All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 1, 2024 - David Icke
34:04
The Soft Sell To The Same End - David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Quantum Hypno is a transformative approach that connects with the superconscious through the power of hypnosis.
I take the time to get to know you and create a relaxed setting where you can share your life story.
There's no rush or time pressure involved.
During the hypnosis session, you'll experience a natural and profound connection with the superconscious, accessing healing, wisdom and the answers that you've been seeking throughout your life.
Envision the ability to travel through time and space, recovering lost knowledge and exploring the universe.
This life-changing work has already helped thousands of people dealing with addictions, trauma, or a sense of being lost, enabling them to move forward in the right direction.
I've worked with people from all walks of life.
So what are you waiting for?
Hello everybody and welcome to this week's dot connector where as always we'll be bringing
you some much needed facts and context to events going on around the world.
Dad, how are you this week?
I'm good, mate.
Excellent.
Well, we're going to start with the self-proclaimed saviour of the world, Elon Musk, and his company Neuralink, who have successfully this week implanted a chip, microchip, into a human brain for the first time, which is something you've been writing about for decades now, has been the long-planned endgame, if you like, of this cult.
So what's your initial reaction to this story?
Totally predictable.
And by the way, he posts on his Twitter ex that it was a successful trial.
We don't know that.
He says that.
He says a lot of things don't turn out to be true.
But what we're looking at here is the difference, and they both end up in the same place, between full-on AI – oh, AI, yeah, great AI, do this, do that, take the world over, all that stuff – and what I'll call soft AI, or soft technocracy.
So what is that?
The first one is just pushing artificial intelligence blatantly openly because that's the cult agenda for the entirety of humanity and human society and indeed human thought and emotion to be controlled by artificial intelligence via connections through the brain.
So that's one side of it.
But there's a lot of people, understandably, not least in what we call the alternative media, who don't want that and can see the blatant, obvious control nature of what that system would do.
So you have to bring them along.
And then you have people like Elon Musk and others, there's Sam Altman's another one, his mate, who call for regulation.
And in Elon Musk's case, he says, oh, AI could be the end of humanity.
And then goes on rolling out more and more AI.
But the soft AI approach is, in Musk's words, that AI taking over is inevitable and is unstoppable.
And therefore, we have to respond to that if humanity is not going to be left behind in terms of the intelligence gap.
We have to be connected to artificial intelligence so that we can be super smart like the AI.
Now, what's the outcome of both the full-on, it's great, this is what's going to happen, and, oh, we're not sure, it's a bit worrying, but it's inevitable.
What's the outcome of both of them?
Microchip people, AI controlled people.
And so what you're seeing with the Musk psyop, and that's what it is, is trying to, and it's successful with staggering numbers, trying to pull along people that would normally push back against this and draw them in as well.
And I have seen this week, In response to this, some members of the so-called, in often their cases, alternative media, who have not pushed back against this and not exposed it in the way that it should be, and would have happened had Musk not have been handed Twitter X,
Where instead of saying, oh here we go, which they would have done before, before he took Twitter over.
Here we go.
This is just a stepping stone to microchip people.
We can see what's happening here.
Instead, you've got, well, you know, it could be good for people who, you know, who are seriously injured and if they can do technology with their mind, it would help them.
But as long as it, you know, doesn't go too far.
The point is that many, many years ago I said that one of the ways they're going to justify foot in the door, thin end of the wedge, The rolling out of AI-controlled attached people is, first of all, to say what a great thing it would be for people who have injuries that mean they can't use their limbs.
And I said it would also be pushed on the basis of, well, if you chipped Alzheimer's patients and you chipped people with dementia in general, then you know, you'd always know where they were.
And children.
I mean, it would be an end to lost children.
And of course, we've already got chipped animals and chipped dogs.
These are all stepping stones towards where it's planned to go.
And what has been announced this week in terms of Neuralink is another stepping stone.
The point is, though, That Musk's Neuralink technology is so far back off the cutting edge, it's laughable.
The idea that you would have to cut open the skull and put probes in the brain It's ridiculous because the plan is, and it's being done with the fake Covid vaccines and in other ways too, it's meant to be done through nanotechnology.
And I found a clip of Elon Musk when I was writing The Dream in which he was questioned on this in an interview.
Well, you know, people, when they, you know, And he said, oh, well, you don't necessarily have to do it like that.
You can put it in through the veins.
Which is what the fake vaccines are all about.
Digital intelligence revolves around eliminating the I.O.
constraint.
So it's some sort of direct cortical interface.
And you called it a neural lace?
