All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 12, 2024 - David Icke
21:45
Is Two Tier Policing A Myth? - David Icke
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oxnelia's Faith-Based Association is a place where spiritual evolution grows through abiding to natural law as opposed to man-made corrupt governance.
Here you will be given the tools to build the new earth through sovereign law, Vedic
principles and practices, an extensive library including radiation and chemtrail mitigation,
Vedic astrology, and vibrationally harmonic music tuned at 432 hertz.
If you are ready to harness your abilities to effect change on this earth, visit Oxnelia.org
today.
Thanks for watching.
You know, part of this, Jay, part of this anger, this frustration, this sense of not being heard, comes from something else that's come to the fore this week, and that's the claim that we have in this country two-tier policing.
Yeah.
Now, we don't just have two-tier policing, we have a two-tier society in many ways.
And, you know, what we've seen are politicians who've been involved in making this a two-tier
police and two-tier society.
I And others, you know, like police officers, you know, oh no!
Outrage!
You can't say that!
It's not true!
Of course it's bloody true!
Of course it's true, and that doesn't mean that it happens all across the board all the time, but clearly it happens.
When you have a situation, for instance, the infamous child trafficking rape gangs in Rotherham, And other cities, from Pakistani rape and child trafficking gangs, where it was known eventually
It came out that it was known what they were doing, councils knew, the police knew, the local authority knew what was happening, but they were frightened of doing anything about it because they didn't want to be called racist.
Now that is two-tier policing.
If you have a Child trafficking gang that's white and they do the same.
And there will be white trafficking gangs that do it, absolutely.
But if you're going to treat one where we'll go in immediately and sort it out and not do the same with the other, never mind the girls, the young girls that are suffering at this.
The rape and the abuse, never mind, that's ongoing.
Well, we don't want to be called racist, right?
So obviously there's two-tier policing, even on that basis alone.
And then, you know, this week we've had Muslim gangs and what have you in places like Birmingham, who've also done things that have completely disrupted the community and attacked people for their crime of being white.
And there was no police presence.
And here's a clip of what happened in that situation.
There were protesters turned up in Birmingham.
Now, according to Jess Phillips, they were made to do this.
That's the Home Office Minister.
Because the far right apparently goaded them and agitated them to coming out and having a row.
And they obviously thought they would, and they took over this roundabout.
They ragged their cars around there.
With absolute impunity.
As you can see, no police there, no high-vis jackets, nobody in riot masks.
And you wonder why we're asking questions about whether people are treated differently, dependent on their identity in this country.
Have a look at this as well.
Community leaders have been speaking to the police as well because...
Right, I think, apologies for the language you're hearing, but a sense of the anger I think you can hear there.
Yeah, Casey, I think we...
And that trigger of a gun there, right down the lens of the camera, that's reassuring, isn't it?
And then they went on to this group of young Muslim men, the Clumsy Swan pub in Birmingham, and they were waving Palestinian flags.
Of course that has to get involved into the mix.
And they attacked a man.
A quick warning here, this clip contains some very violent images that some of you may find distressing.
The battery! The battery! Get in here!
So that guy had gone out into the beer garden on his own and was just stood there in his t-shirt
and he was slightly sort of going, come on, I know you think you're hard enough, but he was clearly not involved.
He's not there politically.
Yeah, absolutely.
You saw in Birmingham cars being smashed up, you saw them with weapons, you saw Sky News, you know, having their tyres slashed, and obviously there was a police officer the next day who said they were policing themselves.
It was fine.
Yeah, well before we go on, let's have a look at this guy.
A spokesman for Birmingham Police who was asked The obvious question, how come you've got all this police presence for the, quote, far right riots?
And yet when this is happening in Birmingham, there's not a police officer to be seen.
And this was his reply.
Why was there such a low key, should we say, police presence?
Because I mean, clearly your officers were there, but they were not So we have really strong business and community relations, and because we were aware through intelligence that there was a potential protest through that misinformation yesterday, we had the opportunity to meet with community leaders, with business leaders,
Prior to that event to kind of understand the style of policing that we needed to deliver during the course of that operation.
So we knew that there was going to be a large amount of people out on that counter protest.
We knew who the vast majority of those people were.
We'd had conversations in terms of what that was likely to look like.
And so our policing response was commensurate to that intelligence and the information that we'd held with our partners and communities prior to that event taking place.
