All Episodes
Nov. 16, 2023 - David Icke
42:16
The Surveillance War With China - Former CIA Caseworker Brian Fairchild Joins Gareth Icke Tonight
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You'll own nothing.
You'll have no privacy.
But don't panic.
You're going to be happy about it.
It's Thursday night.
It's Gareth Hite tonight.
While all eyes are understandably on Gaza and the siege of Al-Shifa hospital, the agenda
to completely enslave humanity is still rolling on, full throttle.
Now I get why all eyes are on Gaza, mine have been too.
There's something about a well-equipped, Western-backed and completely unaccountable army bombing hospitals and massacring children indiscriminately, and then lying about it, that distracts you from day-to-day life.
And before you come at me with the Hamas are using human shields or Israel only targets terrorist fighters, that's Hasbro nonsense, I'll quote Daniel Hagari, an official of the Israeli Defence Forces.
His quote, the emphasis is on damage, not on accuracy.
Wow, it's the world's most moral army, that is.
This week in 1984, the right to protest is under threat from politicians, from the mainstream media, and ironically, from many of those that took to the streets over the last three years to protest for their rights.
They're now some of the loudest voices calling for these rights to be revoked.
It's a funny old world, isn't it?
And it's becoming more and more divided.
At face value, all world events look separate from one another, but everything's connected to everything else.
Covid, Ukraine, the Middle East, climate change, mass immigration, censorship, you name it, the strands connect.
Klaus Schwab, the unelected shaved bollock in charge of the World Economic Forum, is back, pushing his demonic dystopia upon the masses.
We have to get used to having an erosion of privacy, because if you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to worry about, have you?
Right?
Let's have a look at your hard drive then, shall we, Klaus?
I bet it's just innocent cat videos on that bad boy, innit?
No clandestine communications with the selected world leaders that you own.
Course not.
And that's the most important point here.
Because you can listen to Schwab's ramblings and simply put them down to verbal diarrhea coming from a madman, and you'd be right.
But this lunatic has everyone under his wing.
In the UK, you get to choose between Sunak and Starmer at the next election, both World Economic Forum.
So whichever one you vote for, it's a vote for Klaus.
And the same goes for nations all over the world.
And it's not just politics either, but all areas of finance, technology, medicine, military.
If it affects humanity, he's got his grabby little mitts in it.
And that's why it doesn't matter who you vote for.
Because when it comes to the major cult agendas that the World Economic Forum is pushing, the opposition parties that spend every other day arguing, calling each other names, they're suddenly all aligned.
Just like that.
Just this week, Israel's First Lady Nikki Haley has taken time out of calling everything anti-Semitic and warning about the dangers of China to demand that everyone on social media needs to be verified for national security reasons.
Sounds a bit like China that does, Nikki.
Of course it does, because that's the idea.
The National Health Service is overrun in the UK with patient backlogs at an all-time high.
Millions await treatment.
That's another great symptom of lockdowns.
But they're looking to fix the problem of these patient waiting lists, just as they hit 7.7 million, and that's to be commended.
So how are they going to do it?
They're going to hire more doctors and nurses, maybe field hospitals in local village halls.
No, no, no, no.
It's way more innovative than that.
They're going to monitor people's fridges and kettles with AI to determine what they're consuming.
Now, this pilot scheme will allow doctors to see what people are eating so they can have a word.
That's not sinister at all.
And it's certainly not another step down the road to complete surveillance and a Chinese-style social credit system.
And that's where the Middle East and the chess pieces being moved towards World War 3 come in.
Russia, Iran, China and selected others versus the West.
It's been planned for a long, long time.
And all those people pushing for this war, they should know the West ain't meant to win the third one.
Brian Fairchild is a former CIA caseworker who served with the Central Intelligence Agency for nearly 20 years, specialising in counter-terrorism and working on missions all over the world.
Brian's been outspoken about the current state of the CIA and the dangers that the West faces.
He's the author of a novel called The Hidden, where he writes about an AI-driven intelligence war between the US And China.
Brian, welcome to the show.
To begin, can you tell us how you how you got into the CIA?
Because I'm looking at it and I'm thinking becoming a spy doesn't feel like a job you'd apply for at the local job center.
Well, you're probably right there.
And the way I got into it is when I was there were a couple of couple of ways that I wangled my way over.
