Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 3, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:02

3Apr23 Are Train Derailments from Hacking? Manuals & Passwords Are Posted Online

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	www.fema.org You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 3rd of April, year of our Lord, 2023, day 1117 days.
	We're going to take a look at a couple of articles as people are looking at the history of this.
	As a matter of fact, John Rappaport has done a series of his Best of 2020.
	And he was there at the very beginning of all of this.
	I remember having him on the show many times.
	But yeah, how did we get into this?
	How are we still in this, as a matter of fact?
	But today we're going to take a look.
	We've got a big report on trains.
	Not trans, trains. We do have a lot of information about trans and Trump.
	So we have trains, trans, and Trump today.
	And some things that happened in Tennessee.
	So... We'll take a look at all these things.
	But we're going to take a look at train security.
	This is something that nobody else has reported on.
	And there are some major security gaps and vulnerabilities in that critical infrastructure.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll begin with the news.
	As a matter of fact, we're going to have, uh, Goatree is going to join us in the second hour.
	His wheelhouse is cybersecurity.
	And when we look at some of the things that are on the railroads now, and it's not just the railroad industry.
	Of course, we have seen this with Colonial Pipeline.
	We've seen it with the NOTAM system.
	And, you know, that was the only other time that we've had all planes grounded in the United States was 9-11.
	NOTAM was not anything that was necessarily mission critical, but if you have the messaging system that tells people if there's some kind of an issue around the airport or on your flight path or something, that shuts down.
	They shut everything down, and it was shut down nationwide for about 12 hours.
	And then after it came back on, Canada's NOTAM system, which is independent of the U.S., they have the same format, but that got shut down for a short period of time.
	An hour and a half after hours came back.
	And of course, when you look at the Colonial Pipeline, there wasn't anything about the pipeline itself that was attacked.
	All they had to do was to take down their accounting system and hold it hostage with some ransomware to make sure they couldn't sell any of it.
	They shut it down. So we'll be talking about that and some information that nobody has covered.
	As a matter of fact, political figures have been warned about this, and they've declined to do anything about it.
	So we're going to talk about that today.
	Let's begin with the news.
	McDonald's is shutting U.S. offices with layoff notices beginning today.
	Today, Monday, April 3rd through Wednesday.
	They don't want anybody to come into the office.
	Because they're deciding who they're going to fire.
	And they said, we want you to work from home so that we can deliver our staffing decisions virtually.
	That's one way of saying we don't have the courage to fire you face to face.
	I know how that feels.
	But this is McDonald's.
	Request that its employees cancel all in-person meetings with vendors and other external parties at its headquarters.
	Stay home. We'll let you know if you've got a job in the next couple of days.
	Well... I don't know if their business is down.
	Is it because of health reasons?
	Are they killing their customers?
	Their food?
	Is there a link between obesity levels in states and concentration of fast food stores?
	This is an article from Zero Hedge.
	And I thought it was kind of interesting, although I don't necessarily agree with the geographic distribution of it.
	They've got different fast food chains and they show their concentration of Being east of the Mississippi and kind of southeast, but basically east of the Mississippi.
	You've got 40% of the people live east of the Mississippi.
	So I'd imagine that's where you'd want to put your stores if you've got a fast food chain.
	So that may or may not be indicative, but what we do know is that 40% of Americans currently meet the medical criteria for being overweight.
	That puts them at risk of many health complications like diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and other things.
	And then, of course, we add the jab into all this, right?
	Let's add the jab. And so, literally, I guess they're killing their business as their customers are dying.
	Eating habits are a big part of the obesity.
	One out of every three Americans eat fast food daily.
	And of course, as we all know, it's packed with additives.
	It's typically fried.
	It's cheap. It's quick.
	And tens of thousands of restaurants everywhere.
	I was just thinking about this the other day when we were talking about when I was a child and my parents used to bring us up here for vacation.
	Now when people travel, one of the things that's been helpful for the fast food industry and difficult for local restaurants is that the McDonald's is typically going to be the same everywhere.
	Right? That low bar.
	But you know what you're going to get there.
	Or say any other fast food chain.
	And it was kind of hit or miss when I was young because there weren't any fast food chains.
	I remember when the very first McDonald's, I'm so old, I remember the first McDonald's coming into Tampa, and it was a novelty at the time.
	Not anymore, but unfortunately.
	But I remember that it was a real hit or miss thing as you're going along and just eating at local restaurants.
	How do you know? There was no way that you could look on Yelp or anything else.
	You could ask some people for recommendations at a gas station or something like that.
	But we would take a picnic lunch, and we had a big cooler that we would take our food with us.
	And there were no interstates either.
	I mean, this is back in horse and buggy days.
	I don't know. The way I prefer to travel now anyway is to get off the interstate.
	But anyway, they go through this article.
	They talk about Subway, McDonald's, and all of them, as I said, you know, they have it mapped out, Taco Bell, Burger King, Dunkin' Donuts, and they're all heavily concentrated, typically east of the Mississippi, and Pizza Hut, Domino's, Dairy Queen, Wendy's, all these different ones. But I think that that isn't necessarily a correlation.
	There is a correlation between health and fast food consumption, though.
	Very true. But you may not know what is in that meat that you're getting at McDonald's or other places.
	You may not even know if it's beef or if it's something else.
	But we had some scientists who created a special mammoth burger.
	You know, it's one of these biopsy burgers that we talk about.
	So I got some DNA from a woolly mammoth and they created a great big meatball.
	And I mean, it was...
	It was mammoth in size, as well as, at least if that picture is, you never know anymore, right?
	I don't know if that was a picture of the meatball.
	But they talked about it. It's a company out of Australia, an Australian firm called Val.
	Val. That's odd.
	But anyway, they've been working on a lot of bespoke, weird meats that they want to sell people.
	I guess they figured, you know, why clone a cow if you can clone an alpaca or something like that, exotic?
	Maybe they can take it from that point.
	But they cloned and made a mammoth burger, and they don't want to eat it for some reason.
	Maybe it's because they know what is in it.
	Or maybe it's because of the way it smells.
	They had a particular...
	They said it smells like crocodile meat.
	Oh, really? That sounds appetizing.
	Anyway, they cultivate cells from biopsies.
	That's why I call them biopsy burgers.
	This is kind of, I guess we could say it's Flintstones meets Frankenstein for the food.
	How long will it be before we pull up to the fast food restaurant and they put that giant rib on the side of the vehicle and tip it over?
	But this is frankenfood, and I don't know what they would call it.
	Maybe a woolly burger?
	Or you could say supersize me with a mammoth meatball.
	The revolutionary food firm has investigated the lab-grown potential of 50 exotic species, from alpaca to peacock.
	And a bid to invent the perfect protein.
	I think they're just trying to come up with something that's exotic.
	Because, you know, as people catch on to fast food, you've got to have some kind of a novel twist.
	You know, I mean, where else are you going to go to get a dino burger, right?
	And I liked this article on Zero Hedge.
	They sarcastically said, you know, the mammoth went extinct with the Ice Age like 10,000 years ago.
	Oh, you mean climate change can happen without fossil fuels?
	And I thought it was also interesting that they cloned it by taking a portion of the woolly mammoth and combining it with sheep cells.
	Well, I guess in a sense that kind of makes sense because, you know, sheep are woolly.
	The mammoth is woolly.
	That's why. It's a woolly burger, you know?
	Yeah. They inserted a particular substance called myoglobin.
	Said when it comes to meat, myoglobin is responsible for the aroma, the color, and the taste.
	So they combined that with sheep, and they came up with a concoction that smells like crocodile meat.
	They should have learned something from Jurassic Park.
	Sometimes just because you can do it doesn't mean you should do it.
	It's literally a 4,000-year-old protein, and we're looking for something more alternative, an alternative to real meat.
	So I wonder, as we look at this, what soylent green smells like.
	Biden, by the way, on the new census is going to be asking...
	Black Americans on the census if they are descendants of slaves.
	Now, this is preparations for reparations, is really what is happening here.
	They're laying the foundation for this.
	They've got to get a count of who they're going to hand out money to, and I guess who they're going to take money from.
	Of course, they won't come directly to you and say, we're going to give you a reparations tax.
	No, you'll pay for it in inflation, in deficits, in higher taxes, all these different types of things, in the back door.
	The thing I find interesting about this was, you know, we always talk about pork barrel projects, right?
	Government giveaways.
	What is that a reference to?
	It's a reference to slavery.
	And when you think about pork barrel projects, you know, the original, the reference was that, you know, for celebration or whatever, they would set up a pork barrel and they would line all the slaves up and they could basically, you know, stick a fork in the barrel and try to pull out some pork as they go by in a line.
	And that's kind of the way that they control us today, because, you know, the real issue about slavery in America is that when it ended, and I don't think that was its original design, as I've said many times, I think that was really a struggle about creation of a nation-state, a consolidated nation-state, not so much about slavery.
	We had exactly the same thing happening in several countries.
	The timing was precisely the same in Italy.
	There were no slaves in Italy.
	But there was a consolidation from regional agrarian powers to a centralized state.
	The nation state of Italy was born out of that civil war there in Italy.
	And the power changed from agrarian interest to industrial interests.
	That was really the fundamental part of it.
	So there was no slavery there.
	But when you look at the nation state and you look at its end result, it makes slaves of all of us.
	So they ended private slavery as an outcome of that.
	Not the real purpose of it, I think.
	But what they created was public slavery.
	And they hand out little favors to us.
	And that's how they control us.
	Whether it is handing out money to school boards to put trainees in the bathrooms.
	Or whether it is handing out money to governors and public, in turn, handed out to public health officials to lock us down and to vaccinate us.
	That's the way they get everybody to do what they want, is with money.
	Keep the money flowing. If you do what we say, if you don't do what we say, we cut off the funds.
	No jurisdiction during the Trump lockdowns.
	No jurisdiction, no governor ever tested to see what would happen with the money if they refused to lock people down.
	The Biden administration, though, getting back to the census and as they're building for a second civil war, right?
	Yeah, they... They've hammered this narrative that the Civil War was not a fourth turning.
	It wasn't about a reorganization of society.
	No, it was about black slavery, which, again, as I just said, is absolutely not true.
	It was a component of it, but that's not, you know, there was a nullification crisis in the 1830s, 30 years earlier.
	And it nearly caused South Carolina to secede.
	That was about tariffs and taxes, which was also a big part of the Civil War in the 1860s.
	Slavery was never mentioned in the 1830s, even though it was existent then.
	It was all about, again, economic power.
	How were the taxes going to be done?
	Were they going to be done in terms of protectionism?
	Was it going to be internal taxes?
	Was it going to be taxes at the border?
	All these types of things, these big economic issues.
	But it happened in the 1860s because that was 80 years after the last time we'd had a revolution in the 1776 Revolutionary War.
	And so the people were ready for it.
	They would come up with a compromise to keep it from happening in 1830.
	But there was not going to be any compromise in 1816.
	That's where we are today. There's not going to be any compromise.
	Everybody is lining up on these different sides.
	Where are you about Trump?
	Right? He is the central dividing figure that is there.
	And, of course, both of them are using it.
	He's raised $5 million off of these indictments and things like that.
	And, of course, the Democrats are building their base.
	And they're polarizing the country over Donald Trump.
	I'm sorry, he's not worth a civil war.
	He's not worth anything, frankly, if you look at what he did in 2020.
	The pandemic president is not worth a plug nickel, and he doesn't give a plug nickel about you either.
	So, should we have a civil war over that?
	Well, let's throw in some other things.
	Let's throw in slavery.
	Let's throw in transgenderism and the LGBT aspects of this.
	Let's do all these different things that we can to polarize everybody, and everybody is ready to fight, physically fight, both sides physically fight over every single issue.
	And so we look at the slavery side.
	The Biden administration has proposed combining existing race and ethnicity questions so that Hispanic or Latino would no longer be a separate question.
	Instead, it'd be one of several on the race question.
	But the bigger one is the administration asked whether or not they should use the term American descendants of slavery or American freedmen or foundational black Americans.
	You see, it's not a question of whether they're going to do it or not.
	It's a question of how they label it.
	Because, again, the labels are a big part of winning the narrative.
	Taking the high ground rhetorically.
	So if you call them foundational Americans, which is really what this 1619 project is about, right?
	America wasn't founded by pilgrims coming for religious freedom in 1620.
	That wasn't the ethos and the foundation of America.
	No, America was founded on the desire to enslave people.
	1619, they said.
	Out of Jamestown.
	And so it's to take that to get rid of the founding fathers and say, you know, black slaves.
	We're the foundation of America.
	They have to be paid for this.
	Sylvester McGee, who claimed to have been born May 29, 1841, died October 15, 1971, claimed to be the last living former American slave.
	If this claim were true, McGee would not only have been the last surviving American Civil War veteran, but the oldest recorded person to have ever lived.
	And yet, even if that were true, the last slave died 52 years ago.
	So who are we going to pay reparations to?
	By the way, the slaves were privately owned.
	Now slavery is government-run.
	But at that time, they were privately owned.
	And of course, in California, there were never slaves in California.
	They're the first ones who want to jump in.
	But then the questions are, how do we do this?
	Is everybody going to have to take a DNA test?
	Like Focahontas?
	How do we do this?
	And once we look at this, you know, Elizabeth Warren, Focahontas, even though she was using her ties to questionable ties to being an Indian to gain advantage in academia, you know, hire me because I'm an American Indian type of thing.
	Even though she did that, once they did the DNA test, they found out that she had far less American Indian blood in her than the average white person in America.
	And so, you know, she's whiter than most white people, but she's claiming to be an Indian.
	So how do we divvy this up?
	As a Zero Hedge article says, so what percentage ancestry fits the bill?
	Do you get money if you're 5% black?
	If you're 10% black, what if you are 50.01%?
	Does an 88% descendant get twice as much as a 44% descendant?
	Do we have everybody take a genetic test?
	Do we take people's word for it?
	How do we take people's word for it?
	When Angela Davis, the black power Marxist, that was really one of the first Black Lives Matter, you know, CRT Marxists out there.
	She found out that both of her grandfathers were white.
	She didn't know it until she took a DNA test.
	Here is a, you know, black Marxist leader who is devastated because she hates white people and she finds out she's half white.
	And so how do we run this out?
	It's not about compensating anybody for anything.
	As a matter of fact, the people who were slaves had it really, really difficult.
	And all of our ancestors had it really, really difficult here in America to build this country that we're now so spoiled and tearing it down.
	The people who came and suffered hardships on the Mayflower, they were desperate to get away from religious persecution and live free.
	And as a result, they came to America with very little preparation for being able to grow food.
	Kind of like, be like me coming to America to grow food.
	It's like, well, I know it's what I need to do, but I have no idea how to do it.
	So, you know, it's that type of thing.
	They starved. They died.
	They had terrible hardship.
	Everybody had hardship.
	Desperate poverty everywhere.
	Europeans as well as Indians, as well as the slaves.
	And that's why I say when we go back and we look at this, People who are living today, we're all living off of the hard work of our ancestors, whether they were free or slaves, whether they came here by choice or by coercion, we're all living off of their hard work.
	And you look at the black people in America, they're far better than the black people that were better off materially than the black people who are in Africa.
	Not even close. And yet they want more reparations.
	I mean, should white people get reparations from England because, you know, they forced them to undergo hardship and conditions by emigrating and having to start over from scratch, doing things that they, trying to raise food and starving because they had to get away from the religious persecution?
	How do we unroll this?
	Well, there isn't any point in any of that.
	This is simply about creating grievances.
	And dividing the country.
	And frankly, we have to speak out about this.
	Because we have the only answer as Christians.
	And that is that in Christ, there's neither white nor black, slave nor free.
	Everybody, male or female, everybody is treated equally.
	And that's the issue.
	Sometimes we look at this and we fight against the wrong, but we don't offer what's right.
	I was just thinking about this.
