All Episodes
Previous Next
March 14, 2024 - David Icke
13:46
What Is Our Biggest Threat? - Gareth Icke Tonight Speaks To Tom Nelson About The Climate Change Scam
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
There is something amiss with the British royal family.
I mean, aside from being a gaggle of inbred Germans with a fetish for promoting cult narratives and befriending paedophiles.
King Charles was diagnosed with cancer just as a brand new cancer vaccine was being promoted by cult players like the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.
He then promptly disappeared.
Prince William was seen swaying like a hammered teenager trying to pretend he hadn't done a bottle of white lightning behind the bike sheds and then Thomas Kingston, the husband of Lady Gabriella Windsor and former boyfriend of Kate Middleton's sister, died suddenly, aged only 45, and no one seems particularly interested in finding out why.
And all the while, the Princess of Wales, Kate Middleton, was visiting Atlantis with Lord Lucan and Shergar.
We were told she'd had abdominal surgery in January, but after two months of invisibility, people started asking why no one had seen her anywhere.
The Palace released some photos to appease the plebs, but it only made things worse because they looked like they were edited in MS Paint.
All kinds of theories have flooded the internet about Kate's whereabouts, something that would pretty obviously happen when you release such a poorly edited photo and try to pass it off as real.
The image was so bad that the Associated Press sent out an order not to publish the image.
It's clearly doctored.
Now, I don't know what's going off with the Royals, but I do know that nothing happens by accident.
King Charles, like his father before him, may play the Boris Johnson-style bumbling posh guy, but these people are not as stupid as they would have us believe.
Are we honestly meant to believe that the Royal Family, reportedly worth £21 billion of our money, can't afford a deepfake of Kate, or at very least a half-decent graphic designer, rather than someone on work experience?
And who signed off on its release?
Mr Magoo?
We were meant to see it.
There's some form of psy-op afoot, of that I'm fairly certain.
Something else I'm certain of is that the royal family are on the way out.
The institution has served the global cult admirably for over a thousand years and are seen around the world as an iconic symbol of Britishness.
Rightly or wrongly.
In my view, it's wrongly.
But it's true, whether I like it or not.
And that is the institution's Achilles' heel, because the globalists don't want symbols of Britishness, or of being an American, or of any Western culture in general.
They've been scratching away at our history and culture for a very long time, and it's inevitable that the institution of royalty will soon be rebadged.
I say rebadged because the bloodline will continue in key positions of influence, just not in the way that people can cling to in terms of cultural significance.
Now you'll ask, why would the powers that be want rid of the royal family if the royal family are part of the powers that be?
Well, think of it in terms of a football club or a soccer club if you're in the United States.
You may have a big striker, a A target man.
You can play long balls up to him, he'll hold up play, he'll bang in a few goals.
It's served you well.
It's got you from one league to the next.
Promotion after promotion.
Closer and closer to your end goal.
The big guy is a club legend.
Supporters name their kids after him.
But now you're getting closer to reaching your target.
You're in the Premier League and that style of play does not work there.
The big man up front tactic won't get you anywhere when you're in the top division.
So if you want to continue to march on towards your ultimate goal, you need to replace the big guy.
He's served you so well over the years, but you need to replace him with another player, another tactic, another style of play.
And that's what I believe we're about to witness.
Maybe not now, maybe not next year, but soon enough.
The club will dispense with the big man, but the club will continue on, because the club comes first.
After all, it's a big club, and we aren't in it.
Tom is a podcaster and self-described climate realist.
He was involved in tech and software for many years.
In 2005, as an avid birdwatcher, he became heavily involved in debunking a high-profile but bogus ivory-billed woodpecker rediscovery that opened his eyes to the problems with blindly trusting peer-reviewed science.
He's been speaking out about the scam of human-caused climate change for a very long time and is on the line now.
Tom, thanks for joining us.
Where are we now in terms of the Earth's climate?