Uh, the first one is that when I was 13, I lived in Mesa, Arizona, all desert saguaro cactuses around.
And, uh, I read Jack London's, uh, book from the Call of the Wild.
And from that point on, I mean, my, I had captured my imagination and, uh, I wanted to do things that involved adventure.
So when I was 14 years old.
I had moved to Boulder, Colorado.
Lived on the foothills of the Rocky Mountains.
And I went to a movie once.
I went to see James Bond, Sean Connery playing James Bond in From Russia With Love.
And I tell you, you know, from that point on, you know, that was a job I wanted to do.
And everything about the movie, Gareth, you know, just captured my imagination.
It was in Istanbul, Turkey.
They spoke Turkish.
You know, there are foreign, you know, foreign outfits and clothes and James Bond would go into his hotel room and and check for bugs all around and, you know, do cool things like that.
Remember, I'm 14 years old and they would go below Istanbul and down into the down into the bowels of Istanbul and secret passages and they would spy on the Russians.
They even had a like a submarine periscope that they could bring up into Soviet spaces and Right about that time, I figured that's what I wanted to do.
And of course, he got the girl, right?
Tatiana Romano.
Yeah, that might have been something to do with it.
But, but, you know, so as soon as that movie was over, I'm like, man, I got to do something about this.
I got to find out about this.
So I went down to the Boulder Public Library, because this is way before computers and iPhones.
And I searched that library from top to bottom, Gareth, and I couldn't find not even one book written for 14-year-old wannabe spies.
They had a couple of adult books on intelligence, and I'd get those, and I'd try my best to find James Bond in there somewhere, but I just couldn't seem to do it.
So I figured, well, my next step is to write to CIA.
So I wrote to CIA and well, I'm embarrassed to say I didn't actually write.
I got lined paper and a pencil and I wrote in all capital block letters and pencil, Dear CIA, you know, I am a 14 year old student in Centennial Junior High School and I would like to be a spy.
Can you tell me how to do that, please?
Regards, Brian Fairchild.
And I got a stamp from my mom and I send it off.
And, uh, lo and behold, about two weeks later, I came back from school and, and there's an envelope placed up against my, uh, uh, my pillow.
And I'm thinking right now, I'm thinking, Oh, I'm in trouble because I see an 11 envelope.
It says it's a Mr. Fairchild.
And I'm thinking that's my dad, the only Mr. Fairchild I had ever known was my dad.
And I'm figuring they're calling these, you know, writing back to my dad saying, you know, control your son, we're busy men, we don't have
time for this sort of thing, you know, so just, you know, get him out of our hair. But as I read
the letter, it became apparent that when they said Mr. Fairchild, they were talking to me. And
I mean, my self, self, you know, you know, respect when shooting through the, shooting
through the roof.
I mean, this guy was actually writing to me and using my name and calling me mister.
And it wasn't just a form letter either, Gareth.
It was on two pages, a CIA stationery, colored stationery.
And it was two pages of the Todorovich plan.
I mean, he really gave me a plan.
He sat down and he thought about it and he said, great.
Great that, you know, Brian, great that young guys like yourself are interested in serving the country.
And it's great that you guys, that you specifically want to come to CIA.
And here's some advice for you.
Stay in junior high school and stay in high school.
You know, do your best that you can in high school.
If you go on to China and go on to, uh, uh, to college, I would recommend that you take international relations or international politics or Any kind of area studies or a language is good.
Military experience is good.
Those sorts of things set you up for a good career in CIA and six months prior to you wanting to take, you know, Take control and become CIA officer.
You get back in contact with us again and we'll put you through some interviews and some, you know, interim assignments and do a background investigation on you, give you a polygraph and, and you can come on board.
And I mean, that was for me, that was fantastic.
I mean, I, I slept with that thing under my bed for, you know, several weeks afterwards.
And, uh, And every time I came, you know, in life, when I came from one of those crossroads where, you know, I had to choose something, I would choose according to the Todorovich.
And even his name, I mean, Mikhail Todorovich.
You know, I just see him from Russia with love and I'm hearing all these Russians and these KGB guys and Tatyana Ulmanova, you know, all this sort of thing.
And the guy's name is Michael Todorovich.
And that's, it was a real name.
I mean, it wasn't just a copy name.
Later on, when I got into the agency, I talked to people about Mike Kudorovich, and they all knew him.
