All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 5, 2025 - David Icke
53:29
David Icke Speaks On The Day Trump Was Re-elected In 2024
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I am here to bring light.
It's about healing.
Mind, body, soul.
Don't ever settle.
Find your purpose. Find the answers.
Don't hold back.
Achieve maximum success.
Book with me if you want to live.
Book with me if you want to live.
What are we going to talk about?
If something happened today, what's going on?
Well, I know you're a massive fan.
So, Trump wins the election.
Now, obviously, in the old days, we used to acknowledge, pretty much all of us, that people are selected, not elected.
Suddenly, that's not a thing anymore.
Why do you think they've allowed him to become President of the United States for a second time?
Well, how long you got, right?
There's a lot of dots to connect here.
And, you know, not necessarily not going to be some upheavals in the run-up to him being inaugurated.
But, you know, I've got this phrase I've used for years, which is, know the outcome and you'll see the journey.
If you don't know what the outcome is planned to be, then events can look random, like, why are they doing this?
And this has just happened, and it's not connected to this, and it's not connected to that.
But when you know what the outcome is planned to be, you can see the apparently random events as being stepping stones, what I call the totalitarian tiptoe, To that outcome.
And what we have is an outcome that seeks to, for instance, fuse humans with artificial intelligence.
So we have this guy at Google, Ray Kurzweil, who some years ago said that By 2030, which is a major year for these people, when they want lots of these things in place,
by 2030, humans will have their brains, bodies, connected to artificial intelligence, and his words, from the moment that connection takes place, Artificial intelligence will do more and more of human thinking until human thinking as we know it is basically negligible.
Now that's the outcome that they want.
And from that comes human control on a level that in known human history we've never seen.
It creates what I would call the hive mind.
Where people, instead of coming to their own conclusions, come to the conclusions that AI feeds to them.
Now, on the so-called left in politics, although it's not the left that I grew up in, in Leicester, it's the woke left now.
But the Democrats and the woke left basically are rolling over to this stuff.
Like in this country, you're going to see the Starmer government pushing on with this stuff as well, even though they appear to be the opposite of Trump.
And so what they have, the problem they have, is the people that don't want it.
The people that don't want this...
They don't want AI-human fusion.
They don't want this AI-control system.
They don't want any of it.
Now, in the United States, that overwhelmingly is that group of people of 75 million or whatever that support Trump.
And so what we have is...
What I call designer manipulation.
You have different belief systems and therefore you have to pitch your manipulation to that belief system.
You'll tell one group that if they allow themselves to be fused with AI, they'll become gods.
They'll become supermen and superwomen.
And they'll buy that.
But there's this massive group of people that have been talking for years about people being chipped and people being connected to artificial intelligence.
They don't want it.
So what do you do with them?
You have to pitch your manipulation to that belief system.
And therefore, if you notice what has happened since Trump said that he was going to run again, which was very predictable, is that Elon Musk and this group of AI Silicon Valley billionaires...
Have circled the wagons around him.
In recent weeks and months, Elon Musk has absolutely gone crazy in his support for Trump.
Now, you remember that Musk said quite a few years ago now that artificial intelligence could be the end of humanity.
But he's gone on ever since, bringing out more and more AI and promoting more and more use of AI. And he said something very significant, which is the AI fusion with humans is inevitable.
And if we don't, then humans as we know them will...
Die out.
They'll cease to be.
So what you have is design a manipulation to the left.
You'll be gods.
And design a manipulation to the right that says if we don't, we're going to die out.
So it's best to do it my way and trust me because I'll have your back watched in terms of AI and what have you and we should have regulations and all this stuff.
So then you look at this group around Donald Trump.
A key figure is someone called Peter Thiel.
Now Peter Thiel co-founded An organization, a company called Palantir, which supplies the intelligence community, the Pentagon, etc., with surveillance technology and other technology that benefits human control.
And this Peter Thiel is on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group.
Which is one of those organizations that people dub globalist.
It's been pushing for world government and centralization of global power at a world level, dictating to everyone on the planet.
At the same time, the other co-founder of Palantir is a guy called Alex Karp, and he's on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group, this globalist organization.
Ironic then that Peter Thiel is a business associate and has funded the political career of J.D. Vance, Trump's running mate, who says he's against globalism and wants to stop it.