Because if I turn on the television news, then I should be boiling in a pot of molten lava, yet I don't seem to be.
Yeah, I mean, the climate is just continuing to fluctuate like it always has fluctuated.
It is a little warmer now than it was in the depths of the Little Ice Age in the 1800s, but it is colder than it was in lots of other different warm periods.
And over the last 600 million years, if you look at the current temperature, this is a cold period.
We actually are still in an ice age, even right now, because we have ice at the poles.
And for much of that last 600 million years, we had no ice at the poles.
That's something that most people don't know.
I bet if you went into any bar or, you know, cafe and said to someone, did you know that there didn't used to be ice there, they would go, what?
What are you on about?
It's funny, isn't it?
But what do you think the reason is for the climate change movement?
Because obviously money's a factor, I get that, but I can't help but feel it's a little bit deeper than just chasing the Benjamins.
Yeah, I think money and control.
If you can control CO2, you can control life.
So there's just so many ways that they can control us.
If they can make us think that CO2 is so dangerous that they have to micromanage us, and they have to stop us from eating meat, and they have to stop us from driving our cars as much as we want, and stop us from flying.
It's just endless, the things that they can do to us if they can scare us about CO2.
But the whole CO2 scare is a complete scam, and it's beneficial.
More CO2 in the air is better.
And the whole idea that we want to go back to little ice age temperatures, and we can even do that if we wanted, that's all just crazy.
Crazy.
It is interesting.
Any time there's either a catastrophe or a huge problem facing the public, all we need to do is give a little bit of money and a little bit of freedom and we're able to sort it.
It's uncanny, isn't it?
Do you believe the weather is being modified?
Do you think that's being used maybe to make things appear more extreme in certain scenarios so actually the public will then go, oh, actually maybe there is this huge Climate change thing that's going to come and destroy us all.
Yeah, I think that's a great question, but if they're trying to modify the weather and make it extreme, more extreme, it's not working because you look at all the data.
I've checked all the data on cyclones and droughts and floods, everything you can think of, and they are not getting worse.
So yeah, they're just hyping it up.
The same bad weather that's always happened is being hyped as being unusual and caused by us, but it's not.
There's no signal of bad weather increasing at all.
I don't know if it's the same where you are, but for us here in England, obviously I know you're in England now, but you're not from England, they started naming storms.
And it suddenly came from nowhere, but they never did that before.
And it was kind of like, oh, this one's Storm Babbit or whatever.
And it's like, it's January.
That's what it is.
Yeah.
I'm just being told there was a Hurricane Ike.
Was there really?
I must have missed that one.
But yeah, it's just another way of trying to scare us that they can name any breeze if they want to name it as a storm, and they can say, oh no, we have more named storms than we had before we changed the way that we named storms.
But anyway, that's just propaganda.
And if you look carefully at all the data, there's a guy named Ryan Maui that does a great job of looking very carefully at hurricane and cyclone data, and there's no signal.
You can go back as many decades as you want, and they are not getting worse.
That's interesting.
Yeah, the propaganda I agree with.
I mean, someone shared some images just on social media, and it was of someone doing a weather forecast, like maybe 10 years ago, and it's green and yellow, and it's got the temperatures on there, and then it's them doing the weather forecast, I think it was last year, maybe the year before, and they're the same temperatures, but it's all orange and red.
And he's giving this kind of, you know, illusion of, my goodness me, look how hot it's getting.
And you're looking and you're going, that's red.
That's 19 degrees.
That's not red.
That's not red.
That's bad.
Yeah.
There's a ton of just coloring the maps red and that's supposed to convince us that things are getting worse.
So it's kind of a little bit sad that they're trying to convince us using just colors on a map.
But again, if you actually look at the real data, like I live in Minnesota over in the U.S.
and we have data that goes back Over 110 years for each day of the year.
What was the high?
What was the low?
And as you look at that data, you can see that it was really hot in the 1930s.
In Minnesota, it got over 100 degrees Fahrenheit, something like 38 times in the 30s and 40s.
