Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 1, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:29

2Feb23 NASA, NASCAR, RealID — But Big Win for Gun Ownership

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 2nd of February, year of our Lord, 2023.
	3.
	Day 1,057 of the emergency.
	But, you know, we're going to get rid of that in a few months.
	It's crazy. We'll see.
	We'll see what happens with it.
	We have some big news today about the Second Amendment.
	Big win for the Second Amendment.
	As well as some big news for the mainstream media.
	They finally all agree.
	All the people in academia, all the people in the biggest media companies agree.
	That there should be no objectivity in journalism.
	Oh, really? Well, what are you going to do with the fact-checking ideas and the rest of this stuff?
	Are you going to determine disinformation, misinformation, all the rest of this without any facts?
	Well, it'll be whatever they say, right?
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	That's right.
	It's Groundhog Day.
	And not only that, but it's a special Groundhog Day.
	It is 2-22.
	Very special Groundhog Day.
	But it does feel like Groundhog Day, doesn't it?
	I mean, it's not... It's not just the forecast of a big storm coming in.
	It feels like we're doing the same thing over and over again for 692 days.
	Well, yeah, now it's 1,057 days.
	It's Groundhog Day.
	And there's another storm coming in Texas.
	As a matter of fact, it's pretty big what happened in Texas.
	And I want to mention that I don't usually do the weather except on Groundhog Day.
	But when you look at what is happening in Texas, look at this picture.
	This is one of Karen's friends back in Texas.
	Put this up and said, look at this.
	Look at the length of these icicles.
	If these things break off, this could seriously injure somebody.
	If I drove through that, I would have to at least put the top up on my Miata, I guess.
	But it's pretty crazy.
	It is so crazy. They've had so many accidents, and some people have died in Texas.
	As a matter of fact, in one county, they had deputies responding to car accidents every three minutes in the morning.
	And they've had 370 accidents, and this is the beginning of it.
	This is an old article.
	So it continues to go.
	They lost power. Travis is there right now.
	And he's still doing our show uploads and things like that.
	He lost power.
	This is one of the reasons I'm mentioning this.
	That's why we didn't get anything up other than the full shows yesterday.
	So we do have some cuts that will eventually be going up.
	But that's one of the reasons, I guess you could say, It canceled our uploads, not just 1,600 flights across the country, about half of those in Texas alone, but we'll eventually get that up.
	It's been a crazy time, but of course, it's just like what happened last year.
	As we're talking about some crazy things, and this is just kind of a side thing that I just thought was interesting, and I really enjoyed.
	This is back in October.
	Remember, I played this clip.
	It was a NASCAR race.
	And the guy was way back in tenth place.
	And he tried a move that he had done on a video game.
	And some people on those video game simulators, you know, you just basically run the car up against the wall and floor it.
	And you don't have to worry about spinning out because the wall's got you, right?
	You don't have to worry about the centrifugal force.
	And so he was able to just zoom around everybody.
	As a matter of fact, here's a clip of it.
	Take a look at what he did!
	I've never seen anything like that before in my life.
	So at the very end of the race, he goes in.
	Around the wall in three Scraping the wall as he goes.
	And he moved from 10th to 5th place.
	It was a really exciting clip.
	Got everybody excited. And now NASCAR has banned that.
	Can't have too much fun. It is a dangerous move.
	As he said when he was playing with a race car simulation.
	You know, you hit something on the wall, that could spin you out, that type of thing.
	But it was fun to see that, and it was a clever and risky innovation.
	It's kind of like Junior Johnson in the early days of NASCAR. He'd been...
	A whiskey runner, you know, moonshine, that type of thing, in the hills here in Tennessee.
	And he knew a few tricks, but he was also pretty smart.
	And he came up with the idea of drafting, which now they always do.
	Now there's no risk to drafting, but they felt that there was too much risk for this.
	And, you know, we all have to be about safety, of course.
	Especially when it comes to cars.
	So they have now removed that as an option.
	But he got complaints at the time, but they said, well, we don't have any rules to prohibit that.
	So they went ahead and left that stand.
	And it was the most viewed sporting event of 2022 online, or one of the most, I should say.
	Just on TikTok alone, it got more than 12 million views.
	So, that's going to be gone.
	But, you know, you always get another try, I guess.
	And now they're going to go back to the moon, they say.
	This mainstream media article from Bloomberg says, The moon beckons once again, and this time NASA wants to stay.
	Which always begged the question that I didn't understand.
	Why didn't they stay 58 years ago?
	Why didn't they go back for 58 years?
	And again, a guy who worked on the front lines there at Mission Control at Houston got him on just before he died and he said, well, he says, I'm not really sure we went to the moon.
	He said there were some things that seemed very realistic about it, like Apollo 13.
	But he said...
	I'm not really so sure. And he said, I really, one of the things that really made me seriously question this was why they would destroy all the engines and destroy all the plans, especially.
	Was there something that they didn't want people to see?
	So I said 58, 54 years.
	I guess it went 1969, supposedly.
	And they went back a couple more times.
	In 2010, Obama...
	Said, well, you know, hey, look, we're thinking about Mars now.
	We've been to the moon. We've done that.
	Guess we got the t-shirt.
	We don't need to do that again.
	He says, I just have to say pretty bluntly, said Obama in 2010, we've been there before.
	There's a lot more space to explore and a lot more to learn when we do.
	Well, now for some reason they've decided to go back and they've decided to go back and stay.
	And of course, there always would have been a reason to go and stay.
	One of the things that I've talked about in the past when I talk about Bezos' designs, you know, he's not interested in going to Mars.
	He's interested in going to the Lagrange libration points.
	These are gravitationally neutral points.
	Between, well, the two that are key are two that are on either side of the moon.
	There's actually five Lagrange libration points.
	We have a gravitationally neutral area.
	You can put something there and it'll stay in that area without falling to either the moon or to the earth.
	But two of these are very close to the moon because the moon is much smaller than earth.
	And so in the 1970s, There's a book that I read, a book that Bezos read when he was in engineering as well.
	It really captured the imagination of a lot of students at that time.
	By Gerard K. O'Neill, it was called High Frontiers.
	And if you want to, if you look at Elysium and you see those toroid-shaped, donut-shaped space stations and the big cities that they put in there, that was, you know, something that was pushed by O'Neill, his idea being that people would set up bases on the moon.
	They would be able to mine it without all this pain-in-the-neck environmentalism stuff, right?
	Of course, I'm sure they were like, wait, you can't destroy the surface of the moon.
	We need that cheese.
	But they would mine stuff there, and then they would use maglev rails to launch it into the Lagrange libration points where it would be captured, and they would be able to do a lot of processing.
	Very, very... Cheaply, in the sense that, you know, when you want to have efficiency in engines, you just paint something white or you paint it dark in space.
	And, you know, if it's white, it gets very, very cold because it reflects the light.
	If it's black, it gets very, very hot because it absorbs the heat without anything in between.
	You know, no clouds, no atmosphere, anything like that.
	So they could process this stuff.
	And then they could just drop ship it, literally drop it back to Earth.
	I guess that got Bezos in his Amazon imagination going, hey, we could drop ship the LaGrange points.
	Anyway, we're not talking about LaGrange, Texas either.
	He's got an Amazon warehouse there.
	But anyway, you know, there was a reason to stay, is what I'm saying.
	If you had been there, there'd be a reason to stay.
	And so, now this article that I saw at the Sun.
	Inside NASA's new fake moon.
	Created to test out conditions for upcoming human missions.
	NASA has unveiled an ultra-realistic fake moon environment.
	So maybe they didn't get rid of everything on the program.
	Maybe, you know, the plans for the engines and the rockets and all the rest of the stuff.
	Maybe they kept the plans or even the sets for what had been filmed.
	Whether that was Kubrick or somebody else.
	The ultra-realistic fake moon environment to simulate activities on the lunar surface and make it look like you're really there.
	Looks very, very realistic.
	They said the fake moon is said to have realistic lunar lighting and conditions that astronauts will experience when they get to the real thing, finally.
	NASA will also be testing out some of its new robots on the fake moon.
	The fake moon is technically made up of two large sandy areas filled with simulated lunar dust.
	The first lunar sandbox has been around for a few years.
	They don't say how many.
	Is it 54 or more?
	I don't know.
	But they've got a brand new one that has 20 tons of dust in it.
	Both indoor areas can simulate the moon with very high accuracy.
	The older sandbox is 62 feet by 13 feet.
	I'm sorry, it was 13 by 13 feet.
	This new one is 62 by 13 feet.
	Moon dust has grains as fine as powder, says NASA, as sharp as tiny shards of glass, and it has a curious capacity to electrostatically cling to everything due to the way that it was formed.
	Add in the lack of atmosphere and the fact that the moon is home to some of the coldest places on our solar system and the lunar environment will pose a challenge to machinery and spacesuits at best.
	At worst, it could be a hazard.
	Well, it's no problem.
	We did it 54 years ago.
	Is that a problem?
	Yeah, I mean, it will be a problem, he says.
	It's not like... They talk about how they solved this problem once before.
	Okay, so from one absurdity to another, you have Biden's border admission policy is going to allow Haitian Cuban migrants to receive Medicaid, food stamps, cash handouts, on and on and on.
	What was I just saying the other day?
	The issue is the welfare system.
	And the fact that we're making it available to foreigners without any limit.
	You know, that's the whole thing about an entitlement program.
	Once you say, anybody that meets these conditions is entitled to free stuff.
	And so there's no limit on it.
	Anybody, you know, you don't know...
	What the entitlement programs are going to cost you because you don't know how many people are going to qualify.
	Well, guess what? Everybody in the world qualifies for this, except for Americans.
	The Americans go to work if you file all your paperwork properly.
	If you get your e-verify, you can work.
	And if you're an employer, you have to do the e-verify or people like DeSantis will take away your business license.
	Right? What a great system.
	That is what really grates against me about this immigration thing.
	I don't care about the rest of this stuff.
	Look, you know, cultures, languages, all the rest of the stuff, we can sort that thing out at the local level.
	But this thing, what Washington is doing, and what governors like DeSantis want to cooperate with them with, with this E-Verify system, is absolutely reprehensible.
	Americans have to be able to work We have to get the government to grant us a privilege, but it's a right to come here and to live off of those of us who get the privilege to work.
	Are you kidding me?
	It's absolutely amazing.
	Yesterday, Karen has gone back to try again today.
	Jason Barker said, boy, they really gave my wife a hard time to get her license when we moved to Georgia.
	Well, we're going through the same thing now.
	So tomorrow is Karen's birthday, and her license is going to expire.
	And so she needs to get this thing changed.
	I thought it would be just a simple thing.
	Turn in my license and give me a new one.
	Oh, no. Got to have all this paperwork for real ID. And not only that, but she got all of her paperwork together.
	She's got certified birth certificates, marriage certificates that have the seal on them and all the rest of this stuff.
	No, no, no, no. No, that's not good enough anymore.
	She's got a passport.
	She's got certified, sealed certificates.
	No, that's not good. No, we have to have more information.
	Do you do this at the border with people coming in?
	Do you know whether these people or why they're coming in?
	Do you know if they've got a criminal background?
	You don't vet them at all!
	We can't, as an American, we can't even get a license.
	But hey, we'll hand out free licenses and we'll let people who are not citizens get a license.
	We'll let people who are not citizens vote in New York and other places like that.
	They get a free ride and we have to beg for a driver's license?
	I shouldn't even have it. I'm ready to go full sovereign citizen.
	But I know that's more of a hassle, even.
	I know somebody who's done that.
	And I know the hassles that that is.
	But, you know, there is no reason for us to have a driver's license.
	Driving is not a privilege.
	Over the years, I used to get these paper maps, and every time you get a paper map for whatever state you're in, there'd be a message on the back from the governor of that state.
	Driving is a privilege.
	It's not a privilege.
	It's a right. It's a fundamental right, and that's one of the things we need to understand about this move to take over the To ban all private cars and take over all transportation.
	That was our lifeline in this lockdown, was the car.
	You know? Think about it.
	That's why they're going to move so hard to take away our private cars.
	And make sure that any cars that are there are going to be controlled by them and their cronies.
	Their crony corporations that they're working with.
	It's absolutely disgusting to see this.
	Driving is not a privilege.
	Driving is a right.
	And so we try to, as much as it depends on us, to live peacefully with people.
	But it gets to a point.
	I tell you, you know, just...
	The DMV brings out the Patrick Henry in me.
	But these migrants...
	Are going to be getting Medicaid, food stamps, cash benefits, all the rest of this stuff from Biden's HHS. Nicaraguans, Cubans, Haitians.
	And they're going to allow 30,000, and Venezuelans, up to 30,000 a month, I guess, will be legal immigrants.
	But, you know, there's no limit, because if they just want to come through, just make your way in.
	So we can pay the taxes if they'll let us work, and they can get the benefits, right?
	DeSantis has gotten in the face of Biden and the rest of these people like Hochul who want to ban gas stoves.
	He says he's going to make gas stoves tax-free in a proposed budget.
	That's a symbolic move, but it's good.
	I applaud that move. Mark says, supposedly a problem with returning to the moon was the fine particle dust that gets into everything.
	NASA needed to find a solution to that so as to protect machines, equipment, and instruments.
	The fine dust could be simulated with the fine talcum powder.
	That's what Johnson& Johnson could do with a talcum powder that they've been killing people with.
	They've got billions of dollars in lawsuits because they have knowingly Sold talcum powder to women and for babies, used for babies.
	And they just tried to pull the bankruptcy escape clause.
	And that just got shut down this last couple of weeks.
	So this is what they could do.
	They could become a major contractor to NASA. You know, they could keep simulating the moon with talcum powder.
	Anyway, so they simulate it with fine talcum powder-like sand in the desert areas in and around Lima, Peru.
	I find it curious that even the plans for the Saturn VF1 engines, the monsters on Stage 1, were destroyed.
	They were the biggest and most powerful ever.
	Yeah, that's the thing. Why would you destroy the plans?
	I mean, wouldn't that be of historical value?
	Pretty amazing. Anyway, so DeSantis is making his move for the gas stoves.
	And let me say on Rockfin, thank you, Charlie.
	Appreciate the tip on, not Rockfin, on Rumble.
	We'd like for you to tip on Rumble if possible because we don't have to go through the crypto exchanges.
	But I appreciate that, Charlie.
	Thank you. Glad you found Rumble.
	We've got some news both about Cryptocurrencies, the cryptocurrencies that are in the Odyssey world.
	Odyssey is built on top of LBRY. I don't know if they pronounce that library or what.
	That's obviously what they're referencing.
	But they've been in a struggle for quite some time, and they just had a court victory about that.
	This is what a lot of platforms like Odyssey and Rockfin are using these cryptocurrencies.
	And so the government tried to regulate them as securities.
	They just had a court decision saying, no, can't do that.
	So that's a good thing for them.
	I'm glad that they were able to do that.
	But Charlie says he is from Chum Phan Province, Thailand.
	Does anyone know the source for the religious exemption forms for the Trump shot?
	You know, we just checked on this, and when we changed the website, we don't have the excellent letter that Jason Barker did, and we had that on the older website, and I wasn't sure if that got moved over to the new site, but we looked at it. It's not there.
	We can send that to you if you want.
	But Jason Barker is the one who did it.
	And of course, Jason Barker and Angry Tiger and Rhonda and some other people have the Knights of the Storm broadcast that they do on Saturday mornings at 10 a.m.
	Excellent program. I highly recommend it.
	And I highly recommend his letter.
	It helped a lot of people.
	Sorry we don't have that on there right now.