Neural lace, yeah.
It's totally not Google Glass, right?
No.
I'm talking about something which... So you wear it?
No, I mean it would be...
I mean there are a few ways to approach this, but some sort of interface directly with your cortical neurons particularly.
But doesn't that imply surgical insertion?
Not necessarily.
You could go through the veins and arteries because that provides a complete roadway to all of your neurons.
Your neurons are very heavy users of energy, so they need high blood flow.
So you automatically with your veins and arteries have a road network to your neurons.
Still some kind of surgery, right?
Yes, but you could insert something, you know, basically, you know, into the jugular and have... It gets macabre.
It sounds really easy and... It doesn't involve... It doesn't involve, you know, like, chopping your skull off or anything like that.
That's good.
Yeah.
So, in many ways, what's happening with this Neuralink is a kind of diversion because it's not the cutting edge and it's not going to end
up the way it appears to be at the moment. The other thing about Musk, and this is basically
his big, big role in the cult agenda, it's to sell concepts.
Yep.
So through Tesla, he's selling and promoting the concept of electrical autonomous vehicles.
With Neuralink, he's selling the concept of Implanted people connected to artificial intelligence and being able to interact with technology.
And through SpaceX, which is basically a NASA Pentagon operation, where they get massive funding from, he's selling the idea of low-orbit satellites firing 5G, 6G, 7G to come at eventually every inch of the planet.
And that's creating the so-called cloud to which the technology, the implants, are supposed to be connected to so that we become this hive mind.
And it's, you know, sad for me To see an alternative media, not everybody, the real, real alternative people, and there are lots of them, can see it.
But what I call the mainstream alternative media, for them not to react In the way they would have done before he got Twitter X and say, look, we can see where this is going.
This is a stepping stone to microchip people.
They are prevaricating in a way they wouldn't have before.
And that, of course, is the very reason that the deep state that owned Twitter handed it to him.
Because now he's this hero, it means that you've got this cognitive dissonance where he's doing all these things that are pushing on the cult agenda.
But because he's apparently, apparently, a free speech guy with Twitter X, then a lot of the things they would have called out would have been obvious to them.
They're not, because, oh no, well, Twitter is one of us.
Well, if you look at my Twitter page, my ex-page, the number of people they call followers, in other words, people that follow the page, goes constantly up.
Every day it's higher than the day before.
And it's, it's gone up sort of more than 100,000, 110,000, something like that, since not long before Christmas.
But the number of people who view the posts has gone down and down and down.
And the more I've called out Musk, the further it's gone down.
So at the same time, major players in the alternative media mainstream, they're being promoted algorithmically, and being promoted with high profile interviews.
And so this is not a free speech platform.
It's a we're going to promote those that we want to be out there saying what we hear and know further in terms of the way they're what they're talking about.
Yeah.
we're going to suppress those that go much, much further than that.
I mean, there's a guy we both know in Canada, Joss Sigurdsson, whose numbers are ridiculous.
I mean, he just gets sometimes a few hundred views of his posts, and some of his posts
are excellent, far more incisive than those that get big, big views because they're algorithmically
supported.
So all this has been, Jay, this week is more confirmation of where the agenda is going,
AI-controlled people, but also the way the Musk phenomenon is being manipulated to entrance
so many in the so-called alternative.
Bye.
Yeah, it certainly is.
It kind of echoes of what we speak about last week with Donald Trump.
And you were saying in these key years leading up to 2030, no way they're not going to have, you know, one of their own in position of power.
And it's kind of the same with Musk.
Maybe people like Gates and Soros have so much baggage now In the sense of, you know, as soon as they say something, the alternative media would call it out, or they would have absolutely called out this Nooraling story if Gates had said it.
But because it's Musk, they don't.
Maybe that's why they've brought him in.
If I can just take you back a minute.
That's absolutely why they've brought him in.
Absolutely.
He's got first.
Twitter X to give him the Qdos Within great swathes of what I call the pushbackers, so that he can pied piper great swathes of the pushbackers to the edge of the same cliff that the full-blown AI people, the direction that they're taking society.
Yeah, he's also delaying like Trump did as well, isn't he?
If we can go back a minute, there's a really interesting point that came that reminded me, when I was reading the story yesterday, reminded me of the section of your talk, your presentation, the full day one, when you talk about Agenda 2030 and the sales pitches that you couldn't really argue with.
So like, you know, everyone has clean water.
Yeah, great sales pitch.
And when I was reading the story about the person who was paralyzed, who was able to walk as a result of some implant, it just went, well, this is exactly what the sales pitch is going to be.