Another key Trump supporter...
Very, very active in this whole campaign is a guy called Vivek Ramaswamy.
He's a business associate of Peter Thiel.
And then you look at Thiel's background and he was the first private investor in Facebook.
And he was a co-founder of PayPal.
And a group emerged which became known as the PayPal Mafia, including Elon Musk, including a guy called David Sachs.
And it just happens that Musk and Sachs are also massive supporters of the Trump presidency.
So there's another Silicon Valley billionaire called Mark Anderson.
There are so many others.
So these guys are not supporting Trump because they think he's going to be of benefit to the masses.
they're supporting him because they know he's going to be a benefit to them and it's it's absolutely vital that we realize that we live in one
party states whereby some parties can go in the direction of the agenda faster than others because some parties like the Conservative Party in this country, they have an area of their support, call it Middle England, whatever.
That also doesn't want this stuff.
It doesn't want this World Economic Forum, global cult, as I call it, agenda.
So it has to be more circumspect in the way that it sells the agenda and it has to be more careful in how fast it moves towards it because people will see that that's what it's doing.
In America, the Democrats who don't have that pushback They can go very fast with it.
And the Republican Party has to be more circumspect.
It has to sell that in a different way.
And that's what we're seeing.
You see, the reason that I could see from the start that Elon Musk being allowed, because he was, to buy Twitter, now X, Was a scam is because I've been tracking the guy for years before.
When I talk about this human hive mind, what Kurzweil said exactly was that from 2030, the human brain would be connected to the cloud.
Now, i.e.
artificial intelligence.
And the cloud is eventually, and it's becoming so all the time, a global, technologically generated electromagnetic field to which the human brain is designed to be connected and to interact with.
And so in the body, you need a receiver to interact with that electromagnetic cloud.
So you need the cloud and you need the receiver.
Well, when you look at this COVID fake vaccine and you see what they're finding in the blood...
You're seeing self-replicating nanotechnology creating systems, and they're finding something called graphene oxide.
Graphene oxide is a superconductor of electricity, and of course the brain and the body interact through electrical communication.
Play with that, you play with human perception.
It's also graphene oxide, an amplifier of electromagnetic fields in the body.
So if you've got graphene oxide in the body and you come into contact with an electromagnetic field, it's going to have a greater impact than if you hadn't got graphene oxide.
So if you look at Musk, he's, through this SpaceX, been putting up...
Low-orbit satellites under his Starlink system to beam electromagnetic frequencies and communication to the Earth.
And if you want to cover the Earth with the cloud, yes, you can cover areas of it, like urban areas, with 5G towers, 6G, 7G to come.
You're not going to cover every inch of the planet with towers.
To do that, it has to come from above.
And so SpaceX has now got thousands of low-orbit satellites up there and permission to put up eventually tens of thousands.
And it's designed with others, but SpaceX is the leader.
To generate this electromagnetic field that Kurzweil calls and others call the cloud.
And I don't know whether you know the background to SpaceX, but this is the official story that's come out.
Elon Musk was flying to Russia with a CIA operative called Michael Griffin.
And they were planning to do a deal to buy intercontinental ballistic missiles.
I mean, go figure.
The deal didn't happen, and according to Griffin, on the way back in the plane, Musk announced he was going to start this SpaceX, and he offered Griffin a job.
Griffin didn't take it because he was offered another job Of a CIA operation, he was a CIA operative, called In-Q-Tel or IQT. This is the technological development arm and seed funding arm of the CIA. It seed funds companies that are developing technology
that benefits the CIA's agenda of human control.
Away goes Griffin to In-Q-Tel.
And then he was given another job, head of NASA. And when he got that job, SpaceX started to be given massive contracts by NASA, which go on to this day, because of Griffin's input.
So if you look at SpaceX...
Ostensibly, it appears to be a private company.
It's not.
It's an arm's-length operation of NASA and the Pentagon.
And recently, an associate of Elon Musk was questioned about this story that came out that he was in phone contact with Putin in Russia quite regularly.
And this guy said he would absolutely doubt that Musk would have those conversations with Putin without permission, given that because of SpaceX and other companies probably, but definitely SpaceX, that Musk had access to classified material.
