SICK: AOC Refuses to Condemn Violence Against Pro-Lifers!
|
Time
Text
Wow, guys, incredible news today out of the Supreme Court, a big win.
And as we've seen ever since the leak, there's been a lot of pro-abortion groups talking about violence, insinuating violence, seemingly in some cases, to me, encouraging violence.
And now you have a reporter that spent almost two minutes trying to get AOC, To condemn any violence.
You already saw the fire bombings.
You saw it. So this is a real thing.
And she spends two minutes.
She'll talk to everyone. She won't answer the question.
Will you condemn the violence proposed by pro-abortion groups?
Will she not condemn it?
Are you not condemning the violence proposed by pro-abortion groups?
So I guess no condemnation.
Can you not touch me please?
I'm a sheep farmer. I'm a sheep farmer.
Congresswoman. Congresswoman. Congresswoman.
Congresswoman, will you condemn the violence proposed by pro-abortion groups?
Will you condemn the violence?
Senator Manchin said he's deeply disappointed by this decision, and he said he would support legislation to cut it by road, but he did not say anything about the filibuster.
What's your message to him? Not supporting changes to the filibuster is not supporting filibuster.
Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez, we're taking your response to mean that you do not condemn the violence proposed by Corvorsion Group.
Are you concerned about state rights and country protection?
Yes, I absolutely am concerned about that.
Even in Texas, I think anti-slavery laws were overturned on the basis of the right to privacy established by Congress.
Are you concerned about the pro-abortion violence proposed?
We are overturning the right to privacy established by Roe.
And that will have knock-on effects for people even regardless of their views on abortion.
They will wake up with less rights and they don't know it yet.
Will you condemn the violence proposed by pro-abortion groups?
If you're on the left, you get to not answer the question, and it's not a tacit acceptance.
It's not condoning the violence, even if you ignore a question from a reporter for two minutes while talking to other reporters.
That's not a problem.
I have a feeling, based on actual experience, watching it over and over and over again, if you're a Republican and you don't assertively Ad nauseam.
How many times did my father have to condone the nonsense they asked him to condone?
Okay, he condoned it. He did. You must do it again and again and again.
Whatever it was, it didn't even matter.
Okay? Many of the things deserve to be condoned, and he did.
But if he didn't do it with every sentence, it was a problem.
Here, I have a feeling we're going to see crickets, folks.
Watch for yourself. Watch for yourself, and you'll see...
The double standard. Liberal privilege still exists even if Roe v.