Feb. 22, 2024 - David Icke
24:23
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Quantum Hypno is a transformative approach that connects with the superconscious through the power of hypnosis. | |
| I take the time to get to know you and create a relaxed setting where you can share your life story. | |
| There's no rush or time pressure involved. | |
| During the hypnosis session, you'll experience a natural and profound connection with the superconscious, accessing healing, wisdom, and the answers that you've been seeking throughout your life. | |
| Envision the ability to travel through time and space, recovering lost knowledge and exploring the universe. | |
| This life-changing work has already helped thousands of people dealing with addictions, trauma, or a sense of being lost, enabling them to move forward in the right direction. | |
| I've worked with people from all walks of life. | |
| So what are you waiting for? | |
| Hello everybody and welcome to this week's episode of Dot Connector. | |
| I'll start the show by apologising. | |
| I've got devil-looking eyes. | |
| I've got an eye infection, which is not particularly enjoyable, especially with bright LED lights above. | |
| But we're going to get through it. | |
| Dad, you're actually here. | |
| You're actually in the studio. | |
| Yes, it's nice to be in Derby, and I hope you get well soon, mate. | |
| Cheers. | |
| Well, by the look of the flood on our side, you might end up stuck here, to be fair. | |
| It's pretty painful, right? | |
| Yeah, well, it's always better when you're in studio because you can actually have a chat and, you know, there's not the delay online and all of that. | |
| Yeah. | |
| And there's been plenty to chat about this week. | |
| So we're going to start with, following on from a subject that we've covered a lot, which is this Third World War long-planned concept of an East versus West conflict. | |
| Because this story from the BBC and from all the papers here in the UK to do with the UK's nuclear deterrent, which has failed in a test for the second time. | |
| I mean, we did laugh a few years ago when they did a test off the coast of Florida and a missile veered off towards America, which would have been quite an interesting incident to explain. | |
| But just the fact that this story coincides with the head of the army talking about preparing for war in Russia, talking about conscription, talking about the conflict, and it shows that The Western militaries, Britain being one, are completely inept and completely inadequate to have such a conflict. | |
| Does that tie into the idea that the West is not meant to win this one, and this eastward movement of power? | |
| Oh, yes. | |
| I mean, I've got confirmation for you. | |
| Of that, a bloke called Grant Shapps is the Defence Secretary. | |
| He was on the submarine as well, wasn't he? | |
| Yes, he was. | |
| I'll come to him in a second. | |
| He was the Transport Secretary before, and he gave us smart motorways, which are bloody lethal. | |
| Anyway, yeah. | |
| What happened was that they shot this Trident missile, and it went... It's supposed to have gone thousands of miles. | |
| Yeah. | |
| And it went, er, plop. | |
| Right? | |
| The ship's probably rocking from the waves it caused, you know. | |
| But I've got to read you this. | |
| This is a story about what happened. | |
| The latest test of the UK's nuclear deterrent was from HMS Vanguard, and was seen by Defence Secretary... Sorry. | |
| It's just funny that Defence Secretary Grant Shapps is in the same sentence, right? | |
| The missile's booster rockets failed, and it landed in the sea close to the launch site. | |
| Plop. | |
| And Mr Shapps said, following this, and following the second failure, that he had absolute confidence in trident submarines, missiles, and nuclear warheads. | |
| So on what basis, Mr Shapps, do you have that, former Transport Secretary? | |
| Well, they told me. | |
| That bloke in the uniform told me. | |
| And then, each missile is worth around £17 million. | |
| So there's 32 million across the globe. | |
| Yeah, and the last test in 2016 also ended in failure, when the missile veered off course, as you say. | |
| Test-fired missiles are not armed with their nuclear warheads. | |
| Well, that's for you, innit? | |
| Yeah. | |
| Okay, so, in a written statement to Parliament, Mr Shapps confirmed an anomaly did occur. | |
| During the test on January the 30th this year, but said Trident was the most reliable weapons system in the world. | |
| I mean, this guy is Defense Secretary, right? | |
| Sleep well, everyone. | |
| And the test reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK's nuclear deterrent, HAL, in which the government has absolute confidence. | |
| And by the way, it said that the submarine and crew were successfully certified. | |