From the intelligence networks and the Pentagon and NASA. So we're being asked to believe that this guy is working for the people and the systems trying to bring him down when his companies, not just SpaceX, benefit enormously in terms of SpaceX.
It exists because of fantastic government contracts and subsidies.
And so, then you look at Twitter X, which has been the platform which has become the Trump promotion arm in the last few months.
Absolutely over the top.
Now, I'm not saying this because I support Harris.
I mean, oh my God, are you kidding?
You know, I mean, if she's got two brains to rub, cells to rub together, well, that's as much as we can hope for.
But it's not about that.
It's about the fact that it's a one-party state and they are designer manipulating different belief systems on the basis of what these belief systems think and believe.
So, if you want to Have someone like Musk, who's doing this in terms of SpaceX, who has a company called Neuralink, which is brain-chipping people.
And you are trying to designer-manipulate a belief system that has been warning for a long time about the...
AI agenda and the chipping agenda to perceptually control humanity.
If you look at quite a lot of people in what's called the alternative media, before he bought Twitter, they were calling him out on this.
I was bloody calling him out on this.
His companies were...
Look at Tesla and the electric vehicle agenda.
He was ticking the boxes of all these World Economic Forum global cult agendas in his companies.
And yet, what you're trying to do is make him a hero of those that...
Otherwise, we'd be calling him out.
So what do you do?
You let him buy Twitter.
So, you know, you say to people, okay, what was Twitter like before Elon Musk?
Oh, the deep state controlled it.
Oh, really?
Okay.
What does that mean?
Oh, they were deciding what you could say and what you couldn't say.
And who could be on it and who couldn't?
Oh yeah, bloody right.
Well, so the deep state then had it exactly where it wanted.
It was dictating what could be seen.
Yeah.
So why did they sell it to him?
A free speech, quote, absolutist.
Who then started letting people on who were banned before.
And this made him not only a free speech hero, the alternative media, the central part of it that gets all the algorithmic support and all the funding, stopped calling him out on these companies and what they were doing.
It was a wonderful psyop.
And so...
Then you think, well, at least he's into free speech.
Okay.
Well, these are official figures.
Under Twitter, before Elon Musk, 50% of demands by authorities in their various forms for content to be deleted were deleted by Twitter.
Since Musk took over, it's 80%.
So how come?
What happens is he'll pick a fight with a country, say Brazil, which he then backs down on, which was so unbelievably predictable, or Australia, and he'll make a big thing about fighting for freedom of speech.
But in the background, silently, not spoken about, all this stuff is actually being taken down.
Not even to mention the massive shadow banning that goes on among people that are outside the narrative.
And then he picked this fight with Australia, and it was about the preacher who was stabbed on video.
And the Australian government said that they wanted it taken down.
And Musk X took it down in Australia.
No, said the Australian government, we want it taken down globally.
So there was a pushback on that from Musk and it got into a very public fight.
Because, oh no, I'm not taking it down globally because I'll take it down in Australia.
Well, in the six months to March 2024, 40,000 pieces of content were taken down by X on the say-so of the EU, and they were taken down globally.
Not just inside the EU. And as the Australian government, pathetic as it is, said, X has taken down other content demanded by the Australian government globally.
So we're looking at, in my opinion anyway, I've been looking at this for a long time, a massive SIOP which has turned...
A guy who is ticking the box of so much on the wish list of the World Economic Forum Global Coal.
He's been turned into a free speech hero and has therefore been given a free pass by the most promoted part of the alternative media.
And so then you look at what's going to happen from now on.
During the first Trump presidency, there was a significant part of the alternative media that was all Trump supporters that basically gave him a free ride.
Even though he was going back on what he said.
They gave him largely a free ride over claiming to this day credit for the rollout of the fake COVID vaccine called Operation Warp Speed.
What's going to happen now is in this crucial period, he's going to come in in January 2025 for four years.
At least that's the plan.
We'll see how that works out.
But that will take us to 2029. Starmer has just come in in this country, and his five years will take him to basically the same point.
There won't be another president of the United States if Trump goes full term until 2030. So in this crucial period where they want to, from 2025 onwards, there's a button being pressed.