	We'll try to put that up somewhere so people can still get to it.
	Because, you know, this evidently is not over yet.
	They keep saying it's not over.
	Biden has said it's over, but then it's not over several times.
	And now he says he's going to end it in four months.
	Republicans are fighting him on that.
	We'll see what happens. But the WHO, which we all have to bow and scrape to, is saying it's not over.
	And you have Tony Blair at Davos saying, we gotta have those vaccine passports so you know it's not over.
	And the other part of this is that I think that any of the vaccines that they're going to do from here on out are going to be tainted with Nazi Josef Mingela science.
	And so you should have some religious objections to that.
	If you don't, you haven't investigated enough.
	Anybody who looks at it ought to have moral objections to that, regardless of what their religion is.
	As a secular humanist, you ought to have moral objections to what they're doing.
	But certainly as a Christian, and as a Christian, there's another several things that you should object to.
	Anyway, he said they want to go after the gas stoves, so we're going to take off any taxes on gas stoves to encourage people to get it.
	I like that.
	So, it's going to permanently remove the tax on gas stoves.
	But you know, the sad thing about it is that Daily Caller and Reporting This doesn't give you the full perspective.
	They just repeat the propaganda from the Biden administration.
	Oh, well, you know, 13% of the country's childhood asthma cases are from this.
	Prove it. That's absolutely a lie.
	That is not true at all.
	There's no way that they don't have a study that they can point to that is valid to say that.
	And of course, this is not something that has ever surfaced before.
	So this is a December 2022 study.
	And so take a look at that, see why they found something that nobody else has found.
	That's a pretty astounding assertion there.
	Not supported. And then, even worse, the Daily Caller goes on to say, quote the government, saying, we've got to fight climate change.
	We cannot reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the level required by climate science if we continue to burn gas in our homes and buildings, says Rachel Golden of the Sierra Club.
	They end their report.
	The Daily Caller, the conservative, quote-unquote, Daily Caller ends their report with that, quote, unanswered.
	Unanswered. Well, you know, we don't need to worry about CO2, quite frankly.
	It's absolute nonsense, and that's the way they should end their report.
	I'll end it for them. The Australian state of New South Wales is going to get digital ID within weeks.
	This is where Gladys Berejiklian was.
	And she was head of a party that was supposedly supposed to be libertarian, what we would call libertarian here.
	They called themselves liberal in every other country.
	The liberals were people that, you know, in the 19th century, people who called themselves liberal were about liberty.
	Civil liberties as well as other liberties.
	But that name was stolen by the socialists in America.
	And so in the UK and in Australia, they still call themselves liberals, but not liberals in the way that we see them.
	Usually they would be concerned with liberty, but not anymore.
	They're drifting to the left just as the Libertarian Party is drifting to the left here in the United States.
	And so Exhibit A of all that was Gladys Berejiklian.
	Out of office because of corruption.
	But they now want to have a functional digital ID pilot within the next few weeks and before the state election.
	Need to have ID before the state election.
	You mean they need to have ID for election?
	Well, I don't know.
	But you certainly don't have to have a digital ID for the election.
	You just need a picture, right?
	We're not allowed. It's racist to ask somebody for some picture ID. They're in the United States, but, you know, they've got to go all the way to a digital ID, and they've got to do it before the election.
	Well, they don't need the digital ID for the election.
	They're saying they need the digital ID because there are things that people can buy online.
	This is their justification. That's why you need to have a digital ID. And the digital ID is going to be used to require people to identify themselves to log on.
	Now, we've had some laws that are presented in the United States saying, well, we have to do a digital ID because there's certain content that we don't want children seeing.
	Yes, I know. So you should not send your kids to the government schools because they'll show them that content.
	But they pretend that they care about it when it's not a school teacher showing your kids porn and teaching your kids techniques like they were going to become prostitutes, which I guess is what the government is aspiring for all of our kids.
	But that's not a problem when they do it in school.
	But if you were to come across that on the internet, well, you need to check in with them.
	This is just a way for them to set up gatekeeping so that nobody can go on the internet anonymously.
	And that's what's happening here in New South Wales.
	But they're going to talk about it as if they need it for the election somehow.
	So they said you can buy almost anything online these days.
	However, there are some transactions online where you need to show your age, for example, buying alcohol and concert tickets.
	So kids can, in our Western societies now, kids can surgically mutilate themselves.
	They can make that decision at a very early age.
	They can surgically mutilate themselves, chemically mutilate themselves.
	And they can make that decision, and the parents don't need to know about it at all.
	As a matter of fact, it needs to be kept from the parents by the government institutions.
	But hey, if you might be able to buy alcohol online, well, we've got to stop that.
	Yeah, no, we understand what it's truly about.
	As I mentioned before, the LBRY case, the thing that LBRY is the...
	Database, the platform, everything that Odyssey is built on top of.
	Odyssey is about videos, but the LBRY system and credits is much deeper than that.
	So the Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC, tried to come after them and regulate them.
	They took them to court, and they've now won.
	John Deaton, the attorney for LBRY, Asked the court to clarify if LBC token sales in the secondary market are securities, which fall under the SEC's purview.
	He cited a paper by another attorney that examined all security lawsuits since a case several years ago, found that no court in the U.S. had ruled an underlying asset to be a security.
	So the judge said he will, quote, make it clear that my order does not apply to secondary market sales.
	The crypto industry applauded the decision.
	Crypto enthusiasts are hopeful that the SEC will settle in a similar case involving Ripple over the sale of their tokens.
	And again, this is something that is being done quite a bit.
	This is what a lot of the secondary crypto stuff is about, the tokens that are used and kind of within a system or so.
	And that is the way Rockfin operates.
	That's why I prefer that If you'd like to leave tips and comments, leave comments on Rockfin, we'll still try to monitor them.
	But if you'd like to leave tips, please do that on Rumble.
	And Sprumford, thank you for the tip on Rumble.
	Appreciate that very much.
	Thank you so much for that.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Oh, no.
	Oh, no.
	Phil? Hey, Phil!
	No, not you. It's me, Ned Ryerson!
	Okay, little fella.
	Good job. That's different.
	Hey! Hey, Farmer Bob!
	Have we met? You believe this guy?
	About a hundred times.
	Uh, you're gonna freeze to death.
	Who cares? See you tomorrow!
	I don't know where we parked.
	I was following you.
	Hands at ten and two.
	You know, it's funny. I have hair, but you have fur.
	Oh, sir, no animals.
	Two for dinner?
	Follow me.
	Hello! Safety first.
	Yee-haw! He's got the last horse!
	That was Phil Connors!
	Ding! Hello! It's not personal.
	It's just a game.
	Not a bad day, huh?
	All right, and that was the Super Bowl follow-up commercial a couple of years ago with Bill Murray reprising his role in Groundhog Day to advertise the Jeeps.
	I apologize to people who are listening on podcast who could not see that, but I thought that was really funny.
	I got a couple of comments about what I was just talking about before we get into the Second Amendment and some developments there.
	Kong1976 said, I can't see how they can restrict transportation in the USA. They'll just make it crazy expensive.
	It is possible, though.
	Yeah, crazy expensive is the way that they'll do it.
	They don't want to get rid of all of them.
	Right? Because they want to be able to drive their Lamborghinis where they want to go.
	And it will be toll roads and other things like that.
	They will pretty much, they've already said their goal, the C40 organization, that it has nearly 100 cities as part of that.
	I've talked about what their goals are.
	You know, they've got two sets of goals.
	The ones that they must have and the ones that they would like to have.
	And they're not that far off from each other.
	So, for example, what they would like to have is for you to have very, very little meat or dairy, and they've got minuscule amounts that they would have you be allowed to have.
	But what they really want is zero milk, zero dairy, for example.
	When it comes to transportation, One flight every three years of less than 1,000 miles.
	They, on the other hand, will have their electric private planes, or maybe they won't even bother to go with electric private planes, and they'll be able to fly and go wherever they want, just as these people who constantly lecture us at these events about getting rid of all the essentials in our life, like gas stoves, gas heaters, other things like that.
	Everything must be centrally controlled.
	That's why everything is going electric, because they want to control everything through the grid.
	And so MarkM228 says, well, that's how it'll be done, making it crazy expensive.
	But in the UK, and we often follow the UK, the government is restricting transport.
	Same is happening here with peak hour tolls.
	Internal combustion engine bans in cities and so forth.
	They've outright banned them.
	They have banned travel in Canterbury, Oxford, other places in the UK. But it was in Belgium.
	I think it was in Brussels. Well, I'm not sure if it was Brussels.
	But it was in Belgium, where they did the first one of these 15-minute cities.
	And they vary from 5, 10, 15 to 20 minutes.
	But basically, they will corral you in a certain part of the city.
	So you won't even be able to travel anywhere.
	Within the city, more than a couple of times a month, and they'll keep track of that by constantly surveilling your license plate.
	They can cut this off by cutting off the fuel, and that is what they're working on right now.
	That's a big part of why we've got these sanctions.
	The sanctions aren't hurting Putin.
	They're hurting America and Europe.
	And that's the purpose.
	And Biden has said that.
	Yes, painful, but it's going to get us to where we need to go.
	So buckle up.
	You're in for a rough ride because Biden is going to put the screws to you.
	And he doesn't care because it's a part of his Great Reset.
	Bob Ferguson says most vehicles already have black boxes as early as 2001.
	That's right. Mark says progressive insurance has a black box on monetary driving.
	That's how the government will institute tax by the mile.
	And that's how they will also reduce it.
	Already you have that being done With teenagers, to the extent they can't afford any insurance.
	Stories in UK papers about how teen siblings can't, it's the insurance, more even than the cost of the car.
	And so they go partnership in it.
	And they agree that each of them will drive a limited number of miles each month.
	So the car is expensive, the fuel is very expensive, and the insurance is very, very expensive.
	That's how they will control it.
	Wolfman Jack, good to see you there.
	He says, a few insurance providers have a box to help you reduce the cost by good driving habits.
	Yeah, that's right. Or alternatively, what they never talk about is, you know, what if you took that turn too quickly?
	What if you didn't stop long enough at that stop sign in their imagination or whatever?
	Well, they will adjust the price accordingly.
	And we're not far off from a system...
	That would monitor your speed.
	You already know that if you have these mapping apps, they know what the speed is on the road where you are.
	So what's to keep them from snitching to the government and to instantly apply a speeding ticket and insurance points to you for that.
	Let's talk about the Second Amendment that they're also trying to come after.
	A Biden judge.
	Has delivered the gun industry a huge win in New Jersey.
	He found in favor of the gun industry, and he was appointed by Biden.
	And this is because in New Jersey, and there's other laws coming up like this in New York and other places, they want to come after gun manufacturers if anybody commits a crime with their guns.
	This is absurd. This is unconstitutional.
	It's against statutory law.
	And of course, it is unjust, immoral, to hold somebody responsible for something when they have absolutely no negligence in it either.
	So this guy, even though he is appointed by Biden, I think he doesn't want to be overturned.
	You know, that's not a good thing for judges to get overturned.
	And this is such an obvious slam dunk.
	That he knows that even if there's going to be some kind of appellate court in one of the circuits that agrees with him because of their politics, he knows that when it gets to the Supreme Court with the leaning conservative, and it's such an obvious violation, that it's going to be shut down.
	And when it gets shut down, it's going to get shut down hard.
	So he doesn't want to put his neck on the line for this thing.
	The judge, in a 20-page opinion, So the New Jersey law signed last summer by Governor Phil Murphy ignored a larger federal law that protects the makers of guns and other items from being dragged into court when somebody misuses their product.
	And other items, by the way.
	Other items. The federal 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce and Arms Act provides immunity to gun and ammo makers and sellers against the types of public nuisance laws.
	That Governor Murphy in New Jersey championed.
	The court, in his opinion, he says, the court is mindful that firearms are inherently dangerous and even more so in the wrong hands.
	But it is also mindful that the PLCAA embodies Congress's earnest effort to balance those dangers against the national interest in protecting access to firearms, said the Biden-appointed judge.
	Other states are considering similar laws.
	And the National Shooting Sports Foundation is fighting one recently okayed in New York.
	It is also likely that the order will stall or end some of those efforts because he so thoroughly shot down New Jersey's law.
	Mark Oliva, spokesperson for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, an industry trade group, said it is a basic understanding of tort law.
	It's the foundation of Of the Protection of Lawful Commerce and Arms Act that anyone that criminally misuses a firearm or a product is the person who's responsible for the damages caused by their crime.
	Not the person that lawfully made, lawfully sold that product.
	You don't get to sue Ford and Budweiser when somebody gets into a drunk driving accident and causes the death of another individual.
	That's the responsibility of the person who broke the law.
	We shouldn't have to explain this to liberals.
	But you see, they don't care.
	They don't care about the Constitution.
	They don't care about statutory law.
	They don't care about justice.
	They don't care about morality.
	They just want their way.
	And that's what this is about.
	Talking about somebody who breaks the law and consequences for that, you had a man in Omaha, Nebraska, went to a Target with an AR-15 and And he supposedly had 13 loaded magazines of ammunition with him.
	He started shooting in the store.
	And he didn't shoot anybody.
	He had 29 people who called 9-11.
	The arriving officers went into the building and shot him dead.
	He had an AR-15.
	With 13 magazines of ammunition.
	Each of those probably had more ammunition than the Democrats think is safe to have.
	And of course he had the vaunted AR-15.
	Which is going to kill everybody.
	Just looking at this thing, he could die.
	Right? The cop who took him down had a handgun.
	Yeah. Memphis police chief.
	We had the beating death of Tyree Nichols and Tyree Davis here in this article.
	They repeated the person's name.
	The police chief is Sherilyn C.J. Davis.
	This is a typo in here.
	Anyway, so...
	She's the police chief of this police department where these thugs beat Tyree to death.
	And she has a history herself.
	Apparently, the Memphis officials who hired her didn't vet her background whatsoever.
	She was demoted from major to lieutenant and then fired in 2008 from the Atlanta Police Department.
	After a city investigation found her at fault for taking no action on the case of a police sergeant's husband, who ultimately pleaded guilty to a federal charge of producing child pornography.
	Two detectives claimed that Davis, who is now the police chief of the Memphis Police Department, again, another diversity hire, you know, Female, young, black, and so it's like, well, just hire her.
	We don't need to do any due diligence.
	I mean, what could possibly be wrong?
	She checks all the identity politics boxes, right?
	Two detectives claim that she had ordered them not to investigate Terrell Marion Crane because his wife...
	She was a sergeant there at the Atlanta Police Department.
	So she was demoted from major to lieutenant, and then she gets a job as a police chief in Memphis.
	It recently emerged that two of those officers there at the Memphis Police Department, they were involved in the murder of Tyree, had joined the police department in August of 2020, by which time the force was no longer requiring even an associate's degree, with five years' work experience considered to be an acceptable substitute.
	And they have now dumbed down their requirements even more.
	To become a police officer in Memphis.
	They've dropped a physical fitness test, and of course you saw that at the beginning of that.
	You know, they go over to Tyree, stop him, and he's like, what's going on?
	And they drag him out of the car, and they start beating him on the ground.
	He said, what, what? You know, I'm on the ground, I'm on the ground.
	And they continue to beat him.
	So he got up and he ran, and they couldn't catch him.
	Huffing and puffing.
	Eventually they caught up with him.
	But yeah, they were not...
	It seemed like they could pass a physical fitness test.
	They also just mandate only 24 college credit hours and even offering a waiver to applicants who have a felony conviction.
	You got no experience.
	You got no credentials whatsoever, except for the fact that you've got a felony.
