Just When I Thought I Couldn't Hate CNN's Brian Stelter Any More!
|
Time
Text
Okay, guys, just when you thought you couldn't despise CNN and its chief propagandist, Brian Stelter, anymore, he goes out and does something like this and totally redeems himself.
You have to watch. This is an interaction between him and a former New York Times editor, right?
So not exactly a conservative, where she literally lists, Barry Weiss lists all of the things that were deemed You can't touch this, right?
If you talk about the Wuhan lab leak theory, you're a racist.
He tries to pretend like this is totally normal, that it's totally fine, that we could have these conversations.
Yeah, you could have the conversation if you don't mind being cancelled, if you don't mind being wrecked, if you don't want to lose your job, if you're part of these mainstream institutions, no problem, you could have that conversation.
But again, just when you thought you couldn't despise an individual and a propagandist like Brian Stelter anymore, You got to watch this clip because you realize just how bad it is when a former New York Times editor is calling him out and lists just verbatim, boom, ba-boom, ba-boom, 20 things, 15 things, whatever it is, that were totally deemed inappropriate, totally out of the realm of free speech for the last 18 months, also happened to be, in my opinion, almost all totally true.
You realize just how far the media has fallen as an institution.
Check out this clip because it's always fun to watch CNN get absolutely wrecked.
You write, there are tens of millions of Americans who aren't on the hard left or the hard right who feel the world has gone mad.
So in what ways has the world gone mad?
Well, you know, when you have the chief reporter on the beat of COVID for the New York Times talking about how questioning or pursuing the question of the lab leak is racist, the world has gone mad.
When you're not able to say out loud and in public that there are differences between men and women, the world has gone mad.
When we're not allowed to acknowledge that rioting is rioting and it is bad, And that silence is not violence, but violence is violence.
The world has gone mad.
When we're not able to say that Hunter Biden's laptop is a story worth pursuing, the world has gone mad.
When, in the name of progress, young school children, as young as kindergarten, are being separated in public schools because of their race, and that is called progress rather than segregation, the world has gone mad.
There are dozens of examples that I could share with you and with your viewers.
Everyone sort of knows this.
You say we're not allowed, we're not able.
Who's the people stopping the conversation?
Who are they? Um, people that work at networks, frankly, like the one I'm speaking on right now who try and claim that, you know, it was, it was racist to investigate the lab leak theory.
It was, I mean, let's just take an example.
But I'm just saying that when you say allowed, I just think it's a provocative thing you say.
You say, you say, we're not allowed to talk about these things, but they're all over the internet.
I can Google them. I can find them everywhere.
I've heard about every story you mentioned.
So I'm just suggesting, of course, people are allowed to cover whatever they want to cover.
But you and I both know, and it would be delusional to claim otherwise, that touching your finger to an increasing number of subjects that have been deemed third rail by the mainstream institutions and increasingly by some of the tech companies will lead to reputational damage, perhaps you losing your job, your children sometimes being demonized as well.
And so what happens is a kind of internal self-censorship.