control evil, but we can do something.
	So, you know, they did something, and...
	I don't know, but we had Van Jones go after the chair of the Republican Party, Jeremy Faison, who was naive enough to go on CNN. And not only did he go on CNN, where he knew, didn't he know he was going to be sitting in a barrel with everybody taking shots at him?
	How could you not know that?
	And even then, he wasn't prepared to defend himself.
	He had nothing to say.
	So Van Jones says, I think this is unreasonable.
	He said, you want them not to be extreme, but you're being extreme.
	Why is that? You're the problem here.
	Just like Stink Uygur said, you know, there's people out there who don't want, you know, kids mutilating themselves in kindergarten.
	They're insane.
	I mean, all the rational people want kids mutilated in the kindergarten, you know?
	And so, why were you doing this?
	Well, he should have said this was a sustained insurrection and they tried pulling it a second time and we've got to stop that pattern.
	But he didn't say that. He said, why didn't you go to the ethics committee?
	Why didn't you do things that are always done in that body?
	Well, this is a little bit beyond the ethics committee.
	He emphasized the decision to expel these representatives was a choice of majority of his caucus.
	It's like, it's not just me.
	It's like everybody else wanted to do it too.
	Let's just go along with it.
	I don't know what the guy was trying to explain.
	It was crazy what he had to say.
	So they kept coming after him.
	And he just turned off the feed and walked away.
	After Van Jones was finished with him, you had another woman, Collins, who was going to question him, and Caitlin Collins.
	She said, Representative, I know you've got a long drive home, but just one final question for you.
	Oh, okay.
	Chairman Faison has left us.
	He should have never gone there.
	In the first place, if he's going to go there, you've got to think about the line of attack that's going to come.
	Of course, they're going to play the race card and everything else about it.
	The Associated Press. Tennessee becomes a new front in the battle for American democracy.
	Well, yes. Yes.
	Yes. And they finally fired back.
	I'm glad they did, but that's not the angle that the AP is doing.
	You've got a mob that's led by the Tennessee Three to overthrow our God-given rights, to overthrow the Constitution, and to overthrow the democratic process.
	You need to throw the bombs out.
	They said the removal of lawmakers, who were only recently elected, reflects a trend in dozens of states where Republicans are trying to make it harder to cast ballots.
	You know, doing things like these troublesome things like picture IDs or something like that.
	No, the Republicans are not doing it.
	Trump changed the rules with his pandemic election.
	He changed the rules to enhance voting, voting corruption.
	So he was supported and all that by the Republicans.
	I think they've actually done a lot to enhance voting.
	They've enhanced it so much it's become almost irreparably fraudulent.
	We'll be right back.
	The Common Man . . .
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common paths to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially please keep us in your prayers Welcome
	back. I had too many conversations with liberals on the left yesterday at Easter dinner.
	Very one-sided conversation.
	It always is, isn't it?
	I got talked down without a bullhorn.
	Made for a very tiring day.
	Gotta love family dinners.
	I had the same experience at a wedding.
	Yeah, this, you know.
	A lot of state people go, I know who you are.
	That's the beginning of it.
	So yeah, with a frown.
	It's not like, oh, I know who you are.
	No, no, it was not the context of that.
	I know who you are.
	I've heard about you.
	It's like, oh yeah, you heard about me.
	Have you ever heard me though?
	Yeah, I don't think so.
	Okay, so that was something that happened last Thursday and went through the weekend.
	And I wanted to go back and clear that up.
	And I was going to put something out to clarify an update about RFK Jr.
	I talked about it last week when he threw, you know, it was on Thursday that the information was going out that he's going to run for president.
	And I said, I think it's generally a good thing to see him running.
	I didn't say I would vote for him, though.
	And I said, I had a lot of concerns about his past as an environmental lawyer.
	And I said, I hadn't had time to take a look at it.
	And unfortunately, as soon as the show was over, I did.
	I was like, oh man, I can't believe I didn't remember this stuff about R.K. Jr.
	And I was going to put out a Substack update, but it's like, no, I'm going to take some time off.
	I really needed the time off.
	And we did a rebroadcast on Friday.
	By the way, I had a friend at church really enjoyed the segment by Liz James about raw milk and said, yeah, it was good to listen to that a second time.
	And We heard it the first time when she was on, and they had been doing raw milk since that point in time.
	They said it made a big difference in their family and their health.
	As a matter of fact, one person said, I was never able to drink milk before, but I can drink the raw milk and it doesn't cause problems for me.
	So it is important to get some of that stuff out.
	We're going to try to do more in terms of positive stuff that's out there.
	We need to focus. We need to understand where the threats are coming from.
	But we also need to have some positive alternatives.
	And we're going to talk about that with what Texas is talking about doing with the gold-backed digital coin.
	We'll talk about what they're proposing, whether or not that's a good thing.
	But I want to clear this up with RFK Jr.
	And, of course, if you go back about 15 years, 10 to 15 years or whatever, He was doing really, really radical stuff.
	And go back to 2008.
	He's writing op-ed pieces.
	Here's one that he did at the Los Angeles Times.
	What was happening in 2008?
	Well, you had McCain running.
	And we're going to be faced with another choice like that again.
	You want McCain or you want Obama?
	I was like, oh, really? That's my choices here.
	So he was attacking in this op-ed piece.
	It was attacking Sarah Palin, saying she was a tool of big oil.
	But I looked at this and the things that he was saying, you know, and I'll give you the op-ed piece here.
	And let me give you a little bit of that, just to give you an idea of what he's talking about here.
	It begins this way.
	He says, I was water skiing with my children.
	In a light drizzle off Hyannis, Massachusetts last month, when a sudden fierce storm plunged us into a melee of towering waves, raking rain, painful hail, at midday darkness, broken by blinding flashes of lightning.
	As I hurried to get my children out of the water and back to the dock, I shouted over the roaring wind, this is some kind of a tornado.
	And he says, yes, then a water spout, hundreds of feet high, rose from the white ocean and darted across its surface.
	He goes on to describe this violent storm.
	He said, my dog was so undone by the display that she kept us all awake with her terrified whining.
	That same day, two water spouts appeared on Long Island Sound.
	He says, those odd climatological phenomena.
	In the rest of the world, we call it weather.
	You have weather. Weather is odd sometimes.
	We've had some unusual events here.
	Just the one year we've been here, we had unusual events in Texas.
	I guess I could say that, you know, when it got so cold that the windmills froze in Texas, I could say, well, you know, looks like we're going into global cooling.
	Because that was the first lie that was told to us by the climate crowd under Paul Ehrlich.
	But it's always been about population control.
	Always. Because his book was a population bomb.
	Yeah. Yeah. My son says, my dog got scared by thunder.
	Please give up your freedom. That's exactly it.
	Yeah. It was crazy.
	And I looked at this and I thought, how old was he?
	He's the same age as I am, basically.
	He's a year older than I am.
	When he wrote this, he should have known better.
	When he wrote this, I was working with a group that tried to reveal the information that That Michael Mann had.
	Get him to show us the data.
	Show me the data. What have we been doing through this whole pandemic thing?
	It's what RFK Jr.
	has been doing with Children's Health Defense.
	Show us your data. Oh, no.
	They don't want to show the data when they're lying to you.
	And so we were fighting Michael Mann.
	He's the guy who came up with a hockey stick that Al Gore used in his nonsense documentary.
	And, you know, we fought him for that.
	And unfortunately, he won in court.
	He kept it secret. But we'd already had ClimateGate, and he was part of ClimateGate.
	That's why we wanted to get the full stuff.
	He had published the data.
	As a matter of fact, he was working at the University of Virginia.
	We were able to get the University of Virginia to relent.
	And they said, all right, we'll turn them over.
	They fought it at first.
	They said, all right, all right, we'll give up.
	We'll turn it over. And then he got involved, and he wasn't even at the University of Virginia anymore.
	He goes, no, that's my personal stuff.
	It's not your personal stuff.
	It was all done. These are emails that were done on your University of Virginia account while you were working there.
	You have published the data long ago, and it was used to craft public policy.
	What we would like to see is if we were lied to.
	So show us the data. No, I'm not going to show you the data.
	Arcadia513. Thank you for the tip on Rumble.
	My neighbor and I started drinking raw milk after watching her interview.
	I wish there were more resources on the benefits of raw milk.
	Thank you. Well, good. That's good to hear.
	I'm glad to hear that.
	And we have...
	We've got a source for raw goat milk.
	We haven't found one yet close by that's raw milk, but it's been very good.
	Very good. And I think it's important to understand, you know, that the bottom takeaway, if you haven't seen that interview, the bottom takeaway is pasteurization removed a lot of the beneficial stuff.
	Homogenization made it dangerous to your health.
	So anyway, getting back to this, and RFK Jr., he said, once my father, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, brought a delegation of visiting Eskimos home from the Justice Department for lunch at our house.
	Were they having Eskimo sandwiches?
	I don't know. They spent the afternoon building a great igloo in the deep snow in our backyard.
	My brothers and sisters played in the structure several weeks before it began to melt.
	But now he believes we have seen the end of snow.
	It'll never happen again, said RFK Jr.
	15 years ago. That's it.
	It's so sad. My children will never see snow again.
	See, the thing is, I forgot about all this stuff because, you know, when you've got a Democrat leader saying crazy stuff like this, and it's a Kennedy, it's like, who pays any attention to that?
	I didn't pay any attention to it.
	When I went back and I saw this, I was like, no.
	Anyway, meanwhile, he said, this is RFK Jr., 2008.
	Meanwhile, ExxonMobil and its carbon cronies continue to pour money into think tanks whose purpose is to deceive the American public into believing that global warming is a fantasy.
	Well, actually, it was the think tank that I was working for that was trying to get the documents out there.
	If you've got nothing to hide, if science is on your side, why don't you put that out there?
	In 1998, he said these companies plotted to deceive American citizens about climate science.
	Their goal, they said, was that, quote, those promoting the Kyoto Treaty appear to be out of touch with reality.
	Well, you know what?
	Here's a solution. You debate them.
	That's called science.
	You show me your data, I'll show you my data.
	And we can talk about this, but no, no, no, we want to hide that.
	As a matter of fact, he thought what they were doing was something of a crime.
	I'll tell you about that here in a moment.
	That ought to be punished. He said, John McCain is chosen as his running mate, Sarah Palin.
	A diligent student of Big Oil's crib sheets.
	She's something of a flat earther who shares the current administration's contempt for science.
	She has expressed skepticism about evolution, which is like not believing in gravity.
	Well, no.
	Wrong on that issue as well.
	Let's have the debate.
	Bring it on. You bring your data, I'll bring mine.
	We'll have that debate. I'm not afraid of that debate.
	These people are afraid of debates.
	That's why they call us traitors.
	That's why they say we ought to be thrown in prison.
	That's why they say we need to be censored.
	Now, he may be different.
	RFK Jr.
	may be different now. Because now he's suffered from this on his side.
	Maybe he has learned something about it.
	Either way, he's going to be talking about very important issues.
	And that's why I was excited about his candidacy.
	And I'm still excited about his candidacy.
	He's going to be talking about, you see, when he's in the Democrat primaries, the other Democrats aren't going to be attacking him for his climate position.
	If he was in the Republican primaries, you know, debates, they would.
	But in the Democrat primaries, they're not going to attack him for that.
	What they will do is he may attack them on CBDC, and now we've got somebody on the Democrat side opposing CBDC. They'll talk to him about the vaccine stuff, of course.
	And he'll talk about censorship, as he's been doing.
	And he'll talk about the military-industrial complex.
	And how the CIA is running our...
	All those are very positive things.
	I'm happy, really happy, to see him in the debates.
	But there's issues.
	Which, as I said, I support issues.
	And I don't support people.
	Because every person you're going to find is going to be right on some issues and wrong on other issues.
	But, as I said to Gerald Salenti, I said, this is a key issue.
	The climate MacGuffin has been a foundational issue for the reorganization of our society and the prohibition of everything and the impoverishment of everybody.
	And the servitude and slavery that they are going to impose on us in this arbitrary austerity, and we have to oppose that.
	Angus Mustang, thank you for the tip on Rumble.