| Well, that fits, and we'll rejoin the operational cycle as planned. | |
| And there are no implications, says Schaps, for our ability to fire our nuclear weapons should the circumstances arise in which we need to do so. | |
| So, anyone that has Grant Schaps as Defence Secretary is not taking himself seriously. | |
| But on a more serious note, What we've been seeing is the running down of the Western military, and the building up of the Eastern military. | |
| 100%. | |
| So, while China's been building up its weaponry, and not only its weaponry, its troops and its troops mentality, because, you know, The Pentagon has been wokefying the American military and so it's been weakened psychologically that way. | |
| The enormous amount of defense money and weaponry that's been handed over to Ukraine Has weakened, massively weakened the American military. | |
| Same with other countries in Europe. | |
| And, you know, we know that the, well, Chinese government-owned TikTok, in truth, shows a version of TikTok to the West, but it's not the same version that they get in China. | |
| And while the wokery is being infused into the Western military, not least the American, The Chinese have been doing the opposite. | |
| They've been going down the road of men should be men. | |
| Yep. | |
| And so you can see this. | |
| A blatant difference between the way the Western military is being run and the way the Chinese Eastern Russia 2 military is being run and you know it only takes a trigger. | |
| It does. | |
| And you've got Taiwan sitting there. | |
| With this global monopoly on semiconductors that you need for all this computerized world and smartphones and electric cars and all that stuff. | |
| And already China has got this big, big hold on the supply chain of many basic things. | |
| Uh, globally. | |
| And so you can see this, uh, this movement of power from east to, uh, from west to east. | |
| And now, the, you could also add to that, from the economic power, the military power is moving from west to east. | |
| So, uh, we, we can have a chuckle at Grant Shapps, and we should. | |
| And, uh, the latest, um, trident, um, uh, failure. | |
| But it is symbolic and symptomatic of a very obvious plan to run down one at the expense of the other. | |
| The East now, unilaterally, I don't think the East would be the loser. | |
| No, no, I completely agree and that's clearly the plan. | |
| You've spoken about, you know, the easiest way to impose the system they want, which China's the blueprint of, is to have them win the war and impose that then. | |
| On the rest of the world in the same way that it was, you know, Britain and the Allies imposed that back on Germany after the Second World War. | |
| Similar principle, isn't it? | |
| Do you think also it ties into, you know, an important conversation about nuclear weapons? | |
| Because nuclear weapons, obviously only one country's ever used them, America. | |
| But just how... | |
| dangerous and finite mistakes with them would be. | |
| So let's say for example that first test that veered off towards Florida. | |
| Let's say it didn't just explode and it veered off towards Florida and it was armed. | |
| Millions of people. | |
| Millions of people killed by accident. | |
| Do you think that should reignite a bigger conversation within people? | |
| That the idea that you have these weapons that can with one switch kill millions and would destroy the planet if a handful are used. | |
| Does that just tie into The insanity of the human psyche. | |
| Well, it's complete insanity. | |
| I mean, they had this system which they called MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction, whereby if we have loads of nuclear weapons and you have loads of nuclear weapons, well, neither of us are going to use them, because we know that they're going to come back, and we're going to get what we give you. | |
| But of course, there are now more and more systems to try to protect from those attacks, which kind of starts to dilute the MAD option a little bit. | |
| And also, you know, the word MAD is very appropriate because, you know, the world is run by people who are completely fricking bonkers. | |
| And we are entering a point now where Where anything becomes possible. | |
| And, you know, again, you can look at the level of the conspiracy, the manipulation at the political level, and you can say, well, they're not going to do that because it will affect them. | |
| But if you then realize that that political level is just, it's just pawns. | |
| Even the intelligence and military level are just pawns. | |
| And what's actually behind all this, ultimately, is a non-human force operating outside of this band of frequency we call human, the human dimension. | |
| And therefore they're not going to be affected by The scale of horror that a nuclear war would bring. | |