	That's your only credentials, right?
	Well, that's okay. We'll hire you.
	And not only will we hire you, but we'll give you a bonus.
	You know, you can have a felony conviction, and the Memphis Police Department is so desperate for warm bodies to go around and give out tickets to That they will give you a $15,000 signing bonus and a $10,000 relocation bonus.
	And you can have a felony.
	That can be the only relevant thing on your CV. The force has short 500 officers.
	My son says, if you don't have a felony conviction, you can't own a gun.
	But you can become a cop.
	Well, you know, they didn't shoot him.
	They just beat him to death, right?
	Yeah, yeah. It shows that you've got legal experience because you're a convicted felon.
	Well, that worked. Yeah. Doesn't matter which end you're on, right?
	$25,000 bonus, and you can be a felon and work on the Memphis police.
	Because, yeah, obviously, I mean, what the police chief did was pretty minor, I guess, compared to that.
	On YouTube, they are kicking off firearms channels, left and right.
	And a lot of people who are there believe they're getting strikes on old videos that have been there for many years.
	They're going back and looking carefully at the videos and taking down channels.
	And it's not even something that's listed on the rules, of course.
	When they took my channel down in 2018, all they did was to send me an email that said, There's been a complaint, your channel is cancelled.
	Well, I'd like to know who complained about it.
	Was it the FBI? Was it CIA? DARPA? Who was it that complained about my account?
	Obviously, you know, they're important enough that just one complaint was enough to take down a channel that had no strikes on it.
	And they didn't give me a reason.
	They wouldn't give me a reason. They wouldn't respond to anything that I had to say either.
	And you know, they sent that little two-sentence, one or two-sentence email.
	They sent that to me about every 15 minutes for several months.
	I just set up a filter and put it in another folder.
	And I would keep going back.
	And yeah, they keep sending more of these things.
	By the time they stopped a couple months later, they had sent that email to me over 8,000 times.
	They didn't tell me anything.
	And so this is kind of what they're doing to people on YouTube because they have a firearms channel.
	Audi MRR says, ABC News says, court okays barring high IQs.
	I've got that coming.
	And I've got that article.
	U.S. court says it's okay for police departments to refuse to hire someone who is too smart.
	And he gives me several...
	He might have been the one who sent this to me, and I meant to get to this.
	He sent it a couple of days ago.
	We're going to get to that here in just a second.
	But, yeah, so now they're going back and looking at old videos, and they had had a restriction as part of the rules saying you can't show people how to do homemade silencers or suppressors, right? But there was nothing there about these people's videos had nothing to do about making a homemade one.
	They think that it had to do with the fact that they were just attaching a manufactured suppressor.
	So I guess YouTube now wants to silence any news about suppressors.
	Maybe they just want to suppress the Second Amendment.
	I don't know. There is a big caveat, however, at the end of YouTube's firearms policy that says, please note, this is not a complete list.
	In other words, you'll know that you violate it when you get canceled.
	That's exactly what will happen at this point.
	So one person said, I got my second strike in as many days this morning for another video that did not violate any of YouTube's policies when it was posted, and it probably still does not.
	If this continues at this rate, my entire channel will be deleted by Thursday.
	He says, hopefully that doesn't happen, but he said, you can find me on Rumble and other places like that.
	And that's going to be very important for us to be able to go to those places.
	That's why it's good to support these alternative platforms.
	Rumble is adding new features all the time.
	So the article that you were just talking about here that was sent to me, ABC News, Court Okays Barring High IQs for Cops.
	This was a story that I talked about You know, when I talked about what happened in Memphis, I said, you know, there's a few years ago that they had a court case, and it was up in Connecticut.
	And I thank you for sending me this article.
	It was back in 2000.
	And they said, this kind of puts an official face on discrimination in America against people of a certain class, he said.
	Unfortunately, you were born with too high of an IQ. We're going to kick you out.
	He says, I maintain that you have no more control over your basic intelligence than your eye color or your gender or anything else.
	Remember, this was back in 2000.
	And so now everybody thinks that you can control your gender.
	Actually, you could just, I don't know, take the test and just kind of stare out in space and let drool fall out of your mouth.
	He's hired. Take him.
	He's the kind of guy we're looking for.
	He lost at the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York.
	He says, that's it. I'm giving up.
	He was 49 years old, a college graduate.
	He, unfortunately, didn't have any felonies that they could look at.
	He took the exam in 1996.
	He scored 33 points.
	That's the equivalent of an IQ of 125.
	Yeah, that's what my son said.
	Harrison Bergeron, the Kurt Vonnegut novel, had absolutely nothing on this.
	This is the world we live in now.
	Every dystopian sci-fi novel is being implemented.
	So they said he had an IQ of 125, but the New London, Connecticut police said, we'll only interview candidates...
	Who score 20 to 27, he scored 33.
	That would indicate that they have an IQ of 104 or less.
	And they said, well, here's why we don't do that.
	People, if they score too high, they're going to get bored with police work and they're going to leave.
	And we're going to have spent a lot of money training them.
	Well, maybe if you gave them something that was real to do, maybe you've had fewer of them, and maybe you've had people of higher intelligence, you wouldn't have to spend so much time training them.
	And then they go off and ignore whatever you trained them for anyway.
	Except that I think that the training is to shoot first.
	That is what they're being trained for.
	So, yeah, he alleged that his rejection from the police force was discrimination.
	The Second Circuit agreed.
	They said the policy might be unwise, but it was a rational way to reduce job turnover because, you know, they can screen for people who can't get a job anywhere else.
	Nobody else would hire these people, so let's make them a police force in New London, Connecticut.
	Wait a minute, says my son. High IQ cops don't follow the shoot first training?
	Purge them. Yeah. We don't want people like that.
	Just like we don't want people who have ethical concerns about using babies to develop drugs and other issues.
	We don't want them in the military.
	So he gave up and he went to work as a prison guard.
	That was it.
	So this story also that I didn't get to happened a couple of days ago.
	The other shooting that happened over the weekend when the California cops shot this guy who was a double amputee trying to run away from them on his stumps.
	This is absolutely amazing.
	Again, the story, we have not seen the footage on this.
	They claim that they were called because he was threatening people with a knife.
	This guy is also somebody who has had a history of fighting with cops.
	As a matter of fact, he lost his legs because he had an altercation with law enforcement in Texas.
	But he was on the street in California.
	Somebody called and said he's threatening people.
	They showed up and they said two different reports.
	Either he threw a knife at them and then ran, or he ran with the knife in his hand.
	And I guess since they don't want people running with knives in their hands, they had to shoot and kill him because it could be dangerous if you fall with a knife in your hand.
	But Still, he was not running at them.
	He was running away from them.
	And so we'll have to have some more information about this to make a judgment.
	It could be justified lethal force, but still, when somebody is running away from you, that is typically not justified, but there can be extenuating circumstances if they can say that other people were threatened by him.
	And so, again, we'll have to wait and see if there's some more information coming out about that.
	But, you know, the diversity push that we have on the police forces that you see that's happening in Memphis, even having a felony, that's not a problem.
	But it wasn't New London, Connecticut, but it was in old London, England, that you have the police recruiting illiterate officers.
	These are people, you know, you want to make money, right?
	That's why you have too many police, evidently.
	It's not to protect people when you get so many police.
	It's about generating revenue.
	Well, if you want to generate revenue, the person's got to be able to read and write English to fill out the ticket.
	There are people who not only don't have a degree in criminal law or anything else, and they can't even speak English.
	They said, 2014 promise.
	That 40% of the police force in London would be represented by ethnic minorities by 2023 has fallen short, only 17% of them.
	So let's speed this up.
	Let's hire people, even if they can't read and write English.
	Let's make them cops.
	They're taking a significant number of people who are on paper at least functionally illiterate in English.
	The Metropolitan Police are recruiting the wrong people.
	The diversity push has lowered standards.
	Again, we're seeing this globally.
	Everything. All of these things that you see...
	Are happening globally. And usually, they're happening first in Europe or in the UK. And then they start to happen here.
	And so this is where they are at this point in time.
	How much longer is it going to be before we start hiring police officers who don't speak English?
	They pull you over. They give you orders in Spanish or whatever their preferred language is.
	And since you don't obey their orders because you don't speak their language, they kill you.
	So, they are also hiring people who have criminal records in London.
	Amos, 37.
	My friend lost a leg by the police.
	He was running on a motorcycle and they parked the cruiser on top of him and left it there, cooking him.
	Officer Valentine, Independence Police Department.
	Wow. That's amazing.
	Yeah, I hope that he got some compensation, but I'm not Holding out any expectation of that.
	There's tension, they said, between the volume, the quality, and the diversity of the police force, and something has to go.
	So, if we want diversity and we want volume, let's get rid of quality, right?
	That's kind of like the old thing. Good, fast, and cheap, they used to tell us in engineering.
	You know, pick two at best.
	Now, the best thing you're going to do is get two of those.
	Well, that's the way they look at it.
	So, it's like, okay, which one of these is going to go?
	You know, if you're lucky, you get two.
	You may not get any of them, right?
	Well, actually, you can control the diversity.
	But, you know, you won't be able...
	Let's just throw out the quality if we want to get volume.
	Police resources in London are so stretched that major department stores have given up on calling them to catch shoplifters.
	Isn't that amazing? Same thing that we're seeing in Democrat-run cities.
	And if we do catch somebody, we just let them off again.
	Car theft has been decriminalized effectively with only 277 out of 55,000 stolen cars solved by Scotland Yard.
	A 0.5% success rate.
	Scotland Yard is doing even worse than they did when Lestrade was there.
	And then we have this in Scotland.
	A killer... Who identifies not just as a woman, but as a baby.
	And the Scottish prison is supplying him with pacifiers.
	Yes, from Breitbart.
	Formerly known as Adam Graham.
	This has shown a spotlight on another trans prisoner in Scotland.
	The double rapist case.
	This is the Andrew...
	The Adam Graham case was a guy who was in prison for two rapes, and then he decided that he wanted to identify as a woman, and so they obediently sent him to a woman's prison.
	And that has caused a lot of problems for the Prime Minister.
	I'll talk about that in just a second.
	But then, as people were looking at this, they found a guy who identifies as a baby.
	And we have to play along with this.
	What if he identifies as Napoleon?
	Well, you better march when he says to march.
	The Scottish National Party government.
	Has been pushing pro-trans legislation and are still grappling with the case of another skinhead rapist who began dressing in pink.
	This other one was Isla Bryson.
	He started dressing in pink, started identifying as a woman after being apprehended and was briefly incarcerated in a woman's prison.
	Now this guy who identifies as a baby is serving a life sentence for strangling another inmate to death with a pair of shoelaces.
	Babies don't do that.
	I don't think he can legitimately identify as a baby.
	Babies don't strangle people with shoelaces.
	I guess they choke them with pacifiers.
	Progressing from identifying as a woman to identifying as an infant girl.
	With the authorities indulging all of this.
	Though held in an institution for males, the killer has reportedly been supplied with a pacifier and demands that the guards give him diapers, blend his meals like baby food, and hold his hand whenever he leaves his cell.
	And the male, the Daily Mail, uses all female pronouns, of course, when they talk about this.
	The Express in the UK says prison bosses are said to be taking the demands seriously.
	The prisoner has been difficult and manipulative over the years.
	Well, just like a baby, he's always got to have his way.
	I guess that's why they believe it.
	He throws a temper tantrum.
	Are they going to try him as a minor?
	There you go. Maybe that's the angle.
	You can't keep me in jail.
	I'm a minor. That's why they said the prisoner has been difficult and manipulative over the years, which is why he's still behind bars after 17 years.
	I refuse to use their pronouns.
	So, otherwise, this guy who had strangled another inmate to death with a pair of shoelaces, if he wasn't so difficult and manipulative, we would have let him go by now.
	That's what they're saying.
	He's so difficult and manipulative that we've kept him here for 17 years.
	Otherwise, they'd be free.
	We are living in a psycho world.
	He decided that he would trans from a man to a woman, which is becoming more common in jails these days.
	But this is obviously something else entirely.
	The Scottish prison system has no protocol in place for dealing with these prisoners when they decide that they're babies or whatever they decide they're going to be.
	He feels a little chill.
	Can I bring him this blanket? He'd love that.
	Sure. All right.
	It's a security blanket, I guess.
	Thank you.
	It's sad when a mother has to speak the words that condemn her own son.
	But I couldn't allow them to believe that I would commit murder.
	They'll put him away now, as I should have years ago.
	He was always bad.
	And in the end, he intended to tell them I killed those girls and that man, as if I could do anything except just sit and stare, like one of his stuffed birds.
	They know I can't even move a finger, and I won't.
	I'll just sit here and be quiet, just in case they do suspect me.
	They're probably watching me.
	I'll let them.
	Let them see what kind of a person I am.
	I'm not even gonna swat that fly.
	I hope they are watching.
	They'll see.
	They'll see and they'll know.
	And they'll say, why, she wouldn't even harm a fly.
	Yeah, it seems like our politicians are so excited to make sure that we live through every horrific movie we've ever seen.
	And so, you know, they're giving us the psycho treatment as well as the Orwell 1984 and the Brave New Schools and all the rest of this stuff.
	You know, they're prison turning into psycho.
	Transcriminals who raped women are women.
	And this is something that Nicole Sturgeon Who is the Nicola, Nicola, Nicola, Nicola.
	Wasn't there a Swiss chocolate or something like that?
	Anyway, Nicola Sturgeon, Sturgeon General, I guess.
	She is going to a back and forth, flip-flopping back and forth as to whether this rapist was a man or a woman and whether or not he should be in a men's prison or should you put the fox in the hen house, right? He's 31 years old, Adam Graham, found guilty of raping two women during frenzied sex attacks and was sent to Scotland's only all-female prison.
	They've only got one female prison.
	And they sent him there.
	Only when on trial for the attacks did he announce that he was transitioning into a woman.
	And so, of course, he is exploiting their insanity.
	That's the issue.
	Who's really crazy here, right?
	These guys are criminal, but they're not crazy.
	The crazy people are the ones who are running the system.
	People like Nicola Sturgeon and the people who are running the wardens of the prison.
	They're the nuts. After a public backlash...
	She reiterated her belief that trans women are women.
	No matter how many actual women, they violently raped.
	So during a very awkward interview, she went back and forth on the question of whether or not the violent male rapists are actually women.
	She finally said, if somebody presents as a trans person, then we accept that as face value.
	And again, there's another, this is the third case of this.
	Tiffany Scott. Another biological male, convicted of crimes against women, stalking a 13-year-old girl, is now going to go to the women's prison as well, as these other rapists.
	So the insanity is not with these prisoners.
	It's with the people running our governments.
	But there's even more insanity with the Brave New Schools.
	Yes, we are creating in real life the psycho situation.
	We're also creating in real life Brave New World in our schools.
	Missouri schools took kids to a drag show.
	And, of course, they didn't tell their parents.
	They know the parents would not approve, so just don't tell them.
	So Missouri's Attorney General sent a letter to the state's association of school boards urging them to adopt a resolution mandating that parents and guardians receive advanced notice and the ability to opt their children out of sexual instruction.
	This is frustrating because you see this happening.
	We saw this happening in Tennessee.
	Even over in Knoxville, you had the state representative for Knoxville saying, well, there's nothing on the books.
	We can't stop these situations.
	And maybe we need to classify these drag queen shows for kids as something that is adulterated entertainment.
	But there's nothing on the book, so there's nothing I can do.
	So said the district attorney as well.
	And the state attorneys general are saying this all the time as well.
	There's already stuff on the books about people who are involved with lewd behavior with children.