	He says, RFK will probably just deny that he ever said any of the climate change things.
	Yeah, it is going to be hard, though, because he did them enough.
	He's got a lot of explaining to do, Lucy.
	And KWD68, he says, Thomas Massey has submitted legislation to help make raw milk and local meat processing, but it's gone nowhere.
	That's right. He's like Ron Paul.
	Not like Rand Paul.
	He's like Ron Paul. Thomas Massey is.
	He is always on the right side of things and always the only person...
	Always standing alone in something like this.
	It's absolutely true.
	But again, here's the thing.
	We don't have to fix that from the federal side of things.
	This can be done at the state level, and it should be done at the state level.
	Understand where the pressure is being applied among the raw milk issue.
	It's being applied through the FDA and through the Department of Agriculture and things like that.
	There is no authority in the Constitution for there to be a Department of Agriculture or for there to be an FDA. Just like there's no authority for the ATF or the IRS or these other people.
	There's no authority in the Constitution for that.
	And there is authority for we the people and the state governments to do something about it.
	And we've seen this.
	Look, it is still illegal.
	To have marijuana or CBD for...
	I have to catch myself.
	I've said CBDC so much.
	But the CBD or recreational marijuana, medical marijuana, that's all still illegal.
	The feds still say that's illegal.
	But we've got most all the states now.
	I think it's about two-thirds of the states, roughly.
	One or both of those.
	That's nullification. And it shows that we can do that.
	If we can do that for pot, we can do it for raw milk.
	If we have the will.
	Getting back to this.
	RFK Jr. said in 2008, Sarah Palin used to insist that human activities have nothing to do with climate change.
	Quote, I'm not one who would attribute it to being man-made, she said.
	But then after she joined the GOP ticket, she magically reversed herself and said, man's activities certainly can be contributing to the issue of global warming.
	You see? That's what happens.
	People join the club.
	She supported John McCain when he was up against ropes in his last election and got him re-elected, too.
	Yeah. Turncoat.
	Anyway, but then RFK Jr.
	says, Meanwhile, Alaska is melting before our eyes.
	No. Glaciers are disappearing.
	No. No.
	No, none of that happened or is happening.
	Again, they're never called to stand by these lies.
	And it was only two years later.
	In February, you know, he said snow was not, you know, not going to have snow in D.C. anymore.
	So two years later, in February 2010, people say, you remember when RFK Jr.
	was flying around on private planes telling us that we had to change our lives in order to save the planet?
	And this is 2010.
	Nothing has changed. These people have been doing the same game now for 13 years, more than that.
	But anyway, he says...
	Quoting from his article, Recently arrived residents of the northern suburbs accustomed to today's anemic winters might find it astonishing to learn that there were once ski runs in McLean, Virginia, with a rope tow and a local ski club.
	Snow is so scarce today that most Virginian children probably don't own a sled.
	Meanwhile, ExxonMobil and its carbon cronies, you know, poor money and all this stuff, but they said, well, 2010, two years after he said that, That last week's snowstorm paralyzed the Washington area, knocking out power to thousands of homes, closing schools and businesses, and shutting down the federal government.
	Good job, snowstorm.
	Close down the federal government.
	Dulles International Airport got a record 32.4 inches of snow, and a town in Maryland close to D.C. was blanketed by 40 inches.
	That was just two years after his dire predictions of the end of snow.
	Another snowstorm all up to Washington on Wednesday and so forth, right?
	We see this back and forth.
	You know, the difference between climate and weather.
	And, of course, they don't have any data.
	When you start looking at long-term data, now we do have some long-term data because they've been selling this live for 50 years.
	And we see that every one of their specific predictions has failed.
	We see that their trends have failed, have been disproven.
	Their models have been disproven.
	And Alaska, as my son points out, still hasn't melted away yet.
	It's still there. So, he went further though.
	He went further. We've got a lot of people saying nonsense like this.
	A lot of people flying around on private jets doing stuff.
	But RFK Jr. said, we need laws to punish global warming skeptics.
	And again, he may have changed his mind on this.
	Because now he's been on the receiving end of this tyranny.
	He was absurdly wrong in terms of the science, but he was also intolerant of debate, as intolerant of it as his critics are intolerant of him today.
	RFK Jr., one of the climate change's loudest activists, said that there should be a law that lets authorities punish skeptics and deniers, those who engage in selling out the public trust.
	I wish there was a law that you could punish them with.
	I don't think there is a law that you can punish these politicians under.
	And these skeptical politicians are selling out the public trust.
	I think it is treason, he said.
	Do I think the Koch brothers are treasonous?
	Yes, I do. Do I think they should be in jail?
	I think they should be injuring three hots and a cot.
	At The Hague, with all the other war criminals.
	Do I think the Koch brothers should be tried for reckless endangerment?
	Absolutely. That is a criminal offense and they ought to be serving time for it.
	Even Politico said at the beginning of the Obama administration in 2008, he was being talked about as a possible head for the EPA. And the Democrats were saying that he was too extreme for the Obama administration.
	Too extreme to head up the EPA under Obama.
	And they did pass on him for that.
	And so at the time, Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma, ranking Republican, as RFK Jr.
	was saying global warming skeptics should be treated as traitors, quote-unquote.
	Inhofe said, Robert Kennedy calling me a traitor would be like me calling Robert Kennedy a patriot.
	He said, this would speak, not he, but Chamber of Commerce lobbyists said, this would speak volumes as to where Obama is going to go with his appointments.
	A Kennedy appointment is as liberal as you can possibly get.
	There is no other candidate that is based firmer in extremes.
	And so they also started throwing the personal stuff out there.
	He was busted for heroin possession in the 1980s.
	And they excused that by saying, well, considering the times that we live in, it seems like everybody of a certain age had a drug issue.
	Again, you know, we look at that.
	Just take a look at where the people are today.
	We don't have much to choose from in the character issue anywhere.
	I mentioned, you know, he's got a lot of baggage personally, but it's the issues that I'm interested in.
	And this is an issue. This is a fundamental issue.
	The grain issue. And so he even drew the ire of a lot of the environmentalists.
	He was, you know, he's all about green this and green that, but he doesn't want it in his backyard.
	So he fought a wind farm that was going to be put off the coast of his family's place there at Hyannisport.
	Because, you know, It could cause tornadoes or something, I guess.
	And he also said the Pope was right when in 2015 the Pope made it his number one priority to put out a climate encyclical because the Pope was going to be pushing the green religion.
	But look on the other side.
	Look at our other poor choice there.
	Donald Trump. He's now raised $10 million.
	Yes, he's played the victim card.
	That is his gold ticket.
	Absolutely is his gold ticket.
	Angus Mustang, the liberals in my family that always liked RFK are now saying they can't stand him because he's running as an anti-vaxxer.
	And that's the good news. He'll be running, and he's very articulate, and he's done a good job so far of defining the vaccine thing.
	That's why I say I'm excited to see him running as a candidate.
	I just have to say, in full disclosure, this is where he's coming from.
	That was my concern.
	I'd forgotten the specifics about how he had been so radical on the environment, but I figured he was probably on the wrong side of that issue.
	I was surprised at how radical he was.
	That's why I want to go back and correct that.
	Just so that you have full disclosure, you've got all the information there.
	I don't support candidates.
	I support issues and on many issues.
	He has a lot of very good points to make.
	And, um, his book, uh, about Fauci was spot on and his 12th chapter in it about germ games was spot on.
	He called out the CIA and Fauci and all the rest of these.
	So I'm really excited to see him as a candidate.
	Not because it's going to be something interesting to talk about, because that isn't the real issue.
	I mean, there's always interesting things to talk about.
	But we have to get these issues before people.
	And with him running, there will be a debate on vaccines and this whole process.
	And I'm glad to see that.
	And it's going to make it easier for other people to oppose the vaccine as well.
	He's taken point on this and he's taken the brunt of the attacks on this from the very beginning.
	And I applaud him for that.
	And I also applaud him for calling out the CIA and the military-industrial complex.
	He believes, as I do, that they killed his uncle and his father, JFK and RFK. I believe that as well.
	And he's the only family member that does believe that.
	All the rest of them have said, no, no, we believe the official story about Sirhan Sirhan and all the rest of it.
	He doesn't believe that. And so he doesn't believe that, you know, he's a lone shooter.
	He believes the CIA killed his dad.
	Because they opposed his politics.
	And he comes out swinging at the CIA. And I said, that's great.
	That's courage. And we need to have that.
	That needs to be out there.
	And so I'm not trying to dump trash on him.
	It's going to be interesting to see.
	I said, I don't even know this environmental stuff will even come up in the general election.
	You know, the Republicans are probably happy not to bring it up and let him come after.
	I mean, you look at who's...
	You think the Republican field is bad?
	Take a look at the Democrat field.
	You got Biden and Marianne Williamson, who's like this crystal gal, the spiritualist or whatever, lunatic.
	And then you've got RFK Jr.
	How could he not look great against those two?
	I mean, it's a pretty low bar in that debate.
	But anyway, Trump has made almost $10 million out of the people who donated in the first 24, 48 hours had never contributed to him before.
	The Democrats know what they want.
	They want chaos. And Trump gives it to them.
	And, of course, Trump gives them victories as well.
	Since 2016, there have been two midterm elections and a general election, and Trump has basically tanked it for the Republicans.
	So the Democrats would love to see him in a civil war with other Republicans, and they would love to see him as leader of the Republican Party.
	And I think that's what this is about.
	This is, you know, they know that.
	We all know that. Everybody knows that.
	The people who support Trump, the people who oppose Trump, all know that.
	So you think that, you know, the people in Manhattan don't know this?
	Yeah, they're being put up for this.
	Absolutely. So, you know, while he locked us down, while he created the jab, while he paid the governors to do all this stuff to us, then he also did gun prohibition by executive order.
	He did all of these things, and yet the crowd is going wild for him.
	Just amazing. Giving him a lot of money.
	By the way, he didn't just lock us down.
	We see what happened in the aftermath of January 6th, which is still going through.
	The trial of the Proud Boys, including Joe Biggs.
	At least 40 undercover informants were doing surveillance on January 6th, says a defense lawyer.
	At least 40.
	And it's just focused around them.
	The government admitted...
	That they had eight FBI confidential human sources embedded amongst the Proud Boys on January the 6th.
	The lawyer for some of them, his name is Roots, said some of these undercover Metro officers marched with the Proud Boys.
	And some appeared to have played roles of instigators, shouting things like, stop the steal!
	You know, that was Alex Jones and Roger Stone's scam for people, you know.
	Pick your pockets, send you directly to Washington and directly to jail.
	Do not pass code, do not collect $200.
	Send the $200 to me to stop the steal and then you go to jail.
	That's the stop the steal plan.
	And White House, or whose house?
	Our house, were shouts that these instigators, these provocateurs were doing.
	I was telling people for two months after the election, I was warning people about this.
	That's why I was fired.
	I warned them on air.
	I posed Alex's Stop the Steal stuff on air.
	I said it was a grift.
	It was then, and we know it was now.
	And I said, during this show, on the morning of January the 6th, I said, do not go.
	It is a trap.
	There will be agent provocateurs all over the place.
	Now what do we see? They're out there yelling, stop the steal!
	Stop the steal! Take the house!
	At least 40 people.
	Agent provocateurs just around the Proud Boys.
	And, of course, they even infiltrated their defense team.
	That's how bad this has all become.
	So, again, sometimes people will never listen.
	But now Biden is blaming Trump for Afghanistan withdrawal disaster.
	Well, here's the truth.
	They're both to blame.
	Trump was there for four years.
	He campaigned on stopping that.
	And I don't think the Pentagon ever wanted to stop it.
	Why? Because they have a tremendous amount of lithium there.
	As well as, you know, what they need for opioids and opium.
	And the Taliban had nearly shut down opium production when the CIA and its people went in.
	It went up to the high 90s in terms of the percentage of the world's supply, right?
	And so it had been a big producer.
	The Taliban had just about shut it down.
	And when the CIA came in, it went up to record amounts.
	As a matter of fact, you had that clip of the soldiers who were guarding the poppy fields that Geraldo Rivera put out there.
	I said, oh yeah, we got to let them grow poppies.