They said, oh yeah, Mike's a great guy.
He was out in Denver for a while, wasn't he?
Yeah, he did that.
He was involved in Iran-Contra somehow, but he was a good case officer and a good man.
I was lucky to get one of the good ones who was willing to spend some time with a You know, an obviously unsophisticated kid who is, you know, looking for a job at CIA and to really give me his best advice.
So I mean, that's how it happened.
Wow.
So once you were in the CIA, how did your day to day work differ from, you know, that Hollywood version, that from Russia with love version of the CIA?
Yeah, well, this is all going to track and build on each other.
So right now, the way Well, back then, first of all, I got to say CIA was and is intended to be the most, the biggest and the best, you know, national strategic intelligence agency for the United States government.
So at that time, all case officers in CIA, you lived overseas, you spoke languages, you Yeah, you got to know the countries and the regions that you were in you.
You got to know the politics and the religion.
I mean, you know, you got to know the place like an expert because that was your job.
And then what you did is you went out and you recruited foreign spies.
So you would make friends with, you know, people in the government from that country or from other countries like, you know, if you're in Costa Rica, maybe you're doing operations against Russians and Chinese.
It all depends on what your targets are, but you do that every day and you try to build relationships and find a way of pitching somebody that will make sense to them.
Uh, a lot of my colleagues, you know, would, would pitch people and say, man, I really need this next promotion.
And if you could just help me, you know, if you could work with me for a while here and in a clandestine relationship, boy, that helped me a lot, but you know, that's the worst way to do it.
I mean, you have to come at it from their point of view, sort of like, you know, you know, Hey, Yvonne Ivanovich, I know the baby needs a new pair of shoes and your wife needs a new operation.
You know, you're just not making the rent here.
And so maybe I can help out somehow, you know, that kind of thing.
So, you know, so that's what the case officer's job was.
And then the way they would bring you into it, it was like a fortune 500 corporation.
So they would, you know, they would go out and, and, and try to get 20 somethings to write applications, send the right applications in.
And then they would go through those applications, you know, Throw most of them away and then find just those that they thought they really wanted and really needed and then they would offer you a position.
Then once you were offered the position, then they would start teaching you all the rudimentaries of what a CIA officer was.
What is CIA?
What offices are in CIA?
Who is the boss of CIA?
Who's the boss of your operational office?
How do you write for CIA?
You know, what is our real purpose, you know, in CIA?
And then when you had enough of that sort of thing, and you sort of been run around the campus and different offices and things, then they would send you down to the farm, which is our training facility, and you would learn, you know, clandestine tradecraft.
You know, how to follow somebody, how to determine if you're being followed, what a dead drop is, how do you load and unload dead drops, and how do you make signals to show the guy you're sending the dead drop to that the dead drop is loaded and it's ready and he can go and do it.
So, you do that sort of thing.
That's basically how we did it.
What's a dead drop?
Sorry, forgive my ignorance.
A dead drop is like...
Uh, you know, well you can see me here, like, let's say this, this pillbox has some secrets in it.
Okay.
Right?
Well, I find a place, I've been walking out in a park somewhere, and I find a place where, while I'm probably under surveillance, I can, you know, my, I channel my surveillance team to where it's coming behind me, And then I find a place, just the perfect place for this.
And as I walk by, I barely move, but I take this out and I slip it under a little piece of wood here.
And I just keep walking on.
And so you can't see, you know, it's hidden enough to where, I mean, unless somebody's going to stop and start searching everything.
No the your surveillance coming behind you still has you in sight still is trying to figure out what you're doing and you've loaded this dead drop with secret information and you just moved on now somebody and then later on you know I I walk by a wall or something I have a piece of chalk and as I turn the you know turn the wall turn in the corner and there's a wall there you know I'm looking at the the addresses of the wall and I just nick that wall with a With a piece of chalk and that's the signal.
So some guy coming the next day coming from the other direction from way off can see the signals on the wall.
He knows that that dead drop is loaded and that he can go and pick it up.
So he's just going to go make sure that there's nobody sitting on it right at that time.
And maybe he'll sit down on the bench and he'll take out a book and when he leaves he'll just, you know, put his hand underneath and grab that thing and walk away.
So that's what a dead drop is.
Got ya.
Do you know what?
I'm so glad you said that because I saw something like that happen years and years ago in my early 20s.
Really?
