UNREAL: Father Fighting to Save Son From Being Transitioned Loses in Court
|
Time
Text
Well guys, this one's particularly disturbing and it's one I've actually had for a couple days in my lineup.
I just had to get to it and I saw Tucker did a great piece on it last night where a Texas father, a man by the name of James Younger, had to go to the Texas Supreme Court who ruled against him seeking basically to stop chemical castration of his son by His, I guess, ex-wife, the mother, though not biological from my understanding, of his twin children.
He basically tried to stop her from moving to California to transition his son into a girl.
And there's video of him You're talking to the child, asking questions, not leading questions, not anything like that, just asking questions.
And it appears as though it's just the mother's wish to make this happen, not necessarily that there's a desire.
Though, again, I'll disclaim for social media purposes and I imagine the people You know, out there probably don't agree with my position on not allowing nine-year-olds to be mutilated and pushed through sex changes until they're adults.
Or perhaps, in my opinion, maybe older than 18, because how many 18-year-olds do we know that probably made a lot of decisions?
They regretted it shortly after their 18th birthday.
But nonetheless, at least 18, but to allow this to happen to a nine-year-old.
And what's worse is he said, Mr.
Younger said, no one in Texas other than Attorney General Ken Paxton, my friend and someone who's been fighting hard for a lot of these things, and they throw all sorts of stuff at him.
But he's literally, he said, the only person in Texas that even tried to do this.
So a Texas father accused the Texas Supreme Court of being party to an empire of child abuse after the justices rejected his request to prevent his ex-wife from subjecting their son to chemical castration through the use of puberty blockers and cross sex hormones.
How does a father not have rights?
I get it, guys. I've seen it.
It's not like fathers and mothers are equal in this situation.
We can pretend that that's the case.
It's just not. In the reality of whether it's divorce court or basically the court of public opinion in America, that doesn't actually exist.
But that a mother could essentially unilaterally decide to do this for a child without the father's consent.
Is freaking mind-blowing, guys.
When is this stuff gonna stop?
When are we gonna say enough is enough?
I know that the American public, the average American public does not agree that a nine-year-old should be able to do this, that a father shouldn't be able to have some say in it.
What the hell is going on that this stuff is becoming norm?
And even conservative places like Texas are saying, yeah, it's okay, move to California.
Who cares? You know, three-year-olds can make these kinds of decisions.
They can't get a tattoo or even buy a pack of cigarettes.
But we can permanently mutilate their bodies.
And there's zero chance, folks, very little chance they'll regret that one day.
We know that's not the case.
We know that's not how the statistics works.
Please start speaking up.
Please help people like Jeff Younger to stop this insanity from taking over our country, from destroying our morality and decency and the innocence of our children.