David Icke scrutinizes Donald Trump's third assassination attempt at the Hilton, questioning Secret Service protocols and suspect Cole Thomas Allen's potential mind control. He highlights suspicious links between Allen and Henry Martinez's 2023 social media posts referencing NASA research from 2014, when Allen interned there. The analysis reveals how the incident was leveraged to justify demolishing the White House East Wing for a secure ballroom and expanding Section 702 surveillance powers, suggesting the event served as a catalyst for broader political consolidation rather than a genuine security crisis. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Tesla's Hidden Healing Tech00:13:44
100 years ago, Nikola Tesla discovered a healing technology that threatened the entire pharmaceutical industry.
The day he died, the government seized everything.
For 100 years, this technology was hidden.
Until now, plasma is back.
Tesla Club, TZLA.club.
Assassination attempt number three in relation to Trump at the White House correspondence dinner.
At the Hilton Hotel in Washington.
I remember seeing the first attempt at Butler when it had all the look of a theatrical performance.
The whole thing, none of it made sense, but it got tremendous support for Trump.
It's when Elon Musk came in and the The Silicon Valley oligarchs in all their support for him.
Oh, he's such a brave man, and all that stuff.
So, what I'm doing is, I looked at it and I thought, this doesn't seem real to me.
You know, the way the people around him, the Secret Service people around him, suddenly opened up.
I mean, there could be other shooters, there's already been one.
What are you opening him up for so that he can be shot again?
But what was that?
What happened as a result?
What they call in filmmaking the money shot.
The blooded would-be president bravely fight, fight, fight.
So what I'm thinking then is okay, I want to see this bloke's ear.
As soon as possible.
Because that'll tell you if the guy was actually shot at all.
Well, when he revealed it, and he revealed it far too early, by the way.
You remember when he came on at the Republican convention, because it was just before the Republican convention, so he could come as a hero.
And he had this white bandage on his ear.
And all the people in the audience, or lots of people in the audience, not all of them, they were wearing a bandage in sympathy.
I mean, oh.
And then the bandage came off at some point, quite relatively soon after the event.
And no damage.
No damage.
High-powered rifle bullet pinged his ear.
No damage.
Produced the blood, apparently, but no damage.
And then you had the second one.
That was some bloke who was found by the Secret Service some hole ahead of Trump on a golf course, who never had a straight shot at Trump or anything.
And he was arrested, and I think he's been jailed now.
And then we had the third one.
So you'll understand why I was skeptical when the third one happened.
And there are many questions about it.
And, you know, you look at what happens as a result.
What is the apparent event used to justify?
And I'll get into that as we go along.
Anyway, the government have released this footage of a police officer with a dog.
Apparently, talking to this guy, this guy walked into a room, and this guy, the police, then he's having a chat.
You couldn't see the guy, but you could see the police officer and his dog.
And then, for some reason, the police officer turns and goes about his business, and the bloke runs out with a gun.
Now, there's great question as I record this, because it changes all the time, on whether the guy actually shot his gun.
And also, he was nowhere near the hall where Trump and this dinner was going on.
Apparently, about four or five shots were fired, none of which hit this guy who was called Cole Thomas Allen.
Now, if you are coming into somewhere with a gun, Where the president is, etc., at least on another floor, but in the same building, then what would normally happen is they'd shoot you.
Well, probably dead.
And then people would go, oh, yeah, well, you can understand that, why they would do that.
Yeah, okay.
But they didn't.
These shots were unleashed, but didn't hit him.
And they caught him.
Alive.
The other thing about this stuff, and it's kind of always missed, must always play it across the ability to mind control people.
Doesn't mean that everyone who does everything is mind controlled.
I'm saying it has to be taken into account as a possibility.
Because, you know, I've studied this mind control business since the 1990s, and they can.
They can make you not only do something, they can make you believe that you really did decide to do it when it was all put into your mind from an external source.
So there's questions about whether he actually fired the gun currently.
And also, his lawyer approached a judge, who I think, you know, made a judgment in their favor.
Demanding that he could see his client in private, which the government would not allow them to do.
So there's lots of questions going on here.
And what apparently, and it's all apparent at the moment, is that a quote manifesto was sent out by this guy just before, like 10 minutes before he.
Made his appearance.
