All Episodes
Previous Next
July 18, 2024 - David Icke
41:56
Making Big Tech Great Again - The Billionaires Are Playing You - David Icke Dot-Connector
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, does it annoy you to see others get rich in crypto?
If yes, it's natural to wish you could do the same.
But probably looks too hard, you don't have the time, not to mention it's bloody boring.
But if that's you, why not copy me?
On my Copy My Crypto website, I share every crypto I own, which means you just copy me.
Here's how Richard Carlo, who's made over 800 grand as a member, describes the site.
It's like having a big brother who knows what he's doing.
I don't need to know a thing about crypto as I just copy James.
I'm James McMahon and I run the Crypto with James YouTube channel with over 65,000 subscribers.
In mid 2020 my viewers watched me buy 26 cryptos.
Had you put $100 into each one, it went on to be worth $123,000.
One of the cryptos, Phantom, went up 692 times in price and retired a number of people.
Remember this is public record.
Go to YouTube and verify this yourself.
So to join over 3,700 members who copy me, go to the link on screen.
You'll not only find proof of everything I've said, but as one of David's viewers, you get full access for just a dollar.
Guys, it's only a recommendation, but I suggest you go there now.
The offer expires soon.
And after that, I'm not an option.
Good evening, everybody.
And welcome to this week's Dot Connector.
Well, what a week it's been.
And there is only really one place to start, isn't there, Dad?
Quite extraordinary.
Yeah, the Trump shooting.
We'll get into that.
But I just want to start by I know I keep going on about the mainstream alternative media.
But in the wake of the Trump shooting, we have seen the The extent to which what used to be the alternative media has just become right-wing politics and how, when you take a political side, your judgment is enormously affected because suddenly you get your
opinion from the side that you take, i.e.
the Deep State were trying to kill Trump.
Yeah.
And what I've seen this week has been quite extraordinary.
The alternative media before, and we saw this with 9-11, we saw it with 7-7, all these things, school shootings.
Weapons of mass destruction, big one.
is hear the official story and then look at every possible aspect of what actually happened.
And therefore, you started to uncover the lies, deceit, misdirection, misrepresentations in these official stories about the 9-11 and all the rest of it.
And what would happen is others who were not of the conspiracy persuasion in politics and what we call the left in politics, they would condemn.
I've heard it myself so many times.
They would condemn as disrespectful that you were questioning the official story.
You were disrespecting the victims.
What you were actually trying to do is find out what actually happened.
Doesn't everyone want to know that?
And that's how it worked.
And then suddenly, when this Trump shooting happened, there was this big inversion, this big reversal.
Whereby those who were questioning whether possibly it was a setup, maybe it wasn't what it seemed, they were condemned as disrespectful by the same people, now right-wing politics, That were doing it themselves before.
And here's the point, Jay.
If the shooting had been involving Joe Biden, those people that were condemning those that were questioning, is this real?
Are we being told the truth?
Would have been doing exactly that.
They'd have been saying, oh, no, Biden was staged.
It was a setup and all that stuff.
Now, I'm not saying It was staged or I'm not saying anything about what
happened. I don't think we know enough yet
but what I am saying is
This week and the response of the so-called alternative media now
has been you know, just pathetic and the way that it has Regressed
from seeing that There's a power that works through both left and right to
becoming just right-wing politics It does confirm what I've been saying, that alternative media has been hijacked.
And I saw this clip of Russell Brand, who's one of the MAMs, the Mainstream Alternative Media, came in after COVID, having played no part in creating the alternative media.
None of them bring anything new to the table.
It's all just reactive.
responses all the time, no new research, no pushing the cutting
edge. There's none of that. It's all gone in terms of the mainstream. But I saw this clip and he was doing a trailer
for an interview he did with a Trump activist, a Trump kind of
inside worker. And well, what I saw was not the alternative media
that I knew and I saw emerged from nothing.
You got to join me for Stay Free with Russell Brand today with
Elizabeth, can you tell us some of the things that we talked about?
We talked about saving this country, saving the world, making everything a better place and I'm excited for you all to tune in.
