All Episodes
Sept. 17, 2024 - David Icke
15:58
The Alternative Media Hijack Is Real - David Icke
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I am here to bring light.
It's about healing.
you Mind, body, soul.
Don't ever settle.
Find your purpose.
Find the answers.
Don't hold back.
Achieve maximum success.
Book with me if you want to live.
www.microsoft.com www.microsoft.com
www.microsoft.com Bye.
All right, so moving on to our final story tonight.
This is to do with the funding that this various factions of the alternative media is getting, which would explain why it goes here and no further.
It doesn't go into topics that are really going to be dangerous to the cult.
It's there to limit people's minds, and I suppose bring in the people who know something's not right.
And it gives them a home where they feel satisfied that, yep, see, this is going on, but it's only very much stage one of what's going on.
Yeah, and the people that we're going to talk about are also, you know, vote for Trumpers.
Yeah, and particularly people like Dave Rubin, Israel Firsters as well.
Yeah, absolutely.
But same with others like Tim Poole.
The story is that, and what I've been saying over this last year or more, is that these people that have been allowed to hijack the mainstream of the alternative media, they're algorithmically supported and they are promoted so they become the center of attention, so that they hold people in this here and no further barricade brigade, as I call it.
But even I was surprised at the scale of funding of this thing.
I know, it's a good raccoon.
I mean, these people are attracting millions of dollars.
And what must people like Tucker Carlson be attracting?
The story is that they had this organization called Tenet Media, and what's been uncovered, and there's a Justice Department file on this, prosecute some levels of it anyway, is that this tenant media was approaching people like Tim Paul, Benny Johnson, Dave Rubin, and others, and saying, come under our wing and this is what we'll pay you.
And the figures are unbelievable.
I mean, $100,000 a week!
Now, when you're dealing with that sort of money, and there would have been more on top of that from other sources, don't tell me that doesn't influence what you are going to say and not say so that you maintain your income.
I mean, you know, this is intelligence that you're talking to in the population, you know, not idiots.
I mean, it's blatantly obvious.
And so we are getting more and more confirmation That what I've been saying about this hijack is real.
I mean, you know, one of the things I've been pointing out this week is someone like Tucker Carlson and how naive it is to believe that when he was fired from Fox News in the mainstream, That those who fired him and those in the background controlling those who fired him would not have known exactly what would follow.
He was going to become instantly a superstar hero of the alternative media and many of those that follow it.
So, just at that time, Musk's taken over Twitter X.
And he's got a platform, Tucker Carlson, that moves from... I don't know what he was getting... It was the biggest cable news audience in America.
Was it six million a night or something like that?
And he goes to tens and tens of millions on TwitterX, and now his own platform as well.
and gets to do these massive interviews with Vladimir Putin and what have you, and interviews
lots of people who have done very, very limited research, gets them tens of millions of views and promotion.
This is the cross-promotion network that I've been talking about.
And ignore those who've done vastly greater research over vastly greater, even grassly greater,
but vastly greater numbers of years, and to hold this barricade.
And you know, he's now doing this This speaking tour, talking to vast audiences and having members of the mainstream alternative media as his guests every night.
He started off with Russell Brand, who then got on his knees at the end and did a prayer because he's, you know, he's just converted to Christianity.
It seems to be a trait in this mainstream alternative media.
He's had people like Vivek Ramaswamy, who is a Israel first and a Trump sycophant, and he's going to finish off just before the election, when his guest will be Donald Trump Jr.
And for me, Members of the alternative media, genuine people, proper researchers, should not be playing party politics.
They should be seeing that it's a one-party state and, you know, the same force works through both sides to the same end and call that out.
That's not what's happening.
Here's a clip of Tucker Carlson speaking at one of his events in which he's going on about Dick Cheney supporting Kamala Harris, Dick Cheney being a Republican officially, Vice President to boy George Bush, actually President Cheney was in that period.
And again, it's highlighting this good guys, bad guys sides instead of seeing that it's all one side.
Maybe you haven't checked your phone today to see that Dick Cheney and his horrible daughter have endorsed Kamala Harris.
Dick Cheney.
Now, why is that?
What does Dick Cheney have in common with Kamala Harris?
And it's really interesting, actually, because they're constantly telling us that the divides are along race and gender.
And they were always telling us, Rick, Dick Cheney is this rich white guy, and Kamala Harris is this oppressed woman of color.
They've got nothing in common!
But actually, they have everything in common.
Because they're both neocons.
That's exactly right.
They have everything in common.
And it tells you what a lie this race and gender stuff is.
That's not the divide.
The divide is in your heart.
And if you think it's okay to kill people in order to get rich, you're on their side.
And if you don't, you're on our side.
No matter what you look like.
Yeah, you would think, given, you know, the experience of being a journalist, apparently, for that long, you've seen right, left be in power, and you've seen the same agenda continue, that you would have seen through that.
But, clearly not.
