Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 9, 2024 - David Icke

20:52

Zero Tolerance For Freedom - The Rise And Rise Of Censorship - David Icke Dot-Connector

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We all lead busy and sometimes stressful lives.
	If you're experiencing pain and searching for relief, this can be even more devastating.
	It was more than pain, it was extreme agony.
	Are you sick and tired of trying drugs?
	Only to find the troublesome side effects like fatigue become unbearable.
	And I was desperate and I didn't think that anything could help, really.
	Endless expensive gadgets and potions that offer pain relief but deliver none.
	Well, did you know there's a natural and easy way to live pain-free?
	With Althea Finch, the pain-free specialist.
	Well, there is a future.
	That's all I can say and I didn't think I had one.
	Wow.
	Really?
	Wow.
	Good.
	Wonderful.
	No one should have to live with pain.
	And block your body's own healing power with Althea's pain-free method.
	Visit painfreedom.co.uk and let Althea guide you towards your new pain-free future.
	healthier finish for pain free specialists.
	Good evening everybody and welcome to this week's dot connecto.
	It's great to be back with you after taking a break last week.
	Dad, how are you doing?
	Good.
	Excellent.
	That was short and sweet, wasn't it?
	Yep.
	So, right, we're going to dive into the issue that everyone's been talking about since October, basically, because it just continues to escalate, continues to move forward.
	We've obviously seen pushback like never before.
	against Israel and what they've been doing which has led to numerous new increases in censorship
	and increases in the definition of anti-Semitism. And this has continued in the house across the
	pond in America this week with them expanding the definition amid the growing protests on college
	campuses. So let's dive into this. Yeah well picking the truth out of this. First of all
	what we're looking at with this expansion of the definition of anti-Semitism which basically
	includes the criticism of the Israeli government is a blatant problem reaction solution.
	And so So is the very basis of it, which is what happened in October last year.
	Let's start with that.
	You had Hamas operatives breaking through multiple places in the fence to get into Israel.
	A fence that is just about the most guarded fence in terms of both personnel and technology in the frickin' world.
	Yeah, at one point an army personnel said if a bee flies too close to it they know about it.
	Yeah, it's really state-of-the-art, but somehow the Hamas operatives broke through and did what they did to, appallingly, to Israelis.
	So they had then created, by allowing it to happen, the excuse to Create mass slaughter in Gaza and to basically ethnically cleanse the place.
	That's...
	what they've been doing.
	Tens of thousands of dead Palestinians, an enormous number of them children.
	And this week the Israeli army has moved in on Rafa in the south of Gaza and closed the border crossing into Egypt with a view to Going for Rafah.
	And, you know, we've seen these horrible pictures of tanks knocking down welcome to Gaza signs and all the rest of it, and also dropping bombs on that area.
	So, the ethnic cleansing has now moved to the south of Gaza.
	And the reaction has obviously been one of horror from enormous numbers of people, not least students on university campuses in America and the wider world, Europe too.
	But as I've been saying, Jay, over the years, reacting has to be done in a streetwise manner.
	Otherwise, by reacting and thinking that you are opposing something, you're playing into the hands of those that you think you're opposing.
	So let's move to the United States.
	First of all, we had this video posted by Netanyahu.
	In which he described the protests against the Gaza slaughter as like the 1930s in the run-up to the Holocaust.
	What's happening on America's college campuses is horrific.
	Anti-Semitic mobs have taken over leading universities.
	They call for the annihilation of Israel.
	They attack Jewish students.
	They attack Jewish faculty.
	This is reminiscent of what happened in German universities in the 1930s.
	It's unconscionable.
	It has to be stopped.
	It has to be condemned and condemned unequivocally.
	But that's not what happened.
	The response of several university presidents was shameful.
	Now fortunately, state, local, federal officials, many of them have responded differently, but there has to be more.
	More has to be done.
	It has to be done not only because they attack Israel, that's bad enough.
	Not only because they want to kill Jews wherever they are, that's bad enough.
	It's also, when you listen to them, it's also because they say not only death to Israel, death to the Jews, but death to America.
	And this tells us that there is an anti-Semitic surge here that has terrible consequences.
