Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 23, 2024 - David Icke

32:24

All Hail The AI & Crypto Czar - David Icke

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello, my name is Sarah Jane Smith and I'm a Quantum Healing Hypnosis Practitioner.
	This technique achieves the deepest possible level of hypnosis.
	This unique way of hypnosis is a very powerful tool which can help people with mental, emotional and physical trauma.
	This therapy is so powerful that all you need is one session.
	You can get answers to all of your life questions.
	First, we'll get an understanding of what caused the issue so that healing can begin.
	Expand your consciousness and remember who you truly are.
	Are you ready to unlock the potential of your soul and free your mind?
	I'm out.
	Are you ready to unlock the potential of your soul and free your mind?
	But I've got some clips that sort of confirm what I've been saying.
	You know, I've talked about designer manipulation, where you can't manipulate everybody in the same way.
	You can't manipulate different mentalities in the same way.
	You've got to target certain mentalities with designer propaganda.
	So if your outcome Is a fusion of artificial intelligence and humans, and the takeover of the human mind and thinking processes by artificial intelligence, and to have the whole system of government and everything else controlled by AI, then you have to have different ways of selling it.
	You can sell it to the woke left in a certain way.
	You can pretty much sell it directly, what I call the hard sell, through people like Schwab and Gates and their agents.
	But on the so-called right in politics, you have people that are very wary of AI control, AI takeover.
	And certainly the fusion of humans and AI. So you have to do them in a different way.
	And what you do is you do it by presenting people like Elon Musk, but there's others they'll come to, who present themselves as skeptical about AI But tell you it's inevitable,
	so we've got to somehow do it, but I'm sceptical, so trust me, because I'm the one who will basically look after you.
	You can trust me with AI. And in that way, once you've convinced The skeptics that AI take over is inevitable.
	Then you go from trying to stop it to looking at ways to mitigate its impact.
	Oh, well, Elon Musk, he's a good guy.
	He's skeptical.
	He's the one we can trust.
	Now, can we?
	Before I come to examples of that, I saw this article this week by a researcher called Derek Brose.
	And Derek interviewed me a few weeks ago.
	And he's one of those people that are kind of outside the mainstream of the alternative media.
	And I've been able to see what's going on and the nature of the scam that's going on.
	And he wrote this article, You Can't Hide, Elon Musk and SpaceX are helping US intelligence build the world's largest spy satellite network.
	Now, we should ask ourselves, if a person who's doing that Can be trusted with an AI agenda being run through the same agencies that he's serving.
	Brose asks, why are so many freedom-loving, privacy-aware people using a military contractor's satellite service and turning a blind eye to the surveillance grid he is co-creating with the US military and intelligence?
	Why?
	Because they're not paying attention and they're being caught in Musk's a hero and Trump's the savior.
	That's why.
	So he talks about Starlink, this Musk internet connection operation.
	Starlink is what is known as a satellite internet constellation, which is operated by Starlink Services, an international telecommunications company that is wholly owned by Musk's aerospace company, SpaceX.
	Starlink satellites were first launched by SpaceX in 2019 and now reportedly provide internet access to people in more than 100 countries and increasing all the time.
	The most recent numbers on Starlink satellites say the satellite constellation consists of more than 7,000 small satellites in low Earth orbit.
	Generating this electromagnetic cloud that I've talked about at length.
	SpaceX has plans for 12,000 satellites over the coming years and a lot more after that.
	Starlink is said to have more than 4 million worldwide subscribers.
	So SpaceX, Bro says, rightly, has become a key partner of the U.S. military and intelligence apparatus.
	This is the guy who's anti-system and wants to free people from the system.
	That man.
	He's helping them build a massive surveillance grid.
	In September 2023, Bloomberg reported that SpaceX had received its first contract from the US Space Force to, quote, provide customized satellite communications for the military.
	This is the anti-system bloke.
	And under SpaceX's new Star Shield program, this is.
	The move, Bloomberg noted, would extend Elon Musk's role as a defense contractor, which is what he is.
	His contracts with SpaceX come from the Pentagon and NASA and the intelligence network.
	And he cares about your freedom.
	The U.S. military and intelligence will be piggybacking off the Starlink satellites, which are being sold to the average person as a convenient and fast way to access the which are being sold to the average person as a convenient The pursuit of military contracts is not a new feature of SpaceX's business model.
	In 2002, it was reported that SpaceX has contracted with an undisclosed U.S. intelligence customer.
	More recently, Musk's Starlink contracted with the U.S. Department of Defense for an undisclosed amount to provide Starlink communication to the Ukrainian military.