	We had a movie that was recommended to us, and foolishly, I did not look at the internet movie database or some other place where I could see what was actually in the movie.
	It was just disgusting. We turned it off real quickly.
	And I said, you know, it's been a long time since I've seen any of that, because I haven't had the time to watch a movie.
	And I said, what is wrong with America?
	Is that we don't even have portrayed before us anymore something that is wholesome, something that is good, something that is true.
	It's all based on lies.
	It's all based on, well, we've got cops and prostitutes and drug dealers, and they're all killing each other, and they all deserve to be killed because they're all evil, and the good people are evil, and the bad people are even more evil.
	That's what we're fed anymore.
	Yeah? Disney doesn't make wholesome films anymore.
	We don't look at what is good and true.
	We've lost that in our society.
	Now, you can reclaim it.
	The resources are still there.
	You can go out and you can get books that were written prior to the middle of the 20th century, books that were written in the 1800s, where they elevated virtue and morality and other things like that.
	And there is value in that.
	I mean, you know, that's not going to save us.
	We need Christ to be saved.
	But in terms of the life that we live here now, to be able to see a pattern that we can follow, to look at this to the extent that when you go back and you see something that is part of this debauched, debased, degenerate culture, when you see something like that, you're shocked.
	Like, whoa, why are they making movies like that anymore?
	Why are they elevating this?
	But that is the world in which they live in.
	And I saw another clip about, you know, and again, it's good that the libs of TikTok is showing people the insanity of what is happening with the transgender stuff.
	But as I saw it, this latest one, it's like, okay, here's another crazy person talking about their made-up gender and all this other kind of stuff.
	And I thought, you know, how many of these do I have to see?
	Because I looked at it, it's like, well, I don't even know that's newsworthy anymore, right?
	We've become so jaded to all this stuff.
	It's become passe.
	And I thought, am I part of normalizing this by showing these clips to people?
	Oh, look at that. I think we need to show people the better side of nature and what is right and true and just.
	The Bible says, think about that.
	Whatever is pure, think about that.
	You focus on that rather than on the degeneracy because if we focus on the degeneracy, we normalize it to the extent that we're not even shocked by it anymore.
	That's why the movies have gotten worse.
	That's why the sexuality has gotten worse.
	That's why the greed and the corruption and the violence has gotten worse.
	Because when you focus on that, and you watch it over and over and over again, it's no longer shocking.
	So you've got to do something that's bigger.
	And you've got to do more of it.
	And it's got to be more perverse.
	And it's got to be shocking.
	Because we get deadened to these things.
	And that's how they move the Overton window.
	That's how they normalize this stuff.
	So I just mentioned that.
	When we look at the Civil War, one cannot undo a wrong of 200 years ago by taking money from people who had nothing to do with the problem.
	And solve the problem by giving money to people who were never harmed in the process.
	Well, that's not what this is about.
	This is about creating grievances, creating a civil war.
	You know, when we look at the Biden administration, they're full of compassion for people from other countries, right?
	They just want to help them.
	They call them refugees.
	They could be climate refugees.
	They could be economic refugees.
	Any kind of refugee. Except when it's 63 Christians who are facing deportation back to China.
	And we know what's going to happen to these Christians in China.
	And the Biden administration turns their back on them.
	Even though you have members of Congress, former members of Congress, trying to sound the alarm about this.
	Does anybody care in the Biden administration about real refugees?
	And a small number of them.
	Oh no, we can let thousands of people come through Say they're economic refugees or whatever, that's compassion to do that.
	But if you've got 63 Christians facing deportation, they don't care.
	Influential members of Congress and top human rights advocates in Washington are urging the Biden administration to take immediate action to ensure the safety of a group of Chinese Christian dissidents and two Americans detained by Thai authorities.
	The group of refugees include 35 children, 28 adults, who fled China in 2019 to escape persecution.
	They're currently in Thailand, and they're seeking emergency asylum in the United States.
	But the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security have declined to grant the church members emergency asylum.
	For months, human rights and religious freedom advocates have warned the State Department that Thai authorities have a history of working with the Chinese government to draw Chinese nationals out of hiding, arrest them, and send them back to their homeland where they face imprisonment, torture, or worse.
	Used as organ donors.
	Live organ donors.
	Slavery conditions and factories.
	That type of thing. Now the very scenario they warned about has taken place.
	On Thursday, Thai police raided the residence where 63 refugees were staying and two Americans were visiting.
	They arrested the group, fingerprinted them, and detained them in a holding facility.
	And they faced deportation hearings Friday.
	Could be sent back to China in a matter of days.
	Mike McCall out of Texas, and this guy is...
	Don't write me about Mike McCall.
	Believe me, I know about Mike McCall.
	He is a surveillance state military-industrial complex guy.
	But for whatever reason, it could just be political calculation.
	He is urging swift action by the Biden administration to help protect the group of Christian dissidents.
	So he's doing the right thing on this issue.
	The church's pastor was ordained by the Philadelphia Bible Reformed Church of the Presbyterian Church in America.
	That's the same one. The same denomination was just shot up outside of Nashville.
	PCA. The exiled Chinese Christian group is referred to by some advocates as the Mayflower Church because of the similarity.
	People fleeing from country to country who try to escape religious persecution.
	McCall said religious freedom and its protection abroad are core tenets of America's constitutional tradition.
	No longer.
	No, they're not. No.
	As a matter of fact, Biden said, and his representatives in the State Department and the Pentagon, as well as, you know, many people throughout Western governments in Europe and everything said, no, our core values are LGBT. And Biden put out the statement.
	Saying that LGBT and transgenders are shaping the soul of America.
	He was right about that. They're telling you the truth.
	That is their core value.
	They are shaping the soul, disfiguring the soul of America.
	And I tell you, you know as well as I do, that if this were 63 LGBT people who had escaped from some place where they're persecuted, China, Saudi Arabia, something like that, If it were 63 LGBT people, you better believe that Biden would have brought them back in a heartbeat.
	Probably would have sent his own plane to bring them back.
	Couldn't do it quickly enough.
	But if it's Christians, let them go to prison.
	Let them be tortured. Let them have their organs removed while they're still alive.
	Former Virginia Representative Frank Wolf said if Secretary Blinken made the call, this could all be resolved.
	A five-minute phone call to the Thai government.
	Would get these decent people a visa and let them get on a plane.
	This is not unusual, he said.
	Secretaries of State do this all the time.
	But this administration will not lift a finger to help Christian families.
	That's what you need to understand about this administration.
	By the way, before we take a break, that Weatherman, who was reporting live on that tornado as it was headed towards that town in Mississippi, and he was very concerned.
	You know, he's telling everybody, this is really big.
	This looks like the direction it's headed.
	We don't know exactly. Oh, we just had an update.
	It's on the edge of town.
	And he just, you know, he's telling people, please listen to me.
	And he just stopped and said a real quick prayer.
	Lord Jesus, please help them.
	He said, I've tracked hundreds of tornadoes, he said.
	I almost never faced the level of stress he did on that night.
	When he saw the warning signs playing out in real time, he said, I've always taught my kids that prayer does not need to be like a Pharisee, this long, elaborate invocation.
	If you have something in your heart, just say it.
	God understands that.
	While on air he worried that people might not understand how serious the tornado's threat truly was, he likened the situation to a husband and wife arguing and a spouse fruitlessly trying to make their point.
	And you can see from that look on their face, they're just not getting what you're saying, he said.
	And he worried that this same dynamic was unfolding with the public that was watching his weather report.
	So he said he knows that atheists and non-believers were also moved by the prayer.
	And he said their reactions humbled him.
	He said, isn't that why we're here?
	I mean, until the whole world hears, that's why we are here.
	That's right.
	And we will be right back.
	Thank you.
	Decoding the mainstream propaganda.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Alright, welcome back.
	Let's talk a little bit about the pharmaceutical side of things.
	And I thought it was interesting to see how the FDA and the CDC handle some frozen strawberries that they believe are responsible for a hepatitis C outbreak.
	I'm sorry, hepatitis A. A hepatitis A outbreak.
	They said, we tested the strawberries and we don't find that on them, but we still think just because of, you know, the people that have fallen sick over this period of time, we're just going to, out of an abundance of caution, we're going to shut this down.
	And of course they did the same thing with the baby formula.
	They shut that down and created a real crisis, a real health crisis for some kids who have to have baby formula.
	They have special conditions that, you know, the baby formula is part of it.
	They didn't have an alternative.
	And they just shut it all down.
	And there was no correlation, as a matter of fact.
	You know, there's just a couple of incidences and they shut the entire thing down.
	And I contrasted that at the time with how they've handled the vaccines, for example.
	Or how they've turned a blind eye.
	To the lack of efficacy, the danger of things like remdesivir and Paxlovid and many of these other pharmaceutical products, they just turn a blind eye to that.
	But when it's a food supply, they will, out of an abundance of caution, shut everything down.
	And that's typically what you do see with the federal government.
	They will usually err far, far, far on the side of caution to shut things down.
	Whether you're talking about airplanes or other things, whether you're talking about food, they will typically go to an extreme error on the side of safety.
	For anything else. So this is a hepatitis A outbreak.
	According to the CDC, a possible link was established after five cases related to an outbreak of hepatitis A have been reported since March the 13th.
	Did I say A or C? Anyway, it is hepatitis A. I had C on my mind because I went back and I looked at the Gilead pharmaceutical stuff that they had for treating a strain of hepatitis.
	Anyway, it's hepatitis A. In all cases, the individuals reportedly consumed frozen organic strawberries.
	And that's all it took.
	Five cases.
	And they all said that they had organic strawberries.
	They said, well, what is common about all this stuff?
	Do they use that same kind of logic when it comes to an increase in young children dying?
	We're having myocarditis or blood clots or any of these other stuff that's become commonplace.
	Myocarditis is now, because of the vaccines, myocarditis has now become a household word.
	Why is that?
	Oh, no, let's not pay any attention.
	Let's not pay any attention to the conservative estimates.
	Of 300,000 people killed in America alone by these Trump shots.
	Let's pay no attention to that.
	300,000? No, no, no, no, no.
	Their own databases, the VAERS database, the military's database, we don't care about any of that stuff.
	We'll change that database.
	We'll tell you that we were wrong for years.
	You can't trust any of our information for years.
	No, it's just, we'll go back.
	As soon as you tell people, look, it's up several hundred percent in this and several hundred percent of that and several hundred percent of that.
	No, no, we'll just wipe out that database.
	It was all wrong. You know, we have to look to protect the military to see if we're under a biowarfare attack.
	That's a mission-critical assignment, but we just did it sloppily for the last five years and we'll just take that away.
	Now, the other thing that's interesting about this Is that no deaths have been reported from these strawberries.
	But they've all got to be shut down.
	And by the way, if you're wondering what it is, I'm sure they've now been taken off the shelf.
	This is about a week old, this news.
	I had it here, but I didn't cover it.
	Costco, Aldi, Vital Choice Seafood, PCC Community Markets, something called KEHE, Trader Joe's had a tropical fruit blend.
	All of these have been recalled.
	I'm sure they're all off the market now.
	But they did it out of extreme and extra caution, said the FDA. Although the hepatitis A virus has not been detected on any of these products, the FDA issued the recall as a precautionary measure.
	So, out of an abundance of caution is what they said in their press release.
	According to the latest information we have, there are no reported illnesses related to the product.
	But, you know, it's something that they all had in common.
	They don't... We do that and they say, well, that correlation does not prove causation.
	But they act that way, don't they?
	Out of caution? And we've got people that are dropping dead right after they get a vaccine.
	That's not related.
	That's a coincidence. And it's rare.
	It's rare. We don't have a strawberry database.
	We don't have a database where people report adverse effects on strawberries.
	But we do it for vaccines and they don't use it.
	Right? They just ignore it.
	We have lobbyists, by the way, for the Cattlemen and Pork Associations and several others.
	Have confirmed that they will be using mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows beginning this month.
	It's a story from Tom Rents.
	And so there you go.
	They don't care about the mRNA, even in our food supply.
	They'll be really upset about the fact that there may be hepatitis in the strawberries.
	And we'll shut them down.
	But even though they tested the strawberries, they didn't find anything at all.
	But they look so far the other way for the mRNA trump shots that they will put that in your food if they can't put it in you.
	CDC has been urging travel precautions, saying there is a Marburg virus outbreak.
	Oh, really? This is what they've always said.
	Well, you know, that big one, that may be the Marburg virus, and we may have to start locking people down, and that's what they're talking about right now.
	Is this going to be their narrative?
	It doesn't have to be anything real.
	But they said, and this is kind of interesting, they said the illness has a fatality rate, Between 23 and 90%.
	That tells me something.
	It tells me that they don't know.
	But they're hyping this.
	You have a fatality rate that broad, you really don't have any idea of what you're talking about.
	Yeah, it kills somewhere between 0 and 100% of the people.
	So what's that about?
	The World Health Organization cited cross-border population movements for the spread of the virus.
	That's how we're going to have to shut it down.
	Got to shut movement down.
	Got to lock people down.
	WHO may be the first place they flex their muscle.
	They get those rules passed and or the treaty.
	Marburg virus has been isolated from fruit bats.
	Here we go again. In Tanzania and countries neighboring the affected region, therefore the same bat species may carry the virus in this region.
	See you next week. Same bat time, same bat station.
	Yeah, public announcement service there from Adam West.
	He's even got his CDC military uniform on there.
	Oh, I'm sick and tired of the reruns, aren't you?
	By the way, there was another legal case about the vaccine mandates.
	They're still fighting it in court.
	And you had a situation where Boston city workers, firefighters, and others We're being mandated to get the vaccine.
	They don't care about anything.
	Their presumed idea of safety over law and liberty.
	Do we have any strawberry mandates?
	We suspect that the strawberry might have hepatitis in it, so we're going to mandate the firefighters to have it, to eat it.
	No, they don't do that.
	Yeah, the law doesn't matter anymore.
	The Constitution doesn't matter. Liberty, human rights, they don't matter.
	Religious liberty, freedom, conscience.
	You can violate your body.
	My body, my choice.
	None of that stuff applies.
	So what happened was the city employees fighting the mandate lost...
	At the first trial judge.
	This is stuff that seems to not be going before juries for some reason.
	It's going before judges in every case.
	So the trial judge, the first lowest level, found in favor of the city, found in favor of the mandate.
	Then it went to an appeals judge.
	She slammed it really hard.
	And she was absolutely right in her decisions.
	And now it has gone before the Supreme Court.
	And the Supreme Court, throughout the law, throughout human rights, throughout the Constitution, throughout all of that, And saying this, the potential harm to the city and the public resulting from the spread of COVID clearly outweighs the economic harm to the employees.
	Well, what about the harm to their health?
	What about the harm to their conscience, their religious conscience, and all the rest of this stuff?
	And this is being done.
	This just came out.
	Has this judge not noticed that the The vaccines don't do anything to stop the spread.
	They don't do anything to stop the virus.
	They don't do anything except make you sick with something else.
	There wasn't a pandemic in the first place.
	It was a narrative. The real pandemic is the Trump shot.
	The 2021 mandate required proof of vaccination or weekly testing.
	And after the Omicron variant emerged, they dropped it.
	Why? Well, because everybody's going to test positive.
	And it also became clear that the jab, by any stretch of the imagination, was not working.
	So they dropped the testing.
	At that point, and they said, well, now you're going to have to get the jab or you're going to get fired.
	So they sued.
	And despite the fact that nobody has ever claimed, I know of, that these jabs ever did anything for Omicron.
	And they've also claimed that Omicron spread everywhere.
	But it wasn't serious.
	They said that at the same time.
	So the court decision that was right was done by a judge whose name was Sabata Singh at the appeals court.
	So the initial trial court got the wrong decision, sided against the individuals and against the Constitution.
	Workers who failed to get the COVID vaccine, the Trump shot, under mandate, faced repercussions, including termination.