RNC spokesperson and deliverer of extraordinary gifts.
No way!
What are you thinking with this thing?
Happy birthday is what I'm thinking.
Oh my god, it is my birthday as well.
Join us for the show.
See you there, it's day three in the meantime.
To an extent, it's quite similar to October 7th.
Everyone ignored that and just went with the official story.
Because again, it was the right, it was of the right.
You know, if you're right, you're pro-Israel.
If you're right, you must be pro-Trump now.
So, like you say about Biden, if it was him, they'd have called it staged, they'd have called it out, they'd have asked questions.
Because it's something that fits their narrative, They go with it, which is why it's so important to never have a political affair.
Never have a side!
This is the thing Jay, if you have a side, I don't care if it's a religious side or a political side or a cultural side or whatever, You are not going to be dispassionate in the way that you look at evidence.
Because some people, those who've been condemned, have asked the question, was it fake blood?
Was the whole thing staged to make Trump look like a hero and get that money shot, as they call it in the movies, with the raised fist?
Now, I'm not saying that's what happened, because there's so much more to know about that whole event.
What I'm saying is those questions need to be asked.
We need to question everything, the iconic motto, so that we can then say, okay, well, we've looked at that.
No, don't stand up so we can forget that didn't that didn't happen.
So what we left with we can go through this process of genuinely looking at the evidence and making it stand up to scrutiny and then we can get closer and closer to what actually did happen.
But to see the people that were calling out, or some of them anyway, that were calling out 9-11 and what have you as a a setup, is to see them condemning others that are asking
similar questions, that is kind of pathetic really to watch. Now what we can see is that what
happened was allowed to happen.
We can see that.
That's bloody obvious.
You know, you've got this fella, Crooks, who they say it is.
I mean, that's another thing that needs questioning to see if it stands up.
And you've got this 20-year-old kid, a registered Republican apparently, who climbs on a roof With a sight of aim at Trump on the stage.
He's there for a long time, the crowd are pointing out, there's a bloke up there with a gun!
Nothing's done about it.
For a start, any credible protection operation would have been on the roof and have had that covered, but they didn't.
And there were so many things that happened that point to the fact that it was allowed to happen.
100%.
Okay.
But then you say, well, what they were trying to do is kill Trump.
Well, okay.
Well, that, yeah, that's a valid claim.
Valid.
But if they really wanted him dead, would they have got this 20-year-old kid or would they have had a marksman who would not have missed?
And also, they would have assassinated him in a situation, not an open situation like that, but another situation many, many would The veil themselves of that, where the professional marksman or whatever they used to kill him, would not have been identified.
I mean, think of the assassination of JFK.
There were multiple guns going off.
So people said it came from over there, or it came from over there.
Well, how do you identify actually who did it?
Because they disappeared, obviously, and were allowed to disappear.
So another inside job.
And you mean they can't do that again?
They really wanted Trump dead.
So there are many, they get this 20 year old kid.
And it's a strange one.
It's an incredible story in the sense of, if the official story is true,
Um, The way that the bullet passed by his head without hitting him and hit that close is ridiculous in terms of statistical chance.
I mean, I mean, we're into the what?
Oh, and he turns his head at the time.
Yeah, it's just an extraordinary thing.
And what they're saying is, of course, if God did it now and Trump's got this God-like uh... kind of aura that's being placed upon him
so let's um... see uh... we've all seen these pictures before endless times but
let's just uh...
let's have a look at what actually happened take a look at what happened
the the
So there's been lots of things that have been said following that about his reaction.
The reaction of particularly a woman with a hat on behind him, the reaction of another bloke behind him and how they're looking constantly, like she's looking in the seconds leading up to the video like she knows something's coming from over there.
There's also another image which shows the snipers meant to be protecting him on the roof of the other building.
About 10 seconds before that shot's fired, they're already pointing at that building.
They're not pointing in the area, they've already identified that building that he's on.
I mean, there's a few questions in themselves.
Well, there's endless questions about it.
It was quite blatantly allowed to happen.
The big question, of course, is why?
Why was it allowed to happen?
