All Episodes
May 15, 2022 - Triggered - Donald Trump Jr
03:33
SHOCK: Democrat Claims We're "At War" With Russia!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, guys, I don't know if you saw yesterday, but Steny Hoyer, basically the number two majority leader after Nancy Pelosi in the House, said, we're at war.
I wish we'd get off this and really focus on the enemy.
I know there's a lot of politics here, but we're at war.
We need to produce energy.
As I told you, Code Point is now sending 80% reversing Asia supply to European supply because they need it because we're at war.
We're at war? Did we sign a declaration of war?
Did that go through the House?
Did Joe Biden use his powers as president to temporarily do that?
Because it seems like a big deal that we're at war, because if we're at war, it would seem we're at war with Russia, who has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world in terms of number of warheads, about 6,000 of them.
We're at war defending Ukraine, a corrupt country that's not in NATO, not an actual ally of ours.
And I understand that U2 is playing concerts in their subways, so it must be really dangerous.
And also, they must really be our friends now.
But if we're at war, Have we thought about the consequences of that?
I mean, I know they are voting next week to spend $40 billion additional.
So if we weren't at war because of the $13 billion we already spent in the proxy war, I can't imagine the Russians loving that we're spending $13 billion, but then we spend another $40 billion for a total of $53 billion Our government's just saying that we're giving them intelligence, which let the Ukrainians target Russian generals, sink their flagship, I guess, of the Black Sea Fleet.
We're at war with Russia.
How long do you think it takes till they park, say, I don't know, their huge nuclear submarines off the coast of America?
How long do you think until, say, a sociopath like a Putin Realizes that he's losing this war and or losing face before the world and says, maybe that's the only option.
For what? Why are we doing it?
As a kickback to the military industrial complex?
I get it, guys. They haven't been at war since we pulled out of Afghanistan like three months ago.
I understand they want to get back at it.
I understand they watched big pharma get rich.
For the last few years, sucking American taxpayers dry, and it's their turn at the trough.
I understand that DC talks about it, like, not even subtly.
They know. It's just basically a big kickback to big war in the military-industrial complex.
We've got to get those guys paid.
We're subsidizing them.
You know, I get it. That's DC common speak.
Everyone knows it. Everyone talks about it.
But, like, for what?
Is it worth it? I know that everyone's going over to the Ukraine and Nancy Pelosi and all those guys, they're taking their selfies with Zelensky like it's, you know, the new, the political version of angel wings.
You got to get your selfie for the gram.
Give me a break, folks.
We have a baby food shortage in America.
Energy prices are through the roof.
Inflation skyrocketing.
The economy is going to probably crater.
And we're sending $40 billion for a total of 53.
To Ukraine so that we can maybe end up in a nuclear war with Russia.
Export Selection