Even given there are so many of them clearly armed, I mean, would you do the same if it was an EDL type situation?
So we've policed in response to the intelligence that we received at that moment in time.
What I would say is that the vast majority of people that attended that protest yesterday did so law-abidingly and they did it with the right intentions.
There were just a small minority of people that attended there and were intent on causing either criminality, disorder or fear within our communities.
What we saw was a response from our communities where they were trying to kind of make sure that that was policed within themselves as well and trying to deter people from taking part in that disorder.
And as a result, we've been able to go on, gather that evidence, gather that information.
We have made arrests.
Well, we've made an arrest this afternoon.
We continue to try and make arrests in terms of those people that were involved in those disorders yesterday.
So how do you admit there's two-tier policing without admitting there's two-tier policing?
He's just done it there.
Yes, he has.
And this thing about community leaders, I've come across this many times before.
Are we consulting community leaders?
Well, why don't you consult the fricking community?
Who are these community leaders?
A lot of them are self-appointed, and it's like one step back.
You know, you had the police officer with the bullhorn who was saying to Muslims outside a mosque, would you put your weapons in the mosque, please?
Now, not that we're going to arrest you for carrying machetes or knives on the street.
No, can you just put them in the mosque?
I mean, you know, this is the point.
When people see that, They have a sense of anger and of not being treated the same.
And when you have this sense of injustice and it just festers and increases, Then you are going to eventually have a powder keg that's going to explode.
And what happens from here, we'll see.
But it's going to happen again as we go ongoing if the cause of it is not being addressed.
And there's no plans to do that because it's the cult agenda.
You look at these, quote, sides, and you see this mentality, and you see the absolute intransigence to see that the other side may have some valid points, and you wonder in that solidified intransigence Where we are going to go with this, unless we give and take and respect each other,
Then where do we go?
And this is something I saw this week.
It was on the talk TV in Britain.
And it was the night after what we saw there with the Birmingham.
And this guy is a former chairman of the Conservative Muslim Forum.
And he's being questioned on basic things.
Do you accept this?
And what came to mind when I listened to this, and there was so much more of it, what Orwell wrote about when he said, basically, the most essential component was to stop believing what your eyes and ears were telling you.
So even though you're seeing it, it's not actually happening.
This is a very telling clip and, like I say, makes you wonder where we can go with this.
But I think the problem is that the perception of the way the police are operating currently is that they are prepared to monitor, shall we say, the behaviour of people who are making protests out on the street.
But they're not really prepared to monitor what went on yesterday, last night in Birmingham.
Because they're not there.
I do not agree with that.
Well they're not there though, so how do you explain that they're not there?
How are they not there?
Well, if people are standing around outside a McDonald's, they're not actually committing any criminal offences, are they?
Well, they're driving cars in a way which would get them arrested if they were doing it in central London, for one thing.
They're attacking cars.
We've got footage of them attacking cars, breaking windows of cars.
We've got footage of them marauding around a central area, going into the front of a pub and attacking and kicking a guy.
You know, this went on for several hours.
It wasn't as though it was an isolated incident.
There were people seen walking around with weapons.
It was obviously a lawless event, whatever it was, whatever you may want to call it.
And in any other circumstance, police would have been there.
But there are no police.
There's a great deal of CCTV that will have captured this, and I expect the police to follow up.
In terms of whether the police should be there or doing something else where there are actual rioters trying to kill people, there are limited police resources.
Well, they were trying to kill people.
I mean, the footage that we've seen, which we can show you, is of them beating somebody up and of them smashing car windows and terrifying a car driver to such an extent that he had to take evasive action to get away from them.
Well, I would expect that to be prosecuted in due course.
Right.
Well, let's talk then about what happened at Manchester Airport, for example, because we've seen some of those arrested over the course of the last weekend already being up in court.
One of the people who's been charged with disorder has been charged with punching a police officer in the face, right?
Which is obviously a charge that you would want to have at anybody who had done that.
But at Manchester Airport, Two men are still on police bail two weeks after an event where they were very clearly seen on CCTV punching police officers in the face.
They haven't been charged.
If they're out on police bail, presumably the Crown Prosecution Service is still considering whether to charge them, the law will take its normal course.
But the law has taken its normal course since the weekend, that's two days later, and a man who punched a police officer in the face has already been charged.