	Because, you know, if they didn't grow the poppies here, what would these people do for money?
	Well, I don't know. Maybe they could live off those pallets of billions of dollars of cash that you left behind.
	They didn't make that argument, you know, when it was the other people.
	They could have given them money, which they did do.
	They gave them massive amounts of money.
	But that was their excuse, and they got caught red-handed having American troops guard the opium fields so they could put out record amounts of opium.
	So it was opium, it was lithium that were there.
	They had no intention of leaving.
	They had to bug out, and that's why it was a disaster.
	And so both Biden and Trump are to blame for continuing that to the point where they couldn't continue it anymore.
	But they're both going to play that card and say, well, it was the other guy that didn't do it the right way.
	Well, they had an opportunity to shut it down.
	Finally, Leonardo DiCaprio is talking about how a Chinese Communist Party-linked financier planned to donate $30 million to Obama's 2012 campaign.
	That doesn't really matter because these are the crimes of the Democrats.
	It doesn't matter how much money was given to Obama.
	It doesn't matter how much money was given to Biden or to Hunter or to his brother.
	None of that matters.
	We just look the other way when it's Democrats who are getting paid massive amounts of money by foreign governments.
	��
	�� You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you Let's talk about CBDC. Again, as I said, it's going to be a big win to have...
	RFK Jr. talking about this because he understands all the different points about it.
	You know, the surveillance aspect, the control aspect of it, all these different points.
	He really does get it, and he's talked about that.
	So it'll be good to have him there.
	He'll make a great case against it.
	But there's other things that we can do.
	You know, we're not just dependent on, oh, let's hope that we can get somebody in Washington to stop this thing.
	That isn't going to happen, frankly.
	You know, we can educate people as to why we don't want it, but it's going to be stopped at the state level.
	The federal government has gone too far.
	We need to understand where these, you know, how they're going to be moving against us and try to get an idea as to their timing, which is going to be very short term before this comes in.
	They're going to try to introduce this, I believe, possibly even later this year, but they've got a couple of years engineer crisis.
	The only reason that they wouldn't do it is because an election is coming up, but I don't think that's going to pull them back either.
	They're not too worried about whether or not they keep Biden in.
	They'd much rather have the control.
	And he's going to, he's pulling all the stops out to push CBDC through.
	And even though you have the House Republicans aware of this, and they have also defined the problem, We're not going to allow, they've got a bill to say we're not going to allow the Federal Reserve to use CBDC to control our economy.
	We're not going to allow them to deal directly with individuals.
	Nevertheless, even if they pass that, it's going to be vetoed by Biden and they can't override his veto.
	They don't have enough votes in the House and the Senate to do that.
	And there's a lot of Republicans who want it to go through.
	So it's not going to be stopped in the next two years, which I think is going to roll out before the election.
	It's not going to be stopped in Washington.
	And so it's going to be stopped at the state level.
	And I've talked about what's been happening here in Tennessee.
	Senator Nicely talking about, well, let's create a gold, you know, ways for people to, a gold metal depository and things that we can start to, you know, pay bills in gold and have the treasurer accumulate gold and other things like that, also pushing taxes. For a publicly-owned state bank, which he's called the Tennessee Reserve System.
	So small banks understand that the target is on them.
	Many of them don't understand where this is headed.
	And they could look at this and say, well, we could deal with the Federal Reserve or we could deal with the Tennessee Reserve.
	Which one do we want to deal with?
	And we've seen how that's worked out in North Dakota.
	They have almost six times as many banks per capita.
	That means a lot of small, medium-sized banks rather than consolidation.
	And that's what we should be pushing back against.
	We should be pushing back against consolidation of government as well as consolidation of business.
	The Republicans don't care about consolidation of business and the Democrats don't care about consolidation of government.
	Both of those are bad for us.
	And so anytime you've got something that's an alternative path Anytime you've got something that is going to be an opportunity to get away from the pre-planned, you do it this way.
	We've got one way. We've got no other treatments other than the vaccine.
	We've got the supposed pandemic and you can't have any other treatments.
	Or we have too much CO2 and you can't have anything other than an electric car.
	And we've got to shut down the heaters and the ranges.
	It's all got to be electric.
	It's all got to be on the grid that we control.
	All the rest of the stuff. It's all about centralized control.
	So we need to do the opposite.
	And at the state level, we can.
	And so in Texas, a bill that would create a state-issued gold-backed digital currency.
	So I looked at this and I thought, is that a good thing or not?
	You know, I mean, the issue about the digital currency thing, Well, the good news about it is that you could redeem that at any point in time for gold or for cash, and you're back to anonymity.
	The fact that they're doing it with a digital currency, that is something that...
	And again, this is assuming that it's going to pass.
	It's introduced in both the Texas House and in the Texas Senate.
	And we had some really good bills that have come out of the Texas House in the past.
	It was Representative Simpson, David Simpson, I believe is his name, going back 10 years now.
	I interviewed him a couple of times at the time.
	He tried to shut down the TSA and it's Hands-on scanning of people and children and their naked body scanners.
	He tried to shut that down and got a unanimous support in the House before it was shut down in the Senate by the lieutenant governor, who used to work for the CIA. The CIA set him up, made him a multimillionaire, and he spent more money to get elected as lieutenant governor than any other candidate had at that time, far more. And he was the one who shut it down.
	So we've seen good stuff come out of there.
	That doesn't mean just because this bill was introduced that it's going to pass.
	But let's take a look at whether or not it's a good idea or not.
	Enactment of this legislation, this is an article by Michael Meharry, Would create an option for people to transact business in sound money and set the stage to undermine the Federal Reserve's monopoly on money and create a viable alternative to a CBDC. So some good things about that and some bad things about it.
	As he's pointing out, one of the good things about it is it gets people thinking about gold, using gold for transactions, a means for using gold for transactions.
	And, of course, by doing it as a digital currency, then that helps to, you know, gold is, you know, around $2,000 an ounce, and so it's difficult to get this down into a smaller entity.
	There's been other ways to do it, like out of Utah, the gold paper things where they put, you know, physical gold in the paper, and it's a smaller amount, a very small amount of it, so you can use it for smaller transactions and that type of thing.
	So the digital aspect, I guess, is there for that purpose.
	But if you're going to train people to use gold, you're also training them to use digital currency at the same time.
	And so that's kind of, I don't know, which way they're going to go.
	You know, they're going to, I think the people have kind of figured out as they did in Nigeria.
	They tried to introduce us to the biggest nation so far.
	They've tried to roll out the CBDC stuff, Central Bank Digital Currency.
	And they said, well, we've got a lot of adoption of Bitcoin, so maybe people will go with this.
	And so here's our digital cash.
	People said, no, thank you.
	I think I'll go to Bitcoin.
	And so Bitcoin usage actually soared in Nigeria, and their central bank digital currency crashed.
	So maybe people are smart enough to figure this out.
	And it's not necessarily a problem with that.
	But anyway, it was introduced in the Senate bill and in the House.
	The legislation would require the state comptroller to establish a digital currency, fully backed and redeemable, backed by gold and redeemable in gold, or in cash.
	The comptroller would also be required to create a mechanism to use this gold-backed digital currency in everyday use.
	The state of Texas would hold gold backing the currency in trust, On behalf of the digital currency holders.
	So I looked at this and I thought, well, you know, but now we're getting back into, you know, the problem that we have with paper gold.
	Supposedly, there's gold that is behind it at the Shanghai Gold Exchange.
	But, of course, the reality is that it's not there.
	I've talked about that many times with Tony Arderman of Weiswolf Gold.
	You know, that's probably hundreds of times more paper out there purportedly backed by gold than not.
	But if this is redeemable at any point in time by the individuals, That would perhaps keep them honest.
	Just throwing this out there.
	You can think about it and let me know what you think.
	Individuals will be able to purchase digital currency from the state.
	The state would then use the money to purchase gold that would be held in the Texas Bullion Depository or another secure vault.
	Individuals would be able to redeem their digital currency for dollars or for gold, assuming that you still have the paper money from the Federal Reserve.
	And they just had enough signatures, collected enough signatures in Switzerland to put it on a referendum to require the Swiss government to continue producing paper money for privacy and anonymity.
	And so we're going to have to have something like that probably as well.
	A couple of comments already.
	A Syrian girl. Election year won't slow down the CBDC because we no longer have free and fair elections.
	I agree. Our elected regime will continue to be the deep state selected regime.
	I absolutely agree.
	I'm just saying that having, you know, you now had two people.
	Who will be running for president most likely.
	You know, DeSantis has not declared.
	He can't declare, though, until, you know, he's hoping that some people are going to change the Florida law, because there's a Florida law that if he declares while he's governor, he's going to have to resign as governor.
	And so that's why he's delaying on all this stuff.
	But assuming that he's going to run, which appears to be a fair bet, you would have DeSantis talking about, as he did at that press conference, you know, Big Brother digital money, okay?
	And you have RFK Jr.
	talking about it. People need to understand what the problem is before we can stop it.
	It's not going to be stopped at the federal level, but it can be stopped at the state level.
	And we can start setting up structures of our own to try to get around this.
	And that's why I think this is a good approach.
	But people have to understand why it's a problem.
	Or people won't get behind those at the state level in Texas and in Tennessee trying to do something about that.
	And that's what's key. You've got to get behind these people trying to do something at the state level.
	But people have to understand why it's a problem.
	And most people are, you know, mainstream media is avoiding this like the plague, even as we are being herded into this at record speed.
	SoloCat1980, digital currency cannot be properly backed by gold.
	Digital currency is too easily manipulated.
	Digital, fake, backed by gold, real.
	It won't work. Well, we'll have to see.
	Again, it'll be, you know, any of this stuff that talks about why would you want to do this?
	Why would you want to protect people against CBDC? And we have to build the awareness of how this is bad.
	So, again, I have my concerns about the digital aspect as well.
	But I think it's a good thing to talk about this and to have bills about this and try to offer alternative paths to this rather than everything being centralized under the direct control of the Federal Reserve, which is what CBDC is really about.
	Doug Elkins replying to that.
	Didn't think you could hack blockchain tech.
	Well, I don't know. You know, we'll see.
	Anyway, one person says, I have a feeling they will make it illegal to trade in gold, silver, like back when FDR was president.
	That's true. And, you know, he got away with it.
	And he got away with it at a time when we had a lot more respect for the Constitution than we do now.
	Remember, that was, you know, he ran on a platform of getting rid of alcohol prohibition.
	They had enough respect for the Constitution that they passed a constitutional amendment because they knew they couldn't prohibit just anything, right?
	And so that was the 18th Amendment.
	And then he ran on a platform of ending alcohol prohibition.
	It had been a disaster in every regard.
	It wasn't working in any way, shape, or form.
	And so he ran on that.
	And then, as soon as he gets elected, he prohibits gold, which is specifically mentioned in the Constitution.
	When you talk about trashing the Constitution, H.L. Mencken, who was a libertarian, said, well, a year ago, if I had in my pocket a gold coin and a hip flask, the hip flask of alcohol was illegal and the gold coin was legal.
	Now, this year, the gold coin is illegal and the hip flask is legal.
	Ha! This is what happens when you have arbitrary exercise, a tyrannical power, and no rule of law.
	That is the point he was making.
	He didn't say that, but that's the point.
	A gold-backed digital currency would create an alternative, would allow individuals and businesses to avoid CBDC, says Michael Meharry.
	The creation of a state-issued gold-backed digital currency would create currency competition with Federal Reserve notes.
	And it would undermine the Fed's monopoly on money.
	It would also provide an alternative if the Federal Reserve implements a CBDC. I agree with all that assessment, and I've talked to Michael Meharry many times.
	He's sharp. He works for the Tenth Amendment Center.
	He also works for Schiffgold.
	This kind of falls in both areas, really.
	Broadly speaking, he says, by making gold conveniently available for regular daily transactions by the general public, a gold-backed digital currency would create the potential for a wide-reaching effect.
	Professor William Green, an expert on constitutional money, said in a paper for the Mises Institute that when people in multiple states actually start using gold instead of Federal Reserve notes, it would effectively nullify the Federal Reserve and end the federal government's monopoly on money.
