Channel Sponsor - https://organised.co/HEALTHCODE
Pre-order David's New Book - The Roadmap: https://shop.ickonic.com/product/the-road-map-by-david-icke
Tickets for Live Events: https://openvisioneventslimited.telltix.com/
Sign up to the Ickonic Media Platform: https://www.ickonic.com
Latest News From David Icke: www.davidicke.com
Social Media
https://www.facebook.com/davidicke/
https://twitter.com/davidicke
https://www.minds.com/davidickeofficial
https://onstellar.com/davidickeofficial
In this video, we dive into the latest "iran news" and the ongoing "iran protests". The discussion touches upon the authenticity of these demonstrations and the broader "iran crisis", including its impact on the "iran economy" and the issue of "inflation". This "panel moderation" offers insights from experts on the current situation.
Let's start with Iran then, and we'll start with you, Dad.
As it stands, you've got all these protests that we're told are organic.
To me, they're as organic as a Pop-Tart.
There's probably some genuine protests.
Well, there are genuine protesters, but it's clearly inflated.
A lot of the footage is actually from other countries, and some of it is from pro-regime protests.
Now, it's emerged in the last 24 hours as a result of the Israeli media, because they always tell the truth in Hebrew more than the Western media will ever speak the truth, that actually these protesters are being armed.
And he says at the end of this tweet, the presenter from Channel 14, that I will leave you free to guess who's arming them, alluding to the fact that it's obviously the Mossad.
So where do you see this going, Dad?
Well, it's incredibly predictable because if you want to remove a regime, you either bomb it into submission, or as we've seen all through decade after decade, you have what became known as colour revolution.
And colour revolutions, whether it's in Ukraine, there was two there, whether it's in Iran, works like this.
You first of all have to go back one step to the, it's called the 12-day war between Israel and Iran not so long ago.
And of course, it involved American bombing with Trump's support of those Iranian facilities.
Now, if you look back, for a while, this so-called iron dome paid for by American taxpayers to defend against missile attack on Israel, it was working quite well.
And the interceptor missiles were picking off the incoming missiles from Iran.
But towards the end, it wasn't.
No.
And more and more Iranian missiles were landing and hitting targets in Israel.
So when Trump suddenly came in and said it's over, we bombed them now and now it's finished.
A lot of that was actually to try to stop what was happening because basically Israel was starting to feel the consequences of its actions.
But what you know with a global cult agenda, no matter what it is, it doesn't go away.
And so removing the regime in Iran, to take it over with a puppet in their place, is ongoing.
I mean, you go back to 96 and Netanyahu's saying then we must get rid of what's happening in Iran and the regime in Iran.
And so the safest way to respond to that, given that it would appear the Chinese have Put more missiles into Iran in the intervening months, that you get a popular revolution to bring down the regime that you are targeting.
And for suddenly these protests to start just when Iran and the United States want that regime gone is, to say the least, an amazing coincidence.
Very convenient.
And so you're looking at an ongoing situation where they want it to appear that the popular revolution is going to bring down the regime.
But you have seed, like the equivalent of seed-funded the so-called revolution, because how these colour revolutions work is that in most countries, people aren't happy.
And in places like Iran, they're seriously not happy because of the nature of the regime.
And the sanctions they've been under from the US, which has killed their economy.
Yeah, that too.
So you're not faced with a situation that's harmonious and everyone's happy.
And somehow you've got to whip that up into a revolution.
You've already got the population that's open to replacing the regime.
But the thing about Iran is that whenever they replace a regime, they replace it with, if not a worse one, often that, but one that is as bad as the one they're getting rid of.
The difference is, is the regime tyrannical in whatever form going to do what America and Israel tells it, or isn't, isn't it?
And so if you go back to the 1950s, you had a prime minister called Mossadegh, and he came in, and his point was that the Western oil companies were ripping off the Iranian people.
They'd come in, taken all their profits, left the Iranians with next to nothing, and he weren't having it.
So what he did was nationalize the oil industry.
Well, of course, the Western governments weren't having that, not least Britain and the United States.
And so they outed him in what is now well acknowledged as a British and CIA operation to get rid of him.
And they bring in this guy called the Shah, the Shah of Iran.
And he ran the country on behalf of the Americans and the British, I'm sure, right up to 1979, when the Islamic Revolution took place and the Islamic regimes came in.
Now, I saw a post by Tommy Robinson, you know, this well-versed historian, and he was running footage from the years of the Shah saying, this is what we need.
We need to go back to how it used to be.
Well, the Shah was running a tyranny through operations like the SAVAC secret police, infamous, CIA-trained, no doubt funded too.
And the Shah was a puppet of the United States.
He did what he was told.
So eventually he goes and goes off to, I think he was to America and I think he got cancer pretty soon after that.
Now, bring it back to where we are now.
And basically, the man in the shadows on behalf of Israel and the United States that they want to bring in to kind of replace the Islamic regime is the son of the Shah, right?
So the point I'm making is anyone that believes in freedom will support people in Iran demanding freedom.
Absolutely they will.