This story says Trump gun suspect laughs at insane lack of security in manifesto signed off as friendly federal assassin.
The manifesto of the suspect behind the White House correspondence dinner shooting, well, shooting?
Well, not yet confirmed as I speak, was signed off as the friendly federal assassin.
The suspect has been identified as Cole Thomas.
Allen, 31, from Torrance, California.
He's facing two firearm related charges.
It says after opening fire near the room, but that's under question as I speak.
And several, he's supposed to be targeting Trump and several other high profile cabinet members.
And he's believed to be a teacher from California, but his motive for the shooting remains unclear.
He was apparently Teacher of the Month in 2024.
And It's all very strange.
In his manifesto, which was apparently sent to his family, who reported it to the police, the story says, he revealed he was hell bent on killing the Trump administration officials in order of importance, but didn't include FBI Director Kash Patel on that list.
Now, I mean, he might be naive to the nth degree, but if you're going to run, Towards a president and his cabinet, although he didn't get very close, well, you don't expect to get very close, do you?
Because there's all these people around with guns at different levels, different stages on your journey to the president that they're going to kill you.
Well, you'd think they normally would anyway.
So the idea that he was going to get in and kill everybody in the cabinet is, Kash Patel apart apparently, the FBI chief, is really utterly ridiculous.
But one thing that Allen did, he laughed at the, if it was his manifesto, he laughed at the insane lack of security at the Washington Hilton, saying Iranian agents could have brought even more devastating firepower and no one would have noticed.
Like the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance.
I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.
Anyway, the Allen Manifesto was put to Trump in an interview with the US 60 Minutes show and he weren't happy.
The so called manifesto is a stunning thing to read, Mr. President.
He appears to reference a motive in it.
He writes this Administration officials, they are targets.
And he also wrote this I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.
What's your reaction to that?
Well, I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would, because you're horrible people, horrible people.
Yeah, he did write that.
I'm not a rapist.
I didn't rape anybody.
But do you think he was referring to you?
Excuse me.
I'm not a pedophile.
You read that crap from some sick person.
I got associated with stuff that has nothing to do with me.
I was totally exonerated.
Your friends on the other side of the plate are the ones that were involved with, let's say, Epstein or other things.
But I said to myself, you know, I'll do this interview and they'll probably.
I read the manifesto.
You know, he's a sick person.
But you should be ashamed of yourself reading that because.
I'm not any of those things.
Mr. President, I was never.
Excuse me.
Excuse me.
You shouldn't be reading that on 60 Minutes.
You're a disgrace.
But go ahead.
Let's finish the interview.
The other thing that he wrote in the.
Disgraceful.
It was pointed out that there was a very strange posting a few years ago in which the assassin's name was mentioned.
And no one seems to know why.
I'll give you the background.
An ex account run by a Henry Martinez posted the alleged shooter's full name, Cole Allen, all the way back in 2023.
And it is the only post that this account has ever made.
Nothing before, nothing since.
Just one tweet naming the gunman three years before the attack.
But the writer says it gets even wilder.
A Henry Martinez published research at NASA in 2014, the exact same year that Cole Allen interned with NASA.
The Ballroom Protocol Pushback00:09:28
Same name, same institution, same timeline, one account, one post, one eerily precise name dropped years in advance.
And what that's about, well, answers on a postcard, please.
The other thing that people pointed out is that when they reacted to what was happening outside the room, They took JD Vance out, the vice president, first, and then went for Trump when protocol says it should be the other way around.
And the other thing is that they've taken Trump out eventually.
By the way, he fell over and then said in a later interview, I didn't fall over.
They were just, they told me to get down.
No, no, you fell over.
You can see it.
But the point is, you're hearing there's an apparent shooter outside the hall.
And so, what would you do with the president?
You'd take him way, way out of harm, way out of the situation.
But you can see pictures of Trump standing behind the curtain, just behind the curtain where they've just taken him from his seat.
Watching it all happen as people ran from the hall.
It's a really bloody strange one.
And then, on the basis of if you want to know why something happened, look at what's justified as a result of it happening.
And one of the things, only one, I'll come to some others, was Trump's ballroom.
Suddenly, the whole response.
To this situation, was see if we had the ballroom on the White House, then it would be safer for everybody because they want some bloody bunker underneath it, some military bloody bunker.