	We see this exponential rise of anti-Semitism throughout America and throughout Western societies as Israel tries to defend itself against genocidal terrorists.
	And this was retweeted, therefore got a massive audience through the algorithms, by Elon Musk, who is owned by Israel.
	Let's stop pissing about.
	Well, he was taken there to be shown around, wasn't he?
	Oh, yeah, well, you know, get over here, Mr. Musk, now.
	Yes, sir.
	He got Shapiro'd, didn't he?
	Yeah, so, you know, let's stop pussyfooting around.
	It's too late in the day.
	And so you then had this response from American politicians who are overwhelmingly funded out of Israel via organizations like the lobby group AIPAC in the United States.
	And they're pressured.
	Yes, sir.
	No, sir.
	Three bags full, sir.
	Thank you, sir.
	To pass this law to expand the definition of anti-Semitism on the campuses.
	And this is what's been happening.
	And so then we start to see that these protests are being funded By George Soros.
	Now, here's another part of the scam.
	If you want to control the outcome, then you need to control both sides, or all sides, to dictate the outcome.
	You don't want any surprises.
	So you've got the Israeli government that play the cards that they play.
	And then you've got George Soros, who is this multi-billionaire.
	He's very old now.
	There will be an organisation around him that's doing this overwhelmingly.
	But you let him play the card of being not a Zionist and anti-Israel.
	But what I say to people to try to weave their way through this maze is look at the outcome.
	The outcome will tell you the game.
	So you've had the Soros organization funding the protests.
	And that's exactly what the Israeli government want.
	They want the protests.
	Why?
	Because then they have an excuse to say there's all this anti-semitism, the government must act in America, we must expand the definition of anti-semitism.
	So Netanyahu, psychopath, says you can't criticize me, in effect.
	So this is what's been going on.
	It's a game.
	It's a psychological game and It was always going to happen.
	I mean, you know, I've been talking about this for a very very long time that the more extreme the Israeli government become The more laws to stop criticism and exposure of them under the heading of anti-Semitism, the more of those laws were going to be played out.
	And this is what we've seen.
	And what is happening in this period now, as I said it was coming long ago, is censorship, government censorship, EU censorship, on a scale we've never seen before.
	And all around the world, you are seeing now these laws being brought in to to stop social media, internet postings that are at odds with the with the agenda of this global cult.
	And, you know, one of the things I've been saying since Elon Musk, in quotes, bought Twitter, turned it into X, is that if I knew this censorship was coming, and you see nothing yet, but when we get to Canada, you'll, you'll get a feel for it, this country too.
	If I knew it was coming, then Musk and his organization knew it was coming, and his CEO, Yacarino, the World Economic Forum stalwart, knew it was coming.
	So what you can do, therefore, is say, ask Dan for free speech.
	Well, you're not against shadow banning, though, Elon, are you?
	No.
	And you're not against shutting down people off your site on the basis of government diktats.
	You just highlight those for your benefit, but the rest you quietly do what they tell you.
	But what I've been saying is that he has a built-in excuse in Get Away Car to allow him to continue to be the free speech hero of the mainstream alternative media.
	While censoring people.
	And what I said that was going to be, and like I say, they wouldn't have known it was coming if I knew they knew, is government and European Union laws.
	Because one of the things that you see, you know when he kind of says, oh, I'm not going to do this, what Brazil wants, this Supreme Court thing in Brazil wants, because it's not the law in Brazil.
	And Australia says, take this down.
	This was the attack on the priest in Australia.
	Take this down.
	And Musk took it down in Australia.
	His point of resistance was the demand that it was taken down globally, right?
	Because they can't dictate that by their laws, not currently anyway.
	But what we saw from all this, if you read between the lines, and he actually said this, is that if governments pass legal legislation, then he'll adhere to it.
	And so what you're therefore looking at is all these extreme Levels of censorship, which are now coming in more and more, and my goodness me, where it's going to go, make your air cold.
	will be adhered to by Elon Musk and X in his own words.
	And that means that, oh look, I don't really want to do it.
	Oh no, it's not Elon's fault. He doesn't want to do it but he's got no
	choice. That's the whole game. And that was going to be the game from the
	start, as I said at the time. Do you think there's a way we could look
	at this as a positive in the sense of, okay, they're going to censor but nobody
	is ever censored from a position of strength.