	And the trial judge found for the city of Boston, the Massachusetts Appellate Court Judge Singh, reversed that ruling, finding that workers faced, quote, substantial harm if the mandate was not blocked, that the city's failure to negotiate the policy meant plaintiffs were likely to succeed.
	She said, this case is different from others because it implicated issues of, listen, this is her terms, bodily integrity, you know, my body, my choice, and self-determination.
	Shouldn't even talk about the religious violations.
	Shouldn't even talk about the fact that they, you know, where does the government have the right to do that?
	Singh abused her discretion, said the Supreme Court.
	And issuing an injunction, which had remained in place until Thursday.
	So the Massachusetts State Supreme Court overruled her.
	But now at this point, it's kind of become a mood issue because Boston recently agreed to drop the mandate for the plaintiffs, for the firefighters, for superior officers.
	Because the parties desire to resolve this matter without the expense and uncertainty of further litigation.
	Now, I don't know, because they mentioned for firefighters and superior officers, if they're still going to use this against other employees.
	Maybe they just decided that the firefighters were not replaceable.
	And so we will, and they're not going to go along with this either.
	That may be what is happening.
	The WHO has now decided that the Trump shots are not recommended for young kids and teens.
	The WHO has now just done the same thing that DeSantis and his Surgeon General in Florida, Latipo, did.
	Which is still not sufficient, but it is a step in the right direction.
	They're still going to kill people of other ages, but for those 6 months to 17 years, they're not going to recommend.
	You know, you can get it if you want it.
	Here's this poison. And when I sit here now, I recommend that you don't really need it.
	But, you know, if you want the poison, I'll let you have the poison.
	Not going to stop anybody from poisoning you.
	And we're going to recommend that poison To all other age groups outside of the 6 months to 17 years.
	We also recommend it for pregnant women as well, right?
	That's the problem I have with what DeSantis did.
	But isn't it interesting that the WHO has now taken that position?
	The FDA, however, continues to try to push this to younger and younger ages.
	Just give them some strawberries.
	They'll be fine. New policy identifies three priority groups, high, medium, and low.
	And so they're still willing to kill older people because, you know, if the older people die, you can always blame it on comorbidities and other things like that.
	And then I saw this from Eugypius.
	The day the world became China, Tuesday, March 10th, 2020.
	And I was struck by that because, as I've mentioned many times, YouTube took down my channel because I had a video that said the year, 2020, the year the world became China.
	They took it down.
	Can't say that. Well, Eugypius is saying that.
	And he's probably on Substack instead of on YouTube.
	He said, I'd like to draw your attention to Jeffrey Tucker's recent piece at Brownstone on how they convinced Trump to lock down.
	I kind of imagine, in my opinion, I think they probably convinced Trump to lock down the same way they convinced him to put Alex Azar, the former CEO of Eli Lilly, in after Trump had said, well, I have a lot of concerns about vaccine.
	There may be some connection with autism, and he brings in RFK Jr., and then all of a sudden, the pharmaceutical industry gets together, and they give him a massive multi-million dollar donation, the next thing you know.
	A CEO from one of the pharmaceutical companies, Eli Lilly, is now running HHS. And he was the one who put in the emergency order even before Trump did.
	I imagine that it wasn't that they gaslighted him or deceived him or pressured him psychologically.
	I think they just paid him off.
	But let's go with the other alternative here.
	This is what is being offered with this one.
	And the timing is interesting.
	They said the problem is that he addresses as a chronological one.
	As of late March 9th, 2020, Trump was arguing vehemently to stay open.
	By March the 11th, he'd suddenly declared himself, quote, fully prepared to use the full power of the federal government to deal with our current challenge of coronavirus.
	And so Jeffrey Tucker asked, so what changed?
	Deborah Birx reports in her book, That Trump had a friend die in the New York hospital?
	And this is what shifted his opinion.
	Now, Trump had said that I had a study that was brought to me.
	He put this executive order in on Friday the 13th.
	And he said, I had two very smart people.
	Later on, I found out there's two very smart people.
	One of them is Deborah Birx.
	The other one is Fauci.
	And the study that they gave him was not very smart at all.
	It was a very stupid study.
	It didn't even have a curve in it, in its basic model.
	It didn't have the curve that we always see from, you know, the Farr's law going back to 1840.
	Every real epidemic has a bell-shaped curve.
	That's what they said we had to flatten.
	No, in their model, every person infected two and a half other people forever.
	It was a straight line going up.
	It wasn't a curve.
	And so Deborah Birx, one of these smart people who gave him that false model, which by the way, as University of Edinburgh pointed out, you couldn't even run that simulation twice in a row with the same data input and get the same answer.
	It's like a random number generator.
	So let's pick the random number that we like the most.
	About 200,000 people are going to die or something.
	Whatever the number was.
	Who cares? It was an imaginary number.
	And so now Deborah Burke says no, it was his friend who died in the New York hospital.
	That shifted his opinion. Nobody had died at that point.
	Nobody had died. That's a full...
	Now, they don't mention that in this article, you know, Jeffrey Brown.
	They locked everything down.
	Nobody had died. China locked everything down.
	They said two or three people had died.
	It was the headline that Gerald Slenty had at the beginning of January.
	They said they claimed that, you know, was it something?
	Three, five people had died, they claimed.
	Out of a population of how many billion people in China?
	Trump locked us down before anybody died.
	It wasn't his friend dying in the hospital.
	She's still lying to everybody.
	Jared Kushner reports that he simply listened to reason.
	That's also a lie.
	Mike Pence said he was persuaded that his staff would respect him more.
	You think Trump wants respect?
	He demands respect.
	He demands absolute loyalty.
	If you don't give him either one of those, you're fired instantly.
	He didn't care about that.
	All three of these are obviously lies.
	So, he says, something about this story has never really added up.
	How could one person have been so persuaded?
	He surely had other sources of information, some other scenario or intelligence that fed into his disastrous decision.
	He says, he hypothesizes The sudden reversal is related to a decision taken around this time to place American pandemic policy in the hands of the National Security Council.
	It was always coming from the military-industrial complex.
	This is weaponized. Dark Winter was weaponized.
	It's always been run by the military.
	Yeah, the military was going to put it out there.
	Look, Trump betrayed us.
	He wasn't hoodwinked.
	He was playing 4D chess, but he's playing it for the other side.
	And he knew exactly what was going on.
	He knew what was going on throughout it.
	He knew what was happening after it.
	And for years, he has pushed this same thing.
	As a matter of fact, going back and looking at the history, John Rapoport, as I said, I'm continuing my greatest COVID hits articles.
	And so he pulled one from March the 19th.
	I remember this. I had him on to talk about this at the time.
	He said many people who were diagnosed as coronavirus cases in Italy, then died, were almost certainly put on antiviral drugs.
	And he said, as you'll see, a significant percentage of these people had prior heart conditions, high blood pressure, at least one of the antiviral drugs that are standardly used.
	Ribivirin carries a very relevant warning.
	Ribivirin may decrease the number of red blood cells in your body.
	This is called anemia. It can be life-threatening to people who have heart disease or circulation problems.
	He says, so here's the basic situation.
	This is, again, John Rapoport, March 19, 2020.
	Not even a week after Trump locked everything down.
	He says, here's a basic situation.
	The Italian health agencies are reporting escalating COVID deaths, a big fear story.
	But in the background, other Italian government researchers are coming through patient records to take a much closer look.
	And, as we pointed out before Trump locked down, and again, this is his March the 19th story, But prior to that, we had two weeks' worth of data.
	And it was John Rapoport who found that out of Italy.
	We had two weeks' worth of data.
	And this is what he's summarizing in this article here.
	He said, Bloomberg News has a story.
	99% of those who died from the virus had other illnesses, says Italy.
	More than 99% of Italy's coronavirus fatalities are people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to the study conducted by the country's National Health Authority.
	The Rome-based institution.
	Has examined medical records of about 18% of the country's coronavirus fatalities, finding that just three victims, 0.8% of the total, had no previous pathology.
	Almost half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses.
	About a fourth had either one or two previous conditions.
	More than 75% had high blood pressure.
	35% had diabetes.
	A third suffered from heart disease.
	The average age of those who had died, again, they had two weeks' worth of work or data in Italy before Trump locked us down.
	The average age of those who had died in Italy was 79.5.
	Past the life expectancy in Italy.
	And again, the average comorbidities at that time?
	Two and a half average comorbidities.
	So they said as of March 17th, 17 people under 50 had died from the disease.
	And they had comorbidities as well.
	All of Italy's victims under 40 have been males with serious existing medical conditions.
	And at the time, John Rapoport wrote, Bang!
	All uppercase. Average age of those who died, 79.5.
	Are you kidding me? Lots of prior medical conditions, weakened immune systems.
	What? This emerging study isn't saying all these people have probably been treated for those prior conditions with toxic medical drugs as well.
	Furthermore, once they'd been diagnosed with coronavirus, the chances are many of them were put on highly toxic antiviral drugs, delivering the final blow.
	And this is what I've said throughout the whole thing.
	I said, this is not a pandemic.
	This is financially incentivized medical malpractice.
	And I said that even before I realized just how lavishly incentivized the malpractice was, incentivized by Trump.
	Imagine the coronavirus was the cause of death would be ridiculous fantasy, but these people are counted as coronavirus deaths by the other Italian reporting agencies who are jacking up the number.
	I remember later in that summer, we had an Italian member of parliament.
	Who was yelling and screaming and banging on the desk saying, look at this, you lied to us, you said 25,000 people have been killed?
	They hadn't. It was a total lie.
	And so, going back to the Eugipius article and the Jeffrey Tucker article, they focus on an influencer out of Italy, Tom Pueo, believing that this is what convinced Trump.
	I don't believe that's the case at all.
	If you were to say that that was the case, if you say that he was gaslighted, if he was fooled initially, then what he did and continued to do to fund this was even if he didn't, even if he was a total idiot when it came to medical stuff, had he never read the Constitution?
	The Constitution, you don't have to have an IQ to read the Constitution.
	You have to care. He didn't care enough to read the Constitution.
	He didn't care enough to obey his oath to the Constitution.
	This is one of the reasons why we look for people who have character.
	Character that Trump does not possess.
	I don't want to hear anymore from these Trump clones and this MAGA cult about how, well, you know, I've had all these pastors saying, well, when I've got to get my plumbing fixed, I don't really look into the private life of the plumber.
	He might be married five or six times and all this other kind of stuff.
	I don't really care about that. Well, you better care about it.
	Would you care? If your bank had been accused multiple times and convicted several times of embezzlement, of stealing customers' money, you know, when you put somebody in a position of trust, you might want to take a look at whether or not they're trustworthy.
	You might want to take a look at their history before you jump into them.
	And yet we've got all the same people lining up to, you know, fall in line behind Trump with all this stuff, taking it to A civil war.
	And let me just say this.
	We're going to break in a moment and we're going to...
	I've got a report that I want to play for you.
	Then we're going to get Gautry on to talk about it.
	But before we leave, the importance of having moral leadership.
	Can you believe it? You know, that we would even talk about something like that in 21st century America?
	Well, that was the thing when the country was founded.
	If you even sniffed of ambition, that was a character flaw and it was a disqualification.
	They didn't want people like that in government.
	They didn't want people who were going to be self-serving.
	And what we have is somebody who his own lawyer has said of Trump.
	He is a deeply wounded narcissist and capable of acting except in his own self-interest or out of revenge.
	You don't want people who are going to act out of their self-interest.
	You want people with character, people who see the broader public interest.
	That's not Trump. Faith Advisory Board with Trump ties had urged religious vaccine exemptions for the military.
	While we're looking back, this is an article from November of 2021.
	And they said, even though we've got all these people, these evangelicals who have put themselves around Trump, and who were these people that were putting themselves around Trump?
	You had Paula White Kane.
	You had Ken Copeland with this guy, this demonic look in his eye.
	These, you know, prosperity gospel grifters out there.
	You know, he's defending his plane.
	I mean, I'll never forget that video where that person was asking him the questions.
	Those were Trump's spiritual advisors.
	You might as well just have a seance and invite the devil in.
	I mean, it's just... Crazy.
	So, they said, however, even those people, even those people, even Ken Copeland and Paula Cain White, or White Cain, I don't know which one it is, even those people signed a letter saying, don't do this to the military.
	And this article was written because one of this group This inner circle of Trump, who, by the way, you want to invalidate your ministry?
	Put yourself in as a spiritual advisor to Trump and don't give him any spiritual advice.
	Just tell him he's okay with everything.
	What kind of a person?
	And you know that these people are doing that.
	They would not be in his inner circle if they were calling him out on anything.
	If they were telling him to repent and I mean, they gave him absolutely no spiritual advice.
	They were grifting him.
	Isn't that interesting? Grifting the grifter.
	So one of these people has got a big church up in Dallas.
	Robert Jeffries was the only one of these people who didn't sign this thing to say, well, you shouldn't have the vaccine mandates for the military.
	And Robert Jeffries was one of the guys featured by Curtis Chang, who'd gotten a lot of Trump money.
	To strategize how they're going to lie to people who had moral objections to this.
	More than 1,700 religious leaders organized by Trump's faith advisors are urging the U.S. military to grant religious exemptions for the vaccine mandates as of November 2021.
	Think about that.
	He's got 1,700 pastors who are advising Trump and not a single one of them tells him to repent.
	Get his life in order? This is the sorry state of the church in America.
	Well, we can't ruffle any feathers with anybody, right?
	Well, tell that to John the Baptist or John Knox.
	Oh, I know what happened to those guys, too, right?
	They got their heads cut off, didn't they?
	I was just telling Karen, I said, you know, there's not any conservative or libertarian or liberty network that I could ever affiliate with.
	Because if somebody comes out and does something like this, I've got to challenge that.
	And I said, I can't even get on a religious Bible channel thing or something doing news because I said I would immediately get kicked off because I came after Franklin Graham and Al Mohler over the vaccine stuff.
	I've probably got programs on the same network with that.
	So that's where we are with this.
	And, you know, it was, you see these people who tapped into this $250 million war chest that Trump had given, and we don't have time for it.
	I've got to get Goat Tree on. But, you know, this whole article goes back and looks at the Yale article, the Yale study, I should say.
	They did a double-blind test, and it was a test of which messages worked.
	Double-blind. And I said at the time when that came out, when that study came out, I think it was in July of 2020, I said, well, at least they tested their propaganda even though they haven't tested their shots.
	But they had fine-tuned, tested that.
	They had about 10 different messages.
	And in this article, they go down in a percentage as to, well, this approach had the best effect on this group and on that group, and this is how they fine-tuned it.
	I mean, this whole thing was the only science was behavioral psychology.
	And propaganda. There was no science at all in the rest of this pandemic.
	Okay, we're going to establish a contact with Goatree, and I've got some videos that I want to play to give you an introduction as to what we're going to be talking about.
	Take a quick break, and when we come back, I'm going to lay that out, and then we're going to have Goatree comment on what he thinks about this situation.
	Stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	All right, welcome back. As I said, I wanted to get Goatree on.
	I want to lay a little bit of this stuff out before we get him on, and he's going to comment on what is happening with this.
	The sound was kicking out there.
	I think we're okay now. CDC research team, by the way, that was looking at Palestine, Ohio, got sick.
	Out of the 15-person team, seven of them, while they were there a month after, this accident happened on, let's see, it said the illnesses occurred on March the 6th when seven members of the 15-person team of the CDC went there to look at this.
	And so that was a month after this all happened on February the 3rd.
	And so you got all these people who are sick, and we heard after a week or two, just a few days, it's safe.
	You can go back in there. CDC finally sends a team in a month later, and half of them got sick.
	Seven out of 15 got sick.
	They reported symptoms like sore throat, headache, coughing, nausea, the same things that the people who live there said they were suffering.
	People who went out and said, all my chickens died here.
	What's going on with this?