	Professor Green said over time, as residents of the state use both Federal Reserve notes as silver and gold coins, the fact that the coins hold their value more than the Federal Reserve notes do will lead to a reverse Gresham's Law effect, where good money, that is gold and silver, the fact that the coins hold their value more than the Federal Reserve notes do will We'll drive out the bad money.
	As this happens, a cascade of events will begin to occur, including the flow of real wealth towards the state's treasury and influx of banking business from outside the state as people in other states carry out their desire to bank with sound money and an eventual outcry against the use of Federal Reserve notes for any transactions.
	And again, this is what Senator Nicely here in Tennessee understands and has essentially said as much.
	You have to have He understands, as many of us do, that the petrodollar and the reserve status of the dollar is crashing.
	We've had this credit card that we've been living off of, and they've abused it in so many different ways.
	Abused it for political power, abused it for their economic purposes.
	They've abused it so much, it's about to be taken away.
	And when that happens, it's going to be real financial chaos if we don't have another standard out there.
	And so the two things we've got to do is we've got to have multiple ways to get away from this one centralized system that they're going to try to impose on people.
	And we also have to have fallback positions for when the dollar goes into hyperinflation or other things like that.
	So as he goes on to say, Gresham's Law, this is now Michael Meharry talking, Gresham's Law holds that bad money drives out good.
	For example, when the U.S. government replaced silver quarters and dimes with coins made primarily of less valuable copper, the cheap coins drove the silver out of circulation because people hoarded the silver coins and spent the less valuable copper money.
	So how do you reverse that?
	He says the key is making it easier to use gold in everyday transactions, and that's the point of the digital thing, presumably.
	And again, I'm not 100% sold on that.
	I'm concerned about all things digital.
	We'll talk about that in just a moment in terms of now, you know, whether or not some Pentagon top secret documents were released or what.
	You know, was it real? Was it a fake?
	Either way, whether this is real or fake, we know that the federal government has not been able to protect its own data.
	We've seen that over and over again.
	And so I don't really know about the digital aspect of it.
	He says, the reason bad money drives out good is that governments put up barriers to using sound money in day-to-day life.
	That makes it more costly to spend gold, and it incentivizes hoarding.
	And when you remove barriers, you level the playing field, and you allow gold and silver to compete head-to-head with Federal Reserve notes.
	And I just have to say this.
	I don't know if it's still the case.
	And Hong Kong, because so much stuff has changed there.
	They were pushing back pretty hard on the efforts of the Chinese communists to exert total control over them.
	They pushed back on the lies, the Marxist lies are being sold to their kids and government schools.
	But, you know, that all got shut down when the pandemic, so-called pandemic, came to town.
	But when we were there, what was it, 15, 16 years ago?
	It was, I was surprised to see, you know, we had to change money into the Hong Kong currency.
	And I looked at some denominations that were the same.
	You know, so this is X number of dollars, Hong Kong dollars.
	And here's another note, it's also X number of it.
	Different size, different color.
	And it even says a different name of a bank there.
	They had paper notes in circulation there in Hong Kong.
	That were issued by individual private banks, not by a central bank.
	Individual banks.
	And those banks had to have reserves, unlike a central bank that just engages in fiat currency.
	And I thought that was really interesting because that was the kind of system that we used to have in the United States.
	They said they didn't prohibit You know, paper money, but essentially the paper money was issued by private banks in different states, and different states had different reputations as to whether or not they were being careful about, you know, banks, whether or not they watched the banks and made sure that the banks really did have those reserves and so forth.
	But, you know, you would write a, you know, you'd use paper money That was issued by them, just like, you know, you would draw with a check, you know, on a demand deposit, except that it was not to a specific person.
	It was just a note that you could theoretically take it back to that bank, and they would have to give you gold or silver.
	And so that's what some of the states are trying to do now at the state level.
	And we need to think about what we're going to do.
	This may not be the right approach, but it is an idea.
	And we need people who have ideas about how we're going to get out of the grasp of the federal government, because other countries are doing this at this time.
	Everybody is wanting to try to get away from From the dominance of the federal government and the Federal Reserve.
	We all understand that it's a corrupt game where they win all the time and we need to get away from it for the same reason that all these other countries.
	It's not just Russia and China.
	Many, many, many countries.
	Are trying to get away from the control of the federal government.
	And so the states need to be doing this as well.
	And there are people at the state level who are trying to do that.
	The United States Constitution says, in Article 1, Section 10, no state shall make anything but gold and silver coin a tender and payment of debts.
	Michael Meharry says, currently all debts and taxes, for example, in Kansas, are either paid with Federal Reserve notes or Without the Fed, the U.S. government wouldn't be able to maintain all of its unconstitutional wars and programs.
	That's what Marco Rubio was wringing his hands over.
	We're going to lose our ability to control people if we lose.
	He doesn't care about the economic damage that it's going to do to you and I. It's just about their financial control.
	Their financial control in terms of geopolitics but also their financial control here.
	At the same time they are overreaching their And this is going to be their downfall.
	And if we don't have another alternative system, it will be our downfall as well.
	So, we have to come up with something.
	Finally, creating a gold-backed digital currency would take another step in the process of abolishing the Federal Reserve system.
	By attacking it from the bottom up, pulling the rug out from under it, by working to make its functions irrelevant at the state and local levels, and setting the stage to undermine the Federal Reserve monopoly by introducing competition in the monetary system.
	That is the point.
	And again, this could be done in the same way that it was done in colonial America, same way it was done a decade or so ago, in Hong Kong.
	Right? You can have anybody, any entity, the state government can do it with a publicly owned state bank.
	Or you can have private banks that do it that the state monitors them to make sure they have the reserves for the stuff that they've got out there.
	There's a number of ways that you could do it.
	We better do something. And again, you know, my concern with all this stuff, with it being digital, things like that.
	So, well, is this going to be another one of these paper goal things?
	But if you can immediately exchange it for physical goal, perhaps that would perform a good bit of the auditing process that's there.
	We have KWD68. German kids made kites out of cash in the 20s, yeah.
	American kids better home up on their kite-making skills.
	I agree.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Again, as I said, I think it's a real positive for RK Jr.
	running because that will become the issue that everybody wants to talk about.
	And things are starting to turn.
	You know, they can't run with these lies much longer.
	It's becoming too obvious.
	Here's another example of another funeral director.
	We've had many of them now come forward talking about what they see.
	Canadian funeral director, Ann Embalmer, testifies about dirty blood, quote-unquote, found in bodies after the COVID vaccinations.
	And this is coming from vaccineimpact.com, also healthimpact.com.
	Ontario embalmer is speaking out about a never-before-seen white fiber masses.
	Again, not the first person to say this, but it's good that more and more are starting to say it.
	Laura Jeffrey is blowing the whistle on what she has seen, or she's been finding, rather, as a funeral director and embalmer, and wonders why nobody else is doing the same.
	And she's in Toronto, Ontario.
	And so we understand it's part of the embalming process.
	You remove bodily fluids to try to present the person, you know, without as much decay and that type of thing.
	It's part of the embalming process.
	She said, as you drain out the circulatory system as part of that embalming process, she said, I started to notice anomalies to what the return was.
	The return blood was stickier, thicker, darker, and I started seeing little pieces of clot-like polka dots coming out.
	There was something different.
	I would call it dirty blood.
	She had a routine that she followed to conduct her work, which was interrupted shortly after the rollout of the injections, I call it here gene therapy injections, I've called it genetic code injections, known as vaccines, when she began discovering white fibrous masses in the veins of deceased people in her care.
	She said, it's an anomaly that I've never seen before in 27 years as an embalmer and funeral director.
	And I started to see it in the spring of 2021.
	As they're rolling out the vaccines, right?
	And they've been out there for a while.
	The fiber mass clots, she said, are solid and they aren't the exact cast.
	They are an exact cast of what the circulatory system looks like inside of our bodies.
	They often have a current jelly clot incorporated into the tentacles of the white fiber masses.
	So it almost seems as though the masses are feeding off of our blood.
	Referring to the findings as appearing more parasitic than clot-like because it assumes the shape of the veins.
	She said, I was shocked that the people that I was seeing were living with that amount of material in their circulatory system.
	It shows that something is wrong.
	Very wrong. I don't understand why, as a funeral director, I'm the one blowing the whistle.
	Because we have a system that is supposed to take care of us.
	And it hasn't. So here I am.
	Well, that's right. We have these public health agencies and all the rest of them, and they're supposed to be looking out for the safety.
	They say, well, no, not with the vaccines.
	They aren't. Jimmy Dore said the vaccine injury is killing him.
	I don't really know Jimmy Dore.
	I've had a lot of people, oh, you should see Jimmy Dore's this or that.
	I don't have the time to watch other people.
	I have to try to read as much as I can, as quickly as I can, to try to get as broad as I can.
	And so, I don't know him as a comedian.
	I don't know him as a podcast.
	But he has been talking about what these vaccines did with him from the very beginning.
	Again, from Children's Health Defense and They report on it.
	They said American comedian and political commentator Jimmy Dore told Joe Rogan that the side effects that he experienced after the second dose of the genetic code Trump shots never subsided.
	He also said he was attacked online and called anti-vax when he tweeted about his adverse reaction to the shot.
	He said he got the vaccine, so-called, because he has an underlying health issue, a rare bone disease.
	So his doctor recommended it.
	He said, no, I don't trust government or big pharma, but I trust my doctor who, quote, saved my life.
	After the second jab, which he received in April, he told Rogan that he continues to suffer from fevers and body aches and joint pain and exhaustion and stiff neck.
	He said he was also told by a doctor that he has brain inflammation that's likely caused by the spike protein in the Moderna vaccine.
	So, again, it's the sort of thing where he trusted his doctor and His doctor trusted other people or was afraid of other people.
	But the bottom line is he said he had his second Moderna shot.
	He said, I'm still experiencing flu-like symptoms.
	And all this, again, goes back to that was in April of 2021.
	He said that again in the spring as she started seeing these people, some of them dying.
	Anyway, he said, I immediately had flu-like symptoms, body aches, mild headaches, waves of exhaustion.
	Should I be concerned? This is lasting for more than a week.
	Anybody else had a similar experience?
	He put out, and that was in April.
	Then in May, he got a follow-up.
	And he said, I've had these symptoms ever since.
	Even though he got it in April and had those problems, he got a second one again.
	At some point in time, you've got to question the so-called science.
	So I don't know what his current situation is.
	But the Swiss government now, currently, is no longer recommending the COVID vaccinations.
	Again, for anybody, at any age.
	You know, in Florida, you've got DeSantis and his Surgeon General not recommending it for young people in Florida.
	But Switzerland is not recommending it for anybody.
	But, again, the whole problem with this is like that clip I played, you know, where the lunatic lady is talking to her basset hound, and she's pouring poison in the milk.
	She said, now, I know you love milk.
	But I'm putting poison in this, so you'd be wise not to get this.
	But I'm going to let you make up your mind.
	She puts the milk down and watches to see if the dog is going to drink it and die.
	And that's where our health professionals are now, our public health officials.
	They don't want to tell people what they know about how unsafe it is.
	They are too afraid of the pharmaceutical industry to tell people the truth.
	It's just that simple. I'll just end with this story about Arnold Schwarzenegger.
	I've played this clip multiple times about where he says, screw your freedom, right?
	And so now he was called out by somebody on social media.
	Someone was talking about some documentary that he was a new pump club podcast, not documentary.
	Pumping Iron was kind of a quasi-documentary made him famous.
	So now he's got a podcast called The Pump Club.
	Pump me up!
	Yeah, so pump the vaccine into your arm.
	How about that? So somebody said, well, I don't think I'm going to do that because of what he said back in 2021.
	And he said, I want to check it out, but I have a hard time getting over Arnold.
	F your freedom, Schwarzenegger, said the person.
	And of course, at the time, what he was saying was, there is a virus here.
	It kills people.
	The only way we prevent it is you get vaccinated, you wear your mask, you do social distancing, you wash your hands all the time.
	Not just when you think about it, right?
	Well, my freedom is kind of being disturbed here, so screw your freedom, he says.
	Well, now, after that person put that out, Arnold Schwarzenegger, engaged him on Twitter, and he says, sometime my mouth gets ahead of me.