It's going to help people who are paralyzed, people with psychological disorders and so on.
Yeah, that sales pitch is exactly that.
It's a sales pitch, isn't it?
And I think that's a very clear and important point to raise to people, that what they're telling you they're doing it for is really not.
Yeah, it's exploitation of that excuse.
Now, I'm not against technology, full stop, end of story.
Where technology serves humanity, I don't have a problem with that.
Where humanity serves technology, that's where I have the bloody problem.
And that's what we're looking at.
That's what's happening.
I mean, you've only got to look at the smartphone addiction to see how people are serving the phone, not the phone serving them in terms of dominance.
And so you You look at people who have physical problems and if there's technology that can help them,
Then it should be used to help them as long as it stays where it is.
But the other point is this, and I mentioned that earlier, how far from the cutting edge that the neural link technology is.
And that is outside the public domain, where the cutting edge of technology is light years ahead of anything you see publicly.
Whatever you see publicly is not exactly the Stone Age, but it's way back from what they have in the underground bases and the secret projects.
If they really wanted to help people in the way we're talking about, they'd roll that technology out.
It would be far more effective and it would be far less invasive and far less potentially controlling.
But they don't.
And they don't because it's an excuse.
And we need to see through this.
Otherwise, the soft technocracy is going to take us to the same point of control as full-blown technocracy.
Yeah, it absolutely is, and we're being sleepwalked into it.
Just a final one on this.
How important, or is it relevant at all, the timing of this?
Do you feel like this is maybe a switch has been flicked and we're going to see this technology agenda move quite rapidly from here, or do you think it's just... Oh, certainly.
I mean, you know, what I've just said a few minutes ago, about the cutting edge of technology in the underground bases and the secret projects being way ahead of anything we see in the public arena.
It's that's the reason why there seems to be this seamless rolling out of more and more sophisticated technology.
without any delay.
It's like one just follows the other and it's getting faster and faster and faster.
And the reason they can do that is it already exists.
They're not having to invent it.
It exists. It's just a matter of creating cover stories to justify how it comes into the
public arena.
Oh, this guy and a geek in a garage in Silicon Valley has discovered this, or whatever.
But actually, it's coming out of the underground bases of secret projects on places like DARPA, the technological development arm of the Pentagon, and IQT, In-Q-Tel, the technological development arm of the CIA.
That's where all this stuff is coming, and massively out of the military.
And so the speed that it's going to play out is going to get faster.
It already is.
And you know, this stuff about, oh, we need regulation that comes from people like Musk
and are we going to be careful?
It's all just rhetoric and window dressing because the thing just rolls out faster and
faster and he's helping to do it by the technology and AI that he's being a front man for.
And, you know, this 2030 is a real target year before that too, but that's really a target year when AI really starts to blatantly run everything.
My God, how much has it run already?
Because I've said before, there's a race going on.
between people awakening to this and reaching a point of AI technological control
through the digital currency, digital money, and 15-minute cities and all that,
where they will lock down people, literally, and control people to an extent
that will be very, very difficult to emerge from.
And so there's this race where they want the technological control system in place
before enough people have awakened to it to stop it happening.
And so, yes, it is going to get quicker and quicker, not least for that reason,
because they are seeking to get this in place as fast as possible.
And like I say, what Elon Musk and his ilk are doing is targeting those that are resistant to it
to persuade them to go there anyway under another guise.
And unfortunately, so many are falling for it.
And actually, just a final point on this actually, I just thought while you were talking, is to look at this I guess from the esoteric angle as well, which you've written about, which is there's been so many things through this whole agenda that have been trying to disconnect us from whatever you want to call it, Source, Infinite Consciousness, some people call it God.
This is almost like, you know, the final endgame of that, isn't it?
They've done it through Perception Program, they've done it through food, through vaccines, through other things.
But if you literally put technology in the brain, you've completely severed that connection with whatever is out there, which, that's the endgame, isn't it?
Well, that's really the whole bottom line for all of it.
Up to this point, they have manipulated perception.
They have to manipulate perception, because then they manipulate behaviour.
And they have manipulated perception by control of information.
I mean, if you look back, religion was a phenomenal controller of information.
You could be burned at the stake if you didn't believe the religious fairy story at one point.
So you look at religion and then you look at all these other things that are going on now, not least censorship on a mass scale, and it's all manipulating access to information, which means manipulation of perception.
And, you know, that's been a long battle and it can get very complex sometimes for them.
But what if you didn't have to do that anymore?