	What else do you need?
	You don't need to have something specifically says drag queens.
	This is just lewd behavior.
	You stop it. You have the authority to stop it.
	Nobody wants to be the person to step up and do it.
	So they're playing games with this stuff.
	It's like DeSantis and his Surgeon General saying, well, you know, these vaccines are killing people within an age group, so we're going to ban it for one age group.
	But we're not going to stop killing people who are older or younger than that age group.
	And these are people who are playing this game.
	I don't want to have the responsibility.
	I don't want this to all be on me.
	We've got to broaden this out.
	Bring some other people in.
	Let them make the decision.
	If they make the decision, I'll go along with them maybe and I'll enforce it maybe.
	So he said, this is what the Missouri Attorney General said to the State School Board Association.
	He explained to them, drag shows are inherently sexualized performances.
	They draw attention to human sexuality in a manner that appeals to prurient interests.
	Drag shows have no educational value and no place in our public schools.
	If you are adults who are grooming, seducing children, exposing them to sexualized performance, that is a crime and he ought to do something about it.
	He's shirking his responsibility.
	I was going to devote a week to pushing LGBT dogma on kids as young as five.
	Same Wisconsin school district currently under fire for multiple pro-LGBT scandals is holding a week-long session to inculcate elementary school students with gender ideology using material from a radical LGBT activist group.
	This is Madison Metropolitan School District The Daily Caller says it plans on spending a week teaching students to understand the difference between gender, sexual orientation, and sex assigned at birth.
	The material, remember I talked about this yesterday, social and emotional learning, how it's coming from the UN, how it has connections to people who are open occultists, right?
	It is Marxist, and it is, that's why I call it Sodom, go Marxist.
	But this is Sodom and Gomorrah, it really is.
	The material comes from the left-wing group Human Rights Campaign.
	They put together some curriculum called Welcoming Schools.
	A training program that falls under the umbrella of the health and social emotional learning, the SEL lessons.
	And so, as people there are pushing back against this in Wisconsin, one of the people is associate counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty.
	And he gives some parents some advice.
	And it's very, very bad advice.
	This is what he says.
	Corey Brewer. Parents should remain vigilant and engaged with their local school districts, many of which do not hesitate to persuade students to a particular point of view.
	Are you kidding me?
	So you're going to tell people to go ahead and trust your kids to strangers.
	Drop your kids off and abandon them at institutions that have proven that their purpose is to sexually seduce kids, to gaslight them, to harm them psychologically, physically, spiritually.
	Go ahead and drop them off, but keep an eye on these people.
	Oh, you think you're going to be able to see what they're doing?
	They're working very hard to try to make sure that they're going to do this without your knowledge.
	What kind of idiotic advice is that?
	Get your kids out of school.
	End of story. Don't have anything to do with this.
	It's on fire. Don't put your kids in a burning building, parents.
	No, go ahead and put your kids in the burning building, but keep an eye out for them in case something happens.
	Florida teachers. You know, this is a good example.
	Even when you have a situation where they will say, well, you're not going to teach this and we're going to change this.
	The Florida government has put together a law.
	It's been signed by DeSantis.
	Teachers across the state have to have their classroom books approved by a, quote, certified media specialist.
	And you better not have any books that are not a certified media specialist approved, right?
	Oh, that should fix it.
	Well, no. No.
	As a matter of fact, if you've got kiddie porn in there, you could face felony charges.
	Well, that's a good law, but it's not sufficient to do anything at all.
	Because now the Florida teachers are telling each other, we have to hide these things.
	Hide your books so you don't get a felony charge.
	You mean, don't let them see your kiddie porn?
	Are they pretending that they don't know that it's kiddie porn that they have to hide?
	Oh, I didn't know that was kiddie porn.
	I didn't know that was pornographic.
	I just couldn't tell.
	There's how-to manuals that you would give to a prostitute.
	So, the media specialist has to ensure that all classroom books are, quote, free of pornography.
	Now, ask yourself, why is this law necessary?
	Well, because these institutions are pushing pornography.
	Do you think if you prohibit them from doing that, since they have been so keen to do that, do you think that's going to work?
	If you pass a law saying we have to...
	We're going to register sex offenders, you know?
	Then you identify the sex offenders and you drop your kids off at their house, right?
	That's what you want to do. That's what these police are so upset about.
	When they arrested those parents, you let them walk three houses down, you know, the equivalent of three houses down, to go get a donut, a Dunkin' Donut, and come back?
	Do you realize that there are sex offenders around here?
	Yeah, the parents are probably putting their kids in a sex offender institution.
	It's called school. So teachers told the Sarasota Herald Tribune that whether they agree with the law or not, they now have to cut off their students' access to books because, you know, they're just not sure if it's pornographic or not.
	And, yeah, that's really what the concern is, right?
	Now, just take a look at this.
	This is in Wendell, North Carolina.
	This is a place not too far from where we used to live.
	A school cop and his teacher wife arrested for grooming, raping, and filming students.
	They said it was a highly elaborate grooming process.
	Well, I'm sure it wasn't any more elaborate than the SEL and the drag shows are.
	Those are far more successful, far more elaborate.
	And they can pretend that's part of the educational process today in the brave new schools.
	The couple was indicted on three charges each.
	Of taking indecent liberties with a student, first degree sexual exploitation of a minor, and sexual servitude.
	Again, this is the school cop and a teacher.
	You're dropping your kids off for strangers all day, strangers to take care of them that you don't know anything about, and you will never know about these people.
	And it's at an institution that is known for sexualizing kids.
	Oh yeah, just drop your kids off at the Kinsey Sex Institute.
	You might as well, because that's where this kind of stuff is coming from.
	My son says, maybe schools should use biometric IDs, that'll fix it.
	Yeah, there isn't any way that you're going to stop these people.
	It's foolish to think otherwise.
	And as I've said for the longest time, one of the things about the lockdown is that parents would not believe that this could happen to their kids.
	You could tell them this is happening nationally, and you could tell them that this curriculum is being pushed out from Washington.
	That's why they created the Department of Education to push this stuff out and to attach money to it.
	And to go through now, we've had about 40 some odd years of this, 45 years of this.
	And we've had several generations of people go through this system.
	Each one of the generations, this is being normalized.
	And so you could tell people that, but this is a national agenda.
	They didn't believe that it was going to happen to their kids.
	You could show it happening in their state.
	They still didn't believe it. You could show it happening in the same school that their kid went to, and they wouldn't believe it.
	But then when everything got locked down and they had Zoom classes, they started seeing this stuff.
	That's why this all happened. You didn't have parents coming down to the school boards about the CRT stuff and the LGBT stuff.
	They didn't do that before the lockdown.
	God works in mysterious ways, doesn't he?
	As a matter of fact, I have this note from a person, a supporter who sent a contribution by mail.
	He said, To call him to himself.
	Thank you, Linda. I appreciate that.
	Thank you for the support as well.
	You know, a lot of things like that.
	God will use hardship in our life.
	He will use, sometimes, you know, lock everybody in the house.
	So the parents have to watch what the kids are doing in the classroom because we're not paying attention.
	He locked us in the classroom, right?
	You know, you don't have to, sometimes if you don't listen to what God is saying, he's got to get a hammer.
	And if you keep ignoring him, he gets a bigger hammer.
	They're trying to get your attention.
	Angry Tiger.
	The morals of the governed will manifest in the laws of the land.
	That's right. We are now in that final stage of moral corruption.
	A rotting empire.
	You're absolutely right. Take a look at this out of Canada.
	This is a science center.
	And they're going to have a Valentine's Day drag queen science night.
	Mm-hmm. The event, and this is not, I couldn't see anything in here that said it was open to kids.
	But again, you know, this is Canada.
	Who knows? Same thing could happen in the U.S. as well.
	All Western society is now Sodom and Gomorrah.
	The event page describes the person who's going to do it as a two-spirited artist.
	Well, where I come from, we call that demon-possessed.
	You've got multiple spirits?
	Okay, I understand.
	Even using the they pronouns.
	How many are there of you in there?
	We are called Legion because there are many.
	So the activities for this adulterated science night, again, they call it adult science night.
	Well, again, that doesn't have anything to do with age, mental or chronological, right?
	It has to do with the fact that they've adulterated the science.
	As I said, it's a science center.
	So are they going to tell them all about chromosomes?
	They won't tell them about that.
	This is what they'll do. This is a couple of things that's on the agenda.
	They have a lube luge.
	You can learn about different types of lubricants, which ones make the heavy object go faster down the ramp.
	You can have condom cannons, where you can test the strength of the condoms.
	And you look at this stuff and you say, well, okay, this is a science center that's going to do this?
	But you know, when you look at this kind of stuff, is that really that far away?
	I don't know the kids are going to be there, but is that really far away from the sham education system?
	The sham classes that they have for these kids?
	Gingerbread men and all, genderbread men, right?
	Well, they don't call them men, I guess.
	Whatever. I mean, is that, are the schools really any different than this adulterated science night?
	One of the sponsors, by the way, is Planned Parenthood, of course.
	Always there at the center of all this stuff.
	A German school. Pushing mutilated transgender surgeries to an 11-year-old girl, of course, because we are now beyond the Weimar Republic, beyond even Sodom and Gomorrah.
	You know, Sodom and Gomorrah didn't seek to surgically castrate kids.
	An Anglican archbishop.
	Defends the Church of England's transgender guidance for five-year-olds.
	You see, this is where the rotting is.
	It rots from the church down.
	That's where the Greeks got it wrong, right?
	Society doesn't rot from the head down.
	It rots from the church down.
	Church of England's transgender guidance, which affirms children as young as five, engender confusion.
	And they have a curriculum here.
	That is, they call, valuing all God's children.
	You just want to be inclusive, right?
	Rename it seducing all of God's children.
	Misleading all of God's children.
	I wonder if this curriculum that they're handing out to their schools, because they've got 4,700 Church of England primary schools, That the Church of England is now going to be pushing this transgender stuff.
	Does the curriculum come with a millstone that you can tie around your neck before you jump into the sea?
	I wonder if that's the case.
	Maybe they should read that part.
	And then bringing it back to the United States.
	Andy Stanley, the guy who is a son of Charles Stanley.
	Look at what has happened in a generation.
	He is hosting at his church.
	He's got a church in Atlanta.
	He's going to host a conference for parents of LGBT children.
	Charles Stanley's son, Andy Stanley.
	Of course, he has departed from the Orthodox faith in many, many ways for quite some time.
	But the Unconditional Conference is what he calls it.
	An event for Christian parents who have LGBT children.
	No, you don't have any LGBT children.
	Ministry leaders. It's a world that makes us choose sides, he said.
	So we need to have this. Because we are in a world, the parents of children as young as five.
	Did I say that wrong? Okay.
	Anyway. So, anyway, he says this is a world that makes us choose sides.
	No, it's not the world. He's feeling pressure.
	That's why he says that, right?
	Andy Stanley feels pressured by the world to choose sides.
	And he's chosen his side.
	Maybe you should go back to that spot where Moses comes out and he says, Who is on the Lord's side?
	Right? Andy Stanley is not on the side of the Lord.
	He's on the side of the world.
	You know, they had their Shura poles.
	We got our stripper drag queen poles and the rest of the stuff.
	Things don't change too much, do they?
	He says... The stated mission of his program there called Embracing the Journey is to build bridges between LGBT individuals and their families and the church, not in spite of the Bible, he said, but because of the Bible, drawing parents and children into a deeper relationship with each other and vertically with God.
	Well, here's how you do that.
	You want a deeper relationship with God?
	God says you repent of your sins.
	That's how you get a deeper relationship with God.
	You see Him as Lord instead of the culture, instead of the world.
	Because you can't serve two masters, can you?
	You're going to love one and hate the other.
	And it's not just money that can be your master.
	It can be the desire for approval.
	It can be drugs.
	It can be sex.
	And it's frequently sex that is your master.
	And you cannot serve two masters.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Let's talk a little bit about an update that happened with Project Veritas again.
	Again, I had this to talk about yesterday, I think it was.
	But the mainstream media has completely ignored this, as I pointed out on Monday, what happened with Project Veritas and Pfizer executive bragging about doing gain-of-function.
	And you had Pfizer come back with a non-denial.
	They didn't deny that they're doing it.
	They didn't deny that he works for them as a consultant.
	They tried to say that what they were doing, gain of function, was responsible, but it's not.
	And the mainstream media, the key thing, is that they did not pick this up.
	That's what I said on Monday.
	So is the alternative media now, social media, is that the real mainstream media?
	Since nobody talks about this, you had some mentions by Tucker Carlson on Fox, but except for that, mainstream media didn't cover it at all.
	They did put out some denials a little bit, or they would add it to the bottom of the articles, but for the most part, it was ignored.
	But it was still seen over 40 million times just on social media.
	So now Fox covers it because Project Veritas took it to the next level.
	They got a panel truck that has video screens on the different sides of the panel truck.
	And they parked it in front of Pfizer's building in New York.
	Take a look at this. And they're playing that report in a loop.
	That's Pfizer's building, and there they are in a loop playing that thing.
	And so that kind of forced the hand of Fox to give a little bit more reporting to it.
	They use this report to essentially not to go into any depth as to what was said.
	They report on the fact that they parked a van in front of Pfizer.
	Project Veritas taunted Pfizer with an LED truck parked outside the drug manufacturer's New York City headquarters on Tuesday.
	And then they identified this Fox News report, identified Project Veritas, what do they call them?
	A right-wing guerrilla journalism outfit.
	Well, okay, but they're doing journalism unlike Fox, right?
	This piece here is not journalism.
	It's garbage. Because, you know, we all know that Fox is...
	Good Morning America is brought to you by Pfizer.
	Is it brought to you by Pfizer? Like all the means.
	This is why they don't cover it, of course.
	And so they said, Project Veritas, a right-wing guerrilla journalism outfit.
	Outfit. Published footage of a man described as Pfizer Director of Research and Development.
	No, that's not how they described him.
	They don't even get that right.
	And, I mean, what is pathetic about this Fox thing?
	They don't have, even what the allegations are, are not right.
	Jordan Tristan Walker, they got his name right.
	Telling an undercover Project Veritas journalist that the company was exploring plans to, quote, mutate, unquote, the COVID virus themselves through, quote, directed evolution.
	Well, they got those two things in there.
	Walker said, that's not what we say to the public.
	They said it's been seen 27 million times on Twitter alone.
	It's been seen a lot more than that, actually.
	Pfizer responded, and then they go in and they don't go into the detail of what's involved in this.
	They don't go into the pathetic explanation.
	They just give you the pathetic explanation without diving into why it's wrong at all.
	Pfizer responded to Project Veritas with a lengthy statement on Friday, denying that it conducted gain-of-function directed evolution.
	So there you go.
	That's Fox News. They want you to know what really happened.
	And that is, their sponsor, who gives them so much money, did absolutely nothing wrong.
	We'll be right back with Tony Arderman.
	and stay with us.
	��
	�� You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you And joining us now is Tony Arbin.
	He has Wise Wolf Gold, and he has been very kind to set up DavidKnight.gold, which directs you there, lets him know that you're coming through me.
	He's been a big supporter of this program.
	Always great to have Tony on.
	He understands not just gold, but he understands the big picture politically.
	And, of course, we've had some politics, big politics happening yesterday.
	Tony, welcome. Thank you for joining us.
	It's great to be here, David. Good to see you.
	Good to see you. Whenever we have the Federal Reserve changing interest rates, we know it's all politics, right?
	And so this time, they sent some confused signals, I guess.