On Embankment, which is on the Thames, I was in London at the time for a weekend playing some shows, because I used to be a musician in a previous life, and I saw someone leave something and I looked and I went to go, oh, and then someone walked past and picked it up.
And when I told all my friends, no one would have it.
No one would have it.
But honestly, I remember what I saw.
After all your experience, you know, 20 years traveling around the world, when you look at the world now, what do you see as the biggest threat?
Because I know you've spoke a lot about AI and surveillance in that sense.
The problem is, okay, so I've got to build up some background.
Okay, so CIA is supposed to be the United States government's premier strategic intelligence agency.
Right from there, people say, well, what does that mean?
Well, strategic is different from tactical.
Strategic is the big picture, the long run, you know, what is China doing right now?
What kind of a threat is China?
How is China developing, you know, additional threats to us?
And what's it going to be like in 2025 or 2027?
I mean, what direction are we going in?
You know, big grand strategy stuff.
We're tactical, like if you were a paramilitary case officer, tactical is you have your weapon, you have a helicopter, you get in the helicopter, you go off to some Coordinates that you have, you find the terrorist you're looking for and you capture or kill them.
You know, so two different kinds of things, you know, paramilitary operations and espionage operations.
Because espionage operations are, you know, are precisely you living, working in a country as for as long as you can, learning the language, knowing the people, Finding, identifying targets that have access to secret information, whether it's in ministries or in some shop somewhere, you know, whatever kind of intelligence you need, you find the best place to get that.
And then you recruit sources, you know, from among those people that have access.
So that's the, that's the basic difference between the two, two kinds.
But, For 20 years, CIA basically just focused on counterterrorism, right?
So, I mean, we were set up to go against the Soviet Union.
But in 1991, the Soviet Union went belly up.
And from that point on, CIA didn't have a primary mission.
You know, its primary mission was the Russians, the Soviets.
So for 10 years, CIA basically wandered aimlessly looking for a new primary mission.
Something would come up and they would, yes, sir, we can do that over in Grenada or we can do that, you know, over wherever it is.
And they would go and run and do an operation and try to keep relevant, you know, somehow.
But they just didn't have a mission and they were, you know, they were just drifting.
And so they started closing down stations and stations and closing down bases and Bringing case officers home, bringing them back to headquarters and Gareth, nobody, no case officer in his right mind wanted to have anything to do with headquarters and walking the halls of headquarters because you were spies, you know.
And if you're a spy, you're supposed to be recruiting foreign nationals and penetrating those governments, you know, with those foreign national spies.
You can't do that from Virginia.
So you basically have to be overseas.
So we always wanted to be overseas.
Now, contrast that to, okay, so that's the basis of the conversation, but then 10 years later, after the Soviets went belly up, so they went belly up in 2001, it wasn't until September 11th, 2001, 10 years later, when CIA already all of a sudden got a new mission, a new primary mission, and it was Counter-terrorism.
But it was very narrow counter-terrorism.
It wasn't counter-terrorism large.
It wasn't strategic counter-terrorism.
It was military-age male counter-terrorism.
So their idea was kinetic.
You find a terrorist, fix his place, and then finish him.
You either go and capture or kill him.
So find, fix, and finish is how the paramilitary guys would talk about it.
But a whole different thing than espionage.
So for 20 years, though, counterterrorism was the thing.
And while there were a few operations going on around China and other countries, just so they could keep things in the budget line and submit budgets and get some money for some of these other ancillary sorts of things, for all intents and purposes, CIA was a counterterrorism unit.
And they did that for 20 years.
So, Gareth, what that means is that from an institutional point of view, if you become a counterterrorism service, all the people you hire, you're hiring for counterterrorism skills.
All the money you get from Congress is for counterterrorism operations.
All the committees that you deal with, the intelligence committees and so forth and so on, are all discussing with you counterterrorism.
Everything is counterterrorism.
And so there's not a whole lot of room there for China and hypersonic missiles or any of that sort of stuff.
It's all just right down the line, you know.
And one of the reasons why was because when the Soviet Union went belly up, We had a very famous congressman by the name of Daniel Patrick Moynihan.
And in that time period, 1991, Daniel Patrick Moynihan went to the then director of CIA, Jim Woolsey, and he went over to Jim and he said, Hey, Jim, do we even really need you guys?
I mean, do we need a CIA?
I mean, there's an end to history.
