May 15, 2024 - David Icke
20:00
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| We all lead busy and sometimes stressful lives. | |
| If you're experiencing pain and searching for relief, this can be even more devastating. | |
| It was more than pain, it was extreme agony. | |
| Are you sick and tired of trying drugs? | |
| Only to find the troublesome side effects like fatigue become unbearable. | |
| And I was desperate and... | |
| I didn't think that anything could help, really. | |
| Endless expensive gadgets and potions that offer pain relief but deliver none. | |
| Well, did you know there's a natural and easy way to live pain-free? | |
| With Althea Finch, the pain-free specialist. | |
| Well, there is a future. | |
| That's all I can say and I didn't think I had one. | |
| Wow. | |
| Really? | |
| Wow. | |
| Good. | |
| Wonderful. | |
| No one should have to live with pain. | |
| And block your body's own healing power with Althea's pain-free method. | |
| Visit painfreedom.co.uk and let Althea guide you towards your new pain-free future. | |
| Althea Finch, the pain-free specialist. | |
| So in order to increase this censorship, we've seen a number of laws either being | |
| imposed or discussed around the world. | |
| There are online harms bill here in the UK, there's been others in Australia, and there's a big one in Canada that's going through at the moment. | |
| And as you've mentioned many times, Justin Trudeau doesn't seem to care. | |
| What the opinion of him is in Canada, as long as he's furthering the cult agenda, he seems to just crack on, and this does exactly that, doesn't it? | |
| Yeah, well, the thing about Trudeau is that he's more terrified of the cult, in terms of not doing what it tells him, than he is of public opinion. | |
| He's shown that many, many, many times. | |
| And a little bit of background, his official father, Is Pierre Trudeau and if you read the books of Kathy O'Brien and others who've researched Pierre Trudeau, the man was Satanist. | |
| Yep. | |
| So you you might think what the hell upbringing did Justin Trudeau have that's made him so utterly compliant to an agenda that is designed to destroy utterly the freedom of his population, his population, the population. | |
| And therefore, if you look to Canada, you can see, and it's the same with Jacinda Ardern | |
| in New Zealand, you can see them at the cutting edge of anything the cult wants. | |
| So what you're seeing in Canada, we've seen it also in this country, and interestingly they've called the one in this country the harms bill, and they call that one the harms bill. | |
| It's centrally, globally controlled. | |
| And what it means, it's going through the Canadian Parliament, is that the whole definition of hate speech gets massively widened. | |
| And not only that, it's retrospective. | |
| Yes. | |
| So if you've posted something long ago that is not in line with this new law, Then you can be jailed for up to five years as well, I'm reading. | |
| Yeah, and the rest. | |
| And so you can be jailed for something you've posted before the legislation became law if you have the ability to delete it now. | |
| And so this is the memory hole of George Orwell. | |
| This is not only stopping people posting their opinions now and posting information and evidence now, it's cleaning out all that back story of challenge to that information. | |
| And because Again, you're not dealing with newspapers, which you can, you know, hide away in the attic or something. | |
| When the deletion happens digitally, gone! | |
| Completely. | |
| It's gone everywhere. | |
| And this is what we're seeing. | |
| You know, George Orwell's 1984, if you look at the different elements of it, is exactly what's going on now. | |
| It was almost like a blueprint in the sense that the memory hole is being disappeared. | |
| And of course, once those with a memory of what's gone before Yes. | |
| It's like Orwell said, you can't even comprehend a thought. | |
| You can't even think of it, because the words don't exist. | |
| Yeah, well, that's the thing about political correctness, you see. | |
| Political correctness is about changing the language to the point where you're moving from George Orwell called it Newspeak, replacing Oldspeak. | |
| And that's exactly what we're seeing. | |
| Oldspeak contain words which describe something accurately, or as accurately as words can. | |
| So if you wanted to form your opinions and your thoughts, you had the ability to do that with words that had this meaning. | |
| And what is happening now through political correctness and all this legislation is that those words are becoming illegal and meaningless, vacuous, say-nothing words are replacing them. | |
| What was it that he said, Trudeau, someone said about in an audience, mankind, and he said, oh, no, we say people kind. | |
| You see, it's changing the language. | |
| And what it means is that you no longer have the words to describe your opinions in detail, because once again, same process, once those words have gone, The generations that follow will never know that those words ever existed. | |
| Yeah, I agree. | |
| So they won't have that ability to articulate themselves in detail. | |
| Another thing that Orwell said is that we, and it's obviously true, we also think in words. | |