	They've done several of these raising the benchmark rate By 75 basis points through three quarters of a percent, several times huge jumps and several of them in a row.
	We've talked about this with you on in the past, how the last time when they burst the bubble that they had created, they did a 25 basis point increase every quarter.
	So it was like a little stair step until finally they got to the top and busted the bubble.
	And so this time they started going up really fast.
	They started going up three times that fast.
	And so now they pull back to only go up 25 basis points.
	And that was very encouraging to the stock market.
	What happened to gold? Well, it's got a bump, and Zero Hedge had a lot of fun with Jerome Powell only moving up 25 basis points.
	It's a long way from Jackson Hole where he appeared very hawkish.
	I think there's something else going on here, though, David.
	I read an article a couple of weeks ago from the Mises Institute that showed that the money supply expansion for the first time in 33 years did not expand.
	Hmm. That is interesting.
	We go back to the 1970s with Paul Volcker raising interest rates to the teens, and that's what we always think about, that 1970s inflation after we went off the gold standard as being the example.
	But Jerome Powell has moved interest rates, and we've talked about this, faster than anyone else.
	So I think there's something interesting in that.
	I think he realizes that there really is no good answer.
	I mean, Gerald Salente has talked about having people that he knows that are We're good to go.
	They keep raising interest rates.
	It's going to be a deeper and deeper recession.
	But then if they back off, we go into really, really fast inflation.
	So there's no good answer. I mean, they're kind of checkmated at this point in this 4-D chess.
	I still think that the primary objective is to keep the petrodollar, the world reserve currency, as strong as possible because this is, again, this is a worldwide war going on right now, starting with currency wars.
	So we'll see how that plays out.
	I know that the market really responds positively.
	Bitcoin's up right now.
	Gold's up right now. A lot of people think that when the market tank goes, gold goes up, but that because of the paper markets, because of investments, gold will sometimes go with it when it declines.
	So it's interesting to see why is gold spiking?
	Is it the markets or is it the central banks buying gold?
	I tend to think that it's the central banks.
	Yeah, there's an article on a zero hedge gold demand hits 11-year high this last year.
	But as they talk about in the article, most of this was the central banks buying stuff.
	Right. If you read the article, it actually talks about jewelry and electronics, and only coins were up like 2%.
	What's really driving the market, and again, the general public hasn't caught on to this yet, but the central banks have.
	They've broken 55 years.
	I've got an article from Kitco.
	And they ask, why are central banks buying at a 55-year high?
	Well, it's because they know that there's going to be a re-evaluation very soon.
	They're stocking up all of their vaults with the yellow metal to back up their currency.
	Yeah, that's right. This article says that it's the highest level of net purchases by the central banks on record dating back to 1950.
	You know, so that would be what?
	70... 70 plus years.
	I'm not as good at math as you are.
	73 years. I've got to think which year it is.
	That's my big problem. What year is this now?
	Well, again, Bretton Woods was 1944, right before World War II ended.
	They set up the IMF and Pegged gold at $35 an ounce, and that lasted until 1971.
	And you have some analysts saying now that we've had Bretton Woods III with the BRICS nations being established.
	We weren't part of it.
	We weren't invited to the meeting.
	But I think that's where things are drifting.
	And if you go back to that Shift Gold article about gold at 11-year high, again, the central banks are driving it.
	The general public still hasn't caught on.
	that the dollar is on its way out.
	Again, I don't wish this.
	I'm not cheerleading this because it's going to hurt a lot of people.
	I'm not the one that caused it.
	But if you look at the amount of gold buying by the central banks, they know something that the average consumer and investor does not know and that the old order is coming to an end.
	Bretton Woods 2 is going to give way to Bretton Woods 3.
	Bretton Woods 2, by the way, was Nixon taking us off the gold standard in 71.
	And setting up the petrodollar.
	And the petrodollar was essentially pronounced dead at Davos by the Saudi finance minister.
	Paul Craig Roberts talked about that.
	He said, you know, this is going to be huge.
	Because we had, you know, it was exclusively pegged to the dollar.
	And they mentioned, the Saudi finance minister mentioned Chinese currency.
	And he said they're going to be one of many trusted people, you know, even including the United States.
	You know, we're just one of many now.
	And that's essentially announcing that the petrodollar is over because it was an exclusive relationship.
	That's what made the U.S. dollar the reserve currency.
	That's what allowed us to spend money without any accountability for it was having the world's reserve currency.
	And so as Paul Craig Roberts is talking about, the consequences for American power, but especially for those of us who, you know, don't really care about American power, but we care about our cost of living.
	It's going to have huge consequences for the cost of everything for us, isn't it?
	Oh, absolutely. And what we perceive as the purchasing power, you know, it's Groundhog Day, by the way.
	That's the only way that a fiat currency is going to retain its purchasing power is if it's the same day over and over and over again.
	I mean, again, going into the future, look at the decline of purchasing power of the dollar since 1971.
	It's just catastrophic.
	I think it's like 98% since then.
	Again, the Federal Reserve, we won't even talk about that, but from 71, I mean, you can see that this is the reasons why we have all these products like 401ks and IRAs.
	Every commercial is an investment because you have to outplace inflation.
	Why everything in the United States is based on the housing market and consumption.
	We're no longer a production society.
	So all of that is going to be Again, greatly affected by the loss of the petrodollar and world reserve currency status.
	A lot of people want to know what backs up the dollar.
	It's not gold. What backs up the dollar?
	Like 700 bases in 132 countries.
	It's the American empire that backs up the dollar.
	And I think the rest of the world looks upon our crumbling infrastructure and our crumbling empire and says, we're not betting on you.
	We're going to move away from that.
	And that's going to have dire consequences for the dollar.
	Well, you know, throughout the 20th century, real power is energy, right?
	And black gold was what gave it the power.
	As a matter of fact, in the early 20th century, some of them were saying, oh, let's just get rid of the fiat currencies.
	Let's just price everything in terms of oil, which is essentially a unit of energy is the way that they looked at it.
	And so that's the basis of the petrodollar.
	And now, interestingly enough, It is, they're still tied together.
	They're tied together in the destruction of our economies in the West.
	As you look at these oil sanctions, taking everything down, making, kicking off inflation.
	It's not just, it's not just the monetary policies, but it's also the policies that make everything more expensive.
	I've seen this happen in my own lifetime with the OPEC oil embargo, but this time it wasn't an outside source.
	It was done from the inside.
	It was done by chaos and it was done iteratively, the same way they locked us down.
	And so this attack on energy, which affects everything, it's like a value-added tax that goes all the way through everything.
	Everything that's produced, everything that's delivered has that tax built in on it with the oil.
	and by weaponizing the petrodollar the way they did to destroy our energy.
	And it's not just that they – and the reason I mention this, Tony, is because it's not that they just want to change the financial system, but they want to change what our whole society is based on, how we get our energy.
	And if they can control all of the energy and they can reduce it and if they can make it rare, then they've really got us, don't they?
	And the only thing that we can do is try to get some things that are going to be real.
	That's why gold is important if we hold that as individuals.
	We can't do anything about the price of oil.
	We can't store oil and easily use that, but you can use gold and silver to store value and to be able to do exchanges in the future.
	No, you're absolutely right.
	If you look at the 1980s, Ronald Reagan, his strategy for bringing down the Soviet Union was to unleash the oil output from Saudi Arabia.
	That was the way they were going to bring down I know that they knew that, right? This is part of the creative destruction to plan this new, great reset economy.
	So I think you're absolutely right about that.
	Yeah, it is all designed, takedown, and centrally controlled energy.
	Energy, again, the most important thing, and all the rest of it, especially this worthless fiat dollar was built upon that.
	So they're destroying what is real in so many different ways, and that seems to be the thread of everything that we see in our society now.
	Let's talk a little bit about what is on your agenda there at WiseWolf.Gold.
	Well, again, we've set up davidknight.gold, and I just want to thank you again for allowing us to do that.
	I think about 200 members at least of the Wolfpack.
	If you go to davidknight.gold, there's a tab that says join Wolfpack.
	We've had so much interest, at least 200, again, members are David Knight listeners, at least.
	I have to go back and check that, but we so appreciate everybody who's had enthusiasm for that.
	We're growing Wolfpack, which is a monthly membership program.
	I'm putting that out front because it allows you to get gold and silvered We're delivered directly to your door, starting at $50 a month.
	We go all the way up to $1,000.
	Matter of fact, I had a listener, one of your listeners from Utah call me yesterday, and they just signed up for the Sage Wolf program at $1,000 a month.
	And they just wanted a good mix of gold and silver, and they asked about getting fractional gold and fractional silver.
	I said, well, that's what you're going to get, $1,000.
	I can't give you a whole ounce of gold anyway.
	So you get fractional gold, fractional silver, and...
	Anyway, Kinsey and I have been working really hard on getting...
	We're actually purchased forward a bit for about a month on product for Wolfpack.
	So there's no delays at all for getting orders out.
	That's great. Right now, I think, is a good time...
	It's always a good time to buy precious metals, but it's a good time if you're thinking about rolling over a 401k or an IRA. Those can be done really quickly.
	The supply chain for gold and silver is steady.
	I wouldn't call it great, but we do have access to more product than we had in the last three or four months.
	So if you've been on the fence and thinking about switching over and getting out of the fiat markets into physical gold and silver, you should give us a call.
	Just go to davidknight.gold and reach out.
	Yeah, because you've got kind of a double exposure there with both the value of the dollar as well as the stock markets or whatever your IRA is involved in.
	I got a comment here from North American House Hippo.
	He says, I've been buying gold and silver a little bit at a time for over 20 years.
	And that's what your Wise Wolf program, the Wolf Pack, is about, is being able to get in with as little as $50 on a monthly basis and just do it on a regular basis.
	That's a really key way to build that wealth.
	And Kong, 1976, replied to him, said, you should have bought eggs.
	Tickets of the new gold.
	Yeah, yeah. New meaning for nest egg, right?
	That's right. Again, Wolfpack kind of started out as a way for me to have some extra cash flow, and then it turned into something I didn't intend it to, which is going to be bigger than my original idea, which is creating a community.
	And again, we're still working on that.
	I'm going to build a chat feature.
	I'm going to do a podcast today, by the way.
	Kenzie and I are going to do the podcast, and we're going to give away the gold coin, the $20 gold piece I said that we would do last month.
	So anybody that signed up, well, if you can sign up today, you're still eligible.
	But we'll probably do that podcast sometime around 3 p.m.
	So look out. The Wise Wolf Golden Crypto Show will be back.
	We've been so busy. I haven't done one, but we're going to do one today.
	That's great. I've got a funny story to tell you that Karen was telling me.
	A friend, an old friend of ours, who worked for the railroad.
	He worked at taking tickets in New York.
	And he would take a roll of dimes with him to work.
	And there would be periods where it's really busy and everybody's coming in.
	And then there'd be periods where it slacked off and there was absolutely nothing to do.
	So during those slack-off periods...
	He would go through the stuff, and it's very easy to identify the real silver dimes.
	And so he'd just go through the cache that they had there.
	And when he found a real silver dime, he would take that dime and put one of his dimes in there.
	So, you know, it's just an exchange.
	And over the years, he'd been doing this for about 40, 50 years.
	He had saved a lot of silver and...
	He and his wife had an argument, and he disappeared for a couple of days just to get away.
	She got really angry with him, and she took all of her, I don't know if she did it by spite or she did it out of ignorance, but she took all of his dimes and went down and bought cigarettes with him.
	And... It's like these people who bought coffee with Bitcoin a few years ago.
	And they go back and they calculate the price of their coffee cup.
	I don't know how much cigarettes cost.
	I don't know. People come to the shop and tell me those same kind of nightmare stories all the time.
	But I tell people, if you want to find treasure in your coins and your spare change, just turn the coins on the side.
	So, like, put them in a roll.
	Because, again, a coin has three sides.
	It has, you know, the heads, tails, and it has the edge.
	And look at the edge.
	That's how you can tell a real coin, a real dime.
	Because I call the, you know, the modern dimes are just fake.
	They're Chuck E. Cheese token to me.
	I mean, they still spin, but we know that they're constantly going down in value.
	But yeah, the silver, if you turn it and look at the edge, you'll see the silver.
	And again, that copper came out in 1965.
	So look in your change.
	There might be treasure in there.
	If it's a dime, quarter, half dollar, or dollar before 1965, it is silver.
	Well, you know, we don't store up treasure on Earth where these can break in.
	But, you know, it can also be broken into by somebody who doesn't know what they're doing.
	Be spent. But we do have to be good stewards of what we have.
	And we all know what is coming.
	And we all know that this is an intention to it.
	And it is gradually coming to us.
	And that pace will likely accelerate at some point.
	You know, how does anybody go bankrupt?
	You know, going back to Hemingway's story, the rich man, they asked him, you had so much money, how'd you go bankrupt?
	He said, well, gradually, then suddenly.
	And that's the way this American empire is going to fall.
	But not just America, it's going to be worldwide.
	And they have laid their plans and they're going to push these things out.
	They're coming after crypto in many different ways.
	I find it kind of interesting that Elon Musk, talking about how he wants to, you know, he got his start with one of the companies that got put together into PayPal.
	That's really his first fortune, I guess.
	And so he's looking at doing that again and going into competition with PayPal on the Twitter platform.
	But he's also looking at not just being cash, but he's dropped hints that they want to also include Bitcoin in that.
	And I kind of wonder because, you know, I look at him as a, you know, this whole thing.
	Well, it's the free speech platform and all the rest of the stuff, but he keeps getting hammered by the EU, telling you're going to do what we tell you to do and so forth.
	And I think he will.
	So the question is going to be, I wonder, what do you think is going to happen when they tell him we want to get rid of crypto?
	Well, he will dance.
	I mean, again, he'll look like the rebel.
	I trust him like I trust Donald Trump.
	I mean, he is the Trump of the tech world.
	I mean, I have a bit of a memory.
	It's one of the reasons I'm able to do broadcasts without a lot of preparation, because I have to work so much.
	But I go back and I look at everything Elon Musk has said, and again, he changes his mind.
	He waffles back and forth.
	Remember when he was all about Bitcoin?
	Bitcoin. We'll take it to Mars and everything else.
	And then he came out, you can buy a Tesla with Bitcoin.
	Everybody's excited. And then he says, no, it's bad for the environment.
	Yeah, that's right. He just pulled it.
	And I thought, wow, that's a total reverse.
	And he said, buy Dogecoin.
	Maybe we'll take a Dogecoin for the joke.
	So this guy's all over the place.
	I mean, you talk about the payment platforms.
	And I think he will do that.
	Yeah. And of course, when you say it's bad for the environment, that's going to be the tact that they're going to take to ban crypto, right?
	No proof of stake coins out there.
	It's going to be just what we say the value is.
	It's going to be a fiat crypto that we control.
	And the key thing is, as we've already seen from Biden, if you look at it, and I've mentioned this many times, you know, the report that he told all the different, all of government to get involved in back in March, he split it up into four different areas.
	You know, how are we going to redesign the financial system?
	How are we going to enforce this?
	How are we going to write the code?
	And the fourth thing was the climate aspect of it.
	That's going to be, first of all, their selling point.
	Secondly, their justification for confiscating and banning it is going to be the climate.
	And that's what Elon Musk already did, as you pointed out.
	Someone ought to point out how much energy the actual banking sector uses around the world globally.
	It dwarfs Bitcoin by a thousand percent.
	I mean, so people ought to bring that up.
	I mean, again, it's just hypocrisy.
	And any reason, again, this goes back to that Yale study that they're going to do about how to roll out the VACs.
	And how the key points and all the strategies they'll use.