The point is that's not the idea.
The idea is not to replace the Islamic regime with freedom, but with a regime that answers to the United States and Israel.
And another point is that you've got this greater Israel plan of expanding Israel to the perceived greatest extent of Old Testament Israel, load of nonsense, all that is.
But they want to go to basically to the Nile and they want go into part of Iraq.
They want to go into part of Saudi Arabia.
They want the whole of Lebanon and all that area and Jordan and part of Syria too.
And the problem was that the Iranians were pushing back.
They were pushing back through Lebanon.
They were pushing back through other means.
And to get rid of them and bring in a regime that answers to America and Israel takes all that away and makes it much easier for this greater Israel expansion to go on.
I think that's pretty obvious in terms of the connection to Israel, not only in the fact that they're obviously arming these so-called protesters, but also the fact that when you go and see, when you look at the footage from these rallies across the world now, Israel flags are all over everywhere, yeah.
And that to me, you know, that should be a red flag to people.
Essentially, you know, you've got people protesting, apparently, for the freedom of Iranians, and they're waving a flag of their sworn enemy.
I mean, explain that to me like I'm fired.
Yeah, it's embarrassing what we're seeing.
And it's like all these revolutions.
The saddest part is that the people, the civilians who just want freedom and live under a tyrannical regime already are the ones that suffer.
They suffer at the hands of this regime.
They'll suffer at the hands of the next one if what they want to happen happens.
They'll suffer if the Americans bomb.
They'll suffer if the serious Iraelis bomb.
It's really tragic.
And then if you look at the revolution in Ukraine that you mentioned when they got rid of Yanukovych the second time and replaced it with a Western puppet, Poroshenko, and then another Western puppet, Zelensky, is anyone in Iran, sorry, anyone in Ukraine better off today than they were under Yanukovych.
It's not saying this is where we get a ton of stick.
So, oh, you're sticking up for the Iranian regime then, are you?
They do this.
No, no, you're not doing that.
You're saying actually, this potentially is worse than that, or certainly not any better.
So, therefore, both are bad.
Two things can be true at the same time.
Well, that's the lazy thing that you get.
It's like if you oppose what Israel is doing to the Palestinians, then you're pro-Hamas.
Yeah, exactly.
If you oppose what they're doing in Lebanon, then you're pro-Hezbollah.
And you're pro-Putin if you oppose the funding of Zelensky and all the rest of them.
That seems to just be the sort of tired excuse, isn't it?
It's that George W. Bush, you're with us, or you're with the terrorists.
It's like, well, you are the terrorist mate.
You've just got a suit on.
Now, in terms of the Shah, the son of the Shah, that they obviously want to come in, you know, this is probably more up your street, Rich, in terms of your investigation into the messianic agenda and all that kind of stuff, because there's lots of pictures of the son of the Shah, Ravi Pahlavi, licking the wall.
You'd be surprised to know, Les German.
How do you think he ties into that?
Do you think that such a good expression?
Do you think that the Shah are probably more than just puppets of Israel, but are actually deeply connected in with Israel and with their kind of fake version of Judaism?
Kind of like the Saudi royals are.
Yeah, but I think they would be very much Don May crypto in that sense of pretending to be something they're not.
I think that's absolutely true.
You mentioned, I think we said in Whatafa last week, that the point in a revolution is that it goes all the way around.
So it just comes back to the point it started, that it's the point in a revolution like a washing machine.
All you're doing is changing something back to the way it was before.
So these guys are the constant, like David writes in his books, they're the constant in everything.
So what's the constant connection is to pushing this greater Israel project, which is really the political badge for me anyway, over the top of this messianic agenda, which is playing out biblical prophecies, which really are absolute nonsense.
With this kind of messianic stuff with Israel and South America, because obviously he's clearly connected to what they did in Venezuela.
You know, Trump doesn't do anything without Israel's permission.
But also, you've had in Brazil, you had a rabid Zionist in Bolsonaro.
You've got that in, so you've got a Zionist waiting in the wings with Venezuela.
You've got a Zionist Jewish president in Mexico as well now.
And then you've got Millay, Javier Millay in Argentina, whose real name is Milikowski, which is the same name as Benjamin Netanyahu.
Yahoo, who's got the same name.
So there's clearly a connection there with this messianic stuff.
Yeah, I think to understand how the world works, you've got to go to a level above the people that you see because that's where it's coming from.
I would say very strongly, it actually goes into another dimension of reality.
But you go into the shadows, just let's go into the shadows within our quote world.
And that's where it's coming from.
So the leader of Argentina and the leader of America, the leader of all of these countries, Israel, Britain, with Starbuck, all of them, actually ultimately answer to that force in the shadows.
And what this force does to completely delude the population is it plays it out as if all these things are unconnected.
So what it creates is a drama.
It creates a stage show.
The roadmap, escaping the maze of madness, which is what it is, we should know what they're doing, we should expose what they're doing.
But if we don't see the big picture in which that is happening, we'll never find an answer to it.
The more we understand the size of the conspiracy, the more we find the answers to the conspiracy.