| And it may be that, you know, that's part of the plan for motives that we don't fully understand yet. | |
| Or it may be just building up the fear, just like the Cold War. | |
| What you had during the Cold War was fear on both sides. | |
| And, you know, I lived through it. | |
| I remember all the way, I mean, think COVID, think human-caused climate change, and the propaganda to generate the fear, the fear of the Soviet Union, and in the Soviet Union, the fear of the West. | |
| And a lot of things were made possible in terms of policy because of that whole idea that we've got to protect ourselves from the | |
| Russians and their nuclear weapons and all that stuff and vice versa the other way. | |
| And so anything that can generate fear, especially fear of non-existence, | |
| is going to be a fantastic tool of perceptual manipulation. | |
| Because if you look at what happens when people are in fear, They look for someone to protect them from what they fear. | |
| So during COVID, it was protect me from COVID, even though there wasn't a COVID, but they believed there was. | |
| So they gave the power away to doctors, to politicians, to medical, quote, experts, which we'll get into later on. | |
| Absolutely. | |
| Anything but experts. | |
| And so anything that generates that fear will get people to give their power away. | |
| And so it may be just about that, or it may be something even more sinister. | |
| I think you wrote in the past, or when we spoke about it, that you think that's why they're used. | |
| Nukes at the end of World War Two was so that people had a visual understanding of what devastation they could cause, which then led to that fear through the Cold War. | |
| Without that, you'd probably struggle to comprehend. | |
| Yeah, exactly. | |
| I mean, that's a very good point. | |
| And 100%, that's what I said a long, long time ago. | |
| See, when you look at the history of the Japanese participation in World War Two, And what was happening in that whole period leading up to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, the Japanese were going to surrender on the same terms that they surrendered on. | |
| But if you are now, because I can't get across to people enough that this is scripted. | |
| This is like an algorithm chart. | |
| This happens here, and then that happens there, and then that happens there. | |
| So, they're coming to the end of World War II, and now they're going into the period, all scripted, of the Cold War. | |
| And if you're going to terrify people about the prospect of a nuclear attack, then you have to give them some idea of what that would be like. | |
| Because as you say, if they don't have that idea, it's all kind of, you know, not really tangible. | |
| So what you do, when you don't need to, These people don't care who's on the end of it. | |
| You drop those two bombs on Japan and people see very clearly what happens when that happens and therefore you have massively increased the fear potential of Terrifying people by the threat of nuclear war. | |
| So yeah, no doubt whatsoever that was done on purpose for that reason. | |
| First record of the Doom of Nagasaki, target for atom bomb number two, | |
| is filmed from a super fortress many miles away. | |
| So... | |
| Beneath that sinister pall of smoke, the world's most destructive force has been unleashed, with what results we know only too well. | |
| Yeah, and if you think about those two bombs that were dropped compared to the weapons they have today, you could destroy... I mean, I remember reading when the Russians released their new Sarmat 2 nuclear missile, you could take out the entirety of Manhattan with one strike. | |
| That's like 8 million people in one. | |
| Compared to, I think it was around 80,000, I think, Nagasaki and Hiroshima. | |
| So the difference, even though they were incredibly devastating, the difference now is incredible. | |
| And I don't think that's something that people can quite comprehend, can they? | |
| Yeah, no, and the other thing is that when you see not just all the fantastic amounts of money that are spent developing these weapons, but the number of scientists who are involved in it, It tells you something about who's actually running the show, who's running the world. | |
| Because I'm just writing at the moment the third book in a trilogy, and it's taking me into a lot of scientific explanations for reality, and why reality is as it is, and how it works. | |
| And it's a story of maverick scientists who have discovered over the years, people will be really surprised at how long things that seem to be relatively new discoveries were actually known. | |
| And their work was suppressed and not allowed to circulate and Bring changes to the world that would have been beneficial and understandings that would have been beneficial. | |