	You're absolutely right. The environmental strategy will be the last one.
	It'll be climate change because that's what they have their cult built around.
	So they'll go after Bitcoin.
	I don't know if they'll succeed.
	I mean, you look at what's happening with Bitcoin.
	It's interesting to watch.
	I mean, what is really driving the price right now other than the fact that it's finite?
	The fact that it's their scarcity.
	The fact that people don't trust the mainstream market.
	I think Bitcoin has a story to tell.
	I'm not going to give financial advice, but again, I'm buying a little bit every day.
	I think it's a great technology.
	I'm not hot on other cryptos, even though I have a show that talks about cryptocurrency.
	There's a lot There's a lot of unknowns going into the future on what happens to crypto.
	You talk about what happened to Coinbase with you.
	And again, it's going to get harder and harder to trade these coins on those type of platforms.
	But Bitcoin, peer-to-peer, I still think it's, again, if you have a decentralized wallet like an Exodus wallet, it's a great way to transact business.
	And that's now in the crosshairs of the federal government.
	They're now talking about, we have to do something about those wallets.
	Anything that is out of their control, they have to talk about that.
	I wonder, you know, when we talk about the power and the energy footprint of cryptocurrency and the miners, do they factor into any of that?
	How much computer time they spend on tracking and surveilling us?
	We've got these...
	Just in Utah, where they put the big NSA center to store all this information on people, they were using more electricity and more water than giant towns in Utah, just at that computer facility.
	But it's okay when they do that.
	it's not a problem because they're using it to create an open air wireless prison for us so it's okay for them to use as much power as they want when they start really pushing the pedal to the metal that's what i'm going to focus on i'm going to say well let's talk about the nsa center in utah let's talk about how many cycles do they waste on our computers by the spy software they've embedded on there you People say, we don't have the Third Amendment that's not being violated.
	It's the only part of the Bill of Rights that they haven't violated.
	But they probably are living in your house.
	On your devices, on your phones, on everything else.
	I mean, people don't realize that's probably the violation of the Third Amendment, is how the NSA has set up shop on all of your devices.
	You think we could get Al Gore to go unhinged on the NSA's facility?
	How much power it uses?
	You think we could get him to yell about that?
	It's interesting. Part of this scam...
	I want a clean environment, clean water, all this stuff, but they never talk about that.
	They only talk about abstract things like climate change and how you have to be shut down.
	I think that's interesting to watch that most of those people that you hear from, they love the military-industrial complex because they never criticize it.
	That's the tell, right?
	The biggest polluters, the people that have been...
	Shooting depleted uranium everywhere.
	You know, look at the nuclear test ban treaty that Kennedy signed.
	It's because they were detonating hydrogen bombs in the atmosphere.
	That's right. You know, again, this is something that your government was doing.
	So, you're absolutely right, David.
	Well, they've gone full circle.
	You know, the EPA was set up, as I said yesterday, to clean up these toxic super funds and things like that.
	They needed so much money.
	And so they were set up to clean up some of this pollution.
	And yet now what they're demanding is that you can only have cars that have batteries that are obtained by slave labor, slave child labor.
	And then once these things are done, they go into a toxic landfill.
	So now the EPA, with their emissions stuff, is not just shutting down our society and our mobility and everything else.
	They're now demanding, essentially, if you follow their policies through to their logical consequence, the EPA is now creating toxic waste dumps.
	And again, they know that.
	I mean, the kids in the Congo that go and find the cobalt, they call them the blue children.
	The damage that's done because of the need for all this, the materials for the batteries.
	I mean, again, it's catastrophic.
	The electric car, and you call this, I mean, again, it's not about you going green.
	It's about you going green. We lost Tony.
	It froze up. So I don't know what happened, but I guess we'll just close it at this point.
	Just want to tell everybody, davidknight.gold, that'll take you to Tony Ardenbren's Wise Wolf Gold.
	Great guy to deal with.
	I've known him for years.
	Big friend of this show, big supporter of this show.
	And if you want to get into a program where you can buy it gradually, he's got a lot of different levels going all the way down.
	To $50 at the Wolfpack.
	But a great guy to deal with and it's something that you need to think about in terms of preparation.
	We'll be back. Analyzing
	The Globalist Next Move.
	And now, The David Nutt Show.
	you you Well, I want to thank Amos Poole.
	Thank you for the tip on Rockfin.
	And that's very generous.
	I appreciate that. He says, what if they used Veritas to keep us hooked into the virus creation terror campaign?
	Of course, mine is just another conspiracy theory, but they're making the antidote as well.
	Yeah, it's germ theory on steroids.
	You're absolutely right. And as I've said, we need to, you know, there's two different things that are going on here, but the more urgent one is to stop the vaccines.
	That is more urgent right now than the gain-of-function stuff.
	I've been talking about the gain-of-function stuff for over a decade and we need to stop that.
	It's dangerous what they're doing to people and it's criminal.
	We executed people for that after World War II, but then the people at the top of the program Where we executed people.
	We brought them over here to start our bio-warfare stuff.
	So the gain-of-function thing needs to be shut down.
	But the real bio-weapon that is happening right now is the vaccine.
	And they want to keep people diverted from that truth.
	And we need to stay focused on what is the urgent need right now.
	Audi MRR says, dating tip, never admit to crimes against humanity on the second date.
	Good advice. Angus Mustang, thank you very much for the tip on Rumble.
	Appreciate that. Says, thank you and Knight family for what you do.
	And I want to thank everybody.
	We were able to get to, we reset the gauge on the website.
	We were able to get up to 89% last month with your help.
	I really do appreciate that.
	Everything that everyone has done to help us.
	I appreciate that. We were just talking with Tony about Elon Musk and how he wants to get back into this thing that works so well with him, PayPal, creating PayPal.
	He wants to recreate that with Twitter and add additional services with it as well.
	But again, do you trust him since he's already said, well, it's bad for the environment, so we're going to drop Bitcoin now?
	He wants to sell it again?
	Is that something that he's going to be consistent about?
	And at the same time, even the free speech issue, he keeps getting warnings every few days from these people in the EU. He's gotten another warning from the guy who traveled from Brussels to give him that warning in person.
	I've played several times for you the clip Where he bows and scrapes literally, literally.
	Yes, yes, yes, I will do whatever you say.
	When this guy from Brussels, whose name is Theory Breton, the EU Commissioner for the Internal Market, he, you know, in, what was it, May of last year when he said he was going to buy Twitter?
	The guy flew to Austin and he had that cringy video.
	Well, we've had other European officials on, like I said, a weekly basis telling him, you will censor who we tell you and how we tell you to censor.
	And so now this guy, Thierry Breton, has repeated this message yet again.
	So over the coming months...
	You've got to prepare for the block's new social media regulation.
	And Larry Breton says in a video, he tells Musk, there's only a few months left before major platforms like yours will have to fully comply with the Digital Services Act.
	And Musk has said in the past, he's going to comply with all that stuff.
	And of course, there's a big penalty if he doesn't.
	Speaking of money...
	Maxine Waters likes her money clean.
	Waters likes to launder her money.
	She does it through her campaign stuff into her daughter's account.
	She paid her daughter $192,000 in campaign funds during the 2022 cycle.
	Isn't that nice? Her daughter has made more than $1.2 million during this over the years, but most of it came last year.
	This is essentially a loophole, right?
	It is kind of like the members of Congress can do insider trading, and it's not a crime, but it's still unethical whether they call it a crime or not, and this still is unethical.
	She funneled campaign cash to her daughter.
	To run a lucrative operation during the 2022 election cycle, which netted the younger Waters another six figures in payment.
	The setup involves an outside campaign paying Maxine Waters' campaign to appear on slate mailers.
	Now, the slate mailers are common in California.
	They're not done everywhere.
	And what happens is you put out a slate mail You know, vote for all these people.
	And so essentially what they're doing is they're paying her for an endorsement.
	Can you imagine how bad things are in California when you want to be on the coattails of Maxine Waters?
	Anywhere else in the country, that would be a death sentence if you were endorsed by Maxine Waters.
	But people in California, it's so bad in California that people will pay to be on a slate with Maxine Waters.
	Mad Maxine. Yeah, so highly unusual on the federal level.
	It's typically done at the local level.
	So this is something that's unusual on the federal level, and Maxine has found a way to make money from it.
	Because, you know, that's what these people are really about.
	That's why they're not solving our problems.
	They're figuring out how they can skirt the regulations and the ethics to make a lot of money themselves.
	She got the green light to do this from the FEC in the fall of 2004.
	She's been doing it, but they really ramped this up because over all of that time, which is 19 years, well, 18 years because she did the cycle last year.
	So over an 18-year period, Her daughter has made $1.2 million, but about a sixth of that came just last year.
	So she really escalated it.
	The L.A. District Attorney George Gascon dished out $36,500 to Waters Committee for the slate mailers during his 2020 campaign.
	That's the kind of person, this Soros District Attorney in LA, who's creating total chaos, turning criminals down the street, refusing to lock people up for shoplifting and all the rest of the stuff.
	That's the kind of guy that pays $36,000 to get on the mailer.
	Another person who gave her money like that.
	Gavin Newsom, $45,000 to Maxine Waters.
	$33,000 from Barbara Boxer.
	Okay. Lala Harris has done that in the past.
	In 2016, she paid Maxine Waters $30,000 to get on flyers that said, you know, I'm with her.
	Maybe that's where Hillary got the idea.
	You know, it's her campaign slogan.
	I'm with her. Yeah, it's all about me.
	But, you know, that was kind of telling about her.
	But, yeah, there's another kind of cash cow that's being developed, and this one is actually a real cow in China.
	I'm not taking anything from losing anything to Maxine Waters.
	I've got a couple of people who've got comments and tips on it.
	Audi, thank you very much for the tip on Rockfin.
	It says, thank you for being consistent in your point of view.
	Honest reporting and fair commentaries.
	Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	I have to be honest.
	I have to answer...
	One of the things that bothers me is I read that spot in the Bible where it says we will give an account for every word that we say.
	When I talk to a lot of people for three hours a day, that kind of gives me pause, makes a chill run up and down my spine.
	So I know that I've not always been nice about things, but I at least try to keep it honest.
	Even if I lose my temper, I can still be honestly mad about things, but thank you.
	North American House Hippo, thank you for the tip on Rumble.
	I have so many family members and friends up in Canada who have become ill over the past year, and they can't put it together.
	They don't want to hear it.
	They're completely propagandized.
	Me too. Me too.
	People that we have known from high school that we just have a little bit of touch with, but it is very sad to see it.
	Very sad. Let's talk about the physical cash cows, though.
	China has come up with what they call super cows.
	Did you see this?
	They have genetically engineered some cows and they're going to start cloning them.
	They're planning a cloned herd of 1,000 and they have some cows that they say will produce 300 tons of milk.
	They said it'd be each cow would put out 37,000 pints annually and they're going to They've taken this idea of productivity to the utter extreme, haven't they?
	It is cows, they said, that have high fertility.
	And this is what they're putting out, to give you a frame of reference, since most of us don't know how much a cow puts out over a year.
	They said it's about double what the average cow in the UK does.
	Isn't it interesting though, beyond the genetic things, games that they played with this, where China is placing themselves in the food chain.
	But let's talk about the genetics first.
	First, they said the lead project engineer.
	So they took tissues from the cow's ears in order to reincarnate them.
	So they found some cows that were productive.
	And this is typically what you would do is you would breed cows.
	So we've had selective breeding for a very long time in humanity.
	And a lot of people were concerned, confused about this when we first started talking about genetic modification, what the difference was with that.
	And I said, well, we've always done that.
	created different breeds of plants or animals selectively Look at the genetic variation in dogs, for example.
	It's just tremendous what you can produce with selective breeding, but they're still dogs.
	Now, you can, with genetic modification, Because God created a software code that is common to both plants and animals, the DNA. You can, you don't have to,
	you're not limited to breeding like, creatures that are like each other, the same, and I wouldn't say the same species because we determine, we define species differently, but I would just say the same kind of animal, right?
	You have dog kinds and you have Cat kinds and things, and that cat kind would be everything from a house cat to a tiger and lion and that type of deal.
	But they don't even have to be any similarity at all.
	As a matter of fact, you can combine attributes from plants into animals.
	Some of the examples of that were taking some bugs, for example, you know, the stuff, the luciferase that would make them glow and map that into a monkey to make a monkey that glows in the dark.
	Why you want that?
	I don't know, but you've got a problem with sneak attacks at monkeys at night.
	Maybe that could be a useful thing, but no, they're just playing around with God's software.
	And so they're doing this different with this Chinese thing.
	I've talked about biopsy burgers, right?
	In Western society, what they want to do is they want to say, well, we don't want to have farms anymore because there's going to be nitrogen and other things like that.
	We can't have the methane gases.
	And so we're going to just grow this in the lab as if the labs don't have any byproducts or exhausts.
	What does it take in the lab?
	What kind of energy do they use and what kind of byproducts do they have?
	We'll forget about that because they want to prohibit traditional food and they want to take a biopsy of an animal and then grow that into meat.
	And so that's what they're doing with this.
	This is not selective breeding, and it's not necessarily direct genetic modification, but they're cloning these animals.
	And so it has elements of genetic modification in it, but it is still basically selective breeding, but growing it, like they want to grow burgers.
	They then transplanted the cloned embryos into 120 cows and the three cloned cows births were announced this week.
	They currently have 6.6 million cows but they get 70% of their purchases from overseas.
	They said it comes after the Communist Party nation previously unveiled a gigantic pig skyscraper, home to 650,000 pigs.
	I talked about that as well.
	Meanwhile, what are we doing? We're burning down food factories.
	We're destroying chickens, right?
	We are in the West outlawing farms in the Netherlands and other places because supposedly nitrogen is an issue.
	If it's a pollutant, if it's an issue, it could be controlled.
	You don't have to shut the farms down, but we're shutting everything down in the West.
	China is building everything at a breakneck speed.
	They're building oil refineries.
	They're building coal power plants.
	They're building skyscrapers that'll be used for agriculture.
	At the same time, the people who control our countries are doing everything they can to destroy our production of everything, including food.
	We'll be right back. ¶¶ Welcome
	back. Let's talk a little bit about truth.
	We have news leaders, and this is reported by Jonathan Turley.
	He cannot believe what he is seeing here.
	You've got people like the former executive editor of the Washington Post, former CBS News president Andrew Hayward, All of these people, including the editor-in-chief right now of the San Francisco Chronicle, but it's all of these people in the establishment media, and they've agreed, as summarized by Garcia Ruiz, editor-in-chief of the San Francisco Chronicle, objectivity has got to go.
	It's racist. It's bad.
	We don't want to have anything objective in the news.
	What? What are the implications of that?
	I mean, these are the people out there who are pushing back on narratives.
	They're not arguing for post-modernism, which I think is kind of a confusing phrase.
	They really ought to call it post-objectivity.
	But they're arguing for that in everything that they do.
	All the stuff that is happening with transgenderism is a good example of the quote-unquote logical conclusion to this, and there's no logic to it, but it does make sense if you look at their postmodernistic worldview where there is no such thing as truth or objective reality.
	And we understand that this is a tool that tyrants use.
	Orwell understood it. You know, you have to forget the objective facts.
	Math is racist. Anything they don't like, they call racist.
	You've got to say that 2 plus 2 equals 5 if they demand it.
	But what are they going to do about fact-checking?
	What's going to be the basis for them saying that something is fake?
	My son says if they're saying that objectivity is racist, then they're objectively racist themselves.
	That's right. The whole thing about people who say that there is no absolute truth, you'll find that that is their absolute truth.