And, you know, you know, that I've always talked about, if you want to know why a sequence of events
happened, watch the outcome. Yeah. So you watch the outcome.
And it doesn't always turn out that way every time. But I can
tell you from my observations over all these decades, it works
out that way 99% of the time, that you see why something happened when you see where it led to.
Okay, so you've got this, this phrase I came up with in the 90s, problem reaction solution.
Now, you can, you can look and see and identify What was behind the problem, who was behind the problem, and why the problem was created, whether it was an illusory problem or a real one, by what the solution is.
Alright?
In other words, what the outcome is of what happened.
And on that basis, you start to look at things.
There's a few.
First of all, immediately after the shooting, Elon Musk came out and endorsed Trump for president, even though he
said he would never say anything about political sides, and not least on X, but he did.
And if you believe the reports, he's going to put a lot of money into…
45 million a month.
That's what the reports are.
And so you had this Musk endorsement tweet on X.
And then in the aftermath of the shooting, literally two days later,
You had the Republican nomination convention where Trump was officially made the candidate, the Republican candidate, to run for president.
And you had the announcement there, that some of us weren't staggered by who it was either, by the way, called J.D.
Vance, and immediately Elon Musk was in support of J.D.
Vance.
Now, J.D.
Vance is a big, big red flag.
Massive.
What has happened, and they've kind of made a big thing of it, people like Musk and others, and his billionaire mate, David Sachs.
That a lot of these multi-billionaire Silicon Valley tech people, a number of them who were previously supporting the Democrats, have now come out in support of Trump.
Now, when you look at those tech billionaires, they're not supporting Trump because they think Trump's gonna do good things for the people.
They're supporting Trump because they think he will be doing good things for them and their AI technocracy agenda.
And so he's announced that his running mate will be J.D.
advance. And another guy who's constantly around Trump and supporting Trump and stood
for the presidency and then when Trump and basically praised Trump at the early Republican
debates. And then when Trump came, because Trump, if you remember, didn't take part in
the early debates. When he came in, this guy stepped down.
This is Vivek Ramaswamy. Now, it's interesting that J.D. Vance and Vivek Ramaswamy went
to the Yale Law School. Yale, of course, of Skull and Bones fame. And they were in the
same class.
And according to the New Yorker, Vance and Ramaswamy, while they were at the Yale Law School, attended what was called by the New Yorker, a quote, intimate lunch seminar for select students.
And this was hosted by a man called Peter Thiel.
Peter Thiel has since become a business associate and investor.
of JD Vance and JD Vance's companies, venture capital companies.
And he's an investor and business associate of Vivek Ramaswamy.
Yeah.
And so who is Peter Thiel?
These people are anti-globalist.
Oh, stop the globalists!
Well, it turns out Peter Thiel is on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group, this globalist organization.
And Peter Thiel is also a co-founder of a company called Palantir.
Which provides surveillance technology, another high-tech data technology, for the Pentagon and the intelligence networks, not only in America either.
He'll be providing them for Mossad and others.
And this Peter Thiel is so close to J.D.
Vance that he funded his campaign when he ran for the seat for Senator of Ohio.
Which got him into Capitol Hill.
And so now you have these two close business partners.
They also, Thiel and Vance, fund a Roman Catholic prayer app called Hallo, which is promoted by people like Russell Brand.
And they are incredibly close.
Now, Thiel is also a mate of Musk, who's come out for Trump.
Thiel was on Trump's transition team when he won the election in 2016.
And Thiel is also close to these other tech billionaires, including a guy called Mark Andresen.
And Mark Andresen this week blocked me on Twitter.
X. And I've never said a word about this bloke.
On X. I've said a few things about him in their mind, which is not yet out, but I've not said anything about him on Twitter.
But once I started calling out JD Vance and his connections to Thiel, this Andreessen guy just blocked me, so I can't see his posts anymore.
So this situation is, it's fascinating to see this juxtaposition of the Trump shooting
with suddenly all these tech billionaires coming out for Trump.
And the tech billionaires guy, JD Vance, is suddenly named as the vice presidential running mate.
And if they did take out Trump, There would be a good chance that J.D.