	In February of 2024, the Wall Street Journal reported on the existence of yet another contract between SpaceX and the US government.
	The previously unknown 2021 contract was worth a whopping $1.8 million.
	Billion, billion dollars and related to the secretive Starship satellite constellation.
	The U.S. government agency contracting with SpaceX was unlisted in the documents viewed by the Wall Street Journal.
	Quote...
	The size and secrecy of the agreement illustrates a growing interdependence between SpaceX, a dominant force in the space industry, and the national security establishment.
	The Wall Street Journal.
	And it also reported that Gwynne Shotwell, President and Chief Operating Officer of SpaceX, acknowledged there was a, quote, very good collaboration between the intelligence community and SpaceX.
	This is the man...
	That is being eulogized as a freedom, free speech hero by great swathes of the alternative media and those who follow it.
	No wonder I've been pushing back on this without Any care or consideration of the abuse that comes back.
	Because this has to be exposed.
	There's a massive sigh-up going on.
	And Brose says in conclusion, we can clearly state that Elon Musk is a tool for the military-industrial complex.
	Even further, Elon Musk is a technocrat, a proponent of technocracy, a system wherein management of governments is handled by technical experts, often involving technology-focused solutions.
	Early proponents of technocracy, which included, in Canada, Elon Musk's grandfather...
	Claim that the concept would lead to better management of resources and the protection of the planet.
	However, the system of governance by technological experts and their technology would also involve a loss of privacy, a loss of freedom, as well as centralization of power and the management of all human behavior, which is where these freedom people are taking us.
	While telling us, we're just making you free.
	Although the term appears to have been largely forgotten, the technocratic philosophy and influence can be seen everywhere in our modern digital world.
	And as he points out, from Jeb Bezos at Amazon, Bill Gates at Microsoft, Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook, lesser known names at Google and Apple, and of course Elon Musk of Tesla, SpaceX, and Twitter, we can see the technocratic ideology.
	It's being...
	The technocrats are taking over while people that don't want technocracy eulogize the technocrats taking over.
	In fact, Elon Musk has assigned himself the title of techno king at Tesla, a term similar to the technocrats, technate king.
	Elon Musk is perhaps the most infamous technocrat, the article says, who is now working directly with President-elect Trump.
	He has been advocating for implanting chips in human brains, transhumanism, Turning Twitter into an everything in one app, similar to China's WeChat, merging with AI, and is now working directly with the US military and intelligence to develop a classified spy satellite network.
	What will it take, Rose concludes, to educate individuals who profess to love freedom and value privacy to reject Musk's Starlink?
	Clearing their brains of propaganda might be a start.
	Now, it just so happens...
	That a guy called David Sachs, who's a mate of Musk, has now been appointed by Trump to basically run his AI policy.
	The AI czar and crypto czar is a title he's being given.
	Here we go.
	Trump taps arch technocrat...
	David O. Sachs for AI and CryptoZar.
	David Sachs is an arch-technocrat who was part of the so-called PayPal mafia that was founded by Peter Thiel.
	I've talked about him in the Dot Connectors at great length.
	Another mate of Musk.
	As a venture capitalist, David Sachs was an angel investor in companies like Facebook, Uber, SpaceX, Palantir Technologies, that's Teal's operation providing surveillance and data processing technology for the military and the intelligence community.
	And Airbnb, Sachs was involved in.
	Now he will be Trump's czar on AI and crypto policy.
	And at the same time, just a coincidence, nothing to worry about, Donald Trump has appointed a friend, a mate of Musk, to head the Federal Communications Commission, the FCC, that Musk and SpaceX need to give them permission for more satellites and other things.
	And another Musk mate has been appointed to head NASA, Which is providing billion-dollar contracts for SpaceX.
	In fact, SpaceX is an arm's-length operation of NASA and the Pentagon.
	So, while this is going on, you've got Musk and this guy Vivek Ramaswamy, a business associate of Peter Thiel and others, as is J.D. Vance, the vice president.
	And Musk and Ramaswamy are being given the job of deregulating government and making it more efficient.
	And what that will involve, I promise you, is replacing all the vast numbers of people in government they want to replace with AI running government.
	Oh no, Elon believes in freedom!
	And so we come to those clips I mentioned that kind of confirm the way things are going in the way that I've been talking about for a very, very long time.
	That you position yourself...
	As sceptical about AI, as much said, it could be the end of humanity.
	But then, having established yourself as sceptical, you turn out more and more of the stuff because you're leading people, design and manipulation, to accept that you are sceptical about AI and thus you won't let it run amok.
	This is a clip of Musk, absolutely classic clip, referring to what I'm saying, where he says he didn't want to go into AI because he didn't want the AI apocalypse, but everyone else is doing it, so I am.