	Is that an apology?
	Is that an apology?
	Yeah. Sometimes I speak out too much.
	Should he be kicked off of Twitter?
	He's got 5 million followers on Twitter.
	A lot of those was because he was saying, screw your freedom, right?
	So, you know, promote him on Twitter for that.
	So, should he be canceled for saying that?
	Yeah, because he lied to people.
	And a lot of people got injured with all this stuff.
	Now, why don't you admit that you didn't just try to kill freedom, you were killing people.
	That's the reality behind all of this stuff.
	We'll be right back. Analyzing
	The Globalist Next Move.
	And now, The David Nutt Show.
	you Outside the Pentagon, CNN's military affairs correspondent, Jamie McIntyre.
	Jamie, you got very close to where that plane went down.
	That's right, Judy. A while ago, I walked right up next to the building.
	Firefighters were still trying to put out the blaze.
	The fire, by the way, is still burning in some parts of the Pentagon.
	And I took a look at the...
	There's a huge gaping hole that's in this sideway, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
	The only sight is the actual side of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand.
	There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around.
	Well, there you go. That's your weekly reminder, I guess, of where this all began.
	And we kicked off the 21st century with the giant lie.
	And so we got some other issues now coming out from the Pentagon.
	You know, just that, as you saw, if you're watching that video clip.
	Whoever posted that up, said that was the only time that ever aired.
	That was live, and they shut that down.
	But we had, you know, and they were very eager to make sure they had confiscated any possible surveillance film from any of the surrounding businesses or convenience stores or anything like that, right?
	No pictures of this plane flying there.
	But, of course, we did have documentaries that were done that had a computer-generated plane, and they found a priest, I don't know what church or denomination he's part of, said he was stuck in traffic there on the loop.
	Everybody gets stuck in traffic in Washington, D.C. And he said he's stuck in traffic, and the Pentagon was off to the side there, and he said he heard this roar, and this plane just flew right over him and crashed into the Pentagon.
	And when they recreated it, You know, they show this computer-generated plane, and it's like, oh, okay.
	But then they had all these other people that are, you know, in gridlock, stuck there.
	None of them had any footage of it.
	None of them came forward and talked about how they saw the same thing.
	Just that one guy. And as many people had pointed out, it's not just that reporter, but you had many of the first responders show up there and say, this doesn't look like a crash site.
	Where are the engines? You know, engines don't disappear.
	How does it have, it's a big hole, but it's not big enough for that plane and all the rest of this stuff.
	So now we have the Pentagon engaged in something else.
	We have American and NATO plans to aid the Ukraine war offensive have been leaked on social media.
	Now what's this about? Is this real?
	Is this a disinformation campaign?
	You know, they're talking about a counter-offensive that they want Ukraine to invade.
	We've seen this same type of game that was played before the Normandy invasion.
	The Germans knew that the Americans were amassing a force to invade France.
	They just didn't know at what point they were going to go in.
	And they had a lot of disinformation campaigns that they were doing.
	They had places where they created decoys.
	So the Germans would fly over and it looked like they were amassing military equipment for an invasion at a different point.
	And, you know, so there was a lot of information about that.
	A lot of very interesting movies that were done about those disinformation campaigns.
	You know, a dead body that they would use plans on.
	It's like, how do we get this out there?
	And how do we make it look like this person...
	Died or fell overboard or something with these plans, but still preserve the plans so that they're readable and they don't get suspicious about it.
	How do we make this look authentic?
	And so, as they're planning another and amassing more equipment for an invasion, is this something that was planted by the Pentagon?
	Or was it hacked by Russia and released?
	Because Russia looks good in terms of their assessment.
	You know, they're talking about how Russian casualties are a small fraction of the Ukrainian casualties.
	Or is this an attack to show that we have to have more censorship on social media?
	We have to have more control of speech on social media.
	Forget about the fact that the Pentagon has had their personnel files hacked.
	Forget about the fact that the CIA and the NSA has had Vault 7 hacked, which showed exactly how they disguise themselves to make them look like any hostile or any country that they want.
	They can look like the North Koreans or the Russians or the Chinese or anybody, right?
	And hack in. So they had a manual for it.
	They had an app for it.
	And yet somebody hacked them and stole that and put it out on the internet.
	Now, if the CIA and the NSA can't keep their data safe and the Pentagon can't keep its personnel files safe.
	And if you have a situation where Snowden leaks all that stuff out there.
	But we should all give them all of our biometric information and we should put all of our money into a digital blockchain and everything.
	Because it will all be secure once it's being kept by the Federal Reserve.
	The original Karen says on Rumble, imagine how many security cameras are located around the Pentagon.
	That's right, and not any, not a single video ever showed up on the Pentagon.
	They're everywhere there, but no pictures of it.
	I mean, you would think that they'd have, the plane would be coming right out of a lot of these cameras, but no.
	They couldn't even do a grainy, distant Loch Ness Monster style of photo.
	Said my son. Yeah, they're not even trying, right?
	Who has? They don't have to.
	They got around-the-clock propaganda from the mainstream media telling everybody, no, if you don't believe what we just told you, no matter how impossible it is, if you don't believe that, you're the problem, right?
	And so, is this a disinformation campaign that is aimed at the Russians?
	Is this a leak from somebody inside the Pentagon?
	Is it a hack by the Russians?
	Or is it a justification for more censorship?
	And I think it is also very interesting to see how this is all being reported and non-reported By the mainstream media.
	Now, you can see the documents that are out there.
	There's a lot of technical stuff.
	And since I don't really know, and you can't really tell because of the fog of war, who's lying and who isn't, I'm not terribly interested in all the details of this.
	There's many pages of this stuff.
	But I think it is interesting that the mainstream media has completely avoided talking about the contents at all.
	And remember that we had the Pentagon Papers case with Daniel Ellsberg, and they've been breaking their arms trying to pat themselves on the back for that ever since at the New York Times and the Washington Post.
	You had Establishment Hollywood do a, I think it was called The Post.
	It had Tom Hanks in it, it had Meryl Streep, it had all the Hollywood royalty.
	You know, doing this as a hagiography, if you will, for the Washington Post and for the New York Times.
	The fact that Daniel Ellsberg got these things and handed it over to them and they published them.
	You know, there wasn't any social media, but the big mainstream media published it.
	And then the government came after him and said, you know, you came after the papers.
	And said, well, you violated national security.
	And they said, well, we didn't steal this stuff.
	It was given to us.
	And they won in the Supreme Court.
	Said, no, if you have received stolen stuff, the person who stole it is liable to be punished.
	And then Daniel Ellsberg got off on a technicality.
	But that's why they're trying to make the case that Julian Assange actually participated in the stealing of the documents.
	I don't think that's true.
	I think we know what's behind that.
	But I think that that has sent a chilling message to all of these mainstream media organizations who basically live by the information that is leaked, that is given to them by the government and by the military-industrial complex.
	They're not going to destroy that relationship over this stuff.
	And so they are going to go quiet about it.
	And this is the way it's reported by the New York Times.
	Classified documents detailing secret American and NATO plans have appeared on Twitter and Telegram.
	See, they focus just on Twitter and Telegram.
	Those aren't the only places where it showed up.
	It showed up on the Discord server, it showed up on 4chan, other places like that.
	But no, they're going to focus where?
	On Twitter and Telegram.
	And I think that's a telling thing.
	My suspicion is that this is deliberately leaked by the Pentagon, and the information that is there makes the Russians look good, but the Russians say, no, the kill ratio is much more in our favor than what—they only show it up as a 4 to 1 ratio.
	People have said, no, it's much higher than that in favor of the Russians.
	Okay. It could have been leaked by somebody in Ukraine who is simply tired of watching this meat grinder where they are being used in this war by America and by NATO. So there's a number of ways that this could have been done, but I think the fact that they're focusing, which I have New York Times and others, focusing on Twitter and Telegram.
	I think it's very, to target those two platforms that they view as a threat to their control of information.
	And so, again, the documents show that Ukrainian losses are four times what the Russians are, but many Russians are saying that that is understated.
	And so, this has created more blowback against Twitter.
	Everybody's putting pressure on Musk to censor, and he doesn't need too much pressure to do that.
	But he did reply this way, he says, so you can totally delete things from the internet.
	That works perfectly, and it doesn't draw any attention to whatever it was that you were trying to hide at all.
	So that's sarcastically, and it's true.
	You're not going to be able to make that go away, and it will draw attention to it, Streisand effect.
	And so neither the New York Times nor the military analysts that it cited explain how the documents were altered.
	They're saying, well, they're altered.
	But, you know, they don't say how or where.
	Since they are, this is the gray zone who's looking at this, said, however, because the leaked documents have arrived in the form of photographs of printed documents rather than the original files, the possibility of forgery or alteration must be considered.
	And, of course, they could have been forged or altered by, again, any side.
	And so, over 100 more classified documents have now appeared online.
	Many of these have been up there for a month or more.
	And they're just now bringing attention to it.
	And of course, they're focusing on Twitter and on Telegram.
	Some of this stuff includes documents that are marked top secret, and it's not just stuff about Ukraine.
	It's also stuff about the Middle East and about China.
	And the New York Times says it seems to have caught the Biden administration off guard.
	Oh, and the Pentagon as well.
	I guess while the men in the Pentagon...
	We're coordinating their dresses with their high heels.
	All this stuff just happened, you know.
	It's a nightmare for the five eyes, said one senior intelligence official.
	And, of course, the five eyes are the U.S., U.K., Canada, New Zealand, Australia.
	And the five eyes have been pretty much a nightmare for all of us, haven't they?
	Again, whether this is real or not, We know for sure that Vault 7 and the Snowden leaks and all the rest of this stuff and Pentagon personnel files, and we can have example after example of how this has all been lost.
	Just like with companies like, I think it was Equifax was one of the three that keeps that information, where they lost hundreds of millions of files of people's personal financial information.
	Nothing online, nothing on computers is ever safe and secure.
	And yet they continue to want to consolidate everything about us online.
	The New York Times noted that one intelligence slide that was circulating features, quote, an alarming assessment of Ukraine's faltering air defense capabilities as well.
	So, you know, and we've seen this type of thing before.
	I mean, even if it was coming from Russia, When we had ClimateGate, there was information, you know, about University of East Anglia in the UK, the climate center that they had there.
	And there were people inside who were saying, hey, they're lying to all of you.
	Their data disproves everything that they're saying.
	This was in the early 2000s.
	And people tried to get the information there, just like we tried to squeeze the information about Michael Mann out, and they couldn't rest it loose of these people.
	And so then all of a sudden, it magically appeared on a Russian server as about a thousand emails.
	Showing that they were concerned that the actual data was disproving their theories and showing that they were conspiring to try to hide the fact that there was a decline in temperature, you know, that was not related to CO2. And they were able to get away with that.
	At first it created a real big issue, but then the media and the government smoothed it over.
	And convinced everybody not to pay any attention to it.
	So then there was a second leak of 5,000 emails that time.
	Again, on a Russian server, ClimateGate2.
	But no matter what happens, you know, you can have the Biden laptop.
	You can have any of this stuff. You can have all of the physical evidence there and all the documents and everything else.
	If they have complete control over the narrative, if they have complete control of the media, they can sell a lie and they can keep it going forever.
	That's one thing we all need to learn from this pandemic stuff.
	But it was already there with all of the climate stuff from the very beginning.
	One analyst warns this is likely just the tip of the iceberg.
	There may be more leaks that are coming or possibly have already happened.
	But again, media will do their best to cover it up and to make sure that you don't see it.
	The Pentagon leak also reveals Kiev regime is a money and weapons black box.
	As if we didn't know that.
	But now we have the documents for it.
	The Pentagon has no real idea of the losses.
	On the Ukrainian side, except what Kiev tells them.
	They have no idea where the money and the weapons that they give them go either.
	Right? We just pour an end to this.
	Washington itself is a black hole.
	There is so much money in Washington that it is a black hole.
	Drawing in every crook across the planet to try to do business there in Washington.
	Audi MMR, thank you for the tip on Rockfin.
	Thank you very much. In case you hadn't heard about Senate Bill 217, it ends qualified immunity for cops requires cops to intervene.