And now that almost never happens.
So it was way hotter then.
And the people who are selling us this propaganda don't want you to look at that data because it blows the whole scam out of the water if you look at the real data and figure out it's not getting hotter.
Absolutely.
What do pro-climate change types say to you?
You know, if you point out that CO2 is the gas of life, because that is basic, isn't it?
You learn about photosynthesis in primary school.
It's not like a rocket science thing that you have to go off to 10 years of university for.
They were teaching you that when you were little.
So how do they respond to that?
It's pretty amazing.
I think they almost never do respond to the substance of any article.
They'll just say, oh, you're not an expert.
Trust the experts.
Trust the people who have the degrees and are that call themselves climate scientists.
So and I get a lot of people that just ignore me completely or block me.
And I do have my own podcast and I've invited all sorts of climate scientists to be on my podcast and to talk this stuff over.
They don't want to talk about it.
They want to avoid talking about the substance because if you check into the substance, you can find out right away there's no climate crisis.
Nothing's getting worse.
CO2 is not the climate control knob.
So they're very scared of debate, which they should be because they're going to lose because no truth is on their side and nothing alarming at all is on their side at all.
I find that funny, you know.
Like you say there, that people come back to you and say you're not an expert.
You get that.
I remember it's during the Covid era.
You're not a virologist.
You're not a vaccinologist.
It's like what Bill Gates is.
You are hanging on this dude's every word.
The guy's making billions off of you believing him.
I think there's a play going on here.
Just finally, Tom, you've been working on a documentary.
Is that right?
Can you tell us about that?
Yeah, it's called Climb at the Movie, and we just had our worldwide premiere yesterday in London.
About 300 people attended there.
I'm actually on a road trip.
I'm sorry?
I just said, oh, amazing.
Sorry, I was under the impression you were working on it, but it's out.
That's fantastic.
Yeah, yeah, it's done, and we're just premiering it in a few places in the Netherlands tomorrow, and it's going to be in Argentina, it's going to be in Washington, D.C., but the big day is March 21st, and that's when it's going to go online kind of everywhere on March 21st.
It's going to be on YouTube, Bitchute, Rumble, Twitter, Telegram, any place we can think of.
Because I do think they're going to want to shut it down and try to make sure you don't see it.
We're going to put it everywhere so you can see it.
I think there's going to be a lot of clips up on social media because Martin Durkin is very talented and he did a great job with this movie.
He did 2007's Great Global Warming Swindle.
I've been a fan of that since 2007 and this movie is better than the other one.
Oh, that's fantastic.
So what kind of movie is it then?
Is it, you know, like a talking head documentary with experts or is it, you know, is it something slightly different with, you know, maybe some acting in it?
There are a lot of talking heads, and there's a lot of graphs and things, but Martin does a very good job of keeping it interesting.
That's very important, of course.
And he uses old footage from the Romans in the Roman warm period, racing their chariots, and people digging out from big snowstorms in the 70s.
George Washington, it was really cold in his time, so he features that a little bit.
So he keeps the whole thing running.
Towards the end, he talks more about the politics and how this whole thing is really about, again, about the self-described elites trying to force their rule onto the working people.
And what the climate crisis propaganda really is, a lot of it, is a war on the working class.
And they're trying to control us, and they're trying to get our money and take away our power.
So it's kind of a class war, I would say, part of it.
Oh, absolutely.
And that's exampled by people going around in private jets all around the world telling you not to leave your television on standby and to use a bag for life.
It is staggering.
Tom, thank you so much for joining us.
I'm looking forward to watching it.
So the 21st of March, I should be able to find that everywhere then?
Absolutely.
21st of March, we're hoping that millions of people view it, yeah.
Oh, fantastic.
Well, best of luck with it, Tom.
Thanks for joining us.
It's been lovely to talk to you, mate.
Thank you very much.
We'll talk to you next time.
▲
Export Selection