And you guys won.
I mean, you won the Cold War.
Good for you.
But do we even really need this stuff anymore?
So, I mean, it was going that direction.
And that's why they were closing bases and downsizing and trying to figure out what their mission was going to be.
But once they got to 9-11, then they got into high gear.
But it was all on counterterrorism.
And they did that for 20 years.
Pretty much solely just that for 20 years.
Right.
And so go ahead.
So I was gonna say so.
So when it comes to say, China, then, is it do you believe that they basically just took their eyes off the ball?
And now?
Yeah, okay.
Yeah, they did, obviously.
And then so that builds into my next phase here, is that while we're focused so, so narrowly on counterterrorism, the world grew up around us.
And we didn't pay attention.
Right?
So, and to give you a good example, in 2013-2014, the Chinese started to build their man-made islands in the South China Sea.
And, you know, there were people, people like me and others, you know, that would write papers and say, China's doing this in the South China Sea, this is not good, you know, why isn't anybody paying attention to this?
But no, they were just doing counter-terrorism.
So, Four years later, in 2018, an admiral by the name of Davidson, who became the commanding officer of Indo-Pacific Command, was testifying before Congress.
And he said, gentlemen, for all intents and purposes, except for war with the United States, China controls the entire South China Sea.
That was 2018, right?
They started building the islands in 2014.
2015, Xi Jinping told President Obama, I give you my word, we will not militarize these islands.
And then he went and did precisely that.
And then a couple years later in 2018, they controlled the South China Sea.
And then they're doing other things.
They're building, you know, the People's Liberation Army Rocket Force.
And the People's Liberation Rocket Force, People's Liberation Army Rocket Force, Gareth, is the most, it's the largest, most diverse rocket force on Earth.
And in 2021, the U.S.
Army did a report on those missiles.
But they just singled out anti-ship missiles.
So they, the Chinese, they've got nuclear missiles, you know, conventional ballistic missiles.
They've got air-to-air, air-to-surface missiles.
They got all kinds of missiles, right?
The largest, most diverse kind of a missile defense force.
But the Army just singled out anti-ship missiles and said in that 1921, 2021 report that China has so many anti-ship missiles that it can hit every American surface combatant in the South China Sea To the point where they've used up all of their defense capabilities, you know, missile defense capabilities.
Now they're depleted.
They have no more.
And China still has more anti-ship missiles to pound them into submission and sink them.
So, you know, so that's the sort of thing that what was going on while we were focused on nothing but terrorism.
Life went on and the rest of the world overtook us.
Then they developed this, this thing called a hypersonic missile.
And Gareth, I'm sure you heard, you know, what about hypersonic missiles.
Maybe a lot of your, your listeners don't know exactly what they are, but whereas a ballistic missile will take off from a given point and make an arc and that arc will then come down and they'll hit the target.
But that arc is a way that you can shoot it down.
You can, you have the time and you can see what the arc is.
You can do the math and you can hit, hit the target on its way down.
But with a hypersonic missile, you can't do that.
Because first of all, hypersonic means, you know, faster than the speed of sound.
So Mach 5 is the speed of sound.
Some of these missiles are Mach 18, Mach 20, and they can be launched.
They can be launched, you know, they don't, they don't have to do the art.
They can be launched from the air.
They can be launched from the ground.
They can be launched from submarines and they don't do this.
They do this.
Oh, okay.
So you can't even judge where it's going.
They're so damn fast that you can't, your defenses can't find them and fix the target on them because they're just so fast, but they can go around your air defense capabilities and they can go below the radar and they're just like moving like this and we can't do anything about it.
So the The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the guy who just left, Mark Milley, when he was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he said, you know, the Chinese just did a big hypersonic missile test.
And he said, this is concerning for us because we have no defenses.
There's nothing we can do to defend against these missiles.
I mean, that's pretty scary stuff, right?
And then when you add to that, that they have range, And that they can reach Guam and they can reach Okinawa, you know, the key bases that we would operate from in any kind of a confrontation with China in the South China Sea or around Taiwan, we have no defenses.
You know, so the Chinese have, you know, have the advantage on us right there.
So that's why you see, like, you've seen the Chinese barricade Taiwan at least three separate times.
Right.
And they barricaded Taiwan and all of our guys, all the carrier, you know, task groups stay way away.