It's what I call perceptual blitzkrieg, where we're going to have everything thrown at us.
So while we're reacting to one thing, something else is happening, and something else is happening.
It's a mass manipulation technique called...
They call future shock.
You give people so many shocks in a short time that basically they don't know how to cope.
And so in this crucial period where they want so many of these things in place, not least AI, that's the big one, by 2030, you've got these people now coming into political power who are going to span that period.
And what we're going to have is an alternative media, which I say has been hijacked since COVID by mainstreamers that have come in and basically taken it over, that are going to zip their mouths for reasons of unless it gets so...
Blatantly obvious, then some of them might break ranks, but most of them will go with it.
They have, in this period of the second Trump campaign, they have nailed their colours to Trump.
They've put their reputations on the line.
Trump's the saviour.
Now, they're going to be very, very reticent.
In this period.
To come out and say, we were duped a second time.
We misread.
They're not going to want to do that.
They're going to want to try to double down.
Trump is the saviour.
And they're going to find, like they did the last time, loads of excuses for why he's doing what he's doing.
And they'll find loads of excuses for why Musk's doing what he's doing, which they already have.
And so, We are in a situation where I'm sure some things will be done in the Trump presidency that people in this room would say, yeah, I agree with that, and I will say it too if it happens.
Because they can't just not do anything they said they were going to do.
Because obviously that's just rubbing your nose in it.
But the thing to hold on to in this period...
What's the direction of travel?
Where are we being taken?
Never mind the rhetoric, words are easy.
What's the direction of travel?
And you'll see that it is towards more and more control by artificial intelligence moving towards the fusion of humans and artificial intelligence.
And one of the key things, That Musk is saying is that the fusion of humans or artificial intelligence in general is inevitable.
It's inevitable it's going to get more and more, quote, intelligent.
And thus, if we don't fuse with it, we, as a human race, are going to die out and get left behind.
In other words, what he's saying is, it's inevitable.
Now, that is a massive perceptual manipulation technique.
Because when you have on one side, this needs to happen because we'll become gods and superhuman.
And they buy that.
Okay.
But over here, They don't want that.
So you dilute the waters by saying it's inevitable that this is going to happen.
It's not, because it's human decisions that are making those decisions that allow artificial intelligence to get more and more control of human society.
It's the Federal Communications Commission, a government agency, that's giving Musk and SpaceX permission to put those low-orbit satellites up.
It's not inevitable.
These are human decisions.
But what the perception of it being inevitable does is dilute the resistance to, we don't want this at all.
Because then you move from...
Trying to stop it to trying to mitigate something you are being told is inevitable.
And like I say, it's designer manipulation.
What's the belief system we're targeting?
Okay, how do we get them on the same page as them through a different means?
And that's why I've been saying...
Over this period of this election campaign, that whether it's Trump or Harris, they are simply different routes to the same outcome, depending on the belief system of the people involved.
and we need to get streetwise to this because this will be what will be unfolding in a Trump presidency. - What can you see happening in terms of the relationship between the United States and the UK?
Because obviously you had everything with the Labor Party working with the Democratic Party, the Center for Cattering Digital Hate, which obviously you know all about, And then, you know, Trump saying he's going to declare war on Starmer's government.
Should he win?
Well, he's won now.
And Starmer's congratulating him.
And David Lammy, the 10 watt light bulb, is...
Is taking to Twitter to say, I can't wait to work with you, when you were calling him a KKK sympathiser and a Nazi 20 minutes ago.
So it's a bit weird, isn't it?
Do you see them aligning, or do you think that actually the bickering between the two and the arguments and stuff, even though it's all pantomime, could be part of the plan?
Yeah, well, you know, they don't have to align in terms of liking each other.
They just have to align in terms of the direction of travel.
And you are going to see the Starmer government starting to push this whole digital AI agenda.
I mean, he's talking, Starmer, he wants Britain to be the centre of AI in the world or Europe.
So, words are so easy.
It's actions that...
Tell you what is happening, not words.
And if you look at, say, COVID, for instance, you look at a narrative that was coming out of the World Health Organization that was accepted by the vast overwhelming majority of countries in the world, very few exceptions.
And so, from a central point, this reaction to COVID, lockdowns, masks, all of this stuff, fake vaccines, was played out across the world.