| So if you remove the words, you don't even have the words to form your own thoughts. | |
| Never mind articulate them to other people. | |
| And this is where we're going, and we're going there that fast. | |
| Do you also think there's a possibility, because obviously they're doing this through censorship, which is through aggression, which is through imposition. | |
| Do you also think that we've seen this latest generation, I think my generation was probably the last one to not have it, with this short texting, where everything's really short, there's two letter words to describe something, LOL, all that sort of stuff, emojis, rather than using words, to articulate whatever it is. | |
| Do you think that's almost like a double-edged attack? | |
| Exactly right, mate. | |
| All this text speak is also distorting the language and taking out words that have real meaning and deep context to, you know, basically words that have no real depth. | |
| uh... and so yeah that's the thing that this is this is this is all all part of | |
| it what they do | |
| and here's an example with them with justin trudeau | |
| is that they go on and on and what what is the last coming into my mind as i'm | |
| saying this he they go on and on about | |
| the it's right to have free speech and defending free speech | |
| because they don't want you to to see that actually what they're doing is | |
| destroying exactly what they say is important Here's an example of the extraordinary misrepresentation of the views of Justin Trudeau in the way that he's trying to tell you he cares about free speech. | |
| What advice would you give Canadians who want to show public solidarity with Palestinians, but fear being associated with the sort of rhetoric that has been called hateful, which was expressed at the protest Saturday in Ottawa? | |
| Look, it's really, really important that Canadians know that they are free to express themselves, free to protest, to make sure that they are highlighting things they believe in, or things that they are concerned about. | |
| That is a right that Canadians need to always see defended, and this government always will. | |
| However, we have laws against hate speech, against incitement to violence, and we expect police to do their jobs and make sure those laws are enforced. | |
| Because fundamentally, including all the rights to protest, all the rights to free speech, nobody should feel unsafe in their communities, in their community schools, in their places of worship. | |
| Well, he cares about free speech to the point that if you only say what he's happy for you to say, the second you say something else... | |
| Free speech all of a sudden goes out the window. | |
| What was that great line from the great comedian, American comedian Bill Hicks? | |
| You are free to do what we tell you! | |
| You are free to do what we tell you! | |
| That is exactly right. | |
| And Bill Hicks died in, was it 1993 I think? | |
| And he could see that coming then. | |
| We're massively further on from that now. | |
| How important do you think it is, because they're using children as a massive justification for these laws, in terms of protecting children, and you've written extensively about, you know, if they have a sales pitch, quite often the sales pitch is something you can't necessarily disagree with. | |
| You look at Agenda 2030, everyone should have clean drinking water. | |
| Okay, you can't argue with that. | |
| What does that actually mean in reality? | |
| It means they control the water supply, which obviously you don't want. | |
| When it comes to this, they talk about protecting kids online, stopping them from being groomed, stopping them from seeing explicit content at young ages. | |
| Most people would say that sounds pretty sensible. | |
| However, that's the sales pitch to get you on board, isn't it? | |
| Because when they talk about harm, who decides what harm is? | |
| They do. | |
| So harm to them is anything that challenges their system? | |
| Well this is one reason, one major reason, why they write legislation in a very non-specific way. | |
| It's open to interpretation. | |
| It's because they can then interpret it any way they bloody choose. | |
| Yeah, you've seen this in this country with Ofcom, the government censor. | |
| That basically removed me from the mainstream media in April 2020 when I had the nerve to say that there was no virus and that it was all a scam to get people to take a vaccine that was coming. | |
| That aged well as well, didn't it? | |
| Yeah, exactly. | |
| So Ofcom, first of all, in another story we're going to cover, Ofcom was censoring Anyone that was warning people about the dangers of the vaccine. | |
| Therefore, Ofcom and its CEO, career bureaucrat Dame Melanie Dawes, is responsible For all those people that have died and have had their health destroyed for life, who would have made a different decision had they had access to information that her organization censored. | |
| And the same with all the others. | |
| Same with Zuckerberg and Facebook. | |
| Same with Google and YouTube. | |
| So here we are with, again, the use of children as the excuse. | |
| So what you do is you pick up, as you rightly say, an excuse that people would say, well that's fair enough, you know, children shouldn't see that, children shouldn't see this. | |