	If abuse occurs, cops can be held liable for 5% of a settlement, including suing the cop's employer and insurance.
	Well, I think that's a good thing that there is...
	I don't know in terms of where this bill specifically breaks out.
	That sounds, I think, as a good thing.
	Because we've had a situation where, the way this is rolled out, they have bent over so far in the other direction.
	There needs to be some sort of...
	Understanding about what they're doing and it's a difficult job to do.
	However, the fact that there is no real due process as there would be for other people, there needs to be, whenever there's violence like that, an accusation of violence, it ought to be thoroughly investigated and it shouldn't be just dismissed out of hand.
	And that is why these pushbacks against qualified immunity are happening.
	The police unions have switched it so much to one side, and that combined along with the fact that beginning in the Obama administration, they started changing the way they were training the police to a shoot-first curriculum.
	When in doubt, shoot it out, you know?
	And we won't hold you responsible for any of that stuff.
	So the pendulum has swung so far that way.
	It's got to change.
	The approach is not just, okay, let's just get rid of all the police.
	I think I'm not a big supporter of police departments.
	It should be done by the sheriff, which is an elected office, rather than police that is, again, an unaccountable, unelected bureaucracy.
	That is accountable only to the politicians who sent them in.
	And that's a big difference between police departments and sheriff's departments.
	So, again, there's a lot of different institutional things like that that need to be done.
	But getting back to this, one person suggested, what are the odds that these leaks are connected to the Biden bombing of Nord Stream and the betrayal of his own allies?
	Twitter has acknowledged that U.S. officials are requesting that it act to scrub classified materials from the platform, and that may be what this is about.
	It may be a program to push disinformation, censorship, and all the rest of this stuff, because we know that has been front and center for the Biden administration.
	And, you know, they have made it clear, setting up their own, you know, that was where they had that...
	Nina Jankiewicz or whatever, you know, the singing censor, they have been focused on that from day one to really weaponize censorship.
	And so this may just be building another consensus for that.
	There's growing concern that the leaks could be coming from within the Ukrainian military.
	Reuters said Ukraine sought to prevent military leaks after NATO assistance plans reportedly appeared on social media.
	A Ukrainian official told Reuters that the documents contained, quote, a very large amount of fictitious information.
	Well, certainly the Ukrainians have been betrayed more than anybody else.
	Now both Ukraine and Russia say that the leaked U.S. intelligence assessments of war are photoshopped fakes.
	As Breitbart points out, a rare moment of agreement between Russia and Ukraine.
	Neither one of them believe these documents.
	And again, it could be that all this stuff is targeted towards more censorship.
	We just had in the last couple weeks, talked about it, how the real purpose of special forces and special ops, as McRaven said...
	A decade ago. So we all think that's about these kinetic operations, about, you know, jumping out of planes and, you know, putting underwater bombs and everything.
	But Special Forces is fundamentally about doing PSYOP operations and intelligence things.
	And we need to get back to that, he said.
	And so we've got a big program to do that.
	Russia's intelligence agents are now so ineffective, said Zelensky advisor, that they have been reduced to Photoshop...
	And virtual fake leaks.
	These papers were an effort to disrupt the Ukrainian counter-offensive.
	They want to make us look weak, he said.
	The Ukrainian State News said the documents published by Russian sources may have been partially doctored to cover up the real situation of Russia's losses in order to exaggerate Ukrainian casualties.
	But pro-Russian front organizations said just the opposite.
	Vladimir Rogov.
	An organizer for Russia.
	So the documents could be forgeries intended to lull Russian forces into a sense of false security.
	He said, I think this is a classical disinformation operation being conducted to mislead us, to make us think that the counteroffensive is not ready and we can just relax.
	He said, part of what is said there may be true, but as far as the timing is concerned, it's definitely not so.
	He said, in my opinion, it's an effort, an attempt to make us think that an offensive may be possible only after some time and not within the next few days.
	On the other hand, the situation on the front line points to the opposite.
	Equipment continues to arrive.
	Equipment is ready, and enough militants have been trained.
	This equipment will not remain idle, but it will go on the offensive.
	So, like the Normandy invasion, if this is something that was deliberately leaked for that purpose by the Pentagon, It would not be where it's going to take place, but it would be when it's going to take place.
	That would be the big question.
	So it could be that.
	It could be that they are trying to more thoroughly weaponize censorship.
	Ukraine is ready to give up Crimea, says a Zelensky advisor.
	Is this real? Or is this also, you know, again, the fog of war, the lies coming from both sides?
	On Wednesday, the Financial Times reported the single most important development to come out of the conflict in a long time.
	Zelensky's office saying that he is ready to compromise on the future of the Crimean Peninsula, if that is true.
	Kiev is willing to discuss the future of Crimea with Moscow.
	If its forces reach the border of the Russian-occupied peninsula, they said.
	Most explicit statements of Ukraine's interest in negotiations since it cut off peace talks with the Kremlin last April.
	All this represents a public reversal of sorts from Zelensky's prior hardened stance of seeking the return of every inch of Ukrainian territory, which he was putting out there just last October, saying we will definitely liberate Crimea.
	Again, is any of this real?
	Or is it all smoke and mirrors?
	The bottom line is that this thing seems to go on with the support of both parties.
	There's a few people in the Republican Party who have tried to push back against this.
	But again, it is a black hole.
	It is a black box.
	We don't know where the money is going.
	We don't know where the weapons are going.
	And if you want to try to figure out which side is winning this conflict, well, good luck in that because everybody is lying about everything.
	We'll be back. Let me tell you, The David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	Ha ha ha! And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at TheDavidKnightShow.com That's a website.
	Well, of course, we just had Easter, as everybody knows, and CNN, to honor Easter, CNN does an article about the decline of Christianity in America.
	CNN is worried that it may not be permanent.
	Maybe they don't have us yet.
	So they said, well, if you look at this, it's Easter.
	CNN does understand that Easter was about the Christian belief of Christ's resurrection.
	And the idea that that is the core issue for Christianity, because if Christ has not died and been raised, then we are still in our sins.
	And that is the hope of all Christians that he paid for.
	That's what I said last week. You look at the Ten Commandments.
	One Texas legislator wants to put that in the classrooms.
	That is positive in the sense that it gives people a picture of, perhaps, of where they are in God's eyes, but it doesn't offer a solution for that.
	There's absolutely no way that you can undo what you have done.
	That is what the resurrection of Christ was all about.
	The fact that he has that offer of mercy and grace through the life that he led and the death that he died on your behalf.
	But anyway, so CNN is saying, for years church leaders and commentators have warned that Christianity is dying in America.
	They say the American church is poised to follow the path of churches in Western Europe.
	Where you have soaring Gothic cathedrals with empty pews and shuttered church buildings being converted into nightclubs.
	Which they said, so for the next 100 years, that's what we expect to see here in the U.S. Well, we'll see what happens.
	They pointed out that Thomas Jefferson had predicted in the 1820s that Christianity would be replaced in the U.S. by a more enlightened form of religion.
	That rejected Jesus' divinity and belief in miracles.
	He wanted Jesus just as a good moral teacher, who in that case would have been, as C.S. Lewis pointed out, either a liar or lunatic.
	Or the people who wrote down the good moral teachings of Jesus.
	They would be liars or lunatics as well.
	But his prediction was followed by the Second Great Awakening.
	The First Great Awakening was part of one of the key issues about the American Revolution.
	And that, of course, made Christianity a dominant force in American life, but it was a search for the freedom of religion, freedom from the repression in Europe that caused the pilgrims to come here.
	They want to try to replace that as well by getting rid of 1620 and the Mayflower.
	They want to replace that with 1619 Project, their revisionist history.
	One person said, I'd never bet against American Christianity, particularly evangelicalism, and its ability to adapt and to remain a significant shaper of American society.
	And so they say, well, you know, it looked like it was really on the ropes, and of course it has declined quite a bit, the Trump pandemic.
	Hurt the church in America as he was locking people down, as he paid governors to lock people down and continued paying them when they locked churches and people down for everything.
	But I think in a sense, just like it was with the schools, people, the silver lining behind all that was people were able to see what was happening in their kids' classroom and they would never believe it, as I've said.
	You know, you talk about...
	What the plan is from Washington for coming after kids?
	Well, that's just Department of Education.
	That's not in my kids' classroom.
	Well, look, it's in your state.
	No, that's not my kids' classroom.
	Or it's in your school district.
	Or it's in your school that we found this, or whatever.
	No, no, it's all different in my kids' classroom.
	Finally, they were able to see it in their kids' classroom.
	And I think one of the things about the Trump pandemic and the lockdown of churches in America is I think it exposed a lot of play actors who had big megachurches.
	People like Andy Stanley were exposed for frauds, showing that they don't really believe what they're saying.
	And so I think, even though it hurt things to an extent, and you always have a lot of people, just like you've got a lot of pastors who claim to believe one thing and don't, you have a lot of people We're very shallow in their faith.
	They may profess to be Christians, but they don't possess Christ.
	So, you've had a cascade of headlines in recent years that have stained the church's reputation, including sex abuse scandals in the Roman Catholic Church and the Southern Baptist Convention, says CNN. Again, you know, you have people who, in any human institution, you are going to have bad people.
	It's what... Frank Zipago said about policing, he said, just like any other human institution, the question is, is the institution going to purge the bad police, the bad pastors, the bad people?
	You know, one of the things about going to church is, will they kick you out?
	You should be looking for a church that will kick you out.
	If you habitually live a life of public sin and you don't repent of it, you continue to repeat it, then you should be kicked out.
	That is... For your own good.
	Hopefully you'll come around and understand.
	And so after this long thing, laying out all the problems and the threats of Christianity that CNN takes so much delight in, they say how Christianity could reestablish its dominance.
	And they don't get it.
	You know, they look at it and they say, well, even though people are not going to church or anything, it still could have an influence.
	Well, it's not if we keep having the schools.
	Uh, if we, the schools are going to be the approach to that, but they don't talk about that.
	They say declining church membership doesn't automatically translate into declining influence.
	And so that's what they're concerned about.
	They're concerned about influence.
	Now, how are they going to influence politics?
	And again, I think this is where the people who have focused so much on politics, they call themselves Christian nationalists.
	I think that's where they have completely lost it.
	There is no power or salvation in politics.
	There's no power or salvation in any politician, any president.
	And, you know, Christ said, my kingdom's not of this world.
	It comes, it's within us, and then it flows out from us in terms of how we affect the people closest to us.
	It really is a grassroots ground up.
	If it's real at all.
	And so, if the church needs to understand what is coming at them, To make appropriate, as we all need to understand, to make appropriate adjustments.
	We also need to know that our hope does not lie in politics, fortunately, because it is not within our ability to really affect that.
	But I think the real hope for the Christian church is in persecution.
	I think that's where the revival is going to come.
	And we can see that building right now.
	There's been a popular notion that a religious community's strength or influence is connected to numbers and to attendance.
	No, it isn't. For a long time, the church has really been like a giant dead tree.
	Dead on the inside and hollowed out.
	And it just needed a good wind to come along and knock it over.
	And I think a lot of that was with the Trump pandemic.
	Here's what really invigorates a church.
	The one that I talked about last week, the people they call the Chinese Mayflower.
	This is a group of Christians who are being persecuted in China.
	They got out of the country. They're going from country to country.
	And the question was, were they going to be able to get real refugee status here in the United States?
	Even the United Nations had given them refugee status, but Biden did not want to do so.
	Well, now they have, in an update, they have now been able to get to the United States, the Mayflower Church, the Chinese Mayflower, if you will.
	After years of fleeing religious persecution, members of the Chinese Shenzhen Holy Reformed Church arrived on U.S. soil on Friday.
	Pastor Bob Fu of Texas-based China Aid tweeted photos of their arrival.
	And another pastor that was with him, draped in a Stars and Stripes towel as he waited in an airport.
	The congregation was scheduled to fly Friday evening to the Dallas-Fort Worth airport before going on to Tyler, Texas, where they planned to resettle.
	The pastor who was with him, Pastor Pan, led his congregation, also known as the Mayflower Church, to seek asylum first in South Korea in 2019, but local courts there repeatedly rejected them.