And so, what's been happening is there's been a lot of pushback.
You remember Trump, he just overnight just demolishes the bloody east wing of the White House without any permission.
And now he wants to build this ballroom, but he's getting pushback on it.
And so he's been using this happening at the Hilton Hotel to justify the whole ballroom thing being pushed through.
And indeed, the public purse paying for it now.
So he was ushered out, then watched it all unfold from behind the curtain.
And then has a press conference at the White House responding to what had happened.
And the point he was making is you see, it's the ballroom.
We must have the ballroom.
This is what he said.
I didn't want to say this, but this is why we have to have all of the attributes of what we're planning at the White House.
It's actually a larger room and it's much more secure.
It's got.
It's drone proof, it's bulletproof glass.
We need the ballroom.
That's why Secret Service, that's why the military are demanding it.
They've wanted the ballroom for 150 years for lots of different reasons, but today's a little bit different because today we need levels of security that probably nobody's ever seen before.
And just by coincidence, you had Trump sycophants and Israel gophers.
Like Lindsey Graham, Senator Lindsey Graham, calling for the ballroom to be built and using public money to do it.
Ah, but you had all these so called MAGA influencers, sycophants again, who just promote Trump, whatever he does, whatever he says, and streams of them, what you're seeing is only some of them, streams of them.
Immediately responded with, see, it means we need the ballroom.
We can't stop the ballroom anymore.
Yeah, that's the first thing you'd think of, innit?
You know, let's have the ballroom when something like that happens.
But these MAGA influencers, they're all coordinated.
It's pathetic, you know.
You know, oh, the left wing media, they're coordinated and that.
So the right say, the MAGA say.
And it's true.
They are.
But so are you.
Unbelievable.
And then another line that was repeated over and over in the aftermath of this thing is enough is enough.
And here's the story DOJ, Department of Justice, bit of a misnomer, but there you go, moves against White House ballroom lawsuit in wake of shooting.
Enough is enough.
The Justice Department reached out to the attorneys for the nonprofit group opposing the White House ballroom renovation.
Urging them to drop their suit in the light of Saturday's assassination attempt against President Donald Trump.
In the light of the events, Brett Shoemate, Assistant Attorney General to the DOJ's Civil Division, wrote in a Sunday letter to the lawyer representing the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which is opposing the ballroom construction, saying, Your lawsuit puts the lives of the President, his family, and his staff at grave risk.
Oh, do leave off, mate.
I hope Saturday's narrow miss will help you finally realize the folly of the lawsuit that literally serves no purpose except to stop President Trump no matter the cost.
Shoemaker wrote.
Enough is enough, the attorney continued.
Okay.
So, enough is enough.
That was a theme immediately after this.
Happening.
The White House posted, Enough is Enough, along with a Trump quote about hate speech.
Remember when the MAGA and Trump were all against hate speech?
Well, now they're using it.
Well, of course, it's okay when we do it.
Enough is Enough, that was a MAGA theme all week when they were trying to get Jimmy Kimmel fired, the late night talk show host with ABC, because Trump wanted him fired.
Then we had Erica Kirk.
She left the Hilton Hotel in tears.
She always seems to be in tears whenever the camera's around.
And she also noted that enough is enough in a post over the alleged shooting.
And then we had this Trump uses correspondence dinner shooting to justify expanding spying powers.
As the deadline nears, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is set to expire, and the president is claiming Saturday's shooting proved the safety of our nation depends on the program.
This is the anti surveillance president, right?
Is he the same president that was anti war?
Yeah, he was, yeah.
An exchange of gunfire between an armed suspect and law enforcement outside the dinner that's in question.
As I speak, came days ahead of a deadline for extending far reaching government surveillance powers.
And President Donald Trump wasted no time in claiming that the attempted attack on the event proved that the FBI must be permitted to spy on Americans without obtaining warrants.
There you go.
Surveillance Powers After Gunfire00:00:48
He also used it to attack the No Kings protest, these millions of people protesting against Trump.
And, you know, the whole idea of having a president to protect privacy and freedom.
If you want to read more and watch more of my content, then go to the description under the video where you can buy my books.
The latest one is The Roadmap, where you can get tickets for public events, and how you can subscribe to a fantastic.