| And that's fine, but it doesn't stop there. | |
| What they do is they then expand it and expand it to cover all the people that are saying things they don't want the population to hear. | |
| And that's what we're seeing. | |
| That's why you have the, we're acting to protect children. | |
| Oh really? | |
| Dame Melanie Dawes? | |
| What about the children who've died from the fake vaccine and died as a result of the lockdowns that You stop people challenging through your censorship! | |
| Yeah, absolutely. | |
| And now it's all we care... No you bloody don't! | |
| That's the problem and you certainly don't care about freedom of speech and that is now being played out in the Parliament of Canada and it's going to be played out all over the world because The idea is, I repeat, to ensure that no one sees or hears anything that the authorities don't want them to see and hear. | |
| It is 1984. | |
| It is, and obviously with what happened with you in the Netherlands, where, was it classed as a domestic terrorist? | |
| That is obviously setting the precedent as well, that anybody that puts out information that challenges the orthodoxy of the system, or challenges anything it's putting out, Can be classed as that, can be classed as dangerous, and that immediately then gives them, in their mind, the justification to remove the content of that person offline. | |
| Well, it's exactly that. | |
| And, you know, you look at what's happening in New Zealand now, you look at what's happening in the Netherlands, what's happening in Canada, all over the world, more and more, people who are saying anything That embarrasses the state or exposes the state is being absolutely targeted by this fascism legislation that's coming in. | |
| And we have really not seen anything yet because they want to mop up the whole of anyone's opinion or evidence that challenges the cult agenda. | |
| That's as simple as that. | |
| I've been saying it all this time. | |
| And you know, when I see people like Jordan Peterson coming out, being massively promoted by Elon Musk through his algorithms and reposts, saying, oh, it's terrible what's happening in Canada. | |
| Yes, it is, Mr. Peterson. | |
| But some of us were pointing out this was coming decades ago. | |
| And we were bloody laughed at. | |
| And now suddenly, oh well, yeah, okay, well, you know, what kept you? | |
| Yeah, well, lots of people only seem to look at issues when it affects them, and obviously that is beginning to. | |
| They've shown, you know, in the last 10 years, 15 years, the levels they're prepared to go to, to censorship, on, you know, on the one end of the spectrum, deleting entire channels, stopping people earning a living, deleting people off the internet. | |
| On the other extreme end, what they've done to people like Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and so on, where They're setting the precedent, aren't they? | |
| Completely setting the precedent. | |
| On one end, it's to scare anybody that this is what we'll do if you go against us. | |
| And on the other side, making it as difficult as possible to reach people. | |
| Yeah, and, you know, there is a simple answer to it. | |
| There really is. | |
| You can't say this or we'll jail you. | |
| Vast numbers of people say it. | |
| And refuse to be cowered into silence by this stuff. | |
| I mean, how many people in Canada are actually part of this cult. | |
| Not that many compared with the number of people that live in Canada. | |
| Those who are being imposed upon vastly, vastly outnumber those who are doing the imposing. | |
| I think I see an answer to this. | |
| But it takes courage, it takes backbone. | |
| And, you know, when you get to my age, 72 now, and actually a long time past as well, | |
| you don't really give a damn about consequences. | |
| You give a damn about doing what you know to be right. | |
| And if we only did that, we'd see how tenuous and illusory is the power of these people. | |
| Their power is not in their imposition. | |
| Their power is in our acquiescence to their imposition. | |
| And we're going to see now how many backbones exist. | |
| in the human population because we're going to need them and we're going to need them well not | |
| even soon we need them now. I agree my take on it's always been that consequences are always | |
| until they're real only a concept they're only an idea and people don't necessarily | |
| you know take the consequences of their actions because they don't see the outcome. | |
| You've spoken about that's why they docked the two atomic bombs in Japan at the end of the Second World War, because they needed people to see the consequences of that for then the Cold War. | |
| Without that, it doesn't have the same power. | |
| The control system that's being spoken about, and has been spoken about for 30 years by yourself, was a concept in 1995. | |
| Now, you can see the stepping stones towards it. | |
| and people are starting to actually see the consequence of this. | |
| There's a lot of things that I've said over the years which were perceived to be crazy | |
| and then suddenly they start to move mainstream. | |
| I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation. | |
| What is real? | |
| How do you define real? | |
| If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain. |
Export Selection