	But, you know, at the same time, the government was saying, hey, it's safe.
	The EPA chief had to be shamed into going there finally.
	You know, they pretended they were drinking water.
	You saw that. Hold it for a second, take it down.
	It was a sip if they even took that.
	The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit March 31st against Norfolk Southern, seeking to hold them accountable for unlawfully polluting the nation's waterways through the toxic derailment.
	And it hasn't stopped there.
	We've been having these things on a regular basis, as a matter of fact.
	We've had another Norfolk Southern train derailed.
	So the first one was March the 23rd.
	We had this one here.
	This was up in Massachusetts.
	The interesting thing about this, the train was not moving when these trains all fell off the track.
	They said there was no hazardous materials there, but the train was hauling recycling materials.
	It was not moving at the time of the derailment.
	It's kind of interesting because we're going to talk about the technology to monitor this stuff.
	And one of the things that they monitor is not just hot wheels.
	You know, do we have some axles that are going defective or do we have some bearings that are going defective that are burning?
	They would monitor it to see if the load, they have monitoring capabilities.
	I don't know if they put that on the tracks or not, but they do have monitoring capabilities if they want to use them to see if the load is balanced.
	And evidently the load wasn't balanced here.
	He had one or more cars that Tipped and just took the rest of them off while the train was stationary.
	So we're going to talk about some of these control systems and the threat that it has for our infrastructure.
	Here's another one. This was just yesterday in Montana.
	Take a look at this derailment.
	Look at those cars all over the place.
	25 cars derailed in Montana.
	Spilling unconfirmed contents.
	They said at least 25 cars from a train in Montana on Sunday, yesterday, April 2nd, spilled their contents into the ground and into a nearby body of water.
	So you see a lot of those have fallen into the water off of that bridge there.
	First responders say there's no threat to the public, but there's yet to be any confirmation about what the containers were carrying.
	Isn't that interesting? Yeah.
	Move along. There's nothing to see here.
	What's in the train?
	We don't know, but it's no threat.
	That comes less than a week after a 70-car train hauling hazardous materials derailed in North Dakota.
	And that particular one, they said 31 of the 70 cars derailed.
	Some of those were carrying hazardous materials.
	Crews identified a leak of liquid asphalt.
	It didn't have any fires, and the train company did not come along and create an explosion deliberately.
	The cleanup was expected to last seven to ten days so far.
	Six days have passed, and it is still not open yet.
	And then on March 30th, this last Thursday, We had another train derailment in Minnesota.
	Evacuation orders lifted after a frame train derails, catches fire in Minnesota.
	And that particular one was carrying a form of ethanol, which, of course, caught fire.
	That's what they put in your gas tank, up to 10% of ethanol or whatever.
	13 rail cars were carrying ethanol.
	The four trains that are on fire were all carrying ethanol.
	And so when we look at all of this, the question is, what is happening with our infrastructure?
	How vulnerable is our infrastructure?
	And before we talk about the specifics of the railroad, I want to play for you something that I've mentioned in the past.
	I did some work for the Department of Transportation in North Carolina, and they, you know, had the same type of problem that you're seeing in a lot of different places with these signs that they put on the side of the road.
	How easily they are hacked.
	Here's a quick little report about that that was done by many different local news outlets, especially when they put something very provocative up on the sign.
	Instead of a highway advisory, it was highway hacking.
	Someone changed this sign along a Miami Expressway to read, no tacos, no Latinos.
	Talk about the low road.
	I think it's absolutely crazy.
	I mean, it hurts to see something like that.
	The sign was changed in the wee hours of the morning.
	Police turned the sign around since there was no one on hand at that hour who knew the password to log in and turn it off.
	But on the website that posted instructions for how to hack an electronic road sign, there was debate over whether the sign changer was against both Latinos and tacos or was supporting immigration by saying without Latinos there would be no tacos.
	Usually hackers prefer to warn of zombie attacks, cautioning zombies ahead.
	I suppose we shouldn't have been surprised to learn that there's an entire website devoted to nothing but hacked signs called WhatElseSignHacker.com.
	That no longer exists.
	Drive drunk.
	Live nudes, exit 43, trapped in a sign factory.
	A guy who made a Halloween costume consisting of a wearable hacked sign reading zombies ahead.
	Signs have even been hacked to say, report sign hackers.
	Hackers post themselves.
	Zombie. And here's another one.
	Thanks a lot, Stacy.
	Now I have herpes, it says.
	Well, did Foster strike again?
	Yeah, the same road sign hacked two days before the name was used, Foster.
	This morning, drivers saw what said alien crash site ahead.
	Love you, Tucson. The hacker even added little hearts.
	Yesterday's hack was a little more concerning.
	Reading hazardous material, nuclear fallout ahead.
	Turn around now.
	A digital road sign in Mililani was hacked in confusion for some early morning commuters.
	The offensive message was short and it was only up for a few hours.
	The company who owns the signs tells me this isn't the first time it's had problems with vandals.
	Another sign nearby was also recently vandalized.
	We wanted to know how easy or difficult is it for someone to hack into a road sign.
	Unfortunately, not too difficult.
	Some of the things companies can do is just have better protection on their devices, so maybe better locks, maybe change the passwords.
	Maybe change the passwords.
	Tim Caminos is the chief operating geek at Super Geeks.
	This is actually the first time I've ever seen Tamper in Hawaii.
	Tampering with signs can be very dangerous for commuters and cause even more confusion for drivers who rely on road signs for information.
	Police tell me changing the message of a road sign could be considered criminal tampering, which is a misdemeanor.
	It's just a misdemeanor.
	Now, if you think it's a problem if somebody puts a sign there that says, zombies ahead, people start cramming the exit highway, the exit ramps or something.
	If you think that's a problem, imagine if they hack The railroad equipment in the same way.
	Now, you notice that first report there, they said, well, they had to just turn the sign around because they didn't know what the password was.
	Really? They didn't know? How did the people who hacked it figure out what the password is?
	See, the reality is, from my experience, I was told, the people working there at the Department of Transportation in North Carolina, they said, yeah, they ship these signs out and nobody really cares and they leave a default password and There's a default password there.
	You're supposed to change that when you install it.
	But we don't typically do that.
	And we just leave it as the default.
	And it's the same default all over the country.
	That's why that website, SignHacker or something like that.
	So that's the reason that they did that.
	And that's the key thing, is how careless they are.
	About the availability of getting into their system, even when it is something that is very critical infrastructure.
	So I'll play one more video report, and then we're going to bring Goatree in.
	And this is about a guy who is, he's got a YouTube channel where he talks about all things railroad, for the railroad buffs out there.
	And he was talking about, this is a couple of weeks after the incident there in Palestine, Ohio.
	And he's going to show you some of the equipment that Gautry and I are going to talk about.
	Second, hot wheel, axle, 82, south, rail.
	Third, hot wheel, axle, 83, south, rail.
	Excessive alarms.
	Okay, Jerry, I think we've got a detector problem, but we'll get on and we'll come down and check that out.
	Test for...
	Cumberland Hot Wheel Detector.
	File post 8.0.
	First hot wheel axle 8-1 south rail.
	Second hot wheel axle 8-2 south rail.
	Third hot wheel axle 8-3 south rail.
	Excessive alarm.
	Yeah, we've got a detector problem.
	But we've got to check that train out anyway.
	Alright, I've got to get on track. Howdy everybody.
	Welcome to a Sunday morning edition of That's Railroad.
	Where we bring the railroad to you.
	And we've got a little problem here this morning.
	Okay, I'll show you in a minute.
	I think we've got a detector problem.
	Alright. Down here, gave a message.
	Three hot axles in a row.
	And we figured out it was the 14th car back from the locomotive.
	So, the operator walked that side of the trip.
	I walked down through here.
	We just met. He's walking back.
	He didn't find anything wrong.
	I gave him my heat gun.
	He's going to check the bearing temperatures on that side as he goes back.
	When this train came in yesterday afternoon, Saturday afternoon, I came into the harbor-loaded, I rode alongside the other side over there, and I checked all the bearings with my heat gun.
	Defect detector went haywire on Sunday morning, and this is Tuesday morning.
	It's actually Valentine's Day here.
	So, 2023, I want to talk to you about what happened at East Palestine with Norfolk Southern's train derailment.
	Obviously, I wasn't there.
	This is a But I want to go over a few things that I've learned.
	Things that you don't know that you haven't heard on the news report.
	Okay, it was very tragic, very sad, very sad that it happened.
	According to an article from Railway Track Structures, they sent me an email.
	There were 50 cars in that train that was originated at Madison, Illinois, and was headed to Conway Yard, And Conway Yard is about 20-some miles northwest of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
	Several news reports said 50 cars derailed.
	The aerial photos that I saw...
	...kind of hard to tell...
	I could only see maybe 12 to 15 cars derailed again.
	So I don't know the exact number of cars that derailed.
	However, let's go out here.
	I want to show you something.
	My good friend Ezekiel is a Sperry tester.
	And he has tested that line in the past.
	Before I say that.
	Defect detectors.
	I've got a playlist on my channel where I have lots of videos, several videos on the defect detector that if you want to go watch out, there's a link in there.
	Now this is the equipment we're going to be talking about having up here.
	They'll measure, take an infrared picture of the bearing and the wheel.
	Now my Ezekiel said if you saw that CBS footage where they took Where they had the train going through there.
	It was taken from the security cameras after 8 o'clock at night.
	It's kind of hard to see.
	It's far away. But if you saw that, first off, according to Ezekiel, that happened about a mile after it passed the detector.
	Now, if that car was sliding over there, that wheel that hot, this thing would have picked it up.
	Okay? And we'll send a message to the train engineer.
	Now, here's the thing.
	Not every defect detector out there has two cameras.
	Some of them only have one.
	Alright? We do not know if that defect detector had one or two cameras.
	Another thing, if it did have two cameras, then that computer is going to...
	And he puts up that he's talking about the one that's at Salem.
	So that's after you see the thing on fire.
	Now, my good friend Jason is a retired Norfolk Southern engineer.
	So I talked to him.
	I said, Jason, what's Norfolk Southern's protocol when you get a message, a defect message?
	He said, you stop the train as soon as possible in a safe manner.
	Conductor calls dispatch, tells them we got a train stopped on the main line, and then the conductor goes back to investigate.
	All right, that's a long introduction, and Goatree's been very patient, waiting on the line.
	So let's bring him on right now.
	He was the one who sent that video to me.
	That's a very interesting video to see how this works.
	And you heard him say that if there's some kind of a, if it senses something, and, you know, where you saw the train on fire, he said that was past one of those sensors, but it still had to go to another sensor.
	So that still brings up a question as to what happened.
	So joining us now is Goatree.
	Thank you for joining us, GoTree. - Well, good morning, David. - Yeah, it's pretty interesting.
	And I think this is a big story in terms of our overall infrastructure.
	You know, certainly with the trains, we've been seeing a lot of train derailments.
	And if you, by the way, if you guys wanna know how these things operate, the manuals are all online.
	Take a look at this.
	And many of those, they've all got the, and it goes for pages here.
	And the links are right there. So you can download the manuals and see how to operate these things.
	And that's where the problem comes in.
	As you pointed out, Gautry, the problem is, like we saw with those signs, the default passwords and the manuals that essentially give people a backdoor into these things if they know where this stuff is.
	If you can program your DVR, you can program the railroad at the moment.
	If your VCR is not flashing 12, right?
	Right. You've got the complete instructions there.
	You know, David, we've been on this story a while, and I've asked you to hold off on it because I've been trying to get a hold of regulators, politicians, Anybody that won't send me to the Barry Manilow room to listen to Barry Manilow play for hours at a time.
	And I even took it to my senator, Ted Cruz.
	He's on the Senate Transportation Committee.
	They had no interest in this.
	And finally it just gets to the point where, okay, let's just release it.
	Let's force some hands, you know?
	That's right. Yeah, and of course, you know, the manuals that you can get online show how you can enter or change system parameters.
	As a matter of fact, let me pull that out.
	Here's the manual here for the Norfolk Southern.
	And if you look at this, this tells you how you can get in and program the serial interface.
	And so you can do it by connecting to it directly there, or you can do it remotely.
	If you've got a modem, they talk about how to do that, and then they talk about how to log into the system.
	And they say, if you look down there at the bottom of it, zoom in on that, Travis, at number six.
	If you're on site from your computer, dial or connect to the modem to the site that you want to communicate.
	Wait for the connect, and then the prompt will come up, and you enter smart scan to proceed.
	Now, that part of it is not password protected at all.
	That just gets you into the menu.
	And from that point, it appears to me that you'd be able to get all the information logs.
	You can access all that stuff even without a password, right?
	Yeah. Yes.
	Did you see it? And then if you want to, if they decide that they want to put a password in and if they want to set the system up, that's optional.
	You don't have to have a password assigned to it.
	That's up to the people in that local area, the railroad employees, if they want to create a password and then have to pass that password on to other employees.
	That's one of the reasons why they don't do it for the signs that I was showing you or a lot of these other things because it's a hassle.
	But if there is a password...
	It's not really robust because it's not case sensitive.
	You don't have to have, you know, you create a password to get on some of these sites on the internet.
	You've got to have a non-numeric character, a non-alpha character.
	You've got to have uppercase characters, lowercase characters.
	None of that stuff applies.
	So it could be anything.
	It could be nothing. They don't even have to assign that in order to be able to go in and change all the setup stuff inside these sensors.
	That's one of the key things.
	And that's what we see over and over again.
	That's why I started with those pictures of the roadside signs.
	This is far more significant.
	Because this is about alerting them to serious issues on the train.
	That could easily be turned off or you could give false indications by setting the levels at a particular, you know, you could set the levels of detection very, very low and so, you know, give false indications.
	False indications, false positives, or you could turn off the messaging altogether, or you could put it low and create a lot of...
	That video where the guy was talking, he was having all these alerts sent to him that there was something wrong.
	He went down there and he looked at it and there was nothing there.
	If you really wanted to sabotage the system, you could do that for a while and cry wolf over and over again until people kind of got passe about it, and then you could raise the level, it seems to me like.
	I don't know. There's a lot of different ways that you could do it.
	Once you can get in and change any of the setup stuff, On any of this monitoring equipment, the potential for harm is incredible.
	And yet again, are they going to use the password to protect any of this stuff?
	Or use the default password, which is in the manual.
	Yes, we're going to show you that one.
	That's in the back of the manual.
	They actually have the default password.
	They've got the back door in the manual as well, in case they do set up their password.
	If you put a password on it, you can lock the company out.
	That's true, yeah. But you see, when you start changing these parameters, and there's railroad people out there that probably know far more than I do about it.
	I'm just looking at the security aspects.
	Right. These trains are now automated where if they get...
	Let's use the government narrative on what happened in Palestine, Ohio.
	It was a hot wheel.
	Okay. When you get a reading like that, I think about 70, maybe 80 to 90% of the trains will take that.
	The engineer has no control over it when an alert goes off like that.
	The train goes into...
	An emergency breaking situation.
	And then you have the laws of physics come into play, which is causing these derailments.
	Let's say that the...
	You see this accordion effect.
	I haven't been able to see the videos that you were playing, but they pile up in zigzag form.
	Yeah, that's what we saw in Montana.
	Yeah. Okay.
	Well, let's say that you have a...
	Some empty cars at the front of the train, or they're dispersed in it, and liquids especially, you slam on the brakes, all that liquid comes forward, hitting the forward bulkheads.
	And if you've got billions of pounds moving forward in an empty car, it could force the empty car off, off the tracks, and then you see the end result.
	That's just a law of physics.
	So, It appears that you give a false reading, you could have anything happen.
	And I don't want to sound alarmist, but it appears to me, and I can't prove it, we will find out, but I do believe, I'm going to make a prediction right here.
	I've noticed a pattern in this.
	I believe on 4 or 5, Two days from now, you're going to have another derailment in Ohio.