	The group relocated to Thailand in August of 2022 to apply for refugee status at Bangkok's United Nations refugee office.
	On March 30, nearly 30 Thai immigration officers raided the hotel where they were staying.
	And arrested them for overstaying their tourist visa.
	In China, the government had forced landlords to evict the house church and the Christian school that it founded.
	Authorities disrupted the church's services, monitored church leaders, and pressured Pan to sever ties with churches in the West.
	Under Thai regulations, they needed to report to the Chinese embassy to renew their visas, which they refrained from doing so because they felt they would be arrested and deported to China.
	After their arrest, Thai authorities detained 12 men and two teenage boys at an immigration facility in central Bangkok, while 49 women and other children were kept in another center in the northern part of the city.
	And so, finally, the men of the Mayflower Church seized the opportunity for evangelism, they said, while they were there in prison detained.
	They said, well, I guess we'll do prison ministry like Paul did.
	See, this... This is why you can't shut it down.
	Anybody that goes back and looks at Fox's Book of Martyrs, it's a good thing for you to read as a Christian.
	I've mentioned in the past the story of the pastor and George Mueller in England who ran the orphanages and saw amazing providence from God, amazing answers to prayer and that type of thing.
	Well, you know, it doesn't always turn out as what we would look at from a secular standpoint as a happy ending.
	But the Christians understand that it is a happy ending no matter what happens because of their hope of resurrection.
	And so when you look at Fox's Book of Martyrs, it is absolutely amazing to see what people have gone through.
	And what did martyr mean? It didn't mean that they were out there putting a suicide bomb on themselves and blowing other people up to show their devotion.
	And earn the reward in heaven or something like that.
	No. Martyr was simply Greek for witness.
	These people who had been the first martyrs of the people in Rome who would die before they would discount what they had seen with their own eyes.
	And so they became the foundation for our faith.
	That's one of the things when you go back and you look at the cold case Christianity that was done by a cold case detective.
	He said, you know, he's used to going back and opening up files of crimes where everybody was dead.
	And so you go back and you evaluate the credibility of witnesses and other things like that, even though you can't talk to them.
	And so when you go back and you look at that and you look at the fact that people are willing to die rather than to recant what they saw and believed, that is a very powerful testimony.
	And it wasn't just them.
	It went on for centuries and is going on today.
	People who have seen things that have happened in their life, experiences that they've had, things that they understand because they have examined things This information, and they have, you know, just talk about something like creation versus evolution we were mentioning earlier.
	You know? You should go back and you should explore that, and not just listen to one side of it.
	Listen to both sides of it, and convince yourself one way or the other.
	If you've convinced yourself of that, if you've had experiences You're not going to...
	There's no threat of death or punishment.
	It's not going to stop people. They lock you up in prison, you turn it into a prison ministry.
	It's just that simple. And it's...
	That's why I say it's going to be...
	If the church in the West...
	It's going to be revived.
	It is going to be through this kind of experience.
	It's going to have to be a purging of the easy believers and the prosperity gospel people who are there just for the private jets or whatever they can get out of it.
	And it's going to be for the people who have an eternal perspective.
	Going back to Ukraine, it is amazing to see This escalating persecution.
	But again, it's exactly what the Western governments want to do.
	It's what Biden would do if he had the opportunity to do so.
	And it's what they're headed for.
	Ukrainian church is going to ban any prayers in Russian as they are taking over an historic monastery that was there.
	The biggest church in Russia before Zelensky came in.
	And he's shutting that down and creating his own church that is loyal to him.
	And this is why we don't have An established state church.
	This is what an established state church looks like.
	That it allies itself politically.
	That's why you have to be careful.
	You know, we do not want what General Flynn and other people selling Christian nationalism are out there pushing.
	We don't want that at all.
	That is a path to corruption.
	When you mix politics with a church, you get politics.
	And we have seen the worst episodes of Christianity have been when you have this, all the things that everybody, you know, criticizes Christianity for.
	Well, that was really when they allied themselves with the government.
	And when they were more concerned about pleasing the government than they were about pleasing Christ.
	So we have to always avoid that.
	Generation Z has traded a church for a new religion, say faith leaders.
	A lot of those available. You could have the green religion.
	You could have the LGBT religion.
	You could have politics as your religion.
	Secular humanism as your religion.
	It's what you see as your worldview.
	How do you understand the world?
	Where is your place in the world?
	How do you justify your existence?
	What is your hope placed in?
	And so there's a lot of things out there competing with Christianity that don't go by the name of a religion, but they have a dogma And they have rituals that you must perform and things like that, and you can be excommunicated if you don't toe the line on the green religion.
	How is this working out for Gen Z? Well, Gen Z's mental health has declined along with their faith.
	The highest level of mental illness and suicidal ideation compared to other generations.
	This, I believe, is the LGBT religion.
	It's not that Gen Z isn't religious.
	It's that they have picked a new religion.
	And that absolutely is the case.
	They said in recent years, the message, quote, follow your heart, has backfired on Gen Z. Because they have thrown themselves into that effort more zealously than any generation before them.
	Where has that come from, for the most part?
	Follow your heart, that is the mantra of most of the Hollywood movies.
	Just follow your heart. Disney, more overtly about that than anybody.
	That's an explicit message over and over again.
	Just follow your heart. Gen Z has believed that following your heart will make you happy.
	They're just proving that it doesn't.
	So, there's one person who is, I think this is a person, I think he's with the Catholic Church.
	He said the solution to the decline is to stop trying to market Jesus.
	Because people are looking for something authentic.
	And Jesus never marketed himself.
	His apostles didn't either. It's not even trying to convince people.
	It's declaring the truth, right?
	It's a proclamation of what we know is true.
	And people can choose to investigate it or not.
	A school district has been caught censoring a Christian signature, quote-unquote, on its emails.
	Now, this is Loudoun County School District.
	Always in the news, because it's very hostile to parents' involvement, pushing the Sodom and Go Marxist agendas and pushing back against parents.
	And of course, Loudoun County's D.C. suburb explains a lot of that.
	And so now they've decided that they want to come after a teacher who put a Bible verse at the bottom of her emails.
	And again...
	They don't know the difference between the establishment of a state religion, which is what they are actually doing.
	They are saying, well, we have this religion, secular humanism, whatever, and you will not be allowed to have the free exercise of your religion.
	So the difference is, whether it is something that is institutionalized and whether it is something, a real establishment of religion, is what we see Zelensky doing.
	But yeah, we give him billions of dollars, hundreds of billions of dollars.
	But establishment of religion is what was happening in the colonies where you were required to attend the state church.
	And even if they didn't have required attendance, most of them would have the fact that you would have to pay the church anyway.
	And this is the problem I have.
	Since I regard the government schools as government seminaries to push whatever their values are, I feel that we're in the position where even if today, unlike when I was growing up, you know, had compulsory attendance to the government seminaries, to the government religion.
	We don't have compulsory attendance anymore, but you still have compulsory contributions that you have to make to these government churches that we call schools.
	So, in this particular case, Liberty Council is fighting for her.
	They're demanding, this Loudoun County School District, is demanding that she remove her non-school-sponsored, private expression of a Bible verse from her email signature block.
	And so he says, she was directed to remove the verse that she had put in there, John 3.16, For God so loved the world, He gave His only begotten Son.
	That whoever believed in him should not perish but have everlasting life.
	They said, no, no. So they said, okay, I'll put this in.
	Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old, he will not depart from it.
	That's a promise. We've seen that happen over and over again.
	That may happen after you die, but that's a promise we've got from God.
	Anyway, this was also rejected by the school district because it was a Bible verse as well.
	So the lawyers pointed out the district allows teachers to use quotations, Of secular authors and pictures.
	I mean, it could even be somebody who is pushing, you know, secular humanism.
	You can put a quote in there by Thomas Dewey or something, right?
	Probably put a quote in there by Yuval Harari or Klaus Schwab.
	They'd be fine with that.
	You know, how you're all going to, you know, how they will live forever and you will bow before them forever with a boot stomping on your face.
	That'd be fine. But other people are allowed to use quotations, pictures, phrases, or even pronouns that would express the teacher's personal views on a variety of subjects and that are attributable to the teachers and not to the school district.
	But there's a different standard for this.
	So they said, if you use the Bible verse, that runs afoul of the Establishment Clause.
	And again, no, it doesn't. And they may be setting themselves up for a big loss.
	We just had that coach who was banned from silently praying on the 50-yard line after the game.
	He just won a million dollars.
	He won at the Supreme Court, and then he got a judgment of a million dollars against that school district.
	They don't care. It's not their money, right?
	It's one of the reasons why these school districts, one of the things that shut them down on the masks was people who understood that you can come after them personally for this stuff, right?
	And that is a real...
	Talk about qualified immunity.
	How about qualified immunity for school teachers and other government officials?
	It's the same as it is, you know, with the police.
	If these people understand that they can be held accountable for the bad things that they do, they will alter their behavior.
	We've also seen the Supreme Court uphold the Christian flag.
	I talked to Hal Shurtleff with Camp Constitution that was up there in Boston.
	Again, they were applying a different standard for this thing called a Christian flag.
	I don't even know what a Christian flag is.
	But they applied a different standard, and he was able to get that overthrown as well.
	So, no, you can't prohibit that when you're going to have everybody putting up a flag for everything else.
	We got some breaking news here.
	There was a mass shooting in Louisville.
	Louisville, Kentucky? I guess.
	Five dead, six wounded.
	So, anyway, my son says, I think the Christian flag is the white one.
	With a red flag on the blue square.
	It may be. I mean, it isn't.
	It's something people made up.
	I don't see anything sacred about it, frankly.
	Let me just say one more thing here before we go to break and we'll talk about what's going on with the Louisville shooting.
	Franklin Graham has replied to this outrageous law out of Oregon.
	That would disqualify parents from adopting children if they're Christians.
	You understand how this is.
	You understand that we have an intolerant religion, whether you want to call it Marxism or secular humanism or these other aspects.
	No, there will be no competition to how they want to establish society.
	He says, can you imagine a state that disqualifies Christians from adopting children?
	Well, what happened in the Oregon Department of Human Services?
	They have personal qualifications of applicants and certified resources families.
	Prospective adopting parents must, quote, respect and accept and support race, spiritual beliefs, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, etc., etc.
	Implicitly, what they're talking about here is establishing children's rights.
	Because if you can say, well, the child knows all of these things, And you have to bow before them, right?
	Then the parents have no say in this, but the Oregon Department is refusing to grant a Christian mother of five the certification required to become an adoptive parent, Jessica Bates.
	She said, in response to them, she said, God gives us our gender and sex.
	It is not something that we get to choose.
	She said, my faith conflicts with encouraging children to reject their biological gender.
	And again, it's not just Christians who have a problem with this.
	You know, Richard Dawkins saying, are we going to get that far removed from reality that we're going to not pay any attention to biology?
	So they told her she was ineligible to adopt due to her religious beliefs.
	But it's their religious beliefs.
	Again, this would exclude, if he was younger, Richard Dawkins from being able to adopt a child.
	He's an atheist because he won't toe their religion, the LGBT religion.
	This is a religion that's being pushed out their worldview, and it is intolerant of all others.
	Bates was denied because she expressed concerns during the progressive state's required instructions on gender-related issues.
	She was told she would need to support a child's desires to do such things as being referred to by a different pronoun than her biological sex, dressing however they want, or taking them to a pride parade.
	Now, why would they want to do all that stuff?
	Well, it's because the school has put themselves in the position of parenting.
	It takes a village to screw up a child.
	In terms of their pronouns and their gender and all the rest of this stuff.
	I have no problem loving them and accepting them as they are, but I would not encourage them in this behavior, she said.
	See, the problem is that Oregon does not want to accept kids as they are.
	They all talk about that. You have the White House press secretary saying, well, we just have to accept these kids the way that they are.
	It's like, no, you don't want to accept them the way they are.
	The way they are is what their biology is, and you tell them all these kids in Oregon and California think they're in the wrong body.
	It's not the kids in Tennessee who think they're in the wrong body.
	It's the kids there. Why?
	Because adults are pressuring them, bullying them over this.
	For the state to put their political agenda and their woke ideology above the needs of these kids is appalling, said Graham.