	That's how absurd the whole thing is.
	Yeah, they'll have to do field checking.
	How do you feel about this?
	Let me check my feelings on this.
	No, they'll just push whatever the authorities say.
	You don't want anybody fact-checking the authorities because the authorities don't have the facts on their side.
	So again, CBS News, Washington Post leaders, current serving editor-in-chief, and Jonathan Turley says, notably, while Bob Woodward and others have finally admitted that the Russian collusion coverage lacked objectivity and resulted in false reporting, media figures are now pushing even harder against objectivity as a core value in journalism.
	Because, again, the facts are not on their side.
	And we don't need to have that.
	If we establish a totalitarian society, the essence of that is to get you to just cave, to embrace the double thing.
	The Stanford Daily had an interview with the Stanford journalism professor, Ted Glasser.
	He insisted...
	That journalism needs to be, quote, needs to, quote, free itself from this notion of objectivity to develop a sense of social justice.
	Okay, well then define justice.
	Right? Tell me what justice is.
	Doesn't justice involve facts?
	Wouldn't justice involve truth?
	You can't get away from this.
	This whole thing is simply to get you to live by a lie, because that's what totalitarianism is.
	Alexander Solzhenitsyn, do not live by lies.
	Well, they want you to live by lies.
	They're lies. Whatever they say.
	So they said the journalist professor, Ted Glasser, rejected the notion that journalism is based on objectivity, says that he views, quote, journalists as activists because journalism at its best And indeed, history at its best is about morality.
	Okay, define morality.
	They can't escape the fact that everything that they talk about, the language that they use and all the rest of the stuff, is rooted in definitions and facts and reality.
	They want you to live in their virtual world where the only things that are real are what they say are real.
	And you just do whatever they say, no matter how contradictory it is.
	Again, this has been the situation.
	And where did this all come from?
	Why do we call it post-modernism?
	Well, because this all began, and its roots are satanic.
	Its roots were a challenge, an intellectual challenge, to the Bible in the 1800s.
	And mainly coming out of Germany.
	And that was called modernism.
	And so they said, you know, the rationalists, the modernists said, we are going to set in judgment of the Bible.
	And so we will say that if there's anything in there that's supernatural, We will rule that out.
	As a matter of fact, because it's got supernatural stuff in there, we'll rule it out in general.
	But they also were more specific.
	The first line of attack was to question the Bible based on their ignorance of archaeology.
	Well, I've never heard of the Hittites.
	This can't possibly be true because...
	It's not there. Have you even been to the Middle East?
	Well, no, actually. You go back and you look at the artwork that was being produced in the early 1800s.
	Artists were drawing biblical figures because they would reproduce scenes that were described in the Bible, but they would reproduce them.
	Not only as Dutch people, but wearing clothing that was in Holland or clothing that was in Italy.
	The animals and the plants that were in the pictures were what they saw around them.
	They had never been to the Middle East.
	They didn't know what it looked like.
	So they were drawing all these things, reimagining them, you know, to be looking like them.
	And the places looking like them, because they'd never been there.
	When they did go there, they started finding, with archaeology, they started finding all the things that were described in the Bible.
	As a matter of fact, for the first century of archaeology, it was all about taking a Bible and using that as your map to find things.
	And they would go around, they would find stuff all over the place.
	And so then another line of criticism came in that was based on evolution.
	Now, you know, we are modern, we're scientific, and we're going to have higher criticism of the Bible and shut it down.
	So that was always the argument, but you can't even have an argument.
	You know, we can... I don't run away from that kind of stuff.
	We have rational answers to all of that.
	But... Rational and philosophical and scientific and historical and geographical and all the rest.
	There's ways that you can talk to people about that.
	But when they come in and say, well, I don't even really care what's true anymore.
	It's just how I feel.
	That's the age that we live in.
	You can't reason with people.
	They don't care about the facts.
	And they're openly saying that now.
	They're openly saying that about journalism, even though for the last couple of years, oh, you're disinformation, you're misinformation, you're malinformation.
	Based on what? What's the standard?
	And they're openly saying we don't want to have any truth.
	But we do want to have social activism and social justice and morality.
	Well... You have no definition for those things either.
	Lauren Wolf, the fired freelance editor from the New York Times, has not only gone public to defend her pro-Biden tweets, but has published a piece titled, I'm a biased journalist, and I'm okay with that.
	Well, frankly, I am too.
	I'm glad that they're owning their bias.
	You see, the reality is, is that we should try to be objective and But we also need to know that we all have a bias.
	And this is one of the lies that has been around for a long time from mainstream media.
	They've been lying to you and telling you that they are unbiased.
	Well, the very fact of what they choose to report is based on their bias.
	Take a look at Matt Drudge.
	He didn't write anything.
	He's a news aggregator, an editor, if you will.
	But the very stories that he chooses to edit Show what his bias is.
	He used to be biased conservative.
	Now he's biased liberal or leftist.
	Very clearly. All of those things.
	So what you even choose to talk about.
	What the paper, the editor of the paper, chooses to print.
	Where he puts it. Is it going to be the headline story?
	Is it going to be buried in the back?
	All of that is their bias.
	And so I've always said that what you need to do is you need to have people who are going to say, well, here's what we know and talk about the objective facts that are there.
	But you also need to analyze that and you need to, it's a good thing to look at people who are coming from different perspectives and make your own judgment about it.
	Nicole Hannah-Jones of the 1619 Project that I talked about yesterday is a leading voice, says Jonathan Turley, for advocacy journalism.
	Advocacy journalism.
	Indeed, she has declared all journalism is activism.
	Now the leaders of media companies are joining the self-destructive movement, says Turley.
	They're not speaking of columnists or of cable hosts who are sharing opinions.
	And again, you know, I don't like the so-called non-opinion press.
	I think, you know, when somebody's got an opinion, they're talking about what's there.
	Now, they may get the facts wrong, and their conclusions that they draw from the facts may be wrong.
	But I think that the opinions need to be based on objective, established facts.
	But at least the people who are giving you opinions are being honest about it.
	These people who come out and say that they're objective, just like I was talking about the report from Fox News about the Project Veritas versus Pfizer thing.
	Notice how they describe Project Veritas.
	Notice how they will push back on what Project Veritas had to say, but then Fox does not push back on what Pfizer's response was.
	And they don't debate the two of those things either.
	That was a biased article.
	They tried to present it as objective journalism, but it was filled with slants.
	And so we've been in this post-modernism, but again, I think a better understanding of it, if people don't understand modernism, And where that came from, and even its satanic origins, right?
	The father of lies, putting that out there.
	But, you know, you could debate those lies, but now they say, well, I don't even want to debate you.
	Because the facts aren't on their side.
	And the facts aren't on the side of these people in the media, which is why they want to just shut it down and say, well, we're not even going to do that.
	What they're saying now is that objectivity...
	It's synonymous with prejudice.
	It's hateful.
	It's racist. And we see this apply to anything that they disagree with and anyone that they disagree with.
	You notice that they never want to debate anybody about anything.
	They just want to vilify you.
	As I said, it is a relic of Of white newsrooms.
	This is Information Liberation.
	Pull this out of Arizona State University and their Walter Cronkite School.
	Well, that's the way it is, right?
	Well, that's not the way it is.
	Well, that's the way it is, because I said so.
	So, this is a relic of white newsrooms.
	Have objectivity?
	Well, thank you. I'll take that as a compliment, as an honor.
	So are you then saying then that to just go with fiction and feelings, is that the hallmark of people of color news?
	Because that's, you know, where this all leads.
	If you're going to say that objectivity...
	And math and all the rest of these things are relics of white society.
	That doesn't look too good for you, actually.
	But it also doesn't look too good as to what is happening in alternative media.
	You have Jordan Peterson, for example, who is now with Ben Shapiro's Daily Wire, which is looking more and more like the Daily Woke.
	Jordan Peterson calls for regime change in Iran.
	To fight misogyny.
	And the way he phrases this is what is troubling.
	I don't agree with what's being done in Iran.
	It is part of a theocracy there.
	And... They have rules.
	They've got people who are going to jail because they're dancing in public.
	Like I read to you, you may be inciting violence or disobedience, and so we're going to sentence you to prison.
	You had a young lady. The religious police would arrest people who were not wearing the mandated face masks.
	We are so different from them, aren't we?
	No, we just have a different religion.
	You know, we have a Fauci religion.
	That masquerades as science, and we tell people you've got to wear a face mask or we're going to arrest and fine you.
	There, they have another religion, an Islamic variant, that mandates the face masks, but only for women and only for their purposes.
	So, yeah, we should go to war with them to fix their government and give them freedom.
	Yeah, that's what my son says.
	That's what we do all the time. Regime change.
	We should go to war with him. Actually, we already are at war with Iran in terms of sanctions.
	Sanctions are an act of war.
	A good and original idea.
	Yeah, definitely. So, we need to oppose this fundamentalist, totalitarian, misogynist regime.
	Well, that sounds pretty woke.
	Look, what is happening is wrong.
	But Jordan Peterson is missing the solution.
	And he's not framing the problem in the correct way.
	Because he doesn't frame...
	The problem is not that they're anti-woman.
	It's got a lot of different issues with the way that they're set up.
	And you can make all the speeches that you want, but that's not going to change anything.
	I don't know. You know, I look at Jordan Peterson.
	He seems to be going off the rails increasingly.
	He had a moment there.
	We seem like, you know, God was illuminating some things for him.
	But he kept God at arm's length, and what happens is, you know, God will kind of give you over to that.
	I hope that he, you know, it's never too late.
	As long as he's still alive, I hope that he can get his bearings.
	But he's just a psychologist, and he doesn't really have a clue as to what's going on.
	Can't even frame the issue properly.
	Again, he begins by fundamentalist, right?
	Well, there are some fundamental truths.
	That's one of the things we need to learn about objectivity.
	That label of fundamentalism was first pushed against Christians, and they love to use that to conflate Christians with radical, violent Islamic extremists.
	Oh, you're all fundamentalists, right?
	It is a pejorative term that they want to use against Christians.
	It's one of these things like martyrs, for example.
	Martyr was just Greek for witness.
	The Christian martyrs are people who died for what they believed.
	They didn't kill other people.
	The earliest martyrs, the reason they called them martyrs was because they were witnesses to what had happened.
	They were witnesses to Christ, witnesses to what the apostles had done, and they would not recant that.
	And they were killed because they would not recant what they had witnessed.
	That's why they were martyrs.
	And so that term itself has been co-opted to somebody who an Islamic martyr is somebody who kills other people in order to get rid of the infidels.
	It's not about that.
	It's not about murder on the basis of religion.
	Meanwhile, we've got a university that has now removed a benefactor's name because he owned slaves.
	His family is now demanding $51 million be given back to them.
	This goes back to 1846.
	The man was named Thomas C. Williams.
	He attended Richmond College in Virginia.
	In the 1880s, he served as a trustee of the college.
	After his death, his family made a gift to the college.
	That helped to establish their law school.
	And they named it the Williams School of Law after him because of the amount of money that he had donated.
	Now they've decided that he must be purged and they want to change the name to the University of Richmond School of Law.
	His family is not happy about that because they made a public campaign to vilify them.
	And, again, I'll mention as they're doing this to various people, we've had some people in the Caribbean saying, we demand reparations from Benedict Cumberbatch, the actor, because his family had owned plantations down there.
	But, of course, so has Lala Harris' family.
	Her father was proud of the fact that That they owned slaves.
	His family.
	And nobody is asking for any reparations from Lala.
	Because she's not white.
	So they're asking for this and they're vilifying the family.
	And they say he may have played an important part, but according to tax records, his successful tobacco business owned 25 to 40 slaves.
	So, you know, 160, 180 years ago.
	So, the family must be vilified today.
	And so his great-great-grandson explained in a letter to the president, if suddenly his name is not good enough for the university, then isn't it proper ethical and deed virtuous action to return his money with interest?
	Is it not a form of fraud to induce money from a benefactor and then discredit the benefactor after he is long dead?
	Surely the Williams family would not have given a penny to the university knowing that the university would later dishonor our family.
	A 6% compounded interest over 132 years, the gift to the law school alone is now valued at over $51 million and this does not include many other substantial gifts from my family to the university.
	The ethical and virtuous decision is clear.
	Return the money.
	He also said, That the family has assisted minorities during pivotal times.
	He said he hired thousands of workers.
	Many were blacks and women.
	Productive work and industry is the only thing that lifts people out of poverty.
	The Williams family gave away all of their Mint's wealth.
	Most of it was done anonymously.
	Many Richmond institutions are the result of their goodwill and their generosity.
	I tell you, there's nowhere in this country, That has been more successful in destroying itself than Richmond.
	What a beautiful place Monument Drive was in Richmond.
	Beautiful, interesting statues of Civil War people.
	All of that has been defaced, destroyed.
	they cannot do enough to destroy their heritage.
	And that's what this is really about.
	It's about destroying our country.
	This isn't about slavery at all.
	As I pointed out yesterday with the lies about the 1619 Project.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	you you you Thank you.
	Alright, welcome back. We have a message from Angry Tiger.
	Angry Tiger and Jason Barker started Nights of the Storm.
	It kind of came off of the Rockfin community that was listening to this show.
	They have a good community that goes back and forth talking to each other.
	They've pretty much moved over to Rockfin now.
	But it's a good community, and they would keep it going after the show was over.
	And so they decided, well, you know, we can keep this going in any number of ways.
	And so the two of them have a show.
	They will have three, four people on.
	A couple of weeks ago, before Travis left, he was on Saturdays at 10 a.m.
	They had Travis on to talk to him.
	They've had Gard on to talk to him.
	And it was Jason and Angry Tiger and Rhonda Tate were on there and it's a really good program.
	I really like the banter.
	They know what's going on.
	But he says, To stream live.
	Your support is much appreciated.
	And he's got a link there of where you can go to subscribe.
	So we need to do that. And after the program, we can be one of them.
	But yeah, I would definitely recommend them.
	Guard Goldsmith, who has hosted this show several times.
	He has Liberty Conspiracy as well, and he's got some programs on Rockfin and on other platforms.
	I don't know if he's on YouTube or not, but he's got a sub-stack as well, so look up Guard Goldsmith as well.
	He does great work.
	Let's talk a little bit about the presidential race here.
	You know, I mentioned earlier that Bob Woodward did a mea culpa Talking about how pathetic the Russian conspiracy, Russiagate stuff was.
	And he said, we really need to own up to this.
	And as that's coming out, all these, as Jonathan Turley is pointing out, says, but look at what is happening to journalism now.
	They're saying, well, we don't really care about facts.
	I mean, does it really matter if Russiagate was true or not?
	If they got the desired results?
	Of course not. Not according to these people who are running big journalism.
	But the interesting thing is that Trump, after suing Bob Woodward, because Bob Woodward did an interview with him, he knew that it was going to be used to put together a book, and Trump gave his consent for the interview, and Bob Woodward Recorded all of it.
	And there was nothing that was embargoed, nothing that was off the record.
	And then he put the full recording out.
	After he did the book, he put the full recording out in Trump's voice.
	You know, just the Trump recording that he had.
	Put that out as an audiobook.
	That got Trump really upset.
	But doesn't he know? I mean, this is at a time when Bob Woodward was part of the Russiagate conspiracy theorists.
	Trump always looking for these mainstream media people because, again, it's about his ego.
	It's very flattering for him.
	For people from the Washington Post and the New York Times, Trump is impressed with them, and he thinks it's a big deal to be interviewed by them.