	Have a look.
	Tesla is arguably the world's biggest robot maker because we have basically semi-autonomous cars that will ultimately be fully autonomous.
	And we are building a humanoid robot that will be basically like the car but with legs.
	And I kind of held off on doing that for a while because I certainly don't want to hasten the AI apocalypse.
	But clearly, if you look at Boston Dynamics and those humanoid robots are going to happen, they're really going to happen without Tesla.
	So it's like Tesla got a little bit more, I mean, a lot more ability to ensure robotics safety and AI. And I'll try my best to do that.
	You can absolutely see The pieces being moved into place.
	For the Trump administration to seem to be playing out some things that their supporters want.
	To give the impression of, oh, we're winning, Donald's doing it.
	And hidden behind that smokescreen, the rush of In the next five years to an AI takeover.
	And here's another guy, Mark Andresen.
	He's an AI billionaire, mate of Musk and Sachs and Teal.
	And Andresen, for some reason, blocked me on Twitter X, even though at that point I had not even mentioned him.
	And he talked with this Musk groupie, Joe Rogan, about AI. And this was portrayed in the alternative media, or the central core of it anyway, as Anderson exposing AI The AI agenda, warning you about it, what was planned.
	But he was actually positioning himself, like Musk and Sachs, as one of the AI good guys to get you on board.
	This is what he said.
	And this is my belief, and what I've been trying to tell people in Washington, which is, if you thought social media censorship was bad, this has the potential to be a thousand times worse.
	And the reason is, social media is important, but at the end of the day, it's, you know, it's, quote, just people talking to each other.
	AI is going to be the control layer on everything.
	So AI is going to be the control layer on how your kids learn at school.
	It's going to be the control layer on who gets loans.
	It's going to be the control layer on does your house open when you come to the front door.
	It's going to be the control layer on everything.
	And so if that gets wired into the political system the way that the banks did and the way that social media did, we are in for a very bad future.
	And that's a big thing that we've been trying to prevent is to keep that from happening.
	And the Biden administration was explicitly on that path.
	Like they were very clearly going for that.
	And it was just like crystal clear that's where it was headed.
	And do you feel like with a second administration they'd be even more emboldened to act in that direction?
	Yes.
	100%.
	Another Biden administration for sure.
	And then there was an open question around Kamala and the open question there was just she wouldn't, as you know, she wouldn't declare if her issues positions were the same as Biden's or if they were different.
	Right.
	And so, you know, you can imagine a common administration that had a very different approach, but she refused to clarify any of her positions.
	Ah, you see, it's the Democrats.
	They're the ones to worry about.
	We're the good guys.
	We're the good AI guys.
	While we lead you to the same place that the Democrats were leading you.
	Now, Rogan and Anderson went on to promote the idea of AI government, C. Musk and his new role with Trump, and David Sachs as well, and then they went on to promote another massive cult agenda to replace the human military with AI. So,
	AI decides if you live or die.
	That's the outcome that they want.
	And there's also AI-controlled jets, which are far superior.
	Mike Baker was telling us about that.
	They did these simulated dogfights, and the AI-controlled jets won 100% of the time over humans.
	And there's a bunch of reasons for that, and part of it is just simply the speed of processing and so forth.
	But another big thing is if you don't have a human in the plane, you don't have the spam in the can.
	You don't have the human body.
	Yeah.
	In the plane, you don't have to keep a human being alive, which means you can be a lot faster and you can move a lot more quickly.
	G-forces.
	Much higher G-forces.
	Yeah.
	And then there's no option for someone to go crazy.
	That's also right.
	Yes, exactly.
	There's no human element, which is a real element.
	Yeah.
	I think it's going to be common to have Mach 5 jet drones within a few years, and they'll be a fraction of the size of the current manned planes, which means you can have a lot more of them.
	So you kind of want to imagine a thousand of these things coming over the horizon right at you.
	And it really changes...
	It's actually, I think, going to be very interesting.
	It really changes the fundamental equation of war in the following sense.
	Fundamentally in the past, the people who won wars are the people who had the most men and the most material.
	So you just needed the most soldiers and you needed the most equipment.
	And in this drone world that we're talking about, it's going to be the people with the most money and the best technology.
	So for example, small states, small advanced states like Singapore will be able to punch way above their weight and then kind of large sort of economically or technologically backward states that normally would have won will now lose.
	And so it's going to be a recalibration.
	And then the good news is you're not putting soldiers at risk, right?
	So you'll have a lot less death.
	The bad news, arguably, is it'll be easier to get into conflicts because you're not putting soldiers at risk.