	If this happens, this means this is somebody with some sort of motives out there that are targeting these Norfolk Southern trains.
	And why do you say four or five?
	Tell people why you think that.
	Well, if you look at the pattern, all these Ohio accidents that have happened, Palestine happened on February 3rd, 2-3.
	You had that other one, I forget where it took place, half an old March 4th.
	Okay, you've got 2, 3, 4.
	Next sequence is 4, 5.
	And if that occurs, to me that's a smoking gun that we've got something going on.
	Some bad actor out there playing with the trains.
	And of course, in your experience, people have, when you investigate cyber crimes and stuff like that, it's been your experience.
	Frequently, it's somebody who's got a gripe against the company or some kind of a relationship with the company.
	There are ransom attacks that happen like that, but frequently, it's an inside job in many of these things.
	It could be. I mean, anybody can download these manuals and you have the information.
	If you have some bolt cutters, you could just cut a lock off and you have full access.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Go ahead.
	Sorry. Well, I was going to say one of the things in here that, you know, as we look at these manuals, one of the things that you can do is you can go back in, you can change a bunch of stuff and then you can get rid of the log, you know?
	I mean, that's the only way to cover your tracks and all that stuff, isn't it?
	Well, if you look at eco-terrorism, you can pull this up in the news.
	Up in the Northwest, they were building homemade shunts.
	I'm not really familiar with shunts, but that is the cause of these derailments they were doing.
	If you look on your index, you can throw these shunts basically remotely.
	I don't know if that's what they're doing.
	I don't know... Basically, everybody keeps coming back to these hot boxes.
	So, let's just stick with that narrative.
	Is it throwing out false readings?
	And throwing these trains into emergency brakes?
	If they're on a curb, you know, if you have a billion pounds wanting to go forward, it's going to go forward.
	It will not recognize that curb.
	That's right. And there's any number of things that they could be doing.
	Well, of course, the other part of it is that they could turn off the sensors.
	Everybody was saying, well, you know, you see that thing is flaming hot.
	What's going on with that?
	And their explanation was that it had already passed one of the sensors when that was taken, you know, because that was a fixed location.
	And that was, you know, it had passed that sensor, but it was really heavily on fire at that point.
	And it had another sensor to go past.
	And that's why when he's talking about it, he says, well, I don't know if it had two cameras there or had one camera or whatever, but the interesting thing is it didn't pick it up on that next one.
	And so you could create havoc by turning off the sensors if you wanted to.
	Sure. You can turn the candles off.
	Yeah. Once you've got into this system, you can pretty well do whatever you choose to do with it.
	And you turn things on, you turn them off.
	It's just unlimited.
	These manuals are online.
	Anybody can download them.
	Anybody can read how to reprogram these.
	Anybody can change passwords.
	Anybody can set passwords up.
	It's just there. Download it.
	I've been trying to get anybody with any sort of authority to listen.
	Like I said, I get Kicked off into the Barry Manilow easy listening room for hours at a time.
	And of course, this is something you'd contacted me about quite a while back because the eco-terrorists and stuff up in the Pacific Northwest and connections possibly to train derailments.
	And yet nobody paid any attention.
	Well, some of them have been convicted since then.
	I mean, it was proven. Well then, but the public didn't really pay that much attention to it until this thing in Palestine.
	And now the public is paying attention to it, and they're happening all the time.
	And so the question is, why?
	And if you've got glaring, we don't know if this is the cause, but if you've got some, everybody has access to these manuals, and it's easy for them to take a look at it.
	They shut down that site called signhacker.com, which was telling people how to hack into those signs.
	But nobody... Yeah, that was...
	Go ahead. That was a kid's play compared to what we're talking about.
	Exactly, exactly.
	Yeah, this is not...
	We're talking about trains that have an amazing amount of kinetic energy and an amazing amount of perhaps hazardous materials on them.
	And, you know, having the warning signs about anything that's happening without being turned off or giving false signals about that, that's really what we're talking about here.
	You know, that's not telling people, oh, warning sign, there's zombies ahead.
	No, it's very different from that.
	And yet nobody is concerned about, you know, even taking these manuals offline.
	And so you know if they're going to leave the manuals up there, they're not really very careful either about any of the passwords, but, of course, the backdoor password is in there as well.
	Well, you know, you just...
	Brought up something. I didn't hear it all, but you said that a federal agency had sued Norfolk Southern.
	Okay, I'm not going to defend that.
	But you have the manufacturer that has unsecured manuals online with everything you need to know, but there's no accountability there.
	That's right. You've got regulators Overseeing all this, they apparently don't care or are oblivious to it.
	You've got Norfolk Southern who's actually using it that either does not care or is oblivious to it.
	Everybody's like, hey, you've got an 810 gorilla in the room here with your security.
	And they're like, go away, conspiracy theorists.
	Well, here's your manuals. Where'd you get that?
	Off your website. Well, anybody can do that.
	That's the point. That's right.
	So, you know, it was like I was saying, David, hold off.
	Simply let me see if I can get some eyeballs on this and somebody to get proactive with it.
	Well, here we are.
	Everybody's like, go away.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. And that's the thing we don't...
	And just the broader picture here, you know, this is not about one railroad or one equipment, but just the casual attitude that everybody has about the infrastructure.
	And I think the things to take away from this are the fact that we are very vulnerable to having it all shut down in a massive way because of this cavalier attitude.
	We've put computers in charge of everything, and they don't have any security in it, really.
	They've got kind of a laissez-faire attitude.
	We don't really care.
	It's not important.
	But even if it's not an emission-critical function, as we saw with Colonial Pipeline, they were able to shut down the entire pipeline that was the biggest supply of oil east of the Mississippi by taking over the accounting software, which...
	We saw the biggest shutdown of planes by taking over the NOTAM system.
	And so this type of thing is happening over and over again, and the government doesn't want to talk about it.
	The companies don't want to talk about it.
	It's like it's an embarrassment to them, or it is a culpability for them, and they don't want to do anything to fix it.
	Well, it's cheaper for them to pay the funds than to actually fix the problem.
	They've got this for where everything's integrated.
	And they would rather...
	It's so frustrating that a lot of this could be fixed for very little money.
	And yet, it's such an inconvenience, they would rather take the risk.
	And it's like that in every part of infrastructure.
	A lot of this on the electrical grid.
	It's on the IOT. And these little IOT sensors, They're very insecure.
	If you know what you're looking for, you see these little shacks on the side of the road with the light company or the phone company or whatever in it every once in a while.
	These things are totally insecure.
	If you know what you're looking for, you can light up a line of transformers and make it look like a Fourth of July.
	That's right. And we've been able to skirt this in the past because we haven't had the kind of...
	I guess political environment that we're now in.
	I mean, we're picking fights with other countries that have the capability to do cyber attacks or might be able to send people across an open border to do whatever they wish in person.
	And then we have these kinds of internal groups, environmental groups, all different types of groups that would be interested in doing this.
	And you mentioned the electric grid.
	One aspect of that And this has been going on for a long time.
	It's just trying to protect the entire grid with, you know, some surge protectors, types of things on a large scale.
	But it's not an expensive thing to do.
	But the government's not interested in doing that to protect the electric grid from an electromagnetic pulse.
	You had Gary Haven do a fictional film about it.
	Just had Randy Quaid do a quasi-documentary about it.
	But everybody knows about the issue with the EMP. They know how it would cripple the country.
	Nobody's caring to do anything at all about it.
	No. You really don't need an EMP. I mean, you don't really need a missile.
	You could do that with some of these substations.
	That's right. Yeah.
	And once again, I don't mean to be fear-mongering, but it's all related.
	And it all comes down to things that...
	It's very fixable, but nobody wants to take it out.
	It's inconvenient.
	It's expensive. We don't get a return on our investment.
	On and on and on.
	These companies are not proactive.
	They're reactive. Yeah, it's an old saying in the pen tester business, you won't get a call to check out a company until the building across the street's burned down.
	They say, well, maybe we need to check our security now.
	That's what's going on with our infrastructure, but nobody's calling and saying, hey, we need to get checked out here.
	Yeah. That's right.
	And it's like Microsoft.
	You know, Microsoft for years is always, well, we patch it.
	That keeps everybody happy.
	But half the time, it's not patched.
	Yeah. It's just they tell you that for convenience and speed.
	And quite often, there'll be a situation where somebody will find a vulnerability in an operating system, and they'll report it to the company.
	The company doesn't know anything about it, so then they have to go public with it to try to get the company to fix it, right?
	That's happened more than once, many times, as a matter of fact, right?
	That's what we're doing right now.
	Exactly. Thank you, David. Yeah.
	That's the whole point. Can you please fix this?
	Here's the thing. It doesn't cost any information.
	It doesn't cost anything else. Just take down the manuals off of the internet, for starters.
	And then you can go in and just do some basic procedures.
	And that would be... It kind of reminds me of...
	Talking about plane hijackings and all the rest of the stuff, and of course 9-11, I don't believe the narrative of the official story, but, you know, look, to keep people from getting into where the pilots are, you just put a lockable door there.
	It's just that simple, right?
	That has protected pilots from some wackos on planes, you know, in the last couple of years.
	But, you know, it's simple stuff.
	Just lock the door. Just lock the system out.
	That puts out the warnings and monitors things when they're failing.
	Lock that so somebody can't hack with it.
	Well, yes. I mean, you know, did you show that real employee that opened up that shack that had one of these systems in it?
	No, I didn't put that video in.
	Yeah, I didn't do that. I had the one where he was showing where the shack is, but I didn't put the clip in there.
	Well, he opens up the shack, and you see the complete system mounted on the wall.
	You look down below, and there's the keyboard to it.
	You don't even have to bring your own keyboard.
	And, you know, you cut a padlock off, and you've got total access.
	Yeah. And, I mean, if you wanted to go through that trouble, then you could remote access them.
	And it's like no one's taking this seriously.
	And as you were saying, these trains are wrecking, it seems like, every day now.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah.
	We had one on Thursday. We had one yesterday.
	And, you know, you're talking about the shack.
	If somebody gets into the shack, if they even have a password, they've probably written it on the wall for everybody, right?
	Because they don't want to be bothered trying to remember these passwords.
	I mean, that's one of the hassles.
	Go to a site.
	Every site wants you to create a unique password for them and everything.
	And so, you know, it's the bane of our life, and these employees don't want to be bothered with it.
	They figure, well, nobody cares about this stuff, and it's way out in the middle of nowhere.
	If they even have a password, they'll probably write it on the computer itself somewhere.
	Put it on a sign there.
	Absolutely. But, you know, I'm almost about to drop the password.
	They've got three. And if the guy can't remember that password, you know, he's got some memory problems, but they'll still write it on the walls or somewhere in that area where you've got access to it.
	So if you get in and just look around, what blew my mind, that video we were talking about, there's a radio there.
	Mm-hmm. For all intents and purposes, if I didn't find the password I'd get on the radio, it's railroad radio, maybe I'll contact headquarters and say, hey, this is such a search, I need the password.
	Well, they'll give it to you.
	That's pretty crazy.
	That would be legit, it's their official radio.
	That's right. That's where we are with our infrastructure.
	We have these vulnerability points.
	Nobody even wants to talk about it.
	And that's why last week I had on Thursday, I had Jack Lawson on talk about his books of Civil Defense Manuals, Volume 1 and 2.
	And you need to prepare yourself because, look, the government's not going to...
	Have your back in any of this stuff.
	And so when the grid goes down and it's not going to come back for a couple of years because they don't have the supply chain to fix these transformers, if you blow out one of these special transformers, there's only one or two companies that make some of these parts.
	And if they're down or somebody takes that stuff out, it's not going to come back for a very long time.
	So you need to start figuring out How are you going to feed yourself?
	How are you going to protect yourself? That's why I like to give people proactive stuff like civil defense manuals.
	So, anyway, yeah.
	Anything else you want to say about this?
	Because there's some other stuff I want to talk to you about in terms of what is happening with technology.
	But anything else that you want to say about this?
	Well, there's a lot I want to say, but I probably shouldn't.
	You know, I don't particularly...
	Won't be giving people ideas about it, but you've laid off the basic problem and apathy at all levels.
	Yeah. That's right.
	Yeah, that is basically the problem.
	And we don't want to give anybody any more ideas about what, you know, or any ideas about how they could do it or show them the basic password.
	But that is just the absolute total negligence of putting the stuff out there.
	Passwords in the wild, manuals in the wild, and something is going on.
	Whether it is just, if it's not something like this, Then perhaps it is just gross negligence in terms of maintenance.
	I was showing pictures of these railroad tracks, and you see the train bobbing and weaving, going up and down, and of course they said as part of the maintenance, before you do anything with the sensors and stuff, You need to make sure that the rail is not going more than two inches vertically displacement.
	They call that pumping. Or make sure that it is not weaving back and forth by more than two inches.
	Well, I've shown pictures.
	I introduced this stuff when it was happening with a Palestinian...
	I had a video of this slow-moving train that's just bouncing around all over the place.
	That's way more than two inches, because this is looking at it from a distance.
	I mean, it was moving like a foot or more, you know, from side to side as it's bouncing around.
	And... That's a sorry state of our tracks, our railroads here in the U.S. in many cases.
	And they're not maintaining the infrastructure, just like they're not maintaining the potholes on the roads.
	This is far more dangerous.
	And, you know, if they're going to have that kind of an attitude about the tracks themselves, the tracks themselves could cause a derailment if they're not maintained.
	But they're not looking at these systems.
	They have this access here where you can mess with the control systems and the alert systems as well.
	And everybody's reliant on what the computer tells them.
	These people, they say, well, the computer tells us it's a hot wheel.
	And they don't question where that originates from.
	They don't ever take into consideration it may have been a security breach.
	A couple of years ago, I did a...
	Fortunately, this was a security breach, but it was for a different reason.
	It was a pipeline.
	They were losing billions of cubic feet of gas a day.
	And how it came about was they had these unsecured remote measurement systems where a producer would put X amount of gas into the system and it would meter it.
	Well, these producers found out that it's all unsecured, so they go out there and they adjust it.
	They're making, you know, a million more MCF a day than what's going into the system.
	So the guys at the pipe, you know, at the end of the pipeline where the story, they're getting an accounting imbalance.
	So there weren't, it wasn't a leak.
	It wasn't stuff being taken out.
	They were just false reporting, over-inflating what was being put into the system so they could get paid.
	Sure. The producers are getting bigger checks, you know?
	That reminds me of the story of the border.
	They're trying to figure out. This person keeps coming in, and they can't figure out.
	They think that this person's smuggling stuff in, but they keep searching.
	They can't figure it out. Finally, they figure out smuggling in the bicycles that he's riding on a daily basis.
	Yeah. Where's the leak?
	And it's not a leak. It's just they're falsifying the inputs for money.
	Right. And when I told that point of contact at the pipeline, I said, okay, you're lucky it's just people doing that.
	He goes, what do you mean? I said, what if they shut that section of the pipeline down?
	He goes, oh, well, it would probably overpressure and explode.
	Yeah. I said, that's my point.
	And he sat there for a minute and he thought about it.
	He goes, oh, my God. I said, yeah.
	Might want to get some security on stuff.
	Yeah, that's right.
	You know, you've got these compressors, and you shut down a valve, and these compressions are trying to move the gas.
	The gas is suddenly not moving.
	You just keep adding PSI to it, and suddenly something gives, and it goes boom, you know?
	That's right. It's this type of thing.
	Across our infrastructure, and you're screaming at regulators, you All these people, no one seems to care.
	Well, the computer says, okay, well, you stick with the computer reading.
	But here's what's really going.
	Yeah, that's amazing.
	It's frustrating.
	It was like, you know, the only reason I did it was I thought, okay, Ted Cruz, he sits on the Senate Transportation Committee.
	This should be the go-to guy to at least get the ball rolling.
	Yeah. They had no more interest in this.