	I've had requests to be interviewed by these people in the wake of what was going on with Stop the Steal and other stuff like that.
	I did not want to talk with them, not because I've got anything to hide about Alex, but because I know that anything that I had to say Would be heavily edited by them.
	There's no way I'm going to talk to a Wall Street journalist reporter or a Washington Post reporter.
	Like, you want to know what I think?
	I talk for three hours a day, every day.
	So you can take some excerpts from that.
	But I'm not going to give you an interview and let you selectively put out what you want to do so that you can spin and twist the truth.
	There's no way I'm going to do that.
	And to me, you know, to put out the entire transcript of what he had to say, That's the best possible outcome that you could get from any of these people.
	But Trump sued him.
	And less than 48 hours after Trump sued Bob Woodward for $49 million, he's praising him for pushing back against Russiagate.
	On Monday, the ex-president filed a lawsuit against veteran journalist Bob Woodward claiming the recordings he included in the audiobook version of his 2020 book Rage were shared without Trump's permission.
	But as they point out, Trump is not one to pass up a chance to promote a comment from anyone who agrees with him on anything, even when he just sued the person two days ago.
	So Trump's lawyers acknowledged their client had agreed to be recorded by Woodward in an on-the-record interview, but nevertheless, they argued that such permission did not include releasing the audio recordings.
	So he tweeted out a story from John Solomon.
	Who was reporting on what Bob Woodward had said.
	So Woodward does an article.
	John Solomon quotes that.
	Trump quotes the John Solomon article.
	Bob Woodward said Trump scolds media colleagues for Trump-Russia coverage.
	Says the American public was cheated.
	Trump put that out on Truth Social.
	Well, it's because he's a deeply wounded narcissist, as his former lawyer Ty Cobb said, a deeply wounded narcissist who's incapable of acting except in his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge.
	And so, with all that in mind, the Babylon Bee...
	Talking about Nikki Haley announcing that she's going to run for president.
	She's going to make her official announcement February the 15th.
	So the headline from the Babylon Bee is, Trump expected to announce new nickname for Nikki Haley on February the 15th.
	I'm going to totally crush this Nikki Haley woman just as soon as I figure out who she is, said Trump.
	Hey, that might be the nickname right there, Nikki Who.
	But seriously, can someone tell me who she is?
	Yeah. Did he know who she was when he put her in at the UN? I even, you know, because Roger is so close to him, I even said to Roger one day, not on air, but after, you know, off air, I said, what in the world was he thinking when he put Nikki Haley in?
	I mean, he's got a lot of bad appointments, but she's perhaps one of the worst.
	You know, what was he thinking?
	Well, I had to throw a bone to her, you know, put her somewhere where he thought she wouldn't really do anything, you know, in the UN. Oh, that's great judgment on his part, isn't it?
	The UN? Notice how people use the UN to grandstand?
	That's what Nikki Haley did.
	So the Bible in B says, sources confirmed that there is a list of nicknames that the Trump people have come up with.
	These are the contenders.
	Icky Haley...
	Nasty Nikki, Nikki Hacky, Nervous Nikki, M-Ass-A-Dore Nikki, or Haley, Horseface Haley, Handicapped Haley, No-Good Nikki, Little Nikki, Neocon Nikki, Tricky Nikki, No-Chance Nikki, No-Votes Nikki, but this is my favorite one.
	Halliburton Haley.
	That's what she is.
	The key thing about Nikki Haley, besides the...
	Totally empty resume.
	Empty of any real accomplishments or any ideas.
	She's got no ideas, no accomplishments, no reason to be in office of anything.
	But the key thing about Nikki Haley is she's one of these people like Lindsey Graham or the late John McCain or, you know, there's so many of them.
	She's just 100% military-industrial complex.
	She never saw a war that she didn't want to jump into.
	That's why when all this stuff was happening with the Skripal poisoning in the UK, you know, this guy who was double, maybe triple agent or whatever, the Russian who had gotten asylum in the UK and had lived there for a decade or more, and there was supposedly a...
	A gas attack on him.
	Nerve gas attack on him.
	And it was absolute nonsense.
	And the Russian nerve gas is seven times more potent than the VX nerve gas that we have.
	And Putin just laughed it off.
	And he was right to laugh it off. Because if that was what it was, they'd be dead.
	Everybody would be dead. You had people showing it.
	And there were pictures.
	Of, you know, people standing there taking pictures while you had the full hazmat suits on.
	You had a doctor who came by, administered aid to them, said, I thought they were suffering from an opioid overdose or something like that, you know, and it's like they were just out of it.
	She didn't die. These other people didn't die.
	The whole thing was a clown operation, but Nikki Haley was demanding.
	That we put boots on the ground in Syria.
	Because the Russians were in Syria.
	They were in Syria at the invitation of the Syrians.
	Why were we there? Nobody invited us in.
	So we needed to be boots on the ground.
	And Theresa May was the Prime Minister at the time.
	Theresa May and Nikki Haley at the UN. You know, bomb them, put troops on the ground, all the rest of the stuff.
	I called the two of them the Valkyrie.
	You know, these mythological woman warriors, you know, that come out at the beginning of a war.
	Absolutely despicable.
	You got Darren Beattie, who has a revolver.
	He's totally in the tank for Trump.
	But he's right about this.
	Here's the never-ending list of why Nikki Haley would suck as president, he said.
	Well, you only need one. You know, the bottom line is she's a neocon, she's a warmonger, she's a warmonger, and a warmonger, and...
	An ambitious social climber as well, with nothing to contribute.
	Nothing whatsoever of any value.
	So she's going to be promoting herself as of February the 15th.
	It'll be interesting to see what nickname Trump comes up with.
	But that'll be about the only thing interesting about her campaign.
	WND says, well, there's another Republican seriously considering a 2024 run for president.
	And they're talking about Larry Elder.
	You know, conservative commentator, you know, certainly would be interesting.
	He'd have something to say.
	He says, it isn't because I want to derail Trump or DeSantis or anybody else, but you should want to derail Trump and DeSantis.
	I don't know where he stands on the vaccine.
	That's my litmus test for these people, quite frankly.
	What do you say about the Trump shots?
	What do you say about stopping the Trump shots?
	What do you say about removing...
	The legal protection for these things that Fauci put in.
	Those are the lines for me, quite frankly.
	But Trump went on the offense against DeSantis yesterday.
	He said, Is a rhino globalist, Republican in name only.
	Rhino. I see people spell that R-H-I-N-O. It's like, no, no.
	Anyway, he says, I don't know how he says that, because this is the guy that he just endorsed just a couple of months ago.
	He endorsed a rhino globalist?
	Why would he do that?
	And that was the second time he endorsed this rhino globalist.
	Because Ron DeSantis wasn't a rhino globalist, as far as Trump is concerned, until he ran against him.
	So he's endorsed him a couple of times.
	Trump appears to have landed on DeSantis as his desired villain in this professional wrestling-inspired political drama.
	I like the way they put that on MediaEye.
	Ten-second video that he put out of DeSantis from about five years ago.
	DeSantis argued that he wanted to be like then-GOP congressional leader Paul Ryan, and he abruptly cut it off.
	So you know that he cut him off right in the middle of a sentence, about to say something else.
	So what was the rest of that?
	What is the context for that?
	I don't know. As you know, I'm not a DeSantis cheerleader, but still.
	You know, I'm concerned about DeSantis' political ambitions.
	He is very ambitious, but is Trump not ambitious?
	Is Nikki Haley not ambitious?
	I mean, they all are. By the way, you know, Trump gave his endorsements twice to this guy he now says is a globalist rhino.
	And he also gave money to Hillary Clinton.
	What is Hillary Clinton? Well, she's not a Republican in name only.
	She's not a Republican in name.
	But, you know, he doesn't have too good of a track record in terms of picking people in elections or in his administration.
	But he went on to say, the real Ron is a rhino globalist who closed quickly down Florida and even its beaches.
	Loved the vaccines and wasted big money on testing.
	How quickly people forget.
	Yes, how quickly people forget that Trump was cheering the vaccines.
	Now he says that it's wrong to love the vaccines?
	I don't know anybody that loves the vaccines more than Trump does.
	This guy is totally deranged.
	It's amazing to me how deranged Donald Trump is.
	He criticizes Ron DeSantis, says he loved the vaccines.
	And wasted big money on testing.
	How much money did Trump waste?
	About $6 trillion on this stuff.
	Unbelievable. Unbelievable.
	He is right. He did shut down Florida very quickly.
	He shut down Florida about a week.
	He declared an emergency order about a week before Trump did.
	However, he started pulling back in April and completely ended the lockdown by September.
	And when he started doing that, that's when he started getting traction with everybody.
	At the very beginning, he was bad, but he wasn't any worse than Trump.
	DeSantis snaps back at Trump and he says, well, I got re-elected.
	Ooh. Yeah, it's not enough just to get elected the first time.
	Any rube can get elected by telling people stories, but they can't follow through on it.
	That's what we see about Trump.
	But it's amazing to me that he's now going to criticize other people for supporting his vaccines that he still saves.
	Saved millions of lives.
	No, you killed millions of people, Trump.
	That's why I say, Larry Elder, any of these people, if they are going to try to embrace this bioweapon, this Trump shot, This genetic code injection, that's the end of the line.
	You don't need to know anything else about them.
	So, is this Trump's most brazen attack yet?
	writes Politico. Florida had begun easing restrictions cautiously and on a phased basis at first, but more rapidly than almost all the other states.
	In September of 2020, DeSantis lifted capacity limits on restaurants, arguing that the experience of Miami-Dade, which closed restaurants, and Broward, which didn't, showed that they were ineffectual.
	Crucially, the state was absolutely insistent that the schools return to in-person instruction.
	Now there's a consensus that remote learning was largely a debacle.
	But at the time, DeSantis was believed to be making a risky choice.
	The Washington Post reported in August of 2020, quote, Florida is making a high-stakes gamble on school openings, with superintendents pressured into decisions that some fear will result in coronavirus outbreaks.
	And see, this is, again, we should applaud people when they do the right thing.
	DeSantis did the wrong thing, but he was the first person to really pull back.
	And he did more to pull back and more to fight this than any other governor did.
	And so he should be applauded for that.
	The problem with DeSantis is that he did far too little.
	But the other side of it is that he did far more than any other politician against this stuff.
	So there you go.
	Is the glass half empty or half full?
	Trump. This guy is a fake conservative.
	I can tell because he did what I told him to do.
	That's right. Yeah.
	Yeah, he loved the vaccine. So he's a fake conservative.
	So Trump campaigners reportedly planning to bash DeSantis for vaccinating the elderly, despite the fact that Trump continues to support the vaccines.
	The guy is an absolute fool.
	Incapable of acting except out of revenge because he's a deeply offended narcissist.
	And he's incapable of even telling what is in his best interest.
	Again, Trump is the perfect...
	I don't know why the liberals don't like him more.
	I mean, he is the perfect poster child for post-modernism.
	Where truth doesn't matter.
	Where history doesn't matter.
	None of this stuff matters.
	It's whatever Trump says.
	Which is what's really scary, because that's really where the MAGA crowd is.
	The MAGA crowd worships this guy because of who he is.
	There isn't anything that he can do or say that will deter them from this.
	So, again, if you go back and you look at his record, and The Hill did just that.
	They said, well, here's DeSantis' record on COVID-19.
	Here's what he did, and here's what he said.
	And as they point out, on March the 9th, this was four days before Trump issued his executive order of a state of emergency.
	Four days before Trump did it, DeSantis declared a state of emergency on March the 9th.
	But, and then on April the 1st, April Fool's Day, he declared a lockdown.
	He did it later than most governors, says The Hill, but he did impose a lockdown, and it was very thorough.
	Like I said, he locked down some of the highways coming in.
	An NPR report at the time noted that more than 30 other states had already imposed lockdowns before Florida did so, and that those orders affect more than 85% of the U.S. population.
	So he was late on the lockdown.
	Good for him. But it's bad that he did the lockdown again.
	Where's the authority for that?
	He also transferred, as part of this emergency issue, when he did that, he transferred essentially full power over to Florida's Director of the Division of Emergency Management, made him state coordinating officer.
	These people abdicated their power, turned it over to bureaucrats, unelected, unaccountable, Notably, in light of DeSantis' later professed concern with civil liberties, this order gave the coordinating officer the authority to suspend the effect of any statute, any rule, or order that would in any way prevent, hinder, or delay any mitigation, response, or recovery action necessary to cope with the emergency.
	They gave him full, full-on power.
	Reprehensible. He locked down the state.
	Reprehensible. He only looks good in comparison to Trump and the rest of these traitors.
	And that's a pretty low standard.
	This is why I can't get excited about DeSantis.
	So he imposed the lockdown later than most did.
	85% of the country was already locked down.
	He imposed it on April the 1st.
	Before the end of the month, April 29th, he lifted the lockdown.
	Oh, he said that we're going to start lifting the lockdown.
	And he said, we had achieved several critical benchmarks to flatten the curve.
	And by September the 25th, he had ended the lockdown.
	Now, what was going on September 25th, 2020?
	Well, Trump was still playing the game, wasn't he?
	So he had Fauci there up on the podium.
	Trump was afraid to hold any rallies, any public meetings.
	We're not going to have any convention, all the rest of the stuff.
	And, of course, the lockdown election.
	The lockdown election occurred a long time after the September date.
	It was the 25th.
	You know, lockdown election continued through the election.
	Arguably, why Trump lost.
	I really do believe it is why he lost.
	December the 8th, DeSantis attended a Trump White House summit on vaccines.
	Trump is going to attack people for doing what?
	My son said, you followed my orders on the vaccine?
	You idiot, you traitor.
	Trump was defeated one month before, was still in office.
	He held a high-profile event.
	As the first COVID-19 vaccines were on the brink of winning approval, they didn't win approval.
	Trump dictated approval to them.
	You do this or you're fired, and you'll have to go work for Pfizer right now.
	Trump called the development of the vaccines at such speed a, quote, monumental national achievement.
	And he gave DeSantis a shout-out.
	Great job, Ron, he said.
	At a panel discussion with three other governors, DeSantis outlined plans to get vaccines to seniors in nursing homes and health care workers, and then to the broader senior population.
	And he's still killing seniors in Florida because they have stopped these poisonous, toxic bioweapon injections.
	To younger people, but they're still doing it with seniors.
	If I remember correctly, Brian Shalhavi came up with the increase, and it was something like 19,000% increase over what had happened to all the other vaccines with senior population.
	This was the first vaccine that's really been politicized, unfortunately, said DeSantis, and that's going to be something that people are going to have to deal with.
	At that point in time, he was still supporting the vaccine.
	April the 21st, DeSantis says, get vaccinated.
	So he was pushing it.
	He said that he got a dose of the Johnson& Johnson vaccine, the single dose thing, and one and done.
	But when you look at, and then by July 21st, he's still praising the vaccines.
	He's still advocating vaccinations, July 21st, 2021.
	September the 21st, 2021, though, he did a bigger turn.
	He appointed Lattipo, Dr.
	Joseph Lattipo, the anti-mandate surgeon, but not anti-vaccine.
	And even though Lattipo and DeSantis have said, you've got to stop it for this age group, they're still giving it to others.
	November the 18th, 2021, he signed a ban on vaccine mandates.
	January the 21st, 2022, he said he declined to say if he got a booster shot.
	It's been a gradual evolution.
	Too little, too late.
	But the amazing thing to me is that Trump is going to try to destroy him based on Trump's own vaccine.
	How much more insane can we get?
	Well, stay tuned. There'll be more in this crazy 2024 race.
	Thank you for listening. The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.

▲