It didn't matter if there were countries that didn't like other countries or appeared to not like other countries.
It played out everywhere, irrespective of Political background, basically.
I mean, if you look, for instance, at Russia, and you look at its AI agenda, and you look at its fake vaccine agenda as well, it's a mirror of the West.
But the words are different.
Oh, yeah, they're different to them.
Why?
Because of what they say.
But what about what they do?
So, in terms of the Stama government and the Trump regime, you know, they may not like each other.
But the direction of travel is dictated from the shadows and not by them.
See, this is a...
This is a point.
The Starmer government is classic because you have a government that is arrogant but also peopled by buffoons.
Now, if you look back at the COVID era, You had buffoons everywhere.
We had Johnson in this country, Trudeau in Canada.
You had, for the vaccine rollout, you had Biden in America.
I didn't know what day it was.
You had Ardern in New Zealand.
You had Daniel Andrews.
The leader in Victoria, Australia that took extremism to new levels in terms of fascist control of the population during COVID. And you had Macron in France and so on and so forth.
They're buffoons.
And so you look at this Labour government and, of course, the Labour cabinet.
He's been around for a long time.
I've been aware of all the people in the cabinet for a long time.
You mentioned David Lammy.
David Lammy is notorious, even in Parliament, as a moron.
And I was talking to the former Conservative MP, Andrew Bridgen, a few days ago.
He came to my event in Exeter.
Who, of course, started speaking out very courageously about the effects of the fake vaccine.
And he basically said to me, whatever you think of David Lammy in terms of being a moron, it ain't extreme enough when you meet him, right?
Now, the point is...
This guy's Foreign Secretary!
What?
Then you've got this lady, Reeves, Rachel Reeves, who's come out with this budget, which is a disaster for so many people, and the knock-on effects are going to be a disaster for even more.
You've got Ed Miliband!
Oh, my God!
And he's in charge of the energy supply and net zero.
And Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, then you've got Starmer himself.
Oh, my goodness me!
Now, why are there so many moronic people in government?
When there's so many people in the country that are not moronic.
Because moronic people, especially arrogantly moronic people, which is what this Starmer government is, they are easily manipulated.
They are far more likely to be compliant because they don't know anything.
So, I mean, I love it when you...
You have this situation where someone is, what could we say, environment secretary.
What do you know about the environment?
Well, what my civil servants told me when I arrived in the building, right?
So then you have a reshuffle, and the guy becomes, I don't know, energy secretary or defense secretary.
What do you know about defense?
Well, not much.
I just know what I'm being told when I arrive in the building, right?
So, in other words, people that are not sharp, not smart, not informed, are a doddle to manipulate.
But there's another reason that they want morons in government more the merrier.
And that's because under this world government regime that they want, They do not want elected politicians anymore.
That's not the idea.
The idea is you have a world government dictating to the entire planet through agencies like the World Health Organization, the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the IMF, et cetera, et cetera, that are not elected but are appointed what's called technocrats.
A technocracy where the world is dictated not by elected politicians but by bureaucrats and technocrats and medical, quote, experts and Silicon Valley and AI people and all the rest of it.
So if you keep putting buffoons in governments around the world, I mean, you know, Biden's just a really extreme example.
Then what they're doing is breaking down your resistance to a technocratic, non-elected government because that's what they want, and they want this basic reaction.
Well...
You see what the bloody politicians have done?
They can't do any worse, can they?
It's systematic.
And in the Netherlands currently, there was a guy, is a guy, he's blocked me on Twitter X, thank you, I take that as a compliment, called Gert Wilders.
Gert Wilders is one of the heroes of what I call the hijacked alternative media.
And he got in as the biggest party in the Netherlands.
So you think, oh, freedom!
Goethe believes in freedom.
And what he's done is overseen the imposition in the Netherlands of an unelected technocrat who is the former head of Dutch intelligence.
As an unelected Prime Minister.
And this is the way they want it to go, which is why they want buffoons in government.
So basically, you've got all these different politicians and all these different parties.
They're here today, gone tomorrow, with the real power is always there, administered from the shadows.
And they won't always agree.
They won't always like each other.
But...
As long as the direction of travel is the same, the cult is okay with that.
