Since When is it Ok to Use Military Force to Intimidate Civilians?
|
Time
Text
Guys, what the hell is going on with our military this last week?
It's been politicized like we've never seen before, but look at this guy.
They're literally attacking American civilians.
You saw the whole Tucker Carlson thing, I'll do more on that later, last week, where you have active duty military personnel.
Clapping back at him for calling out some of the woke BS that they've been pushing.
And then when the guy does it, he gets called a fat slob by the people on Twitter looking at it.
He starts taking, you know, the thirst selfie of him in the gym to show how tough he really is.
I mean, this is the Department of Defense.
These are active duty people using government accounts to clap back at civilians.
But then worse, this week, we saw The Guam National Guard get paraded through the halls of Congress to Marjorie Taylor Greene's office, a sitting U.S. Congresswoman from the state of Georgia, because she mistakenly called Guam a foreign land instead of a U.S. territory, which it's been since like the mid-90s, okay?
So she made a mistake.
Their rep, Michael Stan Nicholas, marches Guam National Guard members in uniform through the halls of Congress to her office.
To show her, to teach her so she learns, right?
I mean, think about this. Since when is it okay to use active duty military personnel to intimidate American civilians, let alone a sitting member of Congress?
It's not. It's not.
And it's absolutely disgusting.
How could this not be seen as a show of force to intimidate someone?
How could it be seen as anything?
Where is the Secretary of Defense as all of this stuff is going on?
Remember? The guy that Joe Biden couldn't even remember his name, even though they worked together for like years while he was VP. He couldn't remember his name in the conference.
He couldn't remember that little, you know, where he works over, you know, that little building.
Yeah, the Pentagon, Joe.
Okay? But more importantly, if Guam wanted to teach a congressman something, and you should watch both videos.
I'll put them up in here. You should watch both videos.
But if Guam wanted to teach a sitting congressman something, maybe they should focus on Hank Johnson, who, as you will see in this video, Thinks that a military buildup on the island of Guam, in congressional testimony, out loud he's saying these things, he thought that a military buildup on the island of Guam could cause the island to tip over, to capsize, because he's so stupid, he thinks an island is like a boat, okay?
Not an island like it actually is, which is a piece of land that is connected down to the earth.
Hank Johnson, U.S. Congressman, thought that the island of Guam, that is 209 approximately square miles, would tip over if you put some military personnel on one side of the island, but not another.
He said this in congressional testimony, okay?
I give props to the general in this one who was listening to this line of questioning and didn't just say, Sir, you are a moron, okay?
The general kept his cool, was watching, but watch this video.
Seven miles between one shore and the other.
Is that correct? I don't have the exact dimensions, but to your point, sir, I think Guam is a small island.
Very small island and about 24 miles, if I recall, long.
So 24 miles long, about 7 miles wide at the least widest place on the island and about 24 About 12 miles wide on the widest part of the island.
I don't know how many square miles that is.
Do you happen to know?
I don't have that figure with me, sir.
I can certainly supply it to you if you'd like.
My fear is that the whole island will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize.
We don't anticipate that.
So if Guam wanted to teach someone a lesson, maybe they should teach Hank Johnson a lesson about geology and how land works and what an island is because this guy's making military decisions as well and he doesn't even know that islands aren't boats.
So we can't have this stuff going on.
I'll do more on the Tucker Carlson one later because that goes even further.
We cannot allow the U.S. military and members of the armed forces in full fatigues to be used to intimidate civilians because they made a mistake and didn't know something.
Or even a member of Congress, maybe who should have known better, but they didn't and they made a mistake.