Well, you know, I have great suspicions about Many people.
I mean, I don't want to keep going on about it, but I will.
I've been researching this for 35 years.
I've been ahead of the curve over and over and over again.
And none of these people, like Carlson and Rogan, even Neil Oliver in this country, will talk to me, will interview me.
And, you know, why?
Why is that?
Why won't they talk to someone who's been on this journey for 35 years when they've been on it for the equivalent, comparatively, for 35 minutes?
Why?
There's got to be a reason for it because they're talking to people who've done minimal research and know very little about what's actually going on.
But they won't talk to me.
That is a red flag.
And of course, at the same time, I'm shadow-banned increasingly ridiculously on TwitterX by the Musk-Yacarino crowd, his CEO and stalwart at the World Economic Forum.
Uh, because he's, uh, he's all in favor of freedom, of course.
And I've got now, I think the latest I saw was 664,000, or no, 667,000 followers on my page on TwitterX.
And you look at the number of people that see my posts, it's pathetic.
And there's a reason for that.
Why is it?
Well, I think the picking sides is possibly a factor, not the sole factor.
A lot of the information that you talk about, they don't want out there, which is the main factor.
But I think the fact that Everyone else has picked a side, whereas, you know, you call it straight down the middle and we'll praise them when they do something well and you call them out when they do something bad.
Very few, if any, of such a profile do that.
So they find it difficult to pigeonhole you into a right or a left.
thing for a start because you don't play into that game.
Yeah, calling out Elon Musk on his own platform doesn't help either.
It probably doesn't help.
In terms of the religious side of it, this is just a question of thought because, as we've spoken about, the Christianity takeover of the independent media has been enormous.
And in America it was always kind of there, wasn't it?
Like someone like Alex Jones in the southern states, the Christian Patriot audience would have always been probably the predominant audience, but now it's taken over.
Well, when I first went to America to talk about these things, about mid-1990s, most of the places that would give me a platform were Christian Patriot audiences, because they were calling it out.
They were calling it out from their Christian perspective, which is, I think it's far bigger than that.
But what we have seen is this Christian emphasis become very, very prominent and blatant, far more than ever before in the last year.
And I think where people look at it, they take it into extremes.
Whereas you can look at the concept of a divine force that's for good, that is there, that wants the best for humanity, and it's being steered away from that.
That you can look at in one level and go, okay, that's a different language, but it's not too different to the idea of the infinite consciousness.
However, the whole, you're born a sinner, you give your power away, you get on your knees to this force, and you earn the right to then go to heaven.
That is just another example of giving your power away to a politician, which these supposed alternative media figures would encourage people to not do, unless it's Trump.
But there, it's no get on your knees to God, like that Russell Brand player you mentioned.
He's kneeling down, completely giving his power away, and encouraging the audience to do the same thing, when I think that's our biggest issue with it, isn't it?
It's giving your power away, which is what got us in this mess, and it's staggering that so many people don't see that it's literally exactly the same as giving your power away to a politician.
Yeah, and there's another element to this, because if you're a researcher and you really want to know what's happening, you have to be completely dispassionate.
You have to have no-go areas there where you won't go if the evidence is taking you there.
If you have a religious belief, and I'm not just talking about Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, any of them, if you have a rigid religious belief that is not to be questioned, Then there's vast areas of potential research and understanding that you won't go there because your Christian belief system might come under threat and challenge.
And so you're not really a researcher, you know.
And this is another thing that someone mentioned in a video this week, actually, which was very, very true.
I've been talking about this again for about the last year or more now, and that is how No.
mainstream hijacked alternative media, gets all this money and all this algorithmic promotion,
it doesn't bring anything new to the table.
It doesn't bring new research to the table.
So, you know, I see breaking news, bombshell, and I'm thinking that was in my books 20 years ago, you
know?
So they're not bringing anything new and they're not meant to because it's a barricade.
It's a here and no further.
It's like the genie started to come out of the bottle at the time of COVID and you can't put the genie completely back because COVID wouldn't allow that.
Too many people saw through it at one level.
So what you do is you stop the genie coming any further out of the bottle and that's what we're seeing.
Absolutely, and when you look at, you know, your Peter Thiel, your Elon Musk, all those people, I just think of the Nazi propaganda, accuse the other side of that which you are guilty, which is exactly what they're doing.
They're accusing the other side of being pro-censorship, being pro, you know, deep state and all of that, when they are as much of that as the others.
Yeah, and one of the things that Musk is doing with TwitterX is he's setting a precedent that others are following.
I saw a story in the last few days about how To an extent.
YouTube is going down the same road and that is less outright banning and more make sure that whatever you post, if it's the wrong information, No one ever sees it.
Shadow banning.
And that's being perfected on TwitterX, not least in relation to me.
But not just me, other people as well who've got things to say that are outside of the barricade.
Yeah, freedom of speech, not freedom of reach.
Export Selection