	It's a position of weakness because they fear this information, they fear the movement that's begun through COVID and the rumblings of discontent, the lack of trust in authority that's growing, lack of trust in mainstream institutions like healthcare, education, so on, that's growing.
	So as much as it's going to be a challenge and we're going to have to be very creative and use our imagination to continue to reach people, we look at that as a moral victory to start with, that the fact they feel the need to censor, obviously this is doing something.
	Yeah, well it's real simple.
	If you want to control people's behavior, you have to control their perception.
	And you control their perception by what forms their perception, which is information they receive.
	So you censor information so they only hear the information you want them to hear, so they form the perception that comes from the information that you want them to hear.
	It's real simple.
	And what I've been saying over the years, going way back decades now, is that this has basically been the scam.
	With the what you might call the old media, although it was controlled and owned by this cult and all that stuff, and there were genuinely independent versions of it, it was Much more diverse.
	You had, say, a newspaper office where they could argue about what went in the paper or not, or whatever.
	And then there was a newspaper office here, another one there, another one in another country, another one in another country, and so on and so forth.
	It was much more difficult to control everything.
	So this was the this was the game.
	DARPA, the technological development arm of the Pentagon, claims the credit for the creation of the Internet, the technology that created the Internet.
	OK, so why would they why would they want that?
	Well, because when they first created the Internet, They had to let the free flow of information, I mean, they must have been biting their tongue and kicking the wall, but they had to let it happen, because if you had censorship that subsequently come in, you wouldn't have had the internet take over the communication of information in the way that it has.
	So you had to let that go.
	But at the same time, your seed funding So they don't have to think about the bottom line at all,
	because they can buy up the opposition, or the opposition that does have a bottom line that they
	have to watch, they can't compete with this money no object.
	And so you have your Amazons, and your Facebooks, and your Googles, and your YouTube owned by Google,
	all that stuff.
	And they get to a point of near monopoly.
	At that point, where you think, OK, we can go now, then you kick your censorship in.
	And as I've been saying over the years, the idea eventually is that you will not hear or see anything
	that the authorities, the cult ultimately, doesn't want you to see.
	So how do you do that?
	Why have they moved everything to the internet?
	Simple one-word answer.
	Algorithms.
	Because now, through an algorithm, they can not only take things down, they can stop things being posted in the first place.
	And through control of the algorithms, you can dictate virtually the entirety of what is posted on these various platforms.
	You absolutely now control what people see and hear.
	And so this is where we're going, and this legislation that's starting to come in around the world is an absolute confirmation of where this is going.
	And the danger of it, if you compare it to, I think we were talking earlier, about, you know, 100 years ago, even 50 years ago, when something happened in a local area You probably only heard about it in that local area.
	You didn't know what was going on on the other side of the world.
	So in a sense, there was that disconnect.
	Where you didn't hear anything bad, you didn't hear anything good.
	Whereas with this, they're going to make sure you only hear the bad.
	You only hear what they want you to hear.
	So if there's a story in Australia, you're only going to hear their version of it over here.
	If it's a story in America, vice versa.
	So you're not going to get those alternative opinions on something.
	Like, you know, when 9-11 happened, obviously it was the other side of the world to us, but there were still people talking about, this doesn't add up, that doesn't add up.
	When events like that happen in future, you're solely going to get the mainstream perspective, and that's going to be the only thing people can form their opinions from.
	That's the outcome, isn't it?
	That's where it's going.
	You only see and hear what the authorities want you to see and hear, and that's only possible through algorithms and by putting everything onto an electronic communication system, a digital communication system.
	We're now seeing the next big step towards that with these, well, almost beyond fascist censorship laws around the world.
	Yeah, we are, and we're going to dive into that in the Iconic version in a minute.
	If you're watching with us on DavidIke.com or on Twitter, thank you very much for tuning in.
	And to tune into the rest of the show, head over to Iconic.com now.
	There's a lot of things that I've said over the years which were perceived to be crazy.
	and then suddenly they start to move mainstream.
	I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation.
	What is real?
	How do you define real?
	If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.

▲