Vance would run for president and probably get in on the back of that as well.
So there's many, many possibilities.
And again, the alternative media That should be.
He's asking all these questions, looking at all these situations and scanning them dispassionately to get a grasp on what's going on.
But that's not what's happening.
Quite the opposite is happening.
And here's a story.
About Jamie Dimon.
Jamie Dimon is the CEO of JP Morgan.
And, you know, if you're talking about draining the swamp, well, you drain in, right?
And they're talking now about Trump, after his Vance appointment, considering a major role, financial role, for Jamie.
For Jamie Dimon.
And Jamie Dimon will lock in to this big tech network of people we're talking about.
So there's a lot to consider.
And if anyone thinks that, you know, this story is obvious what's happened, well, I think they're missing the point.
It's not obvious.
What's going on is not You were not able to call it clearly yet.
There's a lot more to know.
The other thing that happened as well is Biden has since called for a ban of that particular assault rifle, which obviously taking the guns away has been a long plan of the cult to get rid of the Second Amendment.
So it just plants that seed a little bit in people's minds again.
Yeah, but that's another thing Jay, you know, it was a semi-automatic rifle, where every time you pull the trigger, the bullet's fired.
Why aren't they using an automatic rifle, where once you pull the trigger, the bullets just fire themselves one after the other?
One, bang, bang, bang, bang, bang, bang.
They're trying to kill the guy.
And, you know, it makes no sense to me.
And I'm not saying anything about this is what happened, because we don't know.
But we have to ask questions.
And it seems strange to me that in that open situation, Where he's literally a sitting target in the circumstances of it being allowed to happen.
They didn't hit him.
And that's a strange one because if you were really meaning to kill someone, Then you would have done so in that situation.
You wouldn't have used a 20-year-old kid.
You wouldn't have.
And lots of people are trying to draw comparisons to the Kennedy assassination.
One being a clip I saw this morning of as the motorcade pulls into Dealey Plaza, the Secret Service guy, it goes too quickly and he can't be where he would have been.
And again, how it was allowed to happen, because the first bullet I think would have hit him.
But what they were saying about the Trump one, is that you would have had multiple shooters for one and secondly they're comparing it to the Reagan one where it was like an attempted assassination which lots of people read as a bit of a warning to Reagan that he was obviously doing something they didn't like could there be that this is like a warning to him that two days later he's appointed Vance maybe he wasn't going to do that and it's could that be is there anything play there maybe?
Well it's possible I think he's I think he was going to appoint J.D.
Vance from a bit further back than that but Because I've been calling that, that that would be his running mate.
But, you know, when you when you look at the Kennedy assassination situation, that there is, there is only the, the, the similarity, in the sense of it was clearly allowed to happen.
But also, what you had with the Kennedy assassination was what they call a patsy, a scapegoat, Lee R.V.
Oswald.
Unless they have bullets that do U-turns, there's no way that he shot the president.
And so they have a patsy.
Well, why can't this guy Crooks be a patsy and a part of part of the setup?
Because, you know, mind control is an extraordinarily widespread phenomenon within this whole cult, secret service, secret society arena.
And they can get anyone to do anything.
But But again, these are all questions that need asking and need pursuing.
And what you don't do is rush to bloody judgment the moment it happens.
And fortunately, the regressed alternative media is doing that.
I agree.
I think one thing to touch on to finish on this topic is we've talked a lot about identity politics.
You've talked a lot about how people need to feel part of a group.
I feel like that's come into the alternative movement and that for me has been absolutely peaked with people wearing the ear bandages at the RNC convention.
We saw a tweet that a friend Jeff Berwick put up about, you know, you could tell the left kind of non-player characters in Covid that's still wearing the masks even now.
And now you can see the right non-player characters, the people that are just doing stuff like that, they're wearing that thinking they're being part of a club, part of a team, rather than standing alone going, well, maybe this doesn't make sense.
They need to feel part of something.
Yeah, because Trump's their hero, therefore you can't criticise or question your hero.
And of course, what's been happening is they have said that what is the story of the shooting is that God turned the head of Trump.
And you see pictures of Trump overseen by Jesus and all this stuff.