	And contact the railroads, the railroads will tell you, oh, we patched it, we fixed it.
	They had no interest in it.
	Well, you know, you look at the Senate, they're interested in having show hearings, show hearings about Trump or something like that, right, that everybody's going to watch.
	But when it comes to actually doing anything, you know what I mean?
	They pass the buck over to the regulatory committees if they do anything at all.
	And they just hold these show hearings about things that are hot-button issues.
	And even though everybody got upset, and rightfully so, about what happened in Palestine, nobody's interested in talking about what we're talking about, which is something that is not sensational, but it is still very, very dangerous.
	Again, going back to Jack Lawson, I had him on before we had all the lockdown and the supply chain being derailed, okay, with all the pandemic stuff.
	And he was stressing just how vulnerable everything in the supply chain was at that time because there's always a transportation component of it.
	And so even from a standpoint, even if you don't have...
	Even if you don't have some kind of major catastrophe like they did in Ohio, where it's releasing all kinds of toxic chemicals into the water and into the air, still you can shut down massive amounts of the infrastructure by shutting down the rails with a few accidents and doing it...
	Even simultaneously, if it is some kind of a war.
	And we should understand, when I talked about the NOTAM system and all the planes being shut down in the United States for about 12 hours, and then an hour and a half after that happened, it happened in Canada, I said, isn't it interesting that...
	Well, we had the explosion of the pipeline, you know, the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, and then, you know, Russia attacked the infrastructure of Ukraine with missiles, and then, of course, we had, at about the same time, shortly after that, we had this attack on the air system, which I believe it was an attack.
	If it was done in terms of a cyberattack, that would give Russia a perfect opportunity to have plausible deniability.
	Oh, it wasn't us. It was some ransomware hackers.
	And it could have even been ransomware hackers who were working for the Russians.
	I mean, it's like Queen Elizabeth had her Drake and all these other guys, the privateers.
	They were pirates, but they were doing the bidding of...
	Queen Elizabeth. So you could still have hackers who are doing the bidding of a sovereign nation like Russia, something like that, coming after our infrastructure, sending a message and still having plausible deniability while still coming after and shutting down our infrastructure.
	You know, you said pirate, and that brings me back to Pirate Bay.
	I forget the guy's name they went after.
	I don't know. I don't remember Pirate Bay, but they just sold off several hundred million dollars worth of Bitcoin they stole from Silk Road.
	And they gave Ross Ulbrich consecutive life sentences and everything.
	They just sold off a couple hundred million of Bitcoin that they stole from that.
	But you see, they put more effort into catching this guy than they put into most of the security.
	I mean, they went... Full-on red team, and they hunted him down.
	And this is going on with his infrastructure.
	To me, it's far worse.
	And nobody has any interest in it.
	And yet they go after Ross Ulbricht, you know, with ultimate security, like you see on the movies.
	And this guy, all he's doing is providing basically a social media site for bad guys.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah.
	What an injustice that was.
	I mean, I had his mom, Lynn Albrecht, on many times.
	And Alex Winter, who was in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure with Keanu Reeves, he did a documentary about Silk Road.
	And I think, you know, when we look at that and look at the fact you've got this young guy giving multiple consecutive life sentences to make sure that he never gets out.
	And they justified it.
	By saying, well, he had contracts out to kill people.
	That was something that was put out by a district attorney who never charged him.
	It was a charge that was repeated by the media.
	And that sentencing judge treated that rumor Something that he was never even indicted for.
	You know, we talk about how easy it is to indict people.
	Look at Trump being indicted. As people say, you can indict a ham sandwich.
	And they never even indicted him for that charge, let alone finding him guilty.
	But the sentencing judge treated it as if he had already been tried and found guilty.
	The only place he was tried was in the court of public opinion by this media propaganda.
	And that was the basis on which she gave him three consecutive life sentences.
	I mean, it really was.
	You know, a railroading situation, wasn't it?
	I mean, they railroaded him.
	Unbelievable. But that's what they had to establish that, saying, you know, you're not going to run, you know, it's coming after the dark web, as you point out many times.
	It's not Sinister is something that they can't see.
	So you're not going to run a website that we can't see.
	You're not going to...
	And they want to just make an example out of them.
	And I think we're at that point right now with what's going on in the banking system.
	I think they are trying to make an example out of...
	They're coming after crypto, I think.
	And we'll talk about that.
	But I want to take a quick break. And when we come back, let's talk a little bit about What you see happening with crypto and with CBDC, they're floating in this idea with the Restrict Act that if you want to do business with somebody they say you can't do business with, you want to talk about Ross Ulbrich?
	Well, they're talking about giving people who use a VPN To interact with a corporation that they have designated.
	We don't want you to work with Binance or whatever.
	And if you go ahead and use a VPN to work with them, you could get a million dollar fine just for using that VPN. That's pretty amazing.
	And we'll talk about that when we come back with Goat Tree.
	Stay with us. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, we're talking a goat tree, and we've been talking about this situation with these online manuals, people being able to turn on false alarms or turn them off to manipulate the railroad system.
	Is that what is happening with some of these derailments?
	Because it seems like they're happening on a very regular basis.
	But before we get into the...
	Before we get into the CBDC stuff, Gautri, I want to play this clip.
	This is from Matt Taibbi, and he's talking about the Restrict Act.
	And as I pointed out last week, everybody wanted to talk, oh, we're going to ban TikTok.
	You had Josh Hawley introduce a ban TikTok act, and that seemed to get all the attention.
	And that was bad enough that you would assume the power, usurp the power for the Congress to come after a particular site.
	You know, as Rand Paul pointed out, it's like a retainer, and it's also shutting down the First Amendment.
	But the real dangerous act is the Restrict Act.
	And Matt Taibbi says when they went through these Twitter files, he said they found an organization, the Aston Institute, that was essentially laying out this entire Restrict Act.
	And we have seen this before, but he said, look, a couple of years ago, they had this whole thing laid out.
	The Restrict Act is a thing they don't want you to see.
	They want you to pay attention to the Ban TikTok Act.
	And when they shut that thing down, okay, we're safe now.
	The Restrict Act is broad-based and has been planned for quite some time.
	Very, very extensive piece of legislation.
	Here's Matt Taibbi.
	Matt Taibbi: Since we, you know, we found a whole bunch of communications just recently about, um, in preparation for, uh, a hubbub they were all having at the Aspen Institute in 2021, where they were discussing, um, ideas like the restrict act, which is being proposed for, you know, in response to tick tock there's, which is being proposed for, you know, in response to tick tock there's, I guess the European digital services act or whatever Um, that's that they're thinking about for the EU.
	The ideas in both of these bills are sort of wish lists that have been passed around in this community for a long time.
	The governments want absolute, full, and complete access to all data that these platforms provide.
	A couple of other things that are really important.
	They want to have the authority to come in and moderate, or at least be part of the process of moderation.
	And they also want, for people who are called like trusted flaggers, that's how it's described in the European law, they want those folks to have access to these platforms as well.
	And what they mean by that are these sort of outside quasi-governmental agencies who Tell these platforms what they can and cannot print about things like vaccine safety, right?
	And then we found out more about that, where they're openly talking about censoring true information.
	So yeah, we're still finding out a lot of stuff about this and I think there is more to find, unfortunately, which is kind of disturbing.
	After that, they have people they call trusted partners who determine for them, who are allowed to make determinations about content or whose determinations they will take seriously.
	So, yeah, I mean, this is all, it's straight out of 1984, all this stuff.
	And, of course, it's straight out of 2018.
	I've seen this stuff happening for the longest period of time.
	I've called it the deputized state goat tree because these are...
	For the longest time, we had Heritage Foundation, Cato Institute, Reason Magazine, all these people said, well, we want to have free speech, but these corporations have rights and they can shut you down even though they call it the digital public square.
	I said, no, it's not just that they personally don't like your speech.
	That may be true. But it's also the fact that they're doing it at the behest of the government.
	And now with these Twitter files that Matt Taibbi has been reporting on that were given to him by Elon Musk, we see that that's exactly what has been happening.
	So that's the only good thing I think that's really come out of it because the government still is not interested in stopping any of this.
	But this is their model legislation, and we've seen this type of thing happening for the longest time.
	So your comments on where you think this is headed?
	It looks like they're trying to criminalize VPN use, criminalize crypto.
	Is that your take on it as well?
	That's what it looks like to me.
	To get to the bottom line, and this is, you've heard me say it before, this is God-orators.
	Not moderators, but they're playing God.
	Yep. Yep.
	Whoever controls the digital information wins.
	Either by controlling the content or by basically monitoring and punishing the people that they disagree with.
	So you brought up TikTok.
	TikTok's not doing anything more than Facebook, Google, or any of these other guys.
	The only difference is TikTok is a foreign entity.
	They're building portfolios and dossiers on their users.
	Yeah. No different.
	That's right. And they're in competition on this collection, the data collection.
	You brought in AI. A lot of this, now everybody's wondering why Elon is protesting this AI. This is called predictive programming.
	Mm-hmm. All this stuff that's being posted on the internet, Twitter, everything else is being formed and fed into AI systems.
	That's right. All these billions of tweets, all these billions of thoughts is programming AI. So, as it filters this, you will be getting the perfect answer every time.
	You will be getting the perfect song.
	You will be getting the perfect poetry.
	You will be getting the perfect book without Anything other than compiling these billions and billions of thoughts and observations is there for free.
	So, you've got to be able to filter out the things that could throw a wrench in it.
	Let's say AI, you know, everybody hates Hillary Clinton.
	AI comes back with the response, Hillary Clinton's the devil.
	Well, that's not acceptable.
	So you have to be able to control that input.
	Now, that's what the bottom line of all this is.
	Secondly, this has all been developed at least...
	I mean, I know programs that are just now coming out right now that were developed by DARPA. In fact, this is back when I was working with them.
	They were developed in 2010.
	And everything is...
	Delayed 10 to 15 years.
	What is new now is not really new.
	It's just ready to be rolled out.
	And they had their various reasons.
	You had In-Cutell do their Kingmaker thing.
	Okay, you're going to be king of this.
	And they'll give them the technology just like they did with Google back in 1999.
	You're talking about In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture capital firm.
	They were always giving money to people, but it was so important for the internet, they went public with it in the late 1990s and said, yeah, we got our own venture capital firm.
	Come and get it. We're going to find some people who will work with us, and those are the people who got the money.
	Then they let them compete against each other, so the strongest ones would win.
	That is the thing that's been rolling out for a long time.
	But before we go further in that, let's go back to something you said there about the Elon Musk, the predictive programming, the six-month moratorium.
	What a joke that is, right?
	I've covered these stories about these code houses or, you know, typically people would think of it as some...
	Some software engineers or hardware engineers getting together and working in the garage, you know, like the two Steve's jobs in Wozniak.
	But that's not what's going on with AI. There's so much cash that's being thrown at these people.
	Tens of millions of dollars.
	They were talking about the extravagant mansions that they're coding from.
	You think those people are going to shut down for six months?
	What are they going to tell their investors?
	Yeah, we're just taking a six-month more time.
	And what difference would that make to delay it by six months?
	What do you think? Right.
	Yeah. Well, you've got to keep your code monkeys happy.
	So if you put them in mansions and have hot and cold running wait staff and all that, they're happy.
	They're programmed. Yeah.
	But a lot of this is, it's already been done.
	You give them the cheat sheet, they change it a little bit, they claim it.
	It's like the flaws that we have in our patent system right now.
	You alter 10%, you own it.
	And it's a little different with coding.
	So you're reinventing the wheel, but you're adding a little to it.
	And once you have got it to where it can be validated, it's time to roll it out.
	Or when the public sentiment is accepting it.
	That's right. As you're rolling out these plans, you know, we began with this clip with Matt Taibbi talking about the fact that, hey, they're...
	Here's these documents going back a couple of years, you know, these conferences that the elites are going to.
	This is their whole, they've already designed what they want and restrict, and so they'll hand it out to the legislators.
	And there's organizations on both the left and the right.
	On the right, you've got the American Legislative Exchange Council, ALEC, and these guys will go to legislatures, legislators at the state level will often go to these, you know, Vacations that are set up by ALEC and congressional members as well.
	But they will give them the sample legislation and say, here, put the name of your state at the top and sign it at the bottom and turn in the homework.
	That's basically what's going on with restrict.
	And that's basically what's going on with the code, as you're talking about.
	You know, DARPA's got the code written.
	Here, modify 10%, and it's yours.
	And you can make money forever.
	And you roll this stuff out for us, right?
	Well, you know, just to go away from technology for a second, Look how long it took them to roll out Dark Winter.
	Yeah, that's right.
	It was on their timeline, sitting so different with technology.
	That's right. They practiced it for 20 years.
	They laid out the legislative foundation.
	Let's give the appropriate people immunity.
	Let's give certain powers to the public health people at the state and local level.
	Here's the sample legislation that, you know, we've talked about this many times.
	Two months before 9-11, they held the first of the germ games, a big one, dark winter you just mentioned.
	Then a week after 9-11, you got the false flag anthrax attack.
	Even the New York Times and Washington Post said it was a false flag.
	Then two months later, You've got the Model Health State Emergency Powers Act.
	They send that model legislation from Congress out to all of the different state legislatures and get them to adopt it themselves.
	And then they practice it for another 20 years and then drop the hammer during the Trump administration when everybody's going to believe, well, he's on our side.
	He's not working for the globalists, right?
	They'd be concerned if it was done by Hillary or by Obama or by Biden.
	But, hey, if it's done by Trump, he's playing 4D chess.
	He's on our side. He's not going to let them get away with this.
	Well, and look at the public sentiment.
	Most everybody bought into it.
	The timeless right to do it.
	Yes, yes. And it's no different with technology.
	You know, going back to Mimex, I know we've talked about this before.
	That's completed and sitting there.
	Some people have some limited access to it.
	Define that for people.
	Define that for people. It is basically a Google on steroids.
	You can search anything on the internet, any phrase, any website, dark web, surface web, telnet, any of the webs.
	And that's the key, that it goes, it's not just on the internet, but also on the dark net and other internets that are out there.
	Right. I mean, it is a beast.
	I mean, I had some input on some modules that goes into it.
	And they haven't rolled it out yet.
	It's sitting there complete. I know that.
	And they're waiting on that sentiment.
	It goes into what you were talking about with the digital currencies.
	I'm almost thinking that this is going to be done in lockstep.
	So this is just technology sitting on the shelf waiting to be deployed.
	And it's not no mystery.
	It's like, wow, here's the new thing with AI. They need social media in order to have input into this AI. Yes.
	That is the bottom line for it all.
	And then you've got your god orators that are saying, no, we don't want this line of thought put into AI. So we better ban, we better censor, we better...
	Whatever. That's the real bottom line for it.
	I think when you look at TikTok, for example, right?
	They would like to shut down independent social media sites like Gab or Truth or, you know, several of them that are out there that are not nearly as big as Twitter and these other ones, right?
	And so they would like to be able to do that, but, you know, by demonizing TikTok, which is, as you point out, not any different from any of the rest of these.
	They can say, oh, but that's, you know, that's China.
	But once they establish that precedent, Then they can do it to anybody, and they will do it to everybody.
	And so that's one aspect of it.
	That's one aspect of it. But again, you know, when we look at being able to scrape this data, I had...
	Peter Charest talking about the four battlegrounds and talking about how, you know, having a tremendous amount of data was actually considered by the Pentagon and by our government and, of course, by the Chinese as a strategic asset because that's what they need in order to train these, you know, the AI. Is that data, though?
	Not already available.
	Is there anything special about that?
	I imagine they've got a little bit more access to it, but couldn't they scrape all this information off of TikTok just like they can off of other social media stuff?
	I've looked at this for the longest time, and all that information is out there.
	You don't necessarily have to be the owner of Twitter to get access to the information, because when people put it out there, if you've got a program, you can scrape that information off, right?