	So there's going to have to be a recalibration of when you actually lean into an attack.
	Maybe it's just me.
	But when you clear your mind and take down the blinkers, It's so obvious what is happening and how this PSYOP is working.
	On the same theme this week, Elon Musk has posted that ultimately...
	There will be tens of millions of driverless Teslas throughout the world.
	And that is straight off the global cult World Economic Forum wishlist.
	And he's also said that he could build a tunnel between the UK and the United States to cut travel time.
	To 54 minutes.
	He could do it, he said, for $20 billion, when the cost is estimated by others at $20 trillion.
	But when you see the extraordinary number of posts that Musk makes on Twitter, what the hell else does he do?
	He's running all these companies.
	And what did he say at one point in a Rogan interview?
	80% of my time he's done designing and engineering.
	Oh, please.
	And he comes out with things.
	And the share price of his company goes up that he comes out with and very rarely delivers.
	Now, David Sachs.
	Another aspect.
	You'd have been watching the crypto-Bitcoin extravaganza, where they say, oh, it's going to be $100,000, blah, blah, blah.
	Well, you know, I came across crypto and Bitcoin a long time ago.
	And I've been advised so many times to buy it when it was worth next to nothing.
	And if I had, I'd now be a multi-millionaire, probably, currently.
	But I didn't.
	And I didn't for this reason.
	I've never felt right about it.
	There was just something.
	And it also had this connotation of a digital currency, which is where this global elite...
	Want to take finance.
	So I never have, and I've not regretted it.
	No matter what.
	Because the more that events unfold, the more obvious it is that this crypto, which has now been, you know, picked up by Trump and Musk and promoted,
	Is being manipulated to become this digital control system.
	So President Trump's crypto czar, David Sachs, another one of his roles, his company created and funded BitGo, so he's all into this crypto.
	And BitGo recently joined the Hedera Council and has also heavily invested in the Hedera Council, invested by Goldman Sachs.
	Now, this council involves...
	Many of the usual suspects.
	And is, quote, committed to governing software changes while bringing stability and continued decentralization to the public network.
	That's the cover story anyway.
	So David Sachs has also been heavily involved in the creation of the HBAR Council Company and is set to guide the Trump administration's policies for artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency.
	Coincidentally, Hedera recently launched a suite of AI tools for governance, monitoring and data provenance.
	All links in to where I'm saying this is being taken.
	So this is a Tucker Carlson interview asking the question that why crypto has no transactional privacy?
	Very good question.
	I've asked it myself.
	And another question is why the Trump-Musk regime is going crypto crazy along with Larry Fink of infamous BlackRock And others.
	They are enticing you into a trap that's been set all along, in my view, into the digital currency financial control system.
	And at the same time, they're telling you it's about freedom.
	Have a look at this.
	A lot of people in the crypto world, I think, are admirable people.
	I'm friends with some of them.
	One you mentioned, actually, people I like and admire and largely agree with.
	But I'm a little bit confused as to why you're the only person I've ever heard say what you just said.
	Why aren't the people promoting various cryptocurrencies also sounding the alarm that none of the transactions you conduct using these currencies are private?
	In fact, they're very easily trackable by government.
	Why is nobody saying that?
	I think that's a coincidence at all.
	The solution to ideas or people saying things that you don't agree with is more debate and more discussion and more free speech, whereas most of the people promoting Bitcoin at this point, they've taken the exact opposite.
	They've been supporting the propaganda and the censorship, which I'm on the exact opposite.
	In fact, initially when the debate started happening as to what should be the proper scaling method for Bitcoin, My heart was already on what was called like the big block side, but I wanted to be open to the other arguments.
	And so I was just quiet and started listening.
	And as I tried to listen, suddenly one side started to try and censor the other side.
	And I already knew I was on the side of free speech.
	So as soon as one side tried to censor the other side, I knew, okay, it's time for me to speak up now.
	I'm on the side of free speech, and I'm on the side of Bitcoin being able to scale in the original way that the Bitcoin white paper described as peer-to-peer cash for the entire world.
	That's very different than just this speculative asset.
	Everyone today is excited.
	Bitcoin's about almost $100,000.
	Maybe it would have been $100,000 half a decade ago if it hadn't been hijacked and hadn't been destroyed in its usefulness as cash for the world.
	So you need to look at what's seen and what's not seen.
	And what we see today, okay, it's close to $100,000.
	What's not seen is what it could have been if companies like Microsoft and Expedia and these other big companies around the world didn't have to stop accepting Bitcoin because of its slow transaction fees, slow transaction times, and unreliable transactions and lack of privacy as well.

▲