And the more you can get disagreement, whether it's literal disagreement, you really don't like each other, or it's pantomime disagreement, this is giving the impression to the population that people have choice between different...
Different groups, different parties, different ideologies.
When actually, if you break it down and break it down and break it down and break it down, again, the direction of travel is the same.
Only the speed of that travel might be different.
When it comes to Trump, that was my thought as well in terms of the speed of travel and stuff.
But then you think about it and you think, well, actually, he can't be president again, can he, after this?
So actually...
Is there a possibility that he just runs at it?
Because I'm thinking a lot of people voted for him because of the war situation.
They don't want to be throwing casino chips at the action man figurine in Ukraine forever.
They don't want a war with Russia.
They think he can help there without realizing that he's so rabidly pro-Israel.
He doesn't like Iran.
He's got an issue with China.
So actually there is a potential for war in other places.
But the one for me that I think he's going to struggle massively with...
Is the climate change stuff?
Because he's been quite straight as a die with that.
So how do you think they're going to try and wangle that one?
Or is it just a case of, we're going to do it anyway, deal with it?
Well, in terms of what Trump says and what Trump does, I saw a...
A clip of a video at his inauguration dinner when he got in the last time in 2016. And you remember during that campaign, it was Jail Hillary, right?
And there were chants from the audience wherever he went, Jail Hillary, Jail Hillary, and he would punch the air in support of that.
And then when he became president, he said, oh, I'm not going to jail Hillary.
That's bad for the country.
And this video of him at his inauguration dinner, he made a special point in his speech of highlighting Bill and Hillary Clinton, who were in the audience, as being wonderful people and great servants of America.
And he said in the last...
About three weeks that he would be open to pardoning Hunter Biden in the charges that have been against him.
And this is a guy who did nothing when Julian Assange could have been pardoned at the end of his presidency.
He pardoned a load of people at the end of his last presidency.
Who were friends of his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, even his father, and other people, and didn't pardon Julian Assange or Edward Snowden, who's still in Russia, when he said that he stood for freedom of speech and what have you.
And so what this guy says...
And what this guy does are not the same thing.
And he can talk and push on against the human cause climate change agenda, this ludicrous net zero.
But like I say, words are easy.
Whereas his mate, Elon Musk, is...
Basically pushing elements of this human-caused climate change agenda.
He has been the biggest sales pitcher for electric vehicles via Tesla.
And he's pushed for a carbon tax, which is massively part of the...
So, you know, we'll have to see where that goes and how they deal with it, but just because he says it doesn't mean he's going to do it.
And in terms of wars, etc., his support for Israel is...
Is beyond belief.
There is no balance.
There is no shades of grey.
It's Israel right or wrong, basically.
And during his presidency, last one, he gave Israel basically everything it wanted, including moving the American embassy from Tel Aviv to...
Jerusalem, which had massive symbolic and literal implications for the Palestinians.
He has basically no support for the Palestinian cause and what has happened to them.
And it's interesting too that all these people around him, Musk, who attended...
Netanyahu's speech on Capitol Hill a few months ago at Netanyahu's invitation and clapped him afterwards for talking absolute crap.
You've got J.D. Vance, Trump's vice president, who is Israel right or wrong.
Vivek Ramaswamy, Israel, right or wrong?
Robert Kennedy Jr., Israel, right or wrong?
And so, and then, you know, there's talk of impossibly bringing back this guy Mike Pompeo into the government again.
He was his Secretary of State the last time out.
And Pompeo was the guy who was absolutely insistent that the prosecution of Julian Assange was going to go ahead.
I mean, Assange claims that Pompeo was behind an attempt to kill him at one point when he was in the Ecuadorian embassy.
So we'll see a lot.
From who Trump picks in the major positions of power and the less than major ones, we'll see where this is meant to go.
But you're absolutely right, Gaz.
The danger in any presidency is the second term.
Because if you run a first term and you want a second, you can't upset your natural support base.
Too much, or you're not going to get a second term.
So when you get a second term, you can't run for president again, so you don't have anyone to keep happy.
They might not like you, and they might be resentful, but you don't have to keep them happy.
And so there's a lot of questions about this Trump presidency.
That will be answered in the next few weeks and months.
▲
Export Selection