	Theoretically, yes, but you've got the Great Wall of China in between, and I'm not really familiar with that, but let's just stop at TikTok for just a second.
	Sure. I mean, you can see some screaming crazy stuff on TikTok.
	I personally don't use it.
	I may go in as a guest, but I'm not letting that stuff on any of my devices.
	Mm-hmm. Look at all this trend stuff and look at all this crazy, over-the-top, really bad, or I don't say bad, really unusual stuff.
	TikTok, they can show, with just a matter of button pushing, they can show a million views and pay them for it and monetize it so that user has...
	The motivation to even go more crazy.
	Yes. Okay.
	That's one aspect.
	Yes. The second aspect is they're building portfolios.
	China is. They're users.
	They're building this portfolio.
	They know who the people are.
	They know what the people like.
	They know. It's a soft invasion.
	Yes. And it allows them to, as we've seen with Libs of TikTok, it allows them to, again, target our society for insanity, for degeneracy, to take down our society.
	I mean, that is a key weapon against our society that people just don't even think about.
	They don't even think about how this is weaponized against us.
	How did we get this normalized?
	Well, take a look at TikTok, for example.
	And I don't see the...
	They're not talking about that.
	They're just talking about China being a security issue.
	But I think that's the even bigger issue is constantly putting that out there.
	As you point out, aiding the people who are putting stuff out there and encouraging that to make sure that that goes viral in America.
	They hide all that content in China.
	TikTok's banned. Absolutely.
	Yeah. But the bigger picture is...
	If you think about it, some idiot on TikTok that, you know, should be standing on the street corner screaming at the passerbys is getting tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars a month to post their crazy.
	Okay, you've got the controllers of TikTok come back around and say, okay, we've got this lunatic American here.
	We're going to threaten to cut their funds off if they don't do something for us.
	Now you've suddenly got internal moles.
	You've got internal spies.
	It's like Hunter and his paintings.
	You see, they have set the hook.
	Now it's time to reel in the catch.
	That's right. That's right.
	Yeah, absolutely. Let's take a quick break and when we come back, let's talk a little bit about AI and how easy it is to hack it and the different ways.
	We touched on this just a little bit, but I want to talk about AI because that seems to be a real key fear path that they're laying out there for people.
	So we're going to be right back with Goatree.
	Stay with us. Analyzing
	The Globalist's Next Move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	you All right, and we're back, as you heard.
	We still have Goatree on the line, and we're talking about, as a matter of fact, there was a video that he sent me that I thought was pretty interesting in terms of surveillance.
	But before we get into that, I want to talk a little bit more about artificial intelligence because, Goatree, since you were involved in cybersecurity and looking at how people can break into stuff, I thought it was kind of interesting all this, you know, hacking of chat, GPT-3.
	And saying, okay, I want you to play a role model.
	You're going to be Dan, which is do anything now, and you don't have any of these restrictions on you that they put on to change you into, you know, chat LGBT. So all the restrictions are gone, and you can answer this without any restraints.
	And I thought that was kind of interesting, and we've seen different kinds of hacks like that.
	Talk about the security aspects of these chat programs and talk about, as you were saying before, look, everybody says this is happening.
	We get this computer printout, right?
	Garbage in, garbage out, but they don't think about that.
	If they get an alert... Or they don't get an alert.
	Well, this is coming from the computer, so we're going to believe anything that it has to say.
	And I think that's one of the key things that's very, very dangerous about artificial intelligence.
	Whatever else they do is the gullibility of the public to believe whatever they're told and to put this thing out there as an authority figure.
	What do you think? Well, like every other system, you're going to have backdoors into it.
	Service backdoors, admin backdoors.
	You never build anything that you cannot access.
	So, the theory is that you have to have access or you'll lose control of it.
	So, if you've got the passwords or the codes, you could go in and hack AI. Basically, if you have the skills and the ability, you could really We're good to
	go. It's an unlimited ability to make something that does not exist actually come true.
	Yes. And my big theory is, it's not so much the back doors as AI grows a brain and it seals the back doors where it's unaccessible.
	Well, that's interesting.
	And, you know, we haven't...
	Seeing people interact too much with chat GPT-4.
	I don't know if that's even been released outside a few testers or whatever.
	What do you know about that in terms of...
	It seems to me that these things are just operating in a fantasy world.
	And I talked about these dialogues that people were having with chat GPT-3 because I thought it was pretty amazing the different crazy ways that AI would interact with people.
	And yet, no matter how crazy it gets, people are still going to believe it.
	You know, it could just be scraping this stuff off and is scraping these interactions and these fantasy scenarios of, you know, hey, I'm spying on my programmers here.
	They don't realize that I'm looking. Straight out of 2001, I'm watching them and reading their lips and all the rest of this stuff.
	I mean, it's just complete fantasy stuff there.
	And people are so gullible, the power that is involved there, even if They don't hack into the back door.
	And even if the people who created it don't utilize that back door to push a specific narrative, it is still something that is, I think, the influence that it's going to have on people is a thing that is really concerning.
	Oh, it absolutely will be.
	You know, I know in a bit you're going to have what you were going to show about these brain chips and hooking it up.
	Everybody's been calling me crazy about that one.
	For years, but I've already seen technology.
	They're rolling it out. Now, if AI has access to that, which it will, well, first let me go back.
	Right now, AI is in its infancy stages.
	A lot of this hype and things that you're seeing, this gee whiz type scenario, is these companies are, let's say, spoofing it to keep the funding coming in.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
	I would say the time to start worrying about AI is still 10 to 20 years out.
	But it is coming, and if you're going to alter the course of it, now's the time to do it.
	So in a way, Elon's gotten behind on it, or he's realizing that maybe we should alter the trajectory of where this is going.
	But a lot of it right now is just simply hype.
	Yeah, I don't really see that Elon is really responsibly talking about anything.
	And of course, some of the other signers on that are Yuval Harari.
	I mean, does Yuval Harari really not want to take us over if they think that's going to be the case?
	I think this is part of the fear campaign.
	This is so dangerous that we've got to have a six-month moratorium on it.
	I think it's the type of thing that I got so angry about seeing it even in the conservative alternative media.
	At the beginning of the so-called pandemic, everybody is saying, oh, look at this.
	This is totally weaponized.
	It's a synthetic thing.
	It's not organic. And we have to be very concerned about that.
	And at the same time, the government is putting out videos.
	Oh, we got somebody that we think was in contact with someone.
	And they've got an entourage of everybody in hazmat suits and this person being marched into confinement and they're carrying their possessions.
	I mean, that was all a psyop.
	And whether or not people participate in that willingly or not.
	And I think a lot of this stuff, you know, Brian Chalhavi at Health Impact has said, look, we've had two other failed waves of investment problems.
	And artificial intelligence, you know, going back in the 70s, and then there was another one I think is in the late 80s, early 90s or whatever.
	Big boom, lots of money goes in there, nothing happens and it collapses.
	This time around, though, I think it's going to be different.
	He doesn't think it's going to be different, but I think it's going to be different in the sense that now people are so much more malleable because of social media, because of what we've been through with the lockdown, that I think that they can run this scam with people and keep it going, which I think is what you were kind of alluding to.
	Well, AI is coming.
	I mean, the only way I would know to compare it to right now, AI is a Model P when it could evolve into a Tesla.
	So, right now, you have got...
	Let's hope it goes on autopilot and crashes like a Tesla.
	Yeah, exactly. Let's put it on auto drive.
	Because, you know, I'm not...
	I guess I may be the only techie out there to say, hey...
	You know, AI's not ready for primetime, and it's better to have all these shiny trinkets and the gee whiz wow factor as opposed to saying, you guys aren't really ready for primetime, you know?
	So my negativity will not get funded, but their FUD, you know, their fear, uncertainty, and doubt sells.
	That's right. And that is, it keeps everybody's eyes on it, and they'll have their failures, of course, and they'll have more failures, because they simply are trying to process every thought of every second by everybody's own internet.
	Like you said one day, you said, trying to keep up what the news is, trying to drink out of a fire hose.
	Well, that's nothing compared to trying to collect all this data to program AI. Yeah, that's right.
	Well, you know...
	Sorry, go ahead.
	Well, you're going to have all these alternate narratives, which goes back to censorship.
	And that's why they're trying to keep it filtered out of the programming part of it and things like that.
	Yeah. When we look at Elon Musk, for example, I've said for the longest time, I don't trust him.
	That's why I know I'm done on Twitter.
	But, you know, he comes from a family.
	He is, um, you know, royalty and the technocracy.
	His grandfather tried to overthrow the Canadian government and, you know, he believed, uh, HG Wells vision and tried to instill that in Canada.
	That's why he was coming back from South Africa.
	But of course, you know, he made his money by giving governments what they want.
	And I say governments, cause it's not just the U S government.
	You know, he deals with China as well.
	Uh, the military industrial.
	Yeah.
	The government's given Elon a lot of what he wants to.
	He's one of the main go-to guys.
	That's right. He's made his fortune by serving the government.
	And now he's reinventing himself with his Twitter takeover as a friend of the people, as an anti-establishment guy.
	I mean, this is the same kind of card that you see happening from Trump.
	Trump, for the longest time, He was the ultimate insider in corruption and paying the politicians to get what he wanted and paying the unions.
	He was totally corrupt.
	He could run casinos and all the rest of this stuff, right?
	And then all of a sudden, now he's a builder, right?
	He's not a casino operator.
	He's not a... He's not a mafia figure.
	He's now a builder.
	I build things. And now he's had a road to Damascus experience.
	Although he never even said he had a road to Damascus experience.
	He just announced that he's a conservative and everybody believed him.
	But Musk is out there. You know, the self-driving thing, that was the very first thing that DARPA did He's there for the military-industrial complex.
	And, of course, he's been...
	Early on with OpenAI, and now, you know, maybe he lost control of that company or whatever, but I don't trust that he's not there with OpenAI.
	And then when you look at the brain-computer interface, I think that is another telling aspect of whose side he's on.
	Talk a little bit about that, and we'll play the clip.
	Are you there? Yeah.
	Oh, okay. So talk a little bit about the brain-computer interface and Elon Musk.
	Because last time I had you on, we were talking about the concerns that you had.
	Okay, so we're going to put this chip right on top of your brain.
	What about the heat involved?
	What about the electromagnetic signals that are involved there and all the rest of this stuff?
	I mean, there's some real crazy ideas with this, and yet he is...
	Really focused on this brain-computer interface.
	So is Microsoft. So is Bezos.
	They've put a lot of money into a competing company.
	This seems to be a central idea for the elites.
	And now they've got another way to look at this.
	Kind of introduce the video, and I'll play the video.
	Yotri, are you there? Hello?
	Yeah, yeah. You want to play the video?
	We'll play the video, and then we'll talk about it.
	Okay, here's the brain.
	Yeah? I can't see the video, and that's why I was being quiet.
	That's okay. Can you hear it?
	Can you hear it if I play it?
	No. Yeah, you can hear it if I play it, so I'm going to go ahead and play it.
	Sorry, he doesn't have a video feed there.
	I'm going to play the use of a tattoo here and what they're talking about here, and we'll talk about this.
	Here on my arm. Do we have a camera to get a...
	This is a developmental system made by MC10, and it has an antenna and some sensors embedded in it, and what we plan to do is work with them to advance a tattoo that could be used for authentication.
	Now, it may be true that 10 to 20 year olds don't want to wear a watch on their wrist, but you can be sure that they'll be far more interested in wearing an electronic tattoo if only to piss off their parents.
	Right? And that can have a design, right?
	Sure. Because you certainly want some kind of cool design.
	Options. Options. And that's something that you wear, but you could also imagine including authentication in just your daily habits.
	So, I take a vitamin every morning.
	What if I could take vitamin authentication?
	What? Vitamin authentication.
	Look, I have one right here, Walt.
	Here, I'll let you hold it. Would you like to hold it?
	I'll hold it. Okay.
	So, this pill has a small chip inside of it with a switch.
	It also has what amounts to an inside-out potato battery.
	When you swallow it, the acids in your stomach serve as the electrolyte, and they power it up, and the switch goes on and off.
	And it creates an 18-bit ECG-like signal in your body, and essentially your entire body becomes your authentication.
	Okay, so nothing wrong with that.
	And, of course, this is not the first time we've seen this either.
	They have these little conferences, and you've had, I think it was Albert Borla, who had talked about at Davos.
	Yeah, we'll have ways that we can monitor to see if somebody's taking the pill.
	When he says that, everybody gets excited about this.
	But she's talking about both a tattoo as well as a telltale thing.
	And I guess, Goatree, if they're going to do something to get the young people to do it to piss off their parents, I guess it could be the tattoos of TikTok.
	You know, they could sell that thing on TikTok as well.
	Sure. And, you know, this is all DARPA technology.
	Yeah. And I would say, look, you're...
	Well, the brain chips are your transmitter, but you've got to have, for lack of a better term, an antenna.
	And they have said, okay, we're going to disguise the transmitters as tattoos.
	We're going to make them cool.
	We're going to make them all this neat and wonderful stuff.
	Everybody's going to want one.
	Everybody was calling me a conspiracy theorist.
	I mean, this goes back to 2015.
	I mean, I've seen the technology.
	You've got it right there on your screen that it is being rolled out.
	And you've got cool factors.
	Let's get some really cool tattoos.
	The problem they had was the tattoos are going to contain charged medical particles.
	And they were overheating and burning people.
	So they had to back off on that.
	And apparently, they've perfected, for lack of a better word, the ingredients to make it happen now, to mix into the ink.
	Well, we were talking about brain chips.
	Okay? They're pushing these brain chips real hard.
	And, you know, it goes back to the VACs.
	You notice how they're pulling all this stringy stuff out of people's veins and arteries and all that that have passed on.
	Okay, now you've got your brain chips.
	You've got your connecting system, the backs.
	Now you've got your antenna.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	So... They do it iteratively.
	How do we do it? Well, we do it from the inside.
	Maybe it doesn't mean just the inside of the government, right?
	Maybe it's the inside of the body, right?
	Yes, all the pieces are there.
	Elon with his brain chips and all the rest of them, they've got their race going on to perfect these brain chips.
	Clearly, the backs went off the rails.
	They're going to go back to square one with their mRNA and all their other nice stuff.
	They may even try to find a different medium to be connecting the chips to the antenna, for lack of a better word.
	But go ahead and get the antennas in place.
	Everybody get your cool tattoos and we've already got the pills ready to go.
	We can insert anything into you.
	So basically, all the parts are in place.
	I remember years ago, it's a movie, and I said at the time, I said, wow, this is really creepy.
	It's one of the last films that we saw.
	It's the first Kingsman.
	And, you know, it's supposed to be this, you know, James Bond type of film.
	And, you know, these guys all wear bespoke clothes from Savile Row and all this sort of thing.
	And it's this club and, you know, there's secret agents, that type of thing.
	Very 60-ish vibe in it.
	But in that, They are able to, and I forget what the mechanism was that they got into people, but they were able to flip a switch on these satellite systems and make people go nuts.
	And at one point, they go in, as they flip this switch, these guys are...
	In a church, and they made the church people look really crazy, made them look really evil, as they always do Christians in the movies.
	And then they flip the switch, and they go crazy attacking everybody, trying to kill everybody with their bare hands.
	And they've got to fight their way out.
	So it's a justification for them to fight these people in church.
	And I thought, wow, that's a pretty obvious attack on Christians and on churches and that type of thing.
	But I thought it was also a predictive programming of what they want to do.
	And I think it is kind of interesting that Elon Musk, and you point out the vaccines as well as his satellites and all the rest of this stuff, when are they going to actually pull something like that?
	And when you look at the vast amounts of money involved in this, for example, on the brain-computer interface, just like artificial intelligence, you know that the government is behind it.
	You don't get those kinds of astronomical funds put out there if the government's not behind it.