	But it's going to get worse before it gets better.
	In Canada, you have the Liberty Coalition of Canada.
	Look at this bill that was introduced.
	It's going to ban protests near drag shows.
	Because you know who is ruling you or who they want to put over you.
	Those are the people you're not allowed to criticize.
	And so, as we look at the Tennessee Three and their riot that we began with today, you're not allowed to criticize them.
	Why? Because of their skin color.
	You're not allowed to criticize a trans.
	You're not allowed to protest, even silently.
	You're not even allowed to silently pray at an abortion clinic.
	All of these things.
	Again, these people have their religion, they have their gods, and they are fiercely worshipped.
	And so there's been a bill that's been introduced in Canada, put out by a member of the Legislative Assembly called Kristen Wong-Tam.
	Wong-Tam.
	I think she's got the Wong idea.
	It would empower Ontario's Attorney General to establish a 100-meter safety zone around drag shows and other LGBT events.
	So there you go. And it's punishable by fines of up to $25,000.
	Again, we do not want your speech here.
	You will be silent about this.
	And word for word, we see this.
	We're being warned by people who have lived in Marxist countries that this is exactly what they saw in their country.
	Again, Bob Fu, who I was talking about earlier, who helped these Mayflower Christians, you know, trying to escape China.
	He said, these are the same playbooks being used in the U.S. that are used in China.
	Particularly how the West handled the COVID restrictions.
	He's not even talking about religion now.
	He's talking about the pandemic, MacGuffin.
	He said he became a Christian in the Chinese underground church.
	He went to prison for leading house churches before escaping in 1996.
	And he said he believes the American left is increasingly turning to dictatorial tactics by refusing to allow diverse voices.
	He said, I saw the governor of California basically proscribe an order...
	The church to shut down and to say not only when they can worship, but how they worship.
	The ways that he threatened to punish those churches and pastors sometimes were word for word exactly the same as what the CCP is using against Chinese churches.
	And Trump paid them.
	Trump paid Newsom to do it.
	California was swimming in debt, drowning in it.
	And Trump bailed them out.
	They wound up with tens of billions of dollars of surplus.
	And he kept giving them money.
	He wasn't unhappy with what Newsom did.
	He would have stopped the money if he was unhappy.
	So, yeah, I paid him to do it, he could say.
	Just like, you know, when people say, wait a minute, Hillary Clinton was at your daughter's wedding.
	Yeah, I paid her to be there.
	Well, he paid Governor Newsom to do this to people as well.
	And it's not just churches.
	Again, it's businesses.
	Businesses where you have middle class, small businesses, middle sized businesses, family businesses in many cases.
	People had put those things together by the sweat of their brow and worked their entire life.
	They'd invested in that thing.
	And Trump just shut it down.
	Shut it down. Destroyed their life like that.
	This guy who had everything handed to him on a silver platter did that to the small people.
	I'll never forget that.
	So he's not the only person to note the similarities between the U.S. and dictatorial regimes.
	Somebody who escaped from North Korea.
	Yeonmi Park has a new book out.
	Quote, While Time Remains, A North Korean Defector's Search for Freedom in America.
	Oh, that's a good book.
	We should try to get her.
	See if you can find her, Karen.
	I was realizing...
	The freedoms that I thought Americans had was like slipping away from all of us.
	And she worries that America is in the beginning phase of becoming more like North Korea, particularly when it comes to tactics to divide us, as well as free speech restrictions.
	She said, America uses race to divide people.
	That's where we began the program, isn't it?
	In North Korea, they use what our ancestors did to divide people.
	Even though you're the same people, the same language, the same skin colors, the same genetics.
	She said they would go back and look at our family line.
	She said, based on what my great-great-grandfather did, they determined if I had oppressor blood or if I was oppressed blood.
	Oh, kind of sounds like the racial reparations that the Democrats are pushing, right?
	To divide us, to divide us along racial lines.
	And again, going back to the 1970s, we had the weather underground and you had Bill Ayers and all the rest of them.
	They understood that their efforts to divide us along economic lines, like they had been so successful in Europe doing, weren't going to work here.
	So they had to do it along racial lines.
	And so they took what was put out there by somebody, white-skinned privilege, and they weaponized that, called it white privilege.
	He stopped bombing buildings and he started bombing the minds of people, kids, and school.
	That's where Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn went.
	So, you know, when you look at the history of communism in places like...
	She's talking about North and South Korea.
	Same people, same genetics, same skin color, same language, same everything, right?
	But they're going to find a way to divide people.
	And when you look...
	At North versus South Korea, what a striking difference there is between those two economic systems and what it did to people, those two economic and political systems.
	Same thing that you saw between East and West Germany.
	So you take the same people in Germany and divide them East and West.
	You take the same people in Korea and you divide them North and South.
	Look at what happens to the people who are under Marxism, who are under a centrally planned economy.
	Look at the austerity, the suffering, the dictatorial government, and that's what we are going into.
	So she said, there is forever no redemption in that system.
	They'll look at what your great-grandparents did, and then they will determine if you have oppressor blood or if you have oppressed blood.
	Same thing they're doing today.
	Well, look at your skin color or whatever.
	And she said, so there is collective guilt, collective punishment.
	Which brings us back to Easter, right?
	Christ and his cross, where we leave the wrongs, not just the wrongs that were done by us, but the wrongs that were done to us.
	Where there is no black and white, or Jew or Greek, or different ethnic groups, or male or female, those types of things are removed.
	Not in a leveling way in the sense that we all have different abilities that God gives us.
	We have different roles that God gives us depending on what our gender is, our real sex, our biological sex and things like that.
	But there is no difference in the way that we are related to God and the things that he has done for us.
	Again, the wrongs that we have done, the wrongs that have been done to us, we leave it there.
	That's the only way that you're going to heal.
	Marxism, communism, authoritarianism, that is a system where there is no redemption, where there is no...
	There is nothing about the individual.
	It's all about collective guilt and collective punishment.
	Because it's a tool that they can use to oppress people.
	We're going to be right back.
	Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
	It is, however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes.
	The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
	Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
	Tomorrow it will be something else.
	I heard it!
	I heard it!
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, and of course this is news that breaking cops say a bank shooter was an angry ex-worker.
	Dead on arrival after killing four people.
	I'm not necessarily going to go into this because, you know, we look at this.
	If you have an accident, we have a drunk driver.
	Maybe you've got somebody who is angry at somebody.
	He kills four or five people.
	Everybody stop the presses.
	We've got to ban cars. This is part of a fear campaign.
	The fact that this is going to be featured everywhere.
	The top of all the mainstream media, the top of the Drudge Report and all the rest of this stuff.
	This is a fear campaign. It is to normalize fear.
	It is to push gun prohibition.
	You know, if they'd had cars back then when they were trying to get, you know, get alcohol prohibition, I'm sure they would have featured every drunk driving accident.
	Would have been, you know, national news, that type of thing.
	No, this is about normalizing fear.
	Just like the focus... On the trannies is about normalizing insanity.
	And we had one individual said, look, stop all the stuff about this Dylan guy or whatever, and the fake woman with the fake beer and all this stuff, and now has a Nike contract.
	So that's what they thrive off of.
	They want that attention, and they want that normalized.
	And once we get to the point where Dylan is no longer shocking, where Bruce Jinder is no more shocking...
	They've got us at that point, right?
	We get accustomed to it, you know?
	So we don't want to hang out there and promote that type of thing.
	And, yeah, username 2014.
	Is it strange that shootings tend to only happen when gun legislation is up for discussion?
	Yeah, that's right. That's right.
	It is, you know, whether it is an increase in it or it's increased attention.
	Either way, that is a part of it.
	I'll just point out that we had a shooting that was stopped.
	This was a transgender with a communist manifesto planning to shoot up schools and churches, or maybe church schools, right?
	This is why I call it Sodom and go Marxist, because these two things go hand in hand.
	It's what the schools are teaching the kids.
	You know, the transgenderism, the Communist Manifesto, police in Colorado say they have arrested a male who portrays himself as a female, didn't say if he was called Norman Bates, for allegedly scheming a series of shootings at schools and churches.
	And he also had a Communist Manifesto that was part of his...
	You know, what he was doing. He's planning these shootings.
	19-year-old, so he's just recently graduated from the satanic seminaries we call government schools, and he's putting his degree to good use, planning a shooting of Christians and schools.
	The report said arrest papers show that deputies found A drawn layout of a school and a manifesto filled with schizophrenic rants.
	Imagine that. Somebody who goes by the names they and them can't figure out what gender is.
	Imagine that they would have a schizophrenic rant.
	Totally nuts. Mentions of serial killers and politicians and entertainers, including the Columbine shooters and the former President Trump.
	He had lashed out angrily at President Trump as a con man in his writing.
	Well, even a raving lunatic can see Trump for what he is, don't you think?
	He is a con man, that's for sure.
	And let's just kind of put this in perspective, because this is really about...
	Our pronouns are they, them, for we are many.
	Yeah, that's right. Evidently, there wasn't a herd of swine nearby.
	Take a look at what is being normalized, you know?
	Not just this Dylan Mulvaney or whatever, but also Stephen Tyler, who was with Aerosmith.
	Now, in California, they recently got rid of the statute of limitations for a limited time only.
	And so this is the result of his prosecution.
	They would say, well, if you want to come after somebody for something they've done to you as a child, you only got three years to do it, right?
	That's fundamentally wrong.
	What California did was they said, well, like for a couple of years, we'll allow people, we'll get rid of the statute of limitations and they come after these crimes.
	And that could be done anywhere, right?
	By any jurisdiction.
	But they don't do it, do they?
	They didn't do it for Dennis Hastert or anybody else.
	And so in this situation, that's why he is being accused.
	It's why you have the two child stars, the two minors, Who are around 16 years old.
	And Romeo and Juliet.
	Franco Zeffirelli is Romeo and Juliet.
	Franco Zeffirelli, the director, is dead now, but they're suing the movie studio because he manipulated them at the very last minute.
	He said, well, we shot all this movie, but if we can't do this nude scene, we're just going to shut the movie now.
	We won't release it. Pressured them to do it.
	Lied to them to do it. And now they have a chance to sue.
	But here's the thing about Steven Tyler with Aerosmith.
	He's now 75 years old.
	He was 25 at the time, and the girl in question was 16.
	And he has asked for the lawsuit to be dismissed because he says that it was consensual.
	He and his lawyers just confessed to statutory rape.
	I mean, it doesn't matter whether it was consensual or not.
	It's statutory rape because she was 16 years old.
	I think he needs to get some new lawyers.
	They don't understand that.
	It's absolutely incredible that they don't understand that.
	In the court documents, he said, you know, it was a romantic love affair.
	She was 16 and he was 25.
	And not only that, she said that her parents gave him legal guardianship so he could take her from state to state and not get arrested for child trafficking.
	You see, parents should have rights, but not absolute rights.
	And in the same way that people don't tolerate this unless it's being done by drag queens and trannies, right?
	These are the things that we have always condemned.
	These types of sexual predations on minors who don't have the maturity to know what they're doing.
	And yet, she's 16.
	What about the kids who are 6 or the kids who are in kindergarten that they're coming after now?
	He admitted in his memoirs that he had a relationship.
	He said he almost took a teen bride.
	He said her parents fell in love with me and signed a paper to turn her over to me in custody so I wouldn't get arrested when I was out of state.
	And she said the same thing.
	They made him her legal guardian.
	Again, we go back and we look at this.
	So do legal guardians or parents, do they have the right to have sex with minors, their minor children?
	No, they don't. You know, there are limitations on these things, except all this stuff needs to be swept aside.
	You know, you can't go in and mutilate your child, but, hey, if you're doing it because, you know, they say or you've convinced them that they're in the wrong body, well, then we'll let that happen, right?
	These are the kind of insane contradictions that have always been there with abortion, right?
	Well, you can't kill the kid after the baby comes out of the body, but now they're even saying, oh no, we want to be able to kill the kid if the abortion fails.
	We still need to be able to kill the kid.
	This is under no stretch of the imagination could you say, this is the mother's body at that point in time.
	It just shows how far we have fallen in this society.
	Thank you for listening. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.

▲