All you had to do was connect the human brain to artificial intelligence, not least via this cloud.
And then from a central point, You could dictate what people thought and how they emotionally responded, because that's the idea.
You know, there was a Star Trek storyline involving something called the Borg.
Remember that?
Yep.
And the Borg were a collective They were kind of part biological, part technological.
And they would get what they call called nanoprobes, which they would put into their targets.
And from that moment, their targets would become part of the collective hive mind of the Borg.
So it got bigger and bigger and bigger and it was centrally controlled by a central controller.
Congratulations.
Regarding.
Assimilation is complete.
300,000 individuals have been transformed into drones.
Should they be congratulated as well?
They should be.
They've left behind their trivial, selfish lives.
And they've been reborn with a greater purpose.
We've delivered them from chaos into order.
Comforting words.
Use them next time instead of resistance is futile.
You may elicit a few volunteers.
You cling to sarcasm because you are afraid to see the truth.
Species 10026 is already adding to our perfection.
You can feel their distinctiveness coursing through us.
Enhancing us.
Stop resisting.
Take pleasure in this.
I will not take pleasure in the destruction of a race!
Human sentiment.
Compassion.
Guilt.
Empathy.
They're irrelevant.
Not to me.
Me?
There is no me.
There is only us.
One mind.
My thoughts are my own.
You look now when they were talking in Star Trek about this being done through nanoprobes in people.
And we've got it!
We now call it nanobots and nanomachines and smart dust and neural dust and what have you.
This stuff exists.
And if you look at the basic storyline of the Borg, you're looking at actually what's happening now.
And people like Elon Musk will well know that.
He just doesn't want you to know.
Yeah, it's a form of pre-emptive programming as well, isn't it?
You know, people can relate to the Borg and they can relate to things like Avatar, because those films have been made which plant that seed.
You've written about that previously as well, haven't you?
Yeah, I mean, there's a lot of predictive programming going on, which is basically normalizing the very otherwise abnormal.
It's very simple.
You know, if you bring in something that is dramatically different to what's gone before, then the response will be obviously, what the hell is going on?
What's this?
So what you do in your films and in your TV and what have you, and your culture in general, is you put out these themes as fiction.
And what they're doing is preparing you subconsciously and eventually consciously to be familiar with something that you would otherwise have reeled back from.
There's a kind of familiarity about it.
Basically what predictive programming is doing is easing the way psychologically for people to accept what would otherwise be unacceptable.
So this is all going on and of course the bottom line of every bottom line is control of perception.
And what is AI control of the brain except the, I guess, in human terms, the ultimate control of perception?
And beyond that, you know, they're talking now about transforming the body from human 1.0 to human 2.0, a much more synthetic human body.
That's why synthetic biology or syn-bio is this massively expanding discipline in science now.
But that's the stepping stone as well.
And it's the stepping stone to actually dispensing with the body altogether and just uploading consciousness into cyberspace.
It's what the metaverse thing is all about, really, ultimately.
So that your perception is completely controlled by cyberspace.
Because what they're after is your consciousness.
And more than that, in terms of the energy that they feed off from us, a low vibrational, emotional and mental states, it's to control the perceptions of that consciousness in a way that will produce this low vibrational energy that they feed off.
So, if you are in a state of joy and happiness, that's your state of consciousness, that's no good for them.
No.
They want you to be in fear, in anxiety, in depression, resentment, in hatred, in regret, all these things.
Because that's going to produce the energy on a frequency you can absorb.
Now, if you get control of the brain and you're dictating the thought patterns and emotional responses, because the brain is communicating with the rest of the body all the time and vice versa, then you control the mental and emotional state and responses of the population.
And if you can get consciousness Enslaved and imprisoned in cyberspace, again an artificial reality, then you can dictate its state of being, thus the energy it gives off.
This is so much bigger than the mainstream alternative media on almost anyone else to be honest.
grasps in terms of what's going on and we are poking around in the
symptoms and not seeing the cause. It certainly is and that's why they've been
promoted and people questioning the real motives and real story behind on.
Well, thanks Dad.
If you're watching us on davidart.com or social media, that's it for this free episode.
If you want to head over to iconic.com to watch the rest, we're going to be talking about the attack on the US base in Jordan, we're going to be talking about the post office scandal here in the UK, Lawrence Fox's libel case, and much more.
more, so head over there.
and then suddenly they start to move mainstream.
I'm waiting for someone to convince me that we don't live in a simulation.
What is real?
How do you define real?
If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, taste and see, then real is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.
▲
Export Selection