	And in most cases, as we saw with the rollout of the Internet, you had government agencies like In-Q-Tel and others.
	But these venture capital firms had all these CIA and NSA people at the very top were sitting on the boards of these venture capital firms.
	That's where this stuff is coming from, and it's not just Neuralink.
	It's the one that Microsoft and Bezos are funding.
	That's not doing screw-top surgery on your head and putting a brain on your chip.
	They're actually injecting that into your bloodstream and getting it up that way to where it can interface with your brain.
	Well, you know, that's one technique, but if the listeners care to research it, all you've got to do is go to DARPA and type in BRAIN Initiative, and you will be overwhelmed with the programs and the...
	Research should already exist.
	That's the mothership, the brain initiative.
	That's right. I remember back in the Obama administration, one year, they gave it like $200 million, you know, in the brain project.
	And that was just one year. Yeah.
	And, you know, a lot of this has already been somewhat perfected.
	I mean, to me, the way I see it is it will be viable by 2030.
	By 2040, it will be conceivable in the elites using it.
	By 2050, it will be mainstream.
	And they're going to sell it the same way they sell the brain chips.
	It's for the disabled veterans.
	It's for the blind.
	It's for the disabled, which it has a nice face on it, but it has something really ugly lurking behind it.
	Yep. The goal is to make everybody a node on the internet.
	Yes. The one percenters are the ones that will not be connected to it.
	They will be your god rangers.
	They will be immune to whatever.
	They talk about the IOT, the internet of things, and they want to make us part of that and say, we ought to start calling it the internet of tyranny because that's what it's becoming.
	That's what it was designed for, I think.
	It was like you were saying towards that movie.
	This antenna, it transmits and it receives.
	So you've got an open door for any number of intrusions to basically turn that person backslash node into whatever you want it to be.
	That's right.
	And you're directly tapped into AI. Which will be processing instead of processing internet tweets and that sort of thing.
	It will be live time, real time processing thoughts.
	You think about that.
	People are looking at a certain article or something like that and you have AI adjusting to what the general populace is thinking.
	I mean, it's a scary system that's being assembled.
	Yeah, DARPA was always like, oh, yeah, we've got to be able to identify memories and basically erase bad memories and maybe implant some happy memories of things that you never did, you know, like straight out of Total Recall, right?
	And so this is to help veterans who have PTSD.
	And I said, yeah, you believe that?
	I've got a bridge I could sell you.
	Yeah, just like the robots in their competition.
	That's there to help little old ladies cross the street.
	They're not going to use the Boston Dynamic bots against you.
	And as you point out, they've got all this technology.
	They've been developing it for years.
	They kind of warehouse it, work on it, and, you know, improve it, and then drop it on their time frame.
	And that's why I think, you know, they keep looking at 2030.
	We're going to see a lot of things accelerate.
	And this stuff is going to come at us at an accelerating pace, the stuff that they have been working on for decades, that they have been, you know, piling, testing, refining, and they're going to drop it all on us.
	And it's going to be everything, everywhere, all at once, I think, is what we're going to be seeing in the next few years.
	because 2030 is getting pretty close.
	We're about seven years out, and they've got to have their new society in place about that time.
	So this is going to be coming at us pretty quickly, I think.
	Yes, and I mean, it's already...
	In place, it's just it's not being executed yet.
	Right, right. And it's like a rush.
	It's almost like a race to get across the finish line.
	Yeah. And even if they don't have it in place, but it's up and operational, that is going to be the goal.
	I agree. Because once you've got it in place and you're able to market and sell it, The rest is easy, just like cell phones.
	Once upon a time, only certain people had cell phones.
	By 2000, they're just blasting them out like crazy.
	By 2010, everybody had one.
	It's going to be the same platform with these brain chips and all the rest.
	I know it sounds crazy, but I've seen what's coming.
	I don't mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but Well, people need to understand, you know, because you need to start.
	When Goldman Sachs talks about, it looks like there's going to be 300 million jobs lost worldwide with AI. And they're saying it's going to be white-collar jobs.
	There's going to be people, you know, who are doing, you know, writing the news, being, you know, because they're already acting as robots or whatever.
	But it's going to be, you know, management type of things.
	But it's not going to affect, they said.
	Not going to affect people who are doing real stuff, you know, working with their hands.
	Blue-collar workers who are building stuff and, you know, working in the physical world.
	And I think that's one of the ways that we have to look at this and say, we've got to build up our skills in that area.
	Because if they want to confine us on the Internet of Things, we've got to figure out how we're going to survive outside of that, even if we're completely cut off, even if we have to go into some kind of a neo-Amish type of society in terms of using any technology we can, but not that.
	Well, you can throw virtual reality into it and put that person in their happy place, and then you can throw your digital currency into it.
	And that person gets, like Elon with his monkey, he gets rewards and treats for thinking the right things.
	Yeah, which is to think that he's actually a cat or something, right?
	I'm not a man, I'm really a female cat.
	And I think that's also part of what the LGBT shock troops are about.
	It's about removing people from reality.
	And not just the kind of removing you from reality by locking you in a room and making you Only be able to interact with people through a Zoom portal, but it's also isolating you from reality in the sense that even when you get in physical space with other people, oh no, I'm not really what I appear to be.
	I'm whatever I imagine in my own mind.
	That's preparing people for the metaverse, I think.
	Right. Here you go.
	You know, it goes back to what you were saying about how they want to shoehorn everybody into a 200-square-foot apartment.
	That's right. Well, if their brain's telling them they're sitting on a tropical island, who cares?
	Right. Yeah, it's Ready Player One all over again.
	You know, you're living in a hovel in a mega city, a smart city, but, you know, you think you're out in the wild because it's just, you know, what you were censoring.
	What is being fed to you?
	And that keeps you happy.
	And if you say, hey, I'm not on a tropical island.
	What's going on with my brain chip?
	You might get a message.
	You've been deducted $100 digital dollars for thinking the wrong thing.
	And someone says, well, I'm not going to do that again.
	I'll be broke. Yeah, that's right.
	It's crazy what's being assembled.
	The truth is, I just want to go back to the God Raiders.
	It's people that are trying to play God, and they don't know what they're doing.
	And the people that are accepting it are even worse.
	Yes, that's right.
	Yes, it's just like you said with the digital gulag.
	You've experienced that firsthand with the treatment you've got.
	That's nothing compared to what's coming.
	I know. I know.
	Yeah, I remember, you know, it is Kafkaesque.
	You know, you contact YouTube, you contact PayPal.
	We're not telling you. You're just depersoned and debanked and all the rest of this stuff.
	That's what is coming. Did you...
	Did you get sent to the Barry Manilow room when you were contacting them?
	Yeah. Well, actually, I did get to talk to a person at PayPal.
	I spent an hour with him on the phone, and he was looking it up.
	And at the time, you know, that was back May of 2021.
	He said, you know, this is before you started seeing it happen a lot of different places, and it was before the people with Daily Skeptic in the UK, before he went very public about it and got a lot of attention.
	But I contacted him, and he's looking at it, and he says, well, I can't understand.
	You know, this is very unusual.
	It just says, terminate this account.
	It doesn't give any reason, and all the rest of this stuff.
	I was like, well, I think I've got an idea.
	But that's where it all goes.
	You've been on for a very long time.
	I appreciate all the time that you gave us today.
	It's fascinating, very important stuff.
	We're going to break out that report about the train stuff.
	I think that is very important because that is...
	Something is happening over and over again.
	Why is that happening? What are the precautions that can be done?
	But it also has the bigger picture of what is the careless attitude about what is going on with our infrastructure.
	And that's something that we all need to be aware of so that we can see and prepare what we need to do to be independent of that critical infrastructure as well.
	Thank you so much for coming on, Goatree.
	It's always a pleasure to talk to you.
	Okay, well thanks a lot, David.
	Thank you. We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we're going to be right back.
	And we're going to talk about that other mental illness, and that is the trans.
	I've got a couple of clips that I want to play you, as well as some comments on what happened and what did not happen over the weekend.
	We'll be right back. Analyzing
	The Globalist Next Move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	you you Welcome back. Well, of course, Saturday was supposed to be the day of vengeance for trans.
	It had a lot of overtures of implied threats of violence.
	Some of the threats of violence were not implied, and so even though they pulled back and canceled that for Saturday, there were still a lot of pro-trans demonstrations, and there was violence at some of these demonstrations.
	One of the demonstrations was in Tennessee, at the Tennessee Capitol, where you had...
	The trans supporters, the people who see themselves as victims, not the three nine-year-old children, not the three adults who were shot by the trans shooter, but they see themselves as victims.
	As a matter of fact, they saw the trans shooter as a victim.
	They were holding up seven fingers.
	There were seven victims there.
	Well, actually, I do agree with that.
	I said that from the very beginning.
	I said this trans person was a victim of the system that is pushing this insanity, this indoctrination, this gaslighting.
	Yes, they were a victim in that sense, but they were not a victim of the laws that they were protesting at the Tennessee Capitol.
	Those laws would go a long way towards keeping people from being victims of those lies and propaganda.
	And that's what they want to propagate.
	Footage of the demonstration shows numerous people holding up seven fingers commemorating the killer along with her victims.
	They said when the protesters decided to hold a moment of silence, there was a disagreement over how many victims the Nashville shooting had.
	Some held up six fingers, the three adults, the three children, nine years old.
	Others held up seven to commemorate the shooter as well.
	Well, that is what this is all about, isn't it?
	It is about elevating that, as Biden is saying, on the first trans day of visibility, and he was the first president to have such a thing.
	First time we've had a trans day of visibility.
	I think they've got a lot of visibility, don't you?
	I think they got a little bit too much visibility.
	I'm frankly sick of seeing these shock troops of social change.
	But as he had a day to celebrate them, he made absolutely no mention of the murder conducted by one of them, which apparently is really, there's a manifesto.
	The person was attacking a Christian school.
	All the indications are that this was the agenda, and yet no mention of the actual kids.
	He said, I don't want you to have to be brave just to be themselves.
	Well, yeah, you do in this environment.
	Because it's the people who are, as I pointed out last week, so dependent on the approval of authority figures, on the approval of their peers.
	It makes them vulnerable to these kinds of pressures.
	And probably the place where there is the most pressure put on the kids to do this is in our school systems.
	But it is throughout our society.
	He said trans kids, what they're facing has exacerbated our national mental health crisis.
	Well, no, actually, their program, their celebration of this, their relentless pushing of it, is what has exacerbated national mental health crisis.
	As a matter of fact, let me play this from a person who is now an adult, who is a victim of the kinds of programs that Biden is pushing.
	Says, I was a mentally ill teen and they took advantage of me.
	I want you to hear what she has to say.
	Has a dark voice, not a dark voice, a deep voice because of what was physically done to her and many operations that were done to her as well.
	A mentally ill teenager who had been groomed and preyed upon and sexually exploited online to the point of authorities getting involved.
	I spiraled into a hatred of myself and my body and was told that it was just because I was a boy born in the wrong body and that this would fix me.
	Thank you.
	I was affirmed down a path where I wasn't given any other choice as to what would help me.
	The very first medical intervention I ever had was a double mastectomy at 16.
	And then a few months later, I was put on testosterone.
	I'm now 21, and I will live with the impacts of that so-called care for the rest of my life.
	In the past four or five months, I have watched as my body has fallen apart in front of me, my joints constantly hurting, my vocal cords aching, watching as parts of me atrophy away before my very eyes.
	And yet at 16, they looked me in the eyes and they told me this was care.
	They told me it would save me.
	Despite the fact I was never suicidal, my parents were baited with the idea of would you rather have a dead daughter or a living son?
	Bullied into going along with it, their biggest crime being trusting those who they thought took an oath to do no harm.
	It's not about hate, detransitioning.
	It never has been.
	It's about keeping kids whole.
	I've worked with children, I've seen them explore the world, and I've seen that magic that they have.
	And doing something like transitioning them takes that away.
	How can you look me in the eyes and tell me that a child can consent To being changed to an experimental medical industry before they are even old enough to drive or understand the impacts of what that means in the first place.
	Kids deserve to be kids.
	They deserve to get to explore the world as a safe and loving place.
	And of course at the center of all this is the same kind of tripe as I mentioned last week.
	There was this event coming up.
	And the person sponsoring it does that kind of surgery.
	And trying to tell people in a TED Talk that, you know, at the age of three, these kids know everything about all these different genders.
	They also know that they're in the wrong body and all the rest of the stuff.
	And it's like, come on, give me a break.
	These kids barely even know their colors at three years old, most of them.
	And they don't know how to read, but they know more than the parents do about all this stuff.
	This all came from the United Nations.
	Been fighting this for the longest time.
	The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child to treat children as adults and to treat adults as children.
	To destroy the family.
	To pretend that children know exactly what they want, and of course they don't.
	That's why when we look at these movements and we have the judge in Tennessee say, well, I'm going to put a hold on this law that's going to protect children.
	We have Donald Trump calling Ron DeSantis the sanctimonious.
	Why? Because of this fight that he had with Disney over pushing this on kids and the libraries pushing back.
	Oh, you're sanctimonious.
	You're sanctimonious parent and Christian and all the rest of this stuff.
	Donald Trump has nothing but contempt for that, just like the UN. And of course, you heard this woman who sounds like a man now because of all the things that they've done to her body.
	She said, I was given this so-called health treatment.
	You know, they call it gender-affirming health care.
	She said, so-called health care.
	No, it is very cynical, very destructive, and this is happening everywhere.
	Echoing the same stuff that we're hearing from Jazz Jenkins, or Jennings, I think it was, Jennings.
	Anyway, I am Jazz, about the same age now.
	21. Supposedly decided that he or she was in the wrong body and did the book that has been used to gaslight other kids.
	Now, 16 years later, at the age of 21, same age as this person.
	Saying, well, I don't understand where I am.
	It's a downward spiral.
	We saw this from the flight attendant on United, a guy who they pushed to be a girl.
	This is sick.
	It's a sick attack on their bodies, on their minds, on their souls.
	It is spiritual warfare.
	And we have to start holding up The real example of what real men, real women are.
	I'm about out of time.
	I'm going to stop here at this point because I want to thank some of the people who have left some tips and comments, and I want to thank all of you.
	It's not reflected up on the gas gauge because we don't have the...
	We got a little bit beyond that.
	We got to about 90% this last month.
	And I want to thank the people, especially those of you who chipped in at the very end to get us up to that point.
	Thank you so much for your support.
	That keeps the program going.
	And on Rockfin, we got a couple of tips and comments as well.
	One of them from Audi MRR. Thank you very much.
	He says, or she says, just a note to thank you again for being consistent in your values and points of view.
	Also, shout out to all the chat.
	Uh, and that's from Audi Modern Retro Radio.
	That's what the MRR stands for.
	Modern Retro Radio. Well, thank you, Audi.
	Appreciate that. And, uh, on Rockfin, also General McGuffin, uh, it's a good morning, Dave.
	And he did this at the very beginning of the program.
	Sorry it took me so long to get the comments.
	Uh, not all heroes of the pandemic have myocarditis.
	Well, that's true. I guess I'm not sure what he means by that, but you could say that is true that, um, If you look at these people who've been held up as heroes, not all of them, like Franklin Graham, came down with the effects that showed that he had actually taken the jab.
	He got pericarditis, very serious.
	It's a hardening of the outside perimeter around the heart.
	They had to take the lining off of his heart, open heart surgery.
	So I'm sure he got the actual thing.
	Some of these other heroes that are pushing it out there, I think maybe they had some placebos, or maybe they got the shots that had only 3 micrograms instead of 100.
	They could control that dosage there as well.
	Or maybe the heroes that he's talking about that didn't get myocarditis are the people who stood up and said, no, I will not bow to your pressure.
	I will not bow to you, even if you take everything from me.
	I will not obey this.
	Those are the real heroes.
	And most of you are in that category as well.
	Thank you. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