Well, I've got a few little questions on that.
First of all, what about the bloke in the audience that died?
What was God doing there, right?
But it's kind of brought together something I've been pointing out, and point out in the reveal at some length early on, that this kind of Bringing together of right-wing politics and and and Christianity has kind of come together in this whole thing and you know, this is a clip of
Tucker Carlson.
Tucker Carlson is one of these people that came out of the mainstream in the wake of COVID, bought COVID to start with, came out into the so-called alternative media and has become a big star of the alternative media or what passes for it.
And he pointed out a few things at the start of this clip, like, well, it's all coming together for Trump.
Suddenly, in a matter of three days, there's been the shooting.
There's been the the the the Musk endorsement.
And then this story, a day later, two days later, Where the judge in this case dismissed Trump's Mar-a-Lago classified documents criminal case where they said that he held all these classified documents at his pad in Florida.
And this judge who was Put forward apparently by Trump when he was president in a 93 page ruling concluded that special counsel Jack Smith's appointment violated the appointments clause of the Constitution and anyway dismissed the case against Trump on that.
And the people in the government have said we'll appeal, but that was a big step forward.
So you'll see in this clip that Carlson acknowledges this, but then he and his guest, whoever the guy is, then agree that actually this is God's intervention and not a scam.
Yeah, so Lexi's just come in with this.
Yeah.
Breaking news.
Judge dismisses classified documents case against Donald Trump.
Judge Eileen Cannon has dismissed the classified documents case in a ruling Monday.
She said the appointment of the special counsel, Jack Smith, violated the Constitution.
That's kind of, I mean, I'm just hearing this because it just happened, but it does seem like All of a sudden, and I'm sorry to interrupt, but I just want to respond to that.
It seems like everything has aligned in the period of like three days to make it very obvious Donald Trump's going to be the next president.
There's no doubt about it at this point.
Very little doubt to the extent you can tell the future, but what do you make of that?
Well, they tried to kill him.
Yeah, well, there's that.
I mean, and they missed.
Or God turned his head and they missed.
And then within like four minutes, Elon Musk endorses him as the richest man in the world.
Right.
Biggest, most important media mogul in the world by far.
And, you know, Bill Ackman, lifelong Democrat.
It's like all of a sudden, it's just everything changes in one moment.
Well, when God shows up, that clearly it's hard for even the biggest detractors to deny it.
They go, what did I just watch?
You just watched God turn Donald Trump's head literally a split second, part of a second, right before the bullet whizzed by.
I mean, if he'd have still been looking this way, it catches him here.
He turns this way, it catches him here.
We all just watched it.
I mean, think about God making his presence known.
I mean, on the biggest possible story you ever could.
And the whole world just saw that.
So now, now you've got people going, okay, I believe it.
I believe it.
Cause how do you deny that?
No, that's exactly right.
And further evidence.
I mean, I feel like we're in the middle of history.
America is a movie and we have no idea how it ends, but clearly... Right.
Surely, as a journalist, you would be inquisitive to try and understand why all these events have happened in a sequence that's got this person exactly what they wanted.
You wouldn't just be dismissing it and going, oh well it's obviously God's plan.
It's lazy, if nothing else.
Yeah, it's lazy, that's true.
But also, you're also singing to the choir.
There is that.
Because he's a Christian, his audience is overwhelmingly Christian.
His audience is almost in totality a right wing in terms of the political puppet show.
And so you're not going to upset your audience, which he's got a vast audience.
And there's just one other clip I want to show you involving Tucker Carlson, very short clip.
And that's what he said about the appointment of J.D.
Vance.
People in the alternative should be questioning authority, not being supportive of authority's appointments without question.
And here he's talking about the appointment of J.D.
Vance, and I'll come back on this when we've seen it.
No, J.D.
Vance is the VP pick, and I think every person who pays close attention has got to be thrilled by that.
And if you don't know much about J.D.
Vance, I'm not even going to make a case for J.D.
Vance.
I'm going to tell you what I just saw, which is that every bad person I've ever met in a lifetime in Washington was aligned against J.D.
Vance.