Why have these two not been charged?
Because they weren't engaged in a riot.
They're punching a police officer in the face several times, repeatedly.
When people are rioting, trying to burn down hostels where people are living, you expect the authorities to make an example of them.
That is exactly what Sir Keir Starmer has said will happen.
Right.
But why have these people not been shown an example too, though?
You can see them punching police officers in the face.
I mean, you know, it's as clear as day.
A fray happens regularly throughout this country, 365 days a year, and is prosecuted in the normal way, and that is what is happening to the people at Manchester Airport.
No, I'm saying it seems to me that there is two-tier policing and that's all I'm providing you with evidence to show you that there is two-tier policing which you continually deny.
Yes, what I'm saying is it is a completely false allegation because you're trying to compare two entirely different things, civil riot with normal affray.
Okay.
Well, all that's going to do, along with, you know, Starmer saying there is no two-tier policing, is just poke people more and more and more and more.
Which is, it's clear to see, even if you were, you know, not of a conspiratorial mind, they're doing nothing to try and calm the situation.
They're only stoking it.
So, where it goes from here, if the same mentality continues, it doesn't feel like it's going to be anywhere good.
No, it's not meant to be, but it's like everything.
You know, everything's a choice.
We can choose to be manipulated by allowing ourselves to solidify into sides, or we can start talking to each other and recognizing the validity of what the other might have to say.
Now, The answer is pretty straightforward in the sense of you replace conflict with harmony.
But what it takes to bring about harmony, you wonder when you look at the mentality of so many people involved, whether there is the intent or the desire to actually bring about harmony.
Because you see, One of the things I talk about in the book, The Reveal, is this human addiction to drama.
It's like everything's drama, and people are driven by drama.
They are emotionally addicted to drama, and the emotions that surround drama.
Oh my God, you'll never guess what's happened!
Oh, what's happened now?
And all that.
And in its own way, what we're seeing here is drama being played out, and you can become addicted to drama, so you actually don't want it to end.
And that's another factor in this and shouldn't be underplayed and dismissed.
Agreed.
And so the other thing then involved in that this week is this spat between Elon Musk and Keir Starmer and how Musk said that civil war in Britain is inevitable.
Now, that's not too much of a Nostradamus job, is it, given what's been happening?
And the plan is, as he will well know, is to bring about that very civil war, not just in Britain, but the countries of Europe and North America and elsewhere.
And, you know, what would you do when you look at these things?
You can see it.
As it appears to be.
Or you can see it as it really is.
And you need to be a bit more subtle to see the latter.
So, when you look at what Musk has been saying, and you'll notice how suddenly, out of nowhere, Musk has become incredibly political.
Right?
It started with the Trump shooting incident.
And immediately he's been ultra-political ever since.
When he said he never would be, because I'm just running a platform in Town Square, now he's really overtly political.
And he's pushing a lot of things.
He's attacking Kamala Harris, he's supporting Trump, and he's basically Transformed much of what he posts on his Twitter ex.
So you can see it as, oh, he's our hero.
He's telling them what's going on.
He knows what's happening and he's calling it out.
Well, you can see it like that.
Or you can see it from another point of view.
And I go into Musk in this book and the real background to what he is and why.
And you can see it as the fact that he's just winding the situation up.
Because this guy is a front man for this agenda.
This is why so much of what he does in his companies, in fact, massively most of it, is advancing the cult agenda.
And the cult agenda is for civil war in Western countries.
And that's why all the migrants have been allowed to flood in
and go on being flooded in.
And it's what they want.
And he's just winding that outcome up.
And you can have these fake spats between Stahmer and Musk when in fact, ultimately, they're on the same side.
Yeah, that's not a boxing fight I'd want to watch, I've got to say.
Peace.
A nutter.
He's got some squirrely ones.
Alex Jones is way more reliable than David Icke.
You know, people have called you a lunny, it's been written.
I've been researching this stuff for 20 years.
How can you research?
I've been more than 40 countries doing it.
Which is funny really, because why would they ban someone who is not with it?
Doesn't know what they're talking about.
Why would they ban him from Australia?
Why would he be banned from the mainstream media?
And even banned from a swathe of the alternative media?
Why would that be?
I'm crazy, right?
Why would that be?
The reveal.
▲
Export Selection