Because if they get too close, they can't get close enough to launch their attacks before the Chinese can hit us with missiles and knock them out of the sea.
That's a very scary thing.
It's incredible the technology that people can create to kill people, not so much to feed people.
Do you think this is where it's going to go?
With everything that's happening in the Middle East at the moment, there's chess pieces being moved by different nations.
You've got what's going on, like you said, in the in the South China Sea, Russia, Ukraine.
It feels like, you know, you've got all these warships in the Mediterranean.
Do you think we're at a point now where actually it's going to take one little spark and the whole thing is going to go off?
Well, that's that's a big fear for everybody.
But here's the deal.
It's even worse than that, because, first of all, the United States government as an entity doesn't have a plan.
None of the stuff you see happening around the world, whether putting our naval assets in the Mediterranean or sending, you know, carrier battle groups to quell a problem in North Korea or the stuff that we're doing down in Ukraine or hoping to do, you know, around Taiwan.
None of that, all that's like knee-jerk reaction stuff.
None of it is a plan.
So, you need a plan, right?
I mean, we haven't had a plan.
The United States government, as an entity, hasn't had a plan since World War II and the, you know, trying to figure out how we're going to get all our men and materiel on the D-Day beaches and, you know, for the invasion of Europe to go after Mussolini and Hitler.
You know, so we haven't had a plan since then.
We're just doing this knee-jerk reaction stuff.
So you've got to have a plan, but we're just not very good at that sort of thing.
So my urging for the next person who becomes President of the United States, I would say, if I was on the National Security Council and the President said, Brian, what do we need to do?
I'd say, well, Mr. President, Madam President, we need a plan.
And I don't mean just a couple of things that people say, oh, you know, China's important to us, Europe's important to us.
Oh, the Middle East is important to us.
That's not good enough.
I mean, we got to dig into the weeds and we've got to say, what are our real vital emergency national interests?
And get people from out of the government, people in the government that are experts on this and come to a consensus as to what the United States most vital national security interests are.
And then report back to me.
So that happens.
And then I, you know, the president gets the report and goes, Okay, I agree.
I think I'll argue with you a couple things about here in Europe and a couple things over here in Asia.
But basically, I think you guys have done a great job.
But now, I need you to tell me, now that we've identified our most vital national interest, do we have the capabilities to protect those interests or to project our power?
And I want your recommendation to what we need to do about that.
And then the team, the plan team, Has to come all together and you can't have you can't have CIA and other organizations doing special things and they will.
They'll do this.
So they'll say, oh, let's go do this operation over here.
And when we're successful, that would really look good for CIA.
But we're talking about maintaining control of the world here.
You know, we we're trying to we're trying to build a plan that will keep the United States in a geopolitical leadership position, you know, if at all possible.
So what you've got to do is sit down with those experts And all the intelligence agencies and say, okay, you know, CIA, you're responsible for this, this, this, this, and this.
And we got to know this, these bottom line pieces of information for me, the president to make a decent policy and the military, you know, what capabilities you need to make.
So get out there and start making them get through the red tape, open up some more ship building capability.
You know, the state department, we got to do this.
But it's all got to be focused on the plan.
Right, because if you don't have a plan that everybody's working on, that makes sense, that's a strategic plan that's going to bring you out the other side better than you went in.
Then you might as well not do anything at all.
So you got to have that kind of a plan.
Have you seen in the last couple of years, like the American Empire, which I guess it kind of is, isn't it?
Just like we had the British Empire.
That's actually, you know, it's not what it was.
And actually there is, you know, with the emergence of these BRICS nations that actually, you know, America's, you know, status on the world stage, very much like the British status is actually on the down, on the down at the moment.
Yeah, yeah.
And it's even worse.
And, you know, and we just don't do this.
Well, when it comes down to it, Gareth, I mean, I'm all for, you know, I love my career in CIA.
I want the United States to be strong.
But in the truth of the matter is that we're just not very good at this sort of stuff.
You know, this foreign policy stuff and, and using our power.
And, you know, there have been occasions where we've done pretty well, but Like right now, we're drifting, and we're doing knee-jerk reactions, and we're rushing to the Middle East, and we're rushing to, you know, North Korea, and rushing to Ukraine, and rushing around Taiwan, but we don't have a plan.
And so, it's even worse, because the guys that we're up against, the enemies, a year ago, I wrote a paper.