And I do think the negative case is often more powerful.
Because I know of myself, I do not think I'm a particularly good person.
I have strong reasons for feeling that way.
I don't always think that my side is right.
I know for a fact I have been wrong many, many times.
And I hope to correct and be honest about my error.
So it's not like I think that, you know, I'm always, you know, God's always on my side.
Sometimes I'm not on God's side.
But I definitely know who's representing the other side.
It's a lot easier to tell who the people who are only in it because they like, I don't know, killing other people in Pointless Wars.
Like, I know who those people are.
And their odor is so powerful that I can smell one when he walks in the room.
So the bad guys are all against J.D.
Vance, according to Tucker Carlson there.
But what about Peter Thiel?
What about all these other tech billionaires?
What about them?
What about J.D.
Vance's connections to Vivek Ramaswamy, another guy you promote, mate?
Why?
Why aren't you asking these questions?
You're supposed to be a journalist.
And that is my problem with the alternative media.
And this week with With the reaction to the Trump shooting, it has confirmed all that I've been saying and got much abuse for all these months.
Yeah, it's a club.
It's been a club.
And it's like, I remember years ago when you were talking about, we've spoken about it on the show, about the censorship of anything to do with Israel leading to what they plan to do in the future, which is what they've done since October 7th.
It kind of feels like all this takeover, all this hijack, all this suppression, all this kind of funneling towards Christianity in politics has led to this moment now.
And all the various different characters are now in play.
And again, we spoke previously about the 2030 plan, and obviously they're not going to not want to have their people in charge in the key years up to that.
So you've got Trump, this populist figure that people seem to like, yet all around him you've got all these tech people who are all furthering this AI agenda, furthering this technological agenda.
It's all been building towards that.
Likely to be in the White House as we as we look at it in the form of J.D.
Vance as well as Trump. Musk is another God who is not questioned anymore in terms of
the all the tech stuff that's advancing the cult agenda because he's bought Twitter.
The soft sell.
You always call him the soft seller, don't you?
Oh, he's soft selling.
Well, that's a good point.
We can finish this point with this, this story with this.
He's soft selling AI and the tech technocracy, whereas others are hard selling it.
So it's basically, well, no, Musk's the good guy, you know, he's the one we can trust with this and all that.
And I would just say this to people.
The cult is leading you to the edge of the cliff.
In terms of the end of freedom and total control, the alternative mainstream alternative media, the MAM as I call it, and that technocracy group that funds it and orchestrates it, is leading you to the edge of the same cliff They're just taking you down a different path.
And that's what's happening, and that's why I won't shut up about it.
Absolutely.
It's so important, because if we don't do that, it's going to get to the point that it's far too late.
And by that point, There's no way back.
You know, as you've written about, with the artificial intelligence, the chips in people's brains, that really is the endgame.
And obviously, we're going to work on a documentary this summer on that to come out later in the year.
Yeah, that's what they want to get us.
That's the point they want to get us to while we're following our Piper heroes.
100%.
And we spoke a few weeks ago, didn't we, after the Tucker-Putin interview about creating a hero in the East.
As they've tried to do with Putin, which then creates that sympathy towards that.
You create a hero in the technocracy world, as they've tried to do with Musk, and in many cases succeeded within a lot of people, because they're stupid.
You make that easier to sell.
Which is kind of, they've done the same thing across two areas.
Exactly right.
They'll come out with some hero for climate change next, to get people to start questioning that.
I'm sure.
Wonder who that'll be.
In the last 35 years, there's been Surreal.
They're laughing at you.
They're not laughing with you.
Why?
You have invited me and you stand there and say we're not having you on.
Let's talk about first of all why Jewish groups are calling you anti-semitic.
You're the most mocked at, laughed at.
I've been saying all these 35 years that we are all one consciousness.
All expressions of one infinite state of awareness.
And that, therefore, all the human divisions and fault lines of race, of political persuasion, of culture, of religion, are all illusions to divide us and to perceptually enslave us.
And you know what they call me for saying that?
A racist.
He's anti-Semitic.
What's the truth?
The reveal.
▲
Export Selection