| While at the same time, scientists are focused upon producing more and more sophisticated ways of killing people. | |
| And it's interesting too, you know, there's a whole area of science known as plasma science. | |
| And when you look at the plasma scientists, and for reasons the book explains, this is really revelatory in terms of reality. | |
| They're invariably on the payroll of the intelligence military complex. | |
| And as a result, they are only allowed to make public what that military industrial complex says is allowed to be seen by the public. | |
| So there's enormous amounts of knowledge. | |
| about reality that they have discovered that the public are not allowed to know. | |
| So, for people to still say there's no agenda, and there's no malevolent force, | |
| when science alone is being utterly controlled to create destruction, | |
| while that which would be beneficial to humanity is suppressed. | |
| Absolutely. | |
| And, you know, to have so many people through these defence, so-called defence companies, who have scientific abilities ...and scientific gifts. | |
| To be focused on killing people is a real confirmation of what does run the world. | |
| Yeah, it absolutely is. | |
| And I think the final point on this, to go into this area a little bit deeper, is we've spoken before about the anti-human agenda, and the reason that more people are starting to look at the non-human aspect is because they can't really explain why the world's going in a certain direction. | |
| If it was human beings, then money and control doesn't shield them from the devastation. | |
| And we've seen the radiation in the atmosphere increase through technology, and if there was a nuclear conflict, obviously that would increase the radiation dramatically. | |
| And you've written about this non-human force trying to create a reality that is more susceptible to be able to actually physically appear. | |
| Do you think that could be the long-term agenda? | |
| Well, that could well be, yes. | |
| Because they're messing with the atmosphere. | |
| If they did have a nuclear conflict, it would massively mess with the atmosphere, as well as human life. | |
| And at the moment, these entities that operate in what's known as the astral dimension, they can manifest in our reality, but not for that long. | |
| Because of the vibrational difference for a start. | |
| But, yeah, it's very possible that what they're doing is manipulating our reality to be less compatible with humans and more compatible with them. | |
| I did see a movie a long time ago. | |
| It starred Charlie Sheen. | |
| It was called Arrival. | |
| The Arrival 2 was one of the worst films I've ever seen, but the Arrival 1 was interesting because the basic theme of it was that a non-human race was taking over human society. | |
| It controlled NASA and all these institutions. | |
| And that movie was about actually them changing the atmosphere to suit them. Pre-emptive curtailment. Yeah, | |
| exactly, and not to suit humans. | |
| And when you do look at what the Gateses of this world are doing through their | |
| massive access to funds in manipulating the atmosphere, and it's clearly an anti-human agenda. | |
| and God bless you. | |
| Control of food, control of water, control of energy, all these things that we need to survive, they are taking complete control of and manipulating them in a way that's not good for us. | |
| So more and more people are beginning to see this, and it certainly starts to make more sense that we're dealing with a non-human force, ultimately, rather than just a human one. | |
| I mean, these people like, you know, your Gateses and your Swabs and all these people, they're only gophers. | |
| They're rich gophers, but they're only gophers. | |
| And they are assets playing a role. | |
| They're not ultimately controlling anything. | |
| Absolutely, I agree. | |
| So this version's going out online on Twitter, so for people that want to get deeper into the non-human aspect that you write about, which book would you recommend people head to? | |
| Well, there's a few. | |
| Probably the best one, more recently, is Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told, which kind of covers it all, really. | |
| Okay, cool. | |
| Well, we'll put a link to that below the post. | |
| Thanks for watching with us on Twitter and on davidark.com. | |
| For the rest of the episode, head over to itonic.com where we'll be diving into a lot more topics this week. | |
| There's a lot of things that I've said over the years which were perceived to be crazy. | |
| and then suddenly they start to move mainstream. | |
| I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation. | |
| What is real? | |
| How do you define real? | |
| If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain. |
Export Selection