So, I don't only just write novels, I mean, I write these kind of papers, intelligence papers, To address specific intelligence problems.
And a year ago, I wrote this paper called The New Axis of Evil.
The anti-American military block led by China.
And I say in that paper and document very well that we're not fighting Russia and China and North Korea and Taiwan.
You know, separate things.
They're all one thing.
They themselves are a united alliance and they make crises of their, of their, they make the decisions of their, you know, lists of things they want to do to screw up the United States.
They make these lists and create these crises that may make us have to react and run all around the world.
And why would they do that?
Well, they do that to separate our capabilities, separate our financial, our intelligence, our diplomatic, our economic, you know, our strategic, you know, divide all of those capabilities up so that and so that we have to throw them to the four winds.
If we if we could just fight one enemy at one time, we've got a pretty good, pretty good shot at taking care of that one enemy.
But if we're trying to fight all four of those enemies, All over the world, all the time, at their choosing, the time and date of their choosing, then we're doing it wrong.
Right now, we've got all these military assets up in the Middle East, and we've got other assets up in the Northeast Asia, and we've got other assets that we're worried about now, whether or not even we're going to be supplying money or weapons to Ukraine.
Maybe we've finally gotten to the point where we just don't We don't have the heart anymore to do that.
So we're going through our own little problems and they're having a field day on us.
And I fear, this is another thing I fear, because China, Russia, Iran and North Korea are the new axis of evil.
And their intent, like I just said, is to make us throw our resources to the four winds and react to everything.
Well, US sanctions against those nations, in hindsight, have kind of pushed them all together, haven't they?
Yeah, but not only that.
I mean, that was one of the key things that did, but they also just ideologically aligned with one another.
See, they all agree that the United States is in decline and that they want to take over the United States position as a number one global hegemon.
And that's what they're working towards and they're working very clearly towards it.
So they're going to cause us as much trouble as possible.
None of them want to go to war with the United States because that's counter to their, you know, their, their, uh, you know, their desires.
I mean, if you go to war, you, your countries get destroyed, but if you can cause the United States so many problems, so much money, so much attention, you can wear the United States down.
And then if the United States gets worn down, it doesn't have any kind of a deterrent capability to make those powers step back and go, Whoa, we don't want to mess with these guys, they're gonna, they'll at least hurt us, you know, we might we might win, but they'll hurt us.
You know, so that's the sort of situation we're running into now.
And, but most, most people in the foreign policy area still think we're fighting four separate targets.
And like, we can handle that.
And we can't, you know, because it isn't four separate targets.
It's One united target and they're taking us to the cleaners right now.
So that's where we got it and I really appreciate you letting me come on and it's been an honor.
No it's been a pleasure.
Thank you so much.
Well, it's going to be pretty simple.
Single-bill voting law, that would be the first thing.
Number two would be an amendment for term limits for Congress members and staff.
Number three would be a criminalizing of lobbying.
And number four would be seven-figure fines, expulsion, and prosecution for insider trading.
Those are the four things that I'm running on in particular.
There's a lot more to it.
Prison reform, reforming the tax code, things like the legalization of cannabis, I think is something that is long overdue.
But those four things in particular are essential to correcting the systemic corruption that has destroyed our country, is destroying our nation.
Look at it like this.
The Earth is the speaker or the metal plate.
The frequency being channeled through the speaker or the metal plate is the electromagnetic field around the planet that is raising in frequency and the amount of energy that's being channeled through it.
And human beings, all life on the planet, It's all like grains of rice or salt on the speaker.
So we're transitioning from one frequency to another and each and every age throughout human history is a different cymatic pattern of energy and is manifesting as different forms of human civilization on the crust of the planet itself.
It's very difficult when you are stuck in a cell all day, 22 hours out of the day, to push away negative thoughts.
To filter your thoughts and your mind.
But, I mean, that's part of why it is that I say it made me stronger.
Because now, dude, I mean, going to the store, playing with my dogs, seeing my family, going on a hike, being in nature.
These things are like treats.
These things are much more valued than I thought I valued them before.
Solitary was very difficult.
Ten and a half months in solitary and a total of 27 months behind bars, 29 months in federal custody.
I am currently on supervised release and it's interesting how It didn't destroy me.
It just made me stronger.
It's kind of like a diamond.
You know, a diamond is created under a